formation of cloud droplets from supersaturated vapor
DESCRIPTION
Growth of warm cloud droplets Activated cloud droplets grow by condensation then collection Condensational growth leads to nearly monodispersed distribution of small drops Growth of condensationally grown droplets to raindrop size achieved by collision & coalescence (collection)TRANSCRIPT
Two fundamental phenomena that warm cloud microphysics theory must explain:• Formation of cloud
droplets from supersaturated vapor
• Growth of cloud droplets to raindrops in O(10 min)
Growth of warm cloud droplets
• Activated cloud droplets grow by condensation then collection
• Condensational growth leads to nearly monodispersed distribution of small drops
• Growth of condensationally grown droplets to raindrop size achieved by collision & coalescence (collection)
Growth by condensation
• Consider vapor flux from environment with supersaturation S onto droplet of size r
• Given environmental vapor density ρ(∞) and vapor diffusion coefficient D:
• Ungraded exercise: derive! (p. 222)• Growth rate inversely proportional to r
drdt
SDv
rl
Growth by condensation (cont.)• Consider cloud droplets within rising parcel• Parcel adiabatically cools, supersaturates• CCN begin to activate• S maximized once excess vapor from adiabatic cooling
balanced by condensation onto CCN/droplets (typically within 100 m of cloud base)
• Activated droplets then grow at expense of haze particles• Smaller droplets grow faster than larger droplets, yielding
nearly monodispersed distribution of droplets that grow more slowly with time – insufficient to produce raindrops!
Collision-Coalescence: Collision Efficiency
• Those drops that end up larger than average will also fall faster than average, collecting smaller droplets in paths
• Collision efficiency E is fraction of droplets of size r2
in path of collector drop of size r1 that collide with latter:
E y2
r1 r2 2
y2
r1 r2 2
Collision Efficiency (cont.)• Collector drop much bigger
droplets closely follow streamlines around it y small E small
• For smaller collector drops, for r2/r1 ≈ 0.6-0.9, E decreases due to shrinking relative fall speed
• For r2/r1 nearly 1.0, E increases again due to strong drop-droplet interactions
Coalescence Efficiency E’• Not all colliding droplets coalesce!
• At low/high values of r2/r1, collector drop is only mildly deformed during collision (lower impact energy), minimizing air trapped between drop & droplet, thus maximizing likelihood of drop & droplet making contact
• Presence of electric field can increase E’
• Collection efficiency Ec = EE’
Continuous collection model
2
43
41
4
1 1 2 l c
31 l
1 2 l c1
l
1 2
1 l1
l
dM r v v w Edt
M r
v v w Edrdt
Assume v v , E'v w Edr
dt
Since E and v1 increase with r1, so does dr1/dt, allowing growth by collection to quickly dominate growth by condensation beyond a certain droplet size:
M – mass of collector drop
wl – liquid water content of droplets
ρl - liquid water density
Continuous collection model (cont.)
• Can derive equation for height of collector drops as function of radius given steady updraft speed w (eq. 6.30)
• This equation models general behavior of cloud droplets growing by collection
• v1 < w : drop carried upward by updraft
• v1 > w : drop falls through updraft, possible reaching ground as raindrop
• Derive! (ungraded exercise)
Two fundamental phenomena that warm cloud microphysics theory must explain:• Formation of cloud
droplets from supersaturated vapor
• Growth of cloud droplets to raindrops in O(10 min)
BUT…how to bridge the gap?
• Condensational growth leads to nearly monodispersed distribution of drops – collisions unlikely since fall speeds similar
• Plus, condensational growth slows well before ~20 μm radii required for substantial growth by collection
Possible mechanisms
• Giant CCN as embryos for collector drops• Turbulent enhancement of condensational growth
and collision efficiencies• Radiative broadening of DSD • Stochastic collection model – small fraction of
droplets will grow much faster than average
• Lots of interesting discussion in text (but you’ve already read it, right??)