frontline - march 2013

Upload: flsocialistparty

Post on 14-Apr-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Frontline - March 2013

    1/12

    Disgusting mass burial and disgraceful

    deafening silence

    Page 09

    Neo - Liberal Capitalism

    and the Lankan women

    Page 08

    http://www.socialistparty.com

    Feature

    2013 March- April Vol. 01 Issue 05 Donation Rs.20

    A kidney disease which was found in certain areas of North-Central province is now spreading epidemically

    all over the island.This very serious social problem is gradually engulng the entire country. We, as a leftist

    movement have the responsibility of making a comprehensive political analysis of this problem.

    The government has

    already increased the fuel price

    consequent to which price of

    most of the goods went high.

    furthermore it has noticed

    that the electricity and water

    charges also will be increased.This situation drastically affects

    the basic requirements of the

    people. Stagnant wages, price

    increment of the food items,

    cut off of the concessions in the

    elds of transport, education,

    health, energy etc will be

    create a tense situation among

    the workers paving way for

    collective struggles.

    However, these struggles

    should not be coned to

    trade unionism. By merely

    claiming salary increments and

    replacing another capitalist

    regime is also not the solution

    for this crisis.Therefore it a

    challange to amulgamate allthe worker struggles and steer

    them towards anti-system

    struggle whereas the Center for

    Workers Struggle has already

    commenced promotions,

    education programmes in that

    effect. Center for Workers

    Struggle expressed the fact that

    they are in the process of taking

    various measures to establish

    the said work plan among the

    workers in coming months.

    Cost of living went high

    According to the Center For Workers Strugle there is a

    strong possibility of workers uprising against the booming

    of the value of the goods and services in the country.

    It was reported that the Revolutionary Students Union has

    started its promotion activities in order to conquer the class

    ideology among the student wings. At the beginning of March

    they distributed leaets to uplift the awareness of the people and

    also they will publish a wall newspaper inside universities in the

    month of April starting a new dialogue among the students. They

    have also started an awareness programme inside the hostels

    regarding the existing political issues and the challenges of the

    student community. Furthermore, Revolutionary Students Union is

    prepared to organize cultural activities in order to educate students

    in respect of socialism.

    Revolutionary Students Unioncommenced its activities

    "The only result of the three year process of

    Lankan government after defeating LTTE is the

    internationalization of the national crisis." says Front

    Line Socialist Party. FLSP further says we don't

    believe that Tamil people's problem will be resolved or

    the democratic scope of Lanka will be widened by US

    draft resolution which was adopted by UNHRC.

    The aggrieved people had to raise their voice in a

    place like Geneva as Lanka society has failed to build

    up a social conversation on severe human tragedies of

    the civil war. The whole society is responsible for that.

    We as the left movement admit that we also responsible

    for that.

    The politburo of Front Line Socialist Party reveals

    their position on passing UNHRC resolution against

    Lanka issuing statement yesterday. "US draft resolution

    against Lanka was adopted in UNHRC with 25 votes

    yesterday. Although it is not clear what will be the

    decisions of UNHRC, there are several issues on which

    we should take in to consideration. Lankan government

    has failed to take steps for real reconciliation among

    Sinhalese, Tamils and Muslims. In contrast enmity

    and disunity prevailed among them. There is no

    transparency even in the programs of building of the

    physical living conditions of people who live in areas

    shatteredby war. Not even international organizations

    but main political parties of the opposition were not

    allowed by the government to observe the lives of

    displaced persons.

    The tactic of the government was to continue the

    moods and the remonstrance of war time. It resulted in

    the constriction of the scope of the democratic scope

    of the society.

    Only 13 countries have reacted to the government's

    propagation. The government has lost the trust of 33

    countries who were longtime friends. We don't believe

    that adoption of US draft resolution in UNHRC will

    bring the justice for Tamils and broad the scope of the

    democracy in the country. It is an error if we believe

    the India or US has real need with them to solve theproblems of Tamils. As a result of this process Lanka

    will confuse in global and political, economic web. It

    will challenge the freedom of the people. Therefore a

    political process to join hand in hand with all Sinhalese,

    Tamils and Muslims for the peace and reconciliation

    is necessary. We ask aggrieved Tamils not to believe

    the tactics of global capitalism and we ask aggrieved

    Sinhalese and Muslims to join hand in hand with

    Tamils to solve their problems.

    A Society With Love

    "Free Women" commomerated International Women's Day with a protest march and a seminar

    in Colombo with the theme " A society with love"

    Frontline Socialist Party

    FLSP is preparing to hold the may day with the contribution

    of all the suppressed masses specialy workers, peasants, Students,

    Firemen, youth etc. This time it is scheduled to cvelebrate the

    mayday in an unprecedent manner and the it will consist of a march,

    meeting and a cultural show. FLSP also announced that the May

    Day should not be conned to a particular day and thus it is planned

    to carry on various programms even after the 1st of May. There will

    be many worker programmes prior to May Day, FLSP sources said.

    FLSP to Celebrate

    the May Day

  • 7/30/2019 Frontline - March 2013

    2/12

    2 Frontline/March - April 2013

    The Frontline Socialist Party highlights the need of

    establishing an intelligent political action against the

    skyrocketing cost of living on a daily basis. The party

    releasing a statement in relation to the recent increase

    of oil prices said that it is difcult to walk away from

    this crisis without having an own alternative strategy

    by the suppressed people.

    The statement further added:

    This increase in oil price will result in the decrease

    of the quality of life of the people who are already in

    great difculties. When the prices of certain consumer

    items go up, this will affect only on the people who

    consume those items. However, increase in oil price

    will result in increase of lot of other items. Especially,

    the already increasing prices of food items including

    vegetables will further go up. There is a possibility

    of increasing public transport fares. From peoples

    perspective, this is them getting from bad to worse.

    This is not the rst or the last time this is happening.

    This will continue to happen so. The lives of the lower

    class people who eat two or less meals or in hunger

    will continue to go into crisis. Increase in oil prices will

    result in worsening the lives of shermen. We request

    suppressed people not to accept this situation, or avoid

    this situation or surrender to this situation. Under

    circumstances in which the promises of fullling day to

    day requirements of people given by the administrative

    structures including the government are in breach, the

    only solution that the suppressed people has is to walk

    into alternative structures. As a result of this there is a

    need to have an intelligent political action for social

    victory against this difcult reality. We, therefore,

    make a request to all the people who are distressed to

    come together for an intelligent political action.

    The Frontline Socialist Party has identied

    some of the government ministers and

    ofcers as economic assassins and they are

    trying to escape responsibility. It also states

    that the whole cabinet and the bureaucracy

    are economic assassins. The party also

    shows that the government policy itself is an

    economic assassination policy.

    Publicity secretary of the party, Comrade

    Pubudu Jayagoda, stated this in a media

    conference that was held on 18th of February.

    Comrade Pubudu Jayagoda stated that as a

    result of losing G.S.P. Plus tax concessions in

    the last three years, the number of factories

    closed was 186 and the number of people

    lost jobs were over two hundred thousand.

    Comrade Pubudu Jayagoda expressed his

    views on the statement made by the Governor

    of Central Bank about not obtaining loans

    from the International Monetary Fund.

    The newspapers have reported that as a

    result of losing G.S.P. Plus tax concession,

    186 garment factories were closed and

    217,000 jobs were lost. But the government is

    saying that the G.S.P. Plus is not necessary and

    they do not want to accept the imperialistic

    conditions. After the government request

    to the International Monetary Fund to grant

    loans to the government was refused the

    government ministers and the Governor of

    the Central Bank says that they do not need

    loans with conditions and they do not take

    loans from the International Monetary Fund.

    The analogy of this is the Lankan story of the

    fox saying that the grapes were bitter when it

    couldnt pick them. G.S.P. tax concession and

    G.S.P. Plus are two different things. G.S.P. is

    the common rule on restraint of trade. This

    was commenced in 1968 by a resolution of

    the United Nations Conference on Trade and

    Development. This concession was available

    to Lanka since 1974. G.S.P. Plus is a special

    tax concession. This was commenced after

    the Tsunami in 2004.

    Under this arrangement,

    Lanka can export goods

    with a 12.5% tariff

    concession. As a result

    of this, the Lankan

    garment industry receive

    a massive advantage.

    Approximately, one

    million families directly

    and indirectly live on the

    garment industry.

    The government is

    now saying that they do not want to receive

    G.S.P. Plus based on various conditions.

    What are these conditions? Actually, they

    are not conditions. Lanka became signatory

    to 27 conventions of the United Nations

    in order to obtain these concessions. It is

    necessary to implement those Conventions

    in the country. America refused to give the

    G.S.P. Plus tax concessions, as Lanka did

    not comply with international Labor laws.

    European Union refused due to issues of good

    administration. The government says that this

    is an imperialistic inuence. The analogy is

    the report of the Lessons Learnt Commission.

    When the United Nations Secretary announced

    that they were going to appoint a Committee,

    the government said that there were going

    to appoint one. That is how the Lessons

    Learnt and Reconciliation Commission

    was established. The Commission then

    made recommendations. The government

    published the report as its own. Then it was

    not an imperialistic inuence. This request

    is to implement the Conventions that the

    government became

    signatory to.

    The government is

    not implementing the

    factors that are related

    to the rights of workers,

    rights of the people and

    the issues in relation

    to the democracy.

    The government,

    however, implement the

    imperialistic economic

    conditions without

    any hesitation. The government is trying to

    privatise education, bringing legislation to

    privatise water resources, bringing legislation

    in relation to so called Private Sector Pension

    Act on the conditions imposed by imperialists

    including the International Monetary Fund.

    The government does not say that they are

    conditions.

    America and the countries in the European

    Union have conventions in relation to good

    administration and human rights. The human

    right network in those countries is strong.

    The people in those countries inuence their

    governments not to give concessions to

    the countries that violate human rights and

    workers rights. Lanka lost a quota in relation

    to a uniform of athletes who participated in

    the Olympics as a result of non-compliance

    of rules in the Conventions of International

    Labour Organisation.

    While the government is claiming that

    they do not obtain loans from the International

    Monetary Fund, they obtain loans from

    commercial banks at a higher interest rate.

    The president, presenting the budget report

    said that the budget decit was 507 billion

    and he said that the plan was to obtain loans

    to cover the decit. Our question is how

    this government is going to cover the decit

    without obtaining loans? The government is

    now obtaining loans from commercial banks

    at a higher interest rate.

    In the meantime, minister Weerawansha

    says about economic assassins. What we

    say is that this whole cabinet and the entire

    bureaucracy is an economic assassination.

    Governments economic policy is a policy

    that assassinates the economy. There is a

    saying that a victory has hundred fathers but

    defeat is illegitimate. This economic break

    down is the responsibility of everyone.

    The attempt is to hide the current economic

    breakdown and demonstrate a false anti

    imperialism. The government is asking the

    people to be hungry to be anti imperialistic.

    The government is asking people to tolerate

    abductions, assassinations and breaches

    of democratic rights in order to be anti

    imperialistic. We ask people to understand the

    politics behind this.

    This media conference was also attended

    Comrade Ranjith Piyathilake, the joint

    secretary of the Workers Struggle Centre.

    While the Movement for

    Peoples Struggle is denouncing

    the shooting of Sunday Leader

    journalist, we make a request

    to the people to get together to

    protect media freedom, human

    rights and democracy in the

    country.

    This was contained in an

    announcement made by the

    movements national organizer,

    Member of Parliament,

    Comrade Ajith Kumara. The

    announcement further stated as

    follows.On 16/02/2012 at 12.20 in

    the morning, The Sunday Leader

    journalist Shoukat Ali was the

    victim of a shooting incidence.

    He was seriously injured as a

    result of the shooting occurred

    while he was in his house.

    The reasonable suspicion

    goes in the direction of the

    government in this shooting

    incident. Depending on the

    nature of interference of the

    police in relation to this shooting

    incident in the coming days will

    indicate whether that suspicion

    has a proper basis.

    Previously, the Chief Editor

    of Sunday Leader newspaper,

    Lasantha Wickramatunge, was

    assassinated and since 2009 in

    the last few years, number of

    journalists were assassinated. As

    a result of not being in line with

    government stand, a number

    of journalists were assaulted

    and some had to go overseas to

    protect their lives. A few days

    ago, the Circulation Manager

    of Yaal Thinakkural newspaper

    that was published in Jaffna wasassaulted and his motorbike

    was then set alight. There

    are no proper investigations

    conducted in relation to these

    incidents. That is not because

    that the police is inefcient

    but because the government

    political authorities are behind

    these incidents.

    The Movement for Peoples

    Struggle denounces the assault

    of Mr Shaucat Ali and request

    people to get together in order

    to protect media freedom,

    democracy and human rights in

    the country.

    Shooting of Mr Shaukat

    Ali denounced

    The court proceedings in relation to the abduction

    of Comrade Lalith Kumar Weeraraj, District Organiser,

    and Comrade Kugan Muruganandan, Operative, of

    Movement for Peoples Struggle went on trial before

    Magistrate Court, Jaffna, on 12 February.

    Comrade Dimuthu Attigala, Polit-bureau Member

    of Frontline Socialist Party, gave evidence before court.

    This was the rst time a person who had been abducted

    has given evidence in a court case that is involved an

    abduction. After giving evidence, Comrade Atygala

    expressed her views to the media.

    It was established by various factors that my

    abduction on the 6th of April was executed by peoplewho has connections with government defence units. It

    was established especially in the light of the questions

    they asked. The same day I was abducted, Comrade

    Kumar Gunaratnam was also abducted. They have

    taken steps to send him immediately to Australia.

    This indicates that the people who abducted us have

    connections with the government. They constantly

    questioned me about the politics Lalith and Kugan

    did in the North. They mentioned several times about

    Lalith and Kugan. They also said that Lalith and Kugan

    were still alive and I could soon see them. It is therefore

    clear that the people who abducted Lalith and Kugan

    and who abducted me were the same group of people

    who have connections with government defence units.I stated these facts before the court.

    Dimuthu states giving evidence

    They said that Lalith & Kugan would come

    Frontline Socialist Party

    Lets Build up Peoples Action Against

    Skyrocketing Cost of Living

    Frontline Socialist Party

    In the meantime, minister

    Weerawansha says about

    economic assassinators. What

    we say is that this whole cabinet

    and the entire bureaucracy is

    an economic assassination.

    Governments economic policy

    is a policy that assassinates the

    economy.

    Movement for Peoples Struggle

  • 7/30/2019 Frontline - March 2013

    3/12

    3 Frontline/March - April 2013

    Without doubt, inmany ways it can beeasily understood

    that the present Lankanregime is, as a Bonapartistgovernment. It would be wrong

    if this generalization was beingmade only by considering themere similarities in an abstractmanner, without consideringthe historical and objectiverealities with the situationin France in1849 and thegovernment installed in Russiaafter the bourgeois democraticrevolution in February 1917,which Lenin explained as aBonapartist regime in everyrespect. However, there aresome signicant similaritiesin terms of qualitative featureswhich can be recognized bycomparing these historical

    circumstances with the presentRajapaksha regime.Without having a single

    solution for the deterioratingeconomy, the present regimeis using ethnic, religious andall forms of identity crisesto subjugate and allure themasses. On one hand, theregime inuences all sorts ofchauvinist tendencies to divertthe masses from the classstruggle. On the other hand anunprecedented developmentof anti-democratic and illegalmeasures have been takenagainst workers, peasants,

    students, women and everystrata of the society to suppressthe masses as the ultimatum.It is being done not only byconcentrating the whole powertowards the family cliquebut also appointing relatives,friends, henchmen,gureheadsand puppets to allpower centres includingeconomic institutions,media installations, foreignrelations as well as all threearmed forces and the policedepartment. After installinga military rule in North andEast, the entire society hasgradually been militarising,and it has been signied by theintroduction of the compulsorymilitary training for the rstyear university students,now being followed by theschool principlals. It is worthremembering, "disciplinethroughout the society" wasa slogan for the Nazis andFascists too, at the beginningof their disastrous politicaljourney at the crucial junctureof their economically collapsedcountries. Constitutionalamendments have been takingplace occasionally and thejudiciary becoming a tool ofconstitutional dictatorship isone of the main features underthe present regime. Whileexplaining and comparingthe temporary governmentof Russia in 1917 with theBonapartist nature, Leninstated what is Bonapartism:

    "The manoeuvring of

    state power, which leans on

    (Collected Works- 25

    page - 224)

    After defeating LTTE in2009 May, the Rajapaksharegime has been enjoying the"comfort" of the rightist natureinjected to the society by thethree decades long war by not

    allowing itself to lose the gripof chauvinist elements butinuencing them. It has alsobeen welcoming and blendingall forms of backward Asiaticideologies among the societyto divert the masses from theclass struggle. For the lastthree and a half years sincethe war ended, periodically the"war crime" allegation is beingpointed against the Rajapaksharegime by most of the westernimperialist powers includingthe United Nations. It is a well-known fact that the regime hasan increasing understanding

    with all imperialist forcesconsisting of most of thewestern powers, principallybecause they do not have muchcontradiction in terms of neo-liberal policies. Even thoughRajapaksha tries to manoeuvrethe geo-political contradictionsin the region between India,China and Pakistan for the

    sake of his agenda, the ultimateresult is that he himself and thecountry has been manipulatedby the imperialist forces. Thetimetable approach of thewestern powers including

    United Nations at the annualGeneva summit is being usedby Rajapaksha himself tomaintain the so-called patrioticslogans to deceive the masses.Whenever the war crimeissue or the implementationof LLRC is being raised,Rajapaksha himself and hisnationalist elements tries todeceive and allure the masses.It seems that these are hismuch awaited interventions so

    he can use all his "patriotism"

    to extend his political life foranother day.

    "....in which fancy phrases

    about saving the countryare particularly fashionable

    (concealing the desire to save

    the imperialist programme

    of the bourgeoisie), and you

    have a perfect picture of the

    socio-political setting for

    Bonapartism"

    -Lenin (Collected Works

    page - 224)

    the military clique (on the

    worst elements of the army)

    for support, between two

    hostile classes and forces

    which more or less balance

    each other out" -Lenin

    (collected works 25 page-

    223 )

    When Lenin explained theobjective realities of Russia in1917 June, the class strugglehad elevated towards a dualpower situation. Far differentto the above mentionedRussian experience is thepresent Lankan class struggle,which has been receding inthe recent past for a numberof national reasons, apart fromthe global circumstances,.Apart from other reasons, dueto national question followedby the three decades longnationalistic war, the societyhas deviated from the class

    struggle towards ultra rightistnationalistic tendencies. This isnot only because of the Sinhalaand Tamil chauvinist forcesbut also the policies adoptedby the so-called left as theyabandoned the leftist programand fell into the nationalisticabyss. Even though the classstruggle has not elevated

    similar to the situation inRussia in 1917, the presentregime tries to aggregate themasses representing all classesby using so-called patrioticslogans and deception. It isbeing used to manoeuvre theregional contradictions as well.

    On the other hand, similar tothe Kerensky government, theRajapaksha regime too, tries tobalance different class forces

    out by making a number ofbroken promises.

    "...only by a Bonapartist

    government capable

    of making the most

    unscrupulous promises to all

    classes without keeping any

    of them"- Lenin

    It is worth remembering,

    "discipline throughout the

    society" was a slogan for

    the Nazis and Fascists too,

    at the beginning of their

    disastrous political journey

    at the crucial juncture

    of their economically

    collapsed countries.

    The timetable approach

    of the western powers

    including UnitedNations at the annual

    Geneva summit

    is being used by

    Rajapaksha himself to

    maintain the so-called

    patriotic slogans to

    deceive the masses.

  • 7/30/2019 Frontline - March 2013

    4/12

    4 Frontline/March - April 2013

    The government of United

    States the intendion announced

    for second year move of a

    resolution against Lanka at the

    March 2013 session of the Geneva

    United Nation Human Rights

    Council (UNHRC) for failing

    to pursue those responsible for

    abuses as government forces

    were crushing the LTTE in

    2009. US Deputy AssistantSecretary of State James Moore

    told reporters in Colombo: "The

    U.S. and the other 23 members

    of the UNHRC who voted for

    that resolution in 2012 believe

    that the government of Lanka

    needs to full its commitments

    made to its own people." He

    thus makes it clear that the US

    is not satised with the progress

    and implementation of the

    Lessons Learned Reconciliation

    Commission (LLRC). But

    Washington also raised concerns

    about the removal of Lanka's

    chief justice. The US Deputy

    Assistant Secretary of Defensesaid in Geneva: "It is safe to

    say that the impeachment of the

    chief justice also contributed to

    the decision to ensure that the

    record (against Lanka) stays

    fresh in Geneva." It now seems

    certain that India will support

    the US resolution against

    Lanka, after the Press Trust of

    India quoted India's Minister

    of State V. Narayanasamy as

    saying India would "support any

    resolution brought against the

    island nation" as a way of getting

    powers for Lankan Tamils.

    The Lankan

    Government reacted adversely

    to the U.S. move. In hisIndependence Day speech

    at Trincomalee, President

    Rajapakse said "The UN Charter

    gives no powers to interfere in

    internal affairs of countries",

    and quoted Article 2 of the UN

    charter. On the other hand the

    Tamil National Alliance (TNA),

    which speaks for the interests of

    USmoves resolutionagainst Lanka

    the Tamil bourgeoisie, said that

    "stern action" by the UNHRC

    is "absolutely necessary". The

    TNA position was supported by

    Nava Sama Samaja Party leader

    Wickramabahu Karunaratne

    who appeared alongside TNA

    leaders at a Colombo press

    conference to endorse their call

    for the devolution of power to

    the North and East.

    But when the United

    States or its junior ally Britain

    raises concerns of human

    rights or democracy against

    any country, their statementscannot be taken at face value.

    For the United States is the

    national state which, more than

    any other, speaks and acts in

    the interests of the imperialist

    system. For more than fty

    years the US has used human

    rights and democracy as pretexts

    for their real agenda, which

    is to strengthen imperialism.

    Imperialism does not mean the

    overt political interference by

    large countries in the internal

    affair of small ones. Imperialism

    is essentially an economic

    concept, a variant of capitalism.

    In the simplest possible terms,

    imperialism can be dened as themonopoly stage of capitalism:

    "imperialism is capitalism

    at that stage of development

    at which the dominance of

    monopolies and nancial capital

    is established; in which the

    export of capital has acquired

    pronounced importance." (Lenin

    Imperialism, the highest stage

    of capitalism)

    Although Lanka does

    have big problems with human

    rights, the US and its allies are

    not really concerned with that.

    This is proved by the fact that

    the US only raises human rights

    and democracy concerns with

    countries (e.g. the USSR, Iran,

    Libya, China, North Korea) that

    are not sufciently supporting

    the imperialist system of which

    the US state plays the central

    role. It never raises such

    concerns about the undemocratic

    internal affairs of its satellites(e.g. Bahrein, Qatar, Saudi

    Arabia, Israel). Furthermore, the

    US's resolution is without doubt

    part of a concerted western

    move against Lanka. Britain is

    already invoking what it calls

    "Commonwealth values" while

    Canada is refusing to attend the

    next CHOGM summit if it is

    held in Lanka.

    It would be absurd

    to expect the world political

    leaders of imperialism do

    deliver genuine human rights

    or democracy to Lanka.

    Imperialist intervention will

    not give the Tamils or anyone

    else full democratic rights. Itcan only give them bourgeois

    democracy, which, as Lenin

    warned, is "a paradise for the

    rich and a snare and deception

    for the exploited, for the poor".

    That may be good enough for

    the TNA or the UNP, which have

    no higher aims than bourgeois

    democracy, but it would be

    opportunism for any socialist

    party to call for imperialist

    intervention in Lanka's internal

    affairs. Genuine human rights

    and democracy will only be

    achieved through the political

    and economic struggle of the

    united Lankan working class,

    comprising all the nationalities.

    On the other hand it would

    also be opportunism to support

    the Rajapakse Government on

    the grounds that it is resisting

    imperialist interference. We have

    seen from the Government's

    co-operation with the IMF andthe World Bank that it has no

    contradiction with imperialism.

    There are no bourgeois forces

    in Lanka that are opposed to

    imperialism, and therefore to

    support the Lankan bourgeois

    state against imperialism makes

    no sense at all.

    New Delhi's support

    for the US move is a product of

    the Tamil Nadu government's

    backing for Tamil separatism

    in Lanka, and on a deeper level

    of India's increasing integration

    into the world imperialist system.

    The ruling Congress Party is

    worried about the destabilizing

    effect of the Lankan issue in thesouthern Indian state of Tamil

    Nadu, which sends 39 MPs to the

    540-member Indian parliament,

    which could be a crucial

    contingent in the formation of

    the next coalition government

    in New Delhi following the next

    elections. More fundamentally,

    the Indian government seems to

    be abandoning the non-aligned

    economic nationalism of an

    earlier period, and is drawing

    ever closer to US positions on

    world politics, especially as

    regards Chinese inuence in

    South Asia.

    The UN Human

    Rights Council is itself a body

    which is highly susceptible to

    the inuence of the leadingimperialist countries. 80 per

    cent of its funding comes

    from the United States and its

    satellites, which means that the

    key positions in the UNHRC

    are mostly held by those who

    have served in the diplomatic

    services of such countries. In

    this environment the UNHRC's

    activities will never be impartial,

    especially when dealing with

    poorer countries like Lanka.

    The question remains of the

    U.S.' real motives in launching

    this diplomatic offensive

    against Lanka. In his November

    2011 speech to the Australianparliament, President Obama

    emphasised that the United

    States intends to maintain and

    strengthen its military presence

    in the Asia Pacic region: " I have

    directed my national security

    team to make our presence and

    mission in the Asia Pacic a top

    priority." Obama has variously

    termed the US strategy as a

    "return to the Pacic" and a

    "pivot to the Pacic", but most

    pundits have agreed that it is a

    strategy aimed at containing

    the rise of China's inuence

    in the region. The Obama

    Administration has claimed

    that it is necessary to counterthe long term, large expansion

    of China's military and its more

    assertive behaviour regarding

    its contested maritime claims

    in the South and East China

    Seas. The Chinese Government

    on the other hand sees Obama's

    strategy as old-style Cold War

    The warm relations that exist between Lanka and Chinaare likely to be of concern to the US government. Lanka isseeking foreign direct investment while China is looking toincrease its overseas investment. The result is that China isinvolved in almost all the large-scale projects that are under

    construction in Lanka.

    to page 11

  • 7/30/2019 Frontline - March 2013

    5/12

    5 Frontline/March - April 2013

    Frontline:- You issued

    a statement to the public

    saying that you will work as

    an Independent member in

    the Parliament. What was

    the reason behind it?

    Com. Ajith Kumara:-When I was with Peoples

    Liberation Front we, as JVP

    members, always struggled

    against bureaucracy within

    the Party and as a result of

    that struggle JVP was split

    between the bureaucratic

    layer and the members of the

    Party.

    I was with the members of

    the Party. Then I acted as part

    of the Democratic National

    Alliance, but unfortunately,

    some of their members of

    Parliament (such as Mr

    Anura Dissanayake) did not

    act representing the working

    classs interest but for their

    own agenda by disregarding

    our common objectives as a

    progressive Party.

    After this, I decided to

    actively take part with the

    Movement for Peoples

    Struggle and currently I

    am serving as a National

    Organiser for MPS.

    During my time in

    the parliament I have

    noticed direct and indirect

    collaboration with the current

    government by members

    of the so called left in the

    parliament.

    I have been prevented by

    DNA parliament group leader

    from expressing my view

    concerning budget proposals.

    I was subjected to violation of

    parliamentary rights.

    Those are some of many

    incidents that have occurred

    in parliament.

    Frontline:- You lodged

    a complaint to the Supreme

    Court against the proposed

    Criminal Procedure Code.

    Do you think you can stop

    oppressive laws by simply

    going to the courts?

    Com. Ajith Kumara:-

    First I should reafrm that

    the courts, parliament and the

    executive power work hand

    in hand, therefore working

    people cannot depend on these

    institutions. But still, I decided

    to go to Court as a part of our

    strategy to show to the masses

    that these institutions are onlyserving themselves.

    I managed to drag out

    the special provisions of the

    Code of Criminal Procedure

    Bill for several months but

    while we follow this strategy, I

    dont believe for a minute that

    without changing the system,

    without understanding the real

    cause, we will ever win this

    struggle.

    Even when the so called

    divinaguma was brought into

    the parliament during workers'

    struggles the judiciary never

    challenged the governmentsdecision. They are operating

    within the current system.

    However, we have managed

    to develop a dialogue in society

    as a result of our actions in the

    court.

    The current rulers want to

    get everything by oppressing

    masses and they are not

    current so called opposition

    within the parliament as well as

    the old left are systematically

    collaborating within the system

    and the current constitution isthere to protect these parties and

    the government clearly dened

    as opposition/government

    party.

    From time to time, the

    ordinary public will see

    conicts within these parties

    but out of these conicts the

    people are not the winners.

    The current government and

    the opposition within the

    parliament are controlled by the

    dominant economic class. It is

    important that we understand

    this reality.

    We witnessed over theyears that through the same

    parliament they managed to

    pass draconian laws which our

    people still suffer from as a

    result. What this system has

    done over the years is have a

    few protests and then accept

    and abide by the new laws.

    We totally oppose this

    behaviour by the so called

    opposition in the parliament

    and we are now building up

    our strength by educating

    people from the grass roots

    level.

    Frontline:- You have

    opposed to the bill to amend

    the 2005 Convention onSuppression of Terrorist

    Financing Act, what is your

    view on this decision? Are

    you in the parliament simply

    to oppose everything?

    Com. Ajith Kumara:-

    As you know, the current

    political system is heading

    into a disaster day by day.

    In the parliament, these

    capitalist parties simply want

    to protect the system by

    introducing oppressive laws

    in the parliament.

    We oppose everything

    introduced in the parliament

    simply because they neverhave anything positive for the

    people.

    I ask you the same question

    in return: what are the positive

    steps they put forward in the

    parliament recently? The

    answer is nothing. What we

    see in parliament is a dream

    world and they try to show

    colourful theatre to blind the

    people. Therefore, we have

    a struggle on our hand to

    release the oppressed from

    this neo liberalism.

    We believe our struggle

    is surging higher and higher.

    This government only tries

    to oppress the masses by

    branding them as terrorists

    but the current political

    parties couldnt use even

    parliament to raise awareness

    of this injustice. Therefore,

    unlike other parties, we wont

    hesitant to introduce draconian

    laws to oppressed masses. We

    dont see any difference with

    parliament, the judiciary and

    the current system and that isthe main reason we need to

    work hard to change this entire

    capitalist system.

    Frontline:- When the

    government tries to change

    these laws, how can you

    analyse the quietness of the

    capitalist parties and other

    parties in the parliament?

    Com. Ajith Kumara:- The

    The present political system

    is heading to the disaster day by dayComrade Ajith KumaraNational Organizer of Movement for Peoples' Struggle

    We totally oppose this

    behaviour by the so

    called opposition in the

    parliament and we are

    now building up our

    strength by educating

    people from the grass

    roots level. to page 11

    Interview for Frontline with member of parliament

    comrade Ajith Kumara, regarding the current

    political situation in Lanka

  • 7/30/2019 Frontline - March 2013

    6/12

    6 Frontline/March - April 2013

    A kidney disease which was

    found in certain areas of the

    district of Anuradhapura is now

    spreading epidemically to other

    districts such as Polonnaruwa,

    Vavunia, Ampara,

    Trincomalee, Batticaloa and

    Moneragala. Therefore this

    problem, which has developedinto a very serious social

    problem is gradually engulng

    the entire country. We, as a

    leftist movement have the

    responsibility of making

    a comprehensive political

    analysis of this as well as

    organizing the people and

    ghting against this menace.

    The present discussion is an

    initiation into such a course of

    action.

    Attention was originally

    focused on the disease which

    leads to kidney failure when

    70 farmers within the Padaviya

    division of Anuradhapura

    district were reported in 1992

    to be suffering from a kidney

    disease, of whom 17 died

    within that year. By end of

    the year 2012, 11,212 kidney

    patients from the Anuradhapura

    district and 2,957 patients

    from Polonnaruwa district

    had been reported. According

    to the records kept at the

    Anuradhapura general hospital,

    1811 patients who had received

    treatment from that hospital for

    the kidney disease had died

    during the nine year period

    from 2003 to 2012. That meansthat in the Anuradhapura

    district alone, approximately

    201 patients per year, in other

    words, one patient per every

    two days dies due to this disease

    named as "Chronic Kidney

    Disease" (CKD). Now this

    situation is gradually spreading

    to other districts mentioned

    above. According to the reports

    released by the Ministry of

    Health in January 2013, about

    15% of the population of

    Anuradhapura district suffers

    from CKD. Health authorities

    examined 10,608 individuals

    towards the end of the year

    2012 in Anuradhapura, ofwhich 1414 individuals were

    found to have contracted the

    disease. Up to that point they

    were unaware that they had an

    illness. This as a percentage is

    13%. This is a ne example to

    demonstrate how rapidly the

    CKD is spreading.

    The World Health

    Organization (WHO)

    appointed a special research

    team to investigate the mystery

    kidney disease spreading in

    many areas of Lanka, for

    which no cause has yet been

    identied. Even up to the point,

    the government and health

    authorities of Lanka, while not

    making necessary interventions

    in respect of the kidney disease

    which was destroying the lives

    of the peasants, had not at least

    allocated funds for research

    on the disease. The research

    team appointed by the WHO

    has issued its rst report dated

    6-8 June 2011, its second

    report dated 5-7 October 2011

    and its third report in January

    2012. According to the said

    reports, 15% of the population

    of the North Central Province

    aged between 15 to 70 yearsfaces kidney failure due to

    unidentied cause. Males

    aged over 40 years are the

    most vulnerable. While the

    disease is common among

    farmers the vast majority

    of patients are those who

    had engaged in agriculture

    for over 10 years. Upon the

    examination of urine samples

    of 496 patients, the WHO

    found that the concentration

    of cadmium and arsenic is

    56% and 63% of the samples

    exceeded danger limits. One

    or both of these poisonous

    elements were found in 88%

    of the urine samples tested. Ithas been found out that arsenic

    over and above the acceptable

    limits is present in the head

    hair of 90% and in the nger

    nails of 94% of the population

    in agricultural areas. It is clear

    that this presence of poisonous

    chemicals in the bodies of

    peasants is a phenomenon

    directly connected to the

    weedicides, insecticides and

    other chemical substances used

    for agriculture.

    The changes made by the

    imperialists in the eld of

    agriculture named 'the Green

    Revolution' arrived in Lanka

    too when neo liberal reforms

    began in Lanka in the laterstages of the 1970s. What was

    done by the 'green revolution'

    was the destruction of the

    then existing environment-

    friendly agricultural practices

    and the independence enjoyed

    by farmers in obtaining seeds

    and other agricultural inputs

    thereby making agriculture

    entirely a prey of multinational

    Health authorities

    examined 10,608

    individuals towards the

    end of the year 2012 in

    Anuradhapura, of which1414 individuals were

    found to have contracted

    the disease. Up to that

    point they were unaware

    that they had an illness.

    This as a percentage is

    13%.

  • 7/30/2019 Frontline - March 2013

    7/12

    7 Frontline/March - April 2013

    corporations. Accordingly,

    massive competition sprang up

    among companies in respect

    of agro-chemicals. Due to the

    said competition companies

    competed with each other

    to introduce more and more

    poisonous agro-chemicals.

    Instances of various pests and

    diseases being introducedby various companies

    emerged from countries in the

    continents of Africa, Asia and

    Latin America by the 1980s.

    Lanka also became a victim

    of this situation and today the

    farmers have to pay with their

    lives to increase the prots of

    multi-national companies. The

    CKD is another symptom of

    the disease of capitalism which

    has prot as its sole aim and is

    involved in the accumulation

    of capital with no regard for the

    environment and human lives.

    Danger to the lives of the

    peasantry is heightened not

    only by imperialism which has

    spread its octopus like tentacles

    to the agricultural sector as it

    has to every other sector but

    also by the backwardness of

    the super-imposed capitalism

    in Lanka. The failure of the

    government to prepare a

    legal framework regarding

    the quality of agro-chemicals,

    even though it is obvious

    that there is a clear nexus

    between the tendency towards

    accumulation of poisonous

    heavy metals in the eco-

    system and the kidney diseasespreading in these areas, is an

    example of the backwardness

    of the rulers of Lanka. On

    the other hand it is clear that

    the cause of kidney disease is

    unsafe drinking water. Heavy

    metals such as arsenic and

    cadmium are ingested mainly

    with drinking water. Presently

    these farmers obtain water

    for drinking from wells dug

    in their home gardens. They

    are situated in agricultural

    lands and the probability that

    agro-chemicals are present in

    underground water is high.

    Though the right for access tosafe drinking water is a basic

    human right, the rulers have

    failed to ensure that right to

    the people of Lanka. The urban

    population of Lanka has been

    provided with pipe-borne water

    trough water supply projects.

    However, the attention of the

    rulers has not been directed

    towards initiating a similar

    project for the people of the

    area where thousands have

    died, and the lives of thousands

    more are endangered due to the

    unavailability of safe drinking

    water. Today the people of

    areas struck by the CKD are

    compelled to struggle for safe

    drinking water. The people whoare terried by the disease are

    presently purchasing water at a

    high price. People who are no

    means to do so are condemned

    to use unsafe water.

    The other most serious

    issue of health facilities, state

    hospitals do not have even the

    basic facilities necessary in

    respect of the kidney ailment.

    Only the main hospitals have

    the facilities even to check

    whether the disease has been

    contracted. One example

    for this is the Rural Hospital

    situated at Padaviya which

    is one of the areas where the

    disease is most rampant. If one

    takes the Dehiaththakandiya

    area as another example,

    the base hospitals of both

    Dehiaththakandiya and

    Mahiyanganaya which are

    adjacent to the area both do

    not have diagnostic facilities.

    People have to travel over one

    hundred kilometers to either

    the General Hospital in Ampara

    or the General Hospital of

    Kandy in order to get the

    diagnostic tests performed free

    of charge. The other alternative

    is to pay for the service.Such is the reality of the free

    health service which is said

    to be available in Lanka. The

    situation is not much different

    in respect of treatment too. As

    reported on 12th November

    2012 in the government's own

    'Dinamina" newspaper, 11 out

    of 23 Hymodialysis machines

    at Anuradhapura General

    Hospital used for dialyzing the

    kidney patients are out of order.

    In addition to these, six more

    machines become out of order

    from time to time. Even in the

    district of Anuradhapura where

    the disease is most intense,it is not possible to treat even

    half the patients who come for

    the said treatment. Therefore

    patients are compelled to pay

    for various tests, drugs and

    other treatments. Those who

    cannot afford to do so can

    only die. Not a single capitalist

    government which has come

    to power so far in Lanka has

    taken steps to develop the

    health service even for the sake

    of saving the lives of patients.

    What do the policies of

    capitalist governments tell us,the policies which have failed

    so far to conduct a formal

    investigation in respect of a

    disease which has claimed the

    lives of thousands for a period

    of over a decade, which do not

    ensure the right of the people of

    Rajarata area for safe potable

    water, which do not provide

    free health facilities for patients

    who are in danger, which do

    not take even the minimum

    steps necessary maintaining the

    standards of agro - chemicals,

    and which do not pay attention

    The other mostserious issue ofhealth facilities, statehospitals do not haveeven the basic facilitiesnecessary in respect ofthe kidney ailment.

    to page 11

  • 7/30/2019 Frontline - March 2013

    8/12

    8 Frontline/March - April 2013

    Yet another 08th of March

    has passed. One Hundred and

    Two years have elapsed since

    the inaugural celebration ofthe International Women's'

    Day as proposed to the Second

    International in 1910 by

    the German Socialist, Clara

    Zetkin. During the last 102

    years the women's' day has

    been celebrated by various

    organization under various

    interpretations in various

    wineries across the world.

    However, would one be

    satised that it has progressed

    beyond being a mere day of

    calibrations and succeeded in

    uplifting the living standards of

    oppressed women all over theworld?

    While celebrating women's

    day m' 2012, it is worthwhile to

    inquire in to the tragic situation

    to which women's living

    standards hare descended under

    the present neo - liberalist

    socio - economic set up instead

    of progressing rapidly in the

    struggle which women had

    begun at the inaugural stages,

    the major share of work is being

    done all over the world by thewomen. She is the one who

    accomplishes specic tasks

    of labour in her employment

    as well as being one who

    expends unlimited labour in

    the household which is not

    valued. It is no exaggeration

    to say that she accounts for the

    mayor share of labour activity

    in the world economy. For an

    example, women supply 70%

    of the world agricultural labour.

    However 60% of all these

    who suffer from starvation

    in the world are also women,

    further evidence of the extent

    of the social inequality and

    oppression to which women

    have been subjected is supplied

    by the fact of 2/3 rds. of the

    illiterate population being

    women, and the incidents of

    sexual harassment and murder

    heard dewily. Statistics are

    unnecessary for understanding

    that not even the basic human

    rights of women, lave alone

    there social rights are severed

    in a world which is boasted to

    be developing rapidly.

    Confronted be another

    celebration of the international

    women's day, we are these

    completed to once again

    stress the very necessity for

    international women's' day

    proposed by comrade Clara

    Zetkin. She proposed to the

    socialist second internationalthe necessity of nominating one

    common day for women for the

    proposed of focusing attention

    on the necessity of writing

    to defeat the oppression and

    social injustice experienced by

    women. Though that proposal

    was very correct, it has not been

    possible even after 102 years

    to take the struggle to uplift

    the social states of women

    on a more favourable path

    and to carry the entire world

    towards a change of attitude

    in respect of women. It is been

    conformed repeatedly that it isimpossible to end the operation

    and integrality experienced by

    women by anything short of a

    change of the social system

    Even as Lankan women,

    this tragedy which we are

    experiencing is massive. It is

    not an exaggeration to say that

    women of Lanka have become

    the most oppressed prey of the

    destruction brought upon the

    country by rulers who took

    over the reins vowing to make

    Lanka the wonder of Asia. The

    present rulers, who have begun

    playing the second innings of

    the neo-liberal capitalism more

    successfully, are progressing

    successfully in the game of

    making women an easy prey of

    the social system.

    Women are the cheapest

    and easiest prey of exploitationin the labour market of Lanka.

    They are the more active labour

    in the Middle-Eastern slavery

    and in the garment sector.

    That is the very large segment

    of the Lankan economy. But

    sufcient attention has never

    been focussed on how cheaply

    and oppressively their labour is

    being exploited. A high number

    of those who are sent to the

    Middle-East as housemaids

    are faced with danger to their

    lives as well as barbaric labour

    and sexual exploitation. The

    number of women who die,

    Become victims of harassment,

    return having lost their limbs or

    diseased or are stranded abroad

    is very high. Rizana Nafeek

    paid with her life for the since

    of rulers of this country, who

    were not humane enough as to

    do even the minimum justice by

    the billions in foreign exchange

    which they are amassing for

    their luxurious comfort. There

    is no doubt what so ever that

    the authorities do not even have

    correct statistics regarding

    women who similarly losetheir lives or become injured.

    Hundreds of Thousands of

    women are expending labour

    for a pittance in the zones for

    exploitation named Free Trade

    Zones including those situated

    at Katunayake and Biyagama

    and in garment factories

    dispersed throughout the

    country. They, who are denied

    maternity leave, rest and basic

    human rights get overtime

    service shifts only to satisfy

    capitalists need to meet targets.

    These young women nd

    themselves thrown in to the

    re from the frying pan as they

    are compelled to return empty-

    handed to their home towns

    and villages since the garment

    factories are shutting down one

    after the other due to the loss of

    garment quota brought about

    by the idiocy of the rulers.

    However, they are denied to the

    right to raise even a whimper

    against the injustice befallen

    them or to struggle for worker

    rights. Could one margin that

    the rulers of this wonderland

    will ever accept responsibility

    for the lives of such women

    who have been dehumanizedby being compelled to struggle

    to make ends meet rather than

    struggle for workers rights, by

    lack of rest and recreation and

    denied their lives being cruelly

    victimized by capitalism.

    The situation of the women

    International Women's' Day

    Neo - Liberal Capitalism

    and the Lankan Women

    To page 11

    Even as Lankan women, this tragedy whichwe are experiencing is massive. It is not anexaggeration to say that women of Lankahave become the most oppressed prey of thedestruction brought upon the country by rulerswho took over the reins vowing to make Lankathe wonder of Asia.

  • 7/30/2019 Frontline - March 2013

    9/12

    9 Frontline/March - April 2013

    The skeletal remains that

    were found at the Matale District

    Hospital compound have shocked

    the whole country and raised the

    question about the identity of

    these hundreds of skeletons, and

    how such a dreadful act could

    have happened in a civilized

    society such as ours. According

    to the Judicial Medical Ofcer,

    around 90 skeletons were foundand this brings to the memory

    the ndings of mass graves in

    Chemmini and Sooriyakanda in

    the past.

    Undoubtedly this will be the

    biggest mass grave ever found

    in the history of Lanka whereas

    the whole society is still keeping

    a deafening silence from which

    Disgusting mass burialand Disgraceful Deafening Silencecan be inferred the fact that now

    this is an inactive and lethargic

    society. Whatever interpretations

    to be given to these skeletons the

    possibility of the graves being

    connected to the horror period

    of 1988-89 are strong. At that

    time, the most violent killings

    took place in the Southern

    Province, central province

    specially in the Kandy andMatale Districts. The victims of

    the said period conrm the fact

    that there were army camps and

    torture chambers in the District

    Hospital, Vijaya College, the

    site where the Matale Rest

    House and Koombiyangoda

    Temple are situated, as well as

    several other places in Matale.

    It is also reported that the

    Gajaba Regiment of the army

    was in charge of the area at

    the time. Vijaya College is 100

    metres from the Matale District

    Hospital and the Matale Police

    was stationed nearby.It was plain that the bodies

    had been buried without any

    respect for human kind. In most

    of bodies the heads were found

    separately. There are no female

    or child bodies which prove the

    fact that it was not a consequence

    of any natural disaster or

    of contagious diseases. It is

    possible, this was a horror

    chamber that buried its inmates

    in mass graves and most of the

    people who were responsible for

    this mass grave are still at large.

    It is pertinent to note during the

    1971 insurrection, there were

    no mass murders. Therefore, we

    are convinced that these skeletal

    remains are of those who

    were killed during the period1988/89, when state terrorism

    was at its height. Revealing

    the companionship between

    carpet though this incident was

    occurred under UNP regime. We

    must insist that those responsible

    be brought to justice. Those

    who are responsible for the

    murders are now holding high

    positions in this government. If

    the government is not doing a

    thorough investigation of this

    matter, the government has to

    take responsibility for thesekillings.

    Another important factor to

    be analyzed is the reactions of

    international community and

    other leading NGOs to this

    incident. If this compound was

    found in North or East area

    that might compel them to pass

    even international resolutions.

    But international human rights

    organizations are still remain

    silent to comment on this mass

    grave. It substantiates the fact

    that in order to promote neo-

    liberal economic agenda the

    racial issues are very importantthan these issues whereby they

    are scared to represent the rights

    of the people who fought against

    the capitalist system.

    The UNP regime and its

    successors are answerable

    for these mass graves and the

    Mahinda Rajapaksha regime

    also cannot get rid of this issue by

    remaining silent. According to

    the sources during the 1988/1989

    period the Gajaba Regiment had

    control over the Matale area and

    they maintained all the torture

    camps. Major Gunatilake, Major

    Gotabhaya Rajapaksha (present

    Defence Secretary) and Mohan

    Wimalasuriya commanded

    the regiment and Mahinda

    Balasuriya (former IGP) was

    the head of the Matale Police

    region. Therefore the liabilities

    are shifted to the Mahinda

    Rajapaksha regime and its

    loyal ofcials in respect of this

    mass grave because most of the

    ofcers who are paying a major

    role in the present regime played

    the same kind of role under UNP

    regime in 1988/1989 period.

    These youth lost their

    valuable lives because they

    had dreamed about a better

    world by toppling this horrible

    system. We render our salute

    to them and at the same time

    their unconcluded duty has been

    shifted to the present generation.

    Though some people and parties

    betrayed their noble motive theleftist movement of the country

    was able to safeguard the

    principles protected by them till

    their death. We have to promise

    them that the battle taken by us

    from them will not be handed

    over the next generation and that

    we will conquer the world that

    they had dreamed of.

    two capitalist parties UNP

    and the SLFP in issues which

    affects the system, the present

    government led by the SLFP

    is trying to keep this under the

    It was plain that the

    bodies had been buried

    without any respect for

    human kind. In most of

    bodies the heads were

    found separately. There

    are no female or child

    bodies which prove

    the fact that it was not

    a consequence of anynatural disaster or of

    contagious diseases.

    These youth lost their

    valuable lives because

    they had dreamed

    about a better world by

    toppling this horrible

    system. We render our

    salute to them and at

    the same time theirunconcluded duty has

    been shifted to the

    present generation.

  • 7/30/2019 Frontline - March 2013

    10/12

    10 Frontline/March - April 2013

    cont. page 11

    North Koreas continued

    work on its nuclear and missile

    programs seriously undermines

    regional and international

    peace and security, and

    threatens the security of a

    number of countries, including

    the United States.

    US envoy to the United

    Nations, Susan Rice

    Theres nothing quite like

    the foreign policy outbursts ofthe United States government.

    The bravado always astounds.

    In just one short sentence, the

    Obama administration not

    only accuse North Korea of a

    diabolic plan to use its nuclear

    program to terrorize the

    world, but also presents itself

    as a country that is willing to

    brave these threats in order to

    safeguard international peace.

    And it seems they are not

    alone: after the UN Security

    Councils emergency meeting

    on 12 February which took

    place only 12 hours after North

    Koreas most recent nucleartest the entire 15 member

    Security Council joined the

    United States and pledged

    to take signicant action

    against North Korea. The UN's

    expertise on nuclear weapons

    should not be underestimated

    in 2012 it was estimated

    that the current 15 member

    Security Council has 17,055

    nuclear weapons between

    them; 16,965 of which are the

    property of the ve Permanent

    Security Council Members

    (France, United Kingdom,

    China, Russia and the USA).

    We can only hope that the

    extensive nuclear armouries of

    these countries do not conict

    with their duty as Permanent

    Security Council members to

    safeguard international peace.

    Undeterred by these

    apparent contradictions, the

    United States have ruled that

    North Korea's nuclear program

    is a "global threat". This is

    despite the well known fact

    that the North Koreans are not

    currently able to engineer a

    miniaturized nuclear device

    small enough to be tted to

    a missile, and futhermore,

    only have enough plutonium

    and uranium supplies for 4-8

    nuclear weapons. The fact that

    the US currently own 4,950

    active nuclear weapons is keptquiet. Such self-righteous and

    partisan declarations of the

    US government are a clear

    example that there are two

    standards in world politics:

    one that applies to the United

    States and its growing pool of

    allies and lackeys, and another

    that applies to everyone else.

    North Korea or the

    Democratic People Republic of

    Korea (DPRK) as it is ofcially

    known is no stranger to

    international criticism. Ever

    since the DPRK withdrew from

    the Nuclear Non-Proliferation

    Treaty in 1993, the nuclear

    ambitions of the DPRK have

    been well known and ercely

    criticised. Under former leader

    Kim Jong-Il these ambitions

    were nally realised with

    their rst nuclear test in

    2006, followed by another in

    2009. Widespread economic

    sanctions followed each ofthese tests, adding to an already

    vast and comprehensive array.

    While the US and the UN

    Security Council would like

    you to believe that these nuclear

    tests were the actions of a

    war-mongering North Korean

    regime, a closer inspection

    reveals the exact opposite.

    Contrary to the popular

    image of North Koreans as

    crazed and belligerent, the

    DPRK's nuclear program is a

    direct response to 60 years of

    hostile US foreign policy. The

    Korean War of 1950-53, in

    which over 350,000 American

    soldiers were sent to the

    Korean Peninsula to assist the

    South's conquest of the North,

    marked only the beginning of

    the DPRKs long and painful

    relationship with the US. The

    fact that the US still refuses to

    sign a peace treaty only an

    armistice was ever signed is

    quite appropriate considering

    the erce attitude shown by

    successive US administrations

    toward the DPRK.

    The DPRKs withdrawal

    from the Nuclear Non-

    Proliferation Treaty in

    1993 encapsulates how US

    policy has effectively led to

    a nuclear North Korea. In

    February 1993, Lee Butler,

    then the head of US StrategicCommand, announced that the

    United States was retargeting

    hydrogen bombs aimed at the

    former USSR on North Korea.

    One month later, North Korea

    withdrew from the Nuclear

    Non-Proliferation Treaty.

    From the perspective of the

    North Koreans, it was clear

    that without the protection of

    the former USSR an effective

    deterrent to US bullying was

    needed. Here we arrive at the

    million dollar question is the

    North Korean nuclear program

    necessary to maintain their

    independence and sovereignty?

    A common retort to this

    question is that any increase in

    the global stockpiles of nuclear

    weaponry should be opposed as

    it ultimately increases the risks

    of war. Recent history tells us

    that the reverse is true. Former

    Libyan leader Muammar

    Gaddas elimination of all

    Libyan nuclear weapons in

    2003 did not decrease the risks

    of war it paved the way for

    it. Similarly, Iraqs removal of

    its nuclear arsenal in the early

    2000s did not prevent a US

    invasion, but instead made it

    more likely. Clearly, as long as

    the US has nuclear weapons,

    every country that actively

    resists US inuence without

    any means of defendingthemselves is at risk. From these

    facts, in conjunction with the

    constant US military presence

    in neighbouring Japan and

    South Korea which currently

    includes 22,294 soldiers, 4014

    warships, 21,213 warplanes

    and over 17 thousand marines

    it should come as no surprise

    that new DPRK leader Kim

    Jong-un concluded that an

    effective deterrent to US

    aggression is necessary.

    Considering that the US

    military is by far the largest

    in the world, the Obama

    administrations claim that the

    North Korean nuclear program

    is a threat to the United States,

    to regional stability, and to

    global security is absurd.

    If the DPRK were to attack

    unprovoked, as the US and their

    allies allege, the DPRK would

    not stand a chance against the

    might of the US military. After

    all, the US military spent 1.415

    Such self-righteous and

    partisan declarations of

    the US government are a

    clear example that there

    are two standards in world

    politics: one that applies

    to the United States and its

    growing pool of allies and

    lackeys, and another thatapplies to everyone else.

  • 7/30/2019 Frontline - March 2013

    11/12

    11 Frontline/March - April 2013

    North korea From page 10

    Chronic kidney disease From page 07

    International Women's

    From page 08

    trillion dollars on its military budget in 2012, compared to the

    DPRKs annual military budget of approximately 6 billion. The

    United States are only too aware of this fact they consistently

    threaten the DPRK with their massive military might safe in

    the knowledge that a pre-emptive strike by the DPRK would be

    suicidal.

    While the US consistently play on their obvious military

    supremacy as shown with their regular war games held with

    South Korea in the Sea of Japan that brazenly rehearse an

    amphibious invasion the centerpiece of US foreign policy is to

    cripple the DPRKs socialist economy. For six decades, the US

    have imposed harsh economic sanctions on the DPRK. Within

    the Obama administration this policy is known as strategic

    patience essentially meaning they will besiege the DPRK

    economy with constant sanctions until it cracks under the weight.

    One of the United States constant criticisms of the DPRK

    that they deliberately starve their population in order to allocate

    more resources to the military is closely related to this ruthless

    campaign of sanctions. Former President George W. Bush sums

    up the attitude of the US perfectly, stating he was determined to

    squeeze North Korea with every nancial sanction possible until

    its economy collapsed, regardless of the costs to the North Koreanpeople. With DPRK trade restricted in every imaginable way

    there simply isn't enough space to list them all the North Koreans

    have effectively been forced to become self-sufcient, which, for

    a country as small as the DPRK, has many potential problems.

    Only China deals openly with the DPRK, selling them invaluable

    supplies of oil and foodstuffs. In fact, the sanctions imposed on the

    DPRK are so vast that the US is barely able to impose anymore.

    As the New York Times reported in 2013, there are few sanctions

    left to apply. The arrogant statements of the US such as the

    one that began this article should be viewed within this context.

    Portraying the DPRK as a global threat is the last refuge of a

    desperate giant.

    For the US, whether the DPRK is a global threat is beside the

    point the fact is that the US will never let a socialist economy

    operate freely in a world dominated by US capital. The United

    Sates 53-year trade embargo imposed on socialist Cuba a

    country with no nuclear program clearly demonstrates this. By

    forcing the DPRK into a corner with constant aggressive rhetoric

    and sanctions, the US has given the North Koreans two choices:

    either political independence, with all the economic and military

    threats that come with it; or submit themselves to every whim and

    desire of US capitalism. Which would you choose?

    Comrade Ajith Kumara, National Organizer

    of Peoples Struggle Movement and the Memberof Parliament, is requesting the government to

    dene terrorism and go in front of a mirror to see

    their own image.

    He said this on the 7th of February attending

    a media conference organized by the Movement

    for Peoples Struggle regarding Convention

    on Suppression of Terrorist Financing Bill.

    Comrade Ranjith Piyathilake, Joint Secretary of

    the Peoples Struggle Movement and Comrade

    Jaminda Siriwardane of Revolutionary Students

    Union, also attended the media conference.

    He also pointed out that that bill gives the

    legal right to the government to identify anyone

    who works against the government as a terrorist

    and arrest. Comrade Ajith Kumara, Member of

    Parliament, also expressed his views in the mediaconference.

    Who is the person who gives the interpretation

    at the right time? Is that Mahinda, Gotabha,

    Attorney General or the Inspector General of

    Police? We ask the government to dene the

    word terrorists and go in front of a mirror to

    see their own image. Neither the United Nations

    nor America has dened that word because they

    containment in that the US wants to convince all China's neighbours

    that their region needs Washington's protection and presence to

    counter the rise and so-called "threat" posed by China.

    The warm relations that exist between Lanka and China

    are likely to be of concern to the US government. Lanka is seeking

    foreign direct investment while China is looking to increase its

    overseas investment. The result is that China is involved in almost

    all the large-scale projects that are under construction in Lanka.

    Wu Bangguo, the chairman of China's National People's CongressStanding Committee visited Lanka last year and signed 16 economic

    co-operation agreements with Lanka. China is already the major

    supplier of arms to Lanka. While the US wants to undermine China's

    growing inuence in the region, India is concerned about China's

    "string of pearls" a succession of Chinese built ports, including

    Hambantota, which is said to be surrounding them. It is on this level of

    geo-political imperialist rivalry with China that the US govt. is most

    likely to be now interested in the small island nation, but it prefers to

    speak the hypocritical rhetoric of human rights and democracy.

    be silent on these issues.

    Frontline:- There are different political fronts that have been

    initiated by several political parties. How do you understand

    these developments?

    Com. Ajith Kumara:- Everybody in the current political climate

    wants to form so called political fronts against the government

    but none of them have a clear political vision and policy as an

    alternative. They openly say this is a common front to defeat the

    government. We dont believe this strategy will work, so we will

    continue to work against this government with a clear objective,

    vision and with socialist policies as an alternative. We ask the

    masses to rally around the FLSP to go forward.

    in the estate sector is also very

    unfortunate. They also have

    been dehumanized by stupidity,

    malnutrition, racist pressure

    as well as by the realities of

    being women. Would anyone

    accept the social responsibility

    for the failure to make them

    sufciently aware to ght

    against oppression in a context

    where they are oblivious of

    the oppression which they

    are undergoing due to the

    underage marriage, becoming

    malnourished mothers,

    aborting, birth of underweight

    children, still births as well

    as being compelled to be the

    victim of the second work shift

    and also being sexual victims

    in their own homes in addition

    to expending labour as estate

    workers for lesser wages than

    their male counterparts while

    being victims of diseases

    caused by malnutrition.

    The issues of the womenin the north and east who are

    the victims of post war tragedy

    following thirty years of war

    is one which is being fast

    forgotten in the present society.

    It is almost four years since the

    human tragedy of the widows

    who are the chief householders

    of about 90% of families in

    the north, isolated from us

    was drowned in the 'Northern

    Spring' development myth

    of the authorities. Is Lankan

    society ready at least to admit

    that she, who is a victim of

    racist violence, is undergoing

    constant oppression due to

    cultural, religious as well as

    gender inequality and that

    her voice has been muted

    throughout society?

    Similarly it is not a secret thatfrom the child to grandmother

    born as females in the north

    as well as the south of this

    wonderland are very rapidly

    falling victims of violence. We

    shall only put on record that

    the number of women being

    murdered sexually harassed

    and falling victims of various

    acts of violence not only in

    Kahawatta but all over the

    land of Lanka exceeds what

    is statistically reported. It is

    as if the woman who has been

    turned into an instrument

    of sex and a commodity inthe market and in the media

    does not even deserve to be

    a topic for discussion in the

    Lankan society which has been

    dehumanized and rendered

    insensitive.

    One article such as this

    is grossly inadequate for

    discussing the depth of the

    social, economic and political

    abyss which has swallowed

    up the Lankan woman. It is

    all the more cruel as they, as a

    whole, are oblivious to the fact

    that they are victims of such a

    tragedy. They themselves who

    accept the oppression which

    they are subjected to purely

    because they are women as

    their fate and destiny and the

    entire society which is contentto let them bear this fate and

    destiny are both obstacles to

    redressing this insensibility.

    The responsibility of women's

    movements and other social

    movements is to liberate

    society from this hypocrisy.

    Accomplishment of any

    progressive task cannot be

    expected of any society which

    fails to treat women humanely

    and to provide social justice to

    them.

    The path chosen to propose

    an International Women's Day,

    to struggle, to establish it, must

    be trod bearing responsibility

    to win an honorable social life

    for them. It must be stressed

    that to do so the entire social

    system must be changed and

    that it is imperative for women

    to be in the forefront of the

    struggle for social change.

    to providing welfare for families which have been

    rendered helpless due to the death of the father

    from kidney failure? Firstly, that people have to

    struggle to gain all rights including the simplest

    of rights. Secondly, that this social system which

    gives priority to increasing prots at the cost ofthe security of human life and the environment

    needs to be changed without delay. There is also

    unity of those two parts. The struggle of the

    oppressed to demands such as safe potable water,

    free health service etc. should be developed into

    the broad struggle for changing this murderous

    social system. The task of the party today is to

    take that knowledge to the oppressed people and

    to organize the people to gain their rights and in

    opposition to capitalism which is rotting by the

    day. Otherwise one patient per every two dayswill continue to die of kidney failure for several

    more decades as has happened during the past

    decade.

    US moves From page 04

    The present political system From page 05

    would become terrorists if they dene that. The

    current approach of this government is the same.They are the ones who implement terrorism. The

    legal adviser said that this Act has a denition of

    terrorist act. According to that, the person who

    engages in terrorism is the terrorist. I will tell you

    what a terrorist act in accordance with this Act.

    According to this Act, a terrorist act is an

    act that is done to inuence the government or

    intimidate the public or the section of the public

    with the intention of promoting a political or

    religious ideology.Under the provisions of

    this Act, publishing a newspaper, distributing

    leaets, making protests for someones rights

    could be dened as terrorism and suppress.

    This is therefore is a serious Act. This needs

    to be defeated. It seems to be that not only the

    government ministers but also the members ofparliament of the opposition have not properly

    studied this Act. The opposition said yesterday

    that they would give support to this Act. Only

    after we questioned about this in the advisory

    committee, they questioned this in the parliament.

    We ask everybody to protest against this. We ask

    people to force your member of parliament to

    protest against this Act.

    Terrorism not interpreted,as the government is the terrorist

  • 7/30/2019 Frontline - March 2013

    12/12

    400/2, Talawatugoda road, madiwala, kotte

    Tel: 094112799432

    Printed and published by pubudu jayagoda at no 400/2, Talawatugoda road, madiwala, kotte. print by star printers at No 271 ratnapura Rd, horana

    23rd of February, a protest banner

    was signed in the Batticaloa town forcing

    the government to remove military

    administration, restore civil administration

    and stop looting lands of the people in those

    areas by the Movement for Equal Rights.

    This was interrupted by the government

    defence forces and it is also reported that

    the people who came to sign the bannerand the media personnel were intimidated.

    However, irrespective of interruptions

    made by the police and the defence forces,

    a large group of people signed the banner.

    Government has obstructed

    to the banner signing campaign

    yesterday organized by the

    Equal Rights Movement in

    Kandy city. United People`s

    Freedom Alliance, Wayamba

    provincial councillor Thushara

    Gunarathna and a group has

    come and threatened to the

    people who were signing to the

    banner to stop signing.

    But, as Kandy people were

    signing the banner avoiding

    his threatens, he has behaved

    aggressively trying to defraud

    it. The purpose of this banner

    signing campaign was to force

    government to corroborate the

    equal right to all nationalities

    and to stop land pillage in

    the north removing military

    governance.

    While this banner being

    signed in different places allover the country, from 3pm

    to 5pm yesterday, signs were

    being taken to the banner in

    Kandy. Kandy People have

    actively participated to the

    signing.

    "Free Women

    Movement" organized

    a protest march and a

    seminar on women's

    rights on 8th of March.

    The photos shows

    some events of tht

    programme.

    A new Joint Opposition has been formed

    with the purpose of ousting the Rajapaksha

    government and restoring the rule of law.

    Named as the Vipakshaye Virodhaya

    (Protest of the Opposition ), it is led by the

    UNP and includes the Tamil National Alliance

    and some other parties and small groups too

    numerous to mention. Opposition leader Ranil

    Wickremasinghe used radical words when he

    described the signing of the agreement as "the

    beginning of a revolution": "We have to ghtthis battle on the street, and we must start in the

    smallest village." He went on to claim that there

    can't be any other opposition movement and

    invited all anti-government political parties to

    join the Vipakshaye Virodhaya.

    It is true that the Rajapaksha government

    needs to be chased away and the rule of law

    established free of corruption and bribery.

    Nevertheless the Front Line Socialist Party

    will not join the new coalition, because what is

    needed in Lanka is a socialist alternative to the

    current government, not a capitalist substitute

    for it. We are opposed to the capitalist system

    no matter which party is leading it. Previous

    UNP governments did not solve the social and

    economic problems faced by the people, nor

    did they prevent nancial mismanagement,

    corruption or waste.

    Mr Wickremasinghe is also mistaken

    in describing his movement as a 'revolution'. A

    revolution means a profound social upheaval

    during which the people change their entire

    political and economic system, such as occurred

    in England in 1640, in France in 1789, or in

    Russia in 1917. It does not refer to a mere

    change in the ruling group, such as occurred in

    Ceylon 65 years ago. The announced policies

    of the Vipakshaye Virodhaya rule of law, an

    independent judiciary, reconciliation, democratic

    rights are in fact bourgeois democratic

    rights, rights which every capitalist revolution

    is supposed to provide, but did not in Lanka.

    For fear of the political consequences of giving

    the people full bourgeois rights, the capitalist

    revolution is still incomplete in Lanka.

    Nowadays, only a real socialist revolution can

    carry through the remaining uncompleted tasks

    of the bourgeois revolution, and then go straight

    on to building a new economic system. Such a

    revolution must be led by the Lankan working

    class, not by capitalist parties like the UNP and

    its allies.