french (2008) -- sample assessment - writing · 2015-09-24 · coherence a range of familiar ....
TRANSCRIPT
French (2008) Sample assessment instrument and student responses
Supervised assessment — Writing October 2010
2 | French (2008) Sample assessment instrument and student responses Supervised assessment — Writing
Purposes of assessment1 The purposes of assessment are to:
promote, assist and improve student learning
inform programs of teaching and learning
provide information for those people — students, parents, teachers — who need to know about the progress and achievements of individual students to help them achieve to the best of their abilities
provide information for the issuing of certificates of achievement
provide information to those people who need to know how well groups of students are achieving (school authorities, the State Minister for Education and Training and the Arts, the Federal Minister for Education).
It is common practice to label assessment as being formative, diagnostic or summative, according to the major purpose of the assessment.
The major purpose of formative assessment is to help students attain higher levels of performance. The major purpose of diagnostic assessment is to determine the nature of students’ learning, and then provide the appropriate feedback or intervention. The major purpose of summative assessment is to indicate the achievement status or standards achieved by students at a particular point in their schooling. It is geared towards reporting and certification.
Syllabus requirements Teachers should ensure that assessment instruments are consistent with the requirements, techniques and conditions of the 2008 French syllabus.
Assessment instruments2 High-quality assessment instruments:3
have construct validity (the instruments actually assess what they were designed to assess)
have face validity (they appear to assess what on face value they purport to assess).
give students clear and definite instructions
are written in language suited to the reading capabilities of the students for whom the instruments are intended
are clearly presented through appropriate choice of layout, cues, visual design, format and choice of words
are used under clear, definite and specified conditions that are appropriate for all the students whose achievements are being assessed
have clear criteria for making judgments about achievements (these criteria are shared with students before they are assessed)
are used under conditions that allow optimal participation for all
are inclusive of students’ diverse backgrounds
allow students to demonstrate the breadth and depth of their achievements
only involve the reproduction of gender, socioeconomic, ethnic or other cultural factors if careful consideration has determined that such reproduction is necessary.
1 QSA 2008, P–12 Assessment Policy, p. 2.
2 Assessment instruments are the actual tools used by schools and the QSA to gather information about student achievement, for
example, recorded observation of a game of volleyball, write-up of a field trip to the local water catchment and storage area, a test of number facts, the Senior External Examination in Chinese, the 2006 QCS Test, the 2008 Year 4 English comparable assessment task.
3 QSA 2008, P–12 Assessment Policy, pp. 2–3.
Queensland Studies Authority October 2010 | 3
French (2008)
Sample assessment instrument and student responses
Supervised assessment – Writing
Compiled by the Queensland Studies Authority
October 2010
The QSA acknowledges the contribution of the French State Panel in the preparation of this document.
About this assessment instrument
The purpose of this document is to inform assessment practices of teachers in schools. For this reason, the assessment instrument is not presented in a way that would allow its immediate application in a school context. In particular, the assessment technique is presented in isolation from other information relevant to the implementation of the assessment. For further information about those aspects of the assessment not explained in this document, please refer to the assessment section of the syllabus.
This sample provides opportunities for students to:
demonstrate knowledge of French when using language features to convey meaning in a written text
create written text in French when responding to a task.
This sample assessment instrument is intended to be a guide to help teachers plan and develop assessment instruments for individual school settings.
4 | French (2008) Sample assessment instrument and student responses Supervised assessment — Writing
Assessment instrument
The student work presented in this sample is in response to an assessment task in which students apply and use relevant knowledge and skills to create a response to a problem or issue. The description below does not indicate the proposed audience or the required text type.
Task
You have recently been studying a unit on immigration, racism and terrorism. Write about 175 words of French on the issue of immigration as it affects both France and Australia.
You should consider the problem from both national and individual perspectives and should express an opinion as to whether Australia’s immigration policy should be changed.
With reference to France you may allude to any issues raised in the film “Welcome”, which we viewed in class.
Queensland Studies Authority October 2010 | 5
Instrument-specific criteria and standards
Schools draw instrument-specific criteria and standards from the syllabus dimensions and exit standards. Schools will make judgments about the match of qualities of student responses with the standards descriptors that are specific to the particular assessment instrument. While all syllabus exit descriptors might not be assessed in a single assessment instrument, across the course of study, opportunities to demonstrate all the syllabus dimensions and standards descriptors must be provided.
The assessment instrument presented in this document provides opportunities for the demonstration of:
conveying meaning - writing
This document provides information about how the qualities of student work match the relevant instrument-specific criteria and standards at standards A and C. The standard A and C descriptors are presented below. The complete set of instrument-specific criteria and standards can be found on page 11 of this document.
Standard A Standard C
Knowing and
using language
features
a wide range of vocabulary and grammar is used effectively; where complex language is used, errors do not detract from the overall meaning
a range of cohesive devices is used to link aspects of the text
register is appropriate to the situation
spelling, punctuation and word order display a high degree of accuracy
a range of familiar vocabulary and grammar is used, although errors are evident
basic cohesive devices are used to connect simple ideas
the register used is generally consistent
spelling, punctuation and word order contain inaccuracies
Creating and
responding
written communication adheres consistently to the conventions of the text type
the writer’s ideas and purposes are conveyed effectively with flexibility and originality
written text is well-organised and displays a high level of coherence
an understanding and response to cultural contexts is clearly evident in the writing.
written communication may feature some aspects of the text type
simple ideas are conveyed effectively
organisation of the written text is basic and displays some coherence
the writing shows some recognition of cultural contexts.
Sample student responses: Standard A
6 | French (2008) Sample assessment instrument student responses Supervised assessment — Writing
Standard
descriptors Student response A
The text is well organised and coherent.
spelling, punctuation and word order display a high degree of accuracy
cohesive devices
Understanding and response to cultural contexts is clearly evident
Standard A
Queensland Studies Authority October 2010 | 7
cohesive devices
Where complex language is used, errors do not detract from overall meaning
spelling, punctuation and word order display a high degree of accuracy
The text is well organised and coherent
Understanding and response to cultural contexts is clearly evident
A wide range of vocabulary and grammar are used effectively
Where complex language is used, errors do not detract from overall meaning
The writer’s ideas and purposes are conveyed effectively with flexibility and originality
cohesive devices
Standard C
8 | French (2008) Sample assessment instrument student responses Supervised assessment — Writing
Standard
descriptors Student response C
organisation of the written text is basic and displays some coherence
a range of familiar vocabulary and grammar is used, but errors are evident
simple ideas are conveyed effectively
a range of familiar vocabulary and grammar is used, but errors are evident
spelling, punctuation and word order will contain inaccuracies
the writing shows some recognition of cultural contexts
Standard C
Queensland Studies Authority October 2010 | 9
spelling, punctuation and word order will contain inaccuracies
cohesive devices
simple ideas are conveyed effectively
spelling, punctuation and word order will contain inaccuracies
Standard C
10 | French (2008) Sample assessment instrument student responses Supervised assessment — Writing
spelling, punctuation and word order will contain inaccuracies
Instrument-specific criteria and standards
Standard A Standard B Standard C Standard D Standard E
Kn
ow
ing
an
d u
sin
g
lan
gu
age
feat
ure
s
The student work has the following characteristics:
a wide range of vocabulary and grammar is used effectively; where complex language is used, errors do not detract from the overall meaning
a range of cohesive devices is used to link aspects of the text
register is appropriate to the situation
spelling, punctuation and word order display a high degree of accuracy
The student work has the following characteristics:
a range of vocabulary and grammar is used effectively, although with some errors
selected cohesive devices are used to link aspects of the text
register is usually appropriate to the situation
spelling, punctuation and word order display a reasonable degree of accuracy
The student work has the following characteristics:
a range of familiar vocabulary and grammar is used, although errors are evident
basic cohesive devices are used to connect simple ideas
the register used is generally consistent
spelling, punctuation and word order contain inaccuracies
The student work has the following characteristics:
some familiar vocabulary and grammar is used, although frequent errors are made
some simple linking words are used, but the meaning as a whole is fragmented
errors in spelling, punctuation and word order hinder meaning
The student work has the following characteristics:
responses may be basic sentences using well-rehearsed words and phrases
frequent errors are evident
Cre
atin
g a
nd
res
po
nd
ing
written communication adheres consistently to the conventions of the text type
the writer’s ideas and purposes are conveyed effectively with flexibility and originality
written text is well-organised and displays a high level of coherence
an understanding and response to cultural contexts is clearly evident in the writing.
the writer’s ideas, information and meaning are usually communicated clearly, although errors may occur in complex language
written text is organised and is generally coherent
an understanding and response to cultural contexts may be evident in the writing.
written communication may feature some aspects of the text type
simple ideas are conveyed effectively
organisation of the written text is basic and displays some coherence
the writing shows some recognition of cultural contexts.
written communication may not always be appropriate to the text type
some simple ideas are conveyed
written text lacks coherence
the writing shows little recognition of cultural contexts.
some simple meanings are conveyed.
Queensland Studies Authority October 2010 | 11