frb_011926
TRANSCRIPT
JANUARY, 1926
ISSUED BY THE
AT WASHINGTON
Trade, Industry, and Bank Credit in 1923Business Condition® in the United StatesLoans to Brokers and Dealers in Securities
WASHINGTONGOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
1926
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD
Ex offleio members: | D. R. CBISSINGEE, Governor.
A, W, MELLON, I E D M U N D P L A T T > Vice Governor.Secretary of the Treasury, Chairman. | ^ D 0 L P H G ' MILLEB.
| CHARLES S, HAMLIN.
J. W. MCINTOSH, I GEORGE It. JAMES.
Comptroller of the Currency. j EDWARD H. CUNNINGHAM.
WALTER L. EDDY, Secretary. j WALTER WTATT, General Counsel*3'C-\™^Assistan\SecretarV> \ Director, Division of Research andE. M. MCCLELLAND, Assistant Secretary. \ StatisticsW. M« IMLAY, Fiscal Agent •j e ^e HERSON, I E. A. GOLDENWEISEU, Assistant Director, Division of
Chief\ Division of Examination, and Chief FederalReserve Exa?ninera
Research and Statistics,o L. SMEAD, Chieft Division of Bank Operations.
FEDERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
District No. 1 (BOSTON). CHAS. A. MOESS.District No. 2 (NEW YORK) JAMES Sa ALEXANDER.District No. 3 (PHILADELPHIA) L. L. RUE.District No. 4 (CLEVELAND) _ GEORGE A. COULTON.District No. 5 (RICHMOND) JOHN F. BRTJTON.District No. 6 (ATLANTA) P. D. HOUSTON.District No. 7 (CHICAC4O) ._ „ „ FRANK O. WETMORE.District No. 8 (ST. LOUIS) BRECKINRIDGE JONES.
District No. 9 (MINNEAPLOIS) THEODORE WOLD.District NO. 10 (KANSAS CITY) P. W. GOEBEL.
District NO. 11 (DALLAS) B. A. MCKINNEY.District NO. 12 (SAN FRANCISCO) HENRY S. MCKEE.
u
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The month; PageReview of the month—Bank credit in 1925 .__,,«.; . . >_- 1Business conditions in the United States.. . . . 8Treasury finance 5
The London money market in 1925 „ 40Reserve bank credit, gold stock, money in circulation, and member bank reserve balances,.- 30Loans and investments of national member banks, by class of bank.. _ . . , . „ 31Official:
Changes in State bank membership „„.,. . 32Changes in national bank membership. . . „ . ^ „ 32Fiduciary powers granted to national banks .„„„„.. . . . 32
Business statistics for the United States:Industrial activity. „--- . , » .. 34Commodity movements „ » 37Wholesale and retail trade . ... 38Final estimate of crop production 33
Foreign banking and business conditions:Financial statistics for principal foreign countries „ „ . „ 42Foreign trade of principal countries—-..--. „ . «. 45Price movements in principal countries-
Federal Reserve Board wholesale price indexes 46Wholesale prices in principal countries . . 47Retail prices and. cost of living in principal countries . . 49
Banking and financial statistics:Federal reserve banks—
Condition of Federal reserve banks . * . . 50Federal reserve note account. . . - , . . 54Holdings of earning assets . . - , — 55Discount and open-market opex*ations of Federal reserve banks „ . 56Gold settlement fund , „ 65Discount rates of Federal reserve banks-... 65
Member banks—Condition of reporting member banks in leading cities . . „ , . , 57Banker's balances at reporting member banks in Federal reserve bank cities 58Deposits of all member banks . . . „ 59
Changes in membership in Federal reserve system 60All stock banks in the United States—Condition on September 28, 1925 61Bank debits _ . 66Member banks and nonmember banks on par list and not on par list_. - 67Money rates in principal cities . . . - . ~»- 68Money in circulation „„„ .. _—-- . . . » - . . . . . 67Gold and silver imports and exports „-- - . - . - . „„-.„„. 69Foreign exchange rates- » » . - . - - - - - - - - - . . - 70
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
OFFICERS OF FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS
Federal Reserve Bank of—
Boston ,„„•,„ ,-New York.
Philadelphia
Cleveland., —
Richmond
Atlanta
Chicago
St. LouisM inneapolis
Kansas City..Delias
Ssa Francisco
Chairman
Frederic K CurtissPierre Jay—
R. L. Austin™ .._.
George DeCamp
Wm, W. Hozton
Oscar Newton
Wm A. Heath
Win. McC. Martin „John R. Mitchell
M. L. MeClure ..„„_C. C. Walsh
JohnPerrin „
Governor
W. P. O* HardingBenj. Strong .._
Geo. W.Norris
E. R. Fancher
George J. Seay
M. B. Wellborn
J. B. McDoogal
D. C. Biggs......R. A. Young
W.J. BaileyLvnn P. Talley.
J. U. Calkins..
Deputy governor
W. W. Paddock ,J. H. CaseL. F. SailerG. L. Harrison... „ .E. R. Kennel.
Wm. H. Hutt
M. J. FlemingFrank J. ZurlindenC. A. Peple...R. H. BroaddiiS ,J. L. CampbellCreed TaylorC. R. McKay „..._John H. Blair
...0 . M. Attebery.....W. Bo Gcery..13 xr TUfncrnHarry Yaeger *C. A. WorthingtonR. Ro Gilbert .- . .
Wm. A. DayIr& ClerkL. C. Pontious «.„„
Cash!®?
W. WJJlettoL. H. Hendrkks.1
A. W. GUbart.>J. W. Jones.*
' G. B. Chapin.iRay M. Oidjaej.L. XL Rounds.1
0 . A. MellfceEsay.W. G. McCreedy.iJ, C. Nevln.
Geo. H . Ksess®*John S. Waldos* Jr.aM, W. Bell.
We C. Bacbmao.1
K. C. Childs.sJ, H . Dillard.sD . A. Jones.*O. Jn Netterstrom.iJ. W, Whit®,Gray Warren. >Frank 0 . Doalop*5
J. W. Helm.Fred Harris.
W. N, Ambrose,
* Controller. s Assistant deputy governor,
MANAGING DIRECTORS OF BRANCHES OF FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS
Federal Beserve Bank of—
New York:Buffalo branch
Cleveland:Cincinnati braaehPittsburgh branch..
Richmond:Baltimore branch..
Atlanta:New Orleans branchJacksonville branchBirmingham branchNashville branch
Chicago:Detroit branch
St. Louis:Louisville branch,.,.Memphis branchLittle Bock branch
Managing director
W. W. Schneckenburger
L. W. Manning.
A. H. Dudley.
Marcos Walker.Geo. B. DoSaussure.A. E. Walker.J, B. Fort, Jr.
W. R. Cation.
W. P. Klncheloe.V. S. F-squa
! Federal Reserve Bank of— : Managing dlresftor
I Mmaeapolis:; Helena branch „._! B. E. Towle.
Kansas City: •Omaha branch L. H. Earhart.Denver branch....... . . : JF. E.Olson.
i Oklahoma City branch.. i C. E. Daniel,; Dallas:
Ei Paso branch...„„_ ; M. Crump.Houston branch „ 1 D. P. Reordasa.
; San Francisco: ;i Los Angeles branch ..J B. B. Motherweli.; Portland branch »...| B. B. West.•i Salt Lake City branch ; W. L. Partner.
Seattle branch 0 . R. Shaw.Spokane branch D. L. Davis,
iA. F. Bailey. r
\: !
SUBSCRIPTION PE1CE OF BULLETIN
FEDERAL RESEBVE BULLETIN is the board's medium of communicationwith member banks of the Federal reserve system and is the only official organor periodical publication of the board. It contains, in addition to the regularofficial announcements, the national review of business conditions, detailedanalyses of business conditions, research studies, reviews of foreign banking, andcomplete statistics showing the condition of Federal reserve banks and memberbanks. The BULLETIN will be sent to all member banks without charge. Toothers the subscription price, which covers the cost of paper and printing, is $2«Single copies will be sold at 20 cents. Outside of the United States, Canada,Mexieo9 and the insular possessions, $2.60; single copies, 25 cents.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETINVOL. 12 JANUARY, 1926 No. 1
Bank credit in1925.
REVIEW OF THE MONTH
Banking developments in 1925 reflect alarge increase in the volume of credit extended
by member banks to financethe year's unusually active busi-ness and the increased volume
of transactions in the security market. Thevolume of member bank credit in use dur-ing 192,5 was larger than in an}^ previousyear, and the volume of reserve bank creditoutstanding was considerably above the levelof 1924 and approximately at the average levelof the two preceding years, With the in-creased demand for bank credit from industryand finance the member banks maintainedtheir own investments in securities at thehigh level reached the year before, whenabundance of funds had caused these banksgreatly to increse their holdings of investments.At the reserve banks the increase in the volumeof credit outstanding in December, 1925,compared with the closing month of the yearbefore was due to the withdrawal of gold forexport, amounting to about $150,000,000 dur-ing the year, and to a comparatively smallincrease in the reserve balances of memberbanks from the high level reached at the endof 1924. Domestic currency demand increasedsomewhat during the year, owing to the activecondition of business, but this increased de-mand was met through the use of Americancurrency returned from abroad in sufficientvolume to meet the increase in domestic re-quirements. In general, the year may becharacterized from the point of view of bankingdevelopments as one during which memberbanks financed a larger volume of domesticbusiness out of their own resources and met ademand for gold for export by obtaining addi-tional funds from the reserve banks.
In 1925; for the first time in five years, theannual average of reserve bank credit in usewas larger than for the preceding year, Theaverage volume of bills and securities during1925 was $1,140,000,000. compared with anaverage of $950,000,000 in 1924. This higherlevel of reserve bank credit was due to themaintenance by member banks of a higheraverage of reserve balances, in keeping withthe larger volume of their own deposit liabilities,and to the change in the direction of goldmovements, which during the preceding fouryears had been an important factor in. reducingthe volume of reserve bank credit. Yearlyaverages of reserve bank holdings of bills andsecurities, which measure the total of reservebank credit in use, are shown below:
R E S E R V E B A N K C R E D I T OUTSTANDING
[Yearly averages in millions of dollars]
Year
Bills and! securities! held byi reserve
banks
Changefrom
previousyear
1920.1921..1922...1923..1924...1925. .
3,2432,1601,1871,151
9501,140
- 1 , 0 8 3- 9 7 3
- 2 0 1+190
credit and goldstock.
While the increase in the average level ofreserve bank credit during 1925, after a con-
tinuous decline for four years*w a s c a u s e d hJ t h e l a r s e r Yol~ume of reserve balances and bygold withdrawals, the changes
from month to month during the year re-flected chiefly changes in the domestic demandfor currenc}?. The chart shows for the years1922 to 1925 month-to-month changes in thevolume of reserve bank credit, in the volumeof reserve bank credit combined with the
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
EEDEEAL BESEBVE BULLETIN" JANUARY, 1926
country's stock of gold, in the volume ofmoney in circulation, and in reserve balancesheld by member banks with the reserve banks,,The figures on which the chart is based appearon page 30 of this issue.
SCALE FOR 2 AND 4
6000rMILLIONS OF DOLLARS
5500 j —
3500 lv—v"-—1922 1323
5001325
The reserve bank figures are daily averages and the gold stock and moneyin circulation figures are averages of figures for the first of two con-secutive months. The curves representing reserve bank credit andmember bank reserve balances are on a scale running from $500,000,000to $3,000,000,000, and the curves of money in circulation and of reservebank credit plus gold stock on a scale running from $3,500,000,000 to$6,000,000,000.
In the chart the curve representing reservebank credit shows changes from month tomonth in the average volume of bills andsecurities held by the reserve banks. To thisamount is added for every month the total ofgold stock in the country, and the combinedtotal is shown in the curve at the top of thechart. Fluctuations in this curve, therefore,represent monthly changes in the funds avail-able to member banks at the reserve banksresulting from changes in the stock of gold andfrom increases or decreases in the volume ofreserve bank credit. The reason for combiningthe stock of gold and the volume of reservebank credit into a single curve is that goldreceived from abroad is immediately depositedwith the reserve banks and is first reflected inan addition to the member bank reserve ac-counts, and that gold for export is obtainedby member banks from the reserve banks
and is charged directly to the member banks3
balances. During the years of net goldimports the gold added to the reserve balancesof member banks was either used to reduceindebtedness at the reserve banks or to meeta demand for currency, or remained in thebalances and so increased the lending powerof the member banks in the same way asborrowing. To which of these various possibleuses the reserve bank funds arising fromthe imported gold was put by member bankshas depended upon credit and currency con-ditions prevailing at the time. Changes inthe two factors that determine the domesticdemand for reserve bank credit are shown inthe curves representing money in circulationand reserve balances of member banks. Whenmember banks axe called upon to meet an in-creased demand for currency they are obligedto use a corresponding amount of the fundsheld to their credit at the reserve banks.When, however, funds added to member banks'balances through the deposit of imported goldare not used in meeting a currency demand orin repayment of borrowings at the reservebanks, they remain on deposit as reservebalances and form the basis of additionallending power of the member banks.
The chart shows that in 1925 month-tomonth fluctuations in reserve bank credit werelargely in response to changes in the demandfor currency, as changes in reserve balances wererelatively small, and that, while the volume ofreserve bank credit increased considerably dur-ing the year, the total reserve bank funds avail-able to member banks, as represented by thecurve for reserve bank credit plus gold, changedbut little. This is in contrast to the otheryears shown on the chart, in each of whichgold imports were more than sufficient to offsetthe decrease in reserve bank credit, and thetotal of reserve bank funds, as shown in theupper curve, increased. In 1922 this increasewas used both in meeting a. growing demandfor currency and in supplying additional re-serves to member banks; in 1923 the increasein currency demand arising from an increasedvolume of domestic trade and employment,
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JANUARY, 1926 FEDEKAL BESEBVB BULLETIN
together with a demand for American currencyfrom abroad, absorbed the entire growth in re-serve bank funds; and in 1924, with currencydemand showing only seasonal variations andonly a slight increase for the year, and withthe level of reserve bank credit about the sameat the end of the year as at the beginning, theincrease in reserve bank funds arising fromgold imports was added in large part to mem-ber bank reserve balances, and constituted thebasis of a rapid growth in member bank credit.In 1925, with little change in the demand forcurrency and with gold exports absorbing thegrowth in reserve bank credit, there was littlechange for the year in the volume of memberbank reserve balances. The maintenance ofthese balances at the high level reached theyear before, however, required the continuoususe of a larger amount of reserve bank funds.
With only a slight increase during 1925 inmember bank balances at the reserve banks,
the total of member bankBasis of growth ^ ^ i n c r e a s e d considerably.
of member banK T> . ~ , , . _ . __",
CTedit Between October 10, 1924,and September 28, 1925, the
latest date for which a condition statement forall member banks is available, loans and in-vestments of these banks increased by about$2,000,000,000, or nearly 7 per cent, andmonthly figures for deposits indicate a furthergrowth in bank credit during the last quarterof the year. This growth during 1925 in thevolume of credit extended by member banks,without corresponding increase in their reservebalances with the reserve banks, is explainedchiefly by changes in the character of the de-posits and their distribution among banks sub-ject to different legal reserve requirements.Between October 10, 1924, and September 28,1925, as is shown in the table below, time de-posits of member banks, against which only a 3per cent reserve is required, increased by$870,000,000, while net demand deposits,which carry a much larger reserve require-ment, increased by only one-half this amount.Furthermore, net demand deposits in centralreserve cities, where the required reserves are
13 per cent, declined by $226,000,000, and thosein banks outside of reserve cities, where onlya 7 per cent reserve is required, increased by$435,000,000., The decrease in net demanddeposits at the financial centers reflectedlargely the decline in balances carried by citybanks for their country correspondents, a de~cline which was due chiefly to the employmentby these country banks of their idle balancesin making loans on securities. As a conse-quence of these changes the reserve balances ofmember banks in central reserve cities declinedby $35,000,000 during the period, while thosefor banks in reserve cities increased by $17,-000,000, and those for country banks by$43,000,000. The net result was an increaseof $26,000,000 in the total of member bankreserves. As has been pointed out in earlierreviews, the ratio of reserves of member banksto deposits remains continuously at or near 10per cent, when the calculation is based on thenet amount of deposits on which reserves arecomputed, an amount in which time depositsare reduced to a net demand deposit basis.When reserve balances are related to the com-bined total of net demand and time deposits,however, the two classes of deposits againstwhich reserves are required, a decline in theratio from 7,8 per cent to 7.5 per cent is shownfor the past year. While 7,5 per cent is theaverage ratio of reserves to deposits for allmember banks, the ratio is 11.3 per cent forbanks in central reserve cities, 7.2 per centfor banks in other reserve cities, and 5.3per cent for country banks. This variation inreserve ratios for the different classes of banksindicates tha t in New York and Chicago, thetwo central reserve cities, owing both to largerreserve requirements against demand depositsand the larger proportion of this class of de-posits, deposits of member banks are onlyabout nine times as large as reserves,; while incountry banks, with smaller reserve require-ments and a larger proportion of time deposits,total net demand and time deposits are nearlytwenty times as large as reserve balances.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDEEAL RESERVE BULLETIN JANUARY, 1926
DEPOSITS AND RESERVES OF MEMBER BANKS[In millions of dollars]
i Oct. 10,i 2924
Net demand deposits: ITotal „ : 17,780
In central reserve city banks......| 6,299In reserve city banks., ._ 5, 946In country banks . . . . . 5,535
Time deposits | 9,597
Total net demand and time de-posits „„„. 27,377
Reserve balances 2,122Ratio of reserve balances to net demand I
plus time deposits: ;For all member banks 7.8For banks in central reserve cities _. 11.5For banks in reserve cities ' 7.6For country banks.. j 5.4
Sept. 28,1925
18,2336,0736,1905,970
10,467
28,7002,147
7.511.37.25.3
Change
+453-226+244+43.5+870
+1,323+26
Growth of time .deposits.
Growth of time deposits has been a continuousfactor in the increase of deposit liabilities of
member banks since the organ-ization of the Federal reservesystem, and the fact that they
have increased more rapidly than demanddeposits has been an influence toward decreas-ing the average ratio of reserves that memberbanks have been required to carry against theircombined deposits. The volume of demanddeposits has fluctuated with changes in businessconditions, and after a rapid decline in 1921and the early part of 1922 and a subsequentrecovery, their level in 1925 was considerablyhigher than at the peak five years earlier.Time deposits, on the other hand, increasedthroughout the period of recession in 1921-22and the later period of increased businessactivity, and their level in September, 1925,was $4,300,000,000 above that of November,1920. While time deposits have increased atbanks in all classes of cities and while their rateof growth in recent years has been even greaterat banks in financial centers than at countrybanks, they constitute a much larger proportionof total deposits in the smaller cities. InSeptember of the year just closed the propor-tion of time deposits to total deposits was 13per cent in central reserve city banks, 33 percent in reserve city banks, and 46 per cent incountry banks.
The large volume of time deposits at countrybanks has been a source of additional lending
power for these banks. Not
demand, time deposits are usu-ally considered by the banks as available foruse in the purchase of long-term investments.The large volume of time deposits at themember banks, and particularly at memberbanks in smaller towns and in country districts?indicates that these banks are not only com-mercial banks engaged in making loans tofinance the current operations of trade andindustry and in carrying the proceeds ofthese loans as deposits payable on demand,but are also to a considerable extent servingtheir customers as savings banks and invest-ment institutions receiving time deposits andinvesting them in Government and othersecurities. The relation between time depositsand investments for each of the differentclasses of banks is brought out in the table:
TIME DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS OP MEMBERBANKS, SEPTEMBER 28, 1925
[In millions of dollars]
Class of bank j Time1 deposits
All member banks ' 10,467Member banks i n -
Central reserve cities j 3,115 1,930Other reserve cities .• 3,759 i 2,890Country banks i 5,593 j 4,09S
Invest-ments
8,919
For all member banks combined, time de-posits on September 23, 1925, considerably-exceeded total investments, indicating that acertain proportion of funds obtained throughtime deposits has been used by member banksin increasing their loan account. This hasbeen particularly true for country banks, whosetime deposits in 1925 exceeded their invest-ments by about $1,500,000,000, while incentral reserve cities the banks' security hold-ings were larger than their time deposits.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
, :L926 FEDERAL RESERVE BTJIAMTfE
The proportion of the member banks' fundsemployed in different classes of loans and
Composition of investments also differs for themember bank different classes of banks,. Thecredit, composition of member bankearning assets, by classes of banks, at the closeof the last fiscal year is shown below:L O A N S AND I N V E S T M E N T S O F M E M B E R B A N K S O N
J U N E 30, 1925
[In millions of dollars]
I; Member banks in—
i All ii m c m ? e r '• CentralI banks
Loans on securities.. I 6,718All other loans .." 14,081
Total loans 20,799Investments j 8,888
Total loans and invest- iinents .; 29,687
Percentage distribution: iLoans on securities 22.6All other loans -! 47.4
Total loans .j 70.1Investments _ 20.9
Total loans and invest-ments... 100.0
reservecities
2,8572,651
Otherreservecities
Countrybanks
5, 5082,014
2,275 |5,191 |
3,586G, 239
7,460 !2,866
7,8254,008
13.452.7
73.226.8
100.0
72.327.7
86.133.9
100.0 ! 100. 0
In central reserve and reserve city banksloans constituted considerably more than 70per cent of total earning assets of memberbanks, and in country banks they were two-thirds of the total. At member banks in thefinancial centers, where the surplus fundsof the country are largely emplojT'ed, loans onsecurities are larger than all other loans,while at country banks only 13 per cent ofearning assets are employed in collateral loans.Differences in banking practice may accountin part for the difference in the compositionof earning assets of banks in the financialcenters and outside, but these differences alsoreflect the fact that banks throughout thecountry, after using a large part of theirfunds to meet the financial requirements oftrade and industry in their own localities, placethe funds not required locally on deposit withcity correspondents. Funds thus placed at thedisposal of city banks are subject to with-
75164—26f -2
drawal on demand whenever increased busi-ness activity in the interior of the countrycauses a growth in local financial requirements,,Under these circumstances city banks employthe funds received from the interior chieflyin making demand or short-term loans onsecurities. During 1924 and 1925, with loan-able funds throughout the country in excess oflocal credit requirements, there has been arapid growth of collateral loans by memberbanks.
This review indicates that the most import-ant banking developments during the year1925 have been a continuous growth of memberbank loans on securities, and a, considerableincrease in the second half of the year in loansfor agricultural and commercial purposes.Furthermore, owing to changes in the characterand geographic distribution of the deposits ofmember banks, they were able to support theincrease in the total of their deposits without acorresponding increase in their reserve balances.At the reserve banks the increase in the volumeof credit outstanding reflected the influence ofgold exports, following upon four years of acontinuous inflow of gold from abroad.
TREASURY FINANCE
December Unandng*On December 7 the Treasury announced an
offering at par through the "Federal reservebanks of one-year Z% per cent Treasury cer-tificates, dated December 15, 1925, and ma-turing December 15, 1926, The offering wasfor $450,000,000 or thereabouts, and it wasannounced that the Treasury would accept inpayment for the new certificates outstandingTreasury certificates and 4 ^ per cent Treas-ury notes maturing December 15, 1925. Pre-ferred allotment would be given to subscrip-tions for which payments were tendered inthese certificates and notes, of which theamount outstanding was approximately $480,-000,000. The offering was intended withbalances on hand and December tax receiptsto cover the cash requirements of the Treasuryuntil March, when further financing will be
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL. RESERVE BULLETIN JANUARY, 1926
necessary. The same exemptions from taxationwere provided as have been provided for otherissues under the act of September 24; 1917,and the new certificates will be accepted atpar in payment of income and profits taxespayable at maturity of the certificates. Sub-scriptions for the now issue were closed at closeof business on December 9 and amounted to$875,780,900, Subscriptions were allotted inthe amount of §452,749,000, of which 8167,-210,700 represented allotments on subscrip-tions for which maturing Treasury notes andcertificates were tendered in payment. Allsuch subscriptions were allotted in full, allot-ments on other subscriptions being made on agraduated scale—on subscriptions in amountsnot exceeding $100,000, 50 per cent but not less 'than $500 on any one subscription, and on sub-scriptions in larger amounts, 30 per cent butnot less than $50,000 on any one subscription.Subscriptions and allotments in the severalFederal reserve districts were as shown in thetable following:
Federal reserve district Subscrip-tions Allotments
Total._ ._._ _. _.| $875,780,900 I&152,7-10,000
Boston _ ____| 66,930,500New York .__ _ | 320,927,500Philadelphia.ClevelandRichmondAtlantaChicagoSt. LouisMinneapolis...Kansas City. _.DallasSan Francisco...
81,333,00066,192,50028,611,00035.230,50087,226,50029,515,50022,099, 50017,292,40033,015,50087,370,500
30,055,000171,995,00044,997,00029,165,00012,830,50017,744,50044,4.04,00016,988,50014,219.50012,040,00017,622, 50040,687,500
In his annual report for the fiscal year 1925,the Secretary of the Treasury notes that " theaverage rate of interest borne by certificates ofindebtedness offered in the fiscal year 1925 wasonly 2o9 per cent/? the average rates for earlierfiscal years being: For 1921, 5=7 per cent; for1922, 4.5 per cent; for 1923, 4,1 per cent; andfor 1924, 3,9 per cent. In June the Treasuryissued at par one-year certificates bearinginterest at 3 per cent, and in September, nine"months certificates at 3 3^ per cent.
Payments received from foreign governments.On December 15, payments in the amounts
given below were received from foreign coun-tries on account of their funded indebtedness tothe United States:
Country
Total
Amount of payment
Principal Interest
Total... I $95,253,371.85 \ $26,057,018.00 | $69,196,353.85
Great Britain j 92,310,000.00 ! 24,000,000.00 i 68,310.000.00Belgium ' 677,432.22 : _„.; 077,432.22Czechoslovakia i 1,500,000.00 I 1,500,000.00 ; „Finland. _J 180,650.00 j 47,000.00 I 133,650.00Hungary 39,611.25 ! 10,018.00 I 29,593.25Lithuania ! 45,678.38 I .._.._ _ „ 45,678.38Poland.- ; 500,000.00 ! 500,000.00 _„.
NOTESAgreement with Belgian National Bank.
On December 10 the Federal Reserve Bankof New York; with the approval of the Fed-eral Reserve Board, made an agreement withthe Belgian National Bank to stand ready topurchase Belgian prime commercial bills, whensuch purchases are desired. This agreementwith the Belgian central bank is in pursuanceof the system's policy of cooperating withforeign countries in the reestablishment of thegold standard. The statement issued by theNew York Federal Reserve Bank follows:
As an aid to the plans which are in progress for im-proving the monetary position of Belgium, the FederalReserve Bank of New York, in association with otherFederal reserve banks, has indicated its readiness tocooperate with the Belgian bank of issue, the BanqueNationale de Belgique, if desired, by purchasing primecommercial bills. It is understood that offers of coop-eration have also been made by the Bank of Englandand other European banks of issue.
Annual reports of Secretary of the Treasury and Comp-troller of the Currency.The text of the annual reports of the Secre-
tary of the Treasury and of the Comptroller ofthe Currency for the fiscal year ending June 30,1925, were issued during December.
First annual report of the Agent General for Repara-tion Payments,The first annual report of the agent general
for reparation payments, issued early in De-cember, reviews the progress of the reparationsprogram and of Germany's economic recoveryunder the Dawes plan., The report states:"The plan realized during the year its firstessential preliminary objects; that is to say, abalanced budget and a stable currency. * * *Side by side with the achievement of these twoobjects, the output and distribution of goods,according to available figures, have consider-ably exceeded the experiences of the immediate-
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JANUARY, 1926 FEDERAL BESERVE BULLETIN
ly preceding year and begun to resemble thosebefore the war. At the same time Germanbusiness and industry have found themselvesconfronting the double problem of replenishingthe working capital and remolding their or-ganization along lines that the changed condi-tion require/7 The report states that theinitial annuity payments of 1,000,000,000 goldmarks for the year to September 1, 1925. weremade in full, chiefly in reichsmarks in Germanyfor deliveries in kind. However, the opera-tions of the plan for the year has been "not somuch a test of German capacity to pay as atest of the ability of German economy to adjustitself to a return to stable conditions."
The share of the United States in the firstannuity amounted to about 15,328,000 goldmarks. Up to the date of the report no partof this had been utilized by the American Gov-ernment, this sum remaining to the credit ofthe United States on the books of the agentgeneral.
Appointment of Federal reserve agent at Cleveland.Mr. George De Camp, manager of the Pitts-
burgh branch of the Federal Reserve Bank ofCleveland since 1918, has been appointed asclass C director of the Federal Reserve Bank ofCleveland for the unexpired term of Mr. I). C.Wills, deceased, and designated Federal reserveagent and chairman of the board of directorsof the Cleveland bank for the year 1926.
Appointment of assistant secretary and assistantcounsel.Effective January 1, 1926, Mr. E. M. Mc-
Clelland has been appointed assistant secretaryof the Federal Reserve Board and Mr, B. M.Wingneld has been appointed assistant counsel.
Election of directors.The following directors of Federal reserve
banks have been elected for the three-yearterm beginning January 1, 1926:
CLASS A DIRECTORS
Frederick S. Chamberlain, Boston (reelected).Jackson E. Reynolds, New York.John C. Cosgrove, Philadelphia (reelected).Chess Lambert on, Cleveland (reeiected).J, C. Bras well. Richmond.E. C. Melvin, Atlanta.Charles H. McNider, Chicago (reelected).John C. Martin, St. Louis (reelected).Paul J. Leeman, Minneapolis.Frank W. Sponable, Kansas City (reelected).W. H. Patrick, Dallas (reelected).C. K. Mclntosh, San Francisco (reelected).
CLASS B DIRECTORS
A. C. Bowman, Boston (reeleeted),Owen D. Young, New York (reelected).Alba B. Johnson, Philadelphia (reelected).R. P. Wright, Cleveland (reelected).Edwin C. Graham, Richmond (reelected),W. H. Hartford, Atlanta (reelected).S. T. Crapo, Chicago (reelected),W. B. Plunkett, St. Louis (reelected).Paul N. Myers. Minneapolis.John S. Owen, Minneapolis.1J. Mo Bernardin, Kansas City (reelected).J. EL Nail, Dallas (reelected),E. EL Cox', San Francisco (reelected).
CLASS C DIRECTORS
Charles H. Manchester, Boston (reelected),Pierre Jay, New York (reelected).H. L. Cannon, Philadelphia (reelected).L, B. Williams, Cleveland (reelected),Robert Lassitcr, Richmond (reelected),.W. H. Kettig, Atlanta (reelected).F. C. Ball, Chicago (reelected).C. P. J. Mooney, St. Louis (reelected).George W. McCormick, Minneapolis (reelected),W. S. Bulkley, Kansas City.C. C. Walsh, Dallas (reelected).William Sproule, San Francisco (reelected).
Appointment of chairmen and deputy chairmen.The following have been designated as Fed-
eral reserve agents and chairmen of the boardof directors of the Federal reserve banks forterms of one year, expiring December 31, 1926:
Boston—Frederic H. Curtiss.New York—Pierre Jay.Philadelphia,-—Richard L. Austin,Cleveland—George DeCamp.Richmond—William W. Hoxton.Atlanta—Oscar Newton.Chicago—William A. Heath.St. Louis—William McC. Martin.Minneapolis—John R. Mitchell.Kansas City—M. L. McClure.Dallas—C. C. Walsh.San Francisco—John Perrin.
The following have been designated asdeputy chairmen of the Federal reserve banksfor terms of one year, expiring December 31,1926:
Boston—Allen Hollis.New York—William L. Saunders.Philadelphia—Charles C. Harrison.Cleveland—L. B. Williams.Richmond—Frederic A. Delano,Atlanta—Wo H. Kettig.Chicago—James Simpson.St. Louis—John W, Boehne.Minneapolis—Homer P. Clark.Kansas City—Heber Hord.Dallas—C. E. Linz.San Francisco—Walton N. Moore.
1 Elected for unexpired term, ending Dec. 31, 1927, of 5\ B, Hixon*resigned.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
8 E B D E B A X J BE83SRVE BULLETIN , 1926
BUSINESS CONDITIONS IN THE UNITED STATESProduction of basic commodities in November continued in about the same volume as the
month before, and the general level of prices remained unchanged. Activity of wholesale andretail trade was below the record level of October, but larger than in November of last year.
Production.—Output of basic industries included in the Federal Reserve Board's index ofproduction was at about the same rate in November as in October, but owing to a smallernumber of working days the index declined by about 1 per cent. Employment and pay rolls inmanufacturing industries Eihowed small increases in November as compared with October.iimpioyment and workmen's earnings increased in the machinery industries, while in foodproducts and tobacco and in the clothing industry there were seasonal declines. Building con-tracts awarded were smaller in November than in October, but were large when comparedwith the volume for November of previous years.
Final estimates by the Department of Agriculture in 1925 indicate that the acreage of allcrops harvested was slightly larger than in 1924, but that the aggregate production of cropswas in about the same volume. Yields of cotton, corn, and tobacco were considerably largerthan last year, while the production of wheat, oats, potatoes, and hay was smaller.
Trade.—Sales in leading lines of wholesale trade showed the usual decline in Novemberfrom the seasonally high levels in October, but continued larger than in the correspondingmonth of any of the past five ^ears. Total volume of trade at department stores and mail-order houses was smaller than in October, owing largely to the smaller number of businessdays in November. Compared with earlier years, however, department-store sales were thelargest on record for November and sales at mail-order houses were the largest for that monthin the past six years. Merchandise stocks at department stores showed considerably morethan the usual increase In November and were 4 per cent larger than in November of last year.Distribution of commodities by railroads during November reached new high levels for themonth.
Prices.—Wholesale prices, according to the index of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, re-mained the same in November as in October. Prices of livestock, meats, and cotton goodsdeclined, but these decreases were offset in the general averages by advances in the price ofgrains, fuel, lumber, and rubber. In the first three weeks of December prices of wheat, flour,and hardwood lumber were slightly higher than in November, while quotations on cattle, cotton,coke, copper, and. hides were lower.
1922Index of 22 basic commodities^adjusted for seasonal variations*
<19I9=»100.) Latest figure, November, 115.
1925Index of United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1913-100, bass
adopted by bureau.) Latest figure, November, 158.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JANUABY, £#26 FEDERAL RESERVE BULiLETIN 9
BILLIONS Or DOLLARS2
BILLIONS OF DOLLARS2
FEDERAL RESERVESANK CREDIT
1922 1925
Weekly figures for 12 Federal reserve banks,, Latest figures* Decem-ber, 23.
BILLIONS OF DOLLARS B5LLIONS OF DOLLARS
10
1322 1923 1924- 1925
Weekly figures for banks In 101 leading cities. Latest figures Decem-ber, 16,
Bank credit.—At member banks in leading cities the volume of credit outstanding onDecember 9.was near the high level reached early in November. Loans for commercial andagricultural purposes declined somewhat during the period, and there was also a decrease inthe banks7 security holdings; continued growth of loans on securities, however, was sufficientto offset these reductions and the total of loans and investments remained practically unchanged.
At the reserve banks the seasonal demand for currency and credit resulted in an increaseof total bills and securities in December to the highest level in nearly four years. This increase-in reserve bank credit in use has been in the form of discounts for member banks, as the volumeof purchased bills held changed but little between the middle of November and the middle ofDecember, and holdings of United States securities also remained constant, except for a tem-porary increase connected with Treasury financing on December 15. Money in circulation in-creased by $71,000,000 between November 1 and December 1 and the continued demand forcurrency in December was reflected at the reserve banks both in increased Federal reserve notecirculation and in a decline in cash reserves.
During the latter part of November and the early part of December open-market rateson commercial paper and acceptances remained substantially unchanged. Later in Decemberincreased demand for credit and currency, largely seasonal in character, was reflected in firmermoney conditions.
BUSINESS INDEXES OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD
(Monthly average 1919*-100]
Yea? and month
OctoberNovember.December..
1924
JanuaryFebruary._M a r c h . . . . .April . .MayJaneJulyAugustSeptember.October. . . .November.
1925
Produc-tion inbasic
indus-tries i
.109107117
127124120119111110113108112118115
1
Factoryemploy-
ment-
939294
94m9666m94S3949597S7
Railroad-
1031021G6
1031.09
266196180
168159
no |108108 !105 !
103 i105 !104 j111112 :
178 j176 I151 |171189 i228 |224 i210229
120116124
123125117129123117122123121121121
79'!&83797983S38794
10187
Department-storesales i
Unad-justed
141141210
1081011211361281289598
122165145
Ad-justed
124126131
12413112113312412612812513414512*
Department-storestocksJ
Unad-justed
1481481.24
119127139141136129125131143140
Ad-justed
132132133
134135137138137135133131133134137
Bankdebitsoutsideof New
YorkCity i
107US
12.1120122119122125120
m12S121
* T h e iodexes of product ion in basic indust r ies , building contracts , car loadings, and b a n k deb i t s are adjusted to allow for seasonalthe indexes of depar tment-s tores sales and stocks aro shown both w i th and wi thou t seasonal ad ju s tmen t s .
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
10 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN JANCAEY, 1020
BANK CREDIT
Banking conditions during the past year arediscussed in detail in the review of the month,which appears at the beginning of this issue,with reference particularly to the relation be-tween the volume of reserve bank credit andthe volume of member bank credit outstandingand the relation of changes in member bankreserves to the movement in their deposit lia-bilities. Statistics relating to all banks in theUnited States (exclusive of mutual savingsbanks and private banks not under Statesupervision) have become available for Septem-ber 28, 1925, and are presented on page 61,together with data covering the past five years.Loans of these banks showed an increase of$827,000,000 between June 30 and September28 and investments an increase of $58,000,000,so that at the end of September the totalvolume of loans and investments was nearly$1,000,000,000 larger than three months earlierand about $3,000,000,000 larger than on Octo-ber 10, 1924. Deposits of these banks, ex-clusive of bank deposits, increased by about$400,000,000 between the end of June and theend of September, and at the end of the periodwere about 83,500,000,000 larger than theyear before.
MONEY RATES
A tendency toward increasing firmness char-acterized the money market during 1925, andtoward the end of the year open-market com-mercial paper, 90-day bankers' acceptances,and the yield on United States certificates ofindebtedness were at the highest levels sinceApril, 1924, while call money on stock-exchangecollateral averaged the highest since the closingmonths of 1923. Rates on open-market com-mercial paper, which had receded to the lowestpoint in recent years during the late summerand early fall of 1924 when prime 4-6 monthspaper was quoted at 3 to 3 per cent, advancedsteadily thereafter, quotations opening theyear 1925 at 3J^-3M P e r cent and reachinga high for the year during the last three monthst 4 3 /~4 J^ per cent. In general through theear, the commercial paper market found its
most active demand proceeding from interiorbanks, in contrast to New York City, where thehigher rates offered by collateral loans madecommercial paper relatively less attractive tothe investing banks. As compared with thesummer of 1924, when New York rates on90-day bankers' acceptances, call loans onstock exchange collateral, and the yield on 4-6
months United States certificates of indebted-ness all reached low points of about 2 per cent,the call renewal rate during 1925 averagedSyi per cent in January and over 5 per cent inDecember, 90-day bankers* acceptances were3 per cent in January and 3J > per cent inDecember, and the yieled on 4-6 months UnitedStates certificates of indebtedness was 2.61per cent in January and over 3J^ per cent inDecember. The yield on Liberty bonds, onthe other hand, did not fluctuate greatlyfrom 4 per cent during the year. During theclosing months of the year, with the exceptionof call money, stability characterized themoney markets and December rates weregenerally unchanged from the Novemberlevels. The renewal rate on call money wasdistinctly higher, however, the average duringthe week ending December 26 reaching 5.88 percent, the highest weekly average since August,1921. The table below shows the money ratesprevailing in the New York market during thelast three months.
In the London money market,1 the bank ratewas raised early in December from 4 to 5 percent and rates in the market quickly followed,3-months bills being quoted at 5 per cent, thehighest since June, 1921, in the latter part ofDecember,
MONEY RATES IN NEW YORK
September, 192o_ _.October, 1925November, 1925. _.December, 1925Average for week
ending-Dec. 5 __..Dec. 12Dec. 19...Dec. 26
Primecommer-
cialpaper,
4-6months
Averageon ccrtifi-j yield on
t f | ±y! indebted-' t
90 days : m o n t h s
Renewalrate on
call loans' y
m o n t h s b o n d s
3 3.00 \2 3.33 /*3.532 3. 65
3.51
2 3. 652 3. 652 3.48 \3 3.44 ./3 3.54
3.984.024.04 ;4.04
I
4.02 !4.02 ;
4.05
4.06
4.62
4.874.755.32
5.00
5.0°4.905.88
1 Issues maturing Dec. 15, 1925.2 Issues maturing Mar. 15, 19263 Issues maturing June 15, 1926
ACCEPTANCES
An increased supply of bills was reportedfrom the New York acceptance market duringthe four weeks ending December 16, and, withrelatively good demand, the market was active,total turnover during the first week of Decem-ber being near the high point for the year.
i An account of the London money market in 1925 appears on page 40«
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JANUAKY, 1926 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN 11
The increased supply; which appeared mainlyduring the first part of the period accompany-ing firmer money conditions, was moved withthe aid of relatively heavy purchases for foreignaccount, while during the closing days, whenmoney conditions turned temporarily easier,fewer offerings were accompanied hj an evengreater decrease in demancl, with the resultthat dealers7 portfolios reached the highest forthe yearo Offerings to the reserve bank weresomewhat in excess of the preceding period.In Boston the supply of bills was light, butduring the first two weeks of the period inexcess of demand, with the result that offeringsto the reserve bank were substantial at thattime In both Philadelphia and Chicago thebill market was reported quiet during theperiod, supply being only fair but somewhatin excess of demand. Rates remained un-changed in all markets. On December 16they were quoted in New York as 3% per centbid and 3 j | per cent offered for 30-day bills,33^ per cent bid and 3% per cent offered for60-day bills, 3% per cent bid and 3}4 per centoffered for 90~da}^ bills, 3% per cent bid and3% per cent offered for 120-day bills, and 4 percent bid and 3% per cent offered for 150 and180 day bills.
CAPITAL ISSUESTotal capital flotations in the United States
during 1925 will probably be found to exceedthe record totals of 1924. In October thevolume of new domestic security issues, ac-cording to the compilation of the Commercialand Financial Chronicle, amounted to $33 7r000,000, slightly less than the volume issuedin September, and nearly $100,000,000 lessthan in October, 1924, which was one of thehigh months of last year. Refunding issueswere unusuall}^ large, however, amountingto $80,000,000, as compared with $20,000,000in September. Municipal securities formed asomewhat smaller and corporate securities alarger proportion of the total than in Septem-ber. Of the' latter, industrial and railroadissues showed increases over the previousmonth, while public utility issues declined.The following table shows the domestic se-curities issued in October, 1925, as comparedwith those of September, 1925, and of October,1924.
Foreign flotations in this country were ofmoderate volume in October, according to thecompilation of the New York Federal ReserveBank, the revised total amounting to
390,000. In November $182,525,000 of foreignsecurities were issued in the United States, thelargest amount floated during any month of1925. The kingdom of Italy loan of $100,000,-000 chiefly accounted for this large total.
DOMESTIC CAPITAL ISSUES
[In millions of dollars]
October,1925
September," 1925
October,1924
I Re-New fund-
1 ing
: Re- ! Re-Ncw I fund- . Now fund-
ing ing
Total corporate ' 257.6 i 70.3 ! 263.0 | 16.4! 325.9; 56.5Long-term bonds and I • j | iI ;
notes... I 126.0 j 61.1 173.1 : 11.1 220.2 j 46.5Short-term bonds and I ! I ; j
notes j 15.8 i 4.0 18.6 i 2.0 | 27.4 10.0Stocks „„; 115.8 ' 5.2 71.3 I 3.3 I 78=3 !
Farm loan issues _| 8.3 : 5.0 i 4.7.___ J 15.5 1Municipal ! 71.4 \ 4.9 I 109.8 3.3 ! 91.3 i .8
Total 1337.3! 80.2! 377.5 j 19. 7 ! 432. 7 I 57.3
SECURITY PRICES
Rising prices for common stocks charac-terized the security markets during 1925, Asindicated by the weekly index of 232 repre-sentative common stocks computed by theStandard Statistics Co., stock prices rose intonew high ground with fair continuity through-out the year, breaking sharply in March andin early November, but subsequently recover-ing to higher levels than those preceding thedecline,, This general advance was sharedby both industrial and railroad stocks, but wasmuch more marked in the case of the formerup to August, The largest increase in the railprices has occurred since the prices of indus-trials were checked early in November, thehigher level of the general average in Decemberbeing attributable to new high levels reachedby representative railroad "stocks in thatmonth. Stock market activity during the finalthree weeks of December, as measured by num-ber of shares traded, fell off somewhat from therecord levels of October and November, butwas higher than during the preceding month.Bond prices rose somewhat during the firstpart of December to the highest levels sinceJune, 1925. The following table gives indexesof stock prices computed by the StandardStatistics Co. of New York, the average pricesof 40 bonds computed by Dow, Jones & Co,,and the average number of shares of stock sold
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
12 FEDERAL RESERVE BTJLLETIK , 1926
daily on the New York Stock Exchange forthe last six months:
INDEX NUMBERS OF SECURITY PRICES
Price indexes of1-
Average for—December, 1924.. „July, 1925August, 1925September, 1925.,October, 1925November, 1925..December, 1925. .
Average for week ending— iDec. 7 iDec. 14... |Dec. 21_ IDec. 28 j
!201 in- i
dustrialjstocks I
i
119.7 !I 135. 0 i
136. 0 |139.9 !145.8 i150.4 .151.6
31 rail-road
stocks
111.3111.0114. 3115. 8116. 2120.0125.4
Total,232
stocks
117.2128.1129.7132.9137,, 2141.61410
152.0 i151.6 •149.5 !153. 2 '
124.1125. G125. 0127.4
143.9143. 9142. 4145.7
92. 5792. 6592. 8692.96
Aver-age
priceof 40
bonds2
90.6792.5091.7092.1992,1792.4492.76
Averagenumberof sharesof stock
sold daily(000
omitted)3
1,7831,3531,4581,7112,3022,3971,883
1,9031,8401, 9181,582
1 For the industrial stocks, the average of 1917-1921 prices equals 100;for the rails the average of the high and iow prices made in the 10 years,1913-1922, equals 100. The indexes are weighted by the number of sharesof each stock outstanding. Prices used are closing quotations on Mon-day.
2 Arithmetic average of daily average closing prices, as published inthe Wall Street Journal. Weekly averages arc for week ending withSaturday preceding date given.
8 Saturdays omitted. Weekly averages; ;?*re for five days ending withFriday preceding date given.
AGRICULTURAL CREDIT
During the month of November the inter-mediate credit banks closed direct loansamounting to $15,758,000, which was $2,-156,000 less than in October. Rediscountsgranted amounted to $6,154,000, or 74 per centmore than in the preceding month. The banksat Baltimore, Louisville, and Springfield ex-tended more than two-thirds of the total directloans, chiefly on tobacco, while the bank atWichita loaned $1,560,000 on wheat and cottonand the Berkeley bank nearly $1,340,000,largely on fruits and vegetable products andraisins. Notwithstanding the large volume ofrediscounts granted during the month, the netamount outstanding on November was about$240,000 less than a month earlier.
The following table shows the volume ofdirect loans outstanding on December 12, thelatest available date, as compared with a monthand a year earlier, classified by commoditieson which the loans were based. Rediscountsoutstanding on the same dates are also givenand are classified by types of re-discountinginstitutions.
I N T E R M E D I A T E C R E D I T B A N K S
[In thousands of dollars}
Direct loans outstanding o n -Cotton -Tobacco _Wheat .Canned fruits and vegetablesRaisinsPrunes..PeanutsWoolRiceAll other.. .„.. .
Total __„ .._.
Dec. 12,1925
21,26420,9152,2161,3143,600
1711,044
265141
50,930
Nov. 14, Dec. 13,1925 ; 1924
19,889 13,01418,282 19,7463,223 '• 3,07?1,763 6572,250 4, OOG
1,500145 341
1,580 • 4367 304
101 187
47,306 . 43,459
Rediscounts outstanding for— !Agricultural credit corporations iNational banks... ._ . JState banksLivestock loan companiesSavings banks and trust companies...
Total..
15,86334
3949,886
16,59531
4289,141
82
10,25627
8707,539
374
26,259 i 265277; 18,866
Tine intermediate credit bank system hasmade considerable growth, during the past year,as is shown by the accompanying chart, givingthe changes that have occurred in direct loansto cooperative marketing associations and redis-counts for financial institutions and the com-
MILUQKS DF BOLLAPS60 LOA^S OF INTERMEDIATE CREDIT BANKS
L
WLLI0NS CC-" DOLLARS
80
7C
1925
bined total. The seasonal differences in redis-count and direct loans are accounted for by thefact that rediscounts are granted largely forproductive purposes and hence are largest inthe spring and summer, while direct loans aremade entirely for marketing purposes and arelargest in the fall and "winter. The tableprinted above indicates that the system has-made the largest advances to tobacco and cot-
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JANUARY, 1926 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN 13
ton cooperative associations, since, on Decem-ber 12, 83 per cent of the outstanding directloans were made to such associations. Com-mercial banks this year have made less use ofthe facilities of the intermediate credit banksthan was made last year, While the loans tolivestock loans companies were about a thirdlarger this year than in 1924, the greatest in-crease in the use of rediscounts was made byagricultural credit corporations.
Below is given a table showing the outstand-ing volume of net mortgage loans granted bythe joint-stock land banks, by the 12 Federalland banks, and by 41 life insurance companiesowning more than'82 per cent of the assets of alllife insurance companies.
N E T FARM-MORTGAGE LOANS OUTSTANDING
• [In thousands of dollars]
Nov. 30,1925
Total all joint-stock land banks • 534,134Total 12 Federal land banks j 999,415
Oct. 31, ! Nov. 30,1925 I 1924
526,042 !995,207 I
440, 046919,188
Life insurance companies 1,518,000 1,515,000 | 1,444,379
AGRICULTURE
In 1925 the aggregate production of allcrops, as measured by Federal Reserve Board'sannual index of crop production, was in ap~Droximately the same volume as in 1924.Yields of wheat, oats, rye, hay, white potatoes,and apples were smaller than in the precedingyear, but the production of corn, cotton",tobacco, and barley was larger. For thecountry as a whole agricultural operationswere generally satisfactory, although in sec-tions of the Southeastern States the prolongeddrought in the summer and early autumnmonths resulted in considerable damage andin crop failures in some counties. In certain.areas of the Dallas Federal reserve districtthe drought curtailed the production of cottonand resulted in almost a complete failure offeed crops. The total production of corn wasnearly 600.000,000 bushels larger than in1924,"but the decline in the price resulted in a•considerable reduction in the returns for the•crop, especially in those counties where thecrop is sold rather than fed to livestock, Theacreage planted in cotton was the largest inthe history of the industry and total produc-tion exceeded 15,800,000 bales, the third largestcrop on record, Improvement in the livestockindustry, which began in the late summer of1924, continued in 1925, and prices of live-stock averaged considerably higher through-out 1925 than in 1924.
75164—26f 3
Farm, prices, as measured by Department ofAgriculture's index, averaged higher duringmarketing season than in 1924, the most sub-stantial increases being in the prices of fruitsand vegetables and livestock, as is shown inthe table below:AVERAGE FARM PRICES^ JUNE THROUGH. NOVEMBER.
1924 AND 1925[July, 1909-July, 1914-100]
1924 1925
GrainsFruits and vegetablesMeat animalsDairy and poultry products...Cotton and cottonseed _._Unclassified..
Total .
337126113132198101
17417114314417591
135 ! 147
Grains,Developments in wheat production "have
been especially significant during the pastyear. In 1924 the world at large produced acomparatively small crop, while the crop in theUnited States was exceptionally large, In1925 the situation was reversed, Europe andCanada producing much larger yields thanin 1924, but the United States produced a verysmall crop and recent reports indicate thatharvests in the Southern Hemisphere will besmaller than a year ago. Final estimates by
OJiTS PER 3US.HEL
220
6 0 Jvu/ws -uwv.JUL. AUG-Sti*!1. OCT. NOV. DEC JAM. FEB. MAS. APR. MAY JUH. JUL. AUG.SEFT. OCT. MOV. DEC.
1325
60
the Department of Agriculture in Decemberindicated the total wheat crop at 669,000,000bushels, a reduction of 28,000,000 bushels fromthe preliminary figures issued in Novemberand 22 per cent less than the 1924 crop.Although a yield of 669,000,000 bushels prac-tically places the United States on a domesticbasis, 55,000,000 bushels of wheat and flourwere exported during the first five months ofthe crop year.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
14 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN JANUARY, 19 2 C
The yield of corn, indicated in the finalcrop report, was 100,000,000 bushels less thanthe preliminary estimates made in .November,but was 25 per cent larger than in 1924.Yields of oats and barley were larger thanindicated by the November figures, while theyields of other grains were less. The followingtable gives the December final estimates of theprincipal grain crops:
[in thousands of bushels]
1924
All whcat_ ! 862,027Winter wheat _ ! 589.032Spring wheat j 272,995Corn..... ' 2,3.12,745Oats .__ i 1,522,055Barley _ _.__! 178,322 iE y e __. ' 04,038 !Flaxseed i 31,711 i
1925
609,305398,486270, 879
2, 900, 5811, 501, 909218,00248, 09022,007
Prices of grains have fluctuated widely duringthe past year, as is shown in the accompanyingchart. After the declines in the early monthsof the year, prices of wheat followed tlie variousreports on the conditions and expected yieldof both the domestic and world crops. Re-ports of large crops in Europe and Canada andthe earlier reports of a large crop in the Argen-tine depressed prices in the early fall. Bymid-October, however, reports indicated thatthe Russian surplus had been overestimatedand that crops in the Southern Hemispherewere likely not to be as large as anticapated,and a rapid rise in the price of wheat followed,which was further augmented by the final esti-mates on crop yields reported in December.The price of corn was steadily lowered byforecasts of a large crop and since harvest bythe very poor quality caused by excessivemoisture content.
Early reports indicated that the acreage ofwinter wheat would be increased about 9 percent, but unfavorable weather for plowing andseeding prevented the fulfilling of these inten-tions, aiid the acreage is about 1 per cent lessthan the area seeded last fall. The conditionof the crop, however, was slightly.higher thanin 1924, but was below the average conditionof the crop on December 1 for the past 10years. The following table shows the acreageand condition of wheat and rye as reported bythe Department of Agriculture for December 1:
Acreage sown
1925 1924
Condition Dec.l
1925 ! 1924
Winter wheat... . . 39,540,000 j 39,956,000 ! 82. 7 :Eye I 3,420,000 : 4,088,000 ; 83.8 I
81.087.3
Cotton,In 1925 the cotton-growing industry was
characterized by the largest acreage on recordand a total production that exceeded all previousyields except in 1911 and 1914. Estimates bythe Department of Agriculture based on the con-dition of crop on December 1 indicated a yieldof 15,603,000 bales, as compared with a pro-duction of 16,250,000 bales in 1911 and 16,-992,000 bales in 1914, the two largest yields onrecord. Notwithstanding this large increase inyield, harvesting has progressed as rapidly asin other recent years, and 14,826,000 Daleswere ginned prior to the middle of December,which was approximately 95 per cent of thecrop, as compared with 94 per cent prior to thesame date in 1924 and 1928. Increased pro-duction during the year occurred in all of thecotton growing Federal reserve districts exceptDallas, the greatest increase being in theAtlanta and St. Louis districts. Marketing,as reflected by the movement of cotton fromfarms and plantations to the interior marketsand ports, from the beginning of the seasonthrough the middle of December, continued atabout the same rate as last year, despite thelower price that has prevailed this year thanin the autumn season of 1924. Exports andtakings by American and Canadian spinnershave also exceeded those of last year, but theyhave not increased sufficiently to absorb theincreased marketings, and stocks at publicwarehouses are considerably larger than a yearago.
With a large increase in yield the price ofcotton has declined gradually, but almost con-tinuously since early in the autumn and hasaveraged considerably lower than last year.In addition to the effect of the increased yieldon prices, unfavorable weather during the har-vesting season resulted in considerable damageto the cotton that was open in the fields, and alarge proportion of the crop is of a lowerquality than in other recent years.
Tobacco.Final estimates by the Department of Agri-
culture indicated a total production of tobaccoin 1925 of 1,349,660,000 pounds, as comparedwith a yield of 1,242,456,000 pounds in 1924.This increase in the aggregate output was dueprincipally to larger yields in the Richmond,Cleveland, and Atlanta Federal reserve dis-tricts. In Kentucky, the largest tobacco-growing State, the final output was approx-imately 3 per cent smaller than in 1924 andwas the smallest crop in recent years. ID.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JANCAKY, 1926 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN 15
North Carolina, on the other hand? the secondlargest producing State, the crop was 30 percent larger than in 1924; and the increase inthe total production for the country was duelargely to the increased yield in this State,The quality of the crop is somewhat lower thanthat of the previous year and prices at thebeginning of December averaged 18.3 cents apound, compared with 20.7 cents a pound ayear earlier. Marketing of the 1925 cropcontinued to increase in November and salesof nearly all types of tobacco were larger thanin November of last year. Sales early inDecember of approximately 5,500,000 poundsof re-dried 1923 and 1924 burley tobacco werereported by the Burley Tobacco GrowersAssociation.
Production of tobacco products in Novemberdeclined from the large volume in October, andthe output of all products except cigarettes wassmaller than last year. For'the 11 monthsending with November, production of cigar-ettes continued to increase and exceeded thevolume of 1924, but the production of cigarsdeclined. The following table shows the totaloutput of tobacco products for the 11 monthsending with November, 1924, and 1925:
PRODUCTION OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS
[000 omitted]
Eleven months endingNovember—
bage axe particularly high, the former beingtwo to four times as high as last year. Theaccompanying chart shows the yield and pricesof white potatoes, by the crop year, for thelast several years. Prices have reflected cropconditions and supply very closely. The finalreport on the yield of potatoes indicated a totalcrop of 23,000,000 bushels, or more than 6 per
PRODUCTION AND PRICE OF POTATOES
1924 j 1925
Large cigars (number) _' 6, 147,130 I 6,023,410Small cigars (number) ._.._"• 498.888 ' 420,287Cigarettes (number) __ _j 65,-566,887 j 73,308,092Manufactured tobacco (pounds) • 348,112 340,704
Fruits and vegetables*The marketing of late fruits and vegetables
in November declined to about one-half of theOctober volume. Early winter vegetablesbegan to move during November from thesouthern producing areas, and oranges beganto move in considerable quantities in bothFlorida and California, although in neitherState were shipments as large as in Novembera year agoa TotaJ car-lot shipments of allfruits and vegetables from the beginning oftheir respective seasons to the end of the firstweek in December were 3 per cent larger in1925 than in 1924. Prices on most producehave remained comparatively stable sinceOctober and as a whole are much higher than ayear ago. Prices of white potatoes and cab-
Jo•JULY DEC. JULY DEC. JULY DEC- JULY DEC. JULY DEC JULY
1321-'22 1322-23 1923-'24- 1924-25 1825-26
cent less than was shown in the preliminaryreport in November. The figures of the finalreport as given by the Department of Agricul-ture as to the size of the" principal fruit andvegetable crops are presented in "the followingtable:
FINAL, REPORT BY DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ASTO SIZE OF THE PRINCIPAL FRUIT AND VEGETABLECROPS
Unit
Fruits: '•Appios— !
" Total _ I Bushels._ _Commercial • Barrels
Poaches.-.. Bushels...Pears i doGrapes.. i Tons IOranges (2 States) ,.__! Boxes
Vegetables: jPotatoes-
White... ' Bushels....Sweet ' do
Cabbage ...I TonsOnions . j Bushels...Tomatoes Tons
Yield (000 omitted)
.1925 1924
164,61631,90946,56519,8201, 96734,500
323,24362,494
86917,1732,188
171,25028,06354,11918,8631,76432,200
425,28354,564
96217,8521,606
Livestock.
Conditions on the western ranges, accordingto the December livestock and range report,continued very favorable. The snow which fell
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
16 FEDEEAL RESERVE BULLETIN JANUARY, 192G
early in November in the mountain States ofthe Kansas City and Minneapolis reserve dis-tricts had melted, and winter ranges were inmuch better condition than a year ago. Duringthe past year ranges, except in the drought-stricken sections of the Southwest, have beenconsiderably better than a year ago, and evenin the Southwest early fall rains resulted in con-siderable improvement and good winter rangeswere assured. Cattle and sheep closely re-flected the condition of the ranges and enteredthe winter in much better shape than last year.
In November marketings of meat animalsfollowed the usual seasonal trend, cattle andsheep declining from the peak in October, whilethe receipts of hogs greatly increased. In allcases, however, receipts were less than inNovember of last year. For the 11 monthsending with November, receipts of livestock atpublic stockyards were smaller than in thesame period in 1924. Receipts of cattle andcalves decreased 2 per cent, while those of hogswere nearly one-fifth smaller, due partly to theshort corn crop in 1924.
Reports by the Department of Agricultureindicate that, notwithstanding the low priceof corn, the numbers of sheep. Iambs, and cattleon feed on December 1 in the corn belt Stateswere considerably less than a year earlier.Sheep and lambs were 8 per cent less, duolargely to the smaller lamb crop and to theexpansion of both farm and range flocks, whilecattle were 3 per cent less,
Prices of cattle and hogs showed slight de-clines in November from the October quota-tions, while prices of sheep increased slightly.Prices on all classes of livestock continuedabove corresponding prices of last year, andone of the outstanding features of the livestocksituation this past year has been the muchhigher range of prices paid for all classes oflivestock.
Dairy products.
Seasonal declines in production, decreasedmarketings, and a reduction in stocks in stor-age v<rere the outstanding developments in thebutter situation during November, As com-pared with November of last } ear, however,production was larger, receipts at principalmarkets increased considerably, but stocks asreported for December 1 were 26 per centsmaller than a year earlier. Cheese productionand movements followed the same generaltrends, except that stocks in cold storage on
December 1 were 13 per cent larger as com-pared with the same date the previous year.Prices of butter declined slightly during themonth and on December 18 reached the low-est point since the middle of September. Com-pared with last year, current quotations areabout 4 cents a pound lower.
The year 1924 was characterized by an ex-ceedingly heavy production of all kinds ofdairy products, and exceptionally heavy stocksof butter were in existence at the beginningof 1925. Low prices stimulated consumption,and these heavy stocks were reduced to aminimum by the first of May. Productionof butter and cheese for the first II monthsof 1925, as measured by receipts at principalmarkets, was extraordinarily heavy, the 1925receipts for butter being exceeded only bythose of last year, while receipts of butterduring October and November were the largeston record for those months, and the marketingof cheese for the year reached new high levels".
Prices, which at the beginning of the yearwere the lowest since 1922, began to improveafter the season of heavy production, and inthe late fall months were about 9 cents perpound higher than a year earlier. Consump-tion has continued to expand, and, notwith-standing the increased production during thefall months stocks, though large, were consid-erably smaller than last year. Production ofother dairy products reflected the general de-crease in milk production from the high levelsreached in 1924.
MININGCoal and coke.
Stimulated by a high level of general indus-trial activity and, during the latter part of theyear, by the cessation of anthracite coalproduction, total 1925 output of bituminouscoal exceeded that for 1924 by about 9 per cent.As compared with previous years, it was alsohigh, the 1925 totals being surpassed only oncesince 1920, when in 1923 export orders due tothe Ruhr stoppage accompanied large indus-trial demand in the United States. Despiteincreased output, however, prices ruled gen-erally lower during 1925, the Coal Age indexfor spot prices for bituminous coal averagingthe lowest since its war peak. In comparisonwith preceding years, monthly output during1925 displayed the same mid-year slumpobservable in 1921, 1922, and 1924, in contrastto 1923, when a high level of production wasmaintained throughout the year. The regular
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JANUAKY,1926 FEDERAL BESERVB BULLETIN 17
fall increase in output in 19255. however, wasincreased by demand for anthracite coal sub-stitutes, with, the result that production forthe fourth quarter was close to that in thecorresponding period of 1920 and in excess ofoutput for the quarter in all intervening years,including 1923. During the four weeks endingDecember 12 average daily production reachedthe highest levels since 1920, and on November23 the Coal Age index of spot prices for bitu-minous coal touched $2.32* the highest sinceOctober, 1923. During the first half of Decem-ber, though output was maintained, the firm-ness of the market was affected by the closingof the lake season and mild fall weather, withthe result that prices receded somewhat, theindex standing at $2.20 on December 14, ascompared with 32.30 four weeks earlier, Due tothe small number of working days in November,total output for the month fell to 50,780,000net tons, as compared with 53,203,000 net tonsin October. Average production per workingday was 2,150,000 net tons for the weekending December 12, as compared with 2,~135,000 net tons for the week ending November14 and 1,947,000 net tons for the week endingOctober 10. ' Up to December 12 total 1925output of bituminous coal was 93,876,000 nettons—8.5 per cent above the correspondingfigures for 1924.
Total production of anthracite coal for thefirst eight months of 1925 was the highest forthat period in recent years with the exception of1923," when output for the first eight monthsran about 9 per cent higher. The totalcessation of production attendant upon thestrike during the last four months of the year,however, brought total 1.925 output below anyother recent year except 1922, when productionwas also seriously impaired as a result of labordifficulties.
Total output of coke during 1925 fell mate-rially below the levels reached in 1923 but wasabove any other year since 1.920, By-productcoke, however, established a new record intotal 1925 production, while output of beehive,,though in excess of 1924, was well below thetotals established, in several previous years,Total November production of coke was4,770,000 short tons, the largest since July,1923. Of this total, 3,557,000 short tonsrepresented by-product output, a new monthlyrecord for this type of coke, while the 1,213,000short tons of beehive produced in Novemberwas the largest since March, 1924=, Coke prices
during the first part of December continued torecede from the high levels reached in earlyNovember, Connellsville coke being quoted at33.50 on December 11 and $4 on December 18.as compared with $8 on November 6, 1925
Petroleum.Production of crude petroleum, which began
to decline early in the summer, continued tofall off in November, and the output in theearly weeks of December indicated furthercurtailment. Although this decline in pro-duction has been practically continuous sinceMay, the total output for almost every monththis year exceeded that of the correspondingperiod in 1924, and. for the 11 months endingwith November aggregate production was 5per cent larger than in 1924. Consumption ofcrude petroleum, has been considerably largerthan in 1924, and stocks east of the RockyMountains were reduced from 318,438,000barrels at the end of November last year to296,690,000 barrels this year. In the firstthree months of the year prices of crude petro-leum reflected the usual seasonal increase, butin the late spring and summer months, afterproduction began to decline, they advancedslight!}7" and remained considerably above thelevels of the preceding year. In July, August,,and September prices declined slightly, but inNovember they" turned upward "and in themiddle o_f December averaged, according tothe Oil, .Paint, and Drug Reporter's averageprice for 10 fields, 34 per cent higher than ayear earlier.
The output of gasoline for the 10 monthsending with October was 21 per cent largerthan in 1924 and exceeded the output forthe corresponding period in any previousyear. Consumption of gasoline was also inlarge volume during the year, but in viewof the increased production stocks did notdecline during the summer and early autumnmonths as much as in 1924, and at the endof October they 'were 33 per cent larger thanlast year. Increases in gasoline stocks arepartly due to the conversion of large stocksof petroleum at the beginning of the yearto gasoline, which has resulted in a reductionof petroleum stocks and an increase in stocksof gasoline. Production of other refined prod-ucts also increased in 1925, and stocks of allthese products are larger than last year.Prices of gasoline advanced rapidly during thefirst six months of the year, but from. J
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
18 FEDERAL BESERVE BULLETIN 1926
through November they declined; throughoutthe year, however, they remained at a higherlevel than in 1924.Nonferrous metals.
Both production and consumption of non-ferrous metals was high during 1925, whileprices ruled generally higher than in recentyears. Notwithstanding the fact that pro-duction of copper, lead, and zinc in the UnitedStates and imports of tin during the year wereat the highest rate since the war and aroundthe war peaks, stocks of these commodities onhand at the end of the yeax were all at lowlevels. The average price of lead during theyear was the highest since 1917 and close to thepeak established in that year, tin was quotedhigher on the average than in any year since1919, and zinc since 1920; but copper, thoughabove 1924, did not bring as much on theaverage as in 1923. Silver averaged higher inprice during 1925 than in any year since 1920,but output was the lowest since 1922.
While domestic consumption of copperduring the fall has continued high, exportdemand has fallen off, and the price of refinedelectrolytic copper delivered in New Yorkdropped during November and the first partof December from 14J^ cents per pound onNovember 5 to 14 cents on December 8, thelowest since July 8. At the middle of Decem-ber it was quoted at 1 4 ^ cents, as comparedwith 14J^ cents four weeks earlier. Produc-tion of copper in the United States duringNovember was 135,794,000 pounds—6,000,000pounds below October and the first month in1925, when output was below the correspond-ing month of the previous year. Stocks ofrefined metal at the end of the month werereported at another new postwar low, whilestocks of blister copper increased slightly,total stocks being at about the low levels ofthe year. Lead output in the United Statesduring- November was 7 per cent above thecorresponding month of 1924, but slightlyunder the October peak. Quotations for leadin New York, which reached §% cents duringthe middle of November, receded subsequentlyand stood at 9M cents the second week ofDecember. Though output of zinc duringNovember was the highest since March, it wasexceeded by shipments, with the result thatstocks of slab zinc in refineries at the end ofthe month made another new low of 6,922 tons.Quotations for zinc at St. Louis fluctuatedbetween 8}4 and 8% cents during Novemberand the first two weeks of December, closingthe period at the lower price.
Quotations for bar silver were fairly steady,ranging from 69 to 69 34 during the last twoweeks of November and the first week ofDecember. In the second week of Decemberheavy sales from China depressed the market,and on December 16 bar silver was quoted inNew York at 6834 cents, the lowest since June5, and 4^g cents under the high for the year,November deliveries of tin to the UnitedStates were the lowest of the year, with theexception of May, and stocks in New York atthe end of the month were also the lowest sinceMay. Quotations for tin fell off somewhat inthe last two weeks of November and the firsthalf of December. Straits tin being quotedat 6134' cents on December 16, as comparedwith a high of 6 4 ^ cents on November 12.
MANUFACTURING
Food products.
Sugar meltings in November were 32 percent less than in the previous month and wereconsiderably smaller than in November, 1924,but the total meltings for the first 11 monthsof the year were 6 per cent larger than for thesimilar period last year, reflecting the increaseof the 1924-25 sugar crop. Throughout theyear, and especially during the fall, refinershave carried stocks that exceeded those of lastyear, though the usual autumn declines haveoccurred. The sugar market has reflected theuncertainties caused by a record world cropof sugar and more recently by the prospectsof an even greater crop ixi 1925-26. Priceshave averaged lower throughout the year thanin 1924 and in October reached the lowest pricessince early in 1922e However, prices have re-covered to some extent and were fairly stableby the middle of December,,
The meat-packing companies during the yearto December 1 slaughtered considerably morecattle and calves than in the corresponding periodin 1924, while the number of sheep killedshowed practically no change, but hog slaughter-ings, largely because of the short crop of corn in1924 and a large reduction in the number of hogson farms, were very much less than last year.During November the usual seasonal decline inthe slaughterings of sheep, cattle, and calvesoccurred, while those of hogs greatly exceededthe number killed in October, but there was asmaller number of all classes of animals killed,except of calves, than in November a year ago.Although stocks of beef and mutton showedsome increases during the month, those of porkand lard were smaller, and all stocks were be-low those of last year. Domestic demand con-
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JANUARY, 1928 FEDEBAL BESEBVE BULLETIN 19
tinned active for lamb, pork, and pork prod-nets, but was only fair for beef, and whenmeasured in dollar amounts was 10 per centgreater than in November, 1924, Exports con-tinued to decline and were less than a year agoin physical volume, as they have been, most ofthe year.
Flour milling in November was small, not-only because of seasonal inactivity, but wasadversely affected by the advance in wheatprices during the month, and as a result pro-duction was 13 per cent less than in November,1924. Milling activity has been considerablycurtailed this year in comparison to 1924 sincethe foreign demand for American flours hasfallen off since the new crop of wheat beganto be ground. Exports during the first 11months of the year were but 38 per cent smallerthan during the corresponding period last year.Flour prices reflected the advance in wheat,which began a year ago this fall, and as a con-sequence quotations on flour, especially dur-ing the spring, showed a large margin overcorresponding prices of the preceding year.By the middle of December, However, follow-ing the decline in the price of wheat in theautumn, flour quotations were reduced to $8.95per barrel, a decline of 30 cents from the pre-ceding month, and was slightly lower than ayear ago.
Textiles.In textiles conditions during 1925 have varied
among the different trades. In cotton manu-facturing prices averaged lower than in anyyear since 1922, while production was greaterthan in 1924 and 1922," but slightly less thanin 1923, the year of greatest activity since 1917.At the beginning of the year the woolen in-dustry was moderately active and raw woolprices were at the highest level since 1920;since that time prices have declined consider-ably and production has averaged somewhatless than in recent years. For the silk indus-try 1925 has been a year of great prosperity,raw silk prices have been stable, demand hasbeen large, and manufacturing operations ex-ceptionally active. The knit-goods industrywas also more active than in 1924, and thevolume of output, as indicated bv employmentand earnings of workers in the industry, hasbeen greater than in 1923.
At the beginning of 1925 prices of cottonproducts were steady and manufacturing active*During the spring months prices declined andproduction was reduced to a notable extent,but late in the summer prices strengthened and
mills began to increase operations. Productioncontinued to increase slowly, but when it be-came evident that the new cotton crop wouldbe the largest since 1914 and when this cropbegan to come on the market in great volumein September, prices turned downward. TheFaircnild indexes, showing average prices ofraw cotton, cotton yarn, gray goods, and fin-ished goods declined in October, were fairlysteady in November, and turned downwardagain in December, finally falling to the lowestlevels since early in 1922. Although Novemberhad two or three less working days than Octo-ber, the consumption of raw cotton by millswas practically the same in volume during bothmonths and has been exceeded in Novemberonly in 1916, 1917, and 1922., In the SouthernStates, particularly in the Carolinas where op-erations have been curtailed because of drought,consumption and spindle activity was greaterin November than in October, whereas in theother States there were decreases. Finishers ofcotton fabrics have reported during the yearconditions similar to those noted in the cotton-goods industry—activity at the beginning ofthe year, slight depression in the summer, andimprovement during the autumn.
Manufacturing in the woolen industry wasalso rather active at the beginning of 1.925 anddecreased in the summer. In the autumn theworsted branch of the industry improved, con™siderably. The general level of employmentand production during the year, however, hasaveraged somewhat less than in other recentyears. Prices of raw wool, tops, yarns, andcloths at the beginning of 1925 were at thehighest levels since 1920 or 1921. Quotationson raw wool, particularly on the fine grades,and on yarns declined precipitiousiy during thespring months, and in May tlie Fairchildindexes of raw wool and worsted yarn pricesreached the lowest points since 1922, Pricesof suitings were maintained at high levels dur-ing the spring, but were reduced in the latesummer at openings of the spring, 1926, lines.The feature of the year was the improvementin the demand for worsted goods, which fortwo years had been in relatively poor request.
1 The activity of worsted spindles increased con-siderably, while that of woolen spindles
i changed but slightly. In October the per-centage of active worsted spindle hours tomaximum single shift capacity was the largestreported for any month in two years. Othermachinery, however, has been more activeupon several occasions than during the autumnmonths of 1925. Prices of worsted suitings
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
20 FEDERAL BESBBVE BULLETIN JANUAKY, 1926
were raised slightly about the 1st of December.Taking the year as a whole, employment andearnings of workers in the men's and women'sclothing industries was smaller than in 1924,Sales of women's coats and suits by whole-salers in the New York Federal reserve dis-trict averaged less in 1925 than in 1923 and1924. On the other hand, sales of men'sclothing at wholesale showed an increase dur-ing the year.
The past year has probably been the mostactive year in the history of the silk industry.Imports of silk into the country during thefirst 11 months of 1925 exceeded totals for an}7
year on record, and deliveries to Americanmills have been even greater, as stocks inwarehouses at the end of November weremuch smaller than they were at the beginningof the year—46,813 bales on November 30 ascompared with 61,533 bales on January 1.Statistics of machinery activity indicate thatmills have consumed these large takings, and,according to nonstatistical reports, the demandfor silk goods has been great enough to absorbmill production. Sales of silk goods by whole-salers in the New York district and retail salesof silk goods hj certain reporting departmentstores have continued throughout the yearlarger than in 1924. On the average, prices ofraw silk and of silk goods have risen onlyslightly during this period of large demand andactive buying. Rayon markets have beenactive, and imports throughout the year havebeen enormouso
Demand for knit goods, particularly silkhosiery, was large during 1925, Statistics ofemployment and pay rolls and of productionand shipments generally show increases ascompared with 1924. The Federal ReserveBoard's index of pay rolls in the knit-goodsindustry was at the highest level in Novemberthan for any month since early 1920, and theaverage for 1925 will exceed that of any pre-vious year, November hosiery production,largely because of fewer working days, wassmaller than the October output. Productionof both winter and summer underwear in-creased in October; shipments were especiallylarge, and unfilled orders were reduced.
Iron and steel.
In the iron and steel industry during 1925,movements of production and prices weresimilar to those of 1924, with production al-ways at higher levels and prices at lower levelsthan a year earlier. Buying was large at theend of 1924 and also at the close of 1923, and
both 1925 and. 1924 began with a growingvolume of unfilled orders, rising prices, andincreasing production, Production rapidlyreached large proportions, orders were promptlyfilled, buying decreased, and early in the springprices began to decline and production sched-ules were curtailed. The recession in outputwas considerable in 1924, and employmentand pay rolls in iron and steel industries de-clined to the lowest levels since early 1922.The drop in 1925, however, was not so great,nor was the recovery in the autumn monthsas rapid. Prices of iron and stool products inthe summer ol 1925 reached low points, andthe averages for the year will be the lowestsince 1922. Despite the summer recession,the total yearly production of steel ingots willbe the largest for any year on record. Owingto the increasing use of scrap iron in the manu-facture of steel, the production of pig iron hasnot shown proportionate increases, and the1925 output Vas exceeded in 1916, 1917, 1918,and 1923. The year 1925 ends very much ashave the previous two years, with "increasingorders and production and slightly higherprices than during the summer.
Differences between 1924 and 1925 appearin the sources of the demand for steel products.In both }Tears new construction required largequantities of steel, more in 1925 than in 1924,The recession in 1924 was caused largely bysharp declines in automobile production, a:o..dthe later increase was to a great extent due toenhanced activity in this industry, which con-tinued to be an important consumer of steelthroughout 1925, touring the past year therailroads, generally the largest users of steel,have required less than in previous years, andthe summer recession may be largely attributedto their withdrawal from the market. Recentlythey have commenced active buying again,and during the last three months of the yearorders for rails, cars, and locomotives haveincreased and inquiries preceding future ordershave been numerous, Can manufacturers havetaken a greater volume of steel this year thanin recent years, owing to the large pack ofcanned goods. Buying of pipe and tank plateby the petroleum industry was not as largein 1925 as in 1924 and 1923,
Automobiles and tires.Automobile production in 1925 exceeded
records for all previous years, and in the closingmonths of the year output was exceptionallylarge, The yea,r began with manufacturingoperations at a moderate rate, and during the
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JANUARY, 1926 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN 21
first few months the number of cars producedwas less than in corresponding months of 1923or 1924, A higher rate of production than inthe other years was maintained, however,during the late spring and summer until Augustand September, when changes in Ford plantsincidental to the introduction of new modelscaused a sharp reduction in actual output ofnew cars. Much of the exceedingly large pro-duction in October and November was to makeup the shortage caused by this previous cur-tailment., The number of trucks produced,during the year was also exceptionally largeand continued heavy in all the months.
Other characteristics of the year were thewidespread introduction of new and improvedmodels by the majority of the manufacturers,the increasing popularity of closed cars, and thegeneral and large price reductions. Most ofthe decreases in prices occurred during thesummer, but further reductions of importancewere scattered through the later,months.
The great output of the manufacturers wasapparently called for by the demands of auto-mobile buyers, as, at least during the first halfor three quarters of the year, distribution ofcars equaled or exceeded production, and.stocks Held by manufacturers and dealers werekept small. In the later months, as is usual,production exceeded sales, and stocks wereapparently being accumulated. The sales ofthe General Motors Corporation to dealers inSeptember, October, and November ' werelarger than dealers' sales to users. Dealersreporting to the Federal reserve banks of Phila-delphia and Chicago showed smaller sales inNovember than in October. In the Chicagodistrict both sales and stocks were larger than ayear ago,
Production of automobile tires and. tubesduring 1925 exceeded previous records; ship-ments were equally as great, and consequentlystocks were practically the same at the close asat the beginning of the year. Late in 1924and early in 1925 production was particularlyheavy and stocks were increased to the largeston record. Later, however, shipments in-creased and stocks were reduced, "in Novem-ber shipments were smaller than in any monthfor a year and production was also at aboutthe same level as a year earlier. Crude-rubberprices soared in 1925 to the highest lev-els innearly a decade, influenced by the reducedsupply resulting from export restrictions inproducing countries under the Stevenson plan.The price rose from a low point of 19 cents apound in June, 1924, to a high point of about
75164—26t 4
$1.20 a pound in July, 1925, fell to below 80cents in August, and advanced again to over $1in November. Recently the removal of importrestrictions has been announced for Februaryand the price has fallen some. Imports werelarge throughout the year. Tire prices wereadvanced several times during 1925 and in somecases as much as 70 per cent higher than at thebeginning of the year.Lumber.
Shipments and production of lumber ran innearly equal volume in November, with orderswell in excess of both production and ship-ments, but separate compilations for softwoodsand hardwoods show production of softwoodsrunning above and of hardwoods below ship-ments. In the period of 50 weeks from Jan-uary 3 to December 12 production of soft-woods, according to compilations of theNational Lumber Manufacturers Association,exceeded shipments by approximately 2 percent. In November, for the first time sinceAugust, orders for softwoods exceeded both,production and shipments. The demand forhardwoods has run above production by largemargins for several months, shipments exceed-ing production in November by approximately60 per cent. In the period of 25 weeks endedDecember 12, the period for which data havebeen separately compiled for hardwoods, theexcess of shipments over production amountednearly to 25 per cent,, With hardwood ship-ments running above production by thesearge margins, orders exceeded shipments inNovember, and also in the 25-week period as awhole _ by approximately 7 per cent. Mills ofthe West Coast Lumbermen's Association re-
I port production of Douglas fir in November inexcess of shipments, and mills of the SouthernPine Association report shipments of southernpine for the month running above production.Hides, leather, and shoes.
Hide, leather, and shoe markets during 1925j had few distinguishing features from earlierI years, Production was slightly greater andstocks of leather were further recluced. Pricesaveraged somewhat higher than in 1924, butshowed few significant changes during theyear. Stocks of cattle hides were reducedduring 1925 to the smallest on record (since1920), but supplies of skins, which were verylight at the beginning of the year, were in-creased. Prices of hides, which at the be™ginning of 1925 were the highest in two years,fell slightly in the spring, advanced in thesummer, and declined again during the autumn
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
22 FEDERAL. XtESERYE BULLETUST JANUARY, 1926
months, and at the end of the year were slightlylower than at the beginning.
Production of some types of upper leatherwas greater in 1925 than in 1924, but in generalthe total output of the industry showed littleif any increase, continuing at a relatively lowlevel of activity as compared with earlieryears. Stocks of sole leather increased slightlyduring the summer, but later were reduced,and at the close of the year were of practicallythe same volume as at the end of 1924. Stock'sof upper leathers were further reduced, inmany cases to the smallest on record. Shoemanufacturers held substantially larger stocksof sole leather during 1925 than in earlier years,but less of cattle and calf upper leather.Leather prices, which rose rapidly in the lasthalf of 1924, reached a peak in March and laterdeclined rather steadily and were lower at theend of 1925 than a year earlier.
Production of boots and shoes in 1925 wasslightly larger than in 1924, smaller than in1923, and about the same as in 1922. Themonth-to-month movements were in accordwith the usual seasonal variations noted inprevious years. Prices of shoes, according tothe index" of the Bureau of Labor Statistics,were slightly higher during 1925 than at anytime since 1921. Sales of shoes at wholesaleincreased during 1925 from a very low pointat the beginning of the year, and in the lasthalf of the year were greater than in the sameperiod of 1924. Sales of shoe chain storeswere a little larger in 1925 than in 1924a
BUILDINGAmong outstanding features of the present
building situation may be noted a persistentcontinuance upon a very high level throughoutthe year to the end of November of demandfor new construction under building and en-gineering contracts, and a persistent stabilityand resistance to speculative influences inprices of building materials, indicative of extra-ordinary elasticity in the productive power ofthe building materials industries. In the 11months from January 1 to December 1 thevolume of building and engineering projectsbrought under contract in 36 States, accordingto compilations of the F. W. Dodge Co., ex-ceeded the corresponding total for 1924 by28 per cent, and exceeded the total construc-tion contracted for in the 12 months of 1924by _ 19 per cent. In general, the course ofbuilding and engineering construction during1924 and 1925 is indicated in the followingtable, showing the percentage excess, 1925 over
1924, of aggregate values contracted for eachmonth from January to November, inclusive.
VALUE OF CONTRACTS AWARDED
Percent-age ex-
cess. 1925over 1924
January ! —0.2February ! 0.2March.. _ 10.9April . . ..: 14.0May _| 18.7June ! 35.1
i Percent-1 age ex«; cess, 1925I over 1924
July.... - 52.7August- : 66.6September „ ... 58.6October 28.1November ; 21.8
Although demand for new construction con-tinued throughout November, as in earliermonths of this year, at record high level for themonth, it will be noted that the margin bywhich aggregate dollar values covered underawards of contracts this year have exceededvalues of awards in the corresponding monthsof 1924 has decreased from month to monthsince August, in January and February newconstruction was brought under contract thisyear in practically the same volume as in 1924.For each succeeding month to August the per-centage excess over 1924 increased from 10.9per cent for March to 66.6 per cent for August,and for each month since August the percent-age excess has decreased—to 21.8 per cent forNovember. This regular increase, followed byan equally regular decrease from, month tomonth, would seem to indicate peak activitv ofthe construction industries in August, winchwas in fact the record high month for all timein value construction brought under contract.Too much importance should not, however, beattached to the appearance of regularity in thedevelopment of a peak at this time, since themargin shown from month to month is affectedby the course of building in 1924 as well as in1925, the seasonal developments in these twoyears being somewhat irregular and dis-similar.
Moreover, it would appear that the statisticalevidence of a major reaction from a peak levelof activity found in the October returns wasnot consistently substantiated by develop-ments in November. Values contracted forfell off in November from the aggregate of thepreceding month, but this decline was very con-siderably less than the usual seasonal October-November decrease. Adjusted for seasonalvariation, the Federal Reserve Board's index forvalue of building contract awards rose from 210for October to 230 for November, taking valuein 1919 as 100. Thus, although the value of
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JANUARY, 1920 FEDEBAL BESERVE BULLETIN 23
construction contracted for rose to a recordhigh level in August, the index adjusted forseasonal variation reached its record highpoint of 235 in September. It fell off inOctober to 210? indicating that activity inthe construction industries failed to maintainin October the high level of September.
In current discussion much has been madeof the fact that values contracted for fell offin October, whereas the usual seasonal Sep-tember-October trend is upward. Novemberfigures, however, indicate a resumption of thetrend upward which has characterized build-ing activities since early in 1921. This re-sumption of the general trend is apparent onthe accompanying chart showing the changefrom month to month over this period in ourbuilding-contracts index adjusted for seasonalvariation. On reference to the chart it willbe apparent that sharp declines in theadjusted index have provided equally goodevidence of reaction on several occasions atintervals since 1921, as, for example, in Mayand again in December, 1924, and in July of1923. In each case the decline has been fol-lowed by an equally sharp recovery to a pointin line with the trend of the period. Andthat seems to have happened again in Novem-ber of this year.
BUILDING CONTRACTS AWARDED(1913 = 100)
Adjusted for Seasonal VariationUnadjusted
1320 1921 192.2 1923 192** 192S
Although as nearly as it can be statisticallydetermined the building shortage brought for-ward from the war period has been alreadylargely covered, November reports to theF. W. Dodge Co. of contemplated new con-struction work in 36 States, which account forapproximately seven-eighths of the total volumeoi building in the country, aggregated nearly$700,000,000, which is 35 per cent above thecorresponding total for November of 1924.In a review of the month by this corporation
it is noted, however, that "the strongest in-fluence now holding the volume of buildingup to record proportions is the big increasein New York City activity, largely specula-tive in character.'J"
In New York City, as in other urban com-munities, the demand for new building appearsoo be in large measure a demand for moremodern and conveniently located structuresrather than merely for more space. Morethan one-third of the contracts awarded inNovember (34- per cent) were reported forthe New York Federal reserve district, reportsfrom this district representing principally build-ing projects in the Metropolitan area of NewYork City. New York's proportion of thetotal volume of building increased over themonth from 28 per cent in October. In.earlier months of 1924 the percentage rangedfrom 20 to 35 per cent.
November reports covering the value of per-mits issued in the principal cities indicatethat generally in the larger cities, when allow-ance is made for seasonal variation, buildingoperations were continuing on the high levelof recent months and well above the level of1924, although in the case of individual citiesdecreases are reported., In 168 selected, citiespermits were issued in November covering anestimated cost of construction aggregating8293,857,094, running above the correspondingvalue for' 1924 by §65,864,602, or 28.9 per cent.In comparison with 1924, very large per-centage gains are reported for cities of theAtlanta district, among which may be notedthat for Jacksonville, 568 per cent; for Miami,294; for Orlando, 375; for Pensacola, 84; forTampa, 280; for Lakeland, 486; for Augusta,697; for Columbus, Ga., 323; for Macon, 224;and for Knoxville, 63 per cent, Individualcities in other sections of the country, also,show large gains over November of 1924, thegain for Indianapolis amounting to 67 percent, that for Grand Rapids to 113 per cent,for Madison to 49 per cent, and for "Dallas to74 per cent,
Compilations by S. W. Staus & Co. coveringthe value of November permits issued in 402cities show a net gain for these cities as agroup over 1924 of approximately 26 per cent,the gain for the 25 leading cities of the countrybeing, however, relatively greater and amount-ing to 50 per cent.
In its issue of December 12, commenting onNovember returns, Bradstreet's noted that thebuilding industry was continuing "one of thewonders of the country's industrial develop-
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
24 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN JANUARY, 1926
ment, despite the fact that for two years pastsome of the ablest authorities in that industryhave been setting varying periods to theactivity which has marked construction sincebuilding emerged from war-retarded con-ditions/'7
The Bureau of Labor Statistics wholesaleprice index for building materials advanced inNovember from. 173,9 to 175=6, reflecting anadvance in the price of lumber, Prices ofbrick, structural steel, and other building ma-terials continued through November practicallyon the level of the preceding month.
TRANSPORTATION
Fast and regular movement of freight, con-tinuous maintenance of an adequate supplyof cars for the orderly handling of seasonal peakofferings of agricultural and other products,general avoidance of congestion at marketterminals, and increasing economy of operationhave characterized the service rendered bycarriers during the past year.
It is recalled that the cost to the country offreight congestion and car shortages in 1920, asestimated by Secretary Hoover, amounted to abillion dollars. Unquestionably the annualsaving on these counts in recent years, as thecapacity of the roads has been brought upunder large capital expenditures more nearlyto current requirements, has run into verylarge aggregates.
.'Ill evidence of increased economy of opera-tion, the Railway Age notes that althoughoperating revenues during the first 10 monthsof 1925 were $200,000,000 less than in thecorresponding period of 1923, net operatingincome earned in 1925 was greater by$108,000,000, the gain in income representingthe relatively greater reduction in operatingexpenses as compared with the decrease inrevenue,
One important, consequence of improvedtransportation service has been, it is contended,a general and. very considerable reduction ofstock inventories in all lines of business. Inthe lumber industry alone, it is estimated"approximately $600,000,000 have been takenout of the stock account since 1923/' the reduc-tion in stock being "equivalent to 12J^ percent increase in the production of lumber/7
The reduction of stock inventories in all lineswithin the past five years is estimated at severalbillion dollars, and although the amount cannot be estimated with tmy near approach toaccuracy, the evidence seems conclusive that-liquid funds formerly tied up in inventories and
in goods in transit have in fact been released forother employment in a large aggregate amount,and that this release has been made possiblein large measure by improvement in the freightdelivery service of the railways.
In general, reports covering operations ofthe carriers in November indicate a continuanceof freight distribution in large volume. Totalfreight-car loadings fell off seasonally inNovember, but in this month, as in earliermonths, ran above 1924. For each class ofcommodity except coke a decrease in loadingsis shown over the month, In comparisonwith November of 1924, loadings of grain andgrain products, of livestock, and of forestproducts fell off and loadings of ore, coke, coal,and of miscellaneous freight, including mer-chandise in less than carload lots, increased.For all classes of freight combined decreasesover the month are shown in car loadingsreported from each of the seven transportationdistricts for which data are separately com-piled, but in each of these districts, exceptingthe southwestern, loadings in November, i925?exceeded the corresponding total for 1924.
In the 49 weeks, January 1 to December 5,according to compilations by the Bureau ofRailway Economics, the carriers loaded 48,-500,173 cars in 1925, the excess over 1924 forthis period amounting nearly to 2,500,000 cars,an increase over 1924 being shown for eachgeneral class of freight except grain and grainproducts and livestock.
Operating revenues of the carriers in the 10months, January 1 to November 1, amountingto $5,129,774,465, exceeded .revenues earned inthese months of 1924 by $153,177,890, or 3.1per cent; and operating expenses, amountingto $3,809,091,395, ran above 1924 by $5,222,107,or 0.1 per cent. Net railway operating incomein this period totaled $935,047,508, exceedingthe total for 1924 by $128,380,947, or 15.9 percent. The operating ratio, or percentage ofoperation expenses to operating revenues inthese 10 months, was 74,25 per cent, the ratio forthis period of 1924 being 76.44 per cento Therate of return earned by the carriers in the 10months to November 1 was equivalent to 4.83per cent on property investment as shown bythe carriers' books. Roads in the easterndistricts earned 5.21 per cent, those in thesouthern district 6.06 per cent, and those inthe western district 4.07 per cent.
Freight-car surplus, which decreased to104,000 cars on November 8, increased in eachsucceeding quarter of November to 137,000cars on November 30. Since March the
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JAXUAHY, 1920 FEDERAL BESERVE BULLETIN 25
surplus of freight cars has fallen off frommonth to month from an average of 310,000cars in March to an average of 119,000 cars,including 54,000 box and 39,000 coal cars inNovember.
TRADEWholesale trade.
Wholesale trade in all leading lines declinedin November from the seasonal peak reachedin October, but the total volume of trade con-tinued larger than a year ago... For the 11months ending in November, the volume oftrade in the six leading lines included in theFederal Reserve Board's index of wholesaletrade was approximately 4 per cent largerthan for the corresponding period in 1924.Sales in all lines were larger than in 1924,except groceries, which were in approximatelythe same volume, the greatest increase beingin the sale of meats, due partly to the higherlevel of prices prevailing" this year than in1924.
Declines in aggregate sales in Novemberfrom the seasonally high levels in October,when retailers purchased in large volume tobuild up stocks for the Christmas tradingseason, were about of the same extent as inother recent yea,rs. Declines in the sales ofdry goods, slices, hardware, and drags werelarger than last year, while declines in sales ofgroceries and meats were less.
As a result of the reduction in sales in No-vember, stocks at wholesale firms, as measuredin dollar values, increased and at the end ofthe month were slightly larger than a yearearlier. Stocks of groceries and drugs 'werelarger than in October, while those of meats,dry goods, and shoes were smaller. Comparedwith. November, 1924, inventories of groceriesand drugs were considerably larger in value,but those of the other leading lines were smaller.Accounts receivable at reporting wholesalefirms at the end of Movember were slightlylarger in the eastern Federal reserve districtsthan a month earlier, but o were generallysmaller in the western districts from whichreports were received.
Retail trade.Trade at retail stores declined in November
from the exceptionally large volume in October,owing partly to fewer business days, but itcontinued larger than in the correspondingmonth of 1924. Department-store sales werein the largest volume on record for that xnonthand sales of mail-order houses exceeded thoseof any November in the past six years.
Department-store sales, as measured by theFederal Reserve Board's index, have exceededfor each month those of the correspondingmonth in 19.24, and for the 11 months endingwith November total sales at these storesaveraged more than 4 per cent larger than in thecorresponding period in 1924. Increases overthe corresponding 11 months of 1.924 variedfrom 1 per cent in the Boston Federal reserve
, district to 7 per cent in the Chicago district.,| Stores in nearly all cities in ail districts reported| larger sales for the 11 months than in* 1924.except those in certain cities near the anthracitefields of the Philadelphia Federal reserve dis-trict. Analysis of sales, by separate depart-ments, at stores in seven Federal reserve' dis-tricts indicates that sales of silks and. velvets,linens, neckwear and veilings, ribbons, toiletarticles and drugs, women's "dresses, furniture,china and glassware, toys and sporting goods,luggage, books and stationery, and musical in-struments and radios were more than 10 percent larger than in November, 1924. Sales weresubstantially smaller than last year at depart-ments carrying boys' wear, women's coats andskirts, and waists "and blouses.
In view of the increase in the expectedvolume of Christmas trading, department-store stocks increased considerably more than.usual in November and at the end of the monthwere 3.2 per cent larger than a year ago.Departments carrying toilet articles and drugs,men's furnishings, boys' wear, women's coats,furs, women's and children's hose, knit under-wear, infants'' wear, and luggage reported thelargest increases in stocks, and those sellingwomen's suits and skirts, waists, and blouses,ciiina and glassware, and musical instrumentsand radio supplies showed the greatest de-creases.
The rate at which stocks were turned overat department stores continued faster in No-vember than in the preceding year, and for the11 months ending with November stocks were
I turned over 2,82 times, as compared with 2.71times during the corresponding period in 1924.Compared with last year the largest increasesin stock turnover were in the Richmond, At-lanta, St. Louis, Dallas, and San FranciscoFederal reserve districts, amounting to morethan 5 per cent
EMPLOYMENT
Employment and earnings of factory workersduring 1925 were slightly greater than in 1924,but less than in 1923. The increase in amount of'pay rolls since 1924 has been greater than the
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
26 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN JANUARY^ 1926
increase in number employed, and the decreasesince 1923 less, indicating growing earnings perworker. The monthly changes in employmentand pay rolls during 1925 were similar in direc-tion to those of 1924, but less pronounced.In the late spring and early summer of eachyear there were declines, which in 1924 insome industries were of considerable impor-tance. The low point of 1925 was above that of1924, and the latest year ended with both em-ployment and earnings at higher levels than atthe close of 1924, and the level of pay roils al-most equaled that of December, 1923. Theaccompanying chart shows the Federal Re-serve Board's indexes of factory employmentand pay rolls for the past four years.
FACTORY EMPLOYMENTPAYROLL
1922 1923 1325
In some industries employment or pay rolls,or both, reached higher levels during 1925 thanin any year since 1920, and in a few cases theyexceeded all years included in the index, 1919to 1925. Examples of these more active in-dustries are silk goods, textile dyeing and iimsh-ing, knit goods, furniture, automobiles, paperboxes, printing and publishing, clay products,and glass. On the other hand, other industriesremained at relatively low levels or continuedto show downward tendencies evident in recentyears—some of these are the clothing industries,particularly women's clothing, slaughtering andmeat packing, Hour milling, sugar refining,leather tanning, and tobacco. Certain im-portant basic industries showed movementssimilar to and in fact determined the trend ofthe indexes for all industries; these are notablyiron and steel, machinery, cotton, wool, paperand pulp, and boots ^nd shoes. Those in-dustries closely connected with building—lumber, and stone, clay, and glass products—reported relatively high levels of employmentand earnings.
Few changes of importance were made in thewages of factory workers during 1925, and nodefinite general trend in the level of industrialwages could be noted, although of those changesreported decreases probably dominated. Wide-spread reductions occurred in the cotton-goodsindustry during the latter part of 1924 andearly in 1925 and during 1925 scattered de-creases were made in the woolen and worsted,dyeing and finishing, iron and steel, boot andshoe, lumber, and glass industries. A numberof small increases were reported, but few ofthem affected a significant number of em-ployees.
Statistics of building activity indicate thatemployment in this phase of industry must havebeen maintained at high levels throughout theyear. Road construction and crop harvestingprovided seasonal demands for a large numberof workers. Work in the bituminous coal-min-ing industry was limited during most of theyear, but since the anthracite strike began inSeptember activity in bituminous coal fieldshas increased, a3id toward the end of the } earthe amount of coal mined, which is a fair in-dicator of the extent of employment, was asgreat as at any time in the history of the in-dustry. Railroads reported employment andwage payments during the year at practicallythe same level as in 1924,
SAVINGS DEPOSITS
Savings deposits on December 1, as reportedto the Federal Reserve Board by 888 banks inselected centers throughout the country,totaled §8,003,303,000, an increase of nearly$42,000,000 over the previous month and ofnearly $481,000,000 over the figure for Decem-ber'of last year. Comparative figures forsavings deposits of the reporting banks aregiven, by Federal reserve districts, in the fol-lowing table for December 1, 1925, November1, 1925, and December 1, 1924.
SAVINGS DEPOSITS, BY FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICTS
[Amounts in thousands of dollars]
! Numberi of banks
Boston.. i 64New York: . 30Philadelphia—. 78Cleveland _ 68Richmond. 86Atlanta... : 93Ciiicago ; 184St Louis. 31Minneapolis ; 26Kansas City 52Dallas.- • 96San Francisco 7t)
Total 888
Dec. I,1925
1,335,9782,113,380
523,646854,964350,245265.919960,338142,838109,007106,663103,988
1,130,337
8,003,303
Nov. 1,1925 .
1,332,6052, 108,618
523,094845,840352,868260,868953,075141.904108,783106,475102,436
1,124,992
7,961,556
Dec. 131924
1,271,490% 008,184
494,478798. 916324,357239,495921,174140,938101.395103,45993,198
1,027,404
7,522,488
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JANUARY., 1926 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN" 27
PRICES
The wholesale price index of the Bureau ofLabor Statistics for November stood at 158,unchanged from October. None of the indexnumbers of the several component groupsshowed material changes, the decline m farmproducts, cloth and clothing, and house fur-nishings being offset by advances in all theother groups. The food index, at 160, is at thefigure of January of this year, which was thehighest since February, 1921. On the otherhand, house furnishings, which have beensteadily declining since January, fell in Novem-ber to the lowest figure since March, 1919.
Since midsummer, while there has been only asmall movement in the general index, severalof the groups have shown sustained movementsin one direction or the other. From August toNovember farm products have steadily fallen,from 163 to 154, and smaller but continuousdeclines have occurred in cloth and clothing.and house furnishings. Fuels, metals, buildingmaterials, and miscellaneous commodities havehad a steady advance, while for foods and chem-icals there has been little net change, bothgroups remaining at approximately the highlevels reached earlier in the year.
During December price movements were ir-regular, with the majority of changes in a down-ward direction. Wheat was higher, but beefcattle, cotton, wool, and eggs were lower.Among industrial products iron and steel werefirm, but copper and lead were rather lower andcoke and bituminous coal declined. Lower•quotations were recorded for lumber, bothhard and soft, hides, rubber, and cottonseedoil.
COMMERCIAL FAILURES AND BANK SUSPEN-SIONS
The number of commercial failures duringNovember, as well as the aggregate liabilitiesinvolved, were larger than in the precedingmonth or in November of last year,, The num-ber of failures for the month was reported byR. G. Dun & Co. as 1,672, about 1 per centhigher than in November last year, and totalliabilities as $35,922,421, about 15 per centabove the figure for a year ago. The increasein total indebtedness in default was to a con-siderable extent due to an increased number oflarge failures (each involving liabilities of$100,000 or more) and to a somewhat higheraverage indebtedness for this class of ^failure,but there were increases also in the number andaverage indebtedness of smaller insolvencies.The number and total indebtedness of insolventmanufacturing firms were larger in November
this year than last; in the trading class of en-terprise, although the number of failures wassmaller this year, the indebtedness in defaultwas nearly 20 per cent higher, while amongagents, brokers, etc, both number and liabili-ties were smaller than in November last year.In the following table commercial failures areshown, by class of enterprise, for the month ofNovember:
COMMERCIAL FAILURES DURING NOVEMBER
Class of enterpriseNumber •, Liabilities
i
1925 1924 j 1925 i 1924
All classes „ \ 1,672 i 1,653 | $35,922,421
Manufacturing.T d i
n u a c t u r n g . 442 i 361 !Trading j 1,146' 1,193Agents, brokers, etc ..! 84; 99
I i '
13,993,70113.907,0913,021,629
$31,123,910
10,252,12715.781,6215,090,262
The number of failures was larger in Novem-ber than, in the preceding month in all exceptthe Philadelphia, Cleveland, Richmond, andSt. Louis districts. Liabilities were higher in theNew York, Cleveland, Atlanta, Chicago, St.Louis, Dallas, and San Francisco districts andlower in the other five districts. Comparingthis year and last, the number of failures waslarger in the Boston, Cleveland; Chicago,Minneapolis, Dallas, and San Francisco dis-tricts and smaller in the other six districts.,while liabilities in default were higher in. allexcept the Boston, New York, Philadelphia.,Richmond, and Minneapolis districts. In theSan Francisco district the number of insolven-cies and in the St. Louis district total defaultedindebtedness were higher than for any previousmonth since the district record has been main-tained. Comparative data, by districts, for themonth of November are presented in the follow-ing table:
COMMERCIAL FAILURES DURING NOVEMBER, BYDISTRICTS
Federal reserve district
Total.
BostonNew YorkPhiladelphia.. .„ClevelandRichmondAtlantaChicagoSt. Louis...MinneapolisKansas City.. . .DallasSan Francisco..
Number
1925 1924
1,672 : 1,653
Liabilities
1924
$31,123,910
158302491659174218749010071280
141323021331111132111026512368201
2,118,3345,734,8751,011,2283,428,1141,631,3702,005,0907,065,3915,173,004963,797
1,153,488995,237
4,582,493
5,368,8466.278.3581,129; 3682,441,0421, 715,39S3,604,0134,42918901,039,9452.063', 1421,082,957
904,8203,066,133
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
28 FEDERAL RESEBVE BULLETIN JANUARY,1926
During November 75 banks, with capitaland surplus of $3,295,910, were reported tothe federal reserve banks as having been closedor declared insolvent. This was the largestnumber of suspensions since January, and was23 larger than the total for last month. Theincrease resulted largely from increases in theChicago and Minneapolis districts, among non-member banks; the number of member bankssuspending during the month was smaller thanfor the month before. Of the suspensions inNovember, 11 were member banks—10 withcapital and surplus of $712,500 were nationalbanks and 1 with capital and surplus of$100,000 was a member State bank—and 84,with capital and surplus of $2,483,410, werelionmember banks. One bank in the St. Louisdistrict and 3 in the Minneapolis district,which had previously been closed, were reportedto have resumed operations during the month.The figures for closed banks represent, as faras could be determined, banks which havebeen declared insolvent or have been closed byorder of supervisory authorities, and it is notknown how many of the latter institutions mayultimately prove to be solvent.
BANKS CLOSED DURING NOVEMBER, 1925
Federal reservedistrict
All banks Member '- Nonmcmber
Num-ber
Capita!and
surpius
I Capitaland
surplus
! N u m j Capitalv.,ir i anaDcr . surplus
I "All districts j 75 |$3,295,910 ! 11 ! $812,500
ClevelandRichmond _Chicago...St. LouisMinneapolis. _Kansas CityDallasSan Francisco
75,250429,500
16, 500565.140825, 00026,500 ;_.
1,010,210 • 5 ! 307,750221,360 I _i ..„! 7 !81,200 : J ; 2 :
550,000 j ..; 3 :
64 $2,483,410
11 !12 I
2 :
26
36,500489,890395, 500
26, 500702,460221,36081,200
550,000
i Comprises 10 national banks with capita] find surplus of $712,500 andone State member bank, in the Chicago district, with capital and sur-plus of $100,000.
FOREIGN TRADE
Total imports and exports of merchandiseduring November, the merchandise trade bal-ance of the United States by months in 1924
and 1925, and the trade balance, including im-ports and exports of gold and silver, for the11 months ended November, 1924 and 1925;are shown in the tables following:
MERCHANDISE TRADE BALANCE OF THE UNITEDSTATES
[In thousands of dollars]
Month
1924January...FebruaryMarch..AprilMay __ _June _July „AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember „
Year _
1925January „_February. _MarchAprilMayJune...JulyAugust—.SeptemberOctober.._November
Imports ! Exports Excess ofimports
295,506332,323 j320,482 I324,291 I302,988 i274,001 '278, 594254, 542287,144310, 752290,148 i333,192 i
395,172 '_.305,782 ..339,755 •_.340,936 _335,089 ...306.989 .276; 649330,659 |_,427,460 i.527,172 j .493,573 L445,748 L
Excess ofexports
99,66633,45919,27322. 64532', 101
1,945
3,609,963 : 4,590,984
346,165 :333,457 :385,379 I346,091 !327,519 !325,216 I325,648!
446,443370, 676453, 653398,255370,945
350,095374,104378, 000
339, 652379,877420, 319490,610448, GOO
1,868 ;
76,117140,3If216,420197,425112, 556
981,021
100, 27837,21968,27452,16443,426
14,00439, 79170, 224116, 50670,000
TRADE BALANCE OF THE UNITED STATES FOR 11MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER, 1924 AND 1925
[In thousands of dollars]
1924Imports.Exports
Net imports (—) orexports (+) --
1925ImportsExports...
Net imports (—) orexports (+)
Mer-chandise
3,276, 7714,145, 236
•-I-868,465
3,831,7604,441, 778
+610., 018
Gold
309,44721,974
-287,473
121, 057266, 672
-4-135, 615
Silver
68,08198,611
+30,530
58,84891,538
+32,690
Total
3,654,2994,265,821
+611,522
4,011,6654,789,988
+ 778,323
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
.TANUAKY, 1020 FEDEEAL RESERVE BULLETIN 29
GOLD MOVEMENTS
UNITED STATES
Total imports and exports of gold duringNovember and during the 11 months endingwith November, by" countries of origin ordestination, and comparative figures for thecorresponding month and period last year, areshown in the following table:
GOLD IMPORTS INTO AND EXPORTS FROM THE UNITEDSTATES
[In thousands of dollars]
Country of origin or dc-;iiiui-tion
m P O U T S FKO.M-—
1925 l i months endedNovember—
No vein- :
bcr October :i92o 192-1
England-..--FranceGermanyNetherlands..CanadaMexicoArgentinaChina ..--JapanAll other
-I 2, 579 1, 891 i
TotalEXPORTS TO—
2,85S .370 :
3,451535
3,0003044
10, 450
291
England —France -Germany _NetherlandsCanada i 20,185Mexico ! 389Argentina —.ColombiaUruguay _..VenezuelaBritish IndiiiHongkongAustralia _. _ _Allothcr
1.004
400
208
1,823
Total.
4,000 !804 i
49, 294. 130,8980,500 : 21,423
2 : 4,82^10,085 : 50,90531,848 i 38,7004.514 i 4,98(5
2 i 19, 590120 ! 5,022
7,008 i11, 594 : 32.975
50,741 ! 125,057 : 309,417
I
238
22, 475326
SI
143, 459
1,476
21, 360 | 28, 039
Net imports ! : 22,702Net exports ; 13,904 ;_.._
6.160 ; 2,0001J339 i 80
68,043 :4,318 I45.557 •: 2,9148,21.1 ! 3,5035,561 i3-004 i 5
802 ! 1002,560! 1,102
58771 :58,77111,858 •26,925 j13,558 ! 2,09'
5,3504,103
256,672 !
135s6i5 i
_21,974
287, 473
GREAT BRITAIN
Following is a table showing gold importsinto and gold exports from Great Britain forOctober and November. 1925, and also for
75164—26t—5
the 11 months ended November, 1924 and1925.
GOLD IMPORTS INTO AND EXPORTS FROM GREATBRITAIN
1925
'•November October
Country of origin orcleslirnUio:i
IMPORTS VROM —
France : iNetherlands ; •Rhodesia £170,040 \I{;ussia : 1,095,000Transvaal 2,004,728 : 2,880,089United States 201 ._West Africa 98,298 ;
! l t i '
£3,800289,473
137,29293.858
2,145, ] SI
Total 3,500,185 j 5.412,401
Hclgium 72,258British India '. 273,080Egypt...- 56,430France ! 05,380Netherlands '• 3,185,230KiissiaStraits Settlements j 297,891Switzerland ; 032,805United States I 2,094,494 iWest Africa... ! 575 |All other ! 904,074 j
Total.
Net exports.
5,366291,678
08, 098102,821
1,401,37;)
121,2581,247, 9056, 444,429
11 months endedNovember-•-
1925
£.1.23,9835.087.595i;920. 8184,277,385
20, 048,0034,275,0131,132,6702,404, 043
39,330,710
432r 723
202,18312,702,081
583,152434, 727
0, 085, 322380, 048
1,224,1094,981,901JO, 095, 281
49, 1897, 908,288
8,5:12,283 j 10,175,254 • 45,300,941
£8,579117, 953
2, 235, 721
"20.7)497300144,094
1, 298, 984437,050
30,892, 287
82, 03110, 570, 2241,359,360385, 831
1, 047, 04478, 027
240, (543152,554
29, 906, 22035,108
1,300, 691
45,230,333-
5,036,118! 4,702,853 5, 970, 231 j 14,338,04(5
FOREIGN EXCHANGE
During December the foreign exchange rateswere generally firm. The pound sterling rosefrom $4.8441 on December 1 to $4.8521 onthe 30th, and Swiss francs stood at 19.35 centson the 28th, both at the highest levels in threemonths. Netherlands florins and Swedishcrowns were strong, the latter being quotedslightly above dollar parity. Fluctuations inItalian lire were nominal, the high for the monthbeing 4.04 cents and the low 4,02, while onBelgian francs the rate was virtually unchangedthroughout the month at 4.53 cents, the levelof November. French francs, on the otherhandj were weak, dropping from 3.91 centson the 1st to 3.59 on the 15 th, but subsequently
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
30 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN JANUARY, 1020
recovering part of this loss. Fluctuations inother European rates were small except inPolish zlotc, which rose from 9.69 cents on the2d to 12,76 on the 7th, but in the last half ofthe month steadied about 10 J^ cents.
As a group, the South American rates weresomewhat heavy, the quotations on Argentinaand Brazil being slightly below the highestfigures reached in November, a fact also trueof the exchanges in Canada, Mexico, and Cuba.
Far Eastern exchanges were firm. Japaneseyen touched 43.70 cents, the highest figuresince March, 1924, and Indian rupees were alsostrong at about the highest level of the year.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
[In cents]
Exchange Parvalue •
December,2G25
Low j High
November, 1925
Low
Sterling 480.05; 484.411 485. 37| 48-139French franc i 19.30 3.59' 3.01' 3.74German roichsmark." 23.82: 23.80: 23.81 23.80Italian lira 19.30! 4.02! 4.01; 3.94Netheilards florin.-i 40.20 40.10! 40.24: 40.19Swedish krona : 20.80 2o. 7f>:- 20,85' 26. 741Swiss fi-nnc 10,30 19.27' 19.35j 10.20'Canadian dollar " 100.00 99.88:100.04' 99,98'Argentine peso '•• 00. 4S 93.9i: 94.43 93.08:Shanghai tael 00.85 75.23 7(5.08 75.27i
.High Aver-age
No-vem-ber,1924.aver-age
" I "4S4.70J
4.18!23. 811
4. 00;
2(i'! 7619. : 8
100. 1094. 8J.70. 44
!•184. 5P!
23!8li4. 001
40.23;
IS)! 27!100. 08.94. 4475.82
100. 805.72
23. 804, 33
40. 0520. 8119. 2899. 9985. 4970. 30
RESERVE BANK CREDIT, GOLD STOCK, MONEY IN CIRCULATION, AND MEMBERBANK RESERVE BALANCES
The following table gives the four series offigures which underlie the chart in the reviewof the month, page 2 of this issue of the BULLE-TIN, and presents separately the series for goldstock which appears on the chart only in com-bination with one of the other series, i. e., theone for reserve bank credit. All of the figuresare monthly averages. Those for reserve bankcredit give for each month the daily average
holdings of bills and securities by all Federalreserve banks, and the figures for memberbank reserve balances are also the daily aver-ages for the month. The averages for goldstock and for money in circulation, however,are based on the amounts reported for the firstof the month and for the first of the followingmonth, as given in the United States TreasuryDepartment circulation statements.
RESERVE BANK CREDIT, GOLD STOCK, MONEY IN CIRCULATION, AND MEMBER BANK RESE.HVE BALANCES
[In thousands of dollars]
Month
JanuaryFe brim* yMarch
AprilMayJune
JulyAugust.Septern her
OctoberNovemberDecember
Reservebiinkcrclit
], 304,1031,215.2201,191,013
1,190.0041,188.8:9l,100?0J7
1, 127,8881,053,0081,113,813
1,184,7001.2.10,120i; 304, 433
, ReserveGold I bankstock • credit plus
; ^old. stock
1022
3, 008, 930 : 4, 973.0993, 700, b 19 : 4, 9if), 0393, 735, (387 i 4, 82(5, 700
3,758,092 : 4,918,09(5?:, 770. 018 •• 4, 0/50, 4073, 779,996 : i,9HJ,013
MemberMoney in bankcirculation \ reserve
balances
4,478,8974,377,2f>24, 407, 558
4.398. 9904.377, 6004,372.243
Reservebankcredit-
Goldslock
"• Reserve i Member: bank Money in ' bank1 credit plus circulation reserve! ,&old stock I balances
1923
\1,707,286 I 1,191,191 | 3,935.519 ! 5,120,710.1, 088, 037 i 1,152, 862 ! 3, 949, 259 i 5, 102,1211,711,360: 1,178,919! 3,905,075 • 5,113.99-1
3. 805,182 • 4, 933, 070 4, 350, 4873,841,000 . 4,894,794 . 4,365,4633,866,364 4,979,707 4,457,201
3, 888, 010 ::>,905,237
3,921,017 .
5, 072, 7195, i! 5,3035, 225,480
4,545, 5884,593,3954. 674, 704
1,733, 250 I1.782, 5! 5 !1,820,254
1,812,0221,799,155l,81J,036
1,835,728J,825,0921, 840, 300
1,164, 000 iJ,.173,194 :
I, 124,891 •
3,975,487 5,140,0934,0('2.5!5 i 5.175.7094,030.402 5, K)i,2i;3
1.119,787 4,064,061. \ 5, 183,8181,078,201. 4,093.811 i 5.172,0151, 123,4.72 4,122,259 j 5,215,73!
1, 150,593 ! 4, 151.779 5,302,3721.147,765 ! 4, 188'863 5.330|f;281,200,351 • 4,228,418 5, 428; 709
4.4.4,
4.
'!,
4,
4,
4.4'.4,
621, 014 i5.S9.882 '(533,
60!.OHO.717,
712,73(5,813,
842,870,937.
156 •
859 j
082051
574 '•
838 •
914
587200J CfC,
1.918, 3531, 000, 6G31,87;-;,
1. 868,1.873.1,800,
1, m^,1,834,1,847,
1,8(»4.i.875.1,881,
0.1. S
55 i
obi020761762503
140291013
1924 1925
January..February.March
A pril _May..June..
1,000921951,
6(5858S774
910. 493839842
571963
July 825,999 IAugust ! 836,534 ISeptember ; 930, 9(55
October. . .1.005,742November ! \\ 085,027D eccin b er I 1,220, 700
4, 208, 247 !4,313,7.1-4,353,142
4,392,780 '4,438,792 I4.475,449 j
4.4.4,
4,4.4J
50-1,524,539,
550,5(51,558,
100317408
716857737
5,268,915., 235.299i. 304^916
4,816,3974,744/743 '4.810,320
5,333,273 ! 4,786,488 :
'». 278. 303 ' 4, 787, 758 •i, 31 M i 2 '' 4,785,402
>, 330. 099 4.710.29.:-.,300,851 • 4,719,533 ..,470,433 ; 47 700,123 •
i,550,458 ! 4,843,030j, 040,884 ! 4,930,632
"70,443 | 4; 993, 251I
1.910,877 i 1,072,077 j 4,514.757 ! 5,580,834 4,872,2351,892,160 i 1,050,323 ! 4,452,855 i 5,503,178 4.777.SV41,915,420 ! 1,078,9.12: 4,414,383; 5,493,295 4,7<K);188
1.905,354 !1,922,012 '2, GOO, 505
2.040,240 1,005,252 i 4,300,840 5,450,0022,071,875 : 1, 002, 264 j 4,395, 74(5 0, 488,0102,120, 210 . 1,163, 898 I 4,399,4.1.3 5, 563, 3.11
1,1,1,
060,066 ;049,232 :OGO, 667 •
4,399, 5404,394. 9384, 393, 096
5, 4595,4445, 453
C0<>170763
4.7507)97;:-*
679752274
2,140.701 1,255,031 4,420,391 j 5,676.0222,104,42s) 1,288,731 j 4,434,149 ; 5,722,8802,181,701 __.| L-_'-
4. 721), $7 74,751,7724,805,5.15 •
4, 803, 0224, 930, 302
2,194, 2702.158,8102,137, 427
2, 123,1312,132,0872,141,271.
2, 1C0, 281.2,151.4782,16i,329
2.203,0112,221,307
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
l-, 1026 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN" 31
LOANS AND INVESTMENTS OF NATIONAL MEMBER BANKS, BY CLASS OF BANK
The following tables, derived from annualreports of the Comptroller of the Currency,give for the last seven years the loans andinvestments of national member banks, withloans so classified as to show separately thevolume of loans on securities and the volumeof all other loans. The information is givenseparately for the national banks in New YorkCity, in the city of Chicago, in other reservecities, and for other national member banks.The banks included for New York City and forthe city of Chicago include only those whichare subject to central reserve city reserve re-quirements. The banks included for otherreserve cities include, besides a few nationalbanks in New York City and in Chicago, whichare not subject to central reserve city reserverequirements, all the national banks in otherreserve cities except a few banks which aresubject to so-called country bank reserve re-quirements. '' Other national member banks "includes all national banks in the UnitedStates that are subject to country bank re-serve requirements.
.For the end of June, 1925, information cor-responding to that given in the table is avail-
able for all member banks (8,066 nationalmembers and 1,472 State members). At thistime the total loans (including overdrafts) andinvestments of all member banks were $29,702,-525,000, their investments were $8,888,345,000,and their total loans (excluding overdrafts)amounted to 820,798,714,000, of which 86,717,-511,000 were loans on securities and 814,081,-203,000 were other loans. The distributionof each of these classes of loans, by class ofcity, was published in the November BULLETIN.
LOANS AXD INVESTMENTS OFBANKS
NATIONAL MEMBER
[In thousands of dollars]
i Loans on I
i !1911) ! 3,436,3-191920 3,110,843192J i 2,098,2671022 ..._' 2,006,439J923 ", 2,98.1,1881924 _„' 3,103,5751925 ; 3,659,041
All otherloans
7, 570,56810,491,0309,302,9758,339, 6258, 833, 841
Totalloans
Invest-ments
Totalloans and
invest-ments
II , 007,117 ! 4,990,539 j 15,997, 65613,607,873 I 4,118,60(5 ' 17,726,479
8,871,569 ' 11,975,1449,011.077 j 12,670,118
12,001,242 ! 4,022,116 | 16,023,35811,246,064 i 4,559,353 ! 15,805,41711,815.029 ' 5,065,306 ! 16,880,335
' 5,137,721 17,112,8655, 725, 622 18,395, 740
LOANS AND INVESTMENTS OF NATIONAL MEMBER BANKS, BY CLASS OF BANK
[In thousands of dollars]
National banks in New York City National banks in the city of Chicago
End oi June
191.9.1920.1921.1922.1923.1924.1925.
1919 _19201921192219231924.1925...
Loans onsecurities
All otherloans Total loans
1,134,795785,131 i598,469856,125751,191881,016
1.289,9231, 959,1131, 603, 7961,206,0881,075, 8421,127, 484
2,424, 7182, 744, 2442. 202, 2652,062, 2131, 827,0332,009,100
Invest-ments
•Total loansand invest-
ments
992,874 i 1,091,431 j 2,084,305
703. 096593, 169549. 636812,614773. £58854,, 455950,187
3,187,8143,3H7,4J3 !2, 75 L, 9012,874,827 |2,600.891 i2, 803 555. i3,034,492
National banks in other reserve cities
Loans onsecurities
164,283177, 559159,717156,421170,816200, 495252, 977
All otherloans
368,812554, 701473,439375,178377, 549394,169357,040
i
Total loans
533,095732,200 |633,156 !
i 531,599 j: 548,365 !
594,664 !! 610,617
Other national memo
Invest-ments
134,85670. 61549, 53482,816114, 750127,998109,349
Total loansand invest-
ments
667,951802,875082,090014,415063,115722, 002719,966
1,1,
1,
1,
230 878118, 750949955014
930479480
986,912259, 023
2, 339,3, 203,2, 734,2,428,2, 720,2, 028,2, 735,
127388173695303059023
3, 570.. 0054,382; 1443,084,1033,384,1743, 740, 7833, 014,9713,994} 640
1,438,1901,014,^:92
916,2901,130,6811,303,2451. 238, <.-551,495,756
5,014,1955,396, 5364, 600,3994, 514,8555, 044, 0284,853,4265,490,402
900, 5931,035,397
990,151938,414
1,044,7011.034, 552
3,572,706 ! 4,473,2994,71.3,828 j 5,749,2254,491,567 I 5,481,7184,329,064 i 5,263,0784,054,147 ! 5,098,8484,721,857 i 5,756,409
1,154,167 4,826,383 ; 5,980,550
2,054,397 !.2,440,430 !2,506,050 ,2,533,242 i2,873,453 j2,910,813 I3,170,330 |
7,127, 0908,189,0557,988,3087,801, 3208, 572,3018,673, 2229,150,880
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
32 FEDERAL RESEBVE BtJLLETIN JANUARY, 1920
Changes In State Bank Membership
The following list shows changes affecting Statebank membership during the month ended December21, 1925, on which date 1,451 State institutions weremembers of the system:
ADMISSIONS
Capital : Surplus
District No. 2
Manufacturers & Traders Bank,Buffalo, N. Y _.
District No. 3
Montgomery Trust Co., Norristown,Pa...,,
District No. 7
La Grange Trust & Savings Bank,La Grange, 111
$2,000,000 $1,500,000
500,000 ! 250,000
100,000 : 25,000
$61,935,189
6, G13,687
1,988,682
CHANGES
District No-1 j ! ;
Converted into national bank: IMassachusetts Trust Co., Boston, I • iMass :$1,000,COO ; $500,000 $24,078,258
jDistrict No. 2 j|Fidelity Trust Co., Buffalo, N. Y. J
(merged with Manufacturers & ITraders Bank under title of Man- ,ufacturers & Traders Trust Co.) — 1
District No. 8 ;Voluntary withdrawal: V o 1 u s i a
County Bank & Trust Co., De-Land, Fla —|
District No. 7 iVoluntary withdrawal: Paw Paw j
Savings Bank, Paw Paw, Mich._JClosed: i
Sac County State Bank, SacCity, Iowa —
Commercial State Bank, Britt,Iowa
District No. 8The Wood & Huston Bank, Mar-
shall, Mo., a member, has absorbedthe following nonmcinbor: Bankof Alt. Leonard, Mt. Leonard, MoJ
District No. 11 [
Insolvent: First State Bank, Mount !Calm, Tex. (assets sold to non- Imember).. ...
Withdrawn: Farmers State Bank, :Garvin, Okla_. _
District No, 12Consolidated with another State
member: Iron Commercial & Sav- '.ings Bank, Cedar City, Utah •
1,000,000 •• 1,000,000 ; 35,251,000
200,000 1 40,000; 2,6-18,197
40,000 ! 10,000 : 543,216
75,000 | 25,000 j 1,202,587
100,000 | 130,000 i l,458,90i
10,030 ! 3,300 • 46,000
40,000 ! 400 "= 147,084
15,. 000 | 1, ,500 i 70, 705
50,000 j 11,000 | 283,007
Change of title.—The Farmers Guaranty State Bank, North Zulch,Tex., has changed iis title to Guaranty Bond State Bank.
Fiduciary Powers Granted to National Banks
During the month ended December 21, 1925, theFederal Reserve Board approved applications of thenational banks listed below for permission to exerciseone or more of the fiduciary powers named in section 11(k) of the Federal reserve act as amended, as follows:(1) Trustee; (2) executor; (3) administrator; (4)registrar of stocks and bonds; (5) guardian of estates:(6) assignee; (7) receiver; (8) committee of estates oflunatics; (9) in any other fiduciary capacity in whichState banks, trust companies, or other corporationswhich come into competition with national banks arepermitted to act under the laws of the State in whichthe national bank is located.
Location
Boston, Mass
Portsmouth, N, H_.
Stamford, N. Y
West Grove, Pa
Charleston, S. C - .
Dis-trict
! NO.
Clarksville, TermChicago, HIIonia, Mich_Rockford, 111Stevens Point, Wis __San Bernardino, Calif
Name of bank
Massachusetts NationalBank.
New Hampshire NationalBank.
National Bank of Stam-ford.
National Bank of WestGrove.
Bank of Charleston, N. B.A.
First National BankIrving Park National BankNational Bank of Ionia..™.Security National Bank..Citizens National Bank...American National Bank..
Poweisgranted
1 U>9
1 and 9
I t o 9
5 to 9
I t o 9
11 to 9I to 9I t o 9I t o 91 to 9
Changes in National Bank Membership
The Comptroller of the Currency reports the follow-ing increases and reductions in the"number and capitalof national banks during the period from November 21to December 25, 1925, inclusive:
New charters issuedRestored to solvency. _...Increase of capital approved..
Aggregate of new charters, banks restored tosolvency, and banks increasing capital
LiquidationsReducing capital..
Total liquidations and reductions of capital
Consolidations of national banks under act of Nov.7, 1918..
Amountbanks;
12 i $2,080,0000 ! 0
15 ; 3,215,000
27 | 5,295,000
22 !2 i
3,265,00050,000
24 I 3,315,000
275,000
Aggregate increased capital for period i _; 5,295.000Reduction of capital owing to liquidations, etc !_... ' 3J 315,000
Net increase __ .__! 1,930,000
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
.IAXUART, 1926 FEDEBAL RESERVE BULLETIN 33
FINAL CROP EEFORT[Estimates of the Department of Agriculture. In thousands of units]
Corn (bushels)
Federal reserve district
Total wheat(bushels)
Winter wheat(bushels)
Boston..New YorkPhiladelphia. .ClevelandRichmond.AtlantaChicagoSt. LouisMinneapolis....Kansas CityDallas.. —San Francisco.
United States.
1924
9,31226,64043,121
129,509 I120,755156,149721,792326,285269,978425,70574,722
8, 777
1925 1924 1925 1924 1925
Spring wheat(bushels)
1924
2,312, 745
Federal reserve district
Hay (tons) !
Boston..New YorkPhiladelphia. .ClevelandRichmondAtlanta . . .ChicagoSt. LouisMinneapolis....Kansas C i t y -Dallas.San Francisco.
10,40030,60265,074227,875140,291159,448
1,092,525404,167288,582430,31740,05011,250
1256, 78617.29337,72223,5223,68867S 3014.9,357260,355303,09626,39066,992
2, 900, 581 862,627
2106,814
20,71129,38426,3935,214
55,96049,277
209,459158,896
6.820 i100I227 i
6,653 j17,29337,630 !23,5223,688 |65,572 j49.185 ;16.601 I294,409 !26.186 |
20,711 i.29,292 !26,393 !_.5,214 L.53,673 i49,073
125133
210148
92 92
1,729172
_7,486 • 243,754150,185 j6,70643,087
8,687204
18,099
% 287204
201,9738,711114
57,140
669,365 589,632 398,486 j 272,995 ! 270,879
Oats (bushels)
8,78136,55124.31385| 68621,77510,067605,79559,403444,270 j149,966 |51,712 i24,347
10,85439,57426,918105, 55424,00014,389588,11363,577415,105159,46815,45138,906
1,522,685 ! 1,501,909
Tobacco (pounds) Potatoes (bushels) , Cotton (bales)
1924 1925 1924 1925 1924
4,3857,677 !3,6047,6754,2672,428
22, 5098,788
18,35618,9111,661
12,535
4,6437,1553,099 i6,090 '2,0201,974
16,1186, 537
17,30516,6121,157
16,805
12,45741,68357,500
154,419
113,49338,453
329,4852,1433,685
United States. 112,796 99? 515 1,242,456
12,81941,70157,400160,958582,795127, 51845,210315,8892,6402, 730
53,440
25,59218,45535,70210,93374,11916,29476,26331,2702,25632,566
1,349,660 j 425,283
1925 I 1924
42, 41027,15823,25219,78924,9318,421
50,85210,37348S 99529,4022,117
35, 543
323,243
1,6712,455
» 2,231
1,4425,654
175
13,628
1925
2,0153,302
51 3,402
1,5475,126
211
15,003
1 Includes 17,000 bales grown in. miscellaneous territory.
75164—26f-—6
2 Includes 22,000 bales grown in miscellaneous territory*
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
34 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN JANUARY, 102(1
BUSINESS STATISTICS FOR THE UNITED STATESINDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY IN 1925
According to statistics based upon recordsof the first 11 months, the volume of manu-facturing in 1925 was greater than in anyprevious year. Production of minerals, owingto the small production of bituminous coalearly in the year and the anthracite strike inthe autumn, averaged somewhat less than in1923. Construction activity, as measured b}^the volume of permits issued and of contractsawarded, was far in excess of ail previousrecords; and this was an important factor inmaintaining a high rate of production in many
an increasing rate of production per employee.Although at a lower level relative to previousyears, the general trend of monthly fluctuationsin factory employment and earnings during1925 was "comparable with that of manufactur-ing production. The indexes of employmentand pay rolls are shown on the chart on page 26.
Fluctuations in production during 1925 wererelatively stable throughout the year, with aslight recession in the summer months, owingtoc declines in a few particular industries.At all times, however, activity was greater
INDEXES OF INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY
MANUFACTURING PRODUCTION- -M INERAL PRODUCTION
25
1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1.924 1925
industries. Distribution of commodities, ac-cording to statistics of railroad freight ship-ments and of retail and wholesale trade, hasbeen correspondingly large in volume.
Factory employment and pay rolls weregreater than in 1924, but were at a lower levelthroughout the year than in 1923. Accordingto the Federal Reserve Board's indexes,manufacturing production in 1925 was nearly30 per cent greater than in 1919 and about 5per cent greater than in 19235 while the num-ber employed in factories in 1.925 was smallerthan in both 1919 and 1923, and their earningswere less than in 1923 and only 7 per centgreater than in 1919. These figures indicate
than in corresponding months of 1924. Theoutput of steel ingots during the year totaledmore than in any previous year, despite acurtailment of production in iron and steelindustries during the summer. The auto-mobile industry broke all previous recordsdaring 1925 in both monthly and annualproduction, and output of gasoline and tireswas correspondingly large. The building mate-rials industries—lumber, cement, and brick—equaled or exceeded output of earlier years.Cotton and woolen textiles were active earlyin the year, but later became less so. Thesilk industry, on the other hand, had a year ofmaximum production.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JANUAUY, 1 0 2 6 FEDERAL KESERVE BULLETIN 35
Among the minerals, petroleum productionexceeded that of previous years, and morecopper and zinc were mined than in any yearsince the war. Bituminous coal productionwas low in the early months and at a maximum
rate of output at the end of the year. Owing tothe small wheat crop and reduced shipments oflivestock during 1925, movements of agriculturalcommodities to market were smaller than in1924, a year of exceptionally heavy marketings.
INDEX OF PRODUCTION IN BASIC INDUSTRIES 1
[Index and relatives for each industry adjusted for seasonal variations. Monthly average, 1919=100]
Lumber
120116128
192cJanuary,February.March.AprilMay.June.July.AugustSeptember.October...November
Food products
Animals slaughteredbg
meltings | G a t t l e j C a l v e s | g h e e p
JanuaryFebruary.MarchAprilMay_JuneJulyAugustSeptember.OctoberNovember-
12510995
10599
101105109114121126
10411696
106106101113120
1. 1
2
! This table contains for certain months the index numbers of production in basic industries which are shown in the chart at the bottom of pageS, together with the series of relatives used in constructing the index, In making the final index the relatives are adjusted to allow for seasonalfluctuations and are weighted. The methods of construction were described in detail and all relatives for each series since January, 1913, were pub-lished on pages 1414-1421 of the BULLETIN for December, 1922.
INDEX OF EMPLOYMENT IN MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES *
[Monthly average, 1919=1001
Year and month
1924OctoberNovembe"December
1925January.February._MarchAprilMayJuneJnlyAugustSeptember. _OctoberNovember ...
Generalindex
92. 792.594.1
94.495.896.495. 994. 99-t. 293.193. 995.197. 0\)7. 2
Metals andproducts
Groupindex
82.582.8Set 7
87. 589.690.189. 288.086. 985. 686.1S7.489. 491. 0
Ironandsteel
82.182.485.2
87.1.89.189. 588. 787. 586.384.985.4SO. 688.489. 9
•: Text i le
1 Group :i index j
. 93.6 •: 93.1 :
96.2
97.4 ,. 99.9 i
100. 0i 98.9, 96.4i 95.4 j
i 93.31 94.0: 94.1; 96.9 .i 97.3 .
s and products
95.4 91.496.1
100.0
100.6 :
101.4101.0 :100.899.1 :97.593. "i93.6 :93.397. 799. J
89.293.2
93.497.998. G90, 592.992. 8(>3 494. 5'Jo. 1a.i>. 895. 0
Lum- !her jand !
prod- :
ucts j
101.9 '101.1 :301.0
99.8 ;100.4 i99.6 i
100.6 •99.8 !
100.1 .• 99 3' 99.9102.2102. 8102. 0 ,
Rail-roadvehi-cles
89.889.189. 7
89.389.889.988.884.984, 784. 584. 583. 783. 082. 0
Auto- imobiles'
98.696.399.3
103.8 ,105.1112.7121.7128.5 "1 2 2 . 8 :122.2 i124.2120.4137.7
Paperand
print-ing
104.5105. 2105.9
105.1104.9105. 7104. 7103. 8103.5103.4103. 2104.3106.0107.2
! Food ••1 and ;, prod- j
ucts
92.2 <• 90.6 !
91.1 ;
: 83.4 :
88.5 !1 8fi.2 ;
S3.0 !. 83.2 ;: Sfi.6 i
8;"'. 4 1: 85.9 j
88.0 !
90.6 !89.(3 ;
Leather,and :
prod-ucts
89.288. 787.9
90.992. 592.588.886.883.08;5. 790. 292.191.8
Stone,clay,andglass
118.8117.7116.1
109. 7110.7116.8123.2125.5125.912 L. 3124.8125. 3124.7123.1
To-baccoprod-ucts
83.391.891.1
87. 087. 788. 581. 787.085.885. 9So. 087.190. i89. 7
\ Chem-! icalsI and. prod-
: UCtS
: 71.972.574.1
74. 074. 675. 575. 473.2
; 72.9i 73.0
72. 675.476. -1
1 This table contains for certain months index numbers of employment, together with group indexes for important industrial components. Thegeneral index is a weighted average of relatives for 34 individual industries.. The method of construction was described in detail and indexes for theabove groups since January, 1919, were published on pages 324-325 of the BULLETIN for May, 1925. See also page 668 of BULLETIN for September,1925, for certain revisions.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
36 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN JANUAEYJ 1926
INDEX OF PAY ROLLS IN MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES *
[Monthly average, 1919««1QO]
Year and month .General!! index
1924 iOctober . . . ; 102.6November ! 100.8December I 105.6
1925January ! 102.9February : 108. 5M a r c h . . . ! 110.1Aprii l 107.3May.. . ; 107.4June i 104.8July I 102.4August.. i 104.5September j 103.9October...... ...! 111.3November _ _ J 111.7
Metals andproducts
Groupindex
84.985.191.6
92.996.397.294.494.091.186.389.788.796.297.7
Ironandsteel
i Textiles and products Luxn-ber
! i i ' andI Group v, . • ^ Prod- prod-i index , ucts : ucts
84. 7 I 103. 0 ; 105.6 ".84.5 99.1 i 104.591.1 107.5 : 113.9
99.8 : 111. 292. 5 . 110.299.7 111.9
92.6 I95.8 I90. 5 j93,. 9 i94.. 0 !90,4 i86,1 !88.8 j87. 7 j95.3 |96. 3.
108.6113.4114.4108.0105.0101.8101,2103.899.1
107.5107.0
112. 9114.2114.2111.7109.9 ;103.9100.9101.796.6 I
107.9 .!109.0 !
103.3112.4114.7 :103.599.098.8
101.6106.2 •102.1107. 0 ;104. 5
103.1108.5109. 7107.9108.6109. 7105. 9108.0111. 8117.2116.7
i
Rail-roadvehi-cles
97.694.697.4
91.5100.0100.2
95.491.690.486.788,084.989.291.4
Auto-mo-biles
116.8111.4114.5
99.9132.1142.9156. 2163.9151. 2150.0146.1155.3178.0178.9
Paper j Foodsand ! and
print- i prod-ing i ucts
135.8 ; 103.2136. 0 ! 102. 5139.9 I 104.5
Leather! Stone,and clay,
prod- i anducts ' "
138.2 i137.5 !139.4137.1 ;136.7 i135.5 j133.8 !133.7 i135.8 i142.3 !145.4 i
100.499.898.894.097.2
100.098,999.1
100.0104.5103.6
1
I To-j bacco
prod-I ucts
J..
96.2 149.687.9 j 145.1 j91.5 143.6 I
85.597.9
100.0
95.399.7
100. 091.590.3 j85.189.0 i98.9 j94.8 I95.8 \87.9 !
128.8 I136.4 |143.4 !
149.9 !
154. 6 i154.3 i145.9 I155.7151.6156.8155.4 J
93.587.088.374.290.990.389.090.090.097.198.7
Chem-icalsand
prod-ucts
95.495.598.2
97.099.7
101.697.698.495.795.693.194.9
101.3103.6
* This table contains for certain months index numbers of pay rolls, together with- group indexes for important industrial components. Thegeneral index is a weighted average of relatives for 34 individual industries. The method of construction was described in detail and indexes for theabove groups since January, 1919, were published on pages 324-325 of the BULLETIN for May, 1925. Seo also page 668 of BULLETIN for September,1925, for certain revisions.
INDEXES OF INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY i
[No seasonal adjustment. Monthly average, 1919** 100]
Agricultural movements
Year and month ii Total
I Ani-Live- i malstock ! prod-1 ucts
j1924 i
October ..; 193November.. 160December I 143
1925 !January I 118F b | 88FebruaryMarchApril. J. I—1.1-MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember-
104152168159
123120132
12294918786
91
117105
104123
8990
108123139164150119101101159
Grains
230156120
112767340627599
1.3314990
108
Cot- Vege-ton j tables
278 ,271 i231 !
127 i79 i71 i4328 !
SI75 ;234310277 !
13686
130121128125135142110107204233116
Fruits
35015786
8572
10694
13692
151121244391177
To-bacco
165148184
292161531751
<*)73
171166223
Mineral production
TotalAn-thra-citecoal
i
134122130
141119123118125125129136121130125
10592100
1019896102111106113
2117112
Bitu-mi-nouscoal
125108119
13410097879196
102116121137131
!Petro-leum
190179180
180171191194216212214212206204197
Pig I Cop-iron
9799116
132126140128115105105106107 i119 i118 j
per
137136135
148137149140140139136135134
3141135
Zinc
108109121
128119131124127117121122121129129
Lead
147145143
146131154143147151145143138
a 164155
119119120
1171071041091111181141041082 98101
Manufacturing production
Year and month
OctoberNovember-December. .
1924
JanuaryFebruary. . .MarchAprilM a y . . .JuneJulyAugustSeptember.OctoberNovember _
1925
tal
124113117
127120134132129125126121126141129
Ironandsteel
108108125
145132147128121112109118120134134
Auto-mo-biles
178140125
142169223260250239239153193270225
as113105111
121114122119109105107104107118115
Foodprod-ucts
114108117
118
958887949798
10511498
Lum-ber
160132122
145134150155165ieo164167ISO172138
Paperand
print-ing
133128127
135125142142136133125128128139131
shoes\ Petro- Cement
andbrick
101 j84 !90 i
186185196
89 I9199 i9684 i82 ;85 I95 !96 i10182
169148138
199186204201212216222222209218 |
To-bacco
131114106
118105116113119 j133135127131 '141 i120 i
Rub-bertires
191155163
171176190193195194202203183185156
1 For description and early figures see BXJLLETIN for March, 1924, and for certain revisions see p. 739 of the October, 1925, BULLETIN.2 Revised. 3 Preliminary. * Less than one-half of 1 per cent.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JANUARY,1020 FEDEBAL BESBRVE BULLETIN 37
COMMODITY MOVEMENTS
The following statistics are secured from va-rious sources and compiled in the form givenbelow by the board's division of research andstatistics. Earlier figures (in most cases since1919) can be obtained from previous issues ofthe BULLETIN or upon application to the divi-sion of research and statistics. Federal ReserveBoard.
No-vem-ber,1925
Octo-ber.,1925
No-vem-ber,1924
Grain and Flour
Receipts at 17 interior centers (000 omitted): iWheat (bushels) _. _ . . 35,581Corn (bushels),_.„ ' 19,764Oats (bushels) • 14,596Rye (bushels) _ __J 2,598Barley (bushels)— L 4,791
34,690 ;11.9U719,210 i3,3C4 :0,445 !
59, 583.15,9141 9,4588,9327. 258
Total grain (bushels).. : 77,330 I 75,652 ! 111,148
Flour (barrels) I 2,741 j 3,322 ; 2, 698
Total grain and flour (bushels) . 89,666 j 90,600 [ 123,287
Shipments at 14 interior centers (000 omitted): :
Wheat (bushels) 25,724 ; 24,783 ! 18,0-10Corn (bushels) 6,863 ' 7, 750 . 5, 7(i0Oats (bushels) „ • 13,234 ;• 15,233 . 14,828Rye (bushels) 1,071! i,303 ' 5.045Barley (bushels) 2,471 j 4.744. 4,9-19
Total grain (bushels) 49,304 I 53,813 , 79, 228Flour (barrels) _ _ j 3,979 | 4,869 i 4,395
Total grain and flour (bushels) 67,208 " 75,724 j 99,008
Stocks at 11 interior centers at close of month(000 omitted):
Wheat (bushels)..Corn (bushels) __. _Oats (bushels)..Rye (bushels)Barley (bushels)..
27,489 ! 31,453 j2,002 1,270 i
50,140 : 57,332 !10,089 ; 8,689 !4, 08.2 I 4, COO i
0 , 350/i, 148
57, 57313,4493,292
Total grain (bushels) ._ 100,708 103,644 I 143,817
Receipts at 9 seaboard centers (000 omitted):Wheat (bushels)..Corn (bushels).Oats (bushels)Rye (bushels)Barley (bushels)
Total grain (bushels).Flour (barrels.
19,720 '•• 18,499 '1,301 : 1, -'482,203 . 3, ;72 i
407 i i54 i4,202 • 5,920 :
22, 409578
2, 5894,1167.281
27,893 , 28,893 j 37,0341,917 :- 2, 119 ! 2,191
Total grain and flour (bushels) ! 36,519 ; 38, 423 ! 46, 892
Stocks at 8 seaboard centers at close of month !(000 omitted): :
Wheat (bushels)... ......;Corn (bushels) !Oats (bushels).... JRye (bushels) :Barley (bushels) i
4,986254 197
4443,177
5,040 ! 12,. 855494
2,4424; 5163,111
1,550 : 2.027 i'" ' ' 301 !
3. 519 j
10,412 11/084 1 23,418
10,809 13,165 j 11,615
Total grain (bushels) __j
Wheat flour production (barrels, 000 omitted).|
Tobacco i
Tobacco sales at loose-leaf warehouses ;(pounds, 000 omitted): ;
Dark belt Virginia ; 5.659Bright belt Virginia I 20,079North Carolina „„_•: 86,139South Carolina_..__ - 5,542 ,Burley —-. ! 355 117Western dark J 383 75
10.197 j82, 720
3,30416,89245,180
40572
Transportation
Revenue freight loaded and received fromconnections (ears loaded, 000 omitted):
Classified by nature of products-Grain and grain productsLivestockCoalCoke.... _Forest productsOre.Merchandise, 1. c. 1Miscellaneous
No-vem-ber,1925
Octo-ber,1825
Mo-vein-ber,1924
I Total..
Classified by geographical divisions-EasternAlleghenyPocahontasSouthernNorthwesternCentral westernSouthwestern
205 .146769 •65 '
277 1134 ;
1.079 !
1,590 ;
4,265 ;
952 ':
840 :
242637 :581 :701313 ;
20839184162
3.16222
1, 2181, 923
4r 981
1,107963264727745830345
2291667624228878
1, 0241, 492
4, 081
041797202631531G61318
Total _._ | 4,265 ; 4,981 4,081
BUILDING STATISTICS
Building permits issued in 168 cities,, groupedby Federal reserve districts:
Number of pe rmi t s -Boston (14 cities)New York (22 citias)Philadelphia (14 cities)Cleveland (] 2 cities)Richmond (15 cities)Atlanta (lo cities)....Chicago (19 cities)St. Louis (5 cities)Min neapolis (9 cities)Kansas City (14 cities)Dallas (9 cities)San 2Trancisco (20 clLies)
Total.
Value of permits (dollars, 000 omitted)—Boston (14 cities)New York (22 cities) _..Philadelphia (14 cities)Cleveland (12 cities)Kichmond (15 cities)Atlanta (15 cities) ._Chicago (19 cities)St. Louis (5 cities)Minneapolis (9 cities)Kansas City (14 cities)..Dallas (9 cities)San Francisco (20 cities)..... __
2,2149,288 -2,005 •"3.902 :
3,363 •3,9609,926 I2,192 j1, 009 i2.068 :
2; 033 i10,248 !
3,15211,3752,7205, 9433,9715, 58013,5172,6701.9292,8522,34412,308
52,808 I 63,361
11.097106} 967J 8, 00110,17415.00514,45158, 0886, 7587,1926,2375,343
27,884
Total 293,857
Building contracts awarded, by Federalreserve districts (dollars, 000 omitted):
Boston ..__ __New York... _Philadelphia.Cleveland ._.RichmondAtlantaChicago _St. Louis . . .MinneapolisKansas City 1Dallas _.._,
34,863163, 52324,99437, 37123,26446,24477,00334,9328,35812,(58111, 560
14,244129,31322, 29924,35412,62418,86657,8977,9094,4229,52113,25232,335
2,0108,6592,2414, 7983,9803,39210, 7992,2541,4552,4432,1669,608
54,465
11,98160,56911,90716, 04111,6117,75150,1365,8524,9436,6255,31328,604
347,036 ! 227.993
37,269 ! 2-1,622143,605 j 110,31232,239 ! 24,90671,298 i 55,35729,780 21,97059,82289,94230,994,10,25111.63113,423
26,42970, 79028,4008, 1767,139
11,810
rotal (11 districts).... 474,793 1530,254 ;! 389,971
1 Excluding Colorado.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
38 FEDEKAL, RESERVE BULLETIN J A N u A.U Y, 1920
WHOLESALE AND RETAIL TRADE
WHOLESALE TRADE IN THE UNITED STATES BY LINES[Average monthly sales 1919=100]
1924
February.MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugust.
October..November-.December..
1G25 j.7 anuary jFebruary--•• --!March _!April iMay ;.sane !July iAugust |September ,.jOctober JN o vember :
Gen- .era! iindex '.,
80 !78 '
80 i78 j77 ;70 ;78 ;83 :
92 '95 '84 :79
79 :
70 !
83 .79 •
79 iS3 !S3 !8794 •
301 •
87 '
Gro-ceries
80 177 '8079 :
8i ;83 '83 !
83 i93100 j89 i83 i
i80 !
73 !7G '75 '79 !
848o iS3 :
92 :
9990 =
Meat .Dry
goods•. Shoes Hard-
ware Drugs
66 i03 !62 !G I :04 jG40768 !71 i78 i69 i68 i
71 iGG ;73 j68 j75 I79 i79;78 ,82 !87 i78 j
9 7 ;9 8 ;90 j
72 '70 ;
79 !102 :
116104 •88 •77 ,
82 |88 ,96 !
^ \82 I85
ICG11211891 i
4 9 ••49 i65 i6956 !52 I44 !56 i69 jG7 '57 !57 !
«i46 !63 j6554 !54 i47 i65 i72 !77 j5 9 ;•
91 !90 I
104 I108 i104 ;
93 I93 i
106 i110 |
98 i99 I
89 |90 :
107 |107 !101 '1059998109122103
1101091 IS114110105110107117128109109
116109121115106110111108120133110
' For description of the wholesale trade index see FEDERAL RESERVEBULLETIN for April, 1923,
CHANGE IN CONDITION OF WHOLESALE TRADE, BY LINESAND D I S T R I C T S
Percentage change Percentage changein sales, November, in stocks at end of
1925, compared : November, 1925,with— compared with1—
! October, i Novem- October, ! Novem-: 1925 ' I bcr, 1924 1925 ] bcr, 1924
Groceries:United Stales •:Boston districtNew York districtPhiladelphia (jistrictCleveland districtRichmond district "At lan ta district •Chicago d is trictSt. Louis district __.Minneapolis district „:
Kansas C i ty d istrict 'Dallas districtSan Francisco district
D r y goods:United States ,New York district :Philadelphia district :C leveland district..._Richmond distr ict .Atlanta districtChicago district .St. Louis districtMinneapolis district..Kansas Ci ty districtDallas districtSan Francisco district
Shoes:Uni ted States „B oston districtNew York districtPhiladelphia districtCleveland districtRichmond districtAtlanta d is trictChicago distr ict .St. Louis distr ict . .Minneapolis districtSan Francisco district
-8.6— 7 . 5-4.8- ! ) . 3-12.2-5.1)-14.5
—K'.3 '-G. 0 i-1.0.7 I— 12.1 I-4. 8 |
-22.7!-3.7 .-21.1 !-20. 9 \-30.2 :-3-i. 4 '
1.0- 1 . 5
.3—0. 7
.44. 98.1
-(>. 1- . 82. 5
0.4 4.814. 7
—5. 9.8
1.2
2 2- o ! o
2 2!i .~c~
3.3
CHANGI? IN CONDITION OF WHOLESALE TRADE, BY LINESAND DISTRICTS—Continued
I Percentage change j Percentage chaDge'• in sales, November, \ in stocks at end of• 1925, compared | November, 1925,j with— j compared with i—
i October,! 1925
Novem- ; October, ' Novem-ber, 19241 1925 i ber, 1924
- 9 . 33.725. 3-{>. 0 - 7 . G- 2 . 8 '- 3 . 5 - 8 . 5
8.9
-1.9
-2. 6
—23. i :-G . 2 i
- 1 8 . 1 '- 2 9 . 0 .—14. 0 ;
22 8 :
—22°. o !—18.0 i- 1 8 . 1 I—20.' '
—3. G- 7 . G
- J o . 95.1
-1.5.010.2
4.51.3.913.213.3
-5 .G
- 0 . 2- 1 2 . 4
- 3 . i3.8
-1G.4
- 1 . 7- 2 . 9
-28.7 i 1.1-27.0 ! 14.0-29.2 j -17.3 !-13. 8 ; -16. 8-18.6 11.4-18.0 I 8.3!
--7. 8
~9.T
- 1 8 . 7- 9 . 534. 3
-.12. 7
—17. 5
-3 . 42. 0
-29.720.9
- 4 . 5 ,
—.0
2.4 ,
-10.9 ,
6.4
2.52.4
9.4
~9.~9
Hardware: : ! iUnited States ' —15.1 i 5.9 i - . 7 - . 9New York district I - 1 2 . 8 ! 5 .8 ' -11.4Philadelphia district ' -14.6 | 1.8 j - 3 . 7 . -35.2Cleveland district... _i —19.0 .81 :Richmond district. _ j -13. 3 1.0Atlanta district ._..! —10. 2 27. 2Chicago district - 2 0 . 9 1.0St. Louis district —21.1 1.2Minneapolis district —7.2 4.3Kansas Ci ty district —18.0 —4.1 ' __Dallas district..... —19.3 2.3 : 2. 1 ' 0.0San Francisco district - 1 3 . 9 . 8. 0 ; !
Drugs: ; \United States —15.8 2 . 7 ; 1 .3, 7.4New York distrfct -27 .5 - 3 . 4 j _..iPhiladelphia district - 8 . 2 5. 5 , •Cleveland district —i —I2.G 5. 6 • j _Richmond district ! —10.0 2.1 'Atlanta district.... ; -14.! . 7.2iChicago district j -14 .7 4 . 8 :St. Louis district '• - 3 . 8 8.4Kansas City district j -13 .7 1.0Dallas district. _ . . J - L 7 . 0 . - 7 . 4 ;San Francisco district : — 1L. 9 G. 0
Furniture: ; :Richmond district ' —10.0 1.2.5:Atlanta district ,_J -iO.O 21.0:St. Louis district : -17 .0 <{.{)•• '17.8: -10. ZKansas City district • -14 .8 . - 5 . 1 '• •San Francisco district ! —13.7 14 .6 : :__
Agricultural implements: ' ! \United States « I - 2 2 . 5 20.5 j !Atlanta district ' ' !Minneapolis district .! —1.2 22. 5 j :
Dallas district | - 1 5 . 3 - 2 2 . 2 ; 2 . 4 - —4.1San Francisco district . - 2 7 . 5 22.8 .
Stationery and paper: INew York district ' —8.1 10. 9 :
Philadelphia district I — 9 . 5 : 3 . 7 .At lanta disirict . . . J - 3 5 . 3 22.1 .San Francisco district : —7.8 2. 8 :_
Automobile? supplies:San Francisco district ; - G . 9
Clothing: :New York district —517 ; —17.5 _!
St. Louis dis t r ic t . . ' - 3 2 . 4 - 8 . 3 :
Cotton jobbers: iNew York district _. _, - 2 5 . 0 • 2. 8 . •
Silk goods: : :New York district ! — 5. 2 32. 2 !__
Machine tools: ; : iNew York district : -6 .4 i 33.1! ;
Diamonds: ,New York district i —10.0- 30.8 '
•Jewelry: :New York district 3.0 13.7Philadelphia district > - 8 . 1 • 15.0 —8.0.
Electrical supplies: ,Philadelphia district j — 9. 7 • 13.2 5 . 1 .Atlan ta district_ , G. 3 i 66. 5 •St. Louis district \ —(5.8 : 37. G -.San Francisco district ' - 4 . 1 : 14. 8
Millinery: j ; :
Kansas Ci ty district ; —6-1.8 ; —.3 !
Stoves: \St. Louis district i - 3 3 . 4 . G.6 3 . 5 ! —21.4
4.0
5.8 '
- 9 . 5
3 4G. 7
^ 8. 5- 1 . 6
-17.7
-21." 5
1 Changes in total stocks for the United States are weighted averagescomputed on the basis of firms which have reported regularly to theFederal reserve system since January, 1923.,
2 Sales of agricultural implements for the United States are compiledby the Chicago Federal Reserve Bank from reports of leading manufac-turers and include all of their domestic business.
3 Stocks at 1st of month—quantity, not value.4 Includes diamonds.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JANUARY, 1.920 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN 89
HETAJIL TEASE, BY REPORTING LINES I
[Average monthly sales 1919= 100]
Sales without seasonal adjustment; Sales with seasonal adjustment
Year and month «¥ ' 32 2
^S-HTS 2 2-e-™.> cy: pa K M op.' «:*
O bi> I (
August.September...OctoberNovember..December..
192493
119341141210
1925January ....- ! 108February _ 1 101March j 121\oril -...: 130
May \ 128June.._. .— I 125.July i 95August _.. I 93Sept ember ' 122October ' 16RNovember _; 145
74 ! 201 '106 210 •141 24Q131 . 232 !
148 ' 253
1081051193.17 :
951028739113170
250 ;233 !
252 :258 •
254 ;
254 :259;243 i243 :318
144 • 2C8
172 •
109 :203 jlyQ :3oo;
151 !150 (377 ;J95 !191 j
187 !
383 !195 i391 !237 j220 !
152145 :
159345187 .
13813714413S192 !
108 j124 "138 !140
91
124
in186 i 384
ISO 118•189 131109 i 124186 120282 • 131
155 ' 122 i140 3.39 :
100 ! 3.31159 134103107lfifi171
1 4 3 ••134.130 i142 !
109 ! 342379 353107 , 136
107100
177149152 :122320 •
129 ir>4 :130 j
92991053079009104A2S336141.139
175 :
188230.195184J81202202215195 •
124131 !121133124 :32f,128125234345
98 ,112 i109 :505 •
123
1101101C3 :134306 :
120317 '118 .320 !
211221 .2154230212
249243
257209255255309200
181 : 3 51 : 143 j 138 :183 i 147 ; 137 I 129188 , 150 j i37 j 122 :
191 ; 1M 139 ! J34108 ! 153 ! K2
102 '110 i302 i
98
ITS392
IS
20918.20S203203201205200219211
I i 161 ! 141 I 141101 : 140 I 149159 : 135 ! 127 i104 • 139 152 i1C0 [ 140 ! 3 29 j
170 I 337 j 142 i104 i371 i172 ''175 !177 !
137 134145 ! 153142 i 135146 | 145138 120
112 ,120 ;110 :
1213 .J.36 •125140 i143 i136 !117 ;311
•93207ifcO
2!0202197
202204209205
i For description of the retail trade indexes see Federal "Reserve Bulletins for January and March, 1924.s index of sales of grocery chains revised. Comparable indes numbers for all months since January, 3919, may be obtained from Division of
Research and Statistics, Federal Reserve Board.
DEPARTMENT STOKE SALES, BY FEDERAL ESSEEVS DISTRICTS
•Average inon-:hly sales 1919=100]
Federal reserve district
United States.
BostonNew YorkPhiladelphia...ClevelandRichmondAtlanta.ChicagoMinneapolis...DallasSan Francisco..
; Sales without seasonal adjustmentNum-
ber ,of re-port- '•ing : ,-
firms : „ !
:• ]\OV.
Sales with seasonal adjustment
1925 1924 1925 3924
359 j
24 :
0322 ;54 I23 !35 !03 !
232131 i
145
143358108133140122153105115158
Oct.
165
156186107100160139373135141108
Sept.
122
1181281111151058914531)4
11?139
Aug.
98
88908fl103877811392<>:.•
."July ! Nov, Oct. ; Nov. ! Oct.
95
9294859891781058172123
141
140153153139137113154111315144
Hlj137 I1 6 1 •1 4 4 •134 !137
136120157 !
129 !
130 ;137 j130 '123 ,125100 ;
138 !98 !
145
1421551453461391.17358320120154
Sept. : Aug. July ! Nov. j Oct.i ' ; i
134 I 125 ; 128 320
130146137;129 "323 .300153104 :112 !
149
317 i132118 •326 :12199 ,137 j102 !108 !144 i
129 I134 !120 j
127 !124 i103 !138 ;99 j102 j147 ;
128132118128317OH139103100112
19413/;126122120] 00j 1'2103107144
Federal reserve district
DEPARTMENT STORE STOCKS, BY FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICTS
[Average monthly stocks 1919=100]
United States.
BostonNew YorkPhiladelphia-Cleveland...RichmondAtlantaChicagoMinneapolis...DallasSan Francisco..
Num-ber
of re-port-ing
firms
314
240333523922 i5i !22 |1929
Stocks without seasonal adjustment
1925 . ! 1924
Nov.
164
140153213145147120173124135
Oct.
149
132H8210141 |138 I124 I108 j122135347
Sept. j Aug. ' July j Nov. • Oct.
143 i 131 : 124 ! 148
Stocks with seasonal adjustment
1925
I !Nov. Oct. I Sept. Aug. : July
; 1924
Nov. i Oct.
125 !140 '195337 !
135 •12.1159 •320334140 .
3 2 4 ••179 \12f. ;
u s •
l'l<J ;1 1 1 •
m !13S i
113120 i364 :120 :119 ;303 ."140300H i129
141 :347 i372 !145 I345 |123 i108 :
122332 ;14S
148
135 ;
34G :
171 \140 !343 i120 |370 '121 I133 !347 j
137
121385192321)1291.13154113122135
134 |
137 I133 I188 j120 j319 i111 !150 I112 i319 i136 <
133;
118131.181 .328 j122 :
311J48 :1.15 :119 !133 ;
131 ! 133 ; 132 i
120 .J28 j
120 j114 i343 •
313 ;117132 ;
332
122 .130 :
i7o:127 ;
327 :
110150 :
112120 ;135 =
122 '329 '155 :120 ;127:no i1*19 i112 'US j135 i
120331353330124112152111IIS130
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
40 EEDEKAL BESERYE BULLETIN JANUAKY, 192 0
FOREIGN BANKING AND BUSINESS CONDITIONSTHE LONDON MONEY MARKET IN 1925
The advance in the discount rate of theBank of England from 4 to 5 per cent onDecember 3 restored it to the level that pre-vailed at the time of the resumption of thegold standard last spring. The open-marketbill rate also rose to about 5 per cent in themiddle of December, the highest level in overfour years, this advance being a continuationof the general upward trend which had pre-vailed, except for a decline from July to Octo-ber of this year, from the middle of 1923.
At the opening of 1925 the London bill ratestood at about 3 ^ per cent, a level well overthe New York market, whether on acceptances,call loans, or commercial paper. By the mid-dle of February, owing to a- rise in the NewYork rates, the differential between the Londonand New York money markets had practicallydisappeared, but the rise in the London raleto about A.% per cent following the advancein the New York discount rate at the end ofFebruary restored the differential. Althoughthe Bank of England rate was raised from 4to 5 per cent in the first week of March, thebill rate developed an easier tendency, andby the end of April it stood, at about i}4 percent and remained during May and June atthat level, which was more than 1 per centabove the New York acceptance rate andabout one-half per cent above the call andcommercial paper rates.
After the end of June the London bill ratebegan to decline until in the first week ofAugust it was 4 per cent, or 1 per cent belowthe bank rate, and on August 5 the officialrate was reduced to 4}/o per cent. The down-ward movement of the market rate in July co-incided with an influx of gold and was com-monly attributed to it, but this explanation docsnot appear to agree with the facts. Since goldis not at present used as money in circulationin England and is not held as cash by thecommercial banks, an increase in the supplyof credit in the London market arising fromgold imports must be reflected in increases inthe deposits of the Bank of England, which area portion of the reserves of the j oint-stock banks,or in a growth in currency in circulation. Sofar as can be ascertained from the statementsof the bank, the effects on the market of thisinflux of nearly £9,000,000 of gold were largelyneutralized by an equivalent decline in secur-ity holdings of the Bank of England, leaving
the bank's deposits practically unchanged,and there was no considerable change incurrency in circulation. This is brought outby the following table:
A pr. 29, 1925.Au?. 5, 1925. . . .
Net change
THE BANK OF ENGLAND
[Millions of pounds]
1 1 !! ' Govern- ••1 : merit '
i G o l d | other. sccuri-
; : ties
. ' li>i). 7 '' 1 1 3 . 1 •
! 1C4.5 ! 101.7
'• 4-8.8 i —11.3
Totaldeposits
122. 5121. 5
- 1 . 0
Notes inthe re-servo ofbankingdepart-ment
25.336.1
+10.8
It would seem, therefore, that the influx ofgold was not accompanied by an increase in thevolume of credit actually employed in themarket, and the easing of money rates duringthat period may be ascribed to a diminisheddemand for bank credit due to a slackening inbusiness activity. Between January and Aug-gust there had been a considerable decline incommodity prices, a noticeable slackening incertain kinds of production and in the export
1323 192*
trade, increasing "unemployment, and a con-siderable degree of uncertainty as to theeconomic outlook, further complicated bypossibilities of serious labor difficulties in thecoal industry.
These influences causing a decline in thedemand for credit, continued to be operative
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Tj I92G FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN 41
through August and September, and moneyrates eased further, notwithstanding the factthat the direction of gold mo Yemen ts hadchanged and exports on a considerable scale hadbegun, Between August 5 and early Octoberthe market rate had fallen below Z% per cent,and was again about I per cent below the bankrate, and the official rate was reduced to 4 percent on October 1. In the market the£4,000,000 of gold exports were more thanoffset by an increase of nearly £ll,000,0C0in the security holdings of the bank, and itstotal deposits increased hj £9,000,000.
The relation of money rates in London tothose in the New York market had undergonea fundamental change during this period. Upto early August, the London bill rates had beenabove the Now York rates not only on accep-tances, but also on commercial paper and oncall loans. Since August it had been contin-uously below both the renewal rate and thecommercial paper rate. In the first week o:October, when* the London bill rate stood at3% per cent, it was below the New York Iacceptance rate, nearly 1 per cent below thecommercial paper rate, and almost^2 per centbelow the call-loan renewal rate. Under suchcircumstances the retention in London of fundswhich could bo put into the call or commercialpaper market in New York became unprofit-able, and it is understood that there was aconsiderable movement of funds from Londonto New York, resulting in a low exchange rateattended by a further'loss of gold, not merelyto New York, but to Amsterdam and Zurich.
During the period of gold exports betweenAugust and October, increases in the Bank ofEngland's security holdings had offset theeffect of the loss of gold on the money market.In the first two weeks of October this situationwas altered. In addition to a further loss inthe fortnight of nearly £5,000.000 of gold, thesecurity holdings of the bank declined"by over£15,000,000 and total deposits consequentlydecreased by £18,000,000/ These movementswere accompanied by a sharp upturn in themarket rate, which rose to 3% per cent earlyin November and to 4 per cent by the end ofthat month. The last statement of Novem-ber, however, showed that a further loss of£9,000,000 of gold during the preceding sixweeks had been more than counterbalanced bythe increase of £20,000,000 of securities andthe level of deposits had been restored.,
The drain on the London market throughgold exports, which late in the year was in-tensified by heavy demand from the EastIndies, was accompanied by a growth in the
demand for credit arising out of a. revival oftrade and production, a decrease in unemploy-ment, and considerable activity in the securitymarkets. Furthermore, on November 5 theembargo on foreign loans had been removed,,All these factors contributed to the tighten-ing of conditions in the London market in theautumn months, which preceded the advancein the Bank of England rate from 4 to 5 percent on December 3.
That the changes from August 5, when thebank rate was reduced from. 5 per cent, to thatof the first week in .December, when the ratewas raised to 5 per cent, reflect an increaseddemand for credit rather than a decrease in thesupply of credit is indicated by the followingtaole:
THE BANK OF ENGLAND
Apr. 30, 1925._.Aug. 5, 1925 ._Nov. 25, 1925
[In millions of pounds]
\ !
! Gold j: !
155,7 '.104,5 !1*G 7 i
I
Secur-ities
113.1101.7117.2
Deposits
122.5121 5125.7
Notes inbankingdepart-ment
25.3SG 122.7
Between August 5 and November 25 theloss of gold amounted to nearly £18,000,000,but this gold had been replaced bv securitiesto the amount of over £15,000,000, and thetotal deposits were actually larger by about£4,000,000 on the latter "date. The state-ment of November 25 compared with that ofApril 29 shows that in the seven months fol-lowing the return to the gold standard thebank lost £9,000,000 in gold, but as a result ofthe increased holdings of securities the volumeof central bank deposits available to the com-mercial banks was larger at the end than atthe beginning of the period.
Since the beginning of December an addi-tional factor in tightening money conditions inLondon has been the seasonal increase in cur-rency demand for holiday trade and end-of-yearsettlements. The bill rate in London at theend of November was about 4 per cent, butin the two weeks which followed the advancein the bank rate to 5 per cent on December 8 themarket rate hardened rapidly to nearly thesame figure. This movement completely re-versed the relation of the London and NewYork markets which had prevailed betweenAugust and November. With the Londonbill rate at or near 5 per cent, it was almosteven with the New York renewal rate, and 1%per cent above the New York acceptance rate.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
42 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN" ^ 192G
FINANCIAL STATISTICS FOR PRINCIPAL FOREIGN COUNTRIES[Bank figures are for the last report date of month, except for London clearing banks, which are daily averages]
ENGLAND
[Millions of pounds sterling]
Bank of England:Issue department-
Gold coin and bullion.Notes issued
Banking department-Gold and silver coin.. „=BanknotesGovernment securitiesOther securitiesPublic deposits..Other depositsRatio of gold and note reserve
to deposit liabilities (percent)...
Bank notes in circulation *..Currency notes and certificates..,,Nine London clearing banks:
Money at call and short notice . . . jDiscounts and advances :
Investments .._„'Total deposits ,
Total clearings jGovernment floating debt: !
Total . . . . 'Treasury bills iTemporary advances
Index of security prices (December, !1921=100) (per cent) i
Index number of foreign exchange :
value of the pound sterling (percent)
No-vember
.145165
223427714
111
19.588
290
1111,072
2611,0193,243
76'D647122
116,3
127.5
1925
Octo-ber
148188
225307411
103
23.887
292
1121,082
2601,6273,629
772638134
118.7
126.6
Sep-tember
159178
234377627
102
27.489
293
1121,075
2551,8132,996
775644131
116.0
130.9
1924
No-vember
127146
223418219
112
19.3101285
1021,045
3071,6283,317
788624164
117,4
128.1
1 Notes issued, less amounts held in banking department and incurrency note account.
FRANCE[Millions of francs]
Bank of France:Gold reserve*.Silver reserveWar advances to the GovernmentNote circulationTotal deposits
Three commercial bp.nks:Deinand deposits ...BillsOther loans..
Clearings, daily average of Paris
Price, of 3 per cent perpetual rente
3,683 | 3,CS3315 j 310
31,950 I 29,95048,0853,022
40, 6792,517 !
18, 295
1,831 ! 1,47545.20 i 46.15
3,683310
28, 90045, 5572,176
18.16412,1844,880
95147.70
30422, 60040,4471,994
15,37611, 0494,293
95650. 00
* Not including gold held abroad.
CANADA
[Millions of dollars]
J...
Octo-ber
Chartered banks : |Gold coin and bullion 1 __!Current loans and discounts JMoney at call and short not ice—IPubl ic and railway securities iNote c i r c u l a t i o n |
i i d l d
501, 184355573186Note t o . . , |
Individual deposits ! 2,222Gold reserve against Dominion notes.j 112Dominion note circulation ! 215Bank clearings " \ 1,710Bank debits a i 2,867
1925
Sep-tomber
541.128
37J.564170
2,209102200
1,3322,196
August
541,100
338571164
2,1101162C9
1,2482,090
1924
Octo-ber
551,170
269554173
1,708123240
1,7722, 721
i Not including gold held abroad. 1 Total for month.
GERMANY
[Millions of reichsmarks]
Xleichsbank:Gold at home _Gold abroadReserves in foreign exchangeBills of exchange and cheeksMiscellaneous assets....Deposits ._
Reichsmarks in circulation.Rentenmarks in circulationReichsbank clearings _6 Berlin banks: l
CashBillsDue from other banks.™Miscellaneous loansDeposits
Index of security Drices (Jan. 2,1925-™100) (per cent).".
Capital issues _
Novem-ber
1,11197
4021,650
578587
2,7711,611
61. 64504
1925
Octo-ber
1924
Sep- Novem-tember
1,080128348
1,630682618
2,8033,8164,650
1,07699
3191,717
460620
2,6491,8334,382
455240232
2,2901,655
7041,8631,9802,994
1111,142
6352,3914,330
66.1670
70.3531
ber
75
* Bimonthly statements.ITALY
[Millions of lire]
1925
Octo-ber
Banks of issue: \Gold reserve l 1,133Total reserve 2,022*Loans and discounts 10,576Note circulation for commerce i 12,412Note circulation for the State i 7,067Total deposits. _| 2,489
Leading private banks: \Cash ; 991Loans and discounts- = 8,765Due from correspondents.. __.' 4,296Participations 515Total deposits 12,970
State note issue._.. i 2,100Index of security prices (per cent) ! 214
August
1,1322,00710,41212,3637,0682, 538
9638,6594,5605G4
13,2222,100229
i Not including gold held abroad.
JAPAN
[Millions of yen]
1925
1924
Octo-ber
1,1321,8297,603
10,7747,2972,810
9778,3704,088399
12,4242,400241
1924
i Sep- jNovem-I tember j ber
Bank of Japan:Reserve for notes l
Loans and discountsAdvances on foreign bills..Note circulation _.Government deposits...Private deposits..
Tokyo banks:Cast on hand . . .Total loans..Total depositsTotal clearings
1,057 i364 i130
1,05732399
1,33432940
1252,3321,8803,208
1,35424031
1092,3411,8643,241
1,05731183
1,32223233
113 !2,343 ;
1,888 ;3.364 ;
1,061390118
1,36428837
1212,6201,8452,808
* Gold abroad, gold coin and bullion in Japan.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
J .1926 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN 43
CONDITION OF CENTRAL BANKS IN OTHER COUNTRIES
Novera- Octo- I SepI tembar |
Austrian National Bank (millionsof schillings):
Gold... . . 'Foreign bills (reserve)Other foreign billsDomestic bills, etcNote circulationDeposits-
1925 1G24
Novem-ber
National Bank ©ff Belgium (mil- jlions of francs): j
GoldForeign bills and balances abroad..Bills ..... , JNote circulationPrivate deposits—
National Barak of Bulgaria (mil-lions of leva):
Metallic reserve., - „Foreign notesBalances abroad and foreign bills.C o-mmercial billsGommorcial loansNotes in circulationDeposits _..
femkiieg Offlce9 Czechoslovakia(millions of Czechoslovak crowns):
Gold and silver-.. . . .
Balances abroad and foreign cur-rency
Bills discounted I I _ 1'.Advances on collateralNot© circulation.~.. .„.Deposits
tak of Danzig (thousands ofDanzig guidon):
On deposit with Bank of Eng-land, foreign bills, etc
Loans and discounts33,679 ' 35,04317,853 ' 18,113
Notes and circulation ! 32,716 I 34,043Deposits .J 5,461 i 5,664
42,891 !:.8, 622 j35,2989,343
24,49020, 76828,93922,388
National Bank of Denmark (mil- !lions of kroner): !
Gold !Bills. !Loans.. __Foreign bills and balances abroad.Note circulationDeposits..
& of Estonia (millionsEstonian marks):
Cash in foreign currencyLoans on foreign currency.Bills discounted.Advances on current accounts.Bank notes issuedDeposits of the exchequer-Deposits
Stank of Finland (millions of Fin-nish marks):
Gold. 43Balances abroad, etc.-. 1,428Finnish and foreign government j ,
securities 305Domestic bills ! 330 INote circulation... J, 1,253 .Deposits— I j
Private _.j 110 ,Treasury ; 322 '
National Hank of Qrecce (millions i ~ ; :
of drachms): ^ j !
431,341
385331
1,271
74255
Gold and balances abroad...Government loans and securities.I.Discounts and loans . j .Note circulation __-.Private deposits— I
Sight LTime , . J .
43 :1,165 :
395 !3G3 ,
1,279 j
8 7 j220 ;
43621
7661,223
79213
I2,724 |3,794 ;8,3335,548 !
1,942993
2, 1S23,9872, 528
1,7791,066
1925 1924
jNovem-j Octo- 'Septem-Novern*ber i ber • ber ber
National Bank of Hungary (mil-lions of pengos):
. . ; .Foreign exchange.Bills, etc .__Note circulation.™..Deposits-
Public .Private--
59 50 | 50205 202 | 187"120 ' 135 I 139406 ; 435 ; 408
168 : 16412
of Java (in thousands offlorins):
GoldForeign bills ,Domestic bills ,LoansNote circulation . . .
_'143,456 132,086J 27,713 | 29,582J 17,019 1 17,173J 91,055 107,102. 338, 570 ;323, 632
Bank ®f Latvia (thousands of lats): |Gold.. . . . .Foreign exchange reserveBills.. „ 'Loans «...Note circulation .._Government deposits ,Other deposits
23,554 i30, 460 '63,449 =50,49229,183 i72 136 !50,609 !
23,550 23, 55133, 535 j 33, 96763, lP>0 ! 61, 59449,749 i 48,47929,539 ; 29,44170', 70154,818
32,212 :30,428 :48,015 •85,191 i24,301 i
458 i72 !
245 :
136 I90037
Lithuania (thousands of fIitas):
Gold ,Foreign exchange reserve . :Loans and discounts. . „.._!Note circulation...Deposits !
Netherlands Basak (millions of i"florins): \
Gold ;Domestic b i l l s . . . . . 'Foreign bills !
Loans. . ...INote circulation __:Deposits '
B a n k of N o r w a y (millions of j"kroner): i
Gold !Loans and discounts 'B alances abroad jNote circulation 'Deposits—
"State.... ;Pr iva te . - j
Reserve Bank off Peru (millions of !
libras):Gold at home i 4,124Gold abroad 732Bills _ ] 2,156Notes in circulation ; 6,207Deposits __i 602
Bank of FoSand (millions of zlote):Gold..Foreign exchange, etcBills ...,Note circulationCurrent accounts, etc.—
Treasury , ...Private-
70, 86452, 817
32,15829, 64944, 20884, 65314,852
33,64824, 76841,73581, 09113,451
41890244126 |88134
4188324312887934
147302 !.58 i351 ;
1 6 i73 i
147 j310 I66 i366
14730966372
1965
Bank of Portugal (millions of es-cudos):
Go ld . . . .Balances abroad ._ i 314Bills „ : 171Note circulation .; 1,687Deposits • 78 ;
National Bank of Rumania (mil-lions of lei): : ;
Gold.. . . . . : | 5G6Bills ... | I 8,462Government loans ;-... I 11,774Note circulation _ i _ i 20,494Deposits- | 7,952
41145159355
13321
134,03717,05634, 85995, 768276, 701
48. 28643; 28944, 78926, 00078, 52950, 211
30, 71361, 24138,09789, 34440,127
14348
93320
147
39376
2871
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
44 FEDEBAL BESEBVE BULLETIN JAITOABY, 1926
•Novem-! ber
department; thousands of cher<vontsi): i
Gold ;
Foreign currency ... ;Loans and discounts.... .!Bank notes \
National Bank of the SO]s.gd©2& ':©f Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes |(millions of dinars):
Gold 'Foreign currency and balances
abroad.. „ „ _Bills...Note circulation _ . _.Deposits
South African Reserve Bank(thousands of pounds sterling):
Gold coin and bullion IGold certificatesTotal bills discounted „
Domestic bills_„„„Foreign bills.. „
Union Government treasury bills.British Government treasury
billsNotes in circulationBankers'deposits
8858,9495, 618
1925
Octo-ber
1924
Sep- -Novem-tember, her
18,2654,85852,32278,650
75394
1,0926,017420
7P 3411,6356,448
204,293I, 250
18,4844, 076f.2,48676,569
74419
1,0526,158492
R, 1241,7087,079137
4,6861,470
18, 4764,676 ,52,494 '75,064 ,
74 '419 '995
6.097'583
5,0094,502 ,6, 500841
2,7802,000 :
13,14010,13933,74957,719
72397
1,3166,034247
55210, 2235,4062,0131,1831,200
885 ! 8859,126 i 9,1585,106 ' 4,815
1,01011.132< 954
1925
B&iak of Spain (millions of pesetas):Gold. .! .Balances abroad ..Bills discounted,., ,,Note circulation... . . .Deposits
Bsak of Sswsdesi (millions of kro-ner):
Gold.,..Balances abroad and foreign bills
and securitiesDomestic bills. _ _ „Swedish Govermnanfc securities--Note circulation . „Deposits
230 i
196 j197 |
522 '102 !
Swiss National B&nk (millions offrancs):
GoldDomestic billsLoans..Balances abroad and du© from
correspondents „Note circulation
45630146
819
1924
Sep- jNovem-tember, ber
2,53728
695 ;
4,376
2,53530
SIS4,474
921
231
20120413523102
46529345
5484177
232
204229IS551107
49129042
4584587
239
9732824537134
50528467
64859123
DISCOUNT RATES OF 31 CENTRAL BANKS[Prevailing rates with date of last change]
Country i Rate 1 In effect1 since— Country
AustriaBelgiumBulgariaCzechoslo-
vakiaDanzig...Denmark ..„„..England.—
9 ! Sept. 3,1925 .: Estonia....7 Nov. 30,1925 !i Finland-...
10 ! Aug. 3I?1924 | France• ': Germany...
&A Dec. 1,1925 : Greece9 i Mar. 8.1925 •! Hungary..5}4 Sept. 8,1925 ;. India5 i Dec. 3.1925 ,! Italy
Rate In effectsince—
July 1,1825j Oct. 29,1825• July 9,19251 Feb. 26,1925
Aug. 18,1925Oct. 21,1925Dec. 3,1925June 18,1925
Country | Kate
I, Japan!. Java-...i LatviaI' Lithuania.. .' Netherlandsi Norway!i Peru ,i Poland
Country j Rate
7.3 Apr. 15,1925 Portugal ! 96 j May 3,1925 ;i Rumania™...; 68 i Feb. 10,1924 :i Russia . . . . ! 87 j Feb. 8,1925 ,: South Africa I 5*>3A Oct. 2,1925 i Spain... , 65 Sept. 14,1925 ! Sweden 4&6 Apr. 1,1923 ; Switzerland- 3>
12 j Aug. 12,1925 ! Yugoslavia.. 8
In eSectsince—
Sept. 12,1923Sept. 4,1920Apr. —,1924Nov. 21,1824Mar. 23,1923Oct. 9,1825Oct. 22,1925June 23,1922
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
jANUABTj1926 FEDEBAI/ RESERVE BULLETIN 45
FOREIGN TRADE OF PRINCIPAL COUNTRIES
ADDITIONAL FOREIGN TRADE STATISTICS
Beginning with the current issue, the foreigntrade statistics of the following countries areadded to those previously recorded in the Bui/-LBTZX: Czechoslovakia, Estonia, Hungary, Po-land, Switzerland, and Egypt-
UNITED STATES
[Thousands of dollars]
1925
I Novem- Qcto-
.! 12 monthsi ended November
ber ber
By classes of commodities:Total.,... .„_
Crude materials IFoodstuffs, crude, and food |
animals.. ,Manufactured foodstuffs - - -!Semimanuf act ures IFinished manufactures ,Miscellaneous ._ -..'
By countries: jTotal Europe „ _ !
France jGermany jI ta ly . . . ,,-iUnited Kingdom ,
Total North America •C anada ;
Total South America IArgentina „ j
Total Asia and Oceania .Japan,
Total Africa...... ... ,_.J
376, 665 374,104I
1925
4,163, 447
165,904 151,144 11,677,239
46,588 :29,339 i62,22370,515 i2,096
118,231 '14,492 i15.728 :
9.323 '42; 3-12 :
75,868 •43,233 i43,319
6,714 •'131,459 i37,242 .
7,788 i
44,278 |33,192 j65,713 '77,224 I2,553 ;
115.83415,67515, 7039,680
37,71781.98747,11538, 789
4,003133,98939,0798,506
I
By classes of commodities:Total , 447,59 6 I 490,609
172,534 i 209,659i
Grade materials. •Foodstuff's, crude, and food I
animals 19,485 19.312Manufactured foodstuffs _ _ _ j 46,972 I 51,474Semimanufactures-- ., 50,036 ! 50,751Finished manufactures • 149,232 151,070Miscellaneous • 1,191 660Reexports ! 8,147 7S688
iJy countries: \Total Europe • 237,644 282,702
France.. _ J 29,560 34,051Germany j 39,120 56,481Italy... ! 16,766 17,392United Kingdom ..J 107,247 121,394
Total North. America j 93, 739 96,491Canada _ „ j 53,650 55,798
Total South America ! 34,991' 31,135Argen tina. i 13,230 12,144
Total Asia and Oceania.....! 72,854 73,421Japan ... . . . j 29,861 33,170
Totai Africa— ._•' 8,568 6,861
488,931432, 530750. 539791,24825,390
1,233,110156, 822155, 685101,837414,91.2971, 552448, £76515, ."SB•79,218
.1,350,550384,533
93, 320
4,887,153
1,429,732
336, 223575,46S7659,757
1. 788,8917,960
89,185
|2.629,735279, 944
I 485,030211, 585
1.033, 560I) 122,004638,109388, 813142, 590060,346227, 35786, 221
3, £.35, 076
1,208,464
420,253' 521,119648,8347-15,17323, 232
1.078,643' 146,384140,13874, 716
35C, 123993, 785398,514459,09773, 260
964,794333.2SG6S; 756
4,571,902
1, 340,522
367,945575, 858607,738
1, 581,5408,465
91,828
2,417,386283, 7814.22,140183,071989,145
1,092,690323,010304,636112,699
261, 61168,284 I
FOREIGN COUNTRIES
i1925
i 1 * 0 ^ " ! October
12 months endedNovember—
1925
42,653 ;44,827 ,
13,711 i8 ,774,
France (million francs): : iImports ._ .__; 4,574 ! 4,476Exports ! 4,193 | 4,375
Germany (million gold marks): !Imports i 894 j 1,119Exports __i 797 ! 851
Italy (million lire): i IImports |.. | 1,856Exports... ..: j 1,800
Switzerland (million francs): ! •Imports '• 239 i 269Exports __i 153 j 170
United Kingdom (thousand £ ,sterling): ! ;
Imports : 114,692 | 108,839Exports ! 60,977 ' 67,082'Reexports j 13,538 '• 13,377
Canada (thousand dollars): , !Imports „ _ _ i 75,286 : 80,800 j 874,296Exports '• 141,358 • 144,520 jl, 232,162
Japan (million yen): iImports _J 183 ! 168 iExports...- ....I 213 ,
South Africa (thousand £ ster-ling) : ;
ImDorts ! 6,385 iExports. _ '; 7,454 8) 735
2,618"!2,055 ,
1,320,565 1776,625151,818
2,573 •.2,277 I
1925
i October
Denmark (million kroner):Imports _.._.... .i 156Experts I 145
Czechoslovakia (millioncrowns):
Imports., i, 798Exports _.. 1,617
Estonia (million Estonianmarks):
Imports „_„.Exports-.. _„_ _ i 842
Hungary ( t h o u s a n d goldcrowns):
Imports. 77, 232Exports ! 77,827
Finland (million finmarks):Imports _ 531Exports 607
Netherlands (million guilders):Imports 255Exports _. 163
Norway (million kroner):Imports... _ 97Exports- 87
Poland (thousand ziote):imports 80,083Exports 131,508
Russia (thousand, rubles):Imports 82,500Exports ._... 76; 000
Sweden (million kronor): iImports 131Exports J 137
Australia (thousand £ sterling):Imports 12,195Exports 14,901
Egypt (thousand Egyptian ]pounds): I
Imports ..! 6,117Exports 7,076
India (million rupees):Imports __.i 198Exports., ....J 291
I
leptem-ber
146152
919
77,67580,131
54070S
195178
119
72,842108,905
76.30069,100
125132
9,42810.301
5,3702,493
185279
1924
39,92540? 506
8,5018,370
18,69114,176
2,5002,043
1,257,588790,172138,494
812,8541,070,065
2,4441,773
80,816 • 72,482
12 months ondedOctober—
1925
2,2102,063
1924
2,109
17,15218,918
9.4329j 580
754,900676,100
5,0045,682
2,4881,814
1,4821,096
1,822,9491,315,168
678,899540,473
1,4161,351
153,314160, 474
57, 25884,905
2,3084,147
15,07216,096
8,1056,867
621,100531,700
4,8284,773
2,2781,619
1,022
1,351,1851,181,754
1,3921,241
144,992128,741
49,76265,764
2,4053,710
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
46 FEDEKALc BESEBYE BULLETIN JANUABY, 1926
PRICE MOVEMENTS IN PRINCIPAL COUNTRIESThe tables below give the all-commodities j to a gold basis. The latter figure takes into
and group index numbers of wholesale prices in j account the depreciation of the foreign currencythe five countries included in the Federal Re- | in terms of the American dollar (or gold) andserve Board's indexes. In the first table the ; the series indicates relative price levels in theall-commodities index for each country is shown several countries when all prices are expressedboth in terms of paper currency and converted in dollars.
FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD WHOLESALE PRICE INDEXES(1918=100)
ALL COMMODITIES
Year and month
] i On paper currency basis! United i_. ... ._ ._. _ _ (
| s t a t e s • England France , Canada Japan
1923, average.1924, average..
January—February..MarchApril
1924
AprilMay£ayJune _JulyAugustSeptember-OctoberNovember.December..
JanuaryFebruary....March...AprilMayJune..-JulyAugustSeptember..OctoberNovember-
1925
165159 j
163 I163 !160 I158 I156 !154 |156 i158 ,156159 !160 !165 !
168 i167 :168 ;
163 !162 ••163 i165 i164 ,165 :164;160 .
170 ;
176 :
178 •180 •180 ;181 i177 .174 :
174 !
173 •172 i175 i176 I177 ,
446 ,'
445 :
150147;
i
146 j148 !
483428 :428 '442 ',440 j442 ,436 i442449 !
451 '
147143143145147149.146148148149
178178175171166164163161158157156
i456 !457 j463 !460 !467 I483 i490 i491 ,482 :
482 !498 j
156158 !153 ,148 ,149 :1.47;148 !150 '146 i145 ,152
188200
2052002002012001S9191196198206210
204197191189195195197197194187
Converted to gold basis
England ! France i Canada ' Japan
159 i160 I
124 •121
156160158162158155156160158181167171
175175171268166164163161158157156
1081071171371281201171251201201231.26
1271251241554125119119119118110102
147 :
145 :
!142144143 •140 !141 !142 !146 ,149 ,.145:148i4s:119
156 '157153 i148 I3.49;147 '148 i150 ,146 ,145 ;152 ,
18E166
185182'17216618115815816S161181
im161
160168.162160159161161168161158-
GROUPS OF COMMODITIES*
Year and month
•. Grouped by stag© G! .manufacture
Grouped byorigin
All
ties Haw • Pro- g S " i1 ma- dueerd'l ^ ivterials goods ! g J o d g ;
Do- Im-
goods IP
UNITED STATES
1924—No vcmber...1925—June
July. . .jAugust jSeptember...!October !November. .
ENGLAND
1924—No vcmb er..1925—June...
JulyAugustSeptember. _OctoberNovember..
FBANCE
1924—Novemb er. ..1925—June. _
JulyAugust
160163165164165184166
176164163161158157156
165169 :1701C817Q167167
174161161160158155154
449
490491
478 i435 !510 I506 '
147 i144146144142142143
169151151149145147 I146
439471486487
162 :
165 j169 ;171 i170171 ;176 !
187181 i180 :174173 .168 !
167
424481472
161 I165 ,167 '166167165168
176165163160167155154
430468472473 !
150143146143144144 i146 i
portgoods ,
169173174 j172171162160
Year sad month
: Grouped by stage o£I manuiactur©i All
corn-modi- Rawma-
terials
Pro-ducers'goods
178 I162164 '165 I163 !161 !159 I
541 !565 j578 !530 I
178163165161 :154153151
461
513615
FRANCE—COIltd. I
1825—September...;October iNovember ._iCANADA |
1924—November ._j1925—June
July...AugustSeptember.OctoberNovember.JAPAK
1924—November.1925—June
JulyAugustSeptemberOctober...November
482 i482 ,
148 I147 j148150 I146 i145
499495510
137137134136129128
Con-sum-ers'goods
Grouped byorigin j
Do-mes-tic
goods
4S5 463488 466503 i 484
155 ,151ISO '149149149
152 | 132 | 150 j
210 | 217 !195 i 206 i
216 !
196 i195 i 202 I 201197 i 205 ! 204197 | 206 !
..., 194 ; 199 I•-! 187 , 191 !
203 ;198 i189
161161167171170172183
204 i189:189190 !190190184
461459471
147147147150145144150
212195195197 !
198196
• por tIm- . goods
portedgoods i
584592626
160.154154.154154157164
202196195198196184175
510522554
161166182166152147155
213197202202208208199
iComplete descriptions of these index numbers may be found in the following issues of the BULLETIN: United States—May and June 1920,June, 192L, and May, 1922; England—February, 1922; France—August. 1922; Panada—July, 1922; Japan—September, 2922.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JANUARY, 1926 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN 47
WHOLESALE PRICES IN PRINCIPAL COUNTRIES
ALL COMMODITIES
[Pre-war^ 100]
Europe
Year andmonth
1924JanuaryFebruary-.MarchAprilMay ._JuneJuly -_AugustSeptember.OctoberNovember.December-
Austria(gold
IBel-gium
1925January.FebruaryMarch.. . iApr i l™ . . „May ._..]June |July __JAugust ___!September __„!October !November iDecember.. ._.. j .
139138141137131127127125
580642825555557585566547550555569568
559551546533537552559567577575
Bul-garia
iCzecho-I slo-i vakia i
2,7112,658% 6122,798
974999
1,0211,008
2,551 I 1,0012,811 9682,7372,8532,8432,9883,1323,181
3,275
3,2723,2443,1773;2253,0412,8702,8342,823
968 .953 I
1,01.3 ,1,024 !
Den-mark "
210223227228225219220233231234231232
1,0451,0431,034 j1,020 :
1.008 .998 !
1.009 i993996 .989 !
977 i
23423423022021621020fi189168163158180
Eng-land
(Boardof
Trade)
16518?16516.5164168163165167370170170
17116916G163159 .158 i
Fin-land
1,0711,0781,0941,0951,0901,0881,085i; in1,1173,1141.120i; 139
1,1371,1411 5 3 1
1 Ger-I many(Federali Statis-
Hun-gary(goldb i )
s (gi tical j basis)i Bureau)
494 117.3544 110.2 I499 '~" "45C459465481477486497504507
120.7 i124.1 !122. 5115.9315.0J20.4126.9131.2128, 5131.3
1231311301251191331451451421493541C0
Italy
571573679579571566567572580602621840
L133l\ 122 j1,129 !158 _,_.„_ .
158 I 1,118 i157 ! 1 1 4 2 '157156155154
1,1: i
lf'l21 i
514515 j514 i513 j520 !543 |657558556 j572 •
138. 2 !3.36.5 !134. 4 j131.0 !131.9 :133. 8 !
134. 8 '131.7 i12;
Nether-j NOT-| (OsYc)
13.7121.1 !_.
159152145144141 !141 i13C !134 '135 !131 j
658660 !659 !658 I680 ;683 !707 :731;721 :716 :
712 '
156158155154153151151151158161161160
160158155161151153155155155154154
2B0262266267263284271274275276277278
279281276267260258254245231221217
Poland Russia *
107112no109104101102 j109 I112 j116 I117 !118 i
120 i121 j122 !119118;110 i120 :124 '127 !
128 !
137 '•
169187193181175168169175173164164188
17217818319519?191388175173174176179
Year1 and month
Europe—Continued
Spain |Sweden
I
January..FebruaryMarch.Apri l—M
1924
M a y . . . .JuneJuly, . . . .August.September-OctoberNovember .December..
JanuaryFebruary.. .MarchAprilMay. ._June....JulyAugustSeptember..OctoberNovember..December...
1925
178180J.80 .184 :179 i}79 :182 j182 |184 j186 I181 !198 •
191 I192 |193 ;190 !191 I187188 •184 I185 !187;
161162162161160158157160163167167
16G169168163162161161159157154155
I
Asia and Oceania
China(Shang-
hai)
156100158154154352152149149153lf:5157
159160159158157163360160159158158
DutchEast
Indies
180
I Japan ! Newi(Tokyo):Zealand
178 :177 j178 !174 i177 !177175173179
178 !177 I176 !175;174 •173 I175 :176 |175:
172178179174176176179 I180 i179 I181 I180176
171172 !168169164157160157158160164
211 !208 j
207205199.195200206 j213 !
214213
213210204202•199200198200201200
175180180178.179180180S81181180181181
178175175175175174175175175176
Africa,
Egypt j South(Cairo) I Africa
131
136134335131132143
156158
157161155154151ifiO151
152153Mo
126
Ub
183
130
130
12?
ra
* First of month figures.
The foreign index numbers of wholesale prices are cabled to the Federal Reserve Board by the various foreign statistical offices. Index numbersof commodity groups for most of the countries are also available in the office of the Division of Research and Statistics ol the board, and may behad upon request.
Wherever possible the indexes have been shifted from original bases to a 19 L3 base. Further information as to base periods, sources, numb orof commodities, and period of the month to which the figures refer may be found on page 48 of the January, 1924, issue of the BULLETIN.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
48 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN JANUARY, 1926
WHOLESALE PRICES IN PRINCIPAL COUNTRIES—Continued
GROUPS OF COMMODITIES
U N I T E D STATES—BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS
[Pre-war^ 100]
Bureau of Labor Statistics groups Federal Reserve Board groups
1823, average1924, average1924—-November _.
December...1925—January
February. „March.AprilMay. .Jane „„JulyAugustSeptember.OctoberNovember.,
All Icom*mod- ] Farm •
; ities | prod- I Foodsj • ucts :
Clothsandcloth-ing
Fueland
154150153157160161181156155157160160160158158
141 '143 i150 i157 |163 !162 i161 !153152 I155 i162163 i180155 :
154 !
144144154158160157159154153155157159160158160
200 i191 '190 i191191191 :
191190188188189180189190188
andmetal
ucts
185 '170 j163165168 I178 i174 i169168173 i172170 I169 j172 '175 j
. jChem-1
ing i icals' ' and
Haw materials
fur- :nish- .
Mis-cella-
Crops
144 !135129 :
133 !136 !136134129 !127 ;126 i126 !
127 :127128 :
130
189 j175 !172 1175179 i183 I180 !174 :
174 ;171 !170 :
172 i174 ,174 :176 !
131 j130 !134135135 !135 !134 !134;1 3 3 •133 !133 ,135 !13G ,135135 '
183 !
173172172173 !
173170170170 i170169139138138166 '
123117123129127125125129131138M3138135138142
168172176186196193183173176175173175168162160
Ani-mal
prod-! Forest
prod-: UCtS
Min-eral
prod-ucts
Totalraw
mate-rials
Fro-I duc-j ers'i goods
Con-sum-ers'
goods
i I ! I
122:120 j124129 •133 i136 !
148;141 j134 I141 '154 ;155 !155 .147 '139 I
210 I186182 j187 !193 !
201 ,196 1187 :189181 ,180 !185184 !185 '187 !
185170166169172175173168167167168170172174176
159154155161167169169161160162166
; 1681 166! 162
160
141133131132134136135131131135137134131133135
156156183167169167168166164160167168169166168
ENGLAND—BOARD OF T R A D E I T A L Y - C H A M B E R OF C O M M E R C E
Groups i N ( > |I vein-;j ber !1 j .
All commodities j 154 iTotal food ! 165 i
Cereals i 152 IMeat and iisb... i 167 !Other foods .„„ j 175 ;
Total, not food.._ ! 148 IIron and steel | 119 |Other minerals and metals..m\ 130 ;Cotton 182 IOther textiles 181 !Other articles 158 |
1925 ! 1924 !__.. _..! i
S« - : ! ! "N-0- '1 torn-, £^; j July | vcm-
1925 1924
Qroups N o "
bor | gust ! ber !
156 ! 157 !
166 ' 166 i159 ! 164 i166 : 161 i ___170 ' 174 ! 185 i151 i 152 I 153 ,
123 I 125 I132 !207 ;177 !157
12113G i204 ,179157 !
158;106 :159 .154 '
i
132 j210 !176:157 I
170 I177 !182 |166 i182160 !137 j141226 |214 '161 i
All commoditiesAll foods...
Vegetable foodsAnimal foods
All industrial productsTextiles..: ;„__ JChemicalsMinerals and metalsBuilding materials..Other vegetable produces !Sundries. !
675654705675737
672 1689658 j732664 '763 ,
, „ . 609 i633 I 638 j704 i 709 i664 I 600 j
676 !692 :660 :
738 '
685686665715
670 i 684776 | 827615640703665653
620657692674658
July
668652617700675821616645664664649
No-vem-ber
578584547638576693534555573544549
CANADA—DOMINION B U R E A U OF STATISTICS
FRANCE—STATISTICAL BUREAU
All commoditiesAil foods. „_„
Animal foodsVegetable foodsSugar, coffee, cocoa..
All industrial material _,MineralsTextilesSundries.
I
608510496522502682606928811
572 i491485498480637 •585830 i578
556492 i486 !
490495 ;
607522 .807 :566 ;
557501500496500603518808557
5575084995204.86596506801551
504 i4.58 !459 '466426541448763489
GERMANY—FEDERAL STATISTICAL BUREAU
Ail commoditiesVegetable productsAnimal productsTextiles „. .Wood prc-ducts „Iron productsNonfcrrous metalsNonmctaliic mineralsChemicalsRaw materials, or partly manu-
factured _Manufactured, fully or chiefly _.Producers* goodsConsumers* goods._ „..
161172152188 :-159147108 ,177157 ;
160 ,157 ;149 !
164 i
157157149189159147107177158
151157145160
157161142191160150107178158
151159150157
160173 i138 :193 '•159 i149107178 i158
157161156 |156 I
158170135195159151105177158
155159155154
158170135193157155100178155
155158154151
All commodities. \ 121 'Total food products.. 115
Grains and potatoes 99Fats, sugar, meat, and fish..! 142 ;Colonial goods, coffee, cocoa, i
etc • 181 ;
Total industrial products _ _, 133 ;Hides and leathers J 120Textiles : 188Metals and minerals , 130 iCoal and iron I 120
Domestic goods 113Imported goods 164 ,
124(18103146
181134123102131120115166
128121106150
181135125189132121118165
132 .130 !120147
175135123190134121125165
SWITZERLAND i—DR. J. LORENZ
129136
179136126 !191 j131123129166
129 !
124 I113 i143 [
170 i137 i135205125122121167
Groups
All commoditiesConsumers' goodsAgricultural productsIndustrial products
1 First-cf-month figures.
1925
De-cem-ber
157172112155
No-vem-ber
157173113155
Octo-ber
159173117160
Sep-tem-ber
159174117159
Au-gust
160174115160
1924
De-cem-ber
170183127172
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JANUARY, 1926 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN 49
RETAIL FOOD PRICES AND COST OF LIVING IN PRINCIPAL COUNTRIESINDEX NUMBERS OF RETAIL FOOD PRICES
[Pre-war-100]
I Ij United|i States i
1924January.FebruaryMarch . .April . . . JMay . .JuneJ u l y . . .AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember •
1925JanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober .„Moy ember __December
, Austria Bel-; (Vienna)4
146144 "141138138140140141144 j146 j147!149
151143148148149152157157156158164 !
22,94123,336 '
23,361 ,23,79724,267 I23,499 !25,0£Q25,100 !
25,305 i26,482 i26,806 :
27,16827S 06526,79626,44827,03727,031
25,294
126130128121113118123124127135140139
1401371341271 2 2 •
26; 550 | 130 .25,739 | 135 ,
14025,186 ; 14425,108
Bui- i Eng-garia l and '
2,6742,637 '2,497 :2,5012,438 •'2,687 <2, 6262,727 :
2,723
2,994 .3,040;
3,1313,1633,1283,1003,0323,0832,9002, 7442,710 |2,698
Other countries
! India i N e wi(Bom-l Zea-j b ^ ] J a a d
154 ;151 j147 !143 j143 |14?151356156156.15715G
150149150150150150148146145145148150
SouthAfrica
120122122123122120117117117120122121
152152155153151149152147148J.4.8149
147 '146 :1 4 9 '•
1 4 9 ••
150 :
Me;151252 '1S3155 '
2.2012012112412312212C118118119
m
INDEX NUMBERS OF COST OF LIVING
[Pre-war«100]
1924JanuaryFebruaryMarch. . .AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember...OctoberNovemberDecember.-
1926JanuaryFebruary- -MarchAprilMayJuneJulvAugasLSeptember..OctoberNovember.™
Mas-sa-
chu*setts
157156156154154154155155157:-L57'•57158
J58J5715815835815S160161161IQ'J.162
Bel-gium
480495510498485492493498503513520521
521537511506502505508517525633534534
Czech-oslo-vakia
917917SOS907916923909897908916922928
899911904901894914916894884875
Eng-land »
177179178173171169170171172176180181
180179179175173172173173174176176177
Es*to-nia
959498
104108109
113110114112111112114112
Fin-land
1,1551,1431.1411,1211,1211,1471,1541.1981,1991,2191,2221,217
1,1991,1911,2101 2011,1761,191
ll2661,2421,2281,227
European countries
France(Paris)
S65
"ice"
367
377
886
390
401
Ger-many
1101041G7112115112116J14118122128123
1248 136
136137136138143145145144141
Hun-gary
123101118207104128140138135141141143
1411351321301313301261271261?4123
Italy !Neth-(Mi-| er-Ian) !Sands
i
5105175215225385185125U516546563573
580592602600591596598610624043
. _179
"" l73"
176
181
Nor-way
.238
""244"
258
266
i n 271
179
179
259
248
Po-land
121127126127126124127135141150152153
150151151149147148152151152155158
Spain
178190180195180186182180189185175199
188189192191188190190190190189
Swe-den
178
173~
171
"I74"
178
"177"
176
175
Swit-Eer-land
169168168J66168368169166166169170170
168168167165165165186164165163163
Other countries
Can-ada 1
15014914814514314314S14514614614714.7
149150148147146146146148148149152
Aus-tra-lia
150
"149"
148
14S
loG
153
154~
Indis(Bom-bay)
158166153150ISO153156160160160161160
157157159158156154157152151153153155
SouthAfrica
133134.1341341341331321B2132138134133
133133133184134134133132132132131
s First of the month figures. 8 Revised index.s 1921-100. * January, 1921-100.
NOTE.—Information as to the number of foods and items included, tha original base periods, and sources may be found on page 276 of the April,1925, issue of the BULLETIN. The original bases of the indexes have been shifted to Juiy91914, wherever possible.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
50 FEDEEAL RESERVE BULLETIN JANUARY, 192 G
inarnci? A IT
AVERAGE DAILY CONDITION FOR NOVEMBER AND OCTOBER, 1925
[Amounts in thousands of dollars]
Federal reserve banks
Total bills andsecurities
! November i October
Total cash reserves j Total deposits Federal reserve notes j Reserve percent-m circulation i ages
November ! October
•
Boston. _, 125,445 !New York , 260,159 'Philadelphia... : 91,532 'Cleveland..., Ii8,632 'Richmond 52,983 !Atlanta ! 99,329 'Chicago ' 151,220 j
St. Louis • 71,874 'Minneapolis • 31,708 !
Kansas City J 79,357 'Dallas ' 69,351 >San Francisco.II I.! 137,141 i
Total: 1925 : 1,288,731 ,• 1024.. 1,085,027 :
1923 _. 1,147,765 i1922... 1,210,126 ''1921. 1.520'. 283 j1920 3,375'. 395
108.050 I287,292 I95,387
122, 90559,07367,925150.990 I64,210 ;43,581 ;'73,097 I59,135 i123,980 '
206,861 !1,009,204 j214,219 j304,701 i114,355 i141,322 '346,792 '57,168 '95,877 I79,528 !
51,927 ;255,624 j
219,129
211,175303,159103,791169,363345,42765,49383,45783,11659, 849
262, 592
November | October j November j October I Novem-
151,224 |879,713 j134,444 i178,267 j71,068 ;84,214 !
328,459 82,818 '55,525 :
90,552 j64,405 '
173,363 j
149,624 !857,189 I135,902 '180,532 '70,239 !83,064 !-
329,671 i82.556 i54; 523 !•JO, 417 •63,321 :
169,404
169.715360I21C147,551 i225,571 I88,878 i
157,218 i148,641 i39,877 I67,882 !66,874 j47,293 !
204,648
103,666 !
357; 292 !148,436 i223,340 '84,752 I
157,371 i147.303 j4i;074 i67,823 ,86,789 :47,614 '205,263 ,'
64.581.476.0 .75.571.558.572.746.077.750. 548.5 !
67. 6
October
69.979.174.374. 567.070.472.453,068.252.953.970.1
1,255,631 I1,005.7421,150,593 I1.184,700 [
i; 040, 740 i3, S90, 089
2,877,578 13.131,1533,199,810 :Si 208, 752 ,2,964.419 :
2,182', 795 .
2,867,444 i3,124,202 ;3,194,285 i3,211,513 j2,905,727 :2,162,178 '
2,294,052 !
2,223,364 ,1,938,964 !1,890,022 !1,732,504 !1,830,011 '
2.260,442 :2,208,509 !1,919,312i, 876,362 I1/728,029 i1,867,589 I
1,724,362 |1,836,189 I2,256,777 j2,324,805 !2,402,4423. 327. 632
1,713,723 !1,769.3542,276,388 :
2.309,013 !2; 456,121 ."3,336,768 '
71.677.1 •76.376.171.7
1 43. 7
- Calculated on basis of nat deposits and Federal reserve notes in circulation.
FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS—RESOURCES AN© LIABILITIES, 33Y WEEKS
RESOURCES
[In thousands of dollars]
72.078. 576.176,769.4
1 43.1
Gold v.'ith Federal reserveagents:
"Nov. 25Dec. 2Dec. 9. . . .Dec. 16...
Gold redemption fund withU. S. Treasury:
Nov. 25_.Dee. 2Dec. 9Dec. 10.
Gold held exclusively againstFederal reserve notes:
Nov. 25Dec. 2..Dec. 9Dee. 16
Gold settlement fund withFederal Reserve Board:
Nov. 25 _.Dec. 2.. . . .Dec. 9Dec. 15
Gold and gold certificates heldby banks:
Nov. 25.. .Dec. 2Dec. 9Dec. 16
Totcl I Boston
1,355,403 84. 525-1,343,424 82,845;1,307,572! i 84,030i1.394,759 1 84,540;
50,004 I 8,948'54,162; 10,084'57, 705 i 8, 298'54,5701 i 6.832-
370,2411 .123,085 182,971370,2271 123,709' 182, 755j320,109,' 129,187' 181,265380,109! 136,087 181) 704'
Rich-mond
71,12569,89273:37072; 147
9,139 6,636 2,280| l,296i8,257 7,974. 3.642: l, 8961
12,244,' 10.969 4J041! 2,337J10,876: 14,080 2,243! 2,616!
St.Louis
87,614 114,796 15,40785,8721 114,787 15,22793; 452 114,7871 14,94592,895 114,7361 14J988
Min-neap-olis
KansasCity Dallas
1 I6o,909J 33,882! 19,21162,124| 38,954 j 19,60153,915:" 46,347 18,90453,887! 50,499! 18,745
5,554! 5,629' 1,223|4,8061 4,837; 1,002.'4,667! 3,800: 1,320i4,928i 2,589. 1,215!
1,494-1,4601,166,
SanFran*cisco
179,431177,261194,442
2,320| 3,1663; 524 2,5771 4,0691,810! 2,747 4,0122,228! 2,181' 3,618
l,405,467j!1,397,586.1,365,2771/1,449,329;:
724,0291729,002;753,172:684,899j
Ij61G, 397!616,023!603,836;5S7,358j
93,47392,929!92,32891,372!
50,013144,242;43,767,43,752;
45. 787i49; 380:47,983146,124|
379,380! 120,721 185,251! 72,421: 93,168! 120.425:
378,484, 131,683 186,397 71,788' SO, 678, 119J624!332,353, 140,156 185,306! 75,707! 98,119. 118,587,390,985! 150,167 183,947: 74,763; 97,823 \ 117,3251
232,454; 56,9551 66,689!24J.,377i 55,371 67,298'262,905' 58,259: 65,9631186,168| 55,540: 58,157]
354,276! 18,015' 48,523'351,079, 18,009, 49,423'348,740; 17,345; 47,036,337,044! 17,229 46,827,
Total gold reserves: ii 1Nov. 25 I 2.745,893!! 189,273.Dec. 2 ! 2!742,61lii 186,o5ilDec. 9 I 2. 722, 2Sa!| 184, 058|Dec. 1 6 . . - • 2,701,5861! 18.1,2481
966,110, 204,691. 300,463970,940! 205, 063i 303, llSi943,998i 215,760s 298,305;914,197; 222,9361 288,931!
38,276." 30,546,' 128,608;35,097! 32,140 133,465,36,261' 28,118' 135,830,30,602' 33,024 134.5411
5.354i 3,579, 77,460'5,7911 3,639' 74,71515,9171 3,679j 67,655.6,1581 3,611" 64,800|
1 i r116,05] j 127,293' 320.493.112,676' J26,457i 327,804!117,8851 129,916 322.072i111,523, 134,4581 31Cl 6661
16,6301
18,22916,26516,203
16, 08928,33023,08718,871
11,74811,26212,14911,013
44, 46755,82151, 50146,087
63,618j55,375155,033i
21,108,15,279,19, 018:22, 540!
21,531. 189,86340,478; 22,178 183,50048,157: 21,651'- 181,27352,725 20,926i 198,060
3C,61l! 13.2741 33,40638,079! 11,416! 26,90835,441; 8,7001 35,82330,140: 13,, 670i 37,894
7,142, 4,396' 10,555'i 29,5627,075: 4,007; 10,736! 30,9076,3881 4,043! 10,774. 32,1476,556: 4,238! 10,913. 32,845
85,972180, 781184,129!
I !77,772! 45,360! 252,83182,564! 44,3301 241,31587,64lj 41,125! 249,24337,1031 45,509! 268.799
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JANUABY, 1926 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIlSr 51
FEDERAL RESSRYE BANKS—RESOURCES AND LIABILITIES, BY WEEKS—Continued
RESOURCES—Continued
[In thousands of dollars]
I Total ;; Boston]
Reserves ot'acr than gold: i INov. 25 | 114,642!Dec, 2_ 114,938|:Dec. 9 : 107,616;Dec. 16 - . - . —-1 108,358;;
!16,932!17, 773;16,133j16,961 j
NewYork
27,14825,88325, 62025, 642
Total reserves:Nov. 25 „Dec. 2 _ ._Dec. 9.. _.Dec. 16—- - -
"Nonreserve cash:Nov. 25 ._Doc. 2Dec. 9Doc. 16.
.Bills discounted;Secured by U. S, Govern-
ment obligations—Nov. 25.. . _ . - -Deo. 2Dec. 9 —Dec. 16 —
Other bills discounted—Nov. 25...Dec. 2.Dec. 9Dec. 16 ,
2,860,535;'2,857,549!:2,829,901'2,809,944'!
45, 268 i.44, 389 f45,663!!
206,205!204, 324;2G0,191!198, 209j
4,054J3, 965'3, 94213,769!
346, 326 i314, 582i378,2723 4 3 , 1 2 1 j •
278, 388Jj329, 293!301,102J1
275,946::
Total bills discounted: ;Nov. 2:5Doc. 2.Dec. 9 _„..,pec. 36 - ,
Bills bought in onsen market: !Nov/25 I-.... . . , . -Dec. 2Dec. 9. :
Dec. 16. . ."U.S. Government securities: j
Bonds—Nov,25Dec. 2Dec. 9.. .!Doe, 16
Treasury n o t e s -No v. 25 •Dec. 2..... -'Dec. 9 _.,Dec. 16 !
Certificates of indebted-ness—
Nov. 25. "Dee, 2... jDec. 9 . . . JDec. 16 I
Total IT. S. Government se- |eurities:
Nov. 25.Dec. 2.Dee. 9Dec. 16
Other securities:Nov. 25.._Dec. 2Dec. 9._._Dec. 13..
Foreign loans on gold:Nov. 25 ,Dec. 2 „Dec. 9 _Dec. 16 _ _..
624, 714 ji643,8751
679,374 i!
619G67J
359,458'i357, 723 r369, 550352,6921:
56,285-56,269 j.56,276' I73,451 j;
244,439,:254, 858 '266,080!!1 5 3 , 7 4 0 M
31,575!'28,302i I29,517,;
171,280!!
15,724;15,406!18,187!18,841
16, 34623, 55528,02715, 80J
32, 070i38,961'47,114!34, 642i
85,992;79, 71879, 530
52952952S553
1,9932, 093!1,993|1.246|
6,4126,154|6,1549,350
332,299|339, 429351,873398,4711 _
3,150::3,150H..,3,1951:3.195JL.6,500i!8.300!1
8,300!:8,798i
7,9348, 7768, 676
11,149
481614614651
Total bills and securities:Nov. 25Dec. 2.
1,326,121 i 126,4771,352,4771' 128,069
Dec. 9 I 1,412 292.1 135,934Dec. 16 „ i 1,382,223. 128,489
Due from foreign banks: jNov. 25 I 658';
Dec. 2 _. 771/. ,Dec.& I 861" ..Dec. 16-..— i 710;.
993, 258996,823969, 618
Phila-del-phia
7,8516,5915, 2654,580
212, 542211,654221,025
939,839 227,516
14, 49614,96415,12316. 594
129, 49396, 727
144,3891103,177
1,034913809951
33,11335, 39933, 38834,056
63, ISO91, 032!67, G04j43, 490".
!Cleve- Rich-land mond
6, 2321 5,934: 5,959
5, 5254,7""
306,6951 121,985310,944304,009
118,635J23, 410
296,773 116,231
2,042! 3, 3842,823 3,6271 9 6 0 3 43,1,93 1
3, 4333 1 5 4
At-lanta
6,7566,3216,1666,508
Chi-cago
St.Louis
Min-neap-olis
KansasCity
14.995'3^55314.78314,7071
10,93810.61210,82l|10, 276
134,049132,778136,082140,966
3,1982,810% 945
I
1,8831, 9912,1712,171
I341,488344,357!336,855!331,373;
5,80S1
6, 478!6, 245 i
3,190; 3,1541 2,502j 6,0961
44,090!37,842i50, 380:;58,291
21,947j 33,873!23,7091 38,081!23, 750| 36,881122, 200j 43,850,
14,19012, 058;11, 604114, 682|
23, 759!25, 528!2(3, 715;30,181.
6,825! 42,252;6,682, 51,156i3,8>0i 55,767!
5,715 : 55,089:
20, 202! 30,71i;24, 472! 31, 034!21, 228, 34, 379:22,076! 42,405
I55, 405!66, 433!G2, 322,36, 363|
2,89oi2, 7412,6802, 705
9, 360,8,852!8, 26819, 76(5;
21, 508'15,813!14,375|12, 818!
96,97587,96382,95286, 300
6546.19823659
2,495 j2,451il,S48i2,610|
3, 56313, 6143,583 i3,689!
Dallas
5,9105,4845, 5525, 546
I81,802;86, 36991, 46o!90,824|
51, 27049,81446, 67751,055
1,864 I. 7721, 804! l', 4202,0311,897
9,877!
6, 540;8,853;
13,452!15, 209,11,405;116901
If1, 662
% 2522,3002, 4691, 767
6,8378, 47S8, 6797, 562!
SanFran-cisco
5,9706,1405,961
258,80124.7, 455255, 204274, 495
2,6623,1042, 7312, 484
36, 65539. 4004i; 82230, 274
23, 00028, 7GS24, 37620,094
192, 683!187,759!211,1931146, 667
35,408 :
34,83835,57017 908
55, 0G0 77, 963,59,108| 75; 923!
57,138' 87.261156, 256; 102; 1411
14, 570: 9,645'14,620: 9, 210-!
12, 743; 8, 243
37.949:37, 6881
38,31944,803 !
4, 568!
3, 962.3, 632!3,350'
27,027i 72,903'31,154, 82,190"25,038' 90.146J27,793; 97, 5841
05,986" 34, 451 j66,55J-- 31,712,'67, 556i 30, 836'66.038. 29,721;
30,868i 6,058 j
24,665! 6> 065'
22,443! 5,431|99 P.US' ' """
23,329! ?21, 518: 10, 77817,945' 31.14"
59,655
66,19822,584; 6,299. 20.543, 9,329| 50,368
23,425' 7,21, 583: 16,27,741| 21,738!32,408 20,491!
20, 642. 27, C9518,1601 29,96116,83G! 33,84315,635! 33,321
1P 257!1.257iI! 257!
16,419j
585! 7,965!
585j 7,9651585! 7,965604! 8,104
57,127! 11, 428! 21,989,68,114! 11,428! 21,98977,912' 11,428; 21,989=32,286 3,507: 17,608;
3,000 7,050. l ,026L.l,710i 7.. 050! 4761..3,280! ?; 050i 476!.,
91,182 14, 728; 3,010
1,101 j 8601 19,928;1,191: 8361 19,928'1,191' 839 39,928'1,240, 981: 20, 252j
4,253-' 12,406 \ 25,363!4,253, 12,406| 24,445.4,2c3 ! 12,406, 26,020!2,726! 7,873' 17,8681
| ! |...| 1,995! 1,714;;. 1.995! i;n4:j 2,045! 209:
892! 4,157: 12,565:
1,522:1,522-1
3,521|1 74G!
38,873,18,87318,873 i11,849
93L93: .93!
4,196
7,0081 8,13917,558, 8,139'7, 5581 8,139!7,665; 8,387!
i i
9.0201 23, 282i9; 020, 23,2829,020! 23,2S25,6G2\ 15,211
500
I61,384| 19,063j 30,980 5,444! 15,261 j 47,005| 20,488 IS, 5781 33,419|71,08.1! 19,0631 30,430 5,444, 15,237! 45,487: 20,488 16,5781 33,419182,449. 19,063| 30,430| 5,444? 15,290! 46,157 20,487| 17,078, 33 r419|
139,887i 18,839i 28.722' 4,858 : 13,011 50,685 17,791 i 15,289,1 32,970;
G, 7010,7067.033
22,42422,67422, 62314,382
1,690115115'
4,815|
30,36130,42831, 30231,764
535858
467
36, 28136, 28136,281
7,5977,5977,597
15,051
1,7552,24112,241!2,376!
3,050!3,050]3,050|3,050
605772
30,8071
29,490!29,444.26, 230|
43,93643,93643,93639,040
942
291,230i295, 919,331,453!306,8381
658.'_771L861 j .7.101-
92,34!9GS 613!92,76f91, 71:
440:.4401466i
260340|841;3S0!
897j1,145,1,145!1, 214;
382!382405
214!274!273i290!
100 i „100. „_ : .1001 !ioo'r... j
26o! 228 4553321 291: 581332! 29.1: 581352! 308; 616
119,284 48,305: 108,640i 155,316116,451 47,432! 113,2821 160,534:126,822 47,835; 108,225! 108,284'139,065! 53,637' 10^200 179,204;
75,080 30,165i 77,75G67,138, 39,897! 73,52Q!71,053! 44,545i 68,63273,188| 42,414 69,600
j67,219;' 134,40770,520 143.11374,726! 142,01769,188 121,788
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
52 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN' JANUARY, 1926
FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS—RESOURCES AND LIABILITIES, BY WEEKS—Continued.
RESOUEOES—Oontinued.
[In thousands of dollars]
ITotal Boston
Uncollected items:Nov. 25 iDec . 2 74.2; 551;Dec . 9 „ G92.811J1
Dee . 16 952; 147;B a n k premises: 1 !
N o v . 25 _: 61,817jDec . 2 .__' 62,021:Dec . 9 61,552|Dec . 1G [ 61,(307,
All o ther resources: !N o v . 25 J 18,454;Dec . 2_ . ._ 18,166|Dec . 9 „_. ! 19.362."Dec . 1 6 . . . 17; 032!
62,185
NewYork
i Phila- idcl ! Cleve- I Rich- I At- Chi- St. Min-
i ph ia !" i land ' mond : lanta : cago | Louis t ~jj}*f'oiis
. SanDallas | Fran-
i Cisco
60,17590, 655|
4,1904,190j4,190!4,190j
139.128!131"100i
149,786,171,0801
148, 220228,153'
61,179.06,347:
61,136|86,611'
63,937.57,13281, 946
17, 259': i, 334 7,94817,2(51 1,334- 8, 28117,261" 1,386 7,68117, 261. 1,386. 7, 681
4,5154,456:4. 6893| 235
281 388296 380312 1,112376! 1,007
62,81268,38663,51577,653
2,446:2,4462,446.2, 446
388372362377,
r ~ " "i41,918 83,359' 34,60540,818 89,872 36, 68540,979 86,772 36,10049,864 134,776 45,475"
2,781:2, 7902, 7902,791
2,157:2, 1492,1492,125
8,099:
1,506'1,5831,972;1, 998
4, 750:4,611.4,6274, 627
341333335363
15,052i16,048!
15,862!17,487:
I3,066!3,0663,0703,070
2,8052,707!2,622,2, 670!
42,731:45,544'46,38262,266i
I4,7724,77li4,830.4,884'
28,115; 42,10830,927! 44,70331,878! 44,66034,703; 52,568
I1,834' 3,338l,S34i 3,3381,834 3,3381,834: 3,338
737 1,330i 3,867737; 1,198 3,827710 1,201. 3,767541' 1,206' 3,634
Total resources:N o v . 25 _ 4,997.881!Dec . 2 _ ! 5,078,803Dec . 9____ ._ . . " 5,0621168Dec . 16 „ ! 5,2091.926 425,412, 1,512,630, 408,552j 529,662 253,398 305,448 661,546. 182', 721. 152,600- 220,002j 159,648! 458,307
LIABILITIES
Federal reserve notes in actualcirculation:
Nov. 25Dec. 2 _Dec. 9 „Doc. 16
Deposits:" Member bank—reserve ac-
count—Nov. 25Dee. 2...Dec. 9Dec. 16
Government—Nov., 25Dec. 2Dec. 9Dec. 16
Foreign bank—Nov. 25.Dec. 2Dec. 9Dec. 16
Other deposits—Nov. 25 ,.„Dec. 2Dec. 9Dec. 16
1.731, 510".: 171,279.I', 742, 706!-j 171,143^1,765, 627 J 173.179:1,788, 230". I 176; 824
2,219,813;: 142,5552,235,787i!- 142,810:2,246,386.1 143,0782,264,797", 143,492'.
362,455 148,167 227,863. 89,261 157,233 150,0621 39,143361,533 149,597 227,904 89,763- 159,995 152,885! 38,995362,979,156,730 231,549 90,778 161,173 157,1511389,551: 158,573. 232,510 ~~ "
850,396 130,585 176,101.868,834 131,254' 175,358'870,779 130.899 173,288852,827 13(>; 281: 186,482
...J 36,853.i 2,758'44,136"! 4,295'35,840 3,58l!
...... 5,954.1 280,
12,937j 150'.13, 002 I 161
.„....." 11,884-i 161:8,398 161 i
21.181 110:
. . ._• 20; 074: 113=20,420 115.
I 23,356 133;
Total deposits: . < 'Nov. 25 _„.„' 2,290,784 145,573,Dec. 2 __i 2,312,999 147,379Dec. 9 . . . „..„., 2,314,530 146,935sDec. 16 . 2,300,505, :L44.066'
Deferred availability items:Nov. 25 ; 622,853 60,202,Dec, 2 ..J 670,132 64,165"Dec. 9.. • 626,937; 58.180"Dec.16- : 827,072 78; 215.
Capital paid in: i ,Nov. 25 ..„ 116,844i. 8,611,Dec. 2 116,871 8,61liDec. 9. 116,8631,i 8,611:Dec. 16... 116,964 8,611;
Surplus: ] ••Nov. 25 : 217,837 16,382;Dec. 2 217,837: 16,382|Dec. 9 217,837 16,382'Dec.16 217.837, 16,382
All other liabilities: ,Nov. 25 _ _ - : 18,053! 1,203Dec. 2 . . . . . . „ ! 18,258, 1,200Dec. 9 _. 19,374' 1,276Dec.16.. . 19.318;i 1,314
13,717 92310.479 1,574!11,582 860;
533 154'
11,45811,41710, 2986,813
10, 5169, 5939,4668,965
188;202!
202202j
1,6283, 2533,989
766
217232.232232
290j 1,285370 1,211:234i 1,241628: 1,522;
4,3224,279.4, 5124,512:
69,583!69,82369,723'69,268
I3, 252,
731'2, 005:
13j
107|115115115,
90!
5369|
163;
82,039 321,96981,429 318,186180,348 323,530;83,714 336,499|
3,073 2,348!3,455 12,205 j1,745 3,251,443 442!
82,39483,16281,042
1,5942,3972,5101,121
83898989:
614754323
280;2991299:299!
902!934
1,0311,251
886,087 131,986! 179,231.900,323 133,4001 180,054:
902,125 132,195; 178,750869,138 137,265] 189,002:
127,458 56,243J 54,647144,258 61,747! 57,444;126,728 56,0481 51,011178,490 80,190! 70,632
32.131 11,545 13,141.32,132> n f 5G8; 13,141'32.132 11, 568| 13,14132,190 11,616; 13,141 i
58,749 20,059! 22,462158,749. 20,059! 22.46258, 749 20, 059 22; 462;58, 749. 20, 059 22,462
718| 1,511786; 1, 811:834! 1,893;849! 1,915'.
73,03270,722j
71,91269,559:
58,257.61,662"59,53672,501!
5,9785,9785,979:5,979
11,70111,701!11,70111,701;
1,091!1,074!1,095!1,095
85,256; 325,499!85,020 331,62482,236, 328,111!84,569 338,491,
35,183*34,60034,691!42,707
4,6454. 6451
4,6454, 646
71,738'78,073'74,472i
113,414;
15,721'15, 718!15, 71815,722i
8,950 30,426;8,950. 30,426,8,950 30,426!8,950 30,426
1,3761,417:1,4751,491
2,220:2,197!2,349!2,381:
100100100
84479894!
1,216
83,36985, 68786, 71483,479
34,50037,34835,61044,123
5,127j5,127!5,127!5,1271
9,97l |9,9719,97l!9,971!
961793850881
68,302'69,221.69,2I91
69,294
52,95452,480;
52,002:54, 698
1,525;1,6762,019
67.1031 46,920 203,722~ ~ ' " ~ 48,029. 205,446
48,327 206,65347,931; 207,883
68; 197169,0441
230298533
54,72054,45854,39256,267
13,90814,82414,24415,215
3,1783,1793,1803,183
7.4977', 4977,4977,497
1,1031,1211,3421,144
II
87,357 i87, 276.87,954!89, 679
1,8341,394i1,479!
149
818787j87
I, 158890S45j
I59,998! 165,43862,104! 163,77962,968; 168,65561,859| 168,956
1,340| 2,861937 1.740
l,04fl: i; 773163i 92S
717676,76;
89!79!44 i
144!
142152152152
5,G5So,7586,0815,578
j
90,430i 61,498! 174,09489,647 63,256i 171,42990,365! 64,3.34 176,66190,8151 62.242J 175,612
38,125,40.84040; 574i45,379|
4, 2621
4,259|4, 2504,237.
8,97718,977i8,977;8,9771
30,213!31, 486",32,510!36,480,
4, 277!4, 278!4, 278.4, 278,
7,5921
7, 5927,592:,7,592
42,37&43,68543,33349,726
8,2288,2358,2348,234
15,07115,07115,07115,071
819 1,040 1,689834 1,072 1,674841 i l,142i 1,765830! l,125i 1,781
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JANUARY, 1926 EEDEEAL liESEBVE BULLETIN 53
F E D E R A L E E S E E V E B A N K S - R E S O U R C E S AND LIABILITIES.. BY WEEKS—Cont inued.
LIABILITIES—Cont inued ,
[In thousands of dollars]
Total liabilities:Nov . 25.Dee. 2Dec. 9Dec. 16.
MEMORANDA
Ratio of total reserves to de-posit and Federal reservenote liabilities combined(per cent):
Nov. 25Dec. 2 „ ._.Dec. 9 __Dec. 16
Contingent liability on billspurchased for foreign corre-spondents:
Nov. 25.._ -Dee. 2Dec. 9..Dee. 16.
Own Federal reserve notesheld by Federal reservebank:
Nov. 25Dec. 2..Dec. 9». _. _-Dec. 16
Total i Boston i NewYork
; Phila- !i celphia!
4,997,8811.5,078,803;5,061,1685,269,926''
71. l!70.569.468.7,
403,250; 1,471,202;1,501,274;1,487,225!1,512,630
404, 663i425,412; :
368, 713!377,157;377,434|408,552i
Clove- -land ;
498,855!
502,816!498,800:529,6621
Rich-mond
239,320240,898241,001253,398
Atlanta Chi-cago
St.Louis
I
39,959'40,10145,4221
50,9671
306,410.310,131!321,020!325,9341
65.1|64. l |62. 5:61.8i
2,9462,95l!3,20613,206:
18,23319,189!
24,638.
79.6! 75.9 75.379.01 74.8' 76.276.6 76.5| 74.175.9; 76,9: 70.4
10,990.10,98713,795'19,340;
3,702!3,709!4,029'4.0291
595,666' 173,071
Minne-apolis
148,717&U£jUtOi OUUjUVU' itOjlUJ. XtOf IJ. t
294,6271 610,923 177,921! 150,300293,170! 608,227 177,117] 149,874305,448! 661,546 182,721] 152,600
75.2 55.3! 71. g!73.9! 54.21 71.1175.9 55.9. 69.4!71.7 56.9! 66.3 j
4,2604,2674,636
2,1102,11412,296:
2,296!
1,632!1,635iI,776:1,776'
I5,494!5, 504>5,979i5,979!
114,462 30,946'112,536' 34,140s
118,, 647. 28,634124,072! 29,841!
17,44019,983!21,
14,543 !
15,270,13,931 23,748i14,892! 22,580:
19,760j 16,69419,7571 20,972!,"" ""•" 19,981'
19,483'
45.253.3:49.6;46.0'
1,739"1,835i1,9931,993'
6,274:6,442'6,2101
6, 228j
.KansasCity
; SanDallas | Fran-
! cisco
299.716 151,540! 445,183212|754| 155,7131 445,540214,0511 157,983; 451,717220,002! 159,6481 458,307
78.871.167.5.68.7
1,3141,3161,4301,430
2V 6982,254".2,887'2,864j
52.054.7;57.4;56.6
1. 5921J5951,7331,733'
7.5837,0619,2409,472"
Ii
47.3j44.8i41.5!
68.565.766.671.8
1,393! 2,7871,396 2, 7921, 516 3.0331,516 3; 033
6,498! 51,2795,278 47.2495,834 45; 3725,570: 42,803
FEDERAL EESEEVE BANES—MATURITY DISTRIBUTION OP BILLS, MUNICIPAL WARRANTS, AND CERTIFICATES OFINDEBTEDNESS
[In thousands of dollars]
Bills discounted;Nov. 25Dec. 2Deo.9Dee. Ifi
Bills bought in oren markrt:Nov.'25 1Dec, 2_.
Total
624,714643,875679,374619,067
3£9,458357,723
Dee. 9 ___ ...i 369,550- ~ ' 352,692
31, 57528,30229, .5.17
171,280
Dec. 16.Certificates of indebtedness:
Nov. 2.5Dec. 2 ..._..Dec. 9 . . .Dec. 18 .„
Municipal warrants:Nov. 25__..Dec, 2Dee. 9......Dec. 10... .„.
Within Ifi ! 10 to 30days , days
494,404 ,5io,7i9:549,433483,252 '
104,633 I307,875 ,113,683100,223 i
3,723 '4,691 ; .6,526 :_
92,730 .
31 to 60days
61 to 90 91 days todays 6 months
._... 1. • ._
35,17739, 64938, 27840,275 I
65,345 I61,183 I64,550 i70,338 •
2,424 J.
56, 76152,726 !
49,636 !
49, 247 ;
107,422 1111,115 '108,277 '99,096 i
i28,53831,162 I31,818 j35,871
63,917
50-85* i67.039 !
9,5139,2979,86910,045
18,34116, 09814,56015, 996
Over 8months
4,6894, 68921,323
341322340377
20,73918; 92218,30257,227
4545 '
4545
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
54 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN JANUARY, 1926
FEI3E&AL RESERVE NOTES—FEDERAL HESSEVE AGENTS' ACCOUNTS, BY WEEKS
[In thousands of dollars]
I ':I ! !j Total ,' Boston | ^"ork
Phila- | Cleve-delphiaj land
Federal reserve notes receivedfrom comptroller:
Nov. 25 .. . . 2,912,652"=! 250,412 744,037'Dec. 2 2,922,308i: 254,932 741,189iDec. 9 ! 2,930,395!i 254,117 741,706Deo. .16 ! 2,945,883!: 259,227 743,463!
Federal reserve notes held by , j ! IFederal reserve agent: i' i
Nov . 25 874,732' 60,9001 267,1201Dec. 2 . I 869.531=1 64,600! 267,120;Dec, 9 _ ! 843,748 i 56,300i 260,080Dec. 16 _ | 831,719; 58,600; 249,840."
Federal reserve notes issued to , j ' jFederal reserve bank : I
Nov . 25 _ _ !
Dec. 2__ !Dec. 9 _.!Dec. 1(5 _..!
Collateral held as security forFederal reserve notes issued to .'Federal reserve bank : •; |;
Gold and gold certificates— |Nov. 25 | 305,300iiDec. 2__ 304,901Dec. 9_.._ _ 304,501:;Dec. 16 303,8511
Gold redemption fund— '!Nov . 25 106,481-:Dec. 2 .i 102,8281!Dec. 9__.._ ! 108,645 j'1
Dec. 16 i 108,101.'Gold fund, Federal Reserve L
Board— j1
Nov. 25- 043,682j.Dec. 2 935,695 !
Dec. 9 _._. 89'i,42Sijpec. 16.
Eligible paper—Nov. 25-Doc. 2Dec. 9 . . . ....____Dec. 16 ._.!
Total collateral— INov. 25.... IDec. 2 !Dec. 9 'Dec. 16 i
!I
209,713! 280,223214,737| 288,607218,014' 287.917223,214| 290,853
I30,6001
31,000i33,200,
34,92040, 72034,520
34,800, 345020
2,037, 920 i 189,512! 476,917; 179,113! 245,3032,052,837; 100,332! 474.089, 183.737' 247,8872,086,647'; 197,817 481,6261 185J 4141 253,3972.114,184:: 200,627i 493,623, 188,414: 256,836
35,300 186,697i 4,400: 8,78035,300i 186,698' 4,000' 8,78035,300! 186,698: 3.6001 8,78035,300 186,698.' 3,200. 8,780
27,544:27,529,"27,411:27,411'
9 3 0 , 5 5 3 M949,410.999.029!i.919,180 ji
14,225:12,54518, 730!
14,240i
35,000! 156,00035,0001 156,00030.000 106,00035.0001 186,000
118,062' 190,987118,6791 185,501126,644' 212,777116,689! 131,184
12,296;10,320:11,198i11,998,
14,19113,97512,48512,924
2,286,016!- 202,587! 561,2282,292,834'! 201, 524i 555,7282, 306, 601 ii 210, 6741 532,886
106,389109,389114,389120,889
I57,65062,68Gi56,354,53,398
Rich-mond
i I1 Atlanta:
Chi-cago
131,284, 226,453' 429.963;132,510 225,592' 431,144i132,188: 230,23!' 431,369j133,425 23Q,575| 431,332
27,480 49,460j 203,20727,479' 45,840! 257,28727,479i 45,310' 254,23725,970i 44,910! 250,737
103,804' 176,963 166,756105,031! 179,752, 173,857104,709! 184,921i 177,132107,4551 185,665' 180,595
21,180!21, ICOi21,160!21,160!
2, 465;.4, 232;2, 7101
4,487i
I10,200j_10,200'.,10,200'..10,200'.,,
7,4141 4,1515,672! 4,142i9,252.' 4,142j7,695; 4.091i
160,000110,3001160,000,160,000'
I87,578.84,778!95,490:109,388'
47,500,44,50049, 500!46,500;
38,922i40, 515;45,532,
70,00070,00074,00075,000
92,95597,84192,53293,764
180,735! 270,549! 110,051: 180,569186,398: 267,533: 108,814' 183,513185, 541! 270,755' 113,885! 185,984
2,313,939j 201,229, 511,293! 189,485 291,092, 117,679, 186,651
St. Minnie- KansasLouis I apolis j City
eLouis I apolis City
110,645;110,645!110,645'110,645!
107,232113,739,120,807;127,106:
222,028J228,526'235,594!241,842;
70,917170,737169,95569, 748
88,230! 99,31987, 44,'ii 99,09190,196' 100.584.90.33S 102; 136
25,500 17,230! 24,63325,300 55.970' 23,83324,900 18;090! 22,300.24,380i 18,230! 22,900
45,41745,43745,05545,388
10,57510,57510,57510,325
1,152870
1,663
71,00071,47572,10672,158
74,68675,25878,28479,236'
13,05213,05213,052:,. . „13,052i
1,8571,072
863!1,815
68.500- 313,80107,889= 308,49567,193' 306,32566,533." 304,986
15,082!14,582:' 551800IS, 082 54,30C13,032! 54,30C
53,418 255,00153,307 252,69554,161 252,02553,501 250,686
15,136 . . „15,136'15,136-15,136;. . . .
2.5223; 594
4,139
2,575l2,965;2,768!
I
15,90S15,63015,22915,029
3,500; 51,000, 81,3603, SCO1 48,000' 33,3603,500' 40,000! 43,3603,000! 39,000 46,360
54,292j46,111'50,181''64,983!
699699i61,338j65,12869,971 j
12,82022,47626,547126,297)
78,729J84,600,80,482.80,164
43,90439,61934, 720!36,108!
77,786'76, 573,81,067.86S 607!
I1,500'1,50011,000:1,000,
i36,164i40,737'44,987!42,645!55,375.GO, 338!
63,891!61,390,
170,788183,801162,032179,413
98,51897,47582,088
276,680277,949274,736276,528
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JANUARY, 1926 FEDEBAL RESEBVE BULLETIN 55
FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS—HOLDINGS OF RILLS AND SECURITIES AND EARNINGS THEREON, NOVEMBER, 1825
[In thousands of dollars]
i: ITotal
HOLDINGS ON NOVEMBERSO,1825
Total bills and securities.. Jl.391,150Bills discounted for members ' 679,400Bills bought in open market „„! "~ ""United States securitiesOther seem itiesForeign loans on gold
Bills Discounted
Rediscounted bills:Commercial and agriculture I
paper, n. e. s >Trade acceptances, domestic.Secured by U. S. Govern-
ment obligationsMember bank collateral notes:
Secured by IT, S. Govern-ment obligations
Otherwise secured
Total discounted bills
Bills Bought
Bills payable in dollars:Bankers' acceptances based
on—Imports .„.ExportsDomestic transactions. . .Dollar exchangeAll o t h e r . . . „„._
Trad9 acceptances-Based on importsDomestic. _.. _ _
Bills payable in foreign currencies
Total purchased bills
United States Securities
United States bondsTreasury notesCertificates of indebtedness..
Total U. S, securities
DAILY AVER AGE HOLD-INGS DURING NOVEMBER
Total bills and securities >Bills discountedBills boughtUnited States securitiesForeign loans on gold
EARNINGS DURING NOV-EMBER
Total bills and securities i .Bills discountedBills boughtUnited States securitiesForeign loans on gold
ANNUAL RATE OF EAEN-INGS
Total bills and securities *.Bills discountedBills boughtUnited States securitiesForeign loans on gold
358,835341,818
3y1508,147
1G0,7512,888
1,778
121,388
579,400
155,519130,38959,2985,024
729
95183
642
358,635
264,78130,790
341,818
1,288,731595.997352| 229331,943
5,260
3,8211,819
20
Boston I NewYork
! Pfcila- i Clove-jdelpbiai land
Rich- ! At-inond ! lanta
!l34,645 337,17237,284 ;220,60787,974 43,1158,778 71,209
91,299 133,560 49,673 '100,116- • - - - — • - - - - 2 9 o e i
511 i 2.241
54.48313;93119,0033,050
772
73.371 ! 39,9078,871 3,882
30,430 5,444I 64,449! 15,236
440 ! 340
I "T
Chi-cago
St. ' Minne-1 KansasLouis j apclis j City
168,147 ! 73,571 29,34488,306 I 30,434 0,09332,521 i 22,268 j 6,39948,175 I 20,487 16,578
1,145
73,928. 21,015I 19,060i 33,419.1 100
332
19,513 26,027 10,52255 ! 223 • 99
21,551 | 21,821 : 39,327488 i 320 i 292
133 i 429 169 '
17S533 1133,905 ! 3Is107 ' 39,227 12,309 ji 60,452 ! 12,667 j 11,676 5,282 ,
275
6,1013,296
37,284 1220,607 ; 54,483 \ 73,371 j 39,907 , 29,091
I
41,593 !27,918 !
17,434 I1,025 i
15,54117,8596,9841,071 !
479 I_
846 :..83 L
252 .
4,3075,9933,031 '
3,0601, 213
120
1235:35
3,524
28,60428,1866,929
730
27,693 117,171 3,431 11,938 6,925 i 5,032717 | 548 i........ ! 18 | 124
, SanDallas i Fran-
! cisco
60,137 i10,853 i26,973 !31?065 ;
141,66067,95629,187
241 58:;.
10 ! 588 24
j58,439 ! 8,930 . 2,451 j 6,940 ! 2,303 43,3501,447 ! 3,197 ! 211 i 2,113 | 1,600 19,447
88,306 j 30,434 | 6,093 i 21,015 j 10,853 j 67,056
12,961 |12,547 j6,209 i554 '250 '
10,393 3,735 j 9,744 ! 12,135 12,3948,686 ' 2,268 7,504. ! 11,367 10,7682,867 ' 363 1,696 ! 3,099 | 5,349322 l 33 ! 116 I 377 i 676
105
87,974 j 43,115 : 13,931 j 3,871 j 3,882 j 64,449 32,521 j 22,208 | 6,399 j 19,060 ! 26,978 j 29,187
I i : i I !529 ! 1,257 ; 585 1 7,965 I 1,191 ! 835 19,92:
2,093 I 67,619 I 11,428 ' 21,989 j 4,253 i 12,406 24,84;6,154 I 2,333 ' 7,050 j 476 j i 1,995 1,40
8,776 I 71,209 | 19,063 j 30,430 j 5,444 \ 15,236 46,171
1,62118,873
83
7,558 i 8,139 : 6,701 ; 589,020 i 23,282 ! 22,674 ; 36,281
..j 1,998 j 3,690 i 7.597
30,430 j 5,444 j 15,236 46,175 j 20,487 1 16,578 I 33,419 | 31,065 j 43,9
125,445 1200,159 ! 91,532 -,118,1332 i 52,983 I 99,32937,976 :167,O89 -. 53,. 39V , 76,010 ! 42.321 j 24,51378,797 i 29,170 I 15J486 13,137 ! 4,942 i 59.498
' --' " 19,063 .--.-•78,8,2S5
3776.1,5911,409
13,137 i 4,94230,907 ' 5,443
578 '277
. 9 815,104
214
161,22070,18934,84345,469
719
i
361 ;115 '222 •
23 !1 i
749 !483 '
80 :181 !
6 |-
274 !157 I
4362
2
354 I227 !
31 i94 i
2 •
1691391415
29180167431
3.813.713.403.624.50
I
I3.50 !3.683.433.32 !4.50 j
3.50 !3.50 i3.32 '3.58 I4.50 ,
3.643. 583.403.9:4,50
8. 633. 033.433. 684.50
3.87 i4,00 •3.51 I3. 20 [4.50 I
3.574.003.413.464.50
iI
71,87429,17421,96920,484
247
31,708 j 79,357 \ 69,351 137,1415,747 ! 18,524. ! 9,624 ! 60,5333211 ! 26181 i 28722 I 32,273
439573,211 ! 26,181
16,578 I 3-1,226172 I 209
,628,722 I30,826 !
179 ;43,957
378
471 i231 I97
1403 !
21896 :62 ,59 ,
:
98 I 23839 ! 6125 I 73 j53 i 1021 II
202 I32 j8089 !1 !
3961769C
126
I
3.794. 003.403.764.50
3.684.00 "3.41 :.3.52 ;4.50 ;
3.774.003,413.894.50
3.65 !4.00 i3.40 i3.63 j4.50 !
3.554.003.413.534.50
3.513.598.403.494.50
* Figures include Federal intermediate credit bank debentures, as follows: Philadelphia, average daily holdings, $3,085,000; earnings, $10,313:;annual rate of earnings, 4.06 per cent; Kansas City, average daily holdings, $216,667; earnings, $704; annual rate of earnings, 3.95 per cent.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
56 FEDERAL, RESERVE BULLETIN JANUARY,1926
FEDERAL RESERVE RANKS—VOLUME OF DISCOUNT AND OPEN-MARKET OPERATIONS DURING NOVEMBER, 1925
[In thousands of dollars]
Total Boston ii
NewYork
Phila- i Cleve- Rich- i *tUr.ttldelphia; land i mond A t l a n * a
Chi- St.cago Louis
Total Volume of Operations..|i2,878,846
Bills discounted for member ib a n k s - . - .._ j 2,537,986ill b h t i k t 244943b a n k s . ..
Bills bought in open market..-U. 8. securities bought in |
open marketForeign loans on gold j
244,943
I;203, 775 1,159, 510 1203,400 J270,170 201,867 106, 500 ,245,724
i 150,081 11,007,694 ! 193, 2371 50, 009 | 92, 032 j 5, 679
267,909 -1JS9.9371,705 ; I', 617
2,923 |762 !
56,575 j 4,0003,159 ' 484 313
Rediscounted bills: 'Commercial, agricultural, i
ana livestock paper, in. e. s ! 143, 208
Demand and sight drafts—! 3,856Trade acceptances ' 1,643Secured by U. S. Govern- i
ment obligations i 1,161Member bank collateral notes: |
Secured by U. S. Govern- :ment obligations ....; 1,806,842
3,712
6 2 •
12,329 i 6,955 \ 15,919 | 12,717
151"; B6"j 388~! 189"
__.._! 88 I 210 ! 104
55,366 : 793,504 ; 122, 687 1192,715 1115,988 | 24,888Secured by eligible paper s i 581,256 |, 90,893 I 201,710 j 63,457 i 58,677 i 70,939 ! 16,058
Total bill3 discounted--! 2,537,966 1,150,081 1,007,694 1193, 237 [287,909 ,199,937
Average rate (305-day basis)%| 3.77 •; 3. 83Average matur i ty (in clays): | \\
Member bank collateral iinotes... i 7.08 ii 8.65
Rediscounted bills j 54.05 i; 39.42Number oi' mem.ber banks on 1 ••]
Nov. 30 ! 9,521 i. 419Number of momber banks ae- \ {.
cornmodated during month.! 2,876 / 176Per cent accommodated I 30.2 j: 42.0
Bills Bought in OpenMarket
From member banks ! 70,016 j; 22,401From nonmeraber banks, i ,i
banking corporations, etc.: I ;•With resale agreement • 104,611 ' 5,455All other— , 70,316 i1 22,153
Total bills bought . „...... j 244,943 \ • 50,009
Rates charged: j :"" 1 per cent ! 141,928 ,per cont „ .
per cent „_ . . |Ys per cent j
3% per cent . . . jH per cent ;
4 per cent ....Average rate (365-day basis) %. ••Average maturi ty (in days) 3_Class of bills: :
Bills payable in dollars 3— ;Bankers ' acceptances ;
based on—Imports. . . JExports . 'Domestic trans- ;
actions ,Dollar exchange,-!Unclassified 1
Trade acceptances-- ,Foreign i
Bills payable in foreign icurrencies '
74,84620,0453,8682,286
311,9393. 4360.12
56,228 I44,419 1
24,870 i1,565 112,218 ,
733 •
8,42529,23411,071
448824
Total . . . .I 140,332
U. So Securities Bought In iOpen Marke t \
United States bonds. „•Treasury notes [Certificates of indebtedness...1
Total-.
2,783 ,52,256 !31,966 j
87,005 I
73.46
76.04
23,3168,593
7,598698
4,349
44,554
1502,773
2,923
3.50 ! 3.68 j
! !6. 51 I 8.70 I
60.56 i 52.10 !i !
880 ! 753 I
362 I41.1
363 !
48.2 \
3.75
49.78
863
32537.7
4.00
2.9149.89
604
25642.4
3,160
87,6241,298
2,006 ; 1,705 250
3,673 1,367
92,082 ;
91,102 I273 i48 i105 1
5,679 i
1,483 !4,042 I
1 5 4 •
1,
1,
705
23219358105
52331
1,617
727640250
3.31 !19.03 !
1,322 |1,873 1
207 I5 i
392 1
3.4161.11
3.4778.63
3.5449. G8
2,239 ;2,373 :
1,017 '•50 !..
308 ,397 i
627 j
363
1,254
31
105
4,458 ; 5,679 ! 1,705 i 1,617
41,452 1.15,123 I 4,000 i . . . .!. .„„.
56,575 I 4,000
3 Includes $500,00 federal intermediate credit bank debentures. * Includes bills takes under a resale v contract.* Exclusive of acceptances bought under a resale contract.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JANUARY, .1926 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN 57
REPORTING MEMBER BANKS IN LEADING CITIESPRINCIPAL BESOUBCES AND LIABILITIES, BY WEEKS
[In thousands of dollars]
Number of reporting banks:Nov. 1 8 . ; 722!Nov. 25 „.. 722;Doc. 2 722;Dec. 9 ._ 722;
Loans and discounts, gross:Secured by TJ. S.
Government obliga-tions—
Nov. 18 | 166,202Nov. 25__.. -i 163,635'Dec. 2 | 167,126Dec. 9.. 175,892!
Secured by stocks andbonds— j
Nov. 18. . . . ! 5,419,724Nov. 25...... ......I 5,417,924Dec. 2 „_„_; 5,415,508!Dee. 9 , 5,440,124
All other loans and \discounts— i
Nov. IS _ 8,429,190Nov. 25__. ..i 8.377,653Dec. 2 _.. _: Si423,302Dec. 9..... .: 8,435,708
Total leans and dis-counts—
Nov, 18 -14,015,1161
Federal reserve district
10,83011, 75011,89711,480
New Phila- i Clcvc-York delphia! land
Rich-
102;102102!102!
59,863'55,119!55,125164,558
351,865 2,373,185335,89812,394,728!337,429 j2,394,253 i342,05l!2,388,693
672, 3402, 619, 07652,797-2,588,108;668,008:2, 617,535!664,724 2, 623, 670!
1,035,0355,052,126!
54;54!54!54!
11,982-12,380 i12,, 557i12; 726'
380.830,377; 268!378,753i388,553!
371,4001
377,866!365,183!
362,843
757575751
19,028:19,347!.19.598!20; 077|
A+i-, «., r^v,- „„« St. j M i n n e - ! KansasA t l a n t a Chicago L o u i g a p o ] i s j C i t y
72727272|
6,6527,1076,34616,174!
494,008496, 749496,585501,906
7,9507,637!7,4418,333
SanFran-cisco
100-"IOO!100100
S3!33 '33!
24!24:24-24!
147,318! 99,316140,7051149,237,147,073;
94,85892,56893,957
0311776.3321 371,824; 426,770J 626| 373,0881 430,07-765,148: 375,939; 429,9?'759; 206. 376,2291 427,7
!
r4 1.936 1,7311.
N o v . 25 13,9;7J, 212||1,000,443 5,037, 955iDec . 2 ...114,005,936 1,017,334-5, 066, 913j 756J 493.1, 281, 331Dec . 9 . . . . . ...14,051,724;
U. S. pre-war bonds:Nov. 18 _ _..._. • 221,163Nov. 25. . . ____• 220,557Dec. 2 : 221,341Dec. 9 ' 222,425
U. S. Liberty bonds:Nov. 18 ._• 1,380,786Nov. 25.,.. • 1,386,891Dee. 2- 1,396,429'-Dee. 9 ! 1,404,27211
U . S . Treasury bonds:Nov. 18. ; 428,598!Nov. 25.... 429,3041Dec. 2 _., 431,377Dec. 9 ' 434,5021
IT. S. Treasury notes: •• INov. 18...* .-.-! 349, 624jNov. 25 ... — ! 354,9621Dec. 2 . ., 350,5841Dec. 9 ...i 345,448
U. S. Treasury certificates: ;Nov. 18.. 1 86.071Nov. 25.. I 85; 030;Dec. 2 I 84,155Doc. 9.. J 85,951!
Other bonds, stocks, and !securities: |
Nov. 18 .. J 2,937,Nov. 25... i 2,927,9851Dec. 2 .1 2,908,807.Dec. 9. .! 2,924,475:
Total investments: 1 INov. IS 5,409.940'Nov. 25 _ 5,404, 729:Dee. 2 l 5,392,693iDec. 9 i 5,417,073=
Total loans and invest- jments: !
Nov. 18 19,425,056:Nov. 25.. lie, 363,941!Dec. 2... 119,398,629,Dec. 9..,.. 119,468,797;
Reserve balances with \Federal Reserve bank: !
Nov. 18 1,694,454!Nov. 25. - . 1,655,647:Dec. 2... 1,668,229!Bee, 8 l,683,188i
.1,018,255-5,081, 921! 764,122.1,281,189
25,336; 7,039,23,895 9,051-:25,547= .11,096.25,054 9,842,
857,890 192,838,843,296 196,978;840,014 198,094'842,185; 203,607!
2,4332,4132,4292,432
4,0253,9093,9754,011
3,1663,2123, .1733,165
67,293 109,094! 78,092'66,410" 112,683! 77,45267,242 111,6311 77,56369,729." 115,136' 77,202
1,229,2811 308,598! 181,655, 325,829! 233,7991L. 208,898! 308,067, 181,720s 328,206! 239, 5301L, 214,426; 309,697' 181,513; 326,495! 241,762:..229,742' 299,840 181,594 330,082! 239S 738|
7,8987,8157,9428,040
267,995274,901272,139270,032
913.0179I8| 673927,660935.309
764,21S11,289,368; 525,794; 533,297 2,112,507 508,475' 251,381 438,948j 315.057,1,767,514 1, 286, 722 520,900! 532,569 2,076,089 514,096, 250,543 444, 798j 320,194J1,7 * « AG1} "! 9521 3'41 KQ1 KOO: K9Q OAK'1) fV70 O5J7 JVItt £ « 7 0^1 1K4I AAO i(\1 1OO JQC :1
, .188,910. . . . , 320,19411,201,389
531, 522< 529,945,2,079,987! 518,887 251,184! 442,101 322,498:1, 207, 741529.476 530,02112,096,981! 513.289 253,755! 449,229 320,1051,213,381
9.6349,634;9, 634!
85, SW85, 75285, 75585, 708,
18.460.18,941!
18,689-18,689.
4,942'4,3994i 392;
4,391
6,53416,594,6, 5036., 568:
40,3GSJ40,368!40,367-40,457i
595, 1171
590,30G!
604,360!612,117
198,987199,037;201,149,204,302J
lG7.34li168,03]':166,3571
163,743;
15, 755i15, 497:16, 59516,052
206,3081,138,472205,1731,132,456.203,7811,106,301212,2193,106,716
331,247.2,150,040330,493 2,152,295328, 754 2,135,129337,209*2,143.. 387
9,4839,48S9,483!9,483|
49,911149,406!49, 76249,923;
i16,27916,406!16,448'lC, 376;
7,753!7,654!
7, 675!6,9C4!
4, osa'4,070'4,046:
4,196!
i
249,543!249,151!
248, 263!249, 036
337,007;336,175!335, 682'335,923
33,081B3,08333,08133,083
170,420169, 634168,938:168,8141
34,95734,98434,973:34,849!
27,713!26,734!
26, 637!25.691J
jId, 46915. 73315' 712;
G:, 541,
343,262'343, 70ft-354,475356-191'
25,563;25, 563;25, 564 -25,564!
29.263 i29, 283!29,165"29,336j
7, 655|7,6057,605'7,669:
2,0241
2,0241
2,0G3i2,155j
1, 923;
1,923i1, G23i1,923,
63,0761"62,827j
63,007;62,932'
625,902 129.504:623,870; 129; 225!633,810' 129,387,635,1871 129,579
14,89814,33513,98714,881
H, 69915,19,-14,71214,937
5,78?5, 78J5,7825,771
2,3442,3441,9751,975
4,3174.318!4; 3021
4,135
50,303'50,858:49, 579!49,522'
92,3421
92,831'90.337!91J2211
17.56117.56217, 55917,659
176, 6211179,0321179, 675|179,350
52,94753,27253,07753,151
59,74765, 52465; 77564,608
7,2917,] 186,9557,118
12, 707; 7,096 9,17812,7071 7,036! 9.183!12,957 7,171 ! 9; 183112,957 7,1711 9,183
23,158!
23, lOSi23,149;
10,64o|10,65310,640J10,693 i
6,584!6,803!6,5916S 587!
2, 7192,267;2,269!2,295j
26, 704'26, 992.26, 601 i26,456;
12,282-12,28212,277,12,277-
17,1701
16,057:16,552.17,304
2,5203, 6433, 6434.643:
48,85248, 62948, fllOj
14,129!13, 778;14,04714, .175
16,07716,11416,054:15,4531
3,8323,8253,712:3,837
17,20817, 20817,958!17,958'
18,720|17,75417,804!17,950|
6,106J6,186'6S 349;6,239|
7,508!83 338!,6,338'6,539
3f382j3,3821,813]1, S13|
24,38124,39224,39224,392
147,952
147,933147,452
50,37560,37850,341SO, 311
30,36130,34030,175
17,23616, 66216, 68216,830
422,7121 112.019; 43,350 76,982"437,142, H i ; 0581 43,248 77,836:419,219! 110,348! 43,300' 77,46s1
425,374' HO) 355j 43,226= 76,809;
736,879' 167,827! 109,122 169,050'739.6501 166,473! 109,258' 169,365;742,260; 165,913! 109,544' 169,075'747,260| 166,0361 111.077 168,537:
24, 723i23,974;23,826:
78,64fi!77,591!74,236!
74,325'
206,010209f 807209,037
476,315477,50347S, 560477,352
1,366,2827,208,168^1, 330,9367,190,250 1,1, 346,088 7,202,042 1,1,355; 464:7, 225,3081.
101,285:1,915,270' 655,288' 625,639 2,849,3861 676,302! 360.503 607,998; 303,702:1,665,225103, 6891,910, 592i gge, 125J 625,400 2,815,739| 680,569' 359,80i ; 614,163! 397,785=1,678,892092,175!l,91£,147i 660,909; 620,282 2,822,247, 684,800; 360,728' 611,178! 396.734J1,686,3Q1100,045J1, Oie, 356' 659,0551 621,242 2,844,241! 679,325: 364,832 617,786j 3941430,3,690,733
96,225"95,241 i95,574;95,939!
776,085760,422775,184789,945
84,255! ISO., 760' 41,737! 4«,304| 243,707 51,107| 27,20l! 54,928; 30,45l! 111,63481,200! 12S.836. 41,628-' 45,731! 243,695 48,285| 25S 348! 63,082| 28,572; 110,59779,5321 123,536, 43,030! 44,703! 239,585 50,327! 24,937 52,951: 80,440" 110,38078,602! 121", 213: 41,697i 43.468 : 245,451 50,608' 24,283' 53,6141 80,5711 115,787
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
58 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN JANUAKY, 1926
PRINCIPAL RESOURCES AND LIABILITIES, BY WEEKS—Continued
[In thousands of dollars]
Total
Cash in vaul t : | •N o v . 18 | 288,5711N o v . 25 ..., I 299,213iDec. 2 j 293,534;Dec. 9 J 313,407!
Net demand deposits: I ;
Nov . 18 'l3,247,076:
Nov . 25 ._ '13,025,048Dec. 2 . . 13,099,512Dec. 9 . . . _ 113,154,207,;
T ime deposits: jNov . 18 J 5,320,800.Nov . 25_._. .._! 5,359,673.Dee. 2... .! 5,347,552.Dec, 9 ! 5,342,727
Government deposits: ;Nov . 18 j
"I50,41245,244.45,146,38, 566'
Federal reserve district
Boston NewYork
Nov. 25 ._Dec. 2Dec. 9
Bills payable and redis-counts with Federal re-serve bank:
Secured by U. S. Gov- jernment obligations—! !
Nov. 18 I. 202,247,Nov. 25.. ....| 253,066:
Dec. 2 1 224,258:!Dec, 9.
All other—Nov. 18...Nov. 25..Dec.2._.Dec. 9 . . .
:i9,617!18,674!20,225!22,009;
81, 72291,017181.872j89,168
922,600:5,763,804904,285'5,670,209899,87li5,719,198897,67415,726,765
300,614 1,163,624387,332 1,184,8903S6,53411,171,9534C4,55111,169,727
3,310! 15,5612,979' 14,0062,980i 14,0062,531! 11,910
284,5G6 !ji
185,273! I174,628!226,592'1
2,970' 71,3192,4961 108,0623,720! 73,9023,650! 119,891
20,023; 49,1829, 492! 53, 26016,013' 80,91821,449! 56,836
j Atlanta1' Chicago
! !
16, 65018, 63017, 63319, 57~
32,613i 15,410; 11,438 51,41832,341, 15,411; 10,5011 52,36334,556; 15,270' 10,932* 53,55737,530 16,064; 11.879' 53,911
St.Louis
Minne- Kansas!apolis I City 1
SanFran-cisco
8,254'8,1397,0951
8,5851
772,2051,022,210764,939: 997,720i760,4601,012,732!768,0241,009,741
198,964)199,936|
756,307755,510;
201,482! 751,927i200,368| 743,569i
387,074382,728391,133390,948
202,154205,353203,126202,480
4,471! 7,298i 1,0894,026' 6,553! 9814,026! 6,542! 9793,374! 5,420: 834
11,770; 30,101, 7,92511,981! 29,938 7,72114,695! 22,375 6,64612,190 j 35,937; 5,802
12,737! 31,148 11,68411,967! 25,460 9,00212,888] 29,622 11,58512,109 27,662 13,174
5,710!5,997!5,781!6,1311
12,27812,513"12,403113,144j
373,9341,802,185 399, 465!
366,8681,755,518 401,284'362,7301,742,943 418,328'365,756:1,763,421: 421,684
217.692'l.014,272! 213,854:217,504ii;020,866 213,808217,0761,020,626 208,628217,1561,027,704- 205,066:
i ;2,780; 4,814' 1,298'2,505! 4,131, 1.173'2,505; 4; 131! 1,173'2,1421 3,770. 995
235, 606' 483,437!233,124' 476,054:235,544; 478,561 i237.919 487,142!
107,94.1 i 137,994;109,848 144,200
11,157.11,179.10,817'11,208;
282,817;282,264'285,791|286,680;
95,734'96,408'
107,793 144,451 96,528108,804! 143,949: 96,541!
6,0555,230'
15. 51212'. 106117; 155i14,033;
21,872'32,653!
42, 27046,852:
9,7871
12,107'.12,237;16,360!
3,720i4,114!4,028-!
809\724724
2,900'!1,600!i,6oo!1,000
574! 2,202513! 1,983!513! 1,982:437! 1,684:
16.117'..15; 057:10,377-9,283.
326526845
4,473!7,816;4,258,4,670,
6,037[5,5808,179|4,582
1,5062.059119282,289
22,30422,45123,39324,201
801,739790,055792,221798,453
821.650S24i 018827,428822,812
6,2065,5855,5854, 745
37, 63639,39642,85745,522
6,354 6,6925,731 14,4407,615! 19,4777,743 14,760
REPORTING MEMBER BANKS IN 12 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK CITIES—BANKERS BALANCES
[In thousands of dollars]
Federal reserve bank city
; Total II (12 cities)
Boston
Due to banks: !Nov . 18 2,215,437Nov . 25 2,132,809Dec. 2 ._ 2,276,766Dec. 9 2,241,303 ,
D u e from banks : * i!Nov . 18 ! 635,072 |iNov . 25 i 608,979 j |Dec. 2 __.! 649,109 ||Dec. 9 ; 604,927 |i
1,039,3571,018,7781,109,6021,082,863
38,16240,07645,29237,714
ICleve- Rich- * t lnT1*Jland mond ; A t l a n i - a
; i
St. j Minne-! KansasLouis I apolis ! City
i180, 764 1170,527 1180, 526 j171,700 !
43,613 38,526 .. 25,474 j 352,693 84,148 ! 56,276 1101,390An ™* ' 37172 i 26,395 337,316 ' 81,157 | 55,704 | 95,849
17 ; 24,650 • 355,657 •• 87,370 i 57,982 101,33708 1 26,134 355,149 i 86,991 j 6C, 106 102,633
42,29443,80442,930
110,101 I 69,040101,840107,14299,114
59,65573,61362,430
24, 60927,10623,54524,118
20,098 I 15,245 156,455 ! 36,075 23,43621,695 13,379 ! 151,168 ' 37,635 25.40720,729 ! 14,109 j 164,006 1 36,511 j 2Q, 53019,755 I 14,194 j 146,038 : 37,369 j 29,236
54, 43149,58153,01756,832
Dallas
i 42,01340, 11142, 99739,958
32.38729,26432,11229,572
SanFran-cisco
121,637107,276106, 409108, 819
55,03352,17349, 50348, 555
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JANUARY, 1926 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN 59
REPORTING MEMBER BANKS IN NEW YORK CITY AND CHIC A GO—PRINCIPAL RESOURCES AND LIABILITIES, BYWEEKS
[In thousands of dollars]
Number of reporting banks -, -.
Loans and discounts, gross:Secured by United States Government
obligations..Secured by stocks and bondsAll othor loans and discounts -.
New York City
Nov. 18 ! Nov. 25
61
Dec. 2 Dec. 9
61 61
54, 6562,122,9872, 298,897
50,288 : 49,7902,146, 548 i 2,145,1192, 208, 624 i 2, 295, 759
Total loans and discounts...
United States pro-war bondsUnited States Liberty bonds. —United States Treasury bondsUnited States Treasury notesUnited States Treasury certificates-Other stocks and securities
Total investments -
Total loans and investments..
4, 476, 540 I 4, 455, 460 I 4, 490, 668
29, 682503, 870183, 507159,7""
.13,168837, 071
29, 68.1513. 358185, 669159, 424
14,008 !809,579
59, 6302,130, 0332,309,009
4, 498, 672
29, 771521,104188,822156,77033,465
809, G88
1, 727, 000- •
6, 203, 546
1, 728, .155 i 1, 711, 719 j 1, 719,620
City of Chicago
Nov. 18
46
Nov. 25
46
18.055 i656,140 i680,122 !
16, 405638, 251670.138
1, 354, 327
1, 870100, 30416, 17645,8501,163
189, 324
354, 687
1, 324,794
1,871102,46416,33951,6151,001
185, 273
358, 563
6,193, 615 ! 6, 202., 387 j 6, 218, 292 I 1, 709, 014 j 1, 683, 357
Dec. 2
46
17,968633,932670, 705
Dec. 9
46
17,571637,610685,118
1,322,605 I 1,340,299
1,869 i103,174 i
16.133 i51,836 i
931 j187,487 ;
1,968103, 494
16, 21150, 659
945193, 903
361,430 | 367,180
1,684,035 | 1,707,479
Reserve balances with Federal reserve bank..Cash in vaultNet demand depositsTime depositsGovernment deposits.- :Bills payable and rediscounts with Federal
reserve bank: !Secured by United States Government ,
obligations !
All other --;
Total borrcwings from Federal reserve |bank — -.. :
714,170 i64,791 '
5, 209,172 :
776, 112 •32,606 j
703,111 !74,101
5,131, 22S796,192
11, S47
36, 670 i 67, 56542,996 ' 48,790
7175 50964,859
5,165, 865787,515
11, 347
33, 89576,917
79, 666 116,361 110,812
724,91171,119
5,166,027 I785,260 !
83, 795 !53,123 !
166,43923,880 i
1,199, 516 !496, 342
1,842
5,1054,112
167, 70121,955
1,171, 744499,316
1,453
13,1154,975
136,918 ! 9, 217
165,24
628152
1,163, 607499
1130453
14,176 i4,723
168, 60425, 223
1,188, 504502, 302
1, 497
17,1253,883
21,008
ALL MEMBER BANKS—DEPOSITS, BY FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT AND BY SIZE OF CITY
[In thousands of dollars]
Federal reserve district
Boston _New YorkPhiladelphia ...Cleveland... _RichmondAtlantaChicagoSt. LouisMinneapolis.Kansas CityDallasSan Francisco
Totals.
Banks in cities andtowns having a popu-lation of—
Less than 5,000.5,000 to 14,999-.—„15,000 to 99,999100,000 and over
Aug. 26
1,349,9136,234,0421,170,4961,510,469
571,001728, 625
2,469,803684,599441,593884,027£90,664
1,271,397
17,906,629
1,669,0151,101,8242,388.499
12, 747; 291
Net demand deposits
1925
Sept. 23
1,370,4186,222,9433,175,1621,499,245
591, 505734,046
2, 465,508704,765458,587867,688632,784
1,282,628
18,005,279
1,741,7001,135,7472,376,042
12,751,790
Oct. 28
1,445,5536,464,1011,185, 6761,498,226
611,548762,792
2, 471, 08C717,386455, 964837,559667,413
1,315,098
IS, 432,402
1,779,0961,159,4612,392,981
13,100,864
Nov., 25
1,395,2416,408,22S1,181,9371,475,121
626, 963769,008
2, 449, 631728,045466,66084=7,480674, 507
2,339,345
18,362,766
1,773,7201,158*4112,407,394
13,023,241
1924
Nov. 26
1,327,1416,496,5591,151,7271,486,119
585,396540,472
2, 352, 603690,224503,546848,388641, 603
1,322,964
17,946, 742
1, 698,67C1,076, 7402,132,304
13,039,022
Time deposits
1925
Aug. 26
771,2372,158,054
824,8261.342,131
' 509,526416,629
1,824, 630450,158430,029315,444168,110
1,278,928
10,489,702
1,727,7341,105,0352,142,0795,514,854
Sept. 23
764,5542,161,364
825, 6371,341,591
512,045414,260
1,835,341451,391433,357311,337169,415
1,282,689
10,502,981
1,736,1001,112,7622,126,3955,527, 724
Oct. 28
778,4102,164,082
841,1491,341, 980
535,563428,449
1, 859, 829459,884435,496326,890186, 601
1,310,189
10, 628,522
1.738,310i; 116,3482,143,1505, 630, 714
Nov. 25
794,7722,183, 450
843,8841,342,997
516, 547431,355
1,877, 294459,517433, 519313,791166,821
1,328,098
10,692,045
1,734,5271,118,6582,149,8365,689,024
1924
Nov. 26
694,4062,066,104
765,4881,269,256
483,033350,961
1, 723,047436.085420,176300,293158, 722
1,128,308
9,795,879
1,640.0591,045; 6681,967,0075,143,145
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
60 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN JANDABY, 1926
CHANGES IN MEMBERSHIP IN THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, JUNE 30, 1925, TOSEPTEMBER 28, 1925
Between June 30 and September 28 thenumber of national bank members of theFederal reserve system increased by 13 andtheir total resources by $218,669,000, whilethe number of member State banks showeda decrease of 12 and their total resourcesa decline of $270,340,000. As a consequence,total membership in the system increased byone, and the aggregate resources of all memberbanks showed a decline of $51,671,.000. Atthe end of September active membership, asindicated by the banks7 reports of condition,comprised 8,079 national banks and 1,460State banks and trust companies, a total of9,539 banks, with combined resources amount-ing to $39,053,354,000. The changes for thethird quarter of the year were somewhat smallerthan those for the preceding quarter whenthere was an increase of 56 in the number ofnational banks and a decrease of 49 in thenumber of member State banks, and increasesof more than 8500,000,000 in the resources bothof national and of State member banks. Gainsand losses in membership during the thirdquarter are classified in the following table:
CHANGES IN ACTIVE MEMBERSHIP IN THE FEDERALRESERVE SYSTEM JUNE 30 TO SEPT. 28. 1925
Member banks
Number
Nfc-tional State Total
Active membership, June 30,1925 : 8,066 j 1,472 ! 9,538Additions to membership; . I I I
Primary organization of nationalbanks —
Conversion of nonmember banks. to national -•
Admission of State banksResumotion following suspension.Conversion within the system
112
12
Resources(in thou-sands ofof dollars)
39.105,025
2,743
7, 78821, 273
1992 (5C6)
Total additions.. 12 32,003
Losses to membership:Merger of member banks—
Intraclass..Interclass. ---
Absorption of member banks bynonmember banks (or succes-sion)
Voluntary liquidation (terminal)...Withdrawal _Suspension or insolvencyConversion within the system
11 : 2 (61,893).!. : 2 j 3 (40, 630)
31,885244
ID15 :
212 ;
131
15 ] 1,79512 • 7,694
2 (566)
Total losses— 54 ; 31,618
Net changeActive membership, Sept. 28,1925
+ 1 3 ! —12 i + 1 •3 -5.1,671: 8,079 : 1,460 i 9,539 39,053,354
* Changes not affecting number of banks in the system.* Changes not affecting total resources of member banks.5 Includes changes in resources due to reorganization, growth, contrac-
tion, etc., in addition to changes enumerated,
The increase of 12 in the number of nationalbanks was the net result of 45 additions and32 losses. Of the additions to national bankmembership, 13 were former State banks—2 ofthem already members of the Federal reservesystem—which obtained national bank charters,and 31 were banks newly organized undernational bank charters; 1 bank, in the Cleve-land district, which had previously been closed,resumed operations. Of the 13" State banksconverting into national banks, 7 were in theDallas district, where there were 60 suchchanges in status during the preceding quarter;3 were in the St. Louis district, and 1each in the Cleveland, Chicago, and San Fran-cisco districts. There were newly organizednational banks in ail except the Boston andCleveland districts. Of the losses, 11 werethe result of mergers between national banks,1 was the result of a merger between a nationaland a member State bank, and 9 were due tomergers or successions between national banksand nonmember banks., There was 1 volun-tary liquidation * during the period, and 10suspensions—5 in the Minneapolis district, 4 inthe" Kansas City district, and 1 in the .Rich-mond district.
The decline in State bank membership wasthe net result of 12 additions and 24 losses.The additions to .membership all representedState banks, formerly nonmembers, whichwere admitted to the system. Suspensionsaccounted for 2 of the losses (1 in the Atlantadistrict and 1 in the Chicago district), asagainst 8 during the preceding quarter. Of theother losses, 1 was due to consolidation be-tween national and State member banks, 2were due to the conversion of State intonational banks, and A. were the result of merg-ers with nonmember banks. There were 15member State banks which availed themselvesof their option of withdrawal upon advancenotice, 7 of them in the Minneapolis district,2 in the San Francisco district, and 1 eachin the Cleveland, Richmond, Atlanta-, Chicago,St. Louis, and Pallas districts,
In the following table are shown, by districts,for the period between June 30 and September28, 1925, those changes in membership whichrepresent the interchange between members ofthe Federal reserve system and nonmemberbanks operating under State law. The addi-tions to" membership in the Federal reserve
i Instances in which, as far as could be determined, voluntary liquida-tion resulted in some other outcome than the final termination of theinstitution were classified according to the ultimate status of the bank.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JANUARY* 1926 FEDERAL BES31RVE 61
INTKRMOVEMSNT OF MEMBER AND NONMEMBERBANKS, JUNE 30, 1925 TO SEPTEMBER 28, 1925
Fedorai reservedistrict
All districts
Boston _New YorkPhiladelphia...ClevelandRichmondAtlanta—..ChicagoSt. LouisMinneapolis .. _Kansas City•DallasSan Francisco
Nonmmeber banksjoining the system 1
Total
23
1121
13
01
Con- !
version!of non-' Admis-mem- | sion of
ber i Statebanks 1 banksto na» jtional !banks
11 ! 12
ll
J 21 :
. . __1 . 23 ; 4
1
5; ii
Member banks leavingthe system i
Total
20
1111I7314
With-drawalof mem-
berStatebanks
[Succes-sion of
na-tionalbanksby non-mem-
berbanks
15 5
1 i. . . . .I :1
i7
! 31 ..2 2
system from among nonmember banks (exclu-sive of nonmember banks that were absorbedby member baiiks) represent former nonmem-ber banks which either voluntarily obtainedcharters as national banks, or, upon appli-cation to the Federal Reserve Board, wereadmitted to the system as member Statebanks. The losses represent either Statsbanks which, upon advance notice, withdrewfrom the system, or national banks which,went into voluntary liquidation to be succeededby banks organized under State law as non-member banks. The table shows that for thssystem as a whole additions by these changesin status slightly exceeded losses; in the Bos-ton, New York, Philadelphia, Chicago. St.,Louis, and Dallas districts a net addition tomembership resulted, and in the Clevelandand Atlanta, districts additions and losses off-set each other, whereas in the Richmond,Minneapolis, Kansas City, and San Franciscodistr icts , the losses exceeded the addi t ions. i Exclusive of mergers between member and nonmember banks.
> There were no successions of member State banks by nonmemberbanks during the period.
ALL STOCK BANKS IN THE UNITED STATES—CONDITION ON SEPTEMBER 28, 1925Consolidated figures showing the condition of ALL STOCK BANKS IN THE UNITED STATES 1—-CON-
ail banks in the United States, other than DITI0N 0N D A T E S SPBCIPIBD »mutual savings banks and private banks not [Amount in mim°QS ofdollarsl
under State supervision, as of September 28indicate tha t new record totals have againbeen reached in loans and investments anddeposits. Loans and discounts totaled $30,-292,000,00u, an increase of $828,000,000 overthe June 30 figure and of $2,334,000,000 sinceOctober 10, 1924. Investments show an in-crease of $58,000,000 since June 30 ; 1925, andof $503,000,000 since October 10, 1924. whiletotal deposits, exclusive of bank deposits,amounted to $41,008,000,000 on September 28,or $417,000,000 more than on June 30 and$3,421,000,000 than a year ago. Borrowingsfrom Federal reserve and other banks went up$155,000,000 between June 30 and September28? and $412,000,000 between October 15, 1924,and September 28, 1925.
The table below shows in summary form theamounts of loans, investments, and deposits ofall stock banks in the United States for reportdates since June, 1920. There are also pre-sented on subsequent pages tables giving theprincipal resources and liabilities of these banksarranged by Federal reserve districts and byStates. A table is also included giving tlieprincipal resources of all State banks and trustcompanies, by States.
All banks:June, 1920June, 1921 „June, 1922June, 1923June, 1924October, 1924...December, 1924_April, 1925June, 1925September, 1925.
.'Member banks:Juno, 1920June, 1921June, 1922June, 1923.Juno, 1924.
25,94524,311 i
| 24,358 jI 20,675 i
, . 27,282 jOctober, 1924 I 9,035 ! 28,451 i~ ' ' " """ : 29,027 "I
29,285 ;
29,702 j
Num-ber of
report-ing
banks
28,71529,47729,09229,34228,45128,38528,26628,07327,92127,948
Loans and investments
Total
36,81334,31834,166
| 37,359I 38,407! 39,610 .' 40,202
40,813i 41,561 i| 42,447
: In-Loans i vest-
! nients
9,3999,7459,892 |9,856 j9,650
December, 1924.April, 192-5June, 1925...September, 1925.
Nonmember banks:June, 1920June, 1921..._June, 1922.. _June, 1923June, 1924 „_October, 1924..December, 1924. _April, 1925...Juno, 1925. __September, 1925.
9,587 i9,531 ;9.538 ''9.539 |
19,316 !19, 732 !19,200 !19,486 i18,801 j18,75018,67918,54218,38318,409
10,868 !10,007 j9,808 J10,68411.14511,159 !11,17511, 52811,85912,077
28,17725,85724,64726, 79327, 22227,95828,24328,77529,46430,291
19,784 I18,206 j17,296 :18,88019,26419,82020,18220,39020,81421, 450
8,3937,6517,3517,9137,9588,1388,0618,3858,6508,841
Totalde-
posits,exclu-sive ofbank
deposits
8,6368,4619,519
10,56611.185 !Ill 652 !
1 11,959 Ii 12,038 I; I 12,097 !. i 12,155
6,1616,1057,0627, 7957,9988,6318,8458,895
8, 919
2,4752,3562,4572, 7713,1873,0213,1143,1433,2093,236
32,64231,13431,94434,51236,84137,58739,06639,11240,59141,008
21,88721,01222,36623,83725,67526,28227,81427,14528,40328,172
10,7559S5229,578
10,67511,16611,30511,25211,96712,18812,838
1 Includes all banks in the T7nited?Statos except (1) a certain number ofnonreporting private banks, not under State supervision, and (2) allmutual savings banks, figures for which are available only for Junecalls. Three mutual savings banks in Ohio, however, and one in Cali-fornia, are included because the figures for these banks are included inthe totals reported for all State banks by the State authorities and arenot available separately except for June calls,
2 Orbdates nearest thereto for which figures are available.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
62 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN JAXUAEY, 1926
ALL STOCK BANKS i—PRINCIPAL RESOURCES AND LIABILITIES, BY FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICTS, ON SEPTEMBER.28, 1925 2
[Amounts in thousands of dollars]
Federal reserve district3Number
ofreporting
banks
| Loans| and| discounts,i includingi overdrafts
Invest-ments
Boston.New YorkPhiladelphia....ClevelandRichmondAtlantaChicagoSt. Louis. ._Minneapolis.....Kansas City.-.Dallas _ ._.San Francisco -
678 !1,346 i1,274 ,1,964 :2,059 I1,972 I5,177 I3,122 i3,117 j3.897 ii, 702 !1, 640 !
2,100,1337,201,3422,209,3312,954,5761,793,8021,561. ] 814,816,2771, 541,8991, 098, 3441, 439,818
848,8622, 726.152
Total, Sept. 28, 1925..Total, June 30, 1925—
27,948 I 30,291,71727,941 i 29,464,128
888,3343,327,6671,156,5111,402,258424,744323,478
2,093,005494,331430; 710405,341183,548
1,024,841
12,154, 76812,096,751
Totalloansand
invest-ments
Totaldeposits,exclusiveof bankdeposits
2,988,467 j10,529,009 •3,365,842 !4,356,834 !
2,238,546 '1,884,659 '!6,909,282 I2,036,230I) 529, 054 ''•1,845,159 :
1,032,410 I3,750,993
2, 777, 08010,375,4142,967, 0914, 050, 0901,973. 0201,902', 6006,720,4701,951,8111, 569,8881, 933, 3941,022, 5773, 764,360
42,446,48541,560,879
41,007, 7G640, 591, 421
75,028313,02685,04991, 703118,77868,816109,42272,90725,78622,60022,01170,123
1.075,247' 920,600
1 Includes all banks in the United States except (1) a certain number of nonreporting private banks, not under State supervision, and (2) allmutual savings banks, figures for which are available only for June calls. Three mutual savings banks in Ohio, however, and one in California,are included because the figures for these banks are included in the totals reported for all State banks by tho State authorities and are not availableseparately except for June cails.2 Or dates nearest thereto for which figures are available.
s Figures for State banks and trust companies of Indiana, Michigan, Kentucky, Tennessee, Missouri, Mississippi, and Louisiana were notreported by Federal reserve districts and accordingly were prorated on the basis of such data as were available.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JANUARY, 1926 FEDERAL: B1S&KVE BULLETIN 68
ALL STOCK BANKS i—PRINCIPAL RESOURCES AND LIABILITIES ON JUNE 30 AND SEPTEMBER 28, 1925 »
[Amounts in thousands of dollars]
State
Number ofreporting
banks
Loans and dis-counts, including
overdraftsInvestments Total loans and
investmentsTotal deposits, ox- ! Rediscounts
elusive of bank j ; ud bills pay-deposits ! able
; Sep- |June ! tern- Juno1 ber
I Septem- :
I ber .Tuns j Septem-I ber June j June
MaineNew Hampshire..Vermont.-MassachusettsRhode IslandConnecticut
1 1 1 ••8086
2f>l :
31150
New York „ ...__! 981 .New Jersey i 482 'Delaware 45 .Pennsylvania.-- .„ „_ „_._•' 1,642Ohio • l,0D9 !
District of Columiba.. ; 44 'Maryland 229Virginia.._ „„.! 517 :
West Virginia , 345 .North Carolina ! 524 'South Carolina ! 373 ;
112 • 147,425.._! 61,41486 ; 89,874
249 .1,352,43531 ! 109,285
150 j 272,183
985 16,102,209486 ,1,019,18445 ! 54,950
1,643 "2,711,8051,099 jlP758,i78
154,759 . 1? 8,875 '• 109,516
89,806 • 4.-0,343 ! 41,2351.405,687 •• S98,804 j 396,332
150,591 | 1&C,O27 j 155,298287,019 ! 200,418 i 205,148
44 !229 j521 !345 !587 !373 !
157,891374,141447,127301,481344,887184.354
6, 329.1281,052; 933
56,894 ;2,853.840|l, 821,640 ;
160.94C389J504 i468,250 !301,329353,699 I181,261 ,
:2.8] 1,271 % 739,726• '6LSI20 ! 641,682• 3.';, 830 I 32,723l,8.'i&567 11,753,344
: 60J,692 | 608,917
Georgia •• 632 _. ..' 320,142Florida 318 : 322 , 335,211 ,- 432.764Alabama 354 : 205,980 . ..'. ....Mississippi 336 ' 338 ' 152,600 ! 172,041
Indiana 1,092 ! 599,981 IIllinois _ . . . . 1.900 1,898 ,2.483,288 2,538,123Michigan '729: 710 : '746,626 : 710,441 •Wisconsin... _. 983 983 \ 599,445 ! 600,362Iowa _ _: 1,548 : 776,496 .
c:.,40518<:, 879
!
60.709 jf)ii',759 !36,139 j31,062
41,118 i.10.1,413 I«X, 784 .40,137
133,033370,911851,832203, 518
267,300104, 547130, 017
1,751,239305,312
. 472,601
;8,973,4801, 637,304; 88,780•4. 551.3722,359,870
219,096 i559,020 ."516,836
264,275 247,63289,766117,050130,841 . _.,
1,802,019 !1,663,786311,889 ;. 288,994
; 492,167 ! 450,044< i
9,06S, 854 ,9,094,295.1,694,595 13,607,260. 89.617 i 75,570.4, 607; 184 j4, 010, 6052,430)457 2,305,782
! 244,407 • 7,507 I! ! 2,581 !I 118,447 ; 4,032 |•1, 676,553 ' 63,199 !I 298,002 j! 461,284 •
18,978,584 203,1751,616,082 i 28,107; 78,742 " 1,168^042,324 91,948•2,343,446 37,693
7726,230
222,220566, 341539,344
61,274170,83771,004 :59,406 .38,927 ,32,883 :
127,806
39,243 ; 192,737 211, 284
3 61,240 360,735381,026 , 392,626215,416 : 214,144
361,260 ]
436,624 J 560,570248,764
783,014
215,704 i520,557 '418,435 ,324,652 ;
323,873196,390
312,474530,178236,285190,594
758,4223,273,0751,610, 844800,519
215.100519; 229434,281324,714346,044203, 526
3,535 !
12,920 !30,816 !17,831 i43,217 '14,192 !
Tennessee... _.Arkansas 482Missouri 1,558Kentucky
MinnesotaNorth Dakota..South Dakota..Montana.. _.
551 ; 342,574 '....._ •487 | 175,426 190,779 2:3.970
1,565 . 901,312 ; 925,759 i 317; 417 j_„_„, . . . i .
250,981 j
35,166 :20,546 !30,364 \
56,908 !75,659 !88,527 ;92,91510,990
50, 209358,282
5, 763
33,99028, G2829, Ml
6, 967729. 738
81. 385U8. 185
874,117 -3,354,199 i3,412,240918,367 1,598,458 1.628,808218,179 I 807,963 ! ' 818, 541102,048 ( ! 878,544 .
46,607 : j 389,181 J24.304 ; 201,398 ! 215,083 | 195.765
322)094 jl, 218,729 1,217,853 jl, 155,984
__j 18,5133,265,910 ! 38,7641, 623, 256 i 34, 936803,303 I 10,520874,520 j
I 23,649 !682,391 1 1,353 I
.! 11,103 '220,990 | 12.566
7,446
"~2,~85156,761
3046,117
286,87136, 512
69598, 77758,974
4,96514,60035.10816; 84039,22311,114
1,003
"14355
34,47727,92011,86320,539
378,375 i j222,921 ! 10,857 I
1,182, 210 I 25,006 '„.!., ...L
21,04519,704
1,370 !"'• 658
526 j235 !
.1,309 i653 '526 .233
624, 490 I 631, 766117.784 ' 120,953136; 942 I 134. 54::78,823 ! 79.628
Nebraska..... —_ ; 1,087 ; 1,083 'Kansas .— 1,279 •" 1,274 1Oklahoma. j 773 j 767Colorado.. I 334 •Wyoming 96 !
32996
367, 581325.938247) 388178.202 !38,152 !
367,609324, 430257.. 2271781456
38!, 713
Louisiana . 247Texas. 1,488New Mexico 66
2471,491
63
321,614 ! 342,94:1734,158 1 740,74721,449 20,699
ArizonaUtahIdahoNevadaCalifornia-Oregon.
• 5 7115 !
.__ ; 161 '34
____. 602 :_w. i 279 I
Washington... : 360 !
57 . 45,631114 ! 100,530162 ! 50,41834 25,179
653 2,071; ISO278 • 161,964361 , 227,466
Total 27,921 '27,948 29,404,128
257,721 j35,472 I24,76940,078 |
58,168 i80,71792, 39992,35413,637
875,471 i 889,487152,950 ! 156,425303.488 ! 159,33.0118,187 ; 119,706
424.489 ! 425,777401, t)97 : 405,147
349,626270,810
50. 350
335,915 I271,177 !49,142 !
55,898 j .371,883 :162,032 I 892,440
6,020 : 27,212
45,300103,22050,12025, 697
2,310,002167,920233, 024
30,291,717 '12,096,751
14,13428,05019,3707,001
703, 43982, 424
135,518
12,154,768
I 59.621; 129,158
69, 55932,140
2,800,913243,349345, 651
3S8,839902,779
26,719
59,434131,87669.49632) 758
2.879, 501' 250,350348,542
872,147162,196180, 487129,881
441, 762418, 948384, 559294, 26353,062
302, 297877,99229,176
69,020134,18773,09734,633
2,831,270255,959359,930
871,012 ; 7,818173,003 j 4,930183, 717 ! 5, 957133,783 : 2,094
431,209443,303389,228 '291,82256,038
377,783883,20227,936
67, 571117,08777,89435,298
2, 885,168263, 751360.841
•11,560,879 J42,446,485 140,591,421 J43,007,796
4, 2145,0825,8012,977684
12,8694,1754,9951,680
6,1973,6327,3322,444
10,792 j 20,21615.897 ! 18,346
'81.0 ' 795
2,490 ,3,265 j3,734 ;
3,0172,4942,300
7853. 332
5, 2374,830
920,600 1,075.247
31,521 !
5,612 16,345 ;
1 Includes all banks in the United States except (1) a certain number of nonreporting private banks, not under State supervision, and (2) allmutual savings banks, figures for which are available only for June calls. Three mutual savings banks in Ohio, however, and one in California,are included because the figures for theso banks are included in the totals reported for all State banks by the State authorities and are not availableseparately except for June calls.2 Figures include those of State banks and trust companies as given in the following table, which in some cases represent the condition of banksas of dates other than June 30,1925, and September 28, 1925, respectively..
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
64 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN JANUARY, 1926
STATE BANK AND TBUST COMPANIES i—PRINCIPAL RESOURCES AND LIABILITIES ON JUNE 30 AND SEPTEMBER 28,1925 a
[Amounts in thousands of dollars]
Number ofreporting
banksLoans and discounts,including overdrafts
82,911124, 26557,
567,865j127,649;122,211
63, 53018, 06617,401
138,421108,847132, 700
56,575,596, 987;110,9131131, 296!
Rhode IslandConnecticut
3,458,183'612,379143,857!
1,312.402]1,269; 561 i
3,505,207! 1,380,987
State
Maine..New Hampshire.Vermont.
New York...New Jersey-DelawarePennsylvania...Ohio
District of Columbia.MarylandVirginiaWest VirginiaNorth Carolina „South Carolina
Georgia IFlorida !Alabama 'Mississippi! IIIIIIIIIIII j
Indiana „ 'Illinois.Michigan..WisconsinIowa
Tennessee.,Arkansas. _Missouri..„Kentucky.,
MinnesotaNorth Dakota..South Dakota-Montana „„.
Nebraska....KansasOklahoma..Colorado.....Wyoming...
LouisianaTexas.New Mexico-
ArizonaUtah _.IdahoNevadaCalifornia....OregonWashington „
31145336221441
543261252300
8461,399
603826
3961,427
i,131i 312,49144,896! 24,377
1,402, 5611 870,3901,305,924' 359,8261
31145:340'221!505!297|
265
301
1,394!584!
79,979;221, 907!177,999,172, 748|214,9701103,447,
196, 293 L.193,851!106,214;.106,163:
373,944'.
81, 703:231,082!183, 044i172, 586;221,411!100, 216
29,158!101, 796,
17,01824, 239!
16, 687s12,770
"257,7461
120,089,
I16 ,093 .38,830j11, 7051.21.985
17,634i141,309;130,203 j134, 595;
1,330,351 j328,728!
23,700!783,627365,8911
28,534J100,016j17,151123,963119, 289,13, 040!
50, 579;
Total loans andinvestments
146,44142,33174,532706,286236,496254,911
4,839,370924,87068, 234
2,182, 7921,629,387
105,147323, 703195, 0J 7196,987231, 657116, 217
212,386232,681117,919
Total deposits, ex- • Bediscountselusive of bank de- j and bills pay-posits i able
June I * £ « " • ! June | ta£ber
1,524,947;455,902;348,994=
l,209L._
445;..400!
1,430;'~118,~346|
563,214;
I 83 ,962 .1, 558,157: 557, 740:
425,207 709,921 i351,104; 114, 746541,689; ...i
1S4,382; I127,551] 10,035!577,416! 207,902:
74,209738,2961241,116265,891
4,835,558954,859
68, 5962,186,1881,671,815
110,237331, 0981200,195196, 549|24.0,700:113, 256
308,325
20,792; 128,148
457,908!.2, 082,687J1,165,823
463,740;
140,881
563,014;780,998!120, 676!25,507!.
17t3Oo|.9,225
216,180128,381771,116
2,121,1711,206,205
471, 780567,196
201,691136, 776793,596
138,008!
38,360|_,71,181
694,853233,839i246,404
5,167,1601916, 634
58,39011,950, 040]1, 654, 687
106,518334,436156, 662183,93112059!104,883
179,869316,988
•116,629130,088
466, 798% 146, 6801,180, 9S4
478,747
128,174! 5,130 6,377
124,275800,240
70,9311714, SISj240,695'..253,020;
5,226,373 j914,1531
61, 064.1,957, 063i1,675,206;
106,, 4421
316; 9041161, 050i181,931i221,924;110,090!
1,89120,616
1,20716,915
50,93814,411
62040, 253!17,735
1,010
423,244!
"l52," 164.
2,135,390!1,206,987
483, 6648 598,758.
220,4021148,464!823, 705j
15,00610,213124,906i9,906;
18,163L1,162!7,096|_8,549|
13,812!-18,707!16, 822!5,348!
I
8,892;21,910,
3,170
79,28421,951
38541,11735,215
1,1806,496
13,4309,426
23,4327,135
813
"l 6," 156
16,30618,774
7,45112,873
10,56416,46016,153
1,050 . . ,498] 495415!150!
9151,021
38019764
214846
35
3994
10424
394180248
Total j 19,855
414!149|
913:1,015'
381;194!
6i\2141
39!94
106!24
382!
179,248!
279.278J65,47l!90,223J38,466;
221,455!196,74448,39648,90215,566|
247, 545!193,199
6,166
30,47970, 748]19.929!15', 651 j
282.117!67| 241,88,443;38,168:
222, 718196,067
50,597;45,620|15, 563
260,829:
179,106;5,488;
30,424j
74,486,20,676:
16,157j1, .507,622| 1,537,080;
J _
71, 56374,155
58,802'76,480,
87,046:9,6378,394,
18,995;
19,474:27,555!14,085'15,9982,144:
i36,926!20,271 i
1,129!
1
9,5091
17, 510:8,456;2,477 •
527,032!
25,805.34,658!
93,1739,7325,147
19, 526]
21,49828,39914,45716,3272,492
42,20720,102
1,035
9,46517,681
2,449554,638
22, 75234,152
19,869, 16,784,662 17,146,153! 6,371,129! 6,404.968
366,32475,108j98,61757,461
240,929224,29962,481:64,960-17, 710;
284,471 j213,470!7,295j
39,988188, 258!28,385!18,128
2,034,65497,368108,813
375,29076,97393,59057,694
244,216224,46665.05461,94718.055
303,036199, 2086,523
39,88992,16729,30518,606
2,091,71881, 554110,632
391,54582,441
114,48064,009
276,881238.966
77,75376,36619,454
281,547232,146
7,570
3 45,92577,67631,48821,168
2,116,745103, 754117,364
399.76687; 795.
116,525:64,977]
274,003;263,888'
78, 808!73,51220,605!
217,521!
3 45,53081,324:34,07621,191
2,134,63587,999 i
116,678|
5,326]4.079!4,350'1,210|
2,844J3,593:2,099!
984!599!
8,28517,159
3701
9,0643,3503,616
956
3,0072,8422,311
686420
15,0906,969
370
< 3,633, «],6542,098! 2,2371,789! 1,154
.. ___ j22,436 35,2243,194 1,9232,4111 1,776
23,155,791! 23,551,121 23,576,795! 23,953,716! 441,619; 513,083
} Includes ail banks in the United States except (1) a certain number of nonreporting private banks, not under State supervision, and(2) "all mutual . savings .banks, figures for which are available only for June calls. Three mutual savings banks in Ohio, however, and onein California, are included because the figures for these banks are included in the totals reported for all State banks by the State authoritiesand are not available separately except for June calls.
2 Or dates nearest thereto for -which figures are available.3 Includes amounts due to banks.i Includes"other liabilities.
NOTE.—All figures used;in3the]June^column are for June 30, except as follows: Alabama, June 23,1925; Iowa, May 1,1925; Tennessee, April 691925; Kentucky, June 30,1924; %nd Kansas, June 2,1925. All figures used in the September column are for September 28, except as follows: Maine,Sept. 26,1925; Rhode Island, Sept. 8,1925; New York, Sept. 30,1925; Maryland, Sept. 2, 1925; Georgia, June 30, 1925; Alabama, June 23, 1925;New Hampshire, June 30, 1925; Indiana, June 30, 1925; Iowa, Sept. 8, 1925; Tennessee, Oct. 26, 1925; Kentucky, June 30, 1924; Minnesota, Nov.2, 1925; North Dakota, Oct. 15, 1925; Kansas, Aug. 20, 1925; and Utah,, Oct. 5, 1925.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JANUAEY, 1926 FEDEBAIi BESEKVE BULLETIN 65
DISCOUNT RATES OF FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS IN EFFECT DECEMBER 31, 1925
Federal reserve bank
Paper maturing—
Within 90 days
Commercialsagricultural,and livestockpaper, K. e. s.
= S-Bcured by U. S,Governmentobligations
Bankers'acceptances
Tradeacceptances
After 90 days butwithin 0 months
Agriculturaland livestock 1
paper
BostonNew YorkPhiladelphia...ClevelandRichmondAtlantaChicagoSt. LouisMinneapolis^.Kansas City_.DallasSan Francisco
4334'4444444444
4444444444
4444444444
34444444444
* Including bankers' acceptances drawn for an agricultural purpose end secured by warehouse receipts, etc.
Changes during the month.—None.
GOLD SETTLEMENT FUND
BostonNow YorkPhiladelphia. _ClevelandRichmondAtlantaChicagoSt. LouisMinneapolis. _.Kansas City....DallasSan Francisco _
INTERBANK TRANSACTIONS FROM NOVEMBER 19 TO" DECEMBER 16, 1925, INCLUSIVE
[In thousands of dollars!
Federal reserve bank
Total four weeks ending-Dec. 16, 1925 ..__Nov. 18, 1925Doc. 17, 1924,..Nov. 19, 1924
iTransfers Daily settlements
• Changes in ownershipof gold through trans-fers and settlements
Debits Credits
9,00010. 200% 0005, 0003,0006.0001,0001,0002, 00C4,00C1, 003
44, 20025, 500
107,00073,200
24,0003, 000
4,000
2,0006,000
2,ooo ;1.200 '2,000 :
Debits
900,6982,824, 292729, 510648,317040,364393,499
1,177, 488583, 720189,472406, 2(50311,281351,276
Credits
920,4132, 787, 708
748,350653, 668639, 940410, 716
1,168,479580,129183, 218414, 290306, 960 i348,306 i
44,200 !25, 500 ;
167,000 i73,200 '
!
9,102,1778,907, 2938,298,6148,121,219
9,162,1778,907, 2938,298,6148,121, 219
Decrease ' Increase
22,784 ,4,715
8,009
19,840 !351 !576 I
11,217 :
8,254 j1,4
4,121 '970 I
6,030 !
Balance infund atclose ofperiod
43,752186,168
55, 54058,15830, 60233, 024
134, 54118,87222,53930,14013,66937,895
T44,138 , 44,138 ' 664, 900
724, 983589,390610,131
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
66 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN 1926
DEBITS TO INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTS BY BANKS IN SELECTED CITIESMONTHLY SUMMARY FOR BANKS IN 141 CITIES
[In thousands of dollars]
Federal reserve district
i . 1925I Number ' __I of centers|
i
1924
September • October
No. 1—Boston .,No. 2—New YorkNo. 3—PhiladelphiaNo. 4— ClevelandNo 5—RichmondNo. 6—AtlantaNo. 7—ChicagoNo. 8—St. Louis.No. 9—MinneapolisNo. 10—Kansas City.,-.,No. 11—DallasNo. 12—San Francisco -
2,155,12025,113,884 ,2,025,711 ,2,308,524 ,
757, 5691,250,762 :
5,118,833 i1,191.608 :
848', 3551,154, 720 ,
602,406 ,2,714,261
2,903,99129,811,9772,298,6602,661,005
844,7021,429,6185,775,2281,371,371' 877,313
1,266,353696, 715
2,992,897
November September
Total. 141 i 45,241,613 : 52,929,830
2,644,630 .27,771,5832,007,9712,341,146
769,6801,206.9115,086; 0501,223,51©
783,3251,128,082
629,0022,750,830
October ! November
1,974,98421,387,861 j1,794,0211,996,688 I
648,670 !959,071 i
4,435,340 |1,003,068
773,680 !1,097,173 i
566,180 !2, 335,245
48,342,720 38,971,985
2,357,43523,242,131
1,968,1342,300,487 •
733, 6821,129, 5844,949,2111,212,110 i1,059,292 '1,216,807 •
670,360 .2,578,750 |
2, 252,71723,708,8491,820,7221,980,486
675,127973,154
4,500,2251,081,663
891,1711,062,890
586,6442,359,349
43,417,983 j 41,892,997
New York City.Other cities
1 i 24,369,457140 ; 20,872,156 j
28,916,175 j24,013,055
27,009,43321,333,287
20,734,467 "18,237,518 i
22,505,093 :20,912,290
23, C46, 93418, 846, 063
WEEKLY SUMMARY FOR BANKS IN 256 C E N T E R S[In thousands of dollars]
Federal reserve district1925, week ending-
j Number j . . . _.... _ _ .: of centers' ii I Nov. 25 ' Dec. 2
1924, week ending—
Dec. 9 Dec. 16 ' Nov. 26 i Dec. 3 ' Dec. 10 Dec. 17
No. 1—Boston „__No. 2—New YorkNo. 3—Philadelphia.....No. 4—Cleveland ,..No. 5—RichmondNo. 6—AtlantaNo. 7—Chicago..No. 8—St. Louis .„.No. 9—MinneapolisNo. 10—Kansas C i t y -No. 11—Dallas...No. 12—San Francisco..
14 |182223 I
14172916
668,517 •6,800,563 I
533,155650,259 !
325,284 ;284,766
1,303,466 ,308,282 !213,155 !
300,910181, 014694,340
634,944 I6,223,192 i
544,748695,176 !338,158 I309,151
1,218,988354, 352208,218300, 58218.1, 542
624,4366,930,123
532,196
685,266
Total. 256 i 12,203,711 11,094,317
345,147299,332
1,236, 654329,246222,062313.468180,657706, 584
693,5937,621,780685,955724,185359S 863335.475
1,461,926350.476224,991327,392183,926854,022
598,392 •5,841,288 ••
494,748 .583,633280,378 "•238,179 •.
1,181,431260,679 ;235,049290,520175,441595,939
556,185 I5,881,803 i
530,742 i586,063 j304,876 .261,150 !
1,148,011 i284,714 j230,449 !285,700 1171,907 !633,581 |
547,188 !6,267.719 i
510,683 i602,319 I308,547 I264,877 '
1,129,737 !301,631 !213,166285,094179, 337592,365 I
639,1066,892, 383555,089672,867320,277283, 262
1,328? 085
224, 572307,795187,341675,908
12,369,880 ! 13,829,584
I10, 775, 677 10,875,181 j 11,202,663 I 12,417,067
I iBANK DEBITS FOR FEDERAL RESERVE BANK AND BRANCH CITIES
No. 1—BostonNo. 2—New York.... ..._ ..._.,
Buffalo -No. 3—PhiladelphiaNo. 4—Cleveland
Cincinnati _Pittsburgh
No. 5—RichmondBaltimore
No. 6—AtlantaBirminghamJacksonvilleNashville.New Orleans _.._
No. 7—Chicago..,..Detroit
No. 8—St. Louis iLittle Rock \Louisville _.!Memphis , - _ _,j
No.. 9—Minneapolis jHelena :
No. 10—Kansas City IDenver __.. jOklahoma City ..„[Omaha.. •
No. 11—Dallas jEl Paso . . . _ jIlouston I
No. 12—San Francisco jLos Angeles _ ,Portland _ jSalt Lake City ..'Seattle 'Spokane .,
472,7046,473, 855
84. 632399, 739146, 36781,121
229, 80938, 892
107,37931, 93031,910 .32. 20917, 21274,465
772,913239,54315-1,30019,35250, 31240,814
104,1712,045
92,14241, 79919, 44040.570 I57,8238,537 !
37,420 i229,530 I191,928 j41,41019,80452,45710. 303
445,092 '5,902,889 :
74,802409, 795174,428 .78,457 '254,220•12,361 •108,889 i38, 23430,900 :
28,570 '17,437 •
.100,421 .728,037189,246213. GOO21',77439,47243, 230104,081
2, 47880, 93240, 90020,42541, 95253, 58310, 20436,0042L7,379179, 03137, M l22, 75545,32312, 022
423, 5450,585,130
78,470397,039140, 88080, 371221,71538,81.1109,35836,03020, 94030,43418,09084,808
730, 711182,684178,00021,01847, 89142, 300113.430
2, 45183, 80244, 21923,15745, 02255, 4249, 21033,138223,218189,01741,01319, 22045,11613, 509
474,570 i7,205,201 i
8-1,096 i537,879 i177,395 ;89,000 i230,394 !45,401 i113,594 i40,613 !
35.210 !35,834 -.22,505 !
96.211 !899,013 !
221,210 i199, 80023,182 i4.7,053 !41,668 .11.1,287 i2,844 !93,581 !
40,041 !23,395 !40,744 .59,319 I9,064. i35,424 I
334,093 "203,718 i44,16420,045 i02,920 !14,778 i
421,0805, 551,384
77, 033371,227 :142,480 ;
71,833 :
208,307 i32,32084,700 ;
34,479 .31.97110,024 !10,710 ;
65, 930739.455 .180,394 '127,00020, 029 j38, ,109 "4.1,801 :116.1702,781 •80,425 '40,230 i19, 20245,402 i51,030 |7,489 i38,982 '•180,289 :
180.746 !38; 538 j16,309 !40, 602 •10,490
i
381,214 j5, 585, 40 i |
70,378 I390,085 I141,903 i70,490 i190,489 |32,538 j101,000 i30,730 '32, 54914,87116,9318S, 368721,722 ;146,119358,000 I18,532 i36,422 i41,107 i
105, 5242,492 .80,980 ;38,971 !19,026 I40,842 I49,2008,890 •34,512 :195,305 I192,427 i33,17420, 25638,902 I11,213 i
i
372, 0225, 050, (578
73, 070384, 017138, 20877, 336203.48831,90889,90032,08031,94.015, 05016,35889,274090,357147, 611157, 90020, 01440,90545, 295107.4892,522
79, 72440,40322,61643,34652,23010, 62132,982170,164171,14936,89019,17339,99910, 254
. 439,7216, 544,278
77, 625415,790IOC, 97089,180 .214,38935,38790,20038,15833,7311(5, 6S018,81700, 574819,281180,133187, 60020,11741, 79943,092109, 4132,447
89, 52041,10821, 51445,83554, 3928,30138,429229,203189, 01239, 59410, 51546,14812, 540
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JANUARY,1928 FEDERAL BEBlItYE BULLETIN 67
MEMBER BANKS AND NONMEMBER BANKS ON PAR LIST AND NOT ON PAR LIST
NUMBER AT END OF NOVEMBER, 1925 AND 1924
Nonmember banksMemberbanksl
On par list
; 1925i
Federal reserve district:BostonNew YorkPhiladelphiaClevelandRichmondAtlanta..,..ChicagoSt. Louis..MinneapolisKansas City....Dallas _.San Francisco
1924
419880753863604498
1,402 |628 I835 i
1,034 '858 i747 j
420 j858 I742 !871 |624 !518 !
.,423 j631907 I
.,088 i840 i778 '
1G25
246390512
1,075717366
3,8222,1161,2092,60S77180S
1924
234379519
1.080'742373
3,9522,2361,5352,750872852
Not on parlist ^
1925 1924
11 i686 •!
1,104 !255 i403
1,06320518061
Total _.._.. •' 9,521 [ 9,700 j 14,701 j
NewJEngland States: ;
Maine jNew Hampshire 1Vermont \Massachusetts IRhode Island !Connecticut —I
Eastern States:New YorkNew Jersey... »..PennsylvaniaDelawareMarylandDistrict of Columbia-
Southern States:Virginia __-West VirginiaNorth CarolinaSouth CarolinaGeorgiaFlorida
62 :
55 :46 j
181 ;21 |65 |
637 i332 i958 i
22 !
89 i
is;193 ',141 !
91 i92 •
156 !70 i
5446
182 !21 |
633 j310952
229115
196142
95100172
50143970
884
27615165732
167
23119690247685
49 !1535 l71 •
8 •'74 :
1,125203328810207146
56
3,612
275 :14065935
369 i33
241:19899 :29 ,88 '76 i
989
339240376159
S310352274404159
Nonmember banksMember 'r
banks * ;
Southern States—Contd.KentuckyTennesseeAlabamaMississippiArkansasLouisianaTexas
Middle Western States:OhioIndianaIllinoisMichigan.WisconsinMinnesotaIowa _Missouri
Western States:North DakotaSouth DakotaNebraskaKansasMontanaW
oWyomingColoradoCoNew MexicoOklahoma..
Pacific States:WashingtonOregonCaliforniaIdahoUtah.. __ArizonaNevada—
Total..
1925
1461181244512246783
441263588290185334423198
1631211822661153413733387
156135305SO462110
9,521
1924
1471211284412747751
447268584287187365449192
175132188266130 .39
144 !37 !
431 :
159 !
136 ::
304 i103 i50 ,23
9s700
1925 19.24
445269332728344814
663833
1,299531651677
1,3041,370
287288760
1,0311136218736376
17811437373663423
15,524
Not on parlis
1925
2223520127611217095
820921875164936
28216617631111635
3229
4
3,908
1924
182071962"737517064
818791573812633
2171391745710734
28271
a
3,612
1 Figures for 1925 represent the number of member banks in actual, operation; those for 1924 represent the number shown by the capital-stockrecords of the Federal reserve bank. The number shown by the capital-stock records on November 30, 1925, was 9,590,2 Incorporated banks other than mutual savings banks.
MONEY IN CIRCULATION[Source: U. S. Treasury Department circulation statements]
[In thousands of dollars]
Date
1914-Ju!y 1____.1917—Apr- 11920—Nov. !.„..1922—Aug. .!.„__1924—Dec. 1 „...1925—Jan. ;.
Feb. !-_„Mar. !.„.„Apr. 1_._May 1June 1July 1Aug. 1Sept. 1Oct. 1Nov. IDec, 1
Total
.: 3,402,015••14,100,591^ 5,628, 4281 4.837,418• < 993,570
4,992,931! 4,751,538
4,804,209: 4.776,107; < 725,191
4,774, 3134. 734, 236A, 719,5194,784,0254,827,0054,900,8394,971,765
Gold,;coin andbullion '
! Standard1 Silver j Treasury •\ silver j eortifi- notes ofj dollars : cates 1890
611,545 •641,794 i495, 353 .416,282 .437,971458,206 i455,169 :462,925469,448 I453,211437, 012428,102 ,428,248 :
416,34R413,973 i429,985425,853 :
1,020,149 ;1,348,818 !231,404 i171.985 i933', 688 :9/0,664 !929,650 |913,900 :914,968 1918,862 :972,438 '
1,003,285 i1,014,311 ;1,036,243 ;1,050,057 !1,067,963 i1,108,743 i
70, 30070,86389,72553, 37855, 60657,38455,53355,26454, 66654,39853,90854, 29454,10554,17354,69354,76954.685
478,602 -1
459, 680 ;60,385 !
268, 802 '339,113 !388,540 j360,808 •366, Z9A i371, 229 :
370, 442 i380, 0B1 :379,796 I388, 016 j396.700 :294)069 I390,089 ISS8,012 :
2,4281,997 :
1,6281,5081,407 ,1,405 :
1,4011,3981,396 .1,392 '1, 390 ;1,387 .1,384 :
1,381 :1.3791,3761,375 •
159.960 :
191,351 '261.556 I229', 956 ;263,102 I266,238 ,
United j Federal ! ™ ™ i National-States I reserve | tank ! b a n k
notes ; notes , noteQ | notes
256,509 :257,559 !
253,446 :259,894 ;
202,607 !281,750 ;264,450 I267! 768 j209,439 ,272,217 '
337,845330, 353277,736284,343304,418295, 233283,598
285.780281,043284,799279,943284.806
303, 597306, 575
356,448 .3,310,225 !2,115,3501,802,055 :1.841.621 i1.688; 662 .I) 734, 006 ]
1,702, 212 i1, 676,0781,679,833 i1,636,192 i1,601,884 ;1,629,927 :1,670,6581.706.622 ;1,741,965 !
3,170 :209,877 i65,032 !8,4718,238 i7,987 I7,756 i7, 506 :7,299 !7,109 16,921 j6,777 '5,580 !
6,460 i6,314 i6,185 ,
I
715,180697,160715,023725, 782737,739705, 442 I711,832717,159 !7^403 1
Totalcircula-tion percapita (indollars)
696,649681,7096?8,178680,730 !664,351 I867,707*^6744
34.3539.5452.3639.4744.0844.0341.8642.2841.9941. 5041.8941.4941.3141.8442.1742.7743.35
J The ISgures for the several classes of money do not add to this total, as mutilated currency forwarded for redemption and unassorted currencyheld by Federal reserve banks have been deducted only from the total.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
MONEY RATES PREVAILING IN FEDERAL RESERVE BANK AND BRANCH CITIES
The following table shows the customary rates charged on loans anddiscounts in the various cities in which Federal reserve banks and theirbranches are located, as reported by representative banks. These ratesare not averages but are those rates at which the bulk of paper of each
class is handled by reporting banks. Where it appears from the reportsthat no one rate clearly covers the bulk of the paper handled, a range ofthe rates most commonly charged is given.
[Rates prevailing during week ending with the 15th day of the month]
"District and city
Customer's prime commercial paper
30-90 days 4-6 months
Dec., Nov.,1 Dec, > Dec, Nov.,! Dec.,1925 j 1925 ! 1924 1925 3925 i 1924
Interbank loans
Loans secured by stocks and bonds ;Loans secured by ! | Loans secured by
!
No, 1—Boston ;No. 2—New York
Buiialo --INo. 3—Philadelphia INo. 4—Cleveland - \
Pittsburgh iCincinnati I
No. 5—Richmond iBaltimore j
No. 6—Atlanta •Birmingham :Jacksonville ---'New Orleans !Nashville.-. --~i
No. 7—Chicago ---,Detro i t . .
No. 8—St. Louis 'Louisville.. iLittle Rock .._•
No. 9—Minneapolis - ;Helena 1
No. 10—Kansas C i ty . . . ;Omaha !
Denver jOklahoma City
No. 11—Dallas iEl Paso 'Houston ;
No. 12—San Francisco.. :Portland.. ;Seattle— .-!Spokane jSalt Lake City .Los Angeles _.|
5 -65
5 - 6G6
6 r c3
52-6*6
5 -85 -6
64|-54 ^ 64H>1
6 !6 j
O !
5 !
6 !5 - 7 i4HS ,n -8 i5 -6 i5 -54.6 - 7 j
8 i5 - 75 -6
6 Ii
44-5 I5 -6
55-J-6
66
5 -G
44~6 !
65 -85 -6
in5 -644-5
66
41-5
4 -41. 44-55'—G 64 "-41 55 -6 5 -65 -(i : 654-6 J 6
5*-6i: 5 i-e'5 -G i
4J-5
54-6 .6 •
6
44-515 -6
64 -8 : 5 -8 i 5 -85 -6 j 5 -7 ! 5 -7
6 I 5 "! 54 -5 ! 4l-5i; 41-515 -6 i 41-6 : 5 -6 .
G -!
05 -74-1-6G -85 -65 -56-7
C5 -75 -6
441 42-54- 41-58 ; 8 i 8
5 - 6 i 5 - 6 . 5 - 64 -6 I 4£-6 ! 6
51: 6 I 66 ! 5 -7 : 6 -7
4 -6 i 44-6 i 41-66 - 8 : 5 - 8 6 - 85 -6 i 5 -6 ! 5 - 65 —541 5 -6 ' 4^—5-
6 1 6 1 66 \ 6 1 6
5 -7 i 4 K 1 41-76
6 - 7 I
Dec , ' Nov.,1 D e c , ! D e c , 1 Nov.,1925 ! 1925 ! 1924 I 1925 ! 1925
414 -41
641-55 -65 -654-65 -514 W Jo -65 -74-85 -6
641-55 -G31-5
6641;8
5 -6 :
41-6 •5 :
6 -7 ,4 -6 !
8 -8 :
5 -6 ;5 -54
66 -6-1
6 i6 |
6 -7 ,
4 : 4 -4i-i44-5 !4-l - 5 " !5 - 6 : 5 - 6 !
5 j 5 i5 ,' 5 !6 , 6 i
5 -5-J:. 5 -ol i
41-53 44—5{J-;5 -6 ' 5 -6 j5 -G ' 5 -6 i5 -6 ' 5 -6 15 -6 ! 5 -6 ,
6 "' 51-6 I5 -51' 5 -51
5 , 5 -54:
5 -51, 5 -5115 , 5 !6 ! 6 I
5 -51' 5^-51,6 - 8 , 6 - 8
6 : 6 !6 ! 6 j
6 -61i 6 -7 I5 -7 ; 6 -74 -6 i 5 -66 - 7 i 6 - 741-6 ! 5 -65 -54! 5 -6
6 ' 65 -61! 5 -6J|6 - 7 1 6 - 8
8 I 6 -76 , 6
I4 4 !
5 !4 -4-1
55 -6 ,5-54
its I5 - 6 j5 -6 !3 -6 !41-6 i
6 !41-5 I5 -611
4s-5 I 4-1-541-5 I •• "51-644-55"-6
651
5 -6
4j4445 - 6 I
1
Dec,J.9'24
Demand
oi-u4|-55 -G
6 I51;
5 - 6 ,
41-6 !6 i
4 - 8 I5 -6 !
G !511.
7 - 8 I.5 -6 '51-6 I
6 !
5 -6 I
5 -65 -6
515 - 6
5 -G
3i-4i54-0 !
4 j5 -G5 - 0 !5-5£i4i-G i4^-5 i44-6 i
G .5 -8 :5 - 6 ;5 -G '4 - 5 '5 -G '
Dec,1925
55-515 -G
551-6
66
5 - 6
Nov;;1925
044-55 - 6
554-6
66
5 -G
Time1
j warehouse receipts
D e c , i Doc . \ Nov.,! D e c , j Doc , Nov.,1924 i 1925 . 1925 j 1924 • 1925 ! 1925
5 -511 5 -515 -6 j 5 -6 '
6 ; 65 - 85 - 8
5 -51-i 5 -851: 56 ! C
: 5-81 5 -6I 54-6
5 -6 ' 5 -641-6 j 41i51
6 I 6 :6 1 6
41-51 44-5
4 i34-5 i5 -G ,
454-05 -6 ,5 - 65 -G42-545 -G
65 -85 -651-64 -55 -5434-54
G6
34-44
5 - 66 ;
6 -61-!6-7 !
5 -G i 5 -G5 - 6 i 5 -G5 - 6 1 5 - 6
G 65 - 6 ! 5 -06 - 8 1 5 - 85 - 6 i 6
6-7 !8 i
6 -7 i6 i
6 6 - 7
6 - 7666
6 - 7
5 - 6566
5 -66 - 85 - 65 - 66 - 7
6 - 76
6 - 7
5 --6 ; 5 - 6
! 5 - 6i 61 5 - 6! 8
! 51-6! 6 - 7I 6• 7-8I 7! 6-7
5 -6668
4f-6!5 -6 j6 -61:
6 !7 - 8 I5 ~7 !6 - 7 j
5 -634-6
" 56G8
5 -65 -66 -7
6S7
6 -7
a4'5 j
54-0 i6 !6 I
5 - 6 ,5H>£ !
5 - 6 i6 ",
5 - 8 j5 - 6 ,54-6 '44-51'5 -6 i44-6 i
6 !6 i
44-526 - 8 I5 -G i
66-8
85 -65-1-66 - 7
66-7 !
6-7
42-5 144-5,5 -6
5 '54-6 !
G i6 i
5 -G ;54-51s-oi5 - 8 !5 -6 j5*-G ••
44-55 -6 !
5 -54!8 !
5 - 6 b4 ; 5 -8
51-G I 5 -65 -6 j 65 -6 ' 6 -75 -6 ! 5-1-642-5*i 65 -G 5 -66 -75 -8
644-85 6
44-565
5 -6G8
51-6' 6
5 - 6i 6
41-85 -6
Dec,1924
Cattle loans
Doc, j Nov.,1925 I 1925
i
Dec,1924
|___41-5
64 -51 !51-6 |5 -6 i _6 -7 !
5 Ioli
5 - 6 I...6 - 84 4 - 8 !5 - 7 ;51-6 '
5 -G j 5 - 65^-6 j 54-6 1 05-0 o-^-o •44-5 i 5 - 6 ! 5 -54j 4-2-51! 5 - 654-6 j' 54-6 ! 5 - 6 51-6 ;'
i I44-6 I 4^-5;
41-42;6 -85-6 5 -6 I 5 -6
1 I5 -G
6 I 6; 41-iii
!6 -7 i6 -7 j6 -8 '5 -G !5-6 !
8 I6 I
6-7 I6-76 - 7 I
3|-G !
5 I6 -76 -8 !fi -8 !5 -6 !5 -6 I8 -7 ,
j
66
6 - 7
7 -85 -7
66-7
6 j 7
7 i ? 16 ~ 7 j 7
5 -666
6 -75-66 -85 -6
66-7
6 | 6 - 7
Pi1
5 - 6 , 6 - 76 j 6 - 77 6-7
7 - 8 ) 6 -85 -7 I 6 -8
8 i 6 - 95 -6 j 8
66 -86 -76 -7
77
6 -87 -8
7
i5 - 6 ."
! 5 - 5 |i 5h®
6
6-7 !
6 -7 6 -76 -7 6 -86 -7 ! '' 66 -8 J 7 -86 -8 i 6 -7
8 ; 88 ! 6 -8
6 -611 6 -8-4'• 6
64-7 : 6 -77 ~8 ! 7 •
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
JANUARY, 1926 FEDERAL RESERVE 69
GOLD AND SILVER IMJPORTS AND EXPORTSIMPORTS INTO AND EXPORTS FROM THE UNITED STATES, DISTRIBUTED BY COUNTRIES
November
Country of origin or destination Exports Imports
1924 1925 1924 1925
iAll countries J $6,689,182 j$24l360,071 |$19,862,384 $10,456,115
Franco ! 14,950 j _| 10,717,761 iGermany . „..„ j . J 290,590 :
Italy-
5,077
11 months ending November
Exports
1924 1925
Imports
1924
$21,973,660 ; $256,672,063 $309,446,869 $121,057,168
1925
80,357 i
Netherlands . . J . U ~ 3,265, 772 iIPoland and Danzig..
Spain-..Sweden , ._ _. 999,927
... .
England — !
Canada - JCentral America J.Mexico.- •'West Indies ..:.Argentina .._.!Chile ..-:Columbia - '•Ecuador —'..Peru... !.Uruguay -. . jVenezuela __;.British India... _J 883,362Straits Settlements... 30,000 957,276 L.China - ! 24,125
2,000.334265J 034 i 20,184,998_ ..__..! 700,000414,595 I 389,063
! 1,50010,000 j
~~2,~450"."" 1 ~004," 035"! 3,914
12,553 L... I
5,737 '2,843,665 •
130,193 :!
337,411 i10,061 !
1.400,000 ;10,755 :
131,881 :
100,000 i
2,579,490 j2,857,524
779, 770369,812 |90,016 j_
32," 637154,415157,99730, 235
235,000999,927 j
2,000,3342,914,134 !
1,000 I3,562, 647 j
1,339,20868,048,2651,050,0004.318,343l'f 103,948
! 21,423,387 |I 4,822,116j 2,735,79250, 965, 294
400,000 i 48,231 71,273
Dutch East Indies_ . „ _ - 30,000Hongkong . _. 1, 797,100Japan. _Philippine Islands.British Oceania....EgyptPortuguese Africa.Allother ...„.„
115,000 j268,400 !
369,521 162,896
j 3,000,000144,3G9 ; 164,037187,641 !
141,430
All countries .
45,265
9,401.406 j 8,118,093
FranceGermanyPoland and Danzig.,Spain..
386,456 j
EnglandCanada . . . .Central AmericaMexicoWest IndiesArgentinaBoliviaChile ..,Columbia „Peru-
2,806,767162,227
2,25069, 793
720
895,556184,907
2,90089,180
7752, Ifio
2,8978,381
6,481,416 ! 4,049,035
6,389 ;3,356
26,091265
27,002 j
Venezuela.—. !._ .British India..... ! 2,776,689 4,546,384=China j 3,126,001 ! 1,982,495Dutch East Indies.... „._ ..! UHonkong .._ .J • 70,500 69,258Japan „.„ ; „Portuguese Africa-.... ..!..All other ! 1,375
7,154361,079156,565 :
3.932,748 I109
20, 434702, 656153,794
2, 726,549
238, 7085,810
1,074, 292111
1551505 404
281,0655,247
21, 249.178
96,402
3,92313, 611 14,125
77,580 j
392,4311, 002, 6286,159, 60245,556,6531, 500,0008, 211,189
177'. 62556i; 000
4,896 i15,000 !
3,003,91318,944
100,000 |1,101, 600 '5,350, 258
30,750
243,1004,162, 940
800,000
802,2902,560,010
58, 770,8865,474,289801,650
1,166,03011,858, 796
65,9666,522, 838
130,898, 36538, 7(55,8851, 920, 6304,985, 753337,060
19, 589,4G5350,295
2,020,134721,445
2, 670. 5567,836
295, 790
30,00026,925,176
498,240
291,137 ' 340,947
5,021,9162, 201, 3212, 500; 000
4,6G5,9642, 794, 0721,455,008528,113
1,181,862
98,611.403 ! 91,538,115 j 68,081,010
151,858 L1.145,072 i'212,884 i
5,048,125887,500
23,387,520 !1,520,530
37,025 j1,731,851 |
50,221 ;2,300 !
8,302,2571,749,321382.940
1, 688; 90082,91112,620
900,000655,3-10
48, 234,19818,376,864
6, 536404,900
913,1341,275} 970
2,022
42,374.60529,490,006
1,031, 639
75," 825
68, 2301,224,391
131,667308,318
6,919,3991,898, 718
41,280,26760,62332,304243,037
1,483, 790142, 390
13,020, 5682,425
6,589,8741,6286,923
10,084,799
77,958220
49,294,05531,847,5612,139,5544,513,970582,3612,466
387, 7671,480, 700783,446
1,338, 961
338,317
13.950119, 558
1,955,030
7.008,0491, 636,550229,30015,233
540,69162, 247
58,848,462
217,2646P140
141,449119,900
7,758.0901, 520, 510
37,883,454161,0445,244
67,1191,680,102
7, 987,350
17, 789 :894,558 :
55.9684,183
878, 569
127,186225,350 I
109, 653178,811
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
70 FEDERAL RESEEVE BULLETIN JANUABY, 1928
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES[Noon buying rated for cable transfers in New York as published by Treasury. In cents per unit of foreign currency]
Countries Monetary unit
AustriaBelgiumBulgaria.C zechosiovaida- -DenmarkFinlandFranceGermany..... . . .Great BritainGreeceHungaryItaly.....Netherlands. „Norway—..Poland.Portugal— iRumania !Spain.... . 'Sweden :
Switzerland 'Yugoslavia.. _.Canada iCubaMexico jArgentina—.,Brazil iChile _.._.„!Uruguay—. JChina jChina 'Hongkong !India jJapan. . . |Straits Settlements....!
December. 1025 November, 1925
Parofe xehange!
Average j
Low High Low High
Schilling ___:Franc jLev. ICrown IKrone.. _.|Markka ___iFranc .....IReichsmark __rPound __.|Drachma |Krone.. ___LiraFlorinKroneZlotyEscudoLeu_PesetaKronaFrancDinarDollarPesoPeso..Peso (gold)MilreisPeso (paper) „_..Peso. „ _ .Mexican dollarShanghai taelDollar ......Rupee , _YenSingapore dollar...
14.0719.3019.30
26.8019.3019.3023.82
486.6519.3020.2619.3040.2026.8019.30
108.0519.3019.3026.8019.3019.30
100. 00100. 0049.8596.4832.44
» 19. 53103.42» 48.111 86.85i 47,77
48.6649.8556.78
14.0500i 4.5200i .7268! 2.9608: 24.7000
2. 5202: 3.5900
23.8000:484.4100
1. 2503: .0014, 4.0200
40.1600: 20.1900• 9.6900; o.iooo!- . 4517, 14.. 1200: 26., 7500: 19.2700! 1.7694I 99.8823i 99.8844
48. 616793.910013. 930011. 9500
:100. 55001 54.8300i 75.2300! 57.3500•• 36.6000i 42.8800•! 56.5400
. 14.0750
. 4.5300i . 7308' 2.9621! 25.0000: 2.5225. 3.9J001 23.8100485,3700, 1.3292• .0014! 4.0400i 40.2400
20.380012. 76005.1400
. 466714. 300026.850019.35001.7722
100.040499. 975048.850094.430014. 810012. 2900
102. 530055. 650076.080058. 250036.700043. 7000
| 56.7500
L _....14.04704.5200.7247
. 2.9608i 24. 5700i 2.5212i 3.7400i 23.8000.484. 3900. 1.3255. .0014i 3.9400I 40.1900; 19.9700j 13.4700I 5.1000i . 4482! 14.1700i 26.7400! 19.2600I 1.7686i 99.9844I 99.867248. 676793. 680014.010012.0900102.130055,1.00075.27Q057. 520036.580041.660056. 5800
i PerRate i cent of
; par
Low
November, 1924
High i PerRate ; cent of
! par
I
14.08104. 5300
.73002.9619
25.01002. 52384.1800
23.8100'484. 7600
1. 3730.0014
4.000040. 250020. 460016.67005.1300
.474814.320026. 760019. 2800
1. 7736100.156399.992249. 075094. 810015. 050012.3000
102.890056,680076.440058.4.80036.700043.150056.9200
: 14.0624' 4.5270' . 72791 2.9615: 24.8561: 2.52211 3.96221 23.8061484.5861 !
: 1.3375 !; ,.0014 •: 4., 0048 i! 40. 2265 ,; 20.3126 !I 15.7400 :i 5.1130 i!• . 4 0 3 2 •
! 14.2526I 26.7517 ij 19.2713 iI 1.7704 •J100.0788 i99.9385 !48.7879 I
! 94.4391 !1 14.6126 I| 12.1913 !102.4778j 55,7704 !! 75.8161 :I 57.8143 j' 36.6187 ii 42.3252 j! 50. 6265 |
99.9523.463.77
92. 7513.0720.5399.9499. 586.93.01
20.75100.0775. 7981.554.732.4073,8599.8299.859.17
100. 0899. 9497.8797. 8845. 0562.4299.18115.92113.41121.0375.2584.9199.73
4.8000. 73002.979917.33002. 51335. 2200
23. 7900454.31001. 7538. 0013
4. 300039.620014. 360019.19004.1700. 5138
13. 480026. 610019. 25001.4452
99. 952199. 937548. 708383. 380011. 060011. 080090.680054. 830076.000054.410033.970038.280052. 5000
4. 8900. 73753. 013517.6500
! 2.5222! 5.39001 23.8100j463.8400i 1.7998| . 0013: 4.360040.400014.860019.24004.7400. 5641
13.780026.910019. 31001. 4528
100. 041499.978148. 833386. 7400
i 11.7600! 11.4100i 99.2800i 55.8800j 7G.7900I 55.2400| 34.8000i 38.6600i 53.5000
4.8326 :.7331 I
; 2.9890 '1 17. 5483 j! 2.5184 ;! 5. 2757 !! 23.7983 !;460.96S7 |i 1.7808 i1 .0013 •
4.3335 !40.0513 I
• 14.7152 !19.2074 |
. 4.5104 !.5393 i
; 13.5961 !i 26.8135 j: 19.2765 :•• 1.4490 i! 99.9866 !99.9530 I
1 48.7777 |: 85.4865 !1 11.4709 i
11.2730 !i 95.4626 !• 55. 3100 ,!; 76/3009 !
54.8587 :
1 34.392238.5183
: 53.1065 |
11913 average.
25.043.80
65.4813.0527.3499.9194.729.23.01
22,4599.6354.9199.524.172.79
70.45100.0599.887.51
99.9999.9597.8588,6135.3657.7292.31
114.97114.14114.8470.6877.2793.53
SILVER
[Average price per fine ouncel
December November
London (converted at average rate of exchange) ______ ! $0.69547N e w York _ ..„_ „ , .69236
$0.70125.69558
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
INDEX
Acceptances: ' a g e
Held and purchased by Federal reserve banks £5,56Market for 10
Agent general for reparations payments, annual report of 6Agricultural credit banks, loan of 12Agricultural movements, index of.. 36Agriculture, monthly statistics 13Automobile industry 20Be.nk credit, growth in 1-5Bank debits. . 66Bank suspensions 28Bankers' balances in Federal reserve bank cities 58Belgian National Bank, agreement with, to purchase prime 30m-
mercial bills 6Building statistics 122,37Business and financial conditions:
Abroad 40United States 8-30, 34-39
Business failures 27Canada:
Cost of living and retail food prices 49Financial statistics _ 42Foreign trade 45Wholesale Drices 46
Capital issues 31Chain stores, retail trade of 39Changes in membership in Federal reserve system 60Charters issued to national banks 32Coal and coke production 16Commercial failures. 27Commodity movements 37Comptroller of the Currency, annual report of. 6Condition statements:
All reporting stock banks in the United States 61-64Federal reserve banks 50Member banks in leading cities 57
Cost of living in principal countries 49Cotton:
Raw 14Manufacturing 19
Crops:Condition 13Estimate of production 33
Currency in circulation 30,67Dairy products 16Debits to individual accounts 66Debt payments to United States 6De Camp, George, appointed Federal reserve agent at Cleveland- 7Department-store business 25,39Deposits:
Savings 26Time, growth in 4Time and demand of member banks 59
Deposits, note circulation, and reserves of Federal reserve banks . . 50Deputy chairman of Federal reserve banks, appointment of, for
year 1926 7Discount and open-market operations of Federal reserve banks . . . 56Discount rates:
Central banks of issue 44Federal reserve banks 65London market, 1925 40Prevailing in various centers 68
Earning assets of Federal reserve banks 55Election of directors of Federal reserve banks 7Employment, United States 25
Index of 35England. (Sec Great Britain.)Factory employment and pay rolls, index of. 36Failures, commercial and bank 27Federal reserve agents:
Appointment of, for year 1926 7De Camp, George, appointed at Cleveland... 7
Federal reserve bank credit, gold stock, money in circulation, andmember bank reserve balances 30
Federal reserve banks:Condition of 50Discount and open-market operations of 56
Federal reserve note account — 54Fiduciary powers granted to national banks 32Financial statistics for principal foreign countries 42Food manufacturing — 18Food prices in foreign countries 49Foreign exchange 29,70Foreign trade:
Principal foreign countries 45United States 28.45
France:Cost of living and retail food prices 49Financial statistics 42Foreign trade 45Wholesale prices 46
Fruits and vegetables 15
Germany: P a g e
Cost of living and retail food prices 49Financial statistics 42Foreign trade 45Wholesale prices 47
Gold imports and exports 29,69Gold settlement fund transactions 65Gold stock in the United States 30Grain and flour 13,37Great Britain:
Financial statistics 42Foreign trade 45Gold imports and exports 29,69London money market in 1925 40Retail food prices and cost of living 49Wholesale prices 46
Imports and exports:Gold and silver 29,69Merchandise _ 28
Industrial activity, index of 36Interest rates prevailing in various centers 68Investments and loans of national banks 31Iron and steel manufacturing 20Italy:
Financial statistics 42Foreign trade 45Retail food prices and cost of living 49Wholesale prices 47
Japan:Financial statistics 42Foreign trade 45Wholesale prices 46
Leather industry 21Livestock industry 15Loans and investments of national banks 31Lumber industry 21Mail-order houses, retail trade of 39Manufacturing:
Condition by industries 18Index of production 36
McClelland, E. M., appointed assistant secretary of FederalReserve Board 7
Member banks:Condition of 57Number discounting 56Number in each district 56State banks admitted to membership 32
Membership in Federal reserve system, changes in 60Mineral production, index of 36Metals 18Mining 16Money in circulation 30,67Money rates 10,68
In London during 1925 40National banks:
Charters issued to 32Fiduciary powers granted to 32Loans and investments of 31
Par list, number of banks on 67Pay rolls in factories, index of 36Petroleum industry 17Prices:
Food, in principal countries 49Security 11Wholesale 27,46
Production in basic industries 8,35Reserve ratio of Federal reserve banks 60Resources and liabilities:
Federal reserve banks 60Member banks in leading cities 67
Retail food prices 49Retail trade 25,39Savings deposits 26Secretary of the Treasury, annual report of 6Security prices 11Shoe industry 21Silver:
Imports and exports 69Price of 70
State banks admitted to Federal reserve system 32Stocks at department stores 39Textile indusuy 19Time deposits of member banks 69Tobacco industry 14,37Trade:
Foreign 28,46Retail 25,39Wholesale 25,38
Transportation 24,37Treasury finance 6Wholesale prices 27,46Wholesale trade 25,38Wingfield, B. M., appointed assistant counsel of Federal Reserve
Board 7Wool and woolen industry 19
I
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis