giz_internship report_greening of industrial town
TRANSCRIPT
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 1 | 38
1. Content
1. Content .......................................................................................................................... 1
2. About The Organization ................................................................................................. 2
Background ...................................................................................................................... 2
About APIIC and GIZ Cooperation ................................................................................... 2
3. GIP Jadcherla ................................................................................................................ 3
Site Visit ........................................................................................................................... 3
Visualizations ................................................................................................................... 7
Area Statement .............................................................................................................. 11
Discussions with APIIC ................................................................................................... 16
4. MPSEZ Naidupeta ....................................................................................................... 17
Formatting And Rectification of Maps ............................................................................. 17
Site Visit ......................................................................................................................... 18
Accessibility to Site: ..................................................................................................... 18
Area Differences & Allotted Plots: ............................................................................... 19
Existing Roads & Street Lights: ................................................................................... 23
Existing Construction Works: ....................................................................................... 25
Existing Water Services: .............................................................................................. 26
Hillock Area: ................................................................................................................ 29
Existing Plantation: ...................................................................................................... 30
Various Photographs of Site: ....................................................................................... 31
Key Proposal Other Than Basic Amenities: ................................................................. 32
MPSEZ Calculations ....................................................................................................... 33
5. Learnings ..................................................................................................................... 38
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 2 | 38
2. About The Organization
Background The Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd. (APIIC) was incorporated on
26th September, 1973. APIIC is a wholly owned undertaking of the Government of Andhra
Pradesh. Vested with the mandate of providing industrial infrastructure through the
development of industrial areas, APIIC has so far developed more than 300 industrial parks
spreading over an extent of about 1,21,655 acres (including allotted area).
With the advent of time, the sustainable development aspects are becoming much more
important than ever before. The concerns are related to economic aspects, social aspects
and environmental aspects. It is becoming very important for APIIC to protect the interests
of the entrepreneurs housed in its industrial parks and support them to improve their
businesses and make their operations profitable, while they comply with all the regulatory
aspects. On the other hand it is becoming equally important to take care of the social
concerns, whether it is employment or improving their quality of life and taking utmost care
of environment and its resources from the threats of pollution, disasters and over
exploitation.
About APIIC and GIZ Cooperation APIIC has strategic partnership with the Deutsche Gesellschaft fiir lnternationale
Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH since 2004 under the Indo German Environment Partnership
(IGEP) Programme. The Deutsche Gesellschaft fiir Internationals Zusammenarbeit (GIZ)
GmbH is a federal enterprise with operations around the globe. It supports the German
Government in the fields of international cooperation for sustainable development and
international education. GIZ supports people and societies in shaping their own futures and
improving their living conditions.
The IGEP Programme is a part of priority area of Urban and Industrial Environmental Policy
&Management of the ongoing Indo German Bilateral Development Cooperation. Under the
IGEP Programme, technical cooperation is being provided to the identified Indian partner
organizations by the Deutsche Gesellschaft fiir lnternationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ)
GmbH, on behalf of the German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development
(BMZ). The Ministry of Environment & Forests (MoEF) of the Government of India on the
Indian side and the Deutsche Gesellschaft fiir lnternationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
on behalf of the German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) are
responsible for planning and implementation of the IGEP Programme.
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 3 | 38
3. GIP Jadcherla Green Industrial Park (GIP), Jadcherla was commenced in 2007. The allotment of plots and Road construction was already under taken since then. GIP Jadcherla is located at survey nos. 408 to 412, 418 to 435, 437 to 445, 452 to 459 of Polepally Village, Jadcherla Mandal and survey nos. 588 to 630 of Rajapur Village, Balanager Mandal of Mahboobnagar District. The site is located at 83 km (approx.) from city of Hyderabad. The total area of the site is 954.23 acres where in certain area is already under development.
Site Visit In the first week of the 2 months internship, I got an opportunity to visit GIP Jadcherla site
and take the feel of the site to evolve some visualizations for the proposed green industrial
park. Since the proposal was in almost its last stage, the site visit aimed to visualize
development of site in context of urban design. Site visit mainly focused on the following
elements of the existing settlement:-
Pathways (Roads),
Edges,
Buffers,
Nodes,
Central spaces,
Existing drainages,
Existing slope of the site,
Existing services such as electricity, water supply,
Entry/Exit points,
Existing plantation and green areas,
Natural/Artificial elements to be preserved,
Natural/Artificial elements to be demolished,
Natural/Artificial elements to be preserved with modifications, etc.
During the site visit various photographs had been taken, which were shown on the map as
per their location at the site in following manner.
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 7 | 38
Visualizations Based on the observations derived during the site visit, following are the few visualizations
made for GIP Jadcherla. These visualizations include:
Entrance gate with all the access control services for all kind of means. It also
comprises of a security cabin and an informative signage for the visitors.
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 8 | 38
Apart from the entrance gateway, few more rendered 3d spaces were evolved. These
include:
Central green space,
Waste water canal,
Storm water pond,
Streetscape of the location,
Central iconic sculpture,
OAT of 200 seating capacity,
Commercial area,
Stage and ground for multipurpose use.
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 12 | 38
After site visit and visualization the second bigger task was to calculate the plot-wise area of
the revised master plan of GIP Jadcherla and its one to one comparison with the plots in
earlier master plan since the sell able plot area is always a concern of APIIC from commercial
point of view. The various areas calculated are shown in following tables whereas the referred
maps are shown above for any further clarification:
S.no. DETAIL
SEZ NON-SEZ %
DISTRIBUTION
Previous Master
Plan
Revised Master
Plan
Difference
Previous Master
Plan
Revised Master
Plan
Difference
Previous
Master Plan (SEZ+NON-SEZ)
Revised Master
Plan (Acres) (Acres)
(Acres)
(Acres) (Acres) (Acres
)
Industrial park Components
A.1 Roads 23.04 21.93 -1.11 124.35 134.58 10.22 18.15
% 19.32%
A.2 Plots 51.78 40.47 -
11.31 370.58 330.22 -40.36
70.49%
64.26%
A.3 Open spaces/Parks
15.87 24.24 8.37 51.03 62.89 11.86 8.24% 10.75%
A.4 CFC 0.00 4.03 4.03 25.31 41.89 16.58 3.12% 5.67%
A.5
Area allotted to Aurobindo
75.00 75.00 0.00
A.6
Area allotted to Hetero drugs
75.00 75.00 0.00
A SUB-TOTAL
240.69 240.67 -0.02 571.27 569.57 -1.70 100% 100%
B Non- Industrial park Components
B.1 Area allotted to University 89.46 89.46 0.00
B.2 Rehabilitation area 31.90 31.90 0.00
B.3 Area covered under Tanda 8.97 8.97 0.00
B.4 Area under Grave Yard 6.01 7.70 1.69
B.5 Polepally-Macharam PR Road 8.27 8.27 0.00
B SUB-TOTAL 144.61 146.30 1.69
Grand Total (A+B) 240.69 240.67 -0.02 715.88 715.87 -0.01
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 13 | 38
Sl Zone Identity Previous Master Plan Revised Master Plan Difference
No SEZ/Non-SEZ (NS)
No Area
(Sqm) Area (Acr)
Area (Sqm)
Area (Acr)
Area (Acr)
I Non-SEZ -Roads Area
1 NS CR No.1 23040.01 5.69 22863.28 5.65 -0.04
2 NS CR No.2 33915.40 8.38 34465.62 8.52 0.14
3 NS CR No.3 29654.78 7.33 30284.37 7.48 0.16
4 NS CR No.4 19271.04 4.76 19183.16 4.74 -0.02
5 NS CR No.5 45054.59 11.13 44541.40 11.01 -0.13
6 NS CR No.7-Extn. 7740.21 1.91 6955.54 1.72 -0.19
7 NS CR No.8 6383.51 1.58 6391.14 1.58 0.00
8 NS CR No.9 2493.49 0.62 2556.26 0.63 0.02
9 NS CR No.10 3300.00 0.82 3328.82 0.82 0.01
10 NS CR No.11 3300.00 0.82 3327.69 0.82 0.01
11 NS CR No.12 3300.00 0.82 3324.06 0.82 0.01
12 NS CR No.13 3250.33 0.80 3212.98 0.79 -0.01
13 NS CR No.14 2054.92 0.51 2113.36 0.52 0.01
14 NS CR No.15 8181.30 2.02 0.00 0.00 -2.02
15 NS CR No.16 4853.75 1.20 0.00 0.00 -1.20
16 NS Main Road 154571.34 38.20 152925.52 37.79 -0.41
17 NS MR No.1 34182.34 8.45 34285.07 8.47 0.03
18 NS MR No.1a @ NH 2546.25 0.63 2666.39 0.66 0.03
19 NS MR No.2 8639.99 2.14 8670.90 2.14 0.01
20 NS MR No.3 8640.01 2.14 8734.30 2.16 0.02
21 NS MR No.5 6987.25 1.73 6706.81 1.66 -0.07
22 NS MR No.6 13170.73 3.25 16156.84 3.99 0.74
23 NS MR No.6-Extn. 3170.69 0.78 0.00 0.00 -0.78
24 NS MR No.7 5828.06 1.44 5843.48 1.44 0.00
25 NS MR No.8 24981.98 6.17 0.00 0.00 -6.17
26 NS MR No.9 6108.18 1.51 2167.66 0.54 -0.97
27 NS MR No.11 7153.85 1.77 0.00 0.00 -1.77
28 NS MR No.12 10899.79 2.69 10420.32 2.57 -0.12
29 NS MR No.14 6109.42 1.51 0.00 0.00 -1.51
30 NS Service Road@NH 14448.41 3.57 14580.65 3.60 0.03
31 NS New MR No-11 0.00 0.00 7282.32 1.80 1.80
32 NS New MR No-14 0.00 0.00 5308.82 1.31 1.31
33 NS New CR No-15 0.00 0.00 19756.48 4.88 4.88
34 NS 12mt wide Peri. Road 0.00 0.00 16973.17 4.19 4.19
35 NS 15m wide new road b/w new blocks 1 & 2
0.00 0.00 3157.18 0.78 0.78
36 NS 15m wide road behind APCPDCL
0.00 0.00 4230.93 1.05 1.05
37 NS 12m wide road behind APCPDCL
0.00 0.00 2696.63 0.67 0.67
38 NS Roads under Green Indu Zone
0.00 0.00 16672.65 4.12 4.12
39 NS Roads under Women Entr. Zone
0.00 0.00 22823.73 5.64 5.64
TOTAL 5,03,231.63
124.35
5,44,607.52
134.58
10.22
Sl Zone Identity Previous Master Plan Revised Master Plan Difference
No SEZ/Non-SEZ (NS)
No Area
(Sqm) Area (Acr)
Area (Sqm)
Area (Acr)
Area (Acr)
II SEZ -Roads Area
1 SEZ CR No.6 33645.64 8.31 32864.66 8.12 -0.19
2 SEZ CR No.7 15756.33 3.89 15899.63 3.93 0.04
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 14 | 38
3 SEZ MR No.4 23008.30 5.69 22784.18 5.63 -0.06
4 SEZ MR No.13 9111.55 2.25 0.00 0.00 -2.25
5 SEZ MR No.10 11718.77 2.90 0.00 0.00 -2.90
6 SEZ New MR No-10 0.00 0.00 9968.93 2.46 2.46
7 SEZ New MR No-13 0.00 0.00 7221.43 1.78 1.78
TOTAL 93,240.59
23.04
88,738.82
21.93
(1.11)
Sl Zone Identity Previous Master Plan Revised Master Plan Difference
No SEZ/Non-SEZ (NS)
No Area
(Sqm) Area (Acr)
Area (Sqm)
Area (Acr)
Area (Acr)
III Non-SEZ Plots Area
1 NS Block No.1 35213.33 8.70 0.00 0.00 -8.70
2 NS Block No.2 102293.26 25.28 0.00 0.00 -25.28
3 NS Block No.3 39259.86 9.70 0.00 0.00 -9.70
4 NS Block No.6 170771.95 42.20 0.00 0.00 -42.20
5 NS Block No.7 65233.51 16.12 0.00 0.00 -16.12
6 NS Block No.8 55867.58 13.81 0.00 0.00 -13.81
7 NS Block No.9 42539.86 10.51 0.00 0.00 -10.51
8 NS Block No.12 45731.37 11.30 13356.35 3.30 -8.00
9 NS Block No.13 123839.99 30.60 123816.83 30.60 -0.01
10 NS Block No.14 122040.01 30.16 122009.10 30.15 -0.01
11 NS Block No.15 113031.71 27.93 112977.42 27.92 -0.01
12 NS Block No.16 66862.76 16.52 66349.27 16.40 -0.13
13 NS Block No.17 77000.01 19.03 76969.10 19.02 -0.01
14 NS Block No.18 156133.59 38.58 156112.42 38.58 -0.01
15 NS Block No.19 19176.24 4.74 17942.01 4.43 -0.30
16 NS Block No.20 16000.00 3.95 15969.34 3.95 -0.01
17 NS Block No.21 15026.90 3.71 13277.19 3.28 -0.43
18 NS Block No.22 13882.83 3.43 13867.38 3.43 0.00
19 NS Block No.23 20085.10 4.96 20085.10 4.96 0.00
20 NS Block No.24 16018.41 3.96 15982.93 3.95 -0.01
21 NS Block No.25 16060.02 3.97 16013.51 3.96 -0.01
22 NS Block No.26 16060.02 3.97 16001.38 3.95 -0.01
23 NS Block No.27 16060.02 3.97 15990.35 3.95 -0.02
24 NS Block No.28 13035.78 3.22 9973.31 2.46 -0.76
25 NS Block No.29 8907.91 2.20 0.00 0.00 -2.20
26 NS Block No.30 113499.31 28.05 134336.67 33.20 5.15
27 NS New Block-1 0.00 0.00 10955.76 2.71 2.71
28 NS New Block-2 0.00 0.00 9779.44 2.42 2.42
29 NS New Block-3 0.00 0.00 10112.44 2.50 2.50
30 NS New Block-4 0.00 0.00 9869.10 2.44 2.44
31 NS New Block-5 0.00 0.00 30563.05 7.55 7.55
32 NS Block under Green Indu Zone
0.00 0.00 128282.29 31.70 31.70
33 NS Block under Women Entr.Zone
0.00 0.00 175710.32 43.42 43.42
TOTAL 1499631.37 370.58 1336302.04 330.22 -40.36
Sl Zone Identity Previous Master Plan Revised Master Plan Difference
No SEZ/Non-SEZ (NS)
No Area
(Sqm) Area (Acr)
Area (Sqm)
Area (Acr)
Area (Acr)
1 SEZ Block No.4 41767.11 10.32 48358.79 11.95 1.63
2 SEZ Block No.5 57000.04 14.09 56984.81 14.08 0.00
3 SEZ Block No.10 68283.66 16.87 15992.30 3.95 -12.92
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 15 | 38
4 SEZ Block No.11 42470.35 10.49 42434.94 10.49 -0.01
TOTAL 2,09,521.16
51.78
1,63,770.83
40.47
-11.31
Sl Zone Identity Previous Master Plan Revised Master Plan Difference
No SEZ/Non-SEZ (NS)
No Area
(Sqm) Area (Acr)
Area (Sqm)
Area (Acr)
Area (Acr)
V CFC Area-Non-SEZ
1 NS CFC 39281.87 9.71 0.00 0.00 -9.71
2 NS APCPDCL 40468.40 10.00 40437.50 9.99 -0.01
3 NS Admn.Bldg 22685.22 5.61 0.00 0.00 -5.61
4 NS Amen-1 0.00 0.00 1800.92 0.45 0.45
5 NS Amen-2 0.00 0.00 3034.64 0.75 0.75
6 NS Amen-3 0.00 0.00 5495.11 1.36 1.36
7 NS Amen-4 0.00 0.00 16471.28 4.07 4.07
8 NS Amen-5 0.00 0.00 20228.79 5.00 5.00
9 NS Amen-7 0.00 0.00 1999.04 0.49 0.49
10 NS Amen-8 0.00 0.00 5146.39 1.27 1.27
11 NS Amen-9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
12 NS Amen-10 0.00 0.00 35785.26 8.84 8.84
13 NS Amen-11 0.00 0.00 27253.25 6.73 6.73
14 NS Amenities under Green Indu Zone
0.00 0.00 5017.98 1.24 1.24
15 NS Amenities under Women Entr. Zone
0.00 0.00 6839.02 1.69 1.69
TOTAL 1,02,435.50
25.31
1,69,509.20
41.89
16.57
Sqm Ac. Sqm Ac. Ac.
VI Graveyard
1 NS Graveyard-1 20259.37 5.01 11016.76 2.72 -2.28
2 NS Graveyard-2 4056.65 1.00 20141.87 4.98 3.97
TOTAL 24,316.02
6.01
31,158.63
7.70
1.69
Sl Zone Identity Previous Master Plan Revised Master Plan Difference
No SEZ/Non-SEZ (NS)
No Area
(Sqm) Area (Acr)
Area (Sqm)
Area (Acr)
Area (Acr)
VII CFC Area-SEZ
1 SEZ Amen-6 0.00 0.00 16294.98 4.03 4.03
TOTAL -
-
16,294.98
4.03 4.03
Sl Zone Identity Previous Master Plan Revised Master Plan Difference
No SEZ/Non-SEZ (NS)
No Area
(Sqm) Area (Acr)
Area (Sqm)
Area (Acr)
Area (Acr)
VIII OPEN AREA NON SEZ
1 NS O.S.No.1 11855.11 2.93 11855.11 2.93 0.00
2 NS O.S.No.2 34405.88 8.50 18171.94 4.49 -4.01
3 NS O.S.No.7 30809.22 7.61 14028.02 3.47 -4.15
4 NS O.S.No.8 1635.05 0.40 1804.52 0.45 0.04
5 NS O.S.No.9 53705.76 13.27 30170.76 7.46 -5.82
6 NS O.S.No.10 74099.99 18.31 43521.48 10.75 -7.56
7 NS NG-1 0.00 0.00 3315.90 0.82 0.82
8 NS NG-2 0.00 0.00 1587.69 0.39 0.39
9 NS NG-3 0.00 0.00 3645.25 0.90 0.90
10 NS NG-4 0.00 0.00 1742.28 0.43 0.43
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 16 | 38
11 NS NG-5 0.00 0.00 1200.00 0.30 0.30
12 NS NG-6 0.00 0.00 4630.57 1.14 1.14
13 NS NG-7 0.00 0.00 7995.13 1.98 1.98
14 NS NG-9 0.00 0.00 1345.90 0.33 0.33
15 NS NG-10 0.00 0.00 1395.45 0.34 0.34
16 NS NG-13 0.00 0.00 6082.76 1.50 1.50
17 NS NG-14 0.00 0.00 9576.56 2.37 2.37
18 NS NG-15 0.00 0.00 2183.99 0.54 0.54
19 NS NG-16 0.00 0.00 18782.56 4.64 4.64
20 NS NG-17 0.00 0.00 15282.85 3.78 3.78
21 NS NG-18 0.00 0.00 34157.96 8.44 8.44
22 NS Area under Green Indu Zone
0.00 0.00 14487.40 3.58 3.58
23 NS Area under Women Entr. Zone
0.00 0.00 7526.97 1.86 1.86
TOTAL 2,06,511.00
51.03
2,54,491.08
62.89
11.86
Sl Zone Identity Previous Master Plan Revised Master Plan Difference
No SEZ/Non-SEZ (NS)
No Area
(Sqm) Area (Acr)
Area (Sqm)
Area (Acr)
Area (Acr)
IX OPEN AREA SEZ
1 SEZ O.S.No.3 27555.85 6.81 27555.85 6.81 0.00
2 SEZ O.S.No.4 33806.54 8.35 29102.13 7.19 -1.16
3 SEZ O.S.No.5 1688.76 0.42 10291.00 2.54 2.13
4 SEZ O.S.No.6 1183.81 0.29 1031.19 0.25 -0.04
5 SEZ NG-8 0.00 0.00 30117.04 7.44 7.44
TOTAL 64234.95 15.87 98097.19 24.24 8.37
Discussions with APIIC While doing the above mentioned work, side by side the various meeting were also happened
with the APIIC officials. During the meetings APIIC officials extended their valuable views
and expedited the valuable feedbacks and remarks. Some of the remarks are as following:
Area of quarrying pit to be adjusted within the open space whereas the other open
spaces to be converted into plotted lands again to compensate the industrial plots.
Earlier the locations of storm water collection ponds no 2, 3, 5& 6 were not approved
by APIIC, but after checking the existing site conditions later on they approved pond
no 2 & 5 but instructed to relocate the pond no 3 & 6.
APIIC also expedited various comments regarding the amenities. It was informed that
the GIP is having only 261 acres of land remaining to be sold out, whereas the cost of
development is estimated ass 76 Crores, which simply means that the per acre cost
of development will be around 35 lacs/acre as of now. This condition does not show
the feasibility of proposals hence APIIC instructed to reduce the cost of development
or to propose few new ideas of revenue generation.
Regarding existing roads, earlier APIIC shows its unacceptance regarding changing
the existing cross-sections but later on they agreed as changing the road cross-
sections are essential requirement to follow the road hierarchy in green industrial zone.
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 17 | 38
4. MPSEZ Naidupeta The second project which has been dealt during 2 months internship was MPSEZ Naidupeta.
Multi-Product Special Economic Zone site is located in Naidupeta, a town in the jurisdiction
of Nellore district. For this project the work done encompasses the rectification of drawings,
site visit and various calculations related to basic infrastructure services within the site.
Formatting And Rectification of Maps
Above shown is the map received from APIIC for MPSEZ Naidupeta. This map was in
AutoCAD and had various discrepancies such as dimension mismatch, no proper layering,
and mismatch between the areas written and actual areas, etc. After rectifying the map the
final outcome was as shown in the next map in form of zoning division.
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 18 | 38
Site Visit During th 3rd week of June the site of MPSEZ Naidupeta was done and following is the brief
of it.
Accessibility to Site:
The site of Multi-Product Special Economic Zone (MP-SEZ) is approx. 10.5 Km far from the
Naidupeta Bus Complex. While reaching to the site the observation made and respective
solutions are elicited below:
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 19 | 38
Transport options to reach the site are very limited hence the connectivity is below par.
Meanwhile developing the industrial area it shall be mandatory for the authorities to
increase the options for a better connectivity to the site.
A new visitor can never get a clue about the exact location of the site after reaching
Naidupeta, this is because of lack of information facilities available for the visitors.
Hence a small kiosk from APIIC can be installed at the Railway Station or Bus Complex
to guide the visitors. Apart from kiosks, gantries giving the information (direction &
distance) about the site near the entry to Naidupeta will be useful. Some directional
signage should also be installed on the way to site from Naidupeta town.
Local bus service for the employees of the upcoming industries can be proposed to
increase the accessibility for the future employees.
There is no existing entry of exit controlling point for the site. An access controlled
iconic entrance to be constructed at the entry of MP-SEZ. Since the entrance is a bit
inside from the main approach road, the signage or other iconic features to be placed
at the road side which will act as a hinting element for the entry point to the visitors.
Area Differences & Allotted Plots:
The entire area of the site as written by APIIC in the drawings of MP-SEZ is 2549 Acres, but
the AutoCAD drawing is deriving the actual area as 2749 Acres. During the site visit this issue
was also raised to APIIC official, the reply of the area dispute stated that the 200 Acres area
difference is the outcome of following two reasons:
Since the area written in the drawing/Revenue map is taken manually hence the 5%
error is considerable and within the tolerance limits as per the norms for such sites.
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 20 | 38
As shown in survey map survey no-9 has a total area of 582 Acres but APIIC has
acquired only 420 Acres of the land till date.
Regarding the allotment of plots and plot areas the clarification received from APIIC is:
Only 4 nos of plots are allotted till date. The areas written on the drawing for these
plots are exactly matching with the areas derived from AutoCAD.
No other plotting has been done after that so there is a flexibility to do the plotting once
again for the rest of the site. The area statement is shown below:
Sl Plot Area Actual Area in AutoCAD
No Name/No Written Area Measured Difference
(Acres) (Sqm) (Acres) (Acres)
1 Plot-1 110.00 547904.59 135.39 25.39
2 Plot-2 181.40 727660.62 179.81 -1.59
3 Plot-3 90.00 339663.17 83.93 -6.07
4 Plot-4 100.00 406005.08 100.33 0.33
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 21 | 38
5 Plot-5 137.00 554319.69 136.98 -0.02
6 Plot-6 33.00 132794.26 32.81 -0.19
7 Plot-7 89.56 376628.89 93.07 3.51
8 Plot-8 287.00 1164528.01 287.77 0.77
9 Plot-9 176.00 709697.51 175.37 -0.63
10 Plot-10 71.00 285922.07 70.65 -0.35
11 Plot-11 51.00 205574.65 50.80 -0.20
12 Plot-12 16.60 72506.44 17.92 1.32
13 Plot-13 25.00 102658.41 25.37 0.37
14 Plot-14 11.00 59882.59 14.80 3.80
15 Plot-15 37.50 142619.72 35.24 -2.26
16 Plot-18 20.06 178803.90 44.18 24.12
17 Plot-19 38.00 157741.93 38.98 0.98
18 Plot-20 54.00 218388.72 53.97 -0.03
19 M/s Green Tech 210.00 630197.85 155.73 -54.27
20 CFC Area 67.00 196441.05 48.54 -18.46
21 Open Space at Entrance 15.55 64618.95 15.97 0.42
22 Non Processing Area Block -A 200.00 795504.67 196.58 -3.42
23 Open Space Hillock 65.00 260801.70 64.45 -0.55
24 Non Processing Area Block -B 335.80 1363163.50 336.85 1.05
25 Open Space-1 59.50 268233.29 66.28 6.78
26 Open Space-2 19.02 43213.45 10.68 -8.34
27 Open Space-3 101.08 394242.62 97.42 -3.66
28 63 m Wide Road 292762.31 72.34
29 45 m Wide Road 89713.13 22.17
30 Road To Palchuru 13543.84 3.35
31 Road @ Northern Side 36387.86 8.99
32 Water Supply Track 10786.75 2.67
33 Water Body 188169.02 46.50
34 Area covered by underpass 18103.69 4.47
35 Green Belt-1 5873.51 1.45
36 Green Belt-2 5285.08 1.31
37 Green Belt-3 5672.85 1.40
38 Green Belt-4 3585.67 0.89
39 Green Belt-5 5404.49 1.34
40 Green Belt-6 52243.64 12.91
TOTAL AREA 2749.67
Sl No Description Area (Acs)
1 Non Processing Area-A 196.58
2 Non Processing Area-B 336.85
3 Non Processing Area-C 44.18
4 Non Processing Area-D 38.98
5 Non Processing Area-E 53.97
Total 670.56
Total Site Area 2749.68
% of Total Area 24.39%
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 22 | 38
The areas have been calculated with the help of old master plan file provided by APIIC, which
is inserted below for the better understanding. The Non-processing block D & E shown in
drawing are currently occupied by M/s Green Tech. So for preparing a revised master plan
of the MPSEZ-Naidupeta, considering this part of the site will not be useful. The revised
master plan can be prepared for the rest of the site situated at the other side of the road for
better implementation.
Apart from these, total 3 nos of industries are currently working, 1 no of active site office of
APIIC and 1 no of under construction allotted plot are there within the premises of MPSEZ-
Naidupeta. Location of these already allotted/working plots and non-processing areas has
been marked on the following map for a clear picture:
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 23 | 38
Existing Roads & Street Lights:
The stretch of already constructed road and extent covered under street lights’ installation is
shown in map (figure no 8) for better understanding. The typical road cross-section is followed
for all the roads constructed till date i.e. 1.5 mtrs shoulders followed by 8 mtr wide carriage
way and 2 mtr wide divider. Some major observations regarding existing roads are:
The main road in the site is of 45 mtr width whereas the under construction branch
road is of 63 mtr width.
Road connecting to Venkatagiri Road at the northern side of the site and Palchuru is
under construction and dividing the entire site in two parts. The mentioned road not
under the authority of APIIC, it is a property of R&B Department. The authorities need
to talk over it and stop the further construction of the road since it will be difficult for
the re-plotting of the site with this kind of road.
Road along the boundary wall constructed between processing and non-processing
areas is half done. It is completed outside the boundary whereas final layering has
yet to be done inside the compound (processing zone).
Allotted/Working Plots
Non-Processing
Areas
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 24 | 38
63 mtr wide road is also taken up for the full stretch but only 8 mtr wide carriage way
is completed till date, in other parts final layering has yet to be done. This can be
stopped with immediate effect to avoid the condition already said in first point.
Master plan is showing an underpass at the northern part of the site but there is no
existence of such element, though it is proposed as an inter-linkage between both
the parts of the site. We can avoid these kind of extra financial burden while providing
some other alternates for the connectivity.
Some photographs which are more elaborative for the points mentioned above:
Extent covered
under already
installed street lights
Already completed
45 mtr wide road with
2 mtr wide divider
Road to Palchuru
mentioned in point
no-2
Proposed 63 mtr wide road,
only 8 mtr wide carriage way
has been completed till date.
Refer point no-4
Refer point no-3
road along the
boundary wall
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 25 | 38
Existing Construction Works:
In case of existing construction works within the site we have already discussed about APIIC
Site Office, Running Industries and Existing Roads. Apart from these works several other
construction works are going/finished in the MPSEZ-Naidupeta premises.
i.) Compound Wall: A throughout compound wall has been constructed within the
site to segregate the processing zone and non-processing zone. This compound
wall is almost constructed except the entrance/exit points and the area where
underpass was proposed.
ii.) Rain Water Collection Tanks: Around 10 nos of storm water collection tanks have
been constructed along the river bank within the site.
iii.) Water Reservoir: A water reservoir of 4 lac gallon capacity has been constructed
near the hillock area where as one more 2 lac gallon capacity water tank is under
construction above the hillock.
iv.) Apart from these construction no major construction exist in the site but the supply
lines for water are already laid in various locations of the site. The map is showing
existence of various construction works in MPSEZ.
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 26 | 38
Existing Water Services:
Initially a map was provided by APIIC showing nos of water canals within the site, but the
current scenario of the site is entirely different since most of the water channels now have
been demolished. Few of the channels are still in existence but in dry form. Even the river
Mamdikalva located at the south side of the site is also dry and generally gains the water in
November and December months. The slope of site is from north to south. Southern part of
the site is completely a low lying area, this is a reason during 2012 flood the area faced the
maximum water flow. Some other important observation in this regards are elicited below, for
reference map no.7 & 8 should also be read in continuation of these points:
Canal no. 12L Minor, 13R Minor and 14TER Minor are completely destructed now
whereas canal no 5R Major is exiting upto Prime Electrical industries only.
Canal no 10R Minor is extended upto Tank Porambku but the APIIC wants to shift this
canal in the natural trench beside it only.
Current natural path of storm water drainage is also shown in the map for reference.
At the North West side of the hillock area soil quarrying has been done therefore this
area can be used a water side development in revised master plan. The reason which
proves that the said proposal holds good is its location at the centre of the site and
Water Tanks
Layout of
Boundary Wall
Location of
Storm Water
Collection pits
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 27 | 38
near to the hillock area, which can create a great ambiance of natural hillock along
with a water body. It can become a central green iconic space for the site.
A 10 mtr wide service corridor is there at the north side of the hillock to accommodate
all the water supply and electrical lines going through it.
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 28 | 38
Inside the site there is no concrete drain although some culverts are constructed as
shown in the drainage layout provided by APIIC.
In order to calculate the total runoff APIIC had also provided the rain fall data for the site,
same for the last 5 years is shown in table:
Direction of
natural drain flow
Existing Canals
Canal extended upto
Tank Poramboku
Path in which
canal to be
diverted upto
Poramboku
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 29 | 38
Year/ Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Monthly average of
last 10 years (2003-2012)
JANUARY 54.00 0.00 7.60 4.20 0.00 13.16
FEBRUARY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MARCH 88.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.76
APRIL 10.50 0.00 0.00 10.20 0.00 4.14
MAY 0.00 0.00 95.40 13.40 0.00 21.76
JUNE 45.00 17.40 92.10 105.80 4.40 52.94
JULY 53.50 39.10 82.50 104.10 153.90 86.62
AUGUST 159.80 58.70 285.20 148.40 75.10 145.44
SEPTEMBER 134.20 69.90 164.90 45.90 51.80 93.34
OCTOBER 240.20 107.60 296.30 189.20 169.90 200.64
NOVEMBER 489.90 425.20 185.30 451.40 56.50 321.66
DECEMBER 16.00 122.60 196.90 55.20 341.70 146.48
Avg Annual 1291.90 840.50 1406.20 1127.80 853.30 1103.94
Hillock Area:
This is a unique feature which can make MPSEZ as one of its kind. The surrounding area of
this hillock along with it can be developed as a central green area with recreational amenities
and social infrastructure.
The 2 lac gallon under construction water reservoir can be developed afterwards as a place
of social gathering somewhat as shown in picture above. This type of structure above the
water tank will add the value to the site. Above this the text of MPSEZ Naidupeta can be put
in bold and bigger fonts so that those will be visible from a distance and create a sense of
hint of direction as well as curiosity in the visitors’ mind. This type of structures if constructed
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 30 | 38
within the site will provide a soothing effect to the workers’, visitors’ & dwellers’ minds and
increase their productivity.
Existing Plantation:
There are two types of plantations exist within the site, one is block plantation and another is
revenue plantation. Both types of plantation is shown in drawing provided by APIIC during
site visit. Apart from these some observations regarding existing plantation are as following:
A huge chunk of planted land is covered by Prime Electrical Limited, which has been
taken care of by them only.
At the north-west side of the hillock area next to the quarrying pit mass plantation can
be seen, this is the area about which the proposal of development as a central green
area is raised in earlier points of the same report.
A group of palm trees can be found near road to Palchuru at the southern side of the
site.
A good amount of plantation also exists in the surrounding areas of river Mamdikalva.
Revenue
Plantation along
Roads
Plantation
inside PEL Plot
Plantation near
quarrying pit
Palm trees along
Road to Palchuru
Plantation along
river Mamdikalva
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 31 | 38
Various Photographs of Site:
These are few random photographs of the site displayed to provide the accurate feel of the
site and for better understanding of the current condition of the site.
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 32 | 38
Key Proposal Other Than Basic Amenities:
While dividing zones, if the southern part of the site i.e. around Mamdikalva River can
be develop as a light industrial/agro based industrial zone that would be better since
this zone is a flood influenced zone during heavy rains. It is a low lying area of the site
hence we should also try to develop the green areas around the river which will help
us in creating a buffer between industries and river during rainy season.
Try to maintain the hierarchy of roads since the main road is of only 45 mt width
whereas the branch road is of 63 mt width.
Preserve the surrounding areas of the hillock along with it. Hillock can be developed
as a central green space in combination with the water body in quarrying pit. This
quarrying pit can be developed as a pond of treated waste water.
Under construction water reservoir above the hillock can be developed as a landmark
of social gathering (meditation centre/OAT/Temple/Recreational Space). This will be
visible from a large distance & give the place a unique identity. The text of MPSEZ can
be put over it in huge font size to provide a directional hint to the visitors from a good
distance.
Since already working industries are nearby only, the zone can be developed as heavy
industry zone (Mech/Electrical) whereas next to hillock area a plot is already allotted
to M/s Arbindo Pharma, this entire zone can become chemical industry zone.
Since there is no defined Entry/Exit point to the site, an iconic entrance to be
constructed at the entrance with all access control systems. The preferable would be
a single entry exit point to the site to control the traffic (incoming/outgoing) in a better
way.
A connectivity to be maintained with the M/s Greentech Industries to maintain the
integrity of the site and to fulfil the norms of the SEZ.
An efficient drainage network to be design with the help of existing canals.
Connectivity between processing & non-processing zones to be increased.
Connectivity of the site from the surrounding towns to be increase and the provisions
to be made to guide the visitors regarding the direction and distance by placing
signage, gantries, etc.
Revenue plantation to be increased within the site.
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 33 | 38
MPSEZ Calculations MPSEZ NAIDUPETA: AN OVERVIEW OF POPULATION
Sl Type of Total Area
Avg. Plot
Nos of
Workers Service
Population Visitors
No Industry Covered (Acres)
Size (Acres)
Plot / Plot /
Day Total
/ Plot / Day
Total
/ Plot / Day
Total
1 Mech/Elec/Surgical Instrument Industry
295 5 59 100 5900 0.2 12 5 295
2 Food Processing Industry
192 0.5 384 30 1152
0 0.2 77 5 1920
3 Green Industry 167 1 167 50 8350 0.2 33 5 835
4 Standard Design Factory
25 25 1 500 500 0.2 0 5 5
5 Textile/Leather/Plywood Industry
195 1 195 50 9750 0.2 39 5 975
6 Chemical Industry 181 2 91 100 9050 0.2 18 5 453
7 Arbindo Chemicals 33 33 1 300 300 10 10 25 25
8 GreenTech Industries 155 155 1 500 500 10 10 25 25
9 Other Green & Orange Industries
92 1 92 50 4600 0.2 18 5 460
Total 1335 991 5047
0 218 4993
MPSEZ NAIDUPETA: AN OVERVIEW OFWATER REQUIREMENTS
Sl Type of Water Requirement of
Industries Waste Water generated
(KLD)
No Industry KLD/Unit Total Maximum Minimum
1 Mech/Elec/Surgical Instrument Industry
50 2950 1475 590
2 Food Processing Industry 2 768 9600 3840
3 Green Industry 100 16700 4175 1670
4 Standard Design Factory 2 2 25 10
5 Textile/Leather/Plywood Industry 50 9750 4875 1950
6 Chemical Industry 100 9050 4525 2263
7 Arbindo Chemicals 100 100 50 25
8 GreenTech Industries 100 100 50 25
9 Other Green & Orange Industries 50 4600 2300 920
Total 44020 27075 11293
Proposed Total nos of Plots =991
Total Workers =50470
Total Service Persons =218
Total Visitors =4993
Total Working Population =55680
Water Requirement for Workers @50 lpcd =2784 KLD
Waste Water Generated by Workers @80% =2227 KLD
Total Water Requirement/Day =46804 KLD
Total Waste Water Generated Maximum =29302 KLD
Total Waste Water Generated Minimum =13520 KLD
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 34 | 38
ASSUMPTIONS/ CONSIDERATIONS
1.) Water required by each worker = 50 ltrs/day
2.) Waste water generated by each worker = 80% of the required water
MPSEZ NAIDUPETA: REQUIREMENT OF TRUCK PARKING
Sl No
Type oF Industry
Total Area
Covered
(Acres)
Tonnage/Acre/Day Total Flow
Tonnage/Day
Nos of Trucks/Da
y Input Output
1 Mech/Elec/Surgical Instrument Industry
295 11 4 4425 277
2 Food Processing Industry 192 6 3 1728 108
3 Green Industry 167 11 4 2505 157
4 Standard Design Factory 25 11 4 375 23
5 Textile/Leather/Plywood Industry 195 6 3 1755 110
6 Chemical Industry 181 25 25 9050 566
7 Arbindo Chemicals 33 25 25 1650 103
8 GreenTech Industries 155 11 4 2325 145
9 Other Green & Orange Industries 92 6 3 828 52
Total 1335 24641 1540
Sl No
Type oF Industry
Truck for Parking Area Required
/ Truc
k (Sqm)
Area Required (Sqm)
Zonal Level
Central Level
Entrance
Zonal Centra Entry
% Nos
% Nos
% Nos
1 Mech/Elec/Surgical Instrument Industry
10% 28 30% 83 10% 28 64 1770 5310 1770
2 Food Processing Industry
50% 54 30% 32 10% 11 64 3456 2074 691
3 Green Industry 50% 78 30% 47 10% 16 64 5010 3006 1002
4 Standard Design Factory
10% 2 30% 7 10% 2 64 150 450 150
5 Textile/Leather/Plywood Industry
50% 55 30% 33 10% 11 64 3510 2106 702
6 Chemical Industry 10% 57 30% 170 10% 57 64 3620 10860 3620
7 Arbindo Chemicals 10% 10 30% 31 10% 10 64 660 1980 660
8 GreenTech Industries 10% 15 30% 44 10% 15 64 930 2790 930
9 Other Green & Orange Industries
50% 26 30% 16 10% 5 64 1656 994 331
Total 324 462 154 20762 29569 9856
ASSUMPTIONS/ CONSIDERATIONS
CENTRAL LEVEL
1.) Only loaded trucks (with raw materials) and empty trucks (for finished goods) coming to the SEZ will be using the parking area. The average parking duration for the trucks is assumed to be 8 hrs.
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 35 | 38
2.) 30% of the total daily trucks are assumed to come in a particular 8 hrs including the peak hour.
3.) Area required for a truck for parking including circulation were assumed as follows and the required parking areas are estimated.
ZONAL LEVEL
1.) Parking at Zonal level shall be only transit purpose based for trucks and idle parking for workers.
2.) For larger plots- Zone 1,4 & 6 : Since adequate parking has to be provided at the plot level by industries as well,
hence It is assumed that only 10% of the truck traffic
3.) For smaller plots- Zone 2,3,5 & 7 : Adequate parking may not be feasible at plot level, hence transit parking of at least
50% trucks shall be provided for.
ENTRANCE
1.) Parking at entrance is only for short time halt purpose till the time trucks can move to central parking facility of zonal level parking.
2.) Hence, at the entrance ; space for parking should be 10% of parking at central facility
GENERAL
1.) Capacity of each truck = 16 MT
2.) Area required for each truck = 64 Sqm
Source: APSEZ report by L& T Ramboll
MPSEZ NAIDUPETA: TOTAL TRAFFIC MOVEMENT PER DAY
Sl No
Type of Industry Workforce Population
Total
Modal Split
4W Bike Cycl
e Shared Vehicle
Bus
1 Mech/Elec/Surgical Instrument Industry 6207
5% 25% 25% 5% 40%
2 Food Processing Industry 13517 5% 25% 25% 5% 40%
3 Green Industry 9218 5% 25% 25% 5% 40%
4 Standard Design Factory 505 5% 25% 25% 5% 40%
5 Textile/Leather/Plywood Industry 10764 5% 25% 25% 5% 40%
6 Chemical Industry 9521 5% 25% 25% 5% 40%
7 Arbindo Chemicals 335 5% 25% 25% 5% 40%
8 GreenTech Industries 535 5% 25% 25% 5% 40%
9 Other Green & Orange Industries 5078 5% 25% 25% 5% 40%
Total 55680
Sl No
Type of Industry 4W Parking
Total Considered Area/Unit Total Area
1 Mech/Elec/Surgical Instrument Industry 207 62 30 1862
2 Food Processing Industry 451 135 30 4055
3 Green Industry 307 92 30 2766
4 Standard Design Factory 17 5 30 152
5 Textile/Leather/Plywood Industry 359 108 30 3229
6 Chemical Industry 317 95 30 2856
7 Arbindo Chemicals 11 3 30 101
8 GreenTech Industries 18 5 30 161
9 Other Green & Orange Industries 169 51 30 1524
Total 1856 557 16704
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 36 | 38
Sl No
Type of Industry Cycle Parking
Total Considered Area/Unit Total Area
1 Mech/Elec/Surgical Instrument Industry 1552 466 1.2 559
2 Food Processing Industry 3379 1014 1.2 1217
3 Green Industry 2305 691 1.2 830
4 Standard Design Factory 126 38 1.2 45
5 Textile/Leather/Plywood Industry 2691 807 1.2 969
6 Chemical Industry 2380 714 1.2 857
7 Arbindo Chemicals 84 25 1.2 30
8 GreenTech Industries 134 40 1.2 48
9 Other Green & Orange Industries 1270 381 1.2 457
Total 13920 4176 5011
Sl No
Type of Industry Shared Vehicle Parking
Total Considered Area/Unit Total Area
1 Mech/Elec/Surgical Instrument Industry 52 16 30 466
2 Food Processing Industry 113 34 30 1014
3 Green Industry 77 23 30 691
4 Standard Design Factory 4 1 30 38
5 Textile/Leather/Plywood Industry 90 27 30 807
6 Chemical Industry 79 24 30 714
7 Arbindo Chemicals 3 1 30 25
8 GreenTech Industries 4 1 30 40
9 Other Green & Orange Industries 42 13 30 381
Sl No
Type of Industry Bus Parking
Total Considered Area/Unit Total Area
1 Mech/Elec/Surgical Instrument Industry 62 2 145 270
2 Food Processing Industry 135 4 145 588
3 Green Industry 92 3 145 401
4 Standard Design Factory 5 1 145 145
5 Textile/Leather/Plywood Industry 108 3 145 468
6 Chemical Industry 95 3 145 414
7 Arbindo Chemicals 3 1 145 145
8 GreenTech Industries 5 1 145 145
9 Other Green & Orange Industries 51 2 145 221
Total 557 19 2797
Sl No
Type of Industry Bike Parking
Total Considered Area/Unit Total Area
1 Mech/Elec/Surgical Instrument Industry 1552 466 4 1862
2 Food Processing Industry 3379 1014 4 4055
3 Green Industry 2305 691 4 2766
4 Standard Design Factory 126 38 4 152
5 Textile/Leather/Plywood Industry 2691 807 4 3229
6 Chemical Industry 2380 714 4 2856
7 Arbindo Chemicals 84 25 4 101
8 GreenTech Industries 134 40 4 161
9 Other Green & Orange Industries 1270 381 4 1524
Total 13920 4176 16704
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 37 | 38
ASSUMPTIONS/ CONSIDERATIONS
1.) Idle Parking Spaces: a.) Car = 30 Sqm/Unit b.) Bike = 4 Sqm/Unit c.) Cycle = 1.2 Sqm/Unit d.) Shared vehicle = 30 Sqm/Unit e.) Bus = 145 Sqm/Unit Source: URDPFI Guidelines
2.) Space standards for 4W and shared vehicles have been derived from site design, Space standrads for 2 W ,cycle and bus is as per UDPFI
3.) Parking space calculation has been done based on the 8 hour shift system.
4.) It is assumed that 10 % of buses will be staff busses and out of these only 30% will use idle parking space at a time
Sl No Type oF Industry Total Parking Area
Sqm Acres
1 Mech/Elec/Surgical Instrument Industry 5018 1.24
2 Food Processing Industry 10928 2.70
3 Green Industry 7453 1.84
4 Standard Design Factory 531 0.13
5 Textile/Leather/Plywood Industry 8703 2.15
6 Chemical Industry 7697 1.90
7 Arbindo Chemicals 401 0.10
8 GreenTech Industries 554 0.14
9 Other Green & Orange Industries 4106 1.01
Total 45393 11.22
Internship Report By: - Vivek Agnihotri (Trainee-GIZ)
P a g e 38 | 38
5. Learnings During the 2 months training period from 12th May 2014 to 5th July 2014 every single day was
full of learning experiences. Learning can be better described in WORKS not in WORDS, but
in process to illustrate the valuable learnings during the internship, the following major points
will be good enough to elaborate the work experience:
Since green industrial parks are the requirement of future, it was a great opportunity
to know what exactly green industrial park means. It is not only about the plantation
and green development it also deals with the sufficient public amenities social as well
as physical.
The process of knowing the procedure to evolve a good concept for the development
of energy efficient industrial parks.
Site visits have given a good exposure to feel the accurate site condition as it is and
then try to transform the existing scenario into a better future development.
Work procedure of both the organizations GIZ as well as APIIC.
Meeting with experienced APIIC officials made the internship more informative since
every interaction has given the new feedbacks which were helpful to enhance the
knowledge.
Mentors in the organization have given a freedom to think about the new and
innovative ideas which helps a lot to increase the confidence level as well as the self-
dependent design capability of individual.
Also learnt about the procedure of calculating various components required for the
development of industrial parks such as parking, public amenities, water supply, waste
water storage, storm water storage, etc.
Internship has also given an idea about the costing of the project. Each project should
have a reasonable development cost requirement i.e the design should be based on
the concept of cost efficiency.
Experienced a good work culture and environment, which taught the way of behaviour
in the corporate world. This is important for the improvement of individual personality