gaps in coast guard response trish green. overview project goal background objectives methods...

21
Gaps in Coast Guard Gaps in Coast Guard Response Response Trish Green

Upload: vivien-harrison

Post on 16-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Gaps in Coast Guard Response Trish Green. Overview Project Goal Background Objectives Methods Expected Results

Gaps in Coast Guard Gaps in Coast Guard ResponseResponse

Trish Green

Page 2: Gaps in Coast Guard Response Trish Green. Overview Project Goal Background Objectives Methods Expected Results

OverviewOverview

Project GoalBackgroundObjectivesMethods

Expected Results

Page 3: Gaps in Coast Guard Response Trish Green. Overview Project Goal Background Objectives Methods Expected Results

Project GoalProject Goal

Determine areas where the Coast Guard lacks reasonable response times.

Page 4: Gaps in Coast Guard Response Trish Green. Overview Project Goal Background Objectives Methods Expected Results

Coast Coast Guard Guard AORsAORs

Page 5: Gaps in Coast Guard Response Trish Green. Overview Project Goal Background Objectives Methods Expected Results

Coast Guard MissionCoast Guard Mission

Page 6: Gaps in Coast Guard Response Trish Green. Overview Project Goal Background Objectives Methods Expected Results

Past StudiesPast Studies•Lake County parcel map for Fire Rescue Response• Iowa pre-deploying emergency vehicles in areas of high accident density. •Netherlands study to determine if the area was effectively covered by fire stations and where fire stations should be located to provide better coverage if gaps existed•Emergency response in the Gulf of Finland.

Page 7: Gaps in Coast Guard Response Trish Green. Overview Project Goal Background Objectives Methods Expected Results

ObjectivesObjectives•Determine exact location of Coast Guard Assets •Create layer of Coast Guard Asset locations•Determine range/endurance of assets•Determine areas that no assets can reach within 6 hrs•Analyze results and make recommendation on where assets should be home ported and deployed to

Page 8: Gaps in Coast Guard Response Trish Green. Overview Project Goal Background Objectives Methods Expected Results

Project InformationProject Information

• Cutter response time 6 hrs• Aircraft response before BINGO• Response times are calculated from homeports• All calculations have Aircraft flying to and from same Air Station • Cutter Characteristics taken from Register of Cutters• Aircraft Characteristics taken from U.S. Coast Guard Addendum to the

US National Search and Rescue Supplement (COMDINST M16130.2F)

Page 9: Gaps in Coast Guard Response Trish Green. Overview Project Goal Background Objectives Methods Expected Results

Asset Summary Asset Summary

Page 10: Gaps in Coast Guard Response Trish Green. Overview Project Goal Background Objectives Methods Expected Results

Asset Summary Asset Summary

Page 11: Gaps in Coast Guard Response Trish Green. Overview Project Goal Background Objectives Methods Expected Results

Compile Asset DataCompile Asset Data

Create Create ShapefilesShapefiles

Compile data Compile data in Excelin Excel

Import Import datadata

Page 12: Gaps in Coast Guard Response Trish Green. Overview Project Goal Background Objectives Methods Expected Results

National Security Cutter Name Location LAT LONG

Max Range (nm)

Max Speed (kts) Time (hrs)

Distance (nm)

BERTHOLF Alameda, CA 37.781001 -122.252587 12000 28 6 168

WAESCHE Alameda, CA 37.780094 -122.249959 12000 28 6 168

STRATTON Alameda, CA 37.779365 -122.248532 12000 28 6 168

High Endurance Cutter Name Location LAT LONG Max Range Max Speed Time Distance

BOUTWELL San Diego, CA 32.681167 -117.127 14000 29 6 174

MELLON Seattle, WA 14000 29 6 174

MIDGETT Seattle, WA 14000 29 6 174

MORGENTHAU Honolulu, HI 14000 29 6 174

MUNRO Kodiak, AK 14000 29 6 174

SHERMAN Honolulu, HI 14000 29 6 174

Medium Endurance Cutter Name Location LAT LONG Max Range Max Speed Time Distance

ACTIVE Port Angeles, WA 6100 18 6 108

ALERT Warrenton, CA 46.19244 -123.820958 6100 18 6 108

STEADFAST Warrenton, CA 6100 18 6 108

Page 13: Gaps in Coast Guard Response Trish Green. Overview Project Goal Background Objectives Methods Expected Results

Patrol Boats (110) Name Location LAT LONG Max Range Max Speed Time DistanceCUTTYHUNK (WPB-110) Port Angeles, CA 48.139639 -123.413278 3300 29.5 6 177ORCAS (WPB-110) Coos Bay, OR 43.37983 -124.21695 3300 29.5 6 177Galveston Island (WPB-110) Honolulu, HI 3300 29.5 6 177KISKA (WPB-110) Hilo, HI 19.731467 -155.053067 3300 29.5 6 177

WASHINGTON (WPB-110) Apra Harbor, Guam 3300 29.5 6 177

ASSATEAGUE (WPB-110) Apra Harbor, Guam 3300 29.5 6 177LONG ISLAND (WPB-110) Valdez, AK 61.125433 -146.352083 3300 29.5 6 177ROANOKE ISLAND (WPB-110) Homer, AK 3300 29.5 6 177MUSTANG (WPB-110) Seward, AK 60.1185 -149.434833 3300 29.5 6 177LIBERTY (WPB-110) Auke Bay, AK 58.398333 -134.648333 3300 29.5 6 177ANACAPA (WPB-110) Petersburg, AK 3300 29.5 6 177NAUSHON (WPB-110) Ketchikan, AK 3300 29.5 6 177CHANDELEUR (WPB-110) Ketchikan, AK 55.3313 131.6245333 3300 29.5 6 177

Patrol Boats (87) Name Location LAT LONG Max Range Max Speed Time DistanceDORADO (WPB-87) Cresent City, CA 41.742083 124.18525 612 25 6 150BARRACUDA (WPB-87) Eureka, CA 612 25 6 150SOCKEYE(WPB-87) Bodega Bay, CA 612 25 6 150TERN (WPB-87) San Francisco, CA 37.810333 -122.360667 612 25 6 150PIKE (WPB-87) San Francisco, CA 612 25 6 150BLACKFIN (WPB-87) Santa Barbara, CA 34.404333 -119.692333 612 25 6 150

NARWHAL (WPB-87) Corona Del Mar, CA 612 25 6 150EDISTO (WPB-110) San Diego, CA 32.6865 -117.23425 612 25 6 150HADDOCK (WPB-87) San Diego, CA 32.725383 -117.182 612 25 6 150PETREL (WPB-87) San Diego, CA 612 25 6 150SEA OTTER (WPB-87) San Diego, CA 32.686333 -117.234333 612 25 6 150ADELIE (WPB-87) Port Angeles, CA 48.139666 -123.414 612 25 6 150WAHOO (WPB-87) Port Angeles, CA 48.13 123.41 612 25 6 150SWORDFISH (WPB-87) Port Angeles, CA 612 25 6 150

OSPREY (WPB-87) Port Townsend, WA 48.107033 -122.7728 612 25 6 150SEA DEVIL (WPB-87) Bangor, WA 47.73 -122.74 612 25 6 150SEA FOX (WPB-87) Bangor, WA 47.73 -122.74 612 25 6 150SEALION (WPB-87) Bellingham, WA 612 25 6 150TERRAPIN (WPB-87) Bellingham, WA 612 25 6 150BLUE SHARK (WPB-87) Everett, WA 612 25 6 150AHI (WPB-87) Honolulu, HI 21.3091 -157.873883 612 25 6 150KITTIWAKE (WPB-87) Honolulu, HI 21.307517 -157.873367 612 25 6 150

Page 14: Gaps in Coast Guard Response Trish Green. Overview Project Goal Background Objectives Methods Expected Results

Air Station Name Asset LAT LONGCruise Speed (kts) Fuel Uses lbs/hr Fuel Capacity (lbs) Distance (nm)

San Diego H60 32.727175 -117.182708 125 1160 21884 70

Los Angeles H65 33.944152 -118.419431 125 690 1900 120

San Francisco H65 37.632272 -122.389466 125 690 1500 120

Sacramento C130 38.677093 -121.393508 298 5180 62900 1635

Humboldt Bay H65 40.970988 -124.108236 125 690 1500 120

North Bend H65 43.410293 -124.241917 125 690 1500 120

Astoria H60 46.1545 -123.884314 125 1160 21884 70

Port Angeles H65 48.141293 -123.413954 125 690 1500 120

Sitka H60 57.046834 -135.361069 125 1160 21884 70

Kodiak C130 57.749967 -152.493794 298 5180 62900 1635

Kodiak H60 57.749967 -152.493794 125 1160 21884 70

Kodiak H65 57.749967 -152.493794 125 690 1500 120

Barber's Point C130 21.307354 -158.070302 298 5180 62900 1635

H65 21.307354 -158.070302 125 690 1500 120

Page 15: Gaps in Coast Guard Response Trish Green. Overview Project Goal Background Objectives Methods Expected Results

Analysis Analysis STAGE 1- Evaluate Current STAGE 1- Evaluate Current CoverageCoverage

• Determine where there is coverage1. Gaps in Coverage2. How many assets can reach each case3. Which cutters can reach the case4. Which aircraft can reach the case5. Which assets can respond (depending on mission)

Page 16: Gaps in Coast Guard Response Trish Green. Overview Project Goal Background Objectives Methods Expected Results

Analysis Analysis STAGE 2-Evaluate New Coverage STAGE 2-Evaluate New Coverage AlternativesAlternatives

1. Identify different offshore areas to have assets staged to be ready for cases

2. Identify optimal US locations to homeport assets3. Determine Coast Guard coverage area downrange when aircraft is

deployed on cutters. How many cutters are needed in high threat vector to maintain acceptable coverage?

4. Identify differences in Coast Guard coverage with and without aircraft on deck

Page 17: Gaps in Coast Guard Response Trish Green. Overview Project Goal Background Objectives Methods Expected Results

ToolsTools

BufferBuffer

Counting Overlap Counting Overlap Polygon ToolPolygon Tool

Create Thiessen Create Thiessen PolygonsPolygons

Page 18: Gaps in Coast Guard Response Trish Green. Overview Project Goal Background Objectives Methods Expected Results

Data RequiredData Required

Page 19: Gaps in Coast Guard Response Trish Green. Overview Project Goal Background Objectives Methods Expected Results

Anticipated ResultsAnticipated Results

• Gaps exist past 100 nm• Inshore area will be well covered by assets• Aircraft on deck of cutters increase coverage and operational

readiness.• Cutters need to be stationed offshore to respond to have adequate

offshore coverage.

Page 20: Gaps in Coast Guard Response Trish Green. Overview Project Goal Background Objectives Methods Expected Results

TimelineTimeline• 15Jun all data compiled• 15Jul all layers created• 15Jul have exact date of final presentation confirmed• 15Aug all analysis performed• 15September final maps created and project ready for presentation• Presentation to Coast Guard Command In September-October

timeframe

Page 21: Gaps in Coast Guard Response Trish Green. Overview Project Goal Background Objectives Methods Expected Results

QUESTIONS??????