flood control law in california’s central valley
DESCRIPTION
Background and review of California flood control legislation in 2007. Presentation made to the Sacramento County Bar Association Real Estate Section in May 2008TRANSCRIPT
Protection of Public Safety, Risk, and Liability Shifting after 2007 Legislation
How will it affect local planning and development?
5/12/2008 1Joel Ellinwood, AICP Lawyer-Planner
Prepared and presented byJoel Ellinwood, AICP Lawyer-Planner
Rocklin, California
Flooding – the Valley’s natural statePrehistory – an inland sea, source of today’s gas
and oilIndigenous and colonial period – pervasive
wetlands, meandering rivers and streambeds, seasonal flooding
Gold Rush – control, diversion and use of water for mining and farming
Hydraulic mining changes the landscape 1.5 billion cu.yds soil & rock - 8 x Panama canalClogged rivers, buried valley land
Valley farmers and merchants fight backGroundbreaking environmental litigation brings
end to hydraulic mining 1884. Woodruff v North Bloomfield Gravel Mining Co.
5/12/2008 2Joel Ellinwood, AICP Lawyer-Planner
River towns and sprawlSacramento, West Sacramento, Stockton,
Marysville/Yuba City, Colusa, Red Bluff, Redding all began as river towns
River towns wall off the rivers for survivalFarmers wall off the rivers to reclaim landFreeways become the new rivers in the 1950s
Tale of three cities:Marysville – contained by strong levees becomes
economic backwaterYuba City – highways 20/99 and sprawl sustain
economic dynamismWoodland – Interstate 5 jogs west and YC/Marysville
fade5/12/2008 3Joel Ellinwood, AICP Lawyer-Planner
Flood control regulatory chaosFirst reforms in 1911 – creation of State districtWelter of federal, state, cities and special district
agencies with little coordination, standards, planning, or fundingArmy Corps of EngineersBureau of ReclamationCalifornia Dept of Water Resources – Div Flood
ControlLocal levee, drainage and reclamation districts
Land use planning by cities and counties separate from flood control responsibilities
5/12/2008Joel Ellinwood, AICP Lawyer-Planner
4
Probability of floodingWeather – frequency and severity of stormsHydrogeology (elevation and proximity to floodways)Quality of structural protection“100-year” protection is 1% annual = 26% over 30 years
Yuba County flooded in 1986 and 1997
Consequences of flood control failureRural and agricultural areas - lower economic damageDensely urbanized areas - higher, catastrophic,
damage
Flood risk calculus
5/12/2008Joel Ellinwood, AICP Lawyer-Planner
5
5/12/2008Joel Ellinwood, AICP Lawyer-Planner
6
Who Bears the risk?Self-help – charitable assistanceFederal / State Government Assistance
Flood insurance (64% of 500-year flood plain properties not insured)
Litigation – Paterno v. State of California Case No. C040553. Third Dist. Nov. 26, 2003
5/12/2008Joel Ellinwood, AICP Lawyer-Planner
7
Geography of Sacramento – San Joaquin Valley
50 miles wide450 miles long
5/12/2008Joel Ellinwood, AICP Lawyer-Planner
8
2007 Flood Bill PackageSix Bills – redundant, overlapping, uncertainties (?)
SB 5 (Machado) Adopts 200-year flood as minimum standard Reorganizes Reclamation Board as Central Valley Flood Protection
Board Requires Central Valley Flood Protection Plan by 2012 City and County General Plans to conform to CVFPP within 24 months
– zoning within 36 months Restricts development agreements and subdivision maps within flood
hazard areas unless certain findings are made SB 17 (Florez) Sets pay for board AB 5 (Wolk) requires DWR to map areas “protected by project levees” AB 70 (Jones) Shared liability for city/county “unreasonably approving”
development in flood hazard area not consistent with CVFPP. AB 156 (Laird) Sets mapping, planning and reporting requirements and
timetables, requires DWR to give yearly notice to property owners in flood hazard areas
AB 162 (Wolk) General Plan land use, conservation, safety and housing element revision requirements defined and schedule established
5/12/2008Joel Ellinwood, AICP Lawyer-Planner
9
Statutory Deadlines - DWRDeadline Task Statutory
ProvisionJuly 1, 2008 Develop preliminary maps of areas within 100- and 200-year
floodplains protected by project leveesWater Code § 9610
Provide information to cities located outside areas protected by project levees of flood information available from FEMA and other sources
Water Code § 9610
December 31, 2008
Prepare schedule for mapping areas at risk within the Central Valley Water Code § 8612Prepare maps for levee protection zones, including those lands where flood levels would be more than three feet deep in the event of a project levee failure, and distribute them to other agencies
Water Code § 9130
January 1, 2009 Propose updated requirements for adoption by the Building Standards Commission for construction within areas protected by the CVFPP where flood levels are expected to exceed three feet in a 200-year flood
Health and Safety Code § 5465
January 1, 2010 Develop cost-sharing formulas with local agencies for State flood protection bonds
Water Code § 9625
September 1, 2010 Send the first of the notices to property owners whose land is in whole or in part within a levee protection zone (
Water Code § 9120
December 31, 2010 Prepare a status report on the progress of the Central Valley Flood Protection Plan
Water Code § 9610
January 1, 2012 Complete preparation of the Central Valley Flood Protection Plan Water Code § 9612
5/12/2008Joel Ellinwood, AICP Lawyer-Planner
10
Statutory Deadlines - CVFPB
5/12/2008Joel Ellinwood, AICP Lawyer-Planner
11
Deadline Task Statutory Provision
December 31, 2008
Adopt a schedule for mapping areas at risk Water Code § 8612
Advise the Legislature of implementation schedule for preparation of the periodic flood control system status report for the State Plan of Flood Control
Water Code § 9120
July 1, 2012 Adopt the Central Valley Flood Protection Plan Water Code § 9612
Statutory Deadlines Cities and Counties
5/12/2008Joel Ellinwood, AICP Lawyer-Planner
12
Deadline Task Statutory Provision
Annually Update the Land Use Element to incorporate available information from DWR and FEMA
Gov. Code § 65302 (a)
After January 1, 2009
Amend the Conservation and Safety Elements Gov. Code § 65302 (d) and (g)
July 1, 2012 (affected Central Valley jurisdictions only)
Cities and counties must complete their collaboration with State and local flood management agencies to develop funding mechanisms to finance local flood protection responsibilities (Water Code 9623) [This requires consistency with the Central Valley Flood Protection Plan that isn’t scheduled for adoption until 2012]
Water Code § 9612
July 1, 2014 (affected Central Valley jurisdictions only)
Adopt amendments to the General Plan to conform to the Central Valley Flood Protection Plan
Gov. Code § 65302.9
County must adopt flood emergency plans, in cooperation with its cities, consistent with the Central Valley Flood Protection Plan
Water Code § 9621
July 1, 2015 (affected Central Valley jurisdictions only)
Adopt revisions to the zoning ordinance to make it consistent with the amended General Plan
Gov. Code § 65860.1
Required findings for approvals The facilities of the State Plan of Flood Control or other flood management
facilities protect the property to the urban level of flood protection in urban and urbanizing areas or the national Federal Emergency Management Agency standard of flood protection in nonurbanized areas.
The city or county has imposed conditions on the development agreement that will protect the property to the urban level of flood protection in urban and urbanizing areas or the national Federal Emergency Management Agency standard of flood protection in nonurbanized areas.
The local flood management agency has made adequate progress on the construction of a flood protection system which will result in flood protection equal to or greater than the urban level of flood protection in urban or urbanizing areas or the national Federal Emergency Management Agency standard of flood protection in nonurbanized areas for property located within a flood hazard zone, intended to be protected by the system. For urban and urbanizing areas protected by project levees, the urban level of flood protection shall be achieved by 2025.
Findings must be written and based on substantial evidence in the record
5/12/2008Joel Ellinwood, AICP Lawyer-Planner
13
2007 Flood Bill QuestionsWhat cities and counties are affected? TBD Only applies to portions of the Central Valley
– why not anywhere in the State?Who will pay for General Plan revisions?Is there a de facto development moratorium on
development in flood plains?Is 200-year protection good enough?Who will pay for levee and other work?Is liability shift to local governments meaningful?Will global warming make matters worse?Will Valley river towns die if they can’t grow?
5/12/2008Joel Ellinwood, AICP Lawyer-Planner
14
American Planning Association – California ChapterTerry Rivasplata, Jones & StokesBest Best & Krieger, LLP – Jessica Hirsch & Anthony J. Van Ruiten
The City of WoodlandSacramento Area Flood Control Agency – Pete GhelfiCalifornia Department of Water Resources – webmasterGoogle
5/12/2008Joel Ellinwood, AICP Lawyer-Planner
15