game: more than just meat
TRANSCRIPT
Department Animal Sciences•
Faculty of AgriSciences
Game: more than just meat
Hector and Andrew Stuart Memorial Lecture 2010
Louw HoffmanDepartment of Animal Sciences
Stellenbosch University
16th March 2010The University of Western Australia
History of Game Animals in Africa
• Africa’s mega fauna spared over-exploitation by humans• Pre-colonial – management systems
• Royal game• Habitat manipulation• Harvest regulations, etc
• European colonizers – 350 yrs ago• African peoples’ traditional values vs European ideas of
ownership• Strong market economy• Firearms
• Wildlife competed for space & pasture against cattle• Source of revenue
7Source: DeGeorges & Reilly, 2009
History of Game Animals in Africa
• 1700’s – 500 000 000 springbok in Karoo & Kalahari Desert South African and Namibia
• 1896 – great springbok migrations were past
• 1933 International Conference for the Protection of Flora & Fauna of Africa• Principles National Parks established• Moved people off ancestral grounds• Made them become “poachers”• Modified forest & savannah ecology
• Land ownership• Black African - land belonged to ancestors• White African - owned by title deed.
8
History of Game Animals in Africa
• 1990 - World Parks Commission: goal protecting 10% planet’s surface
• International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN): Sub-Saharan Africa - % protected areas• Botswana – 30%• Namibia -14%• South Africa – 6%• Zambia – 41%• Zimbabwe 16%
9
South Africa
• 6.06% land in protected areas (2008)• 17 million ha in private game ranches (1999)
• 2.2 X protected areas• 3 X amount of land needed to reach goal of 10%
• Why?• Land tenureship• Ownership of animals (domestic and wild)• Direct benefit (aesthetically, monetary, etc)
If it Pays it Stays• Springbok R20/kg (R5/kg costs)• Impala/kudu R18.50 (R4.50/kg)• Other R12.50/kg
• Remember: game ranch supports one family – handed over to 100 families – will not create a middleclass!
10
11
South Africa - Game farming
• Potential size of Industry• 5 000 game farms• 4 000 mixed livestock-game farms• 20% of surface area
• 2000• R713 million from 5061 game farms
• R68.89 per ha• Products (R843m in 2000)
• Live sales R180m (21.4%)• Biltong R450m (53.4%)• International trophy R153m (18.1%)• Ecotourism R40m (4.7%)• Meat R20m (2.4%)• Additional R130m
• Prof hunting fee R50m• Game capture R40m• State fee R30m• Meat processing R10m
Namibia
• Regulated by the Ministry of Environment and Tourism through the Nature Conservation Ordinance no. 4 of 1975 as amended
• Freehold farmers have had ownership rights over land and livestock since the early 1900’s, • although the commercial rights over wildlife and indigenous
plants only given in 1967
• Farmers in communal areas received the same rights much later (1996 and 2001) when policies were adopted to promote community based natural resource management
12
Namibia
• Two million head of game • a figure roughly similar to those for cattle, for sheep and for
goats.
• 90% of the wildlife is located outside formally proclaimed conservation areas.
• More than 80% of the larger game species are found on privately owned farms which comprise about 44% of the surface area of the country.
• 41% of country under some form of wildlife management
13
Namibia: Numbers of harvestable species
AreasRed
hartebeestHartmann's
Zebra Kudu Gemsbok SpringbokTotal wildlife 137 098 72 807 381 511 399 464 749 090
Total south of veterinary cordon fence
137 098 70 107 381 171 389 264 726 090
Freehold 137 098 67 407 378 571 383 764 684 353
Communal 0 2 800 2 600 5 500 42 350
0% 4.00% 0.70% 1.40% 5.80%
Total north of veterinary cordon fence
- 2 700 340 10 200 23 000
0% 3.70% 0% 2.50% 3.10%
15
Kenya
• Group ownership of land• But not ownership of game
• Lease/sell for wheat production
• Result• 56% decline in wildlife in most species past 20 yrs• White-bearded wildebeest – 81% decline (1977-1997)• Cape Buffalo – 15 400 (1970s) - 3 000 (1994)• Eland – 5 700 (1980s) – 1 025 (1996)• Warthog – 88% (1988 – 1986)• Giraffe – 72% (1988 -1986)
16
17
General comments
• Commercial utilization of game in South Africa and Namibia↑ growth during the last 20-25 years
• Game farmers now play a key role in the conservation of many game species
• Capture and sale → very lucrative business worth millions of Rands• 2008
• 9 139 animals sold for R111 478 250
• Scarce and exotic species → ↑ prices • Zambia sable fetches R3 million• Rhino farmed for horns
• “common” species • marketed in an alternative way
• Live auctions,• Hunting: trophy – recreational• Meat production
18
Background
• Tourism → growing lucrative industry• unspoilt habitat• African experience – eat game meat
• Safari kebab
• Appearance maintained• removal surplus animals
• Predators• Recreational hunting
• Trophy• Biltong
• Live auctions• Cropped
19
Predators
• Not always suitable• How many animals would a
pride of five Lion eat per week? Lehman et al 2008, SA J Wild Res 38(1), 66-78
• Do not always capture cheap species
20
What is the most economical?
• Trophy hunting• Recreational hunting• Game harvesting• Live auctions
• Berry 1984• Net return
trophy hunting > live animal sales > non-trophy recreational sales > venison prod
• Index ⇒ number animals involvedvenison > live animal sales > non-trophy recreational hunting >
trophy hunting
21
Trophy hunting
• A good option• Requires high infrastructue and costs
• Lodgng• Honest professional hunter• Sufficient numbers of trophy quality
animals• Not all animals are trophies
• Meat secondary product – not always suitable for quality meat products
• Trophy haunting industry R262 763 202
• Potential of trophy hunting to create incentives for wildlife conservation in Africa where alternative wildlife-based land uses may not be viable Animal Conservation by Lindsey
22
Trophy Hunting
• Reputation• Fair deal• Value for Money• Roland Ward
• Where get Trophy?• Buy in
• Ethics• Black & Blue Wildebeest crosses• Canned Lion
• Hormones• Is the client always right?
• I will kill the animal no matter what• Money buys anything and everything
24
Live Game Auctions
• Capture team• Expensive species – dart individual animals
• Nets• Boma• Hand• Vet present
• Boma Holding facilities• Transport• Insurance
• White muscle capture myopathy
• Auction• Live• Catalogue
Buffalo shoulder showing white muscle capture myopathy - scoline
28
Production systems
• Potential meat production from African game species long known• Trophy hunters• Biltong• Export
• Biltong hunting (2004)• 200 000 hunters in RSA
• Average hunter spends R4 130 on hunt & R11 622 on game (5 animals per hunter; 1 000 000 per season)
• Total of R3 150 474 000 per annum
Consumer – attitudes towards Game meat
• Most probably a tourist• High level of education• Successful business man• Willing to try new things• “Africa experience”
• Perception of Game meat• Harvested in an ethically manner• Harvested sustainably & eco-friendly• Perception of a low carbon footprint
• But expects:• Harvested and processed – first world technology• Meat safe• Contains no residues• Wholesome• Nutritious
29
South African/ Namibian local consumer –attitudes towards Game meat
• Most probably has eaten game meat before – from hunting• SLOPs & Black Diamonds
• Expect lower quality than traditional red meat species• Will not pay more• Consistent quality
30
31
What are the game meat quality attributes?
• Same as for traditional farmed species• Physical quality
• Colour• Toughness• Sensory attributes• Shelf-life
• Chemical composition• Residues• Microbiology
32
What influences the quality of meat?
• Same as for traditional farmed species• Age effect• Gender effect• Pre-rigor treatment
• Method of harvesting• Post-rigor treatment
• Microbiological• Cooling• Further processing
33
Healthiness
• Dietary fat• 15-30% total calorie-intake• Saturated fat <10%; >5%
• Red meat erroneously associated with obesity• However game meat perceived to have health benefits
• Tourists• 300 local game meat consumers
• Healthiness (25%)• Leanness (23%)• Taste (14%)• Health benefits – low fat (83%)
34
Fatty acid Kudu Blesbok Springbok Impala Red hartebeest
Black wildebeest
Mountain reedbuck
Warthog Buffalo Zebra
Total Fat 1.58 0.76 1.07 - 4.69 0.97 2.94 - - -
SFA 35.93 42.33 40.35 38.11 56.18 40.97 38.55 35.8 38.78 34.12
MUFA 20.48 18.51 16.67 20.15 28.1 15.33 17.23 16.7 31.61 22.91
PUFA 43.59 40.96 31.59 41.74 32.41 44.27 42.99 47.6 29.32 42.96
PUFA:SFA 1.23 0.97 0.79 1.10 0.58 1.01 1.15 1.33 0.76 1.26
(n-6)/(n-3) 2.29 3.62 3.28 - 2.75 2.82 2.07 - - -
Cholesterol (mg.100 g-1
meat sample) - 51.38 56.9 - 50.9 46.05 51.08 - - -
Mean total fat (%), fatty acid composition (%) and total cholesterol content (mg.100 g-1) of the M. longissimus dorsi of the common duiker, kudu, blesbok, springbok, impala, red hartebeest, black wildebeest, blue wildebeest, warthog, buttalo and zebra.
PUFA:SFA > 0.4n-6:n-3 < 4.0
35
Cropping of Game
• Humanity• Economy• Efficiency• Low wounding
percentages• Low disturbance &
scattering• Form large herds• Terrain
• Selectivity of correct ages & sexes
• Minimal damage to meat• Ability to bleed carcasses• No association with
humans
36
Game species suitable for harvesting
• Requirements• Sustainability:
• Numbers – population dynamics• Reproductive efficiency
• Habitat• Suitability
• Suitability to night cropping• Kudu / springbok / impala
• Yield
• Consistent• Quality
Commercial harvesting
• 3 major game meat exporters in South Africa• Also export ostrich
• 3 major game meat exporters in Namibia
• Very well established export procedures• Farms registered• Culling teams registered• HACCP
37
Guidelines for theHarvesting of Game
for Meat Export2010
D L van Schalkwyk & LC HoffmanWith special input from M Y Hemberger and K Magwedere
South African Game Meat Export 2009
38
Total Abattoir Slaughter Numbers
Jan Feb Mar April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TotalSpringbok 2397 8967 14920 10649 7590 8250 3378 2671 1193 3063 63078Blesbok 64 209 3638 1315 1045 239 241 573 121 35 7480Deer 8 20 27 11 66Gemsbok 1 60 78 239 44 16 12 15 465Ribbok 6 5 11Kudu 1 79 28 11 312 91 217 266 166 199 1370Red Hartebeest 1 23 109 34 69 15 251Zebra 19 28 47 25 51 33 9 212Impala 17 80 130 319 54 8 114 50 234 1006Eland 15 63 45 31 31 185Black Wildebeest 13 20 281 178 77 131 631 74 57 20 1482Blue wildebeest 1 79 65 279 38 4 1 62 529
MonthlyTotal 2475 9295 19149 12634 9987 8833 4608 3842 1675 3637 76135
Weight of carcasses = 1 648 tWeight exported = 417 t
100 yrs ago there were only 550 animals left –farmers saved and started farming
Only antelope species that has shown an increase in numbers the past few years
Namibia Game Meat Export 2009
• FMM Mariental Abattoir - 68 tons (5 containers) to Belgium de-boned meat cuts
• Brukarros Meat Processors - 16.8 tons to EU (1 container) de-boned meat cuts 1.5 tons to RSA - trimmings
39
40
Legislation …
• Extensive regulations • export of meat, including meat safety• packaging regulations• hygiene inspection regulations• harvesting methods, etc
• Summed up: South African Standard for the Export of Game Meat (National Department of Agriculture, 2001)
Consumer expects ethically acceptable harvesting procedures
Terrain determines harvesting procedure• Open veldt
• Night
• Mountain• Day• Helicopter
• Bush• Night• Boma
41
42
Karoo / grassveld
• Day shooting from a vehicle?• Distance• Firing rate?• Meat quality
• Helicopter (day)?• Expensive• Meat quality• Eastern Cape
• Night shooting?• Efficient• Meat quality maintained• Veld depot required
• Lights• Warm water
• Some work being published on day and night cropping
Bushveld
• Drive at night with spotlight• Game animal blinded
• Shot
• Bush too dense• Only animals along path / road• Slow rate of off-take
• Boma
52
54
Bushveld: Boma (information supplied by Dr T Bergh)
• How does it work?• <07h00: Helicopter chases game into the Boma: 10-
30 min• Game kept
• Overnight• 30 min• Boma full: start culling immediately
57
Bushveld
• How does it work?• Groups of ± 10 animals
into death acre(10x5 m)• .22 with silencer shot from
above• Firing: 60-90 secs• Animals removed – hooked
onto truck• Truck moves 30 m and
then animals exsanguinated• Process completed within
10 min
Chemical and Physical Quality
• Quantified for the longissimus dorsi muscle of the following species:• Springbok• Blesbok• Kudu• Black and blue wildebeest• Gemsbok• Hartebees• Warthog• Eland• Mountain reedbuck• Duiker
61
And?
• Very slight gender differences • Data skew?
• Species differ• Muscle fibre types
• Diet has an effect on fatty acid composition• Impala: Mussina vs Mara Research station
• Initial results indicate differences between muscles• Need more info
• Seasonal effects?
62
Ante and post mortem procedures
• Most game meat removed as individual muscle• Vacuum packed, frozen• Exported into Europe• Defrosted• Sliced into steaks and packed for retail
• Modified atmospheric package
• Problems with freezing and defrosting
63
Ante and post mortem procedures
• Game meat hygiene• Quantification of harvesting techniques on meat quality
• Species specific
• Chilling and transporting procedures• Electrical stimulation?
• Processing• Modified atmospheric packaging• Freezing and defrosting rates• Salami• Traditional
• Biltong• Boere wors (dried sausage)• Re-constructured steaks
65
Other areas that we require knowledge for
• Consumer trends• National• International
• Residues in meat• Namibia bush encroachment?
• What can RSA harvest on an annual sustainable basis?
• Namibia: PhD student “Investigating game meat potential of Namibia”
67
Conclusion
• Game farming is here to stay• Game meat production (thus numbers) will continue to increase
• Maintain the image of free-range
68