general disclaimer one or more of the following statements ...short crack stress-intensity factor...
TRANSCRIPT
General Disclaimer
One or more of the Following Statements may affect this Document
This document has been reproduced from the best copy furnished by the
organizational source. It is being released in the interest of making available as
much information as possible.
This document may contain data, which exceeds the sheet parameters. It was
furnished in this condition by the organizational source and is the best copy
available.
This document may contain tone-on-tone or color graphs, charts and/or pictures,
which have been reproduced in black and white.
This document is paginated as submitted by the original source.
Portions of this document are not fully legible due to the historical nature of some
of the material. However, it is the best reproduction available from the original
submission.
Produced by the NASA Center for Aerospace Information (CASI)
iiiir
i11
11N
1
UDR-TR-82-119
r^ A PRELIMINARY STUDY OFCRACK INITIATION AND GROWTH AT
STRESS CONCENTRATION SITES
W
By
D. S. DawickeJ. P. GallagherG. A. Hartman
A. M. Rajendian
University of DaytonResearch Institute
September 1982
Prepared For:
National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationLewis Research Center
Cleveland, Ohio
v o^Rf lg8?
o N S/y^^o :, , a= 7^ q 4 ^f 0s g : c Aa'f^ ilia
1850
(NASA-CR-169358) A PRELi1LNAFY STILLY CF N81-3373bCRACK !"IITIATION AND GPUWA!3 AT STRESSCONC _N rRATION SITES Intec ka ' clinicalReport, 1 Jan. - 31 Aug. IJb2 (Dayton Univ., UnclasOhio.) 30 p HC A03 /MF A01 .CSCt 20K G3/39 35443
UNIVERSITY OF DAYTONDAYTON, OHIO
A
4
is
UDR-TR-82-119
t
A PRELIMINARY STUDY OFCRACK INITIATION AND GROWTH AT
STRESS CONCENTRATION SITES
By
D. S, Dawic3.eJ. P. GallagherG. A. Hartman
^m
A. M. Rajendran
University of Daytonm , Research Institute
September 1982
Prepared For: j
National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationLewis Research Center
Cleveland, OhioORO
J1
- E
i^
i
aei x
x
}tieix
kt,
y
m
i
^. a
n
{
r, a
?4 ^
ABSTRACT
A literature search was conducted to examine current crack
initiation and propagate= models For notches. The Dowling crack
initiation model and the E1 Haddad et al. crack propagation model
were chosen for additional study. Existing data was used to make
a preliminary evaluation of the crack propagation model. The
results indicate that fo g- the crack sizes in the test, the
elastic parameter K gave good correlation for the crack growth rate
data. Additional testing, directed specifically toward the
problem of small cracks initiating and propagating from notches
is necessary to make a full evaluation of these initiation and
propagation models.
r
FOREWORD
This t^.s First Interim Technical Report is submitted inaccordance with the NASA Gant NAG '3-246. It summarizes the
work accomplished during the period 1 January 1982 through
31 August 1982.
y The work is being performed for the National Aeronautics
and Space Administration. The work is being performed by theE ( Aerospace Mechanics Department of the University of Dayton
Research Institute, with Mr. George Hartman and Dr. J. P. Gallagher
acting as co-Principal Investigator. Technical support is being
provided by Dr. A. M. Rajendran and Mr. D. S. Dawicke.
I.
.a
f
r
i)
f
t
sTABLE OF CONTENTS
r
SECTION
,^. INTRODUCTION
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
t 2.1 STRAIN LIFE INITIATION MODEL
• 2.2 CRACK PROPAGATION MODELS
2.2.1 Elastic J-Integral _(K,)
2.2.2 Elastic-Plastic J-Integral
2.2.3 Strain Based Stress-IntensityFactor
3 APPLICATION OF EXISTING DATA TO CRACKPROPAGATION MODELS
3.1 ELASTIC J-INTEGRAL (K)
3.2 ELASTIC-PLASTIC J-INTEGRAL
3.3 STRAIN BASED STRESS-INTENSITY FACTOR
3.4 SUMMARY OF EXPERIME14TAL RESULTS
4 SUMMARY OF WORK ACCOMPLISHED AND WORKPLANNED FOR THE NEXT PERIOD
REFERENCES
R
IF
f
r
1
PAGE
1
2
2
3
36
7
8
8
13
16
20
21
22
OF Pot;i4a Quit a r
LIST OF IGURES
The Long and Short Crack Stress-IntensityFactor Solutions for a 1" DiametricallyCracked Hole.
Effect of Notch Severity on Dowing's CrackInitiation Cutoff Parameter.
Finite Element Mesh Representation of a 4"Wide Plate with a Crack Propagating from OneSide of a 1" Diameter Hole.
The Elastic Finite Element Solution and theBowie Approximation.
Crack Growth Rate Data Correlated with theElastic Stress-Intensity "'actor for industrialGrade Buss Bar Copper Subjected to a FatigueLoading with Stress Ratio (R) of 0:1.
Extent of Plastic Zone Along Expected Path ofCrack for a 1 " Diameter Hole in a 4" Wide Plate.
Extent of Plastic Enhancement of the Stress-Intensity Factor, as Calculated by the FiniteElement Solution.
Crack Growth Rate Data Correlated with thePlastically Enhanced Stress-Intensity Factorfrom the Finite Element Solution.
Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Behavior of CopperAlloy Using the Stress-intensity FactorProposed by El Haddad and the Elastic LongCrack Data.
Extent of Strain Hardening Experienced by theCopper and Finite Element Predictions of Strain.
PAGE
4
5
110
i
11
si12
14
it
15
17 t
18
19
iv
f
\ f\
$
\ |\
^ |\
\ \^:
\ !^
^ ƒ
.
|
\ |.^
\ .|\
\7.
^ 7}
^ }\
^ }\
\ f\2 v
LIST Of TABLES
TALE .
l CRACK GROWTH RATE TESTS FOR INDUSTRIAL GRADEBAR COPPER TnSTED AT A STRESS RATIO (R) OF 0.1
1
PAGE
§
SECTION I
INTRODOCTXON
The growth of cracks can be divided into the two categories
of initiation and propagation. In a notched structure, the
initiatipn and subsequently the propagation of small cracks are
governed by the stress field created by the notch. After the
crack grows beyond the influence oA4 the notch, crack propagation
behavior is governed by the nominal stress in the structure,.
A, literature search was performed to examine the state-of-
the-art crack propagation and initiation models. Thirteen recently
published studies [1-131 provide examples of crack initiation and
propagation models. The most promising of these models are:
the El Haddad et al. crack propagation model [1], the elastic-
plastic J-integral based crack propagation model described by
Ratwani et al. (2], and the Dowling crack initiation cut-off
model based on linear elastic fracture mechanics (3,4 t 5). The
work to date has included a close examination of the promising
crack propagation models, specifically by testing their ability
to describe existing data.
L
M,y
2
SECTION 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
w
A literature review was conducted to determine theexisting approaches taken to solve the problem of cracks ,initi-sting an;d propagating from notches. This reN°,iew was presentedat NASA-Lewis on 16 July 1982. The remainder of this sectionsummarizes the important ,ispects of the crack initiation an.,Ipropagation models that have been chosen for additional study.
2.1 STRAIN LIFE INITIAT,XON MODEL
A crack initiation model developed by Dowling (3,4,5)
predicts life to initiation for notch geometries using smooth
specimen strain life data. The severity of the notch is taken
into account by elevating the applied stress by the elastic
stress concentration factor (kt). The equivalent strain ampli-
tude for notched geometry is obtained from the cyclic stress
strain curve of the material.
Dowling found this method to be effective in predicting
crack initiation life if the initiation crack length remained
within the influence of the notch. Dowling defined an upper
bound on the initiation crack length which ensured the crack waswithin the influence of the notch. This upper bound was defined
to be the intersection of what he termed the short crack stress-
intensity factor (K s ) and the long crack stress-intensity factor
(KZ ) solutions described as a function of crack length. The
short crack stress-intensity factor was defined as a function of
the stress concentration factor (kt) of the notch and the crack
length measured from the edge of the notch (R), r
Ks = 1.12S k (1)
where 1.12 is the free surface correction factor for an edge
crack. The long crack stress-intensity factor assumed the notch
I
has no effect on the crack behavior,
K9 WS V7 (2)
where a is the sum of the crack length°(Z) and radius (r) of thenotch; S in Equations l and 2 x.s the applied stress.
TY{o long crack and short crack stress- intensity factor
solutions for a diametrically cracked 1.0 inch diameter hole in awide plate are shown in Figure 1. Analytically, the crack length(Rm) associated with the intersectioii of the long crack and shortcrack stress- intensity factors can be expressed in terms of notchradius (r) and stress concentration factor of the notch.
R r(3)M (1. 12 kt ) 2
The Dowling crack initiation cut-off parameter (R m) given byEquation 3 is shown in Figure 2 as a function of notch severity.
1
` As the notch severity increases the initiation crack length
decreases, i.e., the notch behaves like a crack. it can also be
noted that the initiation crack length is on the order of 10 to
20% of the notch radius.
Dowling also suggested that linear elastic fracture mecha-nics parameters could be utilized beyond the initiation cut-off.
2.2 CRACK PROPAGATION MODELS
2.2.1 Elastic J-Integral (K)
The linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM)parameter K, the stress-intensity factor f has been found to be
an effective basis for life analysis procedures when extensive
plasticity does not occur. Localized cyclic plasticity around
the root of a notch has been observed to accelerate the growth
rate of cracks propagating from notches. E1 Haddad et al. [1],
Lein et al. [11,12], and Newman [13] have shown that the LEFM
parameter K, correlates the crack growth rate data in a mannerzwhich would lead to unconservative life predictions for small
cracks propagating from plastically deforming notches under fully
reversed loading.
„ 3
EW
1
r
r N
4 ♦'y ^1
Q Vin.^
^.; StressNormalized
K1 R Str@ss—r
' Intensityk '^5 Factor
3^1
{ 9
I^»
Y}i_. ,eke
OF POOR
"C,'
Ks R1,.12Kt ^
4}V M
KV (R+R)
a^
!
ai-w^
yw
0.0.00 .. 02 .04 .05 .08 .10k (in.)
Crack length measured from edge of notch.
Figure 1. The Long and Short Crack Stress-Intensity FactorSolutions for a 1 inch Diametrically Cracked Hole.
4
OF POOR QUAUTY
s
dr t ^^
a ^^
F2y
^0.
8.
i kt 7.
StressConcentration ^+Factor
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
0.r 00 .05 .10 .15 .20 .25 .30R, m (in. )
Dowling's crack initiation cutoff parameter.
Figure 2. Effect of Notch Severity on Dowling's CrackInitiation Cutoff Parameter.
R
R
^ }}ppp^^ ^e
4, t
lie
5
The advantage of using the LEFM parameter K, is
that it is a material independent property of a specific geometry.
Handbook solutions exist for many simple geometries and a series
of relatively inexpensive linear finite element runs will generatesthe solution for more complex geometries. One of the more direct
methods tfor calculating the stress-,intmn.sity factor via finiteelement analysis involves using the path independent line integralderived by Rice [141, i.e., the J-integral, which is given by
i j (Wdy - T 3—x ds) (4)r
In the elastic case, the stress-intensity factor is proportionalto the square root of the J-integral according to the formula,
a
K = J
(5)
Y
E,
a
where E is the elastic. modulus. The LEFM parameter K provides a
starting point in the life analysis of cracks propagating from3
notches due to the availability of the solution ano its acceptance
in making linear elastic life predictions.
2.2.2 Elastic-Plastic J-integral
Ratwani et al. (2) suggested that the behavior of
cracks propagating from plastically deforming notches could be
de:,cribed using the J- ,ntegral calculated to account for the
plastic behavior. The J-integral proposed for this correlation
is calculated with Equation 4 based on finite element results for
elastic-plastic material properties. Actually, once Ratwani etal. calculated the value of the J--integral under elastic-plastic
conditions for a given loading and crack length, they converted
J to a quasi-stress intensity factor (Kp) using Equation 5, i.e.,
KpJE
(5)_
which was then used for calculating crack growth behavior in the
notch region.
6 OF POOR QUALITY
2.2.3 Strain Based Stress-Intensity Factoru
El Haddad et al. (1) proposed a different type of
' plasticity enhanced stress-intensity factor to account for the
behavior of cracks propagating from notches. This approach is
based upon a strain concentration factor (kE), which is the ratio
of local strain (e) as a function of distance (x) from the notch
to the nominal gross strain (e).
e (x)kE = kE {x) = e (7)
The stress-intensity factor (KEH ) proposed by E1 Haddad et al. is
givon by
KEH = S kE V-7rT (S)
where R is the crack length measured from the notch root and kE
is evaluated for x=k (See Equation 7).n
The strain concentration factor is evaluated by
a nonlinear finite element solution of the untracked,geometry.
The El Haddad et al. stress-intensity factor is equivalent to the
LEFM K for different levels of load when the material at the notch
root does not experience plastic deformation. For stress levels
which result in plastic deformation at the notch root, the strain
concentration factor will elevate the stress-intensity factor to
account for the accelerated growth rate of the crack. For crack
lengths outside the plastic cone of the notch, the stress-intensity
factor approaches that of the LEFM long crack stress-intensity
factor. El Haddad et al. presented results which indicate this
method correlates the crack growth rate data for cracks propa-
gating from several types of notches under several loading
conditions.
a^
7
isF.fCI:fI
1
ORIGINAL PAGE 19!OF POOR QUALITY
SECTION 3
APPLICATION OF EXISTING DATA TOCRACK PROPAGATION MODELS
A small data base of crack growth rate data [15] and a
series of finite element results [16] for industrial grade buss
bar copper were available for use in analyzing the crack propa-
gation models. Fatigue crack growth rate data had been collected
using 4.0 inch wide plates with center cracks (CCP) and withradially cracked holes . (RCH). Specimen types and test stress
levels are given in Table 1. Tensile tests and incremental step
tests were conducted to obtain the monotonic and cyclic stress-
strain curves for material modeling. The finite element based
study was conducted using the MAGNA code and the material model was
obtained from the tensile test results.
3.1 ELAST'I'C J-INTEGRAL (K)
A series of elastic finite element solutions were obtained
for a crack propagating from the RCH specimen. The LEFM para-
meter K, stress-intensity factor, for this geometry was calculated
from the J-integral results of the elastic finite element solu-
tion. Figure 3 describes the finite element grids, crack tip
elements, and a J-integral path for a 1 inch crack as measured
from the edge of the 1 inch diameter,hole in the 4 - inch wide plate.
The finite element solution for the stress- intensity factor isshown in Figure 4. The Bowie [17] solution for the stressintensity factor of a crack propagating from a 1 inch diameter
hole in an infinite plate has been added for comparison.The difference between the Bowie solution and the finite
element solution for K is due to the finite width of the plate.
The RCH crack growth rate data correlated with the finite
element determined K are shown in Figure 5, along with the crack
growth rate data for the CCP specimens. The fatigue cWk grc*th
rate obtained from these specimens were correlated with the
analytical elastic K solution with a width correction factor used
in A gTM standard E647 [18].
80
O
U
44 C4
N •^N O
0 N
0rd
4
rd
bb
U3 •^ -
0
J rd
4J
•3
3 r-fa^
r-I b U
• a 4JP4 rO ^b> 9 am 41 mbU U H •Hm N . U $P 04
U N r>41 U
4J -ri
w U (ddU 1~ 1-I
•rird N b A
^ rt•rl O •rl
eTP4 rd x Au r0-1
^ is
^ row
4
+
i
i
}}
t^
+r ' t
xE
a
F
i
H
zF4
a^riO 0
H Ocn
W W H rA
H H W H
u^x^
BUY
i^ C7 W
lu
U
iL
W to ri O M - O O N N
P4 N N N N N NU' to
.^"4-1 U
oo lt1 r-1 111 C^ t^
Hx
Ho 0 0 0 0 0
'r4 n U l^D Or1 M P-vr
1 fLn+'1 +D
b •^ N d' O 0 0 0
`•' 0 0 0 0 0 0U
Wu^ u^ u1 u1
0 0 0 0 0 0^•^
P4 P4u uaaaaa
aiC,4
a a ^ x xu u a a a aw
WW O rl N M sr tf1 lDH z
9
ORIGINAR 1.1 YDF pOQ
^N
i'
r
SY^
^J
F
r ,
V
,J
q^
3
4 '^
a..
as
'^ G
}F R
N ,'
UniformApplied Load
^r
crack
Coarse Finite Element Mesh
Figure 3. Finite Element Mesh Representation of a 4 inchWide Plate with a Crack Propagating from OneSide of a 1 inch Diameter Hole.
10
Crack Tip J-IntegralPath
Fine Finite Element Mesh for Crack TipRegion
ElasticFiniteElementSolution
r
r.
2.5in
1 5
a*bStress
F,. NormalizedStress—Intensity 1. 0Factor
ORIGINAL. <<:^
OF POOR QUAUTV
0.0 2 4 .B .8 1.00. 0 .Crack Length
Figure 4. The Elastic Finite Element Solution and theBowie Approximation.
11
OF Pa
XX
e^
00
U*
0
00
40
Kmax(ksi)
Figure 5. Crack Growth Rate Data Correlat3d with theElastic Stress-Intensity Factor forIndustrial Grade Buss Bar Copper Subjectedgto a Fatigue Loading with Stress Ratio (R)
r of 0.1.i^;d
12
Y
BLn CCP 2 (25.0 ksi)
B o CCP 3 (21.3 ksi)
T RCH 1 (22.0 ksi)
4 X RCH 2' (22.0 ksi)
X RCH 3 (24.2 ksi)
• RCH 4 (24.2 ksi)
20e
3
13F I
4
ix
^th
e ;^
n^
r
K - S V71a Sec (W ) (9)
where a is the-half crack length and W is the plate width.
For this material, the correlation with the finite element
elastic K is very good. The accelerated crack growth rate for
small cracks near the notch reported by ethers was not observed.
The smallest crack lengths shown in Figure 5 are on the order oZ
0.1 inch which is small compared to the calculated size of the
plastic zone shown in Figure 6.
A study by Newnan [13] suggests that crack closure is the
cause for the accelerated crack growth rate experienced by small
cracks propagating from notches. The current data base seems to
agree with this conclusion. The previously reported accelerated
crack growth rate was seen in tests run with a stress ratio of
-1 (fully reversed loading). The existing test results were for
tests at a stress ratio of 0.1, thus crack closure may not be as
important in the cracking process. We are planning further
investigation in this area.
Newman reasoned that once closure has occurred, the load
needed to open a short crack is less than that needed to open a
long crack. This would result in a greater stress range rn which
damage is being done for the short crack, thus an increased crack
growth rate.
3.2 ELASTIC-PLASTIC J-INTEGRAI
Nonlinear finite element based studies were also conducted
for cracks propagating in the RCH specimens. Figure 7 summarizes
the results of the J-integral calculations in terms of the ratio
a of "plastically" corrected stress-intensity factor K (given by
Equation 6) to the elastic stress-intensity factor, for the two
applied stress levels utilized during the test."s
r#413
ORIGINAL P `^''-` IS
^aOF POOP? QUALITY
X
g,^,^.rLi^YJs
202000.
y
>
SO100©a.
n
°fl7II.
0.
ORIGINAL Pi =- (A'-I
pools QUALITY
R24,000 PSI
22,00' PSI RCH 1RCH 2.
Plastic Zone Size As Measured From Notch (In.)
rY
Figure 6. Extent of Plastic Zone Along Expected Path ofCrack for a i inch viameter Hole in a 4 inchWide plate.
a
14
ORIGINAL ^ 4' I
QF poon QUAU-i '
AppliedStress
5 2 k ' 2 ks ----------a
22.0 ksi
hotel 1 •`elastic
0.0.0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .5 .7
zCrack Length (An,)
Figure 7. Extent of Plastic Enhancement of the Stress-Intensity Factor, as Calculated by the FiniteElement Solution.
P
^t 8
IR ^
15
2.
1.
.
The "plastically" corrected stress-intensity factors basad
on Equation 6 were used to correlate the crack growth rate data
from the RCH specimens as shown in •Figure 8, Finite element
solutions for the CCP specimens are not complete; thus, the crack
growth rate data for the CCP specimens were not included in the
figure. t`
3.3 STRAIN BASED STRESS-INTENSITY FACTORr
A nonlinear finite element solution for an uncracked RCH
specimen was used as an initial, estimate of the plastic strain
near the notch. The results of this program were used to calcu-
late the strain concentration factor (kr). This factor was used
in the plastically enhanced stress-intensity parameter (K EH).
KEH Was the^'i used to correlate the crack growth rate data for the
four RCH tests. The results of this correlation, along with the
elastic long crack (CCP) data are shown in Figure 9.^, 4
The plastically enhanced stress-intensity factor, as
described by El Haddad et al., failed to correlate the crack
growth rate data from the RCH specimens with the long crack data.
An additional test was conducted to determine the validity of
E the strains calculated by the finite element analysis. The test
specimen consisted of an uncracked RCH specimen with strain gages
attached to 1-he inside of the notch. The specimen was then cycled
a' fi at a stress level similar to that used in the fatigue tests. The
experimental results indicate that the material at the notch root
3 experienced a large decrease in plastic strain after the first
cycle due to redistribution of stresses. The plastic . strain
amplitude stabilized after approximately the tenth cycle. The
finite element solution agrees with the first cycle but differs
substantially with the tenth and succeeding cycles, as shown in-
Figure 10. The strain concentration factor for the uncracked
RCH specimen, as calculated b the finite element solution, doesP ynot give an accurate description of the strain along the expected
crack path. A cyclic nonlinear finite element analysis is
'a
16
W ,
R-0. I I
to RCH 1 (22. 0 ksi)
0 RCH 2 (22.0 ksi)
4—RCH 3 (24.2 ksi)
+ RCH 4 (24.2 ksi)
2— +
r*c4o
10,
46.
r
e,l
4
ORIGINAL PAGX^ Na
OF POOR QUALITY4
daTN
(in. /cyc.)1 0 4
ws, 103Q 40 5Q 60 70
NT
/JE I—n)(KSIY'
Figure 8. Crack Growth Rate Data Correlated with the PlasticallyEnhanced Stress-Intensity Factor from the Finite ElementSolution.
^x
a
t
qfe
F
1K
ti
d
U
S{4F[
URIGI 1 t"t»r __. i t,/
OF POOR QUALM Y
RCH SPECUMNS, RM0.1
c max "" 24.2 Ks
6' Q max " 24.2 Ksi r
c max " 22.0 Ksi4 a CCP R=0.1SP25
OENS^comax
° a MAX"'= 21.3 Ksi
r
i '71
Z V_ 0da ft.
00
4 = — ''
IN.( NCLE }
8 an "-
34 cm
°
IliV
V
ry
1
10 5.___ 2
4 6
10 1K
10EHmax
(Ksi in. }
" r
Figure 9. Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Behavior of the Copper
Alloy Using the Stress-Intensity Factor Proposedby El Haddad and the Elastic Long Crack Data.
18
I
r
s.
No ."IF fLL
Pi -
20000.
Applied 15000.Stress
(psi)
10000. —
5000. —
0. 1.000
OF POOR Q: T"i I
I 10th cycle
lot cycle
finite elementresults
.005 .015
Strain (in./in.)
FIgure 10. Fxtent of Redistribution of Stresses Experiencedby the Copper and Finite Elvment Predictions ofStrain.
4n tie ij
i
i
^ S
fR
Sf
0
19
20
planned and when the data is available it will be used to
obtain a better estimate of the plastic strain for the 'Zl Haddard
model.
3.4 SUMMARY OF EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
TNe experimental results used thus far to evaluate the
crack propagation models show that the elastic stress -intensity
factor (K) correlates the crack growth rate data for the condi-
tions tested. The elastic-plastic d^integral based (Krj and the El
Haddad et al. plastically enhanced stress-intensity factor (K EH )
are strongly dependent upon they material model used in the finite
element analysis.
Additional testing is a.equired to determine the cond itions
under which the elastic K fails to correlate the data. Tests are
planned which will specifically address the problem of cracks
from ,. o These tests will crack growthpropagating ^.^.u^^ ► no,.cho^. w ,.rate data for small. cracks (less than 0.05 inch) near notches.
Tests will be run under fully reversed loading and under a stress
ratio of 0.1, to determine the efect of crack closure on the
small crack growth rate.
E
i
J
SECTION a
SUMMARY OF WORK ACCOMPLISHED AND WORKPLANNED FOR THE NEXT PERIOD
During the past six months, the work accomplished can be
summarized as follows:
A. A literature review of current crack initiation and
propagation model for notched structures was conducted.
B. A crack initiation model and several crack propagation
models were chosen for further study.
C. Analysis, using existing crack growth rate data and
finite element solutions, was performed to evaluate the crack
apropagation models.
D. The materials for additional testing has been acquired
and the machining of the specimens has begun.
Between September 1 and 31 December 1982, the following
work will be accomplished:
A. Baseline testing of the aluminum will be conducted.
B. Life predictions using the crack initiation and crack
propagation models will be made.
{ C. Fatigue tests will be conducted on the aluminum.
D. The crack initiation and crack propagation models will
be evaluated for the aluminum.
E. A plate of INCONEL 718 will be procured.
I
^l
21
REFERENCES
4 'J
1. E1 Haddad, M. J., Smith, K. N:, and "hopper, T. li., " AStrain based Intensity Factor Soll,tion for Short FatigueCracks Initiating from Notches," Fracture Mechanics, ASTMSTP 577, C. W. Smith, Ed., American Society for Testing andMatezials, 1979, pp. 274-289.
2. Ratwani, M. M., "Fatigue Crack Growth at Stress Concentra-tions Subject to Strains Beyond Elastic Range," J. ofAircraft, Vol. 18, No. 3, March 1981, pp. 206--212.
3. Dowling, N. E., "Fatigue at Notches and the Local Strainand Fracture Mechanics Approaches," Fracture Mechanics, ASTMSTP 677, C. W. Smith, Ed., American Society for Testing andMaterials, 1979, pp. 247-273.
4. Dowling, N. E. and W. K. Wilson, "Geometry and Size Require-ments for Fatigue Life Similitude Among Notched Members,"Advances in Fracture Research, D. Francois, et al., Ed.,Pergamon Press, 1980, pp. 581-588.
5. Dowling, N. E., "Notched Member Fatigue Life PredictionsCombining Crack Initiation and Propagation,"' Fati gue ofEngineering Materials and Structures, Vol. 2 1 pp. 129-138,1979.
6. Hanunouda, M. M. and Miller, K. J.., "Elastic-Plastic FractureMechanics Analysis of Notches," Elastic-Plastic Fracture,ASTM STP 668, American Society for Testing and Materials,1979, pp. 703-719.
7. Kurath, P., Socie, D. F., and Morrow, J., "A Nonarbitrary'atigue Crack Size Con4ept to Predict Total Fatigue Lives,"AFFDL-TR-79-3144, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory,Wright--Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, Dec. 1979.
8. Duggan. T. V., "Fatigue Integrity Assessment," Int. J. ofFatigue, April 1981, pp. 61-70
9. Wood, H. A. and Rudd, J. L., "Evaluation of Small Cracks inAirframe Structures," AGARD Publication, CESME, Turkey,April 1981.
10. Liu, A. F., "Crack Growth at a Preyielded Hole," Papersubmitted to J. of Engineering Mat'ls and Tech. forpublication 1981.
22
I .-.
11. Leas, B. N., Galliher, R. D., "Growth of Physically ShortCorner Cracks at Circular Notches," Battelle ColumbusLaboratories, September 1980.. .
12. Leas, B. N., "Fatigue Crack Propagation Through IynelastieGradient Fields," Battelle Columbus Laboratories, May 1981.
13. Newman, J. C., Jr., "A Nonlinear Fracture Mechanics Approachto+the Growth of Small Cracks," Presentation at the AGARDSpecialists Meeting on Behavior of Short Cracks in AirframeComponents, September 20-21, 1982. •
r
14. Rice, J. R., "A Path Independent Integral and the Approxi-mate Analysis of Strain Concentration by Notches and Cracks,"Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Applied Mechanics,Volume 34, 1968, pp. 379-386.
- 15. Unpublished Test Results, Air Force Contract No, F33615-78-C-5184, July 1982.
16. Unpublished Finite Element Results, Air Force Contract No.F33615-78-C-5184, July 1982.
17. Bowie, O. L., Journal of Mathematics and Physics, Vol. 35,' 1956, pp. 60-71.
18. "Standard Test Method for Constant-Lead-Amplitude FatigueCrack Growth Rates Above 10- 8 m/cyc," ASTM E647-81, pp. 765-783.
i^
ti
k ^r a*
rt n
f3f^
a.
lip
it
re
23