gallup grunnlag for bedre beslutninger 1 the internet in norway methods, the market, electronic...
TRANSCRIPT
1GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
The Internet in NorwayMethods, The market, Electronic newspapers:
An update http://www.gallup.no/media/
EMRO meeting 16 June 1998, Madeira, Portugal
Helge Holbæk-Hansen Norwegian Newspaper Publishers’ Association http://www.nal.noKnut-Arne Futsæter, Norsk Gallup Institutt A/S http://www.gallup.no
2GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
Introduction
During the last year both the access to and the use of Internet have continued to grow rapidly in Norway.
However, the optimistic growth rates for WEB advertising have failed to materialise.
The advertisers requires certainty from an independent third part to give them confidence in the mess of different figures.
The Internet marked desperately needs international standards.
3GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
Reach - medium
Circulation
Attention
Comm. effect
Sales effect?
Reach - ad
Distance between buyer and seller
Advertiser
Ad sales rep
Advertising dependent
Advertisingindependent
4GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
Interview surveys
AdvantagesWe know the respondent, and have demographic and psychographic data.
Comparable data with other media.
Connection to market information (Consumer & Media’s target group information).
DisadvantagesOnly relevant for large Web sites and their main pages.
Limited level of detail on Internet data - only on media/title level.
5GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
PC meters
AdvantagesKnowledge of the respondent.
Demographic and to an extent opportunities for other variables, although this are limited.
Comparable figures.
High degree of detail by which single pages, advertisements and click-throughs for advertisements can be measured.
Surfing patterns can be tracked.
DisadvantagesExpensive.
Panels are vulnerable to fast changes in the universe; a characteristic of the Internet!
Only possible in the home market, because access to workplaces is doubtful.
Only the most popular sites will be measure the most popular sites.
Samples being far too small.
6GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
Server measurements
AdvantagesHigh degree of detail whereby one can measure single pages, advertisements and click-throughs for advertisements.
Quick and effective reporting.
Inexpensive collection.
DisadvantagesPoor knowledge of the respondent.
Does not register the number of different users.
For the time being there is no joint registration device and calculation method, and consequently no comparable figures.
No validation possible
SERIOUS technical problems such as search engines, cookies, frames, proxy, caching, refreching etc.
7GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
How undercounting occurs
UserUserUser UserUser UserUser UserUser UserUser UserUser UserUser
Fire-Fire-WallWall
ProxyProxyServerServer
PCPCCacheCache
RAMRAMCacheCache
ServerServer
(log file)(log file)
No CountingNo Counting
8GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
The WebMeasure system
WebMeasure overcome the caching problem by measuring in the web browser rather than at the server.
This product is developed by SOFRES: IMR in Australia. TN SOFRES have ambitions to be the single standard for Internet audience measurement worldwide (http://www.sofresimr.com/).
WebMeasure is now operational in Europe, Australia, North America and Asia and, have been established as the Internet measurement standard in Australia.
At the moment WebMeasure consist of three modules: WebMeasure main platform which, measure sites and page exposure. WebMeasure Demographic module which, show who the visitors are. WebMeasure AdMeasure module which, measure ad exposure.
http://www.sofresimr.com/BEYOND SERVER LOG FILES (Andrew Jarret 1998) in The Worldwide Internet Seminar 1998
9GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
www.gallup.no
www.gallup.no\Internet\
www.gallup.no\Internet\intertrack\
{Site visit
Central variables:Site visit, page exposure and ad exposure
Page exposure
Ad exposure
10GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
WebMeasure is a browser based measurement
Installation A unique Java applet is installed on each site to be measured. This applet
contains a unique code and a program communicating with an external server on visits.
The net sites only need to install a WebMeasure HTML. code (approximately 4 lines) into their net sites.
Measuring is initiated immediately.
Data sampling Data are sampled from each browser, i.e. not from the server. WebMeasure is cached along with a WEB page. Only those accesses that have been downloaded completely from a WEB
browser are counted.
11GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
How WebMeasure works
GallupGallupNexusNexus
UserUserUser UserUser UserUser UserUser UserUser UserUser UserUser
Fire-Fire-WallWall
ProxyProxyServerServer
PCPCCacheCache
RAMRAMCacheCache
ServerServer(log file)(log file)
BEYOND SERVER LOG FILES (Andrew Jarret 1998) in The Worldwide Internet Seminar 1998
12GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
WebMeasure versus PC meter panel and server measurement
PC meter panels PC meter panels have weakness due to size and composition of the sample. Even a panel of 30.000 are not able to give data from all sites which are of
commercial interest. Are not representative of business and schools. Expensive to run.
Sever log based systems Undercounting due to caching Overcounting due to search engines No validation possible.
13GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
AdMeasure and demographic modules
AdMeasure module AdMeasure counts number of persons exposed to an ad. AdMeasure counts the exact number of persons exposed to a specific ad
irrespective of where the ad is localised.
Demographic module Net sites and advertisers need to know who is visiting the site, specific pages and
specific ads. WebMeasure contains a model which gives this demographic information. Randomly sample visitors to a WEB site. Pop up survey is used. Variables such as: Gender, age, occupation, income, country of residence.
http://www.sofresimr.com/samples/demo-module-demo.html
14GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
Web interviewing by Pop-Up Surveys
See part 2 (Internet Data Collection Methods) in The Worldwide Internet Seminar arranged by ESOMAR in Paris 1998.
15GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
On-line reporting
http://www.sofresimr.com/samples/demo-module-demo.html
16GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
Have used the Internet
Have access to the Internet
Have looked at the page
Have looked at the advertisement
Sales effect?
Have used the electronic service
How will the measurement challenge be solved
Interview surveys:Gallup’s InterBusinessGallup’s InterBussGallups InterTrackGallup’s WEB Topp
WebMeasure
17GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
Consumer & Media and Gallup’s WEB Topp
Consumer & Media, which is the leading multi-media concept in Norway (see the Norwegian Activity Report) measure access and use of Internet with a nationally representative sample of 30,000 private persons aged 13 and more.
Gallup‘s WEB Topp In an agreement with NAL and other organisations, we measure Norwegian
newspapers that are on the Internet and pure electronic titles/media. Weekly (estimated from the frequency question) and daily reach (yesterday) are
measured by Consumer & Media. Data are reported to the customers by e-mail, made available electronically by
Pulsar Internett and published on Gallup’s homepage. The monthly and quarterly reporting are always covered by the leading
newspapers (print) and of course by the electronic newspapers.
Source: EMRO paper from 1997 under the same title. http://www.gallup.no
18GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
Questions
1. Access to the InternetDo you have access to the Internet at home, at work, at school or other places?
2. Monthly reach of the InternetExcluding sending and reading electronic mail, have you used or logged onto the Internet during the last 30 days?
3. Daily reach of the Internet: (Have used the Internet the last 30 days).Excluding sending and reading electronic mail, did you use or log onto the Internet yesterday?
4. Weekly reach of electronic titles: (Have used the Internet the last 30 days).How many of the last seven days have you visited .....(title name) on the Internet?
5. Daily reach of electronic titles: (Have read at least one day in question 4.)Did you visit ... (title name) on the Internet yesterday?
Questions from August 1997
19GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
The development of Internet in Norway
Total access to Internet May 1998 40% were connected to Internet, compared to 13% in November 1995. 20% were connected at home, 19% at work and 10% at school. The home marked is growing most rapidly, and have been doubled in the last year.
Monthly reach26% have logged onto the Internet in the course of the last 30 days.
Daily reachThe Internet has an average daily reach of 10%.
2
9
13
3
15
24
8
21
34
10
26
40
0 10 20 30 40
Daily reach
Monthlyreach
Total access
1998 (may)
1997 (nov)
1996 (nov.)
1995 (nov.)
Source: Consumer & Media. Gallups InterTrack. All persons aged 13 and more.
Prosent
20GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
The Internet compared to other media
Source: Gallup’s Media Barometer 1996 of May 1997. Average daily reach forall weekdays for the largest radio and TV channels, Text-TV and the Internet. Percentage.
Daily reach of electronic media
5
8
11
14
18
20
23
30
35
59
61
6
0% 25% 50% 75%
12. NRK P2 (radio)
11. Internet
10. NRKTO TV
9. NRK Petre (radio)
8. TV3
7. TV2s Text-TV
6. TvNorge
5. P4 (radio)
4. NRK Text-TV
3. NRK P1 (radio)
2. TV2
1. NRK1 TV
21GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
The use of Electronic Newspapers in Norway
29000
67000
174000178000
105000
411000
0
100 000
200 000
300 000
400 000
500 000
Daily Weekly
Nu
mb
er o
f p
erso
ns
Weeks 33-41 1996 Weeks 8-14 1997 May 1998
Source: 6148 interviews during weeks 33-41 1996, 3907 interviews during weeks 8-14 1997 and 3447 interviews during May 1998 from Consumer & Media. 36,334 persons equal 1%.
22GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
Gallup’s WEB Topp:Weekly reach of the electronic titles
4
11
15
21
40
50
73
81
118
152
175
221
341
22
0 100 200 300 400
14. Fædrelandsvennen
13. Adresseavisen
12. Stavanger Aft.
11. Bergensavisen
10. Bergens Tidende
9. Yellow Pages
8. Digi.no
7. NRK.no
6. TV2.no
5. Aftenposten
4. Dagbladet
3. Nettavisen
2. VG
1. SOL
Source: Approximately 10000 interviews from first quater of 1998 from Consumer & Media. 36,334 persons equal 1%.
23GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
Daily reach of the largest online editions
9000
17000 1700022000
29000
440004400049000
69000
47000
84000
113000
0
25000
50000
75000
100000
125000
150000
Aftenposten Dagbladet VG
Number of persons
1996 1997 1.Q. 1998 May 1998
Source: 6148 interviews during weeks 33-41 1996, 3907 interviews during weeks 8-14 1997,approximately 10000 interviews from first quater of 1998 and 447 interviews during May 1998 from Consumer & Media. 36,334 persons equal 1%.
24GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
24
13
17
18
18
10
51
49
2
7
15
26
36
15
21
79
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
60+
Aged 50-59 years
Aged 40-59 years
Aged 30-39 years
Aged 20-29 years
Aged 13-19 years
Female
Male
VG.no
Population
Who are the weekly readers of VG.no? (1)
Source: Consumer & Media 98/1.
25GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
30
15
19
18
28
41
31
53
13
14
7
49
34
15
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
400+
300-399
180-299
Under 180
Higher education
Secondary education
Primary education VG.no
Population
Who are the weekly readers of VG.no? (2)
Source: Consumer & Media 98/1.
26GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
The Gallup Compass for VG.no (3)
Source: Consumer & Media 98/1.
27GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
The surfers are attractive consumers
2518
42
13
-25
0
25
50Books Computing Entertainment
Music(CD/cassettes)
Annual consumption more than NKr 5.000; books, computing, entertainment and music amongst those visiting VG.no during one week. The possibility of finding a consumers spending more than NKr 5 000 is 42% greater amongst the weekly visitors of VG.no compared to the rest of the population.
Source: Consumer & Media 98/1.
28GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
Double coverage
77.000 visited VG.no during one week between August 1996 and July 1997 while the standard printed edition had an average of 1.384.000 readers.
44.000 of those visiting VG.no during one week read one printed edition as well.
On average 57% of the weekly readers of VG.no read an additional printed edition.
57
43
Source: Consumer & Media 98/1.
29GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
Advertising on the Internet in Norway 1996 -1999
5
40
100
250
0
50
100
150
200
250
1996 1997 1998 1999
Mill
ion
NO
K
Source: Carat Inter-Media AS (http://www.carat.no/trender/)
30GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
Advertising turnover 1997 in Norway
TV
Newspapers
W. mag.Trade j. Radio
Billboards/PostersCinema
Source: Carat Inter-Media AS (http://www.carat.no/trender/)
Internet
31GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
Political implications and future perspectives
Last year we reported the initiative of Norwegian Newspapers to establish standard measurements and the acknowledgement that we need international standards in this marked.
This February a broadly composed group was established in order to develop a joint system for measurements.
A brief summary would describe the situation as follows: There is an agreement to co-operation between the parts involved. The co-operation should preferably include electronic measurement and
possibly one interview based measuring system as well as agreement on standard definitions.
The present challenges are of a technical rather than of a political sort.
What is the situation in your country?
Hege:
NB: Teksten pånotatsiden er for lang
Hege:
NB: Teksten pånotatsiden er for lang
32GALLUPGrunnlag for bedre beslutninger
Thank you!