fracture characterization through the use of azimuthally
TRANSCRIPT
Fracture characterization through the use of azimuthally sectored attribute volumes Amanda Thompson* and Jamie Rich, Devon Energy Co. Mike Ammerman, Ammerman Geophysical
Summary
Azimuthal volumes have often been looked at in conjunction with velocity anisotropy to determine the strike of fractures or maximum stress direction. Due to variations in the directions of fractures, attributes calculated on azimuthal volumes may also provide insight into the strike and dip, location, and spatial variation of the fractures. In particular, attributes highlighting the differences in frequency, time, and amplitude can effectively isolate areas of fractures (Tod et al 2007). If these seismic experiments can detect naturally-occurring fractures in reservoirs then why not use the same principles to detect hydraulically-induced fractures? The techniques discussed in this paper will show how these azimuthally sectored volumes and their attributes can be used to map the hydraulically-induced fractures in the Barnett Shale in the Ft. Worth Basin. Areas of pre-existing hydraulic fractures are typically avoided because of the potential interference with other wells in the area. We demonstrate how prior geologic knowledge of areas of hydraulically-induced fractures will be used in conjunction with the azimuthal volumes in order to effectively map the fractures.
Acquisition and Processing
In April 2009, Devon Energy acquired a wide azimuth 51 km2 proprietary 3D seismic data over the study area. Overall, the P-wave seismic data are of high quality with frequencies approaching 100 Hz. Table 1 summarizes the acquisition parameters. Offsets equal to or greater than the target depth are acquired. During processing, we first computed the azimuthal velocity variation based on the far-offset azimuthal variation in traveltimes. We then prestack time-migrated the data, and generated four 450-wide azimuthally-sectored volumes centered about 00 (North), 450, 900, and 1350 for further analysis. Figure 1 shows the azimuth (spider diagram) of the midpoints inside representative CMP bins. Since all azimuths are present in the bins this justifies the azimuthal processing. Although Table 1 shows the bin size to be 110 ft by 110 ft (33 m by 33 m), we increased the bin size of the azimuthal sectored volumes to generate ‘super gathers’ at 220 ft by 220 ft (67 m by 67m) to increase fold. This processing has been implemented in other 3D surveys in the study area, so the fast and slow azimuth directions are known. The fast direction is usually the maximum horizontal stress direction, which for the basin is
approximately N45E. There was no need to use multiple azimuths with smaller ranges to first determine the fast and slow directions of the data.
Table 1: Acquisition parameters used to allow subsequent azimuthal processing
Number of live lines: 30
Number of stations per line: 120
Receiver line interval 660 ft (201 m)
Receiver group spacing 220 ft (67 m)
Shot line interval 880 ft (268 m)
Vibrator array interval 220 ft (67 m)
Patch size 26,180 ft by 25,520 ft (7,980 m by 7,778 m)
Nominal bin size 110 ft by 110 ft (33 m by 33 m)
Number of vibrator sweeps 8
Number of vibrators per array 3
Sweep range 10-110 Hz, 10 s duration, 3 db/octave
Number of geophones per group 6 in a 6 ft (2 m) circle around station
Figure 1. Spcorrespondishown in Fiand close to
Geologic an
Within this operated Baor directionaterms of spewells beforeApproximaton another s In addition tproduction lconventionaand one welCompletionLower Barnlanded and chowever, thcompletions
Azimuthal
Typically seoffset stackewere run byazimuthallyexploit geomdifferences Horizons weso differencreviewed.
The wells arfilled fractu
pider diagram ofng to the CMP bgure 4. Note the
o uniform.
nd Production D
survey there arearnett gas wells, al and the remaiecial processes, ie April 2009, andtely a dozen micsubset of wells b
to these specialtylogs have been aal (whole) cores,ll has both conve
ns for vertical wenett interval and completed in the
here are seven hos including one w
Attribute Anal
eismic attributesed data. In our s
y a third party vey sectored volummetric, phase, inwere calculated ere picked on ea
ces in time betwe
re considered to res, and if orthor
f the azimuthal cbins displayed ine azimuthal cove
Data
e several hundredtwo thirds of whnder are horizonimage logs wered two wells after
croseismic experbefore April 2009
y log experimenacquired, four we, eight wells haventional and sideells are within thhorizontal wellse Lower Barnett orizontal Upper Bwith microseism
yses
are run on full-astudy a full suiteendor on each of
mes. In total 70 anstantaneous and
on each sectoredach azimuthally-een the azimuths
be producing frrhombic symme
overage n the red box erage is wide,
d Devon-hich are vertical ntal wells. In e run on sixteen r April 2009. riments were run9.
nts, two ells have
ve sidewall coresewall cores.
he Upper and s are primarily
interval; Barnett
mic.
azimuth, full-e of attributes f the four attributes that d amplitude d volume. sectored volume
s could also be
rom open, gas-etry is present
n
s
e
(flat lfractudetecexpecKnowanisobehavthis e
Ellips
Gretcvelocsymmtime dapproto expindepvariatoverpinterpTheseeach attrib
θ(A
by ca
⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜
⎝
⎛
cos.
coscos
Equatattribbe sol
(C^=
In ordrotatewith tequat
)(θA
wherethe ge
layers and one dures), then we hyt open fracturesct the amount of wledge of fast antropy trends fromvior of the microxpectation.
se Fitting to Az
chka and Tsvankcity in a medium metry can be fit bdelays in azimut
oach to azimuthaploit the azimuth
pendent of the mtion with azimutprint of the time-preted on each ofe horizons are thcorresponding aute values, A(θ),
θ 2cos) ba +=
asting equation 1
nn sincos.....sincossincoss
2
222
112
θθ
θθθθ
tion 2 has the foutes, and C are tlved using least-
( ) ATTT T1T −.
der to find the me the ellipse by sthe local coordintion of the ellipse
(cos) 21 βθλ −=
e λ1 and λ2 are theneral coefficien
ominant set of vypothesize that wwith seismic (Ly
f fractures detectnd slow azimuth m previous seismoseismic data wi
zimuthal Volum
kin (1998) showewith horizontal
by an ellipse. Fithally-sectored dal velocity analyhal variations in ore common timth (AVAz). In o-delay anisotropyf the azimuthally
hen used to extraazimuthally-secto, are then fit to a
θθ sincosb +
for each azimut
⎜⎜⎜
⎝
⎛
⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟
⎠
⎞
nn sinn...
sinnsinn
2
22
2
12
1
θθ
θθθθ
rm A=TC, wherthe unknown coe-squares:
major and minor aome angle β suc
nate system. For e can be written
(sin) 22 θλβ −+
he eigenvalues onts
vertically-alignedwe should be ablynn 2004). We ed to vary by azdirections, veloc
mic experimentsll aid in confirm
mes
ed how the NMOly transverse itting such an elldata is the standasis. Our goal hewaveform,
me shifts or amplorder to avoid they, the same horizy sectored volumact a given attribuored volume. Than ellipse using
θ2sinc , (1)
th, θj, in matrix f
⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜
⎝
⎛
=⎟⎟⎟
⎠
⎞
nA
AA
cba
...2
1
. (2)
re A are the meaefficients, which
(3)
axes of the ellipsch that these liner our problem, th
as
)β− , (4)
of the matrix form
d open le to also imuth. city and
ming
O
lipse to ard ere is
litude e zon is
mes. ute for
hese
form
asured h can
se, we e up he
med by
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛cbba
and where βwith the eiganisotropy)
⎜⎜⎝
⎛=
λe
(6
while the re
RMSEeR =
Where RMSellipse.
After fittingBarnett shaleccentricityequation 7 wthe eccentricfrequency adominant frbandwidth. the central tfractures.
Notice in Fithe top of Olower Barnefracturing rethe reliabilitOrdovician considered ais red the fitattribute.
β is the azimuth ogenvalue λ1.The of the best-fit el
⎟⎟⎠
⎞−2
2
21
22
λλλ
,
6)
liability of the fi
.E
SE is the Root m
g ellipses to all 7le and Ordovicia, e, as seen in eqwere mapped andcity and reliabilittribute. Barnes
requency as a me We would expe
tendency of the p
igure 3 that the dOrdovician Unconett shale (Figure egime within thety calculated at tUnconformity. a statistically sigt is valid, which
of the eigenvecteccentricity, e,
llipse is given by
fit is defined as
mean square error
0 attributes on ban Unconformityquation 6 and reld compared. Figity of the waveles (1993) describeeasure of centralect to see azimutpower spectrum
degree of eccentrnformity than at2) indicating a d
e Barnett. Figurethe lower BarnetA value of R gr
gnificant fit. Anconfirms our us
(5)
or associated (or degree of
y
(7)
r for the best fit
both the lower y horizon, the liability, R, in gures 2-5 show et dominant es the wavelet l tendency of thethal variations indue to open
ricity is larger att the top of the different es 4 and 5 show tt shale and eater than 6 is
nywhere the mape of this
e n
t
p
Figurthe lo
Figurthe O
Figurthe lo
re 2. Example ofower Barnett sha
re 3. Example ofOrdovician Uncon
re 4. Example ofower Barnett sha
f eccentricity calale.
f eccentricity calnformity
f Reliability calcale.
culated on the to
culated on the to
ulated on the top
op of
op of
p of
Figure 5. Exthe Ordovic
Incorporati
Once the seierrors in theevaluated accompared toand Januarysomewhat sgenerate a mmore challelength and twas possibleconsistent w
Next, the mcore informFor wells wcompleted wApril 2009 pthree valuesproduction hfractures. Uwe have beethat have a g
Since there traditional tiseveral timelogged befowells produ
xample of Reliabcian Unconformi
ion of Producti
ismic data has be fit of the ellipseccording to theiro the monthly pry 2010. The data impler to analyz
map. The EUR frnging and neede
the number of stae to scale the ho
with the vertical w
icroseismic dataation for the app
with microseismicwas compared toproduction and Js should be an inhas declined by
Using the ellipse en able to identifgood correlation
is only one seismime-lapse experie-lapse componeore fracturing. Seced well and wh
bility calculated ity.
on Data
een fit to an ellipe are calculated,r EUR. These varoduction rate fo
from vertical wze and have beenrom the horizonted to be normalizages. After normrizontal well EUwell EUR.
a, formation imagplicable wells wec, the date the wo its first month’January 2010 pro
ndication of how potential closurefitting to the azi
fy the subset of sn with the produc
mic experiment, iment. Neverthe
ents. First, all theecond, knowledghich produced po
on the top of
pse and the the wells were
alues have been r April 2009
wells were n gridded to tal wells were zed by lateral
malization, it UR to be
ging logs and ere analyzed.
well was s production, oduction. Thesethe well’s
e of the induced imuthal volumesseismic productsction data.
this is not a less, there are
e wells were ge of which oorly was used.
e
s s
Thirdseismwere 2009,anticiinsencurvathougunstimthe enthe inbeforimageused tTreatformaused trelativindicafractu
Conc
Azimthrouthe revariatfractuisolatcorrelthe sevariogalternkrigg
Ackn
GrateProf. insighdiscu
d, any potential dmically mapped.
drilled after the , were comparedipated correlatiositive to fracture
ature), and mappght to have been mulated wells afnd of the seismicnduced fractures e April 2009 ande logs. The treatto help determinment pressures, ation, are recordto correlate prodve values of EUators of the amouured and how eff
clusions
muthal variations gh the use of att
eliability of the btions as being inures. Correlationte areas of fractulation seen visuaeismic products. gram that will al
natively, induceding.
nowledgements
eful thanks to DeKurt Marfurt, U
hts; Dr. Heloise ssions.
damage due to inFinally, knowleseismic experim
d with EUR. Usinn of productivity
e damage (time-tped bypassed pay
properly producfter April 2009 wc analysis to testexist. All of the
d were used in thtment pressures
ne the induced frand actual propp
ded by stage for eduction data and R. These measuunt of rock that fective the forma
in the seismic dtributes. Mappinbest fit ellipse wendicative of hydrn with productioures. Future worally between the We will be able
llow mapping ofd fracture density
evon Energy for Univ. of Oklahom
Lynn, Lynn Inc.
nduced fracturesedge of which wement was conducng these data, wy to attributes thickness and y in areas that weced. Image logs were looked at tot predictions of we cores were extrhe same mannerfor the wells we
racture half-lengpant put away inevery well and wseismic data to
ures can be impois hydraulically ation is stimulate
data can be accenng the eccentricie are seeing thesraulically induceon data has helperk will quantify t production datae to generate a f EUR (or y) using co-locat
permission to puma, for guidance., for comments
was ells
cted in we
ere run on
oward where racted
r as the ere ths.
nto the were the
ortant
ed.
ntuated ty and se ed ed the a and
ted co-
ublish; and and
References
Barnes, Arthur E., 1993, Instantaneous spectral bandwidth and dominant frequency with applications to seismic reflection data, Geophysics, 58, 419-428.
Grechka, Vladimir and Ilya Tsvankin, 1998, 3-D description of normal moveout in anisotropic inhomogeneous media. Geophysics, 639, 1079-1092.
Lynn, Heloise, 2004, The winds of change Anisotropic rocks-their preferred direction of fluid flow and their associated seismic signatures-Part 1, The Leading Edge, 1156-1162.
Tod, Simon, Taylor, Brian, Johnston, Rodney, and Allen, Tony, 2007, Fracture prediction from wide-azimuth land seismic data in SE Algeria: The Leading Edge, 1154-1160.