g:gpublicationspoverty maps vol5layoutprelims ......cupang, on the other hand, had the most number...

28
The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5) 9 I believe that one of the biggest challenges of any local chief executive is to ensure that government programs and basic services would reach the people who need it the most. Implementors usually make the oversight of measuring their success based only on the enormity or quantity of projects that they have accomplished. But a holistic approach in governance must lead us to give more weight to the bottom line of things. At the end of the day, the important question to ask is whether or not the people are experiencing an improvement in their quality of life as a result of what the government is doing. As the newly elected mayor, my administrations goal is to make Antipolo City Numero Uno. This shall be achieved by strengthening the city governments thrust on health and nutrition, education, peace and order, and investments promotion. Even with these goals in mind, I am very much aware that many of the problems that we see on the surface are only symptoms of a hidden but greater concern. I am very thankful that Antipolo had already completed its Community-Based Monitoring System (CBMS) in 2013. With the use of the CBMS, I am more confident that all our programs will be evidence based, responsive, and custom fitted to the needs of the people. I am hopeful that by Gods grace, He will use my leadership to make Antipolo a poverty-free city. Republic of the Philippines City of Antipolo Office of the Mayor Message CASIMIRO A. YNARES III, M.D. CASIMIRO A. YNARES III, M.D. CASIMIRO A. YNARES III, M.D. CASIMIRO A. YNARES III, M.D. CASIMIRO A. YNARES III, M.D. Mayor Mayor Mayor Mayor Mayor

Upload: others

Post on 31-Jan-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    9

    I believe that one of the biggest challenges of any local chiefexecutive is to ensure that government programs and basic serviceswould reach the people who need it the most. Implementors usuallymake the oversight of measuring their success based only on theenormity or quantity of projects that they have accomplished. But aholistic approach in governance must lead us to give more weight tothe bottom line of things. At the end of the day, the important questionto ask is whether or not the people are experiencing an improvement intheir quality of life as a result of what the government is doing.

    As the newly elected mayor, my administrations goal is to makeAntipolo City Numero Uno. This shall be achieved by strengtheningthe city governments thrust on health and nutrition, education, peaceand order, and investments promotion. Even with these goals in mind,I am very much aware that many of the problems that we see on the surface are only symptoms of a hidden butgreater concern.

    I am very thankful that Antipolo had already completed its Community-Based Monitoring System (CBMS) in2013. With the use of the CBMS, I am more confident that all our programs will be evidence based, responsive,and custom fitted to the needs of the people. I am hopeful that by Gods grace, He will use my leadership to makeAntipolo a poverty-free city.

    Republic of the PhilippinesCity of Antipolo

    Office of the Mayor

    Message

    CASIMIRO A. YNARES III, M.D.CASIMIRO A. YNARES III, M.D.CASIMIRO A. YNARES III, M.D.CASIMIRO A. YNARES III, M.D.CASIMIRO A. YNARES III, M.D.MayorMayorMayorMayorMayor

  • 10

    The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    Faces of Poverty in the City of Antipolo

    POPULAPOPULAPOPULAPOPULAPOPULATIONTIONTIONTIONTIONThe City of Antipolo had a total population of 546,075 in 122,098 householdsThe City of Antipolo had a total population of 546,075 in 122,098 householdsThe City of Antipolo had a total population of 546,075 in 122,098 householdsThe City of Antipolo had a total population of 546,075 in 122,098 householdsThe City of Antipolo had a total population of 546,075 in 122,098 householdsThe City of Antipolo is the provincial capital of Rizal in the CALABARZON Region. The 20112012 CBMS censusconducted in the city covered all its 16 barangays, with the results showing a total population of 546,075 covering122,098 households. The average household size was four. Barangay Cupang had the largest population count of82,437 in 18,864 households while Barangay Beverly Hills had the smallest population of 725 in 167 households.

    HEALHEALHEALHEALHEALTH AND NUTRITIONTH AND NUTRITIONTH AND NUTRITIONTH AND NUTRITIONTH AND NUTRITIONOne in everOne in everOne in everOne in everOne in ever y 1,000 childry 1,000 childry 1,000 childry 1,000 childry 1,000 children under 5 years old had dieden under 5 years old had dieden under 5 years old had dieden under 5 years old had dieden under 5 years old had diedAmong the children under 5 years old in the city, 0.1 percent died during the reference period. This corresponds to77 cases of death among children in this age range. The highest proportion of child deaths in the city was recordedin Barangay Calawis at 0.6 percent with four cases. Barangay San Luis, on the other hand, recorded the mostnumber of deaths among children under 5 years old with 14 cases or 0.3 percent. No child death was reported inBarangays Beverly Hills and Dela Paz.

    Nine women had died due to pregnancy-related causes during the reference periodNine women had died due to pregnancy-related causes during the reference periodNine women had died due to pregnancy-related causes during the reference periodNine women had died due to pregnancy-related causes during the reference periodNine women had died due to pregnancy-related causes during the reference periodCBMS results showed that the proportion of women who died due to pregnancy-related causes was at 0.1 percentduring the period. The highest number of deaths among the barangays was three cases (0.2%) recorded in SanJose. Barangays Inarawan, San Isidro, and San Jose had the highest proportion of women who died due topregnancy-related causes at 0.2 percent. Ten of the sixteen barangays in the city had no reported case of death.

    Of the children aged 05 years old, less than 1 percent were malnourishedOf the children aged 05 years old, less than 1 percent were malnourishedOf the children aged 05 years old, less than 1 percent were malnourishedOf the children aged 05 years old, less than 1 percent were malnourishedOf the children aged 05 years old, less than 1 percent were malnourishedLess than 1 percent (0.9%) of the children aged 05 years were malnourished, accounting for a total of 691malnourished children. Of the 16 barangays, Beverly Hills posted the highest proportion (4.1%) of malnourishedchildren. However, it also has the lowest number of malnourished children with only 3 out of 74 children. In terms ofmagnitude, Cupang recorded the highest number, with a total of 160 malnourished children at 1.3 percent.

    HOUSINGHOUSINGHOUSINGHOUSINGHOUSINGAmong all households in the cityAmong all households in the cityAmong all households in the cityAmong all households in the cityAmong all households in the city, about 4.8 per, about 4.8 per, about 4.8 per, about 4.8 per, about 4.8 percent wercent wercent wercent wercent were living in makeshift housing and thee living in makeshift housing and thee living in makeshift housing and thee living in makeshift housing and thee living in makeshift housing and thesame prsame prsame prsame prsame proporoporoporoporopor tion of households (4.8%) was classified as infortion of households (4.8%) was classified as infortion of households (4.8%) was classified as infortion of households (4.8%) was classified as infortion of households (4.8%) was classified as informal settlers.mal settlers.mal settlers.mal settlers.mal settlers.Based on the CBMS data, 4.8 percent of households (or 5,810) were living in makeshift housing. Barangay SanIsidro exhibited the highest magnitude (1,381 households) and highest proportion (13.2%) of households living inmakeshift housing. It is worth noting that Barangay Beverly had no household recorded to be living in makeshifthousing.

    CBMS results also showed that 4.8 percent (or 5,812) of the households in the city were classified as informalsettlers. This was highest in San Isidro where about 14 percent of the households in the barangay were informalsettlers. Cupang, on the other hand, had the most number of households (2,496) considered as informal settlers.

  • The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    11

    1 Waterless barangays refer to villages with less than 50 percent (safe) water supply coverage.

    WWWWWAAAAATER AND SANITTER AND SANITTER AND SANITTER AND SANITTER AND SANITAAAAATIONTIONTIONTIONTIONAt least one in everAt least one in everAt least one in everAt least one in everAt least one in ever y nine households in the city had no access to safe water supply while lessy nine households in the city had no access to safe water supply while lessy nine households in the city had no access to safe water supply while lessy nine households in the city had no access to safe water supply while lessy nine households in the city had no access to safe water supply while lessthan 1 perthan 1 perthan 1 perthan 1 perthan 1 percent had no access to sanitarcent had no access to sanitarcent had no access to sanitarcent had no access to sanitarcent had no access to sanitar y toilet facilitiesy toilet facilitiesy toilet facilitiesy toilet facilitiesy toilet facilitiesCBMS data revealed that 14,132 households (or about 11.6%) had no access to safe water supply. This meansthat at least one in every nine households had no access to safe potable water supply. Among the barangays, thehighest estimate was recorded in Calawis at 94.1 percent, translating to 9 in every 10 households with no accessto safe water supply. In terms of magnitude, San Jose had 3,380 households (21.3%) with no access to safe watersupply. In addition to Calawis, Barangay San Juan (54.9%) was considered waterless.1

    Less than 1 percent (0.7%), corresponding to 830 households, had no access to sanitary toilet facilities. BarangayCalawis recorded the highest estimate at 16.9 percent or 177 households. The most number of households withno access to sanitary toilet facilities was recorded in San Jose with 186 households at 1.2 percent. Of the 16barangays, only Beverly Hills had 100 percent of the households with access to sanitary toilet facilities.

    BASIC EDUCABASIC EDUCABASIC EDUCABASIC EDUCABASIC EDUCATIONTIONTIONTIONTIONAbout 9.1 percent of children aged 615 years were not attending schoolAbout 9.1 percent of children aged 615 years were not attending schoolAbout 9.1 percent of children aged 615 years were not attending schoolAbout 9.1 percent of children aged 615 years were not attending schoolAbout 9.1 percent of children aged 615 years were not attending schoolAbout 9.1 percent or 10,988 of children aged 615 years old were not attending school. In particular, 12,337(16.8%) of those in the 611 age group were not attending elementary school while at least 4 in every 10 childrenaged 1215 years were not attending high school.

    Barangay-level data revealed that San Jose, with 1,512 children, had the most number of children not enrolled inschool at 9.2 percent. The proportion of children not attending school among the 615 age group was highest inInarawan at 22.1 percent (984 children).

    INCOME AND LIVELIHOODINCOME AND LIVELIHOODINCOME AND LIVELIHOODINCOME AND LIVELIHOODINCOME AND LIVELIHOODPoverPoverPoverPoverPover ty incidence in the city was rty incidence in the city was rty incidence in the city was rty incidence in the city was rty incidence in the city was recorecorecorecorecorded at 17.6 perded at 17.6 perded at 17.6 perded at 17.6 perded at 17.6 percentcentcentcentcentAt least 17 in every 100 households had incomes below the poverty threshold. This represents 21,452 income-poor households in the city at 17.6 percent. Barangay San Jose had the most number of income-poor householdswith 3,420 households (21.6%). On the other hand, Barangay Calawis had the highest proportion of householdsliving below the poverty threshold (53.7%) where more than half of the households are considered income poor.

    About 8.2 perAbout 8.2 perAbout 8.2 perAbout 8.2 perAbout 8.2 percent of households did not have sufcent of households did not have sufcent of households did not have sufcent of households did not have sufcent of households did not have suf ficient income to satisfy their basic food needsficient income to satisfy their basic food needsficient income to satisfy their basic food needsficient income to satisfy their basic food needsficient income to satisfy their basic food needsCBMS results showed that 8.2 percent or 9,994 of the households were food poor. This means that at least 8 inevery 100 households did not have enough income to satisfy their basic food needs. Across the barangays in thecity, Calawis had the highest subsistence poverty (40.3%) where two in every five households were food poor. SanJose, with 1,679 households at 10.6 percent, had the highest magnitude of households living below the foodthreshold.

    Households that experienced hunger comprised less than 1 percent of households in the cityHouseholds that experienced hunger comprised less than 1 percent of households in the cityHouseholds that experienced hunger comprised less than 1 percent of households in the cityHouseholds that experienced hunger comprised less than 1 percent of households in the cityHouseholds that experienced hunger comprised less than 1 percent of households in the cityA total of 591 households (or 0.5%) experienced hunger due to food shortage in the last 3 months before thesurvey. Barangay Calawis had the highest proportion of households that experienced hunger at 2.4 percent (or 25households). Barangay San Luis had the most number of households that experienced hunger (143 households or1.6%). No household in Beverly Hills experienced hunger.

  • 12

    The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    22222 This refers to household basic needs as reflected in the 13 CBMS core indicators that cover the following: (1) children 0-4 years old who died; (2)women who died due to pregnancy-related causes; (3) malnourished children 0-5 years old; (4) households living in makeshift housing; (5) households whoare informal settlers; (6) households without access to safe water supply; (7) households without access to sanitar y toilet facilities; (8) children 615 yearsold not in school; (9) households with income below the pover ty threshold; (10) households with income below the food threshold; (11) households thatexperienced hunger due to food shor tage; (12) unemployment; and (13) victims of crime. A higher index would mean more unmet needs and hence, worsecondition for the households.

    33333 A household is considered to experience multiple deprivations if it is poor in at least two of the following dimensions: health, nutrition, tenure,housing, water, sanitation, education, income, job, and security.

    Unemployment rate in the city was recorded at 8.6 percentUnemployment rate in the city was recorded at 8.6 percentUnemployment rate in the city was recorded at 8.6 percentUnemployment rate in the city was recorded at 8.6 percentUnemployment rate in the city was recorded at 8.6 percentOf the members of the labor force, 16,335 (or 8.6%) were not employed during the reference period. San Luis hadthe highest unemployment rate at 11.0 percent (or 1,556 unemployed persons). In terms of the magnitude, thehighest number of unemployed persons of the labor force was reported in Cupang with 2,301 or 8.1 percent.

    PEACE AND ORDERPEACE AND ORDERPEACE AND ORDERPEACE AND ORDERPEACE AND ORDERLess than 1 percent of the population were victims of crimeLess than 1 percent of the population were victims of crimeLess than 1 percent of the population were victims of crimeLess than 1 percent of the population were victims of crimeLess than 1 percent of the population were victims of crimeResults of the CBMS census showed that 0.1 percent of the total population (or 493 persons) were victims ofcrime. The highest recorded magnitude and proportion of crime victims were in Barangay Cupang, at 0.2 percent or170 persons.

    CBMS COMPOSITE INDICACBMS COMPOSITE INDICACBMS COMPOSITE INDICACBMS COMPOSITE INDICACBMS COMPOSITE INDICATOR AND MULTOR AND MULTOR AND MULTOR AND MULTOR AND MULTIDIMENSIONAL POVERTYTIDIMENSIONAL POVERTYTIDIMENSIONAL POVERTYTIDIMENSIONAL POVERTYTIDIMENSIONAL POVERTYMost households met the 13 basic needsMost households met the 13 basic needsMost households met the 13 basic needsMost households met the 13 basic needsMost households met the 13 basic needs22 on the averageon the averageon the averageon the averageon the averageThe average CBMS composite indicator (CCI) of the city was 0.7. This means that, on the average, households inthe city were able to meet all basic needs during the period. However, data at the barangay level showed thatCalawis had the highest index at 2.3. This means that, on the average, households in this barangay were not metable to meet at least two of the basic needs.

    About one in everAbout one in everAbout one in everAbout one in everAbout one in ever y five households in the city sufy five households in the city sufy five households in the city sufy five households in the city sufy five households in the city suf ferferferferfered fred fred fred fred from multiple deprivationsom multiple deprivationsom multiple deprivationsom multiple deprivationsom multiple deprivations3

    About 29 percent of the households were deprived in one dimension and 13 percent experienced deprivation in atleast two dimensions. In particular, about 10 percent were deprived in two dimensions and 2.5 percent were poorin three dimensions. One household experienced deprivations in seven dimensions at the same time. Majority ofthe households (57.8%) were not deprived in any dimension.

    About 1.9 percent of the total households in the city were income poor and water poor the same time. Results alsoshowed that 1,867 households were deprived in terms of income and education. At the same time, 459 householdswere deprived in income, education, and water. In terms of four deprivations, 76 households experienced simultaneousdeprivations in income, education, water, and housing.

  • The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    13

    The Many Faces of Povertyin the City of Antipolo

    INDICATOR

    DEMOGRAPHYPopulationAverage household sizeChildren under 1 year oldChildren under 5 years oldChildren 0-5 years oldChildren 6-11 years oldMembers 12-15 years oldMembers 6-15 years oldMembers 10 years old and aboveMembers of the labor force

    HEALTH AND NUTRITIONChildren under 5 years old who diedWomen who died due to pregnancy related-causesMalnourished children 0-5 years old

    HOUSINGHouseholds living in makeshift housingHouseholds who are informal settlers

    WATER AND SANITAT IONHouseholds without access to safe water supplyHouseholds without access to sanitary toilet facilities

    BASIC EDUCATIONChildren 6-11 years old not attending elementary schoolChildren 12-15 years old not attending high schoolChildren 6-15 years old not attending school

    INCOME AND LIVEL IHOODHouseholds with income below poverty thresholdHouseholds with income below food thresholdHouseholds who experienced hunger due to food shortageUnemployment rate (15 years old and above)

    PEACE AND ORDERVictims of crime

    Magnitude Proportion

    Households Population

    CBMS Core Indicators, City of Antipolo, 2011-2012

    Propo r t ionMagnitude

    14,55468,37880,91073,58446,660

    120,244416,279 54,313

    546,075

    779

    691

    0.10.10.9

    493 0.1

    16,335 8.6

    CBMS Composite Indicator, City of Antipolo, 2011-2012

    CBMS Composite Indicator

    Avera ge

    0.7

    21,4529,994

    591

    17.68.20.5

    12,33719,43510,988

    16.841.79.1

    122,0985

    5,8105,812

    14,132830

    4.84.8

    11.60.7

  • 14

    The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    Total Number of Households and Population, by Barangay, City of Antipolo,2011-2012

    B aran ga y Tota l households Tota l populat ion

    31,566725

    4,57082,43732,14846,72819,45034,80632,89312,75646,61770,9168,048

    42,44133,36146,613

    Bagong NayonBeverly HillsCalawisCupangDaligDela Paz (Pob.)InarawanMambuganMayamotMuntindilawSan Isidro (Pob.)San Jose (Pob.)San JuanSan LuisSan Roque (Pob.)Sta. Cruz

    7,170167

    1,04818,8646,984

    10,1014,3268,0487,6122,844

    10,47815,8601,7429,2197,433

    10,202

  • The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    15

    CBMS Poverty Maps: City of Antipolo

    Map 1. Proportion of Children under 5 Years Old who Died, by Barangay, 2011-2012

    B a ranga y Magn i t ude Pro po r t ion

    B ot tom 10 Ba rangays

    CalawisSan JuanSan LuisMambuganMuntindilawSan Roque (Pob.)Bagong NayonCupangDaligInarawan

    45149384753

    0.60.40.30.20.20.20.10.10.10.1

  • 16

    The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    Map 2. Proportion of Women who Died Due to Pregnancy-Related Causes,by Barangay, 2011-2012

    B a ranga y Magn i t ude Pro po r t ion

    Bo ttom 6 B aranga ys

    CBMS Poverty Maps: City of Antipolo

    San Jose (Pob.)San Isidro (Pob.)InarawanSan LuisSta. CruzCupang

    321111

    0.20.20.20.10.10.0

  • The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    17

    Map 3. Proportion of Children 0-5 Years Old who are Malnourished,by Barangay, 2011-2012

    B a ranga y Magn i t ude Pro po r t ion

    B ot tom 11 Ba rangays

    CBMS Poverty Maps: City of Antipolo

    Beverly HillsMayamotSan Jose (Pob.)San LuisSan JuanCupangDaligMuntindilawSan Roque (Pob.)Sta. CruzCalawis

    3641518819160351234334

    4.11.61.41.41.41.30.80.80.70.50.5

  • 18

    The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    Table 1. Health and Nutrition Indicators, by Barangay, City of Antipolo, 2011-2012

    B aran ga y Number ofch i ld ren

    (0 -5 years old)

    Malnour ishedch i ld ren

    (0 -5 years old)

    Propo r tion

    Chi ld ren under5 years old

    who died

    Number ofchi ld ren(under

    1 year old)

    Women deaths dueto pregnancy- re lated

    cau ses

    Magn i tude Magn i tude Propor t ion Magn i tude Propor tion

    Number ofchi ld ren(under

    5 years old)

    4,09462

    64410,7283,7975,6272,5654,4243,3071,3086,1859,1081,1465,1724,2515,960

    4,80774

    75912,6444,5486,6393,0275,2233,9491,5777,179

    10,7621,3686,1775,1247,053

    1334

    16035151121641228

    15119883433

    0.34.10.51.30.80.20.40.41.60.80.41.41.41.40.70.5

    4047503933545

    1483

    0.10

    0.60.10.10

    0.10.20.10.20.10

    0.40.30.20.1

    0001001000230101

    000

    0.000

    0.2000

    0.20.20

    0.10

    0.1

    83210

    142244984712715319296882971200188323010848951266

    Bagong NayonBeverly HillsCalawisCupangDaligDela Paz (Pob.)InarawanMambuganMayamotMuntindilawSan Isidro (Pob.)San Jose (Pob.)San JuanSan LuisSan Roque (Pob.)Sta. Cruz

  • The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    19

    CBMS Poverty Maps: City of Antipolo

    Map 4. Proportion of Households Living in Makeshift Housing, by Barangay, 2011-2012

    B a ranga y Magn i t ude Pro po r t ion

    B ot tom 10 Ba rangays

    San Isidro (Pob.)San Roque (Pob.)CupangSan LuisSan JuanInarawanMambuganSanta CruzSan Jose (Pob.)Muntindilaw

    1,381557

    1,19354291

    19535837945682

    13.27.56.35.95.24.54.43.72.92.9

  • 20

    The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    Map 5. Proportion of Households who are Informal Settlers, by Barangay, 2011-2012

    B a ranga y Magn i t ude Pro po r t ion

    B ot tom 10 Ba rangays

    CBMS Poverty Maps: City of Antipolo

    San Isidro (Pob.)CupangMayamotSan JuanMambuganSan LuisMuntindilawBagong NayonSta. CruzSan Roque (Pob.)

    1,4612,49635165

    28028184

    197231149

    13.913.24.63.73.53.03.02.72.32.0

  • The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    21

    CBMS Poverty Maps: City of Antipolo

    Map 6. Proportion of Households without Access to Safe Water Supplyby Barangay, 2011-2012

    B a ranga y Magn i t ude Pro po r t ion

    B ot tom 10 Ba rangays

    CalawisSan JuanInarawanSan Jose (Pob.)San LuisCupangBagong NayonSan Roque (Pob.)MambuganDalig

    986956

    1,0533,3801,8663,269659513290228

    94.154.924.321.320.217.39.26.93.63.3

  • 22

    The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    Map 7. Proportion of Households without Access to Sanitary Toilet Facilities,by Barangay, 2011-2012

    B a ranga y Magn i t ude Pro po r t ion

    B ot tom 13 Ba rangays

    CBMS Poverty Maps: City of Antipolo

    CalawisSan JuanSan LuisSan Jose (Pob.)MuntindilawBagong NayonMayamotSan Roque (Pob.)DaligCupangSan Isidro (Pob.)Sta. CruzMambugan

    17738

    139186345140281843222114

    16.92.21.51.21.20.70.50.40.30.20.20.20.2

  • The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    23

    Table 2. Housing, Water and Sanitation Indicators, by Barangay, City of Antipolo, 2011-2012

    Households l iv ing inmakeshi f t housing

    Households who areinformal sett le rs

    Households wi thout accessto safe water supp ly

    Households wi thout accessto san itar y to ilet facil it ies

    B aran ga y

    Pro po r t ionPro po r t ion Pro po r t ion Pro po r t ionMagn i tude Magn i tude Magn i tude Magn i tude

    1260

    181,19312419519535811382

    1,38145691542557379

    1.80

    1.76.31.81.94.54.41.52.913.22.95.25.97.53.7

    1970

    172,496

    21338

    28035184

    1,46113865

    281149231

    2.70.01.6

    13.20.30.30.23.54.63.0

    13.90.93.73.02.02.3

    6594

    9863,269228315

    1,0532901515085

    3,380956

    1,866513327

    9.22.494.117.33.33.124.33.62.01.80.821.354.920.26.93.2

    510

    1774318154

    144034221863813928

    0.70

    16.90.20.30.10.10.20.51.20.21.22.21.50.4

    Bagong NayonBeverly HillsCalawisCupangDaligDela Paz (Pob.)InarawanMambuganMayamotMuntindilawSan Isidro (Pob.)San Jose (Pob.)San JuanSan LuisSan Roque (Pob.)Sta. Cruz

  • 24

    The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    Map 8. Proportion of Children 6-11 years old Not Attending ElementarySchool, by Barangay, 2011-2012

    B a ranga y Magn i t ude Pro po r t ion

    B ot tom 10 Ba rangays

    CBMS Poverty Maps: City of Antipolo

    InarawanCalawisDaligSan LuisSan Roque (Pob.)MambuganSan JuanSan Isidro (Pob.)San Jose (Pob.)Sta. Cruz

    742144843

    1,112846807205

    1,0531,7381,069

    26.720.419.619.017.917.717.617.517.216.9

  • The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    25

    CBMS Poverty Maps: City of Antipolo

    Map 9. Proportion of Children 12-15 years old Not Attending High School,by Barangay, 2011-2012

    B a ranga y Magn i t ude Pro po r t ion

    B ot tom 10 Ba rangays

    CalawisInarawanSan JuanSta. CruzBagong NayonSan LuisSan Jose (Pob.)San Roque (Pob.)DaligSan Isidro (Pob.)

    247845328

    1,7411,1211,6202,7571,2861,1201,690

    57.250.746.144.143.743.643.542.741.541.4

  • 26

    The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    Map 10. Proportion of Children 6-15 years old Not Attending School,by Barangay, 2011-2012

    B ot tom 10 Ba rangays

    B a ranga y Magn i t ude Pro po r t ion

    CBMS Poverty Maps: City of Antipolo

    InarawanCalawisSan LuisSta. CruzDaligSan Jose (Pob.)Bagong NayonMambuganSan Roque (Pob.)San Juan

    984188984

    1,023683

    1,512611665674162

    22.116.510.39.99.89.29.08.98.78.6

  • The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    27

    Table 3. Education Indicators, by Barangay, City of Antipolo, 2011-2012

    Number ofch i ld ren

    (6 -11 years old)

    Chi ldren not attend inge lementar y schoo l

    (6-11 years old)

    Number ofch i ld ren

    (12-15 yea rs old)

    Chi ldren not attend inghigh schoo l

    (12-15 years old)

    Number ofch i ld ren

    (6 -15 years old)

    Chi ldren notattend ing schoo l(6-15 years old)

    B aran ga y

    Magn i tude Magn it ude Magni tudePro po r t ion Pro po r t ion Pro po r t ion

    4,20354705

    11,3094,3036,0692,7764,5643,8711,5226,027

    10,0931,1675,8484,7356,338

    6647

    1441,738843638742807488243

    1,0531,738205

    1,112846

    1,069

    15.813.020.415.419.610.526.717.712.616.017.517.217.619.017.916.9

    2,56859432

    6,7952,6984,1421,6682,8732,5461,0674,0876,334711

    3,7163,0153,949

    1,12121247

    2,7951,1201,402845

    1,174888400

    1,6902,757328

    1,6201,2861,741

    43.735.657.241.141.533.850.740.934.937.541.443.546.143.642.744.1

    6,771113

    1,13718,1047,001

    10,2114,4447,4376,4172,589

    10,11416,4271,8789,5647,750

    10,287

    6119

    1881,345683681984665394220853

    1,512162984674

    1,023

    9.08.016.57.49.86.722.18.96.18.58.49.28.610.38.79.9

    Bagong NayonBeverly HillsCalawisCupangDaligDela Paz (Pob.)InarawanMambuganMayamotMuntindilawSan Isidro (Pob.)San Jose (Pob.)San JuanSan LuisSan Roque (Pob.)Sta. Cruz

  • 28

    The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    CBMS Poverty Maps: City of Antipolo

    Map 11. Proportion of Households with Income Below the Poverty Threshold,by Barangay, 2011-2012

    B a ranga y Magn i t ude Pro po r t ion

    B ot tom 10 Ba rangays

    CalawisSan JuanSan Jose (Pob.)Sta. CruzInarawanSan Isidro (Pob.)San LuisCupangDaligMambugan

    563389

    3,4202,057862

    1,9671,6983,0861,1321,289

    53.722.321.620.219.918.818.416.416.216.0

  • The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    29

    Map 12. Proportion of Households with Income Below the Food Threshold,by Barangay, 2011-2012

    CBMS Poverty Maps: City of Antipolo

    B a ranga y Magn i t ude Pro po r t ion

    B ot tom 10 Ba rangays

    CalawisSan Jose (Pob.)San JuanSanta CruzInarawanSan Isidro (Pob.)San LuisMuntingdilawCupangDalig

    4221,679180

    1,013394909791215

    1,422518

    40.310.610.39.99.18.78.67.67.57.4

  • 30

    The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    Map 13. Proportion of Households who Experienced Hunger due to FoodShortage, by Barangay, 2011-2012

    B ot tom 11 Ba rangays

    B a ranga y Magn i t ude Pro po r t ion

    CBMS Poverty Maps: City of Antipolo

    CalawisSan LuisDaligSan Isidro (Pob.)San JuanSta. CruzSan Roque (Pob.)San Jose (Pob.)Bagong NayonDela Paz (Pob.)Inarawan

    2514385

    1081867285018167

    2.41.61.21.01.00.70.40.30.30.20.2

  • The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    31

    Households with incomebelow the pover ty th reshold

    Households with incomebelow the food thresho ld

    Households who exper iencedhunger due to food shor tage

    Table 4. Income Indicators, by Barangay, City of Antipolo, 2011-2012

    B aran ga y

    Magn i tude Magn i t ude Magn i t udePro po r t ion Pro po r t ion Pro po r t ion

    1,13915

    5633,0861,1321,370862

    1,289952451

    1,9673,420389

    1,6981,0622,057

    15.99.053.716.416.213.619.916.012.515.918.821.622.318.414.320.2

    51110422

    1,422518562394550403215909

    1,679180791415

    1,013

    7.16.0

    40.37.57.45.69.16.85.37.68.7

    10.610.38.65.69.9

    180

    251085167574

    10850181432867

    0.30

    2.40.11.20.20.20.10.10.11.00.31.01.60.40.7

    Bagong NayonBeverly HillsCalawisCupangDaligDela Paz (Pob.)InarawanMambuganMayamotMuntindilawSan Isidro (Pob.)San Jose (Pob.)San JuanSan LuisSan Roque (Pob.)Sta. Cruz

  • 32

    The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    Map 14. Unemployment Rate (15 years old and above), by Barangay, 2011-2012

    CBMS Poverty Maps: City of Antipolo

    B a ranga y Magn i t ude Pro po r t ion

    B ot tom 10 Ba rangays

    San LuisSan Isidro (Pob.)InarawanSan JuanDela Paz (Pob.)DaligSan Roque (Pob.)Sta. CruzCupangMambugan

    15561733668317

    17431173108114092301951

    11.010.910.610.610.210.19.28.98.17.6

  • The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    33

    Map 15. Proportion of Persons who are Victims of Crime, by Barangay, 2011-2012

    CBMS Poverty Maps: City of Antipolo

    Bo ttom 7 B aranga ys

    B a ranga y Magn i t ude Pro po r t ion

    CupangSan Isidro (Pob.)San Roque (Pob.)San LuisMayamotBagong NayonSan Juan

    170105494427186

    0.20.20.10.10.10.10.1

  • 34

    The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    Table 5. Unemployment and Victims of Crime Indicators, by Barangay, City of Antipolo,2011-2012

    Unemployment rate(15 years old and above)

    Persons who are victims ofcr imes

    Number o f personsin the labor force

    (15 years old and above)

    B aran ga y

    Pro po r t ionPro po r t ion Magn i t udeMagn i t ude

    11,185262

    1,53728,39711,57617,1276,30112,44811,5604,44715,86823,7712,99914,09511,80015,866

    825561

    230111731743668951630231

    17331651317

    155610811409

    7.41.94.08.1

    10.110.210.67.65.45.2

    10.96.9

    10.611.09.28.9

    1800

    1701373

    16276

    105176

    444912

    0.100

    0.20.00.00.00.00.10.00.20

    0.10.10.10.0

    Bagong NayonBeverly HillsCalawisCupangDaligDela Paz (Pob.)InarawanMambuganMayamotMuntindilawSan Isidro (Pob.)San Jose (Pob.)San JuanSan LuisSan Roque (Pob.)Sta. Cruz

  • The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    35

    Map 16. CBMS Composite Indicator, by Barangay, 2011-2012

    B a ranga y Av e ra ge

    B ot tom 13 Ba rangays

    CBMS Poverty Maps: City of Antipolo

    CalawisSan JuanInarawanSan LuisCupangSan Isidro (Pob.)San Jose (Pob.)Sta. CruzSan Roque (Pob.)Bagong NayonDaligMambuganMuntindilaw

    2.31.20.80.80.80.80.70.60.60.50.50.50.5

  • 36

    The Many Faces of Poverty (Volume 5)

    Table 6. CBMS Composite Indicator, by Barangay, City of Antipolo, 2011-2012

    B aran ga y CBMS Composite Indicator

    Bagong NayonBeverly HillsCalawisCupangDaligDela Paz (Pob.)InarawanMambuganMayamotMuntindilawSan Isidro (Pob.)San Jose (Pob.)San JuanSan LuisSan Roque (Pob.)Sta. Cruz

    0.50.32.30.80.50.40.80.50.40.50.80.71.20.80.60.6