fosaprepitant and aprepitant dr adam hurlow 16/11/11

17
Fosaprepitant and aprepitant Dr Adam Hurlow 16/11/11

Upload: shona-blair

Post on 17-Dec-2015

221 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Fosaprepitant and aprepitant Dr Adam Hurlow 16/11/11

Fosaprepitant and aprepitant

Dr Adam Hurlow16/11/11

Page 2: Fosaprepitant and aprepitant Dr Adam Hurlow 16/11/11

Fosaprepitant and aprepitant

• Selective neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists• Aprepitant PO/fosaprepitant IV prodrug• Fosaprepitant 115mg equivalent to aprepitant

115mg• Licensed for treatment of chemotherapy

induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) with highly and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy

Page 3: Fosaprepitant and aprepitant Dr Adam Hurlow 16/11/11
Page 4: Fosaprepitant and aprepitant Dr Adam Hurlow 16/11/11

Substance P/NK1R

• Substance P –tachykinin• Acts on NK1 receptor• Found in the area postrema (CTZ), nucleus

tractus solitarri (NTS), vomiting centre• Exogenous Substance P in NTS triggers

vomiting• Substance P/NK1R within the final common

pathway to regulate vomiting

Page 5: Fosaprepitant and aprepitant Dr Adam Hurlow 16/11/11

Pathophysiology of Chemotherapy-Induced Emesis

Page 6: Fosaprepitant and aprepitant Dr Adam Hurlow 16/11/11

CINV

• Acute (post-treatment)– Occurs within first 24 hours after administration of cancer chemotherapy

• Delayed– CINV that begins after first 24 hours– May last for 120 hours

• Anticipatory– Learned or conditioned response from poorly controlled nausea and vomiting

associated with previous chemotherapy

• Breakthrough– CINV that occurs despite prophylaxis and requires rescue

• Refractory– Occurs during subsequent treatment cycles when prophylaxis and/or rescue

has failed in previous cycles

Page 7: Fosaprepitant and aprepitant Dr Adam Hurlow 16/11/11

CINV

• 50% of patients receiving high-dose cisplatin experienced vomiting and 58% experienced nausea despite standard therapy

• Anthracycline and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for breast cancer evoked vomiting in 41% of patients and nausea in 67% following ondansetron and dexamethasone

Page 8: Fosaprepitant and aprepitant Dr Adam Hurlow 16/11/11

Perception vs. Reality: Emetogenic Chemotherapy

Grunberg S. Cancer. 2004;100:2261-2268.

Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy

Page 9: Fosaprepitant and aprepitant Dr Adam Hurlow 16/11/11

Fosaprepitant and aprepitant in CINV

• Recommended in following guidelines fro highly/moderately emetogenic chemotherapy:

• American society of clinical oncology, 2006• European Society of medical oncology, 2008• Multinational association of supportive care

in cancer,2008• National comprehensive cancer network,2008

Page 10: Fosaprepitant and aprepitant Dr Adam Hurlow 16/11/11

Emetogenic Potential of Single Antineoplastic Agents

HIGH Risk in nearly all patients (> 90%)

MODERATE Risk in 30% to 90% of patients

LOW Risk in 10% to 30% of patients

MINIMAL Fewer than 10% at risk

Page 11: Fosaprepitant and aprepitant Dr Adam Hurlow 16/11/11
Page 12: Fosaprepitant and aprepitant Dr Adam Hurlow 16/11/11

Evidence base• Cochrane protocol but no review• Recent literature reviews Chrisp P Core Evidence 2007;2(1) &

Langford P and Chrisp P Core Evidence 2010:5 77-90• 2007 - 1 meta-analysis, 13 RCT, 1 case reports• 2010 – 1 meta analysis, 4 RCT, 2 case reports• Both concluded – clear evidence adding aprepitant to

dexamethasone plus a serotonin antagonist improves control of emesis and nausea and reduces need for rescue medication in patients receiving moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy

• Clear evidence patients more satisfied with their antiemetic therapy when aprepitant added; less impact of symptoms on daily activities

Page 13: Fosaprepitant and aprepitant Dr Adam Hurlow 16/11/11

Evidence: Aprepitant & standard therapy (ST) vs. ST and placebo

  Acute complete response % Delayed complete response %

Navari 1999 77 vs. 57 (p =0.004) 52 vs. 16 (p <0.001)

Campos 2001 75 vs. 51 (p<0.01) 41 vs. 22 (p<0.05)

Hesketh 2003 89.2 vs. 78.1 (<0.001) 75.4 vs. 55.8 (<0.001)

Poli-bigelli 2003 82.8 vs. 68.4 (<0.001) 67.7 vs. 46.8(<0.001)

Gralla 2005 71 vs. 49 (<0.005) 67 vs. 32 (<0.005)

Warr 2005 86 vs. 73 (<0.001) 72 vs 51(<0.001)

Schmoll 2006 87.7 vs 79.3 (<0.005) 74.1 vs 63.1(<0.004)

Herrington 2008 66.7 -70.4 vs 56.2 63-59.3 vs 31.2

Yeo 2009 72.1 vs 72.6 75.6 vs 67.4

Page 14: Fosaprepitant and aprepitant Dr Adam Hurlow 16/11/11

Aprepitant beyond chemo• Preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting: post hoc analysis of pooled data from 

two randomized active-controlled trials of aprepitant. Current Medical Research and Opinion2007, Vol. 23, No. 10 , Pages 2559-2565 Diemumsch P et al

- 1599 patients for major surgery under general anaesthesia - RCT, double blind - aprepitant 40mg or125mg vs ondansetron 4mg IV pre-op

- no significant nausea (56.4% vs. 48.1%) - no nausea (39.6% vs. 33.1%) - no vomiting (86.7% vs. 72.4%) - no nausea and no vomiting (38.3% vs. 31.4%) - no nausea, no vomiting, and no use of rescue (37.9% vs. 31.2%) p < 0.035 for the odds ratio for each comparison

Page 15: Fosaprepitant and aprepitant Dr Adam Hurlow 16/11/11

Regimens

• Fosaprepitant (Ivemend) intravenous infusion, over 20–30 minutes, 150 mg 30 minutes before chemotherapy on day 1 of cycle only

• Aprepitant (Emend)125 mg 1 h pre chemotherapy, then 80 mg od for the next 2 days

Page 16: Fosaprepitant and aprepitant Dr Adam Hurlow 16/11/11

Complications

• Aprepitant is eliminated primarily by metabolism; aprepitant is not renally excreted.

• Well tolerated in patients with mild to moderate hepatic insufficiency (Child-Pugh 5-9). Unknown >9

• No dose adjustment for renal insufficient/HD• Side effects diarrhoea (23-60%), headache 3%,

infusion site pain 7.6-10.4%

Page 17: Fosaprepitant and aprepitant Dr Adam Hurlow 16/11/11

Interactions

• CYP3A4 substrate - increased by ketocoanzole - decreased by carbemazapine

• inhibition of CYP3A4 and induction CYP2C9 - increases dex/methylpred levels - OCP failure - increases midazolam - decreases warfarin