general motors and toyota (cultural difference)
DESCRIPTION
Describes in brief the cultural difference between GM and Toyota.TRANSCRIPT
General Motors (GM) is the world's largest automaker and has been the global industry sales leader for 76 years.
– Founded in 1908– About 2,84,000 employees– Global headquarters in Detroit– Manufactures its cars and trucks in 33
countries
In the Nut Shell…
• Importance of “Execution-as-learning” over “Execution-as-efficiency”
• Most executives believe that flawless execution of operations is the surest path to customer satisfaction and positive financial results
• Psychological Safety
Execution-as-Efficiency VS
Execution-as-Learning
Execution-as-Efficiency Execution-as-Learning
Leaders provide all the answers Leaders set the directions and clarify the objectives
Employees follow the direction Employees looks for the answers
New work process development is infrequent
New work process development keeps on evolving
One way feedback Feedback is two ways
Fear is often a part of the work environment
Fact is well understood that fear would inhibit the ability to experiment and thus the learning process
What’s with Execution-as-Efficiency????
This is an old method of management that was successful at the time of “Manufacturing- Dominated era”. Following were the consequences of the same:
– Critical information and ideas failed to rise to the top
– People didn’t have enough time to learn
– Unhealthy internal competition aroused– Companies thought they can do no wrong
w.r.t. General Motors….
GM faced a huge loss of $38.7 Billion.
Meanwhile at Toyota….The world’s largest Automaker
– Established in the year 1937– Headquartered in Aichi, Nagoya
and Tokyo– 3,16,121 Employees
followed the management style which was
similar to Execution-as-Learning.
The Toyota’s Way had the following components:
– Adding value to the organization
by developing its people– Recognizing that continuously
solving root problems drives organizational learning
Reasons for the failure….
Psychological safety was the identified reason for the failure of “The Toyota Concept” in other companies.
Why Psychological Safety????
Psychological safety is crucial, especially in organizations where
–knowledge constantly changes–where workers need to collaborate–where those workers must make
wise decisions without management intervention
Does Psychological Safety Hinder Performance?
Stairway to Heaven….
Organizations that adopt an Execution-as-Learning model focus on
– learning faster rather than doing better
than competitors.– sacrifices shot-term efficiency to gain
insight and respond to novel problems and attain long term benefits.
There are ways to get there.
• Provide process guidelines
• Provide tools that enable employees
to collaborate in real time
• Collect process data
Conclusion
No one style of management is the best for any organizations. It has to be a mix of both “Execution-as-learning” and “Execution-as-efficiency”.
`
Thank You for your patience…..