geological survey covering montcalm #2 group · 2017. 1. 17. · montcalm township is contained in...

42B09SE0003 2.2543 MONTCALM 010

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

covering

MONTCALM #2 GROUP

Hollinger Mines Limited

Timmins, Ontario November 14, 1977

D. R. Alexander

Area Mines Ltd.

2 mi. .- '.'v.. '-.

MONTCALM #2

C. C. Hu&i'on .j8 Assoc

Area Mines Ltd.MONTCALM TWP.

STRACHAN TWP

Scale l" "'2640' or O, (1:31,680)

8 kit

CLAIM SKETCH

SOUTHWESTERN MONTCALM TOWNSHIP showing

MONTCALM #2 GROUP and

Properties Discussed Under 'Previous Worki

- l -

INTRODUCTION:

During the period July 26-29, 1977, a geological

survey was carried out across the Montcalm #2 property in

Montcalm Township. The writer was ably assisted during the

course of the survey, as well as during subsequent compilation

and interpretation by P. J. Bateman.

The Montcalm #2 property consists of fifteen, con

tiguous, unpatented mining claims in southwestern Montcalm

Township, approximately 65 kilometers (40 miles) west-northwest

of Timmins. The claims covered by the survey include:

P.492012-016 inclusive; P.492022-025 inclusive

and P.451078-083 inclusive.

The property is effectively only accessible by helicopter

- an area around the outcrop in the west-central part of the group

being the most suitable for landing. '

TOPOGRAPHY:

Characteristic to most areas north of Timmins, the

southeastern portion of the property is covered by spruce, alder-

spruce and alder swamps. The more western areas of the property, however, support thick growths of spruce, poplar, birch and alders

with tangles of cedar and alders adjacent to the creek margins.

The variance in relief across the property amounts to

some 20 metres, from the spruce-poplar ridges to the clay banks

of the creek bed.

PREVIOUS WORK:

Upon the discovery of a copper-nickel deposit by

Teck Corporation in September, 1976, a large area was staked,

covering parts of Montcalm, Strachan, Nova, Belford, Watson

and Poulett Townships. Most of the work initiated by that

staking, however, is still pending.

At any rate, a few companies have previously explored

the area, with the work of Area Mines Limited and C.C. Ruston

and Associates being most pertinent to the Hollinger group.

The earliest recorded assessment work was completed

by C.C. Ruston and Associates. In 1956, their property

encompassed 173 claims around the Montcalm-Strachan-Nova-Belford

Township corner. Based on geophysical results, four holes were drilled in Belford Township encountering a mixed sequence of

medium to coarse grained andesitic flows and metasediments

{arkose and greywacke members).

Circa 1964, Area Mines Limited held several claim groups

in Montcalm and Belford Townships. Subsequent to completing

magnetic and electromagnetic surveys, several holes were drilled.

North of the present Montcalm #2 property, one hole

was drilled into a quartz-chlorite schist in contact with

porphyritic to chloritized rhyolite. No expression of an electro^

magnetic anomaly was noted in the drill hole, although the depth

of overburden (205' vertical), suggests that any response was

probably not related to bedrock.West of Montcalm #2, in Belford Township, Area Mines

Limited drilled four holes into a zone of graphitic-rhyolitic

tuffs in contact with fine to medium grained andesitic flows

and pillow lavas. Traces of pyrite, pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite

and sphalerite were encountered across the rhyolitic-graphitic

zone - sulphides being more erratically distributed in the

andesitic volcanics.

- 4 -

Intruding the volcanic complex is an extensive zone

of mafic to ultramafic intrusives. The intrusive body forms

a rather crude ring shape, extending southwest from the Teck

deposit in Montcalm Township into Strachan and Nova Townships before swinging northwest in Belford Township (see plan following).

Data available suggest that the body ranges from diorite to serpentinite in composition.

The portion of this unit outcropping on Montcalm #2, is best described as a gabbro. Megascopically, the rock is composed of feldspar, hornblende and chlorite with minute grains of magnetite and the odd speck of biotite. The gabbro is dark grey green to dark green in colour, granular in texture, and locally carbonatized. Grain size varies from fine to coarse - the intrusive being crudely zoned into coarse, medium and fine grained sections. The coarser grained phases are generally more magnetic. Rare traces of pyrite and pyrrhotite were seen in surface exposures.

A second intrusive event, in this case felsic intrusives, is commonly recognized across the Montcalm-Belford area. Without

regard for the Kapuskasing sequence of granulite gneisses, exposures of felsic intrusives are presumed to be part of the Algoman Orogenic period.

The sequence includes rocks of granitic and monzonitic

composition with occasional pegmatitic, gneissic and migmatitic

phases.

All of the aforementioned units are cut by a series of

tension related(?) diabase dykes - the youngest intrusive event

noted. These intrusives are profuse throughout the Timmins area,

occurring in narrow, north to northwesterly trending dykes.

The diabase varies from fine to coarse grained andis typically ophitic textured. These dykes' characteristic strike

and high magnetic susceptibility allow fairly easy recognition in

most magnetic surveys.

Geology of the Montcalm Township copper nickel discovery, showing previous surveys which just missed the anomaly, and the Dighem survey which revealed It

x ^ location of Montcalm #2

after Canadian Mining Journal, April 1977; p.24

- 5 -

STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY:

Since the geological history in the area is long and complex, it is difficult to sort out the sequence of structural events in more than a generalized sense. As an

aid, those structural features (basically faults), shown on the government publications for the area, have been adopted -

modified only by interpretations on the regional magnetics,

and projections of existing structures onto the property.

Using this method, three phases of faulting have been recognized:

an fi trending north to northwesterly

±2 trending northeasterly

and f3 trending east to east-southeasterly

In several instances, the f2 system traverses the

edge of the mafic intrusive while having little or no effect

on the Algoman granites. This roughly suggests a period in

which the f2 system takes place. Further, the f3 system

clearly offsets both gabbro and granite.

Without continuity of surface outcrop or diamond

drilling, conclusions regarding the mechanics of folding are

extremely tenuous. Thus, from the information at hand, the

structural-depositional history appears to proceed as:

- 6 -

l Erosion and Glacial Deposition —— Large Unconformity ———

PRECAMBRIAN

Proterozoic

faulting and folding (?)

Archean

late Archean diabasic intrusives- Intrusive contact -

Algoman:i

faulting(?) and associated folding(?)felsic intrusives - granite to monzonite

- faulting ( ±2 ? )- Intrusive contact -

mafic intrusives - diorite to serpentinite faulting

- Intrusive contact -

Keewatin:felsic volcanics - flows, pyroclastics and metasediments

mafic volcanics - flows, pyroclastics and metasediments

- 7 -

ECONOMIC GEOLOGY:

The property was acquired to investigate the' Cu-Ni potential of the mafic to ultramafic intrusive, in view of the Teck Corporation discovery. Exploration by Teck, up to March 1977, led to the following preliminary working hypotheses:

" In the drilling to date, two different types of mafic rock have been recognized. One of these is a medium to coarse-grained, equigranular rock of dioritic composition containing about 75 per cent plagioclase, 25 per cent uralitized pyroxene and from O to 5 per cent free quartz. This rock does not contain more than traces of sulphides. The other group is a suite of medium to fine-grained, commonly porphyritic rocks of pyroxenitic to gabbroic composition. They contain all the known sulphide mineralization. Banding is pronounced, with individual bands between l and 10 m thick. Each band has a mafic, sulphide-rich base and grades upward to a more felsic rock with lesser amounts of sulphide. Up to 10 such bands have been identified in individual drill holes.

,,, ,, Principal sulphides in order of decreasing abundance, are pyrrhotite, pentlandite and chalco pyrite. Small amounts of pyrite are present and trace amounts of violarite and valleriite have been identified in polished sections. Sulphides range in abundance from massive to disseminated. Primary

{1) CMJ, April 1977, p.28.

- 8 -

features such as brecciation and filling of skeletal plagioclase phenocrysts by sulphides have been observed. Chalcopyrite has in part been remobilized forming wisps and stringers that cross-cut earlier textures.

The sulphide body as outlined by drilling is about 325 m in length, extends to at least 300 m below surface, is open at depth and averages 25 m in thickness (both zones combined). The maximum true thickness intersected is 75 m. The sulphide body strikes N-S and dips from 80OE to 800W. A number of late, gouge filled faults have been observed in drill core, but no major offsets are indicated. '

The Montcalm #2 property lies on the same flank of the mafic intrusive as the Teck discovery, although ground magnetics suggest that the dyke may be fingering out here - a possible undesirable effect. At any rate, the similar geological environment suggests that follow up should proceed on most potential targets.

CONCLUSIONS:

Considering that the geophysical surveys have not, as yet, been completed, any attempt to summarize the potential of the property would be precipitous.

HOLLINGER EXPLORATION

- 9 -

SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHYl

Bennett, G. (1969) - Geology of the Belford-Strachan Area, Dist, of Cochrane; Ont. Dept. of Mines, Geol. Kept. 78, ace, by maps 2181, 2182.

Blecha, M., Thalenhorst, H, and Komura, A. (1977) -

Teck's Montcalm copper nickel deposit : AEM survey brings major discovery; Cdn. Mng. Jour. April, 1977 pp. 21-28.

Graham, A.R. (1931) - Groundhog-Kamiscotia Area,Dist, of Cochrane; Ont. Dept. of Mines, Vol. 40,

pt 3. pp. 23-37., ace. by map 40c.

i Ont. Dept. of Mines and Geol. Survey of Can. (1963) -

Elf Lake Sheet, Dist, of Cochrane; Aeromagnetic Series Map 2265G, Scale: l" = i mile.

Assessment files - Resident Geologist's Office, Timmins.

• II m l m m m ; — .-- - -- --

42B09SE0003 2 .2543 MONTCALM 020

REPORT

on a

GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY

MONTCALM No. 2 GROUP

Hollinger Mines Limited Montcalm Township, Ontario


H.Z. Tittley, P.Eng.

Oi //t 31 VOS

mvno

808*1 0*608*.

.l..L-rf.... . *! 19908*!" *9908," | "908^ , " ~S "J

! L .

f/OSOIC* t SiOIS* SiOlS*

- fqze* SIOZ6* i *ioza* " tiozs*C

r——s,....:-;--——"J——-21- ——--

81608* i iieoeW/'^oe*

. —— -- " - - - ——— --t- - ——•-

J 100*6* J900Z6* i V

l l I.W

'di 'd ^ ___

looze* Tzooze* coozs* f*ooz6*

INTRODUCTION^

A ground electromagnetic survey was conducted over a small group of claims west of Timmins, Ontario.

Several conductive zones were mapped by the horizontal loop electromagnetic method but most of these appear to lie within a conductive overburden that appears to be present.

Three anomalous zones are selected for further geophysical investigations.

PROPERTY, LOCATION and ACCESS

The Montcalm No. 2 Group was ̂ staked by Hollinger Mines Limited during October 1977 and consisted of 15 claims numbered P-451078 to P-451083, P-492012 to P-492016 and P-492022 to P-492025, all inclusive. During August 1977, claims P-500644 to P-500646 inclusive were added to bring the total to 18 claims

The property lies between the Groundhog and Ivanhoe Rivers near the southwest corner of Montcalm Township, Porcupine Mining Division. Timmins is 42 miles to the east.

Access to the property was provided by helicopters from Timmins to widenings of the creek bed in the west part of the group.

On the more recently staked claims, near the south- east corner, there are old logging roads that lead to the Groundhog River near an old logging camp. From here along the poorly maintained Spruce Falls road it is 31 miles to Highway 101,

- 2 -

HISTORY and GEOLOGY

The only evidence of previous mineral exploration work on the property is the presence of older grid lines in the easterly and westerly claims.

A summary of previous work in the area of southwest Montcalm Township is contained in a separate report on the geology of the group recently submitted by Hollinger Mines Limited. This report is by D.R. Alexander and entitled "Geological Survey covering Montcalm 12 Group".

SURVEY METHODS

Linecutting:

i From a campsite along the creek, a line approximately

normal to the long axis of the creek was measured westerly for 175 feet. At a right angle a line was extended north for 1100 feet and to the south for 1200 feet. At this latter point, the 00 Base Line was turned off, again at a right angle, and extended westerly for 1600 feet to a point called 20W and easterly to 48E. The north tie line at 23N became sub-parallel but was extended easterly and westerly approximately the same distances.

Along the 00 B.L., lines 400 feet apart were extended grid north and south to cover all the claims. Stations were established at intervals of 100 feet.

H.E.M. Survey:

On the existing grid of lines, the H.E.M. survey was conducted using an EM-17 electromagnetic unit manufactured by

- 3 -

Geonics Limited of Toronto. Readings were taken at every 100 feet or less with the coi^.s in the horizontal co-planar mode and 400 feet apart.

RESULTS

The results of the survey are plotted and interpreted on the accompanying plan entitled H.E.M. Survey at a scale of l inch to 200 feet.

Although many conductive zones are interpreted, most of these display such poorly conductive characteristics or such low amplitudes that they cannot be reliably attributed to bedrock features.

Anomalies A, B, and C should be selected for further examination, especially anomaly C where it crosses line 4W. At this point, a higher conductivity is displayed that may suggest a bedrock source.

RECOMMENDATIONS and CONCLUSIONS

Anomalies A and B should be reviewed against future magnetic and vertical loop electromagnetic results.

A grid of lines 200 feet apart, oriented to thesouth east, should cover anomaly C prior to combined geophysical examinations consisting initially of vertical and horizontal loop electromagnetic and magnetic surveys.

- 4 -

The electromagnetic survey successfully detected a conductive zone in the northwest corner of the property that may be due to a concentration of economic sulphide mineralization. Further work is warranted.

Respectfully submitted,

H. Z. Tittley, P.Eng.

42B09SE0C03 2.2543 MONTCALM 030

REPORT

on a

GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY

MONTCALM No. 2 GROUP

Hollinger Mines Limited Montcalm Township, Ontario


H.Z. Tittley, P.Eng,

(

MONTCALM

480944 j 492742 J 452741 J | 4BOT2""""

480975:1? )) F* IJL S,*" Jj 480972480700 480709 .|4807I3

480977 l 480978 l

if. I P.46098I

-v:-^-,.-v. -i--;----- 4- — -^-

480704 t 480709 480669- — - - —l- - — — — T* ~ — ——-

^ .J i 4606 J9p! 480640

STRACHAN

CLAIM MAP

SCALE 1" TO 2640'

INTRODUCTION

A ground electromagnetic survey was conducted over a small group of claims west of Timmins, Ontario.

Several conductive zones were mapped by the horizontal loop electromagnetic method but most of these appear to lie within a conductive overburden that appears to be present.

Three anomalous zones are selected for further geophysical investigations.

PROPERTY, LOCATION and ACCESS

The Montcalm No. 2 Group was staked by Hollinger Mines Limited during October 1977 and consisted of 15 claims numbered P-451078 to P-451083, P-492012 to P-492016 and P-492022 to P-492025, all inclusive. During August 1977, claims P-500644 to P-500646 inclusive were added to bring the total to 18 claims

The property lies between the Groundhog and Ivanhoe Rivers near the southwest corner of Montcalm Township, Porcupine Mining Division. Timmins is 42 miles to the east.

Access to the property was provided by helicopters from Timmins to widenings of the creek bed in the west part of the group.

On the more recently staked claims, near the south- east corner, there are old logging roads that lead to the Groundhog River near an old logging camp. From here along the poorly maintained Spruce Falls road it is 31 miles to Highway 101.

- 2 -

HISTORY and GEOLOGY

The only evidence of previous mineral exploration work on the property is the presence of older grid lines in the easterly and westerly claims.

A summary of previous work in the area of southwest Montcalm Township is contained in a separate report on the geology of the group recently submitted by Hollinger Mines Limited. This report is by D.R. Alexander and entitled "Geological Survey covering Montcalm #2 Group".

SURVEY METHODS

Linecutting:

i From a campsite along the creek, a line approximately

normal to the long axis of the creek was measured westerly for 175 feet. At a right angle a line was extended north for 1100 feet and to the south for 1200 feet. At this latter point, the 00 Base Line was turned off, again at a right angle, and extended westerly for 1600 feet to a point called 20W and easterly to 48E. The north tie line at 23N became sub-parallel but was extended easterly and westerly approximately the same distances.

Along the 00 B.L., lines 400 feet apart were extended grid north and south to cover all the claims. Stations were established at intervals of 100 feet.

H.E.M. Survey:

On the existing grid of lines, the H.E.M. survey was conducted using an EM-17 electromagnetic unit manufactured by

- 3 -

Geonics Limited of Toronto. Readings were taken at every 100 feet or less with the coils^ in the horizontal co-planar mode and 400 feet apart.

RESULTS

The results of the survey are plotted and interpreted on the accompanying plan entitled H.E.M. Survey at a scale of l inch to 200 feet.

Although many conductive zones are interpreted, most of these display such poorly conductive characteristics or such low amplitudes that they cannot be reliably attributed to bedrock features.

Anomalies A, B, and C should be selected for further examination, especially anomaly C where it crosses line 4W. At this point, a higher conductivity is displayed that may suggest a bedrock source.

RECOMMENDATIONS and CONCLUSIONS

Anomalies A and B should be reviewed against future magnetic and vertical loop electromagnetic results.

A grid of lines 200 feet apart, oriented to the

south east, should cover anomaly C prior to combined geophysical examinations consisting initially of vertical and horizontal loop electromagnetic and magnetic surveys.

- 4 -

The electromagnetic survey successfully detected a conductive zone in the northwest corner of the property that may be due to a concentration of economic sulphide mineralization. Further work is warranted.

Respectfully submitted,

H. Z. Tittley, P.Eng.

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey (s). Township or Area. Claim Holder(s)—

GeologicalMontcalm Township

Hollinger Mines LimitedBox 320, Timmins , Ont. P4N 7E2

Hollinger Mines Limited ____Author of Report Dale R. AlexanderAddress of Author c/o Hollinger Mines LimitedCovering Dates of Survey. July 26-29, 1977

Total Miles of Line(linecutting to office)

12.51 miles

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer.-—Radiometric———Other-—————

DAYSper claim

Geological. 20

Geochemical.AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit* do not apply to airborne turveyi)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per ci;

HATE.. NOV. 23 f 1 977 SIGNATURE:

Res. Geol.. . Qualifications.Previous Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

ix) (number)

P ,- 451078

451079

451080

451081

451082

451083

492012

492013

492014

4^2015.

492016

492022,

492023

.492024.

492025

l

TOTAL CLAIMS. 15

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations —————————————————————————.Number of Readings Station interval ___________________________JLine spacing-^--^. Profile scale_______________________________ ,._____,

U

O

Contour interval.

Instrument —

W J W

so

Accuracy — Scale constant.Z Diurnal correction method.

Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value ———.

U Instrument ———HW Coil configurationZ*

Coil separation —Accuracy.s Method: D Fixed transmitter d Shoot back CD In line O Parallel line;Frequency-

Specify V.L.F. nation)Parameters measured.

InstrumentScale constant.Corrections made.

Z

H

wuQ Z

Base station value and location

Elevation accuracy.

Instrument ————Method D Time Domain D Frequency Domain Parameters — On time __________________________ Frequency ^———

- Off time ___________________________ Range ————————

— Delay time ————————————————————————— Integration time.

Power.Electrode array.Electrode spacing . Type of electrode

Ontario



m.



Type of Survey(s). Township or Area. Claim Holder(s)—

Geophysical-Electromagnetic ———-—Montcalm Township———— Hollinger Mines Limited______Box 320, Timmins, Ont. P4N 7E2

Survey Company. Hollinger Mines Limited H. Z. TittleyAuthor of Report -

Address of A..thnr 1 47 Hemlock Street, Timmins, Ont.

Covering Dates of Survey June 10 - November 23, 1977(linecutting to office)

12.3 milesTotal Miles of Line Cut.



Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer-™—Radiometric———Other______

DAYS per claim

40

Geological.Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit! do not apply to airborne turveyt)

Magnetometer____Electromagnetic _____ Radiometric(enter days per claim)

. Nov. 23, 1977 SIGNATURE:.Author of/Report or Agent

L- P

Res. Geol.. . Qualifications.Previous Surveys


MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED Lilt numerically

(number)

- 451078*****tt***t*************4

451079

451080

451081

451082

451083

492012

492013

492014

492015

492016

492022

492023

492024

492025

TOTAL CLAIMS——15.



Number of Stations. Station interval ——— Profile scale .———Contour interval.

685 589100 feet or less

.Number of Readings —JLine spacing______400 feet

u Instrument.Accuracy — Scale constant. Diurnal correction method.Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value -—-——

SSy

InstrumentCoil configuration Coil separation —— Accuracy ———^— Method: Frequency————.

Geonics EM*-17Horizontal Co-Planar

400 feetReal Component ± 2* f Imaginary Component t3l

Q Fixed transmitter 1600 Hertz

D Shoot back S3 In line D Parallel line;

Parameters measured.(specify V.L.F. station)

Real or In*-Phase and Imaginary or Out~0f-Phase

O

Instrument

Scale constant.

Corrections made.

Base station value and location.

Elevation accuracy.

H S

Q bi U

01

Instrument ————————— Method Q Time Domain Parameters — On time ——.

- Off time —^— Delay time ———— Integration time.

D Frequency Domain _ Frequency ̂ _____ Range.—.——.-—.

Power.Electrode array — Electrode spacing . Type of electrode

Ontario





Type of Survey(s). Township or Area. Claim Holder(s)—

Geophysical^-Electromagnetic ____Montcalm Township-———^ Hollinger Mines LimitedBox 320, Timmins, Ont, P4N 7E2

Survey company Hollinger Mines LimitedH. Z. TittleyAuthor of Report —

Address of Ai.ri.nr 147 Hemlock Street, Timmins, Ont.Covering Dates of Survey Sept. l to Nov. 2 3, 1 977

(linecutting to office)2.67 milesTotal Miles of Line Cut.



Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer...—Radiometric———Other—————,

DAYS per claim

40

Geological.Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit, do not apply to airborne turveyi)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic iometnc(enter day* per claim)

. Nov. 23,1977 SIGNATURE:S f Author of

L-DRes. Geol.. . Qualifications.Previous Surveys



(number)

500645

500646

l

TOTAL CLAIMS.



Number of Stations ______181________________Number of Readings _____159Station interval 100 feet or less___________Line spacing_______400 feet

Profile scale_______________________________________,,————.,.—..—.,^.^^Contour interval.

Instrument —

u

lJ w

Accuracy — Scale constant. Diurnal correction method.Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value ———

Instrument Geonics EM-17Coil configuration Horizontal-Co-PlanarCoil separation ________4QO feetAccuracy____Real Component ± 2*, Imaginary Component ±3%__________^

Method: D Fixed transmitter D Shoot back 03 In line Q Parallel lineFrequency_____1600 Hertz_______________________________________'———

(specify V.L.F, station)Parameters measured Real (In-Phase) and Imaginary (Out-Of-Phase)________^

Instrument —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————hScale constant ——Corrections made.

>

o

N

S*

Base station value and location .

Elevation accuracy.

Instrument _____________________________________,————————S Method D Time Domain D Frequency DomainO :H Parameters — On time __________________________ Frequency -

- Off time _________________:________ Range.— Delay time ————————————————————————— Integration time.

Power ——^^—-——.-——^——.Electrode array — Electrode spacing . Type of electrode

NOTES

400' surface rights reservation along the shores of all lakes and rivers.

DATE OR ISSUE

DEC - 81977

SURVEYS AND MAPPING

POULETT Tp. M.I063

8M4

7 M -f

6 M -H

Is-

IOto 5M -h

Q.I-

Q (TOLL.-l LU CD

4M -L

2 M 4

BM 7M 6 M 5M 4M 3 M 2 M l Mi R

499287 l 499268

499290

499293

\

499294' ~ ~" ~ ~ t''

499309

Isl UmK ^

0346

9289

9295— — —

93.0

— — -

479659

P ^

460345D

48034T

p

480570U*-p.L 4805711 Pi r111 499302l

i 11l

47966O| 479661P"-"^."*-"1

460344 480343-^.-- .-^-..HP. P

480348 460339-----*------ R P.

480569 480568 .....t------P. P.480372 480373

l P11l1 499303l

46 C 342V" ^

4B034I-------P.

48UJ40

IP.11] 460567! pT ~~~~

J 480374

ii

491146 '-----JP 1

1

491130v—460563

V-^ — - -.

P.

^ 480566

P.

1 460575

491147 J— — —

IP i P i j P i p IP |p IP i1 149114/9 "li l ! 'VI l 491148 l -A 1499301,499298,480747 l 480746 |N

.U - - ̂ - 'I. 4- -l———J-——-J----^----!---J

OS'10"a p p r d i

48 0 42'49'

p Vi" '49M53^ 499300|499299

T

491154 j 491155 1491156 \ g~"~~491157 ! 491158 | 491159 [ O ! 4B0749 1480741 1480740 1480739 l- — -!——i——* L i____-J--.--,1

, ft |P IP L- —l— - — — i , p l P l-l- 8 M

491160 l 491161 i 491.62 U-L - — —teMT ifl

451069 ' 480738] 499722 | 499723'

499312

P

499311 j/'

479939 1479940 l 479944 '479945' 479947 '1 'li _^___ — — -u ———i~7~T p l P ~I

l 494701 j 494702 |4952I8^ l 495 * 1̂ !

494704 .494703 V 495220

i R r-1479938 |479941i s _ _,— _ — — l—— — — l— —

P [P IPl l

479934 i 479937 j 479942W52679

IPl ' l ' 'l 479948 |498744 498743 1498742] 496741 jl———-l--.-^4-^^^L — .l ——___ .IP i P T p r- p -j p—t l i li

301479949 |4985S9 498560 ] 49856 l [496740 j

——— -U--i-___J____ \----\a l p l p . p ,• 4-p479950

\V

491224 |49I225 l4SI226' i

--- — _ j __ _ ,- .x.,— __ .JP i P l P l

452683 l 4 " 632 I452667T1-î~-i.-H--'-'l l 1452691 1437992 f 437993 ( l 479951

'3933951 437999 , L.____—l———s—-l— ———-r,— r s~~ t" 1 r

I498558J498557 J498562 J498T39 |

i i j__L---IlV""'r"p~i p T p l* i i i480122 ',498556 4ge563 ' 496738

1496555 |498564

4-7 M

P Pi ' l

491237 .491238 447977 (447978 J447979

' l ' ' ' j ' ,498893 |4479B3 1447982 1447981 1447960

l l l l.----L l L i

3597 j,,.,.. 438000 ! "7,94 | Wn. l""",.7"" , 4 a™ ; ____ J^ 1C J_i _ _ — —J — — — — ' — " ~ — . T ! ! y*

. . "^~ P 1i p

r

P u j p. JP IR

l 452684 j 452685 j 452686 ]4526B9 ] 479953 ! 4 79964 | 479959 j 479958

P~ l

U52688 j 452687 l 4 5829B j 458299 j 458300 147996314799601479957593405

-—-—,--.- L——J. — — .J —- —P. Tp Ip Ip jl l l l393407 ! 393406 \ 4 58305 j 458304 j 458303

---l—---r — ~-r

45830E .458301

P l R

479962 l 479961 '.4799S

l P

'5/04516 504517/1

y

/~^-

\j80395

80402

S

- — f —— - — ̂ ^——^^^-^

P, [p. P

( i

430396 '480397 4BO398

P. 'P. 1 P. l 1

480401 l 48O4OO 480399

480021 480020

P P.

u-fSOOli, 4B0023~" - - ---|------P. P.

480025 480024•p--" -p

480026 460027

393411 ! 3934.2 ] 393413 | 393414 |479977 , 479978 ( 479963 j 479984 l 479989 j 479990^ \ 479955— — — — — j. — — -p-^- — - j-- — — |- — ~ ~Tp~~^~~~~1"p~~ Tp H?1 ' i i

479976 l 479979 j 479982 1479985 J47998B ,479991479954

l 393420 l 393421479B74 l 479975 | 479980 j 479981

j-™, —- ; - ! ..1^__L —— -l——-*-~-Ir—-!r--~Tp:——p. : p- i p- : p ! R479986 1479987 j

———— -l————-f- P IP IP

'P. IP^X^XSP. '. P-

JX.

480120 ' 480111-l- - - - - -

P. P.

480049 i 480.19 480112

l

48OIIO j 460.01 i 460100

479965 ' 480148 l

, 480404 l 4804051 480406^*^80033 i 480032 i 460031 j 460030 i 480049 | 480119- -i- - ~~-i---~ - i--~--- r ---— -4 — _ ___^-._^_-_|______ H ______r._____IP IP. i P. IP. ip IP. ]p. i p, TP.

p. If*.lll

480109 l 480102P.

\

\

4B04IO i; 48O409 1480408 480407 480034 l 4BOO35 480036 480037------H-----T------~----l-----"------t-----------P. \l P l P P P P P. P.

i , i ' ' ' ; 4604M 1480412 ^60413 480^.4 4B004I 480040 480039 460038 i 480047 i 4801.T J 4601 14 l .480107

.---...-....-...-...L.. ---,-.-., r -....,-----4-.,-... (^,. ————j-..-..,.,....^.....

. 4BOI08 , 480103tR——— "Jp"

! , - -^-^J480I04

ip. L ate

1480418 ;460417 J 480416 j 480415 | 480042 | 480043 | 480044 | 480045^-,. JL - --.i..,..^.,- -^..--,

(80105

l Ny 1480I48J479966 1480147

T

479967

479966 ! 480151 l 480152

480046 460116

ip. P.

' 480419 !480420\! 460421 l 460422 l 4600M i 460079 i 4800,8 j 480077 j 48007, J 479913^-----^-----ji-r----^----^---^.--"^----^----^—--?---?"""?7 ""

(P. \

l '479914!! 4799.3

480106 (-p----1p

479923 !

! 479970

P. i 479933

479969 480154 ' 48CM53

479924 480140 i 4600g5

IP.

! j ^-n - ~ ~ ~ r- ~ ~ -*-\- ~ ~ ~ ~ T ~ ' ~ ~IP.

492004' 492003 i 492002!492001

1452738

i P.lv 480942 480943 4B0944

P,

452742 , 452741 '-----r---~

l 480727 | v . ..!- - - - J -li-.'P

l: p-

4920O5 148O726 L,

it 48O425

i l

i 480436 i 480437

480440 i 4B0411

480428 l 480129 J 480430 J 4B043I [ 460072 l 480073 l 480074 4800_75_ 4799J2

P. P.4799H /|4Y99I6

479922

IP

i 4804)6 ' 480435V" " " " ~

l 480443

480442

•60435 J j , 4a0433 i 4a0432 l 480071 \ 480070 J 480069 [ 480068 i----rPv--rp-----|R —-i5----rp:"~"r?."""Tp"""""^^" l p.U79921

. J . ---IP.-

i 480097

*

\i 'l 492006'492007

.480992

-.492011

pp.

460946 480946 1480945 j 452743 | 452740 '452739)! f (\4907Z9 '

/•" -460444! 480445 l 48O446 ', 4 8OO64 460065 \ 4BOO66 \ 48O067 !4799.oJXl479.t7 i 47.9M. .. ̂i--L----i-----4------4- — ----t-----r~~~~~ ~'~^" - Tp '"P '^-479928 l r-? ! p ! P ^ i p - P | P ' ! P ;47..09y.-, j . ^ ̂

^•48O952

^— --. i 4607.4 480722 [N^ ^

P ip

"P.

I48O7I5/^80730| 480454 'J46045S l 480452 j 480451

l l 480449 l 480448

4B0447 ' 480063 ! 480062' 460061 i 480060 479918 i 479919

l -. J48O4S5

480 975:i , 480972 \480689

/7 ' ' /0' i ^ i (480976j7 430977^4809/6 i M (9^ ^ : z 1480688 i " "

L--&t:"~ i L480700 \ 48C709 .480713 460724

ir -l 480464 l 480465J.----.L---~-t P. IP.l'460463

"^480466

'l fl

/480143 1480098

480.44 i 480099u- - - --J-----~-

460210 l

^..-1^480484 ; 480485 480494 4fl0 2l9 480218 480217 480216— — H ^S-,- -—(- — — ~-— --^^^- .-..-.--- — - — - .*..---- r ------ 41- - - -

IR. ""^-'P. P- P. P. P- 'P ' ;p ''P. l P.

460486 ' 480493

4BOZ14- - — ~- - ~ - ~ ~~f" ~ ~ ~

480205, * P

480211

. rf*

480201 ' 460202 l 480203l 460208

^ M ^ ^ .!?48098I Ip.AeOSW,. 1. -K48069I 480698 \IR Tp AP. ""!P AT------.------I

480708 O '480717 1480723 '*/ — ^---1-- i---- —J^-* .p. ;p X--TP"^

i i4804571

^ l ii 'l 4B0467 ' 480472l R

r"---F-"--i-^M-"tp""'ip.'"' Jip.""""iv""""jp""; ? j\p. : p480477; P ' ! ' ' i ' ' !

' ' i , ' i - ' t - - — '

, 480209

i

l 480462 l 480487*~?~~~~^~~~~480195 480192480492' 480199 i48O.9B 'ivuiSf >-•ôu'fl^• i.---..i.---.-L----L-----,,- h ------ r -----^---Vr-,--- r -H----

'P. "P. \ P. S l P. l P. iP. \\ t P. -x 1 P.1 ! \i

480191

l M -h

.48 0985 J

" ' S ' \\ l ^ '460481 i 4ROIB4 \ S \ l^., 4804861 480491 460183 "HUI0 * ^ 4 80.83 460186 480.87 480188^' 480.89 480190 .

^. -,-r - rp: - ——— v ;x---. ———----- v --- p----Av .- ———--,

l S ' l"'" ' - a an in 3 J i \\i llAâarvn

48O086 i 480083, 480703^80460': 480470 OQ 480460 480469

480.8. 460.80..^ . . . . . . . -

P P

479903 479902 47990. A-— -- - , -- - - - - - - - - - - V* '

480087p- ----T,

48O094

460540

480088 1 *' " y ' 4BCO?6 ' 451083 ! 4STI08* ' 4M08I yH 480704- - --4-\J-.- -A. . ' ^— -^--1.--- - J.---- - i- --- -*fc -l - - - - -j- ]* r pt i p ,p ^ ip. | R

tt ! 480BH3 l 480093 t?^ i^J^S 1492812 500(

i| 480640Tp~ ~ ~ " " •160 c 4 9 7

K IC/ r,^'i

1 480703 M80665 I48O666 f . i^ .-- -./-----4- ~ - -t- ~-\~l'p -"p P P- ' '-'•'T ' j^80659 *80664 460667 *• p' ~!p~ ~ ' ~'"p * p

(79&6I'.479577

1480678

1.4B0679

479569 479576 479585 . 452919TP" ' ' '

1452918

480256 [480257l 4B025B

J P.

i 479854 i 479855 ]

i P.

M 479567 l 479570 J 479575 | 479578 l 47958^S 479566^^ ^ j -- j/8^ .1 .-t------,----- ----l--- -^ rp- J- i^

480840,480841 '49281^

l 480638

480637 ' 480642 ' 460647

4B065. •'l 48O658 '480663 '4806681i,. .--J — -----i--ip 'P ip

1 46O675/\479566

\479565'P

479571 i 479574 i.,..--J.----

479579 i 479582 479587 l P.""~~t"H"

480233 480254

P.

480253 ' 460252 i 48025.

/.——— . 460244 ! 480?45 ] 480246- --- !- - - ---L -^ - - r ,^----,^ .

P , P. ' P.

480247 480249

480657 i 480662 '480669 .460681 i l 479S641

2M Ti 479572 I 479573 ' 479580 ' 479381

S-^. l l i i479588 1479589 V l 480243 1480242 \ 4 60241 l 480240 [480239 , 480238

4 M 5 M 6 M 7 M

6 M

5 M

fO

GO

4M

UJ

Z)I- a:o u.

-f Z M

4- l M

STRACHAN Tp. M. 114242B09SE00C3 2.2543 MONTCALM B00

LEGEND

HIGHWAY AND ROUTE No.

OTHER ROADS

TRAILS

SURVEYED LINES:TOWNSHIPS, BASE LINES, ETC. LOTS. MINING CLAIMS, PARCELS, ETC.

UNSURVEYED LINES:LOT LINESPARCEL BOUNDARYMINING CLAIMS ETC.

RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY

UTILITY LINES

NON-PERENNIAL STREAM

FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS

SUBDIVISION

ORIGINAL SHORELINE

MARSH OR MUSKEG

MINES

DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS

TYPE OF DOCUMENT

PATENT, SURFACE S MINING RIGHTS

SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY

MINING RIGHTS ONLY

LEASE, SURFACE A MINING RIGHTS

SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY

MINING RIGHTS ONLY

LICENCE OF OCCUPATION

CROWN LAND SALE

ORDER-IN-COUNCIL

RESERVATION

CANCELLED

SAND 4 GRAVEL

SYMBOL

eQBB

• BT

c.s. oc

SCALE : 1 INCH -- 40 CHAINSO 5OO IOOO ZOOO

FEETMETRES

O 200 4OO 600 BOO l KM

ACRES HECTARES

TOWNSHIP

MONTCALMDISTRICT

COCHRANEMINING DIVISION

PORCUPINE


Ontario Surveys and Mapping BranchDate

Whitney Block Queen's Par k.Tor on to

Plan No.

M.872

-'"Vi

x- x

" X

"^"T

a4

9 if

(J!

54

92

O!

4

Spr

uce,

Pop

lar,

Birc

h

Q

som

e A

lder

s

Tit'x

ed S

pruc

e .B

irch

Popl

ar,

\4 5

l O

79

08

0

mix

ed S

pruc

e, P

opla

r, B

irch!

som

e A

lder

s Q

Ce

dar

mix

ed

Spru

ce,

Bir&

h,

with

som

e P

opla

r S

\A f t

iers

mix

ed

Spru

ce

Pop

lar

Q A

lder

s

5-4-

O-

8

Spr

ue*

with

ra

re P

ine

Quo

riz

Dia

base

- 2

)sys

tem

F -

l) sy

stem

Geo

logi

cal

Con

'ac'

(in

terp

rete

d)

Slo

sh

AS

T

HO

LL

ING

ER

M

INE

S

LT

D.

MO

NT

CA

LM

N

O.

2

GE

OL

OG

ICA

L

PL

AN

To

po

gra

ph

ica

l C

onto

ur-

Rid

ge

Pos

t

Mon

tcal

m

Twp.

O

n t.

SC

AL

E :

l"

- 2

00

2400

26

40

HOLL

INGE

R IT

XFLO

RATI

OT!

\

Sca

le;

1 in.

to

16

mi.

L E

GE

ND

--v.

____

LT

D.

NO

. 2

RV

EY

Mon

tcal

m

Twp.

O

n t.

SC

AL

E:

l"-2

0

Z6

4O

' N

ort

h

Tw

p.

L.n

e

42B09SEae03

2.2543 MONTCALM

Ministry of Natural Resources File.

OntarioGEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOC

TECHNICAL DA]

2 2543 MONTCALMTO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPE] FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NC

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION. CONCLUSIONS ETC, j300

Type of Survey(s). Township or Area. Claim Holder(s)—-

GeologicalMontcalm Township

Hollinger Mines LimitedBox 320, Timmins, Ont. P4N 7E2

Survey Company Hollinger Mines Limited_____ Author of Report Dale R. Alexander________Address of Author c/o Hollinger Mines LimitedCovering Dates of Snrvey July 2 6-29, 1977

(bnecutting to office)Total Miles of Line r..t 12.51 miles

J SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED


Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer——Radiometric———Other—————

DAYS pcTcUim

Geological. 20

Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magne tometer. .Electromagnetic .(enter days per

- Nov. 23,1977 SIGNATURE:

. Radiometric

I-'**^^TL ^ *- "^— Author of Report or Agent

Res. Geo I.. .Qualifications.Previous Surveys



(prefix) (number)

P - 451078

451079

451080

451081

451082

451083

492012

492013

492014

492015

492016

492022

492023

492024

492025

TOTAL CLAIMS 15


GROUND SURVEYS If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations.

Station interval ——

Profile scale^—^—

Contour interval.

.Number of Readings

.Line spacing ̂ ——^-—

Z•o

Instrument

Accuracy — Scale constant.

Diurnal correction method.

Base Station check-in interval (hours).

Base Station location and value —-—

Z•o

Instrument

Coil configuration

Coil separation ——

Accuracy —

Method:

Frequency-

Parameters measured.

CH Fixed transmitter d Shoot back EH In line d Parallel line

(specify V.L.F. station)

Instrument

Scale constant ——

Corrections made.


Elevation accuracy.

Instrument ^———————^.—

Method l~~l Time Domain

Parameters — On time ^—^—

- O ff time ——

l l Frequency Domain

— Frequency ————

__ Range ________

Delav time.

— Integration time.

Power.

Electrode array —

Electrode spacing .

Type of electrode

Ontario



-X 3



Geophysical-ElectromagneticType of Survey(s) — Township or Area — Claim HnlHer(s) Hollinger Mines Limited

Montcalm Township

Survey

Box 320, Timmins, Ont. P4N 7E2 Hollinger Mines Limited^^

H. Z. TittleyAuthor of Report .Address of Author 147 Hemlock Street, Timmins, Ont.

Covering Dates of Survey June 10 - November 23, 1977(linecutting to office)

12.3 milesTotal Miles of Line Cut.


ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical

—Electromagnetic.

—Magnetometer——

—Radiometric——

—Other-—————

DAYS per claim

40

Geological.

Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic.(enter days per claim)

. Radiometric

HATE- NOV, 23, 1977 ^r.MATTTPF. s -Author ofJlept)rt""or"Agent

L O

Res. Geol.. .Qualifications.

Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder


(prefix) (number)

P - 451078

451079

451080

451081

451082

451083

492012

492013

492014

492015

492016

492022

492023

492024

492025

TOTAL CLAIMS——15.


GRQL'.ND SURVEYS If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

589Number of Stations ____________________________Number of Readings _ Station interval ______100 feet or less_________Line spacing_______400 feet

Profile scale_________________________________________________________

Contour interval__________________________________________________________

Instrument ^-^^——^^^


Diurnal correction method


Base Station location and value ____

'-J 1

Coil configuration Horizontal Co-Planar

~\ :

Instrument Geonics EM-17

Coil separation __________400 feetAccuracv_______Real Component ±2% > Imaginary Component ±3%__________

Method: CD Fixed transmitter CD Shoot back S In line CD Parallel line

Frequency_______1600 Hertz__________________________________________________(specify V.L.F. station)

Parameters me^nreH Real or In-Phase and Imaginary or Out-Of-Phase______

Instrument ____________________________________________________________________

Scale constant

Corrections made.

Base station value and location .

Elevation accuracv.

Instrument ^^^^^^—^^^^^—..—^^^—^^.^^^^^-.—.^—-—.^^——.— Method l i Time Domain l l Frequency Domain Parameters — On time ____________________________ Frequency ^^-^^

— O ff time ____________________________ Range ————^^^

— Delay time .^^^^^^^^.^^^^^.^^———-—.^————..

— Integration time ^^.^^-—-—^———^^^^^^^^^^—

Power ——^-^——^^^^^^^^^^^^^—^^-————.^—^^^^^^^^^^———^^^-^^————

Electrode array ———————————————————————————————————————————————————

Electrode spacing ______________________________________________

Type of electrode _____________________________________________

Ontario



File.



Type of Survey(s).

Township or Area.

Claim Holder(s)__

Geophysical-Electromagnetic _____Montcalm Township^^^^^ Hollinger Mines Limited

Survey

Box 320, Timmins, Ont. P4N 7E2 Hollinger Mines Limited^^^^^^

H. Z. TittleyAuthor of Report _Address of Amhm- 147 Hemlock Street, Timmins, Ont.Covering Dates of Survey Sept. l to Nov. 23, 1977

(linecutting to office)

Total Miles of Line Cut. 2.67 miles


ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical

—Electromagnetic.

—Magnetometer_

—Radiometric——

—Other_______

DAYS per claim

40

Geological.

Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit* do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)

DATF- Nov. 23,1977 SIGNATURE:.^/ f Author ̂ TRejiorf" orient

L ORes. Geol.. .Qualifications.

Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder


(prefix) (number)

P - 500644

500645

500646.s

lM

i

ya

TOTAL CLAIMS.


GROUND SURVEYS If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations ——————.181__________________Number of Readings _____159Station interval 100 feet or less____________Line spacing________400 feet

Profile scale-^—--^^^—-..^—^—.^—.^—^——————..^—^-^^—^—^———^^^——-^^^-——

Contour interval.

x'

s 1 to

Instrument ^——^—^^-——


Diurnal correction method.


Base Station location and value ^___

Instrument ___________GeonJCS EM-17

Coil configuration Horizontal-Co-Planar

Coil separation _________40Q feetAccuracv_____Real Component t2%, Imaginary Component ±31_____________

Method: d Fixed transmitter d Shoot back Cxl In line d Parallel line

Frequency_____1600 Hertz_______________________________________________(specify V.L.F. station)

Parameters immured Real (In-Phase) and Imaginary (Out-Of-Phase)————————

Instrument ____________________________________________________________________

Scale constant

Corrections made.


Elevation accuracv.

Instrument _____________________________________________________ Method di Time Domain d Frequency Domain

Parameters — On time ___________________________ Frequency ^—^—

- Off time ______________________________ Range .

— Delav time ___________________________

— Integration time .

Power ________________

Electrode arrav

Electrode spacing .

Type of electrode

geological survey covering montcalm #2 group · 2017. 1. 17. · montcalm township is contained in...

Documents