ftth conference 2011 workshop mdu cabling choices thomas knuth corning
DESCRIPTION
FTTH Conference 2011 Workshop MDU Cabling Choices Thomas Knuth CORNINGTRANSCRIPT
MDU Cabling Choices:An Ongoing Challenge
Dr. Thomas KnuthProgram Manager, MDU, Global Corning Cable Systems
2© Corning Incorporated 2011
Content
• MDU Application SpaceStill a fragmented scenario
• Architectural Approaches for Various MDU Building Types Small – Medium – Large Buildings
• Common Themes Across All Deployment Scenarios
• Key Lessons Learned
3© Corning Incorporated 2011
The Multidwelling Unit (MDU): A Challenging Space to Deploy
• Experience shows
NO !
• But: Try to find the most balanced solution for your individual roll-out scenario
• There are various factors influencing MDU deployment scenarios
Regulation
Fiber Count
Deployment Speed
Total Cost
Available Labor
Building sizesArchitecture Local Preferences Network Quality
• Is there an ideal solution to cover all aspects?
4© Corning Incorporated 2011
First Phases of urban mass housing construction • Apartment buildings to 6 floors• Total height rarely exceeded 30 m• Buildings were arranged around traffic knots • Built as closed quarters
Modern Phase ‘Satellite’ cities were created • Standardized building elements • In groups of large individual buildings • Many more floors per building
Today, urban housing returned to more ‘pleasant’ type• New buildings must match the overall appearance of
area• Returned to the sizes used in the beginning of the
20th century
Use Building Size As Basic Design Criteria
5© Corning Incorporated 2011
What Do The Statistics Tell Us?
Large size10%-30%
Medium size60%-85%
Small size5%-10%
Three distinct architectural types, which could serve as basic segmentation
6© Corning Incorporated 2011
Most Relevant MDU Architectures To Cover Basic Segmentation
7© Corning Incorporated 2011
Small MDUs Small buildings usually served by a direct-drop architecture from central distribution point (basement or outside)
Pigtail runs directly to customer
Various connectivity options on
customer side
8© Corning Incorporated 2011
Summary Of Value Proposition – Small MDUs
Space requirement
Logistical efforts
Need for very skilled labor
Applicable for single fiber or multi-fiber
Speed of deployment
Use of small bend-insensitive cable
Use of standard length
Pre-connectorised solution & field-installable connector
Scalable with fiber count per drop cable
More cable to pull but little hardware to install
Medium Medium No Yes Medium
Key deployment factors:
9© Corning Incorporated 2011
Medium-sized MDUs
The medium-sized building segment is the major part of European MDU architectures:
• Driver for business cases• Focus of deployment efforts Need for cost-effective and fast-to-deploy solution
Various architecture approaches exist side by side:
• Fully pre-connectorised cables• Partly pre-connectorised cables• Fully spliced cable solution
10© Corning Incorporated 2011
Medium-sized MDUsMedium-sized buildings are often served by a central riser and various floor terminal
Single- or multi-fiber
connectivity in basement and
riser
Single-fiber connectivity and
field-installed connectors
11© Corning Incorporated 2011
Pulling the cable from the bottom to the top until the branching off points are on the floor level
Removing protection sleeves for floor break out cable assembly by rip cord
Basement
1. floor
2. floor
3. floor
4. floor
5. floor
Connecting the pre-connectorised cable assembly to the floor terminal
Connecting the pre-connectorised bottom end of the riser cable with the basement distribution terminal
Splicing the distribution cable in the basement distribution terminal
Fast Solution For Riser:Cable Assembly – Installation in MDU
12© Corning Incorporated 2011
Pre-Connectorised vs. Conventional Solutions
13© Corning Incorporated 2011
Summary Of Value Proposition
Space requirement
Logistical efforts
Need for very skilled labor
Applicable for single fiber or multi-fiber
Speed of deployment
Small due to multi-fiber cable
Basic building survey
Pre-connectorised solution
Scalable with multi-fiber connector
Fast to pull, quickest to connect
Low Medium No Yes Very High
Key deployment factors:
14© Corning Incorporated 2011
High-rise MDUsHigh buildings are well served by using multi-fiber connectivity
Multi-fiber connectivity in
basement, riser and floor
Multi Single connector for customer area
15© Corning Incorporated 2011
Basement terminal
Legend
Drop cable
Floor Terminal
Collapsiblereel
Riser cable
Indoor Distribution
Hub
High-rise Installation Technique
16© Corning Incorporated 2011
High-rise MDUs
Space requirement
Logistical efforts
Need for very skilled labor
Applicable for single fiber or multi-fiber
Speed of deployment
Small riser cable
Use of standard length
Pre-connectorised solution
Scalable due to multi-fiber connector
Easy to pull, quick to connect
Low Low No Yes High
Key deployment factors:
17© Corning Incorporated 2011
Architecture Summary – Key Lessons Learned
Plug & play approach to save precious labor time & cost
Installed fiber cable type matters (uncontrolled environment)
Power budget considerations drive architectures – look at it carefully
Combined hardware, cable and fiber expertise allows creation of real solutions
Quality and reliability are not to be compromised
Make sure you understand your available labor force
Based on Corning’s wealth of experience in deploying various architecture types globally, we believe:
There is something in common with most of these:
18© Corning Incorporated 2011
How To Understand the Plug & Play Approach Best• Look at all deployment aspects
First-installed cost, labor cost, deployment speed for homes passed, take rate, available labor force etc.
• Good approach is to model and compare potential scenarios:
Model of cost break down of architectural choices
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Pre-connectorisedsolution
Fully spliced risersolution
Direct drop solution
Exam
ple
Labor costMaterial cost
Model of deployment time break down of architectural choices
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Pre-connectorisedsolution
Fully spliced risersolution
Direct drop solution
Exam
ple
Installation time HCInstallation time HP
19© Corning Incorporated 2011
The Problem
FTTH requires fiber cable to be deployed in very challenging environments:
As fiber cable gets inside the private space• Meets more aggressive environment and
handling• Space constraints • Higher installation speed requirements• De-skilled installation practices to lower labour
cost (e.g. no ducting)• More likely to experience unwanted/accidental
public access • Required to be more aesthetically pleasing As a result, the fiber cable …• Has an increased chance of inappropriate
installation procedures• Can experience tighter bends, crush etc.• Needs to be treated “like copper”
Installed Fiber Cable Type Matters Most
20© Corning Incorporated 2011
Uncontrolled Environment:Requires Highest Bending Performance
Choosing the right G657 fiber for your cable
A3*: proposed new ITU-T G.657 category
FTTH requires fiber cable to be deployed in very challenging
environments Category AG.652 Compliant
5mm
Category BG.652 Compliance
not required
7.5 mm
10 mm G.657.A1
G.657.A2
G.657.A3*
G.657.B1
G.657.B2
G.657.B3
21© Corning Incorporated 2011
Maximum Value Analysis- Quick & Simple - Data readily available - Leads to over-engineered networks
& wastage of power budget
Gaussian Statistical Analysis- Relatively quick - Data can be gained from median and STD values- Fixed link length - Gives more accurate prediction of probability of power budget compliance- Can reveal more power budget margin
Monte Carlo Statistical analysis- Takes more time to do analysis - Uses accurate link length distribution - Provides the most accurate prediction of power budget compliance - Allows for most efficient use of available power budget
Power Budget Drives Architectures: Choose Carefully
22© Corning Incorporated 2011
Power Budget Drives Architectures: Choose Carefully
Proposal
• Use Monte Carlo approach to model your network
• Factor in fiber cable bend performance
• Watch out for aging behavior of components (e.g., splitter)
Reward:
• A networks model which comes closest to real life
• Architectural choices can be validated based on facts
23© Corning Incorporated 2011
• MDU cabling options are still a challenge
• There is no ‘one fits all,’ but grouping of building types can be done
• Build the MDU architecture for major groups in your local area
• Balance design choice based on your individual goals
• Various key tools are available to help make right decisions
• Use experience from already-installed FTTH networks, but continue to expect surprises
Key Takeaways Summary