gambling as an extractive industry & the moral jeopardy it generates peter j. adams, 2008 school...
TRANSCRIPT
Gambling as an Extractive Gambling as an Extractive Industry & the Moral Industry & the Moral
Jeopardy it Generates Jeopardy it Generates Peter J. Adams, 2008Peter J. Adams, 2008
School of Population HealthSchool of Population HealthUniversity of AucklandUniversity of Auckland
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
Expansion of Commercial GamblingExpansion of Commercial Gambling
• Major societal Major societal changechange
• Impacts socially & Impacts socially & economicallyeconomically
• Also impacts on Also impacts on political ecologypolitical ecology
• Links with Links with expansion globallyexpansion globally
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
WellingtonWellington
AucklandAuckland
ChristchurchChristchurch
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
Gambling Expenditure in NZGambling Expenditure in NZ
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992
Mil
lion
s N
Z$
SourceSource: : Department of Internal AffairsDepartment of Internal Affairs
((Excluding bingo & raffles)Excluding bingo & raffles)
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
Gambling Expenditure in NZGambling Expenditure in NZ
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Mil
lion
s N
Z$
SourceSource: : DepartmentDepartment of Internal Affairsof Internal Affairs
((Excluding bingo & raffles)Excluding bingo & raffles)
1993 2002
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Mil
lion
s $N
Z
TrackLotteriesMachines (non-casino)Casinos
Gambling Expenditure in NZGambling Expenditure in NZSourceSource: : DepartmentDepartment of Internal Affairsof Internal Affairs
((Excluding bingo & raffles)Excluding bingo & raffles)
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
Gambling Expenditure in NZGambling Expenditure in NZ
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Mil
lion
s N
Z$
SourceSource: Department of Internal Affairs: Department of Internal Affairs
((Excluding housie & raffles)Excluding housie & raffles)
INDIVIDUALTREATMENT
PUBLIC HEALTH
POLITICAL ECOLOGY
REGULATION
LIBERALISATION
NORMALISATION
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
Ecological Perspective…Ecological Perspective…
• Gambling as an Gambling as an extractive industryextractive industry
• No substantial No substantial productproduct
• Extraction within Extraction within current systemscurrent systems
• Those systems in Those systems in turn are affectedturn are affected
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
Drivers for Native Logging Drivers for Native Logging
• Governments interested in profits Governments interested in profits from large scale extractionfrom large scale extraction
• Multinational ability to maximize Multinational ability to maximize profit potentialprofit potential
• Entrepreneurs quick to recognize Entrepreneurs quick to recognize profit potentialprofit potential
• Rapid expansion relies on absence Rapid expansion relies on absence of popular oppositionof popular opposition
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Mill
ions
NZ$
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
Degradation of Degradation of natural ecologynatural ecology
Degradation of Degradation of socio-political socio-political ecologyecology
With Rapid Expansion ofWith Rapid Expansion of Extractive Extractive Industries comes…Industries comes…
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
Gambling Expenditure in NZGambling Expenditure in NZ
Expenditure
Profit
Benefits
Taxes
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Mil
lion
s N
Z$
SourceSource: Department of Internal Affairs: Department of Internal Affairs
((Excluding bingo & raffles)Excluding bingo & raffles)
REGULATION
LIBERALISATION
NORMALISATION
WORRWORRYY
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
Money Builds RelationshipsMoney Builds Relationships• Money exchange forges Money exchange forges
ongoing connectionsongoing connections
• Establishes expectations Establishes expectations and obligationsand obligations
• Reinforced by multiple Reinforced by multiple exchangesexchanges
• Links cut across other Links cut across other relationshipsrelationships
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
Where are they leading?Where are they leading?
What are the risks?What are the risks?
Can they be reversed?Can they be reversed?
What are the long term What are the long term prospects for these profit-prospects for these profit-
driven relationships?driven relationships?
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
Moral & ethical dilemmas Moral & ethical dilemmas generated by receiving generated by receiving gambling fundsgambling funds
Environments promoting high Environments promoting high industry connectednessindustry connectedness
Conflicted relationships very Conflicted relationships very likelylikely
Multiple traps for the naïve, Multiple traps for the naïve, greedy & fearfulgreedy & fearful
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
Risks in Accepting ProfitsRisks in Accepting Profits
1.1. Ethical risksEthical risks
2.2. Reputational Reputational risksrisks
3.3. Governance Governance risksrisks
4.4. Relationship Relationship risksrisks
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
1. Ethical Risks1. Ethical Risks• Trying to do good from Trying to do good from
sources that do harmsources that do harm
• Majority of gambling funds Majority of gambling funds from low income families & from low income families & problem gamblersproblem gamblers
• Credentialing providers Credentialing providers (improving public profile)(improving public profile)
• Contributing to salesContributing to sales
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
2. Reputational Risks2. Reputational Risks
• How link is judged How link is judged by othersby others
• Collegial Collegial disapprovaldisapproval
• Consumer Consumer discomfortdiscomfort
• Government agency Government agency ambivalenceambivalence
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
3. Governance Risks3. Governance Risks
• Creeping relianceCreeping reliance
• Perception of Perception of vulnerabilityvulnerability
• Threatens independence Threatens independence & sovereignty & sovereignty
• Perceived reliance leads Perceived reliance leads to silence & complianceto silence & compliance
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
4. Relationship Risks4. Relationship Risks
• Between colleaguesBetween colleagues
• In larger organisations, In larger organisations, between sections & between sections & levelslevels
• Potential loss of voice, Potential loss of voice, loss of interest, loss of loss of interest, loss of staffstaff
How to respond to How to respond to gambling profit-driven gambling profit-driven
increases in moral increases in moral jeopardy?jeopardy?
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
Intensity of RelationshipIntensity of Relationship
Continuum of Moral JeopardyContinuum of Moral Jeopardy
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
Low RiskLow RiskModerate RiskModerate Risk
High RiskHigh RiskExtremelyExtremelyHigh RiskHigh Risk
Primary Concern
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
Moral Jeopardy & Loss of VoiceMoral Jeopardy & Loss of Voice• Community charities receiving Community charities receiving
significant funds from pokie trustssignificant funds from pokie trusts• Researchers with gambling funding Researchers with gambling funding
avoiding “rocking the boat”avoiding “rocking the boat”• Government agency managing funds Government agency managing funds
from gamblingfrom gambling• Newspapers relying heavily on Newspapers relying heavily on
funding from gambling advertising funding from gambling advertising • Politicians & political parties Politicians & political parties
accepting or influencing distribution accepting or influencing distribution
Low Moral Jeopardy EnvironmentsLow Moral Jeopardy Environments• Principle 1:Principle 1: Ethical consciousnessEthical consciousness
• Moral jeopardy awareness raising activitiesMoral jeopardy awareness raising activities• E.g. workshops with governance boardsE.g. workshops with governance boards
• Principle 2:Principle 2: Informed participationInformed participation • Requirements for disclosure of funding sourcesRequirements for disclosure of funding sources• E.g. web-based observatory tracking moneyE.g. web-based observatory tracking money
• Principle 3:Principle 3: Independence of functionIndependence of function• Reduction in reliance on gambling fundingReduction in reliance on gambling funding• E.g. seek reductions in gambling profitsE.g. seek reductions in gambling profits
• Principle 4:Principle 4: Government duty of careGovernment duty of care• Benchmark standards regarding conflicts of interestBenchmark standards regarding conflicts of interest• E.g. adherence to international charterE.g. adherence to international charter
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
Concluding RemarksConcluding Remarks
• Long term environment of Long term environment of high moral jeopardyhigh moral jeopardy
• Compromises community Compromises community & government sector& government sector
• Subtle degradation of Subtle degradation of democratic systemsdemocratic systems
• Future obligations to Future obligations to devise safeguardsdevise safeguards
Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008Centre for Gambling Studies, 2008
Adams, P. J. (2007). Assessing whether to receive funding support from tobacco, alcohol, gambling and other dangerous consumption industries. Addiction, 102(7), 1027–1033.
Adams, P. J. & Rossen, F. (2006). Reducing the moral jeopardy associated with receiving funds from the proceeds of gambling. Journal of Gambling Issues, Issue 17, August 2006
Adams, P. J. Gambling, Freedom and Democracy. New York: Routledge (Jan 2008)
More material…More material…