following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14 · following this cover page are...
TRANSCRIPT
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.
To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.
1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);
2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.
In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.
Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-x
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
LEON J. HURBAN and JULIA HURBAN, NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)Plaintiffs,
Index No.: 101846/2005-against-
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant CRANE CO., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: \YNew York.
2!3, AcYUw YorkNe
'tPuMJasj&r Yampolsky.Esq-r
WEITX & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorney's for Plaintiff(s)7ObJifoa)]wayNew Yorli NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Kirsten Alford Kneis, Esq.K&L GATES LLP
/
Kr Attorneys for Defendant"CRANE CO.A i0&-Lexington Avenue
OÿNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900
-7 .
zsjtihhSO ORDERED,
‘ Hon. Peter H. Moulton IMAR ') 3 J,6
Nvs St
-n'iL
\
Rt-C Vff .0
FEB 26 2016
\r--!
IFEB 26 cOio
i
PATES
MAR®2 2016SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK ' CIVIL
THOMAS RUTHLEDGE AND MARYRUTHLEDGE,
New York City Asbestos Litigation (NYCAL)
Index No.: 103446-02Plaintiffs,
-against- NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER ASTO DEFENDANT AT&T CORP. ONLY
ABB LUMUS CREST, et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant AT&T Corp hereby requests summary judgment in the aboveentitled case, pursuant to CPLR §3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ Complaint against defendantAT&T Corp. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant AT&T Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: Qj f 9- 'i 2016
By: By:
Wft v-Sagar Chadha, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558 - [email protected] for Plaintiffs
Christopher P. DePliillips, Esq.GIBBONS P.C.One Pennsylvania Plaza, 37th FloorNew York, NY 101 19-3701(212) [email protected] for Defendant AT&T Corp.
c\v.£°SO ORDEREDÿ2ÿIHon. Peter H. Moulton V
Office
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-x
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)
LEONARD PANZICA and PAT PANZICA,
Plaintiffs),
Index No.: 190441-11-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al, : NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC., formerly known as
Square D Company, (hereinafter "SQUARE D"), hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant SQUARE D with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant SQUARE D be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
New York, New YorkDated:
. £ •
Michael Fanelli, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Angelax)iGiglio, EscfJ IIK&L GATES LLPAttorneys for DefendantSCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC.,
(f/k/a SQUARE D COMPANY)599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900
o*9ÿ
00ÿ3\Tj,hSO ORDERED, /AT?7 »MS o m
rHon. Peter H. Moulton' 50
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 109913/07
PHILOMAE S. DONOVAN, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate of John J. Donovan
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, BorgWarner Morse TEC Inc. as successor-by¬
merger to Borg-Warner Corporation, ("Morse TEC"), hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Morse TEC, with prejudice in this
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant Morse TEC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs._
ADATED: ,2016
\ÿoAnna M. DiLonardoAttorneys for DefendantBorgWarner Morse TEC, Inc. assuccessor-by-merger to Borg-WarnerCorporationMarshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin888 Veterans Memorial Highway
0fF\C£ Hauppauge, NY 11788
Attorney sBelluck &546 Fiftra ,
New Yowc
fo/JPIaiptiffL
venue- 4th FloorNY 10036fiV-EO
!4
SO ORDERED,
1 '016
c Hon. Peter H. Moulton
MAR o IA.VS S‘0'WT ..
cHlL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 101607/07
DEBRA M. REIS, Individually and as Executrix of theEstate of GEORGE A. REIS, JR.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, BorgWarner Morse TEC, Inc. as successor-by-
merger to Borg-Warner Corporation ("Morse TEC"), hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Morse TEC, with prejudice in this
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant Morse TEC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
DATED: ,2016
/
4Attornefyslfibr PlaintiffBellucllMFox LLP546 Finn Avenue - 4th FloorNew York, NY 1003ÿ £Q
£ JJL'LAna M. DiLonardo
Attorneys for DefendantBorgWarner Morse TEC, Inc. assuccessor-by-merger to Borg-WarnerCorporationMarshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin888 Veterans Memorial HighwayHauppauge, NY 11788
SO ORDERED,
//Won. Peter H. MoultonMAR0 1 20]sL
Cÿ!L
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 113056/06
PHYLLIS N. SEGAL, Individually and as Executrix ofthe Estate of ELI J. SEGAL
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, BorgWarner Morse TEC Inc. as successor-by-merger to
Borg-Warner Corporation, ("Morse TEC") hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Morse TEC with prejudice in this action, and
there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant Morse TEC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs, /-i
DATED: ,20167
4ÿ2AÿaM.DiLonafdoAttorneys for DefendantBorgWarner Morse TEC, Inc. assuccessor-by-merger to Borg-WarnerCorporation
\ 4 Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin
OFF\C§88 Veterans Memorial HighwayNY 11788
hAttorneys!fdr/Pla ntjffÿBelluck 8J FMfLUP/546 Fifth Avenue - 4th Floor ONew Yorlÿ, N/ 10036 C \ U
W
Hauppauge
2M MMJ]SO ORDERED,Peter H. Moulton
MR o i iMis
C-*IL
CLB5SI28/legal/nosjm/NOVEMBER20M
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK• COUNTY OF NEW YORK
JOSEPH TOTO and PATRICIA TOTO:NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiffs),
Index No.: 107328/01-against-
NYCALI.A.S.
CONGOLEUM CORP., et al.,Parÿf
Defendant(s),•
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
I \VL
Shawnefte-Fluitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600
LfafiJeertaTEsq.ÿAttorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 1 0003
SO ORDERED, lb. mlion. 31jerry Klein-Heiiler
HON.PETERH.MOULTpt \ D few o 3
IVYS' CIV'.’l
X:CLB57922AeeaI/NOSJM/feb2Ql5
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
FLORENCE PITAK, as Executrix for the Estate ofJOHN PITAK and FLORENCE PITAK, individually,
Plaintiff(s),
Index No.: 109974/00- against -
A.C. & S. INC., et ah; NYCALI.A.S. Part
Defendants.-X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
d the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice anddefendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INCU beÿn
F\L£Dwithout costs.
m 4 4 2016
coÿr<;
!
'-Ftan'k'Oniz, Esq. KAPFDAttorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway
._
___NewJYorL.New York10003 ...
Shawnetfe FluittfEsq.Attorneys for Cleaver-Brooks, Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14,h FloorNew-York,-New-York 10006(212)313-3600
:— r
HON.PETER H.MOULTON
SO ORDERED,4lÿSha Li u
MAR 0 3 ' J ; S
f'ivS
CLB55293/legal/nosjm/November 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
JOHN B. EFFINGER,NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiffs),
Index No.: 110212/02'&105715/02
-against-
A.C. & S. INC., et al., NYCAL /> tr~'I.A.S. Part 3/
Defendant(s),-X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
• judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs. /
Dana Norther Esq.for Defendant
CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600
/
Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10036 0
-mv'3SO ORDERED,
4fon. Sherry Klcin-Ilcitlo3 ;
HON. PETER H.MOULTON
A-FB]V/390R6./iMUl/NOS.JM/avril2Q16
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-XNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
EDWARD T. PALMER,
Plaintiff(s),
Index No.: 109280/00- against -
NYCALA.C. & S. INC., et al.;I.A.S, Part SO
Defendants.•X
WHEREFORE, defendants FUL TON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
withdefendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC., be and the same are hereb
prejudice and without costs.
MAR J ;lots
Coo,s.f / I
¥ IAMAttorneys for Fulton Boiler Works, Inc.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)3131
uzaiiie\Ratcliffe, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitzw Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
j
Li -U
SO ORDERED, k.73 ; 3Hern. Peter Moulton
HON.PETER H.MOULTON
I
CLB/55706/legal/nosjm
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
•XJOSEPH T. SANDER and JOAN SANDER,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiffs),
I
Index No.: 190391/11,-against-
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendant(s),X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto, «
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and!
without costs.
WLChelsea Beshore, fesq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006 1(212)313-3600
Ambre. Diaiulis, Esq. /%,Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
I
Fz2iSO ORDERED, 3Hon. Peter Moulton
HON.PETER H.MOUL1
MAR l 4 F.5
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK| COUNTY OF NEW YORK
X NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 50(Judge Moulton)
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis Document Relates to:LAURA DE FORNE, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate ofJOHN V. DE FORNE,
Index No. : 190023/12
Plaintiff (s) ,- against - NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDERA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al .
Defendant (s) .X
WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC. hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
J Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-def endants , all claims
and cross-claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC. be
dismissed with prejudice and without costs. » / t
I Dated:
i
* &New York, New York, 2016 MAR U
Esq. ' 'QeAustin D. O'Malley,Cullen and Dykman LLPAttorneys for Defendant
GOULDS PUMPS, INC.44 Wall Street
New York, New York 10005
212-732-2000Our File No. : ~6L754-12192
, Esq.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorneys for PlaintiffJOHN V. DE FORNE
700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
1iwm\So Ordered:
/Hon. Peter H. Moulton:; j
S
i---j
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, ft)
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 112602/00, 122200/99
JAMES L. WATSONAND
IRENE WATSON NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorkfrfc). l"2_ ,2015 MAR j4?016
N£lv yoÿsK°FFic£C0UhlTy
S'
;// cmunAttorney for Plaintiff(s)James L. Watson and Irene WatsonWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
L Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating Corp.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Kei
ib— o.SO ORDERED,HOT. Peter H. Moulton
E 2383-26058J
iy
F-24 2016
NysI 50
Ch,L
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Party$Sd(Moulton,'?.)
m<j)
s m% o® fu'i]
,
2This Document relates to: I
TJIndex No. 190080/12 !oA
TOCO MARY KNEISEL and WILLIAM KNEISEL,
cz>
CDPlaintiffs, {nnlNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTSMOTION AND ORDER —
§
©o -against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiff s complaint against defendant, Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
m MAR1< 20tsC°UlvT
AMBenjamin Darche, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsMary Kneisel and William KneiselWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003212.558.5500
Stephen Babineci<'Esq.Attorney for DefendantKaiser Gypsum Company, Inc.LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005212.232.1300File No. 29510.673
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
4825-3823-1572.1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
"UAiO - J.UH03 3hi3£!df)S S M
OSJMVfi jz IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCAL
9IOM0-Ww ''Index No. 1004(|5ljgÿjjgjg)gji: j
0)This Document relates to:-<
Z GEORGE MASTROIANNI, as Executor of the Estate ofFRANK CHARLES MASTROIANNIO
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER AS TODEFENDANT PEERLESSINDUSTRIES. INC.
Plaintiff,-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO,, et al,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., with prejudice in this
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
2015
Ajrÿ7Steven Babinecz, Esq.Attorney for DefendantPeerless Industries, Inc.LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005(212)232-1300
Jordon Fox! Esq*
PlaintiffAttorljevGeorge Mastroianni, as Executor of the Estate of FrankCharles MastroianniBELLUCK & FOX546 5th Avenue, 4st FloorNew York, New York 10036(212)558-5500 £O1863-8984
MAR l4?0;s
Nÿf$°FFlCE3/V//fo <***SO ORDERED,
TyHon. Peter H. Moulton
4817-2390-5577.1
I
•*
I
I
INSYNC LITIGATION SUPPORT
c 4 2016
; ;
tv'AR 0 2 2016
'
: ‘.'0.IV; CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50 (Moulton)
xThis Document Relates To: Index No: 190234/11
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER
Gloria F. Cassano, Individually and as Executrix of theEstate of Richard M. Cassano
x
WHEREFORE, defendant THE BOEING COMPANY, Individually and as Successorto MCDONNELL DOUGLAS hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint againstdefendant THE BOEING COMPANY, Individually and as Successor to MCDONNELLDOUGLAS, without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant THE BOEING COMPANY, Individually and as Successor to MCDONNELLDOUGLAS, be and tKe same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.
New Yo/k, New York
Avy oi(,Dated:
Efflc DiMarco, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantTHE BOEING COMPANY,Individually and as Successor toMCDONNELL DOUGLAS150 East 42nd StreetNew York, New York 10017Our File No. 07040.00027
Jordan Fo: I, Iy;q.BELLUCK&FOX LLPAttomdÿs for Plaintiff546 Fifth AvenueNew York, New York 10036
ftON'reTER H. MOULTON, J.S.C.SO ORDERED,
F'i.eMAR i
NEÿVORSKQFriCE
4 20iS
COUNT7274616v.l
insMAR 0 2 2016
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK p.-'
" FO
NYY SLY'KFYY UY • ;T - c;vxx
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
xIndex No: 190227/11This Document Relates To:
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER
Daphne King and Delane Davis as Co-Executor’s for the Estateof Kenneth E. Durden
x
WHEREFORE, defendant PUGET SOUND COMMERCE CENTER, INC.,incorrectly s/h/a TODD SHIPYARDS CORP. (Individually and as Successor to TODDCOMBUSTION EQUIPMENT, INC., (hereinafter “PUGET SOUND COMMERCECENTER, INC.”), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant toCivil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendantPUGET SOUND COMMERCE CENTER INC. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant PUGET SOUND COMMERCE CENTER INC., be and the same are herebydismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
I. W&
MattheyÿPpriq Esq. /The Early Law Firm /Attorney for Plaintiff /360 Lexington Avemae, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10017
iVirginia Squitieri, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantPUGET SOUND COMMERCECENTER INC150 East 42nd StreetNew York, New York 10017File No: 04693.00PILED
SO ORDERED,M.4/? i 4 ?G,gHon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
COUNTY
7059230v.1
Ini ifSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK MAR 0 2 2016
IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
BILLIE J. ROWLING, as Executrix for the Estate ofRAYMOND R. ROWLING, and BILLIE J. ROWLINGIndividually,
Index No.: 102118/07
Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., includingMORSE DIESEL, INC.,
Defendants,
WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., hereby requests summary judgement in the
above-entities case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York., 2016
V
Y2iVchetta, Esq.Rosari
MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneys for DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038(212) 791-0285
Phan Alvarado, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC.Attorneysfor PlaintiffsBillie J. Rowling, as Executrixfor the Estate ofRaymond R. Rowling, and Billie J. Rowling,Individually700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
IfcOn*Ty
0fyGSO ORDERED, /j/ _
Hon. Peter H. MoultonDated:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK MAR 0 2 20 IS
IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 5f)(Moulton)
. : IL
RICHARD RYDER JR. as Executor for the Estate ofRICHARD RYDER SR.,
Index No.: 121479/97
Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
A.C. and S., INC., et al., includingMORSE-DIESEL CONSTRUCTION CO.,
Defendants,
WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc. (incorrectly named herein as “Morse-Diesel
Construction Co.”), hereby requests summary judgement in the above-entities case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Morse
Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York, 2016
,-.Matthew MacIntyre, Esq- pft ft (y OJTOUJXD
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC.Attorneysfor PlaintiffsRichard Ryder Jr. as Executorfor the Estate ofRichard Ryder Sr.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Rosario Chetta, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneysfor DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10Qj8(212) 791-0285
klAf? *4 2016C°ÿTySO ORDERED, Dated:
in. Peter H. Moulton
rIf ii I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK MAR 0 2 2018
IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Pari .(Moulton)
50
KEVIN BARRETT and IRENE BARRETT,Index No.: 109675/99
Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
A.C. and S., INC., et al., includingMORSE-DIESEL CONSTRUCTION CO.,
Defendants,
WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc. (incorrectly named herein as “Morse-Diesel
Construction Co.”), hereby requests summary judgement in the above-entities case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Morse
Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkIJ VZÿ 2016
Phan "Alvarado, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC.Attorneysfor PlaintiffsKevin Barrett and Irene Barrett700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Rosario Chetta, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneysfor DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.
\dS0 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038(212) 791-0285
aG
IMMSO ORDERED, Dated:IdrlfPeter H. Moulton
;Y7SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK IMAIi 02 m
NYCAL ,
I.A.S. Part/iO(Moulton)
NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
IN RE
DONALD E. MORTON JR. and BEVERLY J. MORTON,Index No.: 113324/02
107402/02
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
Plaintiffs,
A.C. and S., INC. et al., includingMORSE DIESEL, INC.,
Defendants,
•x
WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., hereby requests summary judgement in the
above-entities case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkJ*_, 2016
Justin Weitz, E$q.-DWEITZ & LUXEMBURG, PC.Attorneysfor PlaintiffsDonald E. Morton Jr. and Beverly J. Morton700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Rosario Chetta, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY, LI CAttorneysfor DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038(212) 791-0285
JhdlkSO ORDERED, Dated:'idnja'rPeter H. Moulton
\
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton,$
This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 06-101665
GAIL BUCKHEIT, as Executrix for the Estate ofPETER PACIFICO,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
WHEREFORE, defendant, York International Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, York International Corporation, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, York International Corporation, be and the same thereby dismissed with
1prejudice and without costs.
D£XED: XNew Brunswick, NJ
/v
MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ES<HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,York International Corporation48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
JORDAN FM/EBQ|.BELLU ZK f ROX LLP
Attorneys 1 wPlaintiff(s),Gail Bufckheit, as Executrix for the Estate ofPeter Paeifico546 Fifth AvenueNew York, New York 10036
\ Peter H. Moulton
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
SO ORDERED:
\ 448 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY OFFICE
*
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, f.)
INDEX NO.: 99-105478This Document Relates to:
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
JAN FLEMING-SPILLANE, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OFLEE M. SHORTS, AND JAN FLEMING-SPILLANE, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OFANN M. SHORTS, FILED
MAR 1 4 2016against
A.C. AND S, INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING & SUPPLY) COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORK
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
K-o t0»,2CiV>New York, New York
DATED:
(\W/T) C. 6/xtlkHAJrRANttORTgrCSQ. C rWloAWEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff(s),JAN FLEMING-SPILLANE, as PersonalRepresentative for the Estate of LEE M.SHORTS, and JAN FLEMING-SPILLANE, asPersonal Representative for the Estate of ANNM. SHORTS,700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
(
lirfSHA SHAH, ESCr--'HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
SO ORDERED:
Z' honorable Peter H. Moulton
BlNYCALIAS Part 50(Moulton, jp.)
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK MAR 0 2 2016
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
f'A.Tr 51.)NYS -L" cC55 COL i,r CIVIL
INDEX NO: 190488/2011GENE SPINELLI and JOAN SPINELLI,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
Plaintiffs),
-against-
A.L. EASTMOND & SONS, individually, and as successor toEasco Boiler Corp, et al.
Defendant(s)X
WHEREFORE, defendant Armstrong International, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant
Armstrong International, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
Armstrong International Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: White Pldins, New York
THOMAS M. BENEVENTANOLa Sorsa & BeneventanoAttorney for DefendantARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC.3 Barker Avenue, White Plains, NY 10601Tel: (914) 682-3300
BeUuck & Fox LLPAttorney for Plaintiff546 Fifth Avenue- 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Tel: (212)681-1575
----/'Horn Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, fl)
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 190438/11
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
MYRIAM GALEANO, Individually and asProposed Executrix of the Estate of MANUELGALEANO, Deceased,
against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
WHEREFORE, defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as
Successor to Frick Company, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against
defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick
Company, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick
Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED! JW York, New York
_ÿjtfRDAIBELLUC
JASOr/RIEMER, ESQ.
HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,York International Corporation, Individuallyand as Successor to Frick Company48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
IJESQ.OX, LLP
Attorne\fs/for Plaintiff(s),Myriam/Galeano, Individually and as ProposedExecutrlix of the Estate of Manuel Galeano,deceased546 Fifth Ave, 4th FI.New York, NY 10036
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law S.048 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
SO ORDERED:PT Honorable Peter H. Moulton
C0ÿ
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, f)
This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 190025/12
MICHELE ALFANO, AS EXECUTRIX OF THEESTATE OF ANTOINETTE A. KISKIEL A/K/AANN KISZKIEL, DECEASED,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.,
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED:
t! New York, New York
lLitllSHA'SHAH, ESQ.
HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
JORDAN FpX, ESQ.
BBLLUPK & FOX, LLPAtlorpeys for Plaintiff(s),Micnele Alfano, as Executrix of the Estate ofAntoinette A. Kiszkiel a/k/a Ann Kiszkiel546 Fifth Ave, 4th FI.New York, NY 10036
o 3MkSO ORDERED:s >flonorable Peter H. Moulton
#HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
•&# s*o,(J»48 Wall Street
Suite 1100New York, NY
CO-TROOP-22
N.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK STATE
X NYCAL
I.A.S. Part ,#6(Judge Moulton)
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
XX
Index Nos.: 115785/9611327ÿ/97 111062/98108752/99 190360/15
OLIVIA CASTAGLIOLA, as Executrix forthe Estate of GERALD CASTAGLIOL, andOLIVIA CASTAGLIOLA, Individually,
Plaintiffs , SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
F \ l_£- against
MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO.,
ET AL . ,INC. ,
m1
K'SDefendants .X
WHEREFORE, defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC.,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant MARIO & DIBONO
PLASTERING CO., INC., with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims
and cross claims against defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO.,
INC., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
New York, New York
201&Dated:
C2-/C Z
te ilUX. /-ÿ, Esq. IZKristen L. Morrissy, Esq.
CULLEN and DYKMAN LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC.
44 Wall Street, 15th FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 732-2000File No. :
MATTHi=WAttorneys for PlaintiffWEITZ Sc LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York(212) 558-5500
10003
r~
10924-01Is
So Ordered:Hon. Peter H. Moulton, 1C
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, f)
This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 112676-07
ALAN IRGANG, AS ADMINISTRATOR FORTHE ESTATE OF DORIS IRGANG, AND ALANIRGANG, INDIVIDUALLY
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
against
A.O. SMITH WATER CORP., ET AL
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED:New York, York
PRANKWEITS & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs),Alan Irgang, as Administrator for the Estate1Doris Irgang, and Alan Irgang, Individually700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10036
CARL FIGUEROA, ESQlXHOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
£.0SO ORDERED:
f \ v. Peter H. MoultonHOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law *•
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
Nres«“®S,,,srJD07 20J6
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XROBERT HOPE,
Plaintiff. INDEX NO.;190009/20F5
-against- NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERA.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.;
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, Defendant, PIPING SPECIALTIES, INC., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
Plaintiffs complaint against Defendant, PIPING SPECIALTIES, INC., with prejudice, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, PIPING SPECIALTIES, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkFebruary ,2016
o
Solbihon Liss, Esq.Klein & Liss LLPAttorney for DefendantPIPING SPECIALTIES, INC.626 RXR Plaza, Suite 6762Uniondale, New York 11556(347) 880-0280
Ruth D. Marcus, Esq.Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiff10 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, New York 10038 - \
(212)267-3091 C \ V*
Jÿage Peter H. Moulton ' ’NVSSUPRERMSECV1STJDlbSO ORDERED:
MAR o 1 2016
SWSaJKB
>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
O IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALZ>ÿ
This Document relates to:(/)
Z Index No.: 190338/11SAM ANGELO AND NORMA ANGELO,
Plaintiffs,NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-against-
KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC., ct al.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
againstKaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs/ ';
Datecy New.Vork, New Yorky/-2°iP
David Pagtgy, EsOjÿÿAttorney for DefendantKaiser Gypsum Company, Inc.LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP77 Water Street, Suite 2100New York, New York 10005(212)232-1300
WEITZ& LUXENBERG, PC700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
<2SO ORDERED: —nHON.PETER H.MOULTON n
FILED \\
4836-3716-5840.1
MAR 1 4
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
(
ih
INSYNC LITIGATION SUPPORT
MAR 0 ', 2016
i
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton,
This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 119873-98
PATRICIA A. HOTNICH, ASADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OFJOHN HOTNICH, AND PATRICIA A.HOTNICH, INDIVIDUALLY,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERFILED
1 4 2016MARagainst
A.C. AND S, INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING & SUPPLY) COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
- NEW YORK
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
yi-d.DATED:
>New York, New York
1A
ISHA SHAH, ESQ.
HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
WEITZ & LUXENBERG Oz/o3Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),PATRICIA A. HOTNICH, as Administratrix forthe Estate of JOHN HOTNICH, and PATRICIAA. HOTNICH, Individually,700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
HOAGLAND. LONGO,
MORAN. DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
SO ORDERED:Honorable Peter H. Moulton
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
1
1 CO-EDITOR-17\ V\
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK NYCAL
X I.A.S. Part 50, (Moulton, P.)
Index No: 104046/01119382/00
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION,
This Document Relates to: NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
MARIO MAIORIELLO and SANTA MAIORIELLO, MOTION AND ORDER-X
WHEREFORE, defendant, ADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, ADIENCE, INC.
F/K/A BMI, INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant, ADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
<3/ÿ
C)hKtfn C- 6mku
Dated: , 2016
lFiank Qitiz, Eatfr-$jocn c ftWoui, ioti/EITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. '
James M. SkellyÿUsq.
W '’NEILL, O’BRIEN,DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C.Attorneys for DefendantADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC.,530 Saw Mill River RoadElmsford, New York 10523(914) 345-7301File No.: 473.99203
MAIAttorneys for PlaintiffsMARIO MAIORIELLOand SANTA MAIORIELLO700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
31pI /u
FILEDSO ORDERED,
Hon. PeterJU Moulton-;
MAR 1 4 2016
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
:ÿ
i>
{NY283119.1}
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK NYCAL
X I.A.S. Part 50, (Moulton, P.)
Index No: 109471/00122187/99
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
This Document Relates to:MARJORIE MOYER, as Exexutrix for the Estate ofPAUL O. MOYER and MARJORIE MOYER,Individually,
XWHEREFORE, defendant, PREMIER REFRACTORIES INC., F/K/A
ADIENCE, INC., F/K/A BMI, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-
entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, PREMIER REFRACTORIES INC., F/K/A
ADIENCE, INC., F/K/A BMI, INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant, PREMIER REFRACTORIES INC., F/K/A ADIENCE, INC.,
F/K/A BMI, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: , 2016sO-
mMCti C. tadot/jJames M/'Skelly,Frank Ortiz, Esqj ;q.
MARXSÿO’NEILL, O’BRIEN,DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C.Attorneys for DefendantPREMIER REFRACTORIES INC.,F/K/A ADIENCE F/K/A BMI, INC.,
530 Saw Mill River RoadElmsford, New York 10523(914) 345-7301File No.: 473.99201
Attorneys for PlaintiffsPAUL O. MOYER andMARJORIE MOYER700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
j/2/e'v-SO ORDERED,Hon, Peter II. Moulton
O
1{NY204495.1}
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 50, (Moulton, P.)
Index No: 105478/99
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION,
This Document Relates to: NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERJAN FLEMING-SPILLANE, as Personal
Representative for the Estate of LEE M. SHORTS,and JAN FLEMING-SPILLANE, as PersonalRepresentative for the Estate of ANN M. SHORTS,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant, ADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, ADIENCE, INC.
F/K/A BMI, INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant, ADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
3 / 30?
QhJs/fn C.. _Frank Ortiz,
vSrf& fy'
Dated: ., 2016
James fo.fckellyjTSsq.
’NEILL, O’BRIEN,DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C.Attorneys for DefendantADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC.,530 Saw Mill River RoadElmsford, New York 10523(914) 345-7301File No.: 473.99208
MAIAttorneys for PlaintiffsLEE M. SHORTS, ANN M. SHORTSand JAN FLEMING-SPILLANE700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
p l L E D_2SO ORDERED,
/ÿ Hon. Peter H. Moulton---: m 4 4 z0'6
K'S OFFICEi
{NY283126.1}
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK NYCAL
X I.A.S. Part 50, (Moulton, P.)
Index No: 104903/01IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION,
This Document Relates to: NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
DANIEL J. MURPHY and ROSE MARY MURPHY, MOTION AND ORDERX
WHEREFORE, defendant, ADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, ADIENCE, INC.
F/K/A BMI, INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant, ADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Q.j -26?
Oiitu/n C. PxnhixJFrank Ortiz, Esq.
Ovett) c.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. <ÿ
Dated: ., 2016
James MASkelw, Esq.
MARKS; O’NEILL, O’BRIEN,DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C.Attorneys for DefendantADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC.,530 Saw Mill River RoadElmsford, New York 10523(914) 345-7301File No.: 473.99204
Attorneys for PlaintiffsDANIEL J. MURPHYand ROSE MARY MURPHY700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
A \ U3/oSO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
14
:
{NY283120.1}
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK NYCAL
X I.A.S. Part 50, (Moulton, P.)
Index No: 118415/99IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION,
This Document Relates to: NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERRONALD P. AYEN and SUSAN AYEN,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant, ADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, ADIENCE, INC.
F/K/A BMI, INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant, ADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Q Mi , 20Dated: j2_
QuWO LFrank Ortiz, 'Esq.
6uixn c.fyfhdjooWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. '
Jame§ M. Shelf ,sq.
MARKSrOÿNEILL, O’BRIEN,DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C.Attorneys for DefendantADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC.,530 Saw Mill River RoadElmsford, New York 10523(914) 345-7301File No.: 473.99211
Attorneys for PlaintiffsRONALD P. AYEN andSUSAN AYEN700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, x2_
S Hon. Peter H. Moulton
\ 4mOFFICE
{NY283129.1}
TMcMQpk)in/15
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 113057/98
WILLIAM DOUGHTY, NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New
York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against
defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross¬
claims against defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and
the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New,York,. NewJYork
Peter Tambini, Esq. ~7WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 Broadway
Timothy M. McCann, Esq.DAVID M. SANTORO, ESQ.Attorney for DefenoamConsolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.4 Irving PlaceNew York, New York 10003-3598
New York. New York 10003
PILEDMR \ 4 2016
c°n*r! i -)lHON. Peter |f Moulton L Li L .:. ,
Our File #:S-5392-98 MAR 0 9 2016
iVv'T SfiNYS YUYYY ;Y COiJi'T • Civil
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI. A. S. Part 50(Moulton, P)
This document relates to: Index No.: 112401/01
DANIEL SALVATORE NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
•X
WHEREAS, Defendant CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. (“CON-ED”) requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against CON-ED without prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto, it is hereby
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
CON-ED, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New YorK-New YorkSeptgmljer, ,2015
/3, W/S
CckJEsq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Ave, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counselfor Plaintiff
Echolaÿ Timothy McCarth, Esq.Consolidated Eflison, Inc.4 Irving PlWRM 1618New York, New York 10003Counselfor Consolidated Edison, Inc.
3l(ol lbSO ORDEREDÿ
Hon. Peter H. Moulton- ••• i
r~“'14
CQU*ÿVO«-
M 0 9 2::<o
PA't.:vq SlPÿ1
•mmmmn
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-XIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONIndex No.: 190266/11
-—X NYCALBERNADETTE HRUBY, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE I.A.S. Part 5*0
.(HeMerpL)-O ESTATE OF JOHN FRANKENBERG, JR.,
z Plaintiff, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
>CO -against-
zA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS Co., et al.
X
WHEREFORE, Defendant KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC., and its past andpresent parents, affiliates and subsidiaries and its predecessors and successors in interest andtheir agents, heirs and assigns (“Defendants”), hereby request Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs’Complaint against Defendants with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstDefendants, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York_,2012
WEITZ & LI >G, P.C. LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
By: By:Kelly McGee; Esq.Attorneysfor DefendantKAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC.77 Water Street, Suite 2100New York, New York 10005(212)232-1300
Daniel Wassefberg, Esq.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDEREDÿ2, - Date:HON.PETERH.MOULTON,Justice of the Supreme Courtof the State of New York
nFILED ri >
i uMAR 1 4 2016
4833-1633-66S6.1
- SO- C'COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK NYCAL
X I.A.S. Part 50, (Moulton, P.)
Index No: 102153/03127887/02
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION,
This Document Relates to: NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
GIOVANNI COLONNA and ASSUNTA COLONNA, MOTION AND ORDERX
WHEREFORE, defendant, ADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, ADIENCE, INC.
F/K/A BMI, INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant, ADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
__Dated: , 2016
Jjluin (/).Kevin W. Connolly, Esq. 'Susan Barlow, Esq.
MARKS, O’NEILL, O’BRIEN,DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C.Attorneys for DefendantADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC.,530 Saw Mill River RoadElmsford, New York 10523(914) 345-7301File No.: 473.80878
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffsGIOVANNI COLONNA andASSUNTA COLONNA700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,/s Hon. Peter H. Moulton
? !
7#Ij'ULUU
{NY284254.1}
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
•X Index No. 102153-2003GIOVANNI COLONNA and ASSUNTA COLONNA,
February 2017 FIFOTrial GroupPlaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
- against -
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO, et al„
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, Defendant GOODRICH CORPORATION, s/h/a The B.F. Goodrich
Company, hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules, Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs’ Complaint against Defendant
GOODRICH CORPORATION, s/h/a B.F. GOODRICH COMPANY, with prejudice, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all Co-Defendants, all Claims and Cross-Claims against
Defendant GOODRICH CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
FILEDwithout costs.
MAR 1 4 2016
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Dated: New York, New York
3/H ,2016
/tSusan C. Barlow, Esq.
BY:BY:/Patrick J. D\yyer (J
SMITH, STRATTON, WISE, HEHER &BRENNAN, LLP2 Research Way,Princeton, NJ 08540
Attorneys for GOODRICH CORPORATION
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS
3Jio/iiofjMoultonSO ORDERED
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 102153/03,127887/02
GIOVANNI COLONNA AND ASSUNTACOLONNA
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
fW-Dated: New York, New York
IS AJL 2016 \1\oÿ°e
LI&ENBERG, KerryarÿCookHÿsq.MCGIVNTAttorneys for DefendantsSafeguard Industrial Equipment Company80 Broad Street-23rd FloorNew York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
LUGER, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffGiovanni Colonna and Assunta Colonna700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
*3 lo I <PSO ORDERED,Peter H. Moulton
324-7255J
{N0497729-1 }
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 102153/03,127887/02
GIOVANNI COLONNA AND ASSUNTACOLONNA
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
£0f \twithout costs.
cou««$f$§*Dated: New York, New York
?)/3 2016 OFFICE
QJMO C. fynkiuQy5ÿluisNBE&p KerryamCoojs/Esq.
MCGIVNEY&KLUGER, P.C.Attorneys for DefendantsAtwood & Morrill Co., Inc.80 Broad Street - 23rd FloorNew York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Attorneys for PlaintiffGiovanni Colonna and Assunta Colonna700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
toVM&SO ORDERED,
”ÿHon. Peter II. Moulton S0ÿctc
{N0497639-1}
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 102153/03,127887/02
GIOVANNI COLONNA AND ASSUNTACOLONNA
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
.2016
Kewfann Cpok, Esq.1Y & KLUGER, P.C.
Attorneys for DefendantsCourter & Company, Inc.80 Broad Street-23rd FloorNew York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
MOT
Attorneys for PlaintiffGiovanni Colonna and Assunta Colonna700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
1122-24555
z Hon. Peter M. Moulton
{N0497637-1}
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 102153/03,127887/02
GIOVANNI COLONNA AND ASSUNTACOLONNA
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
3/d 2016
OuMB L . lKerryanjrCook, JEsq.McGivi .LUGER, P.C.Attorneys for DefendantsTreadwell Corporation80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor
Attorneys for PlaintiffGiovanni Colonna and Assunta Colonna700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Cÿ,SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter M. Moulton
1235-24785
{N0497635-X }
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALIA.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 102153/03,127887/02
GIOVANNI COLONNA AND ASSUNTACOLONNA
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiff’s complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation with prejudice, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorkf2) L\ 2016
D(.Jyyn CittjL Kerrÿrm Cook, Esq.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.Attorneys for DefendantsTishman Liquidating Corporation80 Broad Street-23rd FloorNew York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456 C \ V
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.Attorneys for PlaintiffGiovanni Colonna and Assunta Colonna700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
4
2383-26114J
SO ORDERED,
£ “'Hon. Peter H. Moulton
{N0497631-1}
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
•xIN RE NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
ANN T. MEZIK, Individually and as Executrix for theEstate of RONALD A. MEZIK,
Index No.: 120142/01
Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
A.C. and S., INC., et al., includingMORSE-DIESEL INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
Defendants,
WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc. (incorrectly named herein as “Morse-Diesel
International, Inc.”), hereby requests summary judgement in the above-entities case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Morse
Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: Ne; :, New York., 2016
Qi&m L tokJfrJatthÿ*' MacIntyre, Ecq C.C flQKJk Rosario Chetta, Esq.
MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneysfor DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC.Attorneysfor Plaintiff?,Ann T. Mezik, Individually and as Executrixforthe Estate of Ronald A. Mezik700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038 _ __(212) 791-,0285---------7:
~ '71f\v.£°'
'
. .liu- '41-
UM 0 9 20fiff\CE
n. Peter H. Moulton 'Dated: 3SO ORDERED/ xiv
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
WILLIAM SCHMIDT and ROSEMARIE SCHMIDT, Index No. 112962/99
Plaintiffs,NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. et al.,
including, MORSE-DIESEL, CONSTRUCTION CO.,INC.
Defendants,
-x
WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc. (incorrectly named herein as “Morse-Diesel
Construction Co., Inc.”), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Morse
Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York'U>, 20\<& £O// y 1
?SGQC/A'Ty
c,Ma&Mw MacIntyre, Fsq._ X/ior, Y>r~WEITO & LUXENBERG, PC.
Attorneysfor Plaintiffs,Wilmu$\Schmidt and Rosemarie Schmidt700 BroidwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
folsÿ Rosario ta, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneysfor DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038(212)791-0285
\%
SO ORDERED, \Dated:Hon. Peter H. Moulton
Vi'"'
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 50
This Document Relates to: Index No. 107289/99
PATRICIA L. GIALLELA, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate of JAMES J. GIALLELLA JR.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, Defendant Reynolds Metals Company, incorrectly sued herein as
“Reynolds Metals Company, as successor in interest to Atlantic Asbestos Corporation,” hereby
requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs’ complaint against Defendant Reynolds Metals Company,
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Reynolds Metals Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
*'4Dated: New York, New York
X Dio ,2016
%U0*ÿ ferz c0Malthcw \XjOMl C. &£r}fri/ Michael J. Curtis, Esq.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCÿ Ocÿ700 Broadway 150 Broadway, Suite 600
A
New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10038
Attorneysfor Plaintijf(s) Attorneysfor Defendant(212) 558-5500 (212) 791-0285
Dated:SO ORDERED.\
Hon. Peter H. Moulton \3\\..... o
\
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
•xDONALD D. WILSON,
Index No.: 112387/02107168/02
Plaintiff, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
A.C. and S., INC., et al., includingMORSE-DIESEL INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
Defendants,
WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc. (incorrectly named herein as “Morse-Diesel
International, Inc.”), hereby requests summary judgement in the above-entities case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Morse
Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York. 2016
i
A;Michael F-aneftf, Esq. fYVWEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC.Attorneysfor PlaintiffDonald D. Wilson700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Rosario cftetta, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneysfor DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038
791-0285cf-
\\
Dated: QSO ORDEREDÿHra. Peter H. Moulton
\
'r;
\\
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
•xSALVATORE D. LOVERDE and JEAN LOVERDE,
Index No.: 109117/00121983/99
Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
A.C. and S., INC., et al., includingMORSE-DIESEL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.,
Defendants,
•x
WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc. (incorrectly named herein as “Morse-Diesel
Construction Co., Inc.”), hereby requests summary judgement in the above-entities case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Morse
Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
FILEDDated: New York, New York. . 2016
CokM(\ L frnhZLWASO423''6
Peter Tambini, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC.Attorneysfor PlaintiffsSalvatore D. Lo Verde and Jean Lo Verde700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
io Chetta, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneysfor DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038(212) 791-0285 —\
t
njÿeter2DatedO/ÿ//6SO ORDERED,\W * 0Flo eter H. Moulton
..-lt
L
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:INDEX NO.: 101665/2006
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
PETER PACIFICO
WHEREFORE, Stewart Warner Corporation (‘'Stewart Warner”), hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against Stewart Warner, with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Stewart Warner be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
New Y/jprk, New York
3/9 , 2016Dated:
—"
Joseph R La Sala, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for DefendantStewart Warner Corporation88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005
Jordan C. Fo: ,Attorneys iorÿulintiffBelluck & FoxÿLP546 Fifth AVehue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036 F
* 4
OFFICE
JjiobbSO ORDERED,Peter H. Moulton
I 0 zoigI
2217525J
iX:CLB/55S> 70./tHsmissals/nosim/SEPTEMBER2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK;
! XNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
PATRICIA A. MESEC, as Executrix for the Estate ofTERRY J. MESEC and PATRICIA A. MESEC,Individually,
1
Plaintiff(s),
Index No.: 103514/03- against -
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.; NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
A
;P- i /
Shawnqt-ÿ©Un\ Esq.Attorneys for Cleaver-Brooks, Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600
Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 1 0003
SO ORDERED,19 ?Hon. Peter Moulton
Aty-.
X:FBW/46519./dismissals/nosim,SEPTEMBER2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
PATRICIA A. MESEC. as Executrix for the Estate ofTERRY J. MESEC and PATRICIA A. MESEC,Individually,
Plaintiff(s),
Index No.: 103514/03- against -
A..O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.; NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
Defendants.-X
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants FLJLTON BOILER WORKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Briafrl-eld. Esq.L
Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Attorneys for Fulton Boiler Works, Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
3 to ftSO ORDERED, 7/Plon. Peter Moulton
/r
/' --J
FB\v/33650/legal/nosjm/SEPTEMBl£R2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
ELLIS WOODS,
Plaintiffs),
Index No.: 112524/98-against-
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
A.C.&S. INC., et al.,
Defendants),
X
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212.
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Esq.Attorney for PUiAtiffWeitz & Luxenberg\700 Broadway \New York, New York 10003
Cc. /
JOVY'.VS Brian Feld, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantFULTON BOILER WORKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street. 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
3*hoh(oSO ORDERED, LHon. Peter Moulton Q 7
1 0 ?
MAR 1 4 2016
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
X:CLB/5655l.Aeeal/NOSJM/seDtembcr20I4
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
•XNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
MARY HANNA, as Proposed Executrix for the EstateOf WILLIAM E. HANNA, and MARY HANNA,Individually,
Plaintiffs),
Index No.: 190092/12- against -
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.; NYCALI.A.S. Part
Defendants. —X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
*s#Dana Northcraft, Esq.
Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
cÿCBrian Feld, Esq.for Cleaver-Brooks, Inc.
w Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600
CP
/>3 /o fSO ORDERED,
~7Soil. Slicx'iy Klein-Hcjllci 1
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
ii i
!
/
;
iCLB58347/legal/nosjm/may2014
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-XROSARIA MUSCHTER,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiffs),
-against- IndexNo.: 190347/10
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., NYCALI.A.S. Part 5ÿ
Defendant(s),-X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
ShawnetteTTTutt; Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600
Matthew MacIntyre,Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
-sj/ojjioSO ORDERED,mil
""7
MAR 1 4 2016/
COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICENEW YORK j)
CLB/60100/dismissals/nosjm/september2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-XJUNE V. NICOTRA, as Executrix of the Estate ofJOSEPH P. NICOTRA, deceased, NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlai
f VIndex No.: 122145/00-against-
#5ÿ
C0<ÿDefendant(s),
off'c£A.C. & S. INC., et al., NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
£sq!Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Shawhefte Fluitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600
r~SO ORDERED, //-—/Hon. Peter Moulton
Ly (oh <p !
|
/J
X:FBW/mS4./leeaI/NOSJM/SEPTEMBER2QIS
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
MILDRED ORGEK, Individually and as Administratrix NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYFor the Estate of WILLIAM E. ORGEK,
Plaintiff(s),JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
Index No.: 104235/97- against -
A.C.&S. INC., et al.; NYCALI.A.S. Partÿ/5ÿ
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Brian Feld, Esq.Attorneys for Fulton Boiler Works, Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600
Jusl ,sq.Attomey)fori51§intiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
SO ORDERED,Peter Moÿdtorÿÿ
i
MAR 1 4
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
J
X:CLB/60064Jleeal/NQSJM/SEPTEMBER20I5
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
' MILDRED ORGEK, Individually and as Administratrix NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
For the Estate of WILLIAM E. ORGEK,Plaintiff(s),
Index No.: 104235/97- against -
NYCALI.A.S. Part 3d
A.C.&S. INC., et al.;
iDefendants.
-X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
i
Justin Weitz. EsqSÿkAttorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Shawnette"Attorneys for Cleaver-Brooks, Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
rq.
SO ORDERED,
' Hon. Peter Moulton
FILED :
MAR 14 2016
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
FILEDMAR 1 4 Z016
FBW3514I/Legal/nosjm/AUGUST 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORKWILLIAM LONG,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiffs),
Index No.: 122024/98-against-
NYCALI.A.S. PartySS'e)
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO, et al„
Defendant(s),X
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Chaples Neal, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantFULTON BOILER WORKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600
DigÿT. BMySEsq. (JAttorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
FT.'sj/ojjkzr L"SO ORDERED, nShnrry FlHn Heillsi
HON.PETERH.MOULTON/'
/
CLB59384/legaI/nosjm/febraury2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF NEW YORK
-XWILLIAM SLAGHT and NANCY SLAGHT,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiffs),
/as>7oS797-IndexNo.: 123048/97:-against-
NYCALI.A.S. Part?0 L, £>
A.C. & S. INC., et al.,
Defendant(s),
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
>0 PAviaracb Sha\ [uitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600
Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
£yj-_
SO ORDERED,
FILED L ;Hoir-Shcrry Kkm-Heiller.
/HON.PETER H.MOULTON /, ;MAR1 4 2016
Cl'UNTV CLERK'SNEW YORK
!yOFFICE
1X:/FBiV/30901/let?al/fehruarv2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
•XNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WILLIAM SLAGHT and NANCY SLAGHT,
Plaintiffs),poi/ot/q ?
Index No.: 123048#?-- against -
NYCALI.A.S. Part SO
A.C. & S, Inc., et al.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs
ft\VCKQ±)Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Charles Neal, Esq.Attorneys for Fulton Boiler Works, Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600
3/A>,SO ORDERED,
K j? y
FiurtpERH.MOULTON /Vo /
iiMAR 1 4 2016 /
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
4
CLB.i58l 05/legal/nosjm/MARCH 20H
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK'
COUNTY OF NEW YORK-X
WILLIAM T. TAYLOR and BARBARA TAYLOR,NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiff(s),
Index No.: 190053/11-against-
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS, et al.s NYCALI.A.S. Partÿ/ <70
Defendant(s),
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS. INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs,
7TFFTW'
Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
ShawnettVÿluitt, r)sqrAttorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600
3/p//fcr_ .SO ORDERED,
F'<.£TDw
Hon-Shorry KjemTlcitlcr
HON.PETERH.MOULTON/
/'S -
I
I'•--J
CLB55777/legal/nosjm/November 2013• SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK•~X
WALTER JOHANNESEN,NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiffs),
Index No.: 126686/02-against-
NYCALI.A.S. PartÿO J U
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.;
Defendant(s),
—X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant's CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs. f\ / ‘"M
£&&&> rAttorney for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant
CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600
Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10036
Sp ORDERED,//ÿ;Shell y Kleiii-Hcillci—
O H0N- PCTER H.MOULTON "7% f7cO(j I
V/y/
CLB/56144/legaI/nosjm/NOVEMBER2014
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
i/
-XARLENE FLYNN, as Executrix for the Estate ofWALTER FLYNN, Individually,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiffs),
Index No.: 190465/11-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., NYCALI.A.S. Part
Defendants),X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
[tXTVblfcrVlAttorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
DWxd*** 2, 2fl*\
ShawnettijTuitxfEsq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600
*'L 7% /Hon. Sherry/><°0, % J% /HON.PETERH.MOULTON
/
FILEDMAR 1 4 2016CLB57813/legal/nosjm/November 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
____X COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORK
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
THOMAS O’CONNOR,
Plaintiffs),
Index No.: 112730/00 &122202/99
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.; NYCALI.A.S. Part}(f5?)
Defendant(s),
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
-Trank Ortiz, Es$./ ft 'luitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600
Sha1Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10036
'2/r~~
7o.l/bSO ORDERED,i nHorn ShruTj THrlfl TTiTiTli i
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
//
•J //
/- -J
X:CLB/60102./dismissuls/nosim/SEPTEMBER2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
•XNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
DAMIANO P. LOMONACO,
Plaintiff(s),
Index No.: 190208/11ÿ- against -
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.; NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and |
FILEDwithout costs.
v-X H\, Esq. c
Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
ShawnetteTtuftf, Esq.Attorneys for Cleaver-Brooks, Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
ii
SO ORDERED, r 1Hon. Peter Moulton
:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to: Index No.: 112602/2000
122200/1999
JAMES L. WATSON and IRENE WATSON, NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVERBOILER COMPANY, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: , 2015Harrison, New York
<4Paul B. Josephs, Esq.MARIN GOODMAN, LLP.attorneysfor DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Avenue
WEITZ & LUXENBERG,Attorneysfor Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Harrison, New York 10528(914)412-7300 ~ÿ! '--1 ' ..vc ::. .' j
SO ORDERED. c: ..
9102 6 O UUiHonorable Paul H. Moulton
2..;4ÿ "A
, rCeÿS?
5
IEAR 0 9 2016
NYS c
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No: 190385/2011
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
RICHARD J. HOLLIS as Executor for theEstate of JOHN HOLLIS
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
F \\-£°without costs.
Dated: New York, New York,2016 14ÿ°
iCE
CO'
AcWx pÿE*. Judith A. YaW, Esq.XENBERG, P.C. L DARGER ERRANTE Y4 VITZ & BLAU, LLP
-Atfornp-ys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Union Carbide Corporation700 Roadway 116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212)452-5300
IT;
[u-SO ORDERED,
MAR 0 9/ÿHon. Peter I I. Moulton, J.S.C
J
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No: 190269/2011This Document Relates to:
BERTA MASON, as Executrix for theEstate of HARLEY N. MASON, andBERTA MASON, Individually
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
FILEDwithout costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkVeWwf-rv _, 2016 MAR 1 4
; CLERK'S OFF1
NEW YORK
7
COUNTY
Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th Floor
JgWlÿfl'Upgrguson, Esq-McÿÿG-p*.-, E*-AVEJTÿLLUXENBERG, P.C. *A0#fneys for Plaintiffs4()0 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
New York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
2/ÿSO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No: 118415/1999
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
SUSAN AYEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF
RONALD AYEN
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
FILEDwithout costs.
Dated: New York, New York2016 ttMtlU"'6
ooumÿS0""Matthew Mathilyic, Esq. £ -WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavitz, Esq. /5(clOfjJ DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLP
Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
i\ 0IM:/2MjieSO ORDERED,
mi o 9 ?r.oHon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
N'/S ‘
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No: 104903/2001
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
DANIEL J. MURPHY AND ROSE MARYMURPHY
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs. FILEDDated: New York, New York
X/JZ .2016 mR 14*; CLERK'S OFFlCNEW YORKCOUNTY
Matthew MacIntyre, Esq.gKlScn C. D&flaÿr Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
LjyjAR 0 9 Z013SO ORDERED,
Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
MY5 C-Y"
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
(Moulton, P.)
Index No: 104903/2001
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
This Document Relates to:
DANIEL J. MURPHY AND ROSE MARYMURPHY
WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC sued herein as Dana Corporation
(“Dana Companies”) hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant
Dana Companies with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Dana Companies be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York(dL . 2016 \ 42 m
OFFICE
h _ .Matthew-MaelntyrerBsq.ÿMSftl L &CflOj Judith A. YavitkfEsq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
DARGER ERRANTE YA VITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Comj anies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
;
'u
J/n/fc !£.;?. 0 9SO ORDERED,'Hon. Peter H. Moulton
i-rs
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No: 107289/1999
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
This Document Relates to:
PATRICIA L. GIALLELLA,INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIXFOR THE ESTATE OF JAMES J.GIALLELLA, JR._
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
FtLEDwithout costs.
DatediTlXk, New York1_, 2016
00 NE'N''oW——4g>T,-Charloa M- Forgmnn, C Baflcuj Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeea Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
J
h222 0 9 2013
SO ORDERED,,/Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No: 112429/1999
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
l 2.1 i %This Document Relates to:
MARJORIE MOYER, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE
ESTATE OF PAUL MOYER, AND MARJORIEMOYER, INDIVIDUALLY_
WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC sued herein as Dana Corporation
(“Dana Companies”), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant
Dana Companies, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Dana Companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
FILEDcosts.
Dated:sm., New York_, 2016 m 1 4 m
COn&0FF,C<B -Ou.
Malibu w Machilyie, B,sC[ÿx>ÿco C /<x</ Judith A. Yavitz/Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212)452-5300
:
0 /(*SO ORDERED,Eton. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
PAC 50- c:v:o
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No: 121880/98
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JANE DOE,AS PROPOSED EXECUTRIX FOR
THE ESTATE OF EUGENE CUNNINGHAM
WHEREFORE, defendant Hobart Brothers Company hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant Hobart Brothers Company, with prejudice, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Hobart Brothers Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
FILE0without costs.
Mf\R 1 4Dated-ÿNew York, New YorkoC/,2ÿ 2016
K'S OFFICECOUNTYCtEBow
'IMMA, a—,Charles M. ,00:560 C.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
7nennifer W. Daÿgef, Esq.DA/RGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU/ LLPAttorneys for Hobart Brothers Company116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
iLid/toSO ORDERED,ffdn. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No: 125872/1999This Document Relates to:
JAMES MCHUGH NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York2016 \ 4*0*
cou
u3on, Esq. CXISKYI D-ÿLwjudith A. Yavitz, Esq.MrWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
DARGER ERRANTE YA VITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
’Ju/& i
SO ORDERED, IPeter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
L—