gabriel - university of washingtondepts.washington.edu › pcapuw › pcap_presentation_...
TRANSCRIPT
Gabriel
WA State DSHS Division of Behavioral Recovery and Health (DBHR)in conjunction with
UW School of Medicine, Triumph Treatment Services, Grant County PARC, New Horizon Care Centers, Spokane Reservation, Drug and Alcohol Prevention Center, Skagit Recovery Center, First Step Family Support Center, and Agape Unlimited.
Therese M. Grant, Ph.D.Washington State PCAP Director
The Washington State Parent Child Assistance Program (PCAP)
King, Pierce, Yakima, Spokane, Grant, Cowlitz, Skagit, Kitsap and Clallam Counties
The ProblemThe Problem
·
Possible effects of prenatal exposure on the child’s health
·
Likelihood of a compromised home environment
·
Likelihood that these mothers will have more exposed, affected children
These problems are costly to society and are completely preventable
Maternal alcohol and drug use puts children at risk because of
ParentParent--Child Assistance ProgramChild Assistance Program
An intensive, 3An intensive, 3--year paraprofessional year paraprofessional home visitation program for the highest home visitation program for the highest
risk alcohol and/or drug abusing mothers risk alcohol and/or drug abusing mothers
To prevent future births of alcohol and drug exposed
children
Primary Goal:
ParentParent--Child Assistance ProgramChild Assistance Program
History of PCAP
1991-95
Federally funded research: Seattle
1996-98
Philanthropist provides interim funding
1996-97
Governor funds replication in Tacoma
1997-98
Follow-up study, original cohort: Seattle
1997-11
State funding in nine WA counties
Since 1998 Replications/adaptations: MN, NC, AK, TX, NV, LA, PA, MI, CA, Canada , NZ
Yakima
Grant
Skagit
Pierce
Cowlitz
Spokane
Clallam
KingKitsap
PPAARREENNTT--CCHHIILLDD AASSSSIISSTTAANNCCEE PPRROOGGRRAAMM ((PPCCAAPP)) University of Washington School of Medicine
Therese Grant, Principal Investigator Cara Ernst, Program Evaluator
Washington State Department of Social and Health Services
Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery (DBHR) Funded through June, 2011 WA State Institutional Review Board
PIERCE COUNTY
KING COUNTY
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
FETAL ALCOHOL AND DRUG UNIT
TRIUMPH TREATMENT SERVICES
YAKIMA COUNTY
COWLITZ COUNTY
DRUG AND ALCOHOL PREVENTION CENTER
GRANT INTEGRATED SERVICES
PREVENTION AND RECOVERY CENTER
GRANT COUNTY
SPOKANE COUNTY
NEW HORIZONS CARE CENTERS AND
SPOKANE RESERVATION
Contractual Partnerships
Housing: - CPC/Willows Housing - Plymouth Housing
Housing: -Inter-Community Housing
SKAGIT COUNTY
SKAGIT RECOVERY CENTER
HHIISSTTOORRYY OOFF PPCCAAPP
11999911--9955 FFeeddeerraallllyy ffuunnddeedd rreesseeaarrcchh:: SSeeaattttllee 11999966--9988 PPhhiillaanntthhrrooppiisstt pprroovviiddeess iinntteerriimm ffuunnddiinngg 11999966--9977 GGoovveerrnnoorr ffuunnddss rreepplliiccaattiioonn iinn TTaaccoommaa 11999977--9988 FFoollllooww--uupp ssttuuddyy,, oorriiggiinnaall ccoohhoorrtt:: SSeeaattttllee 11999977--0099 SSttaattee ffuunnddiinngg iinn nniinnee WWAA ccoouunnttiieess SSiinnccee 11999988 RReepplliiccaattiioonnss//aaddaappttaattiioonnss:: MMNN,, NNCC,, AAKK,, TTXX,, NNVV,, LLAA,, PPAA,, MMII,, CCAA,, CCaannaaddaa,, NNZZ
KITSAP COUNTY
CLALLAM COUNTY
AGAPE UNLIMITED
FIRST STEP FAMILY SUPPORT
CENTER
Housing:
- Phoenix House Longview Housing Authority, Building Changes
Contractual Partnership
1997 and 1998: Drug Strategies, Washington D.C. Policy Research Institute, cites PCAP as an award-winning intervention.
January 2004: National Healthy Mothers, Healthy Babies Coalition awards State and Community Impact Honorable Mention to PCAP for work with alcohol and drug-dependent mothers.
August 2004: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) presents PCAP a 2003 Exemplary Substance Abuse Prevention Award.
PCAP National Recognition
Theoretical Framework of the Intervention
Relational TheoryA woman’s sense of connectedness to
others is central to her growth, development, definition of self.
InterventionLong term, positive interpersonal relationship with advocate
Relational Theory
•
have experienced some of the same adverse life circumstances as clients, but seldom to same degree
•
have subsequently achieved success in important ways
•
are positive role models and offer clients hope and motivation from a realistic perspective
• 2-4 yrs. social services experience and minimum AA degree required
PCAP Advocates
“I've lived through the things they've been through, so I'm not afraid or
intimidated. I've lived with domestic violence. For someone to tell a client in a domestic violence situation to just up and go, it’s not that easy.
There are lots of plans to think about. I understand when someone says, 'I can't just leave
right now.' But I can help plan a strategy, because I've lived it.”
— PCAP Advocate
Theoretical Framework
Stages of ChangeClients will be at different stages of readiness for change. Motivation is a process for change that occurs within the context of interpersonal relationships.
InterventionMotivational Interviewing
•
acknowledge client’s perception of situation•
encourage her to explore + and –
aspects
Theoretical Framework
Harm ReductionAddiction and associated risks are on a continuum. The goal is to reduce harmful consequences of the habit for mother and her child.
InterventionAny steps toward decreased risk are steps in the right direction.
PCAP Enrollment Criteria
1)
Used alcohol/drugs heavily during pregnancy
2)
Not effectively engaged with community resources
3)
Are currently pregnant, up to six months postpartum
-or-Have delivered a child with a diagnosis of FAS/E
Client Characteristics
At Enrollment WA PCAP SitesN=817
Mean age (yrs) 26.5
Unmarried 91%
Mean # of children(including target child)
2.7
Mean # of children living w/client .35
Client Characteristics
At Enrollment WA PCAP SitesN=817
Years of education 11.00
History of domestic violence
76%
Ever jailed 75%
Client CharacteristicsSubstance Abuse During Target
PregnancyWA PCAP Sites
N=817
Any Alcohol 51%
Binge Alcohol 32%
Methamphetamine 54%
Cocaine 34%
Opiates (including Oxycodone) 15%
Marijuana 55%
Cigarettes 82%
Client Characteristics
At Enrollment WA PCAP SitesN=817
Has had psychiatric evaluation 54%
Of those evaluated, were diagnosed 46%
Of those with known diagnoses
Mood disorder 81%Stress/anxiety/panic disorder 50%Personality disorder 13%
Psychotic disorder 3%
Most of our clients were themselvesabused or neglected as children
At Enrollment WA PCAP SitesN=817
One/both parents used alc/drugs 92%
Client’s mom used alcohol during pregnancy w/client 19%
Experienced physical abuse as a child 47%
Experienced sexual abuse as a child 60%
CPS involvement as a child 26%
Advocate
Community Service Providers
Clients & Families
PCAP: A Two-Pronged Approach
Five Functions of PCAP Advocacy
Assessment: determine client’s strengths, weaknesses, needs
Planning: develop specific service plans
Linking: connect client/family to services
Monitoring:
continuous evaluation of progress
Advocacy: intercede on behalf of client and children
PCAP Incorporates These Characteristics
Community Providers
Juvenile Justice
Probation
Alc/DrugTx
Mental HealthTx
Health Care
FamilyPlanning
Job Training
Schools
Bio Dad
Room-mates
Friends
Partners
Neighbors
ExtendedFamily
Caretakers
Children
CPS
Siblings
PCAP Administrative Strategies
•
Individual weekly supervision
•
Weekly group staffing
• Training: pre-service, in-service, and continuing education
• Biannual evaluation feedback
Core Components of the Intervention (DBHR-contracted)
PCAP is a three year home visitation model, implemented by well trained and closely
supervised advocate/case managers.
Caseload recommendation is 15 to 16
active client families per advocate.
Core Components of the Intervention
• Clients are not asked to leave the program because of relapse or setbacks.
• To facilitate an effective service plan, advocates develop and coordinate a network of contacts with family, friends, and providers involved in a client’s life.
• Clients define and evaluate personal goals every four months, which advocates coordinate with program goals.
Core Components of the Intervention
• Advocates link clients with appropriate and available community services.
• Advocates work with both mother and target child regardless of custody issues, and provide advocacy for other family members as needed.
• A minimum of twice monthly individual supervisions and group staffing meetings are recommended.
• Advocates are required to submit completed evaluation instruments according to PCAP protocol.
IT WOULD MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN MY
LIFE IF I HAD:
MORE EDUCATION
IT WOULD MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN MY
LIFE IF I HAD:
MORE EDUCATION
IT WOULD MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN MY
LIFE IF I HAD:
MORE EDUCATION
IT WOULD MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN MY
LIFE IF I HAD:
HELP WITH CHILDCARE
IT WOULD MAKE A
DIFFERENCE IN MY
LIFE IF I HAD:
BIRTH CONTROL
IT WOULD MAKE A
DIFFERENCE IN MY
LIFE IF I HAD:
DRUG AND ALCOHOL
TREATMENT
The Difference Game
• Identify the “baby”
steps it will take to reach each goal
• Make sure at least some of these baby steps are attainable in the 4-month period.
• The client MUST observe herself succeeding in order for her to move along to new Stages of Change.
The Difference Game
The Formula for Preventing Alcohol/Drug Exposed Births
•
Motivate women to stop drinking or using drugs before and during pregnancy
-OR –
• Help women who can’t stop drinking
or using drugs to avoid becoming pregnant
PCAP is Evidence-Based
Published Outcomes
1999:
Intervention with high-risk alcohol and drug-abusing mothers: II. 3-year findings from the Seattle model of paraprofessional advocacy.
Journal of Community
Psychology, 27(1), 19-38.
2003: Post-program follow-up effects of paraprofessional intervention with high-risk women who abused alcohol and drugs during pregnancy.
Journal of Community
Psychology, 31(3), 211-222.
2005: Preventing alcohol and drug exposed births in Washington State: Intervention findings from three Parent-Child Assistance Program sites.
American
Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 31(3): 471-90.
Other PCAP Publications
• 2009: Alcohol use before and during pregnancy in Western Washington, 1989-2004: Implications for the prevention of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 200(3):278e1-8.
• 2008: Suicide attempts among adults with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders: Clinical considerations. Mental Health Aspects of Developmental Disabilities, 11(2):33-41.
• 2006: Neonatal cranial ultrasound leads to early diagnosis and early intervention in baby of alcohol-abusing mother. Mental Health Aspects of Developmental Disabilities, 9(4), 125-127.
• 2005: Quality of Life and Psychosocial Profile Among Young Women With Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders. Mental Health Aspects of Developmental Disabilities, 8(2), 33-39.
• 2004: A pilot community intervention for young women with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Community Mental Health Journal. 40(6), 499-511.
• 2003: Intervening to prevent prenatal alcohol and drug exposure: The Manitoba experience in replicating a paraprofessional model. Envision: The Manitoba Journal of Child Welfare 2(1), 1-12.
• 2002: Benefits and challenges of paraprofessional advocacy with mothers who abuse alcohol and drugs and their children. Zero to 3. 23(2):14-20.
Treatment & Abstinence Outcomes
3-Year Outcomes WA State PCAP
Follow up rate
Inpatient or outpatient tx complete or in progress
Abstinent at exit for ≥
6 moAbstinent at exit for ≥
1 yr
Longest abstinence in PCAP ≥
1 yr Longest abstinence in PCAP ≥
2 yrs
84%
90%
48%41%
65%36%
3-Year Outcomes WA State PCAP
Family planning at intakeFamily planning at exit
-
More reliable method
Subsequent alc/drug exposed birth
10%65%52%
13%
Family Planning Outcomes
Income & Custody Outcomes
3-Year Outcomes WA State PCAP
Main income employmentAt intakeAt exit
Main income welfareAt intakeAt exit
Custody of target child at exitBio motherOther familyFoster careAdopted
3%28%
55%33%
64%15%11%8%
Good things happen when communities implement effective programs and states implement strong
policy.
Systems Working Together
Division of Alcohol & Substance Abuse
(DASA)
Increased treatment beds for women: 55 to 149 (1991 -
2003)
Systems Working Together
The PCAP Model Maintains Project Fidelity
• Monitor quality control• Evaluate program• Demonstrate consistent positive outcomes • Build acceptance, recognition in community• Participate in community task forces
PCAP continues to …..
PCAP is cost effective and saves Washington State
taxpayer dollars.
Reduced Dependence On Child Welfare System Reduced Dependence On Child Welfare System = Reduced Costs to the Public= Reduced Costs to the Public
At PCAP exit, 58 mothers who at enrollment were not caring for/living with any of their previous children, had cared for/lived with their PCAP child throughout the 3-year program.
For every month a PCAP child is not in foster care, the state avoids at least $1,000 in costs.
State foster care costs avoided = $2,088,000.
Fewer Alcohol & Drug Affected Births = Reduced Costs to the Public
112 recent PCAP graduates were using a reliable family planning method at program exit (tubal ligation, IUD, regular Depo Provera injections or Norplant implant).
The average cost for a Medicaid mother's prenatal care, delivery, and postpartum care ($7,949) and her infant’s first year of medical care ($7,168) = $15,117.
If each of these mothers had delivered just one more child, perinatal and first year infant medical costs alone would = $1,693,104.
43
Reduced Involvement with the Criminal Justice System = Reduced Costs to the Public
$10,000$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
Costs if originalsentence imposed
Actual costsbecause of PCAP
Coststo the Public
Amount Saved: $77,644
8 Months Home Electronic
Monitoring $3,625
$18,000 18 mo. Foster Care$63,269 18 mo. Medium Security Prison$81,269
Example of Cost Savings
$80,000$90,000
“Before PCAP I never thought about goals.
They showed me the right direction. They showed me that I am responsible. That no matter who I am or what I do,
I am somebody. It is never too late.”
--
PCAP Client at Graduation