floor vibrations in practice and research classification
TRANSCRIPT
Floor vibrationsin Practice and Research
Classification of human induced floor vibrations
T i T ttiTomi Toratti
VTT
Fl Vib tiFloor VibrationsFloors are the interface between people and the buildings they useFloors are the interface between people and the buildings they use
Floors are the only type of structural sub-system that users of buildings cannot avoid having physical contact withbuildings cannot avoid having physical contact with
Requirements set on floors:Vibration performance, p ,Acoustic performance, Static stiffness, Safety for collapse, y pFire safety, Visual and economic performance.
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 2
VTT
Springiness is associated with the sensation of
Useful distinctions:
Springiness is associated with the sensation of self-generated floor deflection and vibration froma single footstep during the time of contact betweena single footstep during the time of contact between the foot and floor surface.
Vibrational disturbances are caused by footfalls ona floor that are associated with motion induced by persons other than the observer.
Sven Ohlsson (1988)
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 3
VTT
Floor types
1. Low frequency floorsnatural frequency < 8 Hz span normally over 10 mnatural frequency < 8 Hz, span normally over 10 mWeight over 300 kg/m2
2. High frequency floorsg q ynatural frequency > 8 Hz, weight less than 300 kg/m2
3. Floating floorsg- These may increase local deformations+ These may distribute point loads to several floor bbeams
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 4
VTT
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 5
VTT
Floor natural frequency [Hz]
EI )(π 2 tm
EIl
f l)(2 20π
= 2 support, one way action
bl EIllEIf )(21)( 42
0 ⎥⎤
⎢⎡
⎟⎞
⎜⎛+⎟
⎞⎜⎛+⋅=
π 4 supports, two way action
lEIbbmlf
)(21
2 20⎥⎥⎦⎢
⎢⎣
⎟⎠
⎜⎝
+⎟⎠
⎜⎝
+
0 111f = Two supporting beam structures togehter
2,0
2,0
11Ll ff
+
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 6
VTT
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 7
VTT
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 8
VTT
F [Hz]
V [m/s]
1 5
Slow walk 1,7 1,1
Normal alk 2 0 1 5
Walking force1.5
1 2
Normal walk 2,0 1,5
Slow run 2,5 3,3
0 9
1.2
3.0
Force [kN]
0 6
0.9
1.0
2.0
)0.3
0.6
-1.0
0.0
Acc
eler
atio
n (g
)
0.0
0.3
-3.0
-2.0
Free vibrationForcedib ti
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 9
Time [s]3.00.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0-4.0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Time (ms)
vibration
VTT
1000
1200
800
1000
[ ]765
)2sin(1)(3
1
NQ
tfnQtFn
n φπα
=
⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡++= ∑
=
400
600
orce
[N]
[ ]
2,06.0,6,3
2,2.0,4,2
0,4.0,2,1765
Hzfn
Hzfn
HzfnNQ
n
n
n
πφα
πφα
φα
====
====
=====
0
200
Fo )10137(2
ISO
-200
00 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Time [s]-400
Time [s]
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 10
VTT
Vibration on floors
• Low frequency, f < 9 Hzweight over 300 kg/m2
• High frequency floors, f>9 Hzweight below 300 kg/m2
Span usually over 10 m
• Resonance vibrations
Span usually below 10 m
• Shocks induced on floorsResonance vibrations
• Limitation on acceleration of ib ti
Shocks induced on floors
Li it ti th t ti d fl tivibrations • Limitation on the static deflection (velocity response of a unit impulse)
di d fCopyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 11
According to Eurocode 5: f0 > 8 Hz
VTT
Resonance vibrationDeformation (dynamic/static)
tFxKxCxM ωcos0=++ &&&
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 12
Frequency ratio (Load frequency/ natural frequency of the floor)
VTTASL1(E=0.012) , 60 mm betoni
0.05
-0.11
-0.06
-0.010.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0Time [s]
ent [
mm
]
0 mm305 mm610 mm915 mm
-0.31
-0.26
-0.21
-0.16
Dis
plac
eme 915 mm
1220 mm1525 mm
-0.36
ASL1 , 60 mm betoniAskelkuorma
1200
200
300
400
500
600
m/s
2]800
1000
1200
N]
-200
-100
0
100
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
Acc
eler
atio
n [m
m
0 mm305 mm610 mm200
400
600
Voim
a [N
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 13
-500
-400
-300
Time [s]
915 mm1220 mm1525 mm0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1Aika [s]
VTT
Laataston reunat vapaatp
200
250
50
100
150
Aika [s]
[mm
/s2]
-100
-50
00.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
Kiih
tyvy
ys [
-250
-200
-150Askeltaajuus 120 per min
Askeltaajuus 100 per min
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 14
VTT
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 15
VTT
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 16
VTT
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 17
VTT
100
Heel impact (walking)
aoW lki ib ti
10Walking vibration
Walking vibration(12% damping)
Continuous vibrationWalking vibration(3% damping)
Walking vibration(6% damping) ANNOYING
1Continuous vibration(10 t 30 l )
ao
(3% damping)
(10 to 30 cycles)(average peak accel.)
ACCEPTABLE
Frequency of Motion (Hz)
102 4 61 200.1
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 18
Frequency of Motion (Hz)
VTT
Table 1. The vibration classification of floors based on the intensity of the vibration.
Body perception Vibration of articles
A The vibrations are 1 The clinking of glassware and the leafA The vibrations are usually imperceptible.
1 The clinking of glassware and the leaf movements of a plant are usually imperceptible.
B The vibrations are barely 2 The clinking of glassware is usuallyB The vibrations are barely perceptible.
2 The clinking of glassware is usually imperceptible and the leaf movements are barely perceptible.
C The vibrations are 3 The clinking of glassware is barely perceptibleC The vibrations are perceptible. Base class
3 The clinking of glassware is barely perceptible. The leaf movements perceptible
D The vibrations are 4 The clinking of glassware the leaf movements areD The vibrations are clearly perceptible.
4 The clinking of glassware the leaf movements are clearly perceptible.
E The vibrations are strongly perceptible.
5 The clinking of glassware and the leaf movements of a plant are strongly perceptible
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 19
strongly perceptible. movements of a plant are strongly perceptible
VTT
Table 2. Proposal for vibration classes in office and residential buildings.Table 2. Proposal for vibration classes in office and residential buildings.
A1 Normal class for vibrations transferred from another apartment.pSpecial class for vibrations inside one apartment.
B2 Lower class for vibrations transferred from another apartment.Higher class for vibrations inside one apartment
C3, Normal class for vibrations inside one apartment.base class
D4 Lower class for vibrations inside one apartment. For example attics d h lidand holiday cottages.
E5 Class without restrictions.
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 20
VTT
Table 3. Tentative acceptance limits for vibration classes.p f
Emphasised forEmphasised for high-frequency floors,
floating floors andAll floors tops (this part concerns floating floorEmphasised for
low-frequency floors
floating floors andraised floors
concerns floating floor and soft toppings and is
not well defined yet)
Vibration values GlobalDeflection
Local deflection
Class arms2)
[ / 2]vmax
2)
[ / ]vrms
2)
[ / ]|umax|2)
[ ]δ0 1)
[ /kN]δ1 1)
[ /kN][m/s2] [mm/s] [mm/s] [mm] [mm/kN] [mm/kN]
AB
≤0.03≤0.05
≤4≤6
≤0.3≤0.6
≤0.05≤0.1
≤0.12≤0.25
≤0.1≤0.2
CDE
≤0.075≤0.12>0.12
≤8≤10>10
≤1.0≤1.5>1.5
≤0.2≤0.4>0.4
≤0.5≤1.0>1.0
≤0.5≤1.0>1.0
1) Design criteria (load: 1 kN for u and w) to be used in design,2) Dynamic test criteria (load: walking person) to be used in testing
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 21
Dynamic test criteria (load: walking person) to be used in testing
VTT
Local deflection
F
Local deflection
δ1
300 300
F
δ1
600
FF
δ1
300 300
F
δ1
600
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 22
VTT
2.00
acceptednot accepted
1.50
mm
]
1.00
n du
e to
1 k
N [m
δ + w < 1.0 mmBase class C3
0.50
Def
lect
ion
δ < 0.5 mm
0 000.000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Fundamental frequency [Hz]
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 23
VTT
0.3
accepted
0 2
0.25 not accepted
0.15
0.2
rms
[m/s
2]
0.1
a w-r
Base class C3
0
0.05
00 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Fundamental frequency [Hz]
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 24
VTT
0.80
accepted
0.60not accepted
0.40
u max
(mm
)
0.20
u
Base class C3
0.000 5 10 15 20 25 30
Fundamental frequency [Hz]
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 25
VTT
20accepted
not accepted
15
s]
10
v-m
ax [m
m/s
Base class C3
5
00 5 10 15 20 25 30 350 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Fundamental frequency [Hz]
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 26
VTT
Vibration transfer to the neighboring apartment
Measurement Source of
|umax| vrms arms Rate of transfer to the neighboring
vibration
apartment
mm mm/s m/s2
Fl ) F ll tFloor a) Fully cutIn the same room Walking 0,025 0,32 0,037
Vibration to neighbor Walking 0,010 0,044 0,0047 13 %
In the same room Washing 0,0080 0,14 0,016
Vibration to neighbor Washing 0,0078 0,039 0,0040 25 %
Floor b) ContinousFloor b) ContinousIn the same room Walking 0,018 0,176 0,020
Vibration to neighbor Walking 0,0059 0,060 0,0053 26 %
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 27
In the same room Washing 0,016 0,12 0,011
Vibration to neighbor Washing 0,011 0,065 0,0071 64 %
VTT
Conclusions on floor vibration classification
• A classification of floor quality is proposed based on vibration properties
• Benefits: consumers know what they are buying and producers what they are selling
• Different quality levels are possible:• Different quality levels are possible: - high quality apartments, B - normal apartments, C - single houses, D- summer houses D or E
• The limit values may need adjustments as more experience• The limit values may need adjustments as more experience is gained.
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 28
VTT
Conclusions on vibration performance of timberConclusions on vibration performance of timber floors
D i f f fl i l i• Dynamic performance of floors is a complex issue: a contribution of a) excitation, b) response, c) acceptability
• Design procedures are limited• Design procedures are limited• Avoidance of resonance is a prime issue
To increase the vibration performance increase stiffness in• To increase the vibration performance increase stiffness in 2-directions (increase acoustic insulation increase ’softness’)(increase acoustic insulation increase softness )
• Timber-concrete composite floors have performed well based on experimental experiencep p
• Vibration of floors is a common complaint of the occupant
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 29
VTT
Vibration serviceability of timber floors is a complex and important issue but has largely been ignoredand important issue, but has largely been ignored.
Care must be exercised to define the dynamic system.
Modern construction materials and methods can exacerbate vibration problemsp
improved strength efficiency can mean lessened serviceability.
Problem floors cannot be avoided reliably using existing (simplistic) design ‘rules’e st g (s p st c) des g u es
is no international agreement as yet about how to handle the issue in design codes
Copyright © VTT 2002 25.9.2008 30