genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

194
Retrospective eses and Dissertations Iowa State University Capstones, eses and Dissertations 1994 Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Melissa Jo Blacketer Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: hps://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Cell Biology Commons , Genetics Commons , and the Molecular Biology Commons is Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, eses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective eses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Blacketer, Melissa Jo, "Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae " (1994). Retrospective eses and Dissertations. 10582. hps://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/10582

Upload: others

Post on 01-Dec-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Iowa State University Capstones, Theses andDissertations

1994

Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in thebudding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiaeMelissa Jo BlacketerIowa State University

Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd

Part of the Cell Biology Commons, Genetics Commons, and the Molecular Biology Commons

This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State UniversityDigital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State UniversityDigital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected].

Recommended CitationBlacketer, Melissa Jo, "Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae " (1994). RetrospectiveTheses and Dissertations. 10582.https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/10582

Page 2: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

UMI MICROFILMED 1994

Page 3: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

INFORMATION TO USERS

This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer.

The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.

In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.

Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book.

Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order.

University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company

300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600

Page 4: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

F"

Page 5: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

Order Number 9424196

Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Blacketer, Melissa Jo, Ph.D.

Iowa State University, 1994

U M I 300 N. Zeeb Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48106

Page 6: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

r

Page 7: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding yeast

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

by

Melissa Jo Blacketer

A Dissertation Submitted to the

Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of the

Requirements for the Degree of

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY

Department: Biochemistry and Biophysics Interdepartmental Major: Molecular, Cellular, and

Developmental Biology

Approved:

In Charge of M^o^ Work

For the Interdepartmental Major

For the Major D^artment

For the Graduate College

Iowa State University Ames, Iowa

1994

Signature was redacted for privacy.

Signature was redacted for privacy.

Signature was redacted for privacy.

Signature was redacted for privacy.

Page 8: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

11

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF FIGURES iv

LIST OF TABLES vi

ABSTRACT vii

INTRODUCTION 1

Cell Polarity 1

Cell Polarity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae 4

Cyclins and Morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae 7

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mating Response 9

Filamentous Growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae 10

Other Dimorphic Fungi 12

Unanswered Questions About Pseudohyphal Growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae 15

Dissertation Organization 17

CHAPTER 1: MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF MORPHOLOGIC DIFFERENTIATION IN SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE 21

Abstract 21

Introduction 22

Materials and Methods 27

Results 33

Discussion 60

References 72

Page 9: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

Ill

CHAPTER 2: REGULATION OF DIMORPHISM IN SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE: INVOLVEMENT OF THE NOVEL PROTEIN KINASE HOMOLOG ELMlp AND PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 2A 78

Abstract 78

Introduction 79

Materials and Methods 81

Results 91

Discussion 113 Acknowledgements 120

References 120

CHAPTER 3. THE S. CEREVISIAE MUTATION elm4-l FACILITATES PSEUDOHYPHAL DIFFERENTIATION AND INTERACTS WITH A DEFICIENCY IN PHOSPHORIBOSYLPYROPHOSPHATE SYNTHASE ACTIVITY TO CAUSE CONSTITUTIVE PSEUDOHYPHAL GROWTH 126

Abstract 126

Introduction 127

Materials and Methods 130

Results 136

Discussion 153

Acknowledgements 157

References 158

CHAPTER 4. CONCLUSIONS 161

Summary 161

Discussion 162

Future Directions 165

REFERENCES 169

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 180

Page 10: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

iv

LIST OF FIGURES

CHAPTER 1

Figure 1. Morphologic phenotype resulting from elm mutations 35

Figure 2. Complementation matrix 39

Figure 3. ELM3, ELM6, and ELM7 mutations cause temperature conditional growth phenotypes 44

Figure 4. Synthetic lethal phenotype of elm-elm double mutants 47

Figure 5. Synthetic slow phenotype of elm-elm double mutants 49

Figure 6. The mutations elm4-3 and elml3-l exhibit allele-specific, extragenic noncomplementation 55

Figure 7. Invasive growth beneath the agar surface 58

Figure 8. ELM gene dosage affects pseudohyphal differentiation in response to nitrogen starvation 62

Figure 9. Genetic interactions 67

CHAPTER 2

Figure 1. Morphologic phenotype resulting from elml, elm2,

or elm3 mutations 92 Figure 2. Plasmid pA2 suppresses the phenotype caused by elml-1 96

Figure 3. Restriction map of the ELMl region 98

Figure 4. Elmlp is homologous to Ser/Thr protein kinases 100

Figure 5. Phenotype caused by elml mutations in inbred and F1 hybrid diploid yeast strains 102

Figure 6. Loss of ELMl function causes pseudohyphal growth 105

Figure 7. elm2 mutations cause pseudohyphal growth 107

Figure 8. elml, elm2, and elm3 mutants forage in agar medium 108

Figure 9. Dosage of ELM2, ELM3, and CDC55 affects pseudohyphal differentiation in response to nitrogen starvation 110

Figure 10. Synthetic phenotype of elml cdc55 double mutants 112

Page 11: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

CHAPTER 3

Figure 1. Morphologic and growth phenotypes 137

Figure 2. Growth rate measurements 138

Figure 3. Measurement of the cell elongation phenotype 140

Figure 4. Extreme cell elongation is a synthetic phenotype resulting from combination of ppsl-1 and elm4-l 141

Figure 5. Colony morphology of ppsl-1 elm4-l diploids 143

Figure 6. Heterozygosity at the ELM4 locus stimulates pseudohyphal differentiation in response to nitrogen starvation 144

Figure 7. Molecular cloning of PPSl 148

Figure 8. PPSl codes for a homolog of PRPP synthase 151

Figure 9. PPSl determines PRPP synthase activity. 152

Figure 10. A model for regulation of pseudohyphal growth 156

Page 12: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

vi

LIST OF TABLES

CHAPTER 1

Table 1. S. cerevisiae strains 28

Table 2. Intragenic linkage data 41

Table 3. Intergenic linkage data 42

Table 4. Synthetic phenotype of double mutants 50

Table 5. Pseudohyphal growth characteristics 57

CHAPTER 2

Table 1. S. cerevisiae strains 82

Table 2. Complementation matrix 86

CHAPTER 3

Table 1. S. cerevisiae strains 131

Page 13: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

vil

ABSTRACT

The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a dimorphic organism that can

assume either a yeast-hke or pseudohyphal form. Nitrogen limitation induces

pseudohyphal growth, which is characterized by branched chains of elongated cells.

Pseudohyphal cells can grow invasively in agar medium, whereas yeast-like cells

do not. To identify factors involved in morphologic differentiation, S. cerevisiae

mutants exhibiting a constitutive cell elongation morphology were isolated. Genetic

analysis identified 28 recessive and 2 semi-dominant mutations that cause abnormal

morphology, and placed these in 14 distinct gene loci, termed ELM, for ELongated

Morphology. Many elm mutations cause multiple aspects of pseudohyphal growth,

and thus are proposed to allow execution of a specific morphologic differentiation

pathway in inappropriate conditions. Supporting this hypothesis, gene dosage at

several ELM loci affected pseudohyphal differentiation in response to nitrogen

limitation. Genetic interactions were detected between many elm mutations,

suggesting these genes function in the same, or functionally related biological

pathways.

Molecular cloning studies identified several proteins likely to be involved in

morphologic differentiation in S. cerevisiae. ELMl was isolated and shown to code

for a protein similar in amino acid sequence to known serine/threonine protein

kinases. Mutations inELMl showed genetic interactions with a mutation in CDC55

that affects a protein similar in amino acid sequence to the B regulatory subunit of

mammalian protein phosphatase 2A. Thus, protein phosphorylation is likely to be

involved in pseudohyphal differentiation. ELM13 was found to be identical to

CDC12, which codes for a component of the 10 nm filament structure located at the

bud neck. Loss of function of PPSl, a gene coding for phosphoribosylpyrophosphate

Page 14: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

Vlll

synthase, a key rate limiting enzyme in the biosynthesis of histidine, tryptophan,

and purine and pyrimidine nucleotides, interacts genetically with elm4-l to

potentiate the constitutive pseudohyphal growth phenotype.

These results suggest an ordered signal transduction pathway recognizes

conditions of nitrogen limitation and then causes pseudohyphal differentiation to

occur. Loss of function mutations in ELM genes are proposed to alter this pathway,

resulting in constitutive pseudohyphal growth.

Page 15: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

1

INTRODUCTION

Cell Polarity

Cell polarity and cell shape

The estabhshment of cell polarity and changes in cell shape, which occur as an

intrinsic part of the cell cycle or in response to extracellular signals, are fundamental

processes necessary for cell function, A poignant example of form influencing

function can be seen in the nervous system. Cell polarity is necessary for the

propagation of a nerve impulse along the cell body and for site specific secretion of

neurotransmitter into the junction between cells. Development of a complex

elongated shape is necessary for a neuron to transmit a signal over an extended

distance (98). Molecular transport across intestinal epithelia utilizes cells with a

highly organized polar cell surface. Specialized proteins and lipids are distributed

asymmetrically throughout the epithelial cell membrane. This pattern of

distribution accommodates the functional needs of each particular membrane

domain. For example, selective absorption of nutrients, secretion of antibodies,

and ion transport occur in the apical domain. This requires a different lipid and

protein composition than the basolateral plasma membrane, which connects the

cells to one another and seals off the intercellular space (97).

Cell polarity and cell motility

Cell polarity is also requisite for cell motility. The movement of amoebas is

possible due to the nonpolar distribution of two different kinds of cytoplasm:

endoplasm and ectoplasm. Endoplasm is relatively fluid, contains unlinked actin

fibers, and is found in the central region of the cell. In contrast, ectoplasm is

localized near the plasma membrane, and consists primarily of a network of cross-

linked actin fibers giving it a gel-like consistency. Movement occurs by extension

Page 16: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

2

of pseudopode from the ectoplasmic region, and subsequent retraction due to the

inflow of endoplasm into the pseudopod. Tissue macrophages also move to sites of

infection by a similar mechanism. The "crawling" motion of a fibroblast is achieved

by a different mechanism involving the directional development of a flattened

extension called a lamellipodia. The lamellipodia is a broad, thin protrusion

consisting of a network of actin-containing microfilaments. As the lamellipodia

grows it adheres to the substratum. Eventually this creates enough tension to

rupture the "tail end" of the cell and release it from its prior position (24).

Cell polarity and differentiation

Establishment of an axis of division and polar distribution of developmentally

important cytoplasmic components play major roles in cell growth and

differentiation. For example, oriented cell division and the asymmetric distribution

of cytoplasmic determinants are pivotal in the embryogenesis of the nematode

Caenorhabditis elegans. In C. elegans, a specific pattern of nuclear and centrosome

rotation defines the division axes and sets polarity firmly in place by the two-cell

stage of embryogenesis (56). Localization of germ-line specific P granules to the

posterior pole of the cell occurs after fertilization but before the first cleavage takes

place. A pattern of localization and partitioning of the P granules continues through

four division cycles, after which they are equally distributed between two daughter

cells which in turn propagate the germ line during post embryonic development.

Perturbations in either of these processes results in arrested growth as a mass of

amorphous cells (60).

The ability of higher plants to develop shoots and roots is dependent on cell

and plant polarity. The major axis of higher plants defines unlike ends, one of

which generates shoots, the other roots. This is easily visualized in the regeneration

Page 17: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

3

of cuttings in which the apical end produces shoots and the basal end generates

roots regardless of gravitational orientation (100). Cell polarity is requisite for the

development of specialized cells such as those producing root hairs. Asymmetric

cell division of epidermal root cells in some species is associated with competence

to form a root hair. A small sister cell can cease division and form a hair, while a

larger sister continues to divide as an epidermal cell. Polarized cellular events

that occur include the accumulation of polysaccharides at the incipient site of hair

growth and rapid polar deposition of cell wall material at the site of hair development

(7,20,117).

Cell polarity in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle

In the budding yeast )Sacc/iarom3'ces cerevisiae, the establishment of cell polarity

and an ordered progression of morphological changes occurs within each cell cycle.

Bud emergence occurs at a genetically determined select site. Secretory vesicles,

actin patches, the SPA2 protein, and lOnm neck filaments accumulate at the

programmed site just prior to bud initiation. Membrane and cell wall biogenesis is

directed exclusively to the growing bud while chitin deposition is restricted to the

bud neck. Actin patches localize within the bud at the site of growth, first

concentrating primarily at the bud tip then becoming depolarized within the bud

at a later stage of bud development. The mitotic spindle forms along the mother-

bud axis at the time of bud emergence; nuclear elongation and migration to the

bud neck occurs coincident with bud growth. When the bud is approximately 25%

the size of the mother, ER and Golgi compartments migrate into the bud. Nuclear

division follows completion of chromosome distribution. Cytokinesis and mother-

daughter cell separation then occurs producing a daughter cell somewhat smaller

than the mother cell. Membrane and cell wall biogenesis continues in the daughter

cell in an isotropic fashion resulting in uniform cell enlargement (14,55,68,82).

Page 18: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

4

Cell Polarity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Bud site selection

The ordered progression of events, and cycles of polar (bud directed) and isotropic

growth patterns, are nonrandom processes. Control mechanisms must exist which

activate and direct cellular and morphological events in a cell cycle dependent

manner. Previous genetic and biochemical studies of cell polarity and bud formation

in S. cerevisiae have focused on three basic morphological defects: bud site selection

defects, bud emergence defects, and bud elongation defects. Bud site selection

defects are indicated by an altered pattern of bud site localization. Wild type,

MATa or MATa, haploid cells exhibit an axial budding pattern (budding always

occurs adjacent to a previous bud site), whereas wild type^ MATa/a, diploid cells

show a bipolar pattern of bud emergence (budding occurs adjacent to the birth scar

or at the opposite pole). To date, five genes, BUDl (RSRl), BUD2 (CLA21ERC25),

BUD3, BUD4, and BUD5, have been found to be involved in the determination of

budding pattern (10,18,19,23,81,93). Mutations in BUDl, BUD2, or BUD5 cause

random bud site selection in both haploid and diploid cells. Mutations in BUD3 or

BUD4 cause bipolar budding in haploid cells, which normally bud axially, but do

not affect the bipolar budding pattern of MATa/a diploid cells (18,19). Three of

these genes have been cloned and show homology to proteins commonly involved

in signal transduction. The BUDl gene is a GTP-binding protein which has 53%

amino acid sequence identity with the mammalian Krev-1 gene product (93).

Overexpression of the Krev-1 protein has been found to suppress K-ras induced

oncogenic transformation (63). BUD2 shows amino acid sequence similarity to

GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) (23), and the BUD5 gene encodes a putative

guanine nucleotide releasing protein (GNRP) related to the yeast CDC25 gene

product (18,81).

Page 19: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

5

Bud emergence

The bud emergence defective phenotype consists of large, multinucleate,

unbudded (or multiply budded) cells which show delocalization of secretion, actin

distribution, and cell surface deposition. Mutations causing this phenotype have

been found in genes coding for components of the cytoskeleton and genes coding for

signal transduction molecules. To date, the list of genes in this class include: ACTi,

MY02, PFYl, CAP2, ABPl, CDC24, CDC42, CDC43, RHOl, BEMl, and BEM2.

Mutations in the ACTl gene, which codes for the actin protein, and genes coding

for actin binding proteins such as myosin {MY02), profilin (PFYl), and capping

protein (CAP2) cause the bud emergence defective phenotype, as does overexpression

of the actin binding protein gene, ABPl (2,27,43,58,76). The CDC24, CDC42,

CDC43, RHOl, BEMl, and BEM2 genes code for proteins likely to be involved

with signal transduction. Loss of function mutations in CDC24, CDC42, CDC43,

BEMl, BEM2 or an activating mutation in RHOl result in a bud emergence defect

(1,33,57,71,121). CDC42 andRHOl are members of the iîiïO family of GTP-binding

proteins which in turn belongs to the RAS superfamily (57). CDC24 shows significant

amino acid sequence homology with known calcium binding proteins (72) and to

some regions of the proto-dbl and proto-bcr oncogene products (89); the dbl protein

has been shown to act as a GNRP for CDC42Hs, the human homolog of the yeast

CDC42 protein (47). In addition, some CDC24 mutations which lead to random

budding can be suppressed by overexpression of the BUDl G-protein (8,101,102).

CDC43 is a geranylgeranyltransferase which modifies proteins with a C-terminal

C-X-X-L motif. CDC42 (57), RHOl (71), and the bud site selection gene BUDl (8)

each possess this C-terminal sequence. Genetic interaction between CDC24 and/

or CDC42 and four other genes, MSBl, MSB2, BEMl, and BEM2 has been

Page 20: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

6

demonstrated (9). BEMl and the bud site selection gene, BUD5, also interact

genetically (18) while BEM2 has been shown to function as a GTPase activating

protein (GAP) for RHOl (A.Myers - personal communication). These "bud

emergence" gene products are thought to play distinct roles in the organization

and assembly of products required for proper bud growth.

Bud elongation

The principal phenotype of bud elongation mutants is an elongated cell shape.

Mutations causing this phenotype have been found in genes coding for presumptive

cytoskeletal components and signal transduction molecules. Some bud elongation

mutants have a defect in cytokinesis, and hence, are multinucleate and possess

multiple elongated buds. This phenotype is caused by mutations in CDC3, CDCIO,

CDC 11, or CDC 12 (12), homologous genes coding for proteins that co-localize to the

bud neck. All four proteins are thought to be constituents of cytoskeletal lOnm

filaments which assemble at the presumptive bud site, disperse just prior to

cytokinesis, and are involved in normal bud growth (44,48,61).

Alterations in the activity of some signal transduction molecules, such as

overexpression of a protein phosphatase and loss of function of a protein kinase,

have also been shown to cause the bud elongation phenotype. Lesions in the TPD3

or CDC55 genes, which code for homologs of the A and B negative regulatory

subunits of rabbit skeletal muscle type 2 A protein phosphatase (PP2A), respectively,

cause elongated cell shape; overexpression of the PP2A catalytic subunit also results

in the same morphological phenotype. These cells are uninucleate but show delayed

or partially defective cytokinesis (50,90,115). Loss of function of the yeast casein

kinase type I gene YCKl, in combination with a temperature sensitive mutant

allele o{YCK2 (Yeast Casein ©nase 1 and 2 respectively) also results in a cytokinesis

Page 21: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

7

defective, bud elongation phenotype (88). Genetic interaction between CDC55 and

YCK2 (synthetic lethaHty), as well as CDC55 and the bud emergence gene BEM2

(suppression of cdc55 by bem2) has been demonstrated (50,88). These relationships,

along with genetic interactions established between bud emergence genes and bud

site selection genes (see above) suggest these three processes - bud site selection,

bud emergence, and bud morphogenesis - are regulated by interacting biological

pathways.

Cyclins and Morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Recent genetic and biochemical studies indicate the involvement of cyclins and

the cell cycle regulatory protein kinase, CDC28, in control of polarized

morphogenesis in S. cerevisiae. CDC28 is homologous to mammalian p34 and

Schizosaccharomyces pombe cdc2 kinases. The p34 kinase is a universal regulator

of entry into mitosis in all eukaryotes and is also required for entry into S phase

(48,77,78,85). CDC28 is activated by direct phosphorylation as well as association

with a variety of proteins of the cyclin family (92,106). Inactivation of CDC28 in S.

cerevisiae as well as p34 in mammalian cells, is required for exit from mitosis

(38,73). The diverse fimctions of CDC28 are thought to be regulated by the particular

type of cyclin with which it is associated. Cyclins were first discovered in marine

invertebrates based on their striking cell cycle periodicity (32). Nine cyclin homologs

have since been identified in <S. cerevisiae, three G1 cyclins {CLNs), and six G2

cyclins (CLBs). CLNl, CLN2, and CLN3 (also known as DAFl I WHIl) are cyclin

homologs which function in START and the Gl-S phase transition (22,45,67,75,87).

These three genes likely perform some redundant flmction(s) because strains deleted

for any one or two are viable, whereas a triple CLNl, CLN2, CLN3 deletion is

lethal (86). The six G2 cyclins make up three closely related homolog pairs: CLBl /

Page 22: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

8

CLB2, CLB3 /CLB4, and CLB5/CLB6. CLBl and CLB2 are expressed in late S,

G2, and M phase. They function predominantly in the induction of mitotic events.

Individually they are not essential, but a double deletion results in G2 or M arrest

(34,86,112). CLB3 and CLB4 activate CDC28 earlier than CLBl and CLB2 and

are thought to be involved in DNA replication and early spindle assembly events

(34,86). The periodicity of CLB5 and CLB6 resembles that of CLNl and CLN2,

accumulating in late G1 and disappearing soon after the completion of S phase.

Both CLB5 and CLB6 are involved in triggering DNA replication; CLB5 has also

been shown to play a role in the initiation of mitosis (29,97).

In addition to the myriad of cell-cycle control functions attributed to the cyclin

family, Lew and Reed (68) have demonstrated cyclin involvement in the regulation

of morphogenesis. G1 CLNs play a role in actin and secretory polarization whereas

G2 CLBs function to depolarize these same processes. Polarization of cortical actin

patches to the pre-bud site occurs after START and is triggered by CLNICDC28

activity. Actin localization moves to the bud tip during bud emergence followed by

polarized secretion to the same location. The involvement of CLN/CDC28 activity

in this ongoing process was demonstrated by the fact that actin accumulation at

the pre-bud site is greatly delayed in cdc28-ts strains at the non-permissive

temperature, and is prevented entirely in clnl cln2 clnS strains. Additionally,

inappropriate phase expression of CLNl or CLN2 in G2 results in hyperpolarization

of actin to the bud tip and an elongated bud shape; the degree of polarization and

cell elongation corresponds to the amount of CLNl or CLN2 overexpression.

CLB / CDC28 combinations affect morphogenesis in the budded portion of the

cell cycle, serving to trigger depolarization of cortical actin and secretion. This

depolarization "switch" occurs in early G2, approximately 1/3 to 1/2 of the way

through bud development, resulting in a typical oval shaped bud. Loss of CLB /

Page 23: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

9

CDC28 function in budded cells causes hyperpolarization of cortical actin to the

bud tip. Upon extended incubation the cells become elongated indicating secretion

is also hyperpolarized; this effect is most dramatic for clb2 strains. Expression of

CLB1A152, a highly stable form of CLBl, in G1 prevents polarization of cortical

actin to the pre-bud site, and overexpression of CLBl or CLB2 accelerates the

switch to depolarization producing highly rounded cells delayed or blocked in mitosis

(68).

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mating Response

The direction and execution of a series of ordered morphological events occurs

in yeast in response to external stimuli as well as to cues inherent in the cell cycle.

A well studied example is the S. cerevisiae mating response. S. cerevisiae can exist

in a haploid or a diploid form. There are two mating types referred to as MATa and

MATa that are under the control of the mating locus MAT. Haploids of each mating

type produce a unique polypeptide mating pheromone (a-factor in MATa cells, a-

factor in MATa cells) which binds to receptors displayed by cells of the opposite

mating type (STE2 in MATa cells, STE3 in MATa cells). Docking of a mating

pheromone on its receptor results in cellular changes required for mating including

G1 arrest, transcriptional activation, and alterations in cell shape and polarity

which facilitate cell and nuclear fusion (65,107,113). Upon exposure of haploid

cells to mating pheromone produced by the opposite cell type, a polar outgrowth,

called a shmoo, begins to form at a localized site. Proteins which localize to an

incipient bud site, such as cortical actin and SPA2p, also localize to the site of

shmoo formation. The bud emergence genes CDC24 and BEMl are also required

for shmoo formation (107).

Page 24: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

10

Transduction of the mating signal occurs via a trimeric G protein coded for by

the SCGl, STE4, and STE18 genes (a, P, and y subunits respectively). The signal

is transferred via a putative serine/threonine kinase, STE20, and the

uncharacterized STE5 gene product, to a protein kinase coded for by the STEll

gene (107). Propagation then occurs through the action of a protein kinase cascade:

STEll activates STE7, which in turn activates FUS3 andKSSl (16,37,65,111,120).

STEll, STE7, FUS3, and KSSl show homology to the MAPKK kinase, MAPK

kinase, MAP kinase, and CDC281cdc2+ kinase families respectively

(21,25,30,37,51,119,120). FUS3 andKSSl both activate the STE12 gene product,

a transcription factor which stimulates transcription of several genes whose products

function to induce cell cycle arrest and recovery, polarity and morphological changes,

as well as architectural remodeling of the membrane and cell wall, all requisite

processes for mating (28,107). FUSS andKSSl also have nonoverlapping functions:

FUSS propagates the signal for pheromone induced G1 cell cycle arrest whereas

KSSl plays a role in recovery from pheromone induced cell cycle arrest. FUSS

directly phosphorylates the FARl gene product which promotes the association of

FARl with the CDC28-CLN2 complex; this interaction causes CDC28-CLN2

inactivation and triggers G1 arrest (79). KSSl is thought to stimulate CDC28

dependent passage of cells from G1 arrest to S-phase after the mating process is

complete, by promoting the activity of CLNS in an as yet undetermined manner

(21).

Filamentous Growth in Saccharomyces cerevisicie

In its diploid form, S. cerevisiae is a dimorphic species (13,26,31,41,42,70,114)

exhibiting distinct morphological alterations that occur in response to environmental

signals. Particular laboratory isolates, however, vary in their abilities to make

Page 25: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

11

this dimorphic switch. Nitrogen starvation in the presence of glucose is a natural

inducer of the transition from the oval shaped, yeast-like form to the filamentous

form of cells, termed pseudohyphae. The pseudohyphal growth form is characterized

by cells with an elongated morphology which remain connected to each other,

presumably, by the cell wall. In the great majority of cell divisions, a unipolar

budding pattern occurs in which daughter cells bud and rebud at the pole opposite

the birth pole. This produces an expanded, branched structure emanating away

from the center of the colony. When grown on solid agar medium, pseudohyphal

cells penetrate the agar and grow below the surface, a phenomenon termed foraging.

This has lead to the postulation that pseudohyphae, as opposed to yeast-like cells,

may uniquely secrete glycohydrolases which aid in the foraging process (41). These

observations suggest S. cerevisiae can perceive and transduce a nutritional signal

which flips a developmental switch resulting in a specific morphological

differentiation response. Unlike the mating response, however, less is known of

the molecular nature of the signal(s) involved in this transition or the mechanisms

of the signal transduction and response pathway(s). Genetic evidence indicates

that small GTP-binding proteins may be involved. The pseudohyphal transition is

enhanced in strains carrying the mutation (41), and preliminary studies

suggest the RHOl gene product may also play a role in pseudohyphal differentiation.

Apparent sublethal, low levels of Rholp result in colonies with a reduced growth

rate and a bud elongation phenotype (A. Myers, personal communication).

Additionally, recent genetic evidence suggests that a portion of the kinase cascade

utilized by the pheromone response pathway (STE20-STE11-STE7, STE12) also

plays a role in transmission of the pseudohyphal differentiation signal (69).

Mutations in the STE20, STEll, STE7, or STE12 genes suppress the formation of

pseudohyphae in response to nitrogen starvation. Epistasis experiments indicate

Page 26: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

12

the order of the cascade components with respect to pseudohyphal signaHng is

identical to that of the pheromone response pathway. Mutations in the pheromone

receptor genes {STE2, STE3), any of the three G-protein components iGPAl,STE4,

STE18), or the FUS3 or KSSl genes do not affect pseudohyphal differentiation,

suggesting that the pseudohyphal signal may be passed to the STE-MAP kinase

cascade by an alternate mechanism. In this vein, the existence of an alternate

MAP kinase (to FUS3 and KSSl) is implicated which would function to transduce

the signal from STE7 to STE12 and possibly perform other functions specific for

the pseudohyphal response (69). Possible candidates for these functions include

seven recently isolated genes, termed PHD for Pseudoifyphal Determinant, whose

overexpression results in accelerated and intensified pseudohyphal growth in

response to nitrogen starvation. PHDl has been cloned and codes for a putative

transcription factor. A region of the PHDl sequence resembles the DNA binding

motif of known cell cycle regulatory transcription factors SW14 and MBPl. The

proposed DNA-binding region shows 73% identity with a portion of the Aspergillus

nidulans StuA gene, which plays a regulatory role in conidiophore morphogenesis,

a process functionally and morphologically analogous to pseudohyphal development

(40).

Other Dimorphic Fungi

Numerous other fungal organisms are also dimorphic, possessing the ability to

undergo morphological restructuring in response to specific genetic and/or

environmental signals. Typical dimorphic fungi resemble S. cerevisiae by exhibiting

an egg-shaped, unicellular, yeast form or a filamentous form of attached cells.

Switching from yeast-like to filamentous growth often correlates with a change

from a nonpathogenic to a pathogenic state. One example of such a dimorphic

Page 27: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

13

species is Ustilago maydis (for a review see reference 6). Haploids are unicellular,

divide by budding, and are nonpathogenic. Haploids with two different alleles at

the a and b compatibility loci, master regulatory elements that affect mating and

development, can fuse and form a filamentous dikaryon. In contrast to the

unicellular form, the highly elongated dikaryon is infectious and parasitic in plant

tissue, causing corn smut. The ability to switch from the yeast-like to the

filamentous growth form is governed by two major genetic determinants, the a and

b compatibility loci, as well as the recently identified FUZ1,FUZ2, and RFTl genes

(5). The two alleles of the a compatibility locus, al and a2, are thought to bear

coding regions for two components of the mating response pathway (11,91); a

putative mating pheromone and a pheromone receptor protein resembling the S.

cerevisiae a-factor receptor STE3. By analogy to Saccharomyces, the al locus is

thought to code for the a2 mating pheromone receptor, and the a2 locus, to code for

the al mating pheromone receptor (11,36,74). The b compatibility locus has multiple

alleles and contains two separate genes, 6E and 6W (83,84,91). Both of these gene

products are required for filamentous growth, and contain homeodomain-like motifs

similar to those shown to mediate sequence specific DNA-binding in multicellular

eukaryotes (39,62,64,96). Sequence similarities to the S. cerevisiae al and a2

proteins, both determinants of cell type specificity, are also present in these genes

(96). Heterologous b locus proteins associate as a heteromultimer that functions

as a positive regulator of filamentous growth (39). Three other U. maydis genes

that function to promote filamentous growth, FUZl, FUZ2, and RFTl, likely code

for downstream targets of the a and b compatibility loci gene products (5). The

exact role of these proteins in filament development and pathogenicity is currently

under investigation.

Page 28: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

14

A second well characterized example of cellular dimorphism occurs in Candida

albicans (95,103,104). This human pathogen exhibits a basic dimorphism between

a budding yeast and a hyphal form. The growth form preferred is determined by

environmental cues such as temperature, pH, nutrient availability, and exposure

to serum factors. Growth processes, (comparable to those which occur in S.

cerevisiae), involving polar development such as filament ring and septum formation,

actin localization, and cell wall expansion are decidedly different in the Candida

yeast-like and hyphal cell cycles. At the time of bud emergence a filament ring

structure assembles under the plasma membrane at the mother-bud junction in

the yeast-like form. In developing hyphae, this process is delayed and the ring

structure is localized to the developing bud approximately 2\i from the mother-bud

junction. Chitin accumulation at the site of the filament ring is also delayed in

hyphal development relative to the yeast-like form (105). At the onset of budding,

actin polarization patterns are similar in both yeast-like and hyphal cells. However,

following the entry of actin into the developing bud these patterns change. In

yeast-like cells, actin is redistributed throughout the cytoplasmic cortex; in hyphal

cells actin remains clustered at the bud tip (4). These patterns of actin distribution

may be related to patterns of cell wall expansion. Two systems of membrane and

cell wall biogenesis have been shown to operate in C. albicans', general isotropic

expansion, and apical growth. Budding yeast initially employ 30% general growth

and 70% apical growth. This continues until the bud reaches two thirds full size,

at which time apical growth ceases and general growth continues until the bud is

fully grown. Budding hyphae utilize 5% of the general, and 95% of the apical

expansion systems; apical growth does not shut down as it does in yeast bud growth

(4,108).

Page 29: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

15

Analysis of the cytology of the yeast-hyphal transition has been rich and fast

paced. However, classical genetic analysis of this phenomenon has been limited

due to the fact that C. albicans has been observed only as a diploid, and a sexual

cycle has not been identified. This has made the exploitation of C. albicans mutants

that are unable to form hyphae or which constitutively exhibit a hyphal or

pseudohyphal form difficult (17,54,80). The dimorphic transition of S. cerevisiae,

however, can be studied with the use of powerful genetic manipulations. S. cerevisiae

possesses traits associated with eukaryotic organisms such as alternate haploid

and diploid phases and the ability to mate and undergo meiosis. Genes are assorted

according to classical Mendelian genetics and gene segregation can be followed

and documented due to the ability to separate spores by micromanipulation

techniques. Heterothallic strains with a stable haploid mating type are used in

the laboratory so the parents of any mating remain available for further studies.

Unanswered Questions About Pseudohyphal Growth in Saccharomyces

cerevisiae

The study of pseudohyphal growth in S. cerevisiae is in its infancy, hence, specific

questions with regard to this phenomenon are numerous. The nature of the inducing

signal is known to be associated with nitrogen starvation (41). However, the

nitrogenous compounds directly involved in signal presentation, and the mechanism

by which this signal is perceived by the cell are not known. It is also not clear

whether other stimuli, not associated with nitrogen deprivation, can also induce

pseudohyphal differentiation. Answers to these questions should enrich our

understanding of both nitrogen metabolism and developmental response to

environmental change.

Page 30: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

16

Some headway has been made into the nature of the signal transduction cascade

which relays the incoming message to a response system. Liu and coworkers (69)

have demonstrated that several components of the mating response MAP kinase

cascade {STE20, STEll, STE7, STE12), are required for pseudohyphal

differentiation. However, many pieces of the puzzle are still missing. Factors

responsible for bridging the nitrogen starvation signal to the activation of this

central cascade remain to be identified. The proteins which act downstream of, or

in parallel with, this process, to elicit the pseudohyphal response are not known;

however the PHD genes recently isolated by Gimeno and Fink (40) are possible

candidates. Because the STE cascade can be active and trigger responses not

involved with pseudohyphal differentiation such as mating, regulatory mechanisms

must be in place which control and direct the appropriate response when this cascade

is triggered by a particular incoming signal. This may occur, in part, through cell-

type specific expression of gene products involved in these separate pathways. For

example, FUS3, a substrate of STE7 and an activator of STE12 in the mating

response pathway is only expressed in haploid cells. Alternatively, an inhibitory

system may exist which prevents pseudohyphal events in direct opposition to a

MAP kinase activation signal; this inhibition could then be removed in response to

a nitrogen starvation signal. These possibilities, or a combination thereof, may

play a role in regulating the transduction of the pseudohyphal differentiation signal.

At this time little in known of the identity of the molecules involved, their sites or

modes of action, or of the nature of the system in which they participate.

Finally, how the cell regulates and makes morphological alterations necessary

for filamentous growth, such as changes in cell shape, and contiguous growth, as

opposed to cell separation, remains largely uncharacterized. It is clear that cyclin

directed CDC28 kinase activity plays a role in regulating morphogenic processes

Page 31: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

17

(68). It is not known however, if modulation of this activity is part of the

pseudohyphal differentiation response. Additional information about regulatory

elements and systems which direct cell shape changes will likely arise from the

study of the primary determinant of cell shape: the cell wall. Cell wall ghosts of

pure cell wall preparations retain the shape of the cells from which they were

isolated indicating the importance of this structure in designating cell shape. The

S. cerevisiae cell wall is made up of three primary components: glucans,

mannoproteins, and chitin. Cell wall biogenesis is currently an active area of study,

but the molecular basis of how the cell wall is constructed and how its synthesis is

regulated is only just beginning to emerge. The relative composition of cell wall

components is altered under different growth conditions in S. cerevisiae, and major

changes in cell wall composition have been correlated with the dimorphic transition

in several fungi, including Candida albicans (15,35). It is not known whether there

are alterations in cell wall composition associated with the pseudohyphal transition

in S. cerevisiae. Questions of cell wall composition, mechanisms of cell wall

synthesis, and the temporal and spatial regulation of cell wall biogenesis, as they

relate to pseudohyphal growth in S. cerevisiae, remain to be investigated. Answers

to these questions should provide insight relevant to the questions of cell shape

and morphogenesis in S. cerevisiae and other systems as well.

Dissertation Organization

This dissertation includes three papers of which I am the primary author. The

Introduction section includes a review of the literature. Chapter 1 follows the

Introduction and was prepared according to the style requirements for publication

in Genetics. Chapters 2 and 3 are in accordance with the format requirements for

publication in Molecular and Cellular Biology. Each paper begins with an abstract

Page 32: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

18

followed by an introduction section. Materials and methods are then listed, followed

by a results section in which data is presented. Figures are placed within the

results section of each paper shortly after they are mentioned in the text. Each

paper concludes with a discussion of the data presented and of issues which pertain

to these results. References cited within a paper are listed after the discussion

section in the paper in which they are cited. A general Conclusions chapter is

presented after the third paper. References cited within the Introduction and

Conclusions follow the Conclusions chapter.

Because the papers in this thesis have multiple authors, I will detail here the

specific contributions of each one. For all three papers Drs. Myers and Madaule

developed or helped develop the general approaches taken. All three chapters

were written by me, and edited by Drs. Madaule and Myers. The experimental

procedures in Chapter 1 were all carried out by me. In Chapter 2 the primary

cloning of ELMl was done by Dr. Madaule (Fig. 2), the disruption of ELMl in

various strain backgrounds was done by Drs. Myers and Madaule (Fig. 5), and the

site specific mutation of residue 117 in Elmlp was done by Carla Koehler. All

other work, including mutant isolation, all genetic analysis, subcloning and

nucleotide sequence analysis of ELMl, and phenotypic analysis was done by me.

Sarah Coats assisted in the backcrossing procedures, under my direction. In

Chapter 3 all work was performed by me, with the exception of the backcrossing of

ppsl-1 and elm4-l in the NY13 genetic background, which was done by Dr. Madaule.

This dissertation begins to investigate the phenomenon of pseudohyphal

differentiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by the use of classical genetic methods.

The creation and characterization of a collection of mutant strains which

constitutively display an elongated cell shape, even when not starved for nitrogen,

is used to identify genes which are involved in pseudohyphal differentiation. The

Page 33: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

19

cloning of one of these genes has identified a putative serine/threonine kinase likely

to be associated with the pseudohyphal signal transduction machinery. The activity

of an additional signal transduction protein, a protein phosphatase 2A homolog,

has been directly linked to the pseudohyphal differentiation process. Another gene

from the mutant collection directly associated with pseudohyphal differentiation,

shows genetic interaction with a key rate limiting enzyme involved in nitrogen

biosynthetic pathways. This finding will serve as a stepping stone for further

investigation as to the nature of the nitrogen starvation signal.

In Chapter 1, a collection oiSaccharomyces cerevisiae mutant strains displaying

a constitutive cell elongation phenotype are described and characterized. Thirty

mutant strains make up 14 complementation groups, which define 14 genes (termed

ELM for ^Longated Morphology) involved in the presentation of elongated cell

shape. Each complementation group was examined for constitutive pseudohyphal

growth characteristics, such as cell shape, delay in cell separation, and the ability

to grow invasively under the agar surface. To determine whether particular ELM

mutations cause a constitutive activation of the pseudohyphal differentiation

pathway that is normally activated in response to nitrogen starvation, the affect of

ELM gene dosage on the ability of a strain to form pseudohyphae in response to

nitrogen starvation was also tested for each ELM strain. Genetic interaction

between members of the ELM collection is also described.

In Chapter 2, ELMl was cloned and shown to code for a novel putative serine/

threonine protein kinase, a type of protein commonly found to participate in signal

transduction cascades. Gene dosage experiments also demonstrated the

involvement of CDC55, a putative B regulatory subunit of protein phosphatase 2A,

in pseudohyphal differentiation. Additionally, a synthetic phenotype was observed

in elml cdc55 double mutant strains, indicating these gene products are likely to

Page 34: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

20

participate in the same pathway and that regulation ofpseudohyphal differentiation

Hkely involves protein phosphorylation. Genetic background effects associated with

expression of the elm phenotype are demonstrated by additional characterization

of the ELM1,ELM2, and ELM3 complementation groups, as described in Chapter

1, in a variety of genetic backgrounds.

In Chapter 3, elm4-l is shown to be a recessive mutation with a moderate cell

elongation phenotype. Half-gene dosage experiments demonstrate that the elm4-

1 mutation acts as a dominant factor that potentiates pseudohyphal differentiation

in response to nitrogen starvation. A second mutation, ppsi-i, was shown to have

a recessive phenotype of a reduced growth rate, and a synthetic phenotype when

coupled with the elm4-l mutation of constitutive pseudohyphal growth. PPSl was

cloned and shown to code for a homolog of phosphoribosylpyrophosphate (PRPP)

synthase , a rate limiting enzyme in the biosynthesis of nucleotides, histidine, and

tryptophan.

Page 35: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

21

CHAPTER 1. MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF MORPHOLOGIC DIFFEREN­TIATION IN SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE

A paper to be submitted to Genetics

Melissa J. Blacketer^, Pascal Madaule^, and Alan M. Myers

Abstract

A genetic analysis was undertaken to investigate the mechanisms controlling

cellular morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sixty mutant strains

exhibiting abnormally elongated cell morphology were isolated by a visual screen

after ethylmethane sulfate mutagenesis. The cell elongation phenotype results

from a single recessive mutation in at least 24 strains or a single semi-dominant

mutation in two strains; these mutations are denoted elm (eZongated morphology).

The 26 elm mutations defined 14 complementation groups, the largest of which

contains six independently isolated alleles. Genetic interactions between mutant

alleles are described that suggest many of these genes play a role in the same

genetic pathway. The elongated cell morphology of many elm mutants is similar to

that of wild type yeast strains undergoing pseudohyphal growth in response to

nitrogen starvation. Each elm mutation causes one or more characteristics of

pseudohyphal cells: elongated cell shape, delay in cell separation, a unipolar budding

pattern, and the ability to grow invasively beneath the agar surface. Many of the

^ Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Iowa State University, Ames, lA

50011.

^ Unite de Recombinaison et Expression Genetique, Unite INSERM 163, Institut

Pasteur, 28 rue du Dr. Roux, 75724 Paris cedex 15, France,

^ Major professor.

Page 36: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

22

mutants constitutively exhibit all of these traits. Several of the mutant alleles had

a gene dosage affect of potentiating the pseudohyphal transition in a laboratory

strain which normally does not differentiate when starved for nitrogen. Thus, a

subset of the mutations in this collection are likely to affect control or execution of

a defined morphological differentiation pathway in S. cerevisiae.

Introduction

The yeast S. cerevisiae undergoes cellular morphogenesis during its cell division

cycle, and also in response to its nutritional environment, providing a genetic system

for studying mechanisms controlling cell shape. Studies of cell polarity and bud

formation in S. cerevisiae have implicated numerous participants in the molecular

processes that direct growth and determine cell shape. Five genes are known to

function in bud site selection, namely BUD 11RSRl, BUD2 (also known as CLA2

and ERC25), BUD3, BUD4, and BUD5 (CHANT et al. 1991; CHANT and

HERSKOWITZ, 1991; POWERS 2991; RUGGIERI ei aZ. 1992). Mutations in

BUD1,BUD2, or BUD5 cause budding at random sites in both haploid and diploid

cells; mutations in BUD3 or BUD4 cause bipolar budding in haploid cells, which

normally bud axially. The products of BUD 1 IRSR1,BUD2, and BUD5 are similar

in amino acid sequence to GTP-binding proteins, GTPase activating proteins (GAPs),

and guanine nucleotide release factors (GNRPs), respectively. Another set of G-

proteins and associated factors is involved in the process of bud emergence, including

the products of CDC24, CDC42, CDC43, BEMl, BEM2, and RHOl. Perterbations

in any one of these genes can result in a bud emergence defective phenotype

consisting of large, multinucleate, unbudded cells that show delocalized secretion,

actin distribution, and cell surface deposition (MADAULE, AXEL and MYERS,

1987; ADAMS et al. 1990; JOHNSON and PRINGLE, 1990; ZIMAN et al. 1991;

Page 37: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

23

FINEGOLD et al. i991) (unpublished results). Cytoskeletal components coded for

hy ACTl, MY02, PFYl, CAP2, and ABPl also are involved in the bud emergence

process (NOVICK and BOTSTEIN, 1985; JOHNSTON, PRENDERGAST and

SINGER, 1991; HAARER al. 1990; AMATRUDAei al. 1990; DRUBIN, MILLER

and BOTSTEIN, 1988).

Other genes have been found to affect bud shape. Mutations in CDC3, CDC 10,

CDC 11, or CDC 12 are known to affect cytokinesis, and produce multinucleate cells

with multiple, abnormally elongated buds (HARTWELL, 1971). These genes code

for a group of proteins similar in amino acid sequence, which co-localize with the

10 nm filament at the presumptive bud emergence site (HAARER and PRINGLE,

1987; KIM, HAARER and PRINGLE, 1991; FORD and PRINGLE 1991). Lesions

in TPD3 or CDC55, which code for proteins similar in amino acid sequence to the A

and B reulatory subunits, respectively, of rabbit skeletal muscle type 2A protein

phosphatase (PP2A), or overexpression of the PP2A catalytic subunit gene TPD3,

caused elongated cell shape (HEALY et al. 1991; RONNE et al. 1991; VAN ZYL et

al. 1992). Deletion of YCKl coupled with a temperature-sensitive mutation in

YCK2, also results in this morphological phenotype (ROBINSON et al. 1993); these

two genes code for proteins similar in amino acid sequence to mammalian type I

casein kinases. The cell cycle control kinase p34CDC28 complexed with specific

cyclins also is a determinant of polarized cell growth; G1 cylins (CLNs) play a role

in actin and secretory polarization whereas G2 cyclins (CLBs) function to depolarize

these same processes (LEW and REED, 1993). In addition, mutations in CLA4, a

gene isolated in a screen for mutations that are lethal in combination with the clnl

cln2 double mutation, result in a bud elongation phenotype (CVRCKOVA and

NASMYTH, 1993).

Page 38: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

24

These observations indicate, as expected, that cellular morphogenesis is a

complex process. Genetic interactions such as extragenic or multicopy suppression,

or synthetic phenotypes of double mutants, is widely documented among genes

thus far identified to play a role in bud site selection, bud emergence, or bud

elongation, indicating specific biochemical pathways regulate cellular morphologic

development (CHANTe^aZ. i991;HEALYe( oZ. i991; ADAMS eiaZ. i990; BENDER

and PRINGLE, 1989; BENDER and PRINGLE, 1991). However, specific

interactions between this large group of factors that ulitmately determine cell

morphology remain to be described. For example, although it is likely that a guanine

nucleotide hydrolysis cycle or cycles regulates cytoskeletal activity, the direct

effectors of any of the G proteins are not yet known. Furthermore, specific

connections between signal transduction factors and the temporal and spatial

regulation of cell wall biogenesis, the ultimate effector of cell shape, have not been

identified. That such a connection exists was demonstrated by the finding that

mutations in the S. pombe homolog of the geranylgeranyl transferase coded for by

CDC43 decrease the activity of P-l->3 glucan synthase (DIAZ et al. 2993).

Another aspect of cellular morphogenesis in S. cerevisiae that is not clearly

understood is the mechanism by which morphologic differentiation is induced in

response to the nutritional environment. S. cerevisiae is a dimorphic organism,

which exhibits distinct morphological alterations in response to an environmental

signal (BROWN and HOUGH, 1965; GUILLIERMOND, 1920; DITTMER, 1964;

EUBANKS and BEUCHAT, 1982; LODDER, 1970; TOWNSEND and LINDEGREN,

1954). Changes that take place include modifications of cell shape, cell separation,

and budding pattern. Under rich nutrient conditions, S. cerevisiae grows as a

unicellular yeast in which cells have an oval shape and are easily detached from

one another. Nitrogen starvation, in the presence of glucose, induces a transition

Page 39: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

25

from the yeast-like form to a filamentous, pseudohyphal form. Pseudohyphal cells

have an elongated cell shape and remain attached to each other, presumably by

the cell wall. A unipolar budding pattern predominates in which daughter cells

bud and rebud at the pole opposite the birth pole. These features lead to growth in

expanded, branched chains of cells which emanate away from the colony center,

and can penetrate the agar surface to grow invasively in a third dimension

(GIMENO et al. i992). Several genes are known to affect pseudohyphal

differentiation. Mutations in STE7, STEll, STE12, or STE20, which code for

components of the mating response signal transduction pathway, suppress the

formation of pseudohyphae in response to nitrogen limitation (LIU, STYLES and

FINK, 1993; SPRAGUE and THORNER, 1992). Mutations in RAS2 and SHR3

also affect pseudohyphal differentiation by hyperactivating the response to nitrogen

limitation (GIMENO et al. 1992). Recently, seven different PHD genes were isolated

based on the ability, when overexpressed, to cause an accelerated and intensified

pseudohyphal response to nitrogen limitation. PHDl was cloned and shown to

code for a putative transcription factor, which contains a DNA-binding motif related

to those of the cell cycle regulatory transcription factors SWI4 and MBPl (GIMENO

and FINK, 1994).

Switching between yeast-like and pseudohyphal growth most likely involves

cell cycle dependent modifications in the regulatory machinery of bud site selection,

bud emergence, and the control of cell shape. The study of pseudohyphal growth

and its regulation should provide valuable insights about these polar and

morphological processes, and their regulation within the confines of the cell cycle.

In an effort to identify additional factors involved in the processes of cellular

morphogenesis we have taken a genetic approach, isolating S. cerevisiae mutants

that constitutively display an elongated cell shape even in the absence of a

Page 40: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

26

differentiation signal. A subset of the mutations isolated in this way are expected

to result in activation of the differentiation pathway normally triggered by nitrogen

starvation, producing constitutive pseudohyphae. These mutations may reside in

genes coding for proteins involved with perception or transmission of the induction

signal, in cytoskeletal components, or in regulatory elements that affect cytoskeletal

rearrangement and/or cell wall biogenesis and thus directly modulate cell

morphology. This general approach to isolating mutations affecting morphology is

expected to identify previously undescribed genes, as well as others already known

to play a role in cellular morphogenesis. Identification of genetic interaction between

mutations isolated in this screen, both among themselves and with other classes of

mutations affecting morphology, would help to address the question of how the

known regulatory mechanisms interact with one another, ultimately to determine

cell shape. Additionally, constitutive pseudohyphal mutants isolated in this screen

are expected to be valuable for analyses of the differentiation state itself, for example

potential differences in the regulation of cell wall biogenesis and composition in

yeast-like and pseudohyphal cells, or differential gene expression in the two

morphological states.

In this report, we use a genetic screen to isolate S. cerevisiae morphologic

mutants that constitutively display elongated cell shape. Thirty mutant strains

identified 14 independent genes that are involved in cellular morphogenesis.

Specific genetic interactions between mutations isolated in this screen are described.

Mutations are identified that cause multiple pseudohyphal growth characteristics,

and that affect the capacity for pseudohyphal differentiation in response to nitrogen

starvation. These mutations are distinctive from others known to affect

pseudohyphal differentiation, by virtue of being recessive with respect to causing

pseudohyphal growth characteristics in rich medium. Thus, the analysis is likely

Page 41: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

27

to identify factors that function to repress pseudohyphal growth in rich nutrient

conditions. In contrast, the previously identified genes were detected primarily by

the ability to enhance pseudohyphal growth, or being required for the response,

and thus seemingly function as positive factors in the differentiation pathway.

Materials and Methods

Media and strains: The S. cerevisiae strains used in this study are described

in Table 1. Yeast strains were cultured at 30° unless specified otherwise. The

following media were used: YPD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% glucose); SD

(2% glucose, 0.7% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, supplemented as

required with adenine, histidine, leucine, lysine, methionine, tryptophan, and uracil

at 20 |xg/ml each); sporulation medium (1% postassium acetate, 0.05% glucose,

0.1% yeast extract, supplemented with adenine, histidine, leucine, lysine,

methionine, tryptophan, and uracil at 20 |ig/ml each); and SLAHD, a nitrogen

starvation medium described by GIMENO et al. (1992). Solid media for yeast

contained 2% agar.

Genetic methods: Standard genetic methods were used for complementation

analyses, mating, and tetrad dissection (ROSE, WINSTON and HEITER, 1990).

When auxotrophic markers were not available for selection of a diploid from a

cross, cells to be mated were patched as a mixture on YPD medium and incubated

for 4 hrs at 30°, then zygotes were isolated using a micromanipulator. In all

instances diploidy was verified by the ability of the selected strain to sporulate.

Isolation of mutants: Cells of the strain D273-10B/A1 were mutagenized

using a modified version of the ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) treatment described

by ROSE et al. (1990). Ten ml cultures grown in YPD medium to a density of 5x10^

cells/ml were treated with EMS in 0.1 M sodium phosphate pH 7.0, for 90 min at

Page 42: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

28

TABLE 1 S. cerevisiae strains

Strain Genotype Source or derivation

W303-1A MATa ura3 leu2 his3 trpl ade2

D273-10B/A1 MATa mete

D273-10B/A2 MATauraS

D273-10B/A3 MATaleu2

E104 MATa mets elml-1

E105 MATametG elml-2

E117 MATa met6 elml-3

E132 MATa mete elml-4

E139 MATa mete elml-5

E159 MATa mete elml-e

E13 0 MATa mete elm2-1

E102 MATa mete elm2-2

E156 MATa mete elm3-l

E13 7 MATa met6 elm3-2

E124 MATa mete elm4-l ppsl-1

E161 MATa mete elm4-2

E172 MATa mete elm4-3

E123 MATa mete elm5-l

E128 MATa mete elm5-2

E146 MATa mete elm5-3

E155 MATa metS elm5-4

E l l l MATa mete elme-1

E121 MATa mete elme-2

E142 MATa met6 elme-3

E150 MATa met6 elme-4

WALLIS et al. (1989)

TZAGOLOFF et al. (1974)

Segregant from 5th backcross of E105/Wia X D273-10B/A1

Segregant from 5th backcross of E105/Wia X D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

° Strains with the designation "Wl" are progeny of a cross between the indicated original mutant and W303-1A.

b The first five backcrosses were to D273-10B/A1; the sixth backcross was to D273-10B/A2.

Page 43: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

29

TABLE 1 Continued

Strain Genotype Source or derivation

E127

E163

E162

E168

E160

E144

E133

E122

E138

DD

DDelml-l/+

DDeZmi-2/+

DDeZm2-3/+

DDeZmi-4/+

TiDelml-S I elml-5

DDe/mi-5/+

DDelm2-l I elm2-l

'Dïielm2-1 /+

MATa met6 elm7-l

MAT a met6 elm7-2

MATa met6 elm8-l

MATa met6 elm9-l

MATa mets elmlO-1

MATa met6 elmll-1

MATa met6 elml2-l

MATa mets elml3-l

MATa mets elml4-l

MATal MATa ade21 + leu2/+ met6l+

MATa I MATa ura3 / + leu2 / + elml-IIELMI

MATa.lMATaura3l+ leu2l+ elml-21 ELM 1

MATal MATa ura3 / + leu2 / + elml-31 ELM 1

MATa / MATa ura3 / + leu2 / + elml-41 ELM 1

MATal MATa ura3/+ leu21 + elml-51 elml-5

MATa I MATa ura31 + leu21 + elml-51 ELM 1

MATa I MATa ura31 + leu21 + elm2-llelm2-l

MATa / MATa ura31+leu21 + elm2-1IELM2

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-10B/A1

D273-10B/A1 X (segregant from 5th backcross of E105/W1° x D273-10B/A1)

D273-10B/A2 x (segregant from 5th backcross of E104/W1'^ x D273-10B/A1)

D273-10B/A2 x (segregant from 5th backcross of E105/W1° x D273-10B/A1)

D273-10B/A2 x (segregant from 5th backcross of E117/W1° x D273-10B/A1)

D273-10B/A2 x (segregant from 5th backcross of E132/W1° x D273-10B/A1)

Mating of segregants from 5th and 6th backcross of E139/W1° x D273-10B^

D273-10B/A2 x (segregant from 5th backcross of E139/W1° x D273-10B/A1)

Mating of segregants from 5th and 6th backcross of E130/W1° x D273-10B6

D273-10B/A2 x (segregant from 5th backcross of E130/W1° x D273-10B/A1)

Page 44: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

30

TABLE 1 Continued

Strain Genotype Source or derivation

'DT)elm2-2 /+

DDe/m3-i Ielm3-1

YiDelm3-l /+

'DY)elm3-2 /+

TiDelm4-l /+

DDeim4-2 / elm4-2

DDelm4-2/+

DDelm4-3/+

DDelm5-l/+

DDelm5-2l+

DDelm5-4 / elm5-4

jyDelm5-4l+

DDeZmfi-i Ielm6-1

MATa. I MATa ura3 / + leu2 / + eZm2-2IELM2

MATa / MATa ura31 + leu2 / + eZmS-i I elm3-l

MATa / MATa met61 + leu21 + elm3-1/ELM3

MATalMATamet6l+ leu21 + elm3-2IELM3

MATalMATamet6/+ade2l+ elm4-1/ELM4

MATa/MATa ura3 / + leu2 / + elm4-2/elm4-2

MATalMATa ura3 / + leu21 + elm4-2IELM4

MATalMATaura3l+ leu2/+ elm4-3/ELM4

MATalMATa met6 / + leu2 / + elmS-HELMS

MATalMATa metS / + leu2 / + elm5-2IELM5

MATalMATaura3l+ade2l+ his3l+ elm5-41 elm5-4

MATalMATa met6 / + ade2 / + his3 /+ elm5-41ELM5

MATalMATa ura3 / + leu2 / + elm6-llelm6-l

D273-10B/A2 x (segregant from 5th backcross of E102AV1° x D273-10B/A3)

Mating of segregants from 5th and 6th backcross of E156/W1° x D273-10B^

D273-10B/A1 X (segregant from 5th backcross of E156/W1° x D273-10B/A1)

D273-10B/A1 x (segregant from 5th backcross of E137/W1° x D273-10B/A1)

D273-10B/A1 X (segregant from 5th backcross of E124AV1° x D273-10B/A1)

Mating of segregants from 5th and 6th backcross of E161/W1° x D273-10B^

D273-10B/A2 x (segregant from 5th backcross of E161/W1° x D273-10B/A1)

D273-10B/A2 x (segregant from 5th backcross of E172/W1° x D273-10B/A1)

D273-10B/A1 X (segregant from 5th backcross of E123AV1° x D273-10B/A1)

D273-10B/A1 X (segregant from 5th backcross of E128/W1° x D273-10B/A1)

Mating of segregants from 5th and 6th backcross of E155AV1® x D273-10B^

D273-10B/A1 X (segregant from 5th backcross of E155/W1° x D273-10B/A1)

Mating of segregants from 5th and 6th backcross of E111/W1° x D273-10B^

Page 45: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

31

TABLE 1 Continued

Strain Genotype Source or derivation

DDeZm6-i /+

TiDelmG-S /+

DDeZm6-4 /+

MATa/MATa ura3l+ leu2l+ elm6-1IELM6

MATa IM AT a ura3 / + leu21+elm6-3IELM6

MATa / MATa ura3 / + leu2 / + elm6-4IELM6

DIielm7-l Ielm7-1 MATa/MATa ura3/ + leu2l+ elm7-llelm7-l

DDeZm7-i /+ MATa/MATaura3l+ leu2l+ elm7-1/ELM7

DDeZmS-2 Ielm8-1 MATa/MATa ura3/+ Ieu2/+elm8-1 / elmS-l

BDelmS-l /+ MATa / MATa ura3 / + leu2 / + elmS-1/ELM8

DDeZ/n9-i / elm9-l MATa/MATa ura3/+ leu2/+ elm9-1 /elm9-l

DDeZm9-i /+ MATa/MATa ura3/+ leu2/+ elmO-1/ELM9

YfDelmlO-1 /elmlO-1 MATa/MATa ura3/+ ade2/+ elmlO-1 /elmlO-1

\yDelmlO-l / + MATa/MATa ura3/+ ade2/+ elmlO-1/ELMlO

HiDelmll-l / elmll-1 MATa/MATa ura3/+ his3/+ elmll-1/elmll-l

BDelmll-l/+ MATa / MATa ura3/+his3/+ elmll-1/ELM 11

D273-10B/A2 x (segregant from 5th backcross of ElllA/Vl'^ x D273-10B/A1)

D273-10B/A2 x (segregant from 5th backcross of E142AV1° x D273-10B/A1)

D273-10B/A2 x (segregant from 5th backcross of E150/W1° x D273-10B/A1)

Mating of segregants from 5th and 6th backcross of E127/W1° x D273-10B^

D273-10B/A2 x (segregant from 5th backcross of E127/W1° x D273-10B/A1)

Mating of segregants from 5th and 6th backcross of E162/W1° x D273-10B^

D273-10B/A2 x (segregant from 5th backcross of E162/W1° x D273-10B/A1)

Mating of segregants from 5th and 6th backcross of E168/W1° x D273-10B^

D273-10B/A2 x (segregant from 5th backcross of E168/W1° x D273-10B/A1)

Mating of segregants from 5th and 6th backcross of E160/W1^ x D273-10B^

D273-10B/A2 x (segregant from 5th backcross of E160/W1® x D273-10B/A1)

Mating of segregants from 5th and 6th backcross of E144/W1® x D273-10B^

D273-10B/A2 x (segregant from 5th backcross of E144/W1° x D273-10B/A1)

Page 46: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

32

TABLE 1 Continued

Strain Genotype Source or derivation

'D'Delml2-l /elml2-l MATa/MATa ura31 + leu2l+ elml2-llelml2-l

DDeZm J / + MATalMATamet6l+leu2/+ elml2-1IELM12

DDelml3-l Ielml3-l MATalMATaura3/+ leu2l+ elml3-llelml3-l

DDelml3-l / + MATa! MATa met6l+ leu2l+ elml3-1IELM13

D'Delml4-l Ielml4-1 MATa I MATa ura31 + Ieu2l+elml4-llelml4-l

T>T>elml4-l /+ MATa! MATa met6/+ leu2l+ elml4-1IELM14

Mating of segregants from 5th and 6th backcross of E133AV1° x D273-10B^

D273-10B/A1 X (segregant from 5th backcross of E133A/V1° x D273-10B/A1)

Mating of segregants from 5th and 6th backcross of E122/W1° x D273-10B^

D273-10B/A1 X (segregant from 5th backcross of E122/W1° x D273-10B/A1)

Mating of segregants from 5th and 6th backcross of E138/W1° x D273-10B^

D273-10B/A1 X (segregaint from 5th backcross of E138/W1° x D273-10B/A1)

Page 47: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

33

30°; about 15% of the cells in the suspension formed colonies when plated on YPD

medium. Aliquots of 0.2 ml were mixed with 8.0 ml of 5% sodium thiosulfate to

inactivate the EMS. Cells were washed three times in distilled water and diluted

to a final concentration of 6 x 10^ cells/ml. Aliquots of mutagenized cells were

plated on YPD medium for single colonies and incubated at 22° for 2-4 days. Colonies

were screened visually, using an inverted microscope, for irregular colony shape

and elongated cell morphology. Candidates were picked from master plates and

viewed by phase-contrast microscopy to verify the presentation of a bud elongation

phenotype.

Morphological analyses: Colony morphology was examined by using an

inverted microscope to observe the cells through the agar. Cells observed at higher

magnification by phase-constrast or Nomarski optics were obtained from liquid

cultures or by suspending cells from an agar dish in a drop of 1.2 M sorbitol or

distilled water. Cytokinesis was monitored essentially as described by HAETWELL

(1971); in this assay the procedure for formaldehyde fixation and removal of the

cell wall by treatment with Glusulase was that described by PRINGLE et al. (1989).

Results

Identification of mutations that cause elongated cell morphology: Wild-

type strain D273-10B/A1 was mutagenized with EMS to 15% survival (see Materials

and Methods). Visual screening of approximately 40,000 colonies on YPD medium

identified 60 mutant strains that clearly displayed the general characteristic of

elongated cell shape in all or a significant portion of the cell population, however,

considerable morphological variability between these strains was evident. The

cell morphology of representative mutants is shown in Figure 1.

Page 48: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

FIGURE 1." Morphological phenotype resulting from eZw mutations. Cells were grown in liquid YPD medium to early-log phase (AgQQ = 0.1-0.3) for strains shown in panels A-D, F-H, and J-0, or late-log phase (Aggo = 0.8-1.0) for strains shown in panels E and I. Cells were concentrated by centrifugation, briefly sonicated, and photographed under Nomarski optics. Strains are as follows. (A) DD; (B) DBelml-51elml-5-, (C) 'DIielm2-lIelm2-l\ (D) DBelmS-lIelmS-l; (E) 'DI)elm4-21elm4-2; (F) DBelm5-41elm5-4; (G) BDelmG-l Ielm6-l] (H) DDelm7-l Ielm7-1] (I) DDeZmS-i Ielm8-1] (J) DTielmO-l Ielm9-1; (K) DDelmlO-HelmlO-l; (L) BBelmll-Helmll-1] (M) TiDelml2-Uelml2-l\ (N) HHelmlS-llelml3-l', (0) BBelmM-lIelml4-l.

Page 49: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

35

Page 50: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

36

To test whether the abnormal morphology of each strain was due to a dominant

or recessive mutation, each mutant was mated to wild-type strain W303-1A and

diploids were selected on minimal medium using complementing auxotrophies.

Six mutants seemingly were unable to mate; the remaining 54 diploids were

examined by phase-contrast microscopy. Fifty-two diploids exhibited wild-type

morphology, indicatative of recessive mutations, whereas two exhibited slightly

abnormal morphology, suggestive of semi-dominant mutations.

Further analysis determined whether or not the morphological abnormality of

each strain was caused by a mutation at a single genetic locus. The diploids formed

by mating the original mutants to wild type W303-1A were induced to undergo

meiosis on sporulation medium. Spore progeny clones exhibiting the elongated

morphology phenotype were selected, and backcrossed into the D273-10B genetic

background. To date 26 of the original isolates have been shown to contain a single

mutation that causes an elongated morphology phenotype, by the segregation of

this phenotype at the ratio of 2:2 in a minimum of 30 tetrads analyzed through six

backcrosses to wild type. The genes identified by these mutations are termed ELM

for ELonsated Morphology. One of the 26 original mutant isolates, E124, also

contained a second mutation that enhanced the degree of cell elongation caused by

the resident elm mutation (BLACKETER, MADAULE and MYERS, 1994).

In the course of the backcrossing analysis it became apparent that the genetic

background in which elm mutations are placed affects the degree to which the

morphologic phenotype is expressed. In many instances mutant spore progeny

from the crosses of the original isolates to wild type W303-1A differed considerably

in cell and/or colony morphology. The morphological variations included differences

in bud shape and length, cell size, cell clustering or dumpiness, and growth rate

(data not shown). Some phenotypic variation was observed in the first backcross

Page 51: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

37

of these mutant progeny into the D273-10B background, even though in all tetrads

there were two morphologically abnormal spore clones and two clones with wild

type appearance. In successive backcrosses phenotypic variation was not observed;

fifth backcross progeny of each mutant were phenotypically consistent, both among

themselves and with the original isolate. The single exception to this general

observation was isolate E124, which was shown to contain two separate mutations

that caused constitutive pseudohyphal growth as a synthetic phenotype

(BLACKETER et al. 1994).

Assignment of elm mutations to gene loci by complementation and

linkage analysis: To determine the number of distinct genes defined by the elm

mutations, the mutant strains were examined for complementation and genetic

linkage. All strains used in these analyses were the products of five or six

backcrosses into the D273-10B background, and were known to contain a single

mutation that caused the cell elongation phenotype. One series of mutant strains

was obtained in the MATa ura3 background, and a second series was MATa and

carried either the ade2, his3, or leu2 auxotrophic markers. MATa. and MATa strains

were mated in all pairwise combinations, and diploids were selected by

complementing auxotrophies. The morphology of the resulting diploid strains was

observed by phase-contrast microscopy. A wild type, yeast-like morphology was

scored as complementation; retention of the cell elongation phenotype was scored

as noncomplementation. The twenty-six elm mutations included in this analysis

defined 14 complementation groups (Figure 2).

Genetic linkage analysis was used to confirm that the 14 complementation

groups each defined a distinct gene locus. Strains within complementation groups

comprising two or more members were mated to each other, in combinations such

that all linkage relationships could be confirmed directly or via commutative

Page 52: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

FIGURE 2.- Complementation matrix. The indicated strains were mated, and diploids were selected on the basis of complementing auxotrophies. Scoring was as follows: = noncomplementation, the diploid had a mutant morphological phenotype; "+" = complementation, the diploid had a wild-type morphology; = partial complementation, the diploid had a mutant morphological phenotype, but to a lesser extent than either single mutant haploid parent. MATa parents are progeny of the fifth backcross of the original mutant to D273-10B/A1. The original mutants were outcrossed to W303-1A prior to the backcrosses. These strains contain ade2 iMATal24, MATa.155, MATa 160), his3 (.MATal55, MATa 144), or leu2 (all other strains). MATa parents are progeny of the MATa parents crossed to D273-10B/A2. These strains all contain ura3. Four MATa strains, E159, E146, E121, E163, are the original mutant isolates.

Page 53: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

39

MAT \ a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

n 1 0 0 1 3 3 3 0 5 3 2 6 7 2 2 5 1 4 5 2 6 6 6 4 3 2 3 âll0l6 Ot 4 5 7 2 9 0 2 6 7 4 1 2 3 8 5 1 2 0 7 2 8 0 4 3 2 8 elml-1 104 m mi + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + elml-2 105 T + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

elml-3 117 rù' + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

elml-4 132 g a + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

elml-5 139 S w m + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

elml-6 159 _ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

elm2-l 130 + + + + + — + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

elm2-2 102 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

elmS-l 156 + + + + + + + — — + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

elmS-2 137 + + + + + + + — - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

elm4-l 124 + + + + + + + + + T". y, + + + + + + + + + + + + + + elm4-2 161 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + elm4-3 172 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + / + elmS-1 123 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + elm5-2 128 + + + + + + + + + + + + — + + + + + + + + + + +

elm^-3 146 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

elm5-4 155 + + + + + + + + + + + + — — + + + + + + + + + + + elm6-l 111 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + — — — + + + + + + + + elm6-2 121 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + — — — + + + + + + + +

elmG-3 142 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + J— — + + + + + + + +

elm6-4 150 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - — — + + + + + + + +

elml-l 127 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + — + + + + + + + elm7-2 163 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + — + + + + + + +

elmS-1 162 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + — + + + + + + elm9-l 168 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + — + + + + +

elmlO-1 160 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + — + + + + elmll-1 144 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + — + + + elml2-l 133 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + — + + elml3-l 122 + + + + + + + + + + + / + + + + + + + + + + + + - +

elml4-l 138 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

Page 54: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

40

principals (Table 2). Only parental ditypes were observed in all tetrads examined.

Thus, all mutations tested from within a specific complementation group are tightly

linked, indicating they are alleles of a single gene locus. To rule out interallelic

complementation the genetic linkage between representative mutations from

distinct complementation groups also was determined (Table 3). Two non-allelic

mutations were detected in all crosses between members of different

complementation groups, confirming that each group defines a different gene locus.

For the most part independent segregation was observed; in some instances two

distinct ELM genes were found to be linked to one another, as noted in Table 3.

Four additional members of defined complementation groups were identified by

complementation and linkage analysis, using original mutant isolates that had

not been backcrossed.

Temperature conditional phenotypes of elTn3-2, elm6-lj and elm?-!:

Haploid elm mutant strains were examined for growth on YPD medium at various

temperatures. Three specific mutations conferred conditional, slow growth

phenotypes (Figure 3). The mutation elm3-2 conferred a temperature-sensitive

phenotype such that the growth rate was extremely slow at 37°, but was comparable

to wild type at the permissive temperature 22°. Two other mutations, elm6-l and

elm7-l, each caused a cold-sensitive phenotype in which the growth rate was reduced

significantly at 15°, but not at the permissive temperature. The growth rates of

the corresponding elm I ELM heterozygous diploids at the nonpermissive

temperatures were normal, indicating that each temperature-conditional phenotype

results from a recessive mutation. Tetrads from the heterozygous diploids were

analyzed, and in all instances the phenotypes of temperature-conditional growth

and elongated cell morphology co-segregated in all tetrads examined (a minimum

of 10 tetrads were tested in each cross). Thus, these three elm mutations cause

Page 55: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

41

TABLE 2 Intragenic linkage data

Diploid genotype® Tetrad type^

PD TT NPD

elml-1 lelml-2 29 0 0

elml-1 lelml-3 33 0 0 elml-31 elml-4 32 0 0 elml-4 ! elml-5 30 0 0

elml-1 lelml-6 29 0 0

elm2-l lelm2-2 29 0 0

elm3-l lelm3-2 27 0 0

elm4-l/elm4-2 28 0 0

elm4-21 elm4-3 31 0 0

elm5-Helm5-2 29 0 0

elm5-l 1 elm5-3 27 0 0 elmS-l ! elm5-4 23 0 0 elm6-l lelm6-2 23 0 0

elm6-l 1 elm6-3 25 0 0 elm6-31 elm6-4 25 0 0

elm7-llelm7-2 26 0 0

" Selected diploids described in Figure 2 were sporulated, and tetrads were dissected.

^ PD is parental ditype, TT is tetratype, and NPD is nonparental ditype.

Page 56: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

42

TABLE 3 Intergenic linkage data

elm X Tetrad type° elm x Tetrad type elm elm cross^ PD TT NPD Linkage^ cross PD TT NPD Linkage

1-1,1-2 X 2-2<^ 16 25 2 43cM 3-1x4-3 7 26 5 1-1x3-1 4 22 5 _ 3-2 X 5-2 3 22 9 -

1-1 X 4-2 6 23 4 _ 3-2 X 6-4 27 22 0 22 cM 1-4 X 5-2 2 7 1 _ 3-2 X 7-1 3 26 6 -

1-1 X 6-4 2 6 1 3-2 X 8-1 10 19 3 -

1-2 X 7-1 7 19 9 _ 3-2 X 9-1 3 3 1 -

1-2 X 8-1 1 6 1 _ 3-2 X 10-1 1 3 2 -

1-2 X 9-1 3 11 1 _ 3-2 X 11-1 8 26 8 -

1-1 X 10-1 8 18 4 _ 3-2 X 12-1 4 9 2 -

1-2 X 11-1 7 15 6 • 3-2 X 13-1 2 5 1 -

1-2 X 12-1 10 14 7 - 3-2 X 14-1 2 5 2 -

1-3 X 13-1 2 5 1 -

4-2,4-3 X 5-2^ 4-3 X 6-3

1-3 X 14-1 1 2 2 - 4-2,4-3 X 5-2^ 4-3 X 6-3

1 4

8 22

1 3 ;

2-2 X 3-1 8 24 2 - 4-2,4-3 X 7-ic^ 10 24 9 -

2-1 X 4-3 4 26 4 - 4-3 X 8-1 3 4 2 «

2-1 X 5-1 5 19 0 - 4-3 X 9-1 1 3 1 _

2-1 X 6-4 0 12 2 - 4-3 X 10-1 2 3 1 . 2-1 X 7-1 6 26 9 - 4-3 X 1].-1 3 8 3 _

2-1 X 8-1 1 12 2 - 4-2 X 12-1 3 5 1 _

2-1 X 9-1 13 16 3 48 cM 4-3 X 13-1 8 26 4 •

2-1 X 10-1 7 22 3 - 4-2,4-3 X 14-ic^ 11 26 2 49 cM 2-1 X 11-1 7 13 3 -

4-2,4-3 X 14-ic^

2-1 X 12-1 13 13 3 - 5-2,5-4 X 6-4C^ 5-2 X 7-1

12 24 1 41 cM 2-1 X 13-1 2-2 X 14-1

1 9

3 20

3 6

5-2,5-4 X 6-4C^ 5-2 X 7-1 34 19 0 18 cM

° PDis parental ditype, TT is tetratype, and NPD is nonparental ditype.

^ Selected diploids described in Figure 2 were sporulated, and tetrads were dissected.

^ Genetic linkage distances were calculated using the formula: Linkage distance in centimorgans (cM) = 50(TT + (6NPD))/(PD + TT + NPD). Dashes represent calculated distances > 50cM.

^ Tetrad data was pooled for the two crosses indicated.

Page 57: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

43

TABLE 3 Continued

elm X Tetrad type" elm X Tetrad type elm elm cross^ PD TT NPD Linkage^ cross PD TT NPD Linkage

5-2 X 8-1 0 5 1 8-1 X 11-1 4 19 4 5-2 X 9-1 2 10 4 8-1 X 12-1 1 4 1 -

5-4 X 10-1 1 4 1 8-1 X 13-1 1 9 3 -

5-2 X 11-1 5 16 6 8-1 X 14-1 1 3 2 -

5-2 X 12-1 2 6 4 5-2 X 13-1 1 5 2 9-1 X 10-1 0 4 1 -

5-2,5-4 X 14-lc^ 3 9 3 9-1 X 11-1 1 4 2 -5-2,5-4 X 14-lc^ 9-1 X 12-1 16 15 1 33 cM

6-4 X 7-1 5 21 6 9-1 X 13-1 0 7 1 -

6-4 X 8-1 3 24 3 9-1 X 14-1 2 3 2 -

6-4 X 9-1 2 3 1 6-4 X 10-1 4 7 1 10-1 X 11-1 3 18 4 -

6-4 X 11-1 1 20 3 10-1 X 12-1 3 10 1 -

6-4 X 12-1 2 9 2 10-1 X 13-1 2 5 1 -

6-4 X 13-1 4 9 1 10-1 X 14-1 2 4 1 -

6-4 X 14-1 11 16 2 11-1 X 12-1 1 3 2 -

7-1 X 8-1 0 7 1 11-1 X 13-1 7 20 7 -

7-1 X 9-1 8 19 4 11-1 X 14-1 13 16 4 -

7-1 X 10-1 3 21 8 7-1 X 11-1 9 22 6 12-1 X 13-1 11 19 1 40 cM 7-1 X 12-1 4 26 4 12-1 X 14-1 24 20 0 23 cM 7-1 X 13-1 5 29 4 7-1X 14-1 4 12 1 13-1 X 14-1 0 7 0 -

8-1-1 X 9-1 1 3 1 8-1 X 10-1 1 7 1

Page 58: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

44

30" 37°

D5elm3-1 D273-10B/1A D5elm3-1 D273-10B/1A

D5elm3-2 D6eIm3-2 D5elm3-2 D6elm3-2

30® 15®

D273-lOB/lA

D5elm6-1

D6elm6-1

D5elm7-1

D6elm7-1

FIGURE 3.-ELM3,ELM6, andELM7 mutations cause temperature conditional growth phenotypes. Strains were patched on YPD medium and incubated for 3 days at the indicated temperatures. Strains designated "D5" are the products of five backcrosses of an original mutant isolate to D273-10B/A1; strains designated "D6" are products of a cross between D5 strains and D273-10B/A2 (see Table 1 and Figure 2).

Page 59: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

45

both an elongated morphology phenotype and a temperature-conditional growth

defect.

Synthetic phenotypes of double elm mutants: To obtain preliminary

indications that specific ELM genes function in the same cellular process, the

phenotypes of haploid elm-elm double mutant strains were examined. Double

heterozygotes were constructed in crosses between mutations in distinct

complementation groups, as described above for the genetic linkage analysis. After

tetrad dissection spore progeny clones were incubated for 3 days at 30°. Nonparental

ditypes were identified by the presence of two wild type spore progeny clones in a

tetrad, with the expectation that the other two progeny clones in that tetrad were

double mutants. The presentation of a distinctive double mutant phenotype was

confirmed by the observation of that phenotype in one progeny clone of each

tetratype tetrad (identified by the presence of one wild type spore clone among the

four progeny), and its absence in the progeny of parental ditype tetrads (identified

by the absence of wild type spore clones among the four progeny). Double mutant

phenotypes were scored as follows: "normal," spore colony equivalent in size to the

smallest single mutant; "slow," small colony size relative to both single mutants;

or "inviable," spore did not grow into a visible colony, even after an additional 7

days of incubation at 22°. Example tetrad germination plates demonstrating

detection of the synthetic-lethal and synthetic-slow phenotypes are shown in Figure

4A and Figure 5A, respectively.

Numerous synthetic-lethal or synthetic-slow phenotypes were observed to result

from coupling specific elm mutations in haploid strains (Table 4). Combining mutant

alleles of the ELM7 locus with those from ELMl, ELM2, ELM3, ELM6, or ELMll

resulted in inviable spores; coupling the elm7 mutation with mutant alleles of ELM4,

ELM9, ELMIO, ELM12, or ELM13 caused extremely slow growth relative to any

Page 60: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

FIGURE 4." Synthetic lethal phenotype of elm-elm double mutants. (A) Tetrads from elmlO-ll+ elmll-ll+ double heterozygotes were dissected on a YPD plate, incubated for 3 days at 30°, and photographed. Spores which had not formed visible colonies at this time showed no further growth after incubation for an additional 7 days at 22°, and were considered inviable. In viable spores in tetratype and nonparental ditype tetrads were deduced to be elmlOelmll double mutants (see text). The terminal phenotypes of inviable double mutant strains (Table 4) were photographed on the dissection plate, using an inverted microscope, after 3 days of incubation at 30°. (B) elml-2 elm7-l', (C) elml-2 elmll-1; (D) elm2-l elm7-l\ (E) elm2-l elmll-l; (F) elm3-2 elm7-l; (G) elm4-3 elm6-3; (H) elm5-2 elmll-1', (I) elm6-4 elm7-l\ (J) elm6-4 elmS-l; (K) elm6-4 elmll-1', (L) elm6-4 elml4-l', (M) elm7-l elmll-1', (N) elmS-1 elmll-1', (O) elmlO-1 elmll-1. Double mutants were derived by sporulation of double heterozygous strains listed in Figure 2.

Page 61: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding
Page 62: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

FIGURE 5." Synthetic slow phenotype of elm-elm double mutants. (A) Tetrads from elm4-3l+ elml3-ll+ double heterozygotes were dissected on a YPD plate, incubated for 3 days at 30°, and photographed. Tiny or nonvisible spores in tetratype and nonparental ditype tetrads were deduced to be elm4-3 elml3-l double mutants (see text). After incubation for an additional 7 days at 22°, double mutant colonies were classed as "normal", "slow", or "inviable" (Table 4). To determine whether the small size of the double mutant spore colonies was due to a reduced mitotic growth rate or a delay in germination, double mutant, congenic wild type, and single mutant strains were streaked on YPD plates, incubated for 1-3 days at 30°, and compared for growth. (B) Mitotic growth comparison plate. Quadrants on the plate, presented clockwise starting at the upper right, represent wild type strain DD; double mutant strain elm4-3 elml3-l; and single mutant strains MATa elm4-3 andMATaelml3-l. Single mutant strains are described in Figure 2. Double mutants were derived by sporulation of double heterozygous strains listed in Figure 2.

Page 63: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

%

% % il

TT

TT

NPD

TT

NPD è

TT

TT

PD

TT

NPD

Page 64: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

50

TABLE 4 Synthetic phenotype of double mutants

Mutations Growth of double mutant Scorable spores tetrads®

Normal Slow^ Inviable^ PD TT NPD Class^

elml-1, elm3-l 0 30 2 4 22 5 Slow elml-1, elm4-2 0 31 0 6 23 4 Slow elml-2, elm7-l 0 1 36 7 19 9 Lethal

elml-1, elmlO-1 0 13 13 8 18 4 Slow

elml-1, elmll-1 0 0 27 7 15 6 Lethal

elml-2, elml2-l 0 6 22 10 14 7 Slow

elm2-2, elm3-l 0 27 1 8 24 2 Slow

elm2-l, elm7-l 0 0 44 6 26 9 Lethal

elm2-l, elmll-1 0 0 19 7 13 3 Lethal

elm2-2, elml4-l 0 11 21 9 20 6 Slow

elmS-l, elm4-3 0 35 1 7 26 5 Slow

elm3-2, elm6-4 2 17 3 27 22 0 Slow

elm3-2, elm7-l 0 0 38 3 26 6 Lethal

elm3-2, elmll-1 0 14 28 8 26 8 Slow

elm4-3, elm6-3 0 3 25 4 22 3 Lethal

elm4-2, elm7-l\ elm4-3, elm7-l^ 6 34 2 10 24 9 Slow

° PD is parental ditype, TT is tetratype, and NPD is nonparental ditype.

^ Slow growth is defined by tiny spore colonies after incubation for 10 days, that upon replating continued to grow at a reduced rate relative to either single mutant parent.

^ Spores that did not produce visible colonies after 10 days of incubation were scored as inviable.

^ Double mutant phenotypes classed as "lethal" had > 89% inviable double mutant spores; those classed as "slow" had > 89% slow or inviable double mutant spores.

® Tetrad data was pooled for the two crosses indicated.

Page 65: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

51

TABLE 4 Continued

Mutations Growth of double mutant Scorable spores tetrads®

Normal Slow^ Inviable^ PD TT NPD Class^

elm4-3, elml3-l 0 34 0 8 26 4 Slow

elm5-2, elmll-1 0 0 28 5 16 6 Lethal e.lmQ-4, elm7-l 0 0 33 5 21 6 Lethal elm6-4, elm8-l 0 0 30 3 24 3 Lethal

elm6-4, elmll-1 0 0 26 1 20 3 Lethal

elm6-4, elml4-l 0 0 20 11 16 2 Lethal

elm7-l, elm9-l 1 24 2 8 19 4 Slow

elm7-l, elmlO-1 3 31 2 3 21 8 Slow

elm7-l, elmll-1 0 0 35 9 22 6 Lethal

elm7-l, elml2-l 0 6 28 4 26 4 Slow elm7-l, elml3-l 0 31 6 5 29 4 Slow elmS-l, elmll-1 0 0 27 4 19 4 Lethal

elmlO-1, elmll-1 0 0 26 3 18 4 Lethal

elmll-1, elmlB-1 0 32 2 7 20 7 Slow

elmll-1, elml4-l 0 24 0 13 16 4 Slow

Page 66: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

52

of the single mutant strains. Similarly, elmll-1 resulted in synthetic lethality

when coupled with elml, elm2, elm5, elmS, elm7, elmS or elmlO mutations, and

the synthetic slow phenotype when coupled with elm3, elml3, or elml4 mutations.

Thus, all elm mutations show a synthetic slow or synthetic lethal phenotype when

coupled with mutant alleles of ELM7 or ELM 11, or both. Mutations in the ELM2,

ELMIO, and ELM13 loci interact genetically with both elm7-l and elmll-1, and

also result in a synthetic-slow phenotype when coupled with one or two other elm

mutations. Mutations in the ELMl, ELM3, ELM4, ELM6, ELM8, ELM12, and

ELM14 loci interact with elm7-l or elmll-1 (listed above), but not both, and also

display synthetic interactions with one or more additional elm mutations. The

mutation elm5-2 caused a synthetic lethal phenotype only when coupled with elmll-

1, and elm9-l interacted only with elm7-l.

The terminal phenotype of each synthetic-lethal combination of mutations was

observed using a dissecting microscope. All inviable double mutant combinations

were capable of germination. The terminal phenotypes of the double mutants varied.

In some instances cells seemingly lysed or ceased growth shortly after germination

(Figure 4C,E,G,J,K,L,M,N,0). In others multiple rounds of cell division occurred

prior to cessation of growth (Figure 4B,D,F,H,I). To determine whether the small

spore colony size of double mutants displaying a synthetic-slow phenotype was

due to a reduced mitotic growth rate or, alternatively, a delay in germination, the

growth rates of double mutants and the corresponding single mutant parent strains

were compared. Cells were streaked on YPD plates and scored for growth after

incubation at 30°, for 1-3 days; an example analysis is shown in Figure 5. In all

instances, the double mutant strains grew at a reduced rate when compared to

either single mutant parent, indicating the small size of the spore colonies was due

to a reduced mitotic growth rate.

Page 67: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

53

Synthetic-lethal or synthetic-slow phenotypes were observed only when specific

mutations were coupled, and thus were not a general effect of any one of the

mutations. Pairwise crosses between representative alleles of all 14 ELM loci were

included in this analysis; any crosses not listed in Table 4 yielded a majority of

tetrads in which all four spore colonies were of equal size, or in which double mutant

colonies were of equal size with the smallest single mutant spore colonies. This

result indicated the lack of a synthetic phenotype. For example, elm7-l and elmll-

1 did not cause any noticeable synthetic phenotype when coupled with alleles of

three different ELM genes. All the other elm mutations tested did not cause a

synthetic phenotype when coupled with alleles of at least seven other ELM genes.

Extragenic noncomplementation between specific alleles of ELM4 and

ELM13: In the complementation analysis presented in Figure 2, pairs of diploid

strains heterozygous at two distinct JSJLM gene loci were constructed by reciprocal

matings. One instance of extragenic noncomplementation was observed in this

analysis. A mutant phenotype was observed in both diploid strains of the genotype

elm4-3/+ elml3-l/+-, this is shown in Figure 6 along with the cell morpholgy of

elm4-3 and elml3-l haploids, and diploid strains heterozygous at only one of these

two gene loci. The mutations elm4-3 and elml3-l are known to be non-allelic from

genetic linkage analysis, i.e. indepedent assortment of two unlinked elm mutations

was observed in crosses between alleles of the ELM4 and ELM13 gene loci (Table

3). Furthermore, fiill complementation was observed in diploids containing eZmiS-

1 and either of the other two alleles of ELM4. Taken together these observations

indicate an allele-specific interaction between the products of ELM13 and ELM4.

Mutations in ELM genes cause pseudohyphal growth characteristics:

All 14 elm gene loci were identified based on the constitutive presentation of

elongated cell shape (Figure 1), a major characteristic of pseudohyphal growth.

Page 68: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

FIGURE 6." The mutations elm4-3 and elml3-l exhibit allele specific, extragenic noncomplementation. Patches of cells were grown on YPD medium for 1 day at 30°. Photographs were taken using Nomarski optics after suspending cells from the agar dish in a drop of water. (A) MATa. elm4-3', (B) MATa elml3-l; (C) I>Delm4-31+•, (D) 'DJ)elml3-2/+; (E) IH)elm4-3/+ elml3-l / +. Strains are as described in Figure 2 and Table 1.

Page 69: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

/ y

55

E y. .

•/:

f - /

r / - ;

.f" -/ vT"

/r : , r . .

r /•

Page 70: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

56

The mutant strains, therefore, were examined for other features of pseudohyphal

differentiation, namely delayed cell separation and invasive growth under the agar

surface (Table 5). Delayed cell separation was detected by the persistence of cell

clusters after early exponential phase cultures were sonicated in conditions that

completely disperse wild type cells; this phenotype was observed in strains with

recessive mutations in the ELMl, ELM2, ELM3, ELM7, ELM9, ELMIO, ELMll,

or ELM13 genes (Figure 1, Table 5). Assays to detect whether cytokinesis occured

in these mutant strains were performed as described by HARTWELL (1971) and

BLACKETER et al. (1993); each strain depicted in Figure 1 was tested. Cytokinesis

defects were detected in the elml-5 and elmlO-1 mutant strains; all other strains

completed cytokinesis (data not shown). The cytokinesis defect in elml strains is

allele specific, because cytokinesis is completed in strains bearing elml-1

(BLACKETER et al. 1993). Thus, in most instances, the delay in cell separation

most likely arises from persistent cell wall contacts.

To determine if mutations in any of the ELM genes could confer the ability to

grow invasively beneath the agar surface, patches of cells were first grown on YPD

plates for 3 days at 30°. Cells were then washed from the plate by rubbing the

surface gently with a finger under a running stream of tap water. Cells which had

grown below the agar surface were not removed by this procedure. Haploid strains

containing elml, elm2, elm3, elm4, elmS, elm6, elm7, elmll, elml2, elmlS, or elml4

mutations could not be completely removed from the agar plate, whereas strains

bearing elmS, elm9, or elmlO mutations, and congenic wild type strains, were all

completely or nearly completely removed from the plate by the washing procedure

(Figure 7, Table 5). Observation with an inverted microscope showed cells remaining

on the plate were located beneath the agar surface, up to five cell lengths in depth

(data not shown). For all but two mutations the ability to grow invasively under

Page 71: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

57

TABLE 5 Pseudohyphal growth characteristics

Phenotypic trait®"

CeU Delayed cell Invasive Gene-dosage Affected locus elongation separation growth effect^

None - - - N

ELMl + + + M

ELM2 + + + M

ELM3 + + + S

ELM4 + - + M

ELM5 + - + S

ELM6 + - + W

ELM7 + + + W

ELM8 + - + S

ELM9 + + - N

ELMIO + + - N

ELMll + + - N

ELM12 + - + S

ELM13 + + + N

ELM14 + - + S

" A score of "+" is assigned if one or more alleles of the indicated ELM gene causes the phenotypic characteristic. A score of is assigned if no mutant allele results in the phenotype.

^ Results are reported for the elm allele showing the strongest response after 10 days incubation at 22°. "N" is no response, "W is a weak response, "M" is a moderate response, and "S" is a strong response. Cells photographed after 30 days of incubation at 22° are shown in Figure 8.

Page 72: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

58

FIGURE 7." Invasive growth beneath the agar surface. Patches of cells were grown on YPD medium for 3 days at 30°. Photographs were taken (A) before washing; and (B) after gently removing cells from the agar surface by rinsing under running tap water. All elm alleles shown are progeny of the fifth backcross to D273-10B/A1 (see Figure 2). D/Al and D/A3 indicate strains D273-10B/A1 and D273-10B/A3, respectively.

Page 73: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

59

the agar surface cosegregated with the elongated cell morphology phenotype in

tetrad analysis of elm / + heterozygotes (at least 10 tetrads were examined in each

cross), indicating that the two phenotypes result from a single mutation (data not

shown). Cosegregation of invasive growth and cell elongation could not be

demonstrated for elml2-l or elml4-l.

ELM gene dosage affects pseudohyphal differentiation in response to

nitrogen starvation: The association of pseudohyphal growth characteristics

with many elm mutations might result from inappropriate execution of the

pseudohyphal differentiation pathway, which normally is activated in response to

nitrogen limitation. According to this hypothesis the function of certain ELM gene

loci is to repress pseudohyphal differentiation in inappropriate conditions, because

recessive mutations, presumed to inactivate the gene, result in pseudohyphal

characteristics in nitrogen rich media. To test this hypothesis the effect of elm I+

heterozygosity on pseudohyphal differentiation in response to nitrogen limitation

was examined. An enhanced response to nitrogen limitation was predicted, because

presence of the recessive elm mutation presumably would reduce the functional

dosage of the ELM gene by one-half, possibly weakening a function that represses

pseudohyphal growth.

The D273-10B genetic background was used for these experiments. The wild-

type diploid strain DD does not undergo pseudohyphal differentiation when starved

for nitrogen, typical of many inbred laboratory strains (GIMENO et al. 1992).

Heterozygous diploid strains were constructed in the D273-10B genetic background;

each contained one mutant copy and one wild type allele of the ELM gene to be

tested. All heterozygotes and the congenic DD wild type strain showed yeast-like

morphology on nitrogen rich media. When grown on nitrogen starvation media

(SLAHD), wild type diploid DD did not show any signs of pseudohyphal growth

Page 74: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

60

after 10 or more days (Figure 8A). In identical conditions many of the elml+

heterozygous strains underwent pseudohyphal differentiation within 5-8 days,

although the frequency of the transition and the expansiveness of the pseudohyphae

varied among the responsive strains. All strains that formed pseudohyphae did so

in three repetitions of this experiment, and the failure of specific strains to respond

also was consistent in all three trials. Representative fields of cells growing on

8LAHD medium are shown in Figure 8, and the results are summarized in Table

5. Any mutations \jxELM3, ELM4, ELM5, ELM6, ELM7, ELM8, ELM 12, or ELM 14

facilitated pseudohyphal growth on SLAHD medium to some degree. This effect

was not observed to result fi'om mutations in ELM9, ELMIO, ELMll, or ELM13.

ELMl and ELM2 show alleHc variation with regard to facilitating pseudohyphal

differentiation in heterozygous diploids. The elml-3/+ heterozygote underwent

pseudohyphal differentiation on SLAHD medium, whereas any of the other four

alleles of ELMl did not have this effect. Likewise, elm2-2 showed a response in

this assay, whereas elm2-l did not.

Discussion

In a broad based effort to identify genes that control cellular morphogenesis

we isolated S. cerevisiae mutants that constitutively display elongated cell shape,

even in the absence of a signal that might initiate pseudohyphal differentiation.

Twenty-six of the mutants collected in this screen were shown to possess mutations

at a single genetic locus that are responsible for the cell elongation phenotype.

Two mutations, elm7-l and elmll-1, are semi-dominant, whereas the other 24

mutations are recessive. Complementation and linkage analysis showed these

strains define 14 complementation groups, the largest of which contains six alleles;

eight of the complementation groups contain one allele each. These results suggest

Page 75: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

FIGURE 8." ELM gene dosage affects pseudohyphal differentiation in response to nitrogen starvation. Strains were streaked on SLAHD nitrogen limited medium (Gimeno et al. 1992), incubated for 10 days at 22°, and scored for the presence of a pseudohyphal differentiation response (Table 5). Cells were photographed using an inverted microscope after an additional 20 days incubation at 22°. (A) Wild-type control strain DD; (B) DDeZmi-3/+; (C) DDeZ/7i2-2/+; (D) HHelmS-lI+\ (E) VtYielm4-l ! •>r\ (F) TiDelmB-l / +; (G) YiDelmG-l /+; (H) ThDelmV-l /+; (I) DDeZm5-l / +; (J) DDeZ/n5-l/+; (K) HHelmlO-l I+•, (L) DDeZTOii-i/+; (M) DDeZ/7zI2-i/+; (N) DDeZ/n25-2 /+; (0) TilielmM-l /+.

Page 76: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

62

Page 77: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

FIGURE 8. Continued

Page 78: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

FIGURE 8. Continued

Page 79: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

65

mutations in many gene loci are likely to cause this morphologic phenotype, and

that the screen described here was not exhaustive.

Supporting the idea that multiple gene loci influence cell shape, the data showed

that the particular genetic background in which a mutation resides can have

significant influence on the phenotype resulting from that mutation. A single elm

mutation, when placed in undefined genetic backgrounds resulting from meiosis

in an F1 hybrid, can produce strains with considerable variation in the degree of

cell elongation, cell separation, invasive growth under the agar surface, and/or

growth rate. Presumably this is due to allelic variation in the F1 hybrid owing to

naturally occurring DNA sequence polymorphism, implying the existence of

additional genes that interact with the ELM genes to affect various aspects of cell

morphology. Initial analysis of the mutant collection was complicated by this

phenomenon, and made backcrossing into defined genetic backgrounds requisite.

An unforseen benefit, however, arose from observed genetic background effects,

namely that some F2 progeny bearing a specific elm mutation grew very slowly

relative to wild type strains. This trait was used to screen transformants for

restoration of a wild-type growth rate, allowing the cloning of ELMl and ELM13

(BLACKETER oZ. 1993) (our unpublished results). Such a cloning approach was

necessary because the genetic screen used was based on visual identification of

strains with elongated cells, and did not select for temperature-conditional

mutations; only three elm mutations were found to cause a temperature-conditional

phenotype. Thus, in most instances there is no direct selection to distinguish

between elm mutant strains and derivatives in which the mutant phenotype is

suppressed by a transforming plasmid.

Molecular cloning of genes identified in this screen has revealed both previously

known and novel genetic loci to be involved in pseudohyphal differentiation. ELMl

Page 80: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

66

was cloned and found to code for a novel, putative serine/threonine protein kinase

(BLACKETER et al. 1993), thus identifying a previously undescribed function

involved in pseudohyphal differentiation. The mutation elml3-l was found from

molecular cloning and genetic mapping results to be an allele of the CDC 12 gene

locus (our unpublished results). Strains bearing elml3-l display one of the most

striking pseudohyphal morphologies observed in this study (Figure IN). Thus, our

analysis, together with the previous characterization of CDC12, suggests the process

of cytokinesis, and the 10 nm neck filaments, may play an integral role in

pseudohyphal differentiation. Further analysis of this mutant collection may

elucidate additional relationships between morphologic development and previously

characterized molecules known to function in cell division cycle processes.

Genetic interactions among elm mutations: The similar phenotypes

resulting from mutations in many distinct ELM gene loci suggested the

corresponding proteins are part of a single physiological pathway that coordinates

morphologic development, or of multiple functionally related pathways. The

observed genetic interactions among elm mutations, summarized in Figure 9,

support this hypothesis. Each elm mutation causes synthetic lethality or a synthetic-

slow phenotype when combined with at least one other elm mutation. Many pairwise

combinations of mutations produced neither of these synthetic phenotypes,

indicating the observed interactions represent functional relationships between

specific genes. It is unlikely that the synthetic phenotypes observed result from

nonspecific, additive affects of mutations that cause reduced growth rate and/or

cell viability, because the single mutants by themselves have wild type growth

rates, or only moderately reduced growth rates. Synthetic interactions were

observed with all types of mutations, and did not coincide coordinately with those

Page 81: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

67

synthetic lethal phenotype

iml4

elml

ImlO elmS

elml

slow growth synthetic phenotype

noncomplementation

elml

elmll elml

FIGURE 9." (A) Summary of synthetic-lethal genetic interactions between elm mutations. (B) Summary of synthetic-slow genetic interactions and extragenic noncomplementation between elm mutations.

Page 82: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

68

that caused moderate reductions in growth rate, or extreme elongated cell

morphology alterations or delay in cell separation.

Known synthetic phenotypes in yeast support the hypothesis that this type of

genetic interaction indicates a direct functional relationship. Synthetic-lethal and

synthetic-slow phenotypes were found to arise from mutations in genes coding for

cytoskeletal components, such as actin and actin-binding proteins (WELCH et al.

i993; VINH et al. 1993), and a-tubulin and p-tubulin (HUFFAKER, HOYT and

BOTSTEIN, 1987). Synthetic-lethal interactions also were found among

cytoskeletal components and proteins which function in regulation of the

cytoskeleton. Mutations in a-tubulin cause a synthetic-lethal phenotype when

combined with mutations in any of three CIN genes, which code for proteins thought

to act in a coordinated pathway to regulate microtubule function (STEARNS, HOYT

and BOTSTEIN, 1990). Synthetic lethality has been documented among players

in the secretion and bud emergence pathways. Mutations in the ras-related protein

Sec4p, are inviable in combination with mutations in several genes of the late

secretory pathway. Lesions in SEC genes involved in vesicle formation and vesicle

fusion (KAISER and SCHEKMAN, 1990; SALMINEN and NOVICK, 1987), as well

as mutations in genes involved in translocation of secretory proteins into the ER

(ROTHBLATT et al. 1989) also show these genetic interactions. Mutations in the

bud emergence genes CDC42 and CDC43 have a synthetic-lethal phenotype, as do

heml msbl and bem2 msbl combinations (ADAMS et al. 1990; BENDER and

PRINGLE, 1991). Identification of synthetic phenotypes in mutant combinations

can elucidate possible in vivo interactions between gene products before sufficient

progress has been made to discover these interactions biochemically. Synthetic

combinations are thought to occur between gene products which perform a similar

function, or perhaps cooperate, one depending on the other, in order to perform a

Page 83: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

69

particular task. Alternatively, two proteins may belong to a multisubunit complex

which retains partial function when one protein is mutated, but suffers loss of

function upon perturbation of both proteins, resulting in a synthetic-lethal

phenotype.

Extragenic noncomplementation is another genetic phenomenon that indicates

a direct functional relationship between specific gene products. The unlinked

mutations elm4-3 and elml3-l failed to complement each other in double

heterozygous strains, thereby exhibiting extragenic noncomplementation. This

phenomenon is thought to occur as the result of alterations in two proteins that

physically interact in a multisubunit complex, possibly by producing "poison protein

complexes," or by reducing levels of functional, wild type protein complexes (Steams

and BOTSTEIN, 1988; FULLER et al 2989; WELCH et al 1993; VINE et al 1993).

The genetic interaction between ELM4 and ELM13 is allele-specific, consistent

with the hypothesis that the two proteins interact directly. Extragenic

noncomplementation between physically interacting proteins has been well

documented in yeast and Drosophila. Specific mutations in «-tubulin genes do not

complement ^-tubulin mutations in both species (Hays et al 1989; STEARNS and

BOTSTEIN, 1988), and in yeast mutations in the actin binding proteins Sac6p and

Abplp do not complement some actin mutations (WELCH et al 1993; VINH et al

1993). A genetic screen based on extragenic noncomplementation, searching for

mutations that do not complement act 1-1 or actl-4 in heterozygous diploids, yielded

at least four new genes (ANC 1-4) thought to play a role in actin cytoskeletal function

(WELCH et al 1993; VINH et al 1993).

Involvement of elm mutations in pseudohyphal differentiation: Many

strains carrying elm mutations outwardly resemble wild type cells growing as

pseudohyphae in response to nitrogen limitation. To test whether ELM gene

Page 84: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

70

function is directly related to pseudohyphal differentiation, we examined the mutant

strains for pseudohyphal characteristics in addition to elongated cell morphology

(Table 5). Mutations in eight ELM genes, {ELMl, ELM2, ELM3, ELM7, ELM9,

ELM 10, ELM 11, axiàELM13) caused a significant delay in cell separation, producing

aggregated clumps of cells, or branched chains when unipolar budding was possible.

Mutations in all ELM genes, with the exception of ELM9, ELM 10, and ELM 11,

conferred the ability to grow invasively under the agar surface. All elm mutant

strains displayed at least two of the three characteristic pseudohyphal features

tested; elml, elm2, elm3, elm?, and elml3 mutations caused all three phenotypes,

producing constitutive pseudohyphae.

Direct evidence that certain i?LM genes function in pseudohyphal differentiation

was obtained by observing enhanced response to nitrogen limitation, compared to

wild type strains, when specific elm mutations were present in heterozygous diploids

(Table 5). Allele specific effects were observed in this assay. Four out of five mutant

alleles oîELMl (elml-l, elml-2, elml-4, elml-5) did not potentiate pseudohyphal

differentiation in heterozygotes, however, elml-3 heterozygotes displayed a

moderate level of pseudohyphal differentiation upon nitrogen limitation. Likewise,

elm2-2IELM2 heterozygotes showed a moderate differentiation response, whereas

the elm2-l /ELM2 strain did not.

In the course of running this assay we observed variablity in the intensity of

the responses conferred by altering elm gene dosage, both between different elm

alleles, and between identical alleles tested at different times. Response variabHties

between different elm alleles were relatively constant in all trials, and changes in

response intensities of identical alleles followed parallel patterns when experimental

trials were compared. Nonresponding strains, consistently failed to form

pseudohypae in all trials. One variable which affected the extent of pseudohyphal

Page 85: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

71

formation in these experiments was the humidity of the incubation environment.

Trials were conducted at 22° with approximate humidity levels of 20%, 55%, and

75%. Trials done at 55% humidity resulted in the greatest overall degree of

differentiation. The level of moisture in the air may alter the agar surface in such

a way as to affect pseudohyphal differentiation. It is clear that the surface plays a

role in this process because the wild type strain E2 differentiates into pseudohyphae

on nitrogen starvation media containing 1.5 - 2% agar but does not form

pseudohyphae in liquid nitrogen starvation media. There is also precedence for

surface contacts affecting, or directly regulating, differentiation responses in other

fungi. The opaque form of Candida albicans is not capable of forming hyphae

under the regime of pH-regulated dimorphism in hquid growth medium (SOLL,

1990) but can make this transition when anchored to a glass surface, or plated on

a monlayer of skin epithelial cells (ANDERSON et si. 1989). Magnaporthe grisea,

an infectious fungus causing rice blast, requires a hydrophobic surface for the

differentiation of germinating cells into dome-shaped structures called appressoria.

The appressorium then produces a thin hyphal cell which penetrates plant tissue

resulting in infection. On nonhydrophobic surfaces, this differentiation does not

take place and the germ tube continues to grow as vegetative mycelium (HOWARD

et al. i991; LEE and DEAN, 1993). In the case of Uromyces appendiculatus, a

ridged surface is required for the analogous differentiation to take place (HOCH et

al. i987).

In conclusion, we have begun to investigate cellular dimorphism in S. cerevisiae

by isolating morphologic mutants that display elongated cell shape. The mutations

present in these strains defined fourteen genes involved in morphogenesis. We

propose that the mutant phenotype in many of these strains results fi'om constitutive

activation of the differentiation pathway that normally is stimulated in response

Page 86: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

72

to nitrogen limitation. Ten ELM genes were shown to affect directly pseudohyphal

differentiation. Genetic analyses indicated that the ELM genes are functionally

related and participate in the same, parallel, or interconnecting morophogenetic

pathways. Thus, subsequent analysis of the genes identified in this study is likely

to provide further information regarding the molecular events that constitute the

process of pseudohyphal growth and differentiation. As an example, one mutation

that causes constitutive pseudohyphal growth, elml3-l, was found to be a novel

allele of the CDC 12 gene locus. This observation suggests the 10 nm neck filament,

and the cytokinesis step of the cell division cycle, plays a role cellular morphologic

development.

References

ADAMS, A.E.M., D.I. JOHNSON, R.M. LONGNECKER, B.F. SLOAT and J.R. PRINGLE, 1990 CDC42 and CDC43, two additional genes involved in budding and the establishment of cell polarity in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. Ill: 131-142.

AMATRUDA, J.F., J.R CANNON, K TATCHELL, C. HUG and J.A. COOPER, 1990 Disruption of the actin cytoskeleton in yeast capping protein mutants. Nature 344: 352-354.

ANDERSON, J., L. CUNDIFF, B. SCHNARS, M. GAO, I. MACKENZIE and D.R. SOLL, 1989 Hypha formation in the white-opaque transition of Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 57: 458-467.

BENDER, A. and J.R. PRINGLE, 1989 Multicopy suppression of the cdc24 bud­ding defect in yeast by CDC42 and three newly identified genes including the ras-related gene RSRl. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86: 9976-9980.

BENDER, A. and J.R. PRINGLE, 1991 Use of a screen for synthetic lethal and multicopy suppressee mutants to identify two new genes involved in morpho­genesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:1295-1305.

BLACKETER, M.J., C.M. KOEHLER, S.G. COATS, A.M. MYERS and P. MADAULE, 1993 Genetic control of dimorphism in S. cerevisiae: Involvement of a the novel protein kinase homologue Elmlp and protein phosphatase 2A. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13: 5567-5581.

Page 87: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

73

BLACKETER, M.J., R MADAULE and A.M. MYERS, 1994 The S. cerevisiae gene PPSl codes for phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthase, and interacts with the mutation elm4-l to cause constitutive pseudohyphal growth. Mol. Cell. Biol. (In Press)

BROACH, J.R., 1981 Genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, pp. 661-662 in The mo­lecular biology of the yeast Saccharomyces: life cycle and inheritance, edited by J. N. Strathern, E. W. Jones and J. R. Broach. Cold Spring Harbor laboratory, New York.

BROWN, C.M. and J.S. HOUGH, 1965 Elongation of yeast cells in continuous culture. Nature 206: 676-678.

CHANT, J., K CORRADO, J.R. PRINGLE and I. HERSKOWITZ, 1991 Yeast BUD5, encoding a putative GDP-GTP exchange factor, is necessary for bud site selec­tion and interacts with the bud formation gene BEMl. Cell 65:1213-1224.

CHANT, J. and I. HERSKOWITZ, 1991 Genetic control of bud site selection in yeast by a set of gene products that constitute a morphogenetic pathway. Cell 65: 1203-1212.

CVRCKOVA, F. and K. NASMYTH, 1993 Yeast G1 cycUns CLNl and CLN2 and a GAP-like protein have a role in bud formation. EMBO J. 12: 5277-5286.

DIAZ, M., Y. SANCHEZ, T. BENNETT, C.R. SUN, C. GODOY, F TAMANOI, A. DURAN and P. PEREZ, 1993 The Schizosaccharomyces pombe cwg2'^ gene codes for the P subunit of a geranylgeranyltransferase type I required for (3-glucan synthesis. EMBO J. 12: 5245-5254.

DITTMER, H.J., 1964 Phylogeny and form in the plant kingdom. Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ.

DRUB IN, D.G., K.G. MILLER and D. BOTSTEIN, 1988 Yeast actin-binding pro­teins: evidence for a role in morphogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 107: 2551-2561.

EUBANKS, V.L. and L.R. BEUCHAT, 1982 Effects of antioxidants on growth, sporulation, and pseudomycelium production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Food. Sci. 47: 1717-1722.

FINEGOLD, A., D.I. JOHNSON, C.C. FARNSWORTH, M.H. GELB, S.R. JUDD, J.A. GLOMSET and F. TAMANOI, 1991 Protein geranylgeranyltransferase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is specific for the CDC43 gene prduct but not the DPRl gene product. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 4448-4452.

FORD, S.K. and J.R. PRINGLE, 1991 Cellular morphogenesis in the Saccharomy­ces cerevisiae cell cycle: Localization of the CDCll gene product and the timing of events at the budding site. Devel. Genet. 12: 281-292.

Page 88: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

74

FULLER, M.T., C.L. REGAN, L.L. GREEN, B. ROBERTSON, R. DURING and T.S. HAYS, 1989 Interacting genes identify ineteracting proteins involved in microtubule function in Drosophila. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 14: 128-135.

GIMENO, C.J. and G.R. FINK, 1994 Induction of pseudohyphal growth by overexpression of PHD 1, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene related to transcrip­tional regulators of fungal development. Mol, Cell. Biol. 14; 2100-2112.

GIMENO, RO., RO. LJUNGDAHL, C.A. STYLES and G.R. FINK, 1992 Unipolar cell divisions in the yeast S. cerevisiae lead to filamentous growth: regulation by starvation and RAS. Cell 68: 1077-1090.

GUILLIERMOND, A., 1920 The Yeasts. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

HAARER, B., S. LILLY, A. ADAMS, V. MAGDOLEN, W. BANDLOW and S. BROWN, 1990 Purification of profilin from Saccharomyces cerevisae and anlaysis of profilin-dificient cells. J. Cell Biol. 110:105-114.

HAARER, B.K. and J.R. PRINGLE, 1987 Immunofluorescence localization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae CDC 12 gene product to the vicinity of the 10-nm fila­ments in the mother-bud neck. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7: 3678-3687.

HARTWELL, L.H., 1971 Genetic control of the cell division cycle in yeast. IV. Genes controlling bud emergence and cytokinesis. Exptl. Cell Res. 69: 265-276.

HAYS, TS., R. DEURING, B. ROBERTSON, M. PROUT and M.T. FULLER, 1989 Interacting proteins identified by genetic interactions: a missense mutation in a-tubulin fails to complement alleles of the testis-specific p-tubulin gene of Droso­phila melanogaster. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9: 875-884.

HEALY, A., S. ZOLNIEROWICZ, A. STAPLETON, M. GOEBL, A.A. DEPAOLI-ROACH and J.R. PRINGLE, 1991 CDC55, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene involved in cellular morphogenesis: Identification, characterization, and homol­ogy to the B subunit of mammalian type 2A protein phosphatase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11: 5767-5780.

HOCH, H.C., R.C. STAPLES, B. WHITEHEAD, J. COMEAU and E.D. WOLF, 1987 Signaling for growth orientation and cell differentiation by surface topography in Uromyces. Science 235:1659-1662.

HOWARD, R.J., M.A. FERRARI, D.H. ROACH and N.P MONEY, 1991 Penetra­tion of hard substrates by a fungus employing enormous turgor pressures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 11281-11284.

HUFFAKER, T.C., M.A. HOYT and D. BOTSTEIN, 1987 Genetic analysis of the yeast cytoskeleton. Annu. Rev. Genet. 21: 259-284.

Page 89: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

75

JOHNSON, D.I. and J.R. PRINGLE, 1990 Molecular characterization of CDC42, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene involved in the development of cell polarity. J. Cell Biol, 111: 143-152.

JOHNSTON, G.C., J.A. PRENDERGAST and R.A. SINGER, 1991 The Saccharo­myces cerevisiae MY02 gene encodes an essential myosin for vectorial trans­port of vesicles. J. Cell Biol. 113: 539-552.

KAISER, C.A. and R. SCHEKMAN, 1990 Distinct sets of SEC genes govern trans­port vesicle formation and fusion early in the secretory pathway. Cell 61: 723-733.

KIM, H.B., B.K. HAARER and J.R. PRINGLE, 1991 Cellular morphogenesis in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle: Localization of the CDC3 gene product and the timing of events at the budding site. J. Cell Biol. 112: 535-544.

LEE, Y.H. and R. DEAN, 1993 cAMP regulates infection structure formation in the pant pathogenic fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Plant Cell 5: 693-700.

LEW, D.J. and S.I. REED, 1993 Morphogenesis in the yeast cell cycle: Regulation by Cdc28 and cyclins. J. Cell Biol. 120: 1305-1320.

LIU, H., C.A. STYLES and G.R. FINK, 1993 Elements of the yeast pheromone response pathway required for filamentous growth of diploids. Science 262:1741-1744.

LODDER, J,, 1970 The Yeasts: A Taxonomic Study. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam.

MADAULE, P., R. AXEL and A.M. MYERS, 1987 Characterization of two mem­bers of the rho gene family from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84: 779-783.

NOVICK, P. and D. BOTSTEIN, 1985 Phenotypic analysis of temperature-sensi-tive yeast actin mutations. Cell 40: 415-426.

POWERS, S., E. GONZALES, T. CHRISTENSEN, J. CUBERT and D. BROEK, 1991 Functional cloning of BUD5, a CDC25-related gene from S. cerevisiae that can suppress a dominant-negative RAS2 mutant. Cell 65:1225-1231.

PRINGLE, J.R., R.A. PRESTON, A.E.M. ADAMS, T. STEARNS, D.G. DRUBIN, B.K. HAARER and E.W. JONES, 1989 Fluorescence microscopy methods for yeast. Methods in Cell Biology 31: 357-435.

ROBINSON, L.C., M.M. MENOLD, S. GARRETT and M.R. CULBERTSON, 1993 Casein kinase I-like protein kinases encoded by YCKl and YCK2 are required for yeast morphogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13: 2870-2881.

Page 90: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

76

RONNE, H., M. CARLBERG, G.Z. HU and J.O. NEHLIN, 1991 Protein phos­phatase 2A in Saccharomyces cerevisiae; effects on cell growth and bud mor­phogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11: 4876-4884.

ROSE, M.D., F. WINSTON and P. HEITER, 1990 Methods in Yeast Genetics. A Laboratory Course Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Har­bor.

ROTHBLATT, J.A., R.J. DESHAIES, S.L. SANDERS, G. DAUM and R. SCHEKMAN, 1989 Multiple genes are required for proper insertion of secre­tory proteins into the endoplasmic reticulum in yeast. J. Cell Biol. 109: 2641-2652.

RUGGIERI, R., A. BENDER, Y. MATSUI, S. POWERS, Y. TAKAI, J. PRINGLE and K. MATSUMOTO, 1992 RSRl, a ms-like gene homologous to Krev-1 ismg21AlraplA): Role in the development of cell polarity and interaction with the ras pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12: 758-766.

SALMINEN, A. and P.J. NOVICK, 1987 A ras-like protein is required for a post-Golgi event in yeast secretion. Cell 49: 527-538.

SOLL, D.R., 1990 Dimorphism and high-frequency switching in Candida albicans, pp. 147-176 in The genetics of Candida, edited by D. R. Kirsch, R, Kelley and M. B. Kurtz. CRC Press, Boston.

SPRAGUE, G.F.,JR. and J.W. THORNER, 1992 Pheromone response and signal transduction during the mating process of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, pp. 657-744 in The molecular and cellular biology of the yeast Saccharomyces., edited by E. W. Jones, J. R. Pringle and J. R. Broach. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview.

STEARNS, T. and D. BOTSTEIN, 1988 Unlinked noncomplementation: Isolation of new conditional-lethal mutations in each of the tubulin genes of Saccharo­myces cerevisiae. Genetics 119: 249-260.

STEARNS, T., M.A. HOYT and D. BOTSTEIN, 1990 Yeast mutants sensitive to antimicrotubule drugs define three genes that affect microtubule function. Ge­netics 124: 251-162.

TOWNSEND, G.F. and C.C. LINDEGREN, 1954 Characteristic growth patterns of the different members of a polyploid series of Saccharomyces. J. Bacteriol. 67: 480-483.

TZAGOLOFF, A., A. AKAI and F. FOURY, 1976 Assembly of the mitochondrial membrane system. XVI. Modified form of the ATPase proteolipid in oligomycin-resistant mutants of S. cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 65: 391-396.

Page 91: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

77

VAN ZYL, W., W. HUANG, A.A. SNEDDON, M. STARK, S. GAMIER, M. WERNER, C. MARCK, A. SENTENAC and J.R. BROACH, 1992 Inactivation of the pro­tein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit A results in morphological and tran­scriptional defects in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12: 4946-4959.

VINH, D.B.N., M.D. WELCH, A.K. CORSI, K.F. WERTMAN and D.G. DRUBIN, 1993 Genetic evidence for functional interactions between actin noncomplementing (Anc) gene products and actin cytoskeletal proteins in Sac­charomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 135: 275-286.

WALLIS, J.W., G. CHREBET, G. BRODSKY, M. ROLFE and R. ROTHSTEIN, 1989 A hyper-recombination mutation in S. cerevisiae identifies a novel eukaryotic topoisomerase. Cell 58: 409-419.

WELCH, M.D., D.B.N. VINH, H.H. OKAMURA and D.G. DRUBIN, 1993 Screens for extragenic mutations that fail to complement actl alleles identify genes that are important for actin function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 135: 265-274.

ZIMAN, M., J.M. O'BRIEN, L.A. OUELLETTE, W.R. CHURCH and D.I. JOHNSON, 1991 Mutational analysis of CDC42Sc, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene that encodes a putative GTP-binding protein involved in the control of cell polarity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11: 3537-3544.

Page 92: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

78

CHAPTER 2. REGULATION OF DIMORPHISM IN SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE: INVOLVEMENT OF THE NOVEL PROTEIN KINASE HOMOLOG Elmlp AND PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 2A

A paper published in Molecular and Cellular Biology^

Melissa J. Blacketer^, Carla M. Koehler^, Sarah G. Coats^, Alan M. Myers^.S^

and Pascal Madaule^

Abstract

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes ELMl, ELM2, a.nà.ELM3 were identiGed

based on the phenotype of constitutive cell elongation. Mutations in any of these

genes cause a dimorphic transition to a pseudohyphal growth state characterized

by formation of expanded, branched chains of elongated cells. Furthermore, elml,

elm2, or elmS mutations cause cells to grow invasively under the surface of agar

medium. S. cerevisiae is known to be a dimorphic organism that grows either as a

unicellular yeast or in a filamentous form termed pseudohyphae; although the

yeast-like form usually prevails, pseudohyphal growth may occur during conditions

of nitrogen starvation. The morphologic and physiological properties caused by

elml, elm2, and elmS mutations closely mimic pseudohyphal growth occurring in

conditions of nitrogen starvation. We propose, therefore, that absence of ELMl,

^ Reprinted from Mol. Cell. Biol. 13,5567-5581, with permission from the American

Society for Microbiology. Copyright © 1993 American Society for Microbiology.

2 Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Iowa State University, Ames, lA

50011.

^ Major professor.

^ Unite de Recombinaison et Expression Genetique, Unite INSERM 163, Institut Pasteur, 28 rue du Dr. Roux, 75724 Paris cedex 15, France.

Page 93: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

79

ELM2, or ELM3 function causes constitutive execution of the pseudohyphal

differentiation pathway that occurs normally in conditions of nitrogen starvation.

Supporting this hypothesis, heterozygosity at the ELM2 or ELM3 locus significantly

stimulated the ability to form pseudohyphae in response to nitrogen starvation.

ELMl was isolated and shown to code for a novel protein kinase homolog. Gene

dosage experiments also showed that pseudohyphal differentiation in response to

nitrogen starvation is dependent on the product of CDC55, a putative B regulatory

subunit of protein phosphatase 2A, and a synthetic phenotype was observed in

elml cdc55 double mutants. Thus, protein phosphorylation is likely to regulate

differentiation into the pseudohyphal state.

Introduction

Numerous fungal organisms are dimorphic, exhibiting distinct morphological

transitions in response to specific genetic and/or environmental signals. Typically,

dimorphic fungi exhibit either a roughly egg-shaped, unicellular, yeast-like form,

or a filamentous form of attached cells that often are heterokaryons. The switch

firom the yeast-like form to the filamentous form often correlates with a change

ft-om a non-pathogenic to a pathogenic state.

One example of such a dimorphic species is Ustilago maydis (reviewed in Ref.

3), in which haploid cells exhibit unicellular, yeast-like morphology. Haploid cells

fuse to form a filamentous dikaryon if they bear distinct alleles at both the a and b

compatibility loci. In contrast to the unicellular form, the highly elongated dikaryon

is infectious in plant tissue, causing corn smut.

A second well characterized example of cellular dimorphism occurs in Candida

albicans (for recent reviews see Refs. 40,45,46). This species exhibits a basic

dimorphism between a budding yeast and a hyphal form. Several signals have

Page 94: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

80

been implicated in the switch between these two forms, including temperature,

pH, nutrients, and exposure to serum factors. Mutants of C. albicans are known

that are unable to form hyphae, and other mutants constitutively exhibit a hyphal

or pseudohyphal form. Exploiting these observations by classical genetic analysis

is difficvdt, however, because C. albicans has only been observed as a diploid and a

sexual cycle has not been identified.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae also is a dimorphic species (5,9,10,13,14,25,49),

although laboratory isolates vary in their ability to exhibit the filamentous

morphology. In this organism nitrogen starvation in the presence of glucose is a

natural inducer of the filamentous form, which is more appropriately termed

pseudohyphae. Stimulation of the RAB2 signal transduction pathway facilitates

this pseudohyphal response (13). S. cerevisiae pseudohyphal cells have an elongated

morphology and stay attached to each other presumably by their cell wall.

Furthermore, in the great majority of cell divisions a unipolar budding pattern

occurs in which daughter cells bud, and rebud, at the pole opposite the mother cell.

The result is a filamentous, branched structure growing away from the center of a

colony. Pseudohyphae forage deep into agar media, leading to the hypothesis that

they secrete glycohydrolases not present in the yeast-like form (13). These

observations suggest that dimorphism in S. cerevisiae is controlled by a regulatory

switch that causes changes in cell shape, cell behavior, and possibly transcriptional

and/or post-transcriptional activities.

Cell morphology, and in particular cell elongation, is known to be affected in S.

cerevisiae by protein phosphatase 2A (PPase2A), a three subunit enzyme conserved

in yeast and mammals (1,8,19,30,33,44,51). The C subunit of PPase2A bears the

catalytic activity, whereas the A and B regulatory subunits affect the specificity

and/or activity of the enzyme (see Ref. 8 for review). Mammalian PPase2A has

Page 95: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

81

been implicated in tumor formation because this enzyme specifically is altered by

two different tumor viruses, SV40 and polyoma virus (28,53). In addition, the

potent tumor promoter okadaic acid is an inhibitor of PPase2A (4,48). However,

direct evidence that PPase2A is involved in oncogenesis has not been obtained,

and the specific functions regulated by this enzyme are unknown. S. cerevisiae

genes presumed to code for each of the three subunits of PPase2A have been isolated

(1,19,33,44,51); mutations in these loci cause changes in gene expression and cell

morphology. The mechanism by which PPase2A affects these cellular properties,

however, is not known.

In this report we use classical genetic methods to identify S. cerevisiae mutations

that cause constitutive expression of pseudohyphal growth characteristics. The

approach allowed discovery of a novel protein kinase homolog, coded for by the

gene ELMl, which is required for the yeast-like morphology. Another gene shown

in this study to affect pseudohyphal differentiation is CDC55, which codes for a

homolog of the B regulatory subunit of PPase2A (19). These data show protein

phosphorylation is likely to mediate pseudohyphal differentiation signals in S.

cerevisiae, and implicate PPase2A in this process.

Materials and Methods

Strains, media and genetic methods. S. cerevisiae strains used in this

study are described in Table 1 and Table 2. Strains containing the mutations cdc3,

cdclO, cdcll, aiaàcdcl2 were mutants 104,17012,332, and STX450-5B, respectively,

obtained firom the Yeast Genetic Stock Center (Division of Genetics, University of

California, Berkeley, CA). Yeast strains were cultured at 30°C unless specified

otherwise. The following media were used: YPD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone,

2% glucose); YPAD (YPD supplemented with 40 fig/ml adenine); SD (2% glucose.

Page 96: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

82

TABLE 1. S. cerevisiae strains

Strain Genotype Source or derivation

NY13 background: NY13 MA 7a ura3

NY180 MATa ura3 leu2

aNAelml MATa. ura3 elml::URA3

NNAelml/Aelml MATa/MATa ura3/ura3 leu2/+ elml:: URA3/elml:: URA3

E1278b background:

MB758-5B MATa ura3

MB810-5A MATalysl

MATa/MATa ura3/ura3 Iys2/lys2

aSAelml

aZAelml

JUAelml/Aelml

MATa ura3 lys2 elml::URA3

MATa ura3 lys2 elml::URA3

MATa/MATa ura3/ura3 lys2Ays2 elml::URA3/elml::URA3

P. Novick

P. Novick

Integrative transformation ofNYlS

Mating of segregants from aNAelml x NY180

Ref. 42.

M. Brandriss

Mating of segregants from MB758-5B X MB810-5A

Segregant from integrative transformant of

Segregant from integrative transformant of SZ

aLAelml x alAelml

W303 background: W303

W303-1A

W303-1B

aWAelmlH

aWAelml U

MATa/MATa ura3/ura3 Ieu2/leu2 his3/his3 trpl/trpl ade2/ade2

MATa ura3 leu2 his3 trpl ade2

MATa ura3 leu2 his3 trpl ade2

MATa ura3 leu2 his3 trpl ade2 elml::HIS3

MATa ura3 leu2 his3 trpl ade2 elml::URA3

R. Rotlistein

R. Rothstein

R. Rothstein

Segregant from integrative transformant of W303

Segregant from integrative transformant of W303

Strains with the designation "Wl" are progeny of a cross between the indicated original mutant and W303-1A.

Page 97: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

83

TABLE 1. Continued

Strain Genotype Source or derivation

a N AelmlU

WWAelml/Aelml

aWA

aWAcdc55

diSNAcdc55

MATa ura3 leu2 his3 trpl adel elml::URA3

MATa/MATa ura3/ura3 Ieu2/leu2 his3/his3 trpl/trpl ade2/ade2 elml:: URA3/elml : :HIS3

MATa ura3 leu2 his3 trpl ade2 ELMinURA3

MATaura3 leu2 his3 trpl ade2 cdc55::LEU2-2

MATa ura3 leu2 his3 trpl ade2 cdc55::LEU2-2

Segregant from integrative transformant of W303

aWAelmlH x ciSNAelml U

Integrative transformation ofW303-lA

Segregant from integrative transformant of W303

Segregant from integrative transformant of W303

D273-10B background: D273- lOB/Al MATa met6

D273-10B/A2 MATa ura3

Ref. 50.

Segregant from 5th backcross of ElOSAVl*^ x D273-10B/A1

Mutagenesis of D273-lOB/Al

Mutagenesis of D273-lOB/Al

Mutagenesis of D273-lOB/Al

Mutagenesis of D273-lOB/Al

Mutagenesis of D273-lOB/Al

D273-10B/A1 X (segregant from 5th backcross of E105/Wia X D273-lOB/Al)

DDelml-2/elml-2 MATa/MATa ura3/+ leu2/+ elml-2/elml-2 Mating of segregants from 5th backcross of E105AVia X D273-lOB/Al

E104

E105

E130

E102

E156

DD

MATa met6 elml-1

MATa met6 elml -2

MATa met6 elm2-l

MATa met6 elm2-2

MATa met6 elm3-l

MATa/MATa ade2/+ leu2/+ met6/+

Page 98: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

84

TABLE 1. Continued

Strain Genotype Source or derivation

DDelml-2/+ MATa/MATa ura3/+ leu2/+ elml-2/ELMl

DDelm2-2/elm2-2 MATa/MATa his3/+ leu2/+ met6/+ elm2-2/elrn2-2

DDelm2-2/+ MATa/MATa ura3/+ leu2/+ his3/+ elml-2/ELM2

DDelm3-l/elm3-l MATa/MATa ura3/+ leu2/+ met6/+elm3-l/elm3-l

DDelm3-l/+ MATa/MATa ura3/+ leu2/+ elm3-l/ELM3

F1 hybrid backgrounds: NWAelml/Aelml MATa/MATa ura3/ura3 leu2/+ his3/+

trpl/+ ade2/+ elml::URA3/elml::URA3

'WlAelml/Aelml

'b^IAelml/âelml

WI,Acdc55/+

NI

WZ

MATa/MATa ura3/ura3 leu2/+ his3/+ trpl/+ ade2/+ lys2/+ elml:: URA3/elml:: URA3

MATa/MATa ura3/ura3 lys2/+ elml:: URA3/elml:: URA3

MATa/MATa ura3/+ leu2/+ his3/+ trpl/+ ade2/+ lys2/+ cdc55::LEU2-2/+

MATa/MATa ura3/+ lys2/+

MATa/MATa ura3/+ leu2/+ his3/+ trpl/+ ade2/+ lys2/+

D273-10B/A2 x (segregant from 5th backcross of E105/W1G X D273-lOB/Al)

Mating of segregants from 5th backcross of E102AVia to D273-lOB/Al

D273-10B/A2 x (segregant from 5th backcross of E102/Wia X D273-lOB/Al)

Mating of segregants from 5th backcross of E156/WM to D273-lOB/Al

D273-10B/A2 x (segregant from 5th backcross of E156AVia X D273-lOB/Al)

aNAelml x aWAelml U

aZAelml x aWAelml U

aî^Aelml x aLAelml

MB810-5A X aV^AcdcSS

MB810-5AxNY13

MB810-5AxW303-lA

Page 99: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

85

TABLE 1. Continued

Strain Genotype Source or derivation

Other Backgrounds:

al04W 1 MAT a ura3 adel his3 leu2 elml-1

al30Wla MATa ura3 leu2 his3 elm2-l

alBOWlb MATa cide2 leu2 elm2-l

a 130S2 MAT a ura3 lys2 elm2-l

Dy^elm2-l/elm2-l MATa/MATa ade2/+ leu2/+ ura3/+ lys2/+ elm2-l/elm2-l

Segregant from E104 x W303-1A

Segregant from E130 x W303-1A

Segregant from E130 x W303-1A

Segregant from 2nd backcross of al30Wla x

S 1278b strains

al30Wlbxal30E2

Page 100: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

86

TABLE 2. Complementation matrix®

MATa parent MATa parent^

104D5 105D5 102D5 130D5 156D5

E104 - - + + +

E105 - - + + +

E102 + + - - +

E130 + + - - +

E156 + + + + -

® The indicated strains were mated and diploids were selected based on complementing auxotrophies. indicates the diploid had a mutant morphologic phenotype, and "+" indicates the diploid had wild type morphology.

^ MATa parents are progeny of the fifth backcross to D273-10B/A1. The original mutants were outcrossed to W303-1A prior to the backcrosses. These strains all contain a leu2 auxotrophic marker; 102D5 also contains a his3 marker.

Page 101: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

87

0.7% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, supplemented as required with

leucine, tryptophan, histidine, uracil, lysine, methionine and adenine at 20 |ig/ml

each); SDC (SD supplemented with 0.5% casamino acids in addition to the

auxotrophy requirements); sporulation medium (1% potassium acetate, 0.05%

glucose, 0,1% yeast extract); SLAHD (nitrogen starvation medium described in

Ref. (13). Solid media for yeast contained 2% agar.

Standard genetic methods were used for complementation analysis, mating,

and tetrad dissection (35). In those instances where auxotrophic markers were not

available for selection of a diploid from a cross, isolated colonies of potential diploids

were selected based on their increased growth rate relative to the haploid parents.

Morphologic phenotype was also used as a means of selection in crosses where the

colony morphology of the diploid was recognizably different from that of the parents.

In all instances diploidy was verified by the ability of the selected strain to sporulate.

ELMl gene isolation. Genes capable of restoring normal morphology to an

elml-1 mutant strain were selected from a yeast genomic library obtained from F.

Lacroute (Centre de Genetique Moleculaire du ONES, Gif-sur Yvette, France). The

vector, pFL38, derives from the pUC19 bacterial vector (52). pFL38 contains in

addition the URA3 selectable marker as well as a centromeric sequence causing

maintenance at low copy number in yeast. The genomic inserts were obtained by

partial Sau3A digestion (average size 3 kb) of chromosomal DNA from wild type S.

cerevisiae and were ligated to the BamHl site of pFL38.

The elml-1 mutant strain al04Wl was cultured in 100 ml YPAD medium and

transformed with 50 p,g plasmid library DNA using a scaled up version of the Uthium

transformation procedure. Immediately after transformation the cells were

resuspended in 6 ml of TE buffer. Two ml of the cell suspension were added to each

of three tubes containing 15 ml of liquid SDC medium lacking uracil. The total

Page 102: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

88

number of uracil-independent transformants present, 8 x 10^, was estimated from

a small aliquot of the TE suspension plated directly on selective agar medium.

The liquid cultures were incubated at SO^C with gentle shaking for three days. An

aliquot of each saturated culture (5 p,!) was inoculated into 5 ml of fresh SDC

medium, which was again grown to saturation. The dilution procedure was repeated

several times in a row, every 3-4 days. At various times samples from saturated

liquid cultures were spread on selective plates and morphology of individual colonies

was scored. More than 50% of the colonies from the second or third cycle of liquid

culture displayed wild type morphology. Isolated wild type colonies were selected

for further analysis. As a control al04Wl was also transformed with the pFL38

vector devoid of insert. These control cells never reverted to wild type, even after

five cycles of liquid culture.

DNA manipulations and allele construction. DNA manipulations were

performed using standard procedures (2,37). Oligonucleotide-directed site-specific

mutagenesis used the phosphorothiolate method (39). Nucleotide sequence analysis

used the chain termination method (38), and database homology searches and

sequence alignments used the Genetics Computer Group software package (GCG,

Madison, WI). Plasmid pUCllSE is a modified version of pUC118 (52) in which

the multiple cloning site was replaced by a unique EcoRl site. In each instance

where a strain was constructed by integration of a restriction fragment in the

genome. Southern hybridization analysis of the transformant confirmed that

integration occurred as expected by homologous recombination (data not shown).

The null allele elml::URA3 was prepared as follows. The 2.8 kb genomic insert

from pAl was excised as a Sacl-Sall fragment, and subcloned in pBLUESCRIPT

SK+ (Stratagene Cloning Systems, La Jolla, CA). The resultant plasmid, pELMl/

ST16, was digested at the unique Pstl and Bgllï sites, removing ELMl codons 94

Page 103: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

89

to 487. A 1.2 kb Hinâlll fragment of yeast genomic DNA containing the URA3

gene (34) was inserted in pELMl/ST16 in place of the deleted sequence; to facilitate

this cloning step the termini of both the vector and insert fragments were converted

to blunt ends by treatment with DNA polymerase I Klenow fragment. The resulting

plasmid, pElml::UEA3, was digested withZfeal, generating a 2.9 kb fragment used

for transformation of various ura3 strains to uracil prototrophy.

The insertion allele elml::HIS3 was constructed as follows. The 1.4 kb EcoRI

fragment of the genomic insert in pAl was subcloned in plasmid pUCllSE, resulting

in plasmid pELMl/STlB. The yeast HIS3 gene (47) was available as a 1.7 kb

genomic BaniHl fragment cloned in pUC118, in the orientation such that a 1.2 kb

Pstl fragment containing the entire HIS3 promoter and coding region could be

excised. This fragment was subcloned at the unique Pstl site of pELMl/STlS,

present at ELMl codon 94, forming plasmid pElml::HIS3. A2.6 kb EcoiRl fragment

from pElml::HIS3 was used for transformation of the his3 / his3 diploid strain W303

to histidine prototrophy.

The chromosomal ELMl locus was tagged with a genetic marker as follows.

The genomic insert of the suppressing plasmid pA2 was ligated into the integrative

vector YIp352 (20) as a 2.4 kb BarriHl-Sacl fragment. The resultant plasmid,

pELMlQURA3, was linearized by digestion at its unique BglW site located within

ELMl. The linearized plasmid was used to transform wild type strain W303-1A to

uracil prototrophy. This type of integration results in dupUcation of ELMl, with

the two fxmctional copies separated from each other by the YIp352 plasmid sequence

containing the URA3 marker.

The null allele cdc55::LEU2-2, similar to the cdc55::LEU2 allele described by

Healy et al. (19), was constructed as follows. The 2.3 kb Pvull fragment of plasmid

YCpHN (19) was excised and cloned in pUC119, also digested with Pvull. In the

resulting plasmid the 1.3 kb JBCORI fragment containing CDC55 codons 93 to 526

Page 104: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

90

was replaced by a BaniHl linker, forming plasmid p55/ST2; to facilitate ligation of

the oligonucleotide linker the 5' overhangs resulting from EcoRl digestion were

converted to blunt ends by treatment with DNA polymerase I Klenow fragment. A

3.0 kb Bglll fragment from plasmid YEpl3, which contains the LEU2 gene, was

inserted in the unique BaniHl site of p55/ST2 resulting in plasmid, pcdc55::LEU2.

The 4.2 kb PvuH fragment of pcdc55::LEU2 was used to transform leu2 strains to

leucine prototrophy.

The missense allele elml-R117 was constructed as follows. The 1177 bp Pstl-

Bglll fragment from pAl was cloned in pUC119. The lysine codon AAG specifying

Elmlp residue 117 was changed to the arginine codon CCG by oligonucleotide-

directed site-specific mutagenesis. The nucleotide sequence of the entire Pstl-BglïL

genomic fragment was determined to ensure no other base substitutions occured

during the mutagenesis procedure. elml-Rll7 was formed by using the Pstl-Bglll

fragment containing the lysine to arginine mutation to replace the equivalent region

of the wild type ELMl sequence in plasmid pELMl/ST16 (described above). The

2.8 kb Sacl-Sall fragment from the resulting plasmid was cloned in the centromeric

vector pRS315 (43) to form YCpelml. The control plasmid YCpELMl was formed

by cloning the 2.8 kb Sacl-Sall fragment from pELMl/ST16 in pRS315.

Morphological analyses. Colony morphology was examined using an inverted

microscope, observing the cells through the agar. Cells observed at higher

magnification using phase contrast or Nomarski optics were obtained from liquid

cultures, or by suspending cells from an agar dish in a drop of water. Cytokinesis

was monitored essentially as described by Hartwell (18); the procedure for

formaldehyde fixation and removal of the cell wall by treatment with Glusulase

was described by Pringle et al. (31). Staining of nuclei with DAPI was as described

(31).

Page 105: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

91

GenBank accession number. The accession number for the nucleotide

sequence oîELMl is M81258.

Results

Genetic analysis of cell elongation mutants. In the course of studying

RHOl, a gene coding for a p21i'^S-related GTP-binding protein likely to regulate

cell morphology (7,27), specific rhol mutant strains frequently produced derivatives

that displayed a distinctive, elongated cell morphology (unpublished observation,

PM and AM). To analyze further the causes of this phenotype, a wild type S.

cerevisiae strain was chemically mutagenized, and mutants displaying a similar

abnormal cell morphology were collected. Wild type strain D273-10B/A1 was

moderately mutagenized by exposure to ethyl methanesulfonate (15% survival),

then plated for single colonies on YPD medium. After incubation for two to four

days at 22^0, colony morphology was examined directly on the surface of the agar

using an inverted microscope. Morphological mutants were identified by an

irregular colony shape and the presence of elongated cells extending outward firom

the colony; roughly 1% of the mutagenized colonies had such a morphology (Fig.

1A,B). This report describes five mutants from a collection of sixty morphologically

altered strains obtained by this procedure.

Each strain in the study group contains a single recessive mutation that causes

cell elongation. Diploids formed by mating the mutants to reference strain W303-

lA had no detectable morphologic abnormality or growth defect on YPD or SD

medium. Meiotic progeny of these diploids that displayed the cell elongation

phenotype (outcross progeny) were collected and backcrossed successively at least

five times to the unmutagenized parent strain D273-10B/A1. The cell elongation

and wild type phenotypes segregated consistently at a 2:2 ratio in at least 30 tetrads,

indicating that in each instance the cell elongation phenotype is a single-gene trait.

Page 106: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

92

. r

FIG. 1. Morphologic phenotype resulting from elml, elm2, or elm3 mutations. (A) Colony morphology of wild type cells, (B) Colony morphology of an elml-1 mutant. Panels A and B show sibling progeny from the second backcross of the original elml-1 mutant E104 to wild type strains of the W303 background. Colonies were grown for 16 hours on YPD agar medium. (C) Cell morphology of wild type control strain DD. (D) Cell morphology of jyDelm 1-21 elml-2. (E) Cell morphology otDT)elm2-21elm2-2. (F) Cell morphology of DDelm3-l /elmS-l. Strains shown in panels D-F are congenic in the diploid D273-10B background; they were grown for 16 hours in liquid YPD medium to mid-log phase (Aggg = 0.4), concentrated by centrifugation, sonicated briefly, and photographed using Nomarski optics.

Page 107: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

93

In the outcross and early rounds of backcrossing considerable variation was observed

in the severity of the phenotype, both in the degree of cell elongation and in the

growth rate (data not shown). Decreased growth rate was observed only in

morphologically abnormal progeny, and thus was a result of the same mutation

that affects cell shape. In the later rounds of backcrossing, however, a uniform

morphologic phenotype was observed for all progeny of each mutant, and no

significant difference was detected between the growth rates of the mutant progeny

and the wild type parent (data not shown). Thus, certain aspects of the phenotype

caused by these mutations apparently depend on the specific genetic background.

Complementation and allelism tests determined three different genes were

identified by the five morphological mutants in the study group. Complementation

groups were assigned by analyzing the morphology of diploids formed in reciprocal

crosses between the original mutants and their backcross progeny. Three groups

were identified, two with two members each and one with a single representative

(Table 2). Allelism tests were performed by observing haploid progeny from the

diploids obtained in the complementation group analysis. Diploids with elongated

cell morphology always produced tetrads comprising only mutant progeny (30

tetrads analyzed for each cross). Conversely, all diploids with a wild type morphology

produced both mutant and wild type progeny in the ratio expected for independent

assortment of unlinked genes. Thus, the three complementation groups represent

three distinct gene loci, tentatively named ELMl, ELM2, and ELM3 (£?Longated

Morphology). Similar analysis, including allelism tests, showed ELM2 and ELM3

are distinct from five cell division cycle genes {CDC) known to cause cell elongation,

namely CDC3, CDCIO, CDCll, CDC12, and CDC55 (18,19). ELMl was shown to

be different from any of these CDC genes by its unique nucleotide sequence (see

below).

Page 108: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

94

The elongated cell morphology caused by elml, elm2, or elmS mutations in the

diploid D273-10B background is depicted in Fig. IC-F. In each strain cells frequently

remained attached to each other, resulting in cell clusters evident even after

sonication treatment that fully dispersed cells of the congenic wild type control

strain. The dumpiness aspect of the phenotype was more extreme in elml and

elm3 mutant strains than in elm2 mutants. Cell attachment was evident specifically

during exponential growth; mutant cells in stationary phase were nearly completely

dispersed by sonication (data not shown). Fixation with formaldehyde and digestion

of the cell wall with Glusulase disrupted the contacts between exponentially growing

cells such that they were dispersed by sonication into elongated cells with or without

a single bud (data not shown). Thus, the mutants complete cytokinesis but cell

separation is prevented by cell wall contacts (18).

Isolation and nucleotide sequence analysis oîELMl. ELMl was selected

from a genomic library based on its ability to complement the growth rate defect

caused by elml-1 in the outcross progeny clone al04Wl (Table 1). The elml-1

mutation of al04Wl causes elongated morphology, dumpiness (Fig. 2A), and a

reduced growth rate (data not shown). Cell viability was high despite the severely

abnormal appearance of al04Wl, and the phenotype was stable when the strain

was maintained routinely on stock plates, A yeast genomic library based in the

centromeric (low copy number) vector pFL38 was introduced into al04Wl, and

transformants were inoculated en masse in liquid medium selective for the URA3

marker of pFL38. Selection of ELMl relied on the presumption that growth in

liquid culture would allow a population of relatively rapidly growing revertants to

overtake cells still suffering from the reduced growth rate associated with the

mutant phenotype. Indeed, after about 30 generations the great majority of cells

in the liquid cultures displayed wild type morphology. Independent liquid cultures

Page 109: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

FIG. 2. Plasmid pA2 suppresses the phenotype caused by elml-1. Strains were cultured in liquid SDC medium supplemented according to the auxotrophic requirements. Cells were photographed while in exponential growth using a phase contrast microscope. (A) Strain al04Wl (eZmi-i, um3). (B) Strain A2 (al04Wl containing the suppressor plasmid pA2); uracil was omitted from the medium. (C)Auracil-requiringsegregant from strain A2. Strain A2 was cultured in liquid medium containing uracil, allowing plasmid loss. The culture was then spread on an SD plate, still in the presence of uracil. About 5% of the isolated colonies displayed the mutant morphology. Further analysis showed all the wild type-looking colonies to be uracil independent, whereas the mutant colonies required uracil and thus are presumed to have lost pA2. Panel C is representative of all uracil-requiring colonies derived from strain A2, whereas Panel B is representative all the uracil-independent colonies.

Page 110: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

96

Page 111: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

97

were spread on minimal agar medium lacking uracil, and four apparently reverted

single cell clones, named A1 to A4, were further characterized (Fig. 2B shows the

wild type cell morphology of clone A2).

The reverted phenotype was caused in each instance by a transforming plasmid,

because plasmid loss during mitosis resulted in reappearance of the mutant

phenotype. As an example Fig. 2C shows the morphology of a derivative from

clone A2 that requires uracil and thus presumably has lost its plasmid. The four

plasmids present in the reverted yeast clones were recovered, produced in E. coli,

and named pAl to pA4. Restriction enzyme mapping of the plasmids showed they

all contained distinct genomic inserts that share an overlapping 2.1 kb sequence

(Fig. 3). This common region was entirely sequenced and a single long open reading

frame was observed, comprising 1689 bp. Reintroducing plasmids containing the

entire open reading frame into the elml-1 strain al04Wl restored wild type

morphology. Subclones containing only part of the open reading frame, however,

failed to restore wild type morphology (Fig. 3). Thus, this open reading frame

corresponds to a yeast gene capable of suppressing the phenotype caused by elml-

1 .

The targeted insertion strategy (36) indicated the cloned gene is the wild type

allele ELMl. The genomic insert of pA2 was subcloned in the integrative plasmid

YIp352 (20), which contains URA3. The entire plasmid was then inserted in the

genome of W303-1A by targeted integration so that in the resulting strain, aWCi,

the suppressing locus is tagged by the URA3 marker. As expected, this strain

displayed wild type cell and colony morphology. aWQ was mated to the elml-1

strain al04Wl, and 30 tetrads were dissected from the resulting diploid. The

suppressor gene marked by URA3 consistently segregated in opposition to elml-1

(data not shown), indicating eZmi-i and the cloned gene reside at the same genetic

Page 112: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

98

A Plasmid I k b Suppression

F S E X E P E B H E H pA3 (H) I'll 1 1 L-tniiir- (E)

pE104/STl

pE104/ST3

0.5 kb BH E H ELMl

elml::HlS3 [ HfS3

elml::URA3 URA3

FIG. 3. Restriction map of the ELMl region. (A) Location of the genetic element that suppresses the phenotype caused by elml-1. The restriction maps of inserts from relevant plasmids are aligned, and the ability of each plasmid to restore wild type morphology to the elml-1 strain al04Wl is indicated. Restriction sites are shown for EcoRl (E), Pstï (P), Sail (S), Xbal (X), Bglll (B), and Hinàlïl (H). Plasmids pAl to pA4 were selected from a genomic library based on their ability to suppress the defects caused by elml-1 in strain al04Wl; their genomic inserts are partial Sau3A digestion products cloned in theBamHI site of pFL38. Sites in parentheses are located in the multiple cloning region of the vector. Inserts in pE104/STl and pE104/ST3 are the 1.8 kbPsil-SacI fragment and the 1.4 kbiïmdlII-jBcoRI fragment from pA2, respectively (the <SacI and Hindlll sites are from pFL38); the cloning vectors for these plasmids are YEp352 and pRS316, respectively. (B) Map oîELMl and disrupted alleles. The genomic region common to plasmids pAl to pA4 is shown in the top diagram. The nucleotide sequence of this entire region was determined, revealing the open reading frame marked by the solid arrow. The two lower diagrams show the structures of the insertion allele elml::HIS3 and the deletion allele elml::URA3. Open arrows indicate the position of the URA3 and HIS3 coding regions in the mutant alleles.

Page 113: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

99

locus. Southern hybridization analysis of intact chromosomes separated by pulsed-

field gel electrophoresis indicated ELMl is located on chromosome XI (data not

shown).

ELMl codes for a putative novel protein kinase. The nucleotide sequence

of ELMl revealed an open reading frame coding for 563 amino acid residues (Fig.

4). The amino acid sequence of the predicted protein, Elmlp, was used in a

computer-assisted search for related proteins. No particularly close relative was

detected, but significant homology was observed with many protein kinases. When

Elmlp was compared with the available sequences of protein kinases it appeared

roughly equally diverged from all Ser/Thr kinases. Fig. 4 shows as examples Elmlp

aligned with the catalytic region of the bovine cAMP-dependent protein kinase

cAPK-a (41), and with the CDC28 gene product Cdc28p (also known as p34 or

histone kinase) (26). In this comparison Elmlp is 23.7% identical to Cdc28p and

23.1% identical to cAPK-a, whereas the two reference sequences are 23.1% identical

to each other. High conservation is observed in particular regions. For example,

from residue 245 to 280 Elmlp is more than 45% identical to either cAPK-a or

Cdc28p. In addition, the 15 invariant residues found in almost every protein kinase

(17) also are conserved in Elmlp. Thus, Elmlp appears to have a putative protein

kinase catalytic domain, spanning approximately residues 90 to 400. The amino-

and carboxy-terminal regions of Elmlp, where no significant homology to known

proteins was detected, may provide regulatory functions. Two subdomains have

been described in protein kinases that display different consensus sequences in

enzymes specific for either tyrosine or serine/threonine residues (17). At this first

subdomain (residues 259-264) Elmlp bears DIKPSN, which fits best the Ser/Thr

kinase consensus DLKPEN as opposed to the tyrosine kinase signature sequences

DLAARN or DLRAAN. Likewise, at the second subdomain (residues 309-317) the

Page 114: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

100

Elmlp M s p R ' L

D E I R 0

Elmlp Cdc28p cAPK (36-295)

Elmlp Q Y s V

Cdc28p cAPK -

140

N Q V M R Q I Q L W [ K S

^ S

Elmlp s Cdc28p R cAPK

200

W I V T N W C[S L G

E G I P K D 0 ^ L G

L R R I G R F IS IE P B F^H

S Q Q S C I R E D E L D S P P I T P T S

100 K T H[0 Y T L G V S A G S G 0[F G Y V

G E L A^ Y K R L E K V G E G TT^G V V

A H L pfo [T E R I K T L G T G S [F G R V * * *

160 G K T T » M S G[N E A M R L M II I E K

D E G V P S T A I^E S L L K E L K D

K L K Q I E H T L[H E K R I L Q A V H F

*

220

W K R D 0 D E D I L P Q W K K I V I S U

60 E M I H T I

M L V K H H B T

Y S S T L G - - - K V V A

L D L R P G Q G Q R V V A

- H H Y[^

»

180

I F A A[S]R L r[ÏÏ]H V H

Y D I V H S D A H K

E F [ ^ F K D [ ^ - S M

120

p[^K R L E

K l | L D[KJQ

l[^F M|vjM

S P

L D

Y V P G G

Elmlp Cdc28p cAPK

Elmlp N s K R

Cdc28p K Q Y s C A P K 5 Y H K

K R V K G R T W T L C l

D E E E K V A D F G S C I F T P Q S

D L K N L L I N K D F G

D L K N L L I D O Q Q V T D F G

D F V T D G F K L W S L G V T L Y C F F G [ E N

F[S]G D

A A G Y P P F P) ALO

W S I G C I F A E M D 0 I F

G V L Y E M

D U T 0 G C

F M M

Y A A

E L N K I V G T P A F A P E L C H

R A F G V P L A Y T H

380

L S S K I N G H T L I l

L G T P H E A I W

S G K V R F P S H F S :

I V Y L P

L K - - -

Elmlp Cdc28p i p s F cAPK end

K

P Q W R R K D L S Q V V P S L D P R G I

L V I K R

D K D L

D L

S V M P ' S

Elmlp

E l m l p s p D s

E l m l p Q s H D

L L E K D V0L R I S I Q D L V K V L S R D Q P I D S R N H S O I S S

L L A Y D P I H R I S A R R A A I H P Y F Q E S

L L Q V D L^K R J F G N L K D G V H D I K H H

460 480 K G K D K V L V S A T S K V T P S I H I D E E P D K E C F S T T D L R

520 540 E S L P M L T V N T ] D K Q N S D M K T D R K R V I L S F V I E U P N T

560

K T K E

FIG. 4. Elmlp is homologous to Ser/Thr protein kinases. The deduced amino acid sequence of Elmlp is aligned with the protein kinase Cdc28p (26) and the relevant region (residues 36-295) of bovine cAMP dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit, a form (cAPK) (41). The complete amino acid sequences are shown for Elmlp and Cdc28p. Identical residues are boxed, and gaps are represented by dashes. Residues nearly invariant among protein kinases (17) are indicated by stars.

Page 115: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

101

Elmlp sequence GTPAFIAPE matches the consensus G-T/S-X-X-F/Y-X-A-P-E for

Ser/Thr specificity and is diverged from the tyrosine kinase consensus P-I/V-W-T/

M-A-P-E. Thus, Elmlp seemingly codes for a Ser/Thr protein kinase; because it is

not highly related to any particular known protein kinase, Elmlp may define a

novel branch of this protein family.

The lysine residue at Elmlp position 117 is conserved in all protein kinases,

and is known to be absolutely required for the catalytic mechanism of cAMP

dependent protein kinase (16,17,23), In all instances examined conservative

substitution of this lysine by an arginine inactivated the protein kinase activity.

Thus, if Elmlp codes for a protein kinase, then an arginine to lysine substitution

at position 117 is expected to inactivate the catalytic activity. This mutant allele,

termed elml-R117 was constructed and introduced as part of centromeric plasmid

YCpelml into strain aWAelmlU, which bears the deletion allele elml::URA3 (see

below). YCpelml failed to restore normal cell and colony morphology to aWAelml U,

however, the morphologic defect was corrected by control plasmid YCpELMl (which

differs from YCpelml only at two nucleotides within codon 117). Thus, Lys 117 is

essential for activity of Elmlp.

Inactivation of ELMl causes pseudohyphal growth characteristics.

ELMl was inactivated in various haploid and diploid genetic backgrounds by gene

replacement using the deletion allele elml::URA3 or the insertion allele elml::HIS3

(Fig. 3); the effects of the two alleles were indistinguishable. These mutations

caused a cell elongation and delayed cell separation phenotype similar to that

resulting from eZ/ni-i (Fig. 5). Neither eZmi;;L/RA3 nor elml::HIS3 complemented

elml-1, confirming assignment of the cloned gene as the wild type allele ELMl.

Because phenotypic variability was observed in the outcross progeny of the

original elml-1 and elml-2 mutant strains, we utilized gene replacement to compare

Page 116: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

102

Hi

FIG. 5. Phenotype caused by elml mutations in inbred and F1 hybrid diploid yeast strains. The deletion allele elml::URA3 or insertion allele elmlr.HISS were introduced into various strains by homologous recombination, and diploids homozygous for the elml deficiency were obtained by mating the appropriate strains. Strains were grown for 16 hours in liquid YPD medium to mid-log phase, concentrated by centrifiigation, sonicated briefly, and photographed using Nomarski optics. (A) WWzieZ/Mi/4eZmi (W303 inbred background). (E) IAelml (NY13 inbred background); the inset shows the isogenic haploid strain aNAelml. (C) liLAelml / Aelml (Z1278b inbred background). (D) F1 hybrid l^HAelml / Aelml. (E) F1 hybrid WN Aelml I Aelml. (F) F1 hybrid WL Aelml I Aelml. Colony morphology also was recorded in situ using an inverted microscope. (G) Wl.Aelml / Aelml, which also is representative of NN4eZmi/zieZmi, Aelml I Aelml, and WNAelml I Aelml observed under the same conditions. (H) "WNAelml I Aelml displaying some enlarged, round cells.

Page 117: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

103

the effects of ELMl deletion in different inbred genetic backgrounds (i.e. in

independently maintained laboratory reference strains). Inbred diploid strains

(homozygous at all or nearly all loci) deficient iar ELMl were obtained in the W303,

NY13 and Z1278b backgrounds (strains WWAelml I Aelml, NNAelml / Aelml and

ULAelml / Aelml, respectively); all three strains displayed elongated cells that after

sonication remained attached to each other in branched chains (Fig. 5A-C). Strain-

specific particularities were observed, however, confirming that the specific

phenotype caused by elml is highly dependent upon the genetic background.

Deletion of ELMl in the W303 background resulted in a severely abnormal

morphology. WW Aelml I Aelml grew slowly, cell shape was irregular, cell elongation

often was extreme, and some round, enlarged cells were present (Fig. 5A,H). Partial

constrictions were evident over the length of the elongated cells (Fig. 5A), suggesting

a defect in cytokinesis. Such a defect was confirmed by observing that cells were

not separated by sonication after formaldehyde fixation and digestion of the cell

wall with Glusulase, and that many of the elongated cells were multinucleate (data

not shown). In contrast, cell shape in Aelml I Aelml was very regular (Fig. 5B),

and its growth rate on agar medium was not significantly reduced when compared

to a congenic wild type strain. Aelml I Aelml cells stayed attached during

exponential growth in liquid YPD medium, presumably by their cell walls;

cytokinesis defects were not evident, because only uninucleate cells were observed

and digestion of the cell wall allowed dispersal of cell chains by sonication (data

not shown). In the diploid S1278b background deletion of ELMl caused a phenotype

similar to that observed in the NY13 background, except for less uniformity in the

shape of individual cells (Fig. 5C).

Deletion of ELMl in the haploid NY13 background (strain aNDeZmi) caused

cell elongation (Fig. 5B inset), although to a lesser extent than in the congenic

Page 118: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

104

diploid KNDelml IDelml. Cell separation was also delayed in this strain, because

sonication failed to disperse clumps of cells. This mutant displayed the axial budding

pattern that normally occurs in haploids (6,12), precluding formation of expanded

cell chains.

ELMl also was inactivated in three F1 hybrid diploid strains, termed NUAelml /

Aelml, WLAelml I Aelml, and WNAelml I Aelml, obtained by pairwise mating of

haploid elml strains in the W303, NY13, or S1278b backgrounds (Table 1). The

phenotype of these three mutants was virtually identical, and resembled most that

of NNzieZ/ni / Aelml amongst the inbred diploids (Fig. 5D-G). Cell shape was very

regular in all three F1 hybrids, although cell elongation was not as extreme as in

the inbred NN^deZmi /Aelml. As with NN-deZmi / Aelml, cell attachment in the F1

hybrid strains was attributed to cell wall contacts, not to defective cytokinesis.

Strains lacking ELMl were characterized further by observing development

over time of single-cell clones on the surface of a YPD plate. Fig. 6 shows typical

examples of colonies developing from single cells of the deletion strain NZzieZmi /

Aelml or the congenic wild type strain NE. This clonal analysis allowed direct

determination of mother-daughter relationships, and showed that the great majority

of buds form 180° opposite to the mother cell. The tendency of elml cells to remain

attached also is obvious from the lack of rotation of mother-daughter pairs relative

to each other, and the failure of successive daughter cells to displace previous

daughters from the proximity of the mother. Finally, the data showed the doubling

time of the two congenic strains is essentially the same. The F1 hybrid strains

WLAelml / Aelml and WLAelml / Aelml behave similarly in this assay (data not

shown). The appearance of these elml mutants growing on the surface of agar

plates is similar to the morphological form of S. cerevisiae, termed pseudohyphae,

that was observed growing in conditions of nitrogen limitation (13). Because elml

Page 119: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

105

NZAe/ml/Ae/m2 NZ

Oh

2.5 h

3.5 h

4.5 h

6.0 h

7.0 h

9.0 h

FIG. 6. Loss of ELMl function causes pseudohyphal growth. Single cells of the indicated strains were isolated on a YPD plate using a micromanipulator, and incubted at 30°C, The developing clones were photographed at the indicated times thereafter using an inverted microscope.

Page 120: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

106

mutants diplay these growth characteristics in rich medium, we refer to the

phenotype as "constitutive pseudohyphal growth".

elm2 and elm3 mutations also cause constitutive pseudohyphal growth.

Many other elongated morphology mutants obtained by mutagenesis of D273-10B/

A1 behaved similarly to elml strains in the respect that W303-1A outcross progeny

displayed variable phenotypes, including some with pseudohyphal morphology.

Strains containing elm2 or elmS mutations were characterized further in this regard.

A diploid homozygous for elm2-l, TlWljelm2-l/elm2-l, was formed in a largely

hybrid background by mating a progeny clone from the outcross of the original

mutant to W303-1A with one from the second backcross to Z1278b (Table 1).

Pseudohyphal characteristics including cell elongation, cell attachment (after

sonication), and formation of expanded, branched chains of cells all were obvious

in J)WLelm2-l / elm2-l (Fig. 7), and the form of these cells was very similar to that

of elml deletion mutants in F1 hybrid diploid backgrounds. Growth of single cell

clones of the elm2 mutant DJ)elm2-2 / elm2-2 was observed over time on solid YPD

medium. This strain exhibited the typical extended, branched chains characteristic

of pseudohyphal growth. Direct observation of clonal development showed the

doubling time of DDelm2-21 elm2-2 to be essentially the same as the congenic wild

type strain DD (data not shown). The same analysis was applied to the elmS mutant

DDelmS-l /elm3-l with similar results, except for more variability in cell length

(data not shown). Thus, mutations in ELM1,ELM2, or ELM3 all cause a dimorphic

transition leading to a nearly identical constitutive pseudohyphal growth phenotype.

elml, elm2, and elmS mutants grow invasively in agar medium. A

distinctive property of the previously described pseudohyphal form of S. cerevisiae

is the ability to grow invasively under the surface of an agar medium (13), referred

to as "foraging". The foraging capacity of elml, elm2, and elm3 strains was examined

Page 121: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

107

FIG. 7. elm2 mutations cause pseudohyphal growth. (A) and (B) Strain Vi^ljdm2-11elm2-l observed using Nomarski optics. Cells were prepared for microscopy as described in Fig. 5. (C) Strain DWSeZ/nS-i /elm2-l observed in situ using an inverted microscope. (D) A single-cell clone of strain 'D'Delm2-2 j elm2-2 developing over time. The clone was analyzed as described in Fig. 6.

Page 122: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

108

by culturing patches of cells for several days on YPD plates, then scrubbing the

surface of the agar with a finger under running tap water to remove all cells from

the plate's surface. Haploid elm2-l, elm2-2, or elm3-l strains in the D273-10B

background could not be washed from the plate, whereas the congenic wild type

control strain was completely removed (Fig. 8, rows 3-5). Observation with an

inverted microscope showed most of the cells remaining after washing were located

completely under the agar surface, with chains extending up to 5 cell lengths into

FIG. 8. elml, elm2, and elm3 mutants forage in agar medium. (A) Strains were cultured for four days on YPD agar medium, at which time the plate was photographed. Each row contains a pair of congenic strains, with the wild type control on the left and an elm mutant on the right. (B) The same plate shown in panel A was washed under running tap water while scrubbing the agar surface with a finger to remove all unattached cells. After washing the dish was photographed again. The surface of the medium is completely smooth after the washing procedure; thus, the remaining cells are embedded in the agar medium. Strains are as follows. Row 1: wild type N2, mutant / Aelml. Row 2: wild type WE, mutant WLAelml j Aelml. Row 3: wild type D273-10B/A1, mutant 102D5 {elm2-2). Row 4: wild type D273-10B/A1, mutant 130D5 {elm2-l). Row 5: wild type D273-10B/A1, mutant 156D5 (elm3-l). Strains with the "D5" designation are progeny of the fifth backcross to D273-10B/A1 (see Table 2).

1 2 3 4 5

Page 123: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

109

the medium (data not shown). The abihty to forage results from the elm2 or elm3

mutation, because this property consistently co-segregated with the cell elongation

phenotype in at least 12 complete tetrads derived from elm2-21ELM2 or elm3-l /

ELMS heterozygous diploids (data not shown). In the haploid D273-10B background

elml-1 and elml-2 mutants also foraged, although to a lesser extent than the

congenic elm2 or elm3 strains (data not shown). WLAelml I Aelml and W^Aelml /

Aelml also exhibited obvious foraging behavior, whereas the congenic wild type

control strains were completely or nearly completely removed from the YPD plate

by the washing procedure (Fig. 8, rows 1-2).

ELM2 and ELMS function affects pseudohyphal differentiation in

response to nitrogen starvation. The comprehensive phenotypic resemblance

of the pseudohyphal morphologies caused either by elml, elm2, or elm3 mutations,

or by nitrogen starvation of wild type cells, suggested the mutations result in

constitutive execution of the differentiation pathway that normally is triggered by

nutrient availability. To test this hypothesis the effects of ELM 1,ELM2, and ELM3

gene dosage on the ability of a strain to form pseudohyphae in response to nitrogen

starvation were examined. Congenic diploid strains were constructed in the D273-

lOB background that contained either one or two functional copies of each gene to

be examined. All strains displayed typical yeast-like morphology in nitrogen-rich

media such as YPD or SD. On the nitrogen starvation medium SLAHD the

homozygous wild type strain DD failed to display pseudohyphal growth even after

14 days on SLAHD medium, which is typical of most inbred laboratory strains

(Fig. 9A). In contrast, pseudohyphal differentiation was obvious in the congenic

strains DDeZm2-2/+ and D'Delm3-l 1+ after three days on SLAHD medium (Fig.

9B,C). Morphologic differentiation of these two strains is dependent on the

nutritional environment, because pseudohyphal cells transferred from an SLAHD

Page 124: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

110

B

FIG. 9. Dosage of ELM2, ELMS, and CDC55 affects pseudohyphal differentiation in response to nitrogen starvation. Strains were starved for nitrogen on SLAHD medium (13) for several days and observed with an inverted microscope. (A) Wild type control strain DD. (B) DDelm2-l/+. (C) DDelm3-l/+. (D) Wild type control strain WS. (E,F) WLAcdc55/+ . All panels show cells incubated for four days, except panel E, which shows cells grown for two days.

Page 125: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

Ill

plate to the nitrogen-rich medium YPD produced clones with typical yeast-like

morphology; these clones again differentiated into pseudohypyhae when they were

replated on SLAHD (data not shown). Thus, function of both ELM2 and ELM3

significantly affects the ability to flip a developmental switch in response to nitrogen

starvation. This gene dosage effect was not observed for ELMl in strain DDelml-

1 / + .

Protein phosphatase 2A activity affects pseudohyphal differentiation

in response to nitrogen starvation. CDC55, a gene coding for the putative B

regulatory subunit of yeast PPase2A, recently has been described. Deletion of

CDC55 resulted in a morphology that resembles the phenotype caused by deletion

of ELMl in the W303 background; cdc55 cells grown at 15°C were elongated,

irregular in shape, and stayed attached to each other (19). This description, along

with the phenotypic analysis of ELMl presented above, suggested the phenotype

caused by cdc55 mutations may be related to pseudohyphal differentiation.

To allow comparisons of congenic strains, CDC55 was replaced by the deletion

allele cdc55::LEU2-2 in the W303 background. Strain aWAcdc55 had a morphology

similar to that previously described for cdc55 mutations (data not shown). Double

mutants in which both CDC55 and ELMl were deleted were constructed in the

W303 background from a cross of haploid strains aWAelmlUand aWAcdc55. The

auxotrophic markers present as parts of elml::URA3 and cdc55::LEU2-2 allowed

unambiguous identification of the relevant genotypes among the meiotic progeny.

All fifteen double mutants identified grew extremely slowly compared to either

single mutant, producing visible colonies from spores only after five days of

incubation at 30^0; growth of these colonies continued to be extremely slow when

they were replated. The double mutants displayed highly irregular cell morphologies

and suffered a severe block in cytokinesis or cell separation, resulting in formation

Page 126: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

112

of large clumps significantly more extensive than those observed in either elml or

cdc55 single mutants (Fig. 10). Thus, deletion of ELMl and CDC55 in the same

strain caused a synthetic phenotype, at least in haploid strains of the W303

background, suggesting the two genes regulate the same cellular function.

Evidence that CDC55 is involved in pseudohyphal differentiation in response

to nitrogen starvation came from observation of yeast strains heterozygous at the

CDC55 locus. Strain VJlLAcdcSS /+, heterozygous for null and wild type alleles at

FIG. 10. Synthetic phenotye of elml cdc55 double mutants. The strains shown are siblings from a tetratype tetrad from the cross between aWAelmlU and aWAcdc55. Cells were scraped from a YPD plate grown at 30°C, resuspended in 0.5 ml of water, sonicated briefly, and photographed under Nomarski optics. (A) ELM1CDC55. (JB)elml::URA3CDC55. {C)ELMlcdc55::LEU2-2. ÇD)elmlr.URAS cdc55::LEU2-2. The double mutants form large clumps of attached cells that do not disperse under a cover slip, as shown by the out-of-focus cells in panel D.

Page 127: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

113

the CDC55 locus, was constructed in a defined F1 hybrid background by mating

aWAcdc55 to MB810-5A. WLAcdcSS / + was plated on SLAHD nitrogen starvation

medium along with the congenic wild type control strain WS. After two days of

incubation, numerous filamentous extensions from the colony center were observed

in the heterozygous strain, but were absent from the wild type control (Fig. 2.9D,E).

After four days extensive pseudohyphal growth of strain WZAcdc551 + was obvious,

including invasive growth within the agar medium (Fig. 9F). Dimorphic transition

of the wild type control strain WL required at least seven days incubation on SLAHD

medium, and occurred only from the dense parts of the spread, a behavior also

observed with other F1 hybrid wild type strains (data not shown). 'W'ZAcdc55/+

displayed no discernible phenotype when cultured in rich media, in agreement

with Healy et al. (1991). Morphologic differentiation of this strain is dependent on

the nutritional environment, because transferring pseudohyphal cells from SLAHD

to YPD medium resulted in colonies with typical yeast-like morphology; these cells

again formed pseudohyphae when transferred back to SLAHD. Thus, as was the

case with ELM2 and ELM3, halving the gene dosage of CDC55 significantly

stimulated pseudohyphal differentiation in response to nitrogen starvation.

Discussion

This report describes the genes ELMl, ELM2, and ELM3, which are defined

by mutations that constitutively cause pseudohyphal growth characteristics. The

mutations were first identified based on the property of cell elongation. A great

variety of mutations may cause the cell elongation phenotype, because mutants of

this type occurred at a high rate (roughly 1% of the mutagenized colonies). Each

mutation described in this report shares the property of phenotypic variability

dependent on genetic background. Thus, although cell elongation was obvious in

Page 128: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

114

all instances, associated phenotypes including impaired cytokinesis, formation of

clumps resistant to sonication, and reduced growth rate were also observed in some

mutant strains, but not in others. In genetic analyses these associated phenotypes

occurred only in strains with elongated cells, and thus result from the elm mutation.

The elml, elm2, and elmS mutations cause S. cerevisiae strains to adopt a

pseudohyphal morphology distinct from the yeast-like form typically observed in

this species. Mutant cells were significantly elongated and regular in shape. During

exponential growth clonally related cells remained attached and aligned along a

single axis, and diploid strains budded almost exclusively at the pole opposite the

birth pole; thus, the mutants grew as extended branched chains. The pseudohyphal

morphology caused by mutations in any of the three genes was nearly identical,

except that delayed cell separation was more obvious in elml strains. Considering

the pleiotropic nature of this mutant phenotype, it is likely that ELMl, ELM2, and

ELM3 code for components of a biochemical pathway that regulates several cell

growth properties. Comparison of the mutant morphology with that of

pseudohyphae occurring in response to nitrogen starvation (13) showed the two

phenotypes are very similar. In addition, there is a physiological property common

to pseudohyphae resulting either from nitrogen starvation, or from elml, elm2, or

elm3 mutations, namely the ability to grow invasively under the surface of agar

media. We propose, therefore, that the regulatory switch that normally causes

pseudohyphal growth to occur in conditions of nitrogen starvation is triggered

constitutively in the absence of ELMl, ELM2, or ELM3 function. Because the

mutations are recessive, these genes may function to block pseudohyphal

differentiation in inappropriate conditions. Another possible explanation for the

pseudohyphal morphology observed in the mutants is that this phenotype results

indirectly from impaired cell division. We feel this explanation is unlikely, because

Page 129: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

115

mutations affecting the cell division cycle are not expected to cause the observed

foraging behavior. Furthermore, in most genetic backgrounds cell division proceeds

at roughly the same rate in elml, elm2, or elmS mutants as in congenic wild type

strains, suggesting the cycle is not impaired.

Analysis of strains heterozygous for elm2 or elm3 provided strong evidence

that the constitutive pseudohyphal phenotype oîelm2 and elm3 mutants represents

the pseudohyphal differentiation state that normally occurs during nitrogen

starvation. These heterozygous strains displayed normal yeast-like morphology

in rich medium. Upon nitrogen starvation, however, these strains differentiated

rapidly into pseudohyphae, whereas wild type control strains did not. The fact

that a presumed reduction in ELM2 or ELM3 activity increased the sensitivity of

the differentiation response to nitrogen starvation suggested the genes function to

inhibit the pseudohyphal transition. Complete or more extreme loss of function in

homozygous mutant strains, therefore, may result in the differentiation pathway

being executed independent of a signal and explain the phenotype of elm2 and

elm3 mutants. Heterozygosity at the ELMl locus had no noticeable effect on

pseudohyphal differentiation in response to nitrogen starvation, possibly because

Elmlp activity is less strictly related to gene dosage.

The observed strain-dependent variability in the phenotype of elml, elm2, and

elm3 mutants may be a natural consequence of constitutive induction of the

nutritionally regulated pseudohyphal differentiation process. Variability in

competence for pseudohyphal growth in response to nitrogen starvation has been

reported amongst S. cerevisiae wild and laboratory isolates (5,9,10,13,14,25,49).

Presumably, pseudohyphal growth is more or less deficient in some inbred genetic

backgrounds owing to specific defects in genes required for this differentiation state.

These defects could become fixed in particular reference strains, because there is

Page 130: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

116

no selection against such mutations in the laboratory environment. Induction of

the differentiation pathway owing to an elm mutation, in the absence of functions

normally required for pseudohyphal growth, might then cause formation of aberrant

pseudohyphae. The reduced growth rate and defective cytokinesis phenotypes in

certain elm strains, therefore, are likely to be aspects of defective pseudohyphal

growth. Supporting this hypothesis, phenotypic variability was not observed in

three different F1 hybrid diploids lacking a functional ELMl gene. Since the F1

hyrid strains bear a complete genome from each of two independently maintained

parents, unknown mutations affecting a specific function are likely to be

heterozygous. Indeed, all F1 hybrid diploids used in this study (as well as several

additional F1 hybrid strains) were observed to be pseudohyphal-competent when

starved for nitrogen (data not shown). Deletion of elml in F1 hybrid genetic

backgrounds had no noticeable effect on growth rate, and produced a constitutive

pseudohyphal phenotype uniform from cell to cell and strain to strain.

The elml, elm2, and elm3 mutations, which we propose cause constitutive

execution of a pseudohyphal differentiation pathway, were identified in haploid

strains. Pseudohyphal growth in response to nitrogen starvation, however, has

not been reported for haploids. Identification of the mutations was possible because

they cause cell elongation independent of cell type, i.e. in both haploids and diploids.

Delayed cell separation and the ability to forage also were observed in haploid

elml, elm2, or elmS mutant strains. The unipolar budding pattern of pseudohyphae,

however, usually was not observed in haploid elm mutants; these strains instead

displayed the axial budding pattern typical of wild type haploids (Fig. 5B inset).

Unipolar budding requires that buds form opposite the birth pole; in the yeast-like

morphology this occurs only in diploids (12). Thus, constitutive induction of

pseudohyphal differentiation by elml, elm2, or elmS mutations does not bypass

Page 131: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

117

the cell type control of bud site selection, even though other aspects of pseudohyphal

growth are expressed in the mutants independent of cell type. Unipolar budding

was observed for a haploid elml mutant in the W303 background (Fig. lOB),

however, congenic haploid control strains seemingly are defective in regulation of

bud site selection (data not shown).

Three general types of mutation are expected to result in constitutive execution

of the pseudohyphal differentiation pathway, affecting either the primary signal,

its transduction, or direct effectors of the response. As far as is known, the

differentiation signal normally derives from nitrogen starvation (13,24). Mutations

affecting nitrogen assimilation pathways, therefore, may induce pseudohyphal

differentiation by mimicking nitrogen starvation. The following arguments suggest

this is not the case for elml, elm2, or elm3:1) The doubling time of the mutants is

not significantly different from wild type control strains, indicating they are not

metabolically compromised. 2) All three mutations cause the morphologic phenotype

in prototrophic genetic backgrounds; these strains must produce amino acids,

nucleotides, and other nitrogen-containing metabolites at levels sufficient to support

growth with normal doubling times. 3) We observed for several F1 hybrid diploid

strains that pseudohyphal differentiation in response to nitrogen starvation occured

only in a minority of cells in the population (data not shown). In contrast, in elml,

elm2, and elmS mutant strains the great majority of cells exhibit pseudohyphal

growth characteristics. 4) Pseudohyphal differentiation in response to nitrogen

starvation does not occur in liquid medium (13), whereas the mutant strains exhibit

pseudohyphal growth characteristics in either liquid or solid media. Thus, we

propose elml, elm2, and elm3 mutations either affect directly the regulatory switch

that triggers pseudohyphal differentiation, or affect downstream elements

mediating the differentiation process.

Page 132: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

118

elml, elm2, and elmS mutations are likely to be useful tools for elucidating the

molecular switch mechanism that regulates pseudohyphal differentiation in S.

cerevisiae. Our phenotypic analysis oïELMl and CDC55, which code for homologs

of a protein kinase and protein phosphatase subunit, respectively, suggests protein

phosphorylation participates in the switch. Thus, further analysis of these genes

and their products is likely to reveal a signal transduction cascade that controls

morphologic differentiation. One signal transduction process with which the ELMl,

ELM2, or ELM3 gene products potentially could interact is the RAS2 pathway,

because stimulation of RAS2 function significantly facilitated pseudohyphal

differentiation in response to nitrogen starvation (13). The rho related family of

small G proteins may also be involved in dimorphism control because these proteins

are implicated in cell shape regulation (7,21,29,32). Furthermore, specific rhol

mutant strains of S. cerevisiae spontaneously produce derivatives exhibiting

pseudohyphal characteristics (P.M. and A.M., unpublished results).

A physiological process likely to be affected by pseudohyphal differentiation is

cytokinesis. Loss of ELMl function consistently caused pseudohyphal growth

characteristics such as cell elongation, but in most strains cytokinesis was

completed. In the W303 genetic background, however, elml mutations also caused

a cytokinesis defect. Because defective cytokinesis was observed only when W303

was induced to differentiate by an elml mutation, and not when growing in the

yeast-like form, we propose that cytokinesis proceeds differently in the yeast-like-

and pseudohyphal forms of S. cerevisiae. W303 is presumed to be defective in a

pseudohyphal-specific aspect of cytokinesis, whereas pseudohyphal-competent

strains such as the F1 hybrid diploids complete cytokinesis when growing as elml-

induced pseudohyphae. Modulation of cytokinesis during pseudohyphal

differentiation might explain the correlation of cell elongation and cytokinesis

Page 133: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

119

defects caused by several mutations, in particular those affecting the bud neck 10

nm filament {cdc3, cdclO, cdcll, cdcl2) (11,15,18,22). By analogy with the effects

of elml mutations, these cdc mutations may cause primarily an elongated,

pseudohyphal morphology, which eventually leads to a block in cytokinesis. In

this model the bud neck filaments are viewed as cytoskeletal elements mediating

changes in cell shape occurring during differentiation.

Two lines of evidence implicated PPase2Aas a factor controlling pseudohyphal

differentiation, in addition to the phenotypic resemblance between certain elml

and cdc55 strains. The sublethality associated with coupling of cdc55 and elml

mutations suggested the two gene products act in a single biochemical pathway.

Furthermore, the finding that gene dosage at the CDC55 locus greatly affected the

pseudohyphal response to nitrogen starvation, in a manner similar to ELM2 and

ELM3, is a strong indication that PPase2A regulates a switch controlling cellular

dimorphism. Although we cannot rule out the possibility that CDC55 influences

differentiation indirectly by regulating nitrogen assimilation, studies of PPase2A

in mammals do not favor such an indirect effect. Mammalian PPase2A has been

proposed as an important regulator of differentiation and/or proliferation, because

this enzyme is specifically altered by two different DNA tumor viruses, SV40 and

polyoma virus (28,53). A direct involvement of CDC55 in S. cerevisiae differentiation

is consistent with this model and suggests PPase2A function has been conserved

from yeast to man. The proposed function of PPase2A in control of pseudohyphal

differentiation also is consistent with previous reports demonstrating this enzyme

affects both cell morphology and gene expression (1,19,33,51).

In conclusion, we have initiated a genetic analysis of S. cerevisiae dimorphism.

A novel mutant phenotype was identified, which we propose arises by constitutive

execution of the differentiation pathway that normally is stimulated by nutrient

Page 134: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

120

limitation. A putative novel protein kinase involved in morphologic differentiation

was identified. Yeast homologs of two proteins known or suspected to participate

in oncogenic processes in mammals, namely p21ras (13) and PPase 2A, have a

major effect on this fungal differentiation system, suggesting the fundamental

mechanisms regulating morphologic differentiation have been conserved during

evolution. Analysis of other elongated morphology mutants may reveal additional

genes involved in this differentiation process. Finally, the mutations described

here allow preparation of large amounts of pure pseudohyphae, which are difficult

to obtain by nitrogen starvation of wild type strains. This may facilitate the

biochemical and physiological characterization of S. cerevisiae pseudohyphae.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Eric Henderson for sharing microscope facilities, Francois

Lacroute for providing a yeast genomic library, and John Pringle, Peter Novick,

Rodney Rothstein, and Maijorie Brandriss for providing plasmids and yeast strains.

This research was supported by NIH grant GM39254 to A.M. and ARC grant 6620

to P. M. Support was also obtained from EEC and Foundation pour la Recherche

Medicale.

References

1. Amdt, K. T., C. A. Styles and G. R. Fink. 1989. A suppressor of a HIS4 transcriptional defect encodes a protein with homology to the catalytic sub-unit of protein phosphatase. Cell 56:527-537.

2. Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. A. Smith, J. G. Seidman and K. Struhl. 1989. Current protocols in molecular biology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

3. Banuett, F. 1992. Ustilago maydis, the delightful blight. TIG 8:174-180.

Page 135: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

121

4. Bialojan, C. and A. Takai. 1988. Inhibitory effect of a marine-sponge toxin, okadaic acid, on protein phosphatases. Biochem. J, 256:238-290.

5. Brown, C. M. and J. S. Hough. 1965. Elongation of yeast cells in continuous culture. Nature 206:676-678.

6. Chant, J. and I. Herskowitz. 1991. Genetic control of bud site selection in yeast by a set of gene products that constitute a morphogenetic pathway. Cell 65:1203-1212.

7. Chardin, P., P. Boquet, P. Madaule, M. R. Popoff, E. J. Rubin and D. M. Gill. 1989. The mammalian G protein rhoC is ADP-ribosylated by Clostridium botulinum exoenzyme C3 and affects actin microfilaments in Vero cells. EMBO J. 8:1087-1092.

8. Cohen, P. 1989. The structure and regulation of protein phosphatases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 58:453-508.

9. Dittmer, H. J. 1964. Phylogeny and form in the plant kingdom. Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ.

10. Eubanks, V. L. and L. R. Beuchat. 1982. Effects of antioxidants on growth, sporulation, and pseudomycelium production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Food. Sci. 47:1717-1722.

11. Ford, S. K. and J. R. Pringle. 1991. Cellular morphogenesis in the Saccha­romyces cerevisiae cell cycle: Localization of the CDC 11 gene product and the timing of events at the budding site. Devel. Genet. 12:281-292.

12. Freifelder, D. 1960. Bud formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 80:567-568.

13. Gimeno, P. O., P. O. Ljungdahl, C. A. Styles and G. R. Fink. 1992. Unipo­lar cell divisions in the yeast S. cerevisiae lead to filamentous growth: regula­tion by starvation and RAS. Cell 68:1077-1090.

14. Guilliermond, A. 1920. The Yeasts. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

15. Haarer, B. K. and J. R. Pringle. 1987, Immunofiuorescence localization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae CDC 12 gene product to the vicinity of the 10-nm filaments in the mother-bud neck. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7:3678-3687.

Page 136: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

122

16. Hanks, S. K. and A. M. Quinn. 1991. Protein kinase catalytic domain sequence database: Identification of conserved features of primary structure and classification of family members. Methods Enzymol. 200:38-62.

17. Hanks, S. K., A. M. Quinn and T. Hunter. 1988. The protein kinase family: conserved features and deduced phylogeny of the catalytic domains. Science 241:42-52.

18. Hartwell, L. H. 1971. Genetic control of the cell division cycle in yeast. IV. Genes controlling bud emergence and cytokinesis. Exptl. Cell Res 69:265-276.

19. Healy, A, S. Zolnierowicz, A Stapleton, M. Goebl, A. A. DePaoli-Roach and J. R. Pringle. 1991. CDC55, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene involved in cellular morphogenesis: Identification, characterization, and homology to the B subunit of mammaliam type 2A protein phosphatase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:5767-5780.

20. Hill, J. E., A M. Myers, T. J. Koemer and A Tzagoloff. 1986. Yeast/E. coli shuttle vectors with multiple unique restriction sites. Yeast 2:163-167.

21. Johnson, D. I. and J. R. Pringle. 1990. Molecular characterization 0ÎCDC42, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene involved in the development of cell polarity. J. Cell Biol. 111:143-152.

22. Kim, H. B., B. K. Haarer and J. R. Pringle. 1991. Cellular morphogenesis in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle: Localization of the CDC3 gene product and the timing of events at the budding site. J. Cell Biol. 112:535-544.

23. Knighton, D. R., J. Zheng, L. F. Ten Eyck, V. A Ashford, N. -H. Xuong, S. S. Taylor and J. M. Sowadski. 1991. Crystal structure of the catalytic subunit of cyclic adenosine monophosphate-dependent protein kinase. Science 253:407-414.

24. Ljungdahl, P. O., C. J. Gimeno, C. A Styles and G. R. Fink. 1992. SHR3: a novel component of the secretory pathway specifically required for localization of amino acid permeases in yeast. Cell 71:463-478.

25. Lodder, J. 1970. The Yeasts: a Taxonomic Study. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam.

26. Loerincz, A. T. and S. I. Reed. 1984. Primary structure homology between the product of the yeast cell division cycle gene CDC28 and vertabrate oncogenes. Nature 307:183-185.

Page 137: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

123

27. Madaule, P., R. Axel and A. M. Myers. 1987. Characterization of two members of the rho gene family from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:779-783.

28. Pallas, D. C., L. K. Shahrik, B. L. Martin, J. Jaspers, T. B. Miller, D. L. Brautigan and T. M. Roberts. 1990. Polyoma small and middle T antigens and SV40 small t antigen form stable complexes with protein phosphatase 2A. Cell 60:167-176.

29. Paterson, H. F., A. J. Self, M. D. Garrett, I. Just, K. Aktories and A. Hall. 1990. Microinjection of recombinant p2irho induces rapid changes in cell morphology. J. Cell Biol. 111:1001-1007.

30. Peng, Z., W. Wang, S. E. Wilson, K. K. Schlender, R. J. Trumbly and E. M. Reimann. 1991. Identification of a glycogen synthetase phosphatase from yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a protein phosphatase 2A. J. Biol. Chem. 266:10925-10932.

31. Pringle, J. R., R. A. Preston, A. E. M. Adams, T. Stearns, D. G. Drubin, B. K. Haarer and E. W. Jones. 1989. Fluorescence microscopy methods for yeast. Methods Cell Biol. 31:357-435.

32. Ridley, A. J. and A. Hall. 1992. The small GTP-binding protein rho regulates the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers in response to growth factors. Cell 70:389-399.

33. Ronne, H., M. Carlberg, G. Z. Hu and J. O. Nehlin. 1991. Protein phosphatase 2A in Saccharomyces cerevisiae] effects on cell growth and bud morphogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:4876-4884.

34. Rose, M. D., P. Grisafî and D. Botstein. 1984. Structure and function of the yeast URA3 gene: expression in .EscAencAm coli. Gene 29:113-124.

35. Rose, M. D., F. Winston and P. Heiter. 1990. Methods in Yeast Genetics. A Laboratory Course Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor.

36. Rothstein, R. 1991. Targeting, disruption, replacement, and allele rescue: integrative DNA transformation in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 194:281-301.

37. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

Page 138: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

124

38. Sanger, F., S. Nicklen and A. R. Coulson. 1977. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74:5463-5467.

39. Sayers, J., W. Schmidt and F. Eckstein. 1988. 5'-3' exonucleases in phosphorothiolate based oligonucleotide mutagenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 16:791-802.

40. Scherer, S. and P. T. Magee. 1990. Genetics of Candida albicans. Microbiol. Rev. 54:226-241.

41. Shoji, S., L. H. Ericsson, K. A. Walsh, E. H. Fisher and T. Utani. 1983. Amino acid sequence of the catalytic subunit of bovine type II adenosine cyclic 3',5'-phosphate dependent protein kinase. Biochemistry 22:3702-3709.

42. Siddiqui, A. H. and M. C. Brandriss. 1988. A regulatory region responsible for proline-specific induction of the yeast PUT2 gene is adjacent to its TATA box. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:4634-4641.

43. Sikorski, R. S. and P. Hie ter. 1989. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122:19-27.

44. Sneddon, A. A., P. T. W. Cohen and M. J. R, Stark. 1990. S. cerevisiae protein phosphatase 2A performs an essential function and is encoded by two genes. EMBO J. 9:4339-4346.

45. Soli, D. R. 1990. Dimorphism and high-frequency switching in Candida albicans, p. 147-176. In D. R. Kirsch, R. Kelley and M. B. Kurtz, (ed.). The genetics of Candida, CRC Press, Boston.

46. Soil, D. R. 1992. High frequency switching in Candida albicans. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 5:183-203.

47. Struhl, K. 1985. Nucleotide sequence analysis and transcriptional mapping of the yeast pet56-his3-dedl gene region. Nucleic Acids Res. 13:8587-8601.

48. Suganuma, M., H. Fujiki, H. Suguri, S. Yoshizawa, M. Hirota, M. Nakayasu, M. Ojika, K. Wakamatsu, K. Yamada and T. Suganuma. 1988. Okadaic acid: an additional non-phorbol-12-tetradecanoate-13-acetate-type tumor promoter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:1768-1771.

49. Townsend, G. F. and C. C. Lindegren. 1954. Characteristic growth patterns of the different members of a polyploid series of Saccharomyces. J. Bacteriol. 67:480-483.

Page 139: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

125

50. Tzagoloff, A., A. Akai and F. Foury. 1976. Assembly of the mitochondrial membrane system. XVI. Modified form of the ATPase proteolipid in oligomycin-resistant mutants of S. cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 65:391-396.

51. van Zyl, W., W. Huang, A. A. Sneddon, M. Stark, S. Gamier, M. Werner, C. Marck, A. Sentenac and J. R. Broach. 1992. Inactivation of the protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit A results in morphological and transcriptional defects in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:4946-4959.

52. Vieira, J. and J. Messing. 1987. Production of single stranded plasmid DNA. Methods Enzymol. 153:3-11.

53. Yang, S., R. L. Leckteig, R. Estes, K. Rundell, G. Walter and M. G. Mumby. 1991. Control of protein phosphatase 2 A by Simian Virus 40 small t antigen. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:1988-1995.

Page 140: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

126

CHAPTERS. THE S. CEREVISIAE MUTATION elm4-l FACILITATES PSEUDOHYPHAL DIFFERENTIATION AND INTERACTS WITH A DEFICIENCY IN PHOSPHORIBOSYLPYROPHOSPHATE SYNTHASE ACTIVITY TO CAUSE CONSTITUTIVE PSEUDOHYPHAL GROWTH

A paper accepted by Molecular and Cellular Biology^

Melissa J. Blacketer^, Pascal Madaule^ and Alan M. Myers2.4

Abstract

Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant E124 was selected in a visual screen based

on elongated cell shape. Genetic analysis showed E124 contains two separate

mutations, ppsl-1 and elm4-l, each causing a distinct phenotype inherited as a

single-gene trait. In rich medium ppsl-1 by itself causes increased doubling time

but does not affect cell shape, whereas elm4-l results in a moderate cell elongation

phenotype but does not affect growth rate. Reconstructed elm4-l ppsl-1 double

mutants display a synthetic phenotype in rich medium including extreme cell

elongation and delayed cell separation, both characteristics of pseudohyphal

differentiation. The elm4-l mutation was shown to act as a dominant factor that

potentiates pseudohyphal differentiation in response to general nitrogen starvation

^ Reprinted from Mol, Cell. Biol, (in press), with permission from the American

Society for Microbiology. Copyright © 1994 American Society for Microbiology.

2 Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Iowa State University, Ames, lA

50011.

^ Unite de Recombinaison et Expression Genetique, Unite INSERM 163, Institut

Pasteur, 28 rue du Dr. Roux, 75724 Paris cedex 15, France.

^ Major professor.

Page 141: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

127

in a genetic background where pseudohyphal growth normally does not occur. Thus,

elm4-l allows recognition of, or response to, a pseudohyphal differentiation signal

that results from nitrogen limitation. PPSl was isolated and shown to be a

previously undescribed gene coding for a protein similar in amino acid sequence to

phosphoribosylpyrophosphate (PRPP) synthase, a rate limiting enzyme in the

biosynthesis of nucleotides, histidine, and tryptophan. Thus, the ppsl-1 mutation

may generate a nitrogen-limitation signal, which when coupled with elm4-l results

in pseudohyphal growth even in rich medium.

Introduction

The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a dimorphic organism that carries out a

morphologic differentiation process when starved for nitrogen (6-10,17,26). In most

laboratory growth conditions S. cerevisiae exhibits a typical yeast-like morphology

in which individual cells have an ovoid shape and separate from each other easily.

In agar medium limiting for nitrogen supply, however, certain S. cerevisiae strains

adopt a markedly different cell and colony morphology, termed pseudohyphae. These

cells are significantly elongated, and mother-daughter pairs remain attached to

each other. In most cell divisions buds form opposite the birth pole, which is

connected to the previous mother cell. Together these characteristics cause colony

growth in the form of expanded branched chains extending outward from the colony

center. Colony expansion also includes invasive growth under the surface of agar

medium. This property, termed "foraging," is specific to the pseudohyphal form.

These observations suggest S. cerevisiae can perceive a nutritional signal, and

in response to that signal flip a developmental switch that causes a specific

morphologic differentiation response to take place. The molecular nature of this

differentiation process is not yet understood, however, several proteins that affect

Page 142: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

128

the pseudohyphal growth response have been identified by genetic means. Gimeno

et al. (9) showed stimulation of the RAS2 signal transduction pathway potentiates

the pseudohyphal differentiation response. We have identified three unlinked gene

loci, ELMl, ELM2, and ELM3, in which mutations affect pseudohyphal growth

(3). Diploid strains homozygous for any of these mutations grow as pseudohyphae

constitutively, independent of the nutritional environment. In addition,

heterozygous elm2 /ELM2 or elmS /ELM3 strains, which display normal yeast-like

morphology in rich medium, differentiate into pseudohyphae at unusually high

frequency in response to nitrogen limitation (3). Thus, the products of these three

ELM genes seemingly fiinction to prevent pseudohyphal differentiation, and this

inhibition is gene dosage-dependent for ELM2 and ELMS. ELMl codes for a homolog

of protein kinases. Protein phosphorylation as a signal in pseudohyphal

differentiation was indicated additionally fi'om the finding that mutations affecting

protein phosphatase 2A activity also affect pseudohyphal growth (3).

Other genes known to affect pseudohyphal growth include STE7, STEll,

STE12, and STE20, which also fimction in the mating response signal transduction

pathway; mutations in these genes suppress the formation of pseudohyphae in

response to nitrogen limitation (15a). Mutations inRAS2 also affect pseudohyphal

differentiation, by hyperactivating the response to nitrogen limitation (9). Recently,

seven different genes, termed PHD, were isolated based on the ability, when

overexpressed, to cause an accelerated and intensified pseudohyphal response to

nitrogen limitation. PHDl was cloned and shown to code for a putative transcription

factor, which contains a DNA-binding motif related to those of the cell cycle

regulatory transcription factors SWI4 and MBPl (9a).

A mutation that affects amino acid transport also is known to affect

pseudohyphal differentiation, presumably by influencing the starvation-related

Page 143: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

129

signal. Diploid strains lacking a functional SHR3 gene displayed an enhanced

frequency of pseudohyphal differentiation when starved for nitrogen (9,16). The

product of this gene is an endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein required for

localization of several different permeases in the plasma membrane (16). These

results predict additional mutations affecting amino acid metabolism, or generation

of other nitrogen-containing compounds, are likely to influence the signal for

pseudohyphal differentiation. One of the central enzymes in nitrogen metabolism

pathways is PRPP synthase (for reviews see Refs. 2,13,29), which catalyzes transfer

of the terminal pyrophosphoryl group of ATP to carbon C-1 of ribose-5-phosphate.

PRPP is a substrate in the biosynthetic reactions leading to de novo synthesis of

pyrimidine and purine nucleotides, the pyridine nucleotide cofactors NAD and

NADP, and the amino acids histidine and tryptophan. In addition PRPP acts as an

allosteric regulator of several enzymatic steps in these pathways. Thus, PRPP

synthase activity is a critical determinant of the metabolism of nitrogen containing

compounds. This enzyme, however, has not been characterized in S. cerevisiae.

In this report we describe a new mutation, elm4-l. Similar to ELM2 and ELM3,

elm4-l IELM4 heterozygotes display the normal yeast-like morphology in rich media

but pseudohyphal differentiation in response to nitrogen limitation is greatly

enhanced. Homozygous elm4-l /elm4-l strains display moderately elongated cells

in rich medium, whereas other pseudohyphal growth characteristics require

nitrogen limitation to become manifest. A synthetic phenotype of extreme cell

elongation and delayed cell separation, reminiscent of pseudohyphal growth, was

observed when elm4-l was combined with a second mutation, ppsl-1. The wild

type gene corresponding to ppsl-1 was isolated and shown to code for PRPP

synthase. These results provide additional evidence that nitrogen metabolism is a

determining factor for induction of pseudohyphal differentiation. In addition.

Page 144: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

130

isolation of the gene coding for PRPP synthase should prove to be a useful tool for

studying nucleotide and amino acid biosynthesis, and the regulation thereof, in S.

cerevisiae.

Materials and Methods

Strains, media, and genetic methods. S. cerevisiae strains used in this

study are described in Table 1. Yeast strains were cultured at BQOC unless otherwise

specified. The following media were used: YPD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2%

glucose); SD (2% glucose, 0.67% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids,

supplemented as required with leucine, tryptophan, histidine, uracil, adenine, and

methionine at 20 |ig/ml each); SDC (2% glucose, 0.67% yeast nitrogen base without

amino acids, 0.5% casamino acids in addition to the auxotrophic requirements);

sporulation medium (1% potassium acetate, 0.05% glucose, 0.1% yeast extract,

and 20 fig/ml each tryptophan, histidine, leucine, methionine, uracil, adenine, and

lysine); SLAHD (nitrogen starvation medium described in Kef. 9 [0.05 mM NH4+]).

Solid media for yeast contained 2% agar.

Standard genetic methods were used for mating, tetrad dissection

complementation analysis, allele testing by determination of segregation patterns,

and transformation of yeast (22). In those instances where complementary

auxotrophic markers were not available in a cross, zygotes were identified by their

morphology after 4-8 hours of mating and isolated with a micromanipulator. In all

such instances the isolated colony was confirmed to be a diploid by observation of

sporulation.

Morphological analyses. Colony morphology was examined using an inverted

microscope, observing the cells through the agar. Cells observed at higher

magnification using Nomarski optics were obtained from liquid cultures, or by

Page 145: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

131

TABLE 1. S. cerevisiae strains

Strain Genotype Source

NY13

NY 180

MB810-5A

MB758-5B

W303

W303-1A

D273-10B/A1

«DU

aDU

DD

E124

S 124.8c

S 124.4

aDelm4

DDelni4/+

aDelm4

DDelm4/elm4

aNppsl

^ppsl

MA Ta ura3

MATa iiraS leu2 (related to NY13 by five backcrosses)

MATa lys2 (Z1278b background)

MATa ura3 (El278b background)

MATa/MATa ura3/ura3 Ieu2/leu2 his3/his3 trpl/trpl ade2/ade2

MATa ura3 leu2 his3 trpl ade2

MATa meî6

MATa ura3 met6

MATa ura3 met6

MATa/MATa ura3/+ leu2/+

MATa ppsl-1 elm4-l met6

MATa elm4-l ade2 leu2 ura3

MATa elm4-l ppsl-1 leu2 trpl

MATa elm4-l ade2

MATa/MATa elm4-l/+ ade2/+ ura3/+ met6/+

MATa elm4-l ura3

MATa/MATa elm4-I/elm4-l ade2/+ ura3/+

MATa ppsl-1 ura3 leu2

MATa ppsl-1 ura3 leu2

P. Novick

P. Novick

M. Brandriss

M. Brandriss

Ref. 28

Ref. 28

Ref. 27

Progeny from 5th backcross of W303-lAto D273-10B/A1

Progeny from 5 th backcross of W303-lAtoD273-10B/Al

Mating of progeny from 5th backcross of W303-1A to D273-lOB/Al

Mutagenesis of D273- lOB/A 1

Progeny from E124 x W303-1A

Progeny from E124 x W303-1A

Progeny from 5th backcross of S 124.8c to D273-10B/A1

iDelm4 x aDU

Progeny from DDelm4/+

sDelm4 x aDelm4

Progeny from 5th backcross of El24 to NY 13 background (NY 13 or NY180)

Progeny from 5th backcross of El24 to NY 13 background (NY13 or NY180)

Page 146: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

132

TABLE 1. Continued

Strain Genotype Source

aNe/m4

aNeZfW

aNppsI elm4

NNppsI elm4

NNelm4

NNAppsI elm4

aWPPSlQURA3

aW psl

lXelm4/elm4

'L'Lelm4/+

MATa elm4-l ura3 leu2

MATa elm4-l ura3 leu2

MATa ppsl-1 elm4-l ura3 leu2

MATa/MATa ppsl-l/ppsl-1

elm4-l/elm4-l ura3/ura3 Ieu2/leu2

MATa/MATa elm4-l/elm4-l ura3/ura3 leu2Aeu2

MATa/MATa ppsi : : URA3/ppsl : : URA3

elm4-l/elm4-l ura3/ura3 leu2Aeu2

MATa PPSl QURA3 ura3 leu2 his3 trpl ade2

MATa ura3 leu2 his3 trpl ade2 ppsl:;URA3

MATa/MATa lys2/+ ura3/+ elm4-l/elm4-l

MATa/MATa lys2/+ ura3/+ elm4-1/+

Progeny from 5th backcross of El24 to NY13 background (NY13 or NY180)

Progeny from 5th backcross of El24 to NY13 background (NY 13 or NY180)

Progeny from aNppsl x aNelm4

Mating of progeny from aNppsl x aNe/m4

aNelm4 x aN elm4

Mating of segregants of integrative transformant of NN elm4

Integrative transformation of W303-lA

Segregant from integrative transformant of W303

Mating of segregants of 5th backcross of S 124.8c to MB758-5B or MB810-5A

Mating of (segregant of 5th backcross of S 124.8c to MB758-5B or MB810-5A) to MB810-5A

alAppsl MATappsl::URA3 ura3 Integrative transformant of MB758-5B

Page 147: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

133

suspending cells from an agar dish in a drop of water. Micrographie images were

collected digitally on a Macintosh computer using a CCD camera (Hamamatsu),

an analog-digital converter board (Digital Translation, Inc.) and the program Image

1.47 (W. Rasband, NIMH, National Institutes of Health). Measurements of cell

dimensions were made using Image 1.47.

Isolation of PPSl from a genomic library. The genomic library used for

transformation consisted of partial SauSA digestion products of wild type nuclear

DNA cloned into the BamJil site of the LEU2-containing shuttle vector YEplB (5).

The library was introduced into strain 8124.4 (relevant genotype ppsl-1 elm4-l

leu2) using the spheroplast procedure (22), and transformants were plated on SD

medium lacking leucine. After 4 days incubation a few colonies had grown

sufficiently to be picked from the transformation plate, whereas the vast majority

of colonies were significantly smaller and could not be picked for several additional

days. The large colonies were replated on selective medium and scored for colony

morphology. One transformant displayed near normal colony morphology when

plated on selective medium, in contrast to the extended cell chains observed in the

untransformed parent strain. This trait co-segregated with the LEU2 marker of

the introduced plasmid when the transformant was grown in non-selective medium.

The transforming plasmid in this colony was purified and analyzed further, as

described in the Results.

DNA manipulations and allele construction. DNA manipulations were

performed according to standard procedures (1,24). Nucleotide sequence analysis

used the chain termination method (25). Database homology searches and sequence

alignments used the Genetics Computer Group software package (GCG, Madison,

WI).

Page 148: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

134

The deletion allele ppsl::URA3 (see Fig. 7B) was constructed as follows. The

3.1 kb Pstl fragment containing PPSi was excised from plasmid pE124/ST2 and

cloned in the vector YEp352P, forming pE124/ST10. YEp352P is similar to YEp352

(12) except that the Pvull fragment containing the multiple cloning site region is

replaced by a unique Pstl site. pE124/ST10 was digested with 5s^XI, eliminating

PPSl codons 130 to 394. The 3' extensions of the digested BstXl recognition sites

were removed by the 3' - 5' exonuclease activity of DNA polymerase I Klenow

fragment. The blunt-ended plasmid was then ligated to an oligonucleotide linker

containing a Hindlll site, forming plasmid pE124/ST20. A 1.2 kb genomic iîmdlll

fragment containing URA3 (21) was excised from plasmid pUC118U-P and ligated

into theiïmdlll site of pE124/ST20, forming plasmid pAppsl. This URA3 fragment

was modified from the genomic sequence so as to eliminate the Pstl site. The Pstl

-Sad fragment of pAppsI was ligated into the Pstl-Sacl site of pE124/ST2, forming

plasmid pAppsl/ST2. The 1.7 kb Sspl-Sspl fragment excised from pAppsl/ST2

contains the deletion allele ppsl::URA3; this fragment was integrated into the

yeast genome by gene replacement (23).

The chromosomal PPSl locus was tagged with a genetic marker as follows.

The 2.9 kb Psil-SacI fragment containingPPSi was excised from the transforming

plasmid pE124/ST2 and ligated into the integrative vector YIp352 (12). The

resultant plasmid was linearized by cleavage at the unique BsiEII site within PPSl,

and used to transform wild type strain W303-1A to uracil prototrophy. This type of

integration results in duplication of PPSl, with the two functional copies of the

gene separated from each other by the YIp352 plasmid sequence containing the

URA3 marker gene. This predicted integration was verified by Southern

hybridization analysis. Genomic DNA was digested with Bglll, (which does not

cut within the recombinant plasmid), separated by electrophoresis, and probed

Page 149: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

135

with a portion of PPSl. The probe detected a fragment of approximately 6.5 kb in

wild type cells; this fragment was missing in haploids containing the targeted

integration (strain aiWPPSlQURAS) and was replaced by a larger fragment (data

not shown).

Measurement of PRPP synthase activity. Crude cell extracts were prepared

from exponential cultures in YPD medium (Agoo of 0.4 to 0.6). Cells from 10 ml

cultures were washed once in buffer A (50 mM potassium phosphate pH 7.4, 150

mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM P-mercaptoethanol)

and resuspended in 200 ^1 of buffer A in a 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube. An equal

volume of glass beads was added to the tubes. Cells were lysed by six cycles of

vortexing for one minute followed by chilling on ice for three minutes. The lysates

were centrifuged at 10,000 x gfor 30 minutes at 40C, and the resulting supematants

were used for enzyme activity assays. Protein concentrations were determined by

the method of Bradford (4).

PRPP synthase activity was determined using a modified version of the orotate

removal assay described by Kornberg et al. (14). This assay is based on the

conversion of 1 mole PRPP plus 1 mole orotic acid to 1 mole orotate monophosphate

(OMP), which is then converted to UMP; PRPP in the reaction mixtures is dependent

on PRPP synthase activity in cell extracts. The conversion of orotic acid to OMP

was monitored by the decrease in absorbence at 295 nm (molar absorption coefficient

= 3950). Total cell extracts were added at varying concentrations to incubation

mixtures (1 ml) containing of 1.2 mM ATP, 2.5 mM ribose-5-phosphate, 20 mM

potassium phosphate pH 7.4, 2.0 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 50 mM NaF, 0.5 mM

EDTA, 50 |ig/ml BSA; these mixtures were incubated for 10 minutes at 370C. The

incubation mixture (450 p.1) was added to a solution of 0.2 mM orotate, 20 mM Tris-

HCl pH 8.0, 2 mM MgCl2, in a total volume of 1 ml. Consumption of orotate was

then measured after addition of 1 unit of orotidine-5-phosphate pyrophosphorylase

Page 150: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

136

+ orotidine-5-phosphate decarboxylase (Sigma). The A295 of the solutions was

measured every 60 seconds for one hour. Control experiments using known

concentrations of purified PRPP (Sigma) in place of the cell extracts incubated

with ribose-5-phosphate showed the rate of orotic acid consumption was directly

proportional to PRPP concentration; orotic acid consumption rates also were directly

proportional to the protein concentration of the initial incubation mixtures. Control

experiments in which cell extracts were incubated without ribose-5-phosphate

showed orotic acid consumption was dependent on exogenously added ribose-5-

phosphate, and thus was a measure of PRPP synthase activity in the extracts.

Cell extracts boiled for 1.5 minutes before being added to the reaction mixtures

provided the baseline of zero activity. The assay was repeated at least eight times

for each strain analyzed, using three different concentrations of extract prepared

from three independently grown cultures.

Nucleotide sequence accession number. The accession number for the

nucleotide sequence of PPSl is L04130. The same sequence also was deposited by

another laboratory in the EMBL/GenBank database with the accession number

X74151.

Results

Genetic analysis of ppsl-1 and elm4-l. In an effort to identify mutations

affecting cell morphology, wild type strain D273-10B was mutagenized with

ethylmethane sulfonate to approximately 15% survival and colonies containing

abnormally elongated cells were identified by visual inspection with an inverted

microscope (3). A specific mutant in this collection, E124, showed significantly

elongated cells, a delay in cell separation during exponential phase growth (Fig.

lA), and a reduced growth rate (data not shown). When E124 was crossed to a

wild type tester strain, the morphology of the original mutant was observed in

Page 151: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

137

: #. » 0 # # ' .

* » ..» - ,

D273-10B/A1

ELM4 elmé-1

FIG, 1. (A) Cell morphology of the primary mutant E124 and its parent strain D273-10B/A1. Cells were grown to early log phase in liquid YPD medium, concentrated by centrifugation, and photographed under Nomarski optics, (B) Segregation of reduced growth rate as a single gene trait. Tetrads from the cross E124 X aDU were dissected on YPD medium and spore colonies were grown for three days. At this time two colonies in each tetrad were barely visible to the eye, whereas two other colonies were grown to a diameter of approximately 3 mm. The two tiny colonies continued to grow until after four days they could be patched to fresh YPD medium; cell growth then continued at the reduced rate. (C) Segregation of a moderate cell elongation phenotype as a single gene trait. Tetrads from strain DDeZm4/+ were dissected, and the cell morphology of individual spore clones was observed as in panel A. Each tetrad contained two spore colonies with wild type morphology (assigned the wild type genotype ELM4), and two with elongated cell morphology (assigned the mutant genotype elm4-l).

Page 152: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

138

approximately 1/4 of the meiotic progeny, suggesting two independent mutations

acting together are responsible for the cell elongation phenotype.

The genetic defects in E124 were characterized further by repeated backcrosses

in various wild type genetic backgrounds. During this procedure tetrads consistently

contained two spore colonies that grew significantly slower than the two siblings

(Fig. IB). The slow growing colonies displayed either elongated or wild type cell

shape. Continued backcrossing for five generations of a spore colony with reduced

growth rate and normal cell shape invariably yielded 2:2 segregation of the slow

growth phenotype, and all progeny displayed wild type cell morphology. Thus,

E124 contains a mutation, termedppsl-1 (phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthase),

that causes reduced growth rate but has no effect on cell shape. The doubling time

of a ppsl-1 mutant from the fifth backcross in the NY13 genetic background was

approximately three hours, roughly twice that of the congenic wild type strain

(Fig. 2). Diploids formed by mating ppsl-1 strains to wild type tester strains had

wild type growth rates, indicating the mutation is recessive.

10 —

5.0-

Î ^1 .0 -

i 0-5-'O

0.05-

FIG. 2. Growth rate measurements. Strains were grown in liquid YPD medium. Cell density was estimated by measuring light scattering at 600 nm. The logarithm of each Agoo value was plotted as a function of time in culture.

.k-

T 0

T 6 2 4 10 12 8

Time (h) A—A W303-1A A- - -A aVJAppsl

O—O NY13 •••"•aNppsl

Page 153: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

139

Cell elongation also segregated as a single gene trait in backcrosses of the

primary mutant E124. In a backcross series not involving ppsl-1 an elongated

morphology phenotype was observed to segregate from the wild type morphology

(Fig. IC); over five generations the two phenotypes segregated at the 2:2 ratio in

all tetrads examined. These mutant cells seemingly were less elongated than the

original mutant strain E124, although the phenotype was clearly distinguishable

from wild type cells (Fig. IC, Fig. 3). The mutant colonies always had growth rates

similar to their wild type sibling colonies. Thus, a second mutation in addition to

ppsl-1 is present in the original mutant strain E124; this mutation, termed elm4-

1 (elongated /Tzorphology), causes a moderate cell elongation phenotype and has no

apparent affect on the growth rate. The elm4-l mutation is recessive, because the

heterozygote DDeZ7w4/+ was indistinguishable morphologically from the congenic

ELM4IELM4 strain DD (Fig. 3A).

Double mutants containing both ppsl-1 and elm4-l were reconstructed in the

NY13 genetic background. The mutations elm4-l and ppsl-1 were separately

backcrossed five times into this wild type background, resulting in the haploid

strains àNelm4 and oiNppsl. In crosses between these two strains ppsl-1 and

elm4-l segregated independently. An example tetratype tetrad is shown in Fig.

4A, containing one wild type spore colony, one slow growing colony with normal

cell morphology (ppsl-1), one colony with moderately elongated cells and normal

growth rate {elm4-l), and one slow growing colony with the extreme cell elongation

phenotype typical of the original mutant E124. By deduction the genotype of the

latter colony can be assigned as elm4-l ppsl-1. Extreme cell elongation, therefore,

is a synthetic phenotype resulting from combination of ppsl-1 and elm4-l in a

double mutant strain. Measurements of the long and short axis of individual cells

in these congenic strains showed cell elongation is indeed more extreme in the

Page 154: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

140

70-1

60-

EIM4/etm4-l 5" 50-

C3 elm4-l/elm4-l 40-

10-

1.0- 1.2- 1.4- 1.6- 1.8- 2.0- 2.2- 2.4- 2.6- 2.8- 3.0- 3.2-

B 70-1

60-

g50-

0^40-1 S ^30-1 a

ft 20-

10-

1.0-' 1.2-' 1.4-' 1.6- 1.8- 2.0- 2.2- 2.4-' 2.6-' 2.8-' 3.0-' 3.2-' 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4

Length/width ratio

ES3 elm4-l PPSl

•• ELM4PPS1

• elm4-l ppsl-1

J=U n ^ n 1.0- 1.2- 1.4- 1.6- 1.8- 2.0- 2.2- 2.4- 2.6- 2.8- 3.0- 3.2-1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4

Length/width ratio

FIG. 3. Measurement of the cell elongation phenotype. (A) Diploid strains in the D273-10B background. Strains were grown to early log phase in liquid YPD medium, concentrated by centrifugation, and photographed under Nomarski optics. The long and short axis of at least 100 cells from each indicated strain was measured as described in Materials and Methods, and the ratio of those values was determined. The frequency of cells in the population within a given range of length/width ratios was plotted as a function of the ratio. The strains analyzed were DD, 'DDelm4/+, and DDeim4/eim4. (B) Haploid strains in the NY13 background. The strains analyzed were NY13, aNelmé, and àNelm4 ppsl.

Page 155: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

141

A. B.

FIG. 4. Extreme cell elongation is a synthetic phenotype resulting from combination of ppsl and elm4 mutations. (A) A tetratype tetrad from the cross of aNppsl X aNeZm4. Spore clones were grown to early log phase in liquid YPD medium, concentrated by centrifugation, and photographed under Nomarski optics. Colonies 1 (JELM4 PPSl) and 2 (elm4-l PPSl) were of normal size two days after separation of ascospores on YPD medium, whereas colonies 3 (ppsl-1 ELM4) and 4 (ppsl-1 elm4-l) were barely visible by eye at that time and continued to grow very slowly (see Fig. IB). (B) NNppsl elm4, a diploid homozygous for elm4-l andppsl-1, was formed by mating double mutant haploids derived as shown in panel A. Cells were photographed as in panel A. (C) W^ùqjpsl elm4, a diploid homozygous for elm4-l and ppsl::URA3.

Page 156: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

142

elm4-l ppsl-1 double mutants than in single mutants containing only elm4-l (Fig.

3B). The double mutant diploid strain NNppsl elm4 frequently formed branched

chains of elongated cells (Fig. 4B), typical of pseudohyphal growth (3,9). The same

morphologic phenotype was observed in strain NNAppsl elm4, which is homozygous

for both elm4-l and the deletion alleleppsl::URA3 (see below) (Fig. 4C). Branched

cell chains also were observed on the surface of solid YPD agar medium (Fig. 5).

Pseudohyphal differentiation in response to nitrogen starvation is

affected by elm4-l. The morphology of ppsl elm4 double mutants resembled

strains homozygous for mutations in the ELM1,ELM2 or ELM3 gene loci (3). The

latter two mutations also facilitated the pseudohyphal differentiation response

when elm2-l IELM2 or elm3-l IELM3 heterozygotes were starved for nitrogen,

whereas congenic wild type strains failed to form pseudohyphae in the same

conditions (3). The mutation elm4-l was tested for a similar effect by plating strain

DDeZ/n4 / + on the nitrogen starvation medium SLAHD together with the congenic,

wild type diploid strain DD. Typical of most laboratory reference strains, DD failed

to form pseudohyphae on this medium even after two weeks of incubation. In

contrast, DDeZm4/+ formed pseudohyphae obvious after four days incubation, and

these continued to expand into extensive networks of branched filaments over the

ensuing two weeks (Fig. 6). Invasive growth under the surface of the agar medium

was obvious in the heterozygous strain (Fig. 6). Single pseudohyphal cells were

transferred from SLAHD plates to YPD medium with a micromanipulator, and the

resulting clones displayed wild type cell morphology. Pseudohyphal growth again

occurred when these clones were transferred back to SLAHD, indicating morphologic

differentiation of DDeZm4/+ is a specific response to the environment. A congenic

diploid strain homozygous for elm4-l, 'D'Delm41elm4, also exhibited full

pseudohyphal differentiation on SLAHD medium (data not shown).

Page 157: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

143

NN NNppsl-1 ehn4-l

NNppsl-1 elmé-1

FIG. 5. Colony morphology oîppsl-1 elm4-l diploids. (A) Single cells of strains NNppsi elm4 or NN were isolated on YPD medium, and developing clones were photographed at the indicated times thereafter using an inverted microscope. (B) Strain NNppsl elm4 was spread on YPD medium. The plate was grown for 9 hours, then a representative field was photographed as in A.

Page 158: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

144

ELM4/ ELM4

8 days

elm4-l/

ELM4

4 days

elm4-ll ELM4

8 days

FIG. 6. Heterozygosity at the ELM4 locus stimulates pseudohyphal differentiation in response to nitrogen starvation. The strains DD and DDeZm4/+ were plated on SLAHD nitrogen starvation medium and incubated at room temperature for the times indicated. Pseudohyphal growth was not evident in any colonies in the spread of DD cells. In contrast, pseudohyphal differentiation was obvious at many locations in the patch of DDeZm4/+ cells, predominantly in the dense parts of the spread.

Page 159: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

145

Mutation of ELM4 also was tested for the ability to enhance the response to

nitrogen limitation in a genetic background competent for pseudohyphal growth,

namely S1278b (9). Strain IIelm4lelm4 was plated on SLAHD medium along

with the congenic wild type ZZ. Both strains showed pseudohyphal differentiation

after 2 days incubation, however, the response was noticeably enhanced in the

elm4 mutant strain (data not shown). The frequency of pseudohyphal clones was

increased in the mutant, and these were more expanded than those observed in

the wild type strain. Furthermore, individual cells were more elongated in the

mutant strain than in the wild type strain. Noticeable enhancement of

pseudohyphal differentiation on SLAHD medium was not observed in the

heterozygous strain YLelm4 /+.

The mutation elm4-l defines a locus distinct from ELMl, ELM2, or ELM3,

genes shown previously to affect pseudohyphal differentiation. In complementation

tests diploids formed by mating aTielm4 to tester strains containing a mutation in

any of the three ELM loci displayed wild type cell morphology (data not shown),

suggesting elm4-l is in a distinct gene. This conclusion was confirmed by allelism

tests; all wild type diploids from the complementation analysis produced both wild

type and mutant progeny in the ratio expected for independent assortment of

unlinked genes. Thus, elm4-l identifies a gene locus unique within this group,

tentatively termed ELM4.

Cloning and deletion of PPSl. PPSl was selected from a genomic library

based on its ability to restore wild type growth rate to the ppsl-1 elm4-l mutant

S124.4. A plasmid library of yeast genomic DNA was introduced into 8124.4, and

the transformants were plated on medium selective for the plasmids. One colony

was selected that after four days of growth was very large relative to the majority

of colonies on the transformation plate and contained cells with nearly normal

Page 160: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

146

morphology. The transforming plasmid in this colony was amplified in E. coli;

fragments from its genomic insert were subcloned in various vectors and the

resultant plasmids were introduced into S 124.4. One such plasmid, pE124/ST2,

contains a 4.9 kb iîmdlll subfragment from the original transforming DNA cloned

in the 2 fim circle-based vector YEp351 (12); recipients of this plasmid had the wild

type growth rate of approximately 1.5 hours (data not shown) and displayed normal

colony morphology (Fig. 7A). The change in morphology was due specifically to

introduction of the cloned genomic DNA, because loss of the pE124/ST2 during

mitosis resulted in reappearance of both the slow growth and extreme cell elongation

phenotypes (Fig. 7A).

Fig. 7B shows the restriction map of the genomic insert in pE124/ST2. Further

subcloning experiments showed the transforming activity resides within the 1.5

kb Sspl fragment (plasmid pE124/ST12 contains this fragment in YEp352). The

nucleotide sequence of this fragment and some of the adjacent region was

determined. An open reading frame comprising 427 codons is present, designated

PPSl, that includes most of the nucleotides between these two Sspl sites. Subclones

that contained only part of PPSl did not affect the growth rate or colony morphology

of S 124.4 (data not shown).

Deletion of PPSl caused the same slow growth phenotype observed for the

ppsl-1 mutation. The deletion alleleppsl::URA3 was constructed by replacing the

portion of PPSl between the two5s^XI sites with the selectable, prototrophic marker

URA3 (Fig. 7B). Integrative transformation of the homozygous diploid W303 with

a fragment containing the deletion allele produced a ppsl::URA3 /PPSl

heterozygote (Fig. 7C, Lane 2). This strain was induced to sporulate, and 20 tetrads

were dissected. Among the progeny slow growing colonies segregated at the 2:2

ratio from colonies with the wild type growth rate, as had been observed for

Page 161: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

FIG. 7. (A) Suppression of the extreme cell elongation phenotype by a cloned genomic fragment. Strain 8124.4 (relevant genotype ppsl-1 elm4-l leu2) was transformed with plasmid pE124/ST2 and uracil prototrophs were selected. Transformants were spread on selective (SD lacking uracil) or non-selective medium (SD with uracil), incubated for 36 hours, then observed with an inverted microscope. On selective medium all colonies had relatively normal cell and colony morphology, whereas on non-selective medium approximately 5% of the colonies had an abnormal cell and colony morphology typical of ppsl-1 elm4-l double mutants. Colonies with normal appearance on the non-selective plate were shown by subsequent replica plating to be uracil prototrophs, whereas the abnormal looking colonies required uracil (50 colonies of each type were tested). (B) Restriction map of the 4.9 kb genomic insert in pE124/ST2. Recognition sites are indicated for iîmdlll (H), Sspl (S), Pstl (P), (B), BsŒII (E), Xbal (X), and Sad (A). The location of PPSl is indicated. The deletion allele ppsl::URA3 was constructed by replacing the region between the two SsiXI sites with a 1.2 kb^mdlll fragment containing URA3 (Materials and Methods). The lightly shaded polygon represents the 3' terminus of the gene FASl (15). (C) Deletion of PPSl. Genomic DNA was digested with Pstl, separated by electrophoresis, and analyzed by Southern hybridization using as a probe the 3.1 kb Pstl fragment of pE124/ST2 (shown in panel B). In this analysis PPSl was indicated by a 3.1 kb fragment andppsl::URA3 by a 3.4 kb fragment (panel B). The strains analyzed were as follows. Lane 1: W303. Lane 2: An integrative transformant of W303 of the genotype ppslr.URAS IPPSl. Lanes 3 and 4: MATa and MATa meiotic products, respectively, of the diploid analyzed in lane 2; both of these strains exhibited the slow growth phenotype and were prototrophic for uracil.

Page 162: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

148

A.

Selective medium Non-selective medium

B. H S P B E X B S S A X P

4:

PPSl

Z>-\ ppsl: Ikb

URA3

URA3

3.4 kb

3.1 kb

12 3 4

Page 163: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

149

ppsl-1. The cell and colony morphology of the slow growing progeny clones was

normal (data not shown). All the slow growing colonies were uracil prototrophs

and thus contained ppsl::URA3. Southern hybridization analysis confirmed PPSi

was deleted in several of the slow growing progeny clones (Fig. 7C, Lanes 3,4). The

doubling time of one such clone, aWAppsl, was approximately 3 hours, similar to

that of ppsl-1 strains (Fig. 2). PPSl also was deleted in the S1278b genetic

background. Strain aZ^psl showed a reduced growth rate relative to the wild

parent strain, and no alterations in cell or colony morphology were observed.

The deletion allele ppsl::URA3 failed to complement ppsl-1, suggesting the

cloned gene PPSl is the same genetic element as that affected by the original

mutation. This conclusion was confirmed by targeted integration and genetic

linkage analysis (23). The URA3 gene was integrated into the chromosome within

the region that had been cloned, so that uracil prototrophy served as a marker of

the PPSl gene locus (Materials and Methods). This marked strain,

aWPPSlQURAS, was mated to oNppsl-l, and tetrads fi'om the resultant diploid

were analyzed for segregation of uracil prototrophy and the slow growth phenotype

associated with ppsl-1. In 40 tetrads the two phenotypes invariably segregated in

opposition, indicating the PPSl gene locus and ppsl-1 are tightly linked. In a

parallel analysis PPSl segregated independently from elm4-l.

Chromosomal location of PPSl. A portion of the PPSi nucleotide sequence

was reported previously as the region downstream of the gene FASl (15) (Genbank

accession no. M30162). Comparing the FASl and PPSl nucleotide sequences

showed 1) the PstI site immediately upstream of the PPSl coding region corresponds

to nucleotide 8067 of the FASl sequence, 2) the two genes are transcribed firom the

same strand, and 3) the PPSl translational initiation codon is located 489

nucleotides downstream of the FASl translational termination codon (Fig. 7B).

Page 164: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

150

The approximately 480 bp sequences reported in both the previous and current

studies essentially are identical. The known location of FAS 1 (18), therefore, implies

PPSl is located on the left arm of chromosome XI. Physical mapping confirmed

this genetic location; the 3.1 kb Pstl fragment containing PPSi hybridized to clone

number 71161 of the ordered clone bank of Olson et al. (19,20) (data not shown),

known to be located on the left arm of chromosome XI.

PPSl specifies PRPP synthase activity. PPSl codes for a deduced amino

acid sequence of 427 residues, with a predicted molecular weight of 47,017 Da.

Sequence comparisons to known proteins revealed the PPSl product is highly

similar in amino acid sequence to PRPP synthase from mammals and various

prokaryotes. Fig. 8 shows an alignment of the putative yeast PRPP synthase with

that of humans (accession no. P09329). In the two proteins 47.5% of the aligned

residues are identical. High homology extends to both the amino and carboxy

terminals of the two proteins, and there are no terminal extensions in one protein

relative to the other. The PPSl product, however, contains an insertion of 105

contiguous residues relative to human PRPP synthase. A very similar alignment

is obtained between the PPSl gene product and PRPP synthase from E. coli

(accession no. P08330), B. subtilis (accession no. P14193), or S. typhimurium

(accession no. P15849). For example, the yeast and E. coli proteins contain the

same amino acid at 46% of the aligned residues (data not shown). The bacterial

and human enzymes are approximately the same size (314-317 residues); the

insertion in the yeast enzyme relative to E. coli PRPP synthase is of the same

length and in the same relative position as that observed in the comparison between

the yeast and human enzymes.

Page 165: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

151

Yeast M R K c K I F V G N S H Human P N i K I F S G S S H

G N M V C Q S Q K I A D

R L G I E R L G L E

P A P C T L L G K V V T

K K F K K F

I G E T L S L V L Q Q | E T | C | V | E

I G V S V R D I G E S V R G

Yeast E D V Y V I Q S G S P S I N D Human E D V Y I V Q S G C G E I N D

D I N L

M E L L I M E L L I

L V S M I N

A C A C

R G G S A R K I T A V I P Q F P Y S K Q C K I A S A S R V T A V I P C F P Y A R Q D

Yeast K R H R G A I T A R M L A N L L V M A G A D H V V S M D L H A S Q M Q G F F T K P V D N L Y Human D K s R A P I S A K L V A N M L S V A G A D H I I T M D L H A S Q I Q G F F D I P V D N L Y

G G A E

Yeast h A K W I R E N V E D Y E D A V V V S K N P G G T K R V T A L A D S L K I N F A M I H T D Human V L K W I R E N I S E W R N C T I V S P D A G G A K R V T S I A D R L N V D F A L I H K E

R R S K K K A N

Yeast D L Y S Q N K D L Q Q L K L R K Q S M L R K N R P I I R Q G D H P N E E E N I I L S N G I Q T A R I Human E V -

Yeast R N G H V I G D D E A D D D E D A I L E S D S E L H S I D G L E S H G L G G T Y D A V D S E D E E E Human

Yeast I P V L Y R E Q L I T L V G N V R G R S A I I L D D M I D R P G S F I S A A E H L V Q N S G A K K V Human — — — D R M V L V G D V K D R V A I h V D D M A D T C G T I C H A A D K L L - S A G A T R V

Yeast Y V V A T H G I F T G p C L E E L E K S D A I D T I V V T N T Y P I S G E H I A G S K K L V T I D Human Y A I L T H G I F S | G P A I S R I N N A - C F E A V V V T N T I P - Q E D K M K H C S I K I Q V I D

Yeast S p I F A E C I R R D I H IY G E S I S V L F Human S M I L A E A I R R T M N G E S V | S | Y L F

D S L A A L S H V P L

FIG. 8. PPSl codes for a homolog of PRPP synthase. The deduced amino acid sequence of the yeast PPSl gene product is aligned with that of human PRPP synthase (accession number P09329). The complete amino acid sequence is shown for both proteins. Identical residues are boxed and gaps are represented by dashes.

Page 166: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

152

Further evidence suggesting PPSl codes for PRPP synthase was obtained by

measuring this enzyme activity in congenic wild type and ppsl strains. PRPP

synthase activity in a ppsl-1 mutant was reduced by a factor of 25 compared to the

congenic wild type strain NY180, and appsl::URA3 mutant contained 18-fold less

PRPP synthase activity than the comparable wild type strain (Fig. 9).

NY180 aNppsl W303-1A aWAppsl

FIG. 9. PPSl determines PRPP synthase activity. PRPP synthase activity present in whole cell extracts of the indicated strains was determined as described in Materials and Methods. Error bars indicate the standard deviation calculated from the results of at least eight independent assays using various concentrations of whole cell extract.

Page 167: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

153

Discussion

This study identified ELMé as a determinant of pseudohyphal growth in S.

cerevisiae, and also identified a specific biochemical defect that may generate the

signal for this morphologic differentiation response. That ELM4 function affects

pseudohyphal differentiation is clear from the observation that elm4-l Ielm4-1 or

ELM41 elm4-l strains readily formed pseudohyphae when starved for nitrogen on

SLAHD medium, whereas the congenic wild type strain failed to form pseudohyphae.

Thus, elm4-l formally is defined as a dominant mutation that facilitates

pseudohyphal differentiation in response to nitrogen limitation. In addition, the

mutation alters cell morphology in rich medium, causing moderate cell elongation.

In this instance, however, the effects of elm4-l are recessive.

The role of PPSl in pseudohyphal growth. By themselves ppsl-1 or

ppsl::URA3 cause a significantly reduced growth rate, but do not affect cell

morphology in rich medium. Coupling either of these mutations with elm4-l,

however, resulted in the occurrence, even in rich growth conditions, of a morphology

resembling pseudohyphal growth. In particular, cell elongation was extreme and

delayed cell separation was observed. This morphology is a synthetic effect of

coupling elm4-l and the ppsl mutation, as it was not observed in either single

mutant. We propose that a metabolic imbalance resulting from ppsl mutations

serves to signal the pseudohyphal differentiation response. Thus, introduction of

ppsl-1 into an elm4-l strain may have the same effect as plating the elm4-l strain

on the nitrogen-limited medium SLAHD, resulting in pseudohyphal differentiation.

PPSl most likely codes for PRPP synthase. The PPSl gene product is highly

related to the human and bacterial PRPP synthases, and the similarity is fairly

uniform throughout the length of the proteins. Furthermore, strains containing

deletion alleles of PPSl, or the EMS-induced mutation ppsl-1, displayed very low

Page 168: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

154

PRPP synthase activity compared to wild type strains. An obvious distinction of

the predicted yeast PRPP synthase is the insertion of approximately 104 amino

acids that is not present in any of the known enzymes. Analysis of the enzymatic

properties of yeast PRPP synthase may reveal whether this insert provides specific

regulatory functions. Considering the function of PRPP synthase, it might be

expected that deletion of PPSl would cause multiple auxotrophic requirements.

Such an effect was not observed, however, suggesting a second gene specifying

PRPP synthase may be present in S. cerevisiae. This second gene would code for

only a minor fraction of the cellular PRPP synthase, because more than 90% of the

enzyme activity measured in vitro was absent in strains carrying the deletion allele

ppsl::URA3 or the EMS-induced mutation ppsl-1. The sequence of a yeast gene

that may code for the residual PRPP synthase activity in ppsl mutants recently

was deposited in the EMBL/GenBank database with the accession number X75075.

The predicted product of this gene is identical to the product of PPSl at 49% of the

aligned residues (data not shown). The second putative PRPP synthase from yeast

lacks the 104 residue insertion present in the PPSl product.

Imbalances in metabolism of nitrogen-containing compounds are expected in

strains deficient for PPSl. PRPP synthase is a rate-limiting enzyme in the synthesis

of every nucleotide, with PRPP providing the ribose moiety. PRPP also is required

for the synthesis of purine rings, histidine, and tryptophan. In addition, PRPP

regulates, as an allosteric factor, the activity of several enzymes involved in these

biosynthetic pathways. The hypothesis that ppsl strains are altered in nitrogen

metabolism is supported by the observation that in YPD medium expression of [3-

galactosidase fused to the translational control region of GCN4 (12a) was increased

approximately 5-fold compared to congenic wild type strains (data not shown). A

metabolic defect resulting directly or indirectly from the PRPP synthase deficiency

Page 169: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

155

may generate a pseudohyphal differentiation signal similar or identical to that

which results from nitrogen limitation on SLAHD medium.

The role of elm4-l in pseudohyphal growth. The D273-10B reference

strains are typical of most wild type laboratory strains in failing to exhibit

pseudohyphal differentiation when limited for nitrogen on SLAHD medium (3,9).

Introduction of elm4-l into this background, however, produced strains that formed

normal pseudohyphae when limited for nitrogen. This observation implies the

cellular mechanics that confer the pseudohyphal growth mode all are operative in

D273-10B strains, and the defect in pseudohyphal differentiation must be in

perception or transmission of the inducing signal. Thus, in a general sense the

elm4-l mutation seemingly potentiates pseudohyphal differentiation, i.e. it allows

strains to perceive or respond to nitrogen limitation.

The model depicted in Fig. 10 is proposed to explain the genetic behavior of

elm4-l. The elm4-l mutation is dominant with respect to conferring pseudohyphal

growth potential, yet is recessive regarding the cell elongation phenotype observed

in rich media. The latter observation suggests elm4-l is a full or partial loss-of-

function mutation. According to this model pseudohyphal differentiation normally

is repressed in rich growth medium by a mechanism involving the product of ELM4,

as well as the products of other genes in which mutations can potentiate

pseudohyphal differentiation and/or cause constitutive pseudohyphal growth,

inchiding ELM 1, ELM2, and ELM3 (3). Recessive mutations in these genes cause

pseudohyphal differentiation even in rich medium; thus, we propose they function

to block pseudohyphal growth. When wild type cells are limited for nitrogen in the

presence of sufficient carbon source, a signal may be generated that results in

inactivation of the repressing mechanism; pseudohyphal differentiation then occurs.

This inactivation might occur either through direct modification of the repressing

Page 170: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

156

mechanism, or by modifying a downstream function in pseudohyphal differentiation

such that the cell no longer is responsive to the repression signal.

We propose elm4-l impairs the efficiency of a repressing mechanism preventing

pseudohyphal growth in rich medium. The repression mechanism in the wild type

D273-10B background may be highly efficient, so much so that its inactivation as

a result of nitrogen starvation does not occur. In ELM4/elm4-l or elm4-l Ielm4-1

strains, however, the reduced efficiency of the repression mechanism may allow

inhibition of pseudohyphal growth to be overcome in conditions of nitrogen

limitation. The elm4-l mutation would not completely eliminate the proposed

repression mechanism, because a signal derived from nitrogen limitation still is

required for full pseudohyphal differentiation. Leaky repression of pseudohyphal

nitrogen limitation

1 Controlling mechanism involving ELM4 and other ELM genes

yeast-like grovyth

pseudohyphal growth

FIG. 10. A model for regulation of pseudohyphal growth. The model proposes the existence of a biochemical mechanism that represses pseudohyphal growth in rich medium. This mechanism requires the function of ELM 1, ELM2 and ELM3, such that loss-of-function mutations in any of these gene loci cause constitutive pseudohyphal growth. In wild type cells nitrogen limitation results in interference with the repression mechanism, allowing pseudohyphal differentiation to occur. The recessive mutation elm4-l does not inactivate the repression mechanism, but reduces its efficiency so that response to the nitrogen hmitation signal is potentiated. Loss of function mutations in CDC55 act similarly to elm4-l with regard to potentiating pseudohyphal growth.

Page 171: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

157

growth when elm4-l strains are grown in rich medium may allow the observed

moderate cell elongation phenotype, although other pseudohyphal growth

characteristics still are repressed.

With regard to potentiating pseudohyphal differentiation in response to nitrogen

limitation, the dominant behavior of a presumed loss-of function mutation might

be explained by a stoichiometric effect. Similar genetic behavior was observed

with a CDC55 deletion allele, and EMS-induced elm2 and elm3 mutations, all of

which had a dominant effect in facilitating pseudohyphal differentiation in response

to nitrogen starvation (3). CDC55 codes for the regulatory B subunit of the yeast

homolog of mammalian protein phosphatase 2A (11). ELM4 may also code for a

regulatory subunit of an enzyme that functions as part of a mechanism that

represses pseudohyphal differentiation. Changing the stoichiometry of this

regulatory subunit might alter the enzyme's activity, resulting in a dominant effect

of the mutation. Another possible explanation for the data is that the product of

ELM4 is part of a multisubunit complex that functions to repress pseudohyphal

growth. This complex might also include the products of ELM2 and ELM3. Altering

the stoichiometry of the components of the complex might inhibit its activity in

repressing pseudohyphal growth, or reduce its efficiency.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Eric Henderson for sharing microscope equipment, and

Bobby Baum for pointing out the overlap between the PPSl and FASl sequences.

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant GM39254 to AM

and ARC grant 6620 to PM. Support was also obtained from EEC and Foundation

pour la Recherché Medicale. Journal Paper No. J-15617 of the Iowa Agriculture

and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, Iowa. Project No. 3197.

Page 172: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

158

References

1. Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. A. Smith, J. G. Seidman and K. Stnihl. 1989. Current protocols in molecular biology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

2. Becker, M. A., K. O. Raivio and J. E. Seegmiller. 1979. Synthesis of phosphoribosylpyrophosphate in mammalian cells. Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 49:281-306.

3. Blacketer, M. J., C. M. Koehler, S. G. Coats, A. M. Myers and P. Madaule. 1993. Genetic control of dimorphism in S. cerevisiae: Involvement of a the novel protein kinase homologue Elmlp and protein phosphatase 2A. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:5567-5581.

4. Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analyt. Biochem. 72:248-254.

5. Broach, J. R., J. N. Strathem and J. B. Hicks. 1979. Transformation in yeast: Development of a hybrid cloning vector and isolation of the CANl gene. Gene 8:121-133.

6. Brown, C. M. and J. S. Hough. 1965. Elongation of yeast cells in continuous culture. Nature 206:676-678.

7. Dittmer, H. J. 1964. Phylogeny and form in the plant kingdom. Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ.

8. Eubanks, V. L. and L. R. Beuchat. 1982, Effects of antioxidants on growth, sporulation, and pseudomycelium production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Food. Sci. 47:1717-1722.

9. Gimeno, C. J., P. O. Ljimgdahl, C. A. Styles and G. R. Fink. 1992. Unipolar cell divisions in the yeast S. cerevisiae lead to filamentous growth: regulation by starvation andJîAS. Cell 68:1077-1090.

9a. Gimeno, C. J., and G. R. Fink. 1994. Induction of pseudohyphal growth by overexpression of PHDl, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene related to transcriptional regulators of fungal development. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14: 2100-2112.

Page 173: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

159

10. Guilliermond, A. 1920. The Yeasts. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

11. Healy, A., S. Zolnierowicz, A. Stapleton, M. Goebl, A. A. DePaoli-Roach and J. R. Pringle. 1991. CDC55, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene involved in cellular morphogenesis: Identification, characterization, and homology to the B subunit of mammalian type 2A protein phosphatase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:5767-5780.

12. Hill, J. E., A. M. Myers, T. J. Koemer and A. Tzagoloff. 1986. Yeast/E. coli shuttle vectors with multiple unique restriction sites. Yeast 2:163-167.

12a. Hinnebusch, A. G. 1992. General and pathway-specific regulatory mechanisms controlling the synthesis of amino acid biosynthetic enzymes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, p. 319-414. In E. W. Jones, J. R. Pringle and J. R. Broach (ed.). The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces Vol. II, Gene Expression. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor.

13. Jones, M. E. 1980. Pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthesis in animals. Genes, enzymes and regulation of UMP biosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 49:253-279.

14. Romberg, A., I. Lieberman and E. S. Simms. 1954. Enzymatic synthesis and properties of 5-phosphoribosylpyrophosphate. J. Biol. Chem. 215:389-402.

15. Kottig, H., G. Rottner, K. -F. Beck, M. Schweizer and E. Schweizer. 1991. The pentafunctional FASl genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Yarrowia lipolytica are co-linear and considerably longer than previously estimated. Mol. Gen. Genet. 226:310-314.

15a. Liu, H., C. A. Styles and G. R. Fink. 1993. Elements of the yeast pheromone response pathway required for filamentous growth of diploids. Science 262: 1741-1744.

16. Ljungdahl, P. O., C. J. Gimeno, C. A. Styles and G. R. Fink. 1992. SHR3: a novel component of the secretory pathway specifically required for localization of amino acid permeases in yeast. Cell 71:463-478.

17. Lodder, J. 1970. The Yeasts: A Taxonomic Study. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam.

18. Mortimer, R. K., D. Schild, R. Contopoulou and J. Kans. 1989. Genetic map of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Edition 10. Yeast 5:321-403.

Page 174: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

160

19. Olson, M. v., J. E. Dutchik, M. Y. Graham, G. M. Brodeur, C. Helms, M. Frank, M. Maccollin, R. Scheinman and T. Frank. 1986. Random-clone strategy for genomic restriction mapping in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:7826-7830.

20. Riles, L., J. E. Dutchik, A. Baktha, B. K. McCauley, E. C. Thayer, M. P. Leckie, V. V. Braden, J. E. Depke and M. V. Olson. 1993. Physical maps of the six smallest chromosomes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at a resolution of 2.6 kilobase pairs. Genetics 134:81-150.

21. Rose, M. D., P. Grisafi and D. Botstein. 1984. Structure and function of the yeast URA3 gene: expression in Escherichia coli. Gene 29:113-124.

22. Rose, M. D., F. Winston and P. Heiter. 1990. Methods in Yeast Genetics. A Laboratory Course Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor.

23. Rothstein, R. 1991. Targeting, disruption, replacement, and allele rescue: integrative DNA transformation in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 194:281-301.

24. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

25. Sanger, F., S. Nicklen and A. R. Coulson. 1977. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74:5463-5467.

26. Townsend, G. F. and C. C. Lindegren. 1954. Characteristic growth patterns of the different members of a polyploid series of Saccharomyces. J. Bacteriol. 67:480-483.

27. Tzagoloff, A., A. Akai and F. Foury. 1976. Assembly of the mitochondrial membrane system. XVI. Modified form of the ATPase proteolipid in oUgomycin-resistant mutants of S. cerevisiae. FEES Lett. 65:391-396.

28. Wallis, J. W., G. Chrebet, G. Brodsky, M. Rolfe and R. Rothstein. 1989. A hyper-recombination mutation in S. cerevisiae identifies a novel eucaryotic topoisomerase. Cell 58:409-419.

29. Zubay, G. 1993. Biochemistry. Third Edition. Wm. C. Brown Publishers, Dubuque, lA.

Page 175: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

161

CHAPTER 4. CONCLUSIONS

Summary

This project successfully identified at least 10 genes, generically termed "ELM",

that function in the normal control of cellular dimorphism in S. cerevisiae. The

ELM genes were defined by mutations that result in a constitutive cell elongation

phenotype. Among the mutant isolates 30 were shown to contain single Mendelian

factors that cause this phenotype; these mutations were assigned by

complementation and recombination analysis to 14 distinct ELM gene loci. The

analysis showed the mutant collection is not exhaustive and additional i/LM genes

are likely to exist that were not identified in the current study. In addition to

causing cell elongation, mutations in most ELM genes resulted in other

characteristics of the pseudohyphal growth form, namely delayed cell separation,

and invasive growth under agar media; in specific genetic backgrounds many of

the mutations caused a cell and colony morphology strikingly similar in appearance

to wild type cells that have differentiated, in response to nitrogen limitation, from

the yeast-like form into the pseudohyphal form. Direct effects on pseudohyphal

differentiation in response to nitrogen starvation were observed for mutations in

10 different ELM gene loci. The recessive nature of the great majority of the

mutations, inferring loss of gene function, suggested the corresponding protein

products are needed to prevent pseudohyphal differentiation in rich nutrient

conditions.

Molecular cloning and genetic analysis identified several functions likely to be

part of the differentiation mechanism. ELMl was shown to code for a protein

similar in amino acid sequence to known protein kinases. CDC55, which codes for

a protein similar in amino acid sequence to the B regulatory subunit of mammalian

protein phosphatase 2A was found to affect pseudohyphal differentiation in response

Page 176: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

162

to nitrogen starvation, and to interact genetically with mutations in ELMl. These

data indicate a specific protein phosphorylation/dephosphorylation mechanism in

the differentiation response. Molecular cloning of ELM 13 showed this to be the

gene locus previously defined as CDC12; the product of this locus codes for a protein

that co-localizes with the 10 nm filament ring at the bud neck. Thus, modulating

activity of the 10 nm bud neck filament is identified as a likely means of regulating

cell morphology. Mutations in the ELM4 locus were shown to interact with

mutations in a locus termed PPSl, such that double mutants resulted in a

constitutive pseudohyphal morphology. Molecular cloning of PPSl revealed it codes

for phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthase, a central nitrogen metabolism enzyme,

providing a preliminary suggestion that the product of ELM4 is involved in

perception of nitrogen limitation. A certain mutation in the ELM4 gene locus

interacted genetically in a specific fashion with the mutation in the ELM13 / CDC12

locus, providing further evidence for a link between the 10 nm bud neck filament

and the response to nitrogen limitation.

Discussion

The dimorphic transition in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae from

yeast-like growth to filamentous, pseudohyphal growth occurs in response to

nitrogen starvation in the presence of glucose. The isolation of S. cerevisiae cell

elongation mutants was carried out with the goal of obtaining strains with lesions

in genes which function in pseudohyphal differentiation. The findings that many

elm mutants possess additional pseudohyphal characteristics, such as delayed cell

separation and invasive growth, and that gene-dosage of several elm mutations

directly affects pseudohyphal differentiation, indicate many ELM gene products

do indeed play a role in this transition. Because of the abundance of

complementation groups defined by the 30 mutants analyzed in this work, it is

Page 177: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

163

likely that many genes are involved in this process and that this genetic screen

was not exhaustive. The phenotypic effects of undefined mixed backgrounds on

expression of the elm phenotype, presumably due to the interaction of background

lesions with particular elm mutations, further supports this position.

The multitude of synthetic-lethal, and synthetic-slow, genetic interactions

identified between elm genes, as well as one case of extragenic noncomplementation,

demonstrates that these gene products participate in the same, or functionally

related biological pathways. Synthetic interactions are thought to occur between

gene products which perform similar functions, or cooperate, one depending on the

other, in order to carry out a particular task. Alternatively, the simultaneous

mutation of two proteins which belong to a multi-subunit complex may result in a

synthetic phenotype. This phenomenon has been documented in yeast between

actin and actin binding proteins (116,118), a-tubulin and ^-tubulin (55), a-tubulin

and microtubule regulatory proteins (110), secretory pathway components (59,94),

and many genes affecting cell polarity (1,9). Extragenic noncomplementation is

thought to occur when mutations in genes coding for physically interacting proteins

fail to complement the mutant phenotype of the other in double heterozygous strains,

and has been demonstrated between a-tubulin and P-tubulin in yeast and

Drosophila (49,109), as well as between yeast actin and actin binding proteins

(55,116,118). Identification of these types of interactions between elm genes are

suggestive of possible in vivo interactions between eZ/n gene products and will guide

the direction of future biochemical investigation.

Although the data obtained in this study provide initial insights into the nature

of pseudohyphal development, the specific molecular details of the process remain

speculative. Dimorphic differentiation in S. cerevisiae is likely to be regulated by a

molecular switch that controls downstream biochemical events; the downstream

Page 178: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

164

functions would in turn dictate the differentiation state executed by the cell; either

yeast-like or pseudohyphal. The activity of this switch is controlled by a nutrient

sensitive signal related to nitrogen availability. Modifications of morphological

events in response to the differentiation signal must occur to facilitate cell shape

changes required for the newly programmed growth form. The signaling cascade

which triggers these alterations clearly involves protein phosphorylation, as shown

in the current study by analysis of ELMi and CDC55. Previous studies showed

that generation of the yeast-like morphology involves cycles of polar and isotropic

growth which occur in a cell cycle dependent manner (see Introduction).

Modification of these processes, in response to a nitrogen starvation signal, is also

likely to occur within the confines of the cell cycle. Supporting this postulation is

the identification of the mutation in ELM 13 as a new allele of the previously isolated

gene CDC 12, which codes for a 10 nm neck filament protein (44). CDC12 has been

shown to interact genetically with the cell cycle regulatory genes CLNl and CLN2,

from the finding that cdcl2 clnl cln2 triple mutants are inviable (K. Nasmyth,

personal communication). Thus, a likely target of the morphologic control

mechanism identified by the ELM genes is the cyclin/protein kinase complex or

complexes that regulate cell cycle events of many sorts.

The nature of the nitrogen starvation signal is still unclear. Coupling a ppsl-

1 mutation with the moderately elongated elm4-l mutant resulted in induction of

constitutive pseudohyphal growth. This synthetic phenotype may result from the

generation of a nitrogen starvation signal, similar to that generated by starvation

on nitrogen-limited medium, by a metabolic imbalance created by theppsl-1 lesion.

Preliminary starvation experiments showed that limitation for the amino acids

histidine, leucine, or tryptophan, or the purine adenine, stimulates pseudohyphal

differentiation, whereas limitation for uracil does not (unpublished observations).

Page 179: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

165

Pseudohyphal stimulation by starvation for the amino acid leucine, whose

biosynthesis is independent of PRPP concentration, and lack of stimulation by

starvation for uracil, the biosynthesis of which is dependent on PRPP concentrations,

suggests that the end products of PRPP dependent biosynthetic pathways are not

all involved, or exclusively involved, in the presentation of the pseudohyphal

differentiation signal. This emerging pattern suggests a role for the general control

pathway of nitrogen metabolism in yeast (for a review see Ref. 52) in the perception

or presentation of the pseudohyphal differentiation signal. This pathway involves

the transcription factor coded for by GCN4, which is activated by starvation for

single amino acids or purines, but presumably not by uracil starvation. Also involved

is the protein kinase coded for by GCN2, which globally regulates protein synthesis

and GCN4 translation through phosphorylation of the elongation factor eIF-2a.

Identification of genetic interactions between these genes and ELM4 or other ELM

genes would support this hypothesis.

Future Directions

One focus of future work will center on cloning additional ELM genes. This

process will be facilitated ïor ELM3, ELM6, and ELM7, by the use of temperature-

conditional phenotypes as a means for selection of suppressed transformants.

Genetic background effects, such as reduced growth rate or an enhanced digging

capacity, identified for elm mutations in undefined backgrounds, and shown to be

dependent on the elm mutation, may be utilized for cloning selection of other ELM

genes. Upon isolation and sequencing, the construction of a null allele may be

used to determine whether the gene is essential for viability, and a more complete

genetic investigation of synthetic interactions can be carried out. Biochemical

characterization of the ELM protein for each cloned ELM gene will follow. This

analysis will provide information as to ELM protein activity and function, and its

Page 180: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

166

role in pseudohyphal differentiation. ELM-ELM protein interactions identified

genetically can be tested biochemically, both in vitro and in vivo.

A second major goal for future work will be ordering the ELM genes within the

signaling pathway. The epistatic relationship of two genes can be determined by

creating double mutant strains in which one mutation serves to activate a pathway

and the other, unlinked mutation, functions to block the same response. The double

mutant will exhibit the phenotype of the epistatic mutation revealing which gene

acts furthest downstream in the pathway. Alternatively, overexpression of a wild-

type gene that causes an opposing phenotype can be used for this same analysis.

Identification of cloned ELM genes that suppress pseudohyphal differentiation when

present in high copy number, or gain of function lesions in ELM genes will be

sought. Epistasis analyses can then be carried out by coupling elevated ELM gene

dosage or constitutive ELM activation with the loss of function ELM alleles already

isolated. The epistatic relationships between ELM genes and genes known to be

positive regulators of pseudohyphal differentiation, such as components of the STE

MAP kinase pathway and PHDl will also be determined.

A third avenue of investigation will focus on the nature of the nitrogen starvation

signal. Genetic methods will be used to test the hypothesis that the general nitrogen

control pathway plays a role in signal perception and transduction. One approach

will be to determine if the activity of GCN2 or GCN4, both major components of

this pathway, is required for pseudohyphal differentiation to occur. Diploid strains,

carrying homozygous null alleles of GCN2 or GCN4 will be constructed in the

pseudohyphal competent E1278b genetic background. These strains will be tested

for the ability to differentiate into pseudohyphae when starved for nitrogen.

Identification of genetic interactions as well as epistatic relationships between GCN2

and/or GCN4 and ELM genes will be pursued if warranted by the results of the

experiment described above.

Page 181: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

167

A comparative analysis of cell wall biosynthesis and composition in the

pseudohyphal and yeast growth forms of Saccharomyces will be undertaken. The

cell wall is a major determinant of cell shape (15,35,46), and cell wall composition

has been found to be different in yeast-like versus hyphal cells of many fungi (35).

It is likely that differences also exist between these two forms in Saccharomyces,

and that variation in cell wall biosynthesis and composition plays a role in the

achievement of alternative cell shapes. Strains bearing eZm mutations which cause

constitutive pseudohyphal growth will be used for comparison to laboratory strains

growing in the yeast form. The relative content of cell wall components such as

glucan, mannan, and chitin will be determined biochemically. In vivo chitin

distribution will be visualized by the use of the chitin specific fluorescent stain

Calcofluor; and a comparative analysis of chitin synthase and P-l,3-glucanase

activities will be conducted.

Finally, a possible role for tactile stimulation in pseudohyphal differentiation

will be investigated. Wild type strains competent to undergo pseudohyphal

differentiation on an agar surface do not make this transition under identical

conditions in liquid media. Additionally, the humidity of the incubation environment

affects the intensity of the differentiation response, presumably by affecting the

consistency of the agar surface. These data suggest that surface cues participate

in differentiation signaling, which is consistent with the existence of this

phenomenon in differentiation of other fungal species (3,53,66). A general approach

will be initiated first; the optimal surface conditions for the greatest pseudohyphal

differentiation response, including agar concentration and the degree of

humidification, will be determined. Additionally, there is evidence to suggest that

a cAMP associated signaling system may be involved in this process. The activating

mutation RAS^all^ accentuates pseudohyphal differentiation in response to nitrogen

Page 182: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

168

starvation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (41), and addition of exogenous cAMP has

been shown to bypass surface requirements for differentiation and infectious

structure formation in the plant pathogen, Magnaporthe grisea (66). Preliminary

testing for cAMP involvement in pseudohyphal differentiation will include

determining whether exogenous cAMP can bypass the agar surface requirement

for differentiation to take place. A more in depth investigation of this phenomenon

will be pursued if warranted by the initial experimental results.

Page 183: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

169

REFERENCES

1. Adams, A. E. M., D. I. Johnson, R. M. Longnecker, B. F. Sloat, and J. R. Pringle. 1990. CDC42 and CDC43, two additional genes involved in budding and the establishment of cell polarity in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 111:131-142.

2. Amatruda, J. F., J. F. Cannon, K. Tatchell, C. Hug, and J. A. Cooper. 1990. Disruption of the actin cytoskeleton in yeast capping protein mutants. Nature 344:352-354.

3. Anderson, J., L. Cundiff, B. Schnars, M. Gao, I. Mackenzie, and D. R. Soil. 1989. Hypha formation in the white-opaque transition of Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 57:458-467.

4. Anderson, J. M. and D. R. Soli. 1986. Differences in actin localization during bud and hypha formation in the yeast Candida albicans. J. Gen. Microbiol. 132:2035-2047.

5. Banuett, F. 1991. Identification of genes governing filamentous growth and tumor induction by the plant pathogen Ustilago maydis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:3922-3926.

6. Banuett, F. 1992. Ustilago maydis, the delightful blight. TIG 8:174-180.

7. Barlow, P. W. 1982. Root development, p. 185-222. In H. Smith and D. Grierson (ed.), The molecular biology of plant developent. University of California Press, Berkely.

8. Bender, A. and J. R. Pringle. 1989. Multicopy suppression of the cdc24 budding defect in yeast by CDC42 and three newly identified genes including the ms-related gene RSRl. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:9976-9980.

9. Bender, A. and J. R. Pringle. 1991. Use of a screen for synthetic lethal and multicopy suppressee mutants to identify two new genes involved in morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:1295-1305.

10. Benton, B. K.,A. H. Tinkelenberg, D. Jean, S. D. Plump, and F. R. Cross. 1993. Genetic analysis of Cln/Cdc28 regulation of cell morphogenesis in budding yeast. EMBO J. 12:5267-5275.

11. Bolker, M., M. Urban, and R. Kahmann. 1992. The a mating type locus of U. maydis specifies cell signaling componenets. Cell 68:441-450.

Page 184: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

170

12. Broach, J. R. 1981. Genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. p. 661-662. In J. N. Strathem, E. W. Jones and J. R. Broach (ed.), The molecular biology of the yeast Saccharomyces: life cycle and inheritance. Cold Spring Harbor laboratory, New York.

13. Brown, C. M. and J. S. Hough. 1965. Elongation of yeast cells in continuous culture. Nature 206:676-678.

14. Byers, B. 1981. Cytology of the yeast life cycle, p. 59-84. In J. N. Strathem, E. W. Jones and J. R. Broach (ed.), The Molecular Biology of the Yeast Saccha­romyces: life cycle and inheritance. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York.

15. Cabib, E., R. Roberts, and B. Bowers. 1982. Synthesis of the yeast cell wall and its regulation. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 51:763-793.

16. Cairns, B. R., S. W. Ramer, and R. D. Romberg. 1992. Order of action of componenets in the yeast pheromone response pathway revealed with a dominant allele of the STEll kinase and the multiple phosphorylation of the STE7 kinase. Genes Dev. 6:1305-1318.

17. Cannon, R. D. 1986. Isolation of a mycelial mutant in Candida albicans.. J. Gen. Microbiol. 132:2405-2407.

18. Chant, J., K. Corrado, J. R. Pringle, and I. Herskowitz. 1991, Yeast BUD5, encoding a putative GDP-GTP exchange factor, is necessary for bud site selection and interacts with the bud formation gene BEMl. Cell 65:1213-1224.

19. Chant, J. and I. Herskowitz. 1991. Genetic control of bud site selection in yeast by a set of gene products that constitute a morphogenetic pathway. Cell 65:1203-1212.

20. Clarke, K. J., E. McCully, and N. K. Miki. 1979. A developmental study of the epidermis of young roots of Zea mays. Protoplasma 98:283-309.

21. Courchesne, W. E., R. Kunisawa, and J. Thomer. 1989. A putative protein kinase overcomes pheromone-induced arrest of cell cycling in S. cerevisiae. Cell 58:1107-1119.

22. Cross, F. R. 1988. DAFl, a mutant gene affecting size control, pheromone arrest, and cell cycle kinetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:4675-4684.

23. Cvrckova, F. andK. Nasmyth. 1993. Yeast Gl cyclins CLNl and CLN2 and a GAP-like protein have a role in bud formation. EMBO J. 12:5277-5286.

Page 185: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

171

24. Darnell, J. E., H. Lodish, and D. Baltimor. 1986. Molecular Cell Biology. W.H. Freeman & Co., New York.

25. Dietzel, C. and J. Kuxjan. 1987. The yeast SCGI gene: a Ga-like protein implicated in the a- and a-factor response pathway. Cell 50:1001-1010.

26. Dittmer, H. J. 1964. Phylogeny and form in the plant kingdom. Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ.

27. Drubin, D. G., K. G. Miller, and D. Botstein. 1988. Yeast actin-binding proteins: evidence for a role in morphogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 107:2551-2561.

28. Elion, E. A., P. L. Grisafi, and G. R. Fink. 1990. FUS3 encodes a cdc2+/ CDC28-related kinase required for the transition from mitosis into conjugation. Cell 60:649-664.

29. Epstein, C. B. and F. Cross. 1992. CLB5: a novel B cyclin from budding yeast with a role in S phase. Genes Dev. 6:1695-1706.

30. Errede, B., A. Gartner, Z. Zhou, K. Nasmyth, and G. Am merer. 1993. MAP kinase-related FUS3 from S. cerevisiae is activated by STE7 in vitro. Nature 362:261-264.

31. Eubanks, V. L. and L. R. Beuchat. 1982. Effects of antioxidants on growth, sporulation, and pseudomycelium production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Food. Sci. 47:1717-1722.

32. Evans, T., E. T. Rosenthal, J. Youngblom, D. Distel, and T. Hunt. 1983. Cyclin: a protein specified by maternal mRNA in sea urchin eggs that is destroyed at each cleavage division. Cell 33:389-396.

33. Finegold,A., D. I. Johnson, C. C. Famsworth, M. H. Gelb, S. R. Judd, J. A. Glomset, and F. Tamanoi. 1991. Protein geranylgeranyltransferase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is specific for the CDC43 gene prduct but not the DPRl gene product. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:4448-4452.

34. Fitch, I., Dahmann,C., U. Suma, A. Amon, L. Goetsch, B. Byers, and B. Futcher. 1992. Characterization of four B-type cyclin genes of the budding yeast S. cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 3: 805-818.

35. Fleet, G. H. 1991. Cell Walls, p. 199-277. In A. H. Rose and J. S. Harrison (ed.). The Yeasts: Vol. 4 yeast organelles. Academic Press Inc., San Diego.

Page 186: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

172

36. Froeliger, E. H. and S.A. Leong. 1991. The a mating-type alleles of Ustilago maydis are idiomorphs. Gene 100:113-122.

37. Gartner, A., K. Nasmyth, and G. Ammerer. 1992. Signal transduction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires tyrosine and threonine phosphorylation of FUS3 and KSSl. Genes Dev. 6:1280-1292.

38. Ghiara, J. B., H. E. Richardson, K. Sugimoto, M. Henze, D. J. Lew, C. Wittenberg, and S. I. Reed. 1991. Acyclin B homologinS. cerevisiae\ chronic activation of the CDC28 protein kinase by cyclin prevents exit from mitosis. Cell 65:163-174.

39. Gillissen, B., J. Bergemann, C. Sandmann, B. Schroeer, M. Bolker, and R. Kahmann. 1992. A two-component regulatory system for self/non-self recognition in Ustilago maydis. Cell 68:647-657.

40. Gimeno, C. J. and G. R. Fink. 1994. Induction of pseudohyphal growth by overexpression of PHDl, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene related to transcriptional regulators of fungal development. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:2100-2112.

41. Gimeno, R O., P. O. Ljungdahl, C. A Styles, and G. R. Fink. 1992. Unipolar cell divisions in the yeast S. cerevisiae lead to filamentous growth: regulation by starvation andiîAS. Cell 68:1077-1090.

42. Guilliermond, A 1920. The Yeasts. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

43. Haarer, B., S. Lilly, A Adams, V. Magdolen, W. Bandlow, and S. Brown. 1990. Purification of profilin from Saccharomyces cerevisae and anlaysis of profilin-dificient cells. J. Cell Biol. 110:105-114.

44. Haarer, B. K. and J. R. Pringle. 1987. Immunofluorescence localization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae CDC12 gene product to the vicinity of the 10-nm filaments in the mother-bud neck. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7:3678-3687.

45. Hadwiger, J. A, C. Wittenberg, H. E. Richardson, M. De Barros Lopes, and S. I. Reed. 1989. A novel family of cyclin homologs that control the G^ phase in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:6255-6259.

46. Harold, F. M. 1990. To shape a cell: an inquiry into the causes of morphogenesis of microorganisms. Microbiol. Rev. 54:381-431.

Page 187: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

173

47. Hart, M. J., A. Eva, T. Evans, S. A. Aaronson, and R. A, Cerione. 1991. Catalysis of guanine nucleotide exchange of the CDC42Hs protein by the dbl oncogene product. Nature 354:311-314.

48. Hartwell, L. H. 1971. Genetic control of the cell division cycle in yeast. IV. Genes controlling bud emergence and cytokinesis. Exptl. Cell Res. 69:265-276.

49. Hays, T. S., R. Deuring, B. Robertson, M. Prout, and M. T. Fuller. 1989. Interacting proteins identified by genetic interactions: a missense mutation in a-tubulin fails to complement alleles of the testis-specific b-tubulin gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9:875-884.

50. Healy,A., S. Zolnierowicz, A. Stapleton, M. Goebl, A. A. DePaoli-Roach, and J. R. Pringle. 1991. CDC55, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene involved in cellular morphogenesis: Identification, characterization, and homology to the B subunit of mammalian type 2A protein phosphatase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:5767-5780.

51. Herskowitz, I. 1989. A regulatory hierarchy for cell specialization in yeast. Nature 342:749-757.

52. Hinnebusch, A. G. 1992. General and pathway-specific regulatory mechanisms controlling the synthesis of amino acid biosynthetic enzymes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. p. 319-414. In E. W. Jones, J. R. Pringle and J. R. Broach (ed.), The molecular and cellular biology of the yeast Saccharomyces. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor.

53. Hoch, H. C., R. C. Staples, B. Whitehead, J. Comeau, and E. D. Wolf. 1987. Signaling for growth orientation and cell differentiation by surface topography in Uromyces. Science 235:1659-1662.

54. Hubbard, M. J,, D. Markie, and R. T. M. Poulter. 1986. Isolation and morphological characterization of a mycelial mutant of Candida albicans. J. Bacteriol. 165:61-65.

55. Huffaker, T. C., M. A. Hoyt, and D. Botstein. 1987. Genetic analysis of the yeast cytoskeleton. Annu. Rev. Genet. 21:259-284.

56. Hyman, A. A. and JG. White. 1987. Determination of cell division axes in the early embryogenesis of Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Cell Biol. 105:2123-2135.

Page 188: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

174

57. Johnson, D. I. and J. R. Pringle. 1990. Molecular characterization of CDC42, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene involved in the development of cell polarity. J. Cell Biol. 111:143-152.

58. Johnston, G. C., J. A. Prendergast, and R. A. Singer. 1991. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae MY02 gene encodes an essential myosin for vectorial transport of vesicles. J. Cell Biol. 113:539-552.

59. Kaiser, C. A. and R. Schekman. 1990. Distinct sets of SEC genes govern transport vesicle formation and fusion early in the secretory pathway. Cell 61:723-733.

60. Kemphues, K. J., J. R. Priess, D. G. Morton, and N. Cheng. 1988. Identification of genes required for cytoplasmic localization in early C. elegans embryos. Cell 52:311-320.

61. Kim, H. B., B. K. Haarer, and J. R. Pringle. 1991. Cellular morphogenesis in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle: Localization of the CDC3 gene product and the timing of events at the budding site. J. Cell Biol. 112:535-544.

62. Kissinger, C. R., B. Liu, E. Martin-Blanco, T. B. Kornberg, and C. O. Pabo. 1990. Crystal structure of an engrailed homeodomain-DNA complex at 2.8 angstrom resolution: a framework for understanding homeodomain-DNA interactions. Cell 63:579-590.

63. Kitayama, H., Y. Sugimoto, T. Matsuzaki, Y. Ikawa, and M. Noda. 1989. Ams-related gene with transformation suppressor activity. Cell 56:77-84.

64. Kronstad, J. W. and S. A. Leong. 1990. The b mating-type locus of Ustilago maydis contains variable and constant regions. Genes Dev. 4:1384-1395.

65. Kuijan, J. 1992. Pheromone response in yeast. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 61:1097-1129.

66. Lee, Y. H. and R. Dean. 1993. cAMP regulates infection structure formation in the pant pathogenic fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Plant Cell 5:693-700.

67. Lew, D. J., N. J. Marini, and S. I. Reed. 1992. Different G1 cyclins control the timing of cell cycle commitment in mother and daughter cells of the budding yeast S. cerevisiae. Cell 69:317-327.

68. Lew, D. J. and S. I. Reed. 1993. Morphogenesis in the yeast cell cycle: Regulation by Cdc28 and cyclins. J. Cell Biol. 120:1305-1320.

Page 189: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

175

69. Liu, H., C. A. Styles, and G. R. Fink. 1993. Elements of the yeast pheromone response pathway required for filamentous growth of diploids. Science 262:1741-1744.

70. Lodder, J. 1970. The Yeasts; A Taxonomic Study. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam.

71. Madaule, P., R. Axel, and A. M. Myers. 1987. Characterization of two members of the rho gene family from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:779-783.

72. Miyamoto, S., Y. Ohya, Y. Ohsumi, and Y. Anraku. 1987. Nucleotide sequence of the CLS4 {CDC24) gene oï Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 54:125-132.

73. Murray, A. W., M. J. Solomon, and M. W. Kirschner. 1989. The role of cyclin synthesis and degradation in the control of maturation promoting factor activity. Nature 339:280-285.

74. Nakayama, M., A, Miyajima, and K. Arai. 1985. Nucleotide sequences of STE2 and STE3, cell type-specific sterile genes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 4:2643-2648.

75. Nash, R., G. Tokiwa, S. Anand, K. Eriekson, and A. B. Futcher. 1988. The WHIl gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae tethers cell division to cell size and is a cylin homolog. EMBO J. 7:4335-4346.

76. Novick, P. and D. Botstein. 1985. Phenotypic analysis of temperature-sensitive yeast actin mutations. Cell 40:415-426.

77. Nurse, P. 1990. Universal control mechanism regulating onset of M-phase. Nature 344:503-508.

78. Nurse, P. and Y. Bissett. 1991. Gene required in G1 for committment to cell cycle and in G2 for control of mitosis in fission yeast. Nature 292:558-560.

79. Peter, M., A. Gartner, J. Horeeka, G. Ammerer, and I. Herskowitz. 1993. FARl links the signal transduction pathway to the cell cycle machinery in yeast. Cell 73:747-760.

80. Pomes, R., C. Gil, and C. Nombela. 1985. Genetic analysis of Candida albicans morphological mutants. J. Gen. Microbiol. 131:2107-2113.

Page 190: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

176

81. Powers, S., E. Gonzales, T. Christensen, J. Cubert, and D. Broek. 1991. Functional cloning of BUD5, a CZ)C25-related gene from S. cerevisiae that can suppress a dominant-negative J2AS2 mutant. Cell 65:1225-1231.

82. Preuss, D., J. Mulholland, A. Franzusoff, N. Segev, and D. Botstein. 1992. Characterization of the Saccharomyces golgi complex through the cell cycle by immunoelectron microscopy. Mol. Biol. Cell 3:789-803.

83. Puhalla, J. E. 1968. Compatibility reactions on solid medium and interstrain inhibition in Ustilago maydis. Genetics 60:461-474.

84. Puhalla, J. E. 1970. Genetic studies of the b incompatability locus of Ustilago maydis. Genet. Res. 16:229-232.

85. Reed, S. I. and C. Wittenberg. 1990. Mitotic role for the Cdc28 protein kinase oïSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:5697-5701.

86. Richardson, H. E., D. J. Lew, M. Henze, K. Sugimoto, and S. I. Reed. 1992. Cyclin-B homologs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae function in S phase and in G2. Genes Dev. 6:2021-2034.

87. Richardson, H. E., C. Wittenberg, F. Cross, and S. I. Reed. 1989. An essential G1 function for cyclin-like proteins in yeast. Cell 59:1127-1133.

88. Robinson, L. C., M. M. Menold, S. Garrett, and M. R. Culbertson. 1993. Casein kinase I-like protein kinases encoded by YCKl and YCK2 are required for yeast morphogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:2870-2881.

89. Ron, D., M. Zannini, M. Lewis, R. B. Wickner, L. T. Hunt, and G. Graziani. 1991. A region of proto-d6Z essential for its transforming activity shows sequence similarity to a yeast cell cycle gene, CDC24, and the human breakpoint cluster gene, bcr. New Biologist 3:372-379.

90. Ronne, H., M. Carlberg, G. Z. Hu, and J. O. Nehlin. 1991. Protein phos­phatase 2A in Saccharomyces cerevisiae', effects on cell growth and bud mor­phogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:4876-4884.

91. Rowell, J. B. and J. E. DeVay. 1954. Genetics of Ustilago zeae in relation to basic problems of its pathogenicity. Phytopathology 44:356-362.

92. Roy, L. M., K I. Swenson, D. H. Walder, B. G. GabrieUi, R. S. Li, H. Piwnica-Worms, and J. L. Mailer. 1991. Activation of p34'^^'^2 kinase by cyclin A. J. Cell, Biol. 113:507-514.

Page 191: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

177

93. Ruggieri, R., A. Bender, Y. Matsui, S. Powers, Y. Takai, J. Pringle, and K. Matsumoto. 1992. RSRl, a ras-like gene homologous to Krev-1 ismg21Af raplA): Role in the development of cell polarity and interaction with the ras pathway in «Sacc/iaro/n.j'ces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:758-766.

94. Salminen, A. and P. J. Novick. 1987. A ras-like protein is required for a post-Golgi event in yeast secretion. Cell 49:527-538.

95. Scherer, S. and P. T. Magee. 1990. Genetics of Candida albicans. Microbiol. Rev. 54:226-241.

96. Schulz, B., F. Banuett, M. Dahl, R. Schlesinger, W. Schafer, T. Martin, I. Herskowitz, and R. Kahmann. 1990. The b alleles of U. maydis, whose combinations program pathogenic development, code for polypeptides containing a homeodomain-related motif. Cell 60:295-306.

97. Schwob, E. and K. Nasmyth. 1993. CLB5 and CLB6, a new pair of B cycling involved in DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 7:1160-1175.

98. Shepard, G. M. 1983. Neurobiology. Oxford University Press, New York.

99. Simons, K. and A. Wandinger-Ness. 1990. Polarized sorting in epithelia. Cell 62:207-210.

100. Sinnott, EW. 1953. Plant morphogenesis, p. 19-26. In W. E. Loomis (ed.),Growth and differentiation in plants. The Iowa State College Press, Ames.

101. Sloat, B. F., A. Adams, and J. R. Pringle. 1981. Roles of the CDC24 gene product in cellular morphogenesis during the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. J. Cell Biol. 89:395-404.

102. Sloat, B. F. and J. R, Pringle. 1978. A mutant of yeast defective in cellular morphogenesis. Science 200:1171-1173.

103. Soli, D. R. 1990. Dimorphism and high-frequency switching in Candida albicans, p. 147-176. In D. R. Kirsch, R. Kelley and M. B. Kurtz (ed.), The genetics of Candida. CRC Press, Boston.

104. Soil, D. R. 1992. High frequency switching in Candida albicans. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 5:183-203.

Page 192: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

178

105. Soil, D. R. and L. H. Mitchell. 1983. Filament ring formation in the dimorphic yeast Candida albicans. J. Cell Biol. 96:486-493.

106. Solomon, M. J., M. Glotzer, T. H. Lee, M. Philippe, and M. W. Kirschner. 1990. Cyclin activation of p34^^^^. Cell 63:1013-1024.

107. Sprague, G. F.,Jr. and J. W. Thorner. 1992. Pheromone response and signal transduction during the mating process of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. p. 657-744. In E. W. Jones, J. R. Pringle and J. R. Broach (ed.), The molecular and cellular biology of the yeast Saccharomyces.. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview.

108. Staebell, M. and D. R. Soil. 1985. Temporal and spatial differences in cell wall expansion during bud and mycelium formation in Candida albicans. J. Gen. Microbiol. 131:1467-1480.

109. Stearns, T. andD. Botstein. 1988. Unlinkednoncomplementation: Isolation of new conditional-lethal mutations in each of the tubulin genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 119:249-260.

110. Stearns, T., M. A. Hoyt, and D. Botstein. 1990. Yeast mutants sensitive to antimicrotubule drugs define three genes that affect microtubule function. Genetics 124:251-162.

111. Stevenson, B. J., N. Rhodes, B. Errede, and G. F. Sprague,Jr.. 1992. Constitutive mutants of the protein kinse STEll activate the yeast pheromone response pathway in the absence of the G protein. Genes Dev. 6:1293-1304.

112. Surana, U., H. Robitsch, C. Price, T. Schuster, I. Fitch, A. B. Futcher, and K. Nasmyth. 1991. The role of CDC28 and cyclins during mitosis in the budding yeast S. cerevisiae. Cell 65:145-161.

113. Thorner, J. 1981. Pheromonal regulation of development in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. p. 144-147. In J. N. Strathem, E. W. Jones and J. R. Broach (ed.), The molecular biology of the yeast Saccharomyces: life cycle and inheritance. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York.

114. Townsend, G. F. and C. C. Lindegren. 1954. Characteristic growth patterns of the different members of a polyploid series of Saccharomyces. J. Bacteriol. 67:480-483.

Page 193: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

179

115. van Zyl, W., W. Huang, A. A. Sneddon, M. Stark, S. Gamier, M. Werner, C. Marck, A. Sentenac, and J. R. Broach. 1992. Inactivation of the protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit A results in morphological and transcriptional defects in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:4946-4959.

116. Vinh, D. B. N., M. D. Welch, A- K Corsi, K. F. Wertman, and D. G. Drubin. 1993. Genetic evidence for functional interactions between actin noncomplementing (Anc) gene products and actin cytoskeletal proteins in Sac­charomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 135:275-286.

117. Weisenseel, M. H., A. Dorn, and L. F. Jaffe. 1979. Natural H+ ion currents traverse growing roots and hairs of barley. Plant Physiol. 64:512-518.

118. Welch, M. D., D. B. N. Vinh, H. H. Okamura, and D. G. Drubin. 1993. Screens for extragenic mutations that fail to complement actl alleles identify genes that are important for actin function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Ge­netics 135:265-274.

119. Whiteway, M., L. Hougan, D. Dignard, D. Y. Thomas, L. BeU, G. C. Saari, F. J. Grant, P. O'Hara, and V. L. MacKay. 1989. The STE4 and STE18 genes of yeast encode potential b and gamma subunits of the mating factor receptor-coupled G protein. Cell 56:467-477.

120. Zhou, Z., A. Gartner, R. Cade, G. Ammerer, and B. Errede. 1993. Phero-mone-induced signal transduction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires the sequential function of three protein kinases. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:2069-2080.

121. Ziman, M., J. M. O'Brien, L. A. Ouellette, W. R. Church, and D. I. Johnson. 1991. Mutational analysis of CDC42Sc, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene that encodes a putative GTP-binding protein involved in the control of cell polarity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:3537-3544.

Page 194: Genetic analysis of pseudohyphal growth in the budding

180

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to thank my major professor, Dr. Alan Myers, for his teaching,

guidance, and willingness to stray from the norm, incorporating flexible ways to

accomplish our goals.

I would like to express my appreciation to Dr. Kristen Johansen, Dr. Drena

Larson, Dr. Basil Nikolau, and Dr. Robert Thornburg for serving on my Ph.D.

advisory committee, and giving advice and support.

I would also like to acknowledge other members of the lab with whom I have

enjoyed work, companionship, and scientific discussion: Diane Culbertson, Nick

Edgington, Dr. Martha James, Dr. Joni Johnson, Dr. Shu Hwa Lee, Dr. Julie

Peterson, Dr. Michael Scanlon, Indira Shukla, and Jeff Sturgess. Additionally, to

Carla Koehler, for her friendship, and the unselfish sharing of her knowledge and

resourcefulness.

My thanks to my parents, Vic and Rosalie Blacketer, for their unconditional

love and the care they gave my son, as only grandparents can, without which this

would not have been possible.

Finally, a special thanks to my husband, Larry Naylor, for his constant support,

encouragement, and willingness to sacrifice so much to make this work possible.

And for his wonderful parenting and love for our son David. Also, to my son David,

for his understanding and willingness to "hang in there".