gad1 encodes a secreted peptide that regulates grain ...plants contain 46 several signal peptides,...
TRANSCRIPT
1
RESEARCH ARTICLE 1
GAD1 Encodes a Secreted Peptide That Regulates Grain Number, Grain 2
Length and Awn Development in Rice Domestication 3
4
Jing Jina, Lei Huaa, Zuofeng Zhua, Lubin Tana, Xinhui Zhaoa, Weifeng Zhanga, 5 Fengxia Liua, Yongcai Fua, Hongwei Caia, Xianyou Suna, Ping Gua, Daoxin Xieb, 6 Chuanqing Suna,1 7
8 a State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, National Center for 9 Evaluation of Agricultural Wild Plants (Rice), Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic 10 Improvement, Department of Plant Genetics and Breeding, China Agricultural 11 University, Beijing, 100193, China 12 b Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua 13 University, Beijing 100084, China 14 1Corresponding author: [email protected] 15
16 Short title: GAD1 Regulates Grain and Awn Development 17
18 One-sentence summary: GAD1 encodes a secreted peptide that controls critical 19 transitions of rice domestication such from fewer, longer grains with long awns to 20 more, shorter grains with no or short awns. 21
22 The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in 23 this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors 24 (www.plantcell.org) is: Chuanqing Sun ([email protected]). 25
26 ABSTRACT 27 Cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.) was domesticated from wild rice (Oryza rufipogon 28 Griff.), which typically displays fewer grains per panicle and longer grains than 29 cultivated rice. In addition, wild rice has long awns, whereas cultivated rice has short 30 awns or lacks them altogether. These changes represent critical events in rice 31 domestication. Here, we identified a major gene, GRAIN NUMBER, GRAIN LENGTH 32 AND AWN DEVELOPMENT 1 (GAD1), that regulates those critical changes during 33 rice domestication. GAD1 is located on chromosome 8 and is predicted to encode a 34 small secretary signal peptide belonging to the EPIDERMAL PATTERNING 35 FACTOR-LIKE family. A frame-shift insertion in gad1 destroyed the conserved 36 cysteine residues of the peptide, resulting in a loss of function, and causing the 37 increased number of grains per panicle, shorter grains and awnless phenotype 38 characteristic of cultivated rice. Our findings provide a useful paradigm for revealing 39 functions of peptide signal molecules in plant development and helps elucidate the 40 molecular basis of rice domestication.41
Plant Cell Advance Publication. Published on September 15, 2016, doi:10.1105/tpc.16.00379
©2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved
2
INTRODUCTION 42
Cell-to-cell communication helps coordinate developmental and environmental 43
responses. Secreted peptides mediate cell-to-cell signaling during 44
development and pattern formation in multicellular organisms. Plants contain 45
several signal peptides, such as systemin, which functions in the wounding 46
response (Pearce et al., 1991), phytosulfokine, which induces the proliferation 47
of single mesophyll cells (Matsubayashi and Sakagami, 1996), S-locus 48
cysteine-rich protein/S-locus protein 11, which determines self-incompatibility 49
(Schopfer et al., 1999), LUREs, which direct pollen-tube elongation (Okuda et 50
al., 2009), and CLAVATA3, which mediates the signaling of cell fate decisions 51
in the Arabidopsis thaliana shoot meristem (Fletcher et al., 1999). 52
EPIDERMAL PATTERING FACTORs (EPFs), such as EPF1, EPF2 and 53
EPF-like 9 (EPFL9)/Stomagen, act as key regulators of stomatal development 54
in Arabidopsis (Engineer et al., 2014; Hara et al., 2007; Hara et al., 2009; Hunt 55
et al., 2009; Sugano et al., 2010). 56
Cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.), a staple food for more than half of the 57
global population (Khush, 1997), was domesticated from the wild rice (Oryza 58
rufipogon) ~8,000 years ago (Fuller et al., 2010; Zong et al., 2007). Both 59
morphological traits and physiological characteristics changed remarkably 60
during domestication. Thorough understanding of rice domestication 61
processes and molecular mechanisms active in cultivated rice will be 62
beneficial for rice improvement. During the past ten years, the rice evolutionary 63
mechanisms and several domestication-related genes, including Sh4/SHA1 64
(Konishi et al., 2006; Li et al., 2006; Lin et al., 2007), PROG1 (Jin et al., 2008; 65
Tan et al., 2008), Bh4 (Zhu et al., 2011), Rc (Sweeney et al., 2006), OsLG1 66
(Ishii et al., 2013; Zhu et al., 2013), An-1 (Luo et al., 2013) and LABA1/An-2 67
(Gu et al., 2015; Hua et al., 2015) were characterized. 68
Wild rice typically produces a few, long grains per panicle, with long awns 69
(Figure 1A) that are crucial for seed dispersal and deterring granivore 70
predation. However, most current rice cultivars generate many grains per 71
3
panicle, shorter grains and show no or only short awns (Figure 1B). These 72
characteristics facilitate rice storage and processing (Hua et al., 2015) and the 73
differences between wild and cultivated rice represent critical events in rice 74
domestication. However, the molecular mechanisms responsible for these 75
changes are still largely unknown. 76
Here, we found that an EPIDERMAL PATTERNING FACTOR-LIKE (EPFL) 77
peptide, encoded by GRAIN NUMBER, GRAIN LENGTH AND AWN 78
DEVELOPMENT 1 (GAD1) regulates grain number, grain length and awn 79
development, all of which were altered during rice domestication. A frame-shift 80
insertion in gad1 destroyed the conserved cysteine residues of the EPFL 81
peptide, causing the increased number of grains per panicle, the shorter grains 82
and the awnless phenotype found in cultivated rice. Our results thus establish 83
the function of a peptide signal molecule in plant development and help 84
uncover the genetic basis of rice domestication. 85
86
RESULTS 87
Characterization and Cloning of GAD1 88
We obtained one introgression line (OIL31) from a set of introgression lines 89
derived from a cross between indica variety NA93-11 and an accession of 90
common wild rice (W2014, O. rufipogon). OIL31, which harbored four W2014 91
chromosomal segments, produced fewer grains per panicle and longer grains 92
as well as a high percentage of awned seeds (~80%), with long awns (18 ± 93
1.35 mm) in comparison with NA93-11 (Figure 2). 94
A genetic linkage analysis of 236 F2 individuals derived from a cross 95
between OIL31 and NA93-11 indicated that the grain number per panicle, grain 96
length, and awn phenotype were controlled by a single dominant gene, GAD1. 97
We used the awn phenotype as a representative morphological marker to 98
locate the GAD1 gene between simple sequence repeat markers M10 and 99
RM5485 on the long arm of chromosome 8 (Figure 3A). Using 4,250 F2 100
individuals, we further delimited GAD1 to within an ~6-kb region between the 101
4
markers MX14 and MX16, in which there was only one predicted gene 102
(Os08g0485500) in the Nipponbare genome (The Rice Annotation Project 103
Database) (Figure 3B). A comparison of the Os08g0485500 coding region 104
between OIL31 and NA93-11 revealed one single nucleotide polymorphism 105
(SNP1) and three insertion/deletions (Indel1, Indel2 and Indel3). SNP1 was a 106
synonymous mutation, while Indel1 (a 3-bp deletion in NA93-11), Indel2 (a 107
6-bp insertion in NA93-11) and Indel3 (a 7-bp insertion in NA93-11) led to a 108
single amino-acid residue deletion, a two amino-acid residue insertion, and a 109
frame shift, respectively (Figure 3C; Supplemental Figure 1). 110
To verify the function of Os08g0485500, we generated a construct (pCPL) 111
that contained a ~4.0-kb genomic fragment including the entire Os08g0485500 112
gene from wild rice W2014 (Figure 3D), and introduced the pCPL construct 113
into the domesticated japonica variety Nipponbare. Compared with 114
Nipponbare (controls), 32 independent transgenic lines of the wild rice 115
Os08g0485500 (pCPL) showed fewer grains per panicle, longer grains and 116
long awns (Figures 3E to 3I, 3O and 3Q). These results demonstrated that 117
Os08g0485500 in the O. rufipogon genome was a key gene (GAD1) regulating 118
grain number, grain length and awn development. 119
We further transformed a GAD1 interfering RNA (RNAi) construct (Figure 120
3D) into an introgression line harboring the GAD1 locus. The down-regulation 121
of the GAD1 transcript level in the RNAi transgenic plants led to more grains 122
per panicle, shorter grains, and the short-awns (or awnless) phenotype, 123
compared with control plants (Figures 3J to 3N, 3P and 3R). Thus, GAD1 is the 124
key gene controlling the change in grain number, grain length and awn 125
development that occurred during rice domestication. 126
127
Expression of GAD1 Promotes Grain Elongation and Awn Development 128
Using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR), we analyzed the 129
GAD1 expression pattern. GAD1 was preferentially expressed in the 130
developing panicles of OIL31, especially in panicles less of than 0.5 cm in 131
5
length. Lower levels of transcript accumulation were detected in roots, leaves, 132
leaf-sheaths and stems. With the development of panicles, GAD1 expression 133
levels dropped dramatically in both NA93-11 and OIL31 (Figure 4A). Using 134
RNA in situ hybridization, we detected GAD1 transcripts in the primary and 135
secondary branch meristem in OIL31 and NA93-11 (Supplemental Figures 2 136
and 3). Because awns are organs at the tips of lemmas, we also compared the 137
GAD1 expression in NA93-11 and OIL31 at the apices of glumes, which are 138
composed of lemmas and paleae. GAD1 expression was higher in OIL31 than 139
in NA93-11 at the glume apices (Figure 4B). 140
To reveal the effects of GAD1, we compared awn development between 141
OIL31 and NA93-11 using scanning electron microscopy. Based on the rice 142
spikelet development (Sp) stages defined by Itoh et al., (2005), we detected no 143
difference between OIL31 and NA93-11 until the Sp6 stage. At this stage, awn 144
primordia appeared at the apices of the lemmas in OIL31 and extended from 145
Sp6 to Sp8. However, during the same stages, no awns formed in NA93-11 146
(Supplemental Figure 4). 147
The detection of GAD1 expression during spikelet development using 148
RNA in situ hybridization consistently showed no differences in the GAD1 149
expression patterns between OIL31 and NA93-11 until the Sp6 stage (Figures 150
4C1 and 4D1). At this stage, the transcripts of GAD1 were more abundant at 151
the apices of lemmas in OIL31 than in NA93-11 (Figures 4C2 and 4D2). At the 152
Sp7 stage and early Sp8 stage (Sp8e), the abundant expression of GAD1 was 153
maintained at the apices of lemmas that formed the awn primordia in OIL31, 154
and GAD1 expression was still low in NA93-11 (Figures 4C3, 4C4 and 4D3, 155
4D4). Thus, the GAD1 expression pattern was consistent with its role in the 156
promotion of awn development. Additionally, at the late Sp8 stage (Sp8I), when 157
spikelet development is almost complete, the GAD1 transcript was weakly 158
detected in lemmas of both OIL31 and NA93-11 (Figures 4C5 and 4D5). 159
Previous studies indicated that cell division plays a crucial role in 160
promoting awn formation and elongation (Hua et al., 2015; Luo et al., 2013). 161
6
Therefore, we examined the expression of HISTONE H4, a marker gene of 162
active cell division (Marzluff and Duronio, 2002) using RNA in situ hybridization. 163
The HISTONE H4 expression patterns were similar between OIL31 and 164
NA93-11 until the Sp7 stage (Figures 4E1, 4E2 and 4F1, 4F2). However, at the 165
Sp7 and Sp8 stages, HISTONE H4 expression was higher in the awn 166
primordia of OIL31 than in those of NA93-11 (Figures 4E3 to 4E5 and 4F3 to 167
4F5). Thus, there was more active cell division in the awn primordia of OIL31 168
than of NA93-11. A qRT-PCR analysis of HISTONE H1, another marker gene 169
of active cell division (Luo et al., 2013; Marzluff and Duronio, 2002), 170
consistently showed that the expression of HISTONE H1 was higher in the 171
young panicles of OIL31 than those of NA93-11 (Supplemental Figure 5). 172
An analysis of cell cycle-related gene expression at the apices of glumes 173
showed that 22 genes involved in the G1/S and G2/M phases regulating mitotic 174
division (Li et al., 2011) were more highly expressed at the apices of glumes in 175
OIL31 than in NA93-11 (Supplemental Figure 6). Thus, cell division was more 176
active at the apices of glumes in OIL31 than in NA93-11, indicating that GAD1 177
promoted continuous cell division at the apices of glumes, which likely led to 178
the promotion of grain elongation and awn development in wild rice. 179
180
Cytokinin is Decreased in the Introgression Line OIL31 181
The plant hormone cytokinin is one of the factors controlling shoot apical 182
meristem activity, which is a central determinant of grain number. Previous 183
studies revealed that down-regulation of CKX2 or DST causes cytokinin 184
accumulation and increases grain number in rice (Ashikari et al., 2013; Li et al., 185
2013; Zhang and Yuan, 2014). Our RNA in situ hybridization and real-time 186
PCR analysis showed that expression of CKX2 and DST were increased in the 187
introgression line OIL31 compared to cultivar NA93-11 (Figures 4G and 4H; 188
Supplemental Figure 7A). Consistent with the high expression of CKX2 and 189
DST, the cytokinin (iP and tZ) contents were substantially decreased in the 190
inflorescence meristem of OIL31, and expression of the cytokinin-response 191
7
marker genes RR1 and RR2 (Jain et al., 2006) was significantly decreased in 192
the young panicles of OIL31 (Figures 4I - 4K; Supplemental Figure 7B). 193
Together with our observations of higher GAD1 expression and fewer grains 194
per panicle in OIL31 (Figures 2F and 4A) and previous genetic evidence 195
(Ashikari et al., 2013; Li et al., 2013), our results suggest a hypothesis that 196
GAD1 activates DST and CKX2 to reduce the cytokinin level and cause less 197
grain number per panicle in wild rice. 198
199
GAD1 Encodes a Predicted Small Secreted Cysteine-rich Peptide with a 200
Conserved Cysteine Residue 201
The GAD1 cDNA in wild rice W2014 encodes a 127-amino-acid protein that is 202
a homolog of a small secreted cysteine-rich EPF/EPFL peptide in Arabidopsis 203
thaliana (Engineer et al., 2014; Hara et al., 2007; Hara et al., 2009; Hunt et al., 204
2009; Sugano et al., 2010; Takata et al., 2013) (Supplemental Figures 8 and 9 205
and Supplemental Data set 1). Similar to the Arabidopsis EPF/EPFL peptides, 206
the GAD1 prepropeptide contained an N-terminal secretory signal peptide and 207
a mature peptide with a conserved region of six cysteine residues 208
(Supplemental Figures 10 and 11; Supplemental Table 1). The six conserved 209
cysteine residues are essential for proper formation of intramolecular disulfide 210
bonds that are critical for peptide function (Abrash and Bergmann, 2010; 211
Jewaria et al., 2013; Katsir et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2012; Ohki et al., 2011; 212
Takata et al., 2013). A comparison of the predicted mature peptides between 213
wild rice W2014 and cultivar NA93-11 indicated that the 7-bp (Indel3) insertion 214
in gad1 caused a frame-shift mutation that led to the loss of two (5th and 6th) 215
essential cysteine residues and, accordingly, likely prevented the formation of 216
the proper mature peptide, resulting in the loss of the gad1 function in NA93-11 217
(Figure 5A). 218
To determine the amount of GAD1 variation among wild and cultivated rice, 219
we sequenced the GAD1 coding region in 53 accessions of wild rice 220
originating from 12 countries and 203 accessions of cultivated rice from 15 221
8
countries. We found 10 kinds of GAD1/gad1 haplotypes in wild and cultivated 222
rice (Supplemental Figure 12). The GAD1 gene of most wild rice contained a 223
9-bp insertion or was similar to W2014, and encoded a mature protein 224
containing six cysteine residues (6C). This gene was associated with the 225
long-awn phenotype, suggesting that GAD1 with six cysteine residues is 226
functional. In the cultivated rice, there were 180 varieties that, like NA93-11, 227
had frame shifts that destroyed the classic 5th and 6th cysteine residues in 228
GAD1. Among those, 137 varieties contained a 7-bp insertion in the Indel3 of 229
gad1 to generate a dysfunctional mutated mature peptide containing seven 230
cysteine residues (7C), while the remaining 43 varieties contained a 5-bp 231
insertion in Indel3 to encode the dysfunctional mutated protein with four 232
cysteine residues (4C). Among the 180 varieties with the dysfunctional gad1 233
peptide, 161 (~90%) of the varieties showed the awnless phenotype (Figures 234
5B and 5C; Supplemental Figure 12), while 19 varieties displayed an awn 235
phenotype, which may be caused by other awn-regulatory gene(s). 236
237
Neutrality Test and Positive Selection on gad1 in O. sativa 238
The nucleotide diversity of gad1 in cultivated rice was remarkably lower than 239
that of GAD1 in wild rice. Tajima’s D test suggested that gad1 in cultivated rice 240
deviated significantly from the neutral expectation (P < 0.01), while GAD1 in 241
wild rice did not deviate from the neutral expectation (P > 0.10) (Supplemental 242
Table 2). We further examined the nucleotide diversity of 16 loci in the 243
GAD1-containing 1.9-Mb genomic region, and identified an interval of ~900-kb 244
surrounding the GAD1 locus that exhibited a significantly decreased level of 245
nucleotide diversity in cultivated rice relative to wild rice (Figure 6). Our results 246
are consistent with recent whole-genome investigations (Huang et al., 2012; 247
Xu et al., 2012). These data indicated that the gad1 gene regulating grain 248
number, grain length and awn development in O. sativa was strongly selected 249
by humans during rice domestication. 250
To further investigate the selection of GAD1 during rice domestication, we 251
9
used 159 accessions of cultivated rice from 15 countries to compare the 252
appearance of GAD1 with two recently identified genes involved in awn 253
development, An-1, encoding a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor (Luo 254
et al., 2013), and LABA1/An-2, encoding a cytokinin-activating enzyme (Gu et 255
al., 2015; Hua et al., 2015). We found that the proportions of cultivars 256
harboring the GAD1, LABA1 and An-1 alleles were 14%, 30% and 30% 257
respectively (Supplemental Figure 13), suggesting that the gad1 selection 258
might be stronger than that for either laba1 or an-1 during rice domestication. 259
260
GAD1 Might Have Additive Effects with An-1 and LABA1/An-2 261
Two key genes, An-1 and LABA1/An-2, that affect awn development during 262
rice domestication have been characterized previously. An-1 encodes a basic 263
helix-loop-helix protein and regulates awn development (Luo et al., 2013). 264
LABA1/An-2 encodes a cytokinin-activating enzyme and controls awn barb 265
formation and awn elongation (Gu et al., 2015; Hua et al., 2015). To determine 266
the relationships among An-1, LABA1/An-2 and GAD1, we generated a set of 267
near-isogenic lines and pyramiding lines. The awn length of the pyramiding 268
line harboring GAD1 and An-1 (6.27 ± 0.12 cm) was much longer than those of 269
near-isogenic lines containing only GAD1 (1.89 ± 0.16 cm) or An-1 (4.6 ± 0.26 270
cm). Additionally, the awn length of a pyramiding line harboring GAD1 and 271
LABA1/An-2 (2.68 ± 0.16 cm) was longer than that of a near-isogenic line 272
containing LABA1/An-2 (no awn) and GAD1 (Supplemental Figure 14). Thus, 273
GAD1 might have an additive effect with An-1 and LABA1/An-2. 274
275
DISCUSSION 276
In this paper, we found that the GAD1-encoded EPFL peptide regulates grain 277
number, grain length and awn development in rice. A frame-shift insertion in 278
coding region of the GAD1 gene was responsible for the transition from a few, 279
long grains per panicle, with long awns to many grains per panicle, shorter 280
grains and show no or only short awns during rice domestication. 281
10
Crop domestication is the genetic modification of a wild species to 282
generate a new form to meet human needs through cultivation (Doebley et al., 283
2006). Wild rice shows prostrate growth, severe shattering, spread panicles 284
and long awns, while cultivated rice exhibits erect growth, no seed-shattering 285
and compact panicles, which may be more amenable to cultivation and allow 286
harvest of more seeds (Jin et al., 2008; Ishii et al., 2013; Konishi et al., 2006; Li 287
et al., 2006; Lin et al., 2007; Tan et al., 2008; Zhu et al., 2013). Recently, 288
several genes controlling rice domestication-related traits have been 289
characterized. These genes encode transcription factors or enzymes (Gu et al., 290
2015; Hua et al., 2015; Ishii et al., 2013; Jin et al., 2008; Konishi et al., 2006; Li 291
et al., 2006; Lin et al., 2007; Luo et al., 2013; Sweeney et al., 2006; Tan et al., 292
2008; Zhu et al., 2011; Zhu et al., 2013). By contrast, our study revealed that 293
key rice domestication-related traits, including awn development, and 294
yield-related traits were regulated by a predicted small secretory signal peptide 295
GAD1, related to the Arabidopsis EPFL family. Our findings not only provide 296
evidence revealing novel functions of peptide signal molecules during plant 297
development, but also offer intriguing insights on the role of peptide signal 298
molecules in rice domestication. 299
300
The EPF/EPFL Peptides Have Multiple Biological Functions 301
Multiple biological functions of EPF/EPFL family members have been 302
characterized in plants. In Arabidopsis, EPF1, EPF2 and STOMAGEN/EPFL9 303
regulate stomatal development (Engineer et al., 2014; Hara et al., 2007; Hara 304
et al., 2009; Hunt et al., 2009; Sugano et al., 2010); EPFL4 and 305
EPFL6/CHALLAN(CHAL), two EPFL family members, promote inflorescence 306
growth (Uchida et al., 2012); EPFL5 promotes fertility and fruit growth (Abrash 307
et al., 2011). In Brassica napus, EFFL6 regulates filament elongation and may 308
also play affect organ morphology and floral organ specification (Huang et al., 309
2014). In this study, we verified that the EPFL peptide encoded by GAD1 310
regulates grain number, grain length and awn development in rice. 311
11
EPF1, EPF2 and STOMAGEN/EPFL9 regulate plant development by 312
binding ERECTA family members (Lee et al., 2012; Lee et al., 2015). Two 313
genes (LOC_Os06g03970 and LOC_Os06g10230) in the rice genome show 314
high homology to Arabidopsis ERECTA. These genes therefore appear to be 315
good initial candidates to encode proteins that serve as GAD1 receptors. 316
317
GAD1 Has Pleiotropic Effects on Awn and Grain Development 318
Previous studies showed that some key genes controlling the domestication 319
processes of crops have pleiotropic effects. For example, the selection of 320
prog1 led to erect growth, greater grain number and higher grain yields in 321
cultivated rice (Tan et al., 2008). LG1 controls rice ligule development and the 322
transition of panicle architecture in cultivars during rice domestication (Ishii et 323
al., 2013; Lee et al. 2007; Zhu et al., 2013). Q is a major gene involved in 324
wheat domestication-related traits, such as free-threshing character, glume 325
shape and tenacity, and rachis fragility (Simons et al., 2006). In our study, we 326
found that GAD1 also had pleiotropic effects – on grain length, grain number 327
and awn development – during rice domestication. These findings indicate that 328
targeting a gene with pleiotropic effects might be an efficient strategy for crop 329
domestication. 330
331
Crop domestication represents the genetic modification of a wild species to 332
create a new form to meet human needs. Our findings provided insights into 333
the puzzles surrounding rice domestication and revealed a previously 334
unrecognized function of peptide signal molecules in plant development. 335
12
METHODS 336
337
Plant Materials and Growth Conditions 338
For the fine mapping, expression pattern analysis, and panicle development 339
analysis, we used introgression line OIL31 and indica cultivar NA93-11, which 340
is a sibling of 93-11 with no awn. OIL31 was derived from a cross between 341
W2014 (common wild rice from India) and NA93-11. An F2 segregation 342
population, containing 4,250 individuals, derived from a backcross between 343
OIL31 and NA93-11 was used for the fine mapping of GAD1. The introgression 344
line TIL189 was derived from a cross between the indica cultivar Teqing and 345
common wild rice W2014. The japonica variety Nipponbare and the 346
introgression line TIL189 were used as transgenic recipients. We generated 347
two pyramiding lines (An1/GAD1-NIL and GAD1/LABA1-NIL) that harbored 348
GAD1 and An-1 (Luo et al., 2013), and GAD1 and LABA1/An-2 (Gu et al., 349
2015; Hua et al., 2015), respectively, in the NA93-11 genetic background. The 350
introgression and pyramiding lines were generated as described previously 351
(Tan et al., 2007). The plant materials were growth in the field at the 352
Experimental Stations of China Agriculture University, Beijing and Hainan, 353
China. The wild rice and cultivated rice accessions used in the haplotype 354
analysis, neutrality test and selective sweep analysis are listed in 355
Supplemental Data sets 2, 3 and 4, respectively. 356
357
Primers 358
The primers used in this study are listed in Supplemental Table 3. 359
360
Generation of Constructs and Transformations 361
The functional complementation construct (pCPL), which harbored the ~4.0-kb 362
W2014 genomic fragment covering the entire GAD1 gene, was inserted into 363
the binary vector pCAMBIA1300 (AF234296). The GAD1 DNA fragments were 364
PCR-amplified by 1300-3 (Supplemental Table 3) and cloned into the 365
13
pCAMBIA1300 vector KpnⅠ and SalⅠ site. The RNAi construct contained 366
an inverted repeat harboring the 350-bp GAD1 cDNA fragment in the vector 367
pTCK303. The two plasmid constructs were introduced to Agrobacterium 368
tumefaciens strain EHA105, and then transformed into the japonica variety 369
Nipponbare and the introgression line TIL189. 370
371
Phenotypic Evaluation 372
We used 20 plants to measure the grain number of main panicles, grain length, 373
awn length and the percentage of awned seeds in the introgression line OIL31 374
and NA93-11. The average awn length was measured on the apical spikelet of 375
each primary branch on the main stem panicle. The percentages of awned 376
seeds were determined from awned spikelets on the main stem panicle, with 377
the awns > 1 mm on mature grains considered to represent an awned 378
phenotype. Two independent complemented (with pCPL) and RNAi T2 379
homozygous lines were used for the measurements. The main panicles of 10 380
plants were measured for each line. Ten Nipponbare and TIL189 plants 381
harboring empty vectors were used as the controls. 382
383
5′ - and 3′ - RACE and Quantitative RT-PCR 384
We extracted total RNA using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies) 385
and purified RNA with a purification kit (TIANGEN). Total RNA was reverse 386
transcribed with an oligo (dT20) primer using SuperScript III Reverse 387
Transcriptase (Life Technologies). 5′ and 3′ RACE were conducted with 5′- and 388
3′-Full RACE Kits (TaKaRa) following the manufacturer’s instructions. 389
Quantitative RT-PCR was performed on a CFX96 real-time system (Bio-Rad). 390
Diluted cDNA was amplified using the SsoFast Evagreen Supermix (Bio-Rad). 391
The transcript levels were normalized to endogenous ACTIN transcripts 392
amplified with primers ActinF and ActinR. Each set of experiments was 393
repeated three times, and the relative quantification method (2-ΔΔCT) was used 394
to evaluate quantitative variation (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001). 395
14
396
Scanning Electron Microscopy 397
We fixed the young panicles in 2.5% glutaraldehyde-phosphate buffer saline 398
fixative solution, dehydrated the samples using an ethanol series, and dried 399
them with a carbon dioxide critical-point dryer. The dried panicles were gold 400
plated and observed using a Hitachi S-2460 scanning electron microscope at 401
15 kV. Scanning electron microscopy was performed as described previously 402
(Hua et al., 2015). 403
404
RNA in situ Hybridization 405
RNA in situ hybridization was performed as described previously (De Block M 406
and Debrouwer D, 1993) with minor modification. The young panicles of all 407
stages from OIL31 and NA93-11 were fixed in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde, 408
subjected to a dehydration series and infiltration, and embedded in paraplast 409
(Paraplast Plus; Sigma–Aldrich). The tissues were sliced into 8–10 μm 410
sections with a microtome (Leica RM2145). A ~300-bp fragment of GAD1 411
cDNA was amplified and used as the template to generate sense and 412
antisense RNA probes that were labeled by digoxigenin using a DIG Northern 413
Starter Kit (Catalog No. 2039672; Roche) following the manufacturer’s 414
instructions. Five independent experiments have been performed for RNA in 415
situ Hybridization. 416
417
Sequencing and Data Analysis 418
Multiple sequences were aligned with ClustalX (Thompson et al., 1997). The 419
program DnaSP, version 5.0, was used to calculate nucleotide diversity and 420
Tajima’s D test (Rozas et al., 2003). The phylogenetic tree was constructed by 421
the MEGA 5 program The evolutionary history was inferred using the 422
Neighbor-Joining method. The percentage of replicate trees in which the 423
associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are 424
shown next to the branches (Tamura et al., 2011). 425
15
426
Signal Peptide Analysis 427
The cleavage sites and a signal peptide/non-signal peptide in the GAD1 428
protein were predicted using SignalP4.1 429
(http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP) (Petersen et al., 2011). 430
431
Accession Numbers 432
Sequence data from this article can be found in the GenBank/EMBL databases 433
under the following accession numbers: GAD1 cDNA from W2014 (XXX) and 434
gad1 cDNA from NA93-11 (XXX) 435
436
Supplemental Data 437
Supplemental Figure 1. GAD1 sequence comparison between OIL31 and 438
NA93-11. 439
Supplemental Figure 2. RNA in situ hybridization of GAD1 in inflorescence 440
meristem. 441
Supplemental Figure 3. RNA in situ hybridization of the GAD1 sense probe at 442
different developmental stages in OIL31. 443
Supplemental Figure 4. Scanning electron microscopy images of spikelets at 444
different developmental stages. 445
Supplemental Figure 5. qRT-PCR analysis of HISTONE H1 in young panicles 446
of NA93-11 and OIL31. 447
Supplemental Figure 6. Transcript level comparison of 22 cell 448
cycle-associated genes between NA93-11 and OIL31. 449
Supplemental Figure 7. Comparison of CKX2, DST and RR transcript levels 450
between NA93-11 and OIL31. 451
Supplemental Figure 8. Full-length cDNA of GAD1 and its predicted amino 452
acid sequence. 453
Supplemental Figure 9. Phylogenetic tree of EPF/EPFL family genes from 454
rice and Arabidopsis. 455
16
Supplemental Figure 10. Protein structure and maturation process 456
predictions of GAD1. 457
Supplemental Figure 11. Analysis of the consensus sequence from the GAD1 458
protein. 459
Supplemental Figure 12. Haplotypes of GAD1 in diverse wild and cultivated 460
rice accessions. 461
Supplemental Figure 13. Distribution of GAD1/gad1, LABA1/laba1 and 462
An-1/an-1 in 159 varieties of cultivated rice. 463
Supplemental Figure 14. Phenotypes of near-isogenic and pyramiding lines 464
containing GAD1, An-1 and LABA1. 465
Supplemental Table 1. The signal peptide and cleavage site predictions in the 466
GAD1 protein. 467
Supplemental Table 2. GAD1 nucleotide diversity and Tajima’s D test. 468
Supplemental Table 3. Primers used in this study. 469
Supplemental Data set 1. Text file of the alignment used for the phylogenetic 470
analysis in Supplemental Figure 9. 471
Supplemental Data set 2a. Wild rice accessions used in the haplotype and 472
nucleotide diversity analyses. 473
Supplemental Data set 2b. Rice cultivars used in the haplotype and 474
nucleotide diversity analyses. 475
Supplemental Data set 3a. Wild rice accessions used in the selective sweep 476
analysis. 477
Supplemental Data set 3b. Rice cultivars used in the selective sweep 478
analysis. 479
Supplemental Data set 4. Rice cultivars used to analyze the distribution of 480
GAD1/gad1 and two other awn-related genes. 481
482
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 483
We thank the International Rice Research Institute, Chinese Rice Research 484
Institute, Institute of Crop Sciences of Chinese Academy of Agricultural 485
17
Sciences, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences and Guangdong 486
Academy of Agricultural Sciences for providing the wild and cultivated rice 487
samples. This research was supported by the National Key R & D Program for 488
Crop Breeding (2016YFD0100301) and National Natural Science Foundation 489
of China (Grant 91535301). 490
491
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS 492
C.S. designed and supervised this study. J.J. conducted the characterization493
of the introgression line, map-based cloning, genetic transformations, gene 494
expression analysis, and the evolutionary analysis. X.Z. constructed the 495
introgression lines. X.S. and Y.F. maintained plant materials and performed the 496
field management. L.H., W.Z., L.T., F.L., Z.Z., H.C. and P.G. collected the rice 497
germplasm and phenotypic data. C.S., J.J. and D.X. analyzed the data and 498
wrote the article.499
18
REFERENCES 500
Abrash, E.B., and Bergmann, D.C. (2010). Regional specification of stomatal 501
production by the putative ligand CHALLAH. Development 137: 447-455. 502
Abrash, E.B., Dacies K.A., and Bergmann, D.C. (2011). Generation of 503
signaling specificity in Arabidopsis by spatially restricted buffering of 504
ligand-receptor interactions. Plant Cell 23: 2864-2879. 505
Ashikari, M., Sakakibara, H., Lin, S., Yamamoto, T., Takashi, T., 506
Nishimura, A., Angeles, E.R., Qian, Q., Kitano, H., and Matsuoka, M. 507
(2005). Cytokinin oxidase regulates rice grain production. Science 309: 508
741-745.509
De Block M, Debrouwer D. (1993) RNA-RNA in situ hybridization using 510
digoxigenin-labeled probes: the use of high-molecular-weight polyvinyl 511
alcohol in the alkaline phosphatase indoxyl-nitroblue tetrazolium reaction. 512
Anal Biochem 215: 86–89 513
Doebley, J., Gaut, B., and Smith, B. (2006). The molecular genetics of crop 514
domestication. Cell 127: 1309–1321. 515
Engineer, C.B., Ghassemian, M., Anderson, J.C., Peck, S.C., Hu, H., and 516
Schroeder, J.I. (2014). Carbonic anhydrases, EPF2 and a novel protease 517
mediate CO2 control of stomatal development. Nature 513: 246-250. 518
Fletcher, J.C., Brand, U., Running, M.P., Simon, R., and Meyerowitz, E.M. 519
(1999). Signaling of cell fate decisions by CLAVATA3 in Arabidopsis shoot 520
meristems. Science 283: 1911-1914. 521
Fuller, D.Q., Sato, Y.I., Castillo, C., Qin, L., Weisskopf, A.R., 522
Kingwell-Banham, E.J., Song, J., Ahn, S.M., and Van Etten, J. (2010). 523
Consilience of genetics and archaeobotany in the entangled history of rice. 524
Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. 2: 115-131. 525
Gu, B., Zhou, T., Luo, J., Liu, H., Wang, Y., Shangguan, Y., Zhu, J., Li, Y., 526
Sang, T., Wang, Z., and Bin, H. (2015). An-2 encodes a cytokinin synthesis 527
enzyme that regulates awn length and grain production in rice. Mol. Plant 8: 528
635-1650.529
19
Hara, K., Kajita, R., Torii, K.U., Bergmann, D.C., and Kakimoto, T. (2007). 530
The secretory peptide gene EPF1 enforces the stomatal one-cell-spacing 531
rule. Gene. Dev. 21: 1720-1725. 532
Hara, K., Yokoo, T., Kajita, R., Onishi, T., Yahata, S., Peterson, K.M., Torii, 533
K.U., and Kakimoto, T. (2009). Epidermal cell density is autoregulated via a534
secretory peptide, EPIDERMAL PATTERNING FACTOR 2 in Arabidopsis535
leaves. Plant Cell Physiol. 50: 1019-1031.536
Hua, L., Wang, D. R., Tan, L., Fu, Y., Liu, F., Xiao, L., Zhu, Z., Fu, Q., Sun, 537
X., Gu, P., Cai, H., McCouch., and Sun, C. (2015). LABA1, a domestication 538
gene associated with long, barbed awns in wild rice. Plant Cell 27: 539
1875-1888. 540
Huang, X., et al. (2012). A map of rice genome variation reveals the origin of 541
cultivated rice. Nature 490: 497-501. 542
Huang, Y., Tao, Z., Liu, Q., Wang, X., Yu, J., Liu, G., and Wang, H. (2014). 543
BnEPFL6, an EPIDERMAL PATTERNING FACTOR-LIKE (EPFL) secreted 544
peptide gene, is required for filament elongation in Brassica napus. Plant 545
Mol. Biol. 85: 05-517. 546
Hunt, L., and Gray, J.E. (2009). The signaling peptide EPF2 controls 547
asymmetric cell divisions during stomatal development. Curr. Biol. 19: 548
864-869.549
Ishii, T., Numaguchi, K., Miura, K., Yoshida, K., Thanh, P.T., Htun, T.M., 550
Yamasaki, M., Komeda, N., Matsumoto, T., Terauchi, R., Ishikawa, R., 551
and Ashikari, M. (2013). OsLG1 regulates a closed panicle trait in 552
domesticated rice. Nat. Genet. 45: 462-465. 553
Itoh, J., Nonomura, K., Ikeda, K., Yamaki, S., Inukai, Y., Yamagishi, 554
H.,Kitano, H., and Nagato, Y. (2005). Rice plant development: from zygote 555
to spikelet. Plant Cell Physiol. 46: 23-47. 556
Jain, M., Tyagi, A.K., and Khurana, J.P. (2006). Molecular characterization 557
and differential expression of cytokinin-responsive type-A response 558
regulators in rice (Oryza sativa). BMC Plant Biol. 6: 1. 559
20
Jewaria, P.K., Hara, T., Tanaka, H., Kondo, T., Betsuyaku, S., Sawa, S., 560
Sakagami, Y., Aimoto, S., and Kakimoto, T. (2013). Differential effects of 561
the peptides stomagen, EPF1 and EPF2 on activation of MAP kinase MPK6 562
and the SPCH protein level. Plant Cell Physiol. 54: 1253-1262. 563
Jin, J., Huang, W., Gao, J.P., Yang, J., Shi, M., Zhu, M.Z., Luo, D., and Lin, 564
H.X. (2008). Genetic control of rice plant architecture under domestication.565
Nat. Genet. 40: 1365-1369.566
Katsir, L., Davies, K.A., Bergmann, D.C., and Laux, T. (2011). Peptide 567
signaling in plant development. Curr. Biol. 21: R356-R364. 568
Khush, G. S. (1997). Origin, dispersal, cultivation and variation of rice. Plant 569
Mol. Biol. 35: 25-34 570
Konishi, S., Izawa, T., Lin, S.Y., Ebana, K., Fukuta, Y., Sasaki, T., and 571
Yano, M. (2006). An SNP caused loss of seed shattering during rice 572
domestication. Science 312: 1392-1396. 573
Lee, J.S., Kuroha, T., Hnilova, M., Khatayevich, D., Kanaoka, M.M., 574
McAbee, J.M., Sarikaya, M., Tamerler, C., and Torii, K.U. (2012). Direct 575
interaction of ligand–receptor pairs specifying stomatal patterning. Gene. 576
Dev. 26: 126-136. 577
Lee, J.S., Hnilova, M., Maes, M., Lin, Y.L., Putarjunan, A., Han, H., Avila, 578
J., and Torii, K. U. (2015). Competitive binding of antagonistic peptides 579
fine-tunes stomatal patterning. Nature 522: 439-443. 580
Lee, J., Park, J.J., Kim, S.L., Yim, J. and An, G. (2007). Mutations in the rice 581
liguleless gene result in a complete loss of the auricle, ligule, and laminar 582
joint. Plant Mol. Biol. 65: 487-499. 583
Li, C., Zhou, A., and Sang, T. (2006). Rice domestication by reducing 584
shattering. Science 311: 1936-1939. 585
Li, S., et al. (2013). Rice zinc finger protein DST enhances grain production 586
through controlling Gn1a/OsCKX2 expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 587
110: 3167-3172. 588
Li, Y., et al. (2011). Natural variation in GS5 plays an important role in 589
21
regulating grain size and yield in rice. Nat. Genet. 43: 1266-1269. 590
Lin, Z., Griffith, M.E., Li, X., Zhu, Z., Tan, L., Fu, Y., Zhang, W., Wang, X., 591
Xie, D., and Sun, C. (2007). Origin of seed shattering in rice (Oryza sativa 592
L.). Planta 226: 11-20. 593
Livak, K.J., and Schmittgen, T.D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene 594
expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. 595
Methods 25: 402-408. 596
Luo, J., et al. (2013). An-1 encodes a basic helix-loop-helix protein that 597
regulates awn development, grain size, and grain number in rice. Plant Cell 598
25: 3360-3376. 599
Marzluff, W.F., and Duronio, R.J. (2002). Histone mRNA expression: multiple 600
levels of cell cycle regulation and important developmental consequences. 601
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14: 692-699. 602
Matsubayashi, Y., and Sakagami, Y. (1996). Phytosulfokine, sulfated 603
peptides that induce the proliferation of single mesophyll cells of Asparagus 604
officinalis L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 7623-7627. 605
Ohki, S., Takeuchi, M., and Mori, M. (2011). The NMR structure of stomagen 606
reveals the basis of stomatal density regulation by plant peptide hormones. 607
Nat. Commun. 2: 512. 608
Okuda, S., Tsutsui, H., Shiina, K., Sprunck, S., Takeuchi, H., Yui, R., 609
Kasahara, R.D., Hamamura, Y., Mizukami, A., and Susaki, D. (2009). 610
Defensin-like polypeptide LUREs are pollen tube attractants secreted from 611
synergid cells. Nature 458: 357-361. 612
Pearce, G., Strydom, D., Johnson, S., and Ryan, C. A. (1991). A 613
polypeptide from tomato leaves induces wound-inducible proteinase 614
inhibitor proteins. Science 253: 895-897. 615
Petersen, T.N., Brunak, S., Von Heijne, G., and Nielsen, H. (2011). SignalP 616
4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat. 617
Methods 8: 785-786. 618
Rozas, J., Sánchez-DelBarrio, J.C., Messeguer, X., and Rozas, R. (2003). 619
22
DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. 620
Bioinformatics 19: 2496-2497. 621
Schopfer, C.R., Nasrallah, M.E., and Nasrallah, J.B. (1999). The male 622
determinant of self-incompatibility in Brassica. Science 286: 1697-1700. 623
Simons, K.J., Fellers, J.P., Trick, H.N., Zhang, Z., Tai, Y.S., Gill, B.S., and 624
Faris, J.D. (2006). Molecular characterization of the major wheat 625
domestication gene q. Genetics 172: 547-555. 626
Sugano, S.S., Shimada, T., Imai, Y., Okawa, K., Tamai, A., Mori, M., and 627
Hara-Nishimura, I. (2010). Stomagen positively regulates stomatal density 628
in Arabidopsis. Nature 463: 241-244. 629
Sweeney, M.T., Thomson, M.J., Pfeil, B.E., and McCouch, S. (2006). 630
Caught red-handed: Rc encodes a basic helix-loop-helix protein conditioning 631
red pericarp in rice. Plant Cell 18: 283-294. 632
Takata, N., Yokota, K., Ohki, S., Mori, M., Taniguchi, T., and Kurita, M. 633
(2013). Evolutionary relationship and structural characterization of the 634
EPF/EPFL gene family. PloS One 8: e65183. 635
Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M., and Kumar, S. 636
(2011). MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum 637
likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. 638
Biol. Evol. 28: 2731-2739. 639
Tan, L., Liu, F., Xue, W., Wang, G., Ye, S., Zhu, Z., Fu, Y., Wang, X and Sun, 640
C. (2007). Development of Oryza rufipogon and O. sativa Introgression641
Lines and Assessment for Yield-related Quantitative Trait Loci. J. Integr.642
Plant Biol.49: 871-884.643
Tan, L., Li, X., Liu, F., Sun, X., Li, C., Zhu, Z., Fu, Y., Cai, H., Wang, X., Xie, 644
D., and Sun, C. (2008). Control of a key transition from prostrate to erect 645
growth in rice domestication. Nat. Genet. 40: 1360-1364. 646
Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F., and Higgins, 647
D.G. (1997). The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for648
multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic. Acids649
23
Res. 25: 4876-4882. 650
Uchida N., Lee J.S., Horst R.J., Lai H-H., Kajita R., Kakinmoto T., Tasaka 651
M., and Torii K.U. (2012). Regulation of inflorescence architecture by 652
intertissue layer ligand–receptor communication between endodermis and 653
phloem. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: 6337-6342. 654
Xu, X., et al. (2011). Resequencing 50 accessions of cultivated and wild rice 655
yields markers for identifying agronomically important genes. Nat. 656
Biotechnol. 30: 105-111. 657
Zhang D., and Yuan Z. (2014). Molecular control of grass inflorescence 658
development. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 65: 553-578. 659
Zhu, B.F., et al. (2011). Genetic control of a transition from black to 660
straw-white seed hull in rice domestication. Plant physiol. 155: 1301-1311. 661
Zhu, Z., Tan, L., Fu, Y., Liu, F., Cai, H., Xie, D., Wu, F., Wu, J., Matsumoto, 662
T., and Sun, C. (2013). Genetic control of inflorescence architecture during 663
rice domestication. Nat. Commun. 4: 2200 664
Zong, Y., Chen, Z., Innes, J.B., Chen, C., Wang, Z., and Wang, H. (2007). 665
Fire and flood management of coastal swamp enabled first rice paddy 666
cultivation in east China. Nature 449: 459-462. 667
668
669
24
Figure Legends 670
Figure 1. Phenotypes of wild and cultivated rice. 671
(A) O. rufipogon. A panicle of wild rice is shown in the lower left corner, and the 672
grains of wild rice are illustrated in the lower right corner. Bar = 10 mm 673
(B) O. sativa. A panicle of cultivated rice is shown in the lower left corner, and 674
the grains of cultivated rice are illustrated in the lower right corner. Bar = 10 675
mm. 676
677
Figure 2. Phenotypes of NA93-11 and OIL31. 678
(A) Panicle comparison between NA93-11 and OIL31. Bar = 50 mm. 679
(B) Grains of NA93-11 and OIL31. Bar = 10 mm. 680
(C) Genotype of OIL31. The white regions indicate the NA93-11 genetic 681
background. The blue regions indicate wild rice introgressions. The red ellipse 682
indicates the GAD1 locus. 683
(D) and (E) Grain length comparison between NA93-11 and OIL31. Bar = 10 684
mm. 685
(F) Comparison of grain number per panicle between NA93-11 and OIL31. 686
Sample sizes were n = 20. The statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 687
based on a two-tailed Student’s t test. Error bars represent the SD. 688
689
Figure 3. Map-based cloning of GAD1. 690
(A) The target gene was mapped between the markers M10 and RM5485 on 691
the long arm of chromosome 8. The numbers underneath the bars indicate the 692
number of recombinants between GAD1 and the molecular markers. 693
(B) GAD1 was fine mapped to a ~6-kb region between the markers MX14 and 694
MX16. The numbers underneath the bars indicate the numbers of 695
recombinants between GAD1 and molecular markers. Os08g0485500 was the 696
candidate gene. The arrows indicate gene directions. 697
(C) Gene structure of GAD1, and the different sites between OIL31 and 698
NA93-11. The black bars represent 5′ upstream and 3′ downstream regions 699
25
and introns; rectangles represent exons; and triangles represent insertions. 700
There were three Indels (Indel1, Indel2 and Indel3) and an SNP (SNP1) 701
between OIL31 and NA93-11. 702
(D) The constructs used in the GAD1 functional investigation. pCPL represents 703
the ~4.0-kb W2014 genomic fragment covering the entire GAD1 gene region 704
and the 2.5-kb 5′ upstream and 350-bp 3′ downsteam sequences used for the 705
complementation test. pRNAi denotes the RNAi construct that harbors a 706
350-bp specific region of the GAD1 mRNA. UBI is a maize Ubiquitin promoter. 707
Green areas represent the 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions; red areas represent 708
gene coding regions. 709
(E) Panicle comparison between Nipponbare (Nip) and the transgenic line 710
(CPL-1). Bar = 50 mm. 711
(F) Grain comparison between Nip and the transgenic line (CPL-1). Bar = 10 712
mm. 713
(G) Awn length comparison between Nip and two independent transgenic lines, 714
CPL-1 and CPL-2. 715
(H) The comparison of percentages of awned seeds between Nip and two 716
independent transgenic lines, CPL-1 and CPL-2. 717
(I) and (O) Grain length comparison between Nip and transgenic lines. Bar = 718
10 mm. 719
(J) Panicle comparison between a control plant (TIL189) and a transgenic line 720
(RNAi-1). Bar = 50 mm. 721
(K) Grain comparison between TIL189 and a transgenic line (RNAi-1). Bar = 722
10 mm. 723
(L) Awn length comparison between TIL189 and two independent transgenic 724
lines, RNAi-1 and RNAi-2. 725
(M) The comparison of percentages of awned seeds between TIL189 and two 726
independent transgenic lines, RNAi-1 and RNAi-2. 727
(N) and (P) Grain length comparison between TIL189 and RNAi transgenic 728
lines. Bar = 10 mm. 729
26
(Q) Grain number per panicle comparison between Nip and two independent 730
transgenic lines, CPL-1 and CPL-2. 731
(R) Grain number per panicle comparison between ‘TIL189’ and two 732
independent transgenic lines, RNAi-1 and RNAi-2. 733
Sample sizes were n = 10. The statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 734
based on a two-tailed Student’s t test. Error bars represent the SD. 735
736
Figure 4. The expression patterns and effects of GAD1 on spikelet 737
development. 738
(A) Comparison of GAD1 expression patterns between NA93-11 and OIL31. 739
(B) Comparison of GAD1 expression levels of at the apices of glumes between 740
NA93-11 and OIL31. 741
(C1) to (C5) RNA in situ hybridization of GAD1 during spikelet development in 742
NA93-11. Bar = 100 μm. 743
(D1) to (D5) RNA in situ hybridization of GAD1 during spikelet development in 744
OIL31. Bar = 100 μm. 745
(E1) to (E5) RNA in situ hybridization of HISTONE H4 during spikelet 746
development in NA93-11. Bar = 100 μm. 747
(F1) to (F5) RNA in situ hybridization of HISTONE H4 during spikelet 748
development in OIL31. Bar = 100 μm. 749
(G) RNA in situ hybridization of CKX2 in a young panicle of NA93-11. Bar = 750
100 μm. 751
(H) RNA in situ hybridization of CKX2 in a young panicle of OIL31. Bar = 100 752
μm. 753
(I) RNA in situ hybridization of RR1 in a young panicle of NA93-11. Bar = 100 754
μm. 755
(J) RNA in situ hybridization of RR1 in a young panicle of OIL31. Bar = 100 μm. 756
(K) Comparison of cytokinin concentrations in 5–10 mm-long young panicles 757
between NA93-11 and OIL31. 758
Red arrows (and red dashed lines in E3 to E5 and F3 to F5) indicate the tips of 759
27
lemmas. The statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 based on a two-tailed 760
Student’s t test. Error bars represent the SD. In (A), (B) and (K), the data 761
represent the average of three independent biological replicates. 762
763
Figure 5. GAD1 protein variants in wild and cultivated rice. 764
(A) Differences between GAD1 in W2014 and gad1 in NA93-11. The green 765
rectangles represent the signal peptide. Reddish rectangles represent the 766
pro-peptide. Purple rectangles represent the mature peptide. Red vertical lines 767
represent cysteine residues. Blue rectangles represent the frame-shift region. 768
(B) The distribution of GAD1 protein variants in wild rice. 769
(C) The distribution of gad1 protein variants in cultivated rice. 770
771
Figure 6. Nucleotide diversity across the GAD1 genomic region on 772
chromosome 8. 773
(A) The 16 sampled loci (including GAD1) located in the ~1.9-Mb genomic 774
region around GAD1 gene on chromosome 8. 775
(B) Nucleotide diversity in cultivated rice and wild rice at the 16 sampled loci. 776
(C) Ratio of nucleotide diversity in O. sativa relative to that in O. rufipogon, 777
including the ~900-kb selective sweep region surrounding gad1 in cultivated 778
rice. 779
780
O. rufipogon O. sativa
A B
Figure 1. Phenotypes of wild rice and cultivated rice.
(A) O. rufipogon. A panicle of wild rice is shown in the lower left corner, and the
grains of wild rice are illustrated in the lower right corner. Bar = 10 mm.
(B) O. sativa. A panicle of cultivated rice is shown in the lower left corner, and the
grains of cultivated rice are illustrated in the lower right corner. Bar = 10 mm.
Figure 2. Phenotypes of NA93-11 and OIL31.
(A) Panicle comparison between NA93-11 and OIL31. Bar = 50 mm.
(B) Grains of NA93-11 and OIL31. Bar = 10 mm.
(C) Genotype of OIL31. The white regions indicate the NA93-11 genetic background.
The blue regions indicate wild rice introgressions. The red ellipse indicates the GAD1
locus.
(D) and (E) Grain length comparison between NA93-11 and OIL31. Bar = 10 mm.
(F) Comparison of grain number per panicle between NA93-11 and OIL31.
Sample sizes were n = 20. The statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 based on a
two-tailed Student’s t test. Error bars represent the SD.
GAD1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12C
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
NA93-11 OIL31
Gra
ins p
er
pan
icle
**
F
w9311 OIL31
Gra
in l
en
gth
(m
m)
7
9
11
0
6
8
10 **
E
NA93-11 OIL31
NA93-11 OIL31
A
NA93-11
OIL31
B
D
NA93-11
OIL31
Gra
in le
ng
th (
mm
)
7
9
0
6
8** **
O
Nip CPL-1 CPL-2
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6
Aw
n l
en
gth
(cm
)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0 A
wn
le
ng
th (
cm
)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Aw
n p
rop
ort
ion
(%
)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Aw
n p
rop
ort
ion
(%
)
Nip CPL-1
F
I Nip
CPL-1
TIL189 RNAi-1
K
NTIL189
RNAi-1
Gra
in le
ng
th (
mm
)
7
9
0
6
8
** **
P
TIL189 RNAi-1 RNAi-2
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Nip CPL-1 CPL-2
Gra
ins p
er
pan
icle
** **
Q
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
TIL189 RNAi-1RNAi-2
Gra
ins p
er
pan
icle
R
*
** **
L
** **
G H
M
** **
Nip CPL-1
E
TIL189 RNAi-1
J
B
Os08g0485500
D pCPL
pRNAi
5’
ATG TGA
UBI
3’100 bp
GCC TPhenotype
C
M12 RM256M10 RM5485 100 kbGAD18S 8L
A Marker
Chr.8
R=23 9 4 11
MX9M62 MX10M67 MX16
2 6 61033
GAD1MX14
2
5 kbMarker
R=
MX12MX15M3
47 2 2
OIL31
NA93-11
Indel1 Indel3SNP1Indel2
ATG TGA
ATG TGA--- GCCTCC G CGCCGCC
awn
awnless5’
5’ 3’
3’
**
Figure 3. Map-based cloning of GAD1.
(A) The target gene was mapped between the markers M10 and RM5485 on the
long arm of chromosome 8. The numbers underneath the bars indicate the number
of recombinants between GAD1 and the molecular markers.
(B) GAD1 was fine mapped to a ~6-kb region between the markers MX14 and
MX16. The numbers underneath the bars indicate the numbers of recombinants
between GAD1 and molecular markers. Os08g0485500 was the candidate gene.
The arrows indicate gene directions.
(C) Gene structure of GAD1, and the different sites between OIL31 and NA93-11.
The black bars represent 5′ upstream and 3′ downstream regions and introns;
rectangles represent exons; and triangles represent insertions. There were three
Indels (Indel1, Indel2 and Indel3) and an SNP (SNP1) between OIL31 and NA93-
11.
(D) The constructs used in the GAD1 functional investigation. pCPL represents the
~4.0-kb W2014 genomic fragment covering the entire GAD1 gene region and the
2.5-kb 5′ upstream and 350-bp 3′ downsteam sequences used for the
complementation test. pRNAi denotes the RNAi construct that harbors a 350-bp
specific region of the GAD1 mRNA. UBI is a maize Ubiquitin promoter. Green
areas represent the 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions; red areas represent gene
coding regions.
(E) Panicle comparison between Nipponbare (Nip) and the transgenic line (CPL-1).
Bar = 50 mm.
(F) Grain comparison between Nip and the transgenic line (CPL-1). Bar = 10 mm.
(G) Awn length comparison between Nip and two independent transgenic lines,
CPL-1 and CPL-2.
(H) The comparison of percentages of awned seeds between Nip and two
independent transgenic lines, CPL-1 and CPL-2.
(I) and (O) Grain length comparison between Nip and transgenic lines. Bar = 10
mm.
(J) Panicle comparison between a control plant (TIL189) and a transgenic line
(RNAi-1). Bar = 50 mm.
(K) Grain comparison between TIL189 and a transgenic line (RNAi-1). Bar = 10
mm.
(L) Awn length comparison between TIL189 and two independent transgenic lines,
RNAi-1 and RNAi-2.
(M) The comparison of percentages of awned seeds between TIL189 and two
independent transgenic lines, RNAi-1 and RNAi-2.
(N) and (P) Grain length comparison between TIL189 and RNAi transgenic lines.
Bar = 10 mm.
(Q) Grain number per panicle comparison between Nip and two independent
transgenic lines, CPL-1 and CPL-2.
(R) Grain number per panicle comparison between ‘TIL189’ and two independent
transgenic lines, RNAi-1 and RNAi-2.
Sample sizes were n = 10. The statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 based on
a two-tailed Student’s t test. Error bars represent the SD.
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Rela
tive e
xp
ressio
n l
evel
NA93-11
OIL31
A
**
** **
** **
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
tZ iP
CK
s c
on
cen
trati
on
(n
g/g
)
NA93-11
OIL31
K
*
*
CKX2
OIL31
CKX2
NA93-11
RR1
NA93-11
RR1
OIL31
G H
I J
B
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
NA93-11 OIL31
Rela
tive e
xp
ressio
n l
evel
**
HIS
TO
NE
H4
OIL
31
HIS
TO
NE
H4
NA
93-1
1G
AD
1
OIL
31
GA
D1
NA
93-1
1
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
D1 D2 D3 D4 D5
E1 E2 E3 E4 E5
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5
Figure 4. The expression patterns and effects of GAD1 on spikelet development.
(A) Comparison of GAD1 expression patterns between NA93-11 and OIL31.
(B) Comparison of GAD1 expression levels of at the apices of glumes between
NA93-11 and OIL31.
(C1) to (C5) RNA in situ hybridization of GAD1 during spikelet development in NA93-
11. Bar = 100 μm.
(D1) to (D5) RNA in situ hybridization of GAD1 during spikelet development in OIL31.
Bar = 100 μm.
(E1) to (E5) RNA in situ hybridization of HISTONE H4 during spikelet development in
NA93-11. Bar = 100 μm.
(F1) to (F5) RNA in situ hybridization of HISTONE H4 during spikelet development in
OIL31. Bar = 100 μm.
(G) RNA in situ hybridization of CKX2 in a young panicle of NA93-11. Bar = 100 μm.
(H) RNA in situ hybridization of CKX2 in a young panicle of OIL31. Bar = 100 μm.
(I) RNA in situ hybridization of RR1 in a young panicle of NA93-11. Bar = 100 μm.
(J) RNA in situ hybridization of RR1 in a young panicle of OIL31. Bar = 100 μm.
(K) Comparison of cytokinin concentrations in 5–10 mm-long young panicles
between NA93-11 and OIL31.
Red arrows (and red dashed lines in E3 to E5 and F3 to F5) indicate the tips of
lemmas. The statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 based on a two-tailed
Student’s t test. Error bars represent the SD. In (A), (B) and (K), the data represent
the average of three independent biological replicates.
B
A
Awnless
AwnAwnless
Awn
AwnlessAwn
Cultivated rice
(n=137)(n=23)
(n=43)
Cysteine number =7
Cysteine number =6
Cysteine number =4
(n=203)
Cysteine number =7
Cysteine number =6
Cysteine number =4
(n=53)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Cysteine number=4
Cysteine number=6
Cysteine number=7
Wild rice
InDel1 InDel3SNP1InDel2
W2014
NA93-11
Signal peptide Pro-peptide Mature peptide
A - - E
E frame shift
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
C5’ C6’ C7
C
C1 C2 C3 C4
- AS
Nu
mb
er
of
acce
ssio
ns
Figure 5. GAD1 protein variants in wild and cultivated rice.
(A) Differences between GAD1 in W2014 and gad1 in NA93-11. The green rectangles
represent the signal peptide. Reddish rectangles represent the pro-peptide. Purple
rectangles represent the mature peptide. Red vertical lines represent cysteine residues.
Blue rectangles represent the frame-shift region.
(B) The distribution of GAD1 protein variants in wild rice.
(C) The distribution of gad1 protein variants in cultivated rice.
Physical position (Mb)
0
0.02
π
0
0.5
1
1.5
πra
tio
(O
. sati
va/
O.
rufi
po
go
n)
23.4 23.5 23.6 23.7 23.8 23.9 24.0 24.1 24.2 24.3 24.4 24.5 24.6 24.7 24.8 24.9
.
site 1
. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1312 1514GAD1
Very low diversity in O. sativa
A
O. sativa
O. rufipogon
B
C
Figure 6. Nucleotide diversity across the GAD1 genomic region on chromosome 8.
(A) The 16 sampled loci (including GAD1) located in the ~1.9-Mb genomic region
around GAD1 gene on chromosome 8.
(B) Nucleotide diversity in cultivated rice and wild rice at the 16 sampled loci.
(C) Ratio of nucleotide diversity in O. sativa relative to that in O. rufipogon, including
the ~900-kb selective sweep region surrounding gad1 in cultivated rice.
Parsed CitationsAbrash, E.B., and Bergmann, D.C. (2010). Regional specification of stomatal production by the putative ligand CHALLAH.Development 137: 447-455.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Abrash, E.B., Dacies K.A., and Bergmann, D.C. (2011). Generation of signaling specificity in Arabidopsis by spatially restrictedbuffering of ligand-receptor interactions. Plant Cell 23: 2864-2879.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ashikari, M., Sakakibara, H., Lin, S., Yamamoto, T., Takashi, T., Nishimura, A., Angeles, E.R., Qian, Q., Kitano, H., and Matsuoka, M.(2005). Cytokinin oxidase regulates rice grain production. Science 309: 741-745.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
De Block M, Debrouwer D. (1993) RNA-RNA in situ hybridization using digoxigenin-labeled probes: the use of high-molecular-weight polyvinyl alcohol in the alkaline phosphatase indoxyl-nitroblue tetrazolium reaction. Anal Biochem 215: 86-89
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doebley, J., Gaut, B., and Smith, B. (2006). The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell 127: 1309-1321.Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Engineer, C.B., Ghassemian, M., Anderson, J.C., Peck, S.C., Hu, H., and Schroeder, J.I. (2014). Carbonic anhydrases, EPF2 and anovel protease mediate CO2 control of stomatal development. Nature 513: 246-250.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fletcher, J.C., Brand, U., Running, M.P., Simon, R., and Meyerowitz, E.M. (1999). Signaling of cell fate decisions by CLAVATA3 inArabidopsis shoot meristems. Science 283: 1911-1914.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fuller, D.Q., Sato, Y.I., Castillo, C., Qin, L., Weisskopf, A.R., Kingwell-Banham, E.J., Song, J., Ahn, S.M., and Van Etten, J. (2010).Consilience of genetics and archaeobotany in the entangled history of rice. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. 2: 115-131.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gu, B., Zhou, T., Luo, J., Liu, H., Wang, Y., Shangguan, Y., Zhu, J., Li, Y., Sang, T., Wang, Z., and Bin, H. (2015). An-2 encodes acytokinin synthesis enzyme that regulates awn length and grain production in rice. Mol. Plant 8: 635-1650.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hara, K., Kajita, R., Torii, K.U., Bergmann, D.C., and Kakimoto, T. (2007). The secretory peptide gene EPF1 enforces the stomatalone-cell-spacing rule. Gene. Dev. 21: 1720-1725.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hara, K., Yokoo, T., Kajita, R., Onishi, T., Yahata, S., Peterson, K.M., Torii, K.U., and Kakimoto, T. (2009). Epidermal cell density isautoregulated via a secretory peptide, EPIDERMAL PATTERNING FACTOR 2 in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Cell Physiol. 50: 1019-1031.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hua, L., Wang, D. R., Tan, L., Fu, Y., Liu, F., Xiao, L., Zhu, Z., Fu, Q., Sun, X., Gu, P., Cai, H., McCouch., and Sun, C. (2015). LABA1, adomestication gene associated with long, barbed awns in wild rice. Plant Cell 27: 1875-1888.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Huang, X., et al. (2012). A map of rice genome variation reveals the origin of cultivated rice. Nature 490: 497-501.Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Huang, Y., Tao, Z., Liu, Q., Wang, X., Yu, J., Liu, G., and Wang, H. (2014). BnEPFL6, an EPIDERMAL PATTERNING FACTOR-LIKE
(EPFL) secreted peptide gene, is required for filament elongation in Brassica napus. Plant Mol. Biol. 85: 05-517.Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hunt, L., and Gray, J.E. (2009). The signaling peptide EPF2 controls asymmetric cell divisions during stomatal development. Curr.Biol. 19: 864-869.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishii, T., Numaguchi, K., Miura, K., Yoshida, K., Thanh, P.T., Htun, T.M., Yamasaki, M., Komeda, N., Matsumoto, T., Terauchi, R.,Ishikawa, R., and Ashikari, M. (2013). OsLG1 regulates a closed panicle trait in domesticated rice. Nat. Genet. 45: 462-465.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Itoh, J., Nonomura, K., Ikeda, K., Yamaki, S., Inukai, Y., Yamagishi, H.,Kitano, H., and Nagato, Y. (2005). Rice plant development:from zygote to spikelet. Plant Cell Physiol. 46: 23-47.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jain, M., Tyagi, A.K., and Khurana, J.P. (2006). Molecular characterization and differential expression of cytokinin-responsive type-A response regulators in rice (Oryza sativa). BMC Plant Biol. 6: 1.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jewaria, P.K., Hara, T., Tanaka, H., Kondo, T., Betsuyaku, S., Sawa, S., Sakagami, Y., Aimoto, S., and Kakimoto, T. (2013). Differentialeffects of the peptides stomagen, EPF1 and EPF2 on activation of MAP kinase MPK6 and the SPCH protein level. Plant CellPhysiol. 54: 1253-1262.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jin, J., Huang, W., Gao, J.P., Yang, J., Shi, M., Zhu, M.Z., Luo, D., and Lin, H.X. (2008). Genetic control of rice plant architectureunder domestication. Nat. Genet. 40: 1365-1369.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Katsir, L., Davies, K.A., Bergmann, D.C., and Laux, T. (2011). Peptide signaling in plant development. Curr. Biol. 21: R356-R364.Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Khush, G. S. (1997). Origin, dispersal, cultivation and variation of rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 35: 25-34Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Konishi, S., Izawa, T., Lin, S.Y., Ebana, K., Fukuta, Y., Sasaki, T., and Yano, M. (2006). An SNP caused loss of seed shattering duringrice domestication. Science 312: 1392-1396.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee, J.S., Kuroha, T., Hnilova, M., Khatayevich, D., Kanaoka, M.M., McAbee, J.M., Sarikaya, M., Tamerler, C., and Torii, K.U. (2012).Direct interaction of ligand-receptor pairs specifying stomatal patterning. Gene. Dev. 26: 126-136.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee, J.S., Hnilova, M., Maes, M., Lin, Y.L., Putarjunan, A., Han, H., Avila, J., and Torii, K. U. (2015). Competitive binding ofantagonistic peptides fine-tunes stomatal patterning. Nature 522: 439-443.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee, J., Park, J.J., Kim, S.L., Yim, J. and An, G. (2007). Mutations in the rice liguleless gene result in a complete loss of the auricle,ligule, and laminar joint. Plant Mol. Biol. 65: 487-499.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li, C., Zhou, A., and Sang, T. (2006). Rice domestication by reducing shattering. Science 311: 1936-1939.Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li, S., et al. (2013). Rice zinc finger protein DST enhances grain production through controlling Gn1a/OsCKX2 expression. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110: 3167-3172.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li, Y., et al. (2011). Natural variation in GS5 plays an important role in regulating grain size and yield in rice. Nat. Genet. 43: 1266-1269.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin, Z., Griffith, M.E., Li, X., Zhu, Z., Tan, L., Fu, Y., Zhang, W., Wang, X., Xie, D., and Sun, C. (2007). Origin of seed shattering in rice(Oryza sativa L.). Planta 226: 11-20.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Livak, K.J., and Schmittgen, T.D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-??CTmethod. Methods 25: 402-408.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Luo, J., et al. (2013). An-1 encodes a basic helix-loop-helix protein that regulates awn development, grain size, and grain number inrice. Plant Cell 25: 3360-3376.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Marzluff, W.F., and Duronio, R.J. (2002). Histone mRNA expression: multiple levels of cell cycle regulation and importantdevelopmental consequences. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14: 692-699.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Matsubayashi, Y., and Sakagami, Y. (1996). Phytosulfokine, sulfated peptides that induce the proliferation of single mesophyll cellsof Asparagus officinalis L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 7623-7627.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ohki, S., Takeuchi, M., and Mori, M. (2011). The NMR structure of stomagen reveals the basis of stomatal density regulation byplant peptide hormones. Nat. Commun. 2: 512.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Okuda, S., Tsutsui, H., Shiina, K., Sprunck, S., Takeuchi, H., Yui, R., Kasahara, R.D., Hamamura, Y., Mizukami, A., and Susaki, D.(2009). Defensin-like polypeptide LUREs are pollen tube attractants secreted from synergid cells. Nature 458: 357-361.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Pearce, G., Strydom, D., Johnson, S., and Ryan, C. A. (1991). A polypeptide from tomato leaves induces wound-inducible proteinaseinhibitor proteins. Science 253: 895-897.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Petersen, T.N., Brunak, S., Von Heijne, G., and Nielsen, H. (2011). SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembraneregions. Nat. Methods 8: 785-786.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Rozas, J., Sánchez-DelBarrio, J.C., Messeguer, X., and Rozas, R. (2003). DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescentand other methods. Bioinformatics 19: 2496-2497.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Schopfer, C.R., Nasrallah, M.E., and Nasrallah, J.B. (1999). The male determinant of self-incompatibility in Brassica. Science 286:1697-1700.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Simons, K.J., Fellers, J.P., Trick, H.N., Zhang, Z., Tai, Y.S., Gill, B.S., and Faris, J.D. (2006). Molecular characterization of the majorwheat domestication gene q. Genetics 172: 547-555.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sugano, S.S., Shimada, T., Imai, Y., Okawa, K., Tamai, A., Mori, M., and Hara-Nishimura, I. (2010). Stomagen positively regulatesstomatal density in Arabidopsis. Nature 463: 241-244.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sweeney, M.T., Thomson, M.J., Pfeil, B.E., and McCouch, S. (2006). Caught red-handed: Rc encodes a basic helix-loop-helixprotein conditioning red pericarp in rice. Plant Cell 18: 283-294.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Takata, N., Yokota, K., Ohki, S., Mori, M., Taniguchi, T., and Kurita, M. (2013). Evolutionary relationship and structuralcharacterization of the EPF/EPFL gene family. PloS One 8: e65183.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M., and Kumar, S. (2011). MEGA5: molecular evolutionary geneticsanalysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28: 2731-2739.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Tan, L., Liu, F., Xue, W., Wang, G., Ye, S., Zhu, Z., Fu, Y., Wang, X and Sun, C. (2007). Development of Oryza rufipogon and O. sativaIntrogression Lines and Assessment for Yield-related Quantitative Trait Loci. J. Integr. Plant Biol.49: 871-884.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Tan, L., Li, X., Liu, F., Sun, X., Li, C., Zhu, Z., Fu, Y., Cai, H., Wang, X., Xie, D., and Sun, C. (2008). Control of a key transition fromprostrate to erect growth in rice domestication. Nat. Genet. 40: 1360-1364.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F., and Higgins, D.G. (1997). The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexiblestrategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic. Acids Res. 25: 4876-4882.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Uchida N., Lee J.S., Horst R.J., Lai H-H., Kajita R., Kakinmoto T., Tasaka M., and Torii K.U. (2012). Regulation of inflorescencearchitecture by intertissue layer ligand-receptor communication between endodermis and phloem. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109:6337-6342.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Xu, X., et al. (2011). Resequencing 50 accessions of cultivated and wild rice yields markers for identifying agronomically importantgenes. Nat. Biotechnol. 30: 105-111.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang D., and Yuan Z. (2014). Molecular control of grass inflorescence development. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 65: 553-578.Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhu, B.F., et al. (2011). Genetic control of a transition from black to straw-white seed hull in rice domestication. Plant physiol. 155:1301-1311.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhu, Z., Tan, L., Fu, Y., Liu, F., Cai, H., Xie, D., Wu, F., Wu, J., Matsumoto, T., and Sun, C. (2013). Genetic control of inflorescencearchitecture during rice domestication. Nat. Commun. 4: 2200
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zong, Y., Chen, Z., Innes, J.B., Chen, C., Wang, Z., and Wang, H. (2007). Fire and flood management of coastal swamp enabled firstrice paddy cultivation in east China. Nature 449: 459-462.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DOI 10.1105/tpc.16.00379; originally published online September 15, 2016;Plant Cell
Hongwei Cai, Xianyou Sun, Ping Gu, Daoxin Xie and Chuanqing SunJing Jin, Lei Hua, Zuofeng Zhu, Lubin Tan, Xinhui Zhao, Weifeng Zhang, Fengxia Liu, Yongcai Fu,
Development in Rice DomesticationGAD1 Encodes a Secreted Peptide That Regulates Grain Number, Grain Length and Awn
This information is current as of May 29, 2020
Supplemental Data /content/suppl/2016/09/13/tpc.16.00379.DC1.html
Permissions https://www.copyright.com/ccc/openurl.do?sid=pd_hw1532298X&issn=1532298X&WT.mc_id=pd_hw1532298X
eTOCs http://www.plantcell.org/cgi/alerts/ctmain
Sign up for eTOCs at:
CiteTrack Alerts http://www.plantcell.org/cgi/alerts/ctmain
Sign up for CiteTrack Alerts at:
Subscription Information http://www.aspb.org/publications/subscriptions.cfm
is available at:Plant Physiology and The Plant CellSubscription Information for
ADVANCING THE SCIENCE OF PLANT BIOLOGY © American Society of Plant Biologists