1

2

3

4

.0 PURPO

The pur

A

This profor zero

.0 SCOPE

This proapplies

.0 REFERE

South A

South A

WHS C

Rail Saf

Rail Saf

GFG Al

QP02.0

AS/NZS

WI29.60

QP50.6

QP29.2

.0 DEFINIT

WorkerThis inctrainee; WHS Rinterest Embedsystem / Area.

Any PRINT

OSE

rpose of thisdescribe thApproach toto explain t

ocedure is co incidents a

ocedure apto plant and

ENCES

Australian W

Australian W

Code of Prac

fety Nationa

fety Nationa

liance Cod

01 The Deve

S3931 Risk

00 Service

64 Environm

28 – Critical

TIONS

r - A personcludes; an a student g

Representatts and conce

ded / Stratthat has be

SAF

TED copies o

s Safety Rishe applicato safety, anhe behavio

considered and zero inj

pplies to alld task safet

Work Health

Work Health

ctice – How

al Law (Sou

al Law Natio

de of Practic

elopment, C

analysis of

Providers S

mental Risk

WHS and E

n performinemployee;

gaining wor

tive - A meerns of that

tegic Contreen approve

GFG AllFETY RIS

of this proced

sk Managemtion of SIMnd urs and res

essential touries; name

l SIMEC Mty risks.

and Safety

and Safety

w To Manage

uth Australia

onal Regula

ce – WHS R

Control, Use

f technologic

Safe System

Manageme

Environmen

g a task wi a contrac

rk experienc

mber of a wt workgroup

ractor - A ced by SIME

liance WSK MANA

dure are UN

ment ProceMEC Mining

sponsibilities

o ensuring ely ‘Goal Ze

Mining and L

y (WHS) Ac

y (WHS) Re

e Health an

a) Act 2012

ations 2012

Risk Manag

e and Revie

cal systems

ms of Work

ent (ERM) S

nt Training

ithin an SIMctor or subcce or a volu

workgroup tp.

contractor wEC Mining a

Whyalla AGEMEN

CONTROLL

edure is to; g and Libe

s critical to

your personero’.

Liberty One

ct 2012.

egulations 2

nd Safety R

2

gement

ew of System

s – Applicat

Process

System

MEC Miningcontractor o

unteer.

that is electe

working undend Liberty O

NT

ED

erty OneSte

its success

nal safety, a

eSteel Why

2012.

isks

m Documen

tion guide

g and Libertor their em

ed and train

er their ownOneSteel W

QP29Revision

Safet

eel Whyall

and in achi

yalla sites.

nts

ty OneSteemployee; an

ned to repre

n safety maWhyalla for a

9.13 n 29 ty

Page: 1 of

a's Risk-ba

eving our q

This proce

el Whyalla sn apprentic

esent the sa

nagement a specific Pl

12

ased

quest

dure

sites. ce or

afety

lant

Internaprovide Techno Hazard Hazardproperty Line of Plant – implemethings. vehicles Area – Plant / Aparticula Task - A Task Hhazard the dura Conseqhazardo Likeliho Risk - Toccur. Risk Ra

Likeliho Risk Asidentifie Barrier Contro

Any PRINT

al Service P centralised

ology)

- A potenti

Identificaty and/or pro

f Fire - The

– Includes aent and tooPlant includs, and powe

Work areas

Area Hazaar Plant / A

A task is an

azard – This introduceation of the

quence - Thous / risk sc

ood – The

The conseq

anking - A

ood, assess

ssessmented hazard

r of Defence

l - Anything

SAF

TED copies o

Provider - Ed services a

al source o

tion - The pocess.

path or pot

ny physicalol, and includes items aser tools.

s such as m

rd - An inheArea.

ny activity o

e potential ed to the Platask. These

he harm to cenario.

probability o

uence from

numeric va

ed from the

t - The proc

e - A contro

g that helps

GFG AllFETY RIS

of this proced

Employees oat various pl

f harm to pe

process of id

ential path

permanentdes any coms diverse as

mine or explo

erent, and o

r work unde

harm (dangant / Area be may be in

people, env

of the conse

m a hazardo

lue assigne

e risk rating

cess of eval

ol measure

to reduce o

liance WSK MANA

dure are UN

of SIMEC Mlant location

eople, envir

dentifying a

of danger/e

t facility, mamponent ors lifts, crane

oration site

ongoing, so

ertaken by a

ger/energy) by the personcluded in th

vironment, p

equence oc

us scenario

ed to a spec

definitions

uating the C

that protect

or eliminate

Whyalla AGEMEN

CONTROLL

Mining and Lns (e.g. Cen

ronment, pr

all sources o

energy proje

achinery, eqr anything fies, compute

s not consid

urce of pote

a worker in

associatedon(s) perforhe Plant / A

property an

ccurring whe

o and the lik

cific risk by

. RISK M

Consequen

ts personne

the risk pre

NT

ED

Liberty Onentral Engine

roperty and/

of harm to p

ected from a

quipment, atted or conn

ers, machin

dered to be

ential harm

fulfilment of

with execuming that ta

Area Risk Re

d/or proces

en exposed

kelihood tha

adding the

ANAGEM

ce and Like

el from expo

esented by

QP29Revision

Safet

eSteel Whyaeering and I

/or process

people, env

a hazard

appliance, cnected to aery, convey

e Plant.

(danger/en

of that worke

uting a specask, and is oegister.

ss resulting

d to the risk

at the conse

Consequen

MENT of 1

elihood of ex

osure to a h

the hazard

9.13 n 29 ty

Page: 2 of

alla who nformation

.

ironment,

ontainer, ny of these yor, forklifts

nergy) in a

er’s role

cific task. Thonly presen

from the

scenario.

equence wil

nce and

19

xposure to

hazard

.

12

,

he nt for

l

an

5

Reasonpractica

– – –

–

ALARPapplicatRisk Co SFAIRPduty ho

.0 THE RIS

5.1 Ris

A RtheWethis

A RfrombotPlaper

A R

Any PRINT

nably Practable’ includeThe level oThe availabThe cost aswhether theWhat the prisk and wa

P - As Low ation of controntrol Guide

P – So Far Alders are reto eliminateif it is not reis reasonab

SK-BASED

sk-based A

Risk-basede hazards ae then ensus way the A

Risk-basedm hazards ith. For a tasant and thersonnel are

Risk-based

Plant / Aare best

A Task is

Everyonperformi

Everyon

Everyon

Our uniqand lead

SAF

TED copies o

ticable - Fae:

of risk bility and effssociated we cost for therson conc

ays of elimin

as Reasonarols that areeline to help

As Is Reasoequired: e risks to saeasonably pbly practicab

D APPROAC

Approach to

d Approachassociated wre that the pproach mi

d approachinherent to sk to be pere Task haz

in the ‘Line

approach to

Area Hazardknown to th

s an activity

e needs tong tasks

e continuou

e will stop a

que contribudership. (Re

GFG AllFETY RIS

of this proced

actors that m

fectivenesswith availablhe organisaterned knownating or mi

ably Practicae reasonablp determine

onably Prac

afety so far apracticable tble.

CH TO SAF

o Safety

h to safety with the tasline of fire tigates the

h to safety rthe plant / Arformed wit

zards presee of Fire’ of t

o safety rec

ds are best he worker(s

y or work th

o be in a hei

usly judges

and reasses

ution to hazaefer Section

liance WSK MANA

dure are UN

may determ

s of ways to e ways of etion is gross

ws, or oughtinimising th

able; risks tly practicab the tolerab

cticable; und

as is reasonto eliminate

FETY

is being prsk and the risks for eapotential fo

recognisesArea or hazhout injury

ent, and hathe identifie

cognises tha

known to ps)

hat is assoc

ightened sta

which tools

ss if there h

ard identificn 8.0 Respo

Whyalla AGEMEN

CONTROLL

mine whethe

eliminate oeliminating osly dispropot reasonablye risk.

that are at ale. Use the

ble levels.

der section

nably practie risks to saf

racticed whesubsequen

ach hazard or personne

that the pozards introdor illness, t

ave Barriersed hazards

at:

lant / area p

iated with o

ate of ment

s and contro

has been ch

cation and consibilities.)

NT

ED

er something

or minimise or minimisinortionate to y to know, a

a tolerable leRisk Mana

46 of the R

cable; and fety, to mini

en our behnt risk of exhas adequal exposure t

otential for duced by thehe Worker s of Defencbefore com

personnel, w

our role

al alertness

ols are appr

hange or if t

control is ma)

QP29Revision

Safet

g is ‘reason

the risk ng the risk, the risk

about the ha

evel based agement Co

Rail Safety N

imise those

aviour is toxposure to ate barriersto harm.

illness or ine task, or amust be awce in place

mmencing th

while the Ta

s for hazard

ropriate for

they are uns

atched to o

9.13 n 29 ty

Page: 3 of

nably

including

azard or the

on the de of Pract

National Law

e risks so fa

o firstly Idethose haza

s of defence

njury can c combinatio

ware of bothe to ensurehe task.

ask Hazards

ds when

the hazard(

sure

ur role, skil

12

e

ice

w,

r as

entify ards. e. In

come on of h the e no

s

(s)

ls

5.2 Em

An maMinConthisAreHaz

5.3 The

GFTheTheelimAdmas line

S

As

Any PRINT

mbedded / S

Embeddednagement s

ning and Libntactor muss procedureea and is rezards within

e Hierarchy

G Alliance e preferred e next levelmination is nministrativea last reso

e.

Eliminate t

Substitute use of less

Isolate thehandling, is

Engineerin

Administrasigns, supe

Personal P

HIGHES

LOWES

Leve

l of h

ealth

and

saf

ety

tti

SAF

TED copies o

Stategic Co

d / Strategicsystem. Thberty OneStst ensure the. The Embsponsible fon that Plant

y of Contro

advocates acontrol is ws of controlnot reasona

e and persort, after firs

the Hazard

the Hazarhazardous

e Hazard –solate by dis

ng Controls

ative Contrervision.

Protective E

ST

ST

prot

ectio

n

GFG AllFETY RIS

of this proced

ontractors

Contractorhis safety mteel Whyalla

heir risk manbedded / Stror the mana/ Area.

ol

a hierarchy where the ha

are substitably practicanal protectit taking all

– remove t

rd – substituchemicals)

– enclose tstance/time

s – for exam

rols – for e

Equipment

Person

liance WSK MANA

dure are UN

r is a contramanagement

a before it cnagement prategic Conagement of

y of control mazard is elimtution, isolaal. ve equipmereasonably

the hazard f

ute with a h)

the hazard .

mple, ventila

example, sa

t (PPE) – fo

Eliminat

Substitut

Isolate

nal Protect

Administr

Enginee

Whyalla AGEMEN

CONTROLL

actor that wot system mucan be usedprocesses mtractor is ththe risks as

measures (Bminated beftion and en

ent controlsy practical m

from the wo

hazard that

(e.g. barrie

ation, syste

afe work me

or example,

te the Haza

te the Haza

the Hazard

tive Equipm

rative Cont

ering Contr

NT

ED

orks under tust have bed. The Embmeet or excee Plant Owssociated w

Barriers of Dfore the taskngineering.

s (below themeasures to

orkplace/wo

t poses a lo

ers and fen

ms, machin

ethods, trai

hardhat, he

ard

ard

d

ment (PPE)

trols

rol

QP29Revision

Safet

their own saeen approvebedded / Streed the req

wner for the with Plant an

Defence) fok begins. These are

e line) shouo apply con

ork process

ower risk of

ncing enclo

ne guarding

ning, job ro

earing prote

)

9.13 n 29 ty

Page: 4 of

afety ed by SIMErategic quirements oagreed Pla

nd Task

or hazards.

preferred w

ld only be untrols above

.

f harm (e.g

osures), rem

.

otation, war

ection.

MOST

LEAST

Reliability o

f control

12

C

of nt /

when

used e the

. the

mote

rning

6

Imprev

.0 PROCE

6.1 Pla

6.1.1 K

a

b

6.1.2 P

Ggre

Thbu

Thse

B

Plant ri

Plant / 

or Insp

Periodi

Risk Re

Plant / 

throug

Any PRINT

plement theview during

EDURE

ant / Area H

Key Behavi

a) Each Plathe area

b) Workers area they

Process for

GFG Alliancuideline, thepresentativ

here are a nusiness unit

he default tets out the m

usiness Un

LibertAsses

SIME

isk assessme

Area walk th

ection 

ic Review of 

egister 

Area  walk 

h or Inspecti

SAF

TED copies o

e control methe task to

Hazards

ours Displ

ant / Area h, and the coand visitor

y are enteri

r Plant / Are

e considershe risk asseves, worker

number of tt may ident

ool is availaminimum re

it specific to

ty OneSteessment Tem

EC Mining –

ent 

hrough 

        

ion 

GFG AllFETY RIS

of this proced

easures or ensure that

ayed

has accessiontrol measrs are informng.

ea Risk Ide

s that a teamessment ters(s) and ma

tools availabify the appli

able in the Pequirement

ools:

l – Refer tomplate

– Refer to W

liance WSK MANA

dure are UN

Barriers of t they are w

ble, a regissures (barriemed of the

entification

m approacheam shouldanagement

ble to conduicable tools

Plant Risk Mfor busines

o FORM29.0

WI75.WHS.R

ManagemenCommitmen

Whyalla AGEMEN

CONTROLL

f Defence bworking as p

ster that ideers) in place plant haza

n

h to Plant / A be made t stakeholde

uct Plant / As in their saf

Managemensses using t

009 – Steelw

RSK.001 – R

nt nt

NT

ED

efore the taplanned.

ntifies the Pe to preventards and co

Area risk ideup of Subj

ers.

Area risk asfety manage

nt Toolkit (ahis procedu

works Plant

Risk Manag

R

P

(

L

H

R

QP29Revision

Safet

ask comme

Plant / Areat exposure. ontrols impl

entification ject Matter

ssessmentsement syste

attachment 3ure.

t Hazard an

gement Too

Risk Rating a

Prioritisation

(Attachment

Legislative re

Hierarchy of 

Recording th

9.13 n 29 ty

Page: 5 of

ences, and

a hazards w

emented in

is optimal. AExperts, W

, and each em.

3). This To

nd Risk

ols

nd 

n Table 

t 1) 

equirements

Controls 

he risks 

12

then

within

n the

As a WHS

oolkit

 

St

St

St

St

6.1.3 A

Th

Any PRINT

tep 1 – Ide

The

N C A

tep 2 – Ass

PoteThisPrac

tep 3 – Con

Conthe the AlliaRailBus

Reg

tep 4 - Rev

Riskaccowith

A pr

Accessibilit

he register

SAF

TED copies o

ntify the Pl

requiremen

New plant oChange manAny other ev

sess Expos

ential risks as is in accctice.

ntrol Risks

nsidering thright barrierisk contro

ance WHS National Siness Areas

gister at leasA descrCurrent The riskRankingThe addThe riskNote; if be impleLow res

view Contro

k register ordance wit the GFG A

rompt for thInjuries Hazard ChangeSignificaTask baPolicy o

ty of the re

of Plant / A

GFG AllFETY RIS

of this proced

lant / Area

nt for a risk

r equipmennagement vent that ma

sure to Ris

are to be ascordance w

s associate

e legislativer to reduce

ol guidelinesRisk Manag

Safety Law s.

st: ription of thecontrols in

k ranking tag) ditional contk ranking withe residuaemented in sidual risk.

ol Measure

entries (hath the Risk

Alliance WH

e review of / IncidentsCards

e Managemeant Safety Oased risk asor procedura

gister of p

Area risks m

liance WSK MANA

dure are UN

Hazards

assessmen

nt

ay change t

sk and Line

ssessed usiwith the GF

ed with the

e requiremethe risk to

s in attachgement Coand Regula

e hazard place to coking curren

trols / barrieith the addital risk is still

line with th

es

azard and Control Gu

HS Risk Man

f the risk reg

ent Occurrencessessment ral changes

lant risks

ust be acce

Whyalla AGEMEN

CONTROLL

nt will be trig

the plant, or

e of Fire

ing the risk FG Alliance

hazard (Ba

ents and uas low as r

hment 2. Tde of Practation requir

ontrol the hat controls in

ers of defentional contro Moderate oe Risk Con

associateduideline in nagement C

gister can b

s or Safety reviews

essible to em

NT

ED

ggered by:

r the plant p

ranking tabe WHS Ris

arriers of D

sing the hiereasonably This is in atice. Consirements, wh

azard nto consider

nce to be imols in place or above thtrol Guidelin

d controls)attachment

Code of Pra

e from Haz

Briefs

mployees, c

QP29Revision

Safet

processes.

bles in attacsk Manage

Defence)

erarchy of practical in

accordanceideration mhere applic

ration (Curr

mplemented (Residual Ren further cne to lower

) are to bt 2. This isactice.

zards identif

contractors

9.13 n 29 ty

Page: 6 of

chment 1. ement Cod

controls, sen alignment with the G

must be givecable to spe

rent Risk

Risk Rankincontrols muthe risk to a

be revieweds in accorda

fied in:

and visitors

12

e of

elect with

GFG en to ecific

ng)st a

d in ance

s.

6.2 Pro

6.2.1 K

Aa

b

c

d

e

6.2.2 P

T

Liber‐ Tak‐ Haz

SIME‐ PTR‐ FataPlann

Take 

Stop a

Safety

Obse

Any PRINT

ocedure – T

Key Behavi

All workers wa) Show wi

safety enb) Should b

identified) For Non-

risk man) For Rout

understae) Demonst

change o

Process for

The underly

Have

Ident

Ensufrom

Ensu

Use task

rty OneSteel e 2 zard Prompt 

EC Mining RA (STAR) al Risk Mananing Tool

2 / STAR 

and re‐asses

y Behaviour 

rvations 

SAF

TED copies o

Task Hazar

ours Displ

will: llingness tongagementsbe continuoud when perf-Routine tasagement totine work co

and the hazatrate the wor if challen

r Task Risk

ying proces

e an unders

tify the job s

ure there arthe risk ass

ure all worke

or be familiby all worke

gement 

ss the task 

GFG AllFETY RIS

of this proced

rds

ayed

o talk about s. usly judgingforming tasksks have on

ool for the taovered by aards and co

willingness ged by othe

k Identificat

ss for all tas

standing of t

steps and w

e effective csociated wit

ers underst

ar with the ers involved

liance WSK MANA

dure are UN

the hazards

g which tooks. n location, hask. a Work Instronversant into stop aner work coll

tion

sk risk ident

the inheren

work method

controls (bath the Plant

tand and fol

task risk mad in that tas

ManagemCommitm

Whyalla AGEMEN

CONTROLL

s they have

ls and contr

have signed

ruction, whin the Work nd re-asseseagues

ification req

t Plant / Are

d

arriers of det / Area Haz

llow the agr

anagementsk.

entent

NT

ED

e identified i

rols are app

d on to, and

ch has beeInstruction f

ss if the w

quires that w

ea hazards,

efence) in plzards and th

reed work m

t process / t

QP29Revision

Safet

in the task d

propriate for

d be convers

n risk assesfor the task

work method

we:

, risks and c

lace to prothe Task Ha

method and

tool as the f

PTRA (STAR

Safe System

Work Instru

Contractor A

Work 

Codes Of Pr

High Risk Pr

High Risk Pe

Rules and St

9.13 n 29 ty

Page: 7 of

during work

r the hazard

sant in, the

ssed, know. d or condit

controls

tect personnazards

controls

first step of

) 

ms of Work 

uctions 

Authority to 

actice 

ocedures 

ermits 

tandards 

12

k or

d(s)

task

w and

tions

nel

a

T

a

A

Scoc

6.2.3 T

Any PRINT

The Risk-barequired whand potentiincrease; a

Hazard com

1. The

2. Diffitrad

3. The

Tasks ptrade ha

Potential coinjury or illn

All workers performing hazard com

Select and consequenor the hazacertainty.

Task Risk M

SIMEC

Where in QP5

SAF

TED copies o

ased Approhen managial conseqund the task

mplexity sho

e environme

culty of thee/operator

e number of

performed inazards, by a

onsequenceness that is

need to betasks, and

mplexity.

follow the rce and/or h

ard complex

Managemen

C Mining – R

environme50.57 Enviro

GFG AllFETY RIS

of this proced

oach to safeng the risk ence increarisk manag

ould be judg

ent – office/w

task – withcompetenc

identified p

n an office oa single trad

e is judged apossible as

e in a heightcontinuous

risk manageazard comp

xity, choose

nt Tools (S

Refer to WI7

ntal risk is donmental Ri

liance WSK MANA

dure are UN

ety recognisassociated

ases, the riggement tool

ged by the w

workshop v

hin a single cies

plant and ta

or workshopde skill, are

as the maxs a result of

tened state ly judge the

ement proceplexity. If tha more rigo

SIMEC Mini

75.WHS.RS

dealt with inisk Manage

Whyalla AGEMEN

CONTROLL

ses there is with tasks.

gour applied be selecte

worker/s us

vs. plant or m

trade/opera

sk hazards

p environmelikely to be

imum reasoexposure t

of mental ae factors aff

esses / toolere is unceorous risk m

ng)

SK.001 – Ri

n shared risement.

NT

ED

a hierarchy As the lev

d to task risd according

ing criteria

mine site

ator compet

and the de

ent, with noe of low haza

onable conso an identif

alertness forfecting pote

s based on rtainty of th

managemen

sk Manage

k managem

QP29Revision

Safet

y to the levevel of hazardk managemgly.

including th

tency or req

egree of inte

o plant hazazard comple

sequence ofied hazard.

r hazards wential conseq

the judgedhe potential nt tool until t

ement Tools

ment tools th

9.13 n 29 ty

Page: 8 of

el of rigour d complexit

ment should

he following

quiring multi

eraction

ards and fewexity.

or severity o

when quence and

potential consequenthere is

s

his is descri

12

ty

:

iple

w

of

d

nce

ibed

Ta

Task

New

Rowith

TaPro

6.2.4 T

a

W

WQ

Any PRINT

T

asks with a pote

ks where th

w or non-rou

utine Tasksh a known c

asks performovider or Ex

Task Risk M

Liberty(Attach

Note*: an Ehowever the

For the docmanageme

For the docbe competeand control

Each businWhere this be used.

Where enviQP50.57 E

SAF

TED copies o

Types of T

low level ofntial conseq

e complexitis uncerta

utine Tasksemployee

s performedcomplexity a

med by an xternal Cont

owner*

Managemen

y OneSteel –hments 4 an

Embedded /ey are cons

cumented toent tool befo

cumented toent in the tas associate

ess unit canhas not bee

ironmental nvironment

GFG AllFETY RIS

of this proced

asks

f complexityquence

ty or conseqin

s performede

d by an empand conseq

Internal Sertractor for a

nt Tools (L

– the defaund 5)

Strategic Csidered the

ool for new/ore commen

ool for routinask outlined ed with the t

n identify then identified

risk is dealtal Risk Man

liance WSK MANA

dure are UN

y and

quence

d by an

ployee quence

rvice a Plant

Liberty One

lt tools are

Contractor isPlant owne

non-routinencing the ta

ne tasks coin the work

task before

heir applicabd by the bus

t with in shanagement.

Whyalla AGEMEN

CONTROLL

R

Me

Ha

Safe Sys

Safe Sys

Wo

Au

eSteel)

available in

s not consider for their d

e tasks, worsks.

vered by a k instructionconducting

ble tools forsiness unit,

ared risk ma

NT

ED

Risk Mana

ental “Take

azard Promp

stem of Wo(Attachme

stem of Wo(Attachmen

ork Instructio

thority to W

the Task R

dered an Exefined Plan

rkers must s

work instrucn and under the task.

r conducting the default

anagement

QP29Revision

Safet

agement T

2” (Attachm

pt (Attachm

rk Electricaents 4.4 & 4

rk Electricants 4.4 & 4.on (Attachm

Work (Attach

Risk Manag

xternal Connt / Area.

sign on to th

ction, the wrstand the h

g task risk at hierarchy a

tools this is

9.13 n 29 ty

Page: 9 of

Tool

ment 4.1)

ment 4.2)

al / Mechani4.5)

al / Mechani.5) or

ment 4.6)

hment 5)

ement Tool

tractor;

he risk

worker shouhazards, risk

assessmentand tools ca

s described

12

cal

cal

lkit

ld k

ts. an

in

7

8

6.2.5 T

A

sAt

6.2.6 R

TD

Ata

T

HP

.0 RECOR

Each Dand kep

a m in a in a

Risk asrecord.

.0 RESPO

Genera

Departm

Any PRINT

Training

All personshazards anshould be inAll personsto the type Environmen

Review Freq

Tasks that Developmen

All other tasask or cond

Task based

Hazards idePlant / Area

RD KEEPIN

epartment /pt for;

minimum of taccordance accordance

ssessments Any chang

NSIBILITIE

al Manager

Set the s Define th Ensure e Ensure t Monitor t

ment / Bus

Ensure ttools thahierarchy

Ensure tregardin

Ensure w

SAF

TED copies o

entering a d controls. ncluded in t conductingof risk assental Training

quency

are coverent, Control,

k risk asseditions chan

risk assess

ntified in thrisk assess

G

/ Business

the durationwith the relwith QP02.

s entered iges or histo

ES (unique

standard of he metrics teffective systhe businesthe effective

siness Area

the safety mat facilitate hy of controlthe Departmg Plant andwhen signifi

GFG AllFETY RIS

of this proced

Plant / Area The Departhe businesg risk assesessment toog)

d by a WoUse and Re

ssments shge.

sments shou

e task basesment as re

Area, must

n specified oevant code.12 Records

nto the IRMorical data w

contributio

acceptableto measure stems and ps is adequaeness of the

a Manager

managemenhazard idens

ment / Busind Task Hazaicant incide

liance WSK MANA

dure are UN

a should bertment / Busss unit inducssments shool they are u

ork Instructeview of Sy

hould be rev

uld be revie

ed risk asseequired.

t ensure tha

on the forme of practices Managem

MS Risk Rwill automat

on of the ro

e hazard excompliance

processes tately resoure Risk Man

or Embedd

nt system contification, ri

ness Area aards

ents occur th

Whyalla AGEMEN

CONTROLL

e made awasiness Areaction. ould be trainusing. (see

tion shouldystem Docum

viewed eac

ewed after r

essment rev

at any risk a

m used (whee, or ment System

Register datically be arc

ole)

posure ande to give effecrced to comagement sy

ded / State

overs both Psk assessm

applies the s

hat the risk

NT

ED

are of the spa Plant / Are

ned. The trQP29.28 C

be reviewments’.

ch time the

elevant inju

view should

assessment

re they exis

m.

tabase will chived.

acceptable

ct to the staply with theystem

gic Contra

Plant and Aments and th

safety mana

assessmen

QP29Revision

Safet

pecific Planea /hazards

raining shouCritical WHS

wed as per

task is con

ury/incidents

d be update

ts carried o

st), or

be automa

e behaviour

andards e standard

actor’s Man

Area Hazardhe applicati

agement sy

nt is conside

9.13 n 29 ty

Page: 10 of

t / Area and contro

uld be relevS and

QP02.01

nducted or if

s.

ed back into

ut are reco

atically kep

r

nager

ds and incluon of a

ystem

ered for rev

f 12

ols

ant

‘The

f the

o the

rded

pt on

udes

view

9

Manage

Superv

Worker

Safety

.0 DOCUM

Attachm

Attachm

Attachm

Any PRINT

er

Ensure tthe plant

Ensure P Ensure t

manage

visor / Team

Select th Verify th Ensure w Make pe

r

Comply for the ta

Ensure Ptask com

Participaapplicab

Individuatask or c

Where wshould thmeasure

Manager

Developneeds o

Coach a Provide

MENTATION

ment No. 1

ment No. 2

ment No. 3

SAF

TED copies o

the Plant/ At risk registePlant / Areathat superviment tools

m Leader /

he appropriae quality of workers undeople availa

with this proask Plant / Areammences. (ate in requirble als must stoconditions cworkers joinhoroughly faes (barriers

p and maintof the businand assist l

e expert adv

N

- GFGPrio

- GFGCon

- Placom

GFG AllFETY RIS

of this proced

Area Hazarder

a risk registesors and w

Contractor

ate risk manapplication

derstand theable for train

ocedure by

a Hazards a(consult thered training,

op, re-asseshange a task afteamiliarise thof defence)

tain risk maess ine manage

vice on risk

G Alliance Woritisation T

G Alliance Wntrol Guidel

nt Hazard Implex plant)

liance WSK MANA

dure are UN

ds associate

er is accessworkers are t

r Controlle

nagement tn of the risk e risks and

ning

applying th

are considere plant risk r, and contri

ss and upda

er the risk mhemselves w) before com

anagement s

ement in themanageme

WHS Risk MTable

WHS Risk Mline

dentification) (Include a

Whyalla AGEMEN

CONTROLL

ed with the

sible to all etrained, com

r

ool for the tmanagemecontrols in

he risk mana

red, in conjuregister as rbute to the

ate the docu

managementwith the jobmmencing

systems, pr

e applicatioent strategy

Manageme

Manageme

n and Risk hyperlink to

NT

ED

managers d

employees, mpetent and

task being uent tool usedthe Hazard

agement to

unction withrequired) Risk Asses

umented ris

t process hab steps, haz

rocesses an

n of the tooand techniq

nt Code of P

nt Code of P

Assessmeno the actual

QP29Revision

Safet

discipline ar

contractorsd utilise the

undertaken d for the tas

d Register

ool that has

h Task Haza

ssment proc

sk managem

as been cozards, risks

nd tools tha

ols ques

Practice – R

Practice – W

nt Checklistl tool)

9.13 n 29 ty

Page: 11 of

re identified

s and visitorrequired ris

sk

been selec

ards, before

cess where

ment tool if

mpleted, thand control

at meet the

Risk Rating

WHS Risk

t (Large and

f 12

d in

rs sk

ted

e a

the

ey l

and

d

Attachm

Attachm

(Note: W

Any PRINT

ment No. 4

ment No. 5

WI29.600 - S

SAF

TED copies o

- Libe

4

4

4

4

4

4

– Aut

Safe Systempro

GFG AllFETY RIS

of this proced

erty OneSte

4.1 Men

4.2 Haza

4.3 Star

4.4 SSO

4.5 SSO

4.6 Wor

thority to Wo

m of Work Pcess)

liance WSK MANA

dure are UN

eel Task Ris

ntal “Take 2

ard Prompt

r Booklet (R

OW Mechan

OW Electrica

rk Instructio

ork (REMO

Process pro

Whyalla AGEMEN

CONTROLL

sk Managem

”

t

REMOVED)

nical

al

n Template

OVED)

ovides full d

NT

ED

ment Toolki

(REMOVE

etail for the

QP29Revision

Safet

it

ED)

e Authority t

9.13 n 29 ty

Page: 12 of

o Work

f 12

GFG Alliance WHS Risk Management Code of Practice – Risk Rating and Prioritisation Table

Attachment No.1

QP29.13/1 17/05/2011 Page: 1 of 1

Consequence Categories Level Rating Description

1 Negligible Negligible Low-level short-term subjective inconvenience or symptoms. No measurable physical effects. (E.g. minor laceration, burn or abrasion requiring basic first aid treatment).

2 Minor Objective but reversible disability / impairment. (E.g. laceration, sprain/strain, burn etc. that requires medical treatment and/or modified duties)

3 Medium Moderate short-term or irreversible disability or impairment. (E.g. fracture, crush injury, burns etc. requiring specialist medical and/or hospital treatment).

4 Major Near fatality, Single fatality or severe irreversible disability or impairment. (E.g. loss of life, loss of limbs, loss of bodily function such as major paralysis)

5 Extreme Short or long term health effects leading to multiple fatalities. (E.g. as for 4 but with multiple victims).

Likelihood Categories Level Rating Description

1 Rare The event may occur only in exceptional circumstances. May Happen, but it would be a shock.

2 Unlikely The event could occur at some time. Surprised if it happens.

3 Possible The event might occur at some time. Would not be surprised either way: whether it happens or not.

4 Likely The events will probably occur in most circumstances. Not surprised if it happens.

5 Almost Certain The event is expected to occur in most circumstances. Almost expect it to happen.

Note: Add consequence and likelihood to achieve risk rating

Risk Ranking Table

Likelihood Consequence

Negligible Minor Medium Major Extreme 1 2 3 4 5

Almost Certain 5 6 7 8 9 10 Likely 4 5 6 7 8 9 Possible 3 4 5 6 7 8 Unlikely 2 3 4 5 6 7 Rare 1 2 3 4 5 6

Risk Prioritisation Risk Level Suggested Actions

2-4 Low Manage by routine procedures

4-5 Moderate Responsibility and action dates must be specified

5-7 High Reduce as soon as possible

7-10 Very High Immediate action to reduce risk, stop work as soon as practicable

GFG Alliance WHS Risk Management Code of Practice – WHS Risk Control Guidelines

Attachment No.2

QP29.13/2 8/09/2017 Page: 1 of 2

Identification, Planning & Implementation of Risk Controls The GFG Alliance WHS Risk Management CoP requires that corrective actions be implemented for identified risks and each business shall have a program for those controls that systematically addresses their risk profile. The key principle is that sites are to have an active risk register and be able to demonstrate that they are actively addressing the highest rated risks. The key philosophy is that the risk management process is a method of determining priorities and items to address first, thus sites are encouraged to focus on the top priority risks rather than all risks. Control measures implemented to manage a risk should be reviewed and monitored to determine if changing circumstances have altered the control measures required to effectively manage the risk. When reviewing risks, it is good practice to review each of the risks for a particular hazard based on review period for the highest ranked risk. The following table outlines the risk control priorities, timeframes to assess and decide on controls, and timeframes for review of risk control effectiveness.

Low Risk Moderate High Very High

Risk Control Priorities

Manage by routine

procedures

Responsibility and action dates

must be specified

Reduce as soon as possible

Immediate action to reduce risk, stop work as soon as practicable

Time to Assess and Decide on Controls

60 days 60 days 10 days 24 hours

Implement Additional Controls

12 months 60 days 30 days 24 hours

Review of Risk Control Effectiveness

36 months 24 months 12 months

Not applicable (risks to be reduced)

Qualifying Notes Low Risk – Manage by routine procedures The level of risk is such that resources are most probably better directed at addressing higher rated risks. When a risk is identified and rated as a low risk, and the business context warrants additional controls then a reasonable timeframe would be for implementation of the controls to be performed using routine methods within 365 days.

GFG Alliance WHS Risk Management Code of Practice – WHS Risk Control Guidelines

Attachment No.2

QP29.13/2 8/09/2017 Page: 2 of 2

Moderate Risk - Responsibility and action dates must be specified Resources should be allocated to higher rated risks first. An action plan that outlines planned controls or steps to determine planned controls and allocates responsibility should be developed within 60 days. High Risk - Reduce as soon as possible Where a risk scenario has been rated as high risk, the existing controls should be reviewed and any further controls that are reasonably practical identified and implemented as soon as possible, preferably within 30 days. There may be situations where a risk has been identified and rated as high risk and after due consideration no further controls are reasonably practicable or known (ALARP), in such cases the Executive General Manager shall determine whether the risk scenario is to be tolerated. Similarly, there may be cases where additional controls may take longer than 30 days, in such cases the Executive General Manager shall confirm that the timeframe is acceptable within the context of the specific risk scenario. Very High Risk - Immediate action to reduce risk, stop work as soon as practicable Immediate (within 24 hours) interim controls should be implemented to protect persons from the hazard. Prior to the stopping of work assessment should be made to check whether any additional risks might be introduced by stopping the process and appropriate controls implemented. Given the subjective nature of the risk rating method, good practice is to seek a greater understanding of the hazard and risk and confirm the level and nature of risk prior to establishing further controls once initial controls have been implemented.

Plant Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Checklist Attachment No.3

QP29.13/3 23/06/2014

PLANT HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST (LARGE AND COMPLEX PLANT)

Location:

Plant name:

Plant sub name:

Hazard Description Applicable Current Controls/Comments

Risk assessment Current controls Proposed Control measures

Risk Assessment Future controls Overall

Ranking Yes No C L R C L R

1. Entanglement

2. Crushing

3. Trapping or confining

4. Cutting, stabbing or puncturing

5. Shearing, abrasion, tearing, stretching or friction

6. Striking

7. Stored Energy (Pressurised content, hydraulic, pneumatic and vacuum)

8. Electrical

9. Noise and Vibration

10. Fire and Explosion

11. Temperature, moisture

12. Vapour, gases, dusts

Key C - Consequence L - Likelihood R - Risk Rating Low Moderate High Very High Page: 1 of 3

Prompt questions for each hazard description are listed in the full Plant Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Checklist on the Intranet

Plant Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Checklist Attachment No.3

QP29.13/3 23/06/2014

PLANT HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST (LARGE AND COMPLEX PLANT)

Location:

Plant name:

Plant sub name:

Hazard Description Applicable Current Controls/Comments

Risk assessment Current controls Proposed Control measures

Risk Assessment Future controls Overall

Ranking Yes No C L R C L R

13. Radiation

14. Slips, Trips and Falls

15. Access and Egress

16. Lighting

17. Manual Handling , Ergonomics

18. Failure of Plant

19. Asbestos

20. Persons and Equipment moved by Plant

21. Automatic mobile plant

22. Operators competency

23. Stability of Plant

24. Hazardous and Dangerous Substances

25. Biological Hazards

26. Confined Spaces

27. Water or Liquid tanks

28. Other Hazards

Key C - Consequence L - Likelihood R - Risk Rating Low Moderate High Very High Page: 2 of 3

Plant Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Checklist Attachment No.3

QP29.13/3 23/06/2014

PLANT HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST (LARGE AND COMPLEX PLANT)

Location:

Plant name:

Plant sub name:

References WORK HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT, 2012 Work Health and Safety Regulations, 2012

Summary:

Risk Assessment Team Team Leader:

Occupation:

Signature:

Date:

Facilitator:

Occupation:

Signature:

Date:

Name:

Occupation:

Signature:

Date:

Name:

Occupation:

Signature:

Date:

Name:

Occupation:

Signature:

Date:

Plant owner:

Business Unit Manager:

Assessment period:

Key C - Consequence L - Likelihood R - Risk Rating Low Moderate High Very High Page: 3 of 3

Plant Risk Management Toolkit – Mental “Take 2” Attachment No.4.1

QP29.13/4.1 23/06/2014 Page: 1 of 1

QP2

Locatio

Task:

Is there a

If so, lis

P1. Do I u

stepstask?

2. Do I htraini

3. Do I n

4. Is thedepreenerg

5. Are hintrod

6. Do yo

ConfiPerm

EN

7. Haare

eg: Others i

Weathe

Housek

Lighting

9.13/4.2

on:

QP / WI / SOP

st hazards ide

ROCEDURunderstand ts required to ? Yes � No �

have appropng for this ta

Yes � No �

need to isola

Yes � No �

e mechanicalessurised / sgy released?

Yes � No �

hazards goingduced to the

Yes � No �

ou require a ined Space

mit?

Yes � No �

NVIRONMEN

as anything ea changed w

needs to bconsidered

in area?

Yes � No �er conditions?

Yes � No �keeping?

Yes � No �g?

Yes � No �

Plant Ris

for this task?

entified in pro

RE the do the

�

priate ask?

�

ate?

�

l system stored ?

�

g to be area?

�

�

NT

in the which

be d?

� ?

�

�

�

8

9

10

1

12

13

14

DB S O H

sk Managem

Take 5TicWr

Y N ocedure on p

PP. Is extra PP

Yes �

. Are there aedges?

Yes �

0. Do you neany personadornments

Yes �

1. Is respiratneeded?

Yes �

2. Do you remonitor?

Yes �

3. Do you repads for kn

Yes �

MANUAL H

4. Are there handling ha

Yes

Do you need tend / twist?

tretch?

Over-reach?

Handle heavy

ment Toolkit

23/0

5 to 10 minuk ‘YES’ or ‘

rite control m

Ref. Nu

page 2.

PE E required?

� No � ny sharp

� No �

eed to removal s?

� No �

tory protectio

� No � quire a gas

� No � quire knee eeling?

� No �

HANDLING

any manual azards?

� No � to:

Y � N �

Y � N �

Y � N �

y objects? Y � N �

t – Hazard

06/2014

utes to spotNO’ for all qmeasures o

mber: _______

PHYS

ve

on

�

�

�

�

15. Is thmob

16. Is thpinc

17. Is thfalli

18. Slip

19. Tem

20. Is thStre

21. Wor

22. Mateg rstee

23. Are haz

24. Do yMS

Prompt - St

t the hazardquestions

on page 2

______________

SICAL HAZhere any riskbile equipme

Yes � No �

here any riskch points?

Yes � No �

here any riskng?

Yes � No �

pping / TrippinYes � No �

mperature ex

Yes � No �

here a risk ofess? Yes � No �

rk Item FallinYes � No �

terial above frefractory, coelwork Yes � No �

there chemi

zards? Yes � No �

you need anDS?

Yes � No �

teelworks

Date:

ds

_____

ARDS Tk from ent?

�

k from

�

k of

�

ng? �

xtremes?

�

f Heat

�

ng? �

falling? oncrete,

�

cal

�

�

25

26

27

28

29

30

If no

3

32

33

Attach

TOOLS & E5. Do you ha

correct toYes �

6. Does portequipmentag?

Yes �

7. Is mobile a safe con

Yes �

8. Is lighting Yes �

9. Do you resigns?

Yes �

LIFT

0. Is this a coYes �

f yes, use theo, use a dog

1. Are you trthis lift?

Yes �

2. Risk of loaCaptive?

Yes �

3. Is the liftindesigned purpose?

Yes �

ment No.4

Page: 1 of

EQUIPMENave all the ols?

� No �

table nt have curre

� No � equipment inndition?

� No � good?

� No �

equire warnin

� No �

TING

ontrolled lift?� No � e procedure, gger / rigger

rained to do

� No �

ad being

� No �

ng device for this

� No �

.2

f 2

NT

ent

n

ng

?

if

Plant Risk Management Toolkit – Hazard Prompt - Steelworks Attachment No.4.2

QP29.13/4.2 23/06/2014 Page: 2 of 2

OTHER POTENTIAL HAZARDS TO CONSIDER Confined Space Isolation Working at Heights Welding / Cutting Access / Egress Electricity Fire / Explosion Fumes / Vapours / Mists

Engulfment Machinery Tools Road / Rail Traffic Explosive atmosphere Pinch Points Piped Services Weather

Gas Lifting Loads Noise Demolition Atmospheric contaminants

Suspended Loads Dust Interaction with others

Chemical / Biological Hot Work Excavation/Puncture of

Surface

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

Dust Waste disposal Spills

HAZARDS IDENTIFIED IN PROCEDURE:

a

b

c

d

e

f

OTHER HAZARDS:

A

B

C

D

E

F

CONTROLS: Measures taken to overcome the hazards.

Is there a hazard that requires follow up? Yes No

If yes, report to supervisor or complete a Hazard / Near Miss / Incident Report Card.

Names:

QP29.13/4.4

4 8/05/2018

8 Paage: 1 of 1

QP29.13/4

4.5 8/05/20018 PPage: 1 of 1