S2B09NE0155 5.8448 HAGEY 010

Geology

of the

Cal-Chris Group

Lincoln Resources Inc.

J.C.Davies \

1985 (\ Jf RECEIVED

SEP l 7 1985

MINING LANDS SECTION

Introduction

The area covered by the eastern four claims of the Cal-Chris Group

were ^originally part of the Frank West property. Between 1974 and 1950,

trenching and diamond drilling were carried out, but records of this work

are not available.

J.F.West permitted the mineral rights to revert to the Crown and the

area was restaked by D.Calvert in 1980. Additional claims were added to

the west and the claim group, held by D.Calvert and D.E.Christiansen, was

optioned in 1983 to GLE Resources Ltd. A grid was cut and a magnetic

survey was conducted. Lincoln Resources Inc. subsequently obtained the

property from GLE Resources Ltd.

Property

The Cal-Chris Group consists of eleven claims: TB580437-3S,

602376-77, 61555487-88, 654689 and 91, 675652-53 and 675735.

Location and Access

All of the claims lie between Highway 11 and Middle Shebandowan Lake,

at a point about 85km west of Thunder Bay. Access is readily obtained

from the Highway or Lake, or from cottage-access private roads.

Topography

Relief in the area is estimated to be less than 30m. A thin cover of

glacial drift occurs on most of the hills but the orientation of the hills

is parallel to structural trends in bedrock. The shore of Middle

Shebandowan Lake consists almost entirely of glacial debris, but many of

the boulders are angular and locally derived. An alder swamp/muskeg

extends approximately east through the northern part of claims

580437,675735, 675653 and 675652 with drainage both to the south Un claim

675735) and east (in claim 6755652). A forest fire in May .984, was

largely confined by the swamp on the north and cottage-access roads on the

south.

Grid and Base Map

A grid was established over the entire claim group, with the exception

of cottage lots. The baseline was cut at a bearing of 107 degrees ar.d

cross-lines were cut at 60m intervals. The 1984 fire devasted an area

-2-

extending east from 780E to the eastern edge of the Group, and beyond;

within the burn the grid i s almost impossible to follow.

The base nap was derived from air photographs at a scale of 1:3960 and

was photo-reduced to 1:5000. As several photographs were required to

obtain complete coverage, minor distortion has occurred, but the basentap

is consistent with measured distances. The position of cottages has not

been shown.

General Geology

Altered, mafic to intermediate metavolcanic rocks predominate in the

area. These are mainly massive to pillowd, very fine grained flows which,

where best exposed in the burn, have weathered surfaces that are mottled

buff, grey and green. Pink weathered surfaces are due to abundant fine

disseminated hematite and green coloration is due to epidote. In unburned

areas exposures are mostly grey weathering; brown or buff weathered

surfaces typically indicate the presence of iron carbonate.

Primary features are poorly preserved. Partial pillow rims are

evident in some outcrops, and both pillow breccia and finer fragnentais

occur locally. Recognizable bedding is virtually absent.

In the western part of the Group felsic flows appear to form a

distinct layer of the order of 100m wide. These are best exposed to the

west of the Group where the altered rocks are yellowish green and contain

minor quartz veinlets. Felsic flows outcrop on the shore near the east

boundary of claim 602377. Their eastward continuity has not been

established, but it is possible that the sheared felsic volcanics on Lynx

Island are stratigraphically equivalent. Felsic flows and fragmentals are

also present in claims 6154S7 and 88, but do not appear to be as siliceous

as those in the western paart of the Group. Some interlaying of these

rocks with more mafic volcanics is apparent.

A series of felsic porphyry lenses lie to the south of, and

approximatelyparallel to, the baseline. These are mainly quartz bearing,

but quartz veinlets are less numerous than in the larger body of quartz

porphyry in the Frank West property to the north. It is possible that

there is continuity between some of the lenses as overburden is abundant.

Quartz diorite of the Shebandowan stock underlies the southern part of

claim 602377 and small islands in claim 580438. The contact is

interpreted to be regular and to extend under the lake from the southwest

corner of claim 580437 to the southeast corner of claim 602376, but is

poorly defined raagnetlically.

-3-

Structural Geology

The general distribution of mafic and felsic volcanics is indicative

of east-trending volcanic stratigraphy. East of the Group there is

evidence that the volcanics face to the north and it is interpreted that

the entire volcanic section exposed in the Cal-Chris Group is north

facing.

Foliation varies from weak to well developed and consistently strikes

between 100O and 115O with steep north dips.

Lineaments trending east-northeast occur in the area and are believed

to mark the position of a sinistral fault system. One of these, in the

north part of claims 675735 and 675653, coincides with magnetically

interpreted faults.

A strong east-striking, north-dipping shear zone, with a possible

width of up to 100m, occurs in the west-central part of claim 675652.

This may be a sehhhhjdary feature related to the interpreted

east-northeast faults.

Economic Geology

During the present survey, the only workings located are a series of

shallow trenches between the baseline and the alder swamp in claims 675652

and 53. At 1400E and 025N, rock was blasted from outcrop which forms a

low cliff at the north side of a hill. The rock consists of highly

carbonatized mafic volcanics in which there is quartz veining and both

pyrite and chalcopyrite. There was no obvious structural control but it

nay indicate the presence of mineralization in lower ground to the north.

At 1740E and 040N a shallow trench exposes altered mafic volcanics in

which there is minor shearing and some disseminated pyrite. The trench is

at the northedge of a hill and, similarly, may indicate a stronger zone of

liberalization to the north. Nearby, at 1775E and 090N, a very large lens

of white quartz has been exposed by trenching; the quartz is associated

with carbonate in places, but is essentially devoid of sulphides.

At 1815E and 080N, sheared carbonatized volcanics are cut by a small

quartz-carbonate vein which contains minor pyrite. A wider section of

similiar rock was exposed in a deeper trench at 1900E and 100N; at the

writer's suggestion this trench was extended to the north and south and a

second parallel trench was sunk 25m to the west. In both these trenches

the sheared volcanics strike about 095O and dip 50O to 70O north. The

sheared volcanics are reported to contain 0.0602 Au per ton (Schnieders

-4-

and Dutka, 1985) but visible gold is present in quartz-carbonate veins

which constitute a small percentage of the total exposure.

A copper occurrence was noted by Morin (1974) in the area of claim

602377. The pit in felsic volcanics was not located during present work.

Pyrite is present in many of the rocks of the area and there is some

concentration along narrow shear zones. Morin (1974) noted the presence

of carbonatized volcanics in the area of claim 654689 and considered these

rocks to have potential for gold mineralization.

Recommedations

The zone of strongly sheared volcanics with auiferous quartz-carbonate

veins is the principal exploration target in the claim group. In

preparation for further work on this the baseline should be re-surveyed

and picketed between 1320E and 2040E (beyond which the original baseline

can be recognized). North of the baselline the cross-lines should be

picketed through the burn.

It is recommended that soil and humus samples be collected between the

baseline and the alder swamp at 15m intervals along each cross-line east

of 1380E. It is further recommended that this be followed by removal of

shallow overburden from the low ridge between 1840E and 1920E and between

085N and 110N and that the stripped area be washed with high-pressure

hoses to permit detailed geological mapping of the shear zone.

Sheared quartz porphyry and volcanics are present between 1680E and

1860E and from 100S to 150S. Pyrite is common in the shears and carbonate

is locally abundant. It is recommended that the area between the quartz

porphyry and the cottage-access road be prospected and that 'all

Mineralization be sampled.

Prospecting and sampling of other shear zones adjacent to porphyry

lenses should be carried out. This would include the vicinity of 400E and

25S, 540E and 140S, 960-1200E and 070-130S, 1300-1400E and 100S, and 2040E

and 130S.

Claims 654689 and 654691 are mainly underlain by mafic volcanics. The

area contains few outcrops and much windfall, and assessment of the

mineral potential is difficult. Morin (1974) recommended the area for

exploration, and it is here recommended that every second line be flagged

and that geochemical sampling be carried out in order to locate possible

anomalous zones

-5-

Respectfully submitted,

August 20, 1985. John C. Davies PhD. P.Eng.

m moiled -pmk Val axmii . 26 N

mud ^low, SKebdnc/euJaw ovN 6r6op

CERTIFICATE

I, John C. Davies, of the city of Saskatoon, in the province of

Saskatchewan, do hereby certify that:

1. I an a geologist residing at 411 Garrison

Crescent, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.

2. I a* a graduate of The University of Manitoba

with a PhD in geology and have been practicing

my profession continuously for thirty years.

3. I an a member of the Association of Professional

Engineers of the Province of Saskatchewan, a

nember of the Society of Economic Geologists and

a Fellow of the Geological Association of Canada.

4. My report, dated August 20, 1985, on the Cal-Chris

Group is based on personal observations in the

field during the period June 29-July 24, 1985,

and an examination of pertinent literature.

5. I consent to the use of this report, or a summary

thereof, by Lincoln Resources, Incorporated.

6. I hold no interest in the shares of Lincoln

Resources Inc., nor do I expect to receive

any such interest.

Dated at Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, this 20th day

of August 1985.

Ontarn

M.riislrye? Natural

sources

Report of Work (Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

Type of Survey(s)

ClairrTHoiderTs)

52B89NE0155 2.84-48 HAGEYMir

900

GEOLOGICALTownship or Area

HAGEY G-661[Prospector's Licence No.

•&A"}

Address

500-67 Richmond St.W., Toronto,Survey Company

LINCOLN RE50URCES INC.Date of Survey (from a to)

Name and Address of Author {of Geo-Technical report}

JOHN C. DAVIES, 411 GARRISON CR.

Ont.Date of Sur

tSy | QS j S, 5 j 2^ , flp i BS

, SASKATOON, SASKATCHEWAN

)i fvHes o* line Cut

1 1 approx

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right___ Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Special Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Day, perClaim

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological j -JQ

Geochemical

Man Da *s

Complete reverse side

and enter t^al(s) here

- . . , Geophys.cal

- FJoctr omagneT ic

Olhc'

Gpoloqicn'

Groc nt' r^iic .

i Days peri C laim

A'f borne Credits

Note: Special provisions Eicctfom.'ipr.et

credits do not apply to Airborm- Surveys. M.ignetorretui

; Dnvs

Expenditures (exrludes power stripping)Type Of Work Performed

Pcftorrvier! on Claimls)

Calculation ol txpenaitim: Days fri;.-::s

Total t xpenditu re";

Total Days Credits may be apportioned .-u the t Li^rn holden

tn columns at rirjht.

Mining ClaimPrefix Number

TB 58043758O438

-,::.., 602376

602377

, .^vj 615487

' " ! 615488

i ^WfSJ^t1 tV t9V^

-SG1DOt-

; F375652

675653i 675735

: :: f

. M/ft

E xpend.Days Cr.

2/tA^

i": ^ JT^^^S

| P* X*V

C; f 'D" "" ' -

h'a.Ui

X

" tt

i r,^ ''

i'j(

Mmmg C'airn

Prefix i Number

l

Vu^

VED

IQPqi*.'\'0

isnrn---

Total n.t.fnlsor o^ mining

rt-pO' 1 O^ WO' k .

Expend.Dftys Cr.

- -

"

.. ... .

M ;

Certification Verifying Report of Work

1 hereby certify that 1 haw a persona! and intirmtr- know'cdqe of the farts set forth in thp Repot t of Wo'k annrxcd hrroto, ha v t ne pciformcti t h*.' woik O' witnosb(-{j sjme clurinp and/oi yfTfrr its cfjmp'r-t on ,"inci the nnncxocJ report is true.

ne fl'*cf Postri! Address ot Person Cc'tilying

DAVID E. (JHRHiTI ANSON, R. R. 14. Dog Lake Rd. . Thunder Bay,, Ont . P7B 5E5

Ministry o*NaturalResources

Ontario i

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, LECHNICAL REPORTS Geochemical and Expenditure* SUBMI TIED WITH

REPORT n 382

Type of Survev(s)

ical, VLEI )endituresb '

pt or print. ' If number of mining claims traversed exceeds space on this form, attach a list.

Note: Only days credits calculated in the "Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns. Do not use shaded areas below.

GEOLOGICALTownship or Area

HAGEY G-661Claim Holder(t)

DANIEL CALVERTProspector'* Licence No.

E 21497

Address

c/o D.E. Christiansen R.R. 14, Dog Lake Rd., Thunder Bay, Ont.Survey Company

LINCOLN RESOURCES INCDate of Survey (from Si to)

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

John C. Davies, 411 Garrison Court, Saskatoon; Saskatchewan.

Total Mi let of line Cut

2 app.

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (Thisincludes line cutting)

For each additional survey:using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here

l"

i r M 1i,V:\-

Airborne Credits

Not*: Special provisions

to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic, r f' \ V t t*

' V..5 Magnetometer

- RadiomeirjgjO

- Other

.Geological : , ; - '"

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

20

Days perClaim

"i i -iy

Days per Claim

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim

Prefix Number

TB 654689

654691

Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claimd)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total Expenditures

S -f- 15

Total Days Credits

E

Instructions Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim (elected in columns at right.

Expend. Day t Cr.

Mining ClaimPrefix Number

Expend. Days Cr.

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

Date

01.1O.65

R. ri^tffldafu^ Agent ( Signature) 'r Sv s~S\*LjCzZ66x*i*'*-rt-~

Certification Verifying Report of Workl hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

Q-!..E..,. .PJlCi stjL anson , R . R . 14 , Dog Lake Rd. . Thunder Bay. Ont.Date Certified CertU

136? ( 81/9)

REGISTERED

November 20, 1985 Report Of Work 1468

Daniel Calvertc/o D.E. ChristiansenR.R.I14Dog Lake RoadThunder Bay* OntarioP7B 5E5

Dear Sir:

RE: Mining Claims TB 654689, et al, 1n Hagey Township

I have not received the reports and naps ( 1n duplicate) for the Geological Survey on the above-mentioned claims.

As the assessment "Report of Work" was recorded by the Mining Recorder on October l, 198S the 60 day period allowed by Section 77 of the Mining Act for the submission of the technical reports and maps to this office will expire on November 30* 1985.

If the material Is not submitted to this office by November 30, 1985 I will have no alternative but to Instruct the Mining Recorder to delete the work credits from the claim record sheets.

For further Information, please contact Mr. Arthur Barr at (416)965-4888.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario N7A 1U3 Phone:(416)965-4888

AB/mc

cc: Mining RecorderThunder Bay, Ontario

Encl.

Ministry of Technical Assessment Northern Affairs . ., . - ,. and Mines Work Cred.tS

Ontario

t

Date Mini

1985 11 08

File

2.8448no Recorder's Report of

382

Recorded Holder

DANIEL CALVERTTownship or Area

HAGEY TOWNSHIPType of survey and number of

Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical

Magnetometer riays

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column

Geological 31 days

Geochemical Hays

Man days | | Airborne l l

Special provision ^Tl Ground |~xl

l | Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

l | Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

TB 580437-38 602376-77 615487-88 675652-53 675735

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

j | not sufficiently covered by the survey | | insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19)-60.

828 (85/9)

Your File: 382 Our Files 2.8448

1985 11 08

Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Affairs and Mines435 James Street SouthP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay* OntarioP7C 566

Dear Madam:

RE: Geological Survey submitted on Mining Claim TB 580437, et al, In Hagey Township

Please disregard our Notice of Intent dated October 18, 1985 covering the above-nant1oned survey.

The survey has been reassessed at the request of the claim holder. Line cutting credits have been allowed. The assessment work credits, as shown on the attached statement have been approved as of the above date.

Please Inform the recorded holder of these Mining claims and so Indicate on your records.

Yours sincerely,

S. E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1H3 Phone:(416)965-4888

SH/mccc: Daniel Calvert

Toronto, Ontario

David E. Christiansen Thunder Bay, OntarioResident Geologist Thunder Bay, Ontario

End.

John C. .Davies Saskatoon, Saskatchewan

Mr. G.H. FergusonMining l Lands CommissionerToronto, Ontario

ario

Ministry ofNaturalResources

1985 10 18

Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Affairs and MinesP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 5G6

Dear Madam:

Your File: 382 Our File: 2.8448

Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.For further information, if required, please contact Mr. R.J. Pichette at 416/965-4888.

Yours sincerely,

.E. Yundt Director Land Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3

j) -SH/mc

Ends.

cc: Daniel Calvert Suite 50067 Richmond Street Toronto, Ontario M5H 1Z5David E. Christiansen R.R.#14 Dog Lake Road Thunder Bay, Ontario P7B 5E5

West

John C. Davies 411 Garrison Cr. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7H 2Z9

Mr. G.H. FergusonMining S Lands CommissionerToronto, Ontario

845

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Ontario

Notice of Intent

for Technical Reports

1985 10 18

2.8448/382

An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.

If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.

If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.

If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Land Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

846 (82/51

Ministry of Technical Assessment Northern Affairs ,,. . - ... and Mines Work Credlts

Ontario

; File

2 8448Date Mining Recorder's Report of

1985 10 18 Work *0- 382

Recorded Holder

DANIEL CALVERTTownship or Area

HAGEY TOWNSHIP

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical

Electromagnetic riays

Magnetometer rtays

Other Hay s

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column

Geological 16 riays

Georhemir.al days

Man days | | Airborne l l

Special provision fcl Ground fxi

f)3 Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

1 l Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

TB 580437-38 602376-77 615487-88 675652-53 675735

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

Q not sufficiently covered by the survey Q insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) - 60.

828 (85/9)

Mining Lands Section

Control Sheet

File No

TYPE OF SURVEY GEOPHYSICALx GEOLOGICAL

GEOCHEMICAL

EXPENDITURE

MINING LANDS COMMENTS:

Signature of Assessor

VDate

wx/

r

CAL-CHRIS GROUPLINCOLN RESOURCES INC.

o 300

METRES

LATE MAFIC D IKES6Q - tomprojorwre bb - G o b oro , diorite

FELSIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS5a - Quart L diorite5 b " Quartz5C - Quartz5d ~ Quart*-5c - Feldspar porpk^ru5f - Felsite

MAFIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS4o ~ Gabbro (.or m.g.

~ Anorthotit*

COOD

SEDIMENTS 3a - Chert

O

x

FELSIC VOLCANIC ROCKS2n-Massiv* flows 26 - Flow brtccm

td - Altered vi

MAFIC TO INTERMEDIATE VOLCANIC ROCKS

la -MOM iv* flows (b 'Pillowed 14ows

le - Pillow or ?lo*i breccu Id - TuK breccia

(e -Lailli

t

o-

o-

PUBLIC ROAD

PRIVATE ROAD, TRAIL

MAIN POWER LINE

COTTAGE POWER LINE

SWAMP. BOG

MUSKEG

CLAIM POSTS

OUTCROP

BROKEN OUTCROP

GEOLOGICAL BOUNDARY

FOLIATION

BEDDING

PILLOW FACING

GOLD S SOIL ANOMALY MOO, 30-99, 10- t9ppb

DRILL HOLE

GOLD INTERSECTION /3Ocm

-ground

p- Imm -fcld*^**- vemlci*

vehicular , amt-

TRENCH

LINEAMENT

SHEARED

J.C. DAVIES 198552B09NE0155 2.8448 HAGEY 200