geothermal discussion: office of energy security

12
Geothermal Discussion CERTS 2009 February 11, 2009 Jeff Haase

Upload: clean-energy-resource-teams

Post on 14-Jan-2015

412 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Geothermal Discussion: Office of Energy Security

Geothermal Discussion CERTS 2009

February 11, 2009 Jeff Haase

Page 2: Geothermal Discussion: Office of Energy Security

2

Energy Conservation Policy Goal

…achieve annual energy savings equal to 1.5 percent of annual retail energy sales of electricity and natural gas directly through:– energy conservation improvement programs; and – rate design

and indirectly through:– energy codes and appliance standards;– programs designed to transform the market or change

consumer behavior;– energy savings resulting from efficiency improvements to the

utility infrastructure and system;– and other efforts to promote energy efficiency and energy

conservation.

Page 3: Geothermal Discussion: Office of Energy Security

3

MN Geothermal Report

• Funded to develop a comparison to conventional systems: – natural gas and conventional AC

• The report evaluated:– Emissions– Economics

• Due to funding limitations the dataset for the report was modeled

Page 4: Geothermal Discussion: Office of Energy Security

4

Geothermal Challenges

• High up-front costs associated with the well field– Other parts of the system are similar in

cost to traditional equipment– Infrastructure investment that stays

with the house

• Comparison to natural gas and air cooled AC

• Variability of well field installation

Page 5: Geothermal Discussion: Office of Energy Security

5

GSHP & Solar PV

• In some respects the challenges of these two technologies are similar– High up front cost– Site specific installation– Technology advocates– Low operating costs

Page 6: Geothermal Discussion: Office of Energy Security

6

GSHP Viability with Building load

Building Heating/Cooling Load

Viability

Low Load High Load

Page 7: Geothermal Discussion: Office of Energy Security

7

GSHP Viability with Building Efficiency

Building Efficiency

Viability

Inefficient Very Efficient

Page 8: Geothermal Discussion: Office of Energy Security

8

Energy savings goals

Regional emissions will continue to decrease with increased renewable energy on the system

Page 9: Geothermal Discussion: Office of Energy Security

9

Energy System Changes

• More renewables are expected to make up utility generation portfolios.

• Wind has characteristics that are synergistic with GSHP.

• The high EERs that GSHP can deliver in the summer months help to offset very expensive power.

Page 10: Geothermal Discussion: Office of Energy Security

10

When should you take a closer look?

• Electric space heating• High heating/cooling load• Cheap well field install

– Land for horizontal installation– Pond or lake loop installation

• Favorable utility rates– Space heating, GSHP or Dual Fuel

• Aversion to combustion sources

Page 11: Geothermal Discussion: Office of Energy Security

11

Other considerations

• Efficiency, efficiency, efficiency• It’s all about cost

– The well field

• Quality installation• Long term financing• Tax credits

Page 12: Geothermal Discussion: Office of Energy Security

Thank You! Jeff Haase

[email protected] 651.297.5648