formalities, fixation, idea- expression, merger intro to ip – prof merges 2.9.10
Post on 21-Dec-2015
234 views
TRANSCRIPT
Formalities, Fixation, Idea-Expression, Merger
Intro to IP – Prof Merges
2.9.10
Fixation
• “It makes no difference what the form, manner, or medium of fixation may be . . . Sculptural, punched, magnetic, or any other stable form . . . whether it is capable of perception directly or by means of any machine or device . . .”
Live Broadcasts
• Originality– Photography, video– “Authorship” of real-life images
• Fixation
White-Smith v. Apollo (1908)
“They are not intended to be read as an ordinary piece of sheet music …. [W]e cannot think that they are copies within the meaning of the copyright act.” – 209 US at 18.
Fixation issues
• Simultaneous recording and broadcast
• “Authorized” fixation only . . . (bootleg recording cases)
• State law (preemption) – Hemingway case, p. 405
• Original work and copy must merge through fixation copyrightable subject matter
“Copies” and “phonorecords”
• Physical objects
• In which copyrighted works are embodied
– The work starts with a physical instantiation; but is conceptually distinct from the instantiation
– Property is not tied to/limited to the physical object
Transitory duration
Cartoon Network LP, LLLP v. CSC Holdings, Inc., 536 F.3d 121, 127-30 (2d Cir. 2008): data that resides in a buffer for no more than 1.2 seconds before being automatically overwritten is merely of transitory duration and hence does not constitute a ‘‘copy’’ for copyright purposes.
Formalities
• Notice
• Publication
• Registration
• Deposit
Three primary eras
• 1909 Act
• 1976 Act (effective Jan. 1, 1978)
• 1989 Berne Implementation Act (effective March 1, 1989)
What is the “Berne Convention”?
Victor Hugo
Continental tradition
• Droit d’auteur – vs. “copyright” (Anglo-American tradition)
• Declaration of the Rights of Man (1791); moral rights
World Intellectual Property Organization: WIPO
Notice
• Historically: required
• Today (post-Berne Act, March 1, 1989): Encouraged (see section 401(d))
Publication
• No longer quite as important as under 1909 and pre-1989 1976 Act
Deposit
• Still required for US works
Formalities: Publication and Notice
1/1/78: Relevant to works created and “published” in the U.S. before 1978
Distinguish general publication from limited publication
Divesting v. Investing Publication
• Publication cut off state (common law) protection; publication without notice forfeited federal rights.
• Therefore courts were loath to find “divesting” publication
• Not so when notice given; “investing”publication
If general publication occurred, ask: Was there strict compliance with 1909 Act notice rules? If no, the work is in the public domain.
If limited publication (or no publication) occurred, ask: Was the work registered anyway (for certain kinds of works)? If it was, still copyrighted.
Formalities: Publication and Notice
For works fixed after 1/1/78, or fixed before 1/1/78 but not published or registered before 1/1/78, ask:
Was the work disclosed to the public before 3/1/89?
If no, copyright applies
If yes, ask: Was notice included? If no, copyright applies if limited publication occurred; work is in the public domain if general publication without notice occurred.
Estate of Martin Luther King, Jr. v. CBS (11th Cir. 1999)
Careful attention to the work
• Rev. King case:
• Spoken words? Audio recording? Video recording? Text of speech?
Categories of Works
• Literary Works –Has nothing to do with literary merit (if novel is good or bad)
• © Protects: Plot, Structure & Organization –
• Computer Software included under literary works
Musical Works – Two Forms:
• (1) Sheet music, lyrics, musical compilation
• (2) Sound Recording/ Musical Composition: of the composition
Dramatic Works –
Plays, pantomimes & choreographed work (the score is copyrightable)
Pictorial, graphic, sculpture
Audio Visual Works and Motion Pictures (Soundtrack is included in Motion Picture)
Architectural Works --
Eg, Rock & Roll Museum in Cleveland.
a. Limited rights: reproduction as a building
b. Can have copyright for architectural elements
Recordings could be published …
• And not the written speech
• Result: Preserves copyright
– > Copyright not divested under 1909 Act
Formalities: Notice
For works fixed after 3/1/89, notice no longer required; publication status irrelevant to existence of copyright protection.
Notice still brings benefits (eliminates “innocent infringer” defense w/regard to damages) § 405(b)
Acquiring, Keeping and Transferring Copyright
Formalities: Registration
Pre-1/1/78, registration was optional for initial copyright protection, but required as a condition of filing an infringement suit, and for renewal
Post-1/1/78, registration is optional, but U.S. works must be registered as a condition of suit, under § 411
Formalities: Registration
Post-1/1/78, benefits of registration: Evidentiary benefits (registration must be w/in 5 years of first publication) § 410
Registration (cont’d)
Expanded remedial options--statutory damages and attorneys’ fees (registration effected prior to infringement commencing or within 3 months of publication, for newly published works) § 412
Formalities: Deposit
Two copies of published works (§ 407)
One copy of unpublished works
Special rules for certain kinds of works (nb. computer programs) 37 CFR § 202.20
Formalities: RestorationApplies to Berne and WTO members. § 104A
Relevant to lost U.S. copyright protection lost due to failure to comply with U.S. formalities.
Work must still be subject to protection in its country of origin
If notice rules complied with, then restored protection applies (for most countries) as of 1/1/96
Provisions for “reliance” parties
Morrissey v. P&G
• What was copyrighted?
Morrissey
• What would be the effect of upholding the copyright?
Merger doctrine
• Why worry about merger if there is independent creation defense?