getting engaged: funding and communication of cso projects in the association process
TRANSCRIPT
Getting Engaged:
funding and communication of
CSO projects in the association process
Chernihiv, 18-21 January 2016
Welcome Back!
3
• Workshop Program
• Warm-up
• Recap Homework
• Coffee Break
• Introduction to PCM
Today‘s Agenda
CiSEP WS 3: Getting Engaged
4
AGENDA
CiSEP WS 3: Getting Engaged
• Intro to Workshop
•Recap WS 2
• Intro to Project Cycle Management
DAY 1
Monday, 18 Jan 2016
•Communication for CSOs in the Association process Ms Marina RAKIC
DAY 2
Tuesday, 19 Jan 2016 • Fundraising and EU Funding Programmes Mr Dragan POPOVIC
DAY 3 Wednesday, 20 Jan
2016
•Wrap up: Brochure
•Overall evaluation
•Closing Ceremony
DAY 4 Thursday, 21 Jan 2016
Workshop Objective: After the workshop you are able to define the Project Cycle Management. You know how to apply communication tools regarding the EU association. You can identify possible fundraising sources and you know the main EU funding programmes relevant for CSO in Ukraine.
5
Questions? Requests?
CiSEP WS 3: Getting Engaged
6
• Search the room for people who fit to one criteria and sign the sheet! The first one completed is the WINNER…
• ATTENTION: you can sign the sheet only once.
Warm-up: Autograph Bingo
CiSEP WS 3: Getting Engaged
Homework Wrap-up
8
Task Description
• Reading Analysis: What does the Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 imply concerning rights and duties of drivers? Where do you see intersections with DCFTA Chapter 13?
• Stakeholder analysis: Who is concerned by the Regulation? Please conduct a stakeholder analysis!
• Problem tree: Design a problem tree, defining causes and effects of the problem described!
DCFTA Chapter 13 European Labour and Social Standards
Homework Wrap-up
9
Social conditions • Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85
• Timetable: the Regulation's provisions shall be implemented in national transport within 5 years of the entry into force of this Agreement.
AA page 1962/2135 Annex XXXII to Title V Chapter 7 Transport
Homework Wrap-up
10
• A problem tree provides an overview to all the known causes (roots) and effects (branches) to an identified problem.
Problem Tree
Homework Wrap-up
MAIN PROBLEM
Cause Cause Cause
Cause Cause
Consequence Consequence
Consequence Consequence
11
Shift plans are not „drivers-friendly“
Authorities do not / cannot enforce the law
Driving and rest hours are not respected
Tachometres are manipulated
Transport undertakings don‘t
compete fairly
Ukrainian law is not harmonzied with Regulation
(EC) No 561/2006
Drivers are tired Competition is not
fair
Fair players can‘t prevail on the
market
Drivers are discontent and sick Accidents
People are hurt and die
Poor quality of services
High (social) costs
Transport undertakings are not
aware of the risks
Homework Wrap-up
12
• An objective tree inverts the problem tree. Causes-Consequences become Means-Goal Relationships.
Objective Tree
Homework Wrap-up
12
Goal
Means Means Means
Means Means
Goal Goal
Goal Goal
13
Shift plans are „drivers-friendly“
Authorities enforce the law
Driving and rest hours are respected
Tachometres are not manipulated
Transport undertakings
compete fairly
Ukrainian law is harmonzied with Regulation (EC) No
561/2006
Drivers are not tired Competition is not
fair
Fair players prevail on the market
Drivers are content and healthy Low rate of
accidents
Low rate of injured people
High quality of services
Lower (social) costs
Transport undertakings are aware of the risks
Homework Wrap-up
14
Дякую за увагу!