following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · to find a specific order, please use...

176
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the selected date. The documents are displayed in no particular order. However, all of these documents are searchable. To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f (Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac); 2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the form field provided and press Enter or Return. In most applications, the first appearance of the index number, the word, or the phrase in the document will be highlighted. Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications, including browsers and PDF viewers.

Upload: others

Post on 04-Jul-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.

To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.

1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);

2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.

In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.

Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.

Page 2: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

FILEDSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK OCT 1 9 2015

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S.Part 50(Moulton,P.)

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICENEW YORK

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190402/14

ELIPETROVITCHand ANTOINETTEPETROVITCH NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company

with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: N v York

Jordan C. Fox,EBelluck& FoxI546 FifthAvenuNew York, NY

,2015

CeighDeCotiis, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant A. O. Smith WaterProducts Company88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005

__SO ORDERED,

Hon. Peter H.Moulton

2625624

Page 3: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XWILLIAM C. BODDY, and FRED C. BODDYJR. as Co-Executors for the Estate of FRED C.BODDY,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

INDEX NO. 190137/2015

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

X

WHEREFORE, defendant Neles-Jamesbury, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Neles-Jamesbury, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant Neles-Jamesbury, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

For purposes of this order, facsimile and PDF signatures shall be deemed binding as

originals.

Dated: New York, New YorkOctober ,2015

"SfcTT ?ois tmt.buAdam DrekslerWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C. v Drinker Bid'dle & Reath LLP700 Broadway ÿ 1177 Avenue of the Americas, 41st FloorNew York, NY 10003 W New York, New York 10036(212) 558-5500 ÿ 7%{212) 248-3140Attorneysfor Plaintiffs Attorneysfor DefendantWilliam C. Boddy, andFredC. Boddy Jr. as Neles-Jamesbury, Inc.Co-Executorsfor the Estate ofFredC. Boddy

SO ORDERED:oil Peter H. Moulton

F V 15

Page 4: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

---- -—XMARGARET F. DUFFY, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate of FRANK DUFFY,

Plaintiff,

-against-

A. C. AND S., INC., et al.,IncludingMAREMONT CORPORATION,

Defendants.

Index No. 107994/99

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

-X

WHEREFORE, defendant Maremont Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Maremont Corporation withprejudice, and there beingno

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that uponnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Maremont Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs. FILEDOCT 19 2015Dated: New York, New York

August _,2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICÿ'NEW YORK

Matthew Mclntyre, EscWeitz and Luxenberg,P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED,

Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Jordan D. Bcltz, Esq.Kasowitz/Benson,Torres & Friedman,LLPAttorney/for Defendant MaremontCorporation1633 BroadwayNew York, New York 10019

(S D

Page 5: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, ft)

This Document Relates to: Index No: 190034/2015

WALTER ANDREWS and GERALDINEANDREWS

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Lennox Industries, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Lennox Industries, Inc.with prejudice, and there beingno

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Lennox Industries, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

0CT I0 2015

.w-uv UfWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

JonatDARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for Lennox Industries, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,on. Peter H. Moulton "7

Page 6: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536 .13340/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

JACK KOGEN, Deceased,

Plaintiff ,

-against-

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,

Defendants .

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

Index No. : 120898/97105231/98111071/98100665/00113687/02

(May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all afid clpops|jfej|imsagainst defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby

OCT lgdismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED : / £Jc f// 5East Hanover, New Jersey

ee«JNrvc,.i;RK,s

.At.MATTHEW MACINTYRE, ÿSQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

, MURPHY, GAROFALOSTEPFGARRITY, GF& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,norable Peter H. Moulton

Page 7: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536 .10045/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

ROBERT S. SABADASZ, Deceased,

Plaintiff ,

-against-

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,

Defendants .

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

Index No.: 109782/00122191/99

(March 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and thÿpsaÿe /preÿherebydismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: /I'/ci/l[East Hanover, New Jersey

L.

MATTHEW MACINTYRE,WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Cou;

0ii 1-9 ?0]5

ÿWVoflK°FF/cE

, MURPHY, GAROFALOSTEPHIGARRITY, GF& FLINN 'Attorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,Honorable Peter H. Moulton

7o/jsj/b

Page 8: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536 .07933/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

This document relates to:Index No.: 100029/99

HENRY MIKA,

Plaintiff , (May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

-against - NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERUNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,

et al . ,

Defendants .

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED:

East Hanover, New Jersey

ÿ>L[ * 9 m

STEPHEN F. BALSAMO,"HSSQ . CCbGARRITY, GRAHAjtf, MURPHY, GAROFALO& FLINN /

COuKj 'y Cj

MATTHEW MACINTYRE, J3SQWEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Attorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,Honorable Peter H. Moulton

Page 9: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536 .07 8 8 9/AJM

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

ROBERT BURNS KOBLER, Deceased,

Plaintiff ,

-against-

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,

et al.,

Defendants .

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

Index No.: 121894/98

(May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the game are hereby

F M Edismissed with prejudice and without costs. H - '

OCI 19 2015DATED: /ÿJC / / /

East Hanover, New JerseyUf/>5

MATTHEW MACINTYRE,WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

COu.N CLERK'S OFFlSiNEWjf&FlK

STEPHEGARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFAI.O& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,Honorable Peter H. Moulton lo/is/lS

Page 10: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536 .12675/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

NORBERT KACZ ,

Plaintiff ,

-against-

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,

Defendants .

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

Index No. : 115543/02106709/02

(May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, bef111! t &eDre hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED :

East Hanover, New Jersey

MATTHEW MACINTYRE, YESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

OCT 19 2015

COUNTV CtEftR'8 OFFI6ENEW Y0RK

STEPHEN F. BALSAMO, ESQ.GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED, /_ (oflSjfÿHonorable Peter H. Moulton

Page 11: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536 .21782/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

HOWARD A. HNISDO, Deceased,

Plaintiff ,

-against-

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,

Defendants .

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

Index No. : 123989/94124013/94115996/95111074/98117232/07

(May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation,

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

nana

ar|d fthe |ÿam| Jÿre hereby

hk/J/riDATED :

East Hanover, New Jersey

//MATTHEW MACINTYREJ'ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

OCT !9 i

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

STEPHfflSI F. BALEAMO, ESQ.GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,onorable Peter H. Moulton

Page 12: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536 .09910/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

WILLIE J. HAMILTON, Deceased,

Plaintiff ,

-against-

UNITED CONVEYOR. CORPORATION,

et al . ,

Defendants .

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

Index No. : 121991/99106348/00n

(May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, allPlftiiBcrossclaims

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the sarnif hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs. I9 20 15?

A A/'// 5er , New

!.Z£Jz

DATED: / <-- / /

East Hanover, New JerseyQ0ÿLEmS0PFlcsnew yqrk

MATTHEW MACINTYRE,.yESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERG "Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

STEPHEN F. BALÿAMOTeSQ:---GARRITY, GRAHÿ, MURPHY, GAROFALO& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,snorable Peter H. Moulton

joi &// S

Page 13: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536 .13370/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

RAYMOND MICHAEL WACHOWICZ,Deceased,

Plaintiff ,

-against-

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,

Defendants .

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

Index No. : 107135/00125770/99

(March 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be Bpÿd §thl SI*® O hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED : Jt/c!frEast Hanover, New Jersey

3

MATTHEW MACINTYRE, ESQ .WEITZ & LUXENBERG ÿ

Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

ott » s

COUNiY ÿL'; JKS officeNEW YORK

STEPHEN F. BALSAMO, ES(£->I, MURPHY, GAROFALO

STEPH1;GARRITY, GF& FLINN

Attorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,Honora&le Peter H. Moulton

Mi€7/S

Page 14: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536 .10526/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

This document relates to:

WILLIAM ANTON STOCKHAUSEN,Index No. : 108382/00

114791/00

Plaintiff , (March 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

-against- NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERUNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,

et al . ,

Defendants .

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: /U/L / f/ÿ>East Hanover, New Jersey

MATTHEW MACINTYRE, E,

WEITZ & LUXENBERGSTEPHEN F.GARRITY, GI MURPHY, GAROFALO

Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,

Honorable Peter H. Moulton

Page 15: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536 .22502/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

This document relates to:Index No. : 190024/08

SEYMOUR SAMUELS, Deceased,

Plaintiff , (March 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

-against - NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERUNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,

et al . ,

Defendants .

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all cl

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and

dismissed with prejudice and without costs. °C] 1 9 2(115

DATED :• / /

East Hanover, 'New Jersey

MATTHEW MACINTYRE HjZN F. BALSAM57 ESQÿITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALOWEITZ & LUXENBERG

Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,Peter H. Moulton

Page 16: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536 .23105/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

WILLIAM NORTON,

Plaintiff ,

-against-

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,

et al . ,

Defendants .

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

Index No.: 190225/09190134/11

(March 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants ,-,ÿ11 claims and crossclaims

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, bes aJd Ifcjie&"£>re hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: / /•' //5East Hanover, New Jersey

OCT 1

MATTHEW MACINTYRE, .WEITZ & LUXENBERG

Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

9 2015county > n t.,

STEPHEN F. BaZs"SMD7 EfGARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO& FLINN

Attorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,Honorable Peter H. Moulton

s

Page 17: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OFNEW YORK

INRE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONÿX NYCAL

I.A.S.Part 50ÿX (Moulton, f?)

FREDERICK W. EVANS,JR. AND JEANNE EVANS,IndexNo. 190109/2015

Plaintiffs,

-against-NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

3M COMPANY, etal.

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, defendant PFIZER INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-

entitled case, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant

PFIZER INC.only with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant PFIZER INC.only be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

jphin Earl$C--f<!7%THvfrJARLY & STRAUSS,LLC L60 LexingtonAvenue, 20th Floor

ChristopHSTRenzulTi IRENZULLILAWFIRM,LL]

81 Main Street, Suite 508360 LexingtonAvenue, 20th FloorNew York,NY 10017Telephone: (212) 986-2233Facsimile: (212) 986-2255Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Defendant

White Plains, NY 10601 0Telephone: (914) 285-0700Facsimile: (914) 285-1213gQuÿ

OCT 1g 20J5

ÿ ClEHft'g Qp

SO ORDERED, /1L-— —JOhi,j/sr''Hon. Peter H.Moulton

Page 18: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE:NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JOSEPHLUCENT AND DOLORESLUCENT

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50

(Moulton, P.)

Index No: 109348/2011

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant The LincolnElectric Company ("Lincoln") hereby requests

summary judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Lincoln,with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Lincoln,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: Neiv-York, NevlolT .

New York2015

Janet CÿmshrEsqTLOCKS LAW FIRMPLLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 838-3333

BrianT. Murnane, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for The Lincoln Electric Company116 East 27th Street, 12thFloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

>or

F ÿ FQOct i9 2(115

SO ORDERED, /z,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

C°L7Vry(c£

Page 19: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION Index No.: 107400/2002

JORDAN JAMES BUTLER

WHEREFORE, defendant O'CONNOR CONSTRUCTORS, INC. f/k/a

THOMAS O'CONNOR & CO., INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against defendant O'CONNOR CONSTRUCTORS, INC., be and the same are hereby

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

dismissed with prejudice and without cost.

Date: New York. New YorkJuly 1,2015. SC 7 I9 2015

By: Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.UNTILh»gomeg

By: Patrick T. Steinbauer, Esq.

700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003Attorneysfor the Plaintiffs

WEITZ & LUXENBERG LITCHFIELD CAVO LLP420 Lexington Avenue, Suite 2104New York, New York 10170Attorneyfor the DefendantO'Connor Constructors, Inc.

SO ORDERED: -4I& P//S//6Jfon. Sherry Klein Heitler.

HON:PETERH.MOULTON OCT 14 2015

Page 20: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION Index No.: 122199/99

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

JAMES N. WALTERS and MARY M. WALTERS

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant O'CONNOR CONSTRUCTORS, INC. f/k/a

THOMAS O'CONNOR & CO., INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against defendant O'CONNOR CONSTRUCTORS, INC., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without cost. A"/ iDate: New York. New York

July 1,2015.

HTJP.ZZ.MBy: Matthew MacIntyre/"Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003Attorneysfor the Plaintiffs

By: P'atrick T. SteiLITCHFIELD CAVO LLP ÿ ÿ

420 Lexington Avenue, Suite 2104New York, New York 10170Attorneyfor the DefendantO'Connor Constructors, Inc.

SO ORDERED:

"rion. Glioiiy KleinHoitier ÿ

HON.PETERH.MOULTON

/S//

i4 -U/5

.J)

;w L

Page 21: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION Index No.: 122013/98

========================================== NO OPPOSITIONTHIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTIONAND ORDERTHOMAS MAGUIRE and MARIE MAGUIRE

WHEREFORE, defendant O'CONNOR CONSTRUCTORS, INC. f/k/a

THOMAS O'CONNOR & CO., INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against defendant O'CONNOR CONSTRUCTORS, INC., be aig£tjie same are hereby

*dismissed with prejudice and without cost.

Date: New York. New YorkJuly 1,2015.

By:'Patrick T. Steinbauer, Eÿj>LITCHFIELD CAVO LLP420 Lexington Avenue, Suite 2104New York, New York 10170Attorneyfor the DefendantO 'Connor Constructors, Inc.

By:WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003Attorneysfor the Plaintiffs

O

SO ORDERED:

Tlun. Sherry Klein Heiiler

I.PETERH.MOULTON

/0//S.//2>

NYS

Page 22: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

w

o

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK COUNTY -

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document relates to:

CONO AMILO MASCARELLAPlaintiffs,

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„

Defendants.

NYCAL u

I.A.S. PartÿS"O(Moulton, P.)

Index No. 121979/99

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Peerless Industries, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against defendant, Peerless Industries, Inc.,with prejudice inthis action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Peerless Industries, Inc.,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New York, New York

11nqw

RebekafcKLee,Attorney for DefendantPeerless Industries, Inc.Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard& Smith LLP77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005212.232.1300File No. 1863.20666

Phan Alvaracto? Esq.Attorney for Plaintiff(s)CONO AMILO MASCARELLÿt*WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C700 Broadway

New York,New York 10003(212)558-5500

%'C/vn

0

SO ORDERED, \°ion. Peter H. Moulton

OCT 14 2015

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

4832-4960-9000.1

Page 23: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

«1 « - ÿ

Page 24: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

NICOLA AZZARONE

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)

Index No.: 190137/10.

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve Corporation, hereby requests .summary judgment

in the above entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Flowserve Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and

there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Flowserve Corporation, be and the saÿÿaJl h/reby|ftkmjftscd with prejudice and

without costs. OctDated: New York. New York

\ID\'6.....L,2015 COUNTy19 lots

... E5* x1°Ov/Ae-yu,£6ÿ •

Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Nicola AzzaroneLevy Konigsbero, LLP800 Third Avenue, 13lhFlNew York, New York 10022(212) 605-6200

Kerry&iuXooK, Esq.Attorney for DefendantFlowserve CorporationMcGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter 11. Moulton

Page 25: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190002/09,

IRWIN GOODMANAND

MILTON O. KARL NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, with prejudice in this

action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: 0OCT 19 ?0'I5

NlMTot-A-b Js\©n/A«'<—, •Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Irwin Goodman and Milton O. KarlLevy Konigsberg, LLP800 Third Avenue, 13,h F1New York, New York 10022(212) 605-6200

COUNTY CLf___

NEW-KeAttorney for DefendantThe Nash Engineering CompanyMcGivney & Ki.ajger, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Page 26: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190165/11

ARNOLD GORDONAND

Rl iODA GORDON NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, DAP, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs* complaint

against defendant, DAP, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, DAP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New Ycuk. New York,2015

OCT I9

COUNTY ci

Matthew Maclntyre, Lscg/ÿAttorney for Plaintiffs)Arnold Gordon and Rhoda GordonWeitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

McGivney & Kluger.P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Attorney for DefendantDAP, Inc.

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter II. Moulton M/s/zs

MM-44S

Page 27: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

SAM GULLAND

JOANNE DYER

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)

Index No.: 190011/09,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Falk Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, The Falk Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, The Falk Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New YoykANew Yorkr"

2015ew YorkANcwfckU:

f01C,\4oWV-i> tÿovAc-Y-, Esj,Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Sam Gull and Joanne DyerLevy Konigsberg,LLP800 Third Avenue, 13th F1New York. New York 10022(212) 605-6200

kefeyatni-Gdok, Esq/ CÿAttorney for Del:endimlyThe Falk CorporationMcGivney & Klucer,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, johy/ÿon. Peter H. Moulton

Page 28: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-x

INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONx

This Document Relates To:

MARK V. SLEVIN, as Executor of the Estate ofPATRICK T. SLEVIN,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.W. CHESTERTON CO., INC., et al.,

Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 5ÿ(Hnn Shi'iry KLin TT-itl-r)-

Index No.: 190406-10

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC. (f/k/a SQUARE D

COMPANY) ("SQUARE D") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against

defendant SQUARE D with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant SQUARE D be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: ! £*( ÿ \ \ S

-Erica V. Cesaro, Esq.— „T Q ?n1c AngelaWjiglio, Esq.LEVY PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERdjULR y £UlJ K&L GATES LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs) Attorneys for Defendant800 Third Avenue, IPFloorCOUNTY CLFRK'S QF$©fÿEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC.New York, NY 10022 new YORK (f/k/a SQUARE D COMPANY)(212) 605-6200 599 Lexington Avenue

New York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900

SO ORDERED, .

rrr leriy Klein

HON.PETERH.MOULTON

/iV/y/Na a

Page 29: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT1OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.COUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

SAM GULLAND

JOANNE DYER

I.A.S. Part 50(Moullon, P)

Index No.; 190011/09.

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tate Andale, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Tate Andale, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tate Andale, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs. filedOCT 19 2015Dated: New York. New York

.. ACT [.£1. ,2015

COUNTY GLtYdOMJFFigg

ÿi\c-vTouAÿ CVj,Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Sam Gull and Joanne DyerLevy Konigsberg,LLP800 Third Avenue, 13th F1New York, New York 10022(212) 605-6200

Es(fAttorney for DefendantTate Andale, Inc.McGivney & Klajger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

ocr j

Page 30: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

PATRICK T. SLEVIN

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)

Index No.: 190406/10,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant. Tate Andale, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Tate Andale, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tate Andale, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New York. Niw York\ IQ K ÿ 2015 Oct

£o'Nry

?0I5

'0/5ÿ

NI is.Attorney for PlainlilT(s)Patrick T. SlevinLevy Konigsberg,LLP800 Third Avenue. 13lh FINew York, New York 10022(212) 605-6200

SO ORDERED,

/C£KcyaiiM-Cook, Esq.

Attorney for Defendant'fate Andale, Inc.McGivney & Klugcr,P.C,

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Ion. Peter II. Moulton

1666-12

Page 31: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

PATRICK T. SLEVIN

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)

Index No.: 190406/10,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kingsbury Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Kingsbury Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and

there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kingsbury Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York.......ItA.m .,2015Oct

£o9

CQU,2015

'Nry

Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Patrick T. S levinLevy Konigsberg, LLP800 Third Avenue, 13th F1New York, New York 10022(212) 605-6200

fen,,£°ok, Esq.Attorney for DefendantKingsbury CorporationMcGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDJ•R ED, A/ Hon. PeltHon. Peter II.Moulton

jolis//

W -C'C / i4

— l- -y

2468-6

Page 32: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION; NYCAL: l.A.S. Part 50j (Moulton, P)

This Document Relates to:

Index No.: 190406/10.

PATRICK T. SLEV1N : NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYi JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, D.W. Hercules, LLP d/b/a Hercules Engine Components LLC

sued incorreclty herein as Hercules Engine Components, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, D.W. Hercules, I.,LP d/b/a Hercules Engine Components LLC sued

incorreclty herein as Hercules Engine Components, with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, D.W. Hercules, LLP d/b/a Hercules Engine Components LLC sued incorreclty herein

as Hercules Engine Components, be and the same are hereby dismis

without costs.

Dated: New Ywrk, New York0CT Id2015

l<o\ o\........• 2015 county clerk,s

Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Patrick T. SlevinLevy Konigsberg.LLP800 Third Avenue, 13lh F1New York, New York 10022(212) 605-6200

KmyaOJJ'C&ok, Esq.Attorney for DefendantD.W. Hercules, LLPMcGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter II.Moulton

Page 33: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY

X

Inre NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

GEORGE STRYCHALSKI and MARY STRYCHALSKI,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC, et al.

Defendants.

-X

NYCALIndex No.: 190155/2013

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant McKesson Corporation hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant McKesson Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

McKesson Corporation be and the samefijfe igsrdoy dismissed with prejudice and without costs.1L Eh

Dated: New York, New York *

September3% ,2015

LEVY KONIGSBERG, L.L.P.

By:mes M. Kramer

oc? * 9 m6QUNTY CLkR

NIX0NPEABODY LLP

mm,

800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, New York 10022Telephone: (212) 605-6200Facsimile: (212) 605-6290Attorneysfor Plaintiffs

KristinM. Jambcrdino

437 Madison AvenueNew York, New York 10022Telephone: (212) 940-3000Facsimile: (212)940-3111Attorneysfor DefendantMcKesson Corporation frf

SO ORDERED

•Horn Sheny Klein Ilcillci'

HON.PETERH.MOULTON

3 J 0 •' rall']

iSirf]—'L-i.' j

I

Page 34: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

ÿx

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

xCYNTHIA MAGILL, Individually and as an Administratrixto the Estate of OTIS CORTHELL,

Index No.: 190214/09

-against-Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„ I.A.S. Part 50Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Defendants.— x

WHEREFORE, Defendant GARDNER DENVER, INC. (hereinafter "GARDNER

DENVER"), hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant

GARDNER DENVER, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, GARDNER DENA 'with prejudice and

STas Novack, Esq.Levy Konigsberg, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10022(212)605-6200

without costs to either party.

Dated: New York, New York

ÿ Arulfefiy W.uDean, Esq.Segal McCaanbndge SiSegal McCaanbndge Singer & Mahoney, Ltd.Attorneys for Defendants850 Third Avenue, Ste 1100New York, New York 10022(212)651-7500

SO ORDERED,

£Rm. Peter H. Moulton

Page 35: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

Index No.: 190413/11InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

FRANCIS GOES,

PIaintiff(s),NO OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION

- against -

AURORA PUMP COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests Summary

Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Aurora Pump Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs to either party.

Dated: .p»0*>og.r z_q ,2015New York, New York

-kj'JNiu, ÿ —Katrina H. Murphy, EstpjCSEGAL McCAMm&®$SINGER & MAHONEY

Matthew Maclntyre, Esq. 1

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Attorneys for DefendantAurora Pump Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Page 36: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

Index No.: 190107/09InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

RALPH ARONE,

Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION- against -

WEIL-MCLAIN, et al„

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are herebv dismissed with nreiudice and without costs

4f-Matthew Maclntyre, {2sq.

to either party.

Dated: 1O/0S 2015New York, New York

Andrew P. Kates, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED, _HÿrfTPetefH. Moulton

Page 37: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_

Index No.: 100387/08InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

CHARLES BAGGIANO,

Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

against - MOTION

WEIL-MCLAIN, et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs

to either party.

Dated: lo/®SNew York, New York

_, 2015 Fn

Matthew Maclntyre, tssq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

£o*9 2015

ÿAndrew P. Kates, Esq. nSEGAL McCAMBRIDGE ÿ

SINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

New York, NY 10022(212)651-7500 f

SO ORDERED,on. Peter H. Moulton

Page 38: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

Index No.: 190137/09InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

FRANKIE FUGATE,

Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION- against -

WEIL-MCLAIN, et ah,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs

to either party.

Dated: _ (Q/q3 _, 2015

Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.

New York, New York

.ndrew P. Kates, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

New York, NY 10022

SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain

SO ORDERED,Hortf Peter H. Moulton

Page 39: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_

Index No.: 190007/09InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

DOUG CHAPPLE,

Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

against - MOTION

WEIL-MCLAIN, et al„

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed.jwith prejudice and without costs

to either party.

Dated: 10/05 _, 2015

smissedwj

filedOCT 19 ZOfi

New York, New York

eoyN,yNg(ÿcrF'C- ./

Matthew Maclntyre, Eg

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Andrew P. Kates, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED,Hgli.'p&erH"Moulton

WWS

Page 40: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_

Index No.: 100234/03InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

WILLIAM C. ESPOSITO,

Plaintiffs), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

- against - MOTION

WEIL-MCLAIN, et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs

to either party.

Dated: 1Q /o 5 _, 2015New York, New York

Matthew Maclntyre, EsqCWEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

OCT 19 »

G0BNTY cl

Andrew P. KatdJs, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED,. Peter H. Moulton

tej'sj/s

Page 41: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_

Index No.: 111089/02InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

JAMES WILLIAM CARR,

Plaintiffs), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

- against - MOTION

WEIL-MCLAIN, et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed ejÿidice and without costs

to either party.

\d /obDated: 2015

£o0CTlÿm

New York, New York Cou"iy»--- ">.ÿ N't,/

Matthew Maclntyre,esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

*7

. s'-S'.. _c. Andrew P. ]<fates, Esq.

SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED,Ham Peter H. Moulton

Page 42: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

Index No.: 101812/08InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

ROY F. SCHNETTLER,

Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION- against -

WEIL-MCLAIN, et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs

to either party.

Dated: 1 o Iq5 _, 2015New York. New York

Andrew P. Kates, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE

Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 0SWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

P~'

SO ORDERED,on. Peter H. Moulton

Page 43: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_

Index No.: 100917/08InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

WALTER A. REILLY,

Plaintiffs), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

- against - MOTION

WEIL-MCLAIN, et al„

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs

to either party.

Dated: 10 lob 2015New York, New York

Matthew Maclntyre, EsWEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

FILEDOCT 19 2015

COUNTYNU

Andrew P. Kates, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTDAttorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED,on. Peter H. Moulton

Page 44: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_

Index No.: 190172/09InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

WILLIAM E. JOYCE,

Plaintiffs), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

- against - MOTION

WEIL-MCLAIN, et al„

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs

to either party.

Dated: 6/0$ 2015New York, New York

Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

£*0COlJ°~yQ

to,

Andrew P. Kates, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED, ÿ7

Hon. IJefer 6TMoultonMF//S

OCJ 14 ; ;!5

Page 45: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

Index No.: 111218/01InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

JOSEPH SWIADOWSKY,

Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION- against -

WEIL-MCLAIN, et al„

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs

to either party.

Dated: _,20150Cr * ,9 2015New York, New York

Matthew Maclntyre,OFFICE

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter"on. Peter H. Moulton

Page 46: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

(NEW YORK STATb SUPREME COURTCOUNTY OFNEW YORK

InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

-X NYCAL

NOOPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

This Document Applies to:

OCTOBER 2011EXTREMISTRIAL CLUSTER CASE:

AS FORTHE ESTATEOF CHUNGSOON, IndexNo.: 10-190371O'DWYER AND AS SPOUSE

X

WHEREFORE, defendant WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC., sued incorrectly herein

as "WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. (Individually and as Successor to Robert A. Keasbey

Company)," hereby requests summary judgment in the above-captioned case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against defendant

WASTE MANAGEMENT,INC.with prejudice,andthere beingno opposition thereto,

IT IS SO ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York,New YorkMay_, 20*5 » }\ÿ5

Early Lucarelli Sweeney <

360 LexingtonAvenueNew York, NY 10017

Attorneys for Plaintiff

VT77U,ljeisankdthen

larshall S.Turner,Esq.John Maggi<v£sq.

OCT

twuwu / dUlUl ITioÿivy

t, jr* f\ Condon & Forsyth LLPUlTimes Square- 18111 floor

9 2015ry

i Square •

New York, New York 10036(212)490-9100

Attorneys for DefendantCHUNG SOON O'DWYERÿH/ yQÿ°FF/C£ WASTE MANAGEMENT,INC

SO ORDERED.£ *PETERH.MOULTON

NYS StOK

Page 47: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

This Document Relates To: :

ARTHUR LACHAPELLE AND BARBARA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYLACHAPELLE, JUDGMENT MOTIONAS TO

FORD MOTOR COMPANYPlaintiff(s), :

- against - Index No.: 108749/97

A.C. & S, INC., ET AL., :

Defendant(s).-------- - x

WHEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby requests summary-judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant, FORD MOTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkD

°\ \ V 1. ,2015

By: Frank M.Ortiz,UsqWEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003Counsel for: Arthur LaChapelle and BarbaraLaChapelle

COUNTY CLNE

y: Uded Burger, EsqSAARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN &DEUTSCH, LLPAttorneys for DefendantFordMotor Company600 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10016T: 212-593-6700F: 212-593-6970

SO ORDERED:HON. PETER H. MOULTON

/ 7/vA

{00865744.DOC }

Page 48: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

RALPHN.BORELLIAND ANNE BORELLI

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)Index No: 108709/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

_/Ojo ,2015 TW1*1

0C

Ik,Esq. Judith A. Yavotz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Union Carbide Corporation700 Broadway 116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10038 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,Iÿn.Peter H. Moulton

OCT 14 2015

Page 49: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE:NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

RALPHN.BORELLIAND ANNE BORELLI

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No: 108709/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company,

n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. ("Amchem Products") hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Amchem Products, with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New/Yo/k.New York_ /m .2015

E DOCT 19 2015

COUNIY nl i!KS yff-FICENEW YORI)

Esq. f-loJMWEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavm, Esq.ÿ

DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,on. Peter H. Moulton

WKtSl4

Page 50: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

RALPHN.BORELLIAND ANNE BORELLI

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)Index No: 115075/98

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

FILEDDated: New York, New York

/0/8 .2015OCT 1% 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Frank Ortiz, Esq. Judith A. Yajyitz, EsqWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500

DARGERERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for UnionCarbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12thFloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, (6/S//SJlonCPeler H. Moulton

CCi HjJ.j

J

Page 51: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

RALPHN.BORELLIAND ANNE BORELLI

NYCALI.A.S.Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No: 115075/98

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company,

n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. ("Amchem Products") hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Amchem Products, with prejudice, and there beingno

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New Y/rk, New York_/y8_,2015

LY|5

UCi:

Frank-Ortiz-, Esq. HÿcX-ATon?. Judith A. YaVftz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C. DARGER EÿRANTEYAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.700 Broadway 116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212)558-5500 (212)452-5300

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

!I

Page 52: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

-X

-XThis document relates to:

SANTIAGO MENDEZ

NYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton, P)

Index No.: 115899/98

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

-X

WHEREAS, Defendant J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY ("J.H.

FRANCE") requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against J.H. FRANCE, without

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

J.H. FRANCE, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember

/V-NicholasNovack, Esq. fe,

LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLpf"" J I800 Third Avenue, 11th Floor ÿ

New York, NY 10022 rCounselfor Plaintiff ? I$ ?{]ÿ

Qoumlv C[

totw y-0ÿOFP'ce

Robert Malaby, Esq.Malaby & Bradley LLC150 BroadwaySuite 600New York, NY 10038Counselfor J.HFrance RefractoriesCompany

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

ÿli : i

Page 53: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

-X

-XThis document relates to:

WESTON REED

NYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton, ÿ.)

Index No.: 104333/99

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

-X

WHEREAS, Defendant J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY ("J.H.

FRANCE") requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against J.H. FRANCE, without

prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

J.H. FRANCE, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember ff) ,2015

FOCT 19 2015

QUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Nipiolas£Jeivack, Esq.LEVYÿONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11thFloorNew York, NY 10022Counselfor Plaintiff

ÿ9-Robert Malaby, Esq.Malaby & Bradley LLC150 BroadwaySuite 600New York, NY 10038Counselfor J.HFrance RefractoriesCompany

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Page 54: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

SALVATORE GRECO

-X

-X

NYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton, f?)

Index No.: 116211/01

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

-X

WHEREAS, Defendant J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY ("J.H.

FRANCE") requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against J.H. FRANCE, without

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

J.H. FRANCE, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

olas Novack, Esq. Robert Malaby, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counselfor Plaintiff

Malaby & Bradley LLC

OCT 19 2015150 BroadwaySuite 600New York, NY 10038Counselfor J.H. France Refractories

MSW OfF/Cg C<">WC0ÿ'VC.B,

SO ORDERED,(V/v/s

/Hon. Peter H. Moulton

-*1-

Page 55: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

-X

-XThis document relates to:

HENRY DAWSON

NYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No.: 113467/98

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

-X

WHEREAS, Defendant J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY ("J.H.

FRANCE") requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against J.H. FRANCE, without

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

J.H. FRANCE, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember 3D ,2015

BNcholas-Novack. Esq. Mfobert Malaby, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP Malaby & Bradley LLC800 Third Avenue, 11thFloor I9 2015 150 BroadwayNew York, NY 10022 Suite 600Counselfor Plaintiff County c>( FRK'S QFFiPtv/ Y°rk, NY 10038

NiW YQÿR xfbunselfor J.HFrance RefractoriesCompany

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

{00366624.DOCX}

Page 56: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

ÿX

InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton,

XThis document relates to: Index No.: 115028/01

JOHN J. MURPHY NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

X

WHEREAS, Defendant J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY ("J.H.

FRANCE") requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against J.H. FRANCE without

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

J.H. FRANCE, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember:

NichotoTFJoVack. Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP

Robert Malaby, Esq.Malaby & Bradley LLC150 BroadwaySuite 600New York, NY 10038Counselfor J.H. France RefractoriesCompany

800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counselfor Plaintiff

COUNtT CLERK'S OFF/CENEW YORK

OCT 19 2015

SO ORDERED,on. Peter H. Moulton

Page 57: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XInRe: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

XThis document relates to: Index No.: 112401/01

DANIEL SALVATORE NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

X

WHEREAS, Defendant J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY ("J.H.

FRANCE") requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against J.H. FRANCE without

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

J.H. FRANCE, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember3LL-2ClL

NicholgS'Novack- Esf" |LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP

Robert Malaby, Esq.Malaby & Bradley LLC

New York, NY 10022ÿ 19 2015

150 BroadwaySuite 600New York, NY 10038Counselfor J.HFrance RefractoriesCompany

Counselfor Plaintiff'COUNTY GLERk'g i

NfW YQjÿ'WN wee

SO ORDERED,on. Peter H. Moulton

Page 58: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XInRe: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton, J?)

XThis document relates to: Index No.: 102121/01

FRANCIS SHEEHAN NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

X

WHEREAS, Defendant J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY ("J.H.

FRANCE")requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against J.H. FRANCE, without

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

J.H. FRANCE, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

NiLEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP UU I9 ZU1S

September 30,20

Robert Malaby, Esq.

800 Third Avenue, 11thFloorNew York, NY 10022 CQUCounselfor Plaintiff

COUNTY CLERK'S QFFICINEW YORK

Malaby & Bradley LLC150 BroadwaySuite 600New York, NY 10038Counselfor J.HFrance RefractoriesCompany

SO ORDERED,/Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Page 59: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

VITO FRANCIS BLUNDA

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)

Index No.: 190385/09

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Madsen & Howell, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Madsen & Howell, Inc.,with prejudice in this action, and

there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Madsen & Howell, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs. FDated: New York, New York

2015 0cr 1.9 ?015

COUNTY pL6T!K'f

Kush Shukla, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Vito Francis BlundaWilentz,Goldman& Spitzer,P.A.110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, New York 10038-3901(212) 267-3091

Nfty yj

SO ORDERED,Ion. Peter H. Moulton

Kerrya««Jÿj06ok, Esq.Attorney for DefendantMadsen & Howell, Inc.McGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

JM&/IS- npTocn5,Si!5 J\;/ ii

i

,r, 77-43ÿ2

Page 60: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK . . "

NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

VITO FRANCIS BLUNDA

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No.: 190385/09

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, New York Protective Coverings, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant. New York Protective Coverings, with prejudice in this

action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant. New York Protective Coverings, be andÿth(|saniÿre jÿÿeby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkDrMifC' l<i,2015

OCT 19 2015

GOUN FY CLilBK'S OFFICEN1W YORK

Kush Shukla, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiffs)Vito Francis BlundaWilentz,Goldman& Spitzer,P.A.110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, New York 10038-3901(212) 267-3091

KerryainTMrC'ook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantNew York Protective CoveringsMcGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,

I-fom Peter H. Moulton MWSj;cc J- 9 77/

2177-214

Page 61: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

LOUIS CAFARO

l.A.S. Part 50(Moullon, P.)

Index No.: 128517/95

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York., New YorkQLh2lrj±l,2015

FlL £ O0CT19 1015

qQUNTY

Kush Shukla, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Louis CafaroWilentz,Goldman & Spitzer,P.A.110 William Street, 26lh FloorNew York, New York 10038-3901(212) 267-3091

KerryÿnJVfrClook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantJohn W. Wallace & Co.McGivney & Kluger,P.C,

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED., I°i/ V ÿ

Hon. Peter H. Moulton

f:r'~r ÿÿÿ ~" 1 1J duib 582-650!•

Page 62: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK__

__NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

PAUL COLLINSAND

JANE COLLINS

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No.: 190099/08

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, New York Protective Coverings Industries, Inc., hereby

requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

§ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant. New York Protective Coverings

Industries, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, New York Protective Coverings Industries, Inc., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York.. 2015 £0

Kush Shukla, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Paul Collins and Jane CollinsWilentz,Goldman& Spitzer,P.A.110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, New York 10038-3901(212) 267-3091

KerryanÿM-iÿOK, Esq.Attorney for DefendantNew York Protective Coverings Industries, Inc.McGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter IT. Moulton

, 2177-200

Page 63: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK.

NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

RICHARD W. CONNELL

l.A.S. Part 50(Moulton P.)

Index No.: 104179/98

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkOohur H ,2015

PILEDOCT 19 IOft

Kush Shukla, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Richard W. ConnellWlLENTZ, GOl,DMAN & Sl'lTZER,P.A.110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, New York 10038-3901(212) 267-3091

KerfÿarmHM. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantJohn W. Wallace & Co.McGivney & Klucer,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, /0//S//SHon. Peter H. Moulton

Oct ÿ

; 582-67jY-?L/ /M\7 )i /

ÿ O Pf) 715 /

Page 64: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton P.)

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 113573/96

WILLIAM DUFFYNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., be and the ssed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkOoPohi< / ÿ ,20 15

ocn»«®,K,TYCLFW®O'iF,0eCLEWg,

Kush Shukla, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiff(s)William DuffyWlLENTZ, Got.DMAN & SP1TZER, P.A.110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, New York 10038-3901(212) 267-3091

KerAttorney for DefendantJohn W. Wallace & Co.McGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,Ion. Peter H. Moulton

J

Page 65: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 104156/01

ANTHONY PRANONO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York D

CQUNi

Cook, Esq.Kush Shukla, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiffs)Anthony PranoWilentz, Goldman& Spitzer,P.A.1 10 William Street. 26th FloorNew York, New York 10038-3901(212) 267-3091

Kerryimu-MrCook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantJohn W. Wallace & Co.McGivney & Kluglr,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212)509-3456

SO ORDERED,•ton. Peter II. Moulton r "• v

j

Page 66: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

-X

-XThis document relates to:

SPENCER OAKLEY

NYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton, !?-)

Index No.: 190131/09

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

-X

WHEREAS, Defendant VIACOM, INC. requests summary judgment in the above-

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs

complaint against VIACOM, INC.,without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is

hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

VIACOM, INC.,be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkOctober 1, 2015

Nicholas Novack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG LLP800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counselfor Plaintiff

9 7.06Dennis Vega, ISEDGWICK, LLP1Newark Center, 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102Counselfor Viacom, Inc.

SO ORDERED, 4iMln. Peter Moulton, J.S.C. /

Iu

/ Hi0 / i :- iJ

{00368597.DOCX}

Page 67: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

CLB56229/legal/nosjm/MAY 2014

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XRUTH CAPPO, as Executrix for the Estate ofRAYMOND CAPPO and RUTH CAPPO, Individually, NO OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiff(s),

-against- Index No.: 190503/11

A.C. & S. INC., et al„ NYCALI.A.S. Partly

Defendant(s),-X

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Frank Oritz, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiff

t-L £q ShawflitteEluitt.ShawflitteEluitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

New York, New York I

Attorney tor PlamtuIWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway eOC/V/vWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway CQUj

SO ORDERED,nr. Sliei'i'y Klein-Heitler

HON.PETERH.MOULTON

Page 68: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

ÿ1374-1 ?G

Page 69: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

X.VFBW32859/legal/SEPTEMBER2015

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XEDWARD G. CUNNINGHAM and MARY A.CUNNINGHAM,

Plaintiff(s),

- against -

A.C. & S, Inc., et al.

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

Index No.: 111462/98

NYCALI.A.S. Partÿff

-X

WHEREFORE, defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

20/5 Brian Feld, Esq.Attorney for PlaintilWehzM; Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Attorneys for FultonBoiler Works, Inc.

/ueT'-'-nfVK Barry McTiernan & Mooreÿ € Rector Street, 14th Floor

New York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED,Hon. PetePeter Moulton TfrWsnr.

Li L-

OCT 15 2015

kYS 'T - civ;

Page 70: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION—..............— — xThis Document Relates To:

RALPHN.BORELLIAND ANNE BORELLI,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTIN G& SUPPLY), et ai.,

Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H.Moulton)

Index No.: 115075/1998

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendants CRANE CO., with respect to named defendants CRANE

CO. and WEINMAN PUMP & SUPPLY CO. ("CRANE CO."), hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: FILEDOCT 19 2015

New York, New York

'Frank M. Ortiz, Esq. / "

COUNTY CLERK'S GFFlS/ÿJv Kneis, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. GATES LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys for Defendant700 Broadway CJUANE CO.New York, NY 10003 599 LexingtonAvenue(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022-6030

(212) 536-3900

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

7sOCT io ::T5

Page 71: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SEP-30-2015 16:00 From: To:212 344 5461 P.3'7

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION.............. .......... xThis Document Relates To:

WILLIAM A. STOCKHAUSEN and ANGELABELLE STOCKHAUSEN,

Plaintiff(s),- vs.

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„

Defendants.

Index No.; 190062-11

NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: 10/a/jRNew York, New York

E DI.( (i ÿ 1 ' J(

Matthew Tarasofi", Esq" ÿ $ 2015 ÿi\ole M. Kozin, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. K&L GATES LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffÿ9L/NTY GlFftk-'o Attorneys for Defendant700 Broadway NfVy yqÿ°ÿFicE CRANE CO.New York, NY 10003 599 LexingtonAvenue(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022

(212) 536-3900

SO ORDERED,tHon. PetePeter Moulton

Page 72: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

REC¬OCT 0 5 2015

t s\* •• • < ÿ-4i» 1 " \ - L_i [

Page 73: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION- >

This Document Relates To:

LEON. SARRAZIN AND DORIS L. SARRAZIN,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)

Index No.: 115811/2000

A.C. and S„ INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & N°ÿ°PP?S.ITI0ÿSPMMÿ?YSUPPLY), et al„

. .JUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated:_ÿ /2,(11New York, New York

0A/l>ISuzanne/Rhtcliffe,Esq.WEITZ/&JLUXENBERG,PrC.1 _ v,-•AttomepW Plaintiffs) OCT 1» Z015700 BroadwayNew York, NY 100e$)UNr/ CLERK'S OFFICE(212) 558-5500 NEW YORK

Kirsten Alford Kneis, Esq.KÿL GATES LLP

ttorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900

SO ORDERED,on. Peter H. Moulton

7 :O /P 'c

-J

Page 74: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-x

INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

CONO AMILO MASCARELLA,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)

Index No.: 109071/2000

A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY

SUPPLY), et a!., JUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: W

£ D1: TTi

New York, Ne1New York

Phan"Xlvafra3o, Esq. Kirsten Alford Kneis, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,FCÿV KM.GATES LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff(s) ÿÿC/Qg-Mtorneys for Defendant700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

CRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900

Hon. Peter H. Moultonf£

/// /V:

Page 75: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-x

INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION—x

This Document Relates To:

RICHARD J. OTTALAGANO SR. andSHARON ANN OTTALAGANO,

Plaintiff(s),

igams

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, assuccessor-by-merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, etal,

Defendants,

NYCALI.A.S. PartJtf'S'O(Hon. Shorty Klein Ilcitlcr)-

Index No(s).: 190018-11

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated. zgj2jo\

New York, New York

aFrank M. Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CnrrAttorneys for Plaintiff(s) *700 Broadway CnNew York, NY 10003 *°WVrY(212)558-5500

SO ORDERED,

*khuA

smKirstenAlford Kneis, Es (

K&L GATES LLP „Attorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900

HON.PETERH.MOULTON CCi o ::

Page 76: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

-X

-XThis document relates to:

SANTIAGO MENDEZ

NYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton,$)

Index No.: 115899/98

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

-X

WHEREAS, Defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED ("GOULDS") requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against GOULDS, without prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

GOULDS, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated:New York, New YorkSeptember -2ÿ-2035

NichoWlÿIovack,l2sq f fLEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11th FlooinpT ÿ» a ontK

New York, NY 10022Counselfor Plaintiff

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENIW YORK

fonJEpming, Esq.CuIIen & Dykman44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005-2407Counsel for Goulds Pumps, Incorporated

SO ORDEREDn. Peter H. Moulton ilfkIIt i.

ÿ J

15

_j

Page 77: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

WESTON REED

-X

-X

NYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No.: 104333/99

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

-X

WHEREAS, Defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED ("GOULDS") requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against GOULDS, without prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

GOULDS, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember 3° ,2015

NichotesiNovack, Esq. ET |LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP "800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022 OCTCounselfor Plaintiff

9 2015

John-Tanning, Esq?)'Cullen & Dykman44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005-2407Counselfor Goulds Pumps, Incorporated

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENIWYORK

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

' . j

Page 78: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

SALVATORE GRECO

-X

-X

NYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton,$Index No.: 116211/01

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

-X

WHEREAS, Defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED ("GOULDS") requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against GOULDS, without prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

GOULDS, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember 30,2015

Jicholjjs-Nffvack, Esq. ......... *u»nn Eartfnng,KONIGSBERG, LLP , . (_£ulfen & Dykman

800 Third Avenue, 11th Floor ÿ 9 2015 44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10022 New York, NY 10005-2407Counselfor Plaintiff COUNFY CLERK'S m-r-,SS.unseÿfor Goulds Pumps, Incorporated

U 3 off CLERK'S OFFICFNEW YORK E

SO ORDERED, A--1ÿ1/Sj/\.TforkTeter H. Moulton ' ' I

Page 79: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

ÿX

InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton,P)

XThis document relates to: Index No.: 113467/98

HENRY DAWSON NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

X

WHEREAS, Defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED ("GOULDS") requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against GOULDS, without prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

GOULDS, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

NhcljotefNovack, Esq.tEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP 0CT 19 2019800 Third Avenue, 11th Floor

JohfrTasmfjg;ÿCulleiySUDyki44>WaU Street

September 3 °,2015

800 Third Avenue, 11New York, NY 10022Counselfor Plaintiff

COUNTY CLEBK'S.NEW YORKOFFICE Counselfor Goulds Pumps, Incorporated

6~»5M -/P2-

4jk-Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005-2407

SO ORDERED,Af 4. Moulton

{0036662l.DOCX}

Page 80: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

-X

-XThis document relates to:

JOHN J. MURPHY

NYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton, ?.)

Index No.: 115028/01

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

-X

WHEREAS, Defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED ("GOULDS") requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against GOULDS without prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

GOULDS, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember '30 ,2015

Novack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counselfor Plaintiff ©GUis/py

irjgfEsq.len &-Dykman

OCT 19 ?0pT44 ÿStreetYork, NY 10005-2407

Counselfor Goulds Pumps, Incorporated

SO ORDERED, /*//*>er H. Moulton

Page 81: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

DANIEL SALVATORE

-X

-X

NYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton, f>)

Index No.: 112401/01

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

-X

WHEREAS, Defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED ("GOULDS") requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against GOULDS without prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

GOULDS, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember 3 0, 2015

ucholas Novack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counselfor Plaintiff

"annir)«f£sq.Jykman

StreetOCT Ig 20/NewYork,NY 10005-2407

(Counselfor Goulds Pumps, Incorporated

SO ORDERED,

Jfon. Peter H. Moulton #/S

Page 82: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XInRe: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton, |?)

•XThis document relates to: Index No.: 102121/01

FRANCIS SHEEHAN NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

X

WHEREAS, Defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED ("GOULDS") requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against GOULDS, without prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

GOULDS, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember 30 ,2015

LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11th lQ6<5r 10 2015New York, NY 10022Counselfor PlaiÿJÿQÿj

office

ovack, Esq.Oullen &-T)ykman

StreetNew York, NY 10005-2407Counselfor Goulds Pumps, Incorporatedr

i QiSH ÿ

SO ORDERED,TfonfPeter H. Moulton

Page 83: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

ÿX

InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton, |?)

ÿX

This document relates to: Index No.: 101219/01

HOWARD WALDMAN NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

X

WHEREAS, Defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED ("GOULDS") requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against GOULDS, without prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

GOULDS, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

September fO ,2015

Nicholas Npyadk, Esq. r a ÿ JohmFtmnirigÿEsq. /LEVYTCdNIGSBERG, LLP . Cuflen &pÿkman800 Third Avenue, 11th Floor OCT T9 ÿ * 44 WalfStreetNew York, NY 10022 /NpWTork, NY 10005-2407Counselfor Plaintiff y.v •, ,<kS QFrV&yunselfor Goulds Pumps, Incorporated

C0UN ' N6\N VOftK UlSH-S

SO ORDERED, ÿ2ÿHon. Peter H. Moulton

Page 84: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XInRe: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton, f.)

XThis document relates to: Index No.: 101155/98

JOSEPH LANZA NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

X

WHEREAS, Defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO. INC. ("MARIO &

DIBONO") requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against MARIO & DIBONO,

without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

MARIO & DIBONO, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember 3 2015,,

ÿicbolaslSrovack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11th poorNew York, NY 10022

Jphfi Fhtmiffg, Esq.Cullep-& Dykman4JCWall StreetCullepÿc Dykman4ÿ-ÿall StreetNew York, NY 10005-2407Counselfor Mario & Dibono PlasteringCo. Inc.

Counselfor Plaintiff

COUNTY GLERK'3 OFFICENiW YORK

SO ORDERED,Peter H. Moulton

Page 85: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY

XIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX

This Document Relates To:

Esther Shemberg, Individually and asExecutrix of the Estate of Zev Shemberg,

NYCALI.A.S . Part >0 S"£>(Judge Moulton)

Index No. : 190221/10

Plaintiff, NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- MOTION AND ORDER

A .0 . SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, CO. et . al . ,

Defendants .x

WHEREFORE, defendant David Fabricators of New York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing

plaintiff's Complaint against defendant David Fabricators of New

York, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and

cross-claims against defendant David Fabricators of New York, Inc.

be dismissecL~w±th prejudice and without costs.

Date2015

Levy Konigsberg LLPAttorneys for PlaintiffZev Shemberg C |I£ D8 00 Third Avenfe , ill®® FT?New York, New York 10022 „.c

OCT 1»

S&r&h Mustafa, Esq.Cullen and Dykman, LLPAttorneys for DefendantDavid Fabricators ofNew York, Inc.44 Wall StreetNew York, New York 10005

So Ordered:

(212) 701-4183

roUHW CLERK'S OFFlCEOur File No.: 11279-40

ÿ----— !olisl/SHon. Peter H. Moulton, J\ S .C . I 152015

- Cv?:

Page 86: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

IMOGENE ARONE, as Personal Representativefor the Estate of RALPH ARONE,

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No.: 09/190107

Plaintiff (s) ,

-against-

NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al. .

Defendants .

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

-x

WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL

GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a

LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and

cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are

hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York/pit

QCl 19 1S& Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.John J. FanniCullen and DyjAttorney for z)ef\ÿhnt pAttgrneys foNATIONAL GRID GENERATI Y GI- GG ® 7 00 Broadway......-ÿ

New York, NY 10003

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.for Plaintiffs

44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000

(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

mi*0c'i~l5 uij

"n

I

Page 87: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

VINCENT BOYLE and ELLEN BOYLE,

Plaintiff (s) ,

-against-

NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al . ,

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No. : 01/11642601/111219

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Defendants .x

WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL

GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a

LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and

cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are

hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York/ o( 1 2015

-L-E ID t*-Matthew Maclntyre, Esq./John J. Fanning,/Esq J

Cullen and Dykmafi \AaWM WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorney for DefendJ/rt QQJ 19 2015 Attorneys for PlaintiffsNATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC 700 Broadway44 Wall Street New York, NY 10003New York, NY 10005 COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICER 212) 558-5500(212) 732-2000 Nl-W YOKK

SO ORDERED,Peter H. Moulton

/ S//t> /OCT

Page 88: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PHILLIPMOHR,as Executor of the Estate ofROBERTBURTON, and LORETTA BURTON, Individually,

Index No.: 190219/11

Plaintiff,NO OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

- against -

A.O. SMITHWATER PRODUCTS CO. et al.,NYCAL

I.A.S Part 50Hon. Peter H.Moulton

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests

summary judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with

prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs to eif

Dated: New York,New York

LauraB.HolfmanJÿq.Attorneyfor Defendant

MatthewMclntyre,Esq.A7Attorneyfor PlaintiffWEITZ&LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

JAMatthew Mclntyre,Esq.<7

EckertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10Bank StreetWhite Plains,NewYork 10606(914) 949-2909

SO ORDERED,Hon.Peter H.Moulton, J.S.C. L

n ~r t

uU 14 2015

Page 89: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OFNEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IndexNo.: 104731/00

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

NYCALI.A.S Part 50

Hon.Peter H.Moulton

WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests

summary judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with

prejudice, and there beingno oppositionthereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs to either party.

Dated: New York, New York

04)herrx _,2°15

MatthewMclntyre,Esq.& LduraB Hollman,ÿsq.Attorneyfor Plaintiff QQ] 1f) ÿAttorneyfor DefendantWEITZ&LUXENBERG,P.C. ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN&MELLOTT,LLC700 Broadway IÿBaaleStreetNew York,NY 10003 COUNTY &eRains,NewYork 10606(212) 558-5500 N£W YOHÿ914) 949-2909

SO ORDERED, XXrfon.ÿeter H.Moulton, J.S.C.

I

i

ROSEMARIEDEMAURO, as Administratrix for the EstateofJOSEPH MDEMAURO, and ROSEMARIEDEMAURO,Individually,

Plaintiff,

- against -

A.C. and S., Inc. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY)et al.,

Defendants.

M/S

Page 90: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OFNEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

ANNE COGHLAN, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate ofEDWARD COGHLAN,

Plaintiff,

- against -

A.O. SMITHWATER PRODUCTS CO. et al.,

Defendants.

IndexNo.: 118952/00

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

NYCALI.A.S Part 50

Hon. Peter H.Moulton

WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests

summary judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with

prejudice, and there beingno oppositionthereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same arqÿferejÿ Jpsmissed with

prejudice and without costs to either party.

Dated: New York, New York

fhLber (3., 2015

Matthew Mclntyre,EsqAttorneyfor PlaintiffWEITZ &LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

°CTj9£o

LauraB.Hollman,Esq.Attorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10Bank StreetWhite Plains,NewYork 10606(914) 949-2909

p--Hon. Peter H.Moulton,J.S.C

• o

Page 91: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OFNEW YORK

MARY T. GOODBAR, Individually and as Executrix forthe Estate ofMILTONGOODBAR,

Plaintiff,

- against -

A.O. SMITHWATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

IndexNo.: 190009/12

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

NYCALI.A.S Part 50

Hon.Peter H.Moulton

WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests

summary judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with

prejudice, and there beingno oppositionthereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstFig

Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismfssqfl _prejudice and without costs to either party.

Dated: New York, NewYork

Mobff /&,2015

GOu

"isismffssQfl witL

19 Misocr

Mry ,

Matthew Mclntyre, EsqrAttorneyfor PlaintiffWEITZ &LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNewYork,NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, . 212Lion. Peter H.Moulton,J.S.C.

LauraB.Hollman, Esq!Attorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10Bank StreetWhite Plains,NewYork 10606(914) 949-2909

f/sf s

OCT ;,,

/

Page 92: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

JOHNR.DRAPER and GENEVIEVEDRAPER,

Plaintiff,

- against -

A.O. SMITHWATER PRODUCTS,et al.,

Defendants.

IndexNo.: 190116/08

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

NYCALI.A.SPart 50

Hon. Peter H.Moulton

WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company with

prejudice, and there beingno oppositionthereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hÿSy Jlsrÿissed with

prejudice and without costs to either party.

Dated: New York, New York

fhkbVf /£,2015

LauraB.Hollman/Esq.Attorneyfor DefendantEckert Seamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10Bank StreetWhite Plains,New York 10606(914) 949-2909

Matthew Mclntyre,EsqAttorneyfor PlaintiffWEITZ &LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNewYork, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, . /T-Hon. Peter H.Moulton,J.S.C.

-vyyOCT A A 'J I J

Page 93: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PRISCILLA KOENIGas Executrix for the Estate of LESLIEFABER, andPRISCILLA KOENIGas Executrix for theEstate ofMARGARETL.FABER,

Plaintiff,

against -A.C. and S., Inc.(ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUPPLY),et al.,

Defendants.

IndexNo.: 109988-02

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

NYCALLA.S Part 50

Hon.Peter H.Moulton

WHEREFORE, Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with

prejudice, and there beingno oppositionthereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs to either party.

Dated: New York, New York

CHnberfr,2015

C

FILED-SCT 19 2015

Matthew Mclntyre,Esq. <

Attorneyfor PlaintiffWEITZ &LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,.Hon. Peter H.Moulton,J.S.C.

LauraB.HolhnarkjSt}.Attorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10Bank StreetWhite Plains,NewYork 10606(914) 949-2909

f"

Page 94: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OFNEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

FINNIKOBLER, Individually and HEIDIJEAN COLANandLORIANN ELLEGATE as Co-Adminstratrices for the Estate ofROBERT BURNS KOBLER,

Plaintiff,

- against -A.C. and S., Inc. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUPPLY),etal.,

Defendants.

Index No.: 121894/98

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

NYCALI.A.S Part 50

Hon.Peter H.Moulton

WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with

prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant A. 0, Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs to either party. pDated: New York, New York 'Led

,2015 . 19 20B

JNew YorJc, New Yoi

GdffiriL:MMM,.IffMatthew Mclntyre,Esq.f

Attorneyfor PlaintiffWEITZ &LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003(212) 558-5500

IiiurarlL HolhhanlÿÿOÿKAttorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10Bank StreetWhite Plains,NewYork 10606(914) 949-2909

SO ORDERED, ./6onTPeter H.Moulton, J.S.C.

Lous,'lb

J

Page 95: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

HENRY MIKA and ESTHERMEKA,

Plaintiff,

- against ÿ

A.C. and S., Inc. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY),et al.,

Defendants.

Index No.: 100029-99

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

NYCALI.A.S Part 50

Hon.Peter H.Moulton

WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with

prejudice, and there beingno oppositionthereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs to either party.

Dated: New York, New York

2015

£q0CT 1» 2015

MatthewMclntyre,Esq.//Attorneyfor PlaintiffWEITZ &LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNewYork,NY 10003(212) 558-5500

ÿLaura B.Hainan,Esq.Attorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10Bank StreetWhite Plains,NewYork 10606(914) 949-2909

SO ORDERED, .Hon.Pet

XPeter H.Moulton, J.S.C.

Page 96: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEWYORK

JOSEPHNAIMOLIand CARMELA NAIMOLI,

Plaintiff,

- against -A.O. SMITHWATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

IndexNo.: 190405/11

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

NYCALI.A.S Part 50

Hon.Peter H.Moulton

WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests

summary judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with

prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are herjgj» dÿmissed with

prejudice and without costs to either party.

Dated: New York, New York

,2015

£o

zvMatthew Mclntyre,Esq.Attorneyfor PlaintiffWEITZ &LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNewYork, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

OCT lQ y9 2015°°ÿryCl

LauraB.Hollrqan, Esq.Attorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10Bank StreetWhite Plains,NewYork 10606(914) 949-2909

SO ORDERED, HonJfÿterlL Moulton,J.S.C.doj/sj/s

Page 97: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OFNEW YORK

JUDINELSONas the ProposedExecutrix for the Estate ofROSARIA MUSCHTER,

Plaintiff,

- against -

A.O. SMITHWATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

Index No.: 190347/10

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

NYCALI.A.S Part 50

Hon. Peter H.Moulton

WHEREFORE, Defendant A; O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests

summary judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with

prejudice, andthere being no oppositionthereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs to either party.

Dated: New York, New York

Qÿjpbcr 142015F EO

?CT 19 2015

Matthew Mclntyre,Esq.Attorneyfor PlaintiffWEITZ &LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, .TT/\m D/\+rHon.Peter H.Moulton,J.S.C.

LauraB.Hollmari/Iis yQÿ°FHC£Attorneyfor DejendantEckertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10 Bank StreetWhite Plains,NewYork 10606(914) 949-2909

_fd/s/&

-ÿ-J

Page 98: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

CHARLOTTEF. OCZEK, Individually and as Executrixfor the Estate of ALOISIUS J. OCZEK,

Plaintiff,

- against -

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

Index No.: 101162/99

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

NYCALI.A.S Part 50

Hon.Peter H.Moulton

WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests

summary judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with

prejudice, and there beingno oppositionthereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs to either party.

Dated: New York,New York

,2015

<lew YorK, JNew yo:

flcfcku(Li. t/

Matthew Mclntyre,Esq.Attorneyfor PlaintiffWEITZ &LUXENBERG,P.C700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

o0CT 19 2015

ÿÿYQÿK°FFlr,E:'LaUraBTÿIollman,EÿYAttorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10 Bank StreetWhite Plains,NewYork 10606(914) 949-2909

SO ORDERED, .

Flon. Peter H.Moulton, J.S.C.

Page 99: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

ANNA O'NEILL, as Executrix for the Estate ofPATRICK J.O'NEILL, andANNA O'NEILL, Individually,

Plaintiff,

- against -

A.O. SMITHWATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

IndexNo.: 112263/07

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

NYCALI.A.SPart 50

Hon.Peter H.Moulton

WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests

summary judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with

prejudice, and there beingno oppositionthereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice andwithout costs to either party.

Dated: NewYork, NewYork

. 2015fyfobtr a.:£0

MatthewMclntyre,Esq, :

Attorneyfor PlaintiffWEITZ&LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, .

Or i I

frfSQFFictsLaqi&B. Hollman,E,ÿiAttorneyfor DefendEckertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10Bank StreetWhite Plains,NewYork 10606(914) 949-2909

ioiHorn Peter H.Moulton, J.S.C.

Page 100: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

-XThis document relates to:

FRANCIS SHEEHAN

NYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton, fi)

Index No.: 102121/01

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

-X

WHEREAS, Defendant A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY ("A.O.

SMITH") requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against A.O. SMITH, without

prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that uponnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

A.O. SMITH, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and wiÿjgut costs,

Dated:New York,New YorkSeptember/x| ,2015

ocr2015

Tovack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counselfor Plaintiff

. * &rnriyi F"i ' * f'"

Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC10 Bank StreetSuite 700White Plains,NY 10606Counselfor A.O. Smith Water ProductsCompany

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Page 101: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XInRe: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton,

ÿX

This document relates to: IndexNo.: 115028/01

JOHN J. MURPHY NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

ÿX

WHEREAS, Defendant A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY ("A.O.

SMITH") requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against A.O. SMITH, without

prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that uponnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

A.O. SMITH, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember on ,2015

800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counselfor Plaintiff

Novadk. Esq.

:ans Cherin & Mellott, LLC

OCT 19 201510 Bank StreetSuite 700White Plains,NY 10606Counselfor A.O. Smith Water Products

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE CompanyNEW YORK

SO ORDERED,on. Peter H.Moulton

/

//

Page 102: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

Sep 17 2015 15:09:39 412-566-6000 212-344-5461 Eckert Seamans Page 020QX

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.COUNTY OFNEW YORK

JAMES C. DEAN as Executor for the Estate of KARIN R.DEAN,

Plaintiff,

- against -

A.O. SMITHWATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

IndexNo.: 101521/05

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

NYCALI.A.SPart 50

Hon.Peter H.Moulton

WHEREFORE, Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests

summary judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company with

prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs to either party.

Dated: New York,NewYork

{klihicMa015

MatthewMclntyre,Esq. fAttorneyfor PlaintiffWEITZ&LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212)558-5500

it!? ff

vr a;

V_.l

Stephanie L, Coleman, Esq.Attorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Cherjn&Mellott,LLCFour Gateway Center-Suite 301100Mulberry StreetNewark,NJ07102(973) 855-4700

SO ORDERED, .Hdn.Peter H.Moulton,J.S.C.

hIffj/5

Page 103: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

Sep 1? 2015 lb:B?:i? 412-555-5000 212-344-5451 Eckert Seanans Page B04D'1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATEOF NEW YORKCOUNTY OFNEW YORK

FRANKLINPOTTER andBONNIEPOTTER,

Plaintiff,

- against -A.C. and S, INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY)et al.,

Defendants.

IndexNo.: 121088/97,105221/98, 111040/98,102788/00

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

NYCALI.A.S Part 50

Hon. Peter H.Moulton

WHEREFORE, Defendant A O. Smith. Water Products Company, hereby requests

summary judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with

prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice andwithout costs to either party.

Dated: N§w York,New York

2015

Matthew Mclntyre,Esq,Attorneyfor PlaintiffWEITZ&LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003(212) 558-5500

ÿit(MStephanie L. Coleman, Esq.Attorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLCFour Gateway Center-Suite 301100 Mulberry StreetNewark,NJ07102(973) 855-4700

SO ORDEREDÿÿ

Hon.Peter H.Moulton, J.S.C.

F \OCT 19 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 104: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OFNEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

VINCENT BOYLE andELLENBOYLE, IndexNo.: 116426/01;111219/01

Plaintiff,

against -NO OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

A.C. and S., Inc. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUPPLY)etal., NYCAL

I.A.S Part 50Hon.Peter H.MoultonDefendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with

prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs to either party.

Dated: New York,NewYork

finhhr iX2015

Ot~RRK>ÿ riur-_

LauraB.HollmapÿEs/j/EVVAttorneyfor Defendant

0CJJ 9 2015

Matthew MclntyreAttorneyfor PlaintiffWEITZ &LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Attorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10Bank StreetWhite Plains,NewYork 10606(914) 949-2909

SO ORDERED,/ Hon. Peter H.Moulton,J.S.C.z2fÿ- /.

/

/

Page 105: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

Sep 17 2015 15:00147 412-566-6000 -> 212-344-5461 Eckert Seamans Page 014

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

HENRY D. HOLKA andBARBARAA. HOLKA,

Plaintiff,

- against -A.C. and S., INC.(ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUPPLY,et al.,

Defendants.

IndexNo.: 107404/02,114300/02

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

NYCALI.A.S Part 50

Hon.Peter H.Moulton

WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests

summary judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with

prejudice, andthere beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, thg samgÿre Ipjjby dismissed with

prejudice andwithout costs to either party.

Dated: NewYork,NewYork

0rfoberl9- .,2015

> jp>an| thÿsamÿÿe ÿÿ>-OCT 19 2015

GGdN ' CLERK'S OFFICE

Matthew Mclntyre,Esq,Attorneyfor PlaintiffWEITZ&LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNewYork. NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Stephanie L,»Coleman, Esq.Attorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLCFour Gateway Center-Suite 301100 Mulberry StreetNewark,NJ07102(973) 855-4700

SO ORDERED,.—HortTPeter H.Moulton, J.S.C.

Phsjts

Page 106: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

Sep 17 2015 15:07:53 412-556-6000 -> 212-344-5461 Eckert Seamans Page 000

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OFNEW YORKCOUNTY OFNEW YORK

JAMES RAYMOND WACHOWICZ, as Executor for the Estate ofRAYMONDMICHAELWACHOWICZ, andRUTHWACHOWICZ,Individually,

Plaintiff,

- against -A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUTPLY, ct al,

Defendants.

IndexNo.: 107135/00,125770/99

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

NYCALI.ASPart 50

Hon. Peter H.Moulton

WHEREFORE, Defendant A O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests

summary judgment Inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with

prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice andwithout costs to either party.

Dated: lÿew York,New York

.2015

MatthewMclntyre,Esq.ÿAttorneyfor PlaintiffWETTZ &LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, .

Stephanie L. Coleman,Esq.Attorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Cherjn&Mellott,LLCFour Gateway Center-Suite 301100Mulberry StreetNewark,NJ07102(973) 855-4700

Son. Peter H.Moulton,J.S.C.

Fl LEDOCT 19 2015

COUNTY CL ERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 107: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

Sep 17 2015 15:HB:11 412-566-6000 -> 212-344-5461 Eckert Seamans Page 010Q»C

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.COUNTY OFNEWYORK

FRANCES OLEXA, Individually and as PersonalRepresentative for the Estate of JOSEPHP. OLEXA,

Plaintiff,

- against -A.C. and S., INC.(ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING& SUPPLY)et al.,

Defendants.

IndexNo.; 106209-01iWa-oo, iocnsi-03

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

NYCALI.ASPart 50

Hon. Peter II.Moulton

WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with

prejudice, andthere beingno oppositionthereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice andwithout costs to either party.

Dated: New York, New York

fhtofer P-.2015

"%r

MatthewMclntyre,Esq.Attorneyfor PlaintiffWE1TZ &,LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNewYork, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

ÿXajjju Ckw—Stephanie L\ Coleman, Esq.Attorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Cherin&Melloti",LLCFour Gateway Center-Suite 301100 Mulberry StreetNewark,NJ07102(973) 855-4700

SO ORDERED,.(Lion. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

pj/ÿJ/S

ltE°«o»

0\_LRV\S qPF\CE

Page 108: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OFNEWYORKCOUNTY OFNEWYORK

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S.Part 50(Moulton, JO

IndexNo.: 122195-99,110711-00

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND

ORDER

This Document Relates to:

GERARD J. SICKER, SR.

V.

A;C & s rnc.ET AL.

WHEREFORE, defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company hereby requests

summary judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company

withprejudice, andthere beingno oppositionthereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: NewYork, New York

*\j7>| ,2015

filedOCT 19 2015

WEITZ/& LUXENBERO,P.C

Attormyfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNewYork,NY 10003(212) 558-5500

LquraB. Hollman,Esq. 1

Eckert Seamans, ErtCAttorneys for Defendant10 Bank StreetWhite Plains,NewYork 10606(914) 949-2909

SO ORDERED,Hoÿ. Peter H.Moulton

ÿ/S

2518627

Page 109: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OFNEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEWYORK

SHEILA HAMILTON,as Administratrix for the Estate ofWILLIEJ. HAMILTON,

Plaintiff,

against -

A.C. and S., Inc. (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING& SUPPLY),et al.,

Defendants.

IndexNo.: 121991/99,106178/00

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

NYCALI.A.S Part 50

Hon.Peter H.Moulton

WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests

summary judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with

prejudice, andthere beingno oppositionthereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs to either party. |p j| j

Dated: New York, NewYork

(hfobpr (3,2015

r

/-Matthew Mclntyre,Esq.Attorneyfor PlaintiffWEITZ&LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNewYork, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, .

COUNTY aFi'5NtSr¥Tui]K /

-

ÿ ... /'

LauraB.Hollman,Esq./Attorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10 Bank StreetWhite Plains,NewYork 10606(914) 949-2909

/y/y/iF£<5n. Peter H.Moulton, J.S.C.

I k J' -K. • L .ÿ .

-J

Page 110: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

DAVIDR.HIGGINS andVERONICA HIGGINS, IndexNo.: 107737/99;101139/07

Plaintiff,

- against - •

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

A.C. and S., Inc. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY),et al., NYCAL

I.A.S Part 50Hon.Peter H.MoultonDefendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests

summary judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with

prejudice,and there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs to either party. FDated: New York, New York

Laura B.Holhnan, Issg:MatthewMclntyre,Esq.Attorneyfor PlaintiffWEITZ &LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNewYork,NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Attorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10Bank StreetWhite Plains,NewYork 10606(914) 949-2909

SO ORDERED, fojHon. Peter H.Moulton,J.S.C.

Page 111: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OFNEW YORK

NORBERT KACZ and AUDREY KACZ,

Plaintiff,

- against -

A.C. and S., Inc. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUPPLY),et al.,

Defendants.

IndexNo.: 106709/02;115543/02

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

NYCALI.A.SPart 50

Hon. Peter H.Moulton

WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests

summary judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with

prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the safce a* hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs to either party.

Dated: New York,New York

Qdffltsi1/ÿ2015

ÿMMM,MMatthew Mclntyre,Esq,;/"Attorneyfor PlaintiffWEITZ &LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003(212) 558-5500

sa#R aie hereby dismissePTteo0Cr 19 2015

LauraB. Hollman,/p;Sq.Attorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Chertn&Mellott,LLC10Bank StreetWhite Plains,NewYork 10606(914) 949-2909

SO ORDERED, .Alon. Peter H.Moulton, J.S.C.

i

Page 112: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OFNEW YORK

FRANCES GOES and SENTA GOES, IndexNo.: 100904/03,105028/03, 190413/11

Plaintiff,

- against -NO OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

A.O. SMITHWATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.NYCAL

I.A.S Part 50Hon.Peter H.Moulton

WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O, Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests

summary judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with

prejudice, and there beingno oppositionthereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be anpheIhltarÿj£re|jÿps:missed with

prejudice and without costs to either party.

OCT 19 2015Dated: New York, New York

I

Crif JMTV m

__MatthewMclntyre,EsAttorneyfor PlaintiffWEITZ &LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNewYork,NY 10003(212) 558-5500

mm%lj '

.LauraB.Hollman,EsÿjC--"Attorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10Bank StreetWhite Plains,New York 10606(914) 949-2909

SO ORDERED,HoijfPeter H.Moulton, J.S.C.

Of

Page 113: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OFNEW YORK

EDWARD BIENZ, as Administrator for the Estate of WILLIAMP. BIENZ, and CLAIRICE BIENZ, Individually,

Plaintiff,

against -

A.C. and S. INC., (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY)et al.,

Defendants.

IndexNo.: 126172/93,126168/93

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

NYCALI.A.SPart 50

Hon. Peter H. Moulton

WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with

prejudice, andthere beingno oppositionthereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs to either party.

Dated: NewYork, New York

flrfcber ÿ .2015

filedOCT 19

Matthew Mclntyre,Esq.Attorneyfor PlaintiffWEITZ &LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNewYork,NY 10003(212) 558-5500

cooLauraB. HollmanÿEsq.Attorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10Bank StreetWhite Plains,NewYork 10606(914) 949-2909

SO ORDERED, .ffBon. PeterK Moulton, J.

__(fl/zJ/S,J.S.C. ' m ÿ-

.

OptL I i4 v.-:,,.

Page 114: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

NICOLA AZZARONE

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)

Index No.: 190137/10,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Fay Spofford & Thorndike of New York, f/k/a Wolff &

Munier, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Fay Spofford

& Thorndike of New York, f/k/a Wolff & Munier, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there

being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Fay Spofford & Thorndike of New York, f/k/a Wolff & Munier, Inc., be and the same

are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

</ YorkDated: New York, New York20155Sj

rney lor Plaintiffs)Nicola AzzaroneLf,vy Konigsberg,LLP800 Third Avenue, 13'" FlNew York, New York 10022(212) 605-6200

SO ORDERED,Ion. Peter IT Moulton

F|led0CT I9 2015

e0UNÿks0ffice

KerryafttUJfl&kfEsq.Attorney for DefendantFay Spofford & Thorndike of New York, f/k/aWolff & Munier, Inc.McGivney & Klijger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

i0H/•5 iriiEd d namOCT 14 201W73

NY: - C-

Page 115: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190221/10,

ZEV SHEMBERGAND

ESTHER SHEMBERG NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Columbia Boiler Company of Pottslown, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Columbia Boiler Company of Pottslown, with

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Columbia Boiler Company of Pottstown, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: Nr " ' ,XI 1 FILEDOCT 19 2015

j <1

Attorney tor Plaintiff(s)Zev Shemberg and Esther ShembergLevy Konigsberg, LLP800 Third Avenue, 1 3lh PINew York, New York 10022(212) 605-6200

:K'S OFFICE

KerryaiamCook, EsqAttorney for DefendantColumbia Boiler Company of PottslownMcGivneY & Kujgbr,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

-ÿ/'J/zJ/S

Page 116: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

PATRICK T. SLEVIN

NYCALl.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)

Index No.: 190406/10,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs* complaint against defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, with prejudice in this

action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York2015

N\ Mo-VAovc->Attorney for Plaintiffs)Patrick T. SlevinLevy Konigsberg,LLP800 Third Avenue, 13lh F1New York. New York 10022(212) 605-6200

KerryaiuiXIoo'k, Esq.Attorney for DefendantThe Nash Engineering CompanyMcGivney & Klijger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,l-lon. Peter H. Moulton

* *

; 1 9 mCo, e .„

C7 P

NlWYOrkOFFIG£

505-442

Page 117: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNT'Y OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Pari 50(Moulton, P)

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190115/10,

JAMES RICHARD SMITHAND

EVELYN B. SMITH NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant. The Nash Engineering Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, with prejudice in this

action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant. The Nash Engineering Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Attorney for Plaintiff(s)James Richard Smith and Evelyn B. SmithLevy Konigsberg,LLP

Attorney for DefendantThe Nash Engineering Company

800 Third Avenue, 13mPlNew York, New York 10022(212) 605-6200

McGivnf.Y & K.LUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED

* Hon. Peter II. Moulton

CQUNLr CLtHK'S OFfNEW YORK

LEI 505-397

Page 118: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

RALPHN.BORELLIAND ANNE BORELLI

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No: 115075/98

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company,

n/k/aBayer Cropscience, Inc. ("Amchem Products") hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Amchem Products, with prejudice, and there beingno

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

filedcosts.

Dated: New Yodc, New York_/p/6 .2015

OCT 19 2015

COUN iy (. .i LRK'S OFFICENhW YORK

Frank Ortiz, Esq. M<WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

HuLA Judith A. YaVitz, Esq.DARGER EKRANTEYAVITZ & BLAU,LLP

A/ 7

Attorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton Ol f i4

Page 119: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536 .12665/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

PHILIP R. ANZALONE , Deceased,

Plaintiff,

-against-

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,

et al . ,

Defendants .

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

Index No. : 127106/02107100/02

(March 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costd

DATED : £'/// 5East Hanover, New Jersey

MATTHEW MACINTYRÿy ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

OCT 19 2015

RK'S OFFICE

STEPHEN F. BALSAMU,GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,

Hofiorable Peter H. Moulton

Page 120: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536.19036/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

KARIN DEAN,

Plaintiff ,

-against-

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,

et al . ,

Defendants .

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

Index No. : 101521/05

(March 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and withi DDATED : //€>/&/ /5East Hanover, New Jersey

MATTHEW MACINTYRE,/aESQ .WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

OCT 1% 2016

COUNT Y CLERK'S ©FPlOS

STEPHEN F. BALSAMO, EEGARRITY, GRiULAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,Honorable Peter H. Moulton

10//*>//S

Page 121: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536 .12419/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

HENRY D. HOLKA,

Plaintiff ,

-against-

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,

Defendants .

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

Index No. : 107404/02ÿ11433314ÿ

J 5 5•

(March 2014 FIFO Trhal Group)

NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporap<on| |e e!|aS same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED : /0 K/// ZjEast Hanover, New Jersey

MATTHEW MACINTYRE, ÿSQ .WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

c...f i. 9 2015......-ÿ KB OFFICEf kJtlK

STEPHEN F. BAESAMO, ESQt-GARRITY, GRAlÿAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,Honorable Peter H. Moulton hl/sf'5

Page 122: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536 .12410/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

This document relates to:

JAMES E. McCABE, Deceased,Index No.: 113073/02

106579/02

Plaintiff , (March 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

-against- NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERUNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,

et al . ,

Defendants .

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without..it:edDATED

East Hanover, New Jersey

WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

GOJN'TMATTHEW MACINTYRE, STEPHEN F. BALSAM07 ESQT*-

GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALOSc FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,

Honorable Peter H. Moulton

Page 123: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536 .15321/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

This document relates to:

CHRISTIAN MERRILL,Index No. : 111048/98

113102/98

Plaintiff , (March 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

-against- NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERUNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,

et al . ,

Defendants .

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation|l|e ajtg same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: / (-'LI//'JEast Hanover, New Jersey

MURPHY, GAROFALO

A '1 J 'v

MATTHEW MACINTYREWEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,le Peter H. Moulton

Page 124: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536 .12424/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

LYLE V. MOSSOW,

Plaintiff ,

-against-

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,

Defendants .

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

Index No. : 112280/02105718/02

(March 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: /V /C/ //East Hanover, New Jersey

MATTHEW MACINTYRE,WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff7 00 Broadway OCT 19 2015New York, New York 10003

STEPHENF . BaLsIGARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIC5.0. Box 43 8

NEW YORK East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,Honorable Peter H. Moulton

Page 125: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536 .07701/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

VINCENT BOYLE,

Plaintiff ,

-against -

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,

Defendants .

NYCAL

IAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

Index No. : 116426/01111219/01

(May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED :

East Hanover, New Jersey

fileMATTHEW MACINTYRE ESQ . STEPHEN F. BALSfAMOj ESgfWEITZ & LUXENBERG QQJ 1q GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALOAttorneys for Plaintiff tUJ? & FLINN700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,New York, New York lQQfcJMTY CLERfC'sg United Conveyor Corporation

Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

- /.-)/'?//inorable Peter H. Moulton / 'SO ORDERED,

Honorable Peter H. Moulton

Page 126: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536 .12107/AJM

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

JOSEPH M. DeMAURO, Deceased,

Plaintiff ,

-against-

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,

Defendants .

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

Index No. : 125781/99104731/00

(May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

NO OPPOSTXONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs. F" IL IEE SDDATED : / / // 3East Hanover, New Jersey

/ÿMATTHEW MACINTYRE/'ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

OCT 1% 201§

COUNTY GLERK'H OFFICE

, esq:GARRITY, GRJVHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALOSc FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,Honorable Peter H. Moulton h/lSlS

Page 127: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536.22673/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

This document relates to:Index No.: 190116/08

JOHN R. DRAPER,

Plaintiff , (May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

-against- NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERUNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,

et al . ,

Defendants .

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs. 3C r I9 2015

DATED:

East Hanover, New JerseyCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

,,<EW YORK

MATTHEW MACINTYRE STEPHEN F. BALSAM!

GARRITY, GRAHAM, 1MURPHY, GAROFALOWEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,Honorable Peter H. Moulton

Page 128: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536 .12787/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

LESLIE FABER, Deceased,

Plaintiff,

-against-

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,

Defendants .

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

Index No. : 109988/02

(May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: / £"/£' / //.5East Hanover, New Jersey

MATTHEW MACINTYRE,WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 1M03

VO(JA,fy

m , MURPHY, GAROFALO

9 2015

nrv-. P.O. Box 438

EPHEJRITY, GF

& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350

Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,HongrableÿPetei H. Muult

/s /S

Page 129: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536 .20149/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

HORACE L. GARLAND, Deceased,

Plaintiff ,

-against -

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,

Defendants .

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

Index No. : 29846/92102333/06

(May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant. United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the Jjiameÿ ajre hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

/> /&/ //'5DATED :

East Hanover, New Jersey

MATTHEW MACINTYRE,J&BQ. .WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

OCT 19 2015

COUf, j , CLERK'S office

:nF. BÿLSAM&7 iSQTÿMURPHY, GAROFALO

STEPHEGARRITY, G:& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,Honorable Peter H. Moulton

Page 130: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536 .16390/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

FRANCIS GOES,

Plaintiff ,

-against-

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,

Defendants .

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

Index No. : 100904/03105028/03190413/11

(May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation,lS>e|aijd tpe Jktjfe are hereby0 H Irissj

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED : /fc/c/J/5East Hanover, New Jersey

WuMATTHEW MACINTYRE, ÿSQ .WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

OCT 1% 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENIW YORK

STEPHEN F. BALZAMO, ESQ >GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,

Honoiÿfjle Peter H. MoultonMtShs

Page 131: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NYC ASBESTOS LITIGATION

IVETTTE MONTANEZ and PETER MONTANEZ,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. , INC. , et al. ,Defendants .

Index No.: 190409/2014

NO OPPOSITIONSUUMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

IAS Justice:Hon. Peter Moulton

-X

WHEREFORE, defendants VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA, LLC, hereby

request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint

against defendant, VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA, LLC, with prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and

cross claims against defendant, VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA, LLC, and

the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: Port Washington, New York

Nahid Shaikh, Esq.THE LANIER LAW FIRM, PLLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs126 East 56ch Street, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 421-2800

Lance Perez, Esq.MAIMONE & ASSOCIATES PLLCAttorneys for DefendantsVOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA, LLC150 Haven AvenuePort Washington, NY 11050(516) 390-9595

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter Moulton

filedOCT 19 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW York

Page 132: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

18772278020 CELLINO & BARNES, PC 10:35:09 10-07-2015 2/2

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

HERMAN ANDERSON AND DONNA ANDERSON,INDIVIDUALLY AND AS HUSBAND AND WIFE,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC., et al. ,Defendants .

-X NYCALIndex No.190085/2015

IAS Justice:Hon. Peter Moulton

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant MACK TRUCKS, INC., hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant MACK TRUCKS, INC., with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims

and cross claims against defendant MACK TRUCKS, INC., be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: ÿPT5rt Wcÿshinofc-dnj New York

JosephÿJkr Vazquez, Esq.CELLINO & BARNES, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs420 Lexington AvenueSuite 2140New York, New York 10170(800) 621-2020 x 539

Lance Perez, Esq.MAIMONE & ASSOCIATES PLLCAttorneys for DefendantMack Trucks, Inc.150 Haven AvenuePort Washington, NY 11050(516) 390-9595

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter Moulton

.ojlsjiSF 1 1

OCT 19 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 133: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536 .24025/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

This document relates to:Index No. : 190347/10

ROSARIA D. MUSCHTER, Deceased,

Plaintiff , (May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

-against- NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERUNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,

et al . ,

Defendants .

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims

against defendant, United Conveyor are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED

OCT 19 2015

East Hanover, New Jersey COUN1Y CLARK'S OFFICENew YORK

MATTHEW MACINTYRE, E, STEPHEN F. BALSAMO, ESQ.GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALOWEITZ & LUXENBERG

Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,.onorable Peter H. M&ulton

Page 134: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536 .07350/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

ALOISUS J. OCZEK, Deceased,

Plaintiff ,

-against-

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,

Defendants .

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

Index No. : 101162/99

(May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: JC/ll/JrjEast Hanover, New Jersey

MATTHEW MACINTYRE,/ESQ .WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff 0(,J |700 BroadwayNew York, New York

2015

TEPHEN -F . BALSAJfO,TTSQ .GARRITY, GRAHAIÿf MURPHY, GAROFALOSc FLINN

Attorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350Lx 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,

Honorable Peter H. MouTtpn4 0 &

Page 135: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536.21592/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

PATRICK J. O'NEILL, Deceased,

Plaintiff ,

-against-

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,

Defendants .

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

Index No. : 112263/07

(May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: / 7 //5 IC ||East Hanover, New Jersey® 3*

OCT I9 2015

MATTHEW MACINTYRE, . F. BALSÿMCfrÿrgQ .GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALOWEITZ & LUXENBERG COUNTY CLERK'S 9;

Attorneys for Plaintiff N6YV YQRK& FLINN700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,New York, New York 10003 United Conveyor Corporation

72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,ÿHonorable Peter H. Moulton

*0 />

Page 136: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536 .14414/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

This document relates to:

SHARON M. REDDEN,Index No. : 113748/00

108388/00

Plaintiff , (May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

-against - NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERUNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION.

et al . ,

Defendants .

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED : / ÿ'/£-'/ / / OEast Hanover, New Jersey

STEPHEN''FGARRITY, G& FLINN

MATTHEW MACINTYRE, E,

WEITZ & LUXENBERG GAROFALOWEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Attorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,morable Peter H. Moulton f/s//5

Page 137: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

536 .12413/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

EDWIN C. WILSON, Deceased,

Plaintiff ,

-against-

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,

Defendants .

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

Index No. : 113609/02107222/02

(May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)

NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims

against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED :

East HanoverJoJo/J/5r, New Jers

5Jersey

MATTHEW MACINTYRE,WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

FILEDOCT 19 2015

MURPHY, GAROFALOSTEPHEÿ|\GARRITY, GF& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,

Honorable Peter H. MoultonPlS/S

Page 138: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

oz>-CO

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

GUILLERMO PINA and MIRIAMPINA,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

NYCAL _I.A.S. PartÿTS £

Index No. 190041/2015

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTPEERLESS INDUSTRIES.INC.

WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC.,hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES,INC.,with prejudice in this

action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant PEERLESSINDUSTRIES,INC.,beand the same are hereby dismjp&edwithprejudice

and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkllyjK_

Oct 19 ?015ryA/,

CLFpl

Steven T. Corbin, Esq.Attorney for DefendantPeerless Industries, Inc.Lewis BrisboisBisgaard& Smith LLP77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 232-1300File No. 1863-29928

Benjaminfiparche, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsGuillermo Pina and MiriamPinaWeitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDEREDC ÿHon. Peter H. Moulton

Id isis<- (ÿ I 14

ÿ „;3

4841-4637-2641.1

Page 139: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

,NSYNeunowioNsupport RECEIVED BYLEWIS BRISBOIS

UUi |J20 15 SMITH LLP

OCT 01 2015

Page 140: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

(/)

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

GUILLERMO PINA and MIRIAM PINA,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„

Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No. 190041/2015

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTKAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC.

WHEREFORE, defendant, KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC., hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC.,with

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC., be and the same are herqfcy dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkYork, Mew Y<

ijnpS

:reby di

&/Oct

°°oa*9•%

ÿ ULSteven T. Corbin, Esq.Attorney for DefendantKaiser Gypsum Company, Inc.Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard& Smith LLP77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 232-1300File No. 29510.1407

Benjamin Darche, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsGuillermo Pina and Miriam PinaWeitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDEREDon. Peter H. Moulton

-'.j

4822-9667-1014.1

Page 141: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

i

i

INSYNcUTiflATioN SUPPORT

UCi 1 3 2015

Page 142: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

w

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

ELIZABETHRENO,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50

Index No. 190070/15

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTPEERLESS INDUSTRIES.INC.

WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES,INC., with prejudice inthis

action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant PEERLESSINDUSTRIES,INC.,be and the same are hereby dismissedwithprejudice

OCr. Q

and without costs.

Dated: NewYork,NewÿYork

57a

Stephanie L. Coleman, Esq.Attorney for DefendantPeerless Industries, Inc.Lewis BrisboisBisgaard& Smith LLP77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 232-1300File No. 1863.29965

SO ORDERED

Jofcenb-PT ÿOjMms, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsElizabeth RenoThe Williams Law Firm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122

HonTPeter H. Moulton x4 A3

4824-1839-4915.1

Page 143: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

•. V' f— '• *i£mBRISBOi:-;

INSYNeLitigationSUPPORT_.......MAY |6 aim00f 1 / ÿ(J15

Page 144: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

o

W

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

FRED C. BODDY,

Plaintiff,

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

i NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No. 190137/2015

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTKAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC.

WHEREFORE, defendant, KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC., hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC.,with

prejudice inthis action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC., be and the same are Hs*eby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

phi .ÿ $0Dated: New York, New York

ÿ Id-11-MIS COlj,o°rl9 2015

djJL-ÿ7>r

Steven T. Corbin, Esq.Attorney for DefendantKaiser Gypsum Company, Inc.Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard& Smith LLP77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 232-1300File No. 29510.1455

/C£Adam Drexler, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffFred C. BuddyWeitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

/ A.

SO ORDERED ÿ2ÿ—~---_ iolfSf/S / ÿi i4

"l ion. Peter FI. Moultonÿ / I l„,sÿL

" -0

4822-4 176-5416.1

Page 145: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

f

GCO

s.'3(«0

125OS

CD

IP(3

«)

RBCfciVtiJ BYLEWIS BRI6B0IS

B1SGAARD a SMITH LLP

OCT 8 2015

Page 146: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

'ttr.tl'pS

389-15/TMCSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

- XNEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION •

EUGENE STORY and RUTH STORY,

Plaintiffs,-against-

ABB TURBINE, INC., et al.

Defendants.

-X STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Index No. 190285/2015

-X

The undersigned hereby stipulates... that the action on behalf of EUGENE

STORY and RUTH STORY is herebydismissed against CROWLEY MARINE

SERVICES, INC., s/h/a CROWLEY MARITIME SERVICES, INC. with prejudice for

any claims against CROWLEY MARINE SERVICES, INC. arising out of Plaintiff's

service on the DELAIRES, which was being operated pursuant to a General Agency

Agreement with the War Shipping Adhftiflistration. Other than the claims related to

the service of the DELAIRES, the dismissal is without prejudice as to CROWLEY

MARINE SERVICES, INC., with plaintiffs reserving all rights and cdCsesÿfÿctioÿagainst all other co-defendants. C*

°C?to

coÿf %Dated: New York, New YorkOctober , 2015

Daniel P. BlouinfEsq,SIMMONS HANLY CONROY112 Madison AvenueNew York, NY 10016-7416Attorneys for PlaintiffsEugene Story andRuth Story

krh'C£:

r:*;, Thdmas M. Canevari, Esq;'ÿreehill hogan & mahar llp

(80 Pine Street• New York, NY 10005Attorneys for DefendantCrowley Marine Services, inc.

SO ORDERED:

440082.1

If.it-'WStt h\

/ Hon. Peter H. MoultonM/y/5

Page 147: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ARTHUR HALLBERG AND EMILIAHALLBERG,

against

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, ftINDEX NO.: 190475/13

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, KOHLER CO., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, KOHLER CO., with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, KOHLER CO., be and the same are hereby dis|usse| v|th pjgffjdipÿand without

costs.

DATED::/04<TNew York, New York

OCT 19 2015

ÿLERK'S OFFICE'NEW YORK

HA SHAH, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,KOHLER CO.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

SO ORDERED:

rCI IRISTOPI ICR GLADDr-ESQ.NAPOLI, BERN, RIPKATSHKNOLNIK &ASSOCIATES MifAa, j CLAttorneys for Plaintiff(s), ÿ 1ARTHUR HALLBERG and EMILIA HALLBERG350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7413New York, NY 10118

/W/v/aHonorable Peter H. Moulton

CN-HIP-13

Page 148: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

This Document Relates to:JOHN CUZZOLINO and CONCETTA CUZZOLINO,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCT CO., et al.

Defendants,

-X

NYCAL(Hoitlcr, J)—IAS PartÿtfSb

Index No. 190270/2014

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

April 2015 InExtremis

-X

WHEREFORE, Defendant INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY incorrectly sued

herein as INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY f/k/a Hammermill Paper Co. and

Individually and as Successor to US Plywoodhereby requests Summary Judgment inthe above-

entitled case pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules §3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint

against INTERNATIONALPAPER COMPANY with prejudice, and there beingno opposition

thereto, it is

ORDERED, that uponnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without coats)fj lih j

Dated: Newf/Yorfl,New Yc<lh II ,>-Oroi5

7BELLUCrfBy_Jordan Fo546 FifthNew YorlÿWwYork 10036(212) 681-M5Attorneys for Plaintiffs

SO ORQERED:

Ft LEO

I& MILLER,P.C.

John S. Rana, Esq.99 CourKttreetWhite Plains,New York 10601(914) 946-8900Attorneys for Defendant INTERNATIONALPAPER COMPANY

Hon. Sherry Klein Iloitlor,J.S.C:

HON.PETERH.MOULTONDated: fb fÿJ

SbPp

ifURT-CII

Page 149: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xINRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

xIVETTE MONTANEZ and PETER MONTANEZ,

Index No.: 190409/14

-against-Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. et. al. Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, Defendant HONDA MOTOR PARTS SERVICE CO., LTD., hereby

requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant HONDA MOTOR PARTS

SERVICE CO., LTD.,with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, HONDA MOTOR PARTS SERVICE CO., LTD., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party.

Dated: New York, New York / Y

/! II ED / (y$ \)f I/ f 1 —--Nahid A. snaikh, Esq. p-r \ C) 2.0ÿ Benjamm GÿiÿjrersrEsq.

LANIER LAW FIRM,PLLC * SEGAL McCXMBRIDGETSfNGERAttorneys for Plaintiff MAHONEY, LTD.126 East 56lh Street 6th Floor CLERK'S Attorneys for DefendantNew York, New York 1002ÿÿ ÿE\N YOR 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100(212) 421-2800 New York, New York 10022

(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED,'Hon Peter H. Moulton

Page 150: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

I

I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

— - XINRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

XKATHLEEN CURTIN, as Administratrix for theEstate of KEVIN B. CURTIN, and KATHLEENCURTIN, Individually,

Plaintiffs,

Index No.: 190351/12

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION

- against - I.A.S. Part 50Hon. Peter H. Moulton

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.- X

WHEREFORE, Defendant GARDNER DENVER, INC. (hereinafter "GARDNER

DENVER"), hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant

GARDNER DENVER, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, GARDNER DENVER, be and the same are hereby dismissed withjprejudice and

without costs to either party.

Dated: CHbbe/~£,2015New York, New York

9Adam Raffo, ÿ

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

ed with_pr

EDOCT 19 M5

CK'S officeYORK

(ndrew W. Dean, Esq.SEGAL MdCAMBRIDGESINGER AlMAHONEY, LTD.Attorneysfo\DefendantGardner Denver, Inc.850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022(212) 651-7500

$ U Q

hfsisHon. Peter H. Moulton OCT

ÿ !

i4 ÿW/3

Page 151: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION-X

-XIndex No.: 190386/14

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION

I.A.S. PartedHon. Peter H. Moulton

-X

JOSEPH P. HADDEN and ELEANOR HADDEN,

Plaintiffs,

- against -

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant GARDNER DENVER, INC. (hereinafter "GARDNER

DENVER"), hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant

GARDNER DENVER, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, GARDNER DENVER, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs to either party.

Dated: Oc4ÿbÿJ~(s>f 2015New York, New York

Adam Raffo, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Andrew WSEGAL ÿ

19 2015

MBRltefi0ÿÿSINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneysfor DefendantGardner Denver, Inc.850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED,Peter H. Moulton

jollS/h r-

Page 152: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

Index No.: 190025/14InRe:NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NELSONA. SIWA,

Plaintiff(s),NO OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION

t against -

AURORA PUMP COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests Summary

Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, and

there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Aurora Pump Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs to either party.

Dated:

007 9 2015/Gtsu. » i - ' " '

KatrinaH.MurpHypBsgÿ ÿSEGAL McCAMBRÿeJ;'S °f

SINGER & MAHONEY,LTO.

Ambref/Brandis, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Attorneys for DefendantAurora Pump Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

ffon.-f*eter H. Moulton

New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED,

Page 153: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, ft)

This Document Relates to: Index No: 190025/2014

THERESA SIWA, as Executrix for the Estate ofNELSONA. SIWA, and THERESA SIWA,Individually

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporatio 1 ' hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

06ft)ber5 .2015

OÿWlPg ÿ PWpiirnnJrq,WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Jonathan B. Kromberg, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YA\Attorneys for UnionCarbide116 East 27th Street, 12thFloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

Attorneys for UnionCarbide CorporationDARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLP

(Xiq/ibit fiid/idis i

SO ORDERED,H<5n Peter H. Moulton

Page 154: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

THERESA SIWA, as Executrix for the Estate ofNELSONA. SIWA, and THERESA SIWA,Individually

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, ft)Index No: 190025/2014

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs. F/L POCT I

COU/VJ* ''YORK

Dated: New York, New York

Odtdhxr 5 .2oi5

K'S OFFICE

WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

dmbAt fÿardiS; 6S$

Jonathan B. Kromberg, Esq.DARGER ERRANTEYAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12thFloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, sf AHefi. PtTter H. Moulton ---fjfÿJ/ S

Page 155: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ELVIS LICUL AND NEVENKA RADOVICAS PROPOSED CO-EXECUTORS FOR THEESTATE OF ALBINA LICUL AND VICTORLIKUL, INDIVIDUALLY,

Plaintiffs,vs.

A.O. SMITHWATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No: 190173/2015

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Crosby Valve, LLC named in the complaint as "FMC

Corporation, on behalf of its former subsidiary Crosby Valve, Inc." hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Crosby Valve LLC with prejudice, and there

being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Crosby Valve LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed wppfjificegl 0outcosts.

Dated: New York, New York

j»Qc\mec ,2015

_ÿ

_Adam Dreksler, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorney for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500

OCT 19 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFI~

Seth L. Hughes, Escf.'Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Crosby Valve LLC101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212)309-6000

SO ORDERED,Tlon. Peter H. Moulton

OCT 14 20 15

NYS SOPF-50

JRT - CIVIL

Page 156: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

iI

Page 157: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRENEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

ÿX NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, f?)

This Document Relates to: Index No: 190224-14

MARKRICCI, NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONANDORDER

X

WHEREFORE, defendant SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC., successor in interest to

SIEMENS ENERGY & AUTOMATION, INC. by its attorneys, WILBRAHAM, LAWLER &

BUBA, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant SIEMENS

INDUSTRY, INC., successor in interest to SIEMENS ENERGY & AUTOMATION, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC., successor in interest to SIEMENS ENERGY &

AUTOMATION, INC.,be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudicpndjwijjiout |swts.£ÿjDaÿd: / /X 2015 „

_/ ÿ / (vÿ XOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

John S. Howarth, Esq. YORKWILBRAHAM,LAWLER & BUBA1W0 Broadway, 46th Floor

j2nris Rjamanelli, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERGVÿliLJO

WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs

WILBRAHAM,LAWLER & BUBA1W0 Broadway, 46th FloorNew York, NY 10005Attorneys for Defendant, SIEMENSINDUSTRY, INC., successor in interest toSIEMENS ENERGY & AUTOMATION, INC.

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter Moulton

FSEeiflWiiD)OCT 14 2015

RT - CIVIL

Page 158: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

- - XINRE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X

MONSERRATE ACOSTA,

Plaintiff,

-against-

3M CO., et al.,

Defendants.

Index No. 190112/15

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

-X

WHEREFORE, defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against Georgia-Pacific LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against Georgia-Pacific LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

m/sr/nfMEIROWITZ & WASSERBERG, LLP LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff

amuel Meiro tz, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC

By:

233 Broadway, #950New York, NY 10279(212) 897-1988

FILE DOCT 19 2015

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018 COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE(212) 302-2400 NEW YORK

Alexandra E. Ober, Esq.

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED: -. foj/ds-AHdCPeter H. Moulton, J.S.C. 7 '

octi4,.u;* -uID

Page 159: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

OLAF THORLEIF LYBERG

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton,

Index No: 190059/2015

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Cooper Industries, Inc. (Individually and as Successor to

Crouse-Hinds Company), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against

defendant Cooper Industries, Inc. (Individually and as Successor to Crouse-Hinds Company),

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Cooper Industries, Inc. (Individually and as Successor to Crouse-Hinds Company), be

and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

/o/l ,2015

latthew Park, Esq.EARLY LUCARELLISWEENEY &MEISENKOTHEN,LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017(212) 986-2233

filedOCT 19 2015

LTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Jonathan B. Kromberg, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for Cooper Industries, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,on. Peter H. M'oulton

Page 160: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, f)

This Document Relates to: Index No: 190059/2015

OLAF THORLEIF LYBERG NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Gould Electronics, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Gould Electronics, Inc., with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Gould Electronics, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Matthew PaiEARLY LL

Kromberg, Esq.EARLY LUCARELLI SWEENEY &MEISENKOTHEN,LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017(212) 986-2233

& DAKGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for Gould Electronics, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

ocU»®*

on. Peter H. MoultonSO ORDERED,

j

Page 161: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton,

This Document Relates to: Index No: 190059/2015

OLAF THORLEIF LYBERG NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation (incorrectly sued herein as Certain-

Teed Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Keasbey & Mattison Company)

("CertainTeed Corporation"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs. filed

EARLY LUCARELLISWEENEY &MEISENKOTHEN,LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017(212) 986-2233

Dated: New York, Nyw York

/(/'9 .2015

Matthew Park. Esq. Jonathdp4)Jonathdp43. Kromberg, Esq.

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

OCT 19 2015

DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

DARGER

SO ORDERED,on. Peter H. Moulton

/

Page 162: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

10/08/2015 THU 10: 28 FAX 0002/003

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

ELIPETROVITCHand ANTOINETTE PETROVITCH,

Plaintiffs,

-v.-

A O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.

Defendant(s).

NYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No. 190402/2014

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant MET-PROTECHNOLOGIES LLC,A CECO Environmental

Company, Successor by Merger to Met-Pro Corporation,on behalf of its DEAN PUMP

DIVISION,sued herein as "DEAN PUMP DIVISION" (hereinafter "DEAN PUMP DIVISION"),

hereby requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against DEANPUMP DIVISION,with prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that uponnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

DEANPUMP DIVISION,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New YorkÿNew York2015/It

Joserfi W. Belluck, Esq.BEJLLUCK & FOX,LLPAttorney for Plaintiff546 FifthAvenueNew York, New York 10036

ILED

___-

DavidH.Jones, Esq. ,,MALABY & BRADLEY,LLC

OCT 19 2015 Attorney for DefendantMET-PRO TECHNOLOGIES, A

r. CECO Environmental Company, Successor byCOUNTY CLERK Merger to Met-Pro Corporation on behalf of its

NEW YORK DEANPUMP DIVISION150 Broadway - Suite 600New York, New York 10038

SO ORDERED, v—Hon, Peter Moulton

Dated: A/A-//C/ ;

">7/

ÿJo

Page 163: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THOMAS J. FAHEY and ANNE MARIE FAHEY,

Plaintiff(s),-against-

ABB, INC., et al., includingFOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORP.,

Defendants.

NYCALHon. Peter H. Moulton

Index No. 190231/2015

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC (sued herein as "FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORP.")

hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

FOSTER WHEELER LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

!oh/t5

Brendan J. TuHy, EstLevy Konigsberg LLFAttorneys for Plaintiffs'800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022

Dennis E. Vega, Esq.

\ 9 Sedgwick LLPAttorneys for Foster Wheeler LLC

QpÿOfeNewark Center

iMTY ÿ 1085 Raymond Boulevard - 16th Floorc0U ndnvork Newark;NJ 07102

SO ORDERED. -- foj/sl/ S / C;?/ i ; T '' Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C. ' ' 1 " C[Ji5

Page 164: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

X:CLB/60965./leeal/NQSJM/ac.tohcr2015

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

_xITALOA. POMPONI and EILEENPOMPONI, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDERPlaintiff(s),

- against - IndexNo.: 190101/15

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.; NYCALI.A.S.Part 50

Defendants,-X

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.,be and the same are hereby dismissedwith prejudice and

without costs.

PattiBurshtyn,Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

SO ORDERED, . ÿTlon. Peter Moulton

ShawneWffdjt yB sa.vlAttorneys for CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan&jE&o« _2 Rector Street, 14tt*Floo# / lÿ1 ÿNewYork, New York 1000o" £

Page 165: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

X-.ACL/S9247./leeal/N0SJM

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XCLARENCE WAGONBLOTT and MARGARET R.WAGONBLOTT,

Plaintiff(s),

- against -

AMERICAN BILTRITE CO., et al.;

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

Index No.: 190486/13

NYCALI.A.S. Part y! S"

-X

WHEREFORE, defendants ASBESTOS CORPORATION, LTD. hereby request

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants ASBESTOS CORPORATION, LTD.

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

ithB 0 KL C U

prejudice and without costs.

defendants ASBESTOS CORPORATION, LTD. ,be and the same |reh|relj|/ di&HtssIgssjsjjvi°cr 19 20)5

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

EiiudSluplUuii, Esq.

ÿ Attorney for PlaintiffsNapoli Bern Ripka & Associates350 FifthAvenueNew York, New York 10118

Tftomay-mai'afiotÿTlA -v \!£Attorneys for Asbestos Corporation Ltd. 1

Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600

SO ORDERED,QUÿtn-y

HON.PETERH.MOULTON

"b

Page 166: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

X:A CU58529/LEGAUNOSJM

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

X

WILLIAM FOX, JR. and DOROTHY FOX,

Plaintiff(s),

- against -

AMMCO TOOLS, INC.,et al.;

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

Index No.: 190213/13

NYCALI.A.S.Partj/6

-X

WHEREFORE, defendants ASBESTOS CORPORATIONLTD. hereby request

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendantsASBESTOS CORPORATION

LTD,with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that uponnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants ASBESTOS CORPORÿTIÿLLÿB|, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without coslE*\ $

y. r>=Jiristapber-Gkdd;Esq.ÿ

, v Attorney for PlaintiffsNapoli BernRipka Assocaites350 FifthAvenue, Suite 7413New York, New York 10118

OFFICE

Joseph Digifegomo, Esq.ttorneys for AjSBESTOS CORPORATION

LTD.Barry McTieirfran & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600

SO ORDERED, /m//s-]4on Sherry Klm'ri-TTr.iflf.r

HON.PETERH.MOULTON5 ;U|5

Page 167: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

X:CLB/61037./leeal/NOSJM/october2015

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK.. XDONNIE R. RUSSELL and DEBORAH J. RUSSELL,His wife,

Plaintiff(s),

- against -

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

Index No.: 190127/15

AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORP, et al.;

Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50

-X

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

David Chandler, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsKarst & Von Oiste576 FifthAvenueNew York, New York 10036

SO ORDERED,Hon.'Peter Moulton

3yan Kleinman, Esq.Attorneys for CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan& Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006

o /S /S

filedOCT 19 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

OCT & / 1 ; /

Page 168: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

X:DOM/57S77./leeal/NOSJM/MAY2QI5

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OFNEW YORK

XHarriet D'Auria, Individually and as PersonalRepresentative of the Heirs and Estate of ALFONSOD'AURIA,deceased

Plaintiffs),

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

- against - Index No.: 190469/12

AKZO NOBEL PAINTS, LLC,et al.;

Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50

-X

WHEREFORE, defendants DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS, INC. hereby request

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS, INC.

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS, INC., be and the same are bespby dismissed with

iprejudice and without costs. 4*

°CTl»to,s

Bouglas Von Quite, Ecq.'tÿ<>o'A Ac. Marafioti, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiffs Attorneys for DOMCO Products Texas, Inc.Karst & Von Oiste Barry McTiernan & Moore576 FifthAvenue 2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10036 New York, New York 10006

(212)313-3600

SO ORDERED4lon. Peter Moulton

,) I

OCT 15 2015

Page 169: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main
Page 170: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

ROBERT CASTERELLA,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

3M COMPANY Individually and as successor toMinnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, etal„

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)

Index No.: 190133/2015

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

Defendants.—x

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without <y>stÿ

Dated: iiiÿlew York, New York Oct*>.

-pi/qaotrSamuel Meirowitz, EsMEIROWITZ & WAÿSERBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff(s)233 Broadway, Ste. 950New York, NY 10279(212) 897-1988

Kirsten Alford Kneis, Esq.K&E GATES LLP

torneys for DefendantIRANE CO.

599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022"o03u(212) 536-3900 2/ H. )f]

OCT 5 20)5

SO ORDERED, I*Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Page 171: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

OCT ] 3 2015

Page 172: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION.....xThis Document Relates To:

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter Moulton)

Index No(s).: 190389/13

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

STANLEY HOBISH and ROSLYN HOBISH,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„

Defendants.

>WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstlaims

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and withoufcÿts.

Dated: \/Z\ S"~New York, New York

undsay MzDeCicco,Lihdsay MZDeCicco, Esq.Weitz &'Luxenberg P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

%V &

)avid Oxamendi, Esq.K&L GATES LLPAttorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 LexingtonAvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900 f U

Hem. Peter Moulton - 1 J

Page 173: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

a A'f-..

SEP ?, 4 2015

Page 174: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY

-XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

MANUEL FIGUEROA and MARIA FIGUEROA,

Plaintiffs,

- against -

AERCO INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al . ,

Defendants.

-X

I.A.S. Part 50(Justice Moulton)

Index No.: 190247/15

NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION AND ORDER

-X

WHEREFORE, defendant, HOWDEN NORTH AMERICA, INC., f/k/a,

and referred to hereinafter as, HOWDEN BUFFALO, INC.

("HOWDEN") , requests summary judgment in this action, pursuant

to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint against HOWDEN,

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims

and cross claims against HOWDEN, be dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkOctober 2, 2015

Daniel Wasserberg, EsqMeirowirtz & Wasserbetg, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff233 Broadway, Suite 950New York, New York 10279(212) 897-1988

J/Burbridge, Esq.ilietfi and Dykman LLP

/Attorneys for DefendantHOWDEN NORTH AMERICA , INC.44 Wall Street, 15th FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 732-2000Our File No. : 11231-002.76

SO ORDERED:

Hon/ Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.'isjis

u fi]

Page 175: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:DARIO BATTISTONI,

Plaintiff ,

- against -

AERCO INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al . ,

Defendants .

-X

-X

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(iP. Moulton)

Index No.: 190103/15

NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

-X

WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims

beand cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS,

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

/ b II , 2015

fl*ocT, &

Samuel Meirovaitz, E'sc

Meirowitz & Wasserberg LLPAttorneys for PlaintiffDario Battistoni233 Broadway, Suite 950New York, New York 10003(212) 897-1988

Kristen 'Morrissÿy Esq.Cullen and Dykman LLPAttorneys for DefendantGoulds Pumps, Inc.44 Wall Street, 15th FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 732-2000Our File No. : 6754-13738

SO ORDERED:

Hon. Peter H. MouTton(ojisfis

i& 2015

C'vU

Page 176: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main

I

t

r

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

InReNEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

LAWRENCE SERUYA,

-against-

-X

Plaintiff,

Index No.: 153302/2015

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTCROWN EQUIPMENTCORPORATION

AUTOPART INTERNATIONAL, INC.,et al„

Defendants.-X

WHEREFORE,defendant CROWN EQUIPMENT CORPORATION hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant, CROWN EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, with prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

ELLbEnDdCROWN EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, be and the

without costs.

Ed with prejudice and

OCT 19 2015Dated: Purchase, New York

I0 [Ql ,2015

1Kush Shukla, Esq.Wilentz, Goldman& Spitzer, P.A.Attorneysfor Plaintiff110 Williams Street, 26lh FloorNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Diane4L-Mttt€r, Esq.LITTLETON,JOYCE, UGHETTA, PARK &KELLY,LLP.Attorney'sfor DefendantsCrown Equipment Corporation4 Manhattanville Road, Suite 220Purchase, New York 10577(914)417-3400

SO ORDERED.

honorable Peter H.Moulton,J.S.C.His/s

[?;Of i5ÿ015

I c:w