forbes marshall boilers

21
www.forbesmarshall .com

Upload: forbes-marshall

Post on 20-Aug-2015

384 views

Category:

Business


7 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Forbes Marshall Boilers

www.forbesmarshall.com

Page 2: Forbes Marshall Boilers

www.forbesmarshall.com

Energy Balance in a typical steam and condensate loop

Generation 100%

80%Distribution losses

3-5%

Boiler House Losses 15-18%

Trap & Condensate 20%

Process demand 55%

Page 3: Forbes Marshall Boilers

www.forbesmarshall.com

Condensate Drained and Flash steam

vented @3bar

Losses from traps – 75 Kgs/hr

Moisture drained.. 350 Kgs/hr

Feed Water Tank@ 30 Deg C

Process demand 500Kgs/hr dry steam

Boiler required capacity = 1010Kgs/hr

Typical Steam & Condensate Loop Coil Type

Page 4: Forbes Marshall Boilers

www.forbesmarshall.com

High Fuel Bill !!!Poor Product

Quality !!!

High Water

consumption !!!

Corr

osio

n of

Equi

pmen

t !!!

Wet Steam !!!

Poor Life of the Coil

boilers !!!

High Cycle Times !!!

High Steam Loads !!!

The Issues

Page 5: Forbes Marshall Boilers

www.forbesmarshall.com

FWT@ 90 Deg C

Moisture Drained 2%

Condensate Recovery 20%

Process Steam Demand Reduced to 450 Kg/hr

The Solution : Shell Type Boiler

Page 6: Forbes Marshall Boilers

www.forbesmarshall.com

Coil Type Boiler Shell Type Boiler

The Difference

Page 7: Forbes Marshall Boilers

www.forbesmarshall.com

Advantages

Page 8: Forbes Marshall Boilers

www.forbesmarshall.com

SOUNDS EXCITING !!!

A few more reasons to Change

Page 9: Forbes Marshall Boilers

www.forbesmarshall.com

Parameters Fuel Savings Criteria Consumption

Coil Type Boiler 48.75 lt/hr 28% Eff = 75% dryness fraction = 80%

Coil Type Boiler 49.85 lt/hr 30% Eff = 75% dryness fraction = 65%

Shell Type Boiler 35.49 lt/hr Eff = 89% dryness fraction = 98%

Savings due to

Flash Steam recovery Right Trapping

Dry Steam generation

Temperature & Pressure Control

Low Cost of Ownership

Page 10: Forbes Marshall Boilers

www.forbesmarshall.com

Actual Savings ofActual Savings of

25 - 30%25 - 30%

Page 11: Forbes Marshall Boilers

www.forbesmarshall.com

Industry Coil Boiler Shell Boiler

Pharma Industry in Pune    

Heating period for 100 ml (Autoclave) 55 mins 35 mins

Heating period for 500 ml (Autoclave) 66 mins 50 mins

Distilled water o/p from Multicolumn 200 lit 275 lit

  

Bottling Company    

Bottles produced per Minute (BPM) 340 500

 

Rubber Company    

Batch Time 8 Hrs 6 Hrs

Pieces per month 109,000 167,000

Increased Productivity

Page 12: Forbes Marshall Boilers

www.forbesmarshall.com

Coil Boiler Shell Boiler

Steam Quality Wet Dry Saturated

Constant Load Poor Steady

Fluctuating Load Water carry over as Steady due to sufficient

no steam space steam space

Instantaneous Loads Pressure Drop Steady Output

The 2 Q’s ….

Page 13: Forbes Marshall Boilers

www.forbesmarshall.com

Savings in Water

Page 14: Forbes Marshall Boilers

www.forbesmarshall.com

Partial List of industries using Shell Type boilers –

1. Food 13. Personal Products2. Garments 14. Beverages3. Chemicals 15. Packaging Industries4. Cattle feed 16. Plastics5. Dairy6. Educational Institutes7. Rubber8. Hotels9. Hospitals10. Formulations11. Pharmaceuticals12. Glass

More than 200 boilers in operation in the industries which traditionally used coil type boilers

Reference List

Page 15: Forbes Marshall Boilers

www.forbesmarshall.com

Page 16: Forbes Marshall Boilers

www.forbesmarshall.com

The Old System

Feed Water Tank@ 30 Deg C

35% Moisture at 180 Deg C drained

Condensate Drained and

Flash steam vented @3bar

TD traps..!

850kg/hr600 kg/hr

Pressure Drop..

Page 17: Forbes Marshall Boilers

www.forbesmarshall.com

Problems

Page 18: Forbes Marshall Boilers

www.forbesmarshall.com

FWT@ 90 Deg C

Condensate at 95 Deg C

Condensate at 95 Deg Crecovered

Recoverable Flash Steam @ 3 bar

1TPH boiler, dry steam load – 550Kgs/hr

Changed to FT

traps..!

No Pressure Drop..

The Solution !

Page 19: Forbes Marshall Boilers

www.forbesmarshall.com

o Fuel consumption reduced from 5 Tankers per 2 months to 4 tankers per 2 month.

(Saving of 6 tanker of 10000 Kg/Year)

o Reduced load on ETP… Practically the ETP remains idle now.

o For a Drum Heating process – The heating time has reduced from 10 hrs to 4 hours.

o Reactor heating process – 14 hrs to 8 hrs. (Endothermic Reaction)

Results Speak for themselves

Page 20: Forbes Marshall Boilers

www.forbesmarshall.com

More improvements and Benefits

Page 21: Forbes Marshall Boilers

www.forbesmarshall.com