genetic engineer
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/2/2019 Genetic Engineer
1/15
GENETIC ENGINEERSTORIES, EVENTS & TOPICS
3/9/2012
NATSCI 2 TF 5:30PM TO 7:00PM
LORENA S. MAYUGA
3rd YR - MANAGEMENT
-
8/2/2019 Genetic Engineer
2/15
Supergenetics: Turning Leaves Into Flowers
It took plants about 500 million years to evolve the ability to turn leaves into petals. Martin
Yanofsky, a developmental biologist at the University of California at San Diego, duplicated the
feat in just over a decade a milestone in plant genetics.
The first step toward success came in 1990, when molecular biologists identified three plant
genes called ABC. Without them plants produce leaves in place of petals, but further tests
showed ABC alone can't cause flowering. Last year Yanofsky and his colleagues identified SEP, a
complementary set of genes that seemed to regulate the transformation of leaf into petal. They
recently proved that ABC plus SEP contains the full genetic recipe for blooming by creating a
reengineered Arabidopsis plant. "All of the leaves look exactly like normal petals," Yanofsky
says.
This work may have more than theoretical implications. "If you switched the genes on in any
flowering plant, you'd have petals all along the stem the same color as the bud on top," saysYanofsky. Such super-flowers might be useful for producing pigments and perfumes, or simply
for upping the ante on Valentine's Day.
Engineered genes tricked this plant into making a
leafy flower.
Courtesy of University of California at San Diego
-
8/2/2019 Genetic Engineer
3/15
Insecticide sweet corn
Scientists have genetically modified sweet corn so that it
produces a poison which kills harmful insects. This means thefarmer no longer needs to fight insects with insecticides. The
genetically modified corn is called Bt-corn, because the insect-
killing gene in the plant comes from the bacteriaBacillus
thuringiensis.
Advantages:
The farmer no longer has to use insecticide to kill insects, so the surroundingenvironment is no longer exposed to large amounts of harmful insecticide.
The farmer no longer needs to walk around with a drum of toxic spray wearing a maskand protective clothing.
Disadvantages:
This type of genetically modified corn will poison the insects over a longer period thanthe farmer who would spray the crops once or twice. In this way the insects can become
accustomed (or resistant) to the poison. If that happens both crop spraying and the use
of genetically modified Bt-corn become ineffective.
A variety of insects are at risk of being killed. It might be predatory insects that eat theharmful ones or, perhaps attractive insects such as butterflies. In the USA, where Bt-
corn is used a great deal there is much debate over the harmful effects of Bt-corn on thebeautiful Monarch butterfly.
Cotton and potatoes are other examples of plants that scientists have , genetically modified to
produce insecticide.
http://biodictionary%28%271%27%2C%27insecticide%27%29/http://biodictionary%28%271%27%2C%27bacillus%20thuringiensis%27%29/http://biodictionary%28%271%27%2C%27bacillus%20thuringiensis%27%29/http://biodictionary%28%271%27%2C%27bacillus%20thuringiensis%27%29/http://biodictionary%28%271%27%2C%27bacillus%20thuringiensis%27%29/http://biodictionary%28%271%27%2C%27bacillus%20thuringiensis%27%29/http://biodictionary%28%271%27%2C%27bacillus%20thuringiensis%27%29/http://biodictionary%28%271%27%2C%27insecticide%27%29/ -
8/2/2019 Genetic Engineer
4/15
Golden rice
Golden rice is genetically modified rice that now contains a large amount of A-vitamins. Or
more correctly, the rice contains the element beta-carotene which is converted in the body intoVitamin-A. So when you eat golden rice, you get more vitamin A.
Beta-carotene gives carrots their orange colour and is the
reason why genetically modified rice is golden. For the
golden rice to make beta-carotene three new genes are
implanted: two from daffodils and the third from a
bacterium.
Advantages:
The rice can be considered a particular advantage to poor people in underdevelopedcountries. They eat only an extremely limited diet lacking in the essential bodily
vitamins. The consequences of this restricted diet causes many people to die or become
blind. This is particularly true in areas of Asia, where most of the population live on rice
from morning to evening.
Disadvantages:
Critics fear that poor people in underdeveloped countries are becoming too dependenton the rich western world. Usually, it is the large private companies in the West that
have the means to develop genetically modified plants. By making the plants sterile
these large companies can prevent farmers from growing plant-seed for the following
year - forcing them to buy new rice from the companies.
Some opposers of genetic modification see the "golden rice" as a method of makinggenetic engineering more widely accepted. Opponents fear that companies will go on to
develop other genetically modified plants from which they can make a profit. A situation
could develop where the large companies own the rights to all the good crops.
http://biodictionary%28%271%27%2C%27beta-carotene%27%29/http://biodictionary%28%271%27%2C%27vitamin%20a%27%29/http://biodictionary%28%271%27%2C%27genetic%20engineering%27%29/http://biodictionary%28%271%27%2C%27genetic%20engineering%27%29/http://biodictionary%28%271%27%2C%27vitamin%20a%27%29/http://biodictionary%28%271%27%2C%27beta-carotene%27%29/ -
8/2/2019 Genetic Engineer
5/15
Long-lasting tomatoes
Long-lasting, genetically modified tomatoes came on to the market in 1994 and were the first
genetically modified food available to consumers. The genetically modified tomato producesless of the substance that causes tomatoes to rot, so remains firm and fresh for a long time.
Advantages:
Because the GM tomatoes can remain fresh longerthey can be allowed to ripen in the sun before picking -
resulting in a better tasting tomato.
GM tomatoes can tolerate a lengthier transport time.This means that market gardens can avoid picking
tomatoes while they are green in order that they will
tolerate the transport.
The producers also have the advantage that all thetomatoes can be harvested simultaneously.
Disadvantages:
Scientists today can genetically modify tomatoes without inserting genes for antibioticresistance. However the first genetically modified tomatoes contained genes that made
them resistant to antibiotics. Doctors and vets use antibiotics to fight infections. These
genes spread to animals and people, doctors would have difficulties fighting infectiousdiseases.
Strawberries, pineapples, sweet peppers and bananas have all been genetically modified by
scientists to remain fresh for longer.
http://biodictionary%28%271%27%2C%27antibiotic%20resistance%27%29/http://biodictionary%28%271%27%2C%27antibiotic%20resistance%27%29/http://biodictionary%28%271%27%2C%27antibiotics%27%29/http://biodictionary%28%271%27%2C%27antibiotics%27%29/http://biodictionary%28%271%27%2C%27antibiotic%20resistance%27%29/http://biodictionary%28%271%27%2C%27antibiotic%20resistance%27%29/ -
8/2/2019 Genetic Engineer
6/15
An Indonesian woman brings in harvested seaweed from her farm off the beach in Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia.
(AP Photo/Ed Wray)
(Newser) Algae-based fuel is a step closer to reality. Scientists in California have
genetically modified a microbe so that it can convert seaweed into biofuel, the Guardian
reports. "Natural seaweed species grow very fast10 times faster than normal plantsand are
full of sugars, but it has been very difficult to make ethanol by conventional fermentation," says
a researcher. The microbe breakthrough is a "critical step" toward an alternative form of
ethanol, but there's still a long way to go.
"Scaling up processes using engineered microbes is not always easy. They also need to provethe economics work," the scientist adds. That could be tough: "The costs are still five times
higher than they need to be to get to a reasonable fuel price," says another expert. Still, an
abundance of existing seaweed farms offers promise for the future. "In China and Japan, you
will see farms that are the equivalent of the Midwest cornfields in the US," says a researcher
involved. Some 3% of coastal waters worldwide could provide enough ethanol to supply more
than 40% of US drivers' needs, he notes.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/jan/19/gm-microbe-seaweed-biofuelshttp://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/jan/19/gm-microbe-seaweed-biofuelshttp://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/jan/19/gm-microbe-seaweed-biofuels -
8/2/2019 Genetic Engineer
7/15
Sockeye salmon ride home in a fisherman's cooler from the Brewster Pool, the stretch of the
Columbia River near Brewster, Wash. on July 22, 2010. (AP Photo/The Spokesman-Review, Jesse Tinsley)
The FDA has declared a genetically engineered salmon safe for human consumption, putting it
one brief swim away from a supermarket near you. Dubbed AquAdvantage Salmon, the
Massachusetts-bred fish have been enhanced with a gene from an ocean pout an eel-like
fishthat allows them to grow all year round, putting them at salable size in just 18 months.
Weve been studying this fish for more than 10 years, says the companys CEO. This is an
Atlantic salmon. It looks like an Atlantic salmon. It tastes like an Atlantic salmon.
But critics complain that the deliberations have all been behind closed doors, and that much of
the companys data has been kept under wraps, reports the Washington Post. Theres a
transparency problem, says the head of a group that opposes the fishs approval. Others worry
about the ecological implications if an AquAdvantage salmon escaped its fish farm and mingled
with endangered wild salmon. "This is very, very complex," said an expert in genetically
modified organisms.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/06/AR2010090602424.html?nav=rss_email/componentshttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/06/AR2010090602424.html?nav=rss_email/componentshttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/06/AR2010090602424.html?nav=rss_email/components -
8/2/2019 Genetic Engineer
8/15
Scientists have created genetically modified cattle that
produce "human" milk in a bid to make cows' milk more
nutritious.
Researchers say they are able to create cows that produce milk containing a human protein called lysozyme
The scientists have successfully introduced human genes into 300 dairy cows to produce milk
with the same properties as human breast milk.
Human milk contains high quantities of key nutrients that can help to boost the immune system
of babies and reduce the risk of infections.
The scientists behind the research believe milk from herds of genetically modified cows could
provide an alternative to human breast milk and formula milk for babies, which is often
criticised as being an inferior substitute.
They hope genetically modified dairy products from herds of similar cows could be sold in
supermarkets. The research has the backing of a major biotechnology company.
The work is likely to inflame opposition to GM foods. Critics of the technology and animal
welfare groups reacted angrily to the research, questioning the safety of milk from genetically
modified animals and its effect on the cattle's health.
-
8/2/2019 Genetic Engineer
9/15
The Biggest Scientific Breakthroughs of 2008
The year 2008 closes with two enormous scientific and technological challenges unresolved:
How to create renewable and benign sources of energy and how to lessen the damage we're
doing to the global climate system.
Those twin issues are the "greatest challenge facing modern science," according to Nobel
laureate Steven Chu, the gifted physicist who has been nominated to head the Department of
Energy. He will be at the center of the effort to deal with these vexing problems, and his
nomination signals a new day in that effort.
Clearly, those two issues dominated the world of science during 2008, a year that also saw
much progress in fields as diverse as genetic engineering, the imaging of new planets outside
our solar system and the maturing of social media that has altered everything from how we
meet people to financing a costly and victorious campaign for the presidency of the United
States. It's difficult to pick a single scientific achievement that stands out above all othersbecause science, as a whole, doesn't work that way.
Science is and always will be a work in progress. Discoveries today are built upon past
discoveries as progress is achieved, inch by inch. But rarely has there been a year when two
inseparable issues dominated so much of our lives.
Energy and climate moved science from the lab to our living rooms and they were the "hot
button" scientific issues of 2008.
The "breakthrough" in this case is not just hardware; it's a growing understanding of the
urgency in solving these critical problems. Here's our list of the top 10.
Energy and Climate Change
The year the earth stood still. Polluted air, a lopsided dependence on shaky sources of foreign
oil and congested highways couldn't convince Americans that it was time to get serious about
new sources of energy. But more than four bucks per gallon at the gas pump did the trick.
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/JustOneThing/wireStory?id=6461910http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=6438644http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Politics/story?id=6334644&page=1http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/12/obama-announc-1.htmlhttp://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/12/obama-announc-1.htmlhttp://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Politics/story?id=6334644&page=1http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=6438644http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/JustOneThing/wireStory?id=6461910 -
8/2/2019 Genetic Engineer
10/15
Biofuels, hybrids and photovoltaic cells slipped into our conversations like invaders from
another planet. Progress was reported from all areas of energy production but not all roads led
us closer to energy independence. Corn isn't going to replace gasoline. That may be the most
important energy "discovery" in 2008. Corn displaces agricultural land normally used for food
production and, according to one study, it takes about 28 gallons of water to produce enough
biofuel from corn to push a car just one mile. Substitute water wars for gas wars.
That disappointment grew out of research that was dictated by funding. Washington thought
corn was a good idea and that's where a lot of research funds went. It should be the other way
around. Let discoveries chart the course; let the funding follow. Stay fluid.
Throughout the year, discoveries flowed in from hundreds of labs: wearable electronic circuits
that can use body movements to recharge batteries; solar panels so flexible they can be
"painted" on a roof; photovoltaic cells that are twice as effective at converting sunlight to
electricity; and a new generation of fuel-efficient vehicles.
The Sun Is Rising
Construction is under way on new wind farms, with huge turbines generating electricity from
the passing breeze, and vast acreage is being converted to solar collectors. Scientists at several
institutions made progress in creating a way to store solar energy by using solar power to split
water into oxygen and hydrogen and using the hydrogen as fuel.
Embryo engineering breakthrough triggers criticism
Stem cell researchers at Cornell have genetically engineered a human embryo, a pioneeringdevelopment that was immediately condemned as a big step toward designing babies. The
work itself was very simple: After putting a fluorescent protein gene into an embryo all the cells
in the embryo glowed after it divided, giving researchers a chance to track the changes that had
been engineered. The scientists emphasized that their work was done on a nonviable embryo
that could never have grown into a baby.
The work, first covered by The Sunday Times, was criticized by the Center for Genetics and
Society for crossing a boundary that had never been breached. Their concern is that once
researchers understand how to engineer an embryo, people can design their babies with
particular attributes for appearance, intelligence or athletic ability. But the scientists say the
work shouldn't be misinterpreted.
Australian government gives first license to create cloned human embryos to try and obtain
embryonic stem cells. (17 Sept 2008)
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/AheadoftheCurve/story?id=6461100&page=1http://www.fiercebiotechresearch.com/story/cloning-advance-could-lead-to-designer-babies/2008-04-15http://www.globalchange.com/government-debt-expect-higher-inflation-as-secret-weapon-to-reduce-huge-liabilities.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/stemcells2.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/stemcells2.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/government-debt-expect-higher-inflation-as-secret-weapon-to-reduce-huge-liabilities.htmhttp://www.fiercebiotechresearch.com/story/cloning-advance-could-lead-to-designer-babies/2008-04-15http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/AheadoftheCurve/story?id=6461100&page=1 -
8/2/2019 Genetic Engineer
11/15
The in vitro-fertilization firm Sydney IVF was granted the license and reportedly has access to
7,200 human eggs for its research.
If the firm is successful it would be a world first, the Australian government's National Health
and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), which granted the license.
United Nations has given up its attempt to introduce a worldwide legal ban on some or all
types ofhuman cloning (3 March 2005). On Tuesday its deeply divided general assembly voted
to adopt a watered-down "declaration" that condemns all forms of human cloning but is not
legally binding. The declaration, which was passed by 84 votes to 34, with 37 abstentions,
prohibits "all forms of human cloning inasmuch as they are incompatible with human dignity
and the protection of human life". But it has been widely criticised for being imprecise and
meaningless.
Cloned cows may be safe to eat (12 April 2005) - claims made following health and safety tests
on meat and milk from a small number of cloned cows culled from a herd of 100. Although fat
content appeared to be a little higher in the clones, no other significant differences were found.
Speaking on BBC World TV, Dr Patrick Dixon commented: "Although the meat may be safe,
cloning cattle for farmers is a stupid thing to do from the commercial point of view. Failure
rates are high, deformity and other development problems are very common, and the
proceedure is expensive as well as slow. It would only be worth cloning a very special bull, to
create a twins for breeding, but even then the costs might outweigh the benefits. We are very
unlikely to see herds created this way, unless there is something very unique about them - for
example if they had human genes added so that the cows produced something similar to breast
milk. The technology exists to do this, but it is uncertain if such a product would be acceptable
to mothers."
Dr Dixon pointed out that cloned herds would be very vulnerable to attack by bacteria, viruses
or fungi. "Unlike normal herds, cloned animals show no genetic variation, so the same strain of
virus that kills one animal would be likely to kill an entire herd. Every species relies on genetic
variation to for resistance to disease and cloning would create real risks to farmers if carried out
on a large scale - even supposing it was possible." For more see: cloning stories and human
breast milk from cows?Growing new tissue and organs - stem cell research and therapeutic cloning Bone marrow and
other tissues could repair your brain, spinal cord and heart and cure diabetes or old-age
blindness. Adult stem cells promise investor returns while embryonic stem cells and therapeutic
cloning raise major ethical, legal, and image problems.
Korean and US scientists claim human cloning breakthrough - Woo Suk Hwany of Soeul National
University in Korea announced in February 2004 that he had succesfully cloned healthy human
embryos, removed embryonic stem cells and grown them in mice. Just a couple of weeks ealier,
Dr Panos Zavos made another of his frequent cloning announcements about attempts he and
others are making to produce healthy cloned babies. The Korean and US teams are using
http://www.globalchange.com/ivf.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonech.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonech.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonech.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/future%20medicine.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonech.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonech.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/xenosafe.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/geneticengin.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/geneticengin.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonech.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/how-to-lose-millions-video-on-risk.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonech.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/stemcells2.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonech.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/stemcells2.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/stemcells2.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonech.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonech.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/stemcells2.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonech.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonech.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/stemcells2.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonech.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonech.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/stemcells2.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/stemcells2.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonech.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/stemcells2.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonech.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/how-to-lose-millions-video-on-risk.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonech.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/geneticengin.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/geneticengin.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/xenosafe.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonech.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonech.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/future%20medicine.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonech.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonech.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonech.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/ivf.htm -
8/2/2019 Genetic Engineer
12/15
-
8/2/2019 Genetic Engineer
13/15
abused."
He cautioned that developments in these techniques would be "handing a gift" to controversial
scientists such as Dr Panos Zavos and Clonaid intent on cloning human babies.
Dr Dixon said embryonic stem cell research was being overtaken by advances using adult cells."Human cloning technology using embryonic stem cells is very last century. We do not need it.
"It is being overtaken rapidly by the spectacular advances in tissue repair using adult stem cells
taken from the person who is unwell.
"Clinical trials are already showing results in people with heart failure while animal studies have
shown successful repair in brain after stroke, heart muscle, spinal cord and other tissues."
Dolly the Sheep is dead - possibly the world's most famous animal was put to sleep on 14th
February 2003 after developing progressive lung disease. Dolly was cloned from a dead adult
sheep using frozen cells and born on 5th July 1996. There have been many reports that Dolly
may have been getting old before her time, developing arthritis and possibly other problems.
Scientists are waiting for the results of a post mortem to try to understand whether Dolly's
latest problems were linked to the cloning technique, which commonly causes severe
abnormalities. The big worry is whether teams trying to clone human babies will accidentally
create very sick children.
Clonaid claims birth of first human clone (Eve) by caesarian section on 26th December 2002 and
a second child in Europe (Netherlands) to a lesbian couple in early January, a third in late
January to a Japanese couple who cloned their dead son, plus another to a couple from Saudi
Arabia and a further child - country of origin not declared. But no evidence of any kind hadbeen offered by mid February to substantiate their claims.
Born outside the US to an American woman, Eve was apparently created using Dolly technology
- a skin cell and a human egg from the "mother" who is infertile. Clonaid claims 3 other
"mothers" will give birth soon, one of which is carrying a twin of a dead child.
While many experts expressed doubts about the claims, Clonaid said that independent gene
testing would prove the claim about Eve in less than a week. This promise was withdrawn after
a lawsuit was begun in the US to make Eve a ward of court, on the basis that the "mother" was
the baby girl's twin sister and the "mother" had no legal parental rights even though she hadjust given birth to her own twin. A similar court case was launched in the Netherlands after
reports that the second birth was to a Dutch lesbian. Clonaid say that the "parents" are afraid
their cloned babies will be seized and taken away from them permanently. In early February
Clonaid said that testing of the Japanese baby boy was under way.
http://www.globalchange.com/clonaid.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonech.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/stemcells2.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/stemcells2.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/stemcells2.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/stemcells2.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonech.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clone.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/infertile.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonaid.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonaid.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/genescreen.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/genescreen.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonaid.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonaid.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonaid.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonaid.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/genescreen.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/genescreen.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonaid.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonaid.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/infertile.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clone.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonech.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/stemcells2.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/stemcells2.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/stemcells2.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/stemcells2.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonech.htmhttp://www.globalchange.com/clonaid.htm -
8/2/2019 Genetic Engineer
14/15
Safety of genetically engineered salmon debated
The salmon is genetically modified to grow to full-size in half the time it now takes for natural salmon.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
In genetically engineered food, DNA is taken from one organism and put into another One group estimates 75 percent of processed foods have genetically altered ingredients The FDA is studying a genetically engineered salmon
Washington (CNN) -- The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has to decide if genetically
engineered salmon is safe enough for human consumption and is spending three days to
consider safety and labeling issues.
On Monday, the agency's Veterinary Medicine Advisory Committee discussed how
AquAdvantage Salmon is raised. The salmon is genetically modified to grow to full-size in half
the time it now takes for natural salmon. The fish would get a growth gene from the Pacific
chinook salmon and genetic material from the ocean pout, an eel-like fish, that would allow it
to grow in the summer and winter.
Aqua Bounty Technologies, the developer, had to file a new animal drug application for
AquAdvantage salmon because the process alters the structure and/or function of the animal.
-
8/2/2019 Genetic Engineer
15/15
Wenonah Hauter, with the consumer watchdog group Food & Water Watch, was passionate in
her rejection of the salmon, and called on the FDA to move cautiously. "This is a dangerously
limited set of data. Even the FDA acknowledges problems in the sample size, what's the rush?"
With genetically engineered food, genetic material -- DNA -- is taken from one organism and
put it into the genetic code of another.
What many consumers don't know is that for years genetically manufactured crops and food
have been grown and eaten in the United States. Whether they're pose a risk has long been
debated.
Tomatoes, strawberries, potatoes, and corn have all been genetically altered, in fact about 45
percent of the corn and 85 percent of the soybeans grown in the United States are genetically
engineered, according to the Center for Food Safety.
"It has been estimated that 70-75 percent of processed foods on supermarket shelves -- from
soda to soup, crackers to condiments -- contain genetically engineered ingredients," the group
says.
They are modified for a host of reasons -- to help resist pests, tolerate herbicides such as weed
killers, resist disease such as fungi and viruses, tolerate cold and drought, and even to add
vitamins and minerals to foods such as rice.
The FDA has already approved one application for a genetically altered goat that produces a
human drug in its milk. The drug is for patients with clotting disorders, not for ordinary human
consumption.
The FDA will not decide to approve this new salmon at this meeting. According to the FDA's
Larisa Rudenko, this advisory committee meeting is just to lay out the advice and
recommendations on safety. "We take a very careful look at the data and information that have
been presented and try to identify any hazards," said Rudenko, a researcher with the FDA
Animal Biotechnology Interdisciplinary Group.
Committee members in general considered the salmon to be safe, but still struggled with the
small size of the studies and the amount of data presented. Unlike most meetings, there was no
vote at the end of the day. But on Tuesday, the FDA's Center for Food Safety and Nutrition will
take up the hotly debated issue of what the label should look like if the agency approves the
application.