FACILITIES PROGRAM

INDOOR FOOTBALL PRACTICE FACILITY

(UAA-35)

OCTOBER 6, 2014

UAA-35 I-1

TITLE SHEET

INDOOR FOOTBALL PRACTICE FACILITY

(UAA-35)

FACILITIES PROGRAM

FOR

UNIVERSITY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA

MAIN CAMPUS UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA

OCTOBER 6, 2014

UAA-35 II-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUBJECT PAGEI. TITLE SHEET I

II. TABLE OF CONTENTS IIIII. SIGNATURE SHEET IIIIV. INTRODUCTION IV

A. Project Background & Justification B. General Project Description C. University Planning & Design Objectives D. Construction Delivery Method

V. ACADEMIC & STRATEGIC PLAN VA. The University of Florida Strategic Master Plan B. Academic Program Reviews C. Recommendations D. Justifications

VI. SPACE NEEDS ASSESSMENT VIA. Facilities Deficiencies B. Alternative Solutions C. Quantitative Analysis of Program Spaces D. Project and Survey Recommendations

VII. CONSISTENCY WITH ADOPTED CAMPUS MASTER PLAN VIIA. The Adopted Campus Master Plan and Amendments B. Compliance With the Campus Master Plan

VIII. SITE ANALYSIS VIIIA. Site Conditions B. Building Condition Survey C. Campus Map & Site Map D. Floor Plans

IX. PROGRAM AREA IXA. Program Area Table B. Summary by Space Category C. Space Description Forms

X. UTILITIES IMPACT ANALYSIS XA. Analysis of Impact on the Campus Utilities Infrastructure B. Utilities Infrastructure Cost Estimate C. Utilities Maps

XI. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNICATION RESOURCES REQUIREMENTS XIA. University Information / Communication Standard B. University Information Resource Manager Certification C. General Information

XII. CODES AND STANDARDS XIIXIII. PROJECT SCHEDULE XIIIXIV. PROGRAM FUNDS XIV

A. Estimated Funding B. Estimated Budget

XV. PROJECT SPACE AND BUDGET SUMMARY XVXVI. EXHIBITS

A. University Committees Reviews XVIB. Additional Exhibits as required.

XVII. OWNER’S PROJECT REQUIREMENTS (OPR) N/A FOR THIS PROJECT XVII

UAA-35 III-1

SIGNATURE SHEET

INDOOR FOOTBALL PRACTICE FACILITY FACILITIES PROGRAM

FOR

UNIVERSITY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION

UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA

MAIN CAMPUS UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA

PREPARED BY: UF Planning Design & Construction Division

University Athletic Association Staff

REVIEWED AND APPROVED: UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF BUSINESS AFFAIRS

Curtis Reynolds, Vice-President UF PLANNING DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION DIVISION

Miles Albertson, Director UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE VICE-PRESIDENT

AND CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER

Elias G. Eldayrie, Chief Information Officer PHYSICAL PLANT DIVISION

Jeff Chorlog, Assistant Vice-President OFFICE OF ACADEMIC

TECHNOLOGY

Dr. Fedro Zazueta, Director UNIVERSITY ATHLETIC

ASSOCIATION

Chip Howard, Senior Associate Athletic Director FACILITIES PROGRAM

COMMITTEE

Chip Howard, Chair

UAA-35 III-2

PROJECT DIRECTORY: UNIVERSITY PROJECT MANAGER: William Smith

University Project Manager

UF Planning Design & Construction Ben Hill Griffin Stadium 245 Gale Lemerand Drive P.O. Box 115050 Gainesville, FL 32611-5050 Internet: www.facilities.ufl.edu

Phone: 352-273-4030 E-Mail: wps2@ufl.edu

OWNER: The University of Florida Board of Trustees

245 Gale Lemerand Drive PO Box 115050 Gainesville, FL 32611-5050

USER GROUP REPRESENTATIVE:

Chip Howard Senior Associate Athletic Director

Phone: 352-375-6483 FAX: 352-284-2725 E-Mail: ChipH@gators.ufl.edu

UAA-35 IV-1

INTRODUCTION

A. PROJECT BACKGROUND and JUSTIFICATION

University of Florida’s Athletics Association (UAA) is considering the possibilities of providing an indoor practice field for the football program on its current practice site located immediately north of McKethan (baseball) Stadium on the University of Florida campus.

The current facility has three outdoor practice fields. Two natural turf fields at 100 yards and 70 yards, and one synthetic turf field at 50 yards. In support of the practice fields, a 5500 square foot support building was constructed in 2006 to provide space for a satellite athletic training space, hydration station, toilet, and field maintenance equipment storage. While the practice area and support space have served the program adequately in past years, UAA would like to provide an indoor facility to: • Allow practice to continue without interruption of inclement weather. At times, the team needs to seek cover during these events. This disrupts the continuity of the team’s training session. • Compete with peers to recruit quality student athletes. The facility’s lack of a space for indoor training has set the University’s program behind the majority of their peers within the SEC conference and the NCAA. This, in turn, puts the football program at a disadvantage in recruiting top student athletes.

B. GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Provide a more permanent indoor facility utilizing tilt-up precast concrete walls and clearspan steel roof structure over a 70 yard practice field (with end zones) if possible . The facility would take advantage of natural cross ventilation with large overhead doors on each side of the field, and provide mechanical ventilation with large exhaust fans should the space need “flushed” of warm stagnant air. This option allows the current natural turf fields to remain intact. Civil Narrative • Cover Location (East & West): The existing synthetic turf field is located 10 feet east of the retaining wall, and 20 feet west of the central practice field. This spacing provides the minimum recommended safety zone adjacent to the field. A cover would need to be structurally located outside of the safety zone, requiring the adjustment of the retaining wall to west. • Cover Location (North & South): The west retaining wall curves to the east and terminates at the UF property line. This curve initiates less than 10 feet south of the existing synthetic turf field. The cover location will need to consider the northwest corner and the impact on the retaining wall. • Cover Location (Maintenance Shed): The maintenance shed located south of the fields houses all of the maintenance equipment and materials utilized to keep the field in top quality shape. The equipment consists of tractors and similar vehicles which have a variety of attachments. The access space necessary to house the equipment will be a critical component of the roof location. • Cover Location (Throwing Area): Immediately west of the retaining wall is the throwing area for the track facility. Any impact to the wall or western expansion will require

UAA-35 IV-2

relocation of these facilities. • Retaining Wall Structure: The retaining wall was designed to hold the soils for the field. The addition of a structure will most likely require the retaining wall to be re-engineered and improved to support either a direct loading or loading in the angle of incident. • Drainage: The existing synthetic turf field is designed to surface drain to the north, the south, and east, in addition to the underdrain system. The surface drainage is received by swales on the 3 sides, which discharge to surface inlets. Although a covered facility would eliminate the surface drainage from the synthetic turf field, the roof drainage would need to be accommodated. In addition, the east swale serves a portion of the central practice field, dictating that the surface system remains in place. • Irrigation: The irrigation system for the entire practice field facility is provided by an 8” main which is supplied by the well system on the east side of the baseball facility. This main traverses the football practice facility north of the maintenance facility, turns south, then proceeds west to serve the track/soccer complex. If the placement of a roof structure will impact this line, relocation will be necessary. • Potable Water: It appears that a small potable water service traverses the southwest corner of the practice field area. Verification of this line’s existence and use will be necessary. If it is active, then relocation will be necessary. Architectural Narrative • The football practice building will cover a 70 yard, synthetic turf field (310’ x 200’). This includes end zones at each end of the field and 20’-0” of buffer space between the field and the walls. • Tilt-up precast concrete walls on all sides of the building will provide construction efficiency and a durable final surface. • Steel clear-span trusses on concrete columns support a hipped type roof. The clearances of these trusses are to be a minimum of 45’-0” above the playing field hash marks. The roof form allows the perimeter of the building to be shorter than a gabled end wall, therefore reducing the perception of its large scale. • The roof will be TPO or standing seam metal panels on steel (perforated) roof deck. The perforated roof deck will provide acoustical control. • The clerestory glazing system at around the upper portion of the walls will be aluminum storefront system. This will provide natural light into the space, and the glass can be translucent to minimize glare if desired. • All surfaces on the interior of this large volume will be painted a light neutral color (off-white or light gray) to maintain a consistent visual backdrop. • The lighting within the space will be indirect, and located as close to the perimeter of the space as possible, so as not to conflict with visually tracking a kicked or thrown football.

UAA-35 IV-3

• A total of 20, 20’-0” wide aircraft hangar style overhead doors on north and south sides (10 each side), are positioned to provide cross ventilation when all doors are open. Eight of these doors are of transparent construction to allow for views when the doors are closed.

Structural Systems: Foundation and Ground Floor The reports on soil testing have not been authorized or performed at this time; however, experience on the site indicates the possibility of either pile supported or spread footing support of the columns and bearing walls, depending on final soil test results. It is certain that there is clay on site and that unacceptable soil will need to be dealt with. In the case of spread footings, the clay would need to be over-excavated a minimum of 4’-0” and then replaced with acceptable, properly compacted soil. • Assumed Foundation Sizes, utilizing spread footings, is as follows: - At each column: 11’ x 11’ x 2.5’ - Below Tilt Wall Panels (end walls and when outside of column footings): 5’ x 1.25’ Continuous Footing • Pile foundations, if required, will be considerably more expensive but at this point the assumption includes only the spread footing option. The area below any slab on grade and beneath the landscaping walls will require over-excavation of at least 4’-0” when the presence of unacceptable soil is determined and then will be backfilled with acceptable material. Surface and groundwater control will be required during foundation and site preparations. Wherever there as a ground floor system other than turf, it will be a concrete slab supported on the replaced compacted fill over a 10 mil vapor retarder. The majority of this floor system will be a 6”concrete slab due to vehicle traffic. Structural Wall System The proposed wall system for both Concept 2 and Concept 3 is 12” thick, tilt-up concrete wall panels. These panels should be assumed to incorporate a moderate amount of reinforcing except at the integral columns noted below. For support of the roof trusses, the initial design utilizes an integral column (or bolster) at every-other truss, approximately 30’ on center. This column is incorporated at each side of a panel to panel joint and is assumed at this point in time to be a minimum of a 12” x 12” bolster on each end of each wall panel. Structural Roof System The roof deck system will be 3½”, 18 gauge acoustical deck by Epic Metals (ER3.5A). Refer to Architectural information for the required finish. The deck spans between trusses and supplemental framing for maximum span of 15’. The main framing for this Concept is either of 2 options. Both options will be developed to provide a system creating a traditional hipped roof as well as clearances of 40’ at the exterior wall and 60’ at the center of the truss. • Option 1 utilizes a parallel chord, straight sloped truss-frame system, 10’ minimum depth of the main truss. Initial estimates of weight per lineal foot of the truss system plus miscellaneous framing and connections, is 240 PLF.

UAA-35 IV-4

• Option 2 utilizes a solid shape plate girder frame and preliminary estimates of the weight for this, including miscellaneous framing and connections, is 350-375 PLF. C. UNIVERSITY PLANNING and DESIGN OBJECTIVES

The following general goals and objectives shall be considered and addressed throughout design, construction, and commissioning. Consult the UF Design Services Guide for amplifying information.

1. TREE PRESERVATION Since tree preservation and protection is a high priority at the University of Florida, existing trees should be saved and incorporated into the design whenever possible. Planning, design, and construction of this building must strictly comply with the current University Tree Protection Policy and be reviewed by the UF Lakes, Vegetation and Landscaping Committee. The need to remove or relocate any trees other than those recommended by this Committee during programming must be justified and presented to the Committee during schematic design for approval. Tree protection measures shall be incorporated as outlined in the UF Design & Construction Standards and reviewed / approved by Physical Plant Division (PPD) Grounds. See Sections VIII and XVI of this program for additional information on tree preservation.

2. LANDSCAPING, STORMWATER, AND EXTERIOR LIGHTING The design and construction documents shall include fully detailed landscaping, landscape irrigation, hardscape, exterior lighting, stormwater management, erosion control measures, and other site features and components such as benches and seat walls. Such design shall account not only for functionality and aesthetics, but also for security, safety, accessibility, and sustainability.

Site/landscape plans, designs, and specifications shall be developed jointly with UF Physical Plant Division Grounds and in accordance with both the UF Design & Construction Standards and program review comments by the UF Lakes, Vegetation and Landscaping Committee (see Section XVI). The landscape plan will be subject to review by the same during the Schematic Design and Design Development phases.

Low-impact design for stormwater management shall be considered and incorporated into the design, as applicable and where possible, even if an on-site stormwater treatment facility is not required for permitting.

3. BICYCLES, TRANSIT, WALKWAYS AND MOTOR VEHICLE CIRCULATION Bicycles, transit, and walkways are the primary modes of transportation to, on, and around campus. Site design for this project must include adequate walkways that are fully integrated with the existing pedestrian circulation network, as well as safe and convenient bicycle parking facilities and access to bus stops with appropriate amenities. Bicycle lanes, paths, and storage shall be designed in accordance with the latest edition of the UF Design & Construction Standards. Appropriate access shall also be provided for service and delivery vehicles in screened service areas.

Unimpaired access for emergency vehicles and full compliance with ADA requirements is mandatory for all site development plans and throughout construction. Throughout construction, at least one lane of all streets must be kept open and all sidewalks and designated bicycle lanes or paths shall be kept open or appropriately rerouted / redirected.

UAA-35 IV-5

4. DESIGN FOR FUTURE EXPANSION AND RENOVATION Within program and budget constraints, the site and building will be designed to allow flexibility for future growth and change. The usable life and sustainability of the facility shall be enhanced by incorporating features for remodeling and expansion designed to reduce future renovation costs. The Campus Master Plan shall be consulted for guidance on future building locations that should not be impeded by new utilities or other infrastructure associated with the project. See the OPR document in section XVII of this Facilities Program for detailed, project-specific goals related to flexibility.

5. CONTEXTUAL SITE AND BUILDING DESIGN Site and building shall emphasize the design of the total campus entity rather than the individual buildings. While each building is required to be designed as an appropriate response to its particular program, budget, and site requirements, it must also be compatible with the existing fabric of the campus. The design of the building must enrich the campus both functionally and aesthetically … relating to adjoining buildings, not competing with them.

The building site and context shall also integrate with any existing topographic or natural features. The project should seek to create functional open space in the form of building entries, courtyards, plazas or lawns within the building’s exterior space or between the project and existing adjacent buildings. Building height, orientation and set-backs shall be consistent with policies of the Campus Master Plan, as applicable. It is expected that two or more options will be presented to the Owner during the schematic design phase.

6. HISTORICAL RESOURCES The University of Florida campus contains numerous significant historical properties and sites which are listed on or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. The campus includes a registered Historic District and a larger historic impact area as identified in the Campus Master Plan. The University strongly supports maintenance and restoration of historical buildings. All capital improvement projects must comply with the Programmatic Memorandum of Agreement between the University of Florida and the Division of Historical Resources dated October 27, 1989, and be reviewed by the UF Preservation of Historic Buildings and Sites Committee.

7. UNIFYING EXTERIOR TREATMENT THROUGH USE OF BRICK The use of “Gainesville Range” red brick for the major portion of the exterior finish is required in order to serve as the primary visual element consistently used in unifying all campus facilities. The use of “accent” brick is discouraged. Other unifying architectural treatments should be considered that reflect modern interpretations of the collegiate gothic style as expressed in the character-defining features of existing campus buildings, particularly those buildings within the vicinity of the project.

8. SUSTAINABLE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION The University of Florida builds its buildings to last and promotes environmental quality and resource conservation through sustainable design, “green” architecture, and recycling in its physical planning and development.

UAA-35 IV-6

9. UNIVERSITY COMMITTEES REVIEWS New construction projects located on the main campus of the University of Florida – and certain renovation projects –must be presented to the following (4) faculty-based Committees for approval of the site plan and building exterior design at the Schematic and Design Development phases: Transportation and Parking Advisory Committee (TPAC) Preservation of Historic Buildings & Sites Committee (PHBSC) Lakes, Vegetation and Landscape Committee (LVLC) University Land Use and Facilities Planning Committee (ULUFPC)

The Architect is expected to address all review comments provided by the Committees, including the program development phase review comments included in the Section XVI of this facilities program.

10. QUALITY The University expects the facility to convey an impressive, state-of-the-art, and first-class image to current and prospective faculty, staff, and students, as well as visiting faculty, alumni, and private industry. At the same time, cost control, adherence to codes and standards, sustainability, and the durability and ease of maintenance are also primary considerations. Spaces must be technologically equipped, acoustically reliable, well lit, properly conditioned, and arranged thoughtfully in a floor plan that takes advantage of shared-use spaces while accounting for the differences between public and non-public spaces. Premium finishes shall be used in highly visible, public areas, while more standard materials shall be incorporated into less public, staff-oriented work spaces. The designers’ experience with similar facilities should allow it to confirm that the facility is constructed in accordance with the Basis of Design, the construction documents, applicable codes, and the UF Design & Construction Standards as part of Basic (Construction Administration) Services. Major building systems, including mechanical components and the building envelope, will be commissioned by an independent consultant, with whom the design team shall plan and coordinate its efforts.

D. CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY METHOD

Using F.A.C. 6C-14.0055(2) as a reference guideline, the following responses are presented for justification of Construction Management OR Design/Build OR Design-Bid-Build as the method of project delivery:

The F.A.C. 6C-14.0055.(2) is used as reference guideline and following responses are presented for University consideration in approval for the election of Design/Build construction delivery method:

(3).(a): The need for the facility is of significant enough to require a substantial reduction of normal delivery time, requiring overlap of design and construction phases.

The schedule of completion dictates the use DB method

(3).(b): The design and construction of the facility require minimum interface with the users.

Maximum interface is critical to deliver the product that meets the Owner’s requirement

(3).(c): Project is performance based and require the development of a plan for life cycle cost savings and a design solution which will accomplish savings.

Cost saving, quality and schedule is the priority

UAA-35 V-1

ACADEMIC & STRATEGIC PLAN

A. The UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA STRATEGIC MASTER PLAN

N/A

B. ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEWS

N/A

C. RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE REVIEW CONSULTANTS

The space is needed to support UF Football Program.

D. JUSTIFICATIONS

The space is needed for player safety during stormy days when practice still needs to occur.

UAA-35 VI-1

SPACE NEEDS ASSESSMENT

A. FACILITIES DEFICIENCIES

The current facility has three outdoor practice fields. Two natural turf fields at 100 yards and 70 yards, and one synthetic turf field at 50 yards. In support of the practice fields, a 5500 square foot support building was constructed in 2006 to provide space for a satellite athletic training space, hydration station, toilet, and field maintenance equipment storage. While the practice area and support space have served the program adequately in past years, UAA would like to provide an indoor facility to: • Allow practice to continue without interruption of inclement weather. At times, the team needs to seek cover during these events. This disrupts the continuity of the team’s training session. • Compete with peers to recruit quality student athletes. The facility’s lack of a space for indoor training has set the University’s program behind the majority of their peers within the SEC conference and the NCAA. This, in turn, puts the football program at a disadvantage in recruiting top student athletes.

B. ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS

Provide a more permanent indoor facility utilizing tilt-up precast concrete walls and clearspan steel roof structure over a 70 yard practice field (with end zones). The facility would take advantage of natural cross ventilation with large overhead doors on each side of the field, and provide mechanical ventilation with large exhaust fans should the space need “flushed” of warm stagnant air. This option allows the current natural turf fields to remain intact.

D. PROJECT AND SURVEY RECOMMENDATIONS

The project is necessary to support the UF Football program.

UAA-35 VII-1

CONSISTENCY WITH THE ADOPTED CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

A. THE ADOPTED CAMPUS MASTER PLAN (CMP) AND AMENDMENTS

The facility is consistent with policies of the Recreation Element and all other applicable aspects of the CMP, which was prepared and adopted pursuant to FAC 6C-21.213 and 1013.30 F. S. The project is consistent with the terms of the associated campus development agreement, which was prepared and adopted pursuant to FAC 6C-21.213 and 1013.30 F. S. An amendment to the Capital Improvement Element of the CMP will be required to program the scope and siting of the project. The project is consistent with the CMP policies in all other respects as described herein, and is within the minor amendment criteria as established in UF Operating Memorandum consistent with 1013.30 F.S. In anticipation of the scheduled submittal of the required amendment, and a finding of consistency with the adopted CMP, it is the University’s desire that the project UAA-35, Indoor Football Practice Facility be approved as submitted

B. COMPLIANCE WITH THE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN, 2005-2015

1. URBAN DESIGN ELEMENT The project does not impact open space connections identified on Figure 1-4 of the Urban Design Element.

The project (UAA-35, Indoor Football Practice Facility) is not located within the Historic Impact Area depicted on Figure 1-2 of the Urban Design Element.

2. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT The Future Land Use Element of the CMP identifies the project site within the Active Recreation -Outdoor area in the Future Land Use Map. The project is not consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the CMP. The project requires that the site be identified as Active Recreation Indoor in the Future Land Use Map. The Future Land Use Map will be amended to reflect the rearrangement of land use

3. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT

Objective 1.2:   To efficiently utilize and expand existing recreation  facilities to meet the needs of the university population. 

 Policy 1.2.1:   New  recreation  facilities  shall be provided  consistent with  the  Future  Land Use Element,  Capital  Improvement  Program  Element  and  other  policies  of  the master  plan  and depicted on Figures 6‐1, 6‐1.a and 6‐2 of this Element.  Policy  1.2.4:    The UAA  shall  continuously  engage  its Board of Directors,  the NCAA  and other stakeholders to determine needs and the adequacy of existing facilities and programs. 

4. CONSERVATION ELEMENT The project does not reduce the size of an area in the Conservation Future Land Use.

The project (including any associated utilities or infrastructure) is not adjacent to or within an area in the Conservation Future Land Use.

The project is not within 50 feet of a wetland.

The project is not within the 100-year floodplain

The project does not disturb any plants or animals identified as threatened and endangered species or species of special concern by Federal and State agencies.

UAA-35 VII-2

5. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT The project does not include a parking structure or surface with at least 300 parking spaces located in Alachua County.

6. GENERAL INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT The project is paritially within the Hogtown Creek drainage basin. The project design and schedule will provide appropriate stormwater treatment and a courtesy review by the City of Gainesville per Policy 1.3.5 of the Stormwater Sub-Element, unless it is determined that all piping goes to the Lake Alice drainage basin

7. UTILITIES ELEMENT The project will coordinate with the Physical Plant Division and the Office of Information Technology for utility and telecommunications infrastructure provisions.

8. PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT The project will coordinate with the University Police Department for security systems, lighting and Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design provisions.

9. FACILITIES MAINTENANCE ELEMENT The project does not include the renovation, rehabilitation or restoration of an existing structure that meets the definition of an “historic property” as described in Policy 1.5.4 of the Facilities Maintenance Element.

10. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT The project will be added to the Ten-Year Capital Projects List.

11. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT Project notification will be provided to the City of Gainesville and Alachua County through the University Land Use and Facilities Planning Committee per Policy 1.1.1 of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element.

The net new gross square feet of building space (77,500 & 5500) to be constructed by this project is consistent with the campus development agreement.

12. IMPLEMENTATION ELEMENT The project will be implemented consistent with the CMP policies related to committee review procedures and CMP amendments as applicable.

UAA-35 VIII-1

SITE ANALYSIS

A. SITE CONDITIONS

1 . SITE TOPOGRAPHY Refer to Section X, Utilities Impact Analysis for site maps.

2 . STORM DRAINAGE Refer to Section X, Utilities Impact Analysis for site maps and description of the site storm water system.

3 . VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION Provide pedestrian access, no parking will be added or needed.

4 . SITE VEGETATION Maintain with University’s approach to native and adaptive approach.

5 . ARCHAEOLOGICAL HISTORY The Archeological Zones of Sensitivity Map (developed in accordance with Section 267.061(2), F.S.) indicates the project site is a designated archeological site or is partially/fully inside the archeological sensitivity zone. The project site will be surveyed in accordance with Section 267, F.S., by a certified archeologist and remediation provided for prior to construction start.

6 . EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS Refer to Section X, Utility Impact Analysis for campus utility infrastructure maps and description of site utilities.

7 . ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFICANCE OF ADJACENT STRUCTURES Design and build to fit the surrounding structure.

8 . UNUSUAL SITE CONDITIONS Retaining wall that needs to be expanded and designed to carry the new structure.

9 . DIRECTION OF PREVAILING WINDS There is no University wide study of the prevailing wind patterns. Generally the wind patterns vary seasonally reflecting the global patterns: the Gulf Stream which brings warm, moisture laden tropic air from the southeast; and the arctic winds from northwest buffet the region in the winter. More importantly, the Architect must study the effect of microclimate created by existing tree canopy and site conditions (in addition to the relationship to adjacent building exhaust, fresh air intake and vehicular traffic patterns) in siting the building and in designing for views and HAVC/MEP systems.

B. BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY

PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION

1 . N/A

2 . N/A

C. CAMPUS MAP & SITE MAP

Refer to Section X, Utilities Impact Analysis for site maps.

DESCRIPTION (Maps follow end of this SITE ANALYSIS Section)

1 . Campus and Facilities Location Map will be provided by PPD.

2 . Site and Topographical Map will be provided by PPD.

D. FLOOR PLANS

FLOOR PLANS (Floor Plans follow end of this SITE ANALYSIS Section)

Ground Floor Plan; N/A

PROGRAM AREA

PROGRAM AREA TABLE

SUMMARY BY SPACE CATEGORY

SUMMARY OF SPACE BY SPACE CATEGORY Reference: U.S. DOE, Postsecondary Education Facilities Inventory and Classification Manual ROOM USE

CODE SPACE TYPE NASF CONVERSION

FACTOR GSF

500 SPECIAL USE FACILITIES 520 Athletic or practice field 63000 1 63000 520 Athletic support building 6020 1 6020 Sub Total 69020 NASF 1 69020 GSF

UAA-35 IX-1

UAA-35 X-1

UTILITIES IMPACT ANALYSIS

A. UTILITIES IMPACT ANALYSIS

1. CHILLED WATER: Not required for this project.

2. STEAM: Not required for this project.

3. ELECTRICAL: Estimated electrical demand for this facility is around 130 kW which estimates lighting at around 2 watts/sf, and also includes ventilation power and miscellaneous plug loads within the building. The existing Sanders Practice Field lighting, building #560, 573, and 506 are all served by a 750 kVA 4160/277/480 volt pad mounted transformer located near the southwest corner of building #560. This transformer has a peak demand of 539 kw. If the facility demand added to this transformer causes the transformer demand to be above 80% of capacity it will need to be replaced to a larger transformer (probably a 1000kVA) to accommodate the new demand. With the removal of the existing pole mounted lighting that light the field in the area of the new building, the new demand may be offset enough that the existing 750 kVA transformer will be adequate. The engineer of record should investigate this transformer as the source of power for the new facility.

4. POTABLE WATER: If a fire suppression system is required for this project it will require a water main extension from the campus system. It is recommended to connect to the existing 8” loop that wraps the north side of building #560 and extends from the west to east side . The connection point would probably be at the southwest corner of building #560. The new system would require a backflow prevention system according to campus standards.

5. SANITARY: Not required for this project.

6. IRRIGATION: Existing irrigation will need to be abandoned, removed and capped in the area beneath the new facility

7. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT: The projected location of this facility is in an area designated LA-14 according to Causseaux and Ellington’s 2000 Stormwater Management Master Plan. The footprint of the facility may require relocation of the existing storm sewer system located on the east side of the site and construction of additional piping on the west side of the site. No additional permitting is expected to be required; however, verification should be made by the Architect/Engineer with the UF Physical Plant Division. Impervious area calculations should be sent to PPD Architecture/Engineering Dept. (Mr. Chuck Hogan) for inclusion into the annual submittal to the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD).

8. NATURAL GAS: Not required for this project.

9. TELECOMMUNICATIONS: Not required for this project.

10. FIRE ALARM SYSTEM: Confirm with code officials.

11. ENERGY MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEM: Not required for this project.

12. SITE LIGHTING: Consider relocating existing pole mounted field lighting 13. SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS:

Review during design.

B: UTILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE COST ESTIMATES

CHILLED WATER $ .00 $ .00Sub Total $ .00

UAA-35 X-2

STEAM $ .00 $ .00Sub Total $ .00ELECTRICAL Transformer $ 77,750.00 $ .00Sub Total $ 77,750.00POTABLE WATER $ 66,750.00 $ .00Sub Total $ 66,750.00SANITARY $ 2000.00 $ .00Sub Total $ 2000.00IRRIGATION $ 3000.00 $ .00Sub Total $ 3000.00STORM WATER $ 52,500.00 $ .00Sub Total $ 52,500.00NATURAL GAS Sub Total Allowance $ .00TELECOMMUNICATIONS $ .00 $ .00Sub Total $ .00FIRE ALARM SYSTEM $ .00 $ .00Sub Total $ .00ENERGY MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEM

$ .00 $ .00Sub Total $ .00SITE LIGHTING $ .00 $ .00Sub Total $ .00SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS $ .00 $ .00Sub Total $ .00

TOTAL $ 202,000.00

C. UTILITIES MAPS

DESCRIPTION (Utilities Maps follow end of this UTILITIES IMPACT ANALYSIS Section)

1. Chilled Water System 2. Steam System 3. Electrical System 4. Potable Water System 5. Sanitary Sewer System

UAA-35 X-3

6. Irrigation / Reclaimed Water System 7. Storm Drainage System 8. Natural Gas System 9. Telecommunications System 10. Energy Management System 11. Fuel Oil and Gas System 12. Street and Area Lighting System 13. Topographical Map

4-3 1/2"CND.

(UAA-17)

UAA-VB

UAA-06

UAA-17

PR

OJE

CT

N

O.:

DA

TE

:

DR

AW

IN

G N

O.

DR

AW

IN

G T

IT

LE

:

F

F

F

F

F

TO

ROOM

106

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

F

JB

F

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

JB

1 1/2"CND.

BURIED

CND.

CND.

BURIED

D

D

D

12/2 UF

BURIED CABLE

NOT GFI

GAZEBO

TO

BOILER

ROOM

12/2 600V

ABOVE GROUND

D

D

D

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

PR

OJE

CT

N

O.:

DA

TE

:

DR

AW

IN

G N

O.

DR

AW

IN

G T

IT

LE

:

UAA-35 XI-1

INFORMATION / COMMUNICATIONS RESOURCES REQUIREMENTS

A. UNIVERSITY INFORMATION / COMMUNICATION STANDARD

The following University of Florida standards govern the information / communications resources requirements for the design of new facilities and renovation of existing facilities at the University of Florida: Telecommunications and Computer Networking Support Structures Intra-Building Wiring Standards and Preferred Practices Inter-Building Communications Infrastructure Standards Inter-Building Cabling Standards and Guidelines Academic Technologies Office - Classroom Standards (when classrooms are present) These standards may be viewed on the Office of Information Technology (OIT) website (http://net-services.ufl.edu/infrastructure/) or Facilities Planning and Construction website (www.facilities.ufl.edu).

B. UNIVERSITY INFORMATION RESOURCE MANAGER CERTIFICATION

By signature (on the signature page of this facilities program) the University Information Resource Manager certifies that a review of the University information/communication standards has been completed; and that the facilities program was developed in conformance with the University of Florida Information / Communication Standards in accordance with the Section 282, F.S.

C. GENERAL INFORMATION

The design team shall include the resources needed to fully develop a complete scope of work for all telecommunications, I/T, and audio/visual systems and components (including BICSI or RCDD qualified staff). The Owner may elect to accomplish portions of this work outside of the construction contract, but the construction documents must still account for all work (i.e., with notes for work “by others”). (BICSI): Building Industry Consulting Service International, Inc. (RCDD): Registered Communications Distribution Designer Telecommunications plant work (exterior of facility) is typically purchased by the project through OIT. The architect/engineer shall coordinate with OIT to eliminate conflicts with other utilities, landscaping, etc., shall include all such work "by others" in the construction documents, and shall ensure that no gaps exist between the contractors’ scope of work and the scope(s) of work “by others.” Building interior telecommunication installation must be performed by a contactor who is qualified by OIT. OIT maintains a list of pre-qualified Low-Voltage Contractors, this list can be found at http://net-services.ufl.edu/infrastructure/.

Interior voice & data work shall be designed, specified, packaged, and competitively procured as are other trades. OIT shall, however, participate and have approval authority in the bidder pre-qualification process. All such work shall be included in the construction documents and coordinated by the architect/engineer. For UF Health Science Center projects, the interior voice & data work may be purchased by the project from HealthNET.

The roles and responsibilities of other relevant University of Florida entities include: OAT (Office of Academic Technology): OAT Classroom Support will participate in the design and specification of

classroom instructional spaces and associated audio/visual and information technology systems. They will also meet with the User Group during program verification to determine classroom needs. The Health Science Center, Office of Academic Information Systems & Support will support the OAT for Health Science Center projects.

OIT Computing and Network Services (CNS) – Telecommunications and Network Infrastructure (TNI): CNS-TNI will participate in the design and specification of all communications rooms, cable pathways, and data network cables. They will also meet with the User Group during program verification to determine their network needs. HealthNET will perform this function for Health Science Center projects.

During Program Verification and the earliest stages of design, the design team and contractor shall produce a matrix of all Furnishings & Equipment, telecommunications, I/T, and audio/visual items to be provided under this program. The consultants shall then work with the Owner to refine this matrix to clearly establish the costs for, and responsibility for, each item.

UAA-35 XII-1

CODES AND STANDARDS

Design and construction at the University of Florida is regulated, reviewed, and permitted by the Division of Environmental Health & Safety (EH&S), which serves as the Authority Having Jurisdiction and the liaison with the State Fire Marshal. Consult the EH&S website (www.ehs.ufl.edu/buildcode/codes.htm) for a list of applicable codes. Early in the program verification and conceptual design process, the Professional(s) shall discuss and confirm these and other applicable codes with EH&S and, if necessary, the State Fire Marshal. Additionally, the following rules or standards apply to the design and construction of UF projects:

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/reg3a.html) ADA Standards for Accessible Design (www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/adastd94.pdf) HUD Fair Housing Act for Multi-Family residential Construction Florida Public Service Commission, installation and replacement of public telephones State Traffic Operations Engineer, FDOT, government parking facilities Agency for Health Care Administration, hospital and health care facilities DOE Space Standards, Chapter 6A-2, Florida Administrative Code Rules of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Regulation of OSHA and the Environmental Protection Agency Licensing regulations of Asbestos Consultants, the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation Lead-based paint minimum standards of the Department of Housing and Urban Development Florida Standard for Radon-Resistant New Commercial Building Construction http://www.doh.state.fl.us/environment/community/radon/commcnst.htm Florida Standard For Mitigation of Radon In Existing Buildings http://www.doh.state.fl.us/environment/community/radon/mtstndrd.htm Rules of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Rules of the St. Johns River Water Management District (or other agency with jurisdiction). American Society of Heating , Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) handbooks American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists Ventilation Manual American Society of Mechanical Engineers' Unfired Pressure vessel Code American Standards Institute standards (ANSI) Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Standards – www.usgbc.org City and County for off-campus projects not included in the adopted Campus Master Plan. Coordination with local utilities service provider for projects not served by the Campus utilities system. Developments of Regional Impacts for projects not included in the adopted Campus Master Plan. Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotel and restaurants, Bureau of Elevator Inspection for

elevator inspections and permit National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for one acre or more of disturbed site in accordance with

62-621.300 (4), FAC. NPDES Stormwater Notification Center, Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) campus-wide stormwater permitting process. SJRWMD

permitting and reviews shall be coordinated through the University's SJRWMD Coordinator at PPD. Local stormwater permitting agency having jurisdiction over sites not covered in the SJRWMD campus-wide permit. University of Florida Design and Construction Standards (www.facilities.ufl.edu/dcs/index.htm) University of Florida Telecommunication Construction Standard (http://net-services.ufl.edu/infrastructure/) Low Voltage Contractor Pre-qualification Requirement & Pre-qualified Contractor List (http://net-services.ufl.edu/infrastructure/teleco_standards.html) University of Florida Design Services Guide (http://www.facilities.ufl.edu/pdf/DSG.pdf) University of Florida General Terms & Conditions University of Florida Classroom Design Standards

UAA-35 XII-2

Specifically for this project, the following also apply:

HUD Fair Housing Act for Multi-Family residential Construction State Traffic Operations Engineer, FDOT, government parking facilities Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA), hospital and health care facilities USDA – Science and Education Administration Manual for Laboratory Chemical Fume Hoods Compressed Gas Association rules for design, storage and use of compressed gas cylinders OSHA 29CFR.1910.1450 Laboratory Standard U.S. Courts Design Guide (General Services Administration – www.gsa.gov) Standard Features and Finishes for U.S. Courts Facilities (GSA – www.gsa.gov) NCAA requirement if needed.

UAA-35 XIV-1

PROGRAM FUNDS

A. ESTIMATED FUNDING: The project is funded by UAA.

CONSTRUCTION FUNDING: by UAAUAA $ 11,969,140.78Sub-Total $ 11,969,140.78TOTAL PROJECT FUND $ 11,969,140.78

B. ESTIMATED BUDGET

1 DESIGN, PLANNING & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT $ 885,640.78 2 CONSTRUCTION $ 10,331,300.00 3 FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT $ 0.00 4 ART WORK $ 0.00 5 CONTINGENCIES $ 752,200.00 TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET (from Section XV of Facilities Program) $ 11,969,140.78

PROJECT BUDGET SUMMARY

The University expects the DB team to develop design and construction documents that are consistent with the established budget, facilities program, UF Design & Construction Standards, and Design Services Guide. This obligation is mandatory. If estimates by the DB or its cost consultant, or a 3rd-party cost consultant indicate a construction cost that exceeds the budget, the BD shall work with the University and its consultants to modify the design to conform to the budget. However, the design may not vary from the program or the UF Design & Construction Standards without University approval. During the construction documents phase, provisions for additive alternates, as required, shall be included to ensure that the basic program scope is realized and to maximize opportunities for the inclusion of long-term infrastructure flexibility.

PROJECT SPACE SUMMARY

CONSTRUCTION BUDGET was developed using (check one):

Major Space Type Basis Practice field

Benchmark Data

Assumed Bid Date: 12/15/2014

SPACE SUMMATION (from Section IX of Facilities Program)

Program Space Type NASF Factor 1 GSF $ / GSF 2 $

New indoor facility 63000 140 8,820,000.00

New storage building 6020 121 730,000.00

Avg. Construction Cost 3

Total Construction Cost $9,550,000.00 1. NASF (Net Assignable Square Feet) to GSF (Gross Square Feet) Conversion Factor. 2. Based on cost models and projections and assumed bid date. 3. Insert predominant space type factor used for calculating overall $ / GSF.

UAA-35 XV-1

PROJECT BUDGET SUMMARY

1 DESIGN, PLANNING & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT a. Professional Fees $791,700.00 b. State Fire Marshal Review and Inspection $25,000.00 c. Inspection Services $18,500.00

d. Risk Management / Insurance Consultant $6,198.78

e. Surveys & Tests $9,100.00

f. Permit/Impact/Environmental Fees $35,142.00

2 CONSTRUCTION a. Basic Building Construction Cost (incl. demolition) $9,598,200.00

b. Additional/Extraordinary Construction Cost $733,100.00

LVLC Tree Mitigation

Utility Infrastructure Improvement

Telecommunication Interior Wiring

3 FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT

a. Furniture

b. Equipment

4 ART WORK 5 CONTINGENCIES a. Land/Existing Facility Acquisition $ .00

b. Owner Basic Contingency $516,600.00

c. Owner Design Contingency $206,600.00

d. User Group Support

e. Owner Direct Purchases $29,000.00

TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET $11,969,140.78

UAA-35 XV-2

UAA-35 XVI-1

EXHIBITS

A. UNIVERSITY COMMITTEES REVIEW

LAND USE AND FACILITIES PLANNING COMMITTEE

Will present programing, DD, and 100% design phases

PRESERVATION OF HISTORIC BUILDINGS AND SITES COMMITTEE

Will present programing, DD, and 100% design phases

LAKES, VEGETATION AND LANDSCAPE COMMITTEE

Will present programing, DD, and 100% design phases

TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Will present programing, DD, and 100% design phases