foundations of linguistics & foundations of syntax: basic issues loes koring iris mulders eric...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
213 views
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Foundations of Linguistics &
Foundations of Syntax:Basic Issues
Loes Koring
Iris Mulders
Eric Reuland
Eddy Ruys
![Page 2: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Today
• Language as a computational system• Models and interface conditions• Learnability• Starting point of all science:
Wonder (especially about the obvious)
![Page 3: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
What is Language?
Language: Systematic mapping between • Forms: events in an (external) medium (sound,
gesture, ink on paper)&• Meanings
– If you know under what conditions a sentence would be true you know its meaning
– Compositionality: The meaning of a sentence is determined on the basis of the meanings of its parts + the way these parts are combined
![Page 4: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Big Questions
• How did language emerge? Did it further evolve?• How is language related to thought?• How is language represented in the brain?• How special is the language faculty?• How is language acquired?• What is the range of variation among languages?• Are there linguistic universals? If so, what are
they, and what do they follow from?
![Page 5: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Language as a computational system
How (un)controversial?
• An example of a computation:– Interpretation: English null arguments
![Page 6: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
English null arguments(1) a. I wonder who the men expected to see them
b. The men expected to see them
(2) a. John ate an appleb. John ate
(3) a. John is too stubborn to talk tob. John is too stubborn to talk to Bill
(4) a. John is too clever to expect us to catchb. John is too clever to expect us to catch Bill
![Page 7: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
How to understand
Instruction:
• Fill the gap
• Interpret the result as usual
![Page 8: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
English null arguments(1) a. I wonder who the men expected (who) to see them
b. The men expected (the men) to see them
(2) a. John ate an appleb. John ate --
(3) a. John is too stubborn PRO=? to talk to (John)b. John is too stubborn PRO=? to talk to Bill
(4) a. John is too clever PRO=? to expect us to catch (John)b. John is too clever PRO=? to expect us to catch Bill
![Page 9: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Knowledge and Use
Systematic ambiguity between:• Grammar as an abstract system defining a
mapping between form and meaning• Grammar as a system implemented in the brain
that is accessed and used in the actual computations the brain has to carry out in order to assign an interpretation to a form, or find a form for an (intended) interpretive effect issues about the relation between the grammar and the processing system
![Page 10: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
The minimal language system(Chomsky 1995)
PF interface C-I interface
Sensori- CHL Interpretation
Motor system system
Lexicon
- dedicated +dedicated(?) -dedicated
![Page 11: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Evolutionary fable
• Given a primate with the human mental architecture and sensori-motor apparatus in place, but not yet a language organ. What specifications does some language organ FL have to meet if upon insertion it is to work properly? (Chomsky (1998:6)
![Page 12: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Components of the C-I Interface (Reinhart 2006)
Computational System (CS)
Context
Inference
Sensori-motor systems
systwmasys
Concepts
![Page 13: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
A note on the inference system
• Propositional – concepts are not enough must be fed by CHL
• John sings and dances John dances• Every boy sings and dances Every boy
sings• No boy sings and dances -/No boy sings• We are near a gas station vs We are far
from a gas station
![Page 14: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Tasks 1
Characterize
• Computational system (CHL)– Universal versus Language specific properties
• Lexicon– Universal versus Language specific properties
• PF-interface (relation to medium)• CI-interface (relation to thought)
![Page 15: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Tasks 2: find map between linguistic operations and neurocognitive processesPF-interface
|Computational system of
Human Language (CHL) (+Lexicon)
|Conceptual-Intentional
Interface (C-I interface)
?
![Page 16: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
On the relation between linguistics and psycholinguistics
"The split between linguistics and psycholinguistics in the 1970’s has been interpreted as being a retreat by linguists from the notion that every operation of the grammar is a mental operation that a speaker must perform in speaking and understanding language.
But, putting history aside for the moment, we as linguists cannot take the position that there is another way to construct mental representations of sentences other than the machinery of grammar.
....There is no retreat from the strictest possible interpretation of grammatical operations as the only way to construct linguistic representations" (Alec Marantz, lecture notes 2000)
![Page 17: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Tasks 3 and 4
• Determine how the grammar is put to use in reasoning, realizing communicative intentions, etc.
• Determine the nature and locus of cross-linguistic variation, and how the child is able to arrive at the correct grammar of the language she is exposed to.
![Page 18: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Does function determine form?
• Reinhart 2006:
The language system (hence our theory of it) must be compatible with the functions it serves, but cannot be determined by them, since many conceivable systems could potentially serve the same functions
![Page 19: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Levels of adequacy
• Observational adequacy (bare facts)• Descriptive adequacy/Interface adequacy
(output readable to interface)– Processing system– Inference system
• Explanatory adequacy (acquisition)• Neuro-cognitive adequacy (“beyond”
explanatory adequacy, Chomsky 2005)
![Page 20: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Conjecture
• CHL is the optimal solution to meeting interface conditions
• A system meeting observational adequacy in the form-meaning mapping will also meet– interface adequacy
– explanatory adequacy (account for acquisition)
– and meet conditions on implementation (provide a model for language processing: a transparent parser)
![Page 21: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Tensions between requirements
• What do we need for easy description?• What do we need for explanation?• This tension is nothing special:
Compare - Quantum physics- Newtonian mechanics
For understanding planetary motionFor understanding why there are no white holes
![Page 22: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
An example: how do we compute dependencies?
• What did John see?
• What did John see –
• What did John [ [see - ] ]
One-step process or two-step process?
![Page 23: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Required for explanation
• What do we minimally need to account for language structure?
• What do we minimally need to assume is dedicated to language?
• Behind these questions:– What kind of elements and what type of
properties can be plausibly represented in the brain?
![Page 24: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Grammatical system:Essential properties
Required:
• Inventory of vocabulary items/lexicon (elementary form-meaning combinations)
• Combinatory principles
• Abstract from: ‘size’ of basic vocabulary items
![Page 25: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Definitions
• Given a vocabulary V, a language LV is a subset of V* (=the set of all strings over V)
• A grammar GL is a finite set of rules generating the strings over V that are members of L and none of the strings over V that are not members of L
• For an infinite language at least one recursive rule is required
• Recursion: Call an instruction (rule) while carrying out that instruction
![Page 26: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
A simple model
Intuitive procedure:
1. Identify the set L1 of possible first words of a sentence
2. Identify for each member i of L1 the set L2i of words by which it can be followed
3. Continue the procedure until you are done
![Page 27: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Peripheral recursion
Peripheral: The calling of an instruction at the end of carrying out that instructionP(lan)
Realized P
Realized P … P?
![Page 28: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Formalized as: finite state grammar Illustration (Chomsky 1957): oldThe man comes men come S The S1S1 man S3S1 men S4S3 comesS4 comeS1 old S1
![Page 29: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
A hierarchy of grammar types• i. Finite state grammars: peripheral recursion
Rule schema’s (with x, y, strings over a given vocabulary):
S xS; Sy ii. Beyond finite state grammars (context free or higher): minimally allowing embedded recursion as in:
S xSy; SxyS aSb; S ab generates anbn
iii.iv,v, vi. More expressive power (full CFG, CS, URS)
![Page 30: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Some formal languages
The following sets are formal languages:(i) ab, abb, aaabbb, ….. (i.e. n occurrences of a followed by
n occurrences of b)(ii) aa,bb,abba,baab,bbbb,aabbaa,abbbba, …. (X followed by
the mirror image of X)(iii) aa,bb,abab,baba,aaaa,bbbb,aabaab,abbabb, …. (X followed by
X) These are not finite state languages: It is impossible to constract a finite state grammar that would generate all and only the sentences of these languagesWhy: Insufficient means to encode relevant pattern
![Page 31: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
The “language of brackets”
In every wellformed expression the number of opening brackets must equal the number of closing brackets: [n ]n
There is NO finite state grammar for the language of brackets:
S [ O1 On-1 [ On
O1 ] On ] Sn-1
O1 [ O2 …..…..To know how many closing brackets you need, you must have remembered the number of opening brackets FS grammar limits on memory
![Page 32: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
A simple bracketing grammar
S [ S ]
S []
Recursion:
• Calling an instruction while carrying out that instruction
![Page 33: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
What about human language?
S
The birds1 S are1 arriving
that the man2 S is2 listening to
I3 was3 watching S
when …..
![Page 34: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
An informal proof (Chomsky 1957)I. Let S1,S2,S3 be declarative sentences in English, thenII(i) If S1, then S2(ii) Either S3 or S4(iii) The man who said that S5 is arriving today Interdependencies: if---then, either ---- or, man --- isInterdependencies can be embedded: if, either (iii), or S4, then S5 Hence: a + S1 + b; S1 = c + S2 + d
This pattern reflects the mirror properties of (ii).Hence: No theory of linguistic structure based exclusively on Markov process models and the like will adequately reflect the competence of a speaker of English
![Page 35: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Result
• The finite state model is inadequate as a model of natural language.
• This does not just hold for FS grammars proposed so far, but extends to any possible grammar in the set of FS grammars
• This was a result of a new kind.
![Page 36: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Interface adequacy
![Page 37: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
FS grammars and levels of adequacy
• Observational adequacy
• Descriptive/Interface adequacy
• Explanatory adequacy
• ….
![Page 38: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Issues of language design
• The round square dog barked (at the lazy moon)
S1
The S2
round S2
square S3
dog S4
barked
What’s wrong?
![Page 39: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
What’s wrong with mere sequentiality?
• A grammar should encode expressions in such a way that the interface with the interpretive system can read them and use them for further processing
• A grammar should encode dependencies between expressions in such a way that the interface with the interpretive system can read them and use them for further processing
• [[The round square dog]SU [barked]Pred ]Sentence
![Page 40: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
A more powerful type of grammar:Types of phrase structure grammars are defined by different restrictions on rule types. A standard context free (CF) phrase structure grammar expresses hierarchical structure and uses rules of the general form: A BC (where B and C range over the categories of the grammar,
including A) A a (where a ranges over the terminal vocabulary (lexicon)
of the language) (i) Sentence NP + VP(ii) NP D + N(iii) VP Verb + NP(iv) D the(v) N man, ball, ….(vi) Verb hit, took, ….
![Page 41: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Structure
Sentence
NP VP
D N Verb NP
the man hit D N
the ball
![Page 42: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
The dependencies between the subparts of natural language expressions are best captured in terms of a hierarchical structure Tree diagrams represent: 1. The hierarchical grouping of parts of the sentence into
constituents2. The grammatical type of each constituent3. The left –to-right order of the constituents
Hierarchical structure
![Page 43: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Constituent structure and interface adequacy
An analysis of the sentence into contiguous subparts such that:
• The subparts serve as the input for the computation of dependencies
• The subparts are readable to the interface(s)
![Page 44: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Constituent structure guide lines
• Dislocation moves constituents
• Substitution observes constituency
• Dependencies obtain between constituents– Semantic role assigment– Case assignment
![Page 45: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Issues in Learnability
Universal Grammar (UG)
A Hypothesis?
![Page 46: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
The acquisition schema
From the initial state to the final – adult – state:
S0 ------ S1 ------ S2 ---.....---- Si ---........--- Sn ------ Sn------Sn
| | | | | |
D1 D2 Di Dn Dn+1 Dn+2 ......
• Adult state: convergence - input causes no more changes.• Question: How is this possible?
![Page 47: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
A simplified version
Questions: What does a person who knows a language
know? Quite a lot….What does a person who know a language
minimally know?A person who knows a language minimally
knows what strings of words are wellformed sentences and which do not.
![Page 48: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Question: What is the size of the set of sentences of a language? •Principled answer: Infinite; there is no longest sentence.• Practical answer: astronomical, also if one limits oneself to sentences that are not overly long.•Conjecture: The number of well-formed English sentences of 20 words and less is 1020 (Levelt 1967) Six seconds per sentence 19.000.000.000.000 years to hear and say them all. Six years of non-stop listening: the percentage of sentences heard is at most 0,000000000031%
Size
![Page 49: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
1,2,3,4,5,6,7, ….
2,4,6,8,10, ….
1,5,25,125,625,3125, ….. 0,2,6,12,20,30, …..
(1x0, 2x1,3x2,4x3, …..)
Abstract task: continue a series 1
![Page 50: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
1,5,11,19,29, …. Regularity 1:(1x2)-1, (2x3)-1, …. a(a+1)-1: (6x7)-1=41, (7x8)-1=55 Alternative (based on prime number series): 1, (2,3), 5, (7), 11, (13,17), 19, (23), 29, (31,37), 41, (43), 47,
(53, 59), 61, …..
Continue a series 2
![Page 51: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
The abstract version
• I. Consider an infinite set of which a finite subset is given. Determine the full set on the basis of this subset.
II. Consider an infinite series of elements (e.g., the natural numbers). Determine, given a finite beginning of the series how it continues.
• III. Fundamental truth: Such tasks have an infinity of solutions
![Page 52: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
How comes it that human beings, whose contacts
withthe world are brief and personal and limited,
are nevertheless able to know as much as we do
know?(Chomsky 1986)
Plato’s Problem
![Page 53: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Tasks of the sort Complete the series are impossible in theirgenerality.
They may be possible of the type of regularity is given in advance.
For instance: i) There is a constant difference between a member of the
series and its successor.ii) For each member in the series its successor is computed by
multiplying it with a constant factor.
Restricting the hypothesis space
![Page 54: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Complicating factors
• No negative evidence– No systematic corrections– Resistance to correction
• Non-homogeneity– Errors– Idiolectal variation
• Yet the child finds her way
![Page 55: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Insufficient
• Analogy• Motherese• The data is so much richer• Restricted window
May be true: but make learning task harder instead of easier
Require substantive further restrictions on hypothesis space focus of current research
![Page 56: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Classical example (McNeill (1966)
Child: Nobody don't like meMother: No, say "nobody likes me'Child: Nobody don't like me(this goes on 8 times)
Finally:Mother: No, now listen carefully; say "nobody likes me"Child: Oh, nobody don't likes me
Analogy – Negative evidence
![Page 57: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
(1) a. The members of the audience will standb. Will the members of the audience stand?
(2) a. Mary has lived in Princetonb. Has Mary lived in Princeton?
(1’)a. The members of the audience who have been enjoying themselves will stand
a. *Have the members of the audience who - been enjoying themselves will stand?
b. Will the members of the audience who have been enjoying themselves - stand?
Analogy versus structure
![Page 58: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Minimal condition on operations in natural language
• Structure dependence
• Types of impossible operations:
- Mirroring a string
- Move the 25th word
- etc.
![Page 59: Foundations of Linguistics & Foundations of Syntax: Basic Issues Loes Koring Iris Mulders Eric Reuland Eddy Ruys](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110207/56649d3a5503460f94a14942/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Puzzling observation
It is surprising that so many researchers of human learning have such a hard time accepting the following truth:
• Learning a recursive step by presentation only, without restrictions on the hypothesis space, is as impossible as creating the perpetuum mobile.