geoarchaeology at leetsdale: reconstructing prehistoric landscapes of the upper ohio valley joseph...

27
Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank Vento, Clarion University Suanna Selby-Crowley, Geoarcheology Research Associates 2009 GSA Annual Meeting, October 18-21, 2009 Portland, Oregon

Upload: kory-west

Post on 18-Jan-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Project Setting Site area is 40km south of glacial margin. There is an expectation for outwash sedimentation on major valley floors.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric

Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley

Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates

Frank Vento, Clarion UniversitySuanna Selby-Crowley, Geoarcheology Research

Associates2009 GSA Annual Meeting, October 18-21, 2009 Portland, Oregon

Page 2: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Objectives

• Developing linked archaeological and geological stratigraphies at a complex, multi-component site in a region that is relatively unknown.

• Structuring geoarchaeological observations that interface with paleoenvironmental trends.

• Modeling “geo” and “archeo” trends into a diachronic model of site formation.

• Extending the model valley wide, regionally and extra-regionally.

Page 3: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Project Setting

Site area is 40km south of glacial margin. There is an expectation for outwash sedimentation on major valley floors.

Page 4: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Industrialized Landscape on Right Bank, Ohio River

Page 5: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Area 1

Area 3

Area 2

Primary Excavation Areas within Project Footprint

Individual areas selected on the basis of potential impact and archaeological potential. The latter is previewed by subsurface stratigraphy.

Page 6: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Project investigation parcels and terrace relations

Page 7: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Historic Physiography and Land Use

GIS layering generates area-specific images of former land cover.

Page 8: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Archaeological Excavations

Prehistoric features are housed within soil horizons to variable depths.

At depths of ±1 m, excavation extends into terrace substrate which exposes Bw, Bt, or Btx horizons depending on terrace elevation and paleosol articulation.

Page 9: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Baseline Chronology

Initial testing disclosed carbonized residue to depths of 7m but definitive cultural features extended to 4 m, well into Middle Archaic time ranges.

Page 10: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Leetsdale: Initial Sensitivity Map

Isobar delimits extent of Bt horizon. Superposed perimeters offset zones of older and younger prehistoric distributions. Intersection forms zone of multi-component stratification.

Page 11: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Sedimentation Rates and Soil Formation

Terrace construction was most dynamic around 6-5 kya (Area 2N) and rates of alluviation declined after 3 kya.

Evidence for deep soil formation is pervasive in the Late Archaic horizons.

Page 12: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Site Formation in the Back-Channel & Area 1

Lamellae signify episodic flood events and limited pedogenesis in the back channel.

This trend carries over into Area 1, where Late Archaic horizons were found both in lamellar and Bt horizons.

Page 13: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Micromorphology

Medium sands with silty infillings. This is typical of episodic flooding followed by translocation of clays.

Finer textured parent material with clay coatings characteristic of alluvial paleosol (Bt horizon).

Page 14: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Geoarchaeological Variability in Area 2

Page 15: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Leetsdale Composite Section

Page 16: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Back Channel: Changing Vegetation Through Time

AU-2 to AU-3 marks peak of oak frequency and general displacement of tree cover by cheno-ams and herb communities. Is this related to forest clearance at the latter stages of the Late Archaic?

Page 17: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Composite Block Diagram, Leetsdale Prehistoric Site

Page 18: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Leetsdale: Detailed Radiometric Chronology

Page 19: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Phosphates Register Anthropogenic Signatures

Phosphate fractionation differentiates occupational signatures. Locus A depicts long term habitation while Locus B represents single use events (at Leetsdale).

Page 20: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Diachronic Model I: Leetsdale Terrace Construction

Page 21: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Diachronic Model II: Leetsdale Terrace Stabilization

Page 22: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Geoarchaeological Landscapes Along the Ohio

River Valley

Page 23: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Ohio Valley Sites, Landscapes, and Topographies

Page 24: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Landform-Sediment Assemblages, Ohio Valley Site Complexes

Preservation contexts of prehistoric assemblages. They are vertically stacked upstream (one terrace), laterally and spatially zoned downstream (two

terraces).

Page 25: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Geoarchaeological Landscapes Across

Pennsylvania

Page 26: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Representative Geoarchaeological Columns for Pennsylvania’s Trunk

Streams

Page 27: Geoarchaeology at Leetsdale: Reconstructing Prehistoric Landscapes of the Upper Ohio Valley Joseph Schuldenrein, Geoarcheology Research Associates Frank

Implications of the Leetsdale Study

• Allostratigraphic principles accommodate the latitude necessary for explaining complex site formation process.

• Terrace construction at Leetsdale had effectively been completed by 5000 B.P. Subsequent additions to terrace landscapes were the product of dynamic (alluvial) events. The Bt horizon is a marker of landscape stability.

• By 3000 B.P. there is some evidence of terrain change in the form of human interference (deforestation?).

• Broader geoarchaeological correlations are suggested by comparing the Leetsdale sequence with valley-wide (Ohio River) and inter-valley (Pennsylvania) chrono-stratigraphies.