gate control ing the cell wall sysn in staph aureus

Upload: mumusuki

Post on 09-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/7/2019 Gate Control Ing the Cell Wall Sysn in Staph Aureus

    1/11

    Molecular Microbiology (2004) 53(4), 12211231 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04200.x

    2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd

    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKMMIMolecular Microbiology0950-382XBlackwell Publishing Ltd, 2004? 200453412211231Original ArticleThe gate controlling cell wall synthesis in Staphylococcus aureusH. Komatsuzawa

    et al.

    Accepted 26 April, 2004. *For correspondence. E-mail [email protected]; Tel. 81 82 257 5637; Fax 81 82 257 5639.

    The gate controlling cell wall synthesis inStaphylococcus aureus

    Hitoshi Komatsuzawa,

    1

    * Tamaki Fujiwara,

    1

    Hiromi Nishi,

    1

    Sakuo Yamada,

    2

    Masaru Ohara,

    1

    Nadine McCallum,

    3

    Brigitte Berger-Bchi

    3

    and

    Motoyuki Sugai

    1

    1

    Department of Bacteriology, Hiroshima University

    Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Kasumi 1-2-3,

    Minami-ku, Hiroshima city, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan.

    2

    Department of Microbiology, Kawasaki Medical School,

    Matsushima Kurashiki, Okayama 701-0192, Japan.

    3

    Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Zrich,

    Gloriastr. 32, CH-8028 Zrich, Switzerland.

    Summary

    Glucosamine-6-P occupies a central position between

    cell wall synthesis and glycolysis. In the initial steps

    leading to peptidoglycan precursor formation glu-

    cosamine-6-P is processed sequentially to UDP-N-

    acetylglucosamine, while to enter the glycolysis

    pathway, glucosamine-6-P is isomerized by NagB to

    fructose-6-P. Although we could not demonstrate

    NagB activity, nagBinactivation significantly reduced

    growth. Mutational analysis showed that NagA was

    involved in glucosamine-6-P formation from N-

    acetylglucosamine-6-P, and GlmS in that from fruc-

    tose-6-P. Inactivation of glmSprevented growth on

    glucose as sole carbon source, which resumed after

    complementation with N-acetylglucosamine. Tran-

    scription of glmSas well as the amount of GlmS was

    reduced in the presence of N-acetylglucosamine.

    This and the preferential incorporation of N-

    acetylglucosamine over glucose into cell wall material

    showed that N-acetylglucosamine was used exclu-

    sively for cell wall synthesis, while glucose served

    both cell wall synthesis and glycolysis. These obser-

    vations suggest furthermore GlmS to be the key and

    only enzyme leading from glucose to cell wall synthe-

    sis in Staphylococcus aureus, and show that thereexists a tight regulation and hierarchy in sugar utili-

    zation. Inactivation of nagA, nagBor glmSaffected

    the susceptibility of S. aureusto cell wall synthesis

    inhibitors, suggesting an interdependence between

    efficiency of cell wall precursor formation and resis-

    tance levels.

    Introduction

    Sugars and/or amino sugars are utilized by bacteria for

    the synthesis of cell surface structures, and as exogenous

    carbon sources for cellular physiology. Amino sugars

    such as glucosamine (GlcN) and N-acetylglucosamine

    (GlcNAc) are essential components of peptidoglycan,

    lipopolysaccharide in Gram-negative bacteria, and lipote-

    ichoic acid in Gram-positive bacteria (Coley et al., 1972;

    Plumbridge et al., 1993; Raetz, 1996). Various different

    sugars are also utilized in cellular metabolic pathways

    such as glycolysis (Plumbridge et al., 1993; Plumbridge

    and Vimr, 1999). In addition, some bacteria utilize sugars

    for capsule or exopolysaccharide production (Rick andSilver, 1996). Therefore, sugars are not only important

    substrates for cell physiology but also for virulence. Trans-

    port of sugars into bacterial cells is mediated by phospho-

    enolpyruvate phosphotransferase systems (PTS) and

    non-PTS, although sugar transport by non-PTS also inter-

    acts with various PTS proteins (Postma et al., 1993;

    Vadeboncoeur and Pelletier, 1997). Several PTS, includ-

    ing some specific for glucose, GlcNAc, N-acetylman-

    nosamine (ManNAc) and N-acetylneuraminic acid

    (NANA), have been reported in different bacteria (Postma

    et al., 1993; Plumbridge and Vimr, 1999) indicating that

    PTS are sugar-specific. Using PTS, sugars are taken upby bacteria in a phosphorylated form, then processed and

    modified before entering metabolic pathways.

    It is known that GlcN-6 phosphate (GlcN-6-P), which is

    converted to UDP-GlcNAc by the action of GlmM and then

    GlmU, is an initial precursor for cell wall biosynthesis,

    while fructose-6-P (Fru-6-P) is an initial precursor for gly-

    colysis (Mengin-Lecreulx and Heijenoort, 1994; 1996;

    Gehring et al., 1996; Jolly et al., 1997). GlmS (Fru-6-P

    amidotransferase) catalyses the conversion of Fru-6P to

    GlcN-6-P, while NagB (GlcN-6-P deaminase) catalyses

    the reverse reaction converting GlcN-6-P to Fru-6-P

    (Plumbridge et al., 1993; Plumbridge, 1996; Plumbridge

    and Vimr, 1999). GlcN-6-P can also be derived from

    GlcNAc-6-P by NagA (GlcNAc-6P deacetylase), and in

    Escherichia coliManNAc and NANA can also be con-

    verted to GlcN-6-P via GlcNAc-6P (Plumbridge and Vimr,

    1999). Therefore, NagA, NagB and GlmS play key roles

    in the distribution of sugars to cell wall synthesis and

    glycolysis. As GlmS is the key enzyme responsible for the

    synthesis of GlcN-6-P from Fru-6-P, inhibitors of GlmS

    activity impede cell wall synthesis and have been reported

  • 8/7/2019 Gate Control Ing the Cell Wall Sysn in Staph Aureus

    2/11

    1222

    H. Komatsuzawa

    et al.

    2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd,

    Molecular Microbiology

    ,

    53

    , 12211231

    as antibacterial agents (Bearne, 1996; Chmara

    et al

    .,

    1998; Bearne and Blouin, 2000). In E. coli, the regulation

    of these enzymes is coordinated so that in the presence

    of amino sugars GlmS expression is decreased, while

    NagB and catabolic enzymes are induced (Plumbridge

    et al., 1993; Plumbridge and Vimr, 1999). However, in

    Gram-positive bacteria, the regulation mechanism

    responsible for GlcN-6-P synthesis has not been investi-

    gated, although individual factors have been identified in

    several species.

    In Staphylococcus aureus, several factors associated

    with cell wall synthesis have been identified through the

    studies of methicillin resistance in methicillin-resistant

    Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA), these include the fem

    genes, glmM, fmtA-C, fmhBand others (Berger-Bchi

    et al., 1989; Maidhof et al., 1991; Henze et al., 1993;

    Gustafson et al., 1994; de Lancastre et al., 1994; Jolly

    et al., 1997; Glanzmann et al., 1999; Komatsuzawa et al.,

    2000; 2001). However, factors responsible for GlcN-6-P

    synthesis have not been well characterized, although cor-

    responding genes have been identified in the publishedS. aureusgenome sequences (TIGR: http://www.tigr.org).

    GlmS activity has been reported to be increased in a

    vancomycin-resistant S. aureusin which cell wall thicken-

    ing was observed (Cui et al., 2000), but the precise mech-

    anism of vancomycin resistance in this strain has not been

    established. It is logical, however, that factors affecting the

    distribution of sugars to cell wall synthesis are also likely

    to have an effect on antimicrobial resistance.

    In this study factors responsible for GlcN-6-P synthesis

    in S. aureus, NagA, NagB and GlmS were characterized.

    The association of these factors with methicillin and van-

    comycin resistance in MRSA was also investigated.

    Results

    Effects of GlcNAc on growth characteristics ofnagA-,

    nagB- andglmS-mutants

    To analyse the functions of the enzymes involved in GlcN-

    6-P metabolism, GlcNAc was added to chemically defined

    medium (CDM) medium and the effect on the growth of

    the various mutants and on their gene expression was

    determined. The basic CDM used for growth throughout

    these experiments contained 50 mM glucose. Glucose

    taken up by the PTS appears as Glc-6-P in the cell, which

    is metabolized to Fru-6-P. Fru-6-P can subsequently either

    enter glycolysis or, after conversion by GlmS to GlcN-6-P

    then by GlmM to GlcN-1-P, be used for peptidoglycan

    synthesis (Fig. 1). Glucose alone was found to be

    sufficient to support both glycolysis and peptidoglycan

    synthesis in wild-type S. aureusBB270. The nagA-and

    nagB-mutants grew slower than the wild type on medium

    containing glucose as sole carbon source, whereby nagA

    inactivation reduced the growth rate more markedly than

    nagBinactivation (Fig. 2A). In contrast, the glmSmutant

    was unable to grow on CDM with glucose as the sole

    carbon source, but was able to grow when the medium

    was complemented with GlcNAc (Fig. 2B), suggesting

    that glmSmutants lacked the ability to form cell wall pre-

    cursors from glucose. Adding GlcNAc to CDM had noeffect on the growth rate of the wild-type strain BB270 or

    on its nagBmutant, but reduced the growth rate of the

    nagA mutant.

    Effect of GlcNAc and GlnN on the expression ofNagA,

    NagB andGlmS

    GlcNAc was shown to complement glmSmutants and

    allow them to grow in the presence of glucose. Adding

    GlcNAc to the growth medium of a wild-type strain,

    although not affecting its growth rate, reduced the pro-

    moter activity of glmSby almost half (Fig. 3), thus indicat-ing that GlcNAc is channelled, preferentially over glucose

    into peptidoglycan synthesis. In contrast, GlcN, which was

    not as efficient in restoring the growth of glmSmutants as

    GlcNAc (data not shown), had no effect on glmSexpres-

    sion when added to the wild-type strain (Fig. 3). Neither

    the nagA nor nagBpromoter activities seemed affected

    Fig. 1.

    Proposed pathway for GlcN-6-P synthe-sis in

    S

    .

    aureus

    . The intermediates and genes

    encoding the enzymes involved in the GlcN-6-P synthesis and peptidoglycan synthesis areindicated. Sugars and amino sugars are trans-ported into the cell by phosphotransferase sys-

    tems (PTS) in a phosphorylated form. GlcN,glucosamine; GlcNAc, N-acetylglucosamine.

    http://www.tigr.org/http://www.tigr.org/
  • 8/7/2019 Gate Control Ing the Cell Wall Sysn in Staph Aureus

    3/11

    The gate controlling cell wall synthesis in

    Staphylococcus aureus 1223

    2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd,

    Molecular Microbiology

    ,

    53

    , 12211231

    by adding either GlcNAc or GlcN to the growth medium.

    Western analysis (Fig. 4) of GlmS confirmed that GlcNAc

    reduced the GlmS content of wild-type strain and also that

    of the nagBmutant, whereas it did not affect the GlmS

    content of the nagA mutant, which does not allow further

    GlcNAc-6-P metabolism. Similar transcriptional activities

    as observed in BB270 were also seen in the RN4220

    background (data not shown).

    The effects of various sugars on the glmSpromoter

    activity were analysed in more detail by using a glmS-

    promoterxylE-reporter gene fusion, which was intro-

    duced into the wild type. The repressing effect of GlcNAcaddition on the glmSpromoter activity was concentration-

    dependent, increasing with concentrations above 0.5 mM

    (Fig. 5). Analysis of the effects of various other sugars

    showed that ManNAc and to a slightly lesser extent ManN

    Fig. 2.

    Effect of GlcNAc on the growth of wild type and isogenic

    nagA

    ,

    nagB

    and

    glmS

    mutants. Overnight cultures of the wild type,BB270 (circle),

    nagA

    mutant (square),

    nagB

    mutant (triangle) and

    glmS

    (diamond) were inoculated into fresh chemically definedmedium (CDM), in the absence (A); in the presence (B) of 10 mM

    N

    -

    acetylglucosamine. Growth was monitored by measuring the turbidityat OD

    660 nm

    .

    0.05

    0.1

    1

    5

    0 5 10 15 20

    Time (h)

    B

    0.05

    0.1

    1

    5

    0 5 10 15 20

    OD660nm

    OD660nm

    A

    Fig. 3.

    Activity of

    glmS

    -,

    nagA

    - and

    nagB

    promoters in the presenceof different sugars. Strain BB270, containing the corresponding pro-moter

    xylE

    -reporter gene fusions, was grown in chemically defined

    medium (CDM) alone, or CDM supplemented with either 10 mM GlcNor 10 mM GlcNAc as indicated. Promoter activities of the correspond-

    ing genes, indicated in the last line, represent the results of threeindependent experiments. The bars represent one standard deviation.Differs significantly (*

    P

  • 8/7/2019 Gate Control Ing the Cell Wall Sysn in Staph Aureus

    4/11

    1224 H. Komatsuzawaet al.

    2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Molecular Microbiology, 53, 12211231

    repressed glmStranscription, whereas mannose and fruc-

    tose had no effect. Although GlcN had no visible impact

    on the amount of GlmS by Western blots, a slight

    decrease in the glmSactivity was nevertheless percepti-

    ble (Fig. 5).

    GlmS expression during growth

    When grown in CDM, GlmS was present in constant

    amounts over the entire growth cycle in the wild type, as

    well as in the nagA-and nagB-mutants (Fig. 6). Upon

    addition of GlcNAc the GlmS concentration was drasticallyreduced in both the wild type and the nagBmutant,

    whereas in the nagA mutant it was not affected, corrobo-

    rating the observations made above.

    GlcNAc and glucose incorporation in wild type

    and mutants

    We determined the partitioning of glucose into the total

    bacterial cell versus that incorporated into cell wall mate-

    rial. Total glucose or GlcNAc uptake was gradually

    increased in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 7). After

    50 min from the addition of labelled compound, the ratio

    of labelled glucose or GlcNAc incorporation into cell wallin total cell mass was almost similar. Two hours after

    adding labelled glucose, all label appeared in the total

    bacterial cell mass, of which approximately 60% had been

    incorporated into the cell wall (Fig. 7). In presence of cold

    GlcNAc (10 mM), only half of the glucose was incorpo-

    rated within 2 h into the bacterial cell mass, and a slightly

    smaller proportion of it appeared in the cell wall fraction

    (Figs 7 and 8). GlcNAc in contrast appeared mainly in the

    cell wall fraction which comprised 7080% of the added

    GlcNAc after 2 h growth (Figs 7 and 8). Interestingly the

    percentage of appearance of labelled glucose or GlcNAc

    in the total cell mass preceded its accumulation into the

    cell wall over time.

    The effect of GlcNAc addition on glucose incorporation

    and partitioning into the cell wall was determined in the

    wild type, nagA-, nagB-and glmS-mutants. In nagA-and

    nagB-mutants glucose incorporation was somewhat lower

    than in the wild type, reflecting their slower growth com-

    pared to the parent strain. Addition of GlcNAc reduced

    both total glucose incorporation and the percentage of

    glucose diverted into the cell wall of the wild type and

    nagBmutant. In the nagA mutant there was also less

    glucose incorporated, but interestingly, glucose partition-

    ing into the cell wall was not affected. These observations

    are a logical consequence of our earlier demonstrationthat GlcNAc, while altering the amounts of GlmS pro-

    duced in the wild type and nagBmutant, could not repress

    glmSin the nagA mutant. GlmS thus plays an important

    Fig. 5. Activity of the glmSpromoter in wild-type strain BB270 in the

    presence of different sugars. S. aureuswas grown in various concen-trations of N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), glucosamine (GlcN), N-acetylmannosamine (ManNAc), mannosamine (ManN), mannitol(Man) and fructose (Fru), and the XylE activity of the glmS-promoterxylE-indicator gene fusion was determined. The experiments were

    repeated three times. Bars represent one standard deviation. Differssignificantly (*P< 0.05) from none to GlcNAc, GlcN, ManNAc, ManN,Man or Fru.

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    XylEactivity(mUmg1)

    none

    GlcNAcGlcN

    *

    * *

    *

    ManNManNAc FruMan

    50 5 05 .5 0.05 5555 (mM)

    Fig. 6. Immunoblot analysis of GlmS during growth. Mutants were grown in chemically defined medium (CDM) in the presence and absence ofglucosamine (GlcN) or N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc). Cells were harvested at various growth phases at the OD660 indicated.

    0.5 0.8 1.0 1.5 2.0 (O/N) 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.5 2.0 (O/N)

    +GlcNAcGlcNAc

    wild type

    nagA

    nagB

    OD660nm:

  • 8/7/2019 Gate Control Ing the Cell Wall Sysn in Staph Aureus

    5/11

    The gate controlling cell wall synthesis inStaphylococcus aureus 1225

    2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Molecular Microbiology, 53, 12211231

    role as a gatekeeper of cell wall synthesis, as shown by

    the total lack of cell wall material generated from glucose

    in the glmSmutant, which had to be supplemented with

    GlcNAc for growth (Fig. 8).

    The amount of GlcNAc incorporation in the nagB-and

    glmS-mutants was almost identical to that of the parent.

    Seventy to eighty per cent of GlcNAc taken up by the cell

    was incorporated into the cell wall. In the nagA mutant

    GlcNAc taken up was significantly reduced and not incor-

    porated into the cell wall as expected.

    Similar results were obtained when RN4220 and their

    mutants were used for the same experiments (data not

    shown).

    Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of variousantibiotics innagA-, nagB- andglmS-mutants

    Because the genes described in this study are associated

    with the early stages of cell wall synthesis, the MICs of

    various cell wall synthesis inhibitors were determined for

    nagA-, nagB-and glmS-mutants, derived from the MRSA

    strain BB270 (Table 1). MICs were recorded after 24 h

    and again after 48 h incubations to allow for the slow

    growing mutants. In the parent strain, BB270, the MICs

    for the various antibiotics were almost the same in both

    the presence and absence of GlcNAc, although some

    MICs were lower in presence of GlcNAc. In HK9968 (nagA

    mutant), MICs for methicillin, oxacillin and bacitracin inCDM without GlcNAc were slightly lower than those of the

    parent strain. HK9968 grew very slowly in the presence

    of GlcNAc, however, the MICs measured at 48 h were

    very similar to those obtained from the media without

    GlcNAc. In HK9946 (nagBmutant), the MICs in the

    absence of GlcNAc were similar to those of the parent

    strain, whereas in the presence of GlcNAc, the MICs for

    methicillin, oxacillin and teicoplanin were slightly reduced

    even at 48 h incubation. In HK9972 (glmSmutant), MICs

    could only be determined in the presence of GlcNAc, the

    resulting MICs for methicillin and oxacillin were reduced

    compared to those of the parent strain.

    Discussion

    Sugars, once transported into bacterial cells, can be uti-

    lized in diverse cellular processes. The exact mechanism

    of sugar distribution has, however, not been thoroughly

    investigated, especially in Gram-positive bacteria. In this

    report we firstly demonstrated the utilization of glucose

    and GlcNAc, major carbohydrate moieties, in both cell wall

    synthesis and glycolysis in S. aureus. To further investi-

    gate the metabolism of sugars for cell wall biosynthesis,

    we focused on the three factors NagA, NagB and GlmS,

    associated with the synthesis of GlcN-6-P, a precursor for

    cell wall peptidoglycan synthesis (Plumbridge et al., 1993;

    Plumbridge and Vimr, 1999). Based on the hypothesis

    shown in Fig. 1, we investigated the utilization of glucose

    and GlcNAc in nagA-, nagB-and glmS-inactivated

    mutants. In the nagA mutant, GlcNAc was not incorpo-

    rated into the cell wall, indicating that NagA mediates the

    conversion of GlcNAc-6P to GlcN-6-P. Therefore, once

    GlcNAc entered the cytoplasm of the nagA mutant, it

    Fig. 7. Glucose and N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) incorporation instrain BB270. Radiolabelled glucose or GlcNAc was added to thecells growing in chemically defined medium (CDM). After the time

    indicated, radioactivity incorporated into whole bacterial cells (shad-owed bars), or cell wall (white bars) was determined. The resultsrepresent values obtained from three independent experiments. The

    bars indicate one standard deviation.

    14C-glucose incorporation

    GlcNAc ()100

    80

    60

    40

    20

    0Relativetothem

    aximumradioactivity(%)

    14C-glucose incorporation

    GlcNAc (+)100

    80

    60

    40

    20

    0Relativetothema

    ximumradioactivity(%)

    3H-GlcNAc incorporation

    GlcNAc (+)

    Time (min)

    100

    80

    60

    40

    20

    2010 30 40 50 60 90 120

    0Relativetothemaximumradioactivity(%)

  • 8/7/2019 Gate Control Ing the Cell Wall Sysn in Staph Aureus

    6/11

    1226 H. Komatsuzawaet al.

    2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Molecular Microbiology, 53, 12211231

    could not be utilized for either glycolysis or cell wall syn-

    thesis, leading to GlcNAc-6-P accumulation within the

    cells. This is likely to account for the poor growth of the

    nagA mutant on GlcNAc, as it is known that accumulationof sugar-6-phosphates inhibits growth (Kadner et al.,

    1992). GlcNAc was exclusively incorporated into the cell

    wall in the wild type, nagB-and glmS-mutants (Fig. 8).

    These results suggested that GlcNAc is primarily used for

    the cell wall biosynthesis in S. aureus. These results also

    implied that nagBdoes not convert GlcN-6-P to Fru-6-P

    in the presence of exogenous GlcNAc.

    GlmS expression in the nagA mutant was not inhibited

    by the presence of GlcNAc (Figs 3 and 4). The nagA

    mutant did not allow GlcNAc-6-P metabolism, suggesting

    that glmSpromoter activity and thus the GlmS content of

    the cells may be regulated by the GlcN-6-P content of thecells, although this postulated signal is apparently not

    triggered by GlcN as efficiently as by GlcNAc. The GlcN

    uptake system or GlcN metabolism may be different from

    that of GlcNAc. Although the gross uptake of glucose was

    reduced in the nagA mutant, the incorporation ratio of

    glucose into the cell wall did not decrease correspond-

    ingly. This probably resulted in a decreased supply of

    glucose for glycolysis. This sugar depletion in the glycol-

    ysis pathway may also have contributed to the decreased

    growth rate of the nagA mutant in the presence of GlcNAc.

    In the glmSmutant, glucose could not be used for cell wallsynthesis, hence the glmSmutant could not grow in CDM

    containing glucose as a sole carbon source. GlmS expres-

    sion was suppressed by the addition of GlcNAc, which is

    preferentially used for cell wall synthesis, indicating that

    GlmS is a key factor in the distribution of glucose, via Fru-

    6P, to glycolysis and cell wall biosynthesis.

    We also investigated the effect of various sugars on

    GlmS expression (Fig. 5) and demonstrated that some

    sugars (ManNAc and mannosamine) also suppressed the

    GlmS expression, while others (fructose and mannitol) did

    not. These results indicate that S. aureusis able to dis-

    tribute the utilization of various sugars for cell wall synthe-sis and glycolysis. In the nagBmutant there was a

    decrease in total glucose uptake in both the presence and

    absence of GlcNAc, while GlcNAc uptake was not altered.

    These results support the hypothesis proposed for

    GlcN-6-P synthesis in Fig. 1. This is the first system pro-

    posed, in Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria, that

    describes the overall utilization of glucose and GlcNAc,

    Table 1. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of various antibiotics of nagA-, nagB- and glmS-mutants.

    Strain

    GlcNAc

    (mM)

    Oxacillin Methicillin Teicoplanin Vancomycin Fosfomycin

    24 h 48 h 24 h 48 h 24 h 48 h 24 h 48 h 24 h 48 h

    BB270 010

    25632

    512512

    51264

    512512

    0.50.03

    0.50.25

    0.50.25

    10.5

    3216

    6464

    HK9968 (nagA) 010

    128

  • 8/7/2019 Gate Control Ing the Cell Wall Sysn in Staph Aureus

    7/11

    The gate controlling cell wall synthesis inStaphylococcus aureus 1227

    2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Molecular Microbiology, 53, 12211231

    for glycolysis and cell wall synthesis (Plumbridge et al.,

    1993; Plumbridge and Vimr, 1999). Our results indicate

    that the utilization of glucose and GlcNAc is tightly con-

    trolled in S. aureus, and that glmSplays a key role in the

    distribution of sugars to the different pathways.

    The disturbance of sugar distribution by inactivation of

    nagA, nagB, or glmSaffected the antibiotic susceptibilities

    of MRSA (Table 1), and to a lesser extent methicillin-

    sensitive S. aureus(MSSA) (data not shown), to various

    cell wall synthesis inhibitors. Notably, the MRSA, BB270-

    derived mutants showed a reduction in MICs to b-lactam

    antibiotics, compared to those of the MSSA strain. After

    24 h incubation, a significant reduction in the MICs of

    various antibiotics was observed, while after 48 h, the

    MICs of some antibiotics were increased, suggesting that

    growth rate of the mutants was significantly reduced by

    the addition of cell wall inhibitors.

    The findings in this study provide further knowledge

    on S. aureuscell physiology, especially in relation to

    sugar metabolism. The impact of nagA-, nagB- and

    glmS-inactivation on antibiotic susceptibilities, cell growthand cell survival, suggests that these factors are key

    roles for sugar distribution, providing sugars to cell wall

    or glycolysis.

    Experimental procedures

    Bacterial strains and plasmids

    E. coliand S. aureuswere grown in LuriaBertani (LB) broth

    and Trypticase soy broth (TSB), respectively. When neces-

    sary, ampicillin (Ap, 100 mg ml-1), chloramphenicol (Cp,

    10 mg ml-1) or tetracycline (Tc, 3 mg ml-1) was added to the

    medium. Antibiotics were purchased from Sigma ChemicalCo., St. Louis, MO.

    Chemically defined medium (CDM)

    CDM for S. aureus(Hassain et al., 1992) consisted of the

    following five solutions: Solution 1:20.1 g of Na2HPO4-12H2O;

    3 g of KH2PO4; 150 mg of L-aspartic acid, L-gultamic acid, L-

    isoleucine, L-leucine, L-proline, L-threonine and L-valine;

    100 mg of L-alanine, L-arginine, glycine, L-histidine, L-lysine,

    L-methionine, L-phenylalanine, L-serine, L-tryptophan and L-

    tyrosine; 50 mg of L-cystine; dissolved in 700 ml of distilled

    water and adjusted to pH 7.2. Solution 2: 0.1 mg of biotin,

    2 mg of nicotinic acid, 2 mg of D-pantothenic acid, 4 mg of

    pyridoxal, 4 mg of pyridoxamine dihydrochloride, 2 mg of

    riboflavin, 2 mg of thiamin hydrochloride, dissolved in 100 ml

    of distilled water. Solution 3: 20 mg of adenine sulphate and

    20 mg of guanine hydrochloride, dissolved in 0.1 M HCl and

    made up to 50 ml with distilled water. Solution 4: 10 mg of

    CaCl2-6H2O, 5 mg of MnSO4 and 3 mg of (NH4)2SO4-FeSO4-

    6H2O, dissolved in 10 ml of 0.1 M HCl. Solution 5: 10 g of

    glucose and 500 mg of MgSO4-7H2O, dissolved in 100 ml of

    distilled water. Solutions 14 were mixed and the volume

    adjusted to 900 ml with distilled water. This mixed solution

    and Solution 5 were autoclaved separately, then mixed. When

    stated, GlcNAc and GlcN were added to CDM at final con-

    centration of 10 mM.

    DNA manipulations

    Routine DNA manipulations, Southern blotting and hybridiza-

    tion were performed according to standard protocols (Sam-

    brook et al., 1989). DNA sequencing was performed as

    previously described (Komatsuzawa et al., 2000). Poly-

    merase chain reaction (PCR) reagents were from Boehringer

    Mannheim, and PCR was performed with the GeneAmp PCR

    System 2400 (Perkin Elmer). Primers used in this study are

    listed in Table 2.

    Identification ofnagA, nagB, glmS genes

    The DNA sequences of genes encoding putative NagA,NagB, and GlmS of S. aureuswere obtained from the public

    database (TIGR: http//http://www.tigr.org) by homology

    searches, using the respective amino acid sequences from

    E. coli. Based on the DNA sequences, primers were con-

    structed to amplify the genes of interest using chromosomal

    DNA from S. aureusCOL. PCR fragments were cloned into

    pGEM-T easy vector (Promega, Tokyo, Japan) to generate

    pHK4435, pHK4445 and pHK4506 (Table 3). The DNA

    sequences from both strands of the cloned fragments were

    then confirmed.

    Construction of recombinant proteins

    Recombinant proteins of NagA, NagB and GlmS were

    expressed as FLAG-tagged proteins (NagA and GlmS) or as

    a His-tagged protein (NagB). Primers used in this study are

    listed in Table 2. DNA fragments encoding the protein, ampli-

    fied with NagA-5 and NagA-6 for nagA, GlmS-3 and GlmS-4

    for glmS, NagB-2 and NagB-3 for nagB, were cloned into

    pGEM-T easy vector to generate pHK4454, pHK4456 and

    pHK4505, respectively. DNA fragments were then ligated into

    the pFLAG MAC vector (Eastman Kodak Company, New

    Haven, CT) or pQE30 vector (QIAGEN, Tokyo, Japan) to

    generate pHK4466 (nagA), pHK4467 (glmS) and pHK4508

    Table 2. Primers used in this study.

    sNagA-5 aaa agc tta tgg atg ggt cat acg atsNagA-6 atg aat tca tga tta ttt att agc taNagA-7 gga tcc ttc att acc ttt cat acgNagA-8 cgt gtt aac ggt agc ttaNagA-9 tta agc tta tcg tat gac cca tcc atNagB-1 tta cca cct agt ttg tNagB-2 tgg agc tca ttg gcg tac cga ttt ctNagB-3 tgg gat cca tga aag tat taa act ta

    NagB-4 aag ctt aaa cgg cgt acc aggNagB-5 ttg gat cct gta tta aat ttg tgg agNagB-6 gga agc ttc att gtt tac atgFg-1 tta aat aaa gtg tca tcaFg-2 gta aaa ttg ttc cat ccasGlms-3 ata agc tta tgg agg aaa atg tcg ttsGlms-4 tcg aat tca gtg aat tat tcc aca gtGlms-8 gga tcc tag ctt gta cct gct gcGlms-10 ggg gat ccc gac gac caa ttc cGlms-11 gga agc ttc ata ttg gaa tag

    http://www.tigr.org/http://www.tigr.org/
  • 8/7/2019 Gate Control Ing the Cell Wall Sysn in Staph Aureus

    8/11

  • 8/7/2019 Gate Control Ing the Cell Wall Sysn in Staph Aureus

    9/11

    The gate controlling cell wall synthesis inStaphylococcus aureus 1229

    2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Molecular Microbiology, 53, 12211231

    samples were then prepared with the method described

    above.

    Analysis of promoter activities ofnagA, nagB andglmS

    using thexylE-reporter gene

    The putative promoter regions of nagA, nagBand glmS were

    ligated into the xylEtranscriptional fusion vector pSL24

    (Komatsuzawa et al., 1999b). DNA fragments containing the

    putative promoter regions were amplified with primers gen-

    erating BamHI and HindIII restriction sites at the ends, frag-

    ments were then digested and cloned into the pGEM-T easy

    vector. The fragments were checked by DNA sequencing

    before being excised from the plasmids and ligated into

    pSL24 to generate pHK4528 (glmS), pHK4529 (nagB), and

    pHK4563 (nagA). The recombinant plasmids were then elec-

    troporated into S. aureusRN4220 to generate HK9918

    (glmS), HK9920 (nagB) and HK9985 (nagA). Each plasmid

    was then transduced into strain BB270 by phage 80alpha to

    generate HK10041 (glmS), HK10043 (nagA) and HK10042

    (nagB). Strains were grown in CDM supplemented with var-

    ious sugars, GlcNAc (0.0550 mM), GlcN (5, 10 mM), Man-

    NAc (5 mM), mannosamine (ManN; 5 mM), mannitol (Man;5 mM) and fructose (Fru; 5 mM) as indicated. Cells were

    harvested at OD660 nm= 1.0, and whole cell lysates were pre-

    pared as previously described (Komatsuzawa et al., 1999b).

    The Catechol 2,3-dideoxygenase assay was performed as

    previously described (Komatsuzawa et al., 1999b).

    Generation ofnagA, nagB andglmS mutants by

    Campbell-type integration

    Mutants were constructed by Campbell-type integration.

    Briefly, DNA fragments containing internal regions of each

    open reading frame (ORF) were amplified and cloned into

    the pGEM-T easy vector. DNA fragments were then excisedand ligated into the pCL52.1 vector (Komatsuzawa et al.,

    1999b), a vector with an S. aureustemperature-sensitive

    origin of replication, which can replicate at 30 C but not at

    42C. Resulting plasmids were then electroporated into S.

    aureusRN4220, and then each plasmid was transduced into

    BB270 by phage 80alpha (Komatsuzawa et al., 1999a).

    Obtaining bacteria (RN4220 and BB270 derivatives) were

    grown at 30C with Tc (10 mg ml-1) to an OD660 nm of 0.2, then

    incubated at 42C overnight. A small sample of the culture

    at 42C was inoculated into fresh TSB containing Tc

    (10 mg ml-1), and incubated at 42C overnight. The appropri-

    ate dilutions of the cultures were plated on TS agar plates

    containing Tc (10 mg ml-1) and incubated at 42C overnight.

    Ten colonies from each electroporation were selected andreplated on TS agar containing Tc. The disruption of the

    target genes was confirmed by PCR. In some experiments,

    Western blot analysis was also performed to confirm the

    absence of functional protein.

    Growth rate of the mutants

    Overnight cultures of the mutants, grown in CDM, were har-

    vested and then washed once with CDM. Aliquots of this

    suspension (1 108 cells) were then used to inoculated 10 ml

    of CDM broths with or without GlcNAc (10 mM). The growth

    was monitored by the measurement of the turbidity at

    OD660 nm.

    Incorporation of glucose and GlcNAc by mutants

    Overnight cultures of the mutants grown in CDM were used

    to inoculate fresh CDM with or without GlcNAc (10 mM).Cultures were then incubated at 37C. When the OD660 nmreached 0.4, 3 ml of 14C-glucose (200 mCi ml-1) or 4 ml of 3H-

    GlcNAc (1 mCi ml-1) was added. Two samples were then

    taken from each of the cultures. One of the samples was

    centrifuged; the cell pellet was washed twice with PBS, and

    then suspended in PBS. The radioactivity of the cell suspen-

    sion was measured to determine the incorporation of the

    sugar into the whole cells. The second sample was centri-

    fuged and the pellet was resuspended with digestion buffer

    [30% raffinose in 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5) with 0.145 M NaCl]

    containing 200 mg ml-1 lysostaphin (Sigma Chemical Co., St.

    Louis, MO, USA), 10 mg ml-1 of DNase I (Sigma Chemical

    Co.) and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (1 mM). The cell sus-

    pension was incubated at 37C for 30 min to promote proto-plast formation. The protoplasts were then removed by

    centrifugation at 3000 gfor 10 min, and the supernatant was

    collected. The radioactivity of the supernatant was measured

    to determine sugar incorporation into the cell wall.

    MIC testing

    MICs of various antibiotics were determined by the microdi-

    lution method as described elsewhere (Komatsuzawa et al.,

    2000).

    Acknowledgements

    This work was supported by a grant-in-aid for scientific

    research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and

    Culture of Japan (14570238). N.M. is supported by the Swiss

    National Science Foundation Grant No. NRP4049-06321 to

    B.B.-B.

    References

    Bearne, S.L. (1996) Active site-directed inactivation of

    Escherichia coliglucosamine-6-phosphate synthase. J Biol

    Chem271: 30523057.

    Bearne, S.L., and Blouin, C. (2000) Inhibition of Escherichia

    coliglucosamine-6-phosphate synthase by reactive inter-

    mediate analogues. J Biol Chem275: 135140.

    Berger-Bchi, B., Barberis-Maino, L., Strssle, A., and Kay-

    ser, F.H. (1989) FemA, a host-mediated factor essential for

    methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: molecular

    cloning and characterization. Mol Gen Genet219: 263

    269.

    Berger-Bchi, B., and Kohler, M.L. (1983) A novel site on the

    chromosome of Staphylococcus aureusinfluencing the

    level of methicillin resistance: genetic mapping. FEMS

    Microbiol Lett20: 305309.

  • 8/7/2019 Gate Control Ing the Cell Wall Sysn in Staph Aureus

    10/11

    1230 H. Komatsuzawaet al.

    2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Molecular Microbiology, 53, 12211231

    Chmara, H., Milewski, S., Andruszkiewicz, R., Mignini, F.,

    and Borowski, E. (1998) Antibacterial action of dipeptides

    containing an inhibitor of glucosamine-6-phosphate

    isomerase. Microbiology144: 13491358.

    Coley, J., Duckworth, M., and Baddiley, J. (1972) The

    occurence of lipoteichoic acids in the membranes of Gram-

    positive bacteria. J Gen Microbiol73: 587591.

    Cui, L., Murakami, H., Kuwahara-Arai, K., Hanaki, H., and

    Hiramatsu, K. (2000) Contribution of a thickened cell wall

    and its glutamine nonamidated component to the vanco-

    mycin resistance expressed by Staphylococcus aureus

    Mu50. Antimicrob Agents Chemother44: 22762285.

    de Lancastre, H., de Jonge, B.L.M., Matthews, P.M., and

    Tomasz, A. (1994) Molecular aspects of methicillin resis-

    tance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother

    33: 724.

    Gehring, A.M., Lees, W.J., Mindiola, D.J., Walsh, C.T., and

    Brown, E.D. (1996) Acetyltransfer precedes uridylyltransfer

    in the formation of UDP-N-acetylglucosamine in separable

    active sites of the bifunctional GlmU protein of Escherichia

    coli. Biochemistry35: 579585.

    Glanzmann, P., Gustafson, J., Komatsuzawa, H., Ohta, K.,

    and Berger-Bchi, B. (1999) glmM operon and methicillin-

    resistantglmM suppressor mutants inStaphylococcusaureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother43: 240245.

    Gustafson, J., Strasse, A., Hachler, H., Kayser, F.H., and

    Berger-Bchi, B. (1994) The femClocus of Staphylococ-

    cus aureusrequired for methicillin resistance includes the

    glutamine synthetase operon. J Bacteriol176: 1460

    1467.

    Hassain, M., Wilcox, M.H., White, P.J., Faulkner, M.K., and

    Spencer, R.C. (1992) Importance of medium and atmo-

    sphere type to both slime production and adherence by

    coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Hosp Infect20: 173

    184.

    Henze, U., Sidow, T., Wecke, J., Labischinski, H., and

    Berger-Bchi, B. (1993) Influence of femBon methicillin

    resistance and peptidoglycan metabolism in Staphylococ-cus aureus. J Bacteriol175: 16121620.

    Jolly, L., Wu, S., van Heijenoort, J., de Lencastre, H., Mengin-

    Lecreulx, D., and Tomasz, A. (1997) The femR315 gene

    from Staphylococcus aureus, the interruption of which

    results in reduced methicillin resistance, encodes a phos-

    phoglucosamine mutase. J Bacteriol179: 53215325.

    Kadner, R.J., Murphy, G.P., and Stephens, C.M. (1992) Two

    mechanisms for growth inhibition by elevated transport of

    sugar phosphates in Escherichia coli. J Gen Microbiol138:

    20072014.

    Komatsuzawa, H., Choi, G.H., Ohta, K., Sugai, M., Tran,

    M.T., and Suginaka, H. (1999a) Cloning and characteriza-

    tion of a gene, pbpF, encoding a new penicillin-binding

    protein, PBP2B, in Staphylococcus aureus. AntimicrobAgents Chemother43: 15781583.

    Komatsuzawa, H., Ohta, K., Fujiwara, T., Choi, G.H.,

    Labischinski, H., and Sugai, M. (2001) Cloning and

    sequencing of the gene, fmtC, which affects oxacillin resis-

    tance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

    FEMS Microbiol Lett203: 4954.

    Komatsuzawa, H., Ohta, K., Labischinski, H., Sugai, M., and

    Suginaka, H. (1999b) Characteriaztion of fmtA, a gene that

    modulates the expression of methicillin resistance in Sta-

    phylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother43:

    21212125.

    Komatsuzawa, H., Ohta, K., Sugai, M., Fujiwara, T., Glan-

    zmann, P., Berger-Bchi, B., and Suginaka, H. (2000)

    Tn551-mediated insertional inactivation of the fmtBgene

    encoding a cell wall-associated protein abolishes methicil-

    lin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob

    Chemother45: 421431.

    Kreiswirth, B., Lofdahl, S., Betley, M., OReilly, M., Schlievert,

    P., Bergdoll, M., and Novick, R. (1983) The toxic shock

    syndrome exotoxin structural gene is not detectably trans-

    mitted by a prophage. Nature305: 709712.

    Maidhof, H., Reinicke, B., Blmel, P., and Berger-Bchi, B.

    (1991) femA, which encodes a factor essential for expres-

    sion of methicillin resistance, affects glycine content of

    peptidoglycan in methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sus-

    cetible Staphylococcus aureusstrains. J Bacteriol173:

    35073513.

    Mengin-Lecreulx, D., and van Heijenoort, J. (1994) Copurifi-

    cation of glucosamine-1-phosphate acetyltransferase and

    N-acetylglucosamine-1-phosphate uridyltransferase activi-

    ties of Escherichia coli: characterization of the glmUgene

    product as a bifunctional enzyme catalyzing two subse-

    quent steps in the pathway for UDP-N-acetylglucosaminesynthesis. J Bacteriol176: 57885795.

    Mengin-Lecreulx, D., and van Heijenoort, J. (1996) Charac-

    terization of the essential gene glmMencoding phospho-

    glucosamine mutase in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem271:

    3239.

    Plumbridge, J. (1996) How to achieve constitutive expression

    of a gene within an inducible operon: the example of the

    nagCgene of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol178: 2629

    2636.

    Plumbridge, J., Cochet, O., Souza, J.M., Altamirano, M.M.,

    Calcagno, M.L., and Badet, B. (1993) Coordinated regu-

    lation of amino sugar-synthesizing and -degrading

    enzymes in Escherichia coliK-12. J Bacteriol175: 4951

    4956.Plumbridge, J., and Vimr, E. (1999) Convergent pathways for

    utilization of the amino sugars N-acetylglucosamine, N-

    acetylmannosamine, and N-acetylneuraminic acid by

    Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol181: 4754.

    Postma, P.W., Lengeler, J.W., and Jacobson, G.R. (1993)

    Phosphoenolpyruvate: carbohydrate phosphotransferase

    systems of bacteria. Microbiol Rev57: 543594.

    Raetz, C.R.H. (1996) Bacterial lipopolysaccharides; a

    remarkable family of bioactive macroamphiphiles. In

    Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular

    Biology, 2nd edn. Neidhardt, F.C., Curtiss, R., III,

    Ingraham, J.L. Lin, E.C.C., Low, K.B., Magasanik, B.,

    et al. (eds). Washington, D.C.: ASM Press, pp. 1035

    1063.Rick, P.D., and Silver, R.P. (1996) Enterobacterial common

    antigen and capsular polysaccharides. In Escherichia coli

    and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology, 2nd edn.

    Neidhardt, F.C., Curtiss, R., III, Ingraham, J.L., Lin, E.C.C.,

    Low, K.B., Magasanik, B., et al. (eds). Washington, D.C.:

    ASM Press, pp. 104122.

    Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecu-

    lar Cloning: A Laboratory Mannual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring

    Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

  • 8/7/2019 Gate Control Ing the Cell Wall Sysn in Staph Aureus

    11/11