geothermal power · 2020. 7. 31. · geothermal power ken williamson general manager, geothermal...

41
GEOTHERMAL POWER Ken Williamson General Manager, Geothermal Technology & Services, Unocal Corporation WORKSHOP ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS November 29 - December 1, 2000 Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA GEOTHERMAL GEOTHERMAL POWER POWER Ken Williamson Ken Williamson General Manager, General Manager, Geothermal Technology & Services, Geothermal Technology & Services, Unocal Corporation Unocal Corporation WORKSHOP ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS November 29 - December 1, 2000 Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA

Upload: others

Post on 12-Feb-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • GEOTHERMALPOWER

    Ken Williamson

    General Manager,Geothermal Technology & Services,

    Unocal Corporation

    WORKSHOP ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY SYSTEMSNovember 29 - December 1, 2000

    Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA

    GEOTHERMALGEOTHERMALPOWERPOWER

    Ken WilliamsonKen Williamson

    General Manager,General Manager,Geothermal Technology & Services,Geothermal Technology & Services,

    Unocal CorporationUnocal Corporation

    WORKSHOP ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY SYSTEMSNovember 29 - December 1, 2000

    Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA

  • Heat in the EarthHeat in the Earth (Rybach et al., 2000)(Rybach et al., 2000)

    !! Stored in the earthStored in the earth 10 103131 J J

    !! Beneath continents (

  • Geothermal Power WorldwideGeothermal Power Worldwide

    !! 8 GW8 GWee in 21 nations in 21 nations

    !! 50 TWh 50 TWh generated in 1999

    ! In the last 5 years:– Worldwide increased by 17%

    – U.S. decreased 20%

  • Geothermal Power in U.S.Geothermal Power in U.S.0.38% of Country’s Generation0.38% of Country’s Generation

    !! CaliforniaCalifornia 2,294 MW2,294 MW

    !! NevadaNevada 196 MW 196 MW

    !! HawaiiHawaii 25 MW 25 MW

    !! UtahUtah 31 MW 31 MW

    !! TOTAL TOTAL 2,400 MW2,400 MW

  • HIG H ENTHALPY FIELDS & PRO SPEC TSHIG H ENTHALPY FIELDS & PRO SPEC TS

    Pacific“Ring of

    Fire”

    Pacific“Ring of

    Fire”

  • Exploration

    “Oil seep” analogy

  • Geothermal Fields Developed byGeothermal Fields Developed byUnocalUnocal

    GeysersGeysers

    1100 MW1100 MW

    IndonesiaIndonesia

    330 MW330 MW

    PhilippinesPhilippines

    756 MW756 MWSalton SeaSalton Sea

    80 MW80 MW

  • Geothermal BasicsGeothermal BasicsExtracting the Heat CommerciallyExtracting the Heat Commercially

    !! Water transports heat to surfaceWater transports heat to surface

    !! Naturally fractured rock permits circulationNaturally fractured rock permits circulation

    !! Drill to reach at least 200° CDrill to reach at least 200° C

    !! Future technology may use man-madeFuture technology may use man-madefracturesfractures

  • GEOTHERMAL RESOURCE TYPESGEOTHERMAL RESOURCE TYPES

    !! Liquid-Liquid-dominateddominated

    !! Vapor-Vapor-dominateddominated

    !! Low EnthalpyLow Enthalpy

    !! Hot Dry RockHot Dry Rock

  • Example: Vapor-DominatedExample: Vapor-DominatedHigh Enthalpy ResourceHigh Enthalpy Resource

  • Unocal at The GeysersUnocal at The Geysers1967 -19991967 -1999

    380 wells drilled2.5 trillion lbs steam produced124 billion kWh generated

    186 million bbl oil equiv.

  • Example: Liquid-DominatedExample: Liquid-DominatedHigh Enthalpy ResourceHigh Enthalpy Resource

  • Medan

    S u m a t r a

    Kalimantan Sulawesi

    Jakarta

    SALAK PROJECT

    330 MW

    JAVA

    SALAK PROJECT

    INDEX MAP

    100KM0

    SCALE 1:30.000.000

    Unocal 330 MW in Java, Indonesia

    Liquid-dominated 225 - 310º C

    1 - 3 km deep

  • CROSS-SECTION THROUGH AWIBENGKOK FIELD

  • During Project Life:

    Produce >10 12 lbs steam

    Inject 16 billion bbl brine

  • TurbineandGenerator

  • Proposed Research TimelineProposed Research Timeline2000 - 20302000 - 2030

    »» Optimize exploited geothermal systems &Optimize exploited geothermal systems &reduce development cost of high enthalpy systemsreduce development cost of high enthalpy systems

    »» Locally enhance permeability in the tight marginsLocally enhance permeability in the tight marginsof existing systems (EGS)of existing systems (EGS)

    »» Explore for and develop “hidden” highExplore for and develop “hidden” highenthalpy systems, with no surface featuresenthalpy systems, with no surface features

    »» Develop impermeable systems withDevelop impermeable systems withartificial fracturing (HDR)artificial fracturing (HDR)

    -----> Time-----> Time

  • Optimize exploited geothermalOptimize exploited geothermalsystemssystems

  • Life Cycle of a Geothermal FieldLife Cycle of a Geothermal Field(Lovekin, 1998)(Lovekin, 1998)

    Time ---->

    develop maintain decline sustain

    MW

  • OpportunityOpportunity

    !! Only a fraction (~20%) of available heat isOnly a fraction (~20%) of available heat iscurrently extracted from a high enthalpycurrently extracted from a high enthalpyreservoirreservoir

    !! Smart injection management could greatlySmart injection management could greatlyincrease efficiency and longevityincrease efficiency and longevity

    !! The Salak “natural laboratory” presents aThe Salak “natural laboratory” presents aunique opportunity to examine fractured-unique opportunity to examine fractured-system behaviorsystem behavior

  • ChallengeChallenge

    !! Reservoirs have km-scale fracturing:Reservoirs have km-scale fracturing:»» hard to map permeability at km-scalehard to map permeability at km-scale

    »» heat transfer properties poorly knownheat transfer properties poorly known

    »» current models inadequatecurrent models inadequate

    !! Injected liquids are channeled along fracturesInjected liquids are channeled along fracturesand heat sweep is inefficientand heat sweep is inefficient

  • Re se a rc h:Re se a rc h:

    C ha ra c te rize p e rm e a b ility a nd he a tC ha ra c te rize p e rm e a b ility a nd he a ttra nsfe r in fra c ture d syste m stra nsfe r in fra c ture d syste m s

  • Image Log: Salak Well FMIImage Log: Salak Well FMI

  • 12

    U1,2,3

    U4,5,6

    0 1 Km

    Salak Tracer pathways

  • AWI 4-1 TRACER RETURNS AT AWI 1 WELLS

    0 .0

    0 .5

    1 .0

    1 .5

    2 .0

    2 .5

    3 .0

    3 .5

    - 2 0 0 20 40 60 80 10 0

    Elapsed Tim e s ince Dye Injection on 1/8/99, day

    Co

    nce

    ntr

    atio

    n, p

    pb

    1-3

    1-4

    1-5

    1-6

    1-7

    Tracer Returns at Salak

  • Proposed Research:Proposed Research:Designer tracer cocktailsDesigner tracer cocktails

    !! average path temperatureaverage path temperature

    !! maximum path temperaturemaximum path temperature

    !! surface contact area along flow pathsurface contact area along flow path

  • SALAK NUMERICAL MODEL FEATURES

    WESTERNOUTFLOW

    NORTHERN OUTFLOW

    SOUTHERN OUTFLOW

    SHALLOWEASTERN RESERVOIR

    DEEP WESTERNRESERVOIR

  • Technical Challenge:Technical Challenge:

    Combine sparse, complexCombine sparse, complexdata to predict heat sweep indata to predict heat sweep innaturally fractured systemsnaturally fractured systems

  • Reduce development cost of highReduce development cost of highenthalpy systemsenthalpy systems

  • Reducing development costsReducing development costs

    !! Drilling TechnologyDrilling Technology

    !! Energy Conversion TechnologyEnergy Conversion Technology

  • ChallengesChallenges

    !! Need active continuous drillingNeed active continuous drillingprograms to create improvements inprograms to create improvements indrillingdrilling

    !! Geothermal industry too small to attractGeothermal industry too small to attractresearch in service companiesresearch in service companies

    !! Geothermal turbines are not designedGeothermal turbines are not designedand built in the U.S.and built in the U.S.

  • OpportunitiesOpportunities

    !! SandiaSandia and developers collaborate in and developers collaborate indrilling technologydrilling technology

    !! Remarkable drilling improvements haveRemarkable drilling improvements haveoccurred - more are possibleoccurred - more are possible

  • Drilling Cost Reduction at SalakDrilling Cost Reduction at Salak

    75

    64

    44

    27

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    Units 1 & 2 1995 1996 1997

    DAYS PER WELLAWIBENGKOK EXPANSION

  • GeothermalGeothermal

    The BenefitsThe Benefits

  • Power Plant COPower Plant CO22 Emissions Emissions

    0100200300400500600700800900

    1000

    CO

    2 (k

    g/M

    Wh

    ) Coal

    Oil

    Natural Gas

    UnocalGeothermal

    Fossil fuel data from Goddard and Goddard (1990)Unocal data includes The Geysers

  • Capacity FactorsCapacity Factors

    Source: DOE/Energy Information Agency: data for 1996Source: DOE/Energy Information Agency: data for 1996

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    WindWind SolarSolar Conv.Conv. AverageAverage Biomass/Biomass/ FossilFossil GeothermalGeothermal

    HydroHydro MSWMSW

    PercentagePercentage

  • U.S. Government RoyaltiesU.S. Government Royalties

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    W ind Solar Biomass G eothermal

    $ Millions$ Millions

  • ConclusionsConclusions

    !! Ultimate geothermal resource is hugeUltimate geothermal resource is huge

    !! Present research focus should be:Present research focus should be:–– extend life of existing fields,extend life of existing fields,

    –– reduce cost of developing new high enthalpyreduce cost of developing new high enthalpyprojectsprojects

    !! Artificially stimulated systems (HDR/EGS)Artificially stimulated systems (HDR/EGS)hold greatest opportunity in the long termhold greatest opportunity in the long term

    !! HDR/EGS research should focus onHDR/EGS research should focus ontechnology which can be tested in existingtechnology which can be tested in existingfieldsfields

  • The End