geophysical expressions of ore systems · methodology technique airborne surface borehole marine...

33
© Condor Consulting 2014 Geophysical Expressions of Ore Systems Our Current Understanding Saskatchewan Geological Open House December 2, 2014 Ken Witherly Condor Consulting, Inc.

Upload: others

Post on 23-Oct-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    Geophysical Expressions of Ore Systems Our Current Understanding

    Saskatchewan Geological Open House

    December 2, 2014

    Ken Witherly

    Condor Consulting, Inc.

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    The business challenge

    MinEx Consulting

    Depth of cover for base metals discoveries

    (>0.1% Cu-equiv.) made in Western world

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    The business challenge

    Depth to top of ore body for (>0.1 Moz) gold

    discoveries made in Western world

    MinEx Consulting

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    The business challenge

    Average depth of cover for discoveries-all metals

    Western world: 2003-2012

    MinEx Consulting

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    The business opportunity

    Jon Hronsky (2009)

    Modeling for a Voisey’s Bay style orebody in remote WA (30 Mt @ 2.5% Ni, 2% Cu; 20 m thick, 60° dip)

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    The business opportunity

    Courtesy of D Wood (after Chitombo)

    Planned or possible Super Block Caves

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    Defining the Foot Print/Foot Path

    Modified from Australian Academy of Sciences (2010)

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    Defining the Foot Print/Foot Path

    Modified from Australian Academy of Sciences (2010)

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    In the range of 0 - 250 m

    Ford et al. (2007)

    Matrix of geophysical techniques

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    In the range of 250 m - 1.5 km

    METHODOLOGY TECHNIQUE AIRBORNE SURFACE BOREHOLE MARINE

    POTENTIAL FIELDS Magnetics X X X X

    Gravity X (limited

    bandwidth)

    X X X

    ELECTROMAGNETICS

    (EM)

    active source X (limited

    bandwidth)

    X X limited

    passive X (limited

    bandwidth)

    X ? limited

    ELECTRICAL resistivity ø X X limited

    chargeability X (limited

    bandwidth)

    X X limited

    SEISMIC seismic ø X X X

    Ø = not applicable X = nominal

    Matrix of geophysical techniques-II

    Condor Consulting

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    Some hope…

    1.8 km

    Conductive

    shale ZTEM 2D inversion

    ZTEM 3D inversion

    ZTEM airborne EM mapping conductive horizon at 1.8 km

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    Going to depth…

    “We can see deep but things are blurry”

    Joel Jansen-Teck

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    Logging while drilling

    Hillis (2012)

    Plans of the DET-CRC; coil tube drilling and log-while drilling

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    Cheng et al. (2009)

    Logging while drilling…the hope

    With more petrophysical information…

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    Cheng et al. (2009)

    Logging while drilling…the hope

    …better subsurface models can be produced with a

    higher likelihood of successful testing

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    Examples-porphyry Cu-Au-Bingham Deposit-Utah

    Steinberger et al. (2013)

    Geology

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    Examples-porphyry Cu-Au-Bingham Deposit-Utah

    Steinberger et al. (2013)

    TMI-RTP Geological model derived from TMI-RTP

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    Examples-porphyry Cu-Au-Pebble Alaska

    Anderson et al. (2013)

    TMI-RTP

    TMI-RTP

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    Examples-porphyry Cu-Au-Pebble Alaska

    Anderson et al. (2013) TMI-RTP

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    McMonnies and Gerrie (2007)

    Examples-porphyry Cu-Au-Resolution Arizona

    Geology MT section; unconstrained inversion

    MT section; constrained inversion

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    Townsend et al. (2010)

    Examples-Carlin gold-Carlin Nevada

    Mapping structures & stratigraphy

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    Unconformity uranium model

    JNR Uranium

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    Variations in physical properties; density; either high or low.

    Jefferson et al. 2006

    Low density halo High density halo

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    Features not seen before and as yet unexplained

    Condor Consulting

    ~10 km

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    Features not seen before and as yet unexplained

    Condor Consulting

    ~10 km

    But no conductor!

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    Features not seen before and as yet unexplained

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    Data Integration

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    Data Integration

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    Data integration will be critical; but real integration is much more than simply having all your data on the same ‘bus’ (platform)…

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    The HR issues are significant!

    Condor Consulting

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    Where we are…

    • The concept of mineral systems in now 20 years old-ideas take time to

    gain acceptance.

    • The geophysical signatures of mineral systems are now starting to

    be recognized.

    • Some deposit styles will have larger signatures than others.

    • Subsurface information will be critical to effective vectoring.

    • Data integration will be judged on the metric that the whole is

    greater than the sum of the parts…

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    Acknowledgments

    • Cam McCuaig, Graham Closs and Richard Schodde have provided much

    insight into the issues related to undercover exploration.

  • © Condor Consulting 2014

    There is hope!

    Undercover 2020-Sept 2010

    Geologists working with geophysical data to map undercover porphyry Cu-Au systems.