frascati manual 2015
TRANSCRIPT
FRASCATI MANUAL 2015GUIDELINES FOR COLLECTING AND REPORTING DATA ON RESEARCH AND EXPERIMENTAL DEVELOPMENT
Main features and outcomes of the 6th revision
Part 1. Background to the Frascati Manual• The manual’s origins • The 6th revisionPart 2. 2015 edition• Main features of the 2015 edition • Key elements chapter by chapter.Part 3. Implementation of the 2015 Frascati Manual
Contents
BACKGROUND TO THE FRASCATI MANUAL AND ITS
2015 EDITION
• An OECD standard– Statistical purpose, developed by NESTI– Non binding rules – De facto global standard– Used by policy makers and others
• 1st ed. in 1963 – context has changed, but monitoring resources for R&D has always mattered – Name comes from Italian town where
guidelines were first approved in 1962– Revised 5 times in the past– Last time in 2002
• First step in the international measurement of STI and its impacts– Focus on R&D inputs, integrated into
broader measurement and analysis system
What is the “Frascati Manual”?
• Address user and producer needs– Clarify concepts, address new topics and changes in how
R&D is performed and funded– Improve international comparability of R&D data. – Relevant and applicable in developing countries – Facilitate use of FM for R&D data used in National
Accounts – Align to new and revised statistical classifications, systems,
Frascati family of manuals– Improve comparability - address methodological challenges
and disseminate best practices– Role of administrative data in addition to surveys– Take into account the use of R&D microdata and linking for
analysis• An in-depth revision was required to meet these needs
Why revised in 2015?
Examples of Frascati in ‘use’
EU Community framework for state aid for research and development and innovation (2006/C 323/01)When classifying different activities, the Commission will refer to its own practice as well as the specific examples and explanations provided in the Frascati Manual on the Measurement of Scientific and technological Activities, Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development.
Relevance:Meets data users’
needs
Based on consensus among data producers:
Adopted internationally and
supports comparable statistics
Feasible: based on measurement
experience and tested approaches
Revision process and contents aligned to meet three criteria:
• A statistical manual, but aware of its broader use. • NESTI responsibility. • Drawing on other OECD committees input and
stakeholder web-based open consultation.• Declassified by OECD Statistics Committee (CSSP) and
OECD Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy • Avoid unwarranted potential disruption to policy uses
and data series• Main focus on R&D resources
– Clarify that FM measurement perspective not tied to the “linear model of innovation”
– Evidence collected to feed into guidance on outputs and analysis of links between inputs and outputs
Boundaries applying to the revision
90+ different individuals (and country leads) signed up to develop guidance on:
• R&D definition – implementation guidance (ITA)• Outputs of R&D – (CAN, DEU)• Measures of government funding (CHE, secretariat)• R&D expenditures (NOR)• R&D personnel (RUS)• Institutional sector classifications (FRA)• Higher education (DEU, NOR)• R&D globalisation (USA, BEL) • R&D capitalisation (GBR)• Use of administrative data & survey methodologies (CAN)• R&D by industry (secretariat)External input secured through an open consultation in 2013
Phase 1. (March 2013-June 2014) Country-led revision groups
• New, expanded chapter structure agreed by NESTI
• NESTI Bureau tasked to deliver a draft based on discussions and decisions
• Preparation and discussion of draft chapters. • Workshop with country experts, Lisbon,
December 2014• Draft manual presented to delegates, March
2015.
Phase 2. Drafting the new manual (Jul 2014-March 2015)
• April 2015. NESTI agrees the new manual on principle.
• Written comments from NESTI delegates incorporated in draft.
• Style editing • Draft submitted to and approved by CSTP and
CSSP for declassification• Manual design and publishing • Launch at World S&T Forum and CSTP
Ministerial meeting, Daejeon, Korea. 19 Oct 2015.
Phase 3. April-October 2015. Approval and publication.
OECD Working Party of National Experts on Science and Technology Indicators (NESTI)
April 2014NESTI group photo after the approval in principle of the Frascati
Manual 2015
• Some examples – Intensive use of online community space sharing material and
commenting • (100+ users, 250+ documents)
– Intensive use of videoconferencing for group discussion and webinars (up to 30 people at times)
– Online-based stakeholder consultation (50+ submissions)– Use of online survey tool for delegate R&D vignette survey response
gathering – Since September 2014, weekly Bureau meetings to assist in the editing – Two NESTI dedicated workshops (+90 participants)
• Outcomes – A learning process for delegates, new countries. The revision process
serves a pedagogical function within the NESTI community and within the OECD as a ‘learning organisation’
– Most inclusive revision process to date. – Considerable financial savings and value for money– Relevant experience for other groups and future guideline work by NESTI
Some major changes in collaborative project working
CONTENTS OF THE 2015 EDITION
Frascati Manual 2015 Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development
• The Frascati Manual provides guidelines and recommendations for compiling and reporting internationally comparable statistics on R&D expenditures and personnel.
• It is a consensus document with no mandatory enforcement mechanisms that is revised on a regular basis to take into account new developments in the areas of statistics and of R&D (see next slide).
• The title of 7th edition has been changed, reflecting expansion in focus.
Chapter 1: Introduction to R&D Statistics and the Frascati Manual
• Provides objectives, background and general overview of the manual ; of particular interest to non-statisticians, policy makers and various types of users.
• Explains reasons for revisions to the Frascati Manual and expanded coverage:– The explicit adoption in the 2008 revision of the System of National Accounts of Frascati
R&D definitions and data as the basis for treating R&D expenditures as capital formation (investment).
– The need to better reconcile the widespread use of Frascati Manual for both statistical and policy-related purposes (e.g. coverage of R&D tax relief topics and difficulties of measuring R&D business expenses).
– Use of the Frascati Manual by countries at different stages of economic development, with varying forms of economic structures and national research systems necessitated the introduction of individual sector-specific chapters to allow greater granularly in collection guidance. In particular, can better address some specific developing country related topics.
– Because of ongoing changes to the organisation of R&D activities, there was the need to address new statistical challenges (such as measuring intramural versus extramural R&D performance, and R&D globalisation issues).
– Desire to address new types of uses of R&D data (micro-data analyses), methodological challenges (related to burden and response rates) and opportunities (use of administrative records).
– Need to reflect changes/revisions in statistical classification systems implemented since the last 2002 Frascati Manual update.
Chapter 2. Concepts and definitions for identifying R&D
Modified R&D definitions meant to remain consistent with previous definitions
FM2002:• Research and experimental development (R&D) comprise
creative work undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge, including knowledge of man, culture and society, and the use of this stock of knowledge to devise new applications.
FM2015 (see next slide):• Research and experimental development (R&D) comprise
creative and systematic work undertaken in order to increase the stock of knowledge – including knowledge of humankind, culture and society – and to devise new applications of available knowledge.
“Research and experimental development (R&D) comprise creative work undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge,
including knowledge of man, culture and society,
and the use of this stock of knowledge to devise new applications.”
“Research and experimental development (R&D) comprise creative and systematic work undertaken in order to increase the stock of knowledge,
- including knowledge of humankind, culture and society -
gender neutral, still remind users that Social sciences, Arts & Humanities are
within scope
less words, “systematic” on par with
“creative”
FM2002 FM2015
and to devise new applications of available knowledge.”
The previous definition could imply that all knowledge used for experimental development (“D”) had been created by R&D (linear model?). The parsing also hinted that all uses of R&D knowledge for new applications were D.New definition asserts more explicitly that D also has to be creative and systematic work increasing knowledge.
Modified R&D definitions meant to remain consistent with previous definitions
Type of R&DFM2002 and FM2015 (unchanged):• Basic research is experimental or theoretical work undertaken primarily to
acquire new knowledge of the underlying foundation of phenomena and observable facts, without any particular application or use in view.
FM2002 and FM2015 (~unchanged):• Applied research is also original investigation undertaken in order to
acquire new knowledge. It is, however, directed primarily towards a specific practical aim or objective.
FM2002:• Experimental development is systematic work, drawing on existing
knowledge gained from research and practical experience, that is directed to producing new materials, products or devices; to installing new processes, systems and services; or to improving substantially those already produced or installed.
FM2015 (slight modification and next slide):• Experimental development is systematic work, drawing on knowledge
gained from research and practical experience and generating additional knowledge, which is directed to producing new products or processes or to improving existing products or processes.
Chapter 2: Concepts and Definitions for Identifying R&D
• Identifies a set of explanatory criteria to help in implementation. All five criteria are to be met, at least in principle, every time an R&D activity is undertaken whether on a continuous or occasional basis, by a performer in any sector.
– Novel (aimed at new findings)– Creative (based on original concepts; not obvious)– Uncertain (outcome, cost, time allocation not known a priori)– Systematic (planned and budgeted)– Transferable and/or reproducible (should be the potential to transfer results)
• Explicit introduction of the concept of “R&D project” as an aid to resolve challenging boundary cases
• Explicit inclusion of “the arts” as a Field of Research and Development (FORD), (previously field of “S&T” )
• Field-specific examples of basic, applied, and experimental development• More up to date list of examples of boundaries and exclusions from R&D
– R&D and innovation activities — R&D and related scientific and technological activities
– R&D and (versus) design — R&D versus artistic creation– R&D versus product development — R&D versus pre-production development– R&D and software development — R&D and service activities
Chapter 3: Institutional Sectors and Classifications
• The five institutional sectors (Business enterprise, Government, Higher education, Private non-profit and Rest of the world) are maintained and are consistent with those of the SNA with the exception of HE which does not have a direct counterpart in the SNA, but which is core to R&D performance.
• “Abroad” has been renamed “Rest of the world” in accordance with the SNA.
• Definition of HE slightly modified to only retain institutions that provide “formal tertiary education programmes” and “research institutes, centres, experimental stations and clinics that have their R&D activities under the direct control of, or administered by, tertiary education institutions.”
• New figure introduced that gives a stylized representation of domestic Frascati institutional sectors and their borderlines. Main borderline cases discussed in a systematic way. More explicit recognition of organizational complexities.
• Inclusion of text giving a list of general classifications applicable to all institutional units (regardless of sector), i.e. by main economic activity, by public or private status, by affiliation status to a broader group (domestic or foreign), into SNA’s Corporations, General government and Non-profit sectors, by field of R&D and by geography.
Decision tree for sectoring institutional classification
Institution
Does it sell its output at an economically significant price?
YesDoes it provide formal tertiary
education services?Yes
HE
No
BE2
No1
Is it controlled by government?
Yes
Does it
provide
formal
tertiary
education
services?
YesHE
No
Is the unit’s R&D controlled or administered by institutions providing formal tertiary education services?
YesHE
NoGOV
No
Does it
provide
formal
tertiary
education
services?
YesHE
No
Is the unit’s R&D controlled or administered by institutions providing formal tertiary education services?
YesHE
NoPNP
BE Business enterprise sectorHE Higher education sectorGOV Government sectorPNP Private non-profit sector
1. NPIs primarily serving businesses (e.g. trade associations, etc.) are classified in the Business enterprise sector, following the SNA convention of classifying those into the SNA Corporations sector. 2. This sector can be further subdivided into public and private Business enterprises, depending on whether the institution is controlled by government or not. This is analogous to the SNA treatment of public and private corporations.
Chapter 4: Measurement of R&D Expenditures
• Gross domestic expenditure on R&D (GERD) includes current expenditures (including labour and other current costs) plus gross fixed capital expenditures (such as for land, buildings, machinery and equipment).
• Inclusion of new concepts and terminology: internal/external sources of funds (originating within or outside of the control of the R&D-performing unit) and exchange/transfer funds (with or without a compensatory return of R&D).
• Inclusion of a summary table on intramural expenditure categories and of a figure on funding flows from the perspective of an R&D performer.
• New examples on identifying R&D sources for funds that flow through multiple units and across sectors.
• Inclusion of a text on measurement of funds for extramural R&D and on sales and purchases of R&D.
• Inclusion of a table identifying which sources of funds should be collected on R&D performer surveys.
• Improved guidelines on the treatment of labor costs, in particular for external R&D personnel fully integrated into the intramural R&D of a reporting unit, to be in line with identified categories of R&D personnel in chapter 5.
• Recommendation to collect depreciation costs, but not to include such costs in intramural R&D.
Chapter 4: Measurement of R&D Expenditures
• Inclusion of a comprehensive list of types of fixed assets used for R&D - i.e. land and buildings, machinery and equipment (in place of ‘instruments and equipment), capitalized computer software and other intellectual property products - and for which R&D expenditure data should be collected.
• Differentiation of FM depreciation from SNA depreciation (capital consumption).
• Clarified guidelines on the collection of software R&D that is part of current costs and part of capital expenditure.
• Explanation on how software R&D is treated differently by FM (part of R&D) and by the SNA (part of software).
• Inclusion of specific recommendations on the treatment of deductible taxes such as VAT.
• New clarifications and examples for allowable reporting (e.g., related to administration costs; to treatment of MNE R&D cost allocations; and to operations & maintenance costs of rented research facilities).
• Clarification on how to report public general university funds (GUF).• Recommendation to report R&D tax incentives separately from other
government sources of R&D funds. (e.g., tax credits used for performing business R&D should be treated as internal funds, not public funds).
Chapter 5: Measurement of R&D Personnel:Persons employed and External contributors
FM2015 R&D personnel in a statistical unit include all persons engaged directly in R&D, whether they are employed by the statistical unit or are external contributors fully integrated into the statistical unit’s R&D activities, as well as those providing direct services for the R&D activities (such as R&D managers, administrators, technicians and clerical staff). • Coverage of R&D personnel now refers to total persons employed and deals
explicitly with the treatment of non-employees and external personnel fully integrated into the intramural R&D of a reporting unit, e.g. categories such as self-employed, volunteers and students.
• Two main groups of individuals who potentially contribute to the R&D activities can be identified:
– Persons employed by the statistical unit who contribute to the unit’s intramural R&D activities (used interchangeably with the term “internal R&D personnel” in the manual).
– External contributors to the unit's intramural R&D activities (used interchangeably with the term “external R&D personnel”). This group includes two subgroups: (i) persons who receive wages/salaries but not from the statistical unit performing the R&D, and (ii) a number of special cases of persons external to a statistical unit who contribute to intramural R&D.
Chapter 5: Measurement of R&D Personnel
• Classification of R&D personnel is now envisaged according to their ‘function’ (researchers, technicians, other supporting staff).
• Definition of researchers has been changed:– Researchers are professionals engaged in the conception or creation of new
knowledge., products, processes, methods and systems and also in the management of the projects concerned. They conduct research and improve or develop concepts, theories, models, techniques instrumentation, software or operational methods.
• To be counted in R&D personnel totals, individuals should make appreciable contributions (at least 0.1 FTE) and any one individual cannot contribute more than 1.0 FTE.
• Doctoral and master’s students may be included in either group of R&D personnel if they meet the specific criteria aimed at ensuring that only individuals with an appreciable contribution to the institution’s R&D are included.
• Improved convergence with the treatment of related labour costs in chapter 4.• Definitions of FTEs (recommended counts for international comparisons) and of
headcounts (recommended primarily to describe, in percentage terms, R&D personnel characteristics) are included.
• Guidelines are given for identifying/estimating FTEs and HCs and for estimating FTEs according to a specific formula, if necessary.
• Distributions of aggregate R&D personnel totals discussed (e.g., by sex, function, age, and formal qualification).
Chapter 6: Methodologies and Procedures
• This chapter provides general guidelines on methodology that are in principle common to all institutional sectors. Some considerations on each individual sector’s sampling units are nevertheless given in this chapter.
• Guidelines on survey design (e.g., sampling plan, questionnaire design) are given and the use of administrative data is also considered. Preference for dedicated R&D surveys is still acknowledged.
• The chapter covers issues with respect to data collection, integration of multiple data sets, editing of collected data and imputation, estimation and output validation.
• The need to provide indicators of data quality for the published aggregates is explicitly acknowledged.
• Compilers of R&D statistics are encouraged to collect data on expected expenditure data for the following year(s) (nowcasting).
Chapter 7: Business Enterprise R&D
• New chapter, but incorporates material previously part of FM2002 chapter on “Functional Distributions”.
• Extensive guidance on defining units in the BE sector.• Interest and benefit of using identification codes for sampling and collecting
data from statistical units.– Main economic activity (as indicated by ‘value added’ or substitute criteria)– public or private status and by affiliation status (parents or members of a domestic or foreign
group; foreign controlled enterprise).– New size classifications recommended. (e.g. size cut-off at 10 or more employees)
• Variety of functional distributions of Business enterprise Expenditure on R&D (BERD) detailed (e.g. source of funds, type of R&D)
• Distribution by industry orientation vs. economic activity discussed and inclusion of a table describing the different approaches and criteria used.
• Distribution by FORD, socioeconomic objective, and technology areas discussed (not specifically recommended).
• Comprehensive section on survey design, frame creation, data collection, estimation and data quality relevant to the Business enterprise sector.
• Case of “combined” R&D and innovation surveys accepted but not recommended.
• Inclusion of cautionary guidance related to the use of financial accounting sources (e.g., R&D expense) and over- and under-reporting of R&D.
Chapter 8: Government R&D
• New chapter, with a focus on collecting data from Government performers.• Provides definitions of the components of the Government sector, i.e. central (federal),
regional (state) and local (municipal) governments.• Boundaries between units overlapping sectors, and notion of ‘control’ clarified.
– Government ≠ Public (e.g. public corporation is part of Business enterprise sector)• Variety of functional distributions of GOVernment Expenditure on R&D (GOVERD)
detailed (e.g. socioeconomic objective, type of R&D).• Identification of R&D vs. related S&T activities, policy-related studies, health care in
‘public’ hospitals, system development and demonstration, technology readiness-level (TRL) classifications .
– When a prototype performance is assessed by actual operational usage, this assessment is unlikely to represent R&D.
• Some measurement specifics for Government sector R&D costs are considered: treatment of pension funds and other social security costs, VAT, cost of facilities.
• Non-government sources of funding discussed.• Guidelines on treatment of individuals dedicated to administration and assessment of
R&D funding proposals (generally not included in R&D).• Cautionary guidance provided on the role of “intermediary” agencies that pass R&D funds
from one agency to another.• Recommendation to classify researchers by seniority grade.• Funder-based approach discussed in some detail, but considered as a complementary
approach to performer-based.
Chapter 9: Higher Education R&D
• New chapter, but incorporates and expands annex material previously part of FM2002.
• Definition of the Higher Education sector slightly modified and includes– all universities, colleges of technology and other institutions providing formal
tertiary education programmes, whatever their source of finance or legal status; and
– all research institutes, centres, experimental stations and clinics that have their R&D activities under the direct control of, or administered by, tertiary education institutions.
• Variety of institutional and functional distributions of Higher education Expenditure on R&D (HERD) and personnel detailed
• Inclusion of a guiding framework for compiling HERD statistics in the light of the diversity of international institutional settings and of the range of statistical sources.
• Inclusion of a proposed classification by seniority grades.• Inclusion of guidelines for time-use surveys to help estimate the R&D components of
FTEs and expenditures.• New terminology and definitions for “foreign-owned branch campuses” (FBC) and
“branch campuses abroad” (BCA) to address measurement aspects related to globalisation of Higher education.
Chapter 10: Private Non-Profit R&D
• New Chapter.• Scope and definition of the sector kept identical to FM2002 (non-profit institutions
serving households (NPISH) + individuals) residual sector in nature.– Non-profit institutions ≠ Non-market institutions (there are market-producing NPIs)
• Tagging of NPIs belonging to other sectors, using for example statistical registers, may allow presentation of total performance as per general non-profit accounts .
– NPIs controlled by Higher education institutions are part of Higher education sector– NPIs serving business (e.g., trade associations) are part of Business enterprise sector
• Inclusion of guidelines on identification of R&D in the PNP sector (e.g., cautionary guidance on the need to exclude programmatic evaluations and assessments).
• Variety of functional distributions of Private Non-Profit Expenditure on R&D (PNPERD) detailed (e.g. source of funds, type of R&D).
• Clarification on the treatment of individuals/volunteers in this sector.• Funder-based approach considered relevant for the PNP sector, but
complementary to the performer-based approach.• Acknowledgement of new funding models, i.e. wealthy philanthropists and crowd-
funding.
Chapter 11: Measurement of R&D Globalisation
• New chapter: the manual now explicitly recognises the concept of R&D globalisation. Consistent with the SNA, the term “Rest of the world” has (in general) replaced the term “abroad”.
• Covers both business and non-business R&D globalisation.• Business sector: three statistical measures are covered (i) cross border
R&D funding flows [consistent with traditional FM, but expanded ownership details]; (ii) current costs and personnel for R&D performed by members of multinational enterprises (MNEs) within compiling countries and abroad [new]; and (iii) international trade in R&D services [new].
• Relevant MNE definitions are given and an illustrative example of MNE member ownership relationships with corresponding terminology.
• New terms and definitions of foreign-owned branch campuses (FBC) and branch campuses abroad (BCA) provided for the Higher education sector.
• Special case of international organisations considered
Chapter 12: Government Budget Allocations for R&D
• Acronym changed from GBAORD to GBARD. Revised chapter stresses priority of ensuring timeliness for the collection of these data. It is suggested that GBARD data be based on initial budget appropriations voted on by the legislature.
• Includes a detailed description of the various types of R&D support (e.g. payments for services, grants, loan guarantees, etc.) and their treatment.
• Notes (but does not recommend) the common practice of using government surveys to compile GBARD (in particular to identify R&D content and GUF).
• It is recommended to distribute GBARD by socio-economic objectives updated to reflect Eurostat’s latest 2007 NABS classification.
• Distribution by (and recent work on) modes of funding (e.g. project versus institution) acknowledged, but not recommended.
Chapter 13: Measurement of Government Tax Relief for R&D
• New chapter providing guidelines on reporting government support for R&D through tax incentives, with a view to assisting in the production of internationally comparable indicators of Government Tax Relief for R&D expenditures (GTARD). New measurement area subject to further developments.
• Basic definitions given for tax allowance, tax credit, tax exemption and tax expenditures given in the glossary of terms.
• Detailed description of existing types of tax instruments.• Guidelines on estimation methods and formulation of a common benchmark for
international reporting. Ideally, countries should record the following: • [1] refundable credits provided to taxpayers or other types of units for R&D in the reference period (if
applicable) • [2] foregone tax revenues in the reference period, for R&D in the same period • [3] credits earned but not used in the reference period, e.g. carried forward, valued on a nominal basis• [4] credits earned in a previous period used in the reference period, also on a nominal basis.
• The two main indicators for GTARD can be defined on the basis of these components:• GTARD on an earned or accruals basis = [1]+[2]+[3]• GTARD on a use or cash basis = [1]+[2]+[4]
Two printed annexes and a series of online annexesPrinted:• Annex 1. Brief history and origins of the manual
– Describes historical developments and changes introduced in the different editions
• Annex 2. Glossary of terms– New to this edition– Printed version includes some 125 terms with
definitions/explanations– To be maintained and further developed online at http://
oe.cd/frascati
Annexes
On-line Annexes
• Removed from FM2002 – retrievable in older editions– R&D in the Higher education sector– Treatment of R&D in the United Nations’ System of National Accounts– Supplementary guidance on the classification of large R&D projects (in defense and
aerospace)– Correspondence between R&D personnel in Frascati and ISCO-88 classes– Online Annex on R&D in developing countries (issues covered in the 2015 manual) – Fields of Science and Technology (included in the 2015 edition as Fields of R&D, in ch2)
• Retained FM2002 annexes - www.oecd.org/sti/inno/frascatiannexes.htm – R&D related to health, information and communication technology (ICT) and
biotechnology– Methods of deriving regional R&D data – R&D deflators and currency converters– Practical methods of providing up-to-date estimates and R&D projections
• Preparations for new annexes in FM2015– Expanded note on integrating SNA and FM R&D concepts, terms and needs– Expanded material and sources for R&D globalisation measures
37
IMPLEMENTATION
• Already proved useful for training new generation of S&T statisticians
• Success depends on effective implementation– Recommendations implemented in surveys – Information shared on a timely basis with national and
global user community – Reduced burden on respondents and NSOs– Effective discussions among practitioners and OECD on
how to interpret the new guidelines and achieve greater international comparability
• Towards improved quality of and trust in R&D statistics
• Work towards improving the use and interpretation of the data, including micro-data
Realising value from this revision
• Frascati webpage fully revamped• Links to all relevant Frascati resources• …including Frascati Community space for R&D
survey practitioners– http://oe.cd/frascati-community– Revision collaborative space transformed into
implementation support space– Key features
• Safe space for NESTI delegates and approved experts• Q&As on FM methodology interpretation in substitution for
bilateral email • Relevant documents, e.g. questionnaires, country news. • Basis for future annex development
Webpage – http://oe.cd/frascati
Daejeon, launch 19 Oct Tokyo, 27 Oct 2015 NEXT? Seoul, 23rd Oct
“Roadshow” seminarsPresentation of key aspects to Frascati users
• OECD now has to revise its approach to collect data from countries international data collection– Structure and content of data requested from countries– Collection processes and IT systems– OECD R&D data tables and publications (RDS and
MSTI)– Co-ordination with other international organisations– Transitional arrangements
• Discussion of proposals and decision at NESTI – March 2016
• Systems development phase • Initial adoption intended by end 2016
Working towards implementationFrascati Manual 2015 in OECD databases
Please visit our Web site: http://oe.cd/frascati
Thank you!