fresno county employees’ retirement association governance roundtable october 18, 2006 tom...

48
Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

Upload: ethelbert-sharp

Post on 12-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association

Governance RoundtableOctober 18, 2006

Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

Page 2: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

2

Agenda

1. Governance background

2. Board interviews/surveys

3. Discussions:1. Roles and responsibilities2. Committees3. Policy to be prepared

4. Wrap up

Page 3: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

2. Governance Background

Page 4: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

4

Fiduciary Duties

Loyalty to the beneficiaries as a group and prudence in managing the beneficiaries’ property and serving their interests.

Page 5: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

5

Fiduciary Duties (cont’d)

Loyalty:

Primary duty is to the participants/beneficiaries

Managing the different “hats” we wear

Page 6: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

6

Duty of Loyalty

Many forms of conduct permissible in a workaday world for those acting at arm’s length, are forbidden to those bound by fiduciary ties. A trustee is held to something stricter than the morals of the market place. Not honesty alone, but the punctilio of an honor the most sensitive, is then the standard of behavior. As to this there has developed a tradition that is unbending and inveterate. Uncompromising rigidity has been the attitude of courts of equity when petitioned to undermine the rule of undivided loyalty by the ‘disintegrating erosion’ of particular exceptions. Only thus has the level of conduct of fiduciaries been kept at a level higher than that trodden by the crowd. It will not consciously be lowered by any judgment of this court.

Chief Judge Cardozo (Meihnard v. Salmon)

Page 7: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

7

Demonstrating Prudence

Prudence is process:

Clear delegation

Knowledgeable decision-makers

Sound policies

Due diligence process

Effective delegation

Page 8: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

8

The Challenge

Plan Operations

MemberDemographics

Benefit Policy

Wage Policy

Funding Policy

ActuarialLiabilities

ActuarialAssets

TRUSTEES

InvestmentPolicy

InvestmentStructures

InvestmentActivities

ActuarialAdjustments to Assets

Cash Flow

RiskTolerances

RiskManagement

TurnoverMortalityRetirementsAgeMarried

Client ServicesRecordsPaymentsExpensesAccountingFinancial Reporting

IndexingBenefits

InflationGrowth

?Monthly Pension

at Retirement

Contributions

Asset MixStrategyAsset ClassesExpected Performance

In HouseExternalActivePassiveForeignDerivatives

PurchasesSalesIncomeAppreciationCustodyPerformanceAccounting

Page 9: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

9

The Answer

More involvement in decisions/operations?

More committees?

More meetings?

Longer meetings?

Answer: A policy-focused board!

Page 10: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

10

A Policy-focused Board …

Focuses on: setting goals and direction, controlling risk, ensuring accountability, and Building organizational infrastructure

It does above by getting educated, setting sound policies, and building reporting systems.

Page 11: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

11

The Pension Business

Page 12: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

12

Effective Boards

Boards cannot be truly effective unless they understand the business they are governing: What is the ultimate purpose? What drives performance? What are the biggest risks? Which decisions are most important? What needs to be measured?

Page 13: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

13

The Purpose

KCERA January 1, 2003

Pay to Ms. X. Smith $753.00-- Seven Hundred Fifty Three------/100

Big Bank T. Paymaster

KCERA February 1, 2003

Pay to Ms. X. Smith $753.00-- Seven Hundred Fifty Three------/100

Big Bank T. Paymaster

KCERA March 1, 2003

Pay to Ms. X. Smith $753.00-- Seven Hundred Fifty Three------/100

Big Bank T. Paymaster

KCERA April 1, 2003

Pay to Ms. X. Smith $753.00-- Seven Hundred Fifty Three------/100

Big Bank T. Paymaster

KCERA July 1, 2003

Pay to Ms. B. Smith $753.00-- Seven Hundred Fifty Three------/100

Big Bank T. Paymaster

KCERA May 1, 2003

Pay to Ms. X. Smith $753.00-- Seven Hundred Fifty Three------/100

Big Bank T. Paymaster

KCERA June 1, 2003

Pay to Ms. B. Smith $753.00-- Seven Hundred Fifty Three------/100

Big Bank T. Paymaster

Page 14: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

14

The Pension Business

Discount Rate

Low

High

High Contributions

Liabilities

Risk High

EfficientFrontier

Page 15: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

15

The Pension Business

Discount Rate

RiskLow

High

High

EfficientFrontier

High Contributions

Liabilities

Page 16: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

16

How Important is Asset Mix Policy?

It depends:

It explains 90% of variability in return over time for a typical fund

It explains 100% of the absolute level of return

Source: Brinson, Hood, Beebower; Determinants ofPortfolio Performance

Page 17: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

17

Arithmetic of Active Management

Fees Fees

Passive $ Active $

Page 18: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

18

Distinguishing Skill vs. Luck

Probability ofUnderperformance

Expected ----------- Holding period ----------Excess Return 5 yrs 10 yrs 30 yrs

1% 42.8% 39.9% 32.9%2% 36.0% 30.6% 18.9%3% 29.6% 22.4% 9.4%

Even if a manager has skill, there is a significant probability that the manager will under-perform for extended periods of time.

* Adapted from: Jeremy Siegel, “Stocks for the Long Run”.

Page 19: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

19

Major Risks – Funding & Investments

Affordability of benefits

Funding shortfall/contribution volatility

Actuarial assumption risk

Actuarial error

Concentration risk

Conflict of interest

Excessive costs

Imprudent manager selection process

Page 20: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

20

Major Risks – Benefit Administration

Poor benefit policy

Inaccurate or late benefit payments

Loss of tax exempt status

Communications risk

Human resource risk

Malfeasance or fraud (internal controls)

Mismanagement of MIS projects

Disaster recovery

Page 21: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

21

Hierarchy of Investment Decisions

1. Mission/Objective of the Fund

2. Risk tolerance level

3. Asset allocation

4. Benchmarks

5. Asset class strategies

6. Manager selection process/criteria

7. Other investment policies and risk parameters

Page 22: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

22

Hierarchy of Benefit Administration Decisions

Actuarial methods and assumptions

Pension benefit policy

Service quality targets

Organizational structure

Budget

Business plan

Compensation policy

Staff performance evaluation measures

Page 23: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

23

Major Risks - Governance

Conflicts of interest

Failure to demonstrate prudence

Lack of board knowledge/training

Excessive travel and other expenditures

Micro-management

Breakdown in group dynamics

Page 24: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

24

Anatomy of Decisions

Boards often view multi-faceted activities as a single decision

In fact, most decisions involve different types of decisions: Policy decisions Strategy decisions Implementation decisions

Some decisions should rest with the Board, some should rest with staff or agents

Page 25: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

25

Anatomy of Decisions

Annual Communications Plan

Hire Communication Consultants

Prepare Communication Materials

Deliver Communications

Communication Goals & Guidelines

Policy

Strategy

Implementation

Communications Budget

Page 26: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

26

Accountability

In order to legitimately hold an individual accountable, one must provide: Clear objectives/mandate Authority to make the decisions necessary to

carry out the mandate Necessary resources

Can’t be the doer and the overseer

Page 27: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

27

Effective Boards: Important vs. Urgent

(A)

Important &

Not Urgent

(B)

Important &

Urgent

(C)

Not Important &

Urgent

(D)

Not Important &

Not Urgent

Page 28: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

28

Effective Boards (cont’d)

Effective Boards try to: Maximize the time they spend in Box A Spend no time in boxes C and D

By focusing on Box A, effective Boards hope to minimize the need to spend time in Box B.

Page 29: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

29

Effective Use of Board’s Time

Issue is not frequency of meetings, but quality:

The right agenda Policy and oversight focus

Board member preparation

Meeting materials (quality and timing)

Education

Staff policy analysis and recommendations

Page 30: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

2. Board Interviews/Surveys

Page 31: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

31

The Good

Good mix of backgrounds and training among board members

High level of confidence in current Retirement Administrator

Board invests considerable time

Board practices significantly improved in recent years: More engaged More transparent More information

Page 32: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

32

The Not-so-good

Perceived lack of clarity regarding roles of board and staff

Dissatisfaction with meetings:– Long and inefficient– Heavy agendas– Too much materials– Seldom closure– Decisions are drawn out over numerous meetings– Repetitive discussions– User-friendliness of board packets

Mixed views on effectiveness of committees

Page 33: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

33

The Not-so-good (cont’d)

Everyone acknowledges importance of education, but there are mixed views on implementation: Conferences vs. in-house Mandatory vs. encouraged

Stronger orientation needed

More focus on investments and ethics training

Need to review our policies periodically

Page 34: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

34

Not-so-good (cont’d)

Numerous policy gaps: Communications (vis-à-vis staff, members,

vendors) Planning Retirement Administrator evaluation Service provider evaluation/RFPs

Frustration with disability process: Implementation vs. strategy

Page 35: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

35

Cortex’s Assessment

Prior boards and administration left little in the way of a policy framework/institutional memory

Current board has been mired in fighting fires over past several years (i.e. reactive mode)

There is now a commitment to moving to a proactive governance approach

Challenges lie in both the lack of a framework and executing the existing framework

Page 36: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

36

Cortex Assessment (cont’d)

Multi-pronged action plan:

Find/create efficiencies

Policy work

Training and education

Information and reporting

Page 37: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

4. Discussion

Page 38: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

38

Roles & Responsibilities

Board, Chair, Committees, individual board members, Retirement Administrator

Discussion topics: Vendor selection Manager interviews Staff hiring/firing Strategic/business plans Policy analysis/recommendations from RA

Page 39: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

39

Vendor Selection

Which vendors/advisors does the Board consider to be primary advisors which the Board must select? (Other advisors/services presumably can be selected by the Retirement Admin.)

What level of involvement/information does the Board expect with respect to the selection of vendors/advisors by the Retirement Administrator?

Page 40: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

40

Manager Interviews

The Board currently interviews all investment managers on an 18 month cycle. Can the Board’s involvement in this area be reduced? If so, how?

Page 41: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

41

Staff Hiring/Firing

Please confirm the role the Board believes it should play with respect to the hiring and firing of staff other than the Retirement Administrator. Senior management vs. staff

Page 42: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

42

Planning

Does the Board expect formal strategic/ business plans be developed?

If so, what role should the Board and Retirement Administrator play in developing such plans?

Page 43: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

43

Policy Analysis

What are the Board’s expectations of the Retirement Administrator with respect to policy analysis and recommendations? Verbal vs. written report? Analysis of alternatives? Concrete recommendations?

What are the Board’s expectations of its committees with respect to the above?

Page 44: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

44

Role of Chair

What are the primary functions of the Chair position? Provide vision and leadership? Run effective meetings? Police the Board? Other?

Provide supporting details

Page 45: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

45

Board Member Expectations

What are the key things the Board expects of individual board members in order to maximize the effectiveness of the Board as a whole?

Page 46: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

46

Committees

Please discuss any changes you would like to see regarding committees: Number of committees Mandates of committees How committees operate Other

Page 47: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

47

Please select the 5 policies you would like Cortex to prepare

1. Trustee education

2. Policy development process

3. Board operations

4. Code of conduct

5. Service provider evaluation

6. Board communications

Board self-evaluation

Retirement Administrator performance evaluation

Planning policy

Monitoring & reporting

Other

Page 48: Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Governance Roundtable October 18, 2006 Tom Iannucci, Cortex Applied Research

5. Wrap-up