1

FOREWORD

In deepest gratitude to The One Almighty God, The Attorney General Office

presents The 2012 Annual Report for all the people of Indonesia as an effort to inspire

transparency and truthfulness in law enforcement oriented national institution.

The realization of transparency and truthfulness of R.I Attorney General Office

through announcing public information referred to Regulation No. 14/2008 on

Transparent Public Information defined in The 1945 National Constitution of Indonesia

Article 28 F in particular, that stipulated the individual right to communicate and

obtained information for improvement of oneself and social environment, and has the

right to seek, obtain, and retain information by means of any available channel.

The 2012 Annual Report reflected comprehension of Attorney General Office on

the right to obtain public information in respect to public surveillance on government

performance that functioned to enforce the compliance of national institutions to the

corridor of law in presenting its management of the national budget.

This Annual Report will further clarify targets and achievements accomplished by

R.I Attorney General Office throughout 2012 in accordance to the system of National

Development Planning. Analysis on these targets and achievements were parts of the

efforts to synergize planning, organizing, implementing, and evaluation from every

aspects encompassing man, material, and money; with the conclusion on problems and

solutions mapping for improvement and straightening of the Attorney General Office in

the following year.

We would like to express our appreciation to everyone for the support and

assistance for the organizing of this Annual Report, with the expectation that this

Attorney General Office Annual Report would be an informative reference to its readers

and the observers’ of law enforcement in Indonesia.

We trust that the report would deliver aspiration and comprehension to the public

on the organization of R.I Attorney General Office forward movement to answer the

challenges and public expectation.

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Foreword

Table of Contents

Doctrine

Vision and Mission

Duties and Powers

Attorney General’s Order

CHAPTER I : Introduction

CHAPTER II : Attroney General Office at a Glance

2.1 Attorney General Office Profile

2.2 Organizational Structure

2.3 Leadership Profile

CHAPTER III : Bureaucratic Reform of Attorney General Office

CHAPTER IV : Achievements

4.1 Development

4.2 Intelligence

4.3 General Crimes

4.4 Special Crimes

4.5 Civil and Administrative Law

4.5 Internal and Extenal Supervisions

4.6 Education and Training Bureau

CHAPTER V : Other Activities

CHAPTER VI : Conclusion

Appendix : Names of Provincial Attorney’s Offices, District Attorney’s Offices and

Branch Attorney Offices di Indonesia.

3

THE ATTORNEY’S DOCTRINE

TRIKRAMA ADHYAKSA: SATYA ADHI WICAKSANA

SATYA :

Loyalty arising from honesty to Almighty God, oneself, one’s family and one’s

fellowman.

ADHI :

Perfection in the performance of one’s duties arising from one’s accountability to

Almighty God, one’s family and one’s fellowman.

WICAKSANA :

Wisdom in words and conduct, particularly in the application of one’s powers and

authority.

4

VISION & MISSION

VISION

For the Attorney General Office to become a law enforcement that is clean, efficient,

transparent, and accountable, providing optimal services as part of the effort to ensure

the supremacy of law in a professional, proportional and honorable manner, founded

upon the principles of justice, truth and probity.

MISSION

1. To optimize both the quantitatitve and qualitative performance of the Attorney

General Office functions in performing duties and exercise of powers in aspects of

the handling of criminal, civil and administrative cases, and to optimize the

intelligence functions of the Attorney General Office in a professional, proportional

and honorable manner through the appropriate, well-designed, focused, effective and

efficient application of standard operating procedures.

2. To optimize the role of development and supervision so as to support other divisions

in the performance of their duties, in particular regards to law enforcement.

3. To optimize public services in the legal field based upon full responsibility, principles,

effectiveness and efficiency, and to hold the rights of the public in high regard.

4. To reform and reengineer the organizational structure of the Attorney General Office

and the management of information system, particularly through the implementation

of the quick-wins program so it may be easily accessed by the public, the preparation

of a Blueprint for the development of Attorney General Office human resources over

the mid and long terms up to 2025, the reform and reengineering of financial

administrative management, improving infrastructure and facilities, and improving the

welfare of staff through better remuneration to ensure a more effective, efficient,

transparent, and accountable performance of the Attorney General Office.

5. To produce Attorney General Office officials whom are reliable, resilient, professional,

and imbued by a high level of morals and ethics, in order to support the eloquence

performance of foremost duties, function powers, particularly in regards to the effort

of equitable law enforcement and other related duties.

5

DUTIES AND POWERS

Referring to Article 30 Legislation No. 16/2004 on R.I Attorney Service, the duties and

powers of the Attorney General Office are as follows:

Criminal sector:

To conduct prosecutions;

To enforce judicial orders and decisions of final and conclusive effect;

To conduct supervision of those serving conditional sentence, placed under

supervision orders, or released on parole;

To investigate certain types of suspected crime as stipulated by law;

To complete certain types of case files, and for such purposes to conduct additional

investigations prior to the forwarding of such files to the court, in manners of practices

conducted through coordination with investigator(s).

Civil and Administrative Sector:

The prosecution service, based on special authority, may act both at home and abroad

for and on behalf of the state or government.

In the Public Order and Security Sector, the Attorney General Office has the

following duties:

Improving the public’s awareness of the law;

Upholding law enforcement policies;

Oversight circulation of printed materials;

Oversight religious beliefs in respect to means that threaten society and the state;

Preventing the misuse and/or denigration of religion;

Conducting legal research and development in law and statistics on crime.

6

ATTORNEY GENERAL’S ORDER

DATED 22 JULY 2012

1. To cultivate virtues as would be reflected in attitude and conduct that demonstrate

personal integrity based upon spiritual values and Tri Krama Adhyaksa doctrine;

2. To improve knowledge through continual skills and profesionalism developments for

the purpose of supporting the Attorney General Office’s foremost duties and

functions;

3. To heighten service in genuine and intense performance of duties that the general

public would experience the valuable presence of Attorney General Office.

Jakarta, 22 July 2012

Republic of Indonesia Attorney General

BASRIEF ARIEF

7

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

In order to the realization of good

governance for the improvement in the

quality of public service and

optimalization in the performance of law

enforcement institutions particularly to

the effort to abolish corruption that

becomes the national priority of the

government as stated throughout the

documents of National Development

Planning system, both in the Long Term

National Development Planning 2010-

2025, and in the Mid Term National

Development Planning 2010-2014, then,

in reference to the Government Annual

Workplan, the Attorney General Office

has been annually continuing its

optimum effort to achieve the

performance target achievements as

mandated by the government.

The effort in target achievements

has dual functions: first to present the

commitment of Attorney General Office

to give positive contribution for the

achievement of the vision of long term

national development plan, which is

“The realization of an autonomous,

developed, just, and affluent Indonesia”,

and two, to exhibit the motivated

Attorney General Office in its adherence

to the public demand in the reform of

Attorney General Office that will ensue

in a reliable Attorney General Office.

Due to the importance of Attorney

General Office position for the

realization of “A Just Indonesia”, in July

2012, R.I President, DR. H. Susilo

Bambang Yudhoyono held a restricted

cabinet session with the topic of

“Eradicating Corruption, Law

Enforcement Synchronization and Land

Issues” at the Attorney General Office

building. In particular regards to the

handling of corruption crimes, the year

2012 focused more on ten corruption

susceptible areas of: Government

Procurement System, Finance and

Banking, Tax, Fossil and Gas Energy,

State/Regionally Owned Enterprises,

Customs & Excise, Utilizations of

State/Local Budgets and Revised

State/Local Budgets, State/Local

Assets, Mining and Public Service. The

selection of Attorney General Office

building as the location for the restricted

cabined session must be perceived as

the proof of the government belief to the

Attorney General Office in law

enforcement, particularly in the sector of

eradication of corruption, by every

members of adhyaksa corps.

Eradication of corruption has

been a main focus of the Indonesian

government in post-reform era.

Numerous ways were implemented

simultaneously by the executive,

legislative, an judicial institutions to

prevent and to eradicate corruption

crimes.

The President had declared

Presidential Decree No. 9/2011 on

Corruption Prevention and Eradication

8

Action Plan 2011 that was subsequently

followed by Presidential Order No.

17/2011 on Corruption Prevention and

Eradication Action Plan 2012. The

President instructed the implementation

of the numerous detailed action plans

with the main focus on prevention of

corruption at law enforcement

institutions with the objectives on

escalated levels of accountability,

transparency of information, human

resources capacity and development,

and inter-agencies coordination.

In the frame of self-reform, the

Attorney General Office has

accomplished a series of protracted

arrangement for its internal and external

sides. The Attorney General Office

bureaucratic reform program has been

done for the internal aspects of

organizational, implementation, and

human resources, that resulted in public

service quality improvement especially

related to the improvement on the

performance of the core business of the

Attorney General Office that covered the

areas of general crimes, special crimes,

civil and administrative, and supervision

of public order and security.

Coordinative and communicative

engagements were done with other

institutions, with special regards to law

enforcement ones for the external part,

as well as international collaboration

efforts with other nations that are

deemed highly potential to become

destinations of criminals flights and/or

the concealment of criminals acts

assets, as an optimum efforts from the

Attorney General Office to place the

arrest on criminals and recovery of

national assets and loss that were being

concealed overseas.

As a form of commitment to

internal organization of Attorney General

Office, the 2012 bureaucratic reform

was strongly lay on rectification strategy

for institutional perfomance through

enhancement of accountable and

transparent case management system.

From the side of law enforcement

performance, the 2012 internal

organization of Attorney General Office

has prosecuted 1.209 corruption cases

valued at IDR 302.609.167.229 (Three

Hundred Two Billion and Six Hundred

Nine Million One Hundred Sixty Seven

Thousand and Two Hundred Twnety

Nine Indonesian Rupiah) of recovery of

state finance/assets in special crime

cases, and 113.268 prosecutions of

general crime cases. From the initial

2012 target of 1.385 civil and

administrative cases, 3.494 cases were

prosecuted; marking 252% level of

achievements for the performance of

civil and administration section.

The coordination and

synchronization between the Attorney

General Office for its external

organization in 2012 with other

institutions were established through

MoUs with R.I Supreme Court, Police

Force, Ministry of Justice and Human

Rights, Ministry of Social Affairs,

Ministry of Women Empowerment and

Children Protection, Witness and

Victims Protection Agency, Bank of

Indonesia and Ministry of Finance. In

2012, R.I Attorney General Office has

9

attempted to set up an international

collaboration by establishing a bilateral

law covenant with the Malaysian

Attorney General Office for the

organization of a direct two way

communication line to accelerate the

process of information exchange, mainly

in urgent cases.

The Attorney General Office

realized that the endeavours made were

still far from perfection, and there are

future challenges as to the stabilization

of bureaucratic reform, optimalization of

law enforcement performance, and

budget management to support a new

Attorney General Office that will heavily

incline to the application of Information

Technology in conducting its prime

duties and function. In facing these

scores of future challenges, the Attorney

General Office is being optimistic,

adamantly hold onto the motto of

“Nothing is Impossible”. With the spirit to

strive in togetherness, all those

challenges becoming opportunities for

the Attorney General Office to achieve

the collective objective, which is to

regain the public trust to the institution.

10

CHAPTER II

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

OFFICE AT A GLANCE

The Attorney General Office is

the government institution that exercises

the state prosecutorial power. As an

institution operates in the fields of law

enforcement and justice, the Attorney

General Office is headed by the

Attorney General, who is appointed and

removed by, and is directly accountable

to the President. The Attorney General's

Office, Provincial Attorney’s Offices,

District Attorney’s Offices and Branch

Attorney Offices are all forming the state

prosecutorial power. All compose an

integral and inseparable entity.

2.1. ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE

PROFILE

The 1945 National

Constitution mandated the law

enforcers to stipulate equality in

justice and government, indicated

that justice in the era of

globalization shall be the ground

for every governing acts to ensure

the sense of justice and reasurre

the presence of a just law to all the

subjects. To create such

conditions, the state law enforcers

as the forefront officials must have

an independent manner in

performing their duties, irrespective

to the differences within the social

structure and classes existed in the

general public that may influence

the service. This demanded

jurisdiction rationale in the form of

implementation of law to assure

the comprehensiveness on rights

and obligations, and existence of

social boundaries to freedom of

every individual in doing the

activities.

Under Legislation No.

16/2004, which superseded Law

Number Number 5/1991 on the RI

Attorney Service, the R.I Attorney

Service, as one of the law

enforcement institutions, required

to deliver higher function in

upholding legal supremacy,

protection of public interest,

upholding of human rights and

eradication of corruption, collusion

and nepotism. Under the preceding

2004 legislation, the RI Attorney

Service, as the government

institution responsible for

exercising the power of the state in

the prosecutorial field, must

perform its duties in an

independent manner, free from the

influence of government or third

parties (Legislation No. 16/2004

article 2 section 2).

In performing its duties and

powers, the Attorney Service is led

by the Attorney General with the

assistance of one Deputy Attorney

General and a number of Junior

Attorneys General and the Head of

the Education and Training

11

Bureau. Legislation No. 16/ 2004

on R.I Attorney Service also

stipulates the central position of

the Attorney Service in the

strategic role to maintain resilience

of the nation, due to the

responsibility held by the Attorney

Service in investigating and

prosecuting certain types of cases,

and its intermediary position to

filter the processes of investigation

and trial, as well as ensuring the

implementation of final and

conclusive effect of judicial orders

and decisions, hence the Attorney

Service holds the control for the

judicial process of a case

(Dominus Litis) since the institution

determines the prerequisitions to

proceed any judicial actions for a

case or not, based on admissible

evidence, as defined by the

Criminal Procedures Code.

It should also be noted that

the Attorney Service is the only

state organization responsible for

the implementation of judicial

decisions (executive ambtenaar).

Besides its role in criminal cases,

the Attorney Service also plays

other roles in the sector of civil and

administrative by acting as the

state’s attorney on behalf of the

government in issues on law

enforcement, legal aid, legal

advice, and other legal actions to

the state or government,

encompassing the

institutions/agencies, central and

local government

institutions/agencies, and central

and local government enterprises,

for the safeguarding and

recovering of state assets, and

providing legal services to the

public. In the part as the holder of

those powers, Attorneys have the

right to bring public prosecutions,

implement judicial decisions, and

conduct other powers as conferred

by the Legislation No. 16/2004

articles 30, 31, 32, 33 and 34 on

R.I Attorney Service.

The reform of Attorney

Service organization and human

resources is obligatory to adjust

with the changing era, for

irrespective to its extend and

breadth, an organization would be

rendered irrelevant should it fails to

adjust to the change of times.

This applies to the Attorney

Service that consecutively

conducting the comprehensive

reform process in prosecutorial

area, as implied by Legislation No.

16/2004 on R.I Attorney Service.

To implement the actions for

the efforts in improving its

performance as implied in the

Legislation No. 16/2004 on the R.I

Attorney Service, the Attorney

Service has made considerable

reforms based on the six Attorney

General’s Regulation issued on 21

July 2007 that covers the following

organizational aspects: (1)

Recruitment of Civil Servants and

Candidate Prosecutors; (2) Career

12

Development; (3) Education and

Training Bureau; (4) Minimum

Professional Standards for

Attorneys; (5) Code of Conduct;

and (6) Supervisory Mechanisms.

In performing its duties and

powers, the Attorney Service is not

only focused on handling of

general crimes, but also corruption

crimes, civil and administrative, as

well as public complaints. The

performance of these prime duties

and functions is always based on

the principle of equality before the

law, without any distinction

between individuals in regards to

social status, ethnic group, religion

nor race.

Referring to the said six

Attorney General’s Regulations,

the Prosecution Service is fully

aware that the success

performance of duties requires

collaboration and coordination with

other existing law enforcement and

judicial institutions.

The 2012 Attorney Service

Performance Development Agenda

focused on bureaucratic reform

through duties performance based

on appropriate, well-designed,

focused, effective and efficient

standard operating procedures

(SOP) to optimalize public

services; conducted organizational

reforms and formed professional,

reliable, and accountable

personnel to ensure proper duties

performance as part of equitable

and effective law enforcement

process.

The Attorney Service has the

mandatory powers implicated in

the Law to perform duties by

conducting effective, appropriate,

and cost-efficient monitoring and

evaluation on administrative

management and case disposal.

Clean and upright case disposal

will be potential to bring a good

governance willed performance

and handling of public impairing

corruption cases that is expected

to not only convict of suspect, but

also to ensure the significant

recovery of state assets.

To improve accountability,

efficiency and effectiveness of

systematic performance based on

the pattern of good governance to

prevent interference of cases as

required in the application of good

governance, the Attorney Service

conducts direct connected

supervision in collaboration with

the public for follow-up actions on

appropriate complaints, for

optimum manners in handling and

completion of cases and

prevention on abuses of powers

and ranks.

2.2. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

With the Presidential

Regulation No. 38/2010 on R.I

Attorney Services Organization

and Management, the Attorney

Service has been performing its

13

duties in referrence to the virtue of

Attorney General’s Regulation No.

009/A/JA/01/2011 on the

Organization and Work Procedures

of the Republic of Indonesia

Prosecution Service that has

reformed organizational structure

The Attorney General is the

leader and highest office holder in

the Prosecution Service, and is

responsible for directing and

controlling the implementation of

the duties and powers of the

Attorney Service. In the

implementation of his duties and

authority, the Attorney General is

assisted by one Deputy Attorney

General, a number of Junior

Attorney Generals, and one Head

of Bureau. The Junior Attorney

Generals are as follows: (1) Junior

Attorney General Development; (2)

Junior Attorney General

Intelligence; (3) Junior Attorney

General General Crimes, (4) Junior

Attorney General Special Crimes,

(5) Junior Attorney General Civil

and Administrative; (6) Junior

Attorney General Supervision; and

(7) Head of the Education and

Training Bureau.

The Deputy Attorney General

has the duties and powers to assist

the Attorney General in the

implementation of his duties and to

represent the Attorney General

should the Attorney General be

unavailable of service, as well as

such other duties as assigned by

the Attorney General.

The Junior Attorney General

Development has the duties to

conduct planning, infrastructure

and facilities development,

organizational and administrative

procedures, human resources and

financial administration,

management of state assets,

provision of legal opinions,

preparation of legislation and

regulations, overseas collaboration

engagement, and provision of

other technical services and

support.

The Junior Attorney General

Intelligence has investigative,

security and support duties

concerned with the prevention of

crime so as to support law

enforcement of a preventive or

coercive nature in the areas of

ideology, politics, economics,

finance, socio-cultural, defense

and security; imposing travel bans,

and helping to uphold public order

and security.

The Junior Attorney General

General Crimes has the duties

and powers in the management of

general crimes encompassing pre-

prosecution, additional

investigation, prosecution, appeal,

and enforcement of judicial orders

and decisions of final and

conclusive effect; examination and

supervision of of those serving

conditional sentence, placed under

14

supervision orders, or released on

parole, and other legal actions.

The Junior Attorney General

Special Crimes has the duties and

powers in the management of

general crimes that are governed

by special criminal procedures

encompassing investigation,

examination, pre-prosecution,

additional investigation,

prosecution, appeal, and

enforcement of judicial orders and

decisions of final and conclusive

effect; examination and

supervision of of those serving

conditional sentence, placed under

supervision orders, or released on

parole, and other legal actions.

The Junior Attorney General

Civil and Administrative has the

duties and powers in the

management of civil, and state

administrative and constitutional

cases encompassing law

enforcement, state attorneys,

provision of legal advice and other

legal actions to the state and

government including state

institutions/agencies, central and

local government

institutions/agencies, and state and

regionally owned enterprises, in

order to the safeguarding and

recovery of state assets,

preservation of government

authority, and provision of legal

services to the public.

The Junior Attorney General

Supervision has the duties and

powers in the management of of

effective internal supervision

through planning, implementation

and controlling the implementation

of Attorney Service internal

performance and financial

supervision, and implement

supervision on particular purposes

as assigned by the Attorney

General in accordance to the laws

and regulations in effect.

The Education and Training

Bureau has the duties and powers

in the provision of education and

training within the context of

strengthen and development of

Attorney Service personnel

competencies and professionalism.

15

REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA ATTORNEY SERVICE CHART OF ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

RI Attorney General

Deputy Attorney General

Expert Advisors

Specialist Staff

Attorney General’s

Assistant

Junior Attorney

General

Intelligence

Junior Attorney General General

Crimes

Junior

Attorney General Special

Crimes

Junior Attorney General Civil

and

Administrative

Junior Attorney

Genral

Supervision

Head of the Education and

Training

Bureau

Junior Attorney

General

Development

Research and

Development Center

Legal Outreach

Center

Criminal Statistics and IT Data

Center

Provincial Prosecutor’s Offices

District Prosecutor’s Offices

16

H. BASRIEF ARIEF, SH. MA

Republic of Indonesia Attorney General

Personal Data

Name : BASRIEF ARIEF SH. MA

Place/Date of Birth : Tanjung Enim / January 23rd

, 1947.

Religion : Islam

Education Formal:

1. Civil Law, Andalas University, Padang

2. Master of Arts, Magistrate Program in Law, Padjajaran University, Bandung

In-Service:

1. Strategic Investigation Intelligence Training (1987)

2. General Crimes Training (1988)

3. SPADYA (1990)

4. Smuggling Crimes Training (1992)

5. SESPANAS (1995)

6. National Defense Institution (1999)

Career

SATYALENCANA KARYA SATYA XXX presented by the R.I President, 1998

Throughout his career in the Attorney Service the man born in 1947, Tanjung Enim, South Sumatra has

received numerous merits. Prior to his service in the Round Building, Basrief had served as Head of

Belawan District Attorney Office in North Sumatra, Head of Outreach Division at R.I Attorney General

Office, Head of Cibinong District Attorney Office in West Java, Head of Central Jakarta District Attorney

Office, and Assistant for General Crimes Section in Jakarta Provincial Attorney Office.

With his various technical and professional experiences in either of local or central Attorney Offices,

Basrief Arief is one of the prominent leaders in Attorney Service. The man is recognized for his honesty

and probity during his career in the corps that has upraised his name had been assigned as the Deputy of

Attorney General during the era of RI Attorney General Abdul Rahman Saleh. The Magistrate in Law

graduated from Padjajaran University whom obtained his Bachelor in Law from Andalas University had

once held the position of the Head of Corruption Investigation Committee established by the Coordinating

Minister of Political, Legal and Security Affairs.

He was appointed as RI Attorney General by President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono on Friday,

November 26th, 2010.

2.3. LEADERSHIP PROFILES

17

DR. DARMONO, SH. MM

R.I Deputy Attorney General

Personal Data

Name : Dr. DARMONO, SH. MM

Service No. : 19530605 197803 1 001

Registry No. : 6785330

Rank/Grade : Senior Attorney (IV/E).

Place/Date of Birth : Klaten, June 5th, 1953.

Religion : Islam.

Education Formal:

1. Bachelor of Art, Faculty of Law, Indonesia Islamic University, Jogjakarta, 1977

2. Master of Management, STIE IPWI Jakarta, 2001

3. Doctorate degree, Padjajaran University, Bandung, 2010

In-Service:

1. Prosecutorial Training (1981)

2. Smuggling Crimes Training (1988)

3. SEPADYA (1992)

4. Leadership II Training (1995)

5. SPAMEN (1997)

6. Strategic Investigation Intelligence Training (1998)

Career:

1. SATYALANCANA KARYA SATYA XXX presented by R.I President, 2010

2. Guest speaker for handling of criminal cases in numerous roundtables.

Darmono has long been known as one of the most consistent attorneys in the battle against corruption. At

the time of service as Head of the West Kalimantan Provincial Attorney Office from September 2005 to

September 2006, the 1997 graduate from Indonesian Islamic University Faculty of Law, Jogjakarta, set

the record of tackling 280% corruption cases from the original target.

Darmono commenced his career as the Head of the Operations Section of the District Prosecutor’s Office

in Raba, Bima, West Nusa Tenggara, from 1981 to 1989. In Jakarta, he successfully consolidated the

personnel of Jakarta Provincial Attorney Office through a process of internal reform.

As an addition to his service as Deputy Attorney General, Damono also assigned to the position of

Attorney General ad interim from 24 September 2010 by Presidential Decree No. 104/P-2010, until the

appointment of H. BASRIEF ARIEF, B.A, M.Law as Attorney General on 26 November 2010.

18

ISKAMTO

Junior Attorney General Development

Personal Data

Name : ISKAMTO, SH.

Place/Date of Birth : Jember, October 8th, 1953

Rank/Grade : Senior Attorney (IV/e)

Service No. : 195308101980031023

Registry No. : 680534

Religion : Islam

Position : Junior Attorney General Development

Education Formal:

Bachelor of Arts, Faculty of Law, Jember University, 1979

In-Service:

1. Prosecutorial Training (1985)

2. Smuggling Crimes Training (1990)

3. Civil Attorney Training (1992)

4. SPAMA (1995)

5. Leadership II Training (2001)

6. Leadership I Training (2009)

Career:

1. SATYALANCANA KARYA SATYA XXX presented by R.I President, 2010

2. Sidhakarya Adhyaksa 5th place, 1999, Head of Cilacap District Attorney Office, Central Java

3. Satya Lencana Karya Satya 20, 1999.

4. ADHYKARYA BHAKTI NUSA for Best Regional development Leadership Figure 2006, April 15th, 2006

Iskamto commenced his career in General Crimes Division, Denpasar District Attorney Office, Bali, on

October 15th, 1987. During his service, Iskamto had served at Denpasar District Attorney Office and

Jember District Attorney Office, North Sulawesi Provincial Attorney Office, and DKI Jakarta Provincial

Attorney Office. In 2009, he was assigned to the position of Junior Attorney General Intelligence prior to

his appointment as Junior Attorney General Development in 2010.

19

ADJAT SUDRADJAT, BA.,MM

Junior Attorney General Intelligence

Personal Data

Name : ADJAT SUDRADJAT, BA.,MM

Place/Date of Birth : Bandung, May 19th, 1955

Rank/Grade : Senior Attorney (IV/e)

Service No. : 19550519 198203 1 001

Registry No. : 6825534

Religion : Islam

Education Formal:

1. Bachelor of Arts, Faculty of Law, Padjajaran University, 1981.

2. Master of Management, STIE Jakarta, 2000.

In-Service:

1. Prosecutorial Training (1986)

2. Intelligence Basic Course (1993)

3. SPAMA (1996)

4. Strategic Investigation Intelligence Training (1997)

5. SPAMEN (2001)

6. National Defense Institution (2011)

Career:

1. SATYALANCANA KARYA SATYA XX presented by R.I President, 2007

In his service, Adjat Sudradjat had served in Supervision Division, before his assignment as Head of

South Sulawesi Provincial District Office in 2009, prior to his assignment as Secretary to Junior Attorney

General General Crimes, that was followed with his assignment to the position of Expert Staff Intelligence

Division. Adjat Sudradjat has been appointed as Junior Attorney General Intelligence on August 8th, 2012,

subsequent to his position as Expert Staff Intelligence Division.

20

MAHFUD MANNAN, SH. MH

Junior Attorney General General Crimes

Personal Data

Nama Lengkap : MAHFUD MANNAN, SH. MH.

Place/Date of Birth : Barru, October 15th, 1954

Rank/Grade : Senior Attorney (IV/d)

Service No. : 19541015197903 1 001

Registry No. : 6795444

Religion : Islam

Education Formal:

1. Bachelor of Arts, Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University, 1978.

2. Master of Arts, Magistrate Program in Law, Hasanuddin University, 2005.

In-Service:

1. Prosecutorial Training (1983).

2. Corruption Crimes Training ( 1989)

3. SEPADYA (1992).

4. Strategic Investigation Intelligence Training (1998).

5. SPAMEN (2000).

Career:

1. SATYALANCANA KARYA SATYA XXX presented by R.I President, 2009

2. Amanna Gappa Award from PERSAHI South Sulawesi, 2009

During his career Mahfud Mannan had served as Head of Kajari District Attorney Office, South

Kalimantan, Assistant Civil and Administrative Papua Provincial Attorney Office, Head of Samarinda

District Attorney Office, Assistant General Crimes East Kalimantan Provincial Attorney Office, Assistant

Supervision South Sulawesi Provincial Attorney Office, Assistant Intelligence South Sulawesi Provincial

Attorney Office, Deputy Inspector Supervision on Treasury Unit III under the Junior Attorney General

Supervision Attorney General Office, Deputy to Head of Central Sulawesi Provincial Attorney Office,

Deputy to Head of South Sumatera Provincial Attorney Office, Head of Papua Provincial Attorney Office,

Head of South Sulawesi Provincial Attorney Office, Head of Education And Training Bureau Attorney

General Office.

Mahfud Mannan was assigned to the position of Junior Attorney General General Crimes in 2012. His

main priority focused on the endeavour to strengthen attorney profesionalism in the performance of case

handling to reach the objective of effective duties performance that would address the constant demand

of justice for the public.

21

DJAMAN ANDHI NIRWANTO

Junior Attorney General Special Crimes

Personal Data

Name : D. ANDHI NIRWANTO, BA., MM

Place/Date of Birth : Kudus, January 8th, 1956

Rank/Grade : Jaksa Utama (IV/e)

Service No. : 195601081981031004

Registry No. : 6815612

Religion : Islam

Education Formal:

1. Bachelor of Arts, Faculty of Law, Tarumanegara University, 1980

2. Master of Management, Institute Of Business Law And Legal Management, Jakarta, 2000

In-Service

1. Prosecutorial Training (1988)

2. Basic Intelligence Training (1990)

3. Smuggling Crimes Training (1991)

4. Corruption Crimes Training (1992)

5. SEPADYA (1992)

6. Subversive Crimes Training (1993)

7. SPAMEN (1999)

8. Leadership I Training (2007)

Career

1. 1st Head of Indonesia Attorney Association

2. SATYALANCANA KARYA SATYA XXX presented by R.I President, 2011

D. Andhi Nirwanto commenced his career as District Attorney at Wonogiri District Attorney Office. He had

served at Palangkaraya District Attorney Office, Demak District Attorney Office, as the Assistant

Supervision at West Java Provincial Attorney Office, Deputy to Head of West Sumatera Provincial

Attorney Office, and South Kalimantan Provincial Attorney Office. He also once served as Head of DKI

Jakarta Provincial Attorney Office.

Andhi Nirwanto had also held the position of Secretary to the Junior Attorney General Special Crime.

These days, the attorney whose hobby is sport is serving the position as Junior Attorney General Special

Crime at RI Attorney General Office since April 11th, 2011.

For Andhi Nirwanto, equal treatment in law enforcement against corruption crimes is a noble duty that

must be performed, and that Attorney Service must be on the forefront to prevent and eradicate

corruption crimes in order to regain the public trust in the institution.

22

DR. ST. BURHANNUDDIN

Junior Attorney General Service Civil and Administrative

Personal Data

Name : DR. ST. BURHANUDDIN, SH. MM

Place/Date of Birth : Cirebon, July 17th, 1954

Rank/Grade : IV/d

Service No. : 195407171987031001

Registry No. : 687545

Religion : Islam

Education Formal:

1. Bachelor of Arts, Faculty of Criminal Law, Diponegoro University, Semarang, 1983

2. Master of Management, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, 2001

3. Doctorate degree, Satyagama, Jakarta, 2006

In-Service

1. Prosecutorial Training (1991)

2. Corruption Crimes Training (1992)

3. Strategic Investigation Intelligence Training (1993)

4. Smuggling Crimes Training (1994)

5. Admininstrative Law Training (1995)

6. Intellectual Right Training (1996)

7. SPAMA (1996)

8. SPAMEN (2003)

9. Leadership II Training (2003)

10. Leadership I Training (2008)

Career

SATYALANCANA KARYA SATYA XX presented by R.I President, 2007

Burhannudin commenced his career by participating in Attorney Training in 1991. In his career, he had

served as Director of Execution and Examination under the Junior Attorney General Special Crimes,

Head of North Maluku Utara Provincial Attorney Service, Inspector V under Junior Attorney General

Supervision, Head of South Sulawesi Provincial Attorney Service. Burhannudin was assigned as Junior

Attorney General Service Civil and Administrative since April 11th, 2011.

23

Prof. Dr. MARWAN EFFENDY

Junior Attorney General Supervision

Personal Data

Name : Prof. DR.MARWAN EFFENDY, SH. MM

Place/Date of Birth : Lubuk Linggau, August 13th, 1953

Rank/Grade : Senior Attorney (IV/e)

Service No. : 195308131980031003

Registry No. : 6805364

Religion : Islam

Education Formal:

1. Graduated from Faculty of Law, Sultan Agung Islamic University, 1977

2. Completion of national level Bachelor of Arts, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University, Semarang, 1980

3. Master of Management, Lampung University, Bandar Lampung, 2000

4. Doctorate degree, Padjajaran University, Bandung, 2004

In-Service

1. Basic Intelligence Training (1981)

2. Interrogation Technique Training (1983)

3. Law Coaching Course (1983)

4. Attorney Training (1985)

5. Special Crimes Training (1989)

6. Environmental Law Course (1992)

7. SPAMA (1995)

8. Strategic Investigation Intelligence Training (1997)

9. SPAMEN (1999)

Career

SATYALANCANA KARYA SATYA XXX presented by R.I President, 2010

Marwan Effendy commenced his career by participating in Attorney Training in 1985. During his service

Marwan Effendy has served as Head of Liwa District Attorney Office (1996), Assistant Special Crimes

Lampung Provincial Attorney Office (1999), Head of Bandung District Attorney Office (2000), Assistant

General Crimes DKI Jakarta Provincial Attorney Office (2002), Assistant Special Crimes DKI Jakarta

Provincial Attorney Office (2002), General Assistant to R.I Attorney General (2004), Deputy to Head East

Java Provincial Attorney Office, Director of Prosecution Section under Junior Attorney General Special

Crimes Attorney General Office, Head of East Java Provincial Attorney Office and Head of Education And

Training Bureau Attorney General Office. Marwan Effendi was assigned as Attorney General Supervision

on Thursday, May 27th, 2010, subsequent to his position as Junior Attorney General Special Crimes.

24

BAMBANG WALUYO

Head of Education And Training Bureau

Personal Data

Name : BAMBANG WALUYO, BA.,MA

Place/Date of Birth : Magetan, July 12th, 1958

Rank/Grade : Senior Attorney (IV/d)

Service No. : 19580712 198303 1 001

Registry No. : 6835810

Religion : Islam

Education Formal:

1. Bachelor of Arts, Indonesia Islamic University, Jogjakarta, 1982

2. Master of Arts, Magistrate Program in Law, Institute of Business Law and Legal Management, Jakarta,

2002

In-Service

1. Law Research (1983)

2. Prosecutorial Training (1989)

3. Workload Analysis (1990)

4. Smuggling Crimes Training (1991)

5. SPADA (1994)

6. SPAMEN (1997)

7. Leadership II Training (2011)

Career

SATYALANCANA KARYA SATYA XX presented by R.I President, 2003

Bambang Waluyo commenced his career by participating in Attorney Training in 1989. During his service

Bambang Waluyo had served as Head of Central Education and Training (2004), Head of Human

Resources Bureau (2005), Head of Gorontalo District Attorney Office (2009), Head of Central Research

and Development (2010), Head of Central Java Provincial Attorney Office (2011), then as Head of

Education And Training Bureau R.I Attorney Service in 2012.

25

CHAPTER III

BUREAUCRATIC REFORMATION

R.I Attorney Service commenced

its bureaucratic reform program in 2008.

In 2009, the Service submitted its report

on the implementation of phase I of the

program to the Minister of Administrative

Affairs and Bureaucratic Reform, who

assigned an independent committee to

evaluate the report. The said committee

reported at the end of 2009 that the

reform program was being successfully

implemented by the Attorney Service.

As a result, the Minister granted the

approval process to award incentives to

Attorney Service personnel. The

approval and disbursement process of

the incentive took quite a long time

(approximately two years). The Attorney

Service decided to move forward with

the reform program without waiting for

the process to be completed.

In 2010, Ministry of Administrative

Affairs and Bureaucratic Reform issued

a new bureaucratic reform

implementation guideline for all

ministries and/or institutions. Attorney

Service adjusted its bureaucratic reform

implementation with the new guideline.

Based on the Grand Design and Road

Map for Bureaucratic Reform 2010 -

2014 (Presidential Regulation No.

81/2010 and Minister of Administrative

Affairs and Bureaucratic Reform

Regulation No. 20/ 2010, every

ministries and/or institutions have to

implement the reform in 8 areas, of :

1 Reform Area I : Reform Management

2 Reform Area II : Internal Regulation

Management

3 Reform Area III : Organizational

Management

4 Reform Area IV : Operational Procedure

5 Reform Area V : Human Resources

Management

6 Reform Area VI : Supervision

Development

7 Reform Area VII : Performance

Management

8 Reform Area VIII : Public Service

Development

9 Reform Area VIII : Monitoring and

Evaluation

To further define the 8 Reform

Areas, every ministries and/or

institutions have to implement almost 40

programs to accomplish 23 performance

indicators.

Until 2012 Bureaucratic Reform

Program implementation in R.I Attorney

Office has accomplished:

REFORM AREA I (Reform

Management):

Implemented programs were:

a) Improvent on commitments in doing

reform and behavoural change:

Envisioning Workshop has been

conducted for Attorney Service

leaders, all Echelon I Officials (13

persons), all Echelon II (comprises

of Echelon II Officials in Attorney

General Office, all Head and Deputy

to Head of Provincial Attorney

Offices total 21.722 persons).

Comment [DN1]: 8 areas or 9 areas?

26

b) Improvement on participation in

reform through formation of R.I

Attorney Service Bureaucratic

Reform Team led by Deputy to

Attorney General with members

comprised of every Head of Units

(Junior Attorney General and Head

of Bureau). Several Technical

Teams existed at technical level of

Attorney Service Bureaucratic

Reform Program implementation of

certain programs to ensure

apropriate operations with Attorney

Service Bureaucratic Reform

Program Implementation Planning

that were assisted by Attorney

Service Bureaucratic Reform

Assistance Team and a number of

relavant expert consultant. All

impementations of Attorney Service

Bureaucratic Reform Program were

done in coordination of Attorney

Service Bureaucratic Reform Team,

which involves other components

derived from the Attorney Service

members and external parties.

c) Formulation of Reform Management

Strategy related to Personnel Code

of Conduct, through revisions of

2007 Attorney Code of Conduct with

proper adjustment to international

standard. As an addition, Attorney

Service also has Civil Servant

Regulation Technical Guideline.

Programs in Reform Area I to be

implemented, i.e.: formulation of reform

management strategy and reform

management communication strategy,

drafting of reform management planning

document, drafting of risk analysis to

reduce resistance to reform

implementation and development of

Attorney Service personnel contentment

on Bureaucratic Reform Program, etc..

REFORM AREA II (Internal

Regulation-Deregulation

Management)

Implemented programs:

a) Creation of database for online

Attorney Service Regulation that will

enable all personnel to access new

regulations from computer at any

location.

b) Study on Attorney Service internal

regulations and deregulations

synchronization (e.g.: Operational

and Procedural, Education, Junior

Attorney General Letter of

Assignment, etc.), to observe the

possible existence of traversely

and/or inversely regulations.

Programs to be implemented are

drafting of Attorney Service internal

regulation process to create

synchronized links between work unit

responsible in initiation of new internal

regulations and Law Bureau.

REFORM AREA III (Organizational

Management)

1. To gain clear understanding on

duties and functions of each work

unit, in 2011 Attorney Service has

made new regulation on Attorney

Service organization (Attorney

27

Service Regulation No. 09/2011 on

Attorney Service Organization and

Management). Attorney Service has

conducted Workload Analysis that

enable the calculation of number of

attorney required at each Attorney

Office and/or work units in

Indonesia.

2. To condct right sizing of

organization, Attorney Service has

obtained study result on right sizing,

which implementation management

was based on new Attorney Service

Regulation on Attorney Service

Organizational Work Force that

enabled cancellation of 3.000

position.

3. To develop effective human

resources unit, Attorney Service has

conducted training for personnel

from Human Resources Bureaus

and those served under Junior

Attorney General Development, with

coaching from experts in human

resources to Attorney Service

personnel.

Programs to be implemented in

Organizational Management are

development of effective human

resources units, education and training,

and outreach.

REFORM AREA IV (Operational

Procedure)

Implemented programs are:

a) Improvement on Attorney Service

Information Technology (IT) system-

based procedure: creation of

Attorney Service database system

on case handling procedure of

general crimes, special crimes, civil

and administrative, and others such

as handling of public complaint, etc..

Until November 2012, accomplished

case handling procedure data entry

has reached:

a. General Crimes Cases Data:

111.876

b. Special Crimes Cases Data:

3.459

c. Civil and Administrative Cases

Data: 7.603

d. Handling of Public Complaint

Data: 3.808

e. Employment Data: 21.000 (with

continual improvement in data

quality)

b) Revisional drafting of effectual

Attorney Service SOPs for General

Crimes, Special Crimes, Civil and

Administrative, and Supervision

units. Current tasks of SOP formats

revisions were made for apropriate

adjustments to the new guidelines

on formulation of SOP as stipulated

in the Minister of Administrative

Affairs and Bureaucratic Reform

Regulation No. 21/2008 on

Guidelines for Formulation of State

Administrative SOP that has been

succeeded by Minister of

Administrative Affairs and

Bureaucratic Reform Regulation No.

35/2012 on Guidelines for

Formulation of State Administrative

SOP.

c) Management of work force key

performance indicators (KPI)

28

through creation of IT system based

Attorney Service work force KPI.

Programs to be implemented are:

drafting of KPI for attorneys and non-

prosecutorial functioned attorneys, and

other official positions to apropriately

adjust SOP with Minister of

Administrative Affairs and Bureaucratic

Reform Regulation No. 35/2012 on

Guidelines for Formulation of State

Administrative SOP.

REFORM AREA V (Human Resources

Management)

Implemented programs are:

a) Adjustment of Attorney Service

Human Resources Management

with effectual Employment policy

through implementation of Attorney

Service Workload Analysis and

establishment of grading system for

7.800 positions existed under

Attorney Service. The analysis

become the rationale for approval of

escalation in remuneration for

Attorney Service personnel that has

been put in effect since 2011.

b) Transparent and objective

promotions and mutations of

Attorney Service personnel through

implementation of Competence

Assessment that has been

accomplished for every officials in

Echelon II (120 persons) and

Echelon III (700 persons), and

partially accomplished for officials in

Echelon IV (600 persons). To

ensure objectiveness, the

assessment was thoroughly

conducted by an independent third

party. The result of the Competence

Assessment has been employed as

one of the logics for Attorney

Service leaders to determine

promotions and mutations of

attorneys.

Program to be implemented in Human

Resources Management is: transparent

and objective recruitment of civil servant

(this is due to current application of

moratorium issued by Minister of

Administrative Affairs and Bureaucratic

Reform on New Civil Servant

Recreuitment).

REFORM AREA VI (Supervision

Development)

Implemented programs for Supervision

are:

a) Application of State Internal

Supervision System (SPIP), which

in essential was a revision of Close

Observation System. Attorney

Service, particularly in Supervision

unit, has formed SPIP Task Force

Unit and trained the members using

the standard modules issued by

Finance and Development

Supervision Agency (BPKP). SPIP

Task Force Unit will conduct

Diagnostic Assessment for Attorney

Service supervisory systems to

differentiate the effectual and

ineffectual operations to determine

requirements for further

development, before the Task Force

Unit drafting a number of technical

guidelines to create SPIP logical

grounds and application.

29

b) Anti Corruption programs conducted

by Attorney Service based on

Presidential Order No. 09/2011 and

No. 17/2012. Attorney Service also

becomes motivator in formulation for

Statement of Mutual Agreement

(SKB) on “whistle blower” between

Head of Police Force and Attorney

General.

c) Implementation of E-Procurement

System (LPSE) through formation of

Procurement Service Unit at each of

Provincial Attorney Office. Trainings

for representatives of Attorney

Service personnel to obtain

understanding on the application of

LPSE operation in obligatory

manners for every Attorney Offices

effective in January 2013 will be

conducted in near future.

REFORM AREA VII (Performance

Management)

Implemented programs are:

a) Improvement on Attorney Service

performance management through

creation of database for IT based

case handling management and

formulation of indictment channel in

Attorney Service website.

b) Extensive public access to

performance information through

website improvement to enable

public in accessing the information

on case handling in Attorney

Service, and to provide public

compaint channel to enable any

online submission.

REFORM AREA VIII (Public Service

Development)

Implemented programs: Formulation of

standardized Attorney Service Public

Service Regulations (SPP).

Programs to be implemented are:

socialization of SPP, its application for

every work force and for its application

in collaboratory manners with other

insitutions.

REFORM AREA VIII (Monitoring and

Evaluation)

Designing of model and mechanism for

the application of monitoring and

evaluation for proper implementation of

Bureaucratic Reform Program in accord

to Bureaucratic Reform Self

Assessment guideline as stipulated in

the Minister of Administrative Affairs and

Bureaucratic Reform Regulation No.

31/2012 on Guideline for Bureaucratic

Reform Self Assessment.

ATTORNEY SERVICE

BUREAUCRATIC REFORM

IMPLEMENTATION

At the launching of Bureaucratic

Program, Attorney Service has been

conducting the implementation through

employment of its Bureaucratic Reform

Teams for the operation and application

of certain programs that was

simultaneously formed at the program

planning phase. With suffice

participatory level Attorney Service has

accomplished almost every obligatory

programs in accord to Minister of

Administrative Affairs and Bureaucratic

Reform Regulation.

30

To accelerate its Bureacratic Reform, R.I Attorney Service will applying a number of

strategic program priorities as a part of its strategy in organizational strengthen, as

would be depicted in the below institutional strategic map:

R.I ATTORNEY SERVICE

INSTITUTIONAL STRATEGIC MAP

31

CHAPTER IV

PERFORMANCE ACHIEVEMENT

4.1 DEVELOPMENT

To optimalize the functions of

Development unit in supporting

performance of other units,

particularly in law enforcement and

development, in 2012 R.I Attorney

Service has determined the focus of

straightening the development unit

that encompassed Human

Resources professionalism

development, proper financial

management, management of R.I

Attorney Service organizational

structre and procedures in

accordance to the workload

analysis on each position and its

effective and efficient work load,

optimalization of law collaboration

particularly in MLA, and adequate

provisions of proper facilities and

infrastructures.

Empirically, in 2012 Attorney

Service has done a series of

activities in:

1. Law Development and

Establishment

a. R.I. House of Representatives

has currently become the

initiator to amend Legislation

No. 16/2004 on R.I Attorney

Service. To assist the House of

Representatives in

strengthening Attorney Service

office structure, prime duties,

and functions, Attorney Service

has formulated comparative

draft of Law for amendment of

Legislation No. 16/2004 on R.I

Attorney Service at the House

of Representatives.

b. Focus Group Discussions

(FGDs) to examine Draft of

Law on Corruption Crimes

Eradication and the law on

corruption crimes prevention

and eradication have been

conducted in Bengkulu, West

Nusa Tenggara, West

Kalimantan, Jogjakarta, and

East Kalimantan.

c. FGDs to examine Draft of

Amendment to Legislation No.

16/2004 on R.I Attorney

Service have been conducted

in Serang, Banten, and

Puncak, Bogor.

d. On behalf of the Government

of Republic of Indonesia, for

the second time, R.I Attorney

General has signed the MoU

for collaboration in law with

Malaysian government.

e. R.I Attorney Service has

signed mutual agreement on

criminal issues between the

Government of Indonesia with

government of Hong Kong that

has been ratified in Legislation

No. 3/2012.

f. Formulation of Government

Regulation Compilation Team

on Utilization of Revenue from

R.I Attorney Service Non-Tax

State Revenue to compile draft

of Design for Government

Regulation related to the

32

natures and levies of R.I

Attorney Service Non-Tax

State Revenue. The

compilation was conducted as

appropriate to R.I Attorney

General Order No.: B-

102/C/Cu.2/04/2012 dated

February 6th, 2012 on

Government Regulation

Compilation Team on Natures

and Levies in R.I Attorney

Service Non-Tax State

Revenue as applied in R.I

Attorney Service.

2. Human Resources Arrangement

a. Recruitment

The success and failure of

Attorney Service core business

duties performances as

mandated in Legislation No.

16/2004 are significantly

influenced by the R.I Attorney

Service Human Resources

structure, composition, and

quality. Considering its

significance, R.I Attorney

Service included Human

Resources Arrangement in its

scale of priorities within

bureaucratic reform program.

One of the efforts is conducting

transparent recruitment of

human resources that involves

third party.

In spite of it, until 2012 R.I

Attorney Service has not

opened any recruitment for

candidate civil servant in

regards to the policy on

candidate civil servant

recruitment moratorium in R.I

Attorney Service.

In 2012, Career Hierarchy

Subsection conducted a

number of below activities of

selections for human

resources development:

1. Selection of candidate

participants in the Attorney

Training 2012 that

generated 140 participants

for the Attorney Education,

Training, and Instructorial

program.

2. Selection of candidate

participants Leadership

Trainings Levels II, III and IV

2012 Leadeship II Training

participated by 60 persons,

Leadership III Trainings

participated by 30 persons

and Leadership IV Training

participated by 120 persons.

b. Profile Assessment

Profile Assessment to 980

Echelon IV officials of:

1. 172 officials from East Java

Centre in Surabaya,

October 8th – 16th, 2012.

2. 94 officials from South

Sumatera Centre in

Palembang, October 22nd –

25th, 2012.

3. 95 officials from South

Sulawesi Centre in

Makassar, October 29th -

November 1st, 2012.

4. 135 officials from North

Sumatera in Medan,

November 5th – 12th, 2012.

33

5. 484 officials from DKI

Jakarta Centre in Jakarta,

November 12th – 30th, 2012.

3. Organizational Structure and

Procedure Management

In 2012, the Attorney Service has

proposed Secretary of Cabinet to

establish six District Attorney

Offices of: Bungku District

Attorney Office under the Central

Sulawesi Provincial Attorney

Office, Pengururan District

Attorney Office under the North

Sumatera Provincial Attorney

Office, Hunipopu Mainland

District Attorney Office under the

Maluku Provincial Attorney Office,

Kwandang District Attorney Office

under the Gorontalo Provincial

Attorney Office, Gunung Tua

District Attorney Office under the

North Sumatera Provincial

Attorney Office, and South

Morotai District Attorney Office

under the North Maluku

Provincial Attorney Office.

4. Proper Financial Management

Development

a. Budget Disbursement

2012 R.I Attorney Office

Budget Allocation Requisitions

(DIPA) valued at IDR

3.791.086.509.000 (three

trillion seven hundred ninety

one billion and eighty six

million five hundred nine

thousand rupiah), with actual

realization from the overall R.I

Attorney Office work force

dated December 17th, 2012 of

IDR 3.526.055.872.629 (three

trillion five hundred twenty six

billion and fifty five million eight

hundred seventy two thousand

two hundred twenty nine

rupiah) or equivalent to

93,01%.

b. R.I Attorney Service has

improved its financial audit

result in the Audit Board

Report from Qualified Opinion

into Unqualified Opinion With

Clarifying Paragraph.

c. Non-Tax State Revenue

(PNBP)

R.I Attorney Service 2012

PNBP target imposed by

Ministry of Finance valued at

IDR 120.873.000.000 (one

hundred twenty billion eight

hundred seventy three million

rupiah) with actual realization

in December 2012 of IDR

667.134.217.140 (six hundred

sixty seven billion one hundred

thirty four million and two

hundred seventeen thousand

one hundred forty rupiah) or

equivalent to 551,93% from

target imposed.

R.I Attorney employee structure

showed even spread of human

resources, in both geographical and

rank/grade terms. Grade III attorneys

amounted to 6.455 persons, grade IV

attorneys amounted to 2.230 persons. In

administration, highest percentage

existed for grade III staff of 7.048

34

persons and grade II staff of 5.898 persons.

35

Table 1 R.I Attorney Offices List of Attorney and Administration Personnel in Indonesia

UNIT/REGION

ATTORNEY ADMINISTRATION TOTAL

COMMENT SEX SEX PERSONNEL

Grade -3 Grade - 4 TOTAL

Grade - 1 Grade - 2 Grade - 3 Grade - 4 TOTAL

ATTORNEY & M F M F M F M F M F M F ADMINISTRATION

ACEH 166 31 37 7 241 0 2 156 61 189 57 0 0 465 706

SUMATERA UTARA 280 160 73 31 544 0 9 206 102 249 129 0 0 695 1239 SUMATRA BARAT 127 79 43 8 257 0 4 118 98 119 124 1 0 464 721

RIAU 131 57 42 9 239 0 0 94 57 101 72 0 0 324 563 JAMBI 101 42 32 4 179 0 0 101 34 98 56 0 0 289 468

SUMATERA SELATAN 174 98 41 6 319 0 0 153 94 162 78 0 0 487 806 BENGKULU 80 35 23 4 142 0 0 68 38 65 38 0 0 209 351 LAMPUNG 140 91 41 10 282 0 5 137 64 112 71 0 0 389 671

D.K.I JAKARTA 125 69 39 25 258 0 3 137 57 179 89 0 1 466 724 JAWA BARAT 324 209 97 34 664 1 5 325 104 367 160 1 1 964 1628

JAWA TENGAH 302 164 80 38 584 0 2 317 125 370 238 1 0 1053 1637

D.I YOGYAKARTA 65 74 53 31 223 0 0 147 52 144 82 0 0 425 648 JAWA TIMUR 355 193 134 52 734 0 2 290 107 349 199 2 1 950 1684

KALIMANTAN BARAT 119 40 37 4 200 0 1 65 37 86 53 0 0 242 442 KALIMANTAN TENGAH 125 32 37 2 196 0 0 90 31 73 38 0 0 232 428

KALIMANTAN SELATAN 149 47 29 5 230 0 0 93 44 96 56 0 0 289 519 KALIMANTAN TIMUR 141 46 35 4 226 0 1 70 43 78 32 0 0 224 450

SULAWESI UTARA 74 41 23 4 142 0 0 64 53 84 41 0 0 242 384

SULAWESI TENGAH 91 19 19 2 131 0 1 64 22 79 50 0 0 216 347 SULAWESI TENGGARA 65 19 18 1 103 0 1 83 31 70 40 0 0 225 328

SULAWESI SELATAN 219 126 50 17 412 0 0 135 62 214 138 2 0 551 963 BALI 114 69 45 17 245 0 0 89 44 102 68 0 0 303 548

NUSA TENGGARA BARAT 67 37 25 2 131 0 0 78 38 87 44 0 0 247 378 NUSA TENGGARA TIMUR 133 15 29 1 178 0 5 117 74 110 43 0 0 349 527

MALUKU 68 25 16 1 110 0 1 81 46 59 47 0 0 234 344

PAPUA 85 25 19 1 130 0 5 92 48 98 56 0 0 299 429 MALUKU UTARA 61 4 16 1 82 0 0 58 34 27 18 0 0 137 219

BANTEN 99 54 36 9 198 0 1 82 35 90 56 0 0 264 462 KEPULAUAN BANGKA

BELITUNG 75 20 20 3 118 0 0 69 42 39 30 0 0 180 298

GORONTALO 50 12 13 3 78 0 0 48 39 43 27 1 0 158 236

KEPULAUAN RIAU 89 7 21 2 119 0 0 42 16 59 23 0 0 140 259 ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE 171 123 483 142 919 1 8 372 125 494 302 14 8 1324 2243

ON DEPLOYMENT SERVICE 17 10 39 5 71 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 72

TOTAL 4382 2073 1745 485 8685 2 56 4041 1857 4493 2555 22 11 13037 21722

36

4.2 INTELLIGENCE

In accordance to Legislation

No. 16/2004 on R.I Attorney Service

and other form of regulations of

Presidential Order and R.I Attorney

General Order related to R.I

Attorney Service Organizational and

Procedures, Intelligence Division

has important part in safeguarding

stabilization and public order, and to

support Attorney Service duties and

functions performances in handling

of cases, particularly in general

crimes, special crimes, and civil and

administrative. The Intelligence

Division has been strengthened by

the enactment of Legislation No.

17/2011 on State Intelligence Law,

which positions R.I Attorney Service

Intelligence Division as part of the

State Intelligence Apparatus that

organized intelligence functions in

law enforcement.

R.I Attornes Service

Intelligence Division led by Junior

Attorney General Intelligence

assisted by one Secretary to Junior

Attorney General Intelligence dan

three Directorates for Technical

Issues, Coordinator, and Taskforce

Unit, and each regional Head of

Intelligence Work Force (Heads of

Provincial, District, and Branch

Attorney Offices). Technical issues

in law enforcement managed by R.I

Attorney Service Intelligence

Division encompassed:

1. Safeguarding and recovery of

state assets and economy, and

supporting the performance of

General Crimes Division.

2. Prevention, supervision of mass

media, printed materials,

foreigners, supervision of

religious and beliefs movements

that included sects, cultural

beliefs, religious and cultural

mysticisms, occultism, traditional

metaphysic healing, clairvoyance,

acupuncture, traditional healing

practice, metaphysic, and other

relevant subject that could

endanger public and state,

prevention of abuse and/or

denigration of religion, ideology,

politic, social, culture, defense

and security, state unity, violation

on human rights, pursuit and

arrest of fugitive, supporting

performances of Development

and Supervision Divisions, and

other duties as assigned by

Junior Attorney General

Intelligence.

3. Cryptology, administration and

products of Intelligence Division.

On Presidential Order No.

17/2011 on 2012 Prevention and

Eradication Acts Against Corruption,

Intelligence Division reports to

Presidential Work Unit Supervision

and Controlling Development

Division.

Intelligence Performance achieved

in 2012:

a. Established 31 teams for the

Supervision/Performance

37

Evaluation and Socialization of

R.I Attorney General Regulation

No.: PER-037/A/JA/09/2011

dated September 23rd, 2011 on

R.I Attorney Service Intelligence

SOP and reporting deliverables of

activities.

b. Accomplishment of intelligence

activities in economy, finance,

and development sectors by

Directorate of Economic and

Financial Security and Crime

Prevention (Directorate I) under

the authority of the Junior

Attorney General Intelligence,

with 2012 performance

achievement of 79 activity reports

(LHK), remaining of 21 activity

reports with following details: (a)

completion of duty orders for 43

cases in the period of 2012 (19

cases statuses raised to

investigation stage, 23 cases

halted, and 1 case forwarded to

other agency), remaining 1 case;

and (b) completion of 18 cases in

Judicial Intelligence Operations

during the period of 2012 (7

cases statuses raised to list of

examination stage, 11 cases

halted and 0 case was forwarded

to other agency), remaining 7

cases.

c. Performed assets tracking on 57

suspects in corruption crimes

investigated by R.I Attorney

Service Special Crimes Division.

d. Performed security actions during

37 trials of corruption and general

crimes, pre-trial courts, and trials

in Court of Constitution.

e. Performed congregational

activities for three following main

issues of:

Government policy planning for

energy and confined usage of

premium type fossil fuel;

Supporting information for

government policy in law

enforcement. (Fit and proper

test of materials implicated in

Legislation No. 17/2011 on

State Intelligence);

Selection process for

Commissioner of Finance

Service Authority.

f. Intelligence Division Judicial

Intelligence Operations in 2012 to

examine allegation of corruption

that succeeded in revealing 441

corruption indicated cases, to be

handed to the central and

regional Special Crimes Division

for investigation.

g. Implementation of intelligence

activities in the sectors of

ideology, social, politic, defense,

security and public order by

Directorate of Politic, Socio

Cultural, and Organizational

Resources (Directorate II) under

Junior Attorney General

Intelligence with 2012

achievements of 53 activity

38

reports (remaining of 47 activity

reports).

h. Coordination with Directorate

General of Immigration for travel

bans imposed on fugitive convicts

evading the serving of legal

decision of physical punishment

to determine the geographical

existence - national or

international - of the said

convicts.

i. 42 activity reports generated in

2012 from cryptology and

intelligence products activities

done by Directorate of Cryptology

and Intelligence Product

(Directorate III) under Junior

Attorney General Intelligence,

added with 10 activity reports in

2012 by Monitoring Centre Unit

Directorate of Cryptology and

Intelligence Product (Directorate

III) under Junior Attorney General

Intelligence, summed up the total

52 activity reports generated by

Directorate III.

j. Vigilance on 50 suspects,

accused, and convicts in general

crimes and corruption crimes

cases with details of:

a. Vigilance on 11 suspects.

b. Vigilance on 1 accused.

c. Vigilance on 38 convicts.

k. 775 legal outreach activities in

2012 reaching total audience of

66.065 persons conducted by

Attorney Service personnel in

Indonesia to manifest legal

awareness in public as preventive

acts against corruption crimes

done by all personnel of

Provincial Attorney Offices and

District Attorney Offices

personnel in Indonesia, with

following details:

Table 2

Recapitulation of Legal Outreach

Activities 2012

No Activities Frequency Audience

1 Legal Outreach

398 times 30.067 persons

2 Legal Information

377 times 35.998 persons

l. Since its initiation in July 2011 to

December 2012, R.I Attorney

General Intelligence Division

Monitoring Centre unit has

conducted vigilance of 58

suspects and convicts in Wanted

List generated from the requests

from Special and General Crimes

Divisions, with following details:

Table 3 Recapitulation Number of Wanted List Detained by Intelligence Taskforce in

2012

Year Case Type

Investigation Phase

Execution Phase

2012

Corruption cases convicts General cases convicts

13

--

38 persons

12 persons

Total 13 persons 50 persons

39

Junior Attorney General

Intelligence 2012 Priority Program

focused to the program of

“Attorney Service Intelligence

Division Functions Development“

built on 5 pillars of:

a. Intelligence Operational

Reinforcement through :

Implementation phase of

effective, efficient, and

functional organizational

restructurization.

Socialization of Attorney

Service Intelligence SOPs.

Development in coordination

and function of Attorney

Service intelligence division

within intelligence

community.

b. Improvement of Intelligence

performance through:

Optimalization of

intelligence products

through employment of

investigative, vigilance, and

congregative functions in

intelligence activities and

operations.

Development of

supervision, monitoring and

evaluation activities at

regional Attorney Offices.

Optimalization of Attorney

Service intelligence

functions to support

achievements of duties and

powers and other divisional

functions within R.I Attorney

Service through facilitatation

of intelligence support

concrete pattern formulation

in 2012.

Completion, organization,

and annulment of decisions

for preventive measures

(CEKAL).

Optimalization of

intelligence activities and

operations for the

supervision of religious

sphere, printed materials,

foreigners, and mass media.

c. Public legal awareness

program through qualitative

and quantitative improvement

in Public Legal Obedience,

legal outreach and

socialization activities that

required assessment to obtain

program outcomes.

d. Human Resources

Development through:

Courses, seminar, training,

workshop;

Reward and Punishment

system, and proper

placement.

e. Improvement in intelligence

support through budget

increase for intelligence

equipment and other others

devices that required

assessment on budget

propriety standard to

sufficiently supporting

intelligence activities and

operations and the minimum

40

standard of requirements at

Attorney General Office,

Provincial Attorney Office,

District Attorney Office, and

Branch Attorney Office levels.

The Junior Attorney General

Intelligence prepared 2012 work

plan to improve quality of

performance, qualitative and

quantitative accountability of

investigation, security, and

congregation results. The following

graph and table show the extent of

actualization of Junior Attorney

General Intelligence 2012 workplan:

Graphic 1

Intelligence Division Target and Achievement: Activities

Graphic 2

Intelligence Division Target and Achievement: Activity Reports

41

Table 4 Intelligence Division Achievement in 2012

No Person in Charge Activity Target Achievement %

1 Secretary to Junior Attorney General Intelligence

Other technical management support from the Junior Attorney General Intelligence

12 months service

Conducted intelligence evaluation and supervision at 30 Provincial District Offices from 31 Provincial District Offices

83%

2 Head of Legal Outreach Division

Legal Outreach 502 institutions

Conducted 775 activities with total audience of 66.065 persons

150%

No Person in Charge Activity Target Achievement %

1 Directorate I (Economic and Financial Law)

Conducted Activities in Economic and Financial Law

100 LHK 79 LHK 79%

2 Directorate II (Social & Political Affairs)

Conducted Activities in Social and Politic Affairs

100 LHK 53 LHK 53%

3 Directorate III (Production of Intellegence Facilities)

Conducted Activities in Production of Intelligence Facilities

50 LHK 52 LHK 104%

4 Head of Provincial Attorney Offices, Head of District Attorney Offices and Branch Attorney Offices in Indonesia

Conducted Activities in Investigation/ Vigilance/ Congregation of Intelligence Cases

1156 LHK. 2386 LHK 206%

Average Achievement 182%

42

Table 5 Recapitulation of Attorney General Decisions on Overseas Travel Bans in 2012

No Requestor Number of

Overseas Travel Ban Issued

Number of Overseas Travel Ban Extension

Number of Overseas Travel

Ban Revoked

Number of Overseas Travel

Ban Expired

1 R.I Attorney Office Special Crimes

43 16 1 -

2 Head of Provincial Attorney Offices

111 39 7 25

3 Police Force 19 3 3 3

4 Others 16 2 - 22

Total 189 60 11 50

4.3 GENERAL CRIMES CASES

In performing duties and

functions, the government has

determined scales of priorities and

non-priorities for a number of

activities. Several activities within

the scale of priority were corruption

eradication and bureaucratic reform

program. The handling of general

crimes did not belong to the

activities within the scale of priority

for either budget allocation and

implementation. Nevertheless,

considering its nature to provide

sense of justice as demanded by

the justice enquiring public,

therefore the handling of general

crimes cases has significant

importances to achieve Attorney

Service mission in recovering public

trust.

On the said rationale, the

Attorney Service in handling of

general crimes cases fastened itself

to professionalism principles derived

from obedience to every in-effect

stipulations in legal regulations and

put its conscience forward to comply

with the sense of justice.

Optimalization for general crimes

has been done through: (1) a faster,

more effective, more efficient, and

more controlled case disposal in a

professional and proportional

manner, (2) ensuring even number

of cases disposed to number of

investigation result of insubstantial

cases received, (3) application of

guidelines (criteria) for general

crimes prosecutions for criminal

charges to maximize public sense of

justice, (4) delegation of power for

important cases prosecution plan,

(5) minimize backwards and

forwards sending of cases, and

backlogs of case investigation

commencement warrants (SPDP)

and investigation result completion

confirmations (P-21).

43

Case Management Performance

- General Crimes achievements in

general crimes case disposal at

every Provincial Attorney Offices

in Indonesia throughout 2012 will

be shown in the following table:

Table 6

Recapitulation of Case Investigation Commencement Warrants (SPDP)

No Description No. of SPDP

1 Outstanding Case period 2011 32.557 SPDP

2 Incoming Case period January - December 2012 114.278 SPDP

T o t a l 146.855 SPDP

3 Disposal

Discontinued by Investigator 803 SPDP

Forwarded to Stage I 108.731 SPDP

T o t a l 109.168 SPDP

Table 7

Recapitulation of Case Forwarded to Stage 1

No Description No. of File

1 Outstanding Case period 2011 34.319 Files

2 Forwarded Case period January - December 2012 112.657 Files

T o t a l 146.976 Files

Disposal

3 Finalized 88.685 Files

4 Returned to Investigator (P.18/P.19) 22.986 Files

Completed 13.217 Files

Incompleted 2.710 Files

Retained from Public Attorney 12.535 Files

T o t a l 140.140 Files

Table 8

Recapitulation of Prosecution Stages Activities (APB/APS)

General Crime Cases

No Description No. of Case

1 Outstanding Case period 2011 4.123 Cases

2 Forwarded Cases period January - December 2012 111.545 Cases

T o t a l 115.618 Cases

Finalized

3 Forwarded to other institutions 1.665 Cases

Process Cancelled by law 2 Cases

Forwarded to District Court with APN 108.177 Cases

Forwarded to District Court with APS 3.424 Cases

T o t a l 113.268 Cases

Comment [DN2]: APB?

44

133 convicts were sentenced to death during January s/d December 2012, with details

of criminal acts shown in following table:

Table 9 Recapitulation of Death Sentences

Disaggregated by Criminal Acts 2012

No

Criminal Acts

Number of Convicts

Comments

1 2 3 4

1 Narcotics 71 persons Other General Crime Acts

2 Terrorism 2 persons State Security and Public Order

3 Homicide 60 persons Man and Possession

T O T A L 133 persons

Achievements of General Crime cases disposal performance per Directorate:

Table 10 Case Disposal Per-Directorate

DIR OHARDA

(Man & Possession) DIR KAMNEG & TIBUM (State Security & Public

Order)

DIR TPUL (Other General Crime Acts)

TOTAL

Pre - Prosecu

tion

Prosecution

Execution &

Examination

Pre - Prosecuti

on

Prosecuti

on

Execution &

Examination

Pre - Prosecut

ion

Prosecution

Execution &

Examination

Pre - Prosecuti

on

Prosecution

Execution &

Examination

Target 50 50 50 40 40 40 199 125 125 289 215 215

Achievements

46 26 17 34 21 12 762 762 563 842 809 592

% 92% 52% 34% 85% 53% 30% 383% 610% 450% 291% 376% 275%

Table 11 General Crime Case Disposal Performance 2012

KEJAGUNG Provincial, District & Sub-District

Attorney Offices Pre -

Prosecution Prosecution

Execution & Examination

Target 289 215 215 112.442

Achievements 842 809 592 104.539

% 291% 376% 275% 92 %

45

Graphic 3 General Crime Cases Disposal Performance in 2012

Table 12

Recapitulation of Important General Crime Cases Disposal

No Criminal Acts Incoming

Cases

Case Disposal Disposal Rate

(%) On Trials Court

Sentenced

1 Intellectual Property Rights 95 88 5 97,9%

2 Forestry (Illegal Logging) 1099 518 129 58,87%

3 Environmental 14 13 1 100%

4 Banking 23 21 1 95,65%

5 Narcotics 12.685 9132 1935 87,24%

6 Psychotropic 889 123 118 27,10%

7 Counterfeited Note 173 160 11 98,84%

8 Unauthorized Mining 219 168 34 92,23%

9 Money Laundering 6 6 0 100%

10 Trafficking 131 67 5 54,96%

11 Child Protection 3370 1471 321 53,14%

12 Immigration 63 19 3 34,92%

13 Food and Drugs 580 553 15 97,93% 14 Denigration of Religion 2 1 1 100%

15 Misuse of Firearms and Explosives 1056 931 95 97,16%

16 Domestic Violence 778 308 52 46,27%

17 Gambling 5242 4850 249 97,27%

18 Homicide 569 274 64 59,40%

19 Oil and Gas 403 327 45 92,30%

20 Natural Resources Conservation 29 28 1 100%

21 Terrorism 43 41 2 100%

22 Cyber crime 29 23 6 100%

46

Policies for Optimalization of

Case Disposal Process

The Junior Attorney General

General Crimes has escalated

the levels of collaboration and

coordination to optimalize case

disposal process in numerous

ways; one was through Mutual

Agreements between R.I

Attorney General Office with

Ministries/Institutions that are

either directly or indirectly

related to the case disposal

process. Some of the said

agreements were as follow:

a. Mutual agreement between

R.I Minister of Finance

Director General of Customs

& Excise on Coordination and

Junior Attorney General

General Crimes on Law

Enforcement Against

Narcotics, Psychotropic, and

Money Laundering Crimes

No.: KEP-83/BC/2012 and

No.: KEP-02/E/EJP/04/2012,

in effect Thursday, April 5th,

2012.

b. Mutual Agreement between

R.I Minister of Finance

Director General of Tax and

Junior Attorney General

General Crimes on Law

Enforcement Against General

Crimes in Tax Sectors No.:

KEP-109/PJ/2012 and No.:

03/E/EJP/04/2012.

c. Memorandum for Mutual

Agreement between

Chairman of R.I Supreme

Court, Minister of Justice and

Human Rights, R.I Attorney

General, and Head of Police

Force on Adjustment for the

Application of Insubstantial

Crimes Penalty, Rapid

Examination and

Implementation of

Restorative Justice No.:

131/KMA/SKB/2012, No.:

M.HH-07.HM.03.2 Year 2012,

and No.: KEP-

06/E/EJP/10/2012 dated

October 17th, 2012.

Recapitulation of Non-Tax State

Revenues (PNBP)

- Revenues from fines and

insubstantial cases

: IDR

82.265.021.987

- Revenues from court fees on

insubstantial cases and

fines : IDR

4.888.396.546

- Revenues from auctions and

forfeited monies

: IDR 8.918.610.359

- Revenues from indemnification

and penalties

: IDR 113.277.999

Total

: IDR

96.298.584.890

Recapitulation of Non-Tax State

Revenues (PNBP) as follow:

47

Table 13 Recapitulation of Non-Tax State Revenues (PNBP)

Fines and Insubstantial Cases IDR 82.265.021.987

Court Fees on Fines and Insubstantial Cases IDR 4.888.396.546

Auctions and Forfeited Money IDR 8.918.610.359

Indemnification and Penalties IDR 113.277.999

T O T A L IDR 96.298.584.890

4.4 SPECIAL CRIMES CASES

Optimalization and quality

performance in Special Crimes

Division did not merely rely on

quantitative numbers, but also

purported to the quality

improvement in corruption case

disposal in all phases, from

investigation, examination,

prosecution, and execution that

more than just to increase the

numbers of corruption case

disposal, but also for the quality of

disposal process and type of cases;

from technical aspect, intellectual

levels of the accused, modus

operandi, state financial loss and

damage caused.

Current trend for corruption

eradication is not restricted to

delivering physical sentence to

convicts, but it has to be able to

recover state financial loss.

Therefore, investigators are

expected to be capable in

conducting tracking of

possessions/assets owned by the

accused and also in conducting

seizures to be deemed as

considerable evidence for the

purpose of determining amount of

indemnification.

Leaders at central level has

done reformative efforts of

delegation of powers in full effect to

leaders at regional level in terms of

control on disposal of corruption

cases to the Head of Provincial

Attorney Offices and Head of District

Attorney Offices as leaders at

regional level with the expected

objective of a more time-efficient

disposal of corruption cases

generated from bypassing long

bureaucary and attentiveness to

local wisdoms that accompanied

with probity demonstrated in the act

of submitting implementation report

to supervisors.

Throughout 2012 General

Crimes Division at R.I Attorney

General Office, Provincial Attorney

Offices, District Attorney Offices,

and Branch Attorney Offices has

investigated 833 cases, examined

1.399 cases, and prosecuted 1.511

48

cases, with financial recovery

valued at IDR 302.609.167.229

(three hundred and two billion six

hundred and nine million one

hundred sixty seven thousand two

hundred twenty nine rupiah) and

US$ 500.000 (five hundred

thousand US dollar).

Performance of case disposals

are as follow:

Table 14 Special Crimes Cases Disposal Performance in 2012

R.I Attorney General Office

Provincial, District, & Branch Attorney Offices

LID DIK

Prosecution of

Corruption

Cases

Prosecution of

Economy &

Other Cases

Prosecution of

Substantial

Violation on

Human Rights Cases

Execution &

Examination of Corrupti

on Cases

Execution &

Examination of

Economy &

Other Special Crimes Cases

LID DIK

Prosecution of Corrupt

ion Cases

Prosecution of

Economy &

Other Special Crimes Cases

Target 80 80 80 45 2 80 45

1.300 1.300 1.300 450

Achieve

ments 78 85 75 0 0 0 0

755 1.314 1.430 190

%

97,5

% 106% 93% 0% 0% 0% 0%

58% 101% 110% 40%

49

Graphic 4 Junior Attorney General Special Crimes Cases Disposal Performance in 2012

Graphic 5 Special Crimes Cases Disposal Performance in 2012

50

Table 15 Attorney General Office Special Crimes Cases Disposal Performance

Target and Ahievements 2012

No Activity Target Achievement %

1 Quality Improvement in Investigations and Examinations in Corruption Case Disposal

A. Investigation : 80 Cases. 78 Cases 97,5 %

B. Examinations : 80 Cases.

85 Cases 106 %

2 Disposal and Completion of Corruption, Other Special Crimes, and Substantial Violation on Human Rights Cases.

A. Prosecution of Corruption Case : 80 Cases

75 Cases 93 %

B. Prosecution of Economy and Other Special Crimes Cases : 45 Cases.

0 Cases

0 %

C. Prosecution of Substantial Violation on Human Rights Cases : 2 Cases .

0 Cases

0 %

3 Control on Execution and Examination Functions.

A. Execution and Examination of Corruption Crime Cases : 80 Cases

0 Cases

0 %

B. Execution and Examination of Economy and Other Special Crimes Cases : 45 Cases

0 Cases 0 %

Table 16

Case Disposal Performances at Provincial, District, and Branch Attorney Offices in Indonesia Target and Achievement

No Activity Target Achievement %

1 Quality Improvement in Investigations and Examinations in Corruption Case Disposal

A. Investigation : 1.300 Cases

755 Cases 58 %

B. Examination : 1.300 Cases

1.314 Cases 101%

2 Disposal and Completion of Corruption, and Other Special Crimes Cases.

A. Prosecution of Corruption Cases : 1300 Cases

1.430 Cases

110 %

B. Prosecution of Economy & Other Special Crimes Cases : 450 Cases.

T.P. Fisheries/ZEE = 121 Cases T.P. Customs = 50 Cases T.P. Excise = 19 Cases Total = 190 Cases

40 %

Recapitulation of investigation, examination, and prosecution phases in corruption

cases period 2012 in Indonesia:

51

Table 17 Recapitulation of Investigation, Examination, and Prosecution Phases of Corruption

Cases period 2012 in Indonesia

Acheivement Year 2012:

a. Investigation

Table 18 Investigation Performed in 2012

No Work Force Target Achievements Percentage

1 Attorney General Office 80 85 106 %

2 Provincial, District, and Branch Attorney Offices in Indonesia

1.300 1.314 101 %

TOTAL 1.380 1.399 101 %

b. Prosecution

Table 19 Prosecution Performed in 2012

No Work Force Target Achievement Percentage

1 Attorney General Office 80 75 93 %

2 Provincial, District, and Branch Attorney Offices in Indonesia

1.300 1.430 110 %

TOTAL 1.380 1.505 109 %

c. Recovered State Funds

No. Office No. of

Investigation No. of

Examination No. of

Prosecution Recovery of State Funds

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

1 Attorney General Office

78 85 76 IDR

7.725.154.000 USD

500.000

Total

833 1.399 1.511 IDR

302.609.167.229 US$

500.000

52

Table 20 Recovered State Funds in 2012

No Work Force Amount

1 Attorney General Office IDR 7.725.154.000.- + USD 500.000

2 Provincial, District, and Branch Attorney Offices in Indonesia

IDR 294.884.013.229.-

TOTAL IDR 302.609.167.229.- + USD 500.000

Implementation of R.I Presidential

Order No. 5/2004 on Acceleration

of Corruption Eradication for duties

within the responsibility of R.I

Attorney Service that

encompassed:

a. Optimalization of investigative

and prosecutorial efforts in

corruption cases to punish

perpetrators and recover state

assets;

b. To prevent and to deliver

severe punishment for abuse of

power within the context of law

enforcement conducted by

attorneys/public prosecutors;

c. To improve cooperation with R.I

Police Force, BPKP (Finance

and Development Supervisory

Agency), PPATK (Central for

Financial Transaction Reports

and Analysis), and other

relevant state institutions for law

enforcement and recovery of

state wealth loss due to

corruption.

Table 21

R.I Attorney Service Achievement in Management of Corruption Case Disposal

No Year Examination Prosecution

1 2010 2.315 Cases 1.715 Cases

2 2011 1.515 Cases 1.217 Cases

3 2012 1.401 Cases 1.511 Cases

4 2013 (Target/Estimation)

1.430 Cases 1.430 Cases

5 2014 (Target/Performance

Plan)

1.380 Cases 1.380 Cases

53

1. Recovered State Funds:

- IDR 302.609.167.229

(three hundred and two billion

six hundred and nine million

one hundred sixty seven

thousand two hundred twenty

nine rupiah) and US$

500.000 (five hundred

thousand US dollar)

- US$. 500.000,- (five

hundred thousand US dollar)

Public Appealing Corruption Case

Handling in 2012:

1. Indictment of Corruption

and Money Laundering Cases

in Tax Sector on accused

Dhana Widyatmika and

accomplices.

2. Corruption in

Procurement for

Bioremediation in PT. Chevron

Pasific Indonesia by Bachtiar

Abdul Fatah and accomplices.

3. Corruption in PT.

Indosat Mega Media (IM-2) by

suspect Indar Atmanto, MSc.

4. Corruption in PT.

Merpati Nusantara Air Lines by

suspects Hotasi Nababan and

accomplices.

5. Corruption in

Information System

Procurement for Directorate

General of Tax by suspects

Bahar and accomplices.

6. Atypical saving account

in Bank Mega originated from

accumulation of funds derived

from corruption in Batu Bara

local authority Regional

Revenue and Expenditure

Budget by suspects Yos

Rauke, and accomplices.

7. Corruption in Ministry of

Public Works’ World Bank

funded Basin Water Resources

Management (BWRM) Project

by suspects Giovanni Gandolfi

(Italian), and accomplices.

8. Corruption in Bank BHS

by previously fugitive status

convict Sherny Kojongian that

has been succesfully executed

(by deportation process from

USA) with collaboration

between Corruption Suspects

and Convicts Detection

Multiparty Team and Interpol.

The domain of law enforcement

and judicial process of corruption

cases are not solely dominated by

Attorney Service as there are other

law enforcer institutions, which are

the Police Force and Commission

for Eradication of Corruption

(KPK). Eradication of corruption

could not be manage by only one

institution, as it requires solid

collaboration that is well

coordinated to conduct early

vigilant surveillance upon

perpetrators’ movements to create

preventive effects on them. Some

signed agreements to organize the

efforts were:

1. Memorandum of

Understanding on agreement

between Head of KPK and

Junior Attorney General

Special Crimes on

54

Collaboration for Handling of

Corruption Case dated

February 23rd, 2012 that

arrange the division of duties

and responsibilities between

Attorney Service and KPK

based on suspects criterion in

simultaneous handling of one

particulat case.

2. Mutual agreement on

Mapping of 10 Corruption

Susceptible Areas in 2012

dated March 29th, 2012

between R.I Junior Attorney

General Special Crimes,

National Police Force Head of

Criminal Recherche and KPK

Secretary General.

3. Mutual agreement

between R.I Ministry of

Finance Inspectorate General

and R.I Junior Attorney

General Special Crimes on

Coordination and Collaboration

in Law Enforcement Against

Corruption No.: Kep-

70/IJ/2012, and No.: Kep-

01/F/Fjp/04/2012 dated April

5th, 2012.

4. Mutual agreement

between R.I Ministry of

Finance Director General of

Customs and Excise and R.I

Junior Attorney General

Special Crimes on

Coordination for Law

Enforcement in Customs and

Excise Sectors No.: Kep-

82/BC/2012, No.: Kep-

01/F/Fjp/04/2012 dated April

5th, 2012.

5. Mutual agreement

between R.I Attorney Service,

R.I National Police Force, and

KPK on Optimalization of

Corruption Eradication dated

march 29th, 2012.

55

4.5 CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE

Besides its role in law enforcement

for criminal cases, Legislation No.

16/2004 also mandated R.I Attorney

Service to conduct law enforcement

for State Civil and Administrative

Affairs. To perform the function of

powers in the sector, Attorney

Service arranges three structures of

directorates, each led by Director of

Civil, Director of State

Administrative, and Director of

Restoration and Protection on

Rights, each divided the duties

within five sections encompassed:

(1) Law Enforcement, (2) Legal

Assistance (State Advocation), (3)

Legal Opinion, (4) Law Service, and

(5) Other Legal Actions.

Achievements of Civil and

Administrative in 2012 were as

follow:

a. Duties and powers of Civil and

Administrative sector.

1) Law Enforcement

Whereas 606 cases occurred

in 2011, 634 cases occurred

in 2012. Law enforcement

here is limited to Attorney

Service effort in completion of

restitution paid by corruption

convicts under Law No.

3/1971.

2) State Advocacy

Administer 2.455 cases (by

litigation) in 2012 and 3.319

cases in 2011 on behalf of

central government or

regional authorities.

3) Legal Opinion

Administer 211 legal opinions

in 2012 compared to 106 in

2011. The data comprised of

the activity of delivering legal

opinion and implementation

of legal assistance.

4) Legal Service

Administer 179 legal services

in 2012 compared to 88

cases in 2011.

5) Other Legal Actions

Administer other legal actions

in particular regards to

mediation, to 15 cases in

2012 compared to 16 cases

in 2011.

b. Recovery of State Funds.

1) Recovery of State

Funds/State Wealth

In 2012, the total sum of

recovered state funds/state

wealth was IDR

2.084.813.235.837,18 (two

trillion eighty four hundred

billion and eight hundred

thirteen million two hundred

thirty five thousand eight

hundred thirty seven rupiah

and eighteen cent) and land

measured 120.554 m2. The

said results showed

declination from 2011 which

reached IDR

34.854.250.286.305 (thirty

four trillion eight hundred fifty

four billion two hundred fifty

million two hundred eighty six

thousand three hundred and

five rupiah) and 4 (four) units

of truck.

56

2) Restoration of State

Funds/Wealth

In 2012, restored state funds

amounted to IDR

421.023.384.361,07 (four

hundred twenty one billion

twenty three million three

hundred eighty four thousand

three hundred sixty one

rupiah and seven cent) and

US$ 46.249.463,32.

3) Restitution Payment.

Restitution payment in 2012

was IDR 145.836.053.607

(one hundred forty five billion

eight hundred thirty six million

fifty three thousand six

hundred and seven rupiah)

compared to IDR

10.968.034.764 (ten billion

nine hundred sixty eight

million thirty four thousand

seven hundred sixty four

rupiah) in 2011.

Table 22

Recovered and Restored State Funds/Wealth*

No Activity Amount

1 Recovered (Civil cases) IDR 2.084.813.235.837,18 and land measured 120.554 m2

2 Restored (Restitution cases) IDR 421.023.384.361,07 and US$ 46.249.463,32

TOTAL IDR 2.505.836.620.198,25

US$ 46.249.463,32

120.554 m2 land

Table 23

Civil and Administrative Target and Achievement in 2012

No Activity Target

case/activity Achievement %

1 Improvement in civil cases 60 51 85%

2 Improvement in state administrative cases 40 45 110%

3 Improvement in restitution cases 80 75 93%

Sub Total 180 171 95%

4 Improvement in civil, administrative, and restitution cases at Provincial, District, and Branch Attorney Offices

1205 3291 273%

Total / Average Achievement 1385 3494 252%

57

Graphic 6 Civil and Administrative Case Litigation in 2012

Table 24

Completion of Case

Table 25 Achievement in 2012

No Attorney Office

Civil and Administrative Activity Description

Total Law

Enforcement

State Advocation Legal

Opinion Legal

Service

Other

Legal Actions

Litigation

Non-litigation

Total

A

ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE - 60

28 88

41 69 5 203

TOTAL 634 580 1875 2455 211 179 15 3494

Directorate Law

Enforcement State

Advocation Legal

Opinion Legal

Service

Other Legal

Actions Total

Total 634 2455 211 179 15 3494

Target

Achievement

58

Junior Attorney General Civil

and Administrative has planned to

conduct relevant supervision to

duties and functions of Junior

Attorney General Civil and

Administrative that will underlining

the winning points and

advantageous powers of Civil and

Administrative sector with its state

advocates and beneficial gains

from using the service of advocate.

Civil and Administrative

division has conducted technical

meeting on “Developing

Conscience Motivated

Professional, Proportional, and

Reliable Attorney Service

Personnel Through Civil and

Administrative Technical Meeting”

on June 18th – 19th, 2012 in R.I

Attorney General Office Sasana

Pradana Hall that was participated

by the Head of Provincial Offices in

Indonesia.

In Strategic and Policy

Planning, one of the effort in

programs and activities designated

as duties of each sector operating

under Junior Attorney General Civil

and Administrative to achieve the

duties performance of Junior

Attorney General Civil and

Administrative was the

collaborations as follow:

a. Mutual agreement No.:

001/PKS/PNM/I/2012 – No.: B-

037/G/Gs.1/01/2012between PT

Permodalan Nasional Madani

(company) and R.I Attorney

General Office on Legal Actions

on Civil and Administrative

Affairs.

b. Mutual agreement No.: 3/2012 –

No : B-83/G/Gs.1/01/2012

between R.I Minister of

Religions and R.I Attorney

General Office on Legal on Civil

and Administrative Affairs

Actions.

c. Mutual agreement No.:

013.Mou/040/DIR/2012 – No.:

B-099/G/Gs.1/01/2012between

National Electricity Company

(PT. PLN (Company)) Java and

Bali Regional Office and R.I

Attorney General Office on

Legal Actions on Civil and

Administrative Affairs.

d. Mutual agreement No.:

018.Mou/040/DIR/2012 – No.:

B-099/G/Gs.1/03/2012between

National Electricity Company

(PT. PLN (Company)) Western

Indonesia Regional Office and

R.I Attorney General Office on

Legal Actions on Civil and

Administrative Affairs.

e. Mutual agreement No.:

022.Mou/040/DIR/2012 – No.:

B-131/G/Gs.1/03/2012between

National Electricity Company

(PT. PLN (Company)) Eastern

Indonesia Regional Office and

R.I Attorney General Office on

Legal Actions on Civil and

Administrative Affairs.

f. Mutual agreement No.:

SP.45/HK.09.01/2012/DU - No.:

B-163/G/Gs.1/04/2012 between

PT Angkasa Pura I (Company)

59

and R.I Attorney General Office

on Legal Actions on Civil and

Administrative Affairs.

g. Mutual agreement No.: Mou-

01/DIR/2012 – No.:

167/G/Gs.1/04/2012 between

PT Taspen (Company) and R.I

Attorney General Office on

Legal Actions on Civil and

Administrative Affairs.

h. Mutual agreement No.:

K.TEL.75HK.840/UTA_00/ 2012

– No.: 209/G/Gs.1/04/2012

between PT Telkom (Company)

and R.I Attorney General Office

on Legal Actions on Civil and

Administrative Affairs.

i. Mutual agreement PRJ-

05/PJ/2012 – No.:

168/G/Gs.1/04/2012 between

Ministry of Finance Directorate

General State Funds and

Wealth and R.I Attorney General

Office on Legal Actions on Civil

and Administrative Affairs.

j. Mutual agreement KEP-

110/PJ/2012 – No.:

169/G/Gs.1/04/2012 between

Ministry of Finance Directorate

General Tax and R.I Attorney

General Office on Legal Actions

on Civil and Administrative

Affairs.

k. Mutual agreement KEP-

69/IJ/2012 – No.:

170/G/Gs.1/04/2012 between

Ministry of Finance Directorate

General and R.I Attorney

General Office on Legal Actions

on Civil and Administrative

Affairs.

l. Mutual agreement

01/SP/TVRI/V/2012 – No.:

216/G/Gs.1/05/2012between

TVRI National Information and

Outreach Institution and R.I

Attorney General Office on

Legal Actions on Civil and

Administrative Affairs.

m. Mutual agreement

043/SJ/DIR/2012 – No.: B-

271/G/Gs.1/06/2012 between

Perum Perhutani and R.I

Attorney General Office on

Legal Actions on Civil and

Administrative Affairs.

n. Mutual agreement

P/19/SP/2012 – No.: B-

313/G/Gs.1/07/2012 between

PT Jasa Raharja (Company)

and R.I Attorney General Office

on Legal Actions on Civil and

Administrative Affairs.

60

4.6 INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL

SUPERVISION

To defend endeavours made

for the accomplishment of R.I

Attorney Service vision and mission,

strengthening supervisory duties

were required in order to support

bureaucratic reform program

through improvements for

accountable Attorney Service

human resources and institutional

performances for the achievement

of good governance. In accord to

the importance of the strengthening

supervisory duties, in particular

regards to legal and officials

sectors, R.I Attorney Service has

established the efforts to strengthen

supervisory duties within the

implementation scale of priority.

Throughout 2012,

Supervision Division has

accomplished various

achievements in implementations

of inspections for general affairs,

leaders observation and cases.

The work plan originated from

Supervision 2012 Annual Program

Performance (PKPT) were: 1)

General inspection to 156 objects,

comprised of 31 objects at

Provincial Attorney Office, 119

objects at District Attorney Office,

and 6 objects within the workforce

at R.I Attorney General Office, 2)

Leaders observation inspection

was planned to be done to 150

objects, comprised of 31 objects at

Provincial Attorney Office, 119

objects at District Attorney Office,

and 6 objects within the workforce

at R.I Attorney General Office.

From the overall number,

Supervision Division has

accomplished all targets,

particularly for general inspection

and observational inspection on

leaders, resulting in 100% target

achievement for year 2012.

Supervision Division has

exceeded its 2012 target by 113%

for cases inspection performance,

conducting 51 activities from initial

plan of inspection to 45 targets.

The case inspections were carried

out by supervisory officials from R.I

Attorney General Office and

regional attorney service offices

through examining allegation

reports/complaints on derogatory

biased irregularities in behaviour,

conducts and statements made by

Attorney service officials as

stipulated in Regulation No.

53/2010 and other national

regulations.

Process and finalization of

complaints managed under Junior

Attorney Service Supervision were

being handled by five Inspectors

of: (a) Inspector I, (b) Inspector II,

(c), Inspector III, (d) Inspector IV,

and (e) Inspector V. In 2012, 1.665

complaints reports were received,

which 1.118 of them has

undergone process and

61

finalization, resulted in 67,15%

accomplishment from findings of

185 legitimate complaints and 933

illegitimate ones, or equal to 4,85%

increase from 62,3%

accomplishment in preceding year.

Graphic 7

Complaints Reports up to December

2012

Public appealing complaints reports in

2012:

- Arrest done by Supervision task force

on Monday, October 8th, 2012, in

back parking lot of Citos supermarket,

Cilandak, South Jakarta, as an action

for verbal report from Eddy

Chahyono, staff of quarry witness

Budi Ashari, SE, Director PT. Budi

Indah Mulya Mandiri, whom on

October 5th, 2012 reported the

demand of 2.5 billion related to

procurement for construction project

of Sangatta Port, East Kalimantan in

2012.

Arrested suspects were:

- Andri Fernando Pasaribu, BA,

Prosecutor (III/b), Service No.:

19800710 200603 1 001, Registry

No. 60680186, Functional

Prosecutor for Secretariat of Junior

Attorney General Civil and

Administrative;

- Arif Budi Maryanto, BA, Prosecutor

(III/a), Service No. 19850117

200312 1 009, Registry No.

4048545, Functional Prosecutor for

Secretariat of Junior Attorney

General Civil and Administrative;

- Sutarna, BA. staff Administrative

(III/a), Service No. 19690728

200212 1 002 / Registry No.

403691293, Administrative staff for

Directorate of Rectification for

Forest Clearance (PPH) Junior

Attorney General Civil and

Administrative.

The Junior Attorney General

Supervision has transferred the

reported suspects to Junior Attorney

General Development for further

action.

Recapitulation of

Accomplishment on Complaints

Reports in 2012:

62

Table 26 Recapitulation of Accomplishment on Complaints Reports in 2012

No Inspector

Outstanding Complaints Reports per Dec 2011

Incoming Complai

nts Reports in 2012

Total Complaints

Reports

Finalization

In Progress Legitima

te

Illegitimat

e

Total

Finalizati

on

Numbers 550 1.115 1.665 185 933 1.118 394

Table 27

Recapitulation of Disciplinary Sanctions i

mposed on Attorney Service Officials in Indonesia by Grade (up to December

2012)

(PLEASE INSERT RELATED RANKS I – IV)

No Grade Administrative Prosecutorial Total

Numbers 130 239 369

Table 28

Recapitulation of Disciplinary Sanctions imposed on Attorney Service Officials in

Indonesia by Type of Punishment (up to December 2012)

No Grade Administrative

Staff Prosecutorial

Staff Total

1. MILD 30 61 91

2. MEDIUM 50 116 166

3. SEVERE 50 62 112

Total 130 239 369

63

Table 29

Recapitulation of Disciplinary Sanctions imposed on Attorney Service Officials in

Indonesia by Type of Violation (up to December 2012)

No Grade Administrative

Staff Prosecutorial

Staff Total

1. INDISCIPLINE 46 34 80

2. ABUSE OF POWERS 61 182 243

3. OTHER VIOLATIONS 23 23 46

4. CIVIL 0 0 0

Total 130 239 369

Table 30

Recapitulation of Disciplinary Sanctions imposed on Attorney Service Officials in

Indonesia by Substantial Indisciplinary Acts (up to December 2012)

No Grade Administrati

ve Staff

Prosecutorial Staff

Jumlah

1. Three Year Demotion in accordance with Government Regulation PP 53 of 2010

12 15 27

2. Demotional Reassignment 0 0 0

3. Removal from Prosecutorial Duties 0 18 18

4. Removal from Structural Position 2 16 18

5. Involuntary Honorable Discharge 17 3 20

6. Dishonorable Discharge from Civil Service 19 10 29

7. Temporary Discharge from Civil Service 1 5 6

Total 51 67 118

Note: One report may implicate more than one employee of the Public Prosecution Service, hence the number of legitimate reports do not reflect the number of sanctioned personnel.

64

In accordance to the principle of

reward and punishment established by

the government to improve the

performance of human resource,

referring to R.I Attorney General

Directive No: KEP-061/A/JA/04/2012

dated April 25th, 2012 on Performance

Appraisal for Indonesia Provincial

Attorney Office, Assistant of Provincial

Attorney Office, and Highest Performing

Attorney of 2012, Supervision Division

has conducted appraisal involving R.I

Attorney Service Head of Committee

and echelon II officials from each

division of Junior Attorney Generals with

following results:

1. Highest Performing Provincial

Attorney Offices and District Attorney

Offices Type A and Type B:

a. Provincial Attorney Offices

1. Central Java

2. West Java

3. North Sumatera

b. District Attorney Offices Type A

1. Tangerang

2. East Jakarta

3. Palopo

c. District Attorney Offices Type B

1. Sekayu

2. Cikarang

3. Lamongan

2. Highest Performing Assistants

a. Assistant Development

1. Yunan Hardjaka, BA.,MA.

2. Amandra Syah Arwan, BA.,MA.

3. Sukaryo, BA.

b. Assistant Intelligence

1. Radja Nafrizal, BA.

2. Sampe Tuah, BA.,MA.

3. Wito, BA.,MA.

c. Assistant General Crimes

1. Asri Agung Putra, BA., MA.

2. Sadiman, BA., MA.

3. Heru Sriyanto, BA.

d. Assistant Special Crimes

1. Manumpak Pane, BA., MA.

2. Dr. Chaerul Amir, BA., MA.

3. Dr. Drs. Agus Istiqlal, BA., MA.

e. Assistant Civil and Administrative

1. Yusuf, BA., MA.

2. Azhari, BA., MA.

3. Datas Ginting Suka, BA., MA.

f. Assistant Supervision

1. Yuqaiyum Hasib, BA.

2. H. Abdul Muni, BA., MA.

3. Panjaitan Simanihuruh, BA.,

MA.

3. Highest performing Attorney:

1. Bima Suprayoga, BA., MA.

2. M.Zuhri, BA., MA.

3. Aliansyah, BA., MA.

Other than performing internal

supervision duties, to preserve the

successful implementation of

bureaucratic reform inside Attorney

Service, Supervision Division has

conducted a series of activities, with

some of the following:

1. Arrangement of Online Complaint

Database to every Provincial Attorney

Offices

2. Formulation of Applicative Instrument

for Attorney Performance Appraisal

(IPKJ), Applicative Instrument for the

Functioning Supervisory Officials

Performance (IPKPPF), Instrument

for Unit Performance Appraisal

(IPKU)

3. Application of IT system for

complaints reports through special

65

channel at Attorney Service website

at www.kejaksaan.go.id .

4. Drafting of R.I Attorney General

Regulation No.: PER-

014/A/JA/11/2012 dated November

13th, 2012 on Attorney Code of

Conducts and Junior Attorney

General Supervision Directive No.:

JUKLAK-01/H/HJW/11/2012 dated

November 29th, 2012 on Attorney

Code of Conducts

5. The Junior Attorney General

Supervision conducted regular

meeting to implement the

memorandum of agreement No.:

KEP-099/A/JA/05/2011 and No.: NK-

001/KK/05/2011 dated May 19th,

2011 between R.I Attorney General

and Commission for R.I Attorney

Service, in particular regards to article

9 on Regular Meeting that was to be

held at the minimum of once per

quarter.

6. Signing of mechanism for the

collaboration between R.I Attorney

General and Commission for R.I

Attorney Service on related issues of

linked database for management of

complaints reports, to achieve the

working target stipulated in the

Presidential Order No.17/2011 on

Corruption Prevention and

Eradication Action Plan 2012.

Public Servants’ Assets Declaration

(LHKPN).

Numbers of Attorney Service

personnel obliged to declare their assets

were 8.774 persons, with compliance

number for LHKPN Form A and Form B

reached 5.406, or equal to 61,61% and

outstanding LHKPN of 3.368, or equal to

38, 39%.

66

4.7 EDUCATION AND TRAINING

R.I Attorney Service Education

and Training Bureau as a supportive

element for the Attorney Service

duties and powers within the sector

of education and training has

designed courses and officially

established 2012 Course Programs

as arranged in R.I Attorney General

Directive No.: KEP-

042/A/JA/03/2012 on Establishment

of R.I Attorney Service 2012

Education and Training Programs.

Achievement of Education and

Training Bureau in 2012 was

innovation in designing courses that

has succeeded in designing 23 new

courses for 2012 on the topics of

technical management and

technical function that have

obtained certificates of accreditation

for course institution as

acknowledgement for

appropriateness of Attorney Service

Education and Training Bureau in

conducting educational programs in

Leadership III, IV and Pre-Service

with certificate of accreditation

Category B (3 years), Technical and

Functional Training with certificate

of accreditation Category C (2

years). R.I Attorney Service

Education and Training Bureau has

been applying quality management

system that has been awarded ISO

9001 certificate for Quality

Management System for the first

time.

Accomplished education and

training programs in 2012 are as

follow:

1) Education and Training on

Management and Leadership

67

Table 31

Education and Training Program on Management and Leadership

No. Type of Course No. of Class

Achievement Comment

1 2 3 4 5

1. Leadership IV 8 100% Number and type of training and education programs to be done in January – November 2012 has been fully achieved.

2. Leadership III 5 100%

3. Program Performance Planning & Evaluation

1 100%

4. Governance 1 100%

5. Procurement 2 100%

6. ToR / Proposal 2 100%

7. Substance Training of Trainers (ToT)

1 100%

8. Echelon III Refresher Course 1 100%

Achievement 21 100%

Table 32

Leadership Program (Diklat Pim)

No. Type of Course No. of Class Input/Output Achievement

1 2 3 4

1. Leadership IV 8 231/231 100% 2. Leadership III 5 145/144 99% 3. Echelon III Refresher Course 1 40/40 100%

Achievement 14 416/415 99%

68

Table 33

Technical Management Program

No. Type of Course No. of Class Input/Output Achievement

1 2 3 4

1. Program Performance Planning & Evaluation

1 40/39 99%

2. Governance 1 40/39 99% 3. Procurement 3 80/79 99% 4. ToR / Proposal 2 80/79 99%

5. Substantive ToT 1 40/39 99%

Achievement 9 320/315 98.44%

Table 34

Number of Attorney Service Personnel participated in

Management and Leadership Programs in 2012

No. Type of Course Allocation of

Course Participant

Achievement %

1. Leadership IV 210 persons 201 persons 91 2. Leadership III 150 persons 144 persons 94 3. Program Performance Planning &

Evaluation 40 persons 39 persons 99

4. Governance 40 persons 39 persons 99 5. Procurement 80 persons 79 persons 99 6. ToR/Proposal 80 persons 79 persons 99 7. Substantive ToT 40 persons 40 persons 100

Total 640 persons 621 persons 98%

69

2) Technical Program

For the effectiveness of technical

course programs, R.I Attorney

Service Education and Training

Bureau has created R.I Attorney

Service Alignment Programs for

Technical Function Education

and Training that refers to the R.I

Attorney Service Head of

Education and Training Bureau

Regulation No.: KEP-

134/J/J.3/07/2012 dated July 17th,

2012 on R.I Attorney Service

Alignment Programs for

Technical Function Education

and Training.

The alignment consisted of:

1. Prosecutorial Basic Training

2. Intelligence Training

3. Special Crimes Training

4. General Crimes Training

5. Civil and Administrative

Training

6. General Affairs

Training/Administration and

Management

Throughout 2012, the Central for

Technical and Functional

Education and Training has been

conducting 48 trainings from 5

Technical Education and Training

Alignments participated by 1.876

persons from the allocated 1.960

persons as explained in following

table:

70

Table 35

Education and Training Technical and Functional Program In 2012

No.

Type of Education/Training

Number of Class

Achievement

%

1 2 3 4 5

1. Human Resources, Finance, and Asset Management

1 100 Number and type of training and education programs to be done in January – November 2012 has been fully achieved.

2. Human Resources Management 1 100

3. Finance Management 1 100

4. Asset Management 1 100

5. Institutional Accounting System (SAI) 1 100

6. Expenditure and Treasury 1 100

7. Inteligence 2 100

8. Supervisory Management 1 100

9. Audit 2 100 10. Judiciary and Attorney Integrated Training 2 100 11. Fishery Crimes 2 100 12. Computer Forensic 2 100 13. Juvenile Crimes 3 100 14. Technical Supervision 1 100 15. Advocacy 1 100 16. Asset Recovery 2 100 17. Trial Advocacy 2 100 18. Asset Tracing 2 100 19. Cyber Crime 1 100 20. Wild Life Crime 1 100 21. Transnational Crime 1 100 22. Environmental 1 100 23. Money Laundering 1 100 24. Litigation 1 100 25. Non - Litigation 1 100 26. Contract Drafting 2 100 27. Corruption & Money Laundering Crimes 2 100 28. General Crimes 1 100 29. Civil and Administrative Crimes 1 100 30. Banking Crimes 1 100 31. Case Disposal Techique 1 100 32. Technical Insolvency 1 100 33. Public Relation and Protocol 1 100 34. Internal Security 1 100 35. Strategic Investigation Inteligence 2 100 36. Basic Intelijen 2 100 37. Prosecutorial Advance Training 9 100

Achievement 50 100%

71

Table 36

Achievement Education and Training Technical and Functional In 2012

No. Type of Education/Training

Allocation of

Participant

Achievement %

1 2 3 4 5

- Human Resources, Finance, and Asset

Management

40 37 97

- Human Resources Management 40 40 100

- Finance Management 40 40 100

- Asset Management 40 40 100

- Institutional Accounting System (SAI) 40 40 100

- Expenditure and Treasury 40 40 100

- Inteligence 80 79 99

- Supervisory Management 40 40 100

- Audit 80 71 91

- Judiciary and Attorney Integrated Training 80 79 99

- Fishery Crimes 80 79 99

- Computer Forensic 80 79 99

- Juvenile Crimes 120 119 99

- Technical Supervision 40 40 100

- Advocacy 40 40 100

- Asset Recovery 80 78 98

- Trial Advocacy 80 74 94

72

- Asset Tracing 80 40 100

- Cyber Crime 40 35 95

- Wild Life Crime 40 35 95

- Transnational Crime 40 39 99

- Environmental 40 38 98

- Money Laundering 80 80 100

- Litigation 40 39 99

- Non - Litigation 40 39 99

- Contract Drafting 80 79 99

- Corruption & Money Laundering Crimes 40 40 100

- General Crimes 40 39 99

- Civil and Administrative Crimes 40 40 100

- Banking Crimes 40 40 100

- Case Disposal Techique 40 40 100

- Technical Insolvency 40 40 100

- Public Relation and Protocol 40 40 100

- Internal Security 40 40 100

- Strategic Investigation Inteligence 80 78 98

- Basic Inteligence 80 80 100

- Prosecutorial Advance Training 450 450 100

Achievement 2450 2366 96,57%

73

3) Minor Affable Law Enforcers Capacity Development (Diverse and Restorative

Justice)

Table 37

Minor Affable Law Enforcers Capacity Development Program

(Diverse and Restorative Justice)

No. Type of Education and Training Target 2012 Achievement 2012

Total %

1. Juvenile Criminal Act Cases 80 Persons

120 persons

150%

4) Functional Education and Training

In 2012 R.I Attorney Service Education and Training Bureau has delivered

Prosecutorial education and trainings in 9 classes comprised of 450 persons.

Table 38

Prosecutorial Education and Training (PPPJ)

No. Type of Education and Training Target 2012 Achievement 2012

Total %

1. Prosecutorial Education and Training (PPPJ)

450 Persons

450 Persons

100%

5) Donor Institution Engagement Education and Training Program.

R.I Attorney Service Education and Training Bureau donor institution engagement

Technical Education and Training in 2012:

Table 39

R.I Attorney Service Education and Training Bureau Donor Institution

Engagement

Technical Education and Training

No Type of Education and

Training Donor Impelementation of Activity

1 2 3 4

1. Environmental and Wildlife Crime

US Department of Justice/US-DOJ Office of Overseas Prosecutorial Development Assistance and Training (OPDAT)

4 times:

February 1st – 2

nd, 2012, at

Novotel Hotel, Manado

March 20th – 21

st, 2012, at The

Hill Hotel, Bukittinggi, West Sumatera

April 4th – 5

th, 2012, at Santika

74

Premier Hotel, Malang, East Java

May 9th – 10

th, 2012, at Grand

Hyatt Hotel, Bandung West Java

2. Human Trafficking US Department of Justice/US-DOJ Office of Overseas Prosecutorial Development Assistance and Training (OPDAT)

September 17th – 19

th, 2012, at

Hermes Palace Hotel, Banda Aceh.

3. Integrity ToT for Widyaiswara

and Trainers Indonesia Changes for Justice Project (C4J) – USAID

June 18th, 2012, at R.I Attorney

Service Education and Training Bureau

4. Money Laundering, Asset Expropriation and Corruption

Indonesia Changes for Justice Project (C4J) – USAID

October 1st – 5

th, 2012, at Novotel

Hotel, Bogor, West Java

5. Leadership, Human Resources & Public Speaking

Indonesia Changes for Justice Project (C4J) – USAID

September 3rd

– 7th, 2012, at Novus

Hotel, Puncak, West Java

6. Leadership and Human Resources Certificated Training

Indonesia Changes for Justice Project (C4J) – USAID

September 3rd

– 19th, 2012, at

Novus Hotel, Puncak, West Java

7. Integrity Module Composition Indonesia Changes for Justice Project (C4J) – USAID

2 month program, April - May 2012

8. Need Assessment for Gender Based Crimes Case Disposal

United Nation Population Found/UNFPA

1 month program, September, at Provincial Attorney Office

9. Juvenile Criminal Act Module Composition

UNICEF - Ministry of Justice and Human Rights

Commenced in September and currently still in progress

Graphic 8

Education and Training Bureau Performance in 2012

Number of Participants TARGET AND ACHIEVEMENT

75

Education and Training Bureau construction/provision of facilities and infrastructure

- Construction/rehabilitation of main office building: Construction phase (70%)

- Gate stature augmentation: Construction phase (70%)

Table 40

Education and Training Bureau Construction/Provision of Facilities and

Infrastructure

No. Description of Construction/Provision Target Achievement Comment

1.

Main office building 100 % 70 % Construction phase

2. Gate stature augmentation 100% 70 % Construction phase 2. Achievement 100 % 70 %

Graphic 9

Education and Training Bureau Performance Achievement in 2012

76

CHAPTER V

OTHER ACTIVITIES

To improve Attorney Service

performance in 2012, the institution has

applied online procurement system, or

E-Procurement (LPSE) to ensure the

realization of transparent and fair

competition. Every single procurement

process has been done through LPSE

to develop and ensure the efficiency,

effectiveness, transparent and

accountable practice for state

expenditure disbursement. The

electronic process for government

procurement system will assure the

availability of information, business

prospect and opportunity, as well as

stimulating non - discriminative fair

competition for all business players

working within the government

procurement sector.

On December 9th, 2011, Attorney

Service has signed MoU with Ministry of

Finance LPSE. R.I Attorney General

Office has attempted the improvement

efforts by delivering a four days E-

Procurement training at Attorney

Service Education and Training Bureau

participated by personnel from R.I

Attorney General Office and Indonesia

Provincial Attorney Offices with

resources and trainers from Institution

for Governement Procurement Policy

(LKPP), Ministry of Public Works,

Ministry of Finance and the team from

R.I Attorney General Office, with

following topics and materials:

1. Introduction of Presidential

Regulation No. 54/2010 or

Presidential Regulation 70/2012

Second Adjustment on

Procurement.

2. Training on the application of

procurement and administration

agency.

3. Simulation of electronic

procurement system with functional

characters of LPSE, Procurement

Unit (ULP), and vendor (in phases

of introduction, bidding process,

registration, up to post-qualification)

practiced directly by every

participant.

4. ToT on application of procurement.

In 2012, every procurement

allotment for R.I Attorney General

Office has undergone Ministry of

Finance (LPSE).

Within the same year, socialization

for Presidential Regulation No. 54/2010

and national certification test for

procurement for R.I Attorney General

Office and Indonesia Provincial Attorney

Offices have been conducted for 1.588

participants with 386 certified

graduatees, as in the following details:

77

NO WORKING UNIT/ NO. of

GRADUATEE VENUE PARTICIPANTS

1 2 3 4

1. R.I Attorney General Office & DKI Jakarta Provicial Attorney Office 150 64

2. West Java Provicial Attorney Office 76 16

3. East Java Provicial Attorney Office 180 13

4. Central Java Provicial Attorney Office 89 33

5. North Sumatera Provicial Attorney Office 86 48

6. South Sumatera Provicial Attorney Office 47 10

7. South Sulawesi Provicial Attorney Office 51 10

8. Riau Provicial Attorney Office 47 2

9. North Maluku Provicial Attorney Office 45 5

10. D.I Yogyakarta Provicial Attorney Office 62 34

11. Central Sulawesi Provicial Attorney Office 57 10

12. West Kalimantan Provicial Attorney Office 41 3

13. Bali Provicial Attorney Office 51 8

14. Bangka Belitung Islands Provicial Attorney Office 55 6

15. Maluku Provicial Attorney Office 69 11

16. Gorontalo Provicial Attorney Office 49 24

17. Riau Islands Provicial Attorney Office 35 16

18. Lampung Provicial Attorney Office 59 24

19. Aceh Provicial Attorney Office 70 5

20. North Sulawesi Provicial Attorney Office 33 2

21. West Sumatera Provicial Attorney Office 125 26

22. Jambi Provicial Attorney Office 60 3

23. Central Kalimantan Provicial Attorney Office 51 13

TOTAL 1588 386

78

CHAPTER VI

CONCLUSION

The Annual Report illustrated the

manifestation of R.I Attorney Service

performance in 2012 to deliver its best

service to the justice enquiring public.

This report showed the performance

of R.I Attorney Service, as the

government institution in the sector of

law enforcement, which operation

requires acceleration and synergy with

related institution as well as support

from general public.

The people of Indonesia in this time

has gained better awareness of their

constituency rights and obligation. The

dynamic population demanded

convenience and promptness in

administrative service. Despite the

numerous efforts taken by R.I Attorney

Service in improving its development,

the optimal use in its practice has not

been encountered by the general public.

A thorough Bureaucratic Reform is still

within the development progress,

particularly in terms of the business

process and human resources.

Furthermore, transparent information

has also become the rights of general

public that must be mandatorily met, as

stipulated Within the Regulation No.

4/2008 on Transparency in Public

Information.

Other insufficiencies occurred in

reward and punishment mechanism for

public service, depleted integrity,

professional based career and

remuneration system that is still partially

met, as well as disorderliness of

performance management and

minimum standard for service.

In the attempts to create

improvement or reform for institutional

structure, legal customs and substance

of duties performance are simultant and

continual requirements. Every

improvement phase must be conducted

in the manners proper to the plan

formulated with concise patterns and

measurements to comply with the

expectation of the general public.

R.I Attorney Service as the

controller of legal cases process, or

Dominis Litis, has central position within

law enforcement, due to its mandate as

the only institution with the authoritative

power to decide the necessity of placing

further judicial process on a case based

on admissible evidence defined in the

Criminal Procedures Code, and R.I

Attorney Service is the only executorial

institution responsible for the

implementation of judicial decisions

(executive ambtenaar).

Upon those said rationales, R.I

Attorney Service is mandated to conduct

reform for the purpose of performance

improvement in order to become more

responsive in responding to the public

critics and demands that would be

arduous to accomplish without the

compulsory reform. Future expectation

mandated onto R.I Attorney Service as

the institution for law enforcement is for

this institution to be able to proof its

performance of work accountability in a

transparent manner.

79

LIST OF PROVINCIAL ATTORNEY OFFICES, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICES,

AND BRANCH ATTORNEY OFFICES IN INDONESIA

(PLEASE INSERT AND EDIT RELATED DATA FROM ACEH IN BANDA ACEH TO

RIAU ISLANDS IN TANJUNG)