General SessionSchool-wide ReformMary Kealy & George SugaiLoudoun Cty P.S., VA OSEP Center on PBISJuly 20, 2009www.pbis.org www.scalingup.org

PURPOSESchool-wide Reform: Consideration of policy & practice implications General Considerations (11:00 George)General to Specific (District-Elementary-Secondary)Specific to General (SWPBS & Reform)District Example (11:40 Mary)Comments & Questions (12:10 Q&C)

School-wide Reform Challenges

Prof. dev.Pers. prep.Org. chg.EvaluationLeadershipPolicyEtc.Impl. fidelityEvid. prac.Prac. compt.Cult. contextFamily sup.Etc.

School Reform (unvetted)AcademicSocial beh.Study skillsSpecialsPost-sec.VocationalRecreationalEtc.

Policy & Practice Examples & ConsiderationsMessagePolicy context matters

HR 2597 May 21, 2009Positive Behavior for Safe & Effective SchoolsESEA funds for SWPBSProvisionsProfessional development Safe & Drug Free CommunitiesEarly intervening services & counseling programsOffice of specialized instructional supports

American Recovery & Reinvestment ActIDEA & Title Recovery FundsData systemsE.g., SWISSWPBS implementation, e.g.,Early Intervening Services IDEASchool-wide Programs (ESEA Title I)Professional Development (ESEA Title II)

Policy Practice Feedback LoopsPolicy (Plan)Practice (Do)Fixsen et al. (2005) NIRN. www.scalingup.orgInvest inInformed policy-practice

Response-to-InterventionInvest inRtI for All

1-5%1-5%5-10%5-10%80-90%80-90%Responsiveness to InterventionAcademic SystemsBehavioral SystemsCirca 1996

Effective Behavioral InterventionsEffective Academic InstructionSystems for Durable & Accurate ImplementationContinuous & Efficient Data-based Decision MakingPOSITIVE, EFFECTIVE SCHOOL CULTURE(SWPBS)=

Responsiveness to Intervention

Academic+ Social BehaviorInvest inIntegrated/braided initiatives

RTIContinuum of Support for ALLDec 7, 2007Invest inLabeling behaviornot people

SYSTEMSPRACTICESDATASupportingStaff BehaviorSupportingStudent BehaviorOUTCOMESSupporting Social Competence &Academic AchievementSupportingDecisionMakingApproach for operationalizing best practiceInvest inSystemic support for implementers

AgreementsTeamData-based Action PlanImplementationEvaluationGENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCESSReadiness agreements, prioritization, & investments3-4 year implementation commitmentLocal capacity for training, coordination, coaching, & evaluation Systems for implementation integrityInvest inLocal implementation capacities

~80% of Students~15% ~5% ESTABLISHING CONTINUUM of SWPBSSECONDARY PREVENTION Check in/out Targeted social skills instruction Peer-based supports Social skills club TERTIARY PREVENTION Function-based support Wraparound Person-centered planning PRIMARY PREVENTION Teach SW expectations Proactive SW discipline Positive reinforcement Effective instruction Parent engagement SECONDARY PREVENTION TERTIARY PREVENTION PRIMARY PREVENTION Invest inLogically linked interventions

ClassroomSWPBSPracticesNon-classroomFamilyStudentSchool-wide Smallest # Evidence-based Biggest, durable effectInvest inFidelity implementation of evidence-based practices

Sample Teaming MatrixAre outcomes measurable?Invest inDecisions for working smarter

Initiative, CommitteePurposeOutcomeTarget GroupStaff InvolvedSIP/SIDAttendance CommitteeIncrease attendanceIncrease % of students attending dailyAll studentsEric, Ellen, MarleeGoal #2Character EducationImprove characterImprove characterAll studentsMarlee, J.S., EllenGoal #3Safety CommitteeImprove safetyPredictable response to threat/crisisDangerous studentsHas not metGoal #3School Spirit CommitteeEnhance school spiritImprove moraleAll studentsHas not metDiscipline CommitteeImprove behaviorDecrease office referralsBullies, antisocial students, repeat offenders Ellen, Eric, Marlee, OtisGoal #3DARE CommitteePrevent drug useHigh/at-risk drug usersDonEBS Work GroupImplement 3-tier modelDecrease office referrals, increase attendance, enhance academic engagement, improve gradesAll studentsEric, Ellen, Marlee, Otis, EmmaGoal #2Goal #3

www.pbis.orgHorner, R., & Sugai, G. (2008). Is school-wide positive behavior support an evidence-based practice? OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support. www.pbis.org click Research Evidence BaseInvest inEvidence-based practices

FundingVisibilityPoliticalSupportTrainingCoachingEvaluationLocal School Teams/DemonstrationsPBS Systems Implementation LogicLeadership Team

Active & Integrated Coordinationwww.pbis.org PBS Implementation BlueprintInvest inSystemic implementation logic

ValuedOutcomesContinuousSelf-AssessmentPractice ImplementationEffectivePracticesRelevance

Priority Efficacy

FidelitySUSTAINABLE IMPLEMENTATION & DURABLE SCHOOL-REFORM THROUGH CONTINUOUS REGENERATION

Main Messages.Invest in

Schoolwide Reform EffortsSuccessful Implementation:A School District Perspective

Mary V. Kealy, EdDAssistant Superintendent for Pupil ServicesLoudoun County Public SchoolsVirginia, USA

President-Elect, Council for Administrators of Special Education

Challenges Successes Lessons Learned

System Change Initiatives

Early InterventionInclusive PracticesPositive Behavior Intervention and Support (PBIS)Response to Intervention (RtI)

Implementation Challenges District LevelEvaluationData ManagementProfessional Development Resources

Leadership

Lessons Learned

AdministrativeLeadership

Lessons LearnedCapacityBuilding Model

AdministrativeLeadership

Lessons LearnedCapacityBuilding ModelProfessionalDevelopment

AdministrativeLeadership

Lessons LearnedCapacityBuilding ModelProfessionalDevelopmentCulture ofCollaboration

AdministrativeLeadership

Lessons LearnedCapacityBuilding ModelProfessionalDevelopmentCulture ofCollaborationIntegrated Initiatives

AdministrativeLeadership

Lessons LearnedAccountabilityandSustainabilityCapacityBuilding ModelProfessionalDevelopmentCulture ofCollaborationIntegrated Initiatives

AdministrativeLeadership

SchoolLevelData-DrivenDecisionMakingIntegrated InitiativesCollaborationMaintainingMomentumLeadership

Staffing And Resources

ChallengesVisionAdministrativeLeadershipResourcesand SupportCollaborativeTeamworkActionPlans++++

Challenges VisionAdministrativeLeadershipResourcesand SupportCollaborativeTeamworkActionPlans++++ CONFUSION

ChallengesVisionAdministrativeLeadershipResourcesand SupportCollaborativeTeamworkActionPlans++++ANXIETY

ChallengesVisionAdministrativeLeadershipResourcesand SupportCollaborativeTeamworkActionPlans++++FRUSTRATION

ChallengesVisionAdministrativeLeadershipResourcesand SupportCollaborativeTeamworkActionPlans++++SLOW CHANGE

ChallengesVisionAdministrativeLeadershipResourcesand SupportCollaborativeTeamworkActionPlans++++FALSE STARTS

ChallengesVisionAdministrativeLeadershipResourcesand SupportCollaborativeTeamworkActionPlans++++ SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION

Success: Show Me the Data!Successful implementation has led to improvement both at the district and school level in:Student behaviorStudent achievementSchool climate

FCPS Elementary School: Suspension Rate

Chart1

2003-04

3.53

Chart2

2003-04

3.53

Chart3

2003-04

3.53

Chart4

2003-04

3.53

Chart5

2003-04

3.53

Chart6

2003-04

3.53

Chart7

2002-03

3.53

3.43

Chart8

3.53

3.43

Chart9

3.53

3.43

Chart10

3.53

3.43

Chart11

3.53

3.43

Chart12

3.53

3.43

Chart13

3.53

3.43

Chart14

3.53

3.43

Chart15

3.53

3.43

Chart16

3.53

3.43

Chart17

3.53

3.43

Sheet1

2002-032003-042004-05

3.533.43

Chart18

0.420.81

1.520

1.750.42

7.345.05

3.432.550.31

7.134.37

3.533.43

2.281.01

0.530

3.351.43

4.381.5

1.761.56

8.137.68

6.312.110.71

12.0910.85

2.571.05

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

Suspension Rates

Chart19

Cardinal Forest0.420.81

Flint Hill1.520

Fort Belvoir1.750.42

Groveton7.345.05

3.432.550.31

Hollin Meadows7.134.37

Hybla Valley3.533.43

Island Creek2.281.01

Lees Corner0.530

Lorton Station3.351.43

Mount Vernon Woods4.381.5

Newington Forest1.761.56

Riverside8.137.68

6.312.110.71

Woodlawn12.0910.85

Woodley Hills2.571.05

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

Elementary Suspension Rates

Chart20

Hayfield MS17.2213.61

Herndon MS20.1317.8

Sandburg MS14.1511.49

Whitman MS13.1317.11

2003-04

2004-05

Middle School Suspension Rates

Chart21

Chart22

17.2213.61

20.1317.8

14.1511.49

13.1317.11

2003-04

2004-05

Suspension Rates

Chart23

17.2213.61

28.0612.85

2003-04

2004-05

Suspension Rate

Chart24

17.2213.61

28.0612.85

2003-04

2004-05

Suspension Rates

Ft. Belvoir

0.421.521.75

0.8100.42

Cardinal Forest

Flint Hill

Fort Belvoir

Groveton

Cardinal Forest0.420.81

Flint Hill1.520

Fort Belvoir1.750.42

Groveton7.345.05

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

Sheet2

2002-032003-042004-052003-042004-05

1Cardinal Forest0.420.81Groveton7.345.05

2Flint Hill1.520

3Fort Belvoir1.750.422002-032003-042004-05

4Groveton7.345.05Halley3.432.550.31

5Halley3.432.550.31

6Hollin Meadows7.134.37

7Hybla Valley3.533.43

8Island Creek2.281.01

9Lees Corner0.530

10Lorton Station3.351.43

11Mount Vernon Woods4.381.5

12Newington Forest1.761.56

13Riverside8.137.68

14Stratford Landing6.312.110.71

15Woodlawn12.0910.85

16Woodley Hills2.571.05

2003-042004-05

1Hayfield MS17.2213.61

2Herndon MS20.1317.8

3Sandburg MS14.1511.49

4Whitman MS13.1317.11

2003-042004-05

1Hayfield HS17.2213.61

2West Potomac HS28.0612.85

Chart29

1.75

0.42

Fort Belvoir

Chart30

7.34

5.05

Groveton

Chart31

4.38

1.5

Mount Vernon Woods

Chart32

8.13

7.68

Riverside

Chart33

12.09

10.85

Woodlawn

Chart34

17.22

13.61

Hayfield MS

Chart35

3.43

2.55

0.31

Halley

Chart36

1.76

1.56

Newington Forest

Chart37

3.35

1.43

Lorton Station

Chart38

2.28

1.01

Island Creek

Chart39

28.06

12.85

West Potomac HS

Chart25

28.06

12.85

13.64

Chart26

3.92

2.34

1.43

Chart27

7.13

4.37

2.98

Sheet3

2003-042004-05

1Cardinal Forest0.420.81

2003-042004-05

2Flint Hill1.520

2003-042004-05

3Fort Belvoir1.750.42

2003-042004-05

4Groveton7.345.05

2003-042004-052005-06

6Hollin Meadows7.134.372.98

2003-042004-05

7Hybla Valley3.533.43

2003-042004-05

8Island Creek2.281.01

2003-042004-05

9Lees Corner0.530

2003-042004-05

10Lorton Station3.351.43

2003-042004-05

11Mount Vernon Woods4.381.5

2003-042004-05

12Newington Forest1.761.56

2003-042004-05

13Riverside8.137.68

2003-042004-05

15Woodlawn12.0910.85

2003-042004-05

16Woodley Hills2.571.05

2002-032003-042004-05

14Stratford Landing6.312.110.71

2002-032003-042004-05

5Halley3.432.550.31

2003-042004-05

1Hayfield MS17.2213.61

2003-042004-05

2Herndon MS20.1317.8

2003-042004-05

3Sandburg MS14.1511.49

2003-042004-05

4Whitman MS13.1317.11

2003-042004-05

1Hayfield HS17.2213.61

2003-042004-052005-06

2West Potomac HS28.0612.8513.64

2003-042004-052005-06

Glen F3.922.341.43

FCPS Elementary School Pass Rate for Reading at Third Grade

Chart1

Chart2

44.3

67.7

82.2

Chart3

2003-0476.8

2004-0578.6

2005-0679.4

Sheet1

2003-042004-052005-06

44.367.782.2

76.878.679.4

Sheet2

Sheet3

FCPS Middle School: Suspension Rate

Chart1

2003-04

3.53

Chart2

2003-04

3.53

Chart3

2003-04

3.53

Chart4

2003-04

3.53

Chart5

2003-04

3.53

Chart6

2003-04

3.53

Chart7

2002-03

3.53

3.43

Chart8

3.53

3.43

Chart9

3.53

3.43

Chart10

3.53

3.43

Chart11

3.53

3.43

Chart12

3.53

3.43

Chart13

3.53

3.43

Chart14

3.53

3.43

Chart15

3.53

3.43

Chart16

3.53

3.43

Chart17

3.53

3.43

Sheet1

2002-032003-042004-05

3.533.43

Chart18

0.420.81

1.520

1.750.42

7.345.05

3.432.550.31

7.134.37

3.533.43

2.281.01

0.530

3.351.43

4.381.5

1.761.56

8.137.68

6.312.110.71

12.0910.85

2.571.05

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

Suspension Rates

Chart19

Cardinal Forest0.420.81

Flint Hill1.520

Fort Belvoir1.750.42

Groveton7.345.05

3.432.550.31

Hollin Meadows7.134.37

Hybla Valley3.533.43

Island Creek2.281.01

Lees Corner0.530

Lorton Station3.351.43

Mount Vernon Woods4.381.5

Newington Forest1.761.56

Riverside8.137.68

6.312.110.71

Woodlawn12.0910.85

Woodley Hills2.571.05

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

Elementary Suspension Rates

Chart20

Hayfield MS17.2213.61

Herndon MS20.1317.8

Sandburg MS14.1511.49

Whitman MS13.1317.11

2003-04

2004-05

Middle School Suspension Rates

Chart21

Chart22

17.2213.61

20.1317.8

14.1511.49

13.1317.11

2003-04

2004-05

Suspension Rates

Chart23

17.2213.61

28.0612.85

2003-04

2004-05

Suspension Rate

Chart24

17.2213.61

28.0612.85

2003-04

2004-05

Suspension Rates

Ft. Belvoir

0.421.521.75

0.8100.42

Cardinal Forest

Flint Hill

Fort Belvoir

Groveton

Cardinal Forest0.420.81

Flint Hill1.520

Fort Belvoir1.750.42

Groveton7.345.05

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

Sheet2

2002-032003-042004-052003-042004-05

1Cardinal Forest0.420.81Groveton7.345.05

2Flint Hill1.520

3Fort Belvoir1.750.422002-032003-042004-05

4Groveton7.345.05Halley3.432.550.31

5Halley3.432.550.31

6Hollin Meadows7.134.37

7Hybla Valley3.533.43

8Island Creek2.281.01

9Lees Corner0.530

10Lorton Station3.351.43

11Mount Vernon Woods4.381.5

12Newington Forest1.761.56

13Riverside8.137.68

14Stratford Landing6.312.110.71

15Woodlawn12.0910.85

16Woodley Hills2.571.05

2003-042004-05

1Hayfield MS17.2213.61

2Herndon MS20.1317.8

3Sandburg MS14.1511.49

4Whitman MS13.1317.11

2003-042004-05

1Hayfield HS17.2213.61

2West Potomac HS28.0612.85

Chart29

1.75

0.42

Fort Belvoir

Chart30

7.34

5.05

Groveton

Chart31

4.38

1.5

Mount Vernon Woods

Chart32

8.13

7.68

Riverside

Chart33

12.09

10.85

Woodlawn

Chart34

17.22

13.61

Hayfield MS

Chart35

3.43

2.55

0.31

Halley

Chart36

1.76

1.56

Newington Forest

Chart37

3.35

1.43

Lorton Station

Chart38

2.28

1.01

Island Creek

Chart39

28.06

12.85

West Potomac HS

Chart25

12.85

13.64

Chart26

2.34

1.43

Chart27

17.11

15.67

Sheet3

2003-042004-05

1Cardinal Forest0.420.81

2003-042004-05

2Flint Hill1.520

2003-042004-05

3Fort Belvoir1.750.42

2003-042004-05

4Groveton7.345.05

2003-042004-05

6Hollin Meadows7.134.37

2003-042004-05

7Hybla Valley3.533.43

2003-042004-05

8Island Creek2.281.01

2003-042004-05

9Lees Corner0.530

2003-042004-05

10Lorton Station3.351.43

2003-042004-05

11Mount Vernon Woods4.381.5

2003-042004-05

12Newington Forest1.761.56

2003-042004-05

13Riverside8.137.68

2003-042004-05

15Woodlawn12.0910.85

2003-042004-05

16Woodley Hills2.571.05

2002-032003-042004-05

14Stratford Landing6.312.110.71

2002-032003-042004-05

5Halley3.432.550.31

2003-042004-05

1Hayfield MS17.2213.61

2003-042004-05

2Herndon MS20.1317.8

2003-042004-05

3Sandburg MS14.1511.49

2003-042004-052005-06

4Whitman MS13.1317.1115.67

2003-042004-05

1Hayfield HS17.2213.61

2003-042004-052005-06

2West Potomac HS28.0612.8513.64

2003-042004-052005-06

Glen F3.922.341.43

FCPS Middle School:Pass Rate for Eighth Grade English

Chart1

67.689.1

2004-05

2005-06

Chart2

67.6

89.1

Sheet1

2004-052005-06

67.689.1

Sheet2

Sheet3

LCPS Middle School: Suspension Data

Improved School Climate

Chart1

2.95238095244.6363636364

3.90476190484.6363636364

2.80952380953.3181818182

3.95238095244.2727272727

44.3181818182

3.57142857144.6363636364

BEFORE Implementing PBS

AFTER Implementing PBS

Ratings (1 - Strongly Disagree to 5 - Strongly Agree)

School Climate Survey Responses from School Administrators of PBS Schools in Loudoun County Public Schools (n=22)

Sheet2

Sheet2

2.95238095244.6363636364

3.90476190484.6363636364

2.80952380953.3181818182

3.95238095244.2727272727

44.3181818182

3.57142857144.6363636364

BEFORE Implementing PBS

AFTER Implementing PBS

Ratings (1 - Strongly Disagree to 5 - Strongly Agree)

School Climate Survey Responses from School Administrators of PBS Schools in Loudoun County Public Schools (n=22)

Sheet1

2.09090909093.3636363636

2.30769230774.1538461538

23.6666666667

1.83333333333.3333333333

24

22.6666666667

13

14.5

1.52.5

24

13

BEFORE Implementing PBS

AFTER Implementing PBS

Ratings (1 - Least to 5 - Most)

Satisfaction Level of School Administrators for Improving Student Behavior in Targeted Areas of the School (n=22)

BEFORE Implementing PBSAFTER Implementing PBSBEFORE Implementing PBSAFTER Implementing PBS

NameSchoolMy school promotes common expectations and teaches appropriate student behaviors.The school climate for staff and students is positive.The learning environment is free of undesirable student behaviors.Students exhibit socially-desirable behaviors.Students are motivated for learning.Our school has strategies to decrease problem behaviors.My school promotes common expectations and teaches appropriate student behaviors.The school climate for staff and students is positive.The learning environment is free of undesirable student behaviors.Students exhibit socially-desirable behaviors.Students are motivated for learning.Our school has strategies to decrease problem behaviors.CafeteriaHallwaysPlaygroundBathroomsCommon AreasOffice Referrals using Check-In Check-OutLocker AreaBusesPhysical EducationUsing Data for Behavior InterventionsOn-Time to SchoolCafeteriaHallwaysPlaygroundBathroomsCommon AreasYellow Zone Support with CICOLocker AreaBusesPhysical EducationData CollectionOn-time to School

Jeannie ShowalterRRD32244255244512222432

Kim ForcinoLOV24244345244424

Elaine LaymanTOL2424445424443

Diane NewcomerTOL33244444344433

Arlene GlaserCTY4544455544453345

Roz ZietzCTY4544455544453345

Ric GauriloffMMS4544455554552121144345

Kristin McGrawMMS2324434324442121124424

Janice KoslowskiERM35444355555524

Jill BroaddusCSP34244445244513113442

Rodney MooreSHM45444455455523

Angela AtwaterLIB454455

Joyce HardcastleLIT34454455454512223444

Sharon Keegan-CoppelsSYC4444545555553445

Mike PellegrinoLUC44244354244424

Tim MartinoSUL24234355445413

Barbara HolleyASH45455555455533223443

Melinda Carper/Elise DonaldsonBAL33244255344512

James DallasCED14244155454524

Laura SeckMEA34344444344424

Vicki FyeFHR22223344344524

Will WaldmanSTM2324344424442243

2.95238095243.90476190482.80952380953.952380952443.57142857144.63636363644.63636363643.31818181824.27272727274.31818181824.63636363642.09090909092.307692307721.833333333322111.5213.36363636364.15384615383.66666666673.333333333342.666666666734.52.543

Improved Student Behavior

Chart3

2.09090909093.3636363636

2.30769230774.1538461538

23.6666666667

1.83333333333.3333333333

24

22.6666666667

13

14.5

1.52.5

24

13

BEFORE Implementing PBS

AFTER Implementing PBS

Ratings (1 - Least to 5 - Most)

Satisfaction Level of School Administrators for Improving Student Behavior in Targeted Areas of the School (n=22)

Sheet2

Sheet2

2.95238095244.6363636364

3.90476190484.6363636364

2.80952380953.3181818182

3.95238095244.2727272727

44.3181818182

3.57142857144.6363636364

BEFORE Implementing PBS

AFTER Implementing PBS

Ratings (1 - Strongly Disagree to 5 - Strongly Agree)

School Climate Survey Responses from School Administrators of PBS Schools in Loudoun County Public Schools (n=22)

Sheet1

2.09090909093.3636363636

2.30769230774.1538461538

23.6666666667

1.83333333333.3333333333

24

22.6666666667

13

14.5

1.52.5

24

13

BEFORE Implementing PBS

AFTER Implementing PBS

Ratings (1 - Least to 5 - Most)

Satisfaction Level of School Administrators for Improving Student Behavior in Targeted Areas of the School (n=22)

BEFORE Implementing PBSAFTER Implementing PBSBEFORE Implementing PBSAFTER Implementing PBS

NameSchoolMy school promotes common expectations and teaches appropriate student behaviors.The school climate for staff and students is positive.The learning environment is free of undesirable student behaviors.Students exhibit socially-desirable behaviors.Students are motivated for learning.Our school has strategies to decrease problem behaviors.My school promotes common expectations and teaches appropriate student behaviors.The school climate for staff and students is positive.The learning environment is free of undesirable student behaviors.Students exhibit socially-desirable behaviors.Students are motivated for learning.Our school has strategies to decrease problem behaviors.CafeteriaHallwaysPlaygroundBathroomsCommon AreasOffice Referrals using Check-In Check-OutLocker AreaBusesPhysical EducationUsing Data for Behavior InterventionsOn-Time to SchoolCafeteriaHallwaysPlaygroundBathroomsCommon AreasYellow Zone Support with CICOLocker AreaBusesPhysical EducationData CollectionOn-time to School

Jeannie ShowalterRRD32244255244512222432

Kim ForcinoLOV24244345244424

Elaine LaymanTOL2424445424443

Diane NewcomerTOL33244444344433

Arlene GlaserCTY4544455544453345

Roz ZietzCTY4544455544453345

Ric GauriloffMMS4544455554552121144345

Kristin McGrawMMS2324434324442121124424

Janice KoslowskiERM35444355555524

Jill BroaddusCSP34244445244513113442

Rodney MooreSHM45444455455523

Angela AtwaterLIB454455

Joyce HardcastleLIT34454455454512223444

Sharon Keegan-CoppelsSYC4444545555553445

Mike PellegrinoLUC44244354244424

Tim MartinoSUL24234355445413

Barbara HolleyASH45455555455533223443

Melinda Carper/Elise DonaldsonBAL33244255344512

James DallasCED14244155454524

Laura SeckMEA34344444344424

Vicki FyeFHR22223344344524

Will WaldmanSTM2324344424442243

2.95238095243.90476190482.80952380953.952380952443.57142857144.63636363644.63636363643.31818181824.27272727274.31818181824.63636363642.09090909092.307692307721.833333333322111.5213.36363636364.15384615383.66666666673.333333333342.666666666734.52.543

Lessons LearnedResourcesandSupportsAccountabilityandSustainabilityCapacityBuilding ModelProfessionalDevelopmentCulture ofCollaborationIntegrated Initiatives

AdministrativeLeadership

Resources and Support State National

ResourcesAnd support Local

Contact InformationDr. Mary V. Kealy Loudoun County Public Schools 21000 Education Ct. Ashburn, VA 20148

Mary.Kealy@loudoun.k12.va.us

***(c) Dean Fixsen and Karen Blase, 2008***NOTICE GREEN GOES IS FOR ALL**************************