future trends and challenges in engine lubricants icis-lor kuala lumpur 2008
TRANSCRIPT
Reproduction of any material whether by photocopying or storing in any medium by electronic meansor otherwise is prohibited without prior written consent of Infineum International Limited.
© Copyright INFINEUM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED 2007. All rights reserved
See the legal disclaimer notice on www.Infineum.com
"INFINEUM", "DOBANAX", "PARATAC", "SYNACTO", "VEKTRON", and the corporate mark comprising the interlocking ripple device are trademarks ofInfineum International Ltd. “VISTONE” is a trademark of Exxon Mobil Corporation used under licence
by Infineum International Limited.
Future Trends and ChallengesFuture Trends and Challengesinin Engine LubricantsEngine Lubricants
Dr. Jai G. BansalDr. Jai G. BansalGlobal Technology Advisor - Crankcase Lubricants
Infineum International Limited
IntroductionIntroduction
The automotive and heavy duty diesel industries aregoing through a period of rapid change
More hardware changes in the pipeline than in last 50 years
The lubricant industry is changing accordingly
The purpose of this presentation is to discuss:The key drivers behind this changeResulting challenges for the lubricant/additive industryHow the lubricant/additive industry is responding to thesechallenges
OutlineOutline
Introduction
Industry Drivers and Consequences
Key Trends and Challenges in Lubricant Formulations
Environment
Cost ofOwnership Globalization
Shortage ofNatural Resources
Tougher HSERegulations
EmissionRegulations
ExtendedDrain
FuelEconomy
AlternateFuels
Competitionat OEMs
CustomerSatisfaction
Industry Drivers and ConsequencesIndustry Drivers and Consequences
……Industry Drivers and ConsequencesIndustry Drivers and Consequences
GasolineDirect
Injection
Down-sizing
CatalystConverterDurability
Turbocharging
On-board oilmonitoring
Dieselcommonrail
Advancedmaterials and
surfacetreatments
EGRRetardedtiming
Variable valveactuation
ACERT TMDPF
SCR
Rapidly ChangingRapidly ChangingLubricant RequirementsLubricant Requirements
1. Emissions2. Extended Drain3. Fuel Economy4. Alternate Fuels
Key Trends and Challenges in LubricantKey Trends and Challenges in LubricantFormulationsFormulations
Emission Control StrategiesEmission Control Strategies
Approaches vary with OEMs but involve somecombination of
Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) – without or with externalcoolingDiesel Particulate Filter (DPF)Selective Catalyst Reduction (SCR)Caterpillar use proprietary ACERTTM system
Different approaches lead to specific and fragmentedlubricant needs
Nevertheless certain trends are common to most dieselengine lubricants:
Higher soot loading in the oil due to EGRRestrictions on SAPS (Sulphated Ash, Phosphorus andSulphur) to protect after-treatment devices
Retarded Timing
1988
API CE
1991
CF-4
1994
CG-4
1998
CH-4
2003
CI-4
Plus
2007
CJ-4
Externally cooled EGR
So
ot
inO
il,w
t%
1.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
2.0
Evolution of Soot Requirements in NAEvolution of Soot Requirements in NA ~6 lb of sootin typical oil
sump!
Less surfaceactive sootfrom cooled
EGR
Soot from Cooled EGR engines is unresponsiveSoot from Cooled EGR engines is unresponsiveto conventional dispersantsto conventional dispersants……stepstep--outouttechnologies requiredtechnologies required
0 2 4 6 8 10
Soot in Oil, Wt%
Vis
Inc
rea
se
New
TechnologyConventional
Dispersant
NormalDosage
2 X
Normal Dosage
Restricted SAPS EnvironmentRestricted SAPS Environment
Sources of SAPSSulphated Ash – Metal detergents, ZDDP antiwear additivesPhosphorus – ZDDP antiwear additivesSulphur – ZDDP, certain metal detergents, additive diluents,basestock
Phosphorus – The industry is fully cognizant of theimpact of “P” loading on catalyst efficiency in gasolinepowered vehicles
Long term trend is to reduced ZDDP in the oilExtent of reduction will be determined by engine durabilitySignificant reductions beyond current levels will requiredevelopment of new phos-free anti-wear technologies
Sulphur – With “S” largely eliminated from diesel fuel indeveloped markets, and the widespread use of Group IIand III basestocks, focus on sulphur content is now onthe additive systems
Metal detergents are metallic salts of organic materialssuch as sulphonate, phenate and salicylate
Some also contain metallic carbonate core to impart basicity oracid neutralization capability to the oilCommon metals are calcium and magnesium
Detergents play an important role in providing essentialpiston cleanliness and acid neutralization capability
Correct choice can also play a role in reducing ash and sulphur
Role of Metal Detergents in SAPS ConstrainedRole of Metal Detergents in SAPS ConstrainedEnvironmentEnvironment
Detergent ComparisonDetergent Comparison
Specially tailored salicylates for crankcase lubricants canoffer significant advantages, especially in extended drain
and SAPS constrained applications
Sulphonate Phenate Salicylate
Piston Cleanliness
Top No Yes Yes
Bottom Yes No Yes
Rust Control Yes No Yes
Antioxidancy No Yes Yes
Sulphur - Free No No Yes
The Struggle to Reduce Ash : Calcium versus MagnesiumThe Struggle to Reduce Ash : Calcium versus Magnesium
TBN Contribution
AS
H,w
t%Calcium
Detergent
Magnesium
Detergent
Lower Ash at
equal TBN
• Existing magnesium detergents can play an important rolein reducing ash content in the oil
• However, large step-change reductions in ash from thecurrent levels will require development of non-metallicdetergent and TBN systems
Extended drain oils have broad appeal to the lubricantindustry
Optimum use of natural resourcesCost of ownership - reduced downtime for fleet operators,reduced cost of disposalMarketing feature for OEMs
Drain intervals are in part constrained byEmission control systems – soot loading in EGR engines, DPFConcerns about engine durability
Key enablersHigh quality basestocks – Group III, conventional as well asvery high VI Group III’s (eg, from GTL)Advanced additive technologies such as salicylate detergents,enhanced low S/P anti-wear and new antioxidant technologiesInterestingly, viscosity modifiers also play key role – a factgenerally not well understood in the industry
2. Extended Drain2. Extended Drain
Role of Viscosity ModifiersRole of Viscosity Modifiers
Basic rule of lubrication: If the engine starts, OilIf the engine starts, Oilmust pumpmust pump
Not just when the oil is fresh but all through its life in theengine
Oils formulated with certain viscosity modifiers canexperience serious loss of pumpability at lowtemperatures due to ageing in the engine
For such oils, extending the time between oil changescan dramatically increase the risk of lubrication failure
Careful selection of VM is critically important inextended drain applications
Oil AOil A(VM(VM ””AA””, Premium additive system, Group III), Premium additive system, Group III)
0
100
200
300
400
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
Time from Start, Min
Oil
Pre
ss
ure
,K
Pa
Fresh After 10K Miles
Little change after 10K milesof service
Oil BOil B(VM(VM ““BB””, Premium additive system, Group III), Premium additive system, Group III)
0
100
200
300
400
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
Time from Start, Min
Oil
Pre
ss
ure
,K
Pa
Catastrophic loss ofperformance with age
Fresh
After 8K Miles
Fuel efficiency has been an important consideration forthe vehicle manufactures for quite some time
Escalating fuel costs in recent times have further raisedthe profile of FE in the automotive as well as the heavyduty diesel engine industry
Large share of the FE gains will accrue frominnovations in hardware designs
However, lubricants can also play an important role inminimizing energy losses in the engine and, indeed theentire drive train
3. Fuel Economy3. Fuel Economy
BoundaryFriction
RheologicalLosses
In-ServiceRetention
Fuel Economy TriangleFuel Economy Triangle
Real FE gains in engine lubricants will involve allReal FE gains in engine lubricants will involve allthree corners of the trianglethree corners of the triangle
StepStep--out Reduction in Boundary Friction isout Reduction in Boundary Friction isAchievable with Advanced Additive TechnologiesAchievable with Advanced Additive Technologies
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
0 100 200 300
Moly in Oil, ppm
Co
eff
icie
nt
of
Fri
cti
on
Conventional Moly
Technologies
Advanced Moly
Technology
However, evolving engine designs pose newHowever, evolving engine designs pose newchallengeschallenges
Advanced SurfaceAdvanced SurfaceTreatment / CoatingsTreatment / Coatings
Low FrictionLow FrictionEnginesEngines
Reduced impactReduced impactof frictionof friction
modifiers onmodifiers onfuel economyfuel economy
CompatibilityCompatibilitybetween frictionbetween frictionmodifiers andmodifiers and
surfacesurfacecoatings?coatings?
Growth of Light Viscosity Grades
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
1985
1995
2004
2006
2012
*
Millio
nG
allo
ns
RheologyRheology -- Low Viscosity LubricantsLow Viscosity Lubricants
Low viscosity lubricants are becoming an increasinglyimportant element in the race for higher FE
SAE 10W-30
SAE 5W-30
SAE 5W-20
For gasoline engines,For gasoline engines,SAE 0WSAE 0W--20 are not20 are notfar awayfar away
For HD dieselFor HD dieselengines, SAE 5Wengines, SAE 5W--3030and 5Wand 5W--40 synthetic40 syntheticoils are starting tooils are starting togain marketgain marketacceptanceacceptance
Source: NPRA * Infineum estimate
Potential Implications of Low ViscosityPotential Implications of Low Viscosity
Viscosity * Speed
Contact Pressure
Fri
cti
on
Hydrodynamic
Lubrication
Mix
ed
Lu
bri
ca
tio
n
Bo
un
da
ry
Lu
bri
ca
tio
n
ViscosityViscosity
Wear,Wear,friction,friction,
evaporationevaporation
Low Viscosity LubesLow Viscosity Lubes -- Challenges andChallenges and OpportunitiesOpportunities
To date, formulation challenges associated with wear inlighter viscosity grades have been overcome
Further reductions in viscosity will need carefulattention both from engine designers and oilformulators
Conventional ZDDP anti-wear technology are unlikely tooffer much help
Treat rate limited by phosphorus constraintsMore aggressive ZDDPhigher friction reduced FE
Low/zero phosphorus antiwear technologies are likelyemerge in near future
Such technologies will be expensive but will provide very highvalue if the can protect engines while minimizing friction at thehardware interface
……Challenges and OpportunitiesChallenges and Opportunities
Careful attention will be required from engine designersto ensure that FE gains from the reduced viscosity arenot wiped out by the resulting increase in friction
Opportunity for friction modifiers such as the advanced molyadditive systems to play a bigger role?
Higher volatility will result in oil thickening over time,leading to reduced FE
Narrow cut, high VI basestocks will play an important role inminimizing the evaporative losses
Fuel Economy RetentionFuel Economy Retention
Lubricants have to deliver FE performance throughouttheir life in the engine, not just when they are fresh
Formulation leversDurable friction modifiersAntiwear systemLow volatilityAntioxidantsDispersants – particularly for soot induced viscosity control inHD diesel engine oils
Group III basestocks will play a major role in FEretention due to their
low volatilitysuperior antioxidant responsehigh viscosity index
4. Alternate Fuels4. Alternate Fuels
Use of biomass derived fuels to extend conventionalfuels is gaining momentum
Renewable energy sourceSecurity of energy supplyOften price supported through government incentives
Gasoline – Use of ethanol is growing, particularly in NA10% ethanol has been used as oxygenate in gasoline for longtimeRecently E85 (85% ethanol) has been gathering momentumSome Brazil experience suggests that E85 will require oilformulators to address issues such as rust and emulsion
Diesel – Issues are much bigger here compared togasoline because of the wide chemical and physicalvariety of alternatives being proposed
BioBio--DieselDiesel
Derived from renewable resources, the use of FAME(Fatty Acid Methyl Ester) in diesel engines has beenspreading across the globe
FAME is generally blended with petroleum dieselDesignated “BX”, X = % of FAME in blendEG, B5 = 5% FAME, 95% petroleum based diesel
Positions of HD diesel engine OEMs vary widelyB5 is generally accepted provided the FAME meets US or EUfuels specsSome OEMs allow B20 and B30 for specific engines but mayrequire additional monitoring
Use of B100 is rare but does exist – mainly in captivefleets
WhatWhat’’s in a FAME?s in a FAME?
FAME is manufactured from a variety of vegetable andanimal sources
RME - Rapeseed methyl esterSME - Soybean methyl esterPME - Palm oil methyl ester etc... etc...
The use of bio-diesel has a number of potential issuesDiversity of sources Variable qualityUnsaturation in the backboneoxidationPresence of wax or wax-like structures low temperaturefluidityBoiling range is typical higher than petroleum dieselaccumulation of unburnt or partially burnt FAME in the oilDiversion of food crops to fuelRenewable but may be not sustainable
Effect on Lubricant PerformanceEffect on Lubricant Performance
Two oil quality levels, standard and top tier, were testedwith varying levels of bio-diesel contamination for
corrosion (Cummins HTCBT test)
oxidation (GFC oxidation test)
deposits (TEOST MHT-4 test)
Low temperature fluidity
Copper and Lead Corrosion (HTCBT)Copper and Lead Corrosion (HTCBT)
Copper Lead
0
50
100
150
Neat 10%
B0
10%
B50
10%
B100
Co
pp
er,
pp
m
Standard
Top Tier 1
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Neat 10%
B0
10%
B50
10%
B100
Le
ad
,p
pm
Standard
Top Tier 1
Standard quality lubricants may be unsuitable forStandard quality lubricants may be unsuitable forbiobio--diesel; some top tier oils appear to be OKdiesel; some top tier oils appear to be OK
Oxidation Stability (GFC)Oxidation Stability (GFC)
0
10
20
30
40
Neat 10%
B0
10%
B50
10%
B100
Vis
Inc
rea
se
,c
St
Standard
Top Tier 2
0
2
4
6
8
Neat 10%
B0
10%
B50
10%
B100T
ota
lA
cid
Nu
mb
er,
mg
KO
H/g
Standard
Top Tier 2
Viscosity Increase Total Acid Number
More potent antioxidants in top tier lubricants areMore potent antioxidants in top tier lubricants areable to compensate for the oxidative weakness ofable to compensate for the oxidative weakness of
biobio--dieseldiesel
Deposits (MHTDeposits (MHT--4)4)
0
10
20
30
Neat 10%
B0
10%
B50
10%
B100
De
po
sit
,m
gStandard
Top Tier 2
Again, top tier lubricants fair much better thanAgain, top tier lubricants fair much better thanstandard quality lubricantsstandard quality lubricants
Low Temperature FluidityLow Temperature Fluidity
Two oils based on a top tier SAE 5W-40 technologyformulated with a Group III basestock
Oils similar in all respects except viscosity modifiers, A and B
Oils were doped with bio-diesels from different sources
Low temperature pumpability measured with the MRV-TP1 test
Yield stress is one of the two parameters measured inthis test
Yield stress formation of network structures = “congealedoil”Presence of yield stress indicates risk of lubrication failure due“air binding” - higher the yield stress, greater the risk
NeatLube
10%B50
10%B100
10%B50
10%B100
10%B50
10%B100
SEVERE
MEDIUM
LOW
NIL
* As measured by the yield stress in the MRV-TP1 test
RAPESEED PALM SOY BEAN
RIS
KO
FL
UB
RIC
AT
ION
FA
ILU
RE
*
Risk of Lubrication FailureRisk of Lubrication Failure
SomeSome VMsVMs may be incompatible with biomay be incompatible with bio--dieseldiesel
A A A A
A
A AB
B
B B
B
B
B
Summary and ConclusionsSummary and Conclusions
As the needs and expectations of the engine OEMs andthe lubrication industry are changing, the additiveindustry is rapidly adapting to the changes around it.
Evolutionary approaches will continue to play a role inlubricant formulations of the future
However, real step-out changes in the additivetechnologies are taking place to address the longerterm needs of the industry
Such changes will affect not just one or two classes ofadditives, they will affect almost every major type ofadditive component used in oil formulations
……Summary and ConclusionsSummary and Conclusions
To use the orchestra analogy – we are not just changingthe string or the brass section, we are slowly but surelychanging the entire orchestra!
These are challenging times for everyone in the valuechain – OEMs, oil marketers and additive suppliers
Passion for innovation and perseverance will be keyassets in this environment