general meeting laguna laguna – fréjus site geotechnical feasability (rewiew of wp2 munich...

15
General meeting LAGUNA LAGUNA – Fréjus site Geotechnical feasability (Rewiew of WP2 Munich January 26th-27th, 2009) March 30th.- April 2nd 2009, Wroclaw

Upload: eunice-malone

Post on 12-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: General meeting LAGUNA LAGUNA – Fréjus site Geotechnical feasability (Rewiew of WP2 Munich January 26th-27th, 2009) March 30th.- April 2nd 2009, Wroclaw

General meeting LAGUNA

LAGUNA – Fréjus site

Geotechnical feasability

(Rewiew of WP2 Munich January 26th-27th, 2009)

March 30th.- April 2nd 2009, Wroclaw

Page 2: General meeting LAGUNA LAGUNA – Fréjus site Geotechnical feasability (Rewiew of WP2 Munich January 26th-27th, 2009) March 30th.- April 2nd 2009, Wroclaw

LA

GU

NA

Fré

jus

Sit

e

>1500 m

rock overburden

km 1

2.86

8

PH

T 3

PH

T 5

Centrale B

PH

T 9

(LSM)

G1

G2

PH

T 1

7

PH

T 1

5

PH

T 1

1

G5

G3 Centrale CG4

Usine BUsine C

LSM Underground Laboratory Modane

Railway tunnel

CURRENT SITUATION: GENERAL PLAN

Longitudinal section

6,2 km

12.8 km

6,6 km

Road tunnel

Page 3: General meeting LAGUNA LAGUNA – Fréjus site Geotechnical feasability (Rewiew of WP2 Munich January 26th-27th, 2009) March 30th.- April 2nd 2009, Wroclaw

LA

GU

NA

Fré

jus

Sit

e

Geotechnical parameters of rock mass

• Unit weight 27 kN/m3

• Elastic modulus 15 GPa

• Poisson’s ratio 0.2

• Friction angle 35/40° (lower/mean value)

• Peak cohesion 3000 kPa

• Residual cohesion 2000 kPa (short term)

500-750 kPa (medium term)

200-300 kPa (long term)

• Plastic strain 0.5 % (for reach residual cohesion)

• Dilation angle 3°

Page 4: General meeting LAGUNA LAGUNA – Fréjus site Geotechnical feasability (Rewiew of WP2 Munich January 26th-27th, 2009) March 30th.- April 2nd 2009, Wroclaw

LA

GU

NA

Fré

jus

Sit

e

Main characteristics of calc-schists

• Time-dependent behaviour of rock mass (displacements)

• Tendency to wedge instability on roof

• Anisotropy of rock mass properties (effect of schistosity)

• Reduction of rock mass strength after failure

• No water circulation in the rock mass (OK for cavern stability

and thermal losses during reservoir operation)

Page 5: General meeting LAGUNA LAGUNA – Fréjus site Geotechnical feasability (Rewiew of WP2 Munich January 26th-27th, 2009) March 30th.- April 2nd 2009, Wroclaw

LA

GU

NA

Fré

jus

Sit

e

Cavern design

11

0 m

25

m 70

m1

7 m

19

m

9 m

41.9

D=67 mD=76

m

21.9

47.5

LENA221'000 m3

GLACIER320'000 m3

MEMPHYS558'000 m3

D=35 m

Page 6: General meeting LAGUNA LAGUNA – Fréjus site Geotechnical feasability (Rewiew of WP2 Munich January 26th-27th, 2009) March 30th.- April 2nd 2009, Wroclaw

LA

GU

NA

Fré

jus

Sit

e

Memphys – 3D model (FLAC)

Page 7: General meeting LAGUNA LAGUNA – Fréjus site Geotechnical feasability (Rewiew of WP2 Munich January 26th-27th, 2009) March 30th.- April 2nd 2009, Wroclaw

LA

GU

NA

Fré

jus

Sit

e

Memphys – Displacements – Long term

Page 8: General meeting LAGUNA LAGUNA – Fréjus site Geotechnical feasability (Rewiew of WP2 Munich January 26th-27th, 2009) March 30th.- April 2nd 2009, Wroclaw

LA

GU

NA

Fré

jus

Sit

e

Memphys – Failure zone – Long term

Page 9: General meeting LAGUNA LAGUNA – Fréjus site Geotechnical feasability (Rewiew of WP2 Munich January 26th-27th, 2009) March 30th.- April 2nd 2009, Wroclaw

LA

GU

NA

Fré

jus

Sit

e

Memphys – Analysis of wedge stability

Page 10: General meeting LAGUNA LAGUNA – Fréjus site Geotechnical feasability (Rewiew of WP2 Munich January 26th-27th, 2009) March 30th.- April 2nd 2009, Wroclaw

LA

GU

NA

Fré

jus

Sit

e

Large excavations at Frejus - Conclusions

• The construction of the large excavations for the 3 detector types of Laguna is feasible at Frejus site.

• For Glacier it is possible to built a unique large tank. The division into

2 smaller tanks can reduce the total construction costs of the caverns.

• For Lena it is not necessary to have curved walls

• The final lining should be placed at least 2-3 months after the excavation

in order to reduce the rock pressure in the long term (excavation from

top to bottom, construction of final lining from bottom to top).

Page 11: General meeting LAGUNA LAGUNA – Fréjus site Geotechnical feasability (Rewiew of WP2 Munich January 26th-27th, 2009) March 30th.- April 2nd 2009, Wroclaw

LA

GU

NA

Fré

jus

Sit

e

Interaction between tank and rock mass

• The stability of the rock mass during excavation is ensured by anchors and reinforced shotcrete

• The definitive cavern is sustained by a concrete lining.

•Glacier needs a inner, independent tank.

•The rock loads are supported by the concrete lining and will not be

transferred on the steel tank.

•The water from the rock mass can cause an external load on the

imperious tank (even if apparently the rock appears dry). To avoid this

type of load, it is necessary to design an external drainage system.

• The earthquake is not a problem for the steel tank, if there is not an

active fault crossing the cavern (atypical situation).

Page 12: General meeting LAGUNA LAGUNA – Fréjus site Geotechnical feasability (Rewiew of WP2 Munich January 26th-27th, 2009) March 30th.- April 2nd 2009, Wroclaw

LA

GU

NA

Fré

jus

Sit

e

Railway tunnel

LAGUNA

Road tunnel

Safety tunnel

Location LAGUNA

Page 13: General meeting LAGUNA LAGUNA – Fréjus site Geotechnical feasability (Rewiew of WP2 Munich January 26th-27th, 2009) March 30th.- April 2nd 2009, Wroclaw

LA

GU

NA

Fré

jus

Sit

e

LAYOUT (top view)

Control room,

offices, storage, power

Air and water

purification

Roa

d T

unne

l

Safety Tunnel

Access Tunnel

Electronics

Electronics

Electronics

Page 14: General meeting LAGUNA LAGUNA – Fréjus site Geotechnical feasability (Rewiew of WP2 Munich January 26th-27th, 2009) March 30th.- April 2nd 2009, Wroclaw

LA

GU

NA

Fré

jus

Sit

e

LAYOUT (side view)

Road TunnelSafety Tunnel

Access Tunnel

Air and water

purification

Control room,

offices, storage, power

Electronics Electronics

Page 15: General meeting LAGUNA LAGUNA – Fréjus site Geotechnical feasability (Rewiew of WP2 Munich January 26th-27th, 2009) March 30th.- April 2nd 2009, Wroclaw

LA

GU

NA

Fré

jus

Sit

eLAYOUT

Control room

Air and water

purification

Ac c

ess

Tun

nel

Cables, piping etc

Pow

er

Offi

ces

Sto

rage

Electronics

Electronics

Electronics

Safety Tunnel