flowing gas process examples link 2011/d... · 2017. 5. 17. · –qpo marketing – 7,984 divided...
TRANSCRIPT
1
LINK® System Customer Interface
Ranked Examples Low/High Measurement
Late/Intraday Nominations
Limit Value (Correct /Incorrect Way)
Percent Limit Value
ProRata Examples Default Rankings
“Assign” button
Percentage Example High Measurement
Swing Examples OBA Swing Low/High Measurement
Storage Swing Low Measurement
Limit Value
Additional Examples Upstream Entity Example
Receipt Shipper Example
TABS Allocation Examples
Upstream Contract Example
Flowing Gas Process
*Note: Examples can be interchangeable
by Submittal Parties & Levels of ranking
Flowing Gas Process Examples
Directory
LINK® System Customer Interface
RANKED EXAMPLE 1 (LOW AND HIGH PDA)
RECEIPT OPERATOR LEVEL
*NOTE: EXAMPLES CAN BE INTERCHANGEABLE BY SUBMITTAL PARTIES & LEVELS OF RANKING
2
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 1 (Low PDA)
• Above are 4 contracts nominated at Location 79988.
3
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 1 (Low PDA)
• Measurement (Energy Quantity) for gas day 11/01/16 is lower than scheduled.
4
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 1 (Low PDA)
• Receipt Operator PMJ Energy ranked their PDA at the Upstream level.
• Since measured volumes are lower than scheduled quantities, the system will use
the “Alloc Rank Lvl Low” column to determine how measured flow will be allocated
at the Upstream level.
• There are two Up Name (EDC Energy and QPO Marketing).
5
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 1 (Low PDA)
• Measured flows are allocated according to the Receipt Operator PDA.
• EDC Market is allocated their scheduled quantity and QPO Marketing is allocated
the rest of the measured flow which was not enough to cover their scheduled
quantities.
• QPO Marketing has a variance of 7,281 short to the pipe.
• Now we will look at what happens with high measurement
6
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 1 (High PDA)
• Above are 4 contracts nominated at Location 79988.
7
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 1 (High PDA)
• Measurement (Energy Quantity) for gas day 11/01/16 is higher than scheduled.
8
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 1 (High PDA)
• Receipt Operator EDC Market ranked their PDA at the Upstream level.
• Since measured volumes are higher than scheduled quantities, the system will use
the “Alloc Rank Lvl High” column to determine how measured flow will be allocated
at the Upstream level.
• There are two Up Name (EDC Market and QPO Marketing).
9
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 1 (High PDA)
• Measured flows are allocated according to the Receipt Operator PDA.
• EDC Market is allocated their scheduled quantities and QPO Marketing is allocated
their scheduled quantities plus the overage.
• QPO Marketing has a variance of 3,169 long to the pipe.
10
LINK® System Customer Interface
RANKED EXAMPLE 2 (INTRADAY & LATE NOMS)
RECEIPT OPERATOR LEVEL
*NOTE: EXAMPLES CAN BE INTERCHANGEABLE BY SUBMITTAL PARTIES & LEVELS OF RANKING
11
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 2 (Intraday & Late Nominations)
• Scheduled Quantities that were nominated timely.
12
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 2 (Intraday & Late Nominations)
• Receipt Operator GHI Pipeline ranked his PDA at timely but did not rank the “Def Lvl
Low” and “Def Lvl High”.
13
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 2 (Intraday & Late Nominations)
• QPO Marketing submitted an intraday nomination at meter 79990.
• Nominations were scheduled through the batch process.
14
Intraday Nomination
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 2 (Intraday & Late Nominations)
• QPO Marketing is ranked with the default rankings.
• The 999 ranking is the highest ranking and will be allocated last in the allocation
process. 15
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 2 (Intraday & Late Nominations)
• Measured volumes are greater than scheduled quantities for gas day 11/01/2016.
16
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 2 (Intraday & Late Nominations)
• WVU Gas is allocated their scheduled quantities.
• QPO is allocated their scheduled quantities plus the overage.
17
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 2 (Intraday & Late Nominations)
• If GHI Pipeline would have set the “Def Lvl Low” and “Def Lvl High”, it would have assigned these rankings to any new Upstream Entity/Upstream Contract scheduled quantities.
18
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 2 (Intraday & Late Nominations)
• Upstream Name QPO Marketing and WVU Gas with Upstream Contract TRN172
are allocated their scheduled quantities.
• Upstream Name WVU Gas is allocated their scheduled quantities plus the overage.
19
LINK® System Customer Interface
RANKED EXAMPLE 3 (LIMIT VALUE)
CORRECT/INCORRECT WAY
RECEIPT OPERATOR LEVEL
*NOTE: EXAMPLES CAN BE INTERCHANGEABLE BY SUBMITTAL PARTIES & LEVELS OF RANKING
20
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 3 (Limit Value- Correctly)
• Above are 4 contracts nominated at Location 79988.
21
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 3 (Limit Value- Correctly)
• Measured volumes are greater then scheduled quantities for gas day 11/01/2016.
22
LINK® System Customer Interface
Ranked Example 3 (Limit Value- Correctly)
• EDC Market entered a limit value of 1,000 on Up Name EDC Market.
23
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 3 (Limit Value- Correctly)
• EDC Market is allocated 1,000 over the schedule quantity.
• QPO Marketing is allocated the rest of the excess measured volumes.
24
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 3 (Limit Value - Incorrectly)
• We will now go over when Limit Value can be entered incorrectly
• Above are 4 contracts nominated at Location 79988. 25
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 3 (Limit Value - Incorrectly)
• Measured volumes are greater then scheduled quantities for gas day 11/01/2016.
26
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 3 (Limit Value - Incorrectly)
• EDC Market entered a limit value of 1,000 where the “Alloc Rank Lvl High” has the
lower number ranking.
27
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 3 (Limit Value - Incorrectly)
• Even though EDC Market has a limit value of 1,000, QPO Marketing is allocated all of the
excess gas because QPO has the highest ranking assigned in the “Alloc Rank Lvl High”.
28
LINK® System Customer Interface
RANKED EXAMPLE 4 (PERCENT LIMIT VALUE)
RECEIPT OPERATOR LEVEL
*NOTE: EXAMPLES CAN BE INTERCHANGEABLE BY SUBMITTAL PARTIES & LEVELS OF RANKING
29
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 4 (Percent Limit Value)
• Above are two nominations at location 79980
30
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 4 (Percent Limit Value)
• EDC Market set a limit value of 15 on Up Name “QPO Marketing”.
• EDC Market also sets the “Pct Limit Value” field to 10% in the PDA screen. If QPO
Marketing’s schedule quantity changes then it will recalculate the limited value to be 10% of
the nomination. 31
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 4 (Percent Limit Value)
• QPO Marketing changed their nom from 1500 to 2000.
32
LINK® System Customer Interface Ranked Example 4 (Percent Limit Value)
• Limit Value is recalculated by 10%.
– 2,000 X 10% = 200 33
LINK® System Customer Interface
PRORATA EXAMPLE 1 (DEFAULT RANKINGS)
RECEIPT OPERATOR LEVEL
*NOTE: EXAMPLES CAN BE INTERCHANGEABLE BY SUBMITTAL PARTIES & LEVELS OF RANKING
34
LINK® System Customer Interface ProRata Example 1 (Default Rankings)
• Above are 4 contracts nominated at Location 79988. 35
LINK® System Customer Interface ProRata Example 1 (Default Rankings)
• Measurement (Energy Quantity) for gas day 11/01/2016 is higher than scheduled.
36
LINK® System Customer Interface ProRata Example 1 (Default Rankings)
• Receipt Operator PMJ Energy did not update their PDAs at the Upstream level, the
system default rankings are used.
• The measured flows are allocated pro-rata based on each scheduled quantities at
the location.
• There are two Up Name (EDC Market and QPO Marketing).
37
LINK® System Customer Interface ProRata Example 1 (Default Rankings)
• Pro-rata calculation (Schedule Quantity (individual) divided by Total Scheduled Quantity at the location
multiply by total flow at the location):
– QPO Marketing – 7,984 divided by 10,031 multiply by 11,225 = 8,934
– EDC Market – 2,057 divided by 10,031 multiply by 11,225 = 2,301
• Both Upstream parties have variances long to the pipe.
38
LINK® System Customer Interface
PRO-RATA EXAMPLE 2 (ASSIGN BUTTON)
RECEIPT OPERATOR LEVEL
*NOTE: EXAMPLES CAN BE INTERCHANGEABLE BY SUBMITTAL PARTIES & LEVELS OF RANKING
39
LINK® System Customer Interface ProRata Example 2 (Assign Button)
• Above are 4 contracts nominated at Location 79988. 40
LINK® System Customer Interface ProRata Example 2 (Assign Button)
• Measurement (Energy Quantity) for gas day 11/01/2016 is lower than scheduled.
41
LINK® System Customer Interface ProRata Example 2 (Assign Button)
• Receipt Operator PMJ Energy updated their PDAs at the Upstream level by utilizing
the “Assign” button.
• The measured flows are allocated pro-rata based on each scheduled quantities at
the location.
• There are two Up Name (EDC Market and QPO Marketing).
42
LINK® System Customer Interface ProRata Example 2 (Assign Button)
• Pro-rata calculation (Schedule Quantity (individual) divided by Total Scheduled Quantity at the location
multiply by total flow at the location):
– QPO Marketing – 7,984 divided by 10,031 multiply by 9,888 = 7,870
– EDC Market – 2,047 divided by 10,031 multiply by 9,888 = 2,017
• Both Upstream parties have variances short to the pipe.
43
LINK® System Customer Interface
PERCENTAGE EXAMPLE (HIGH PDA)
RECEIPT OPERATOR LEVEL
*NOTE: EXAMPLES CAN BE INTERCHANGEABLE BY SUBMITTAL PARTIES & LEVELS OF RANKING
44
LINK® System Customer Interface Percentage Example (High PDA)
• Above are 4 contracts nominated from receipt meter 79988. 45
LINK® System Customer Interface Percentage Example (High PDA)
46
Measurement (Energy Quantity) for gas day 11/01/16 is higher than scheduled.
LINK® System Customer Interface Percentage Example (High PDA)
• Receipt Operator PMJ Energy updated their PDAs at an Upstream level by entering a percentage in the PDA Pct column.
• The measured flows is allocated based on the percentage entered for each party.
• There are two Up Name (EDC Market and QPO Marketing).
47
LINK® System Customer Interface Percentage Example (High PDA)
• QPO Marketing receives 75% of the measured flows. Calculation is (Total Measured Flow at the
location) 12,000 multiply by (PDA Percentage entered) 75% = 9,000.
• EDC Energy receives 25% of the measured flows. Calculation is (Total Measured Flow at the location)
12,000 multiply by (PDA Percentage entered) 25% equals 3,000.
48
LINK® System Customer Interface
SWING - OBA EXAMPLE (LOW AND HIGH PDA)
RECEIPT/DELIVERY OPERATOR LEVEL
49
LINK® System Customer Interface Swing – OBA Contract
• Scheduled volumes for contracts other than the OBA contract
are kept whole.
• A swing to an OBA will result in either a Due Shipper or Due
Pipe imbalance.
50
LINK® System Customer Interface Swing – OBA Example (Low PDA)
51
Customer Nominating to 73023
OBA Nomination
LINK® System Customer Interface Swing – OBA Example (Low PDA)
• Measured volumes are less then scheduled quantities for gas day 11/01/2016.
52
LINK® System Customer Interface Swing – OBA Example (Low PDA)
53
LINK® System Customer Interface Swing – OBA Example (Low PDA)
• Customers are
allocated their
scheduled quantities.
• Operator is allocated
the difference between
measured flows and
scheduled quantities
(not including any OBA
scheduled quantities).
• The Allocated Quantity
on the OBA is the
imbalance and not the
variance column.
54
LINK® System Customer Interface Swing – OBA Example (Low PDA)
55
Receipt Operator Allocation Total
Delivery Operator Allocation Total
• Net Allocated Quantities matches to measured flows of 2,500.
• Operator is allocated the difference between measured flows and scheduled quantities. In
this example a due shipper imbalance was created on the OBA.
LINK® System Customer Interface Impact of OBA Nominations on Allocations
• OBA Nominations appear on the allocation screens and reports as
scheduled quantities.
• The OBA’s allocated number is the imbalance on these screens and reports.
• The “Variance” column on the Allocation screen should not be referenced as
the imbalance because it includes scheduled quantities from the OBA
contract.
• The OBA nomination allows the pipeline to evaluate imbalance resolution for
scheduling purposes.
• We will now look at what happens with high measurement
56
LINK® System Customer Interface Swing – OBA Example (High PDA)
57
Customer Nominating to 73023
OBA Nomination
LINK® System Customer Interface Swing – OBA Example (High PDA)
• Measured volumes are greater then scheduled quantities for gas day 11/01/2016 at
location 73023.
• The Schedule Net Quantity column includes 10,000 OBA nomination.
58
LINK® System Customer Interface Swing – OBA Example (High PDA)
59
LINK® System Customer Interface
• Customers are allocated
their scheduled quantities.
• Operator is allocated the
difference between
measured flows and
scheduled quantities (not
including any OBA
scheduled quantities).
• The Allocated Quantity on
the OBA is the imbalance
and not the variance
column.
Swing – OBA Example (High PDA)
60
LINK® System Customer Interface
SWING - STORAGE EXAMPLE 1 (LOW PDA)
RECEIPT/DELIVERY OPERATOR LEVEL
61
LINK® System Customer Interface Swing – Storage Contract
• Scheduled quantities for contracts other than the storage swing contract are kept
whole.
• A swing to a storage contract will result in either a withdrawal or injection depending
on the low or high delivery.
62
LINK® System Customer Interface
Customer Nominating to 79978
Swing – Storage Example 1 (Low PDA)
63
LINK® System Customer Interface Swing – Storage Example 1 (Low PDA)
64
Storage Nominating to 79978
• There are two activities nominated to/from the Storage Service point .
• A swing to a storage contract will result in either a withdrawal or injection depending
on the delivery measured volumes.
LINK® System Customer Interface Swing – Storage Example 1 (Low PDA)
• Measured volumes are less then scheduled quantities for gas day 11/01/2016.
65
LINK® System Customer Interface Swing – Storage Example 1 (Low PDA)
66
LINK® System Customer Interface Swing – Storage Example 1 (Low PDA)
• Customers are
allocated their
scheduled
quantities.
67
LINK® System Customer Interface
Receipt Operator Allocation Total
Delivery Operator Allocation Total
• Allocated Quantities net to measured flows of 1,550.
• Schedule to Deliver 5,500 but only delivered 1,500. 3,950 was left on the pipe to be injected
into CBA PIPE Storage Contract.
Swing – Storage Example 1 (Low PDA)
68
LINK® System Customer Interface
SWING – STORAGE EXAMPLE 2 (LIMIT VALUE)
RECEIPT/DELIVERY OPERATOR LEVEL
69
LINK® System Customer Interface
Customer Nominating to 79978
Swing – Storage Example 2 (Limit Value)
70
LINK® System Customer Interface
Storage Nominating to 79978
• There are two activities nominated to/from the Storage Service point for each
storage contract.
• A swing to a storage contract will result in either a withdrawal or injection depending
on the delivery measured volumes.
Swing – Storage Example 2 (Limit Value)
71
LINK® System Customer Interface Swing – Storage Example 2 (Limit Value)
72
• Measured volumes are greater then scheduled quantities for gas day 11/01/2016.
LINK® System Customer Interface Swing – Storage Example 2 (Limit Value)
•STU has two storage contracts which they have set up the PDA to swing to storage.
•The allocation process will allocate Contract TRN230 first up to the limit value depending on the flow at their delivery location 79978.
•Contract TRN255 will take any flows under/over Contract TRN230.
73
LINK® System Customer Interface Swing – Storage Example 2 (Limit Value)
• Since measured volumes are greater than scheduled there will be no allocations on
the receipt side for the storage contracts.
74
LINK® System Customer Interface Swing – Storage Example 2 (Limit Value)
• Contracts other than the storage contracts are allocated their scheduled quantities.
• CBA Pipe Storage Contract TRN230 is allocated the limit value of 5,000.
• Storage Contract TRN255 is allocated the rest of the measured volumes.
• This is a delivery location and the customer shorted the pipe by 9,500. Instead of having imbalances on
contracts, the customer withdrawals gas from storage to cover the excess deliveries to their city gate.
75
LINK® System Customer Interface
UPSTREAM ENTITY EXAMPLE (LOW AND HIGH PDA)
ALLOCATION METHOD - RANKED
*NOTE: EXAMPLES CAN BE INTERCHANGEABLE BY SUBMITTAL PARTIES & LEVELS OF RANKING
76
LINK® System Customer Interface Upstream Entity Example (Low PDA)
• There are 2 Service Requesters (QPO Marketing and YZ Energy Co) listing QPO
Marketing as the Upstream Name.
77
LINK® System Customer Interface Upstream Entity Level Example (Low PDA)
• Upstream Entity QPO Marketing ranked their PDA at the Service Requester level.
• Since measured volumes are lower than scheduled quantities, the system will use
the “Alloc Rank Lvl Low” column to determine how measured flow will be allocated
at the Service Requester level.
• There are two Service Requesters (QPO Marketing and YZ Energy Co).
78
LINK® System Customer Interface Upstream Entity Example (Low PDA)
• Measured flows are allocated according to the Upstream Entity PDA.
• There is not enough measured flows to fill YZ Energy Co scheduled quantities. QPO
Marketing is allocated 703 of the measured flow.
• YZ Energy Co has a variance short to the pipe.
79
LINK® System Customer Interface Upstream Entity Example (High PDA)
• We will now look at what happens when there is high measurement
• There are 2 Service Requesters (QPO Marketing and YZ Energy Co) listing QPO
Marketing as the Upstream Name.
80
LINK® System Customer Interface Upstream Entity Example (High PDA)
• Upstream Entity QPO Marketing ranked their PDA at the Service Requester level.
• Since measured volumes are higher than scheduled quantities, the system will use
the “Alloc Rank Lvl High” column to determine how measured flow will be allocated
at the Service Requester level.
• There are two Service Requesters (QPO Marketing and YZ Energy Co).
81
LINK® System Customer Interface Upstream Entity Example (High PDA)
• Measured flows are allocated according to the Upstream Entity PDA.
• QPO Marketing is allocated their scheduled quantity and YZ Energy is allocated their
scheduled quantity plus the overage.
• YZ Energy Co has a variance of 3,169 long to the pipe.
82
LINK® System Customer Interface
RECEIPT SHIPPER EXAMPLE (LOW AND HIGH PDA)
RANKED
*NOTE: EXAMPLES CAN BE INTERCHANGEABLE BY SUBMITTAL PARTIES & LEVELS OF RANKING
83
LINK® System Customer Interface
Receipt Shipper Example (Low PDA)
• YZ Energy Co has scheduled quantities on two contract (K# TRN200 & K# TRN175).
84
LINK® System Customer Interface Receipt Shipper Example (Low PDA)
• Receipt Shipper YZ Energy Co ranked their PDA at the Service Requester
Contract/Activity level.
• Since measured volumes are lower than scheduled quantities, the system will use
the “Alloc Rank Lvl Low” column to determine how measured flow will be allocated
at the Service Requester Contract/Activity level.
85
LINK® System Customer Interface Receipt Shipper Level Example 1 (Low PDA)
• YZ Energy Co is allocated -0- because there was not enough measured flow at the
location.
• YZ Energy Co has a variance short to the pipe on both contracts.
86
LINK® System Customer Interface Receipt Shipper Example (High PDA)
• We will now look at and see what happens when there is high measurement
• YZ Energy Co has scheduled quantities on two contract (K# TRN200 & K# TRN175).
87
LINK® System Customer Interface Receipt Shipper Example (High PDA)
• Receipt Shipper YZ Energy Co ranked their PDA at the Service Requester
Contract/Activity level.
• Since measured volumes are higher than scheduled quantities, the system will use
the “Alloc Rank Lvl High” column to determine how measured flow will be allocated
at the Service Requester Contract/Activity level.
88
LINK® System Customer Interface Receipt Shipper Example (High PDA)
• YZ Energy Co is allocated 9618 because there was high measured flow at the
location.
• YZ Energy Co has a variance long to the pipe.
89
LINK® System Customer Interface
TABS ALLOCATION EXAMPLE (LOW AND HIGH PDA)
DELIVERIES IN
RECEIPT OUT
IMBALANCE
90
LINK® System Customer Interface TABS Allocation Example ( Low and High PDA)
• Verbiage can be confusing as gas placed into a TABS pool (service point) is called “Deliveries In”. Gas taken out of a TABS pool (service point) is called “Receipts Out”.
• Allocations are generated based on TABS contract and Operational Impact Area (OIA).
• The system has internal algorithms for allocating TABS pools so no PDA is applicable. The allocation algorithms are as follows:
– Deliveries into the service point equals the allocation at the supplying physical receipt points.
– Supply from another TABS customer is allocated the same as the scheduled nomination.
– Receipts out of the service point are kept whole preventing the shipper from incurring an imbalance at the receipt point.
91
LINK® System Customer Interface
TABS Allocation Example - Deliveries In (Low PDA)
• We will first start off with low measurement
• ADG entered nominations on their TABS contract for gas day 11/01/2016.
– All Nominations are at the ELA (79504) Service Point.
• The gas being supplied into the system for two activities are from physical locations.
• The gas being supplied into the system for one activity is from another TABS
Contract.
92
LINK® System Customer Interface
TABS Allocation Example - Deliveries In (Low PDA)
• The measured volume at 79987 and 79989 is less than the scheduled quantities for
gas day 11/01/2016. 93
LINK® System Customer Interface
TABS Allocation Example - Deliveries In (Low PDA)
• ABC Energy is the only one nominating at the physical locations..
– ABC Energy will be allocated all measured flows at these locations.
94
Loc Prop 79987 Allocation
Loc Prop 79989 Allocation
LINK® System Customer Interface TABS Allocation Example - Deliveries In (Low PDA)
• The TABS Allocation screen displays allocations for deliveries-in to the TABS contract. – The allocations at the physical receipt points are carried into the delivery-in allocation for the
TABS contract.
– Supply from another TABS customer is allocated the same as the scheduled nomination.
95
LINK® System Customer Interface TABS Allocation Example – Receipt Out (Low PDA)
96
• The two contracts are nominating their gas supply into the system from ADG Energy TABS
Contract at the ELA Service Point (79504) for gas day 11/01/2016.
LINK® System Customer Interface TABS Allocation Example – Receipt Out (Low PDA)
• Receipts out of the service point are kept whole preventing the shippers from incurring a variance
at the receipt point.
97
LINK® System Customer Interface TABS Allocation Example – Imbalance (Low PDA)
• AB C was set up long in their TABS by 3,000.
98
• Imbalance is calculated Receipt-out minus Deliveries-In.
• Actual Receipt-Out 7,000 minus Deliveries-In 9,834 = imbalance 2,834 Due
Shipper.
Slide 149
LINK® System Customer Interface
TABS Allocation Example – Deliveries In (High PDA)
• We will now look at high measurement
• ABC entered nominations on their TABS contract for gas day 11/01/2016
– All Nominations are at the ELA (79504) Service Point.
• The gas being supplied into the system for two activities are from physical locations.
• The gas being supplied into the system for one activity is from another TABS
Contract.
99
LINK® System Customer Interface TABS Allocation Example – Deliveries In (High PDA)
• The measured volume at 79987 is greater than the scheduled quantities and 79989
is less than the scheduled quantities.
100
LINK® System Customer Interface TABS Allocation Example – Deliveries In (High PDA)
• ABC Energy is the only one nominating at the physical locations.
– ABC Energy will be allocated all measured flows at these locations.
101
Loc Prop 79987 Allocation
Loc Prop 79989 Allocation
LINK® System Customer Interface TABS Allocation Example – Deliveries In (High PDA)
• The TABS Allocation screen displays allocations for deliveries-in to the TABS contract. – The allocations at the physical receipt points are carried into the delivery-in allocation for the
TABS contract.
– Supply from another TABS customer is allocated the same as the scheduled nomination.
102
LINK® System Customer Interface TABS Allocation Example – Receipt Out (High PDA)
103
• All three contracts are nominating their gas supply into the system from ADG Energy TABS
Contract at the ELA Service Point (79504) for gas day 11/01/2016.
LINK® System Customer Interface TABS Allocation Example – Receipt Out (High PDA)
• Receipts out of the service point are kept whole preventing the shippers from incurring a variance
at the receipt point.
104
LINK® System Customer Interface TABS Allocation Example – Imbalance (High PDA)
• ABC Energy imbalance is calculated Receipt-out minus Deliveries-in equal
imbalance.
• Actual Receipt-out 10,000 – Actual Deliveries-In 9,363 = Imbalance 637 Due Pipe.
105 Slide 144
LINK® System Customer Interface
UPSTREAM CONTRACT EXAMPLE (HIGH PDA)
RECEIPT OPERATOR
UPSTREAM ENTITY
RECEIPT SHIPPER
*NOTE: EXAMPLES CAN BE INTERCHANGEABLE BY SUBMITTAL PARTIES & LEVELS OF RANKING
106
LINK® System Customer Interface Upstream Contract Example (High PDA)
• We will now cover to see what happens with high measurement
• WVU is nominating two contracts with WVU Gas as the Upstream Name.
• WVU on TRN172 also has activity 5 with an Upstream Contract.
• WVU Gas wants any swings to be on Contract TRN147.
107
LINK® System Customer Interface Upstream Contract Example (High PDA)
• Measured Volumes are greater than the scheduled quantities at location 79990 for
gas day 11/01/2016.
108
LINK® System Customer Interface Upstream Contract Example (Receipt Operator – High PDA)
• Scheduled Quantities are broken out by Upstream Name and Upstream Contract.
109
LINK® System Customer Interface
Upstream Contract Example (Receipt Operator – High PDA)
• Per the Receipt Operator ranking Upstream Name WVU Gas gets allocated to be
kept whole and the overage is swung to WVU Gas with Upstream Contract is
TRN172.
110
LINK® System Customer Interface Upstream Contract Example (Upstream Entity – High PDA)
• WVU Gas ranks to keep WVU with the Upstream Contract to be kept whole.
111
LINK® System Customer Interface
Upstream Contract Example (Upstream Entity – High PDA)
• WVU Gas questions why their PDA rankings did not work.
• It is explained that if you have the Upstream Contract in the activity it treats it as a separate line item and therefore gets allocated as a separate line item at the Receipt Operator level and the allocation from the Receipt Operator Level is carried down at the Upstream Level.
• WVU Gas has two options, they can call the Receipt Operator and have them change the PDA or WVU Gas can -0- the nom with the Upstream Contract and create a new activity with WVU Gas only in the Upstream Name and then they would be able to rank at the Upstream Level and Receipt Shipper Level
112
LINK® System Customer Interface Upstream Contract Example (Nom Change)
• WVU changed their nomination from activity 5 to activity 7 with no Upstream
Contract
113
LINK® System Customer Interface Upstream Contract Example (High PDA)
• Measured volumes are greater than scheduled quantities for gas day 11/01/2016.
114
LINK® System Customer Interface Upstream Contract Example (Receipt Operator – High PDA)
• Receipt Operator also changed the ranking to prevent any overage gas being
swung to the -0- scheduled quantity.
115
LINK® System Customer Interface Upstream Contract Example (Receipt Operator High PDA)
• Upstream Name WVU Gas is allocated all measured volumes.
116
LINK® System Customer Interface Upstream Contract Example (Upstream Entity – High PDA)
• WVU Gas has ranked for WVU Gas with Upstream Name WVU Gas to be the
swing.
117
LINK® System Customer Interface Upstream Contract Example (Upstream Entity – High PDA)
• WVU Gas is allocated the measured flows.
118
LINK® System Customer Interface Upstream Contract Example (Receipt Shipper – High PDA)
• WVU Gas ranked the contracts/activities to swing on the TABS contract TRN147.
119
LINK® System Customer Interface Upstream Contract Example (Receipt Shipper – High PDA)
• Contract TRN172 is allocated the scheduled quantities.
• Contract TRN147 is allocated the scheduled quantities plus the overage.
120
LINK® System Customer Interface
Flowing Gas Process Example
GHI Pipeline
121
LINK® System Customer Interface Flowing Gas Stages
Stage 1: Submit Nomination
Stage 2: Setup the PDA for the Receipt Meter - This can be done at all levels if desired, if not will be defaulted to ProRata
Stage 3: Setup the PDA for the Delivery Meter - Both meter are covered under a Swing so only the Receipt/Delivery Operators
need to setup the PDA
Stage 4: Measurement comes in for Meters
Stage 5: Receipt Meter is Allocated according to PDA
Stage 6: Delivery Meter is Allocated according to PDA
Stage 7: Shipper Imbalance
LINK® System Customer Interface Stage 1: Submit Nomination
123
• Service Requester GHI Pipeline Nominates from Receipt
Location: 79987 to two delivery locations: 79965 and 79964
LINK® System Customer Interface Stage 2: PDA Setup – Receipt Meter (Receipt Operator)
• Receipt Operator “YZ Energy” updated the PDA.
– In the allocation process, the order that the gas will be allocated:
• JMP Gas Co
• JKL MKTG
• ABC ENERGY – will get allocated any excess
124
LINK® System Customer Interface Stage 2: PDA Setup – Receipt Meter (Upstream Entity)
• Upstream Entity “ABC Energy” updated the PDA.
– In the allocation process, the order that the gas will be allocated:
• HGF Pipeline
• GHI Pipeline - will get allocated any excess
125
LINK® System Customer Interface Stage 2: PDA Setup – Receipt Meter (Receipt Shipper)
• Receipt Shipper “GHI Pipeline” updated the PDA.
– In the allocation process, the order that the gas will be allocated:
• Activity 7
• Activity 6 - will get allocated any excess
126
LINK® System Customer Interface Stage 3: PDA Setup – Delivery Meter 79964
• Meter 79964 is covered under a Swing Alloc Methd. All customers are kept whole and the imbalance is between the SET (pipeline) and PQR Gas Co. (Storage Swing Contract).
127
LINK® System Customer Interface Stage 3: PDA Setup – Delivery Meter 79965
• Meter 79965 is covered under a Swing Alloc Methd. All customers are kept whole and the imbalance is between the SET (pipeline) and CBA Pipe (OBA Contract).
128
LINK® System Customer Interface Stage 4: Measurement comes in for Meters
• At meter 79987, the Measurement is higher than scheduled. All levels of PDAs, we will be using the “Alloc Rank Lvl High”.
• At meter 79964, the Measurement is higher than scheduled but it is a storage swing meter. We will be utilizing the “ Alloc Rank Lvl Low” at the Delivery Operator level.
• At meter 79965, the Measurement is lower than scheduled but it is a OBA meter. We will be utilizing the “Alloc Rank Lvl Low” and “Alloc Rank Lvl High” at the Delivery Operator level.
129
LINK® System Customer Interface Stage 5: Receipt Meter Allocations 79987
• Will now review the allocations on the receipt side due to measurement
• JMP Gas Co and JKL Mktg is allocated to be kept whole.
• ABC Energy is allocated to take the overage.
• This is connected at the Upstream Entity level as shown on the next slide 130
LINK® System Customer Interface Stage 5: Receipt Meter Allocations 79987
• HGF Pipeline is allocated to be kept whole.
• GHI Pipeline is allocated to take the overage.
• This is further connected down the line with the Receipt Shipper level
131
LINK® System Customer Interface Stage 5: Receipt Meter Allocations 79987
• Activity 7 is kept whole
• Activity 6 is allocated 1500 in excess (Imbalance)
132
LINK® System Customer Interface Stage 6: Delivery Meter Allocations 79964
• Now we will look at the delivery meter side. Seeing as they are both
covered under a Swing everyone is kept whole
• GHI Pipeline is allocated their scheduled quantity on the delivery side.
133
LINK® System Customer Interface Stage 6: Delivery Meter Allocations 79965
• GHI Pipeline is allocated their scheduled quantity on the delivery
side.
134
LINK® System Customer Interface Stage 7: Shipper Imbalance (GHI PIPELINE)
• Shipper Imbalance Screen shows 1,500 Due Shipper on contract TRN257 at Bal Loc 79505. – Negative numbers represent Due Shipper.
– Positive numbers represent Due Pipe.
135
LINK® System Customer Interface Stage 7: Shipper Imbalance (GHI PIPELINE)
• Service Requester Imbalance Summary shows daily
imbalances by Service Requester.
136
LINK® System Customer Interface Stage 7: Shipper Imbalance (GHI PIPELINE)
• Activity Imbalance shows imbalance by Service Requester Contract and activity.
– Activity 6 has the imbalance per allocations at Receipt Point 79987.
137