gauge b-l model with residual z3 symmetry · (dm, dm !light-mediator !sm, sm) is ruled out by the...
TRANSCRIPT
Gauge B−L model with residual Z3 symmetry
Mohammadreza Zakeri
University of California, Riverside
May 16, 2017
2017 International Workshop on Baryon and Lepton Number Violation:From the Cosmos to the LHC
Mohammadreza Zakeri (UCR) PLB 750 (2015) 135138 May 16, 2017 1 / 21
Overview
1 Baryon and Lepton Numbers in the Standard Model
2 Gauge B−L Symmetry
3 Collider Signature
4 Dark Matter
5 SIDM
Mohammadreza Zakeri (UCR) PLB 750 (2015) 135138 May 16, 2017 2 / 21
Baryon and Lepton Numbers in the Standard Model
The Standard Model
Baryon(B) and Lepton(L) numbers are accidental globalsymmetries.
Neutrino oscillations −→ Le, Lµ, Lτ are not conserved.
Lepton number as a global symmetry−→ Majorana neutrino masses: breaks down (−1)L (leptonparity).
B−L is conserved.−→ Promote B−L to a gauge symmetry:
SO(10) grand unification: SU(3)C× SU(2)L× SU(2)R× U(1)B−L.String Theory.
Mohammadreza Zakeri (UCR) PLB 750 (2015) 135138 May 16, 2017 3 / 21
Gauge B−L Symmetry
Conventional Gauge B−L
Anomaly Conditions:∑i∈SM
(B − L)i = +3,∑i∈SM
(B − L)3i = +3 (1)
νR1, νR2, νR3 ∼ −1,−1,−1 (2)
∑i
Li · Φ̃ · vRi =∑i
(νiL, liL) ·(φ0
−φ−)· vRi (3)
Dirac Mass for Neutrinos!
Mohammadreza Zakeri (UCR) PLB 750 (2015) 135138 May 16, 2017 4 / 21
Gauge B−L Symmetry
Gauge B−L with Exotic Charges
Anomaly Conditions:∑i∈SM
(B − L)i = +3,∑i∈SM
(B − L)3i = +3 (4)
νR1, νR2, νR3 ∼ 5,−4,−4 (5)
5− 4− 4 =− 3, (5)3 − (4)3 − (4)3 =− 3. (6)
Mohammadreza Zakeri (UCR) PLB 750 (2015) 135138 May 16, 2017 5 / 21
Gauge B−L Symmetry
Gauge B−L with Exotic Charges
νR1, νR2, νR3 ∼ 5,−4,−4 (7)
Particle B−L
N1,2,3 −1
χ3 3
〈χ3〉 = u3 (8)
νLNRφ0
+NLνR2χ3 +NLνR3χ3 +NLNR ⊂ LYuk (9)
Mohammadreza Zakeri (UCR) PLB 750 (2015) 135138 May 16, 2017 6 / 21
Gauge B−L Symmetry
Neutrino Mass Matrix
νLNRφ0
NLνR2χ3 +NLνR3χ3 NLNR
⇓ ⇓ ⇓M0 M3 MN
MνN =
(0 M0
M3 MN
)(10)
ν̄R1 ·NL · χ23 ⊂ L5 , can be added to generate mass for νR1.
Mohammadreza Zakeri (UCR) PLB 750 (2015) 135138 May 16, 2017 7 / 21
Gauge B−L Symmetry
Dirac Neutrino Mass from Seesaw
MνN =
(0 M0
M3 MN
)(11)
Mν 'M0M−1N M3 (12)
f1 , f2 : Any pair of two neutral fermions with the same chirality.
B− L(f1) + B− L(f2) mod 3 6= 0 (13)
No operator of any dimension for a Majorana mass term whichviolates B−L.
−→ The neutrinos are exactly Dirac.
Mohammadreza Zakeri (UCR) PLB 750 (2015) 135138 May 16, 2017 8 / 21
Gauge B−L Symmetry
New Scalars
NLνR1χ6, χ2NLNL, χ2NRNR, χ32χ6, χ2
3χ6. (14)
〈φ0〉 = v, 〈χ3〉 = u3, 〈χ6〉 = u6 (15)
All neutrinos become massive.
Z3 residual symmetry remains.
All leptons transform as ω = exp(2πi/3) under Z3.
Lepton symmetry which is not Z2 (Majorana ν), nor U(1) or Z4
(Dirac ν).
Z3 is sufficient to guarantee that all the neutrinos remain Dirac.
Mohammadreza Zakeri (UCR) PLB 750 (2015) 135138 May 16, 2017 9 / 21
Collider Signature
Gauge Sector
Br(Z ′ → q+q−) Br(Z ′ → l+l−) Br(Z ′ → νν)
Conventional B−L 1/4 3/8 3/8
This Model 1/18 1/12 5/6
LHC data: 2.5 TeV
Precision e+e− → e+e− measurements at LEP: MZ′/g′ > a few
TeV.
Mohammadreza Zakeri (UCR) PLB 750 (2015) 135138 May 16, 2017 10 / 21
Dark Matter
Stability
χ2 transforms as ω = exp(2πi/3), with no stabilizing symmetry.
Lint =1
2fLχ2NLNL +
1
2fRχ2NRNR +H.c. (16)
χ2
ν̃R
NR
NR
ν̃R
χ2
ν̃L
NL
NL
ν̃L
For mχ = 100 GeV, fL = fR and ζ0 = ζ3 long-lived if:√fζ << 3× 10−11 −→ mN ∼ 1013GeV (17)
Mohammadreza Zakeri (UCR) PLB 750 (2015) 135138 May 16, 2017 11 / 21
Dark Matter
Direct Detection
LUX Constraints:
u,d
χ2χ2
u,d
Z′
u,d
χ∗2χ∗
2
u,d
Z′
0 200 400 600 800 10006
8
10
12
14
16
18
mχ (GeV)
(Mz'
g ')TeV
Mohammadreza Zakeri (UCR) PLB 750 (2015) 135138 May 16, 2017 12 / 21
Dark Matter
Relic Abundance
χ2χ∗2 → Z ′ → SM SM:
χ2
χ∗2
Z ′
SM
SM
P-wave Suppressed!
Mohammadreza Zakeri (UCR) PLB 750 (2015) 135138 May 16, 2017 13 / 21
Dark Matter
Relic Abundance
χ2χ∗2 → h→ SM SM:
χ2
χ∗2
h
SM
SM
In conflict with LUX data!
Mohammadreza Zakeri (UCR) PLB 750 (2015) 135138 May 16, 2017 14 / 21
Dark Matter
Relic Abundance
Assumptions:
mχ2 > mχ3,6 .
hχ2χ∗2 is negligible.
χ2
χ2
χ2
χ2
χ3,6
χ3,6
χ2
χ3,6
χ3,6
χ2
χ2
χ3,6
χ3,6
χ3,6
Mohammadreza Zakeri (UCR) PLB 750 (2015) 135138 May 16, 2017 15 / 21
SIDM
Scalar Sector
Scalar potential: V (Φ, χ2, χ3, χ6).
In general: h mixes with Re(χ3), Re(χ6).
In the decoupling limit:
S =√
2Re(−u3χ3 + 2u6χ6)/√u23 + 4u26, (18)
S′ =√
2Re(2u6χ3 + u3χ6)/√u23 + 4u26, (19)
S is massive ∼ B−L breaking scale.
S′ can be fine tuned to be light ∼ 10 MeV
Mohammadreza Zakeri (UCR) PLB 750 (2015) 135138 May 16, 2017 16 / 21
SIDM
S ′ as a Mediator
S′h mixing is very small ∼ v/u6.S′S′h and S′S′hh can be significant.
Γ(h→ S′S′) =λ206v
2
256πmh=
(λ060.04
)2
0.5 MeV. (20)
Invisible at the LHC because S′ decays slowly to e−e+ (mixingwith h).
mS′ ∼ 10 MeV for SIDM.
Mohammadreza Zakeri (UCR) PLB 750 (2015) 135138 May 16, 2017 17 / 21
SIDM
Constraints on Light Mediators for SIDM
T. Bringmann et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 141802 (2017)
As the Universe cools down:→ DM velocity decreases→ Enhanced DM annihilation→ Changing reionization history→ Distortion of CMB.
(DM, DM → light-mediator → SM, SM) is ruled out by the CMBand indirect detection experiments.−→ Assumption: The final states interact with plasma.
Mohammadreza Zakeri (UCR) PLB 750 (2015) 135138 May 16, 2017 18 / 21
Conclusion
B−L gauge symmetry −→ Z3.
Neutrinos are Dirac fermions via seesaw mechanism.
Complex neutral scalar χ2, transforming as ω = exp(2πi/3):−→ Not absolutely stable (χ2 → ν ν)
Direct-search experiments constrain mZ′/g′ to be very large:
−→ Impossible to discover Z ′ at the LHC.
Relic abundance of χ2 is determined by χ2 → S′S′.−→ S′ as a light mediator for SIDM is ruled out.−→ S′ may subsequently decay to SM.
Mohammadreza Zakeri (UCR) PLB 750 (2015) 135138 May 16, 2017 19 / 21
Thank You!
Mohammadreza Zakeri (UCR) PLB 750 (2015) 135138 May 16, 2017 20 / 21
References
E. Ma, N. Pollard, R. Srivastava, M. Zakeri, Phys. Lett. B 750 (2015) 135138
J.C. Montero, V. Pleitez, Phys. Lett. B 675 (2009) 64.
E. Ma, R. Srivastava, Phys. Lett. B 741 (2015) 217.
LUX collaboration, D. S. Akerib et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116.161301.
L. Feng, S. Profumo, L. Ubaldi, J. High Energy Phys. 1503 (2015) 045.
T. Bringmann, F. Kahlhoefer, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, and P. Walia, Phys. Rev.Lett. 118, 141802 (2017)
Mohammadreza Zakeri (UCR) PLB 750 (2015) 135138 May 16, 2017 21 / 21