geert bouckaert community of practice on results based management brussels, january 8th, 2014 public...
TRANSCRIPT
Geert Bouckaert
Community of Practice on Results Based ManagementBrussels, January 8th, 2014
Public Sector Reform: general trends in the OECD
• 1.Trajectories of reform
• 2.Pressure for performance
• 3.Specialisation for performance
• 4.Participation for performance
• 5.General trajectories and next steps
1.Trajectories of reform
P erc eived lac k o f:
- P erfo rm anc e- R es p o ns ib ility- A c c o untab ility- T rans p arenc y- C o ntro l- P o lic y c ap ac ityto guarantee res ults- . . .
A
- C reatio n o fagenc ies- M o re auto no m y- M o res p ec ialis atio n- Inc reas e o f s inglep o lic y c ap ac ities- P erfo rm anc eM eas urem entS ys tem s (P M S )- . . .
B
(1)
P R O B LE M S O LU T IO N
1.Trajectories of reformP erc eived lac k o f:
- P erfo rm anc e- R es p o ns ib ility- A c c o untab ility- T rans p arenc y- C o ntro l- P o lic y c ap ac ityto guarantee res ults- . . .
A
- C reatio n o fagenc ies- M o re auto no m y- M o res p ec ialis atio n- Inc reas e o f s inglep o lic y c ap ac ities- P erfo rm anc eM eas urem entS ys tem s (P M S )- . . .
B
- D ys func tio nalauto no m y- C entrifugalagenc ies- S ub o p tial fo c us o nagenc y o utp uts , no to n p o lic y o utc o m es- C o ns id erab letrans ac tio n c o s ts- D is c o nnec teds ingle p o lic yc ap ac ities- P ervers io ns o fP M S : "G am ing" , . . .
C
(1)
P R O B LE M S O LU T IO N
(2)
S O LU T IO N = P R O B LE M
1.Trajectories of reform
P erc eived lac k o f:
- P erfo rm anc e- R es p o ns ib ility- A c c o untab ility- T rans p arenc y- C o ntro l- P o lic y c ap ac ityto guarantee res ults- . . .
A
- C reatio n o fagenc ies- M o re auto no m y- M o res p ec ialis atio n- Inc reas e o f s inglep o lic y c ap ac ities- P erfo rm anc eM eas urem entS ys tem s (P M S )- . . .
B
- N ew / renew edc o -o rd inatio n
H T MM T MN T M
- G uaranteeeffec tive p o lic yc ap ac ity- A ud it C ap ac ityinc reas ed
D
- D ys func tio nalauto no m y- C entrifugalagenc ies- S ub o p tial fo c us o nagenc y o utp uts , no to n p o lic y o utc o m es- C o ns id erab letrans ac tio n c o s ts- D is c o nnec teds ingle p o lic yc ap ac ities- P ervers io ns o fP M S : "G am ing" , . . .
C
(1)
P R O B LE M S O LU T IO N N E W S O LU T IO N
(2)
S O LU T IO N = P R O B LE M
(3)
1.Trajectories of reformP erc eived lac k o f:
- P erfo rm anc e- R es p o ns ib ility- A c c o untab ility- T rans p arenc y- C o ntro l- P o lic y c ap ac ityto guarantee res ults- . . .
A
- C reatio n o fagenc ies- M o re auto no m y- M o res p ec ialis atio n- Inc reas e o f s inglep o lic y c ap ac ities- P erfo rm anc eM eas urem entS ys tem s (P M S )- . . .
B
- N ew / renew edc o -o rd inatio n
H T MM T MN T M
- G uaranteeeffec tive p o lic yc ap ac ity- A ud it C ap ac ityinc reas ed
D
- D ys func tio nalauto no m y- C entrifugalagenc ies- S ub o p tial fo c us o nagenc y o utp uts , no to n p o lic y o utc o m es- C o ns id erab letrans ac tio n c o s ts- D is c o nnec teds ingle p o lic yc ap ac ities- P ervers io ns o fP M S : "G am ing" , . . .
C
(1)
P R O B L E M S O L U T IO N N E W S O L U T IO N
(2)
S O L U T IO N = P R O B L E M
(3)
-H : p urerec entralis atio nM : p rivate
m o no p o liesN : s ym b o lic p o lic y,
w eak netw o rks- A ud it-T s unam i- N ew p erfo rm anc etriggered R ed T ap e- Es tab lis h d is trus tw ithin the p ub lics ec to r
S O L U T IO N = P R O B L E M
1.Trajectories of reformP erc eived lac k o f:
- P erfo rm anc e- R es p o ns ib ility- A c c o untab ility- T rans p arenc y- C o ntro l- P o lic y c ap ac ityto guarantee res ults- . . .
A
- C reatio n o fagenc ies- M o re auto no m y- M o res p ec ialis atio n- Inc reas e o f s inglep o lic y c ap ac ities- P erfo rm anc eM eas urem entS ys tem s (P M S )- . . .
B
- N ew / renew edc o -o rd inatio n
H T MM T MN T M
- G uaranteeeffec tive p o lic yc ap ac ity- A ud it C ap ac ityinc reas ed
D
- D ys func tio nalauto no m y- C entrifugalagenc ies- S ub o p tial fo c us o nagenc y o utp uts , no to n p o lic y o utc o m es- C o ns id erab letrans ac tio n c o s ts- D is c o nnec teds ingle p o lic yc ap ac ities- P ervers io ns o fP M S : "G am ing" , . . .
C
(1)
P R O B L E M S O L U T IO N N E W S O L U T IO N
(2)
S O L U T IO N = P R O B L E M
(3)
N E W S O L U T IO N ?
-H : p urerec entralis atio nM : p rivate
m o no p o liesN : s ym b o lic p o lic y,
w eak netw o rks- A ud it-T s unam i- N ew p erfo rm anc etriggered R ed T ap e- Es tab lis h d is trus tw ithin the p ub lics ec to r
- R e-es tab lis h T rus t- R e-eq uilib rateT rus t andP erfo rm anc e- P erfo rm anc ego vernanc e- . . .
S O L U T IO N = P R O B L E M N E W P R O B L E M ?
2.Pressure for performance
I II
III IV
1
32
-- ++
internalpressure
externalpressure
--
++
2.Pressure for performance
Policy development&
internal ex anteevaluation
externalex ante
evaluation
decision
externalex post
evaluation
internalex post
evaluation
monitoring & controlstrategy - finance - personnel - organization - communication
Input OutputActivity
Objectives
Effect
Needs
Trust
7
6
5
4
321
Environment
2. Pressure for performance: Trust as ‘Income’
T R U S T IN P U T A C T IV IT Y O U T P U T O U T C O M E
2.Pressure for performance: Trust as cause and effect
T R U S T
O U T C O M E IN P U T
A C T IV IT YO U T P U T
Integrating micro-meso-macro
performance frameworks
Macro-level
Meso-level
Micro-level
Input Activity Output Effect/Outcome Trust
Input Activity Output Effect/Outcome Trust
Input Activity Output Effect/Outcome Trust
2.Pressure for performance
• Performance administration
• Managements of performances
• Performance management
• Performance governance
3.Specialisation for performance
I II
III IV
1
3
2
high le ve l o fo rganizat io nalpro l i f e rat io n
lo w le ve l o fc o o rdinat io nand c o ns o l idat io n
lo w le ve l o fo rganizat io nalpro l i f e rat io n
high le ve l o fc o o rdinat io nand c o ns o l idat io n
3.Specialisation for performance
c o n s o lid a tio n
o r g . p r o lif e r a tio n
N e w Z e a la nd
1
2
3
4.Participation for performance
Co-Quality Model (CQM)
• Co-design
• Co-decide
• Co-implement
• Co-evaluatie
5.General trajectories and next steps
Typologies:
Maintain, Modernise, Marketise, Minimise
Models:
New Public Management, Neo-Weberian State, New Public Governance
Is it possible to reform?
• Pollitt: SSS: Slogans, Short Term, Savings
• Research of COCOPS: little evidence, many perceptions
• Crisis versus reform
5.General trajectories and next steps
• Rebuild trust within the public sector• Rebalance trust based and performance based
control systems• Renew co-ordination (smart hierarchies, citizen
focused markets, sustainable networks)• Use a Performance Governance framework• Build societal consensus for reform• Add a meso focus (policy) to the micro focus
(organisation)• Anticipate problems caused by ‘solutions’
References• Verhoest Koen, Van Thiel Sandra, Bouckaert Geert, Laegreid Per (Eds) (2012)
Government Agencies: Practices and Lessons from 30 Countries. Palgrave McMillan, Basingstoke, 474 p.
• Pollitt Christopher, Bouckaert Geert (2011, 3d expanded ed.) Public Management Reform, A Comparative Analysis - NPM, Governance and the Neo-Weberian State. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 367 p.
• Bouckaert Geert, Peters B. Guy, Verhoest Koen (2010) The Coordination of Public Sector Organisations. Palgrave McMillan,Basingstoke, 311 p.
• Van Dooren Wouter, Geert Bouckaert, John Halligan (2010) Performance Management in the Public Sector. Routledge: London, pp. 208
• Bouckaert Geert, Peters B. Guy, Verhoest Koen (2010) The Coordination of Public Sector Organisations. Palgrave,Basingstoke, 311 p.
• Pollitt Christopher, Bouckaert Geert (2009) Continuity and Change in Public Policy and Management. E. Elgar, Cheltenham, 223 p.
• Bouckaert Geert, Halligan John (2008) Managing performance, International comparisons. Routledge, London, 440p.
KU Leuven
Public Management InstituteParkstraat 45 bus 3609
B-3000 Leuven
Belgium
0032 16 32 32 70
www.publicmanagement.be
Further information