genetic evaluation of mixed breed populations
DESCRIPTION
Genetic Evaluation of Mixed Breed Populations. Goals. Compare methods to evaluate mixed breed data All breeds and crossbreds together Crossbreds in breed of sire file Compute national evaluations and examine changes PTA’s of purebreds and crossbreds Display results without confusion. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
2005
Paul VanRaden and Mel TookerPaul VanRaden and Mel Tooker
Animal Improvement Programs LaboratoryAgricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, [email protected]
Genetic Evaluation of Genetic Evaluation of Mixed Breed PopulationsMixed Breed Populations
S-1008 Annual Meeting 2005 (2) P.M. VanRaden200
5
GoalsGoals
Compare methods to evaluate mixed breed data• All breeds and crossbreds together• Crossbreds in breed of sire file
Compute national evaluations and examine changes• PTA’s of purebreds and crossbreds
Display results without confusion
S-1008 Annual Meeting 2005 (3) P.M. VanRaden200
5
Options for Reporting PTAOptions for Reporting PTA
Genetic base• Each breed on its own base• Other breeds on Holstein base• All breeds on mixed breed base
Heterosis and inbreeding• PTA can include or exclude heterosis• EFI and rank differ with mate breed
S-1008 Annual Meeting 2005 (4) P.M. VanRaden200
5
Options for ImplementationOptions for Implementation
Within breed of sire model• Further testing but fewer issues• May 2006 could be possible
All breed model• Traits in Net Merit need same base• Type and calving ease separate• November 2006 more likely
S-1008 Annual Meeting 2005 (5) P.M. VanRaden200
5
All- vs Within-Breed EvaluationsAll- vs Within-Breed EvaluationsCorrelations of PTACorrelations of PTA
99% REL bulls
Recent bulls
Recent cows
Holstein >.999 .994 .989
Jersey .997 .988 .972
Brown Swiss .990 .960 .942
Guernsey .991 .988 .969
Ayrshire .990 .963 .943
Milking Shorthorn .997 .986 .947
S-1008 Annual Meeting 2005 (6) P.M. VanRaden200
5
Breed Effects and HeterosisBreed Effects and HeterosisTransmitting ability differences from HolsteinTransmitting ability differences from Holstein
Milk Fat Pro SCS PL DPR
Jersey -3378 - 35 - 54 +0.15 +1.6 +2.3
Brown Sw -2235 - 43 - 37 - 0.03 +0.8 +0.1
Guernsey -3128 - 39 - 71 +0.06 - 2.0 +1.0
Ayrshire -2713 - 70 - 67 - 0.07 +0.6 +0.9
M.Shorthrn -3441 -118 - 97 - 0.09 +1.2 +2.1
Heterosis + 700 + 35 +26 +0.02 +0.3 +1.8
Heterosis and DPR estimates are from previous research
S-1008 Annual Meeting 2005 (7) P.M. VanRaden200
5
Recent Sires of Crossbred CowsRecent Sires of Crossbred CowsSires born since 1997Sires born since 1997
Sire Daughters
Name breed Pure Cross
Advent JE 698 73
Golden JE 421 42
Eagle BS 234 35
Brendon-P JE 207 29
Big Time JE 522 28
S-1008 Annual Meeting 2005 (8) P.M. VanRaden200
5
ConclusionsConclusions
S-1008 Annual Meeting 2005 (9) P.M. VanRaden200
5
ConclusionsConclusions
All breed model accounts for:• Heterosis• Unknown parent groups by breed• Heterogeneous variance by breed
Breed differences well estimated PTA changed more in small breeds Breed of sire model is alternative