geprisp
DESCRIPTION
GEPRISP. Te Kotahitanga. GEPRISP A framework for Te Kotahitanga. G. E. P. R. I. S. P. Goal. Experiences. Positioning. Relationships. Interactions. Strategies. Planning. G. E. P. R. I. S. P. Hui Whakarewa: 3 day induction hui. Goal - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
GEPRISP
Te Kotahitanga
G E P R I S P
Goal Experiences Positioning Relationships Interactions Strategies Planning
GEPRISP
A framework for Te Kotahitanga
Goal To improve Māori students’ educational achievement
Hui Whakarewa: 3 day induction hui
Experiences
of Māori students in education are examined and inform this process
Positioning of teachers within agentic discourses is critical
Relationships that exist in classrooms need to be examined and may need to change
InteractionsCurrent ways of interacting in classrooms may also need to change
Strategies are introduced to create opportunities for different ways of interacting
Plan We need to plan for all this to happen
New strategies can be introduced
Which support the use of different interactions
Which develops new relationships ‘a pedagogy of relations’
Which continues to challenge teachers’ positioning and promote teachers’ agency
Creating new experiences of Māori students being affirmed, valued and academically engaged.
Cycle of in-class observations, feedback, co-construction meetings and shadow-coaching
G E P R I S P
E P R I S PGThe need to improve Māori students’ educational achievement
The need to examine Māori students’ current experiences
The need for agentic positioning
The need for relationships of mutual trust and respect
The need for a wide range of interactions
The need for strategies that support discursive practices
The need to plan for all this to happen
Evidence needed to inform GEPRISP
Measurable increase in Māori students’ educational achievement
Measurable increase in positive experiences for Māori students
Qualitative shifts in thinking from deficit to agentic
Evidence of relationships of caring at three levels: Caring, Expectations and performance
Shifts in interactions from traditional to discursive
Evidence of increase in range and type of co-operative,
dialogic and and
interactive strategies
Evidence of planning: •in-class•in-school•whole school
GOAL: Measurable improvements of Māori students’ participation
Māori student participation indicators may involve data from:
• Attendance records• Suspensions and stand downs• Retention• Exemptions• Referrals
GOAL: Measurable improvements within Māori students’ achievement
Māori student academic achievement evidence may include:
• AsTTle results• Departmental assessment tasks• School-wide assessments• Academic awards / distinctions• National and international assessments• Literacy and numeracy achievements• Classroom assessments
• Evidence about the current schooling experiences of Māori students.
• Evidence of Māori student’s improvements in morale, engagement and participation in learning.
• Use of this evidence in a systematic manner to inform a range of learning and professional outcomes.
EXPERIENCES: Valuing and legitimating Māori students’ educational experiences
• Teachers are able to identify their own positioning in relation to Māori students.
• Teachers reject deficit thinking as a means of explaining Māori students’ educational performance.
• Teachers reject the deficit thinking of others as a means of explaining Māori students’ educational performance.
• Teachers know and understand how to bring about change in Māori students’ educational performance.
POSITIONING: Evidence of agency within teacher positioning
Evidence of the teacher:•caring for Māori students as culturally–located individuals
•demonstrating high expectations for the learning performance of Māori students
•demonstrating high expectations for the behavioural performance of Māori students
•providing a well-managed learning environment
•providing culturally appropriate and culturally responsive
contexts
RELATIONSHIPS: Measurable evidence of relationships of mutual trust and respect
INTERACTIONS: Evidence of a wide range of teaching and learning interactions observed
Whole Individual GroupC
ulture
Co-construction
Feed forward academic
Feedback academic
Prior experience and knowledge
Feed forward behaviour (+/-)
Feedback behaviour (+/-)
Monitoring
Instruction
INTERACTIONS: Evidence of a wide range of teaching and learning interactions observed
Evidence of changes in: •Student engagement in learning•Student work completion•Student-teacher interactions•Teacher location in terms of proximity•Increase in the cognitive level of lessons•Use of Māori students’ prior knowledge and experience •Student involvement in co-construction/ power-
sharing
Strategies may include:•Cooperative learning•Formative assessment and goal setting•Student generated questioning•Integrated curricula•Critical reflection•Ako / Reciprocal Learning•Differentiated learning
STRATEGIES: Evidence of the use of interactive and discursive strategies to create a culturally
responsive context for learning
Evidence of goals and / or action plans at:• an individual level• a department level• a school level
Are goals / action plans Specific, Achievable and Measurable?
Relevant and Time-framed?
What evidence do we have of the relationship
between evidence of outcomes for Māori students, planning and delivery?
PLANNING: Evidence of planning to achieve the goal of raising Māori student achievement and
participation