forest restoration approach in … kawang burung dipterocarp 45 kedondong non dipterocarp (wild...
TRANSCRIPT
FOREST RESTORATION APPROACH IN NORTHERN ULU SEGAMA FOREST RESERVE: WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE SABAH FORESTRY DEPARTMENT-SIME DARBY
ORANG UTAN HABITATS PROTECTION AND REHABILITATION PROJECT
BYAlbert M. Radin, Indra P. Sunjoto, Jameri Tahir & Peter M. Lagan
Workshop onNatural Forest Management
Best Practice in Forest Restoration
10 Nov. 2010The Pacific Sutera Harbour Resort
Kota Kinabalu - Sabah
Outline
Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010
IntroductionStrategic PlanningImplementationNursery ManagementInfrastructureWildlife MonitoringIssues and DiscussionsConclusion
INTRODUCTION
USM SFMP – 15th March 2006Area – 241,098 haManaged by SFD & YSObjective: protection, conservation &
rehabilitation of vital ecosystem of endangered wildlife – notably orang utan
Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010
Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010
INTRODUCTIONNUS – ± 12,000 haThe most degraded forest of Ulu Segama FRCaused: forest fire and past conventional harvestingWWF(Malaysia) wildlife census 2007 & 2008 - ± 400 orang utans trapped2006 – YS funded restoration activity at western NUS (980 ha restored)2007 – WWF (Malaysia) raised restoration funds for central NUS (450 ha restored)
INTRODUCTION
Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010
2008 – MoU and Agreement between SFD & SDPSBRestoration grant - RM 25 million for 10 yearsSFD-SDPSB Restoration & Protection of orang utan
Habitats in NUSForest restoration, wildlife monitoring & EE
Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010
STRATEGIC PLANNING
Steering Committee : SFD, SDPSB,YSD, YS, SWD, WWF
Recruitment of (34) field staff – Aug. 2009 Area stratification based on Aerial
Photograph (2006) Result: 46% secondary forest, 49% open
area (wild ginger, shrubs, creepers) & 5% oil palm
Target to complete planting : 6-8 years Annual restoration area : 500 ha – 1000
ha Focus restoration: planting higher
proportion of orang utan’s food source Planting method : line planting Open area: single planting; spacing 7.5m
x 5m; species: pioneer and wild fruit trees Secondary forest: cluster planting (4
seedlings) in Y shape; spacing 12.5m x 12.5m; species: dipterocarps & non dipterocarps
5° 05' 54.93"
5° 06' 27.49"
5° 07' 00.05"
5° 07' 32.60"
5° 08' 05.16"
5° 08' 37.72"
5° 09' 10.28"
5° 09' 42.84"
5° 10' 47.95"
5° 11' 20.51"
5° 10' 15.39"
118° 01' 44.86"
118° 00' 07.48"
118° 00' 39.94"
118° 02' 17.33"
118° 02' 49.79"
118° 03' 22.25"
118° 03' 54.72"
118° 04' 27.18"
118° 04' 59.64"
118° 05' 32.10"
118° 06' 04.57"
118° 06' 37.03"
118° 07' 09.49"
118° 07' 41.95"
118° 08' 14.41"
118° 01' 12.40"
117
116
115
120
112
118
113
122
119114 699
645
629
595
580
546
490
457
447317
922000
922000
924000
924000
926000
926000
928000
928000
930000
930000
932000
932000
934000
934000
936000
936000
938000
938000
5660
00
566000
5680
00
568000
5700
00
570000
5720
00
572000
5740
00
574000
5760
00
576000
STRATIFICATION MAPNORTHERN ULU SEGAMA-MALUA FR.SIME DARBY FOREST RESTORATION PROJECTScale: 1:60,000
Interpretation Based On Aerial PhotoSecondary Forest - 2,491 Ha.Shrub/Herbaceous Vegetation - 2,647 Ha.Oil Palm - 267 Ha.
Compartment Boundary
0.7 0 0.7 1.4 KilometersN
L E G E N D:
JABATAN PERHUTANAN SABAHPUSAT PENYELIDIKAN PERHUTANANREMOTE SENSING & GIS LABMap Source:d:\frc\AVProject\.aprMap No.: PPP\RSGIS\0816Tarikh:03/06/2008
IMPLEMENTATION
Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010
(A) Site Preparation
Involve site reconnaissance and survey
Required knowledge and skills of survey
Natural features adopt as blocking boundary
Compassing: 8m interval for planting line and 8m interval for planting point
Line opening: 2m width, slashing weeds and creepers
Progress (Sept. 2009 – Oct. 2010) : 445 ha
Productivity: 6.25 mandays/ha Cost: RM 506.00/ha
Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010
IMPLEMENTATION
(B) Silviculture treatment
Removal of overhead shade and impeding vegetation (woody vines and climbing bamboo).
Focus at secondary forests. To enhance growth and quality of
planted seedling and potential natural regeneration.
Manual cuts of climbers : less 5cm stump height and hanging 1m above the ground.
Progress (Sept. 2009 – Oct. 2010) : 395 ha.
Productivity: 2.05 mandays/ha Cost: RM 174.00/ha.
IMPLEMENTATION
Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010
(c) Comprehensive Restoration Plan
Information of site-species matching Consideration: shade, topographic relief,
drainage and general soil type Required knowledge and skills of tree ID and
forest ecology Assessment for each planting point Site-species suitability guidance by FRC team Recommendation : point to be planted
(method of planting : single or cluster), to be skipped & natural regeneration selection
Wild fruit trees : < 20% Consideration: available seedlings stock Progress (Sept. 2009 – Oct. 2010) : 375 ha Productivity: 1.03 mandays/ha Cost: RM 85.00/ha
Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010
IMPLEMENTATION(D) Planting
Modification of spacings and methods. Not uniform forest structure and fragmented
pocket forests. Spacing : 8m x 8m. Under canopy: cluster planting of 3 seedlings
(dipterocarps & non dipterocarps). Open area: single planting (pioneers & wild
fruit trees). Intensity: 156 points/ha. Average seedlings: 253 seedlings/ha. Application of fertilizer CIRP and NPK green
(± 10 grams/seedlings). Slow progress due to productivity, seedlings
availability and drought factor. Composition: 71% dipterocarps : 29%
pioneers and fruits. 38% under canopy planting, 46% open area
planting, 10% natural selection & 6% skipped
33 species planted Progress (Sept. 2009 – Oct. 2010) : 191 ha. Productivity: 5.6 mandays/ha Cost: RM 1,038.00/ha.
No Vernacular name Group No Vernacular name Group1 Seraya melantai Dipterocarp 18 Nyatoh sidang Non dipterocarp
2 Seraya tembaga Dipterocarp 19 Gaharu Non dipterocarp
3 Seraya majau Dipterocarp 20 Medang pengulobon Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)
4 Seraya punai Dipterocarp 21 Telisai @ ketapang Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)
5 Kapur paji Dipterocarp 22 Kayu malam Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)
6 Kawang pinang Dipterocarp 23 Meritam Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)
7 Kawang jantung Dipterocarp 24 Kedondong Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)
8 Pangiran kesat Dipterocarp 25 Kembayau (kedondong) Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)
9 Pangiran gajah Dipterocarp 26 Ranggu Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)
10 Selangan batu laut Dipterocarp 27 Sentang / limpaga Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)
11 Obah suluk Dipterocarp 28 Belimbing hutan Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)
12 Belian Non dipterocarp 29 Mata kucing Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)
13 Pulai Non dipterocarp 30 Mempening Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)
14 Putat paya Non dipterocarp 31 Laran Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)
15 Pelajau Non dipterocarp 32 Binuang Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)
16 Sengkuang Non dipterocarp 33 Kulimpapa Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)
17 Mengaris Non dipterocarp
LIST OF PLANTED SPECIES
IMPLEMENTATION
Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010
(E) Maintenance
Reconditioning by elimination of competitor vegetation, as to boost the growth of planted seedlings.
Census of survival seedlings. Activities: planting line clearing, circle
weeding fertilizing & resupply dead seedling.
Application of herbicide – Sentry (strictly in accordance with FSC standard).
Maintenance intensity : 13 rounds (4 rounds for each 1st & 2nd year, 3 rounds in 3rd year & 2 rounds in 4th year).
Productivity: 3.2 mandays/ha Cost: RM 300.00/ha/round Considering of 13 rounds: RM
3,900.00/ha (for four years)
IMPLEMENTATION
Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010
Survival rate
Survival rate one year after planting : 67% 52% mortality occured at open planting and 48%
under canopy planting
Contributing factorPercentage of mortality (%)
Single planting
Cluster planting
Average
Drought 53.00 34.00 44.00
Human factor 0.50 - 0.01
Wildlife disturbance 0.50 1.00 0.05
Forest debris 1.00 1.00 0.08
Others (handling, weeds competition)
45.00 64.00 55.86
Total 100.00 100.00 100.00
Weeds and creepers competition
Sambar deer browsing
Workers carelessness
Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010
NURSERY MANAGEMENT Location: Compartment 116. Full operation : May 2010. Cost development: RM 326,000.00. Management: contracted to AY
Enterprise Supply seedlings to the project:
RM3.00/seedlings. Capacity: 200,000 seedlings at one
time . Seeds source: Ulu Segama FR,
Tawau, Kunak, Kinabatangan, Telupid & Sandakan.
Current stocks: 115,000 seedlings 59 mixed species of dipterocarps,
non dipterocarps, pioneers and wild fruit species
No Vernacular name Group No Vernacular name Group1 Seraya melantai Dipterocarp 31 Pelajau Non dipterocarp2 Seraya tembaga Dipterocarp 32 Sengkuang Non dipterocarp3 Seraya majau Dipterocarp 33 Keranji Non dipterocarp4 Selangan batu gelombang Dipterocarp 34 Mengaris Non dipterocarp5 Seraya daun emas Dipterocarp 35 Nyatoh sidang Non dipterocarp6 Seraya kuning barun Dipterocarp 36 Nyatoh bulu Non dipterocarp7 Seraya punai Dipterocarp 37 Perupok Non dipterocarp8 Seraya kuning siput Dipterocarp 38 Medang pengulobon Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)9 Seraya lenggai Dipterocarp 39 Telisai @ ketapang Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)10 Seraya timbau Dipterocarp 40 Tampoi Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)11 Kapur paji Dipterocarp 41 Kayu malam Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)12 Kapur gumpait Dipterocarp 42 Terap ikal Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)13 Kawang pinang Dipterocarp 43 Terap togop Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)14 Kawang jantung Dipterocarp 44 Meritam Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)15 Kawang burung Dipterocarp 45 Kedondong Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)16 Pangiran kesat Dipterocarp 46 Penarahan Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)17 Pangiran gajah Dipterocarp 47 Rambai Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)18 Keruing putih Dipterocarp 48 Kembayau (kedondong) Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)19 Keruing belimbing Dipterocarp 49 Jering Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)20 Keruing merah Dipterocarp 50 Ranggu Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)21 Keruing gondol Dipterocarp 51 Kembang semangkuk jantan Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)22 Keruing daun besar Dipterocarp 52 Sentang / limpaga Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)23 Keruing merekah Dipterocarp 53 Belimbing hutan Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)24 Selangan batu laut Dipterocarp 54 Mata kucing Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)25 Selangan batu terendak Dipterocarp 55 Mempening Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)26 Obah suluk Dipterocarp 56 Laran Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)27 Belian Non dipterocarp 57 Binuang Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)28 Pulai Non dipterocarp 58 Kulimpapa Non dipterocarp (wild fruit)29 Rengas Non dipterocarp 59 Gaharu Non dipterocarp30 Putat paya Non dipterocarp
AVAILABLE SEEDLINGS AT PROJECT NURSERY
INFRASTRUCTURE
Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010
(i) Base camp (1) unit office building cum quarters
completed in March 2010. Development cost: RM 319,000.00. Centre of administration and
management.
(ii) Roads Main road : 20 km Inter block roads Maintained by SFD team (1) unit excavator, (1) motorgrader,
(1) unit back hoe loader & (1) unit dump truck
Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010
WILDLIFE MONITORING
Done by SFD’s Wildlife Unit. Collecting basic wildlife
information at working area (Cpt. 112).
Result: abundance of small mammals, RTE species also observed (orang utans, clouded leopards & sun bears).
No Species Notes1 Orang utan Estimated about 5 to 10 individuals 2 Wild boar Very common at common boundary with estate 3 Sambar deer Dominating open area 4 Leopard cat Viable population at disturbed forest 5 Porcupine Very common at open area 6 Mouse deer Common at secondary forest7 Moon rat Common at flat and dry area 8 Monitor lizard Very common at water logged area 9 Common tree shrew Very common at secondary forest 10 Large tree shrew Common at secondary forest 11 Small spiny rat Common at secondary forest 12 Pen tail shrew Common at secondary forest 13 Slender tree shrew Common at disturb forest 14 Plaintain squirrel Common at secondary forest 15 Pangolin Common at open and dry area 16 Clouded leopard Estimated 1 to 2 individuals 17 Sun bear Estimated 1 to 2 individuals
BASIC WILDLIFE INFORMATION AT COMPARTMENT 112
ISSUES AND DISCUSSIONS
Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010
(i) Target vs Reality
Target for annual planting : 500ha – 1000ha. 6-8 years to complete 5,400ha (started 2008). Achievement : 191 ha (Sept. 2009-Oct.2010). Issues of low performance: staff recruitment, inadequate
planting material, limited species diversity & prolonged drought.
Mitigation measures:(i) Reconstruct PoP – a realistic target of 500 ha/annum(ii) Increase nursery capacity(iii) Engage local communities of Segama to supply seedlings(iv)Continuous SFD’s capacity building(v) Increase SFD’s staff number for skills required incomponents, i.e.: survey, CRP & supervisor(vi)Contract out planting and maintenance component to
local entrepreneurs & local communities of Segama
ISSUES AND DISCUSSIONS
Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010
(ii) Polythene bag size
The usage of bigger poly-bag size : 6” x 9”. Reasons: better rooting system and upkeep nutrient level
for open planting . Issues: more weights and affecting productivity per
hectare. Mitigation measures:
(i) Improve planting medium composition to reduce poly-bag’s weight
(ii) Application of ‘tray system’ for seedlings transportation
ISSUES AND DISCUSSIONS
Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010
(iii) Productivity
Slow progress due to lower productivity of SFD’s contract staff.
Factors: different background, skills, incompetent & problematic .
Mitigation measures:(i) Termination of problematic staff –
(6) people sacked out.(ii) Minor revisions of productivity incentives. (iii) Continuous capacity building – on the job training
ISSUES AND DISCUSSIONS
Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010
(iv) Seed sources
Inadequate planting material impedes planting progress.
Issue: seeds production is influenced by weather pattern (little drought encourage flowering & fruiting of dipterocarps) and very localised .
Mitigation measures:(i) Encourage nursery operator to out source seeds procurement from other district.(ii) Nursery operator engage with local communities – traditional knowledge of local flowering and location. (iii) Seeds supply from FRC team.(iv) Training on the seeds collection technique by FRC team.(v) Establishment of phenology plots within
the Ulu Segama FR – assisted by FRC team.
ISSUES AND DISCUSSIONS
Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010
(v)Spacing
Recommended planting space in planning phase:- (a) Open areas: 7.5m x 5m - single planting; (b) Secondary forests: 12.5m x 12.5m – cluster planting
Issue: not practical for big scale restoration programme Reason: forest structure is not uniform and are
fragmented pockets of forests. Mitigation measures: modified to 8m x 8m with
combination single and cluster planting.
ISSUES AND DISCUSSIONS
Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010
(vi) Higher mortality
Higher mortality rate: 33% after one year planting. Contributor factors: weeds competition, seedlings
handling and drought phenomenon. Recommended mitigation measures:- Reduce number of carried poly-bags to lighten
knapsacks weight– can jeopardize productivity, increase mandays/ha.
Control the length of planting line ~ 500m – 800m. Intensive maintenance programme by shortening
interval period– can affect cost/ha Prohibition of planting during prolonged drought Increase efficiency of herbicide application
CONCLUSION
Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010Sabah Forestry Department – Nov. 2010
Strategic planning provides guidance with some improvements during the implementation phase.
Some issues are recognized and mitigation measures are taken into action to increase project performance.
Size of rehabilitated area is not merely the measurable achievement but forests quality and its ecosystem functions must be address properly.
THANK YOU