fiverr presentation gig: good for us
DESCRIPTION
"Good For Us" presentation revamp gig available only on Fiverr.com/CreativePro180TRANSCRIPT
1
G O O D F O R YO U
C O M PA N I E S A R E D E E P LY I N T E R C O N N E C T E D
W I T H
2
SOCIAL issues ENVIRONMENTALissues
C O N S U M E R S W A N T TO B U Y F R O M C O M PA N I E S T H AT A R E G O O D F O R U S
B U T I T ’ S H A R D TO D I S C E R N T H E H E R O E S F R O M T H E P R E T E N D E R S
3
4
G O O D F O R U S I S T H E H E A LT H Y C H O I C E L A B E L F O R C O N S C I O U S C O N S U M E R S
O N L I N E A N D P R I N TC E R T I F I C AT E L I C E N S I N G
5
Online Certificate
License Fee: 8,000
SME Fee: 2,000
Print Certificate
License Fee: 16,000
SME Fee: 4,000
M A R K E T P OT E N T I A L
61. Bio Fach Shanghai, 2013, file:///Users/chrisjensen/Downloads/Development_and_Policy_of_Organic_Market_in_China.PDF
Chinese organic production is expected to rise by over 30% in the next decade
Up to 60% of Chinese and Indian consumers are influenced by ethical labels
2. Datamonitor, 2011 http://www.ats-sea.agr.gc.ca/inter/6153-eng.htm
7
100,00010,00030
8
Content Everywhere Experience Community
9
Google Rich Snippets
Easy Posting and Sharing
Embeded Content
10
Beautiful
Interconnected
Personal
11
Sharing Curating Content
C O M P E T I TO R S
12
Stories Community Experience
13
HackathonGalvanise talent and funding towards
Raisesawareness of theGood for Us
brand
Grow a community of
interested artists/designers
14
Funding SoughtY E A R 1 Y E A R 2 Y E A R 3
Total Online Certificates X X X
Total Print Licenses X X X
TOTAL REVENUE X X X
Development & Maintenance X X X
Infrastructure X X X
Salaries and Employment expenses X X X
Sales Commissions X X X
Marketing X X X
Professional services, office & T&E X X X
TOTAL COSTS X X X
NET REVENUE X X X
15
SCALABILITY VALIDITY ENGAGEMENT
Automated Data Updates Multiple Credible Sources Stories & Gamification
Manual Research Scientific analysis credible sources.
Semi-active community
Ethical Consumer Guide
Manual Research High - Reputable Sources Low – Data only
Medium - High High – Reputable sources. Low – Data only
Reliant on crowd sourcing Wiki, susceptible to bias Lack of community
Crowd sourced opinions General public opinions Community declining
Manual Research Sources not published Low - Data only