fire_safe

Upload: ranjit-marimuthu

Post on 02-Jun-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Fire_Safe

    1/16

    I n s u l a t e d P a n e l s

    SystemsLook for the logo

    Building tothe Powerof

  • 8/10/2019 Fire_Safe

    2/16

  • 8/10/2019 Fire_Safe

    3/16

    Property Insurer Fire Certification

    Requirements

    Contents

    Introduction

    Kingspan are world leaders in the research, development

    and testing of fire engineered insurer approved firesafe

    roof, wall, facade and temperature controlled (chill and cold

    store) systems. This work has resulted in the development

    and application of fire engineered technologies which

    provide firesafe systems for building owners, occupiers

    and tenants, enhancing property and business risk protection.

    Kingspans firesafe solutions are based upon Factory Mutual

    Global (FM) and the Loss Prevention Certification Boards

    (LPCB) rigorous fire test and accreditation methods. FM

    and LPCB systems are widely recognized by investors,

    property insurers, designers and constructors for their

    superior fire engineered performance thus reducing fire risks.

    Kingspan believes that the only way to test any cladding

    system is to perform a realistic scale test on the composite

    product incorporating realistic joint details and fixings.

    The new Euroclass Reaction to Fire Tests does not fully assess

    panel performance and should not be taken in isolation.

    Large scale fire tests such as those carried out by FM Globaland LPCB provide a better indicator of how panels will

    perform in a real fire situation.

    Introduction 3

    Insurance Certification 4

    Fire Test 6

    Facts and confirmed research 9

    Myths and Misinformation 10

    Case study 12

    Firesafe at a glance 14

  • 8/10/2019 Fire_Safe

    4/16

    Insurance Certication

    Factory Mutual Global (FM)

    Approval Requirements

    FM Global (FM), formally known as Factory Mutual, has asevere test standard for assessing reaction to fire. This test

    standard is FMRC 4880 (1994) Approval requirements for

    Class 1 fire classification with no height restriction.

    Achievement of Class 1 with no height restriction is

    dependent on performance in a number of tests that

    include

    ASTM E84 Surface Burning Characteristics

    ASTM D482 Ignition Residue tests

    ASTM E711 Oxygen Bomb tests

    UBC 26-3 Room Test

    FMRC Room Corner Test (25/50ft test)

    The FM Global FMRC 4880 maximum 50 ft (15.24 metres)

    height wall test is very severe. Two walls 15.24 m high

    with a small ceiling are lined with panels and a large fire

    source (345kg dry timber) is positioned in the corner. Toachieve approval there has to be no flame spread or fire

    propagation to the extremities of the panel construction.

    Kingspan FM approved panels are well within these limits

    with no flame spread away from the fire source.

    LPCB

    The loss Prevention CertificationBoard (LPCB) provides stringentlarge scale fire testing,

    certification, approval procedures

    and guidance contained in the

    LPCB Design Guide for the Fire

    Protection of Buildings. Theserequire that the approved

    systems/equipment are

    fit-for-purpose when needed.

    The building fabric is an important part of any insurance

    assessment. Choice of an FM approved panel system or an

    appropriate grade of LPCB approved panel will lead to -

    No Additional Premium

    No Additional Excess

    APPROVED

    Approved to LPS 1181Certificate Nos. 186a, 260a & 279c

    Approved to LPS 1208Certificate No. 186b & 279b

    certs

  • 8/10/2019 Fire_Safe

    5/16

    Naas Fire Station

    Naas

    Project Name

    Product

    Colour

    Usage

    Naas Fire Station

    KS1000 RW Roof Trapezoidal

    Merlin

    Emergency Fire Services

  • 8/10/2019 Fire_Safe

    6/16

    Insurer Certication Requirements

    FM 50ft Room Corner Test

    The images on these 2 pages show a sequence from

    ignition to extinguishment of 200mm thick Kingspan IPNpanels. The fire load consists of 345kg red oak pallets. The

    key pass fail criteria is that there is no lateral fire spread to

    the edge of the enclosure and no ignition of the ceiling.

    The Kingspan panels are well within these limits proving

    that the panels do not promote the spread of fire.

    As a result of this test, and other large scale tests

    Kingspan wall, roof and ceiling panels are approved by

    FM Global for use without any restriction in height.

  • 8/10/2019 Fire_Safe

    7/16

    Insurer Certication Requirements

    Fire is contained in the room corner

    - no evidence of fire propagation

  • 8/10/2019 Fire_Safe

    8/16

    LPS 1181 Fire Tests

    Large Scale Fire Testing-LPS 1181 Test

    The key parameters of the test include:

    Fully developed fire -1 mega watt fire load.

    Max temp > 1,000 C at internal liner.

    LPS 1181 test designed to assess flame spread, ignition

    and promote flash over conditions.

    Kingspan results Effect at 1,000 C internal surface temperature.

    Stable protective char formed.

    Char/core expands to fill any gap between facings,consequently no voids.

    Fire rated isophenic core. 70% unaffected, 30% char at

    1,000 C.

    No spread of flame, flashover or fire travel within the

    core between the facings.

    At high temperatures greater than 300 C protective

    char forms.

    Panels are unaffected away from main fire source.

    Panels removed after LPC test show no spread of flame

  • 8/10/2019 Fire_Safe

    9/16

    Facts and Conrmed Research

    Although the rigid isophenic used in the panels is

    unsurpassed in its thermal insulating properties, it is

    basically combustable, like all organic substances.

    But the historical fire performance and insurance lossstatistics relating to the use of Kingspan isophenic (IPN)

    panels in the external envelope has been excellent. Thereis no evidence whatsoever to suggest that Kingspan

    panel systems are not fit-for- purpose and there is no

    link with higher insurer losses. This is proven by detailed

    insurer loss statistics and case studies on fires in buildings

    clad with such panels.

    The following findings can be summarized from the

    research carried out on many real fires where Kingspan

    insulated roof and wall systems were in use:

    The panels do not contribute to a fire. They are only

    damaged in the immediate area of the fire andself-extinguish after the fire load has gone

    By forming a protective char layer, the fire is starved

    of oxygen between the metallic skins of the panel.

    The panels are thus self-extinguishing and do not

    contribute to a fire.

    Thermoset rigid isophenic (IPN) does not melt or drip

    when exposed to fire. Thus, the danger of igniting

    secondary fires does not arise.

    The gases given off when isophenic foam burns are

    less toxic than those given off by conventional building

    materials (e.g. wood)

    When used as roof cladding, the sandwich panels resist

    the spread of fire and reduce radiant heat

    The additional fire load caused by isophenic panels

    varies between 3 and 6 kWh/m2 and therefore has very

    little effect on a fire. This very low value results from

    the low density of the insulating foam core which isapproximately 41 kg/m3

    The results from the standardised tests used todetermine combustibility are confirmed completely by

    the behaviour of the panels in practice

    Conclusion

    The behaviour of KINGSPAN insulated roof and wall

    panels in a fire is similar to that of other fire-resistantbuilding materials.

    With respect to current fire regulations and the need to

    build passive fire protection into a structure, insulated

    isophenic panel systems are amongst the safest proven

    building methods.

  • 8/10/2019 Fire_Safe

    10/16

    Combustibility of installedpanel systems

    In recent years, huge confusion has been caused by panel

    manufacturers and their suppliers making claim and

    counter claim about the non-combustibility or otherwise

    of their own and their competitors panel systems.

    ABI Definitions of Construction 2003

    (ABI - Association of British Insurers)

    The following table outlines the ABIs

    Definitions of Construction

    Definition Description

    FIRE RESISTING All elements of construction

    (including floors) to be non-

    combustible and achieve

    at least 90 minutes fire

    resistance

    NON COMBUSTIBLE All elements of construction

    to be non-combustible

    OR approved to LPS 1181

    INCLUDES KINGSPAN

    FIRESAFE IPN

    PARTLY COMBUSTIBLE Any build ing having from

    10% up to 35% construction

    elements of combustible

    construction.

    COMBUSTIBLE Any building having between

    35% and 70% of combustible

    materials in the elements of

    construction.

    HIGHLY COMBUSTIBLE Any build ing having over 70%

    of combustible materials in

    their element of construction

    Myths & Misinformation

    A propane torch reduces polystyrene to flammable gas and liquid in seconds

    Combustibility of Real-Life PanelInstallations

    The reality is that all panel systems have varying levels

    of combustibility because all contain combustible

    materials. The only reliable way of assessing panel system

    combustibility is to base a judgement on testing the

    entire system. Tests and standards such as LPS 1181,LPS 1208 and FM 4880 are ideal in this respect. The

    varying levels and grades of performance defined by

    these tests allow the specific panel system performance

    to be matched to the specific risk.

    Ignitability of Polystyrene

    Polystyrene is a thermoplastic this means that heat will

    cause the material to melt and form a liquid. This liquid

    is highly flammable and easily ignites. This performance

    is in stark contrast to isophenic a thermosetting material,

    which forms a strong carbonaceous char protectingthe core from further attack.

    The real issue is not directly related to the combustibilityof the panel system core - all have combustible elements.

    The real issue is related to how a specific system willperform in a real fire scenario and whether it acts as non-

    combustible building element by not contributing to fire.

  • 8/10/2019 Fire_Safe

    11/16

    Myths & Misinformation

    Ignitability of Kingspan Fire Rated IPN

    One concern raised by insurers is the potential forexposed insulation in real situations. The reality is that

    any insulation panel system is likely to be damaged or

    modified after installation and this may lead to exposureof the core and example would be where a hole has

    been cut in the panel for new pipework, ductwork or

    electrical services. Such modifications are often not

    finished correctly and are perceived to provide an easy

    entry point for fire. The question is how big is the risk?

    The fact is that Kingspan approved IPN is very difficult

    to ignite. The images below cover the effect of a high

    intensity propane torch on exposed IPN after the metalfacings have been removed. The propane torch generates

    a temperature of over 1000C. The images show the effect

    after 30 minutes exposure and are a good demonstrationof how the IPN forms a strong carbonaceous char that

    protects the core foam from ignition. When the burner is

    removed after 30 minutes the core self extinguishes.

    Good practice dictates that any panel damage is repaired

    or site modifications are installed correctly however,

    the propane torch test does demonstrate that insurerapproved IPN does not ignite and the exposed core does

    not present a fire hazard.

    After 30 minutes at over 1000

    Section cut through the thickness of the panel after30 minutes exposure showing that the char occurs only

    in the area of direct flame impingement and there is

    no fire propagation.

  • 8/10/2019 Fire_Safe

    12/16

    Case Study

    Wharfedale Hospital, 5th July 2003This is the first recorded fire in a building clad in LPCB

    approved isophenic panels. This fire occurred in an

    extension to the hospital under construction. An arsonistignited a solvent based adhesive poured over a largepile of combustible building materials that was stored

    in the ground floor of the facility. The ground floor was

    essentially open with the external cladding starting at the

    first floor level.

    Kingspan commissioned Tenos to per form an

    independent investigation into the fire. This involved a

    visit to site and discussions with the Fire & Rescue Team.

    A detailed report is available.

    ConclusionThe Tenos report concludes In spite of significant

    heat generated by the fire (sufficient to damage the

    intumescent coating and distort the steel beams); theorientation of the cladding panels directly above the fire;and the fact that the fire stopping was not in place; the

    cores of the panels as evidenced by photograph 2, 3 and

    4 did not ignite; did not promote fire spread within the

    core or to the eaves and did not significantly contribute

    to the products of combustion.

    These photographs provide a record of the damage and

    include some explanatory comments.

    Image 1

    Image 4

    Image 2 Image 3

    Image 1Side of the building exposed to direct ame

    impingement and smoke/heat damage from the ground

    oor. It is clear that the IPN core has not ignited and has

    played no role in the re.

    Image 2

    The side of the building that experienced a bigger reattack. Flames appear to have risen to the eaves

    a height of approximately 10 metres. The external steel

    sheet has bowed and delaminated in the areas of ame

    impingement however, there is no indication the re

    has spread through the cladding.

    Sections were cut out of the short panels in the middle

    of this photograph in order to inspect the steel columnbehind the panels. The next photograph shows this more

    clearly.

    Image 3

    Close-up of the inspection holes cut in the panelafter the re. The insulation core can be seen clearly

    and looks to be virtually unaffected by the direct ame

    impingement on the outer steel facing. The steel column

    was not affected.

    Image 4

    A panel that has been exposed to direct ame

    impingement on the outer sheet. The metal has been

    pulled away by contractors to inspect the isopheniccore. It is clear that the insulation core has been almost

    unaffected by the re. Only light charring can be seen.

  • 8/10/2019 Fire_Safe

    13/16

    Protecting business and property

    with insurer approved systems

  • 8/10/2019 Fire_Safe

    14/16

    KINGSPANS RANGE OF FIRESAFE ISOPHENIC (IPN) PANELS

    Firesafe is Kingspans range of insurer approved panels

    These panels with a sophisticated Isophenic core will not promote fire spread,are self extinguishing and give off minimal smoke in a real fire situation

    The most important way of distinguishing between different panel systemsis through fire testing. Building regulation tests are important in this

    respect but it must always be remembered that the key objective of buildingregulation guidance is to ensure that personnel can leave the building safelyin the event of a fire. (EI resistance tests)

    Property conservation is not a key consideration to regulators In stark

    contrast to insurers and investors! Kingspan believes that the only way to test any cladding system is to perform

    a realistic scale test on the composite product incorporating realistic joint

    details and fixings.

    The new Euroclass Reaction to Fire Tests do not fully assess panelperformance and should not be taken in isolation.

    Insurers recognise the limitations of the small scale reaction to fire tests used todemonstrate compliance and have developed their own tests suchas FM & LPCB

    Insurance certificates available are FM Global & LPCB

    FM Global is an American insurance agency which carries out stringent large

    scale fire tests. Kingspan has FM unlimited approval which means the panelscan be used on buildings of unlimited height

    Even clients not insured by FM Global will request FM standard productsbecause of their stringent product testing.

    LPC was purchased by the Building Research Establishment (BRE) fromABI (Association of British Insurers) & Lloyds in 2000. LPCB provide

    research, testing and Fire test Approvals. LPS 1181 is a wall and ceiling testfor insulated panels. LPCB are promoting the LPS 1181 test across CentralEurope.

    External claddings that are LPCB approved to LPS1181 can be classed as

    non-combustible building, Association of British Insurers (ABI) May 2003

    Kingspans unique firesafe blend is a patented formula which can not becopied by our competitors.

    If you would like to see a fire test on our Firesafe Isophenic panels pleasecontact any Kingspan office

    Look for the logo

    Identification PlaquesFire officer and insurance surveyor identification plaques

    are used for rapid identification of building fabric

    Kingspan maintain a project register of all buildings

    constructed with roof and wall systemsidentified by a special registration number.

    Kingspan labels are avaiable for attaching to

    the building to assist property insurers and the brigades.Labels are available on request.

  • 8/10/2019 Fire_Safe

    15/16

    KINGSPAN PANELS PROFILES

    Wall & Facade Systems - horizontal / verticalEXTERNAL PROFILATION

    For panels with isophenic or mineral fibre insulation

    B (box)

    1

    10

    6

    40 4040 10

    6

    0,

    75

    17,5 17,5

    8,75

    M (micro)

    1

    50 50

    E (euro)

    For panels with isophenic insulation only

    3

    50

    R5

    2

    W (wave)

    259 16 9

    0,8

    1,5

    12,5 24,5 24,5

    L (tramline)

    9 16 9 299299

    1,5

    S (segment)

    8 8

    1

    N (mini micro)

    INTERNAL PROFILATIONFor panels with isophenic or mineral fibre insulation

    B (box)

    1

    10

    6

    40 4040 10

    6

    1

    33,33 33,33 33,33

    MB (minibox) F (flat)

    Roof Systems - pitched / flatPanels with isophenic insulation

    Panels with mineral fibre insulation Rooflight panels

    FF RM RW / GRP MK1 RW / GRP MK3

    XD

    Please consult the colour range with Kingspan Technical Design Bureau.

    * KS 1000 RW can be used as wall panel

    RW SM SX

    RT

  • 8/10/2019 Fire_Safe

    16/16

    Kingspan Limited

    Czech Republic: Telephone: +420 495 866 111, Fax: +420 495 866 100, Email: [email protected]

    Slovakia: Telephone: +421 244 635 326, Fax: +421 244 635 325, Email: [email protected]: Telephone: +49 281 952 50-0, Fax: +49 281 952 5050, Email: [email protected]

    Austria: Telephone: +43 120 501 75 100, Fax: +43 120 501 75 900, Email: [email protected]

    Poland: Telephone: +48 48 378 31 00, Fax: +48 48 378 13 30, Email: [email protected]: Telephone: +370 37 451 883, Fax: +370 37 451 885, Email: [email protected]

    Hungary: Telephone: +36 29 573 400, Fax: +36 29 573 401, Email: [email protected]

    Romania: Telephone: +40 21 231 50 89, Fax: +40 21 231 50 89, Email: [email protected]: Telephone: +385 1 464 80 51, Fax: +385 1 464 80 52, Email: [email protected]

    Serbia: Telephone: +381 24 671 525, Fax: +381 25 535 057, Email: [email protected]

    www.kingspan.info